Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands; Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 34441-34442 [E7-12119]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 120 / Friday, June 22, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with
Department practice and 19 CFR
351.212(c)(2). Id at 3888.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the
exporters listed above, the cash deposit
rate will be established in these final
results of review (except, if the rate is
zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5
percent, no cash deposit will be
required for that company); (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non–PRC exporters not listed above
that have separate rates, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter–specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC–wide rate of 376.67 percent;
and (4) for all non–PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the
PRC exporters that supplied that non–
PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of these
new shipper reviews for all shipments
of subject merchandise from Qingdao
Camel, Qingdao Saturn, XuZhou and
Longtai entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the publication date, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
subject merchandise exported by
Qingdao Camel, Qingdao Saturn,
XuZhou and Longtai and produced by
their respective suppliers listed above,
the cash–deposit rate will be that
established in these final results of new
shipper reviews; (2) for subject
merchandise exported by Qingdao
Camel, Qingdao Saturn, XuZhou and
Longtai but not manufactured by their
respective suppliers, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the PRC–wide
rate (i.e., 376.67 percent); and (3) for
subject merchandise exported by QXF,
the cash deposit rate will be the PRC–
wide rate (i.e., 376.67 percent).
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:51 Jun 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the review period. Pursuant to 19
CFR 351.402(f)(3), failure to comply
with this requirement could result in
the Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO as explained in
the administrative protective order
itself. Timely written notification of the
return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice of final results of this
administrative review and new shipper
reviews are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(C)
and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5) and 351.214(j).
Dated: June 11, 2007.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
Appendix I
Comment 1: Intermediate Methodology
Comment 2: Garlic Bulb Surrogate Value
A. Product Specificity
B. Broad Market Average
C. Public Availability
D. Contemporaneity
E. Tax and Duty Exclusivity
Comment 3: Surrogate Financial
Companies
Comment 4: Surrogate Value for Labor
Comment 5: Carton Surrogate Value
Comment 6: Inclusion of Packing
Weight in Movement Expenses
Comment 7: Brokerage and Handling
Surrogate Value
Comment 8: Water Surrogate Value
Comment 9: By–Product Offset
Comment 10: Application of Packaging
Materials in the Calculation of Normal
Value
Comment 11: Shangyang Freezing’s
Polyethylene and Polyester Surrogate
Values
Comment 12: Dongyun’s Section C
Database
Comment 13: Dongyun’s Yield Loss
[FR Doc. E7–12031 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34441
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–421–807]
Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products from the Netherlands;
Amended Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 22, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published Certain Hot–
Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from
the Netherlands; Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 72 FR 28676, (May 22, 2007)
(Final Results), covering the period of
review (POR) November 1, 2004,
through October 31, 2005. We are
amending the Final Results to correct
ministerial errors made in the
calculation of the dumping margins for
Corus Staal BV (Corus Staal), pursuant
to section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
22, 2007, the Department published the
final results of the 2004–2005
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products from
the Netherlands, in which we
determined that the respondent, Corus
Staal, sold subject merchandise to the
United States at less than normal value
during the period of review (POR). See
Final Results. On May 22, 2007, we
received an allegation, timely filed
pursuant to section 751(h) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.224(c)(2), from Corus
Staal that the Department made a
ministerial error in the Final Results.
The petitioners did not comment on the
alleged ministerial error.
After analyzing Corus Staal’s
submission, we have determined, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224, that we made
a ministerial error in our final margin
calculation for Corus Staal. For both the
preliminary and final results in this
review the Department determined that
all sales in the home market were made
at the same level of trade. However, in
both the preliminary and final
comparison market programs, we failed
to revise the level of trade variable
reported by Corus Staal to reflect the
Department’s determination that all
sales in the home market were at the
same level of trade. For a detailed
discussion of the ministerial error, as
well as the Department’s corrective
programming, see the Analysis
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
34442
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 120 / Friday, June 22, 2007 / Notices
Memorandum to the File, from David
Cordell, dated June 15, 2007.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e),
we are amending the final results of the
2004–2005 antidumping duty
administrative review of the order on
Manufacturer/Exporter
certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat
products from the Netherlands. The
revised dumping margin is as follows:
Original Final Margin
Corus Staal BV ........................................................................................................................
The Department will disclose
calculations performed for the amended
final results to the parties within five
days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have
calculated importer–specific assessment
rates for the merchandise based on the
ratio of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for the examined sales
made during the POR to the total
customs value of the sales used to
calculate those duties. The Department
will issue appropriate ad valorem
assessment instructions directly to CBP
15 days after publication of these
amended final results of review. We will
direct CBP to assess the resulting
assessment rate against the entered
customs values for the subject
merchandise on each of the importer’s
entries during the POR.
Cash Deposit Requirements
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
On May 4, 2007, the Department
published a Federal Register notice
that, inter alia, revoked this order,
effective April 23, 2007. See
Implementation of the Findings of the
WTO Panel in US Zeroing (EC): Notice
of Determinations Under Section 129 of
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and
Revocations and Partial Revocations of
Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72
FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). Therefore,
there is no need to issue new cash
deposit instructions for these amended
final results of this administrative
review.
These amended final results of this
administrative review and this notice
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
Dated: June 15, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–12119 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:51 Jun 21, 2007
Jkt 211001
2.52 percent
Revised Final Margin
2.26 percent
Tubular Goods from Mexico, 60 FR
41056 (August 11, 1995).
International Trade Administration
On June 1, 2006, the Department
[A–357–810, A–475–816, A–588–835, A–580– initiated and the ITC instituted sunset
reviews of the AD orders on oil country
825, A–201–817]
tubular goods from Argentina, Italy,
Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Japan, Korea, and Mexico. See Initiation
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and
of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 71 FR
Mexico; Revocation of Antidumping
31153 (June 1, 2006); and Oil Country
Duty Orders Pursuant to Second FiveTubular Goods from Argentina, Italy,
year (Sunset) Reviews
Japan, Korea, and Mexico, 71 FR 31207
(June 1, 2006). As a result of the sunset
AGENCY: Import Administration,
reviews of these AD orders, the
International Trade Administration,
Department found that revocation
Department of Commerce.
would be likely to lead to the
SUMMARY: As a result of the
continuation or recurrence of dumping.
determination by the International
See Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) that
Argentina, Italy, Japan, and Korea, Final
revocation of the antidumping duty
Results of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews
orders on oil country tubular goods
of Antidumping Duty Orders, 71 FR
(‘‘OCTG’’) from Argentina, Italy, Japan,
59074 (October 6, 2006); and Oil
Korea, and Mexico would not be likely
Country Tubular Goods from Mexico;
to lead to a continuation or recurrence
Final Results of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
of material injury to an industry in the
Review, 72 FR 24563 (May 3, 2007).
United States within a reasonably
Pursuant to 752(c) of the Act, the
foreseeable time, the Department of
Department notified the ITC of the
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
likely continuation of dumping by
publishing this notice of revocation of
these antidumping duty orders pursuant manufacturers, producers, and exporters
to sections 751(c) and (d)(2) of the Tariff of OCTG in Argentina, Italy, Japan,
Korea, and Mexico, and the magnitude
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).
of the margin of dumping likely to
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 22, 2007.
prevail were the AD orders revoked.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On May 31, 2007, the ITC determined
Martha Douthit or Fred Baker, AD/CVD
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act
Operations, Offices 6 and 7, Import
that revocation of the AD orders on
Administration, International Trade
OCTG from Argentina, Italy, Japan,
Administration, U.S. Department of
Korea, and Mexico, would not be likely
th Street and Constitution
Commerce, 14
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;
material injury to an industry in the
telephone (202) 482–5050 (Douthit),
United States within a reasonably
(202) 482–2924 (Baker).
foreseeable time. See Oil Country
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tubular Goods from Argentina, Italy,
Japan, Korea, and Mexico, USITC
Background
Publication 3923, Investigation Nos.
On August 11, 1995, the Department
published the AD orders on OCTG from 731–711, 713–716 (Review) (June 2007).
The ITC notified the Department of this
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and
determination on June 18, 2007.
Mexico. See Antidumping Dumping
Duty Order: Oil Country Tubular Goods Scope of the Orders
from Argentina, 60 FR 41055 (August
11, 1995); Antidumping Duty Order: Oil Argentina, Italy, Korea, And Mexico:
OCTG are hollow steel products of
Country Tubular Goods from Italy, 60
circular cross-section, including oil well
FR 41057 (August 11, 1995),
casing and tubing of iron (other than
Antidumping Duty Order: Oil Country
Tubular Goods from Japan, 60 FR 41058 cast iron) or steel (both carbon and
alloy), whether seamless or welded,
(August 11, 1995), Antidumping Duty
Order: Oil Country Tubular Goods from whether or not conforming to American
Petroleum Institute (API) or non–API
Korea, 60 FR 41057 (August 11, 1995),
specifications, whether finished or
Antidumping Duty Order: Oil Country
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 120 (Friday, June 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34441-34442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12119]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-421-807]
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the
Netherlands; Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 22, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the
Netherlands; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
72 FR 28676, (May 22, 2007) (Final Results), covering the period of
review (POR) November 1, 2004, through October 31, 2005. We are
amending the Final Results to correct ministerial errors made in the
calculation of the dumping margins for Corus Staal BV (Corus Staal),
pursuant to section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 22, 2007, the Department published
the final results of the 2004-2005 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products
from the Netherlands, in which we determined that the respondent, Corus
Staal, sold subject merchandise to the United States at less than
normal value during the period of review (POR). See Final Results. On
May 22, 2007, we received an allegation, timely filed pursuant to
section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(c)(2), from Corus Staal
that the Department made a ministerial error in the Final Results. The
petitioners did not comment on the alleged ministerial error.
After analyzing Corus Staal's submission, we have determined, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224, that we
made a ministerial error in our final margin calculation for Corus
Staal. For both the preliminary and final results in this review the
Department determined that all sales in the home market were made at
the same level of trade. However, in both the preliminary and final
comparison market programs, we failed to revise the level of trade
variable reported by Corus Staal to reflect the Department's
determination that all sales in the home market were at the same level
of trade. For a detailed discussion of the ministerial error, as well
as the Department's corrective programming, see the Analysis
[[Page 34442]]
Memorandum to the File, from David Cordell, dated June 15, 2007.
Therefore, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(e), we are amending the final results of the 2004-2005
antidumping duty administrative review of the order on certain hot-
rolled carbon steel flat products from the Netherlands. The revised
dumping margin is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/Exporter Original Final Margin Revised Final Margin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corus Staal BV................................................ 2.52 percent 2.26 percent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department will disclose calculations performed for the amended
final results to the parties within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated
importer-specific assessment rates for the merchandise based on the
ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales made during the POR to the total customs value of the
sales used to calculate those duties. The Department will issue
appropriate ad valorem assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of these amended final results of review. We will
direct CBP to assess the resulting assessment rate against the entered
customs values for the subject merchandise on each of the importer's
entries during the POR.
Cash Deposit Requirements
On May 4, 2007, the Department published a Federal Register notice
that, inter alia, revoked this order, effective April 23, 2007. See
Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US Zeroing (EC):
Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Revocations of Certain
Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). Therefore, there is
no need to issue new cash deposit instructions for these amended final
results of this administrative review.
These amended final results of this administrative review and this
notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(h) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
Dated: June 15, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-12119 Filed 6-21-07; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510-DS-S
