Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Amending Section 5 (Obligations of Market Makers) of Chapter VI of the Rules of the Boston Options Exchange for Clarification Purposes Regarding the Guaranteed Directed Order, 35735-35736 [E7-12604]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 125 / Friday, June 29, 2007 / Notices
[FR Doc. E7–12634 Filed 6–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55945; File No. SR–BSE–
2007–23]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston
Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Amending
Section 5 (Obligations of Market
Makers) of Chapter VI of the Rules of
the Boston Options Exchange for
Clarification Purposes Regarding the
Guaranteed Directed Order
June 22, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 1,
2007, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘BSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
BSE has filed the proposal as a noncontroversial rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) 4 thereunder, which renders
the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. On June 21, 2007, BSE
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend
Section 5 (Obligations of Market
Makers) of Chapter VI of the Rules of the
Boston Options Exchange (‘‘BOX
Rules’’) for clarification purposes
regarding the Guaranteed Directed
Order (‘‘GDO’’). The text of the
proposed rule is available at the
Exchange, the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, and on the Exchange’s
Web site (https://www.bostonstock.com).
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Jun 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, BSE
included statements concerning the
purpose of, and basis for, the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The Exchange has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend
Section 5 (Obligations of Market
Makers) of Chapter VI of the BOX
Rules 5 to clarify that the GDO is
exposed for one time period with an
NBBO filter at the end of the exposition.
The section of the BOX Rules which
discusses the GDO contains a cross
reference to Chapter V, Section 16(b).
The Exchange proposes to extend the
cross reference and numbering to reflect
the specific subsection of the
corresponding BOX Rule so that the
Exchange’s rules are accurate,
comprehendible, and transparent to the
marketplace. The GDO exposure time is
not affected by this filing and remains
three seconds, as set forth in Chapter VI,
Section 5 of the BOX Rules.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,6
in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,7 in particular, in that it is designed
to promote just and equitable principles
of trade, and to protect investors and the
public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
5 Specifically, the Exchange is amending Chapter
VI, Section 5(c)(iii)(2)(b)(5) of the BOX Rules.
Telephone conversation between Terri Evans,
Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation,
Commission, and Brian Donnelly, AVP Regulation
and Compliance, BSE, on June 21, 2007 (clarifying
the specific rule being amended by the proposed
rule change as described in Amendment No. 1).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35735
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 8 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 9
thereunder.10
The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay. The Commission believes
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Commission notes that the proposed
rule change provides greater specificity
as to a cross-reference within a rule,
thereby avoiding confusion resulting
from an incomplete cross-reference.
Accordingly, the Commission
designates the proposal to be operative
upon filing with the Commission.11 At
any time within 60 days of the filing of
the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.12
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
10 BSE provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change.
See Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act, and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A), 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
11 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay of the proposal, the Commission
has considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
12 For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
within which the Commission may summarily
abrogate the proposed rule change, as amended,
under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the
Commission considers the period to commence on
June 21, 2007, the date on which BSE submitted
Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
9 17
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
35736
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 125 / Friday, June 29, 2007 / Notices
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN
COMMISSION
Notice of Actions Taken at June 13,
2007 Meeting
Susquehanna River Basin
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Commission actions.
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BSE–2007–23 on the
subject line.
AGENCY:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–12604 Filed 6–28–07; 8:45 am]
Public Hearing—Projects Approved
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: At a public hearing held on
June 13, 2007 in North East, MD, the
Susquehanna River Basin Commission
approved certain water resources
projects, accepted a settlement proposal,
Paper Comments
and incorporated two projects into the
• Send paper comments in triplicate
SRBC Comprehensive Plan, as described
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Securities and Exchange Commission,
section below. In other meeting action,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
the Commission heard informational
20549–1090.
presentations on: (1) The 2007 migratory
fish runs through the fish passage
All submissions should refer to File
facilities located at the lower
Number SR–BSE–2007–23. This file
Susquehanna River hydroelectric
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the projects, (2) a Coastal Plain Aquifer
Study being led by the U.S. Geological
Commission process and review your
Survey Maryland District, and (3)
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will hydrologic conditions in the basin
post all comments on the Commission’s indicating the occurrence of dry
conditions during the month of May.
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
The Commission also adopted the FY–
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
2009 budget, elected Commission
submission, all subsequent
officers for FY–2008, approved/ratified
amendments, all written statements
several grants and contracts, and
with respect to the proposed rule
presented the SRBC Maurice K.
change that are filed with the
Goddard Award to William A. Gast of
Commission, and all written
the Pennsylvania Dept. of
communications relating to the
Environmental Protection. For further
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than meeting details, visit the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.srbc.net.
those that may be withheld from the
DATES: June 13, 2007.
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin
available for inspection and copying in
Commission, 1721 N. Front Street,
the Commission’s Public Reference
Harrisburg, PA 17102–2391.
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DC 20549, on official business days
Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel,
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. telephone: (717) 238–0423; ext. 306; fax:
Copies of such filing also will be
(717) 238–2436; e-mail: rcairo@srbc.net
available for inspection and copying at
or Deborah J. Dickey, Secretary to the
the principal office of BSE. All
Commission, telephone: (717) 238–
comments received will be posted
0422, ext. 301; fax: (717) 238–2436;
without change; the Commission does
e-mail: ddickey@srbc.net. Regular mail
not edit personal identifying
inquiries may be sent to the above
information from submissions. You
address.
should submit only information that
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At a
you wish to make available publicly. All
public hearing on June 13, 2007, the
submissions should refer to File
Susquehanna River Basin Commission
Number SR–BSE–2007–23 and should
be submitted on or before July 20, 2007. took the following actions:
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Jun 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
1. Project Sponsor and Facility: Town
of Conklin (Well 5), Broome County,
N.Y. Approval for groundwater
withdrawal of 0.350 mgd.
2. Project Sponsor and Facility: Town
of Erwin (ID Well 2, Well 2, Well 3, ID
Well 1), Steuben County, N.Y. Approval
for groundwater withdrawals of 0.504
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
mgd, 0.350 mgd, 0.325 mgd, and 0.125
mgd.
3. Project Sponsor and Facility: Far
Away Springs—Brandonville, East
Union and Mahanoy Townships,
Schuylkill County, Pa. Approval for
groundwater withdrawal of 0.079 mgd
and consumptive water use of up to
0.200 mgd.
4. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Hughesville Borough Authority (Well 1,
Well 2, Well 3), Wolf Township,
Lycoming County, Pa. Approval for
groundwater withdrawals of 0.260 mgd,
0.260 mgd and 1.440 mgd.
5. Project Sponsor: Glenn O.
Hawbaker, Inc. Project Facility: Pleasant
Gap, Spring Township, Centre County,
Pa. Modification of consumptive water
use approval (Docket No. 20050307).
6. Project Sponsor and Facility: Centre
Hills Country Club (Hole #8 Well,
Driving Range Well), College Township,
Centre County, Pa. Approval for
groundwater withdrawals of 0.316 mgd
and 0.316 mgd.
7. Project Sponsor: New Enterprise
Stone & Lime Co., Inc. Project Facility:
Tyrone Quarry, Warriors Mark and
Snyder Townships, Huntingdon and
Blair Counties, Pa. Modification of
surface water and groundwater approval
(Docket No. 20031205).
8. Project Sponsor: New Enterprise
Stone & Lime Co., Inc. Project Facility:
Ashcom Quarry, Snake Spring Valley
Township, Bedford County, Pa.
Modification of groundwater approval
(Docket No. 20031204).
9. Project Sponsor and Facility: AES
Ironwood, LLC, South Lebanon
Township, Lebanon County, Pa.
Modification of surface water and
consumptive use approval and
diversion (Docket No. 19980502).
10. Project Sponsor and Facility: East
Cocalico Township Authority (Well F,
Well M), East Cocalico Township,
Lancaster County, Pa. Approval for
groundwater withdrawals of 1.150 mgd
and 1.580 mgd.
11. Project Sponsor: Golf Enterprises,
Inc. Project Facility: Valley Green Golf
Course, Newberry Township, York
County, Pa. Modification of
consumptive water use approval
(Docket No. 20021019).
12. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Mount Joy Borough Authority (Well 3),
Mount Joy Borough, Lancaster County,
Pa. Approval for groundwater
withdrawal of 1.020 mgd.
13. Project Sponsor and Facility: Dart
Container Corporation of Pennsylvania
(Well B), Upper Leacock Township,
Lancaster County, Pa. Approval for
groundwater withdrawal of 0.122 mgd.
14. Project Sponsor: Honey Run GIBG
LLC. Project Facility: Honey Run Golf
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 125 (Friday, June 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35735-35736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12604]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55945; File No. SR-BSE-2007-23]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Amending Section 5 (Obligations of Market
Makers) of Chapter VI of the Rules of the Boston Options Exchange for
Clarification Purposes Regarding the Guaranteed Directed Order
June 22, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 1, 2007, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
BSE has filed the proposal as a non-controversial rule change pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \4\
thereunder, which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the
Commission. On June 21, 2007, BSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend Section 5 (Obligations of Market
Makers) of Chapter VI of the Rules of the Boston Options Exchange
(``BOX Rules'') for clarification purposes regarding the Guaranteed
Directed Order (``GDO''). The text of the proposed rule is available at
the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and on the
Exchange's Web site (https://www.bostonstock.com).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, BSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend Section 5 (Obligations of Market
Makers) of Chapter VI of the BOX Rules \5\ to clarify that the GDO is
exposed for one time period with an NBBO filter at the end of the
exposition. The section of the BOX Rules which discusses the GDO
contains a cross reference to Chapter V, Section 16(b). The Exchange
proposes to extend the cross reference and numbering to reflect the
specific subsection of the corresponding BOX Rule so that the
Exchange's rules are accurate, comprehendible, and transparent to the
marketplace. The GDO exposure time is not affected by this filing and
remains three seconds, as set forth in Chapter VI, Section 5 of the BOX
Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Specifically, the Exchange is amending Chapter VI, Section
5(c)(iii)(2)(b)(5) of the BOX Rules. Telephone conversation between
Terri Evans, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation,
Commission, and Brian Donnelly, AVP Regulation and Compliance, BSE,
on June 21, 2007 (clarifying the specific rule being amended by the
proposed rule change as described in Amendment No. 1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, and to protect investors and
the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \9\ thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\10\ BSE provided the Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change. See Section 19(b)(3)(A) of
the Act, and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder. 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(A), 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Commission believes waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. The Commission notes that the proposed rule change provides
greater specificity as to a cross-reference within a rule, thereby
avoiding confusion resulting from an incomplete cross-reference.
Accordingly, the Commission designates the proposal to be operative
upon filing with the Commission.\11\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay of
the proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
\12\ For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which
the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change, as
amended, under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission
considers the period to commence on June 21, 2007, the date on which
BSE submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
[[Page 35736]]
including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BSE-2007-23 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2007-23. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of BSE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2007-23 and should be
submitted on or before July 20, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-12604 Filed 6-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P