Petitions for Modification, 36064-36066 [E7-12755]
Download as PDF
36064
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 126 / Monday, July 2, 2007 / Notices
Dated at Arlington, Virginia, this 26th day
of June, 2007.
David L. Meyer,
Director, Office of Administration and
Management.
[FR Doc. E7–12671 Filed 6–29–07; 8:45 am]
mail), or 202–693–9441 (Telefax), or
contact Barbara Barron at 202–693–9447
(Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov (Email), or 202–693–9441 (Telefax).
[These are not toll-free numbers].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
other mine if the Secretary determines
that: (1) An alternative method of
achieving the result of such standard
exists which will at all times guarantee
no less than the same measure of
protection afforded the miners of such
mine by such standard; or (2) that the
application of such standard to such
mine will result in a diminution of
safety to the miners in such mine. In
addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modifications.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of petitions for
modification of existing mandatory
safety standards.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and
30 CFR Part 44 govern the application,
processing, and disposition of petitions
for modification. This notice is a
summary of petitions for modification
filed by the parties listed below to
modify the application of existing
mandatory safety standards published
in Title 30 of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
DATES: Comments on the petitions must
be received by the Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances on or before
August 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. E-Mail: StandardsPetitions@dol.gov.
2. Telefax: 1–202–693–9441.
3. Hand-Delivery or Regular Mail:
Submit comments to the Mine Safety
and Health Administration (MSHA),
Office of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 2349, Arlington, Virginia 22209,
Attention: Patricia W. Silvey, Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances.
We will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
Individuals who submit comments by
hand-delivery are required to check in
at the receptionist desk on the 21st
floor.
Individuals may inspect copies of the
petitions and comments during normal
business hours at the address listed
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Sexauer, Chief, Regulatory
Development Division at 202–693–9444
(Voice), sexauer.edward@dol.gov (E-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:57 Jun 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2007–027–C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company,
RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Pennsylvania
17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 36–09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 49.2(b)
(Availability of mine rescue teams).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the use of two mine
rescue teams of three members with one
alternate for either team instead of two
teams of five members and one alternate
for each team. The petitioner states that:
(1) The underground anthracite mine is
small and cannot accommodate more
than three or four miners in the working
places; (2) to use five or more rescue
team members in the confined working
places of the mine would result in a
diminution of safety to the miners and
the members of the mine rescue team;
(3) the risk of disaster is considerably
reduced because the electric power does
not reach beyond the bottom of the
slope and coal is hauled by hand
trammed cars or battery electric motor;
(4) rescue and recovery operations at
other mines have utilized only one
team; and (5) the Pennsylvania Deep
Mine Safety and other surrounding
mines will provide assistance in an
emergency. The petitioner asserts that
the proposed alternative method will in
no way provide less than the same
measure of protection afforded the
miners under the existing standard.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Docket Number: M–2007–028–C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company,
RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Pennsylvania
17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 36–09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 49.6(a)(1)
& (5) (Equipment and maintenance
requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the use of eight selfcontained breathing apparatus and eight
permissible cap lamps and charging
rack instead of using twelve selfcontained oxygen breathing apparatus
and twelve permissible cap lamps and
charging rack at each mine rescue
station for its seven member rescue
team. The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method would not
alter, change, or reduce the ability,
effectiveness or safety of the
underground mine personnel.
Docket Number: M–2007–029–C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company,
RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Pennsylvania
17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 36–09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.335
(Construction of seals).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit an alternative
method of construction of seals. The
petitioner proposes to use wooden
material of moderate size and weight
due to the difficulty in accessing
previously driven headings and breasts
containing the inaccessible abandoned
workings, through the use of homemade
ladders. The petitioner states that to
transport concrete blocks or equivalent
materials manually on ladders on
pitching veins will expose miners to
greater hazards of falling, being struck
by falling materials, or resulting in
strains or sprains because of the weight
of the materials. The petitioner cites
low-level explosibility of anthracite coal
dust and minimal potential for either an
accumulation of methane in previously
mined pitching veins or an ignition
source in the gob area, as justification
for the proposed 10 psi design. The
petitioner states that the mine has not
experienced measurable liberations of
methane to date. The petitioner asserts
that the proposed alternative method
would provide at least the same
measure of protection as the existing
standard.
Docket Number: M–2007–030–C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company,
RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Pennsylvania
17801.
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 126 / Monday, July 2, 2007 / Notices
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 36–09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.360
(Preshift examination at fixed intervals).
Modification Request: The petitioner
proposes to: (1) Conduct an examination
and evaluation from the slope gunboat
during the pre-shift examination after an
air quantity reading is taken just in by
the intake portal, including a visual
examination of each seal for physical
damage; (2) take an additional air
reading and gas test for methane and
oxygen deficiency at the intake air split
location(s) just off the slope in the
gangway portion of the working section;
and (3) have the examiner place the
date, time and his/her initials at
locations where air readings and gas
tests are taken prior to anyone entering
the mine and properly record the
results. The petitioner states that: (1)
The slope will be traveled and
physically examined in its entire length
on a monthly basis regardless of
conditions found at the section
evaluation point; (2) the dates, times,
and examiner’s initials will be placed at
sufficient locations throughout, and
results of the examination will be
recorded on the surface; and (3) any
hazards detected will be corrected prior
to transporting personnel in the slope.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed
alternative method would provide at
least the same measure of protection as
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2007–031–C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company,
RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Pennsylvania
17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 36–09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1100–
2(a)(2) (Quantity and location of
firefighting equipment).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard 30 CFR 75.1100–2(a)(2), which
requires that each working section of
underground coal mines producing less
than 300 tons of coal per shift be
provided with specified firefighting
equipment and supplies. The petitioner
proposes to use portable fire
extinguishers only, to replace existing
requirements where rock dust, water
cars, and other water storage equipped
with three 10 quart pails are not
practical. The petitioner states that
equipping its small anthracite mine
with two portable fire extinguishers
near the slope bottom and an additional
portable fire extinguisher within 500
feet of the working face will provide
equivalent fire protection. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:57 Jun 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
petitioner asserts that the proposed
alternative method would provide at
least the same measure of protection as
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2007–032–C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company,
RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Pennsylvania
17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 36–09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1200(d) & (i) (Mine map).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard which requires, in part, an
accurate and up-to-date mine map with
contour lines of all elevations and mines
above or below. The petitioner proposes
to use cross-sections instead of contour
lines through the intake slope at
locations of rock tunnel connections
between veins, and at 1,000 foot
intervals of advance from the intake
slope. In addition, the petitioner
proposes to limit the required mapping
of the mine workings above and below
to those present within 100 feet of the
vein being mined, except when veins
are interconnected to other veins
beyond the 100-foot limit through rock
tunnels. The petitioner states that
contours provide no useful information
due to the steep pitch encountered in
mining anthracite coal veins, and their
presence would make portions of the
map illegible. The petitioner further
states that use of cross-sections in lieu
of contour lines has been practiced
since the late 1800’s and provides
critical information about the spacing
between veins and the proximity to
other mine workings, which fluctuate
considerably. Additionally, the
petitioner states that the mine workings
above and below are usually inactive
and abandoned, therefore, are not
subject to changes during the life of the
mine. The petitioner states that all
mapping for mines above and below are
researched by its contract engineer for
the presence of interconnecting rock
tunnels between veins in relation to the
mine and a hazard analysis is done
when mapping indicates the presence of
known potentially flooded workings.
Petitioner asserts that when evidence
indicates that prior mining was
conducted on a vein above or below and
research exhausts the availability of
mine mapping, the vein will be
considered to be mined and flooded and
appropriate precautions will be taken
under 30 CFR 75.388, when possible.
Where potential hazards exist and mine
drilling capabilities limit penetration,
petitioner will drill surface boreholes to
intercept the mine workings and will
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36065
analyze the results prior to mining in
the affected area. The petitioner asserts
that the proposed alternative method
would provide at least the same
measure of protection as the existing
standard.
Docket Number: M–2007–033–C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company,
RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Pennsylvania
17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 36–09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1202
and 75.1202–1(a) (Temporary notations,
revisions, and supplements).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standards to permit the required interval
of survey to be established annually
from the initial survey in lieu every 6
months. The petitioner proposes to
update the mine map by hand notations
on a daily basis, conduct subsequent
surveys prior to commencing retreat
mining, and when either a drilling
program under 30 CFR 75.388 or plan
for mining into accessible areas under
30 CFR 75.389 is required. The
petitioner states that: (1) Low
production and slow rate of advance in
anthracite mining make surveying on 6
month intervals impractical and, in
most cases, annual development is
frequently limited to less than 500 feet
of gangway advance with associated uppitch development; (2) the majority of
small anthracite mines are using nonmechanized, hand-loading mining
methods; (3) development above the
active gangway is designed to mine into
the level above at designated intervals
thereby maintaining sufficient control
between both surveyed gangways; and
(4) the available engineering/surveyor
resources are very limited in anthracite
coal fields which makes surveying on an
annual basis difficult to achieve with 4
individual contractors currently
available. The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method would
provide at least the same measure of
protection as the existing standards.
Docket Number: M–2007–034–C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company,
RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Pennsylvania
17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 36–09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1400
(Hoisting equipment; general).
Modification Request: The petitioner
proposes to use the slope (gunboat) to
transport persons in shafts and slopes
using an increased rope strength/safety
factor and secondary safety rope
connection instead of using safety
catches or other no less effective
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
36066
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 126 / Monday, July 2, 2007 / Notices
devices. The petitioner states that no
such catch or device is available for the
conditions present. The petitioner
asserts that the proposed alternative
method would provide at least the same
measure of protection as the existing
standard.
Docket Number: M–2007–035–C.
Petitioner: Black Beauty Coal
Company, Vermilion Grove Road, 4500
N. 1500 E. Road, Ridgefarm, Illinois
61870.
Mine: Riola Mine Complex—
Vermilion Grover Plant, MSHA I.D. No.
11–03060, located in Vermilion County,
Illinois.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1909(b)(6) (Non-permissible dieselpowered equipment; design and
performance requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the use of the
Getman Roadbuilder, Model RDG–
1504S, serial number 6940, without
front brakes as it was originally
designed. The existing standard requires
that service brakes on self-propelled
non-permissible diesel-powered
equipment act on each wheel and are
designed such that a failure on one
component will not result in a complete
loss of braking capability. The petitioner
states that: (1) The Roadbuilder has six
wheels with dual brake systems on the
four rear wheels, and is designed to
prevent loss of braking due to a single
component failure; (2) seventy-four
percent of the machines total weight is
over the four rear wheels; (3) brakes on
the rear of the Roadbuilder are sufficient
to safely stop the machine; (4) training
will be provided for grader operators to
lower the moldboard for additional
stopping capability in emergency
situations; (5) operators will be trained
to recognize the appropriate speeds to
use on different roadway conditions;
and (6) operators will be trained to limit
the maximum speed to ten miles per
hour. The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method would
provide at least the same measure of
protection as the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2007–036–C.
Petitioner: KMMC, LLC, (dba) Vision
Mining, P.O. Box 99, Sebree, Kentucky
42455.
Mine: Vision No. 9 Mine, (MSHA I.D.
No. 15–17044), located in Webster
County, Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1101–
1(b) (Deluge water spray systems).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the use of delugetype water spray systems installed at
belt conveyor drives in lieu of using
blow off dust covers. The petitioner
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:57 Jun 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
proposes to have a person who is
trained in the testing procedure specific
to the deluge-type water spray fire
suppression systems conduct
examinations and tests on a weekly
basis as follows: (1) Conduct a visual
examination of each deluge-type water
spray fire suppression system; (2)
conduct a functional test of each delugetype water spray fire suppression
system and observe its performance; and
(3) record the results of the examination
and test in a book maintained on the
surface which would be retained and
made available to the authorized
representative of the Secretary. The
petitioner states that if any malfunction
or clogged nozzle is detected as a result
of the weekly examination or functional
test, corrections will be made
immediately. The petitioner asserts that
the proposed alternative method will at
all times guarantee no less than the
same measure of protection to all miners
as would be provided by the mandatory
safety standard.
Dated: June 25, 2007.
Jack Powasnik,
Acting Director, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. E7–12755 Filed 6–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2007–0054]
Material Hoists, Personnel Hoists, and
Elevators; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comment concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the
information collection requirements
specified in the Material Hoists,
Personnel Hoists, and Elevators
Standard (29 CFR 1926.552). The
Standard is designed to protect
employees who operate and work
around personnel hoists.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
August 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
three copies of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA–2007–0054, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the ICR (OSHA–
2007–0054). All comments, including
any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Stewart
Burkhammer at the address below to
obtain a copy of the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stewart Burkhammer, Directorate of
Construction, OSHA, U.S. Department
of Labor, Room N–3468, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 126 (Monday, July 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36064-36066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12755]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of petitions for modification of existing mandatory
safety standards.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977 and 30 CFR Part 44 govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification. This notice is a summary of
petitions for modification filed by the parties listed below to modify
the application of existing mandatory safety standards published in
Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
DATES: Comments on the petitions must be received by the Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before August 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
1. E-Mail: Standards-Petitions@dol.gov.
2. Telefax: 1-202-693-9441.
3. Hand-Delivery or Regular Mail: Submit comments to the Mine
Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2349,
Arlington, Virginia 22209, Attention: Patricia W. Silvey, Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
We will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments. Individuals
who submit comments by hand-delivery are required to check in at the
receptionist desk on the 21st floor.
Individuals may inspect copies of the petitions and comments during
normal business hours at the address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Sexauer, Chief, Regulatory
Development Division at 202-693-9444 (Voice), sexauer.edward@dol.gov
(E-mail), or 202-693-9441 (Telefax), or contact Barbara Barron at 202-
693-9447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov (E-mail), or 202-693-9441
(Telefax). [These are not toll-free numbers].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary determines that: (1) An
alternative method of achieving the result of such standard exists
which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of
protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or (2)
that the application of such standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in such mine. In addition, the
regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish the requirements and
procedures for filing petitions for modifications.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M-2007-027-C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company, RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury,
Pennsylvania 17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 49.2(b) (Availability of mine rescue
teams).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the use of two mine rescue teams of three
members with one alternate for either team instead of two teams of five
members and one alternate for each team. The petitioner states that:
(1) The underground anthracite mine is small and cannot accommodate
more than three or four miners in the working places; (2) to use five
or more rescue team members in the confined working places of the mine
would result in a diminution of safety to the miners and the members of
the mine rescue team; (3) the risk of disaster is considerably reduced
because the electric power does not reach beyond the bottom of the
slope and coal is hauled by hand trammed cars or battery electric
motor; (4) rescue and recovery operations at other mines have utilized
only one team; and (5) the Pennsylvania Deep Mine Safety and other
surrounding mines will provide assistance in an emergency. The
petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will in no way
provide less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners
under the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2007-028-C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company, RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury,
Pennsylvania 17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 49.6(a)(1) & (5) (Equipment and
maintenance requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the use of eight self-contained breathing
apparatus and eight permissible cap lamps and charging rack instead of
using twelve self-contained oxygen breathing apparatus and twelve
permissible cap lamps and charging rack at each mine rescue station for
its seven member rescue team. The petitioner asserts that the proposed
alternative method would not alter, change, or reduce the ability,
effectiveness or safety of the underground mine personnel.
Docket Number: M-2007-029-C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company, RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury,
Pennsylvania 17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.335 (Construction of seals).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit an alternative method of construction of
seals. The petitioner proposes to use wooden material of moderate size
and weight due to the difficulty in accessing previously driven
headings and breasts containing the inaccessible abandoned workings,
through the use of homemade ladders. The petitioner states that to
transport concrete blocks or equivalent materials manually on ladders
on pitching veins will expose miners to greater hazards of falling,
being struck by falling materials, or resulting in strains or sprains
because of the weight of the materials. The petitioner cites low-level
explosibility of anthracite coal dust and minimal potential for either
an accumulation of methane in previously mined pitching veins or an
ignition source in the gob area, as justification for the proposed 10
psi design. The petitioner states that the mine has not experienced
measurable liberations of methane to date. The petitioner asserts that
the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure
of protection as the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2007-030-C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company, RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury,
Pennsylvania 17801.
[[Page 36065]]
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.360 (Preshift examination at fixed
intervals).
Modification Request: The petitioner proposes to: (1) Conduct an
examination and evaluation from the slope gunboat during the pre-shift
examination after an air quantity reading is taken just in by the
intake portal, including a visual examination of each seal for physical
damage; (2) take an additional air reading and gas test for methane and
oxygen deficiency at the intake air split location(s) just off the
slope in the gangway portion of the working section; and (3) have the
examiner place the date, time and his/her initials at locations where
air readings and gas tests are taken prior to anyone entering the mine
and properly record the results. The petitioner states that: (1) The
slope will be traveled and physically examined in its entire length on
a monthly basis regardless of conditions found at the section
evaluation point; (2) the dates, times, and examiner's initials will be
placed at sufficient locations throughout, and results of the
examination will be recorded on the surface; and (3) any hazards
detected will be corrected prior to transporting personnel in the
slope. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method
would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing
standard.
Docket Number: M-2007-031-C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company, RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury,
Pennsylvania 17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1100-2(a)(2) (Quantity and location
of firefighting equipment).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard 30 CFR 75.1100-2(a)(2), which requires that each
working section of underground coal mines producing less than 300 tons
of coal per shift be provided with specified firefighting equipment and
supplies. The petitioner proposes to use portable fire extinguishers
only, to replace existing requirements where rock dust, water cars, and
other water storage equipped with three 10 quart pails are not
practical. The petitioner states that equipping its small anthracite
mine with two portable fire extinguishers near the slope bottom and an
additional portable fire extinguisher within 500 feet of the working
face will provide equivalent fire protection. The petitioner asserts
that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same
measure of protection as the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2007-032-C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company, RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury,
Pennsylvania 17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1200(d) & (i) (Mine map).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard which requires, in part, an accurate and up-to-date
mine map with contour lines of all elevations and mines above or below.
The petitioner proposes to use cross-sections instead of contour lines
through the intake slope at locations of rock tunnel connections
between veins, and at 1,000 foot intervals of advance from the intake
slope. In addition, the petitioner proposes to limit the required
mapping of the mine workings above and below to those present within
100 feet of the vein being mined, except when veins are interconnected
to other veins beyond the 100-foot limit through rock tunnels. The
petitioner states that contours provide no useful information due to
the steep pitch encountered in mining anthracite coal veins, and their
presence would make portions of the map illegible. The petitioner
further states that use of cross-sections in lieu of contour lines has
been practiced since the late 1800's and provides critical information
about the spacing between veins and the proximity to other mine
workings, which fluctuate considerably. Additionally, the petitioner
states that the mine workings above and below are usually inactive and
abandoned, therefore, are not subject to changes during the life of the
mine. The petitioner states that all mapping for mines above and below
are researched by its contract engineer for the presence of
interconnecting rock tunnels between veins in relation to the mine and
a hazard analysis is done when mapping indicates the presence of known
potentially flooded workings. Petitioner asserts that when evidence
indicates that prior mining was conducted on a vein above or below and
research exhausts the availability of mine mapping, the vein will be
considered to be mined and flooded and appropriate precautions will be
taken under 30 CFR 75.388, when possible. Where potential hazards exist
and mine drilling capabilities limit penetration, petitioner will drill
surface boreholes to intercept the mine workings and will analyze the
results prior to mining in the affected area. The petitioner asserts
that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same
measure of protection as the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2007-033-C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company, RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury,
Pennsylvania 17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1202 and 75.1202-1(a) (Temporary
notations, revisions, and supplements).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standards to permit the required interval of survey to be
established annually from the initial survey in lieu every 6 months.
The petitioner proposes to update the mine map by hand notations on a
daily basis, conduct subsequent surveys prior to commencing retreat
mining, and when either a drilling program under 30 CFR 75.388 or plan
for mining into accessible areas under 30 CFR 75.389 is required. The
petitioner states that: (1) Low production and slow rate of advance in
anthracite mining make surveying on 6 month intervals impractical and,
in most cases, annual development is frequently limited to less than
500 feet of gangway advance with associated up-pitch development; (2)
the majority of small anthracite mines are using non-mechanized, hand-
loading mining methods; (3) development above the active gangway is
designed to mine into the level above at designated intervals thereby
maintaining sufficient control between both surveyed gangways; and (4)
the available engineering/surveyor resources are very limited in
anthracite coal fields which makes surveying on an annual basis
difficult to achieve with 4 individual contractors currently available.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would
provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing
standards.
Docket Number: M-2007-034-C.
Petitioner: Chestnut Coal Company, RD 3, Box 142B, Sunbury,
Pennsylvania 17801.
Mine: No. 12 Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09493), located in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1400 (Hoisting equipment; general).
Modification Request: The petitioner proposes to use the slope
(gunboat) to transport persons in shafts and slopes using an increased
rope strength/safety factor and secondary safety rope connection
instead of using safety catches or other no less effective
[[Page 36066]]
devices. The petitioner states that no such catch or device is
available for the conditions present. The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of
protection as the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2007-035-C.
Petitioner: Black Beauty Coal Company, Vermilion Grove Road, 4500
N. 1500 E. Road, Ridgefarm, Illinois 61870.
Mine: Riola Mine Complex--Vermilion Grover Plant, MSHA I.D. No. 11-
03060, located in Vermilion County, Illinois.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1909(b)(6) (Non-permissible diesel-
powered equipment; design and performance requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the use of the Getman Roadbuilder, Model
RDG-1504S, serial number 6940, without front brakes as it was
originally designed. The existing standard requires that service brakes
on self-propelled non-permissible diesel-powered equipment act on each
wheel and are designed such that a failure on one component will not
result in a complete loss of braking capability. The petitioner states
that: (1) The Roadbuilder has six wheels with dual brake systems on the
four rear wheels, and is designed to prevent loss of braking due to a
single component failure; (2) seventy-four percent of the machines
total weight is over the four rear wheels; (3) brakes on the rear of
the Roadbuilder are sufficient to safely stop the machine; (4) training
will be provided for grader operators to lower the moldboard for
additional stopping capability in emergency situations; (5) operators
will be trained to recognize the appropriate speeds to use on different
roadway conditions; and (6) operators will be trained to limit the
maximum speed to ten miles per hour. The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of
protection as the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2007-036-C.
Petitioner: KMMC, LLC, (dba) Vision Mining, P.O. Box 99, Sebree,
Kentucky 42455.
Mine: Vision No. 9 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 15-17044), located in
Webster County, Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1101-1(b) (Deluge water spray
systems).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the use of deluge-type water spray systems
installed at belt conveyor drives in lieu of using blow off dust
covers. The petitioner proposes to have a person who is trained in the
testing procedure specific to the deluge-type water spray fire
suppression systems conduct examinations and tests on a weekly basis as
follows: (1) Conduct a visual examination of each deluge-type water
spray fire suppression system; (2) conduct a functional test of each
deluge-type water spray fire suppression system and observe its
performance; and (3) record the results of the examination and test in
a book maintained on the surface which would be retained and made
available to the authorized representative of the Secretary. The
petitioner states that if any malfunction or clogged nozzle is detected
as a result of the weekly examination or functional test, corrections
will be made immediately. The petitioner asserts that the proposed
alternative method will at all times guarantee no less than the same
measure of protection to all miners as would be provided by the
mandatory safety standard.
Dated: June 25, 2007.
Jack Powasnik,
Acting Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. E7-12755 Filed 6-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P