Construction Records for Rigging Equipment; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements, 34483-34485 [E7-12050]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 120 / Friday, June 22, 2007 / Notices rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. TA–W–61,415; American & Efird, Inc., d/b/a Robison Anton Textile Co, Bloomsburg, PA: April 23, 2006. The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. TA–W–61,368; Kraft Foods Global, Inc., Post Cereals Division, Battle Creek, MI: April 12, 2006. TA–W–61,589; Hi-Craft Engineering Incorporated, Fraser, MI: May 25, 2006. TA–W–61,426; Badger Attachments, Div., Paladin Corporation, Wausau, WI: April 30, 2006. The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers’ industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. TA–W–61,549; Molex, Inc., Fiber Optics Division, Downers Grove, IL. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–61,267; Fox River Paper FR, LLC, Formerly Fox River Paper Company, Housatonic, MA. TA–W–61,486; Thompson Steel Company, Inc., Franklin Park, IL. TA–W–61,547; McMurray Fabrics, Inc., Lincolnton, NC. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–60,333; Intel Corporation, Jones Farm Campus, Hillsboro, OR. TA–W–60,334; Intel Corporation, Cornell Oaks Campus, Beaverton, OR. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:51 Jun 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 TA–W–60,335; Intel Corporation, Ronler Acres Campus, Hillsboro, OR. TA–W–60,338; Intel Corporation, Elam Young Campus, Hillsboro, OR. TA–W–60,339; Intel Corporation, Aloha Campus, Aloha, OR. TA–W–60,340; Intel Corporation, Amber Glen Campus, Beaverton, OR. TA–W–60,341; Intel Corporation, Evergreen Campus, Hillsboro, OR. TA–W–60,514; Intel Corporation, Hawthorn Farm Campus, Hillsboro, OR. TA–W–60,880; Vantage Industries, LLC, Hamilton, IN. TA–W–61,242; Visteon Corporation Regional Assembly, Interiors Div., Visteon Corp., Manpower, Chicago, IL. TA–W–61,309; Shiloh Industries, Mansfield Division, Mansfield, OH. TA–W–61,425; Oak Mine, Inc. (The), Grant Pass, OR. TA–W–61,397; Hamlin Tool & Machine Co., Inc., Workers Producing Seat Belt Brackets, Rochester, MI. TA–W–61,405; Jarden Consumer Solutions, d/b/a Sunbeam Products Incorporated, Testing Lab, Milford, MA. The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–61,279; Lexmark International, Inc., U.S. Customer Services, Lexington, KY. TA–W–61,351; Low Country Cotton Service, LLP, Greenville, SC. TA–W–61,427; Iron Age Footwear, A Subsidiary of Iron Age Corp., Greensboro, NC. The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. None. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of June 4 through June 8, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: June 15, 2007. Ralph DiBattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–12076 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 34483 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No. OSHA–2007–0055] Construction Records for Rigging Equipment; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION: Request for public comment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comment concerning its proposal to extend OMB approval of the information collection requirements contained in paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(6)(i), (b)(6)(ii), (c)(15)(ii), (e)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) and (f)(2) of the Rigging Equipment for Construction Standard (29 CFR 1926.251). These paragraphs require affixing identification tags or markings on rigging equipment, developing and maintaining inspection records, and retaining proof-testing certificates. DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by August 20, 2007. ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments electronically at https:// www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting comments. Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service: When using this method, you must submit three copies of your comments and attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA–2007–0055, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Room N–2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are accepted during the Department of Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t. Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA docket number for the ICR (OSHA– 2007–0055). All comments, including any personal information you provide, are placed in the public docket without change, and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov. E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 34484 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 120 / Friday, June 22, 2007 / Notices For further information on submitting comments see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading in the section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal Register notice) are listed in the https:// www.regulations.gov index; however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download through the Web site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Stewart Burkhammer at the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stewart Burkhammer, Directorate of Construction, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–3468, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES I. Background The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA’s estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires that OSHA obtain such information with minimum burden upon employers, especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce to the maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657). The following section identifies and describes the information collection requirements contained in the Rigging Equipment in Construction Standard (i.e., ‘‘the Standard’’). The purpose of VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:51 Jun 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 each of these requirements is to prevent employees from using defective or deteriorated equipment, thereby reducing their risk of death or serious injury caused by equipment failure during material handling. • Alloy Steel Chains, Paragraph (b) Paragraph (b)(1) requires that alloy steel chains have permanently affixed durable identification tags stating size, grade, rated capacity and sling manufacturer. Paragraph (b)(6)(i) requires the employer to make a thorough periodic inspection of alloy steel chain slings in use on a regular basis, but at least once a year. Paragraph (b)(6)(ii) requires the employer to make and maintain a record of the most recent month in which each alloy steel chain was inspected and make the record available for examination. • End Attachments, Paragraph (c) Paragraph (c)(15)(ii) requires that all welded end attachments of wire rope slings be proof-tested by the manufacturer at twice their rated capacity prior to initial use, and that the employer retain a certificate of the proof test and make it available for examination. • Synthetic Webbing (Nylon, Polyester, and Polypropylene), Paragraph (e) Paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) require that synthetic web slings be marked or coded to show the manufacturer’s name or trademark, the rated capacity for the type of hitch and the type of synthetic webbing material. • Shackles and Hooks, Paragraph (f) Paragraph (f)(2) requires that all hooks for which no applicable manufacturer’s recommendations are available be tested twice before they are put into use. The employer shall maintain a record of the dates and results of the tests. II. Special Issues for Comment OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues: • Whether the proposed information collection requirements are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency’s functions, including whether the information is useful; • The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of the burden (time and costs) of the information collection requirements, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • The quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and • Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply; for example, by using automated or other technological information collection and transmission techniques. PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 III. Proposed Actions OSHA is requesting that OMB extend its approval of the information collection requirements contained in the Rigging Equipment Standard (29 CFR 1926.251). The Agency will summarize the comments submitted in response to this notice and will include this summary in the request to OMB. Type of Review: Extension of currently approved information collection requirements. Title: Rigging Equipment for Material Handling (29 CFR 1926.25(b)(1), (b)(6)(i), (b)(6)(ii), (c)(15)(ii), (e)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii), and (f)(2). OMB Number: 1218–0233. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit. Number of Respondents: 1,327,370. Frequency: On occasion. Average Time Per Response: Average 3 minutes (.05 hour) for an employer to maintain and disclose a certificate to 30 minutes (.50 hour) for an employer to acquire information and make a tag for a sling. Estimated Total Burden Hours: 56,335. Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $-0-. IV. Public Participation—Submission of Comments on This Notice and Internet Access to Comments and Submissions You may submit comments in response to this document as follows: (1) Electronically at https:// www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2007–0055). You may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES). The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments by your name, date, and the docket number so the Agency can attach them to your comments. Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand, express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877) 889– 5627). E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 120 / Friday, June 22, 2007 / Notices Comments and submissions are posted without change at https:// www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about submitting personal information such as social security numbers and date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download through this Web site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on using the https:// www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments and access the docket is available at the Web site’s ‘‘User Tips’’ link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not available through the Web site, and for assistance in using the Internet to locate docket submissions. V. Authority and Signature Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 5–2002 (67 FR 65008). Signed at Washington, DC, on June 14, 2007. Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. [FR Doc. E7–12050 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–26–P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice (07–049)] Dated: June 18, 2007. Keith T. Sefton, Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management. [FR Doc. E7–12063 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am] Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION: Notice of intent to grant exclusive license. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES AGENCY: BILLING CODE 7510–13–P SUMMARY: This notice is issued in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby gives notice of its intent to grant an exclusive license worldwide to practice the inventions described and claimed in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,261,844, entitled ‘‘Urine Preservative’’; 6,133,036, entitled ‘‘Preservation Of Liquid Biological Samples’’; and 6,716,392, entitled ‘‘Preservation Of Liquid Biological Samples’’, to Antlers Plus LLC., having its principal place of business in Henley, Missouri. The fields VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:51 Jun 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 of use may be limited to deer hunting. The patent rights in these inventions have been assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The prospective exclusive license will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. DATES: The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this published notice, NASA receives written objections including evidence and argument that establish that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. Competing applications completed and received by NASA within fifteen (15) days of the date of this published notice will also be treated as objections to the grant of the contemplated exclusive license. Objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made available to the public for inspection and, to the extent permitted by law, will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the prospective license may be submitted to Patent Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Mail Code AL, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX 77058, (281) 483–4871; (281) 483–6936 [Facsimile]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt G. Hammerle, Patent Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, Johnson Space Center, Mail Code AL, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX 77058, (281) 483–1001; (281) 483–6936 [Facsimile]. Information about other NASA inventions available for licensing can be found online at https://technology.nasa.gov/. NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). ACTION: Request for comment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The NCUA is resubmitting the following information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 34485 the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain comments from the public. DATES: Comments will be accepted until July 23, 2007. ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to NCUA Clearance Officer listed below: Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil McNamara, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314–3428, Fax No. 703–837–2861, E-mail: _ociomail@ncua.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314–3428, or at (703) 518–6444. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of information: OMB Number: 3133–0032. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection. Title: Records Preservation under 12 CFR Part 749. Description: Part 749 of NCUA Regulations directs each credit union to have a vital records preservation program that includes procedures for maintaining duplicate vital records at a location far enough from the credit union’s offices to avoid the simultaneous loss of both sets of records in the event of a disaster. A proposed regulatory amendment requires the program be in writing and include emergency contact information for employees, officials, regulatory offices, and vendors used to support vital records. Respondents: All credit unions. Estimated No. of Respondents/Record keepers: 8,420. Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 2 hours. Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping, reporting and on occasion. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 16,930. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $842,000. By the National Credit Union Administration Board on June 18, 2007. Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E7–12059 Filed 6–21–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7535–01–P E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 120 (Friday, June 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34483-34485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2007-0055]


Construction Records for Rigging Equipment; Extension of the 
Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information 
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comment concerning its proposal to extend 
OMB approval of the information collection requirements contained in 
paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(6)(i), (b)(6)(ii), (c)(15)(ii), (e)(1)(i), (ii), 
and (iii) and (f)(2) of the Rigging Equipment for Construction Standard 
(29 CFR 1926.251). These paragraphs require affixing identification 
tags or markings on rigging equipment, developing and maintaining 
inspection records, and retaining proof-testing certificates.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by 
August 20, 2007.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments 
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting 
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer 
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service: 
When using this method, you must submit three copies of your comments 
and attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2007-0055, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier 
service) are accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket 
Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA 
docket number for the ICR (OSHA-2007-0055). All comments, including any 
personal information you provide, are placed in the public docket 
without change, and may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov.

[[Page 34484]]

For further information on submitting comments see the ``Public 
Participation'' heading in the section of this notice titled 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the 
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at 
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal 
Register notice) are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index; 
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly 
available to read or download through the Web site. All submissions, 
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and 
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Stewart 
Burkhammer at the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stewart Burkhammer, Directorate of 
Construction, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3468, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-
2020.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce 
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an 
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information 
collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that 
information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs) 
is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's 
estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The 
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 
et seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or 
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing 
information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational 
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also 
requires that OSHA obtain such information with minimum burden upon 
employers, especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce 
to the maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in 
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    The following section identifies and describes the information 
collection requirements contained in the Rigging Equipment in 
Construction Standard (i.e., ``the Standard''). The purpose of each of 
these requirements is to prevent employees from using defective or 
deteriorated equipment, thereby reducing their risk of death or serious 
injury caused by equipment failure during material handling.

 Alloy Steel Chains, Paragraph (b)

    Paragraph (b)(1) requires that alloy steel chains have permanently 
affixed durable identification tags stating size, grade, rated capacity 
and sling manufacturer. Paragraph (b)(6)(i) requires the employer to 
make a thorough periodic inspection of alloy steel chain slings in use 
on a regular basis, but at least once a year. Paragraph (b)(6)(ii) 
requires the employer to make and maintain a record of the most recent 
month in which each alloy steel chain was inspected and make the record 
available for examination.

 End Attachments, Paragraph (c)

    Paragraph (c)(15)(ii) requires that all welded end attachments of 
wire rope slings be proof-tested by the manufacturer at twice their 
rated capacity prior to initial use, and that the employer retain a 
certificate of the proof test and make it available for examination.

 Synthetic Webbing (Nylon, Polyester, and Polypropylene), 
Paragraph (e)

    Paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) require that synthetic web 
slings be marked or coded to show the manufacturer's name or trademark, 
the rated capacity for the type of hitch and the type of synthetic 
webbing material.

 Shackles and Hooks, Paragraph (f)

    Paragraph (f)(2) requires that all hooks for which no applicable 
manufacturer's recommendations are available be tested twice before 
they are put into use. The employer shall maintain a record of the 
dates and results of the tests.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements 
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions, 
including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and 
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply; 
for example, by using automated or other technological information 
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is requesting that OMB extend its approval of the information 
collection requirements contained in the Rigging Equipment Standard (29 
CFR 1926.251). The Agency will summarize the comments submitted in 
response to this notice and will include this summary in the request to 
OMB.
    Type of Review: Extension of currently approved information 
collection requirements.
    Title: Rigging Equipment for Material Handling (29 CFR 
1926.25(b)(1), (b)(6)(i), (b)(6)(ii), (c)(15)(ii), (e)(1)(i), (ii), and 
(iii), and (f)(2).
    OMB Number: 1218-0233.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 1,327,370.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Average Time Per Response: Average 3 minutes (.05 hour) for an 
employer to maintain and disclose a certificate to 30 minutes (.50 
hour) for an employer to acquire information and make a tag for a 
sling.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 56,335.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $-0-.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and 
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows: 
(1) Electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All 
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name 
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2007-0055). You 
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files 
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference 
to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the 
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES). 
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments 
by your name, date, and the docket number so the Agency can attach them 
to your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a 
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about 
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand, 
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the 
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-2350 (TTY (877) 889-5627).

[[Page 34485]]

    Comments and submissions are posted without change at https://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about 
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and 
date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted 
material) is not publicly available to read or download through this 
Web site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are 
available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. 
Information on using the https://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit 
comments and access the docket is available at the Web site's ``User 
Tips'' link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about 
materials not available through the Web site, and for assistance in 
using the Internet to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational 
Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The 
authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2002 (67 FR 
65008).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on June 14, 2007.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
 [FR Doc. E7-12050 Filed 6-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.