Brake Rotors From China, 36037-36040 [E7-12668]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 126 / Monday, July 2, 2007 / Notices
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act and the
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) and the Yuba County
Water Agency (YCWA) have made
available for public review and
comment the Draft EIR/EIS for the
Proposed Lower Yuba River Accord
(Yuba Accord).
Two public hearings will be held to
provide interested individuals and
organizations with an opportunity to
comment verbally and in writing on the
Draft EIR/EIS.
The purpose of the Yuba Accord is to
resolve instream flow issues associated
with operation of the Yuba River
Development Project (Yuba Project) in a
way that protects and enhances lower
Yuba River fisheries and local watersupply reliability. At the same time, it
would provide revenues for local flood
control and water supply projects, water
for the CALFED Program to use for
protection and restoration of
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta)
fisheries, and improvements in
statewide water supply management,
including supplemental water for the
Central Valley Project (CVP) and the
State Water Project (SWP).
DATES: Two public hearings will be held
on August 1, 2007 from 2 to 3 p.m. and
from 6 to 7 p.m. in Marysville,
California.
Submit written comments on the Draft
EIR/EIS on or before August 24, 2007 at
the address provided below.
ADDRESSES: The hearings will be at the
Yuba County Water Agency, 1220 F
Street, Marysville, CA 95901.
Send written comments to Ms. Dianne
Simodynes, HDR|Surface Water
Resources, Inc., 1610 Arden Way, Suite
175, Sacramento, CA 95815–4041. Send
requests for a compact disk or a bound
copy of the Draft EIR/EIS to Dianne
Simodynes, telephone: (916) 569–1096.
The Yuba Accord Draft EIR/EIS will also
be available on the web at: https://
www.usbr.gov/mp/nepa/
nepa_projdetails.cfm?Project_ID=2549.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
Tim Rust, Reclamation, Bureau of
Reclamation, Division of Resources
Management, 2800 Cottage Way,
Sacramento, CA 95825, at (916) 978–
5516, or by e-mail at trust@mp.usbr.gov;
or Mr. Curt Aikens, YCWA, at 1220 F
Street, Marysville, CA 95901, at (530)
741–6278, or by e-mail at
caikens@ycwa.com.
The Yuba
Accord represents an effort on the part
of the Yuba River stakeholders to find
a solution to the challenges of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:57 Jun 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
competing interests by providing water
for fisheries, developing new tools to
ensure local reliable water supply,
crafting a revenue stream to pay for the
Yuba Accord, and providing additional
water for out-of-county environmental
and consumptive uses. These various
objectives would be met through
implementation of the Yuba Accord,
which includes the ‘‘Principles of
Agreement for Proposed Lower Yuba
River Fisheries Agreement’’ (Fisheries
Agreement), the ‘‘Principles of
Agreement for Proposed Conjunctive
Use Agreements’’ (Conjunctive Use
Agreements), and the ‘‘Principles of
Agreement for Proposed Long-term
Transfer Agreement’’ (Water Purchase
Agreement).
The Yuba Accord agreements are:
• A Fisheries Agreement among
YCWA, California Department of Fish
and Game, and the collective nongovernmental organizations, with the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Marine
Fisheries Service supporting the
agreement. Under the Yuba Accord
Fisheries Agreement, YCWA would
revise the operation of the Yuba Project
to provide higher flows in the lower
Yuba River to protect and enhance
fisheries and to increase downstream
water supplies.
• Conjunctive Use Agreements
between YCWA and water districts
within Yuba County for the
implementation of a comprehensive
program of conjunctive use of surface
water and groundwater supplies and
actions to improve water use
efficiencies.
• A Water Purchase Agreement
among YCWA, the California
Department of Water Resources (DWR),
and Reclamation. Under this agreement,
Reclamation and DWR would purchase
water for the CALFED Environmental
Water Account and for the CVP and
SWP project uses.
All three of these agreements need to
be in place for the Yuba Accord to be
implemented.
The Draft EIR/EIS analyzes the
impacts of implementing the Yuba
Accord on surface water hydrology,
groundwater hydrology, water supply,
hydropower, flood control, water
quality, fisheries, wildlife, vegetation,
special-status species, recreation, visual,
cultural resources, Indian Trust Assets,
air quality, land use, socioeconomic,
growth inducement, and environmental
justice resources and conditions.
Alternatives evaluated in the Draft EIR/
EIS include the No Action Alternative,
No Project Alternative, Proposed
Project/Action Alternative (Yuba
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36037
Accord Alternative), and Modified Flow
Alternative. In addition, the Draft EIR/
EIS addresses other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable actions in
conjunction with the implementation of
the Yuba Accord, thus analyzing
cumulative impacts.
Copies of the Draft EIR/EIS are
available for public review at the
following locations:
• Bureau of Reclamation, 2800
Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825.
• Yuba County Water Agency, 1220 F
Street, Marysville, CA 95901.
• Department of Water Resources,
Division of Environmental Services,
1416 Ninth Street, Sacramento, CA
95814.
• Sacramento Public Library, 828 I
Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
• Yuba County Library, 303 2nd
Street, Marysville, CA 95901.
If special assistance is required at the
public hearings, please contact Dianne
Simodynes (e-mail:
Dianne.Simodynes@hdrinc.com). Please
notify Ms. Simodynes as far in advance
of the hearings as possible to enable
Reclamation to secure the needed
services. If a request cannot be honored,
the requestor will be notified.
Before including your name, address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: June 18, 2007.
John F. Davis,
Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. E7–12728 Filed 6–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–744 (Second
Review)]
Brake Rotors From China
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of a five-year review
concerning the antidumping duty order
on brake rotors from China.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
36038
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 126 / Monday, July 2, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
antidumping duty order on brake rotors
from China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of
the Act, interested parties are requested
to respond to this notice by submitting
the information specified below to the
Commission; 1 to be assured of
consideration, the deadline for
responses is August 21, 2007.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
September 14, 2007. For further
information concerning the conduct of
this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: July 2, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On April 17, 1997, the
Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on imports of
brake rotors from China (62 FR 18740).
Following five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective August 14, 2002, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
brake rotors from China (67 FR 52933).
The Commission is now conducting a
second review to determine whether
revocation of the order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time. It
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 07–5–172,
expiration date June 30, 2008. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 10
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:57 Jun 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
will assess the adequacy of interested
party responses to this notice of
institution to determine whether to
conduct a full review or an expedited
review. The Commission’s
determination in any expedited review
will be based on the facts available,
which may include information
provided in response to this notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year review, as defined
by the Department of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review
is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination and its expedited fiveyear review determination, the
Commission defined the Domestic Like
Product as all aftermarket brake rotors,
coextensive with Commerce’s scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original determination
and its expedited five-year review
determination, the Commission defined
the Domestic Industry as all producers
of aftermarket brake rotors. In its
original determination, the Commission
also determined that appropriate
circumstances existed to exclude
AlliedSignal from the domestic
aftermarket rotor industry as a related
party; however, in its expedited fiveyear review determination, the
Commission did not find that
appropriate circumstances existed to
exclude any producer from the domestic
industry.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the review and public
service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the review as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the
Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the review.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are reminded that they
are required, pursuant to 19 CFR 201.15,
to seek Commission approval if the
matter in which they are seeking to
appear was pending in any manner or
form during their Commission
employment. The Commission is
seeking guidance as to whether a second
transition five-year review is the ‘‘same
particular matter’’ as the underlying
original investigation for purposes of 19
CFR 201.15 and 18 U.S.C. 207, the post
employment statute for Federal
employees. Former employees may seek
informal advice from Commission ethics
officials with respect to this and the
related issue of whether the employee’s
participation was ‘‘personal and
substantial.’’ However, any informal
consultation will not relieve former
employees of the obligation to seek
approval to appear from the
Commission under its rule 201.15. For
ethics advice, contact Carol McCue
Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official,
at 202–205–3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in this review available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the review, provided that the
application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the review. A
separate service list will be maintained
by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the
APO.
Certification.—Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with this
review must certify that the information
is accurate and complete to the best of
the submitter’s knowledge. In making
the certification, the submitter will be
deemed to consent, unless otherwise
specified, for the Commission, its
employees, and contract personnel to
use the information provided in any
other reviews or investigations of the
same or comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 126 / Monday, July 2, 2007 / Notices
and operations of the Commission
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.—Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is August 21, 2007.
Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as
specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments
concerning the adequacy of responses to
the notice of institution and whether the
Commission should conduct an
expedited or full review. The deadline
for filing such comments is September
14, 2007. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of sections
201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission’s
rules and any submissions that contain
BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6 and
207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The
Commission’s rules do not authorize
filing of submissions with the Secretary
by facsimile or electronic means, except
to the extent permitted by section 201.8
of the Commission’s rules, as amended,
67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also,
in accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by
either the public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the review you do not
need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested
information.—Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determination in the review.
Information To Be Provided in
Response to This Notice of Institution:
As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes
any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address if available) and name,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:57 Jun 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
telephone number, fax number, and email address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of
the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union
or worker group, a U.S. importer of the
Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer
or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business
association, or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in this review by providing information
requested by the Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping duty
order on the Domestic Industry in
general and/or your firm/entity
specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in
section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of
subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of
imports of Subject Merchandise on the
Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries after
2001.
(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during
calendar year 2006 (report quantity data
in units and value data in U.S. dollars,
f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker
group or trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms in which your
workers are employed/which are
members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Domestic Like Product;
(c) the quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s); and
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36039
(d) the quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country, provide the
following information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2006 (report quantity data
in units and value data in U.S. dollars).
If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms which are members
of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports
and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of
Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’)
imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from the Subject
Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise
imported from the Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country,
provide the following information on
your firm’s(s’) operations on that
product during calendar year 2006
(report quantity data in units and value
data in U.S. dollars, landed and dutypaid at the U.S. port but not including
antidumping duties). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in the Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from the Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
36040
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 126 / Monday, July 2, 2007 / Notices
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country after 2001, and
significant changes, if any, that are
likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
Country, and such merchandise from
other countries.
(11) (OPTIONAL) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 25, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–12668 Filed 6–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–581]
In the Matter of Certain Inkjet Ink
Supplies and Components Thereof:
Notice of a Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting the Joint Motion of
Complainant Hewlett-Packard
Company and Respondent All Media
Outlet Corporation To Terminate the
Investigation With Respect to That
Respondent; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:57 Jun 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) granting the joint
motion of complainant Hewlett-Packard
Company (‘‘H–P’’) and respondent All
Media Outlet Corporation d/b/a
Inkandbeyond.com (‘‘All Media’’) to
terminate the investigation with respect
to All Media, and terminating the
investigation in its entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Walters, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on September 6, 2006, based on a
complaint filed by H–P of California,
subsequently amended, alleging
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain inkjet ink supplies and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims
1–4, 7–9, 22, 24, and 25 of U.S. Patent
No. 5,825,387; claims 1–9 and 12 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,793,329; claims 8–10, 14,
and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 6,074,042;
claims 1–6 and 19–29 of U.S. Patent No.
6,588,880; claims 1–7 and 11–18 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,364,472; claims 6, 7, 9, and
10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,089,687; and
claims 1–3 and 5 of U.S. Patent No.
6,264,301. The complaint named six
respondents: Ninestar Technology Co.
Ltd. of China, Ninestar Technology Co.
Ltd. of California, Aurora Eshop, Inc. d/
b/a butterflyinkjet.com of California,
Iowaink, LLC d/b/a iowaink.com of
Iowa, L2 Commerce Inc. d/b/a
Printmicro.com of California, and All
Media Outlet Corp. d/b/a
Inkandbeyond.com of California.
On March 19, 2007, H–P and All
Media jointly moved to terminate the
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
investigation with respect to All Media,
based on a settlement agreement. The
Commission investigative attorney
supported the motion.
On June 6, 2007, the ALJ issued an ID
(Order No. 9) granting the joint motion
to terminate the investigation with
regard to All Media. The ALJ found that
the joint motion complied with the
requirements of Commission Rule
210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). The ALJ also
concluded that, pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR
210.50(b)(2)), there is no evidence that
termination of this investigation will
prejudice the public interest. In
addition, the ALJ noted that the
termination of litigation under these
circumstances as an alternative method
of dispute resolution is generally in the
public interest. Accordingly, the ALJ
terminated the investigation as to All
Media. In addition, the ALJ terminated
the investigation in its entirety. No
petitions for review of this ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to
review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 27, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–12752 Filed 6–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[USITC SE–07–012]
Government in the Sunshine Act
Meeting Notice
United
States International Trade Commission.
TIME AND DATE: July 10, 2007 at 11 a.m.
PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Inv. Nos. 731–TA–873–875, 877–
880, and 882 (Review) (Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bar from Belarus, China,
Indonesia, Korea, Latvia, Moldova,
Poland, and Ukraine)—briefing and
vote. (The Commission is currently
scheduled to transmit its determination
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 126 (Monday, July 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36037-36040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12668]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-744 (Second Review)]
Brake Rotors From China
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of a five-year review concerning the antidumping
duty order on brake rotors from China.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a
review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the
[[Page 36038]]
antidumping duty order on brake rotors from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to
section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to
respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to
the Commission; \1\ to be assured of consideration, the deadline for
responses is August 21, 2007. Comments on the adequacy of responses may
be filed with the Commission by September 14, 2007. For further
information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: July 2, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On April 17, 1997, the Department of Commerce issued
an antidumping duty order on imports of brake rotors from China (62 FR
18740). Following five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission,
effective August 14, 2002, Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of brake rotors from China (67 FR
52933). The Commission is now conducting a second review to determine
whether revocation of the order would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a
reasonably foreseeable time. It will assess the adequacy of interested
party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to
conduct a full review or an expedited review. The Commission's
determination in any expedited review will be based on the facts
available, which may include information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions.--The following definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by the Department
of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination and its expedited five-year review determination, the
Commission defined the Domestic Like Product as all aftermarket brake
rotors, coextensive with Commerce's scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original determination and
its expedited five-year review determination, the Commission defined
the Domestic Industry as all producers of aftermarket brake rotors. In
its original determination, the Commission also determined that
appropriate circumstances existed to exclude AlliedSignal from the
domestic aftermarket rotor industry as a related party; however, in its
expedited five-year review determination, the Commission did not find
that appropriate circumstances existed to exclude any producer from the
domestic industry.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the review and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the review as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the review.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are reminded that they are required, pursuant to 19
CFR 201.15, to seek Commission approval if the matter in which they are
seeking to appear was pending in any manner or form during their
Commission employment. The Commission is seeking guidance as to whether
a second transition five-year review is the ``same particular matter''
as the underlying original investigation for purposes of 19 CFR 201.15
and 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees.
Former employees may seek informal advice from Commission ethics
officials with respect to this and the related issue of whether the
employee's participation was ``personal and substantial.'' However, any
informal consultation will not relieve former employees of the
obligation to seek approval to appear from the Commission under its
rule 201.15. For ethics advice, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy
Agency Ethics Official, at 202-205-3088.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 07-5-172,
expiration date June 30, 2008. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 10 hours per response. Please send
comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI submitted in this review available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the review, provided that the
application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent
interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
the review. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary
for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification.--Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in
connection with this review must certify that the information is
accurate and complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent,
unless otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the information provided in any other reviews
or investigations of the same or comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits
and investigations relating to the programs
[[Page 36039]]
and operations of the Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.--Pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission's rules, each interested party response to this notice must
provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such
responses is August 21, 2007. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission's rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of
responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission
should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing
such comments is September 14, 2007. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the
Commission's rules and any submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the
Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except
to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as
amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in accordance with
sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to
the review (as identified by either the public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document
(if you are not a party to the review you do not need to serve your
response).
Inability to provide requested information.--Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act in making its determination
in the review.
Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of
Institution: As used below, the term ``firm'' includes any related
firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address if available) and name, telephone number, fax number,
and e-mail address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S.
producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a
U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or
business association, or another interested party (including an
explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or
which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in this review by providing information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping duty order on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your
firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various
factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a))
including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on
the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 2001.
(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during calendar year 2006 (report quantity data in units and
value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker
group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an
aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which
are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like
Product;
(c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country,
provide the following information on your firm's(s') operations on that
product during calendar year 2006 (report quantity data in units and
value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are
members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the
Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported
from the Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject
Merchandise imported from the Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during calendar year 2006 (report quantity
data in units and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at
the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties). If you are a
trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
[[Page 36040]]
market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2001,
and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a
reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include
technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to
increase production (including the shift of production facilities used
for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply
among different national markets (including barriers to importation in
foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions
to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and
availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among
the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from
other countries.
(11) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 25, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-12668 Filed 6-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P