Combating Exploitive Child Labor Through Education in Bolivia, Cambodia, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Dominican Republic, Indonesia, Morocco, the Philippines, Togo, and Uganda, 32869-32914 [E7-11526]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
by task.
Total Burden Hours: 1,356.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $0.
Description: The paperwork
provisions of the Standard specify
requirements for marking the rated load
on derricks, preparing certification
records to verify the inspection of
derrick ropes, and posting warning signs
while the derrick is undergoing
adjustments and repairs. Certification
records must be maintained and
disclosed upon request.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Title: Additional Requirements for
special dipping and coating operations
(Dip Tanks) (29 CFR 1910.126(g)(4)).
OMB Number: 1218–0237.
Type of Response: Reporting and
Third-party disclosure.
Affected Public: Public Sector:
Business or other for-profits.
Number of Respondents: 1.
Number of Annual Responses: 1.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Total Burden Hours: 1.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $0.
Description: The standard on
Additional Requirements for Special
Dipping and Coating Operations, 29
CFR 1910.126(g)(4)), requires employers
to post a conspicuous sign near each
piece of electrostatic detearing
equipment that notifies employees of
the minimum safe distance they must
maintain between goods undergoing
electrostatic detearing and the
electrodes or conductors of the
equipment used in the process. Doing so
reduces the likelihood of igniting the
explosive chemicals used in
electrostatic detearing operations.
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–11497 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am]
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Office of the Secretary
Combating Exploitive Child Labor
Through Education in Bolivia,
Cambodia, Colombia, the Democratic
Republic of the Congo, the Dominican
Republic, Indonesia, Morocco, the
Philippines, Togo, and Uganda
June 14, 2007.
Bureau of International Labor
Affairs, Department of Labor.
Announcement Type: New. Notice of
Availability of Funds and Solicitation
for Cooperative Agreement
Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA
07–10.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: Not
applicable.
Key Dates: Deadline for Submission of
Application is July 25, 2007.
Executive Summary: The U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of
International Labor Affairs, will award
up to USD 46.494 million through 10 or
more Cooperative Agreements to one or
more qualifying organizations and/or
Associations to combat exploitive child
labor in the following 10 countries:
Bolivia (up to $3.344 million),
Cambodia (up to $4 million), Colombia
(up to $5.1 million), Democratic
Republic of the Congo (up to $5.5
million), the Dominican Republic (up to
$4 million), Indonesia (up to $5.55
million), Morocco (up to $3 million), the
Philippines (up to $5.5 million), Togo
(up to $5 million), and Uganda (up to
$5.5 million). Projects funded under this
solicitation will seek to sustainably
withdraw and prevent children from
entering exploitive labor through the
provision of direct educational services
and other project interventions, and
ensure direct beneficiaries’ enrollment,
retention, and completion of the
education and/or training program(s) in
which they are enrolled. Projects will
also seek to build capacity in target
countries to eliminate exploitive child
labor and promote educational
alternatives for children. Projects
funded aim to complement and expand
upon existing projects and programs
aimed at eliminating exploitive child
labor, particularly the worst forms of
child labor, and improving basic
education in the target countries.
Applicants must respond to the entire
Scope of Work outlined in this
solicitation for each country for which
an application is submitted.
AGENCY:
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The U.S. Department of Labor
(USDOL), Bureau of International Labor
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32869
Affairs (ILAB), announces the
availability of funds to be awarded by
Cooperative Agreement to one or more
qualifying organizations and/or
Associations (hereinafter referred to as
‘‘Applicant(s)’’) for the purpose of
promoting the elimination of exploitive
child labor, particularly the worst forms
of child labor (for additional
information on these key terms, see
Appendix A), in target countries.
Projects funded under this solicitation
will seek to achieve this goal by
withdrawing children from, and
preventing children from entering,
exploitive child labor through the
provision of direct educational services,
including education and/or training
programs, and improving the capacity of
target countries to address exploitive
child labor.
ILAB is authorized to award and
administer Cooperative Agreements for
this purpose by Section 20607 of the
Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, Pub. L. 110–05, 121
Stat. 8 (2007). Cooperative Agreements
awarded under this solicitation will be
managed by ILAB’s Office of Child
Labor, Forced Labor, and Human
Trafficking (OCFT). The duration of the
projects funded by this solicitation is
three to four years. The start date of
program activities will be negotiated
upon award of the Cooperative
Agreement, but will be no later than
September 30, 2007.
Please note that Appendix A provides
USDOL’s definitions for all key terms
denoted in italics throughout the text of
this solicitation. For ease of reference,
the term ‘‘child(ren)’’ and ‘‘child labor’’
have not been denoted in italics, though
definitions of each are included in
Appendix A. Child(ren) are defined by
USDOL as individuals under the age of
18 years. For section I.3.B., Applicants
should note that there may be some
differences between USDOL definitions
of certain key terms and the definitions
used by foreign governments. For
example, definitions used by USDOL in
this solicitation do not necessarily
correspond to a foreign government’s
own definition of terms such as ‘‘youth’’
or ‘‘hazardous work.
1. Background: USDOL Support for the
Global Elimination of Exploitive Child
Labor
The International Labor Organization
(ILO) estimated that 218 million
children ages 5 to 17 were engaged in
child labor around the world in 2004.
Children engaged in exploitive child
labor on a full-time basis are generally
unable to attend school, and children
engaged in exploitive child labor on a
part-time basis balance economic
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
32870
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
survival with schooling from an early
age, often to the detriment of their
education.
Since 1995, the U.S. Congress has
appropriated $595 million to USDOL for
efforts to combat exploitive child labor
internationally. This funding has been
used to support technical cooperation
projects to combat exploitive child labor
in more than 75 countries around the
world. Technical cooperation projects
funded by USDOL range from targeted
action programs in specific sectors of
work to more comprehensive programs
that support national efforts to eliminate
the worst forms of child labor as defined
by ILO Convention 182. USDOL-funded
projects seek to achieve five major goals:
1. Withdrawing or preventing
children from involvement in exploitive
child labor through the provision of
direct educational services;
2. Strengthening policies on child
labor and education, the capacity of
national institutions to combat child
labor, and formal and transitional
education systems that encourage
children engaged in or at-risk of
engaging in exploitive labor to attend
school;
3. Raising awareness of the
importance of education for all children
and mobilizing a wide array of actors to
improve and expand education
infrastructures.
4. Supporting research and the
collection of reliable data on child labor;
and
5. Ensuring the long-term
sustainability of these efforts.
By increasing access to basic
education, USDOL-funded projects help
nurture the development, health, safety,
and enhanced future employability of
children engaged in or at-risk of
entering exploitive labor in geographic
areas or economic sectors with a high
incidence of exploitive child labor.
Projects funded by USDOL–OCFT are
subject to the provisions of the
Government Performance and Results
Act (GPRA), which was passed by
Congress in 1993 to establish strategic
planning and performance measurement
in the federal government to ensure that
taxpayers’ dollars were being used
efficiently and effectively for the public
good. GPRA requires federal agencies to
develop and submit strategic and annual
performance plans that include
performance goals and indicators. Each
year federal government agencies
receiving appropriated funds are
required to submit to Congress a
performance and accountability report.
Congress uses these reports to make
informed assessments of program
effectiveness for future funding
decisions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
For GPRA purposes, ILAB falls under
USDOL’s Strategic Goal 2: A
Competitive Workforce: Meet the
competitive labor demands of the
worldwide economy by enhancing the
effectiveness and efficiency of the
workforce development and regulatory
systems that assist workers and
employers in meeting the challenges of
global competition. Specifically, OCFT
is required to measure Indicator 2K:
Contribute to the elimination of the
worst forms of child labor
internationally. The GPRA indicators
that OCFT measures across all of its
child labor elimination projects, are: (1)
The number of children withdrawn or
prevented from exploitive child labor
and provided education and/or training
opportunities as a result of a USDOLfunded child labor elimination project;
and (2) The number of countries with
improved capacity to address child
labor as a result of USDOL-funded child
labor elimination projects. For more
comprehensive definitions of USDOL–
OCFT’s GPRA Indicators, see Appendix
A. For additional information on GPRA,
please visit https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/mgmt-gpra/gplaw2m.html.
In addition to its GPRA indicators,
OCFT also collects information on two
other non-GPRA, common indicators
related to direct beneficiaries’ retention
in, and completion, of education and/or
training programs (hereinafter referred
to as ‘‘direct educational services;’’ for
additional information on this key term,
see Appendix A).
2. Factors Contributing to Exploitive
Child Labor and Barriers to Education
There are complex factors
contributing to children’s involvement
in exploitive labor, as well as barriers to
education for children who are engaged
in, or at-risk of entering, exploitive child
labor. These include poverty; education
system barriers; infrastructure barriers;
legal and policy barriers; resource gaps;
institutional barriers; informational
gaps; demographic characteristics of
children and/or families; cultural and
traditional practices; tenuous labor
markets; and weak child labor law
enforcement. While these factors and
barriers tend to exist throughout the
world in areas with a high incidence of
exploitive child labor, they manifest
themselves in specific ways in the
countries of interest in this solicitation.
Some factors unrelated to education
that contribute to children entering
exploitive labor include their families’
need for extra income, children’s need
to provide a livelihood for themselves
and/or their siblings, lack of parent(s) or
caregiver(s), cultural practices, and lack
of awareness of the hazards associated
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with exploitive child labor, including
the worst forms of child labor. In
addition, children have a variety of
educational needs and encounter
different barriers depending on their
work status (e.g., children withdrawn
from exploitive labor, underage children
at risk of dropping out of school and
joining the labor force, children engaged
in exploitive labor in a particular
sector).
3. Scope of Work
A. General Requirements
Each project must promote the five
goals for USDOL-funded projects
outlined in section I.1. Applicants
should propose an innovative project
strategy that will build on existing
efforts to withdraw children from, or
prevent children from entering,
exploitive child labor. Applicants
should identify and address the specific
needs of proposed direct beneficiaries’
to ensure (1) their long-term withdrawal
from, or prevention from entering,
exploitive child labor; (2) their
involvement in acceptable work—for
direct beneficiaries of legal working age,
this may be accomplished through a
reduction in the number of hours
worked and/or improvement(s) in their
working conditions in accordance with
national labor laws and international
standards, such as ILO Conventions 138
(Minimum Age Convention, 1973) and
182 (Worst Forms of Child Labor
Convention, 1999); and (3) their
enrollment in, retention in, and
completion of, a direct educational
service.
Note: For a child to be counted as a direct
beneficiary for the purposes of USDOL’s
GPRA reporting requirements (see section I.1
above for more information on the GPRA),
the Cooperative Agreement awardee
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘Grantee’’) must have
completed the following three (3) steps:
(1) Assess the specific needs of each child
targeted by the project in order for the child
to (a) be withdrawn from, or prevented from
entering, exploitive labor and (b) be enrolled
in an educational activity;
(2) Develop and implement an appropriate
strategy for the child that provides a direct
educational service; and
(3) Monitor and report to USDOL on the
child’s work status (e.g., is the child working
in an exploitive labor situation?) and
educational status (e.g., is the child still
attending an educational or training
program?).
USDOL considers strengthening legal
frameworks and law enforcement
practices that prohibit exploitive child
labor and promoting adherence to
national educational requirements that
support universal access to basic
education as critical strategies for
achieving long-term impact in
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
combating exploitive child labor.
Applicants are encouraged to propose
creative ideas that address the nexus
between better enforcement of child
labor and education laws and the
improvement of educational
opportunities for children. Applicants
are expected to consider the economic,
social, and cultural contexts of the target
country (ies) when formulating project
strategies and to recognize that
approaches applicable in one country
may not be relevant to others.
Applicants must take into account
country-specific issues that could affect
project results, including those outlined
in section I.3.B. for each target country,
and meaningfully incorporate them into
the proposed strategy, either to increase
opportunities for, or reduce obstacles to,
successful implementation. Applicants
should demonstrate a thorough
knowledge of previously piloted
interventions and good practices to
eliminate child labor in each target
county and seek to build upon progress
achieved by such past projects.
i. Focus on Action Research and Data
Collection
In order to identify gaps, unmet needs
and opportunities that could be
addressed through a USDOL child labor
elimination project, Applicants must
conduct a needs assessment in
preparing their application(s) to make a
preliminary identification of the current
working and educational status of the
children that the Applicant proposes as
direct beneficiaries of the project. It is
expected that the information gathered
during this assessment will be refined
after award, although the application
should present a clear indication of the
criteria that will likely be used to select
proposed direct beneficiaries. These
criteria should be based on the target
country’s legislation related to child
labor, including the worst forms of child
labor; the minimum age for work;
acceptable hours and conditions for
children’s work; and national policies
related to child labor, such as a countryspecific list of hazardous work for
children that has been submitted to the
ILO. The assessment, with data sources,
must include information on the
incidence and nature of exploitive child
labor, particularly the worst forms of
child labor, among proposed direct
beneficiaries, hours and conditions of
work, age and sex distribution of the
proposed direct beneficiaries,
educational performance relative to
other children, if available, and any
research or other data that might
indicate correlations between
educational performance and child
labor. In the proposed strategy,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Applicants must consult and make
reference to relevant literature and
documents relating to child labor and
the education of proposed direct
beneficiaries. Applicants are encouraged
to propose strategies for collecting
further data on exploitive child labor
and children’s participation in
schooling in the early stages of the
project’s baseline data collection. In
addition, Applicants are encouraged to
conduct small-scale research projects in
support of the project’s overall
objectives, in particular on the
unconditional worst forms of child labor
where there is often a lack of systematic
and reliable data. Applicants are
encouraged to disseminate findings
from such research and to use this
information in formulating more
targeted and coordinated responses to
exploitive child labor, including the
unconditional worst forms of child
labor.
ii. Withdrawal or Prevention From
Exploitive Child Labor Through Direct
Educational Services and Other Project
Interventions
Projects funded under this
Cooperative Agreement solicitation
must provide for the long-term
withdrawal of children from, and
prevention of children from entering,
exploitive child labor through the
provision of direct educational services.
USDOL recognizes that the provision of
direct educational services alone may in
some cases be insufficient to ensure the
complete or sustained withdrawal of
children from exploitive child labor. For
this reason, Applicants are also
encouraged to propose other project
interventions as part of a package of
services for direct beneficiaries.
Applicants are encouraged to be creative
in proposing comprehensive costeffective interventions that will have a
demonstrable impact in eliminating
exploitive child labor and promoting
direct beneficiaries’ enrollment,
retention in, and completion of direct
educational services in the geographic
areas and/or sectors in which children
are engaged in, or at-risk of engaging in,
exploitive child labor. Applicants
should address low rates of school
enrollment; availability of and access to
direct educational services, particularly
in rural areas; and the quality of such
educational services. Applicants should
develop strategies to increase the
perceived relevance of education and
training for children engaged in, or atrisk of engaging in, exploitive labor,
their families and their communities
with an aim toward increasing school
enrollment. Applicants should also
address the unique barriers to education
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32871
for girls, particularly in rural areas, and
incorporate these into the proposed
interventions. Applicants may propose
solutions for education delivery, such as
non-formal schools, including multigrade programs in rural areas where
formal schools may be unavailable,
especially at the secondary level.
Projects may also support professional
training for teachers and provide
incentives to children, such as books
and uniforms, in-school feeding
programs, school supplies, and
transportation assistance to remove
educational barriers.
For individual target countries,
Applicants must demonstrate
knowledge of the school calendar and
the requirements of basic, non-formal,
and vocational education systems;
develop an approach that successfully
enrolls children in educational
programs with minimal delay and
without missing an academic year or
program cycle; and address the noneducation factors contributing to
children’s involvement in or risk of
entering exploitive labor. If cultural
traditions and norms impact decisions
about schooling, Applicants must show
how education programs would be
sensitive and responsive to these
traditions, particularly as they relate to
girls’ education.
Please Note: For the purposes of GPRA,
enrollment in a direct educational service is
not the sole criterion that defines a child as
withdrawn from exploitive child labor. For
example, a child who attends a USDOLsupported non-formal education program in
the morning and works under hazardous
conditions in mining during the afternoon
and evening should not be counted as
withdrawn or prevented from exploitive child
labor. That is, if before program intervention,
a child is not going to school and is working
in a worst form of child labor, and, after
program intervention, the child is now
enrolled in school but continues to work in
a worst form of child labor, then that child
is not, by definition, withdrawn from
exploitive child labor and should not be
counted in the withdrawn/prevented
indicator. The process of withdrawing a child
from exploitive child labor may take some
time. Children should only be counted as
withdrawn at the point at which the child is
no longer working in exploitive child labor
(this includes no longer working at all or
working under improved working conditions
such as shorter hours and/or safer
conditions) and is benefiting from the
education and/or training program(s)
provided by the USDOL-funded project. For
more information on GPRA, see section I.1
Background: USDOL Support for the Global
Elimination of Exploitive Child Labor.
iii. Clear and Specific Outcomes
Within the countries identified in this
solicitation, the Applicant must identify
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32872
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
the geographic areas and/or sectors of
greatest need, and establish (1) the
number of children that the project is
targeting for withdrawal from exploitive
child labor, and (2) the number of
children the project is targeting for
prevention from exploitive child labor
through the provision of direct
educational services and other project
interventions. Applicants must use the
definitions provided in Appendix A
when establishing these targets.
Applicants’ strategies should address
the specific and contextual factors that
contribute to children engaging in
exploitive labor and the barriers to
education that they face in target
countries. Brief background information
on these issues for the target countries
is provided in section I.3.B. CountrySpecific Requirements. Applicants must
be able to identify the specific needs of
proposed direct beneficiaries in order to
ensure (1) their long-term withdrawal or
prevention from exploitive child labor;
(2) their involvement in acceptable
work—which for direct beneficiaries of
legal working age, may be accomplished
through a reduction in the number of
hours worked and/or improvement(s) in
their working conditions in accordance
with national labor laws and
international standards, such as ILO
Conventions 138 and 182; and (3) their
enrollment, retention in, and
completion of a relevant direct
educational service.
Expected outcomes/results of the
project include: (1) Reducing the
number of children engaged in, or atrisk of entering, exploitive child labor;
(2) increasing and/or improving
educational opportunities for children
who are engaged in, or at-risk of
entering, exploitive child labor,
particularly the worst forms of child
labor; (3) ensuring direct beneficiaries’
enrollment, retention in, and
completion of direct educational
services; (4) facilitating the successful
transition of direct beneficiaries from
non-formal education programs into
formal schools, vocational programs, or
acceptable work; and (5) ensuring the
sustainable, long-term withdrawal and
prevention of direct beneficiaries from
exploitive child labor.
iv. Collaboration and Leveraging
Resources
Due to the limited resources available
under this award, Applicants are
expected to implement programs that
complement existing efforts and, where
appropriate, replicate or enhance
successful models to serve a greater
number of children and communities. In
order to avoid duplication, enhance
collaboration, expand impact, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
develop synergies, the Grantee must
work cooperatively with national
stakeholders in developing project
interventions, including the Ministries
of Labor, Education, and other relevant
ministries or government bodies.
Applicants are encouraged to work with
other key stakeholders, including
international organizations;
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs);
national steering/advisory committees
on child labor and education; faith and
community-based organizations; trade
unions, employers’ and teachers’
organizations; and children engaged in
exploitive child labor and their families.
Furthermore, Applicants are strongly
encouraged to collaborate with existing
projects, particularly those funded by
USDOL, including other EI projects,
Timebound Projects of Support (TBP)
and other projects implemented by ILO–
IPEC. For additional information on
collaboration, see section VIII.1.
Applicants are encouraged to leverage
project resources by collaborating with
entities engaged in efforts that could
contribute to the elimination of
exploitive child labor, including efforts
that promote children’s access to
educational and training opportunities
and that address poverty—a major factor
that increases the likelihood that
children will engage in exploitive child
labor. Applicants are also encouraged to
secure concrete commitments from
business entities and individual
business leaders to engage in
partnerships to reduce child labor and
increase educational opportunities for
direct beneficiaries. Ideas for business
involvement could include, but are not
limited to the following: scholarships,
donations of goods, mentoring and
volunteering by employees, assistance
in awareness raising, provision of
internships for children/youth and/or
teachers during vacation periods that
would help them improve leadership
and other skills for implementing
programs to address exploitive child
labor. Please note that applications that
propose non-U.S. Federal Government
resources that significantly expand the
dollar amount, size, and scope of the
project, in the form of matching funds
or other cost sharing arrangements, are
eligible for up to five (5) extra points, as
discussed in section V.1.F. However,
Applicants must not duplicate the
activities of existing efforts and/or
projects and are expected to work
within host government child labor and
education frameworks and priorities.
Applicants are advised that there are
specific requirements associated with
proposing matching funds and cost
sharing arrangements, outlined in
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section III.3, which do not apply to
leveraged resources.
Note to Applicants: USDOL has notified
host government ministry officials of the
proposed project. During the preparation of
an application for this Cooperative
Agreement solicitation, Applicants are
encouraged to discuss proposed
interventions, strategies, and activities with
host government officials and other key
stakeholders noted above.
v. Sustainability
USDOL considers the issue of
sustainability to be of paramount
importance and recognizes that
questions of sustainability must be
addressed at all stages, including project
design, implementation, and evaluation.
From their inception, project strategies
should foster sustainability. To USDOL,
sustainability is linked to project impact
and the ability of individuals,
communities, and a nation to ensure
that the activities or changes
implemented by a project endure. A
project’s impact is manifested at the
level of individuals, organizations, and
systems. For individual children and
their families, this would mean a
positive and enduring change in their
life conditions as a result of project
interventions. At the level of
organizations and systems, sustained
impact would involve continued
commitment and ability (including
financial commitment and policy
change) by project partners to continue
the actions generated by the project,
including enforcement of existing
policies that target child labor and
schooling. Applicants are encouraged to
develop approaches that support child
and youth participation in project efforts
to eliminate the worst forms of child
labor. Applicants are encouraged to
identify local organizations in the target
country, including type of local
organizations (e.g., NGO, communitybased, rural, indigenous), which could
potentially implement or contribute to a
future project. In addition, as child labor
elimination projects tend to be
implemented in resource-poor
environments where government
education and labor inspection systems
may be limited, Applicants are
encouraged to work with local
stakeholders to develop sustainable
child labor and education monitoring
systems, including community-based
systems, that can complement
government efforts to monitor children’s
work and educational status beyond the
life of the project and enforce the
country’s child labor and education
laws.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
B. Country-Specific Requirements
Combating Exploitive Child Labor
Through Education in Bolivia
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
i. Background
Bolivia is a country with numerous
socio-economic disparities and
challenges, particularly for members of
indigenous groups who, according to
the 2001 Census, constitute
approximately 62 percent of the
population. Bolivia has one of the
highest rates of poverty and child labor
in the Americas, with over 23 percent of
children ages 7 to 14 years working in
2002. Bolivia’s socio-economic
challenges are made more acute by
natural disasters such as the recent
severe flooding and resulting
humanitarian crisis in the Departments
of Santa Cruz, Beni and Cochabamba.
Bolivian children work in agriculture,
including in the production of sugar
cane and Brazil nuts in Santa Cruz,
Beni, and Pando. In cities such as
Oruro, Potosi, and La Paz, children are
engaged in activities such as begging,
street vending, shining shoes, and
assisting transport operators. Children
work in industry, construction, small
businesses, hotels and restaurants, and
traditional small-scale mining. In the
valleys, children smuggle goods and
traffic drugs. The commercial sexual
exploitation of children (CSEC) is a
problem in Bolivia, particularly in the
Chapare region and in urban areas. A
study sponsored by the International
Organization for Migration (IOM) and
the Organization for American States
(OAS) of urban centers in Bolivia found
commercial sexual exploitation of girls
from Argentina, Paraguay, Brazil, Chile,
and Colombia. In some cases,
indigenous girls are brought or sent by
their parents from rural to urban areas
to work as domestic servants for higherincome families in exchange for
education, clothing, room, and board.
These girls often end up in situations
that amount to indentured servitude
and/or forced labor. Bolivian children
are trafficked internally for the purpose
of CSEC, agriculture and mining. In the
south of Bolivia, child labor has been
observed among debt-bonded, landless
families living on haciendas (large
farms).
In January and February 2007,
unprecedented rainfall totals nearing 3
times the annual average resulted in
severe flooding of the highlands and the
Amazon River, affecting, in particular,
the Departments of Santa Cruz, Beni,
and Cochabamba. Rural families
working in subsistence farming were
particularly hard hit, and it is likely that
the number of children at-risk of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
involvement in exploitive child labor
has risen in these areas as a result of the
flooding. This natural disaster caused
extreme damage to houses, crops, roads,
and other basic infrastructure including
schools, many of which closed down or
are being used as shelters for the
displaced. The disaster has also affected
the national debate on land reform and
autonomy at the regional, departmental
and municipal levels.
Bolivian law sets the minimum age
for employment at 14 years, except in
the case of apprenticeships. Children
ages 14 to 18 years must have the
permission of their parents or of
government authorities to work. The
law requires employers to grant
‘‘adolescent’’ workers time off to attend
school during normal school hours. The
1999 Child and Adolescent Code
defines ‘‘adolescents’’ as persons ages
12 to 18 years. The Ministry of Labor is
responsible for enforcing child labor
provisions in the formal sector, but only
employs 15 labor inspectors to work
throughout the country to enforce child
labor regulations and other labor issues.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
The Government of Bolivia’s policy
framework to address child labor is the
National Plan for the Progressive
Eradication of Child Labor (2000–2010).
A three-year sub-plan (2006–2008) to
combat child labor prioritizes the
elimination of the worst forms of child
labor, the development of national
policy against child labor, and interinstitutional and inter-ministerial
coordination. Although resources for
implementation have been limited, the
plan focuses on children working in the
mining, sugar cane, and urban sectors of
the country. A 2003 Domestic Worker’s
Law addresses some of the abuses
committed towards child domestic
workers. In 2005, the UN Committee on
the Rights of the Child identified
hazardous domestic work, the sugar
cane and mining industries, CSEC, and
the trafficking of children for CSEC and
other purposes, as the child labor
sectors in Bolivia that are in greatest
need of special attention. The Bolivian
Congress has approved reforms to
address CSEC, and has criminalized and
set penalties for all types of trafficking
in persons.
Bolivia also faces challenges in
providing education to its children and
youth under 18, who constitute 45
percent of the country’s population. The
Constitution of Bolivia establishes free
and compulsory primary education for
children, yet because of the high rate of
child labor and other education and
non-education system barriers, many
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32873
Bolivian children fall behind in their
education. In 2002, despite a high rate
of enrollment in primary schools, only
81 percent of students were likely to
reach grade 5. Although UNESCO
estimates a primary to secondary
transition rate of 91 percent in Bolivia,
UNICEF estimates that only 39 percent
of working children continue with their
schooling.
In order to facilitate children’s access
to social services such as health and
education, the Government of Bolivia is
working with UNICEF to provide free
birth and identity documents to the
estimated 12 percent of children ages
0–9 years who lack birth certificates. In
the past, the government instituted
programs to benefit both working
children and indigenous children,
including the development of a flexible
curriculum designed to keep working
children and adolescents in school by
offering night classes through the
Ministry of Education’s Vice-Ministry of
Alternative Education.
Bolivia’s 1994 education reform
program led to the creation of special
programs to train teachers in bilingual
instruction and publication of texts and
other teaching materials in indigenous
languages. There have been programs,
such as those implemented by UNICEF,
to improve educational infrastructure
and to increase the relevance and
learning of indigenous children through
intercultural bilingual education.
Currently, the Government of Bolivia
focuses on universal literacy, improving
access to basic education in rural areas,
and incorporating indigenous languages
and cultures into the school curricula.
In the past, the government also
supported previous USDOL-funded
programs to combat child labor in smallscale traditional mining in the Andean
region, and to improve access to and
quality of basic education. Given the
high rates of poverty and low levels of
involvement in schooling, children in
Bolivia, particularly indigenous
children, have historically been highly
vulnerable to exploitive forms of child
labor. The Government of Bolivia has
identified the importance of addressing
the issues of labor exploitation and
education reform. The government has
recently proposed an education reform
law that entails a curriculum change to
address historic exclusion and
discrimination of indigenous children,
embracing the linguistic diversity of
Bolivia’s Quechua, Aymara, and
Spanish-speaking populations.
The enforcement of these plans and
laws is challenging because of limited
resources, citizens’ lack of faith in the
justice system, corruption, a slow
judiciary system, and political divisions
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32874
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
and turmoil. The OAS Justice Center of
the Americas notes that those who
suffer most from this legal situation are
the poor indigenous population and
workers in the informal economy.
iii. Scope of Work
Taking into account the challenging
implementing environment in Bolivia
and the current government’s attention
and priority to the unmet needs of the
most disadvantaged sectors of the
population, Applicants must propose a
creative and innovative approach to
address the challenges of reintegrating
and educating children who have been
engaged in the worst forms of child
labor. Applicants must also take into
account any cross-cutting themes
(discussed below) that could affect
project results in Bolivia and
meaningfully incorporate them into the
proposed strategy, either to increase
opportunities for, or reduce obstacles to,
successful implementation.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
In support of the National Plan for the
Progressive Eradication of Child Labor
(2000–2010), Applicants are encouraged
to target children working under
hazardous and/or exploitive conditions
in urban domestic service, agriculture,
mining, and CSEC. Applicants should
pay special attention to children who
may have been trafficked for exploitive
labor and/or engaged in forced labor.
Applicants may identify other target
sectors where children are at-risk or
involved in other worst forms of child
labor, but should provide a convincing
justification for inclusion of such target
sectors. Since indigenous children are
the largest population involved in the
worst forms of child labor, the project
should pay special attention to their
needs and provide a large share of
benefits to these children. Given the
recent humanitarian assistance needs in
the Departments of Santa Cruz, Beni,
and Cochabamba, Applicants may
choose to focus on child labor issues
that existed prior to, and/or may have
been exacerbated by, the severe flooding
in these areas.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Applicants should support the
Government of Bolivia’s policy
framework to address child labor, the
National Plan for the Progressive
Eradication of Child Labor 2000–2010,
and consider the three-year sub-plan
(2006–2008) that focuses on children
working in the mining, sugar cane, and
urban sectors of the country. If focusing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
on domestic service, or CSEC and
trafficking, Applicants should work to
strengthen the implementation and
enforcement of recent legal reforms in
these areas of domestic workers and the
commercial sexual exploitation of
minors. If working in areas of the recent
floods, Applicants should coordinate
with other donors providing assistance,
and complement rather than duplicate
existing efforts.
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
Bolivia has experienced recurrent
political and economic unrest and
instability, which has an impact on the
implementation of development
projects. The government has
committed itself to deep political,
economic and social transformations,
and the country is engaged in intense
debate on themes including cultural
identity, education reform, judicial
reform, land reform, and
decentralization and political
autonomy. Furthermore, the severe
flooding in January and February 2007
has had a major impact in the highlands
and the Amazon River, affecting, in
particular, the Departments of Santa
Cruz, Beni, and Cochabamba, and rural
families working in subsistence farming
in these areas. Applicants should
consider how these factors might affect
the project in the geographic areas
where the project would be
implemented and propose a design that
would contribute to mitigating the
effects of these factors.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants must propose a strategy
for strengthening the capacity of
Bolivian government and civil society
organizations to identify and assist
children engaged in or at-risk of
exploitive labor, particularly the worst
forms of child labor. The complexity of
the issue of child labor requires interinstitutional coordination among many
public and private agencies and
institutions. Applicants should identify
how the project will productively
engage existing public and private
service programs in the intervention
area(s) to ensure that project goals will
be met, and project efforts will become
sustainable. Evaluations of USDOL
projects in the Andean region have
noted incidents of weak local
organizational capacity and recurring
social unrest (e.g., strikes,
demonstrations, work-stoppages, road
closures). Applicants should indicate to
what extent these challenges might be
significant in the areas where the project
would be implemented, how they
would be addressed, and how
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
relationships between indigenous and
non-indigenous organizations working
for the benefit of children, leaders, and
groups could be promoted to address
the problem of exploitive child labor.
Given the current debates in Bolivia on
decentralization and autonomy at the
regional, departmental and municipal
levels, Applicants should also consider
how this could lead to changes that
might affect implementation of the
project, and focus on building capacity
to promote sustainability.
Since indigenous children represent
the largest population involved in
exploitive child labor, it is likely that
they will constitute a significant
proportion of the direct beneficiaries
served by this project. Given the current
priorities of the government to provide
programs to the benefit of these groups,
Applicants should demonstrate
considerable knowledge of Bolivian
indigenous culture and movements and
indigenous values regarding education
and child labor. This knowledge should
be incorporated into the project design
to ensure ownership and involvement of
indigenous groups. Applicants must
develop a strategy that will increase the
relevance of education for indigenous
children, their parents, and the urban,
rural, and/or peri-urban communities
where they live. Applicants should
develop a program that can operate in
the context of the government’s
emphasis on the use of indigenous
languages and culture as part of the
larger education and curricula reform
efforts. Applicants should also identify
and address additional social, cultural,
or other factors that should be taken into
account in designing the project. In no
way, however, should project strategies
exclude or marginalize non-indigenous
children who could also qualify as
direct beneficiaries of this project.
Combating the Worst Forms of Child
Labor in Cambodia
i. Background
After decades of violence and armed
conflict, the Government of Cambodia
has experienced positive economic
growth since 1999 due in large part to
its resilient garment export sector and
growing tourism industry. The longterm development challenges for
Cambodia will be to encourage rural
development and build basic
infrastructure; bridge the income gap
among citizens; improve access to and
quality of education; and increase
economic growth that spurs job
creation, in light of the country’s
demographic transition. At least 50
percent of the population is under 21
years old, with many children and
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
youth lacking appropriate education and
productive skills.
Key to accomplishing Cambodia’s
development goals will be to remove
and prevent children from the worst
forms of child labor, especially
hazardous work in agriculture. Children
begin working at a very young age, some
as early as age six, with many dropping
out of school to work exclusively.
According to the Understanding
Children’s Work (UCW) Project,
approximately 45 percent of children
ages 5 to 14 years were found working
in 2001. The majority of working
children were found in the rural
agricultural sector (76.5 percent),
followed by services (17.7 percent),
manufacturing (4.9 percent) and other
sectors (0.9 percent). Economically
active children in Cambodia work an
average of 22 hours per week, which
increases to 31 hours when household
chores are taken into account. NonKhmer children, such as Vietnamese
migrant children, are more likely to be
working than Khmer children.
Child labor is most prevalent and
severe in three provinces: Banteay
Meanchey, Prey Veng and Siem Reap.
However, other provinces such as Otdar
Meanchey Cham, Phnom Penh, Kandal,
and Takeo also show high prevalence
rates. Working children facing the most
obstacles to schooling and greatest risk
of dropping out are in Kaoh Long,
Mondol Kiri, and Preah Vihear.
Children most at-risk of being trafficked
to urban areas in Cambodia or outside
the country live in the rural districts of
Kompong Cham, Battambang, Svey
Rieng, Prey Veng, Kandal, and Takeo.
Hazardous work by children occurs in
both rural and urban areas, and includes
work on commercial rubber plantations,
in salt production, fish processing,
portering, brick-making, and garbagepicking. Children also work in
restaurants and in handicrafts and
related industries. Street children
engage in scavenging, begging, and shoe
polishing. Children, primarily girls, also
work in domestic service. Most girls
working as child domestic workers are
14 to 17 years of age, though it is not
uncommon to find girls as young as 8
or 9 years of age. Many child domestic
workers typically work 12 to 16 hours
a day, 7 days a week, preventing them
from going to school and learning
productive skills.
Children are also involved in other
worst forms of child labor. Certain
provinces of the country have higher
incidence of the worst forms of child
labor, based on their geographic
characteristics, proximity to borders,
levels of poverty, etc. Areas designated
as Special Economic Zones may attract
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
workers, including child workers, and
increase migrant flows and
vulnerability. There have been
documented patterns of children
migrating to large cities for work, only
to find themselves in various forms of
exploitive or abusive labor. The
commercial sexual exploitation of
children (CSEC) is a problem in
Cambodia. Cambodia is reported to be a
country of origin, transit, and
destination for trafficking in children for
the purposes of CSEC as well as various
forms of work, including forced labor
and begging. Internationally,
Vietnamese children are trafficked into
Cambodia for CSEC and forced labor
and Cambodian children are trafficked
to Thailand and Vietnam.
Although Cambodia abolished school
fees in 2001, the prohibitive costs of
schooling (i.e., school supplies,
uniforms); poor quality and relevance of
education (i.e., limited availability of
instructional materials, shortage of
trained and motivated teachers); and
inadequate access to schools (i.e.,
distance/transportation, primary schools
lacking full range of grades, no
secondary schools in many
communities) contribute to children
entering into exploitive labor,
particularly in rural areas. School
enrollment in the rural areas continues
to lag behind urban areas. Only about 20
percent of rural children receive
education in grades 7–9, and rural girls
are 47 percent less likely to receive an
education than boys. As of 2003, 60
percent of children who started primary
school were likely to reach grade 5. The
situation is compounded by a shortage
of non-formal schools and literacy
programs in rural areas.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
A number of efforts are currently
being undertaken by the Government of
Cambodia, international organizations,
and nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs) to directly address exploitive
child labor in Cambodia, as well as the
underlying causes of child labor such as
poverty and lack of resources. In 2006,
the Government of Cambodia ratified
both ILO Convention 182 on the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor and the United Nations Protocol
to Prevent, Suppress and Punish
Trafficking in Persons, especially
Women and Children. The government
has drafted a National Plan of Action for
the Elimination of the Worst Forms of
Child Labor, and has set time-bound
targets for reducing the proportion of
children engaging in the worst forms of
child labor by 2015. The National
Steering Committee on Child Labor was
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32875
reconstituted in September 2006 to
guide the country’s efforts toward
eliminating child labor under the
National Plan of Action for the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor. Child labor was included as a
priority issue in the first two-year
Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Labour
and Vocational Training for 2007–08. In
addition, child labor concerns have
been incorporated into the government’s
major development frameworks,
including the National Strategic
Development Plan (NSDP) 2006–2010
and the Education Strategic Plan (ESP)
2006–2010.
In addition to the unconditional worst
forms of child labor identified under
ILO Convention 182, the government
has drafted a ministerial order, known
as a Prakas, identifying 16 other
categories of worst forms of child labor
to be targeted for elimination. They are:
Portering; domestic service; waste
scavenging/rubbish picking; work in
rubber and tobacco plantations; fishing;
work in agricultural plantations; brick
making; salt production; handicrafts;
processing sea products; stone and
granite breaking; quarrying; coal mining;
restaurant work; and begging. The
Ministry of Labour and Vocational
Training has the primary responsibility
for enforcement of child labor laws and
regulations. Cambodia’s Labor Law
defines 15 as the minimum age for work
(18 for hazardous work), although
children between 12 and 15 may do
light, non-hazardous work that does not
prevent regular attendance at school or
other training programs. Employers who
violate the law may be fined 31 to 60
days of the base daily wage. The Labor
Law prohibits work that is hazardous to
the mental and physical development of
children under age 18 and prohibits all
forced or compulsory labor, including in
agriculture and domestic work.
However, the Labor Law currently
applies only to the formal sector, while
child labor exists mostly in the informal
sector.
Addressing trafficking in persons is a
priority for the Government of
Cambodia, which drafted a National
Plan of Action Against Trafficking in
Persons and Sexual Exploitation 2005–
2009. The National Plan of Action
Against Trafficking in Persons and
Sexual Exploitation expands the scope
of a previous plan to include trafficking
for both sexual and labor exploitation
purposes. Along with Burma, Laos, the
People’s Republic of China, Thailand,
and Vietnam, Cambodia is signatory to
the ‘‘Coordinated Mekong Ministerial
Initiative against Trafficking
(COMMIT).’’
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
32876
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
Cambodia is currently participating in
several USDOL-funded projects
designed to combat exploitive child
labor and provide educational
opportunities for children. The
‘‘Support to the Cambodian National
Plan of Action on the Elimination of the
Worst Forms of Child Labor: A
Timebound Approach,’’ implemented
by ILO-IPEC, aims to withdraw 4,260
and prevent 5,650 children from
working in exploitive conditions in
several sectors: Brick-making
(Shanoukville, Siem Riep, Kampong
Cham); portering (Banteay Meancheay);
rubber-making (Kampong Cham);
domestic service (Phnom Penh); salt
production (Kampot and Kep); fish
processing (Shanoukville, Kampot,
Kep); services such as hotel work,
restaurant work, and beer promotion
(Siem Riep and Phnom Penh); and
trafficking (Shanoukville, Banteay
Meancheay, Prey Veng). In addition, the
project is building a robust enabling
environment for the development and
implementation of policies and
programs on child labor and increasing
the knowledge and capacity of the
government and stakeholders on child
labor.
USDOL is currently funding three
child labor and education projects in
Cambodia, implemented by Hagar
International, World Education, and
Winrock International. The Hagar
International project assists trafficked
women and children by providing
temporary shelter, rehabilitative and
counseling services, literacy and
vocational training classes, and
assistance with reintegration into their
communities of origin or new
communities. The World Education
project works in Prey Veng, Kompong
Cham, Banteay Meanchay, and Phnom
Penh to reduce the number of children
trafficked and/or involved in CSEC and
domestic labor. As of September 2006,
the project had prevented 15,749
children from being trafficked through
provision of educational and other
services. Cambodia is also part of
CIRCLE, a global project implemented
by Winrock International and funded by
USDOL that aims to reduce the
engagement of children in the worst
forms of child labor by funding smallscale projects carried out by
community-based organizations.
CIRCLE project strategies in Cambodia
have included awareness-raising among
children at high risk of dropping out of
school, and strengthening education
systems to better serve children who
have been trafficked and/or involved in
CSEC, out-of-school youth, and child
migrants. In addition, external funding
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
to target poverty reduction, increase
access to basic services, and strengthen
institutions from partners such as the
World Bank, the Asian Development
Bank, and several other UN agencies
continues to support programs in
Cambodia.
iii. Scope of Work
Applicants should design a creative
project strategy to build partnerships to
combat exploitive child labor and
improve education for children engaged
in, or at-risk of entering, exploitive
labor, taking into account the socioeconomic conditions in Cambodia.
Applicants must also take any crosscutting themes (discussed below) into
account that could affect project results
in Cambodia and meaningfully
incorporate them into the proposed
strategy, either to increase opportunities
for, or to reduce obstacles to, successful
implementation.
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
The Government of Cambodia has
identified priority sectors for attention
under its draft National Plan of Action
for the Elimination of the Worst Forms
of Child Labor. In line with the draft
National Plan of Action for the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor, USDOL has identified hazardous
child labor in agriculture as the primary
sector of focus for this project.
Specifically, Applicants should
prioritize children engaged in
hazardous work on commercial farms
and subsistence agriculture, where
children’s work prevents them from
going to school, exposes them to
harmful chemicals, and places them at
risk of injury from heavy loads,
agricultural tools, or machinery.
Specific sub-sectors within agriculture
should be clearly identified by
Applicants. Applicants should also
propose additional sectors of focus that
are in accordance with the draft
National Plan of Action for the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor and can include but are not
limited to, mining, CSEC, scavenging/
garbage picking, brick making,
portering, stone quarrying/breaking,
fishing, begging, work in restaurants,
hotels, and karaoke bars, and domestic
service. A convincing justification must
be included for selection of target
sectors, and justifications should clearly
demonstrate knowledge of existing
interventions in those sectors and how
the proposed project will build off of or
complement existing or past
interventions.
In determining provincial targets,
Applicants should take into
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
consideration priority areas outlined in
the draft National Plan of Action for the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor, as well as the location of current
USDOL-funded activities and ensure
that efforts are not duplicated and that
efforts/resources are leveraged where
possible. At a minimum, Applicants
should propose four provinces for
project interventions and provide a clear
justification for choices. Applicants are
encouraged to target populations that
are particularly disadvantaged, such as
girls.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Applicants should demonstrate a
thorough knowledge of ongoing and
previously piloted interventions and
good practices to eliminate child labor
in Cambodia and the Mekong region, at
the local, national and regional levels.
Proposals should support and/or build
upon the efforts of past and existing
projects to withdraw children from, and
prevent children from entering, the
worst forms of child labor in agricultural
and other sectors in rural areas;
children’s involvement in prostitution
and begging in urban areas; as well as
the trafficking of children for exploitive
labor, without duplicating ongoing or
previous efforts. Interventions and
activities should support the
government’s National Plan of Action
for the Elimination of the Worst Forms
of Child Labor. At minimum,
collaborations should take place with
the MOLVT; the Ministry of Social
Affairs; Veterans and Youth
Rehabilitation (MOSAVY); the Ministry
of Education, Youth, and Sport
(MOEYS); the National Steering
Committee; provincial and local-level
government officials; ILO-IPEC; World
Education; United Nations agencies and
other International Organizations
working in Cambodia; the Civil Society
Network Against Child Labor; and other
NGO’s and local groups working on
child welfare and social service
provision.
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
Over the past decade, Cambodia’s
economic growth has improved, but its
history of conflict and resulting negative
socio-economic effects have left the
country with significant development
challenges that must be considered
when designing project interventions.
Applicants should consider the specific
challenges of a lack of basic rural
infrastructure; low capacity of civil
society and governmental institutions;
lack of access to quality and relevant
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
education, especially in rural areas; and
the lack of a skilled workforce. In
addition, Cambodia is a country of
origin, transit, and destination for
trafficking in persons. Given children’s
vulnerability to being trafficked due to
lack of economic resources, lack of
education, and migration patterns in the
region, internal and cross-border
trafficking of children should be
addressed in the application. However,
the primary focus of the project should
not be on trafficking; rather, trafficking
should be addressed within the overall
context or as a project component.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants must propose a strategy
that supports the government’s National
Plan of Action for the Elimination of the
Worst Forms of Child Labor and
contributes toward Cambodia’s targets
for reducing the incidence of the worst
forms of child labor by 2015. In order
to address the inadequacies of the
current education system, the proposed
strategy should assist in increasing the
capacity of the Ministry of Education
offices nationally and in target
provinces to ensure improved service
delivery, increased budgetary
commitments and management, and
awareness of child labor. Service
delivery and management should be
further enhanced in both the formal and
non-formal system through teacher and
administrator trainings and other
approaches as proposed by the
Applicant. Given the lack of alternatives
to formal schooling in rural areas, the
Applicant must also design a strategy to
assist children who are not able or are
unwilling to attend formal school, by
providing access to non-formal
education and vocational training. If
cultural traditions and norms impact
decisions about schooling, Applicants
must show how education programs
would be sensitive and responsive to
these traditions, particularly as they
relate to girls’ education.
Enforcement of existing labor laws is
inadequate in Cambodia. To address
this issue, Applicants should propose a
strategy for increasing the capacity of
labor inspectors on enforcement of legal
provisions relating to child labor in the
formal workplace, and contribute to
ongoing efforts to expand legislation to
cover children working in the informal
sector. This strategy should demonstrate
how efforts would be coordinated with,
and complementary of, existing efforts
of the ILO–IPEC-supported Timebound
Program and the government’s National
Plan of Action for the Elimination of the
Worst Forms of Child Labor. In
addition, Applicants should design
activities to support the government in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
its review of its current list of hazardous
child labor and finalization of the new
list, efforts to raise awareness of the list,
and improve compliance and
enforcement of regulations surrounding
the list.
There is a lack of systematic and
reliable data on the unconditional worst
forms of child labor in Cambodia. These
forms of child labor are often culturally
sensitive and/or illicit, making
information difficult to gather.
Applicants are encouraged to conduct
small-scale research projects and
disseminate findings on the
unconditional worst forms of child labor
in Cambodia, especially on products
made from exploitive child labor or
forced labor. This information should
also be used in formulating more
targeted and coordinated responses.
Project of Support to the Colombia
Timebound Program on the Elimination
of the Worst Forms of Child Labor
i. Background
In Colombia, 10.4 percent of children
ages 5 to 14 years were found working
in 2001. The majority of working
children were found in the services
sector (49.9 percent), followed by
agriculture (35.6 percent), and
manufacturing (12.6 percent).
Approximately 14.1 percent of all boys
5 to 14 were working compared to 6.6
percent of girls in the same age group.
Children mine and process emeralds,
gold, clay, and coal under dangerous
conditions. Some work in aspects of the
illegal drug trade, such as harvesting
coca. Child labor is also a problem in
the informal sector, where children
work in agriculture, commerce,
industry, and services. Many girls work
in domestic service.
Child pornography and commercial
sexual exploitation of children (CSEC),
including prostitution and sexual
tourism, are reported in Cartagena and
at resorts on the Caribbean Coast.
Colombia is a major source of girls
trafficked for the purpose of CSEC.
Children are trafficked internally from
rural to urban areas for sexual
exploitation, and are also trafficked
abroad. Children in Colombia are also
recruited, sometimes forcibly, by
insurgent and paramilitary groups to
serve as combatants in the country’s
ongoing conflict.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
There are a number of efforts by the
Government of Colombia, international
organizations, and nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) to address
exploitive child labor. The Government
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32877
of Colombia’s policy framework to
address child labor has been the
National Plan for the Elimination of
Child Labor and the Protection of
Working Youth (2003–2006). The
government and other relevant actors
are drafting a new national plan, which
has not yet been officially approved.
In November of 2006, a new legal
framework was put into effect, the
Childhood and Adolescence Code,
which replaces most all provisions of
the 1989 Minor’s Code, and includes
provisions related to child labor. The
2006 Code establishes the government’s
obligation to eliminate the worst forms
of child labor. The Ministry of Social
Protection (MSP) is responsible for
enforcing child labor laws in the formal
sector and protecting adolescent
workers authorized by the government
to work. Labor can only be performed by
those under the legal working age of 14
under special circumstances. Various
legal provisions regulate the conditions
under which minors may work to
ensure that their education is not
compromised. Employers must enroll 12
to 17 year olds who have not completed
basic education in school and allow
them sufficient time to pursue their
studies. Schools must report cases to
authorities in which children are
involved in the worst forms of child
labor. The National Police is also
responsible for detecting and
investigating these cases.
Other important policy frameworks
and legal instruments that address
exploitive child labor in Colombia
include the National Plan of Action for
the Prevention and Eradication of
Commercial Sexual Exploitation of
Boys, Girls, and Adolescents Below 18
Years of Age (2006–2011), and
Colombia’s Ten-Year Plan for Children
(2004–2015). A Ministry of Social
Protection Resolution prohibiting
children under 18 from certain forms of
dangerous work was published in
December 2005. In compliance with
Colombia’s ratification in 2005 of ILO
Convention 182 on the Worst Forms of
Child Labor, the law prohibits those
under age 18 from the worst forms of
child labor.
The Government of Colombia
participates in several programs to
eliminate exploitive child labor that are
funded by international organizations
and foreign governments including the
United States. These programs include a
USDOL-funded project implemented by
World Vision to withdraw and prevent
children from exploitive labor in the
municipalities of Funza and Madrid.
Colombia also participates in a regional
project in four South American
countries to withdraw and prevent
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
32878
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
children from CSEC and child domestic
labor, and was part of a global project
on child soldiers, both funded by
USDOL and implemented by ILO–IPEC.
Another ILO–IPEC project, funded by
the Canadian government, aims to
improve national, regional, and
municipal government cooperation to
address child labor.
Various Colombian government
entities carry out activities related to the
elimination of exploitive child labor.
The Colombian Family Welfare Institute
administers programs to provide
rehabilitation services to children who
have been recruited into armed groups,
children engaged in CSEC, and children
who live on the streets. The Colombian
Institute of Geology and Mining
implements a project with the United
Nations Development Program to
eliminate child labor in the mining
sector. Other ministries working in this
area are the Ministry of Social
Protection, the Ministry of
Communication, the Inter-institutional
Committee against Trafficking in
Persons, and the National Police.
The Government of Colombia
supports education and other programs
that may indirectly contribute to the
elimination of exploitive child labor.
The Ministry of Education’s Policy
Guide for Vulnerable Populations
includes strategies to address child
labor, and the Ministry of Defense
distributes educational kits to schools in
areas where children are at-risk for
recruitment into armed groups. Through
World Bank loans, the Government of
Colombia is working to improve
education in rural areas, and funds a
‘‘Families in Action’’ conditional cash
transfer program to encourage school
attendance. The government assists
needy families to pay for education
costs including books, supplies,
transportation, and other fees. The
World Food Program and the Colombian
government also operate a primary
school feeding program. The
government participates in, and makes
financial contributions to, a project
implemented by the International
Organization for Migration that provides
services to vulnerable groups, including
education and job-training for displaced
youth. This project is funded by the
United States Agency for International
Development and Italy. All of these
programs help to promote the retention
of children to grade 5 and beyond, since
education is compulsory in Colombia to
age 15. As of 2003, however, only 77
percent of students were likely to reach
grade 5.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
iii. Scope of Work
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
Applicants should identify target
sectors and specific beneficiary groups
in line with Colombia’s new National
Plan for the Elimination of Child Labor
and the Protection of Working Youth,
with a particular focus on sectors that
the government has identified as a
priority under a Timebound Program as
part of its commitment to implement
ILO Convention 182. Applicants may,
however, identify other sectors where
children are at-risk or involved in other
worst forms of child labor, but must
present a compelling reason for such a
choice. Since many Colombian children
are affected or displaced by conflict, the
project should pay special attention to
their needs.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Applicants should support
Colombia’s new National Plan for the
Elimination of Child Labor and the
Protection of Working Youth and sectors
that the government has identified as a
priority under a Timebound Program.
Since a Timebound Program is complex,
in addition to the Ministry of Labor, the
project should include coordination
with other ministries working in areas
related to combating exploitive child
labor and child protection, including
the Ministry of Social Protection, the
Ministry of Communication, the Interinstitutional Committee against
Trafficking in Persons, the Colombian
Family Welfare Institute, and the
National Police.
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
Colombia has endured more than 35
years of conflict by rival armed groups.
This conflict affects the implementing
environment in areas such as security
and the existence of a high number of
internally displaced persons with
reduced access to health care,
education, or employment. Displaced
persons are particularly vulnerable to
labor abuse and exploitation, including
the worst forms of child labor. Armed
groups also recruit and use children as
soldiers, and there has been a high
degree of violence against organized
labor. Applicants should consider to
what extent these challenges might
affect the project’s implementation.
Project strategies should account for the
continued conflict, and the relationship
between the armed conflict and
exploitive child labor. Changes in the
political environment, including those
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at the national, regional, and local level,
may also affect project implementation.
These changes may be a result of
elections or also of changes in policy
and personnel in cooperating
government agencies. Applicants should
design strategies that minimize
disruptions when such events occur.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants must propose approaches
that assist Colombia in developing and
implementing a Timebound Program to
eliminate the worst forms of child labor.
This program will assist the
Government of Colombia in fulfilling its
obligations under Articles 1 and 7 of
ILO Convention 182. Specifically, the
Applicant’s strategy should strengthen
the capacity of the Colombian
government and civil society
organizations to take immediate,
effective, and timebound measures to:
(a) Prevent the engagement of children
in the worst forms of child labor; (b)
provide the necessary and appropriate
direct assistance for the withdrawal of
children from the worst forms of child
labor and for their rehabilitation and
social integration; (c) ensure access to
free basic education, and, wherever
possible and appropriate, vocational
training, for all children removed from
the worst forms of child labor; (d)
identify and reach out to children at
special risk; and (e) take account of the
special situation of girls. In support of
a Timebound Program to Eliminate the
Worst Forms of Child Labor, the
Applicant’s proposal must focus both on
withdrawing and preventing children
from exploitive child labor through the
provision of direct educational services,
as well as improving country capacity to
address child labor, including the
policies and capacities of relevant
government and civil society
institutions. Timebound Programs to
Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child
Labor have been implemented in several
countries around the world. Lessons
learned from these Timebound
Programs should be used to improve the
design of a Timebound Program in
Colombia.
Applicants must also propose a
strategy to strengthen the ability of
Colombian government and civil society
organizations to improve relevant
policies and institutional capacity to
eliminate the worst forms of child labor.
In addition, Applicants should seek to
strengthen the capacity for interinstitutional coordination given that the
complexity of child labor issues requires
the collaboration of many public and
private institutions in what are
currently often disparate programs.
Applicants’ proposals should clearly
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
identify the institutions with which
they intend to conduct capacitybuilding activities; each organization’s
specific role in relation to the project’s
strategy of support to the Timebound
Program; the expected result of
technical assistance to be provided by
the Applicant; and the means through
which the organizations will receive
technical assistance (i.e., specified
number of trainings or consultancies).
These efforts could involve building
organizational capacity in the following
areas: To withdraw children from, and
prevent children from entering,
exploitive child labor; to plan,
implement, and monitor activities to
eliminate exploitive child labor; and to
identify and effectively respond to cases
of the worst forms of child labor. They
could also include improvements to
laws and law enforcement in an
environment of constrained resources
and ongoing armed conflict; to
education policies; to quality of service
provision to children and social support
for families; and to awareness raising.
Applicants should identify how the
project will productively engage
existing institutions such as Interinstitutional Committee for the
Eradication of Child Labor and the
Protection of Young Workers and the
Inter-institutional Committee against
Trafficking in Persons in the
intervention area(s) to ensure that
project goals will be met and project
efforts will become sustainable.
In their proposed strategy, Applicants
should demonstrate a thorough
knowledge of previous and on-going
interventions and good practices to
eliminate child labor in Colombia,
including those funded by USDOL,
those occurring as part of National Plans
for the Elimination of Child Labor and
the Protection of Working Youth, and
the National Plan of Action for the
Prevention and Eradication of
Commercial Sexual Exploitation of
Boys, Girls, and Adolescents Less than
18 Years of age. The proposal should
build upon the efforts of past and
current efforts to withdraw and prevent
children from engaging in exploitive
labor. Education strategies should take
into account successful existing
Colombian educational programs
including Accelerated Learning and
New Schools (Escuela Nueva). When
appropriate, Applicants should identify
intervention strategies that link direct
beneficiaries to these educational
services.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Promoting Education and Appropriate
Youth Employment in the Dominican
Republic Through Public-Private
Partnerships
i. Background
An economic crisis in 2003 led to
increased poverty rates throughout the
Dominican Republic, which has
disproportionately affected the poorest
segments of society, including children
and youth. In 2000, approximately 14.5
percent of children between the ages of
5 and 14 years were working in the
country, as compared to 5.9 percent in
Costa Rica, 9.2 percent in Honduras,
10.2 percent in El Salvador, 10.9 percent
in Nicaragua, and 16.1 percent in
Guatemala. In the Dominican Republic,
approximately 21.6 percent were boys
ages 5 to 14 were working as compared
to 7.3 percent of girls in the same age
group. The Government of the
Dominican Republic estimates that 41
percent of working children ages 5 to 17
work in services, 21 percent in
commerce, 19 percent in agriculture,
and 11 percent in manufacturing
industries. Most work performed by
children takes place in the informal
sector. In urban areas children work in
the streets, markets, garbage dumps, and
repair shops. They wash cars, shine
shoes, and carry heavy loads. Many
urban child workers are migrants from
other regions. Children also work as
domestic servants in third-party homes.
In rural areas, children work mostly in
agriculture and services, and most child
agricultural workers are boys. Haitian
and Dominican children plant and cut
sugar cane. Child labor has been found
to be a problem in Haitian sugar cane
worker villages, or ‘‘bateyes’’ that lack
basic services such as water, electricity,
and schools.
The Dominican Republic is also a
source, transit, and destination country
for children trafficked for the purposes
of commercial sexual exploitation
(CSEC) and forced labor. Children are
trafficked internally from rural to urban
and tourist areas where CSEC is a
problem, especially in Boca Chica,
´
Puerto Plata, and Sosua. Haitian
children are trafficked to the Dominican
Republic for work in the streets, in
agriculture, and also for the purpose of
CSEC. Children, particularly Haitian
children, are sometimes ‘‘adopted’’ by
families who register the child as their
own and provide some form of payment
to the birthparents. Such children are
often exploited as domestic workers or
as workers in family businesses.
Although education is free and
compulsory to age 14, nearly half of all
Dominican children do not complete
school through the primary level, and at
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32879
the secondary level, 50 percent of
students are over age, and up to 20
percent are 3 or more years behind their
cohorts. High repetition rates contribute
to school abandonment and, in rural
areas, barely 50 percent of schools go
beyond the fourth grade. More than 50
percent of rural schools operate on a
multi-grade system.
The Government of the Dominican
Republic defines ‘‘youth’’ as individuals
between the ages of 15 and 35 years.
Article 15 of the General Youth Law
focuses on promoting the successful
integration of youth into the job market
and the Ministry of youth, under the
direction of the Administrative
Secretariat of the Presidency, works to
promote the development and societal
integration of Dominican youth to allow
them to contribute to national welfare.
The economic crisis has contributed to
increased school drop-out rates, an
increase in the number of youth who
resort to crime, violence, and gang
activity, and high rates of youth underand unemployment. The unemployment
rate for youth ages 15 through 24 years
is 31 percent, nearly double that of the
average population (17 percent). Many
adolescents of legal working age (14
years) with low school attainment and
few marketable skills find work in the
informal sector and work under
hazardous conditions, receiving much
lower pay than work in the formal
sector would offer.
In addition, the traditional vocational
and skills training institutions have only
been partially accessible to low-skilled
youth with low levels of education, and
a significant number of youth who do
not have official identity documentation
are not allowed to participate in
national training programs. Many of
these youth lack the information
necessary to help them obtain the
required documentation.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
In 2005, the Dominican Congress
signed the Central American Free Trade
Agreement (CAFTA) which commits the
government to labor provisions,
including the elimination of the worst
forms of child labor. In 2006, the
government launched a National Plan to
Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child
Labor (2006–2016). The Secretariat of
Labor (SET), in coordination with the
National Council for Children and
Adolescents (CONANI), is responsible
for protecting minors against labor
exploitation. The SET operates
provincial and municipal committees
on child labor. The government has
been working to increase its efforts to
protect children from exploitive child
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
32880
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
labor, such as by making monthly labor
inspections to sugar cane worker
villages. It has effectively enforced child
labor laws in the formal sector;
however, has been less successful in the
informal sector. Also, the legal
requirement that CONANI receive a
minimum of two percent of the national
budget is not being met.
Dominican law sets the minimum age
for employment at 14 years and
provides guidelines for acceptable work
practices for minors between the ages of
14 and 18. Employers of minors are
required to pay them at least the legal
minimum wage. Fines have been
established for violations of legal
provisions involving child labor.
National laws establish penalties of
imprisonment and fines for assisting in
or the trafficking of minors for the
purposes of forced labor; CSEC,
including prostitution and pornography,
or other degrading activities in exchange
for compensation; and the making,
distributing, or publishing of
pornographic photographs of children is
also punishable by incarceration and
fines. Laws are also in place that
prohibit forced labor and the use of
children in drug trafficking.
The government is implementing an
Action Plan for the Eradication of Abuse
and Commercial Sexual Exploitation of
Boys, Girls, and Adolescents. The
Armed Forces provides educational and
recreational programs for working and
at-risk children and runs a shelter for
such children. The government also
supports several child labor, trafficking,
and CSEC awareness campaigns,
workshops, and trainings, and provides
funding to nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) that work with
trafficking victims. The anti-trafficking
unit of the Office of the Attorney
General investigates and prosecutes
trafficking crimes. The government has
shut down several businesses involved
with CSEC, rescued children, and
obtained related convictions. However,
according to the U.S. Department of
State, the Dominican Republic lacks
effective trafficking law enforcement
and victim protection programs, due in
part to a lack of resources. The border
with Haiti is not sufficiently monitored,
according to the U.S. Department of
State. The Technical Institute for
Professional Development provides
training to individuals who have been
trafficked and to children at risk of
being trafficked, especially those in the
Boca Chica area. The Tourism Police
provides counseling services to abused
children, including trafficked children.
CONANI operates a referral center for
children in Boca Chica who have been
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
involved in CSEC, and runs seven
shelters for children.
The Government of the Dominican
Republic also supports education and
other programs that may indirectly
contribute to children’s withdrawal
from, or prevention from entering,
exploitive labor. In 2005, the
government developed an interministerial social sector policy that
focuses resources for the poor. The
Secretariat of Education (SEE) provides
some stipends for poor families who
keep their children in school and out of
exploitive work. A World Bank USD 23
million loan will be used to expand a
SET program that provides job training
and internships to individuals age 16
and above, as well as to expand an SEE
program that provides school deserters
with the opportunity to complete their
education.
Several projects funded by USDOL
have supported the government’s
Timebound Program to eliminate the
worst forms of child labor and were
designed to remove or prevent over
22,000 children from exploitive work in
agriculture, urban work, CSEC, and
trafficking. These projects, implemented
by the ILO-IPEC and DevTech Systems,
Inc., have several interesting
components that include the
development of a community-based
child labor monitoring system (CLMS)
and the engagement of the academic and
business sectors, including the
Dominican foundation EDUCA
(previously the recipient of USAID
assistance to develop businesseducation partnerships). These efforts
aim to combat child labor and promote
better educational opportunities for
children involved in child labor. The
Office of the First Lady also administers
a program to provide income generating
opportunities to families of children atrisk for CSEC, including beneficiaries of
ILO-implemented projects. The
government has participated in a
USDOL-funded regional project
implemented by ILO-IPEC to eliminate
CSEC and hazardous agricultural child
labor in Central America and the
Dominican Republic, and a USDOLfunded regional project implemented by
CARE to strengthen government and
civil society’s capacity to address the
educational needs of working children,
and improve the quality of, and access
to, basic education.
iii. Scope of Work
Applicants will design a project
strategy that involves social partners
such as, but not limited to, employers,
industry organizations, worker
organization, NGOs, community-based
organizations (CBOs), and academia, to
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
combat exploitive child labor and
improve education for children engaged
in, or at-risk of entering, exploitive
labor. The project should take into
account the socio-economic conditions
in the Dominican Republic that include
inter-generational poverty; early school
desertion, and premature employment
by children in the non-formal labor
sectors, including in the worst forms of
child labor; and under- or
unemployment of youth in the formal
sectors of the economy.
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
The project should target children
engaged in, or at-risk of entering,
exploitive child labor, including the
worst forms of child labor, and taking
into account the priorities identified by
the Government of the Dominican
Republic in its 2006 National Plan to
Eliminate the worst forms of child labor.
Applicants will identify priority
geographical areas and primary target
groups of children: (1) Children under
age 14, and (2) youth between the ages
of 14 and up to 18. Applicants will
design different but complementary
programs for each target group,
providing equal opportunities for both
males and females. Each program’s
design should be developed in part by
those who will benefit from its services
in the targeted regions.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
The project should support the
Dominican Republic’s National Plan to
Eliminate the worst forms of child labor
and build upon other USDOL-funded
efforts and projects supporting the
Dominican Republic’s Timebound
Program to Eliminate the worst forms of
child labor. It should build links with
Secretariat of Education programs to
improve the quality of basic education.
It should also coordinate with the World
Bank-financed youth job training and
internship project, taking into account
the spirit and provisions of the
country’s General Youth Law. The
project’s job/vocational training
component targeted to the older age
group should support national policies,
but should also be adapted to the
specific characteristics of the project’s
regions.
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
Exploitive child labor in the
Dominican Republic is both a
consequence and cause of recurring
poverty, which is exacerbated by a lowquality education system. While the rate
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
of child labor for children under 15 is
higher in the Dominican Republic than
in Central America, the unemployment
rate for individuals ages 15 through 24
years is 31 percent, nearly double that
of the average population (17 percent).
Thus, paradoxically, premature child
labor and school desertion, and high
‘‘youth’’ unemployment represent two
sides of the same coin; the challenge of
overcoming economic and social
inequalities and of accessing high
quality education and employment
opportunities.
In addition, the traditional vocational
and skills training institutions have only
been partially accessible to low-skilled
‘‘youth’’ with low levels of education.
National training programs also have
not necessarily taken into account the
specific social and productive contexts
in which the knowledge transferred
would be applied. The country’s
opening up to trade and flow of people
migrating and returning provide many
opportunities to make reforms. The
country also has an engaged business
and academic sector eager to address
these challenges, and is ripe for the
development of such social
partnerships.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
This project should focus on
strengthening sustainable networks,
consortiums, or working groups
composed of both public and private
sector entities in order to implement
actions to eliminate exploitive child
labor in the Dominican Republic. These
actions should also promote educational
and training opportunities, particularly
those leading to improved future
employability for youth in jobs that are
more likely to combat the cycle of
poverty that often results in exploitive
child labor. The project should pay
special attention to promoting corporate
social responsibility, developing codes
of conduct in specific sectors targeted
(e.g., agriculture, tourism, or other
proposed sectors of project focus), and
expanding the emerging role of the
business sector in combating exploitive
child labor.
Applicants should propose
demonstration projects that develop
partnerships with social partners such
as, but not limited to, the following:
employers, industry organizations,
worker organization, NGOs, CBOs, and
academia to (1) improve the quality of
basic education for target children
under age 14, and (2) enhance
educational, vocational and job training
and job placement opportunities for
target youth between the ages of 14 and
up to 18 years. Each of the two
demonstration projects should forge
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
links between education and practical
experience, and promote leadership,
entrepreneurship, and citizenship
relevant to the Dominican context.
Activities of these partnerships may
include, but are not limited to, the
following: action research designed to
inform demonstration projects and
proposed policies that would benefit
children involved in exploitive child
labor in the Dominican Republic. These
activities would center on expanding
awareness of public and private sector
entities regarding exploitive child labor,
improving coordination between the
public and private sector to combat
exploitive child labor, and the adoption
of policies and practices by both public
and private organizations to improve
educational and employment
opportunities for youth that have low
income and low levels of schooling, no
technical training, and work experience
only in exploitive child labor.
The project may also focus on
increasing the number and quality of
individual private sector initiatives to
eliminate and prevent exploitive child
labor. Examples of these types of
initiatives include the provision of
direct educational services to children,
the adoption of policies or development
of innovative initiatives by programs by
private sector organizations to combat or
monitor exploitive child labor, and the
development of private sector
mechanisms to detect and respond to
cases of exploitive child labor.
Preventing Exploitive Child Labor and
Reintegrating War-Affected Children in
the Democratic Republic of the Congo
i. Background
The Democratic Republic of the
Congo (DRC) concluded a brutal civil
war in 2003 that lasted 5 years and took
the lives of nearly 4 million people. In
2006, for the first time in more than 40
years, the government held
parliamentary and presidential
elections. Despite these achievements,
armed groups operate outside of the
government’s control, and fighting
continues in different regions of the
country, particularly in Ituri District,
North and South Kivu, and northern
Katanga. Violent conflict, widespread
poverty, and a lack of basic services
contribute to the exploitation of
children.
In the DRC, children work in the
informal sector and in subsistence
agriculture, which constitute the largest
parts of the economy. Some parents
make their children hunt, fish, engage in
prostitution, or beg in the streets to
support their families instead of
attending school. Children also work in
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32881
the extraction of natural resources. In
Katanga province, children reportedly
dig holes and wash, sift, and transport
minerals to pay school fees and support
their families. While recent child labor
statistics are unavailable, the
Understanding Children’s Work (UCW)
Project, an interagency collaboration
among the ILO, UNICEF, and World
Bank, estimates that approximately 39.8
percent of children ages 5–14 years were
found working in 2000. At the height of
the 5-year civil war, an estimated 30,000
children were fighting or living with
armed groups. While there are no
official statistics, reports indicate that
3,000 to 11,000 children still need to be
demobilized. Amnesty International (AI)
notes that, while girls represent 40
percent of child soldiers, they only
represent two percent of the children
released by armed groups in some areas
of the country. According to AI, this
discrepancy has occurred because
service providers falsely assume that
female child soldiers are the ‘‘wives’’ of
adult fighters. Armed groups in the DRC
continue to abduct and recruit children
to support violent conflict. Children
associated with armed groups are used
as combatants, laborers, and sexual
slaves or forced to mine natural
resources. Many children remain
vulnerable to recruitment or rerecruitment due to a lack of economic
alternatives and inadequate community
support.
Children are trafficked within the
DRC for forced labor and sexual
exploitation. Most trafficking occurs
within the eastern provinces of the
country where government control is
weak and armed groups continue to
abduct and forcibly recruit children.
In October 2005, the UN Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
(OCHA) reported that 1.6 million people
remained displaced due to violence and
instability. According to UNICEF,
displaced children are frequently
separated from their parents, removed
from school, and exposed to disease and
malnutrition.
The HIV/AIDS epidemic is a
significant problem in the DRC for all
children and their families. According
to UNAIDS, there are approximately
120,000 children living with HIV/AIDS
and an estimated 680,000 children who
have been orphaned by AIDS in the
DRC. The HIV/AIDS prevalence rate
ranges from 1.7 to 7.6 percent, but it is
thought to be as high as 20 percent
among women in conflict areas due to
widespread sexual abuse and violence.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32882
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
iii. Scope of Work
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
There are a number of current efforts
by the Government of the Democratic
Republic of the Congo, international
organizations, and NGOs to combat
exploitive child labor, including child
soldiering, and address the country’s
lack of resources. With the support of
the World Bank, the government is
implementing a national plan for the
disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration (DDR) of adult and child
ex-combatants. In 2006, the government
created a national committee to combat
the worst forms of child labor, adopted
the National Plan for the Protection of
Children, and finalized a poverty
reduction strategy paper that addresses
the problem of child labor. In
collaboration with UN agencies, the
World Bank, the European Commission,
and other donors, the government also
finalized a Country Assistance
Framework (CAF) to coordinate
strategies for the reform, reconstruction,
and development in the DRC from 2007
to 2010.
The government participates in a 4year, global project, funded by USDOL
and implemented by ILO–IPEC to
reintegrate war-affected children.
Ending in May 2007, this project aimed
to withdraw 2,000 children and prevent
another 2,000 children in the DRC from
child soldiering and other forms of
exploitive labor. With government
support, UNICEF disarms and
reintegrates child soldiers, rehabilitates
classrooms, trains teachers, and
distributes school supplies. USAID
promotes community infrastructure
projects and micro-credit schemes to
facilitate the reintegration of excombatants. USAID is also partnering
with select international mining firms to
reduce the number of child miners in
Katanga province.
The Ministry of Labor is responsible
for implementing and enforcing child
labor laws and regulations. The law
provides for legal sanctions against
employers who actively recruit children
under the age of 15, and employers who
are found employing children under 15
may be punished with a fine. Legal
remedies to enforce child labor laws
include criminal penalties, civil fines,
and withdrawal or suspension of one or
more civil, national, or family rights,
including denial of legal residence in
the country for a period of 5 to 10 years.
The law also enables inspectors and the
police to bring charges against
employers of children under age 15 in
all sectors, including apprenticed
children and family businesses.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Applicants must take into account
cross-cutting themes (discussed below)
that could affect project results in the
DRC and meaningfully incorporate them
into the proposed strategy, either to
increase opportunities for, or reduce
obstacles to, successful implementation.
In the DRC, specific considerations for
project strategies and program activities
should include the following
components:
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
The proposal should target children
who are engaged in exploitive child
labor, with a focus on children who
have been affected by armed conflict.
Applicants are encouraged to include
war-affected children compelled to
work in mining, mining-related
activities, or exploitive labor in mining
areas as a target group of the project.
Applicants are also encouraged to
identify target other groups for
intervention, but must provide
convincing reasons as to why they merit
funding.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Applicants must demonstrate that the
proposed project activities support the
National Plan for DDR and the National
Plan for the Protection of Children, and
complement existing policies and
programs that address the underlying
causes of poverty. At a minimum,
collaborations should take place with
the Ministry of Labor and Social
Security; the Ministry of Primary,
Secondary, and Professional Education;
the Ministry of Mines; the National
Commission for Disarmament,
Demobilization and Reintegration; ILO–
IPEC; and UNICEF. Applicants must
also demonstrate that the project will
work collaboratively with local,
regional, and national institutions and
organizations already engaged in
addressing exploitive child labor and
education issues in the DRC. Applicants
should also support the efforts begun
under the USDOL-funded, ILO–IPEC
Child Soldiers project to withdraw
children from, and prevent them from
entering, exploitive labor in the DRC. In
addition, the project should also
collaborate and coordinate with the
projects reintegrating ex-child
combatants being implemented by
USAID and UNICEF, as well as the
USAID-funded mining project in
Katanga province.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
USDOL seeks to fund a sustainable
project that provides for the emerging
educational needs of war-affected
children at-risk of, or engaged in,
exploitive child labor in the DRC as the
country demobilizes. Applicants should
take into consideration the fluidity and
constantly changing nature of the
security situation in the DRC and
related migrations flows. Applicants
must also address the cross-cutting
theme of HIV/AIDS.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
In developing the project strategy,
Applicants must provide a definition of
‘‘war-affected children’’ that will be
used in identifying potential direct
beneficiaries under the project and
should account for the demographic and
social characteristics of such children
and youth. Applicants should keep in
mind interventions for hazardous work,
particularly for children between 15 and
up to 18 years who meet the minimum
age requirements for work. If Applicants
propose to target children working in
agriculture, they must demonstrate
knowledge of injury prevention
strategies for children who continue to
work under the supervision of their
parents. In addition, Applicants should
incorporate HIV/AIDS awareness
activities into their proposed strategy to
withdraw children from, and prevent
them from entering, exploitive labor.
Project of Support to the Indonesian
Timebound Program on the Elimination
of the Worst Forms of Child Labor
i. Background
Indonesia is the world’s fourth most
populous country, with an approximate
population of 245 million, and has the
world’s largest Islamic population.
Indonesia’s economy is still recovering
from the effects of the 1997–98 Asian
financial crisis and the December 2004
earthquake and tsunami, but has
regained macroeconomic stability and is
achieving modest progress in pursuing
poverty reduction and growth strategies.
Major development challenges include
improving access, efficiency, and
quality in the delivery of education and
basic social services; strengthening
democratic reform after the country’s
first direct Presidential elections in
2004; increasing the capacity and
resources of recently decentralized
government agencies; and accelerating
employment opportunities for the
estimated 2.5 million new entrants into
the workforce each year. In addition,
Indonesia continues to battle periodic
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
natural disasters, such as the 2004
earthquake and tsunami.
Key to accomplishing Indonesia’s
development goals will be to remove
and prevent children from the worst
forms of child labor. Based on a review
of available survey information, in 2002
the ILO estimated that 7.5 percent of
children age 10 to 14 years, or 1.6
million children, were working in
Indonesia. It was also estimated that 3.4
million children age 15–17 were
working, for a total of 4.87 million
working children in the country. In both
age groups, boys represented
approximately 60 percent of working
children, while girls represented 40
percent. Localized studies and
unofficial estimates put the number of
working children much higher.
The majority of child work in
Indonesia occurs in rural areas.
Children work under hazardous
conditions in agriculture on palm oil,
cacao, tobacco, and sugar plantations.
Children also work in fishing,
construction, manufacturing, footwear
production, food processing, and the
small-scale mining sector. Other
children work in the informal sector
selling newspapers, shining shoes, street
vending, scavenging, and working
beside their parents in family businesses
or cottage industries. There are also
large numbers of street children in
urban centers. Children, primarily
females, are also exploited in domestic
service, often under conditions
resembling forced labor. Within
Indonesia, girls typically enter domestic
service between the ages of 12 and 15
and typically work 14 to 18 hours a day,
7 days a week. They do not have access
to education, and often employers
forbid them from leaving their
workplaces or withhold their wages. In
addition, in an attempt to migrate to
Malaysia and the Middle East to work
as domestic servants, many girls end up
being trafficked or exploited in a system
of debt bondage by traffickers and
recruiting agencies. Easy access to
illegal documents and poor regulation of
employment recruiting agencies
exacerbate the problem.
Indonesia is a source, transit, and
destination country for individuals
trafficked internationally and internally,
including children. Children, primarily
girls, are trafficked both internally and
internationally for commercial sexual
exploitation (CSEC) and domestic
service. There are also increasing
reports of children being trafficked to
work in organized begging rings. In
addition, children are exploited in the
production of pornography and in the
international sex industry. Children are
also known to be involved in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
production, trafficking, and/or sale of
drugs. Indonesia’s decentralization
policy has placed primary responsibility
for provision of education services at
the district level. This has contributed
to the decline in education standards,
especially at the secondary levels, as
district governments are ill-prepared to
manage the decentralized education
systems. There are shortages of teachers
in many areas, existing teachers are
often poorly trained, and school
curricula do not include relevant
vocational training. Public funding for
education in Indonesia is one of the
lowest in South East Asia. By law,
education is compulsory and free for
nine years in Indonesia. Children are
required to attend school until age 15.
The law provides for government
provision of education services, but also
stipulates that families are expected to
provide financial contributions
supporting educational programs, with
the exception of children meeting the
‘‘impoverished’’ guidelines determined
by district regulations. For both the
impoverished children who receive a
government education subsidy and the
other children, the additional fees and
informal levies, plus the cost of books
and uniforms, are often more than
families can afford. In addition,
transportation costs are many times
prohibitive for poor families. USAID
estimates that only 40 percent of
children who enroll in primary school
complete 9 years of basic education.
The lack of access to schools beyond the
primary level contributes to low
transition rates to, and high drop-out
rates from, junior secondary schools.
Children, especially girls, in this grade
level and age group are particularly
vulnerable to dropping out of school
and entering the worst forms of child
labor. For children who drop out of
school, the re-entry to the formal school
system can be difficult due to the
psychological and emotional trauma
that children involved in the worst
forms of child labor have suffered.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
There are a number of current efforts
by the Government of Indonesia,
international organizations, and NGOs
to address exploitive child labor in
Indonesia and also the underlying
causes of poverty and lack of resources.
Recent reform efforts and statements by
the government reflect an increased
willingness to openly acknowledge and
fiscally support programs to tackle child
labor. The government is in the process
of completing its first phase of activities
under its 20-year National Plan of
Action to Eliminate the Worst Forms of
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32883
Child Labor, which focuses on five
sectors including fishing, mining,
footwear production, trafficking, and the
drug trade. The government,
coordinated through the National
Steering Committee on Child Labor, is
reviewing progress of the National Plan
of Action to Eliminate the Worst Forms
of Child Labor to identify priority
sectors and activities for the second
phase. The State Planning Board, with
support from the World Bank, is
currently piloting a Conditional Cash
Transfer program in six provinces with
reduction of child labor as one of the
targets for the program. The National
Plan of Action to Combat the Trafficking
of Women and Children and the
National Plan of Action to Combat
Commercial Sexual Exploitation are in
place, aimed at reducing child
trafficking and CSEC. In addition, the
Government of Indonesia has
incorporated eliminating child labor
into its national development policy,
including child labor-specific targets
and goals in its National Medium Term
Development Plan (2004–2009), the
Poverty Reduction Strategy (2005–
2009), and the National Plan of Action
of Human Rights in Indonesia (2004–
2009).
The law sets the minimum age for
work at 15. Employing and involving
children under the age of 18 in the worst
forms of child labor are prohibited
under the law and failure to comply can
result in criminal sanctions of two to
five years imprisonment. The law
defines the worst forms of child labor as
slavery; use of children in prostitution,
pornography and gambling; use of
children for alcohol, narcotic, and
addictive substance production and
trade; and all types of work harmful to
the health, safety and morals of the
child. The law identifies a list of such
harmful activities and provides detailed
descriptions and examples of these
activities, including jobs requiring
children to work with machines; jobs
where physical, chemical, or biological
hazards are present; jobs with inherent
hazards such as construction, offshore
fishing, and lifting heavy loads; and jobs
that harm the morals of the child
including in bars, massage parlors,
discotheques, or in the promotion of
alcohol or drugs. The law contains an
exception for employing children ages
13 to 15 years in light work that does
not harm their physical, mental, and
social development. A set of
requirements is outlined for
employment of children in this age
range, including a maximum of three
hours of work per day, parental
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32884
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
permission, and no disruption of
schooling.
Additional legal sanctions are laid out
for the offenses of CSEC, child
trafficking, involving children in the
production or distribution of alcohol or
narcotics, and involving children in
armed conflict. A newly passed antitrafficking bill criminalizes all types of
human trafficking domestically and
internationally, prescribes harsh
penalties for violators of the bill, and
mandates victim services and
compensation.
The Government of Indonesia is
participating in a USD 4.1 million
USDOL-funded ILO–IPEC project in
support of the National Plan of Action
to Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child
Labor and Timebound Program to
progressively eliminate the worst forms
of child labor, as well as a USD 1.4
million addendum to address
vulnerable children in tsunami-stricken
areas. In support of the national
Timebound Program, USDOL also funds
a USD 6 million Child Labor Education
Initiative project implemented by Save
the Children to combat child trafficking
in Indonesia, and a USD 2.5 million
project implemented by Save the
Children to prevent children from
entering exploitive labor in tsunamiaffected areas. In 2006, the Government
of Indonesia also participated in a
regional USDOL-funded anti-trafficking
project and a regional awareness-raising
project to eliminate the worst forms of
child labor. In addition, in 2006 a
Netherlands-supported USD 1.2 million
project to eliminate exploitive child
domestic work in Indonesia and 7 other
countries in the region was completed.
Sweden continues to support a project
on child labor and youth employment in
Indonesia, Pakistan, Tanzania, Egypt,
and Guatemala.
iii. Scope of Work
Applicants must propose a creative
and innovative approach to address the
challenges of educating and assisting
children engaged in, or at-risk of
entering, the worst forms of child labor.
Strategies must be in alignment with the
government’s current efforts to design
and implement the second phase of its
National Plan of Action to Eliminate the
Worst Forms of Child Labor, and must
also build on efforts initiated under the
first phase. Applicants must
demonstrate knowledge of Phase I
National Plan of Action to Eliminate the
Worst Forms of Child Labor activities
and, where applicable, propose
strategies to continue or build off those
efforts. Applicants must take into
account cross-cutting themes (discussed
below), specific considerations, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
additional activities that could affect
project results in Indonesia, and
meaningfully incorporate them into the
proposed strategy, either to increase
opportunities or reduce obstacles to
successful implementation.
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
Proposed direct beneficiaries should
be children working in sectors
identified by the government as priority
areas within Phase II of the National
Plan of Action to Eliminate the Worst
Forms of Child Labor. Applicants do not
need to propose direct beneficiaries for
all sectors identified in the National
Plan of Action to Eliminate the Worst
Forms of Child Labor, but at a
minimum, children working in
domestic service, on plantations, and
trafficked for CSEC should be included
in the project’s target groups. Applicants
should also propose strategies for
assisting urban street children, as a high
risk group for trafficking and
involvement in the drug trade.
Applicants may identify other sectors
where children are engaged in, or at-risk
of engaging in other worst forms of child
labor, but should present a compelling
reason for this choice. Geographic target
areas should also be consistent with
Phase II of the National Plan of Action
to Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child
Labor and take into account previous
activities or new areas that need urgent
attention. Given the recent
humanitarian assistance needs as a
result of the natural disasters on Java
and Sumatra islands, Applicants may
choose to focus on child labor issues
that already existed or may have been
exacerbated in these areas.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Applicants should support the
Government of Indonesia’s Timebound
Program to Eliminate the Worst Forms
of Child Labor and its efforts under
Phase II of the National Plan of Action
to Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child
Labor. In particular, at the national
level, close collaboration with the
National Action Committee on Child
Labor, chaired by the Ministry of
Manpower and Transmigration, is
necessary. Since a Timebound Program
is complex, in addition to the Ministry
of Manpower, the project should
include other ministries working in the
area of child labor and protection
including, but not limited to, the
following: The Ministry of National
Education, Ministry of Social Affairs,
Ministry of Health, Ministry for
Women’s Empowerment, the National
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Development Planning Agency
(BAPPENAS), and the National Police.
Applicants should also collaborate with
other national and international
institutions carrying out child labor
projects including ILO–IPEC, Save the
Children, IOM, and UNICEF.
Additionally, due to Indonesia’s policy
of decentralization, strong collaboration
with relevant ministries and action
committees at the provincial and district
levels is imperative. Applicants should
also be involved in the government’s
efforts to implement the Conditional
Cash Transfer program. If working in
areas of the recent natural disaster,
Applicants should coordinate with
other donors providing assistance, and
complement rather than duplicate
existing efforts. Applicants are also
encouraged to demonstrate how their
organization’s previous efforts to combat
child labor or promote education have
led to the mainstreaming and
sustainability of project initiatives.
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
Since the late 1990’s, Indonesia has
undergone recurrent political and
economic unrest and instability, which
has an impact on overall country
development. The country held its first
direct presidential elections in 2004 and
recently, the government has committed
itself to political, economic and social
transformations. The country is engaged
in debate on development themes
including education reform; economic
growth and employment creation; good
governance and democracy; and
continued strengthening of
decentralization. Policy decisions in
these areas directly affect many of the
factors that lead children to enter
exploitive child labor. Indonesia is the
world’s largest Muslim country and
while the government is secular,
religious traditions, organizations and
institutions play an important part in
the cultural, political, and societal
environment in Indonesia. In addition
to Islam, there are a multitude of
minority religions and ethnic groups
existing within the country and in some
areas, there are inter-religious/ethnic
conflict and tension.
Furthermore, over the past 3 years,
Indonesia has been plagued by a series
of large-scale natural disasters in both
rural and urban areas, including the
December 2004 tsunami, the May 2006
earthquake in central Java, the 2007
earthquake in Yogyakarta and flooding
in Jakarta, as well as a series of more
localized, small-scale disasters.
Indonesia continues to be at high risk
for future natural disasters due to its
location and geography. The past
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
disasters have caused extreme damage
or destruction of houses, livelihood
equipment, crops, roads and other basic
infrastructure including schools. Due to
families’ loss of income, destruction of
homes, and deprivation of education
opportunities, children in disasterstricken areas are more vulnerable and
at-risk of entering the worst forms of
child labor. Applicants should consider
how the above factors of political and
economic instability, religion, and
natural disasters might affect the project
in the geographic areas where the
project would be implemented.
Applicants should propose a design that
would contribute to lessening the effect
of macro level instability, minimize
disruptions when such events occur,
and address responses in any project
sites affected by disaster.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants must propose a strategy to
assist the Government of Indonesia to
implement Phase II of the National Plan
of Action to Eliminate the Worst Forms
of Child Labor to eliminate the worst
forms of child labor. Specifically, the
Applicant’s strategy should strengthen
the capacity of the Indonesian
government, civil society, employers,
and trade unions to take immediate,
effective, and time-bound measures to:
(a) Provide the necessary and
appropriate direct assistance for the
withdrawal of children from the worst
forms of child labor and for their
rehabilitation and social integration; (b)
provide the necessary and appropriate
direct assistance for prevention of the
worst forms of child labor; (c) ensure
access to free basic education, and,
wherever possible and appropriate, to
non-formal and vocational training, for
all children withdrawn from, or at-risk
of entering, exploitive child labor; (d)
identify and reach out to children at
special risk; (e) improve design and
implementation of relevant policies and
programs to exploitive child labor; and
(f) raise awareness on the dangers of
exploitive child labor and the
importance of education.
In addition to prioritizing provision of
direct educational services to children
engaged in, and at-risk of entering,
exploitive child labor, the proposed
strategy should have a strong focus on
upstream policy-level work, supporting
the appropriate government and nongovernment agencies in implementing
Phase II of the National Plan of Action
to Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child
Labor. Applicants must demonstrate
their existing linkages and relationships
with the relevant agencies and
organizations, or demonstrate how these
linkages will be quickly formed, to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
ensure a smooth transition of activities
from Phase I to Phase II of the National
Plan of Action to Eliminate the Worst
Forms of Child Labor. Specific proposed
activities can include, but are not
limited to, the following: technical
support and guidance to the National
Action Committee on the elimination of
the worst forms of child labor; support
in the formation and functioning of
provincial and district action
committees on the elimination of the
worst forms of child labor; assistance in
raising awareness on and implementing
the provisions of the new antitrafficking bill as it relates to children;
developing legislation and policy
related to child domestic workers;
technical assistance in data collection
and mapping of worst forms of child
labor; development of a national or
provincial level child labor monitoring
system (CLMS); increased coordination
and involvement of civil society,
employers, and trade unions with
government efforts to eliminate
exploitive child labor; capacity building
for labor inspectors and law
enforcement to improve enforcement of
existing law and regulations on child
labor; and technical guidance to
BAPPENAS as it undertakes the
implementation of the conditional cash
transfer program to ensure continued
attention to child labor concerns.
The lingering effects of the financial
crisis and decentralization of education
services have caused deterioration in
the education system. The proposed
strategy should increase the capacity of
the local Ministry of Education offices
in target district and provinces to ensure
improved service delivery, increased
budgetary commitments and
management, and awareness of
exploitive child labor. Service delivery
and management should be further
enhanced in both the formal and nonformal system through teacher and
administrator trainings and other
approaches. Applicants must also
develop a strategy that will improve the
relevance of, and access to, education,
especially at the junior secondary levels.
Applicants must also design a strategy
to assist child laborers who are unable
or unwilling to attend formal school, by
providing access to non-formal
education and vocational training
through community learning centers or
other appropriate service providers.
Applicants should exhibit an
understanding of existing efforts to
promote youth employment in
Indonesia and in the South East Asia
region and design interventions to
support public/private partnerships to
promote job training programs and
youth employment for children of legal
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32885
working age. Applicants are encouraged
to propose interventions to increase
vocational training opportunities for
youth and support alternative income
generating activities for parents to
reduce their reliance on their children’s
labor to supplement family income and
to encourage school enrollment. Where
such programs already exist and are
functioning, Applicants are encouraged
to demonstrate existing linkages to
implementing agencies and to propose
strategies for collaboration and
coordination of efforts.
Migration of families and individual
children for work in Malaysia and the
Middle East, as well as within
Indonesia, has led to increased levels of
child trafficking, debt bondage and
other forms of forced labor, and
vulnerability to additional types of
exploitation. Lack of access to
education, non-relevant and low quality
curriculum content, lack of employment
opportunities, poor regulation of
employment recruiting agencies, and
easy access to false passports and
identity papers have all exacerbated this
phenomenon and increased children’s
vulnerability for ending up exploited by
the worst forms of child labor. The
proposed project strategy should
incorporate this phenomenon into its
education services design, as well as
propose activities to increase awareness
on safe migration and reduce the risk of
being trafficked.
Applicants are encouraged to work
with the government to improve labor
data collection to include child labor, as
well as conduct rapid assessments and
disseminate findings on exploitive child
labor in Indonesia, especially in sectors
identified by the National Plan of
Action to Eliminate the Worst Forms of
Child Labor and where data has not
been systematically collected and is
lacking. In sectors selected for research,
attention should be given to the
characteristics of hazardous work in
each selected sector, steps to reduce or
eliminate the hazards, and
recommendations for government
action.
Combating the Worst Forms of Child
Labor in Morocco
i. Background
Morocco continues to face a variety of
challenges as it seeks to improve
education and basic social services,
provide economic opportunities for its
citizens in both rural and urban areas,
and incorporate its large youth
population into educational systems
and the job market. While recent
statistics are unavailable, the
Understanding Children’s Work (UCW)
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
32886
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
Project, an interagency collaboration
among the ILO, UNICEF, and World
Bank, estimates that approximately 13
percent of children ages 7–14 years were
found working in 1998–1999. Children
are found working in a variety of
sectors, including agriculture,
manufacturing, trade, and service
establishments. The majority of working
children were found in rural areas (87
percent), where they work to
supplement family earnings. In fact,
children in rural areas are six times
more likely to be working than those in
urban areas. Many parents of rural
children did not receive an education,
and therefore, often do not value
sending their children to school. Eightyfour percent of children who work do so
in the agricultural sector, most in
subsistence agriculture, which includes
preparing fields, planting, tending
crops, harvesting, herding livestock, and
other activities. Most of these children
do not attend school, in part because of
living long distances from school
facilities. Most work for their families,
but a small percentage also works on
commercial farms. Whether in
subsistence agriculture, medium-scale
enterprises, or commercial farms,
children are vulnerable to hazardous
environments and unhealthy working
conditions. The Moroccan government
has designated several forms of
agricultural work as hazardous for
children, including the application of
pesticides; operation of farm machinery
and dangerous tools; tending herds near
areas of heavy traffic; agricultural
production line work; working at
heights such as in olive harvesting; and
work in slaughterhouses.
Children work in industrial and
artisan sectors in the production of
textiles and carpets, and other light
manufacturing activities. A large
number of children work as junior
artisans in the handicraft industry,
many of them working as apprentices
before they reach 12 years of age and
under substandard health and safety
conditions. Boys are also recruited to
work as apprentice mechanics in urban
areas with little supervision or
instruction.
Children also work in construction,
food production, and in the hospitality
industry. In urban areas, many girls
working as ‘‘petites bonnes,’’ or
domestic servants, can be found in
situations of unregulated ‘‘adoptive
servitude,’’ in which girls from rural
areas are ‘‘sold’’ by their parents,
trafficked, and ‘‘adopted’’ by wealthy
urban families to work in their homes.
Although awareness raising programs
have targeted urban centers, this
practice is still commonly accepted.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Children are also ‘‘rented’’ out by their
parents and other relatives to beg.
Also in urban areas, thousands of
street children work in the informal
sector. Street children engage in diverse
forms of work, including selling
cigarettes, begging, shining shoes, and
washing and polishing cars. While most
street children are boys, an increasing
number of girls are now seen on the
street as well. Many of these girls had
worked as household maids before
fleeing from abusive employers. Street
children are vulnerable to sexual and
physical abuse and substance abuse.
Many are forced into illicit activities
such as prostitution, drug-selling and
theft as means for collecting money for
gang leaders.
The commercial sexual exploitation of
children (CSEC) in Morocco involves
both boys and girls. There are official
reports of child prostitution in the cities
`
of Agadir, Casablanca, Meknes, Tangier,
and Marrakech. Morocco is a country of
destination for children trafficked from
sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa, and
Asia and serves as a transit and origin
point for children trafficked to Europe
for the purposes of forced labor, drug
trafficking, and CSEC. Children are also
trafficked internally for exploitation as
child domestic workers and beggars,
and for prostitution. A growing number
of girls are trafficked to El-Hajeb in the
Middle Atlas mountains, where they are
forced into prostitution.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
There are a number of current efforts
by the Government of Morocco,
international organizations, and
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)
to address exploitive child labor in
Morocco and underlying causes related
to poverty. The Government of Morocco
has put in place a number of programs
that contribute to achieving its National
Action Plan to Eliminate Child Labor
(2005–2015). The National Action Plan
to Eliminate Child Labor focuses on
improving implementation of child
labor laws, raising awareness of these
laws, and improving basic education.
Sectoral plans target children in
agriculture and herding, the industrial
sector (carpets and stitching), metal and
auto work, construction, the hospitality
industry, and food production, as well
as children working in the informal
sector, such as street children and
children engaged in CSEC.
The Government of Morocco’s major
development challenges include
achieving sustainable macroeconomic
growth; accelerating employment
opportunities for the adult and youth
labor market; improving access,
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
efficiency, and quality in the delivery of
education and basic social services; and
reducing poverty and inequalities in
rural areas and among poor,
marginalized groups by raising living
standards. Since the 1990s, the
Moroccan government has emphasized
addressing social and economic issues
to reduce poverty and the development
gap between the rural and urban areas.
Some of these efforts have included the
increase in development of rural
infrastructure (roads, electricity, potable
water), education reform, emergency
programs for rural areas, and extension
of medical services to the poor. The
government has also established key
measures to improve labor conditions
and boost job prospects. A new
Moroccan Labor code instituting
reforms in the country’s labor laws was
enacted in 2003, and the government
signed a Free Trade Agreement with the
United States in 2004, which came into
effect on January 1, 2006.
The minimum age for employment in
Morocco is 15 years. The Ministry of
Employment and Vocational Training
(MEVT) is responsible for implementing
and enforcing child labor laws and
regulations. In February 2006, the
MEVT created a Child Labor Unit.
Morocco’s laws provide for legal
sanctions against employers who
actively recruit children under the age
of 15. Employers who are found
employing children under age 15 may
be punished with a fine. Legal remedies
to enforce child labor laws include
criminal penalties, civil fines, and
withdrawal or suspension of one or
more civil, national, or family rights,
including denial of legal residence in
the country for a period of 5 to 10 years.
The law also enables inspectors and the
police to bring charges against
employers of children under age 15 in
all sectors, including apprenticed
children and children working in family
businesses. The government’s National
Observatory for Children’s Rights, a
multi-sectoral body chaired by Princess
Lalla Meriem, held its eleventh
conference in June 2006 where the
National Plan for the Protection of
Children was adopted and emphasis
was placed on implementation
achievements and problems.
The Government of Morocco is
participating in two USDOL-funded
projects to eliminate child labor by
providing educational opportunities for
children engaged in or at risk of
engaging in exploitive child labor. In
2003, USDOL funded a 4-year, USD 3
million Child Labor Education Initiative
project implemented by Management
Systems International (MSI). The MSI
project, ‘‘ADROS’’, aims to eliminate the
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
practice of selling and hiring child
domestic workers by creating
educational opportunities for those
vulnerable to, or working in, domestic
servitude. As of March 2007, the
program had withdrawn 9,862 children
from exploitive labor in domestic
service and placed them in training and
educational programs. USDOL funded
another 4-year project in 2003, which is
being implemented by ILO–IPEC. This
USD 2.25 million project aims to
strengthen national efforts against the
worst forms of child labor in Morocco
and, as of March 2007, has withdrawn
or prevented 9,222 children from work,
primarily in the agricultural sectors of
the Gharb and Taroudat regions.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
iii. Scope of Work
Applicants must take into account
cross-cutting themes (discussed below),
specific considerations, and additional
activities that could affect project results
in Morocco, and meaningfully
incorporate them into the proposed
strategy, either to increase opportunities
for, or reduce obstacles to, successful
implementation. Proposed strategies
must address mechanisms for
withdrawal of children from, and
prevention of children from entering,
exploitive labor and development of
educational or training programs for
children under 18 years. Proposed
strategies should enable children to
enroll in appropriate educational
programs and successfully transition
them into the formal education system
or into vocational or other training that
will allow them to improve the
livelihood of their families and
themselves.
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
Applicants must focus their proposals
on combating exploitive child labor in
both rural and urban areas, and must
propose specific efforts to address
CSEC, trafficking of children for
exploitive labor, domestic servitude,
and exploitive child labor and
hazardous work in agriculture. Where
applicable, Applicants should specify
how direct interventions for children
below the minimum age of employment
(14 and under) and children of
employable age (15–17 years) differ. In
rural areas, Applicants should
specifically target exploitive child labor
in agriculture, especially on commercial
farms, where children’s work prevents
them from going to school and they are
exposed to harmful chemicals, are
forced to carry heavy loads, and may be
injured by agricultural tools or
machinery. In urban areas, Applicants
should target children (mostly girls) sent
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
from rural areas to work as domestic
servants, and children working in
formal enterprises such as factories and
workshops. Consideration may also be
given to street children engaged in, or
at-risk of entering, the worst forms of
child labor. Applicants are also
encouraged to identify other areas/
sectors for intervention, but must
provide convincing reasons why the
targeted sector merits funding.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Interventions and activities should
support the Government of Morocco’s
2005–2015 National Action Plan to
Eliminate Child Labor. At minimum,
collaborations should take place with
the Ministry of National Education,
Higher Education, Staff Training, and
Scientific Research; the MEVT,
including the Office for Vocational
Training and Employment Promotion;
the Ministry of Social Development,
Family, & Solidarity; other government
agencies overseeing vocational and
apprenticeship programs relevant; ILO–
IPEC; MSI; and relevant NGOs. Where
applicable, Applicants are also
encouraged to collaborate with the
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural
Development, and Sea Fisheries.
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
Applicants must propose a design that
would take into consideration
Morocco’s major development
challenges described in section (i).
Background, of this portion of this
solicitation. The strategy proposed by
Applicants must reflect a strong
understanding of Morocco’s new Labor
code and take advantage of macro-level
trends and events such as those related
to the Free Trade Agreement signed
with the United States in 2004.
Applicants should support government
efforts to provide economic opportunity
to the poor and rural groups, as well as
efforts to enhance educational services
and decent employment prospects for
the country’s growing youth population.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants must propose a strategy
that supports the government’s National
Action Plan to Eliminate Child Labor
(2005–2015). The project should
support the broad objectives of the
National Action Plan to Eliminate Child
Labor: (a) Ensuring conformity of
national child labor laws with
international conventions and
promoting their application through
enforcement mechanisms and
awareness raising activities, (b)
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32887
expanding and strengthening of
education and vocational training, and
(c) development and strengthening of
social protection mechanisms.
Applicants’ proposals must also support
at least one of the government’s sectoral
action plans targeting children in
agriculture and herding, the industrial
sector (carpets and stitching), metal and
auto work, construction, the hospitality
industry, food production, street work,
and CSEC.
In addition, Applicants should
propose to strengthen the capacity of the
Moroccan government and civil society
organizations to identify and assist
children engaged in, or at-risk of
entering, the worst forms of child labor.
Applicant should propose ways to
improve the capacity of the Moroccan
government to enforce existing labor
laws. To address this issue, Applicants
may propose activities to strengthen the
Ministry of Social Development,
Solidarity, and Labor’s Child Labor
Unit, improve the capacity of Morocco’s
labor inspectorate to identify cases of
exploitive child labor and enforce the
labor code, and expand piloted systems
to monitor and identify child laborers
and link them with social protection
services.
Applicants should address low rates
of school enrollment, high drop-out
rates, and limited availability of schools,
especially in rural areas where the
majority of working children live and
school attendance is the lowest. Projects
may support professional training for
teachers and implement capacitybuilding activities for Ministry of
Education offices nationally and in
targeted provinces to ensure improved
service delivery, increased budgetary
commitments and management, and
awareness of exploitive child labor.
Strategies may also include the direct
provision of support costs to children,
such as books and uniforms, in-school
feeding programs, school supplies, and
transportation assistance to remove
educational barriers. Applicants are
encouraged to develop creative
solutions for education delivery, such as
non-formal schools, including multigrade programs in rural areas where
formal schools may be unavailable,
especially at the secondary level.
Applicants must develop a strategy
that will increase the perceived
relevance of education and training for
children engaged in, or at-risk of
engaging in, exploitive labor, their
families and their communities with an
aim toward increasing school
enrollment. Applicants must show how
education programs and awareness
raising campaigns will be sensitive to,
and respond to, cultural traditions that
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32888
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
have led to lower school enrollment
rates in rural areas of Morocco.
Strategies should support government
efforts to remove barriers that lead to
gender disparities in enrollment,
whether these are physical barriers,
such as transportation obstacles, or
attitudinal barriers, such as a perceived
lower value amongst parents and
communities of educating girls.
Applicants may provide, as appropriate,
support services such as psychosocial
counseling and health care to direct
beneficiaries and implement awarenessraising activities that highlight the
hazards of exploitive child labor and the
benefits of education for children.
Applicants should exhibit an
understanding of current efforts to
promote youth employment in Morocco
and design interventions to strengthen
the education system and support
public/private partnerships to promote
job training programs and youth
employment. Applicants are encouraged
to propose interventions to increase
vocational training opportunities for
youth of legal working age and support
alternative income generating activities
or skills training for parents to reduce
their reliance on their children’s labor to
supplement family income and to
encourage school enrollment.
Applicants are encouraged to conduct
small-scale research projects and
disseminate findings on the
unconditional worst forms of child labor
in Morocco. Reports suggests that the
trafficking, commercial sexual
exploitation of children, and other worst
forms of child labor, do exist in the
country, but more systematic
information is needed. In considering
projects in hazardous sectors,
Applicants are encouraged to undertake
action research on improving the
occupational safety and health situation
and developing injury prevention
strategies to promote safe, acceptable
work for children ages 15–17 years.
Applicants are also encouraged to
demonstrate how previous child labor
or education efforts of their organization
have led to the mainstreaming and
sustainability of project initiatives.
Support for the Philippine Timebound
Program To Eliminate the Worst Forms
of Child Labor
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
i. Background
The Republic of the Philippines has
experienced positive acceleration and
sustained Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
growth in recent years. Yet, in light of
a worsening poverty situation, the
government faces tremendous fiscal
constraints in its ability to finance
poverty alleviation programs and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
provide for the most basic social
services for its citizens. Rapid
population growth and unequal income
distributions continue to exacerbate the
number of families and children living
below the poverty line, and the increase
in the incidence of children working in
exploitive forms of work. The
Philippines National Statistics Office
estimated that approximately 4 million
children 5 to 17 years, or 16.2 percent,
were economically active in 2001. This
represents a 12 percent increase in the
number of working children since 1995.
An estimated 70 percent of working
children are found in the rural
economy. Approximately 53 percent of
working children in rural areas are
engaged in agriculture, hunting, and
forestry. Children work as ‘‘sakadas’’ or
farm workers on plantations or
subsistence agriculture, and in both
crop and livestock production while
being exposed to various occupational
safety and health hazards. Children are
found working in variety of agricultural
sectors: Coconut, corn, flower, livestock,
pearl, rice, rubber, sugar, tobacco, and
other fruit and vegetable farms. Many
children are also involved in forestryrelated activities, such as hunting and
logging. Children involved in crop
cultivation work under extreme heat;
suffer from farm injuries caused by the
use of sharp knives, ‘‘bolos’’ (machetes),
sickles, and grain threshers; and are
exposed to chemical, biological, and
other agents found on the farm.
Children are also found working in a
variety of industrial sectors and
occupational activities, with many
working under hazardous conditions.
Some of the worst forms of child labor
in the Philippines include the forced
and bonded labor of children; the use of
children in local drug trades; the
commercial sexual exploitation of
children (CSEC), including prostitution;
the recruitment and use of children as
soldiers in armed opposition groups;
and the use of children in hazardous
work in the agricultural industry,
especially in growing sugar cane.
Children in the commercial sex industry
are used in the production of
pornography and are exploited by sex
tourists. Children are also found
working in pyrotechnics production,
deep-sea fishing, mining, and quarrying.
Children living on the streets engage in
informal labor activities such as
scavenging or begging. Child domestic
workers, primarily girls, or
‘‘kasambahays’’ are the backbone of
many Filipino households working an
average of 15 hours a day and on-call 24
hours a day, 7 days a week. Children are
reportedly trafficked internally from
rural areas to major cities, such as
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bacolod, Cebu, and Metro Manila, and
abroad to work in prostitution, domestic
service, and other areas of the informal
sector.
The Asian Development Bank has
identified increases in disability in the
general population as a contributing
factor to poverty in the Philippines.
Research on injuries among adults and
children in the country’s general
population shows that injury fatality
rates have increased 196 percent in the
Philippines over a 35 year period (1960–
1995). The Government of the
Philippines, in consultation with Safe
Kids Worldwide, has revealed that fatal
and non-fatal injuries are among the
leading causes of morbidity and
mortality in Filipino children below the
age of 15 years. In the last 30 years,
childhood fatality rates attributed to
injuries increased threefold in the
country. In 2003 alone, approximately
420,000 Filipino children experienced
an injury. At least 24 percent of
economically active children 5–17 years
working in the Philippines experienced
a work-related injury in 2001. Children
living in urban slum communities and
distant rural villages have the highest
prevalence of disabilities, which is
compounded by limited access to health
care services and unsanitary living
conditions.
In rural areas, limited employment
opportunities and low wage jobs for
adults lead many children to work to
supplement family income. Parents who
perceive the education available to their
children to be of low quality or lacking
relevance for their children’s future are
more likely to opt that their children
enter the workforce early. Also
problematic is the lack of secondary
schools in remote parts of the
Philippines, leaving numerous children,
especially girls, unable to continue their
education past the primary school level
and forcing them to seek early
employment. Regrettably, this is the
case for many girls from poor rural and
farming communities in the Visaya and
Mindanao regions who migrate or are
trafficked from rural to urban areas for
the purposes of domestic service or
commercial sexual exploitation. In
addition, rural to urban migration has
increased the number of urban poor
families and children contributing to
high numbers of children working on
the streets and scavenging.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
Even prior to its ratification of the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child
(CRC) and ILO Conventions 138 and
182, the Government of the Philippines
began efforts to combat child labor in
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
earnest around the mid-1980s. The
Government of the Philippines
intensified actions against child labor by
entering into a partnership with
UNICEF in 1988; creating a National
Child Labor Program Committee in
1992; joining ILO–IPEC in 1994;
conducting the first national child labor
survey in 1995; launching the historic
Global March Against Child Labor in
1998; and collaborating on three subregional programs of child labor in the
fishing, footwear, and mining
industries.
These efforts continue today, where
the Philippine National Strategic
Framework for Plan Development for
Children, 2000–2025, also known as
‘‘Child 21,’’ and the National Program
Against Child Labor (NPACL)
Framework serve as the primary
government policy instruments for the
development, implementation,
monitoring, and evaluation of programs
designed to prevent and eliminate child
labor in the Philippines. Child 21 sets
out broad goals to achieve quality of life
for Filipino children by 2025, and the
NPACL lays out the blueprint for
reducing the incidence of child labor by
75 percent by 2015.
The NPACL has a committee chaired
by the Department of Labor and
Employment (DOLE) with assistance
from ILO–IPEC and UNICEF. Other
major partners involved in fulfilling the
mission of NPACL include government
agencies, workers’ groups, employer
organizations, nongovernmental allies,
and international development
institutions. To carry out NPACL
objectives in communities, Regional
Child Labor Committees (RCLC),
Program Implementation Committees
Child (PIC) and Barangay Councils for
the Protection of Children (BCPC) have
been established at the regional, local,
and village levels. Child labor concerns
have also been mainstreamed into the
following key policy documents:
Medium Term Philippine Development
Plan (2004–2010), National Plan of
Action for Decent Work (2005–2007);
and Education for All National Plan
(2004–2015).
On June 28, 2002, the Government of
the Philippines became the first country
in Southeast Asia and fourth country in
the world to launch a Timebound
Program to eliminate the worst forms of
child labor in targeted sectors over a
specified period of time. The Philippine
Timebound Program (PTBP) embodies
the strategic framework and
implementation plans of the NPACL.
The initial phase of PTBP seeks to
prevent or withdraw 40,000 children
from exploitive work in 6 sectors and in
6 regions spanning a total of 8
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
provinces. The priority sectors include
children working in (1) deep-sea fishing,
(2) mining/quarrying, (3) pyrotechnics
production, (4) sugar cane farming, (5)
domestic work, and (6) commercial
sexual exploitation. Initial target areas
were located in Bulacan, Metro Manila,
Camarines Norte, Iloilo, Negros
Occidental, Negros Oriental, Cebu, and
Davao. USDOL has provided USD 10.7
million in funding for projects in
support of the PTBP, which are being
implemented through ILO–IPEC, World
Vision, and Winrock International. In
addition, the Philippines was part of an
ILO–IPEC inter-regional project to
prevent and reintegrate children
involved in armed conflict, with a
geographic focus in Mindanao.
The NPACL is currently undertaking
an assessment of the PTBP, which will
inform the target sectors for Phase II of
the PTBP. The new phase will likely
expand existing sectors and identify
new sectors where children are working
in exploitive conditions for priority
elimination. Based on their initial
research, partners of the NPACL have
proposed to expand agricultural sectors
to possibly include children working on
rubber farms. In addition, scavenging
and waste recycling have been
recommended as future sectors for
consideration. Finally, an increase in
the trafficking of children for domestic
labor and prostitution has received
attention as possible future sectors for
interventions. Additional sectors in
agriculture where children are also
involved in hazardous work and are at
risk for occupational injuries include
forestry and logging activities, livestock
and hog farming, and other crop-related
activities.
The Government of the Philippines
and its nongovernmental partners have
demonstrated commitment to children
by ratifying key UN conventions on
children’s welfare; passing national
legislation against the worst forms of
child labor; and implementing programs
to prevent and remove children from
hazardous and exploitive work.
However, government resources
available for programs to combat
exploitive child labor are modest in
comparison to the magnitude of the
problem.
The Government of the Philippines
continues to run its flagship program
through DOLE, ‘‘Sagip Batang
Manggagawa’’ (SBM—Rescue the Child
Laborers). SBM uses community-based
mechanisms for detecting, monitoring,
and reporting children working in
abusive and hazardous situations;
provides immediate relief through
search and rescue operations through
Quick Action Teams (QAT); offers legal,
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32889
health, and psychosocial services to
children rescued from exploitive labor
and sexual exploitation; and facilitates
the reintegration of children into their
communities of origin.
The Government of the Philippines
also has a long history of instituting
legislative reforms to protect the welfare
of children and regulate the
employment of minors. The Labor Code
of the Philippines and Republic Act
(R.A.) 7658 of 1993 sets the basic
minimum age for employment at 15
years, with the exception that a child
may be permitted to work under the
supervision of a parent or legal guardian
as long as the work does not interfere
with school or place the child’s life,
safety, health, morals, or normal
development in danger. In accordance
with R.A. 7658 and the Labor Code,
DOLE Order No. 4 of 1999 outlines
major areas of work and related
occupations regarded as hazardous for
children.
R.A. No. 9231 of 2003, An Act
Providing for the Elimination of the
Worst Forms of Child Labor and
Affording Stronger Protection for the
Working Child, codified into domestic
law the worst forms of child labor as
specified in ILO Convention 182. The
Act also regulates hours of work;
delineates the management and
disbursement of the working child’s
income; guarantees access to education,
health, and legal services; and includes
more stringent penalties for those in
violation of the law.
To address issues of trafficking in
persons, the Government of the
Philippines passed R.A. 9208 of 2003,
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003,
which criminalizes and establishes
penalties for the trafficking of children
and adults for the purposes of
exploitation, including trafficking for
adoption, sex tourism, prostitution,
pornography, the recruitment of
children into armed conflict, or under
the guise of arranged marriage.
iii. Scope of Work
Taking into account the challenging
implementing environment in the
Philippines and the current
government’s attention and priority to
the unmet needs of the most
disadvantaged sectors of the population,
Applicants must propose a creative and
innovative approach that addresses the
challenges of reintegrating and
educating children who are in the worst
forms of child labor. The application
must also take any cross-cutting themes
(discussed below) into account that
could affect project results in the
Philippines and meaningfully
incorporate them into the proposed
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32890
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
strategy, either to increase opportunities
for, or to reduce obstacles to, successful
implementation.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
Applicants must focus their proposals
on combating prostitution of children,
exploitive child labor in agriculture,
especially in the sugar cane industry,
and exploitive labor in domestic service.
Children trafficked from their home
communities for domestic service or
prostitution should be given priority
consideration. Applicants should make
the withdrawal and prevention of
children 15 years and under from
exploitive labor a priority. In
determining other target sectors and
geographic areas for priority
elimination, Applicants should consult
with NPACL and provide a justification
for the proposed sectors and geographic
areas. At minimum, Applicants must
target four sectors and work in at least
five regions. In instances in which
proposed sectors or geographic areas
may fall outside the priority areas of the
NPACL, Applicants must offer a
convincing justification for this choice.
Project interventions may be carried out
in both urban and rural areas, however,
the geographic focus of the project
should be on regions where there is a
high incidence of exploitive child labor.
In considering the distribution of
children for target sectors and
geographic areas, Applicants should
take into account that a majority of
working children in the Philippines is
in rural areas and in agriculture.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Applicants should propose a strategy
to collaborate with the NPACL and
ensure the effective enforcement of
recent legal reforms through the
proposed project of support to the
PTBP. In developing its approach to
strengthen the national policy
framework on child labor and integrate
strategies into already existing
government programs, Applicants
should coordinate with key government
agencies, such as the DOLE; Department
of Education (DepEd); Department of
Social Welfare and Development
(DSWD); Department of Agrarian
Reform (DAR); and the Department of
Health (DOH). Within the DOLE,
Applicants should specifically
coordinate with the Bureau of Women
and Young Workers (BWYW) and
Occupational Safety and Health Center
(OSHC), and the Work Improvement in
Neighborhood Development program. In
addition to government agencies,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Applicants should collaborate with key
stakeholders working to fulfill the
mission of the NPACL (i.e., relevant
nongovernmental organization,
employers’ and workers’ groups, and
international institutions).
Applicants should also build upon
and not duplicate activities from the
first phase of the PTBP and ensure the
sustainability of effective project
strategies by previously funded USDOL
projects to support the PTBP.
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
The Philippines’ longstanding
macroeconomic policies have resulted
in large budget deficits with debt
interest payments as a percentage of the
national budget increasing from 19.5
percent in 1998 to a high of 27.4 percent
in 2003. In order for the Government of
the Philippines to see sustained
improvements in the economic forecast
and achieve its 2015 goal to
substantially decrease the number of
children in hazardous occupations,
poverty alleviation and child labor
elimination strategies must take into
account (1) slow economic
development, especially in the
agricultural sector; (2) unequal
distribution of incomes among citizens;
(3) high unemployment, elevated
underemployment, and low wage rates
for adult workers; (4) rapid population
growth; (5) reduction of the federal
deficit and improved governance; (6)
lack of resources and access to
education and basic social services; and
(7) political instability and armed
conflict, particularly in Mindanao.
Applicants should consider how the
macroeconomic factors might affect the
project in the geographic areas where
the project would be implemented and
propose a design that would contribute
to addressing the implementing
environment. In addition, Applicants
should propose a strategy that addresses
the hazardous labor conditions that lead
to injuries among working children,
especially those working in agriculture
(see information on injury and
disabilities among children in the
Philippines in section (i) Background).
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants must propose a strategy to
support the Government of the
Philippines in fulfilling its goals under
Phase II of the PTBP within the NPACL
framework. Applicants must work with
NPACL’s following programmatic areas:
(1) Action research; (2) advocacy and
mobilization; (3) children’s
participation; (4) community
organization and empowerment; (5) law
and policy; (6) surveillance and rescue;
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(7) workplace monitoring and
inspection; (8) capability building; (9)
documentation, monitoring and
evaluation; (10) direct services; and (11)
institutionalization.
At the policy level, Applicants must
demonstrate how its approach carries
out the strategic framework and
implementation plans of the NPACL to
reduce the number of children in the
worst forms of child labor, especially
hazardous occupations, by 75 percent
by 2015. Applicants should demonstrate
how it intends to effectively support
implementation and enforcement of
R.A. No. 9231, An Act Providing for the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor and Affording Stronger Protection
for the Working Child and R.A. 9208,
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003.
In addressing the hazardous work
activities for children, Applicants
should support the NPACL efforts to
update DOLE Order No. 4 of 1999,
Hazardous Work List. Applicants
should also consider how to further the
enactment of the ‘‘Batas Kasambahay’’
or Domestic Workers Bill. Finally,
Applicants should develop a strategy
that addresses the broader development
goals eliminating child labor as
specified in the following key policy
documents: Medium Term Philippine
Development Plan (2004–2010),
National Plan of Action for Decent Work
(2005–2007); and Education for All
National Plan (2004–2015). In carrying
out the project to withdraw children
from, and prevent children from
entering, exploitive child labor through
direct action, Applicants should
develop a strategy that builds the
capacity and reflects the institutional
organization at the NPACL at the
regional, provincial and village levels.
Applicants should work with
implementing agencies to reach the
community through RCLC, PIC and
BCPC.
Applicants must develop a strategy
that addresses the opportunity costs of
schooling for parents in the Philippines
that currently sway them to allow
children to enter the workforce
prematurely, especially when they
weigh the expense of schooling, access
to schools, and the perceived
irrelevance of education. Applicants
should coordinate with the DepEd to
prioritize regions and ensure that
primary schools (formal or non-formal),
secondary schools, and vocational
training centers offer quality, relevant
instruction. The establishment of
alternative educational delivery
mechanisms is also encouraged, such as
multi-grade schools in remote rural
areas are also encouraged, especially in
farm communities with high pockets of
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
child labor. Furthermore, Applicants
should ensure the effective
decentralization of educational
administration and policies, such as the
no-fee policy, in a way that supports the
integration of current or former working
children.
Finally, in considering projects in the
sugar cane industry or other agricultural
sectors, Applicants are encouraged to
undertake action research on improving
the occupational safety and health
situation and developing injury
prevention strategies to promote safe,
acceptable work for children 15–17
years, building on the efforts of the
USDOL-funded ILO–IPEC, World
Vision, and Winrock projects of support
to the PTBP that worked to eliminate
hazardous work for children in the
sugar cane industry.
Combating Exploitive Child Labor in
Togo Through Education
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
i. Background
An estimated 64.5 percent of children
ages 5 to 14 were found working in Togo
in 2000, according to the Understanding
Children’s Work (UCW) Project.
Children work in both rural and urban
areas, especially in family-based
farming and small-scale trading.
Children are also found working in
factories, as domestic servants, and in
commercial sexual exploitation (CSEC).
Togo is a country of origin,
destination, and transit for children
trafficked for the purposes of domestic
labor, sexual exploitation and
agricultural work. Trafficked children
also work as produce porters and
roadside sellers. Four primary routes for
child trafficking in Togo have been
documented: (1) The domestic
trafficking of Togolese girls, particularly
´
to the capital city of Lome; (2) the
trafficking of Togolese girls to Gabon,
Benin, Niger, and Nigeria; (3) the
trafficking of girls from Benin, Nigeria,
´
and Ghana to Lome; and (4) the
trafficking of boys to Nigeria, Benin, and
ˆ
Cote d’Ivoire. There are also reports of
children being trafficked to Lebanon,
Saudi Arabia, and Europe. Children
represent a majority of those trafficked,
and children of Kotocoli, Tchamba,
Ewe, Kabye, and Akposso ethnicities are
particularly at-risk of being trafficked.
Most of these children come from poor
rural areas, primarily the Maritime,
Plateau, and Central regions.
HIV/AIDS is a factor that may
contribute to the incidence of exploitive
child labor in Togo, including the worst
forms of child labor. According to
UNICEF, some 88,000 children have
been orphaned in Togo due to HIV/
AIDS.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
By law, education is free and
compulsory in Togo until age 15.
However, parents are increasingly
responsible for both direct and indirect
costs of education, and secondary
education is not affordable for many
families. School fees ranging from 4,000
to 13,000 CFA (USD 7 to 24) are often
required, though the fees for girls and
economically disadvantaged children
may be reduced or waived entirely.
Togolese schools are overcrowded, have
crumbling infrastructures, and lack
basic supplies. Teachers are poorly
trained, and the government has
difficulty in paying teachers’ salaries,
resulting in a shortage of teachers in
Togo. Other deficiencies in the
education system include low
educational quality in rural areas, high
repetition and drop-out rates, and
sexual harassment of female students by
male teachers.
ii. Relevant Programs, Policies, and
Projects
The Ministry of Labor and the
Ministry of Population, Social Affairs,
and Promotion of Women have primary
responsibility for enforcing the
country’s child labor laws. These
ministries and the Ministries of Justice,
Health, and Security, including Togo’s
police, army, and customs units, are
involved in anti-trafficking efforts. In
addition, the Ministry of Tourism is
working to combat sexual tourism,
including CSEC. The government has
taken initial steps to combat the worst
forms of child labor.
Togolese law sets the minimum
employment age in any enterprise at 15
years, unless an exemption is granted by
the Ministry of Labor after consulting
with the National Council on Work.
Children, however, may not begin
apprenticeships before completing the
mandatory level of education, or before
the age of 15. In 2006, Togo’s National
Assembly adopted a new Labor Code,
which includes provisions on child
labor, including the worst forms of child
labor. Under the new law, the ‘‘worst
forms of child labor,’’ parallel the
definition from ILO Convention 182,
and exposing a child to a worst form of
child labor is punishable by
imprisonment. The government also is
implementing a National Plan of Action
on Child Abuse, Child Labor, and Child
Trafficking that includes activities such
as strengthening border controls,
awareness-raising campaigns, and
establishing community structures for
prevention of child trafficking and
reintegration of trafficked children.
In 2005, the government passed a law
prohibiting child trafficking, with a
penalty of up to 10 years in prison for
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32891
traffickers, though inconsistencies in the
law have made implementation and
prosecution difficult. In 2006, Togo was
1 of 24 countries to adopt the
Multilateral Cooperative Agreement to
Combat Trafficking in Persons,
especially Women and Children, in
West and Central Africa and the Joint
Plan of Action against Trafficking in
Persons, especially Women and
Children in the West and Central
African Regions. As part of the
Multilateral Cooperative Agreement, the
governments of West Africa agreed to
put into place a child trafficking
monitoring system; to ensure that birth
certificates and travel identity
documents cannot easily be falsified or
altered; to provide assistance to each
other in the investigation, arrest and
prosecution of trafficking offenders; to
protect, rehabilitate and reintegrate
trafficked children; and to improve
educational systems, vocational training
and apprenticeships.
In recent years, the Government of
Togo has supported two USDOL-funded
projects to eliminate exploitive child
labor and provide educational
opportunities for these children. Since
2001, the government has actively
participated in a USD 9 million regional
project, funded by USDOL and
implemented by ILO–IPEC, to combat
trafficking in children for labor
exploitation in West and Central Africa,
known as ‘‘LUTRENA’’. Ending in June
2007, the LUTRENA project has created
a network of local vigilance committees
to monitor and prevent child trafficking
in communities throughout Togo and
has launched a central database on
trafficked children, which includes
information from the government
(customs, police, etc.), NGOs, and the
community. From 2002–2006, CARE
Togo implemented a USD 2 million
project funded by USDOL to combat
child trafficking through education,
directly serving over 6,000 children who
were withdrawn or prevented from
being trafficked. The project targeted 6
prefectures and 60 villages in the
Maritime and Central regions, based on
the high incidence of child trafficking
and poor provision of educational
services in these regions. Interventions
included mobilizing and empowering
communities to protect children from
being trafficked, awareness-raising
campaigns through radio broadcasts and
door-to-door sensitization efforts,
involvement of parents and
communities in school management,
support to reintegration centers, and
improvements to school infrastructure.
Togo also participates in an ILO–IPEC
project to combat child labor in
Francophone Africa, funded by France,
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32892
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
and an ILO–IPEC project concerning the
social reintegration of minors involved
in illicit activities, which is funded by
the Italian government. The Government
of Togo also works in partnership with
UNICEF, Terre des Hommes, Plan
International, and other NGOs on child
labor and trafficking issues.
iii. Scope of Work
Applicants must take into account
cross-cutting themes (discussed below)
and specific considerations that could
affect project results in Togo, and
meaningfully incorporate them into the
proposed strategy, either to increase
opportunities for, or reduce obstacles to,
successful implementation. In Togo,
specific considerations for project
strategies and program activities should
include the following components:
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
The project should focus direct
interventions on withdrawing children
from, and preventing children from
entering, exploitive child labor,
including trafficking in persons.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Applicants must demonstrate that the
proposed project activities support the
Government of Togo’s National Plan of
Action on child abuse, child labor, and
child trafficking. The project must also
assist government efforts to implement
the Multilateral Cooperative Agreement
to Combat Trafficking in Persons,
especially Women and Children, in
West and Central Africa and the Joint
Plan of Action against Trafficking in
Persons, especially Women and
Children in the West and Central
African Regions. Collaborations should
take place with the Ministry of Labor;
the Ministry of Population, Social
Affairs, and Promotion of Women; the
Ministry of Education; the Ministry of
Justice; the Ministry of Security; the
Ministry of Health; the ILO; and
UNICEF. Applicants should have a
thorough knowledge of the USDOLfunded anti-trafficking project
implemented by CARE in 2002–2006
and must collaborate with the USDOLfunded, ILO–IPEC LUTRENA project in
addressing of trafficking in children in
Togo. The proposal must also
demonstrate that the project will work
collaboratively with local and regional
institutions and organizations already
engaged in child labor and education
issues in Togo.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
Applicants must propose strategies
that address issues related to trafficking
of children for exploitive child labor and
the impact of HIV/AIDS in increasing
the number of children engaged in, or
at-risk of entering, exploitive child
labor.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants should demonstrate an
understanding of the underlying
sensitivities involved in returning
children trafficked, sold, or abducted for
exploitive child labor, or withdrawing
children from CSEC, and propose
strategies for addressing these
situations, which may include the
provision of psychosocial counseling.
Applicants should also consider and
seek to address the increased incidence
among, and apparent vulnerability of,
certain ethnic groups to child
trafficking.
Combating Exploitive Child Labor
Amongst War-Affected Children in
Northern Uganda
i. Background
Child labor is common in Uganda,
especially in the informal sector.
Children sell small items on the streets,
work in shops, beg for money, and are
involved in the commercial sex
industry. Children also work in
agriculture, brickmaking, charcoal
burning, quarrying, and construction.
An ILO–IPEC report based on the 2000–
2001 Uganda Demographic and Health
Survey estimated the total number of
working children aged 5 to 17 years in
the country at 2.9 million, accounting
for 34.2 percent of all children in this
age group.
HIV/AIDS is a significant factor
contributing to the incidence of
exploitive child labor, including the
worst forms of child labor in Uganda.
According to UNICEF, almost two
million children have been orphaned in
Uganda, primarily due to HIV/AIDS.
In northern Uganda, there are
enormous barriers that prevent children
from accessing and completing a quality
education. Since 1986, the Lord’s
Resistance Army (LRA) has abducted
approximately 25,000 children from
Uganda and southern Sudan to serve as
porters and soldiers. Abducted girls
often suffer the added trauma of rape,
and are frequently given to rebel
commanders as sexual slaves. Twenty
years of war between the government
and the LRA has forced approximately
1.6 million people (a majority of whom
are women and children) to seek refuge
in Internally Displaced Persons’ (IDP)
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
camps or, alternatively, in the towns of
Gulu and Kitgum. With the signing of a
peace agreement between the
government and the LRA in August
2006, some families have left the IDP
camps to return to their land. In the
Karamoja region, drought and ethnic
conflict over cattle has put thousands of
people at risk. The government’s forced
disarmament program has also led to
violent clashes between the Ugandan
military and the agro-pastoralist
Karimojong people, particularly young
men.
Children in northern Uganda face an
increase in stress from war, violence,
and displacement. Displaced and
formerly abducted children must cope
with the psychological effects of this
trauma. Moreover, in many cases, they
return to school after a long absence to
find themselves in the difficult position
of being older than their classmates and
having missed years of schooling.
Formerly abducted girls have additional
challenges as they often return from
captivity as new mothers of young
children.
Despite government incentives to
local teachers and a teacher training
college located in Gulu, northern
Uganda is suffering from a shortage of
educators. The teachers are often
unequipped to accommodate the special
needs of students adversely affected by
conflict in the region and/or impacted
by HIV/AIDS. Furthermore, for many
children, the financial costs of attending
school in northern Uganda are too great.
In 1997, the Ministry of Education
instituted a policy of Universal Primary
Education (UPE) to make formal
schooling more affordable and thus
more available to students in Uganda;
however, families must pay for school
materials, uniforms, Parent Teacher
Association (PTA) fees, and lunch and
building fees. At the secondary
education level, families are also
required to pay tuition. Although some
youth have an interest in learning skills
or a trade, most technical training
colleges require a level of academic
achievement that former child soldiers
and other war-affected youth have not
attained.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and
Projects
The Ministry of Gender, Labor, and
Social Development (MGLSD), charged
with enforcing Uganda’s child labor
laws, investigates child labor
complaints through district labor
officers. The MGLSD houses a Child
Labor Unit and implements the
government’s 2006 National Child Labor
Policy and National Plan of Action to
Eliminate Child Labor. The MGLSD also
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
coordinates Uganda’s Orphans and
Vulnerable Children Policy, which
extends social services to groups that
include children who participate in the
worst forms of child labor. In addition
to the MGLSD, local governments are
empowered to investigate child labor
complaints. The National Council of
Children, the Family Protection Unit in
the police department, and the Uganda
Human Rights Commission gather and
act upon reports of child abuse.
The Ministry of Education and Sports
has developed strategies for working
with children living in areas of conflict
in a Basic Education Policy and Costed
Framework for Educationally
Disadvantaged Children. The policy
aims to increase community
participation in education, strengthen
linkages between formal and non-formal
education, improve education quality by
ensuring appropriate infrastructure and
curriculum content and methodology,
and provide appropriate learning
materials. The Ministry of Education
and Sports and the MGLSD have
established a multi-agency working
group to address the needs of children
who have suffered from armed conflict.
The law sets the minimum age for
employment at 14 years and prohibits
persons below the age of 18 from
engaging in hazardous labor. The
Constitution of Uganda states that
children under 16 years have the right
to be protected from social and
economic exploitation and should not
be employed in hazardous work; work
that would otherwise endanger their
health, physical, mental, spiritual,
moral, or social development; or work
that would interfere with their
education. The law prohibits
compulsory and forced labor. While
trafficking in persons is not a specific
violation under Ugandan law, related
offenses cover detaining a person with
sexual intent, which is punishable up to
7 years of imprisonment; trading in
slaves, which is punishable by up to 10
years of imprisonment; and
‘‘defilement,’’ defined as having sex
with a minor, which is a punishable
offense with a range of sentences
leading up to the death penalty.
The Government of Uganda supports
three USDOL-funded projects to
eliminate child labor and provide
educational opportunities for children
engaged in or at risk of engaging in
exploitive labor. The government is
participating in the USD 3 million
‘‘Opportunities for Reducing Adolescent
and Child Labor through Education
(ORACLE)’’ project funded by USDOL
and implemented by the International
Rescue Committee and the Italian
Association for Volunteers in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
International Service. Ending in
September 2007, the ORACLE project
contributes to the prevention and
elimination of the worst forms of child
labor amongst conflict-affected children
in northern Uganda through the
provision of transitional and non-formal
education and family-based poverty
reduction strategies. As of September
2006, the project has withdrawn or
prevented 4,047 children from
exploitive labor in Kitgum and Pader,
updated the skills of 716 teachers, and
conducted public awareness campaigns
on the problems of child labor and the
value of education. The government is
also participating in a USD 3 million
USDOL-funded, ILO-IPEC regional
project to combat and prevent HIV/
AIDS-induced child labor in Uganda
and Zambia. To reduce vulnerability to
participation in child labor, this project
provides vocational and basic
education, psychosocial rehabilitation
and social protection to children
orphaned by HIV/AIDS. The ‘‘Kenya,
Uganda, Rwanda, and Ethiopia
Together’’ (KURET) Project is also being
implemented in Uganda by World
Vision, in collaboration with the
International Rescue Committee and the
Academy for Educational Development.
This USD 14.5 million project, funded
by USDOL, provides educational
alternatives to children living in HIV/
AIDS-affected areas who are especially
vulnerable to engaging in the exploitive
child labor, and has activities in the
northern Uganda districts of Arua, Lira,
and Gulu.
In collaboration with the government,
UNICEF provides funding for early
childhood development, girls’ education
initiatives, and infrastructure
improvements. USAID supports training
for School Management Committees,
develops HIV/AIDS education for
primary school students, and promotes
teacher training. Several NGOs have
also developed programs focusing on
the rehabilitation and reintegration of
former child soldiers and war-affected
children, as well as HIV/AIDS-affected
children.
iii. Scope of Work
Applicants must take into account
cross-cutting themes (described below),
specific considerations, and additional
activities that could affect project results
in northern Uganda, and meaningfully
incorporate them into the proposed
strategy, either to increase opportunities
for, or reduce obstacles to, successful
implementation. In northern Uganda,
specific considerations for project
strategies and program activities should
include the following components:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32893
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/
or Geographic Focus
The project should focus direct
interventions on withdrawing and
preventing war-affected children and
youth from exploitive child labor, with
particular emphasis on the worst forms
of child labor, in northern Uganda,
including the Karamoja region.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs
and/or Links to Specific National
Policies
Applicants must demonstrate that the
proposed project activities support the
Government of Uganda’s National
Policy on Elimination of Child Labor
and National Plan of Action on
Elimination of Child Labor.
Collaborations should take place with
the MGLSD and the Ministry of
Education and Sports, and the
Applicants must also demonstrate that
the project will work collaboratively
with local and regional institutions and
organizations already engaged in child
labor and education issues in northern
Uganda. The proposal should support
the efforts begun under the USDOLfunded ORACLE project to withdraw
and prevent children from engaging in
exploitive labor in northern Uganda.
Applicants should also demonstrate
collaboration and coordination with the
USDOL-funded KURET and ILO–IPEC
Regional HIV/AIDS projects in
addressing the cross-cutting theme of
HIV/AIDS in Uganda. Given the
complex social situation of children in
northern Uganda, Applicants are also
encouraged to collaborate with other
existing programs working on issues of
poverty, health and nutrition,
community development, reintegration,
and conflict resolution.
3. Implementing Environment/CrossCutting Themes
USDOL seeks to fund a sustainable
program that provides for the emerging
educational needs of war-affected
children engaged in, or at risk of
engaging in, exploitive child labor as
northern Uganda transitions towards
peace. Applicants should take into
consideration the fluidity and
constantly changing nature of the
security situation in northern Uganda
and related migrations flows.
Applicants must also incorporate the
cross-cutting theme of HIV/AIDS into
the project strategy.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
In developing the project strategy,
Applicants must provide a working
definition of ‘‘war-affected children/
youth’’ that will be used in identifying
potential direct beneficiaries under the
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32894
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
project and should account for the
demographic and social characteristics
of such children and youth. Applicants
should also exhibit an understanding of
current efforts to promote youth
employment in northern Uganda.
II. Award Information
Type of assistance instrument for
projects to be awarded under this
solicitation: Cooperative Agreement.
USDOL’s involvement in project
implementation and oversight is
outlined in section VI.2. The duration of
the project(s) funded by this solicitation
is three to four (4) years. The start date
of project activities will be negotiated
upon awarding of the Cooperative
Agreement, but will be no later than
September 30, 2007.
Up to USD 46.494 million will be
awarded under this solicitation. USDOL
may award 10 or more Cooperative
Agreements to one or more
organizations and/or Associations that
may apply to implement projects to
combat exploitive child labor in the
following 10 countries: Bolivia (up to
$3.344 million), Cambodia (up to $4
million), Colombia (up to $5.1 million),
Democratic Republic of the Congo (up to
$5.5 million), the Dominican Republic
(up to $4 million), Indonesia (up to
$5.55 million), Morocco (up to $3
million), the Philippines (up to $5.5
million), Togo (up to $5 million), and
Uganda (up to $5.5 million). The
Grantee may not subgrant any of the
funds obligated under these Cooperative
Agreements, but may use subcontracts.
See section IV.5.E for further
information on subcontracts and
Appendix D for additional clarification
on the differences between subgrants
and subcontracts.
III. Eligibility Information
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
1. Eligible Applicants
Any commercial, international,
educational, or non-profit
organization(s), including any faithbased, community-based, or public
international organization(s) capable of
successfully developing and
implementing educational programs
that aim to withdraw children from, or
prevent children from entering,
exploitive child labor in the target
country is eligible to apply. However,
the Grantee (or Lead Grantee, in the case
of an Association) is not allowed to
charge a fee (profit). Neutral, nonreligious criteria that neither favor nor
disfavor religion will be employed in
the selection of Cooperative Agreement
recipients. Applications from foreign
governments and entities that are
agencies of, or operated by or for, a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
foreign state or government will not be
considered. An Applicant must
demonstrate a country presence,
independently or through a relationship
with another organization(s) with
country presence, which gives it the
ability to initiate program activities
upon award of the Cooperative
Agreement (see section V.1.C.ii). Please
Note: Applicants may apply for more
than one Cooperative Agreement under
this solicitation; however, separate
applications must be submitted for each
country. If applications for more than
one Cooperative Agreement are
combined, they will not be considered.
If it is deemed the most effective and
efficient strategy for achieving the goals
outlined in the Scope of Work, USDOL
may award one or more Cooperative
Agreements to an Association, which is
a partnership of more than one
organization(s). Any such Association
must submit to USDOL, as an
attachment to the application, an
Association agreement, reflecting an
appropriate joint venture, partnership,
or other contractual agreement and
outlining the deliverables, activities,
and corresponding timeline for which
each Associate will be responsible.
Copies of such agreements will not
count toward the page limit.
If any entity identified in the
application as an Associate does not
sign the Cooperative Agreement, the
Lead Grantee must provide, within 60
days of award, either a written
subcontract agreement with such entity,
acceptable to USDOL, or an explanation
as to why that entity will not be
participating in the Cooperative
Agreement. USDOL reserves the right to
re-evaluate the award of the Cooperative
Agreement in light of any such change
in an entity’s status and may terminate
the award if USDOL deems it
appropriate.
For the purposes of this proposal and
the Cooperative Agreement award, the
Lead Grantee will be: (1) The primary
point of contact with USDOL to receive
and respond to all inquiries,
communications and orders under the
project; (2) the only entity with
authority to withdraw or draw down
funds through the Department of Health
and Human Services—Payment
Management System (HHS–PMS); (3)
responsible for submitting to USDOL all
deliverables, including all technical and
financial reports related to the project,
regardless of which Associate performed
the work; (4) the sole entity that may
request or agree to a revision or
amendment of the award or the Project
Document; and (5) responsible for
working with USDOL to close out the
project. Note, however, that each
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Associate is ultimately responsible for
overall project performance, regardless
of any assignment of specific tasks, but
Associates may agree, among
themselves only, to apportion the
liability for such performance. Each
Associate must comply with all
applicable federal regulations and is
individually subject to audit.
In accordance with 29 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 98, entities that
are debarred or suspended from
receiving federal contracts or grants
shall be excluded from Federal financial
assistance and are ineligible to receive
funding under this solicitation.
2. Other Eligibility Requirements
Applicants must include their Dun
and Bradstreet Number (DUNS) in the
organizational unit section of Block 8 of
the SF 424. For Associations, Block 8 of
the SF 424 should contain the DUNS
number of the proposed Lead Grantee,
and a list of the DUNS number(s) of all
proposed members of the Association
should be included as an attachment to
the SF 424. DUNS is an acronym which
stands for ‘‘Data Universal Numbering
System,’’ and a DUNS number is a
unique nine-digit number used to
identify a business. Beginning October
1, 2003, all Applicants for Federal grant
funding opportunities are required to
include a DUNS number with their
application per the Office of
Management and Budget Notice of Final
Policy Issuance, 68 Federal Register
38402 (June 27, 2003). The DUNS
number is a nine-digit identification
number that uniquely identifies
business entities. There is no charge for
obtaining a DUNS number. To obtain a
DUNS number call 1–866–705–5711 or
access the following Web site: https://
www.dnb.com/us/.
Requests for exemption from the
DUNS number requirement must be
made to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Office of Federal
Financial Management at 202–395–
3993. If no DUNS number is provided
in the application, and the Applicant
does not provide evidence of an OMB
exemption from the DUNS number
requirement, then the application will
be considered non-responsive.
After receiving a DUNS number,
Applicants must also register as a
vendor with the Central Contractor
Registration through the following Web
site: https://www.ccr.gov or by phone at
1–888–227–2423. Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) should become active
within 24 hours of completion. For any
questions regarding registration, please
contact the CCR Assistance Center at
1–888–227–2423.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
After registration, Applicants will
receive a confirmation number. The
Point of Contact listed by the
organization will receive a Trader
Partnership Identification Number
(TPIN) via mail. The TPIN is, and
should remain, a confidential password.
3. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
This solicitation does not require
Applicants to share costs or provide
matching funds; however, Applicants
are encouraged to do so, and this is a
rating criteria worth up to five (5)
additional points (see section V.1.F.).
Applicants who propose matching
funds, in-kind contributions, and other
forms of cost sharing must indicate their
estimated dollar value in the Standard
Form (SF) 424 and SF 424A submitted
as part of the application. Grantees
should note that they will be
responsible for reporting on these funds
quarterly in financial reports (SF 269s)
and are liable for meeting the full
amount of these costs during the life of
the Cooperative Agreement.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Application Package
This solicitation contains all of the
necessary information, including
information on required forms, needed
to apply for Cooperative Agreement
funding. This solicitation is published
as part of this Federal Register notice.
Additional copies of the Federal
Register may be obtained from your
nearest U.S. Government office or
public library or online at: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
index.html.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
Applications may be submitted to
USDOL in hard copy or electronically at
https://www.grants.gov. Applicants
electing to submit hard copies must
submit one (1) blue ink-signed original,
complete application, plus three (3)
copies of the application. Applicants
may submit applications for one or more
countries. However, Applicants
applying for a Cooperative Agreement
for more than one target country must
submit a separate application for each
country. The application must consist of
two (2) separate parts, (1) a cost
proposal and (2) a technical proposal, as
described below. Applicants should
number all pages of the application. All
parts of the application must be written
in English, in 10–12 pitch font size.
Part I of the application, the cost
proposal, must contain the SF 424,
Application for Federal Assistance, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Sections A–F of the Budget Information
Form SF 424A. Applicants are also
required to submit a detailed outputsbased budget that links costs to project
design and an accompanying budget
narrative. The SF 424, SF 424A, and a
sample outputs-based budget are
available from ILAB’s Web site at
https://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/
bkgrd.htm. The individual signing the
SF 424 on behalf of the Applicant must
be authorized to bind the Applicant.
The cost proposal must contain
information on the Applicant’s indirect
costs, using the form provided on
ILAB’s Web site at https://www.dol.gov/
ilab/grants/bkgrd.htm. Applicants
should note all instructions outlined on
this form and include one of the
following supporting documents, as
applicable, in their application: (1) A
current, approved Cost Allocation Plan
(CAP); (2) a current Negotiated Indirect
Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA); or (3) a
Certificate of Direct Costs. In the case of
Associations, each member of the
Association must submit a copy of the
aforementioned documents.
All Applicants are requested to
complete the Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants (OMB No.
1890–0014), which has been provided
in Appendix D.
Part II, the technical proposal,
demonstrates the Applicant’s
capabilities to plan and implement the
proposed project in accordance with the
provisions of this solicitation. The
Technical Proposal must not exceed 45
single-sided (81⁄2″ × 11″), double-spaced
pages with 1-inch margins. The
technical application must identify how
Applicants will carry out the Scope of
Work in section I.3. of this solicitation.
The following information is required:
• A two-page abstract summarizing
the proposed project and Applicant
profile information including: Applicant
name, contact information of the key
contact person at the Applicant’s
organization in case questions should
arise (including name, address,
telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail
address, if applicable), project title,
Association members and/or
subcontractors (if applicable), proposed
project activities, funding level
requested and the amount of leveraged
resources, if applicable;
• A table of contents listing the
application sections;
• A project design description as
specified in the Application Evaluation
Criteria found in section V.1.A. of this
solicitation (maximum 45 pages) and a
corresponding Logical Framework
matrix as described in section V.1.A;
• A Sustainability Plan
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32895
• A Work Plan identifying major
project activities, deadlines for
completing the activities and person(s)
or institution(s) responsible for
completing these activities that is linked
to the Logical Framework matrix.
Please note that the abstract, table of
contents, Logical Framework matrix,
Sustainability Plan, and Work Plan are
not included in the 45-page limit for the
project design description.
Any applications that do not consist
of the above-mentioned parts and
conform to these standards will be
deemed unresponsive to this solicitation
and may be rejected. Any additional
information not required under this
solicitation will not be considered.
3. Submission Dates, Times, and
Address
Applications must be delivered (by
hand, mail, or electronically through
www.grants.gov) by 4:45 p.m., Eastern
Time, July 25, 2007 to: U.S. Department
of Labor, Procurement Services Center,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room
S–4307, Washington, DC 20210,
Attention: Ms. Lisa Harvey, Reference:
Solicitation 07–10. Applications sent by
e-mail, telegram, or facsimile (FAX) will
not be accepted. Applications sent by
non-Postal Service delivery services,
such as Federal Express or UPS, will be
accepted; however, Applicants bear the
responsibility for timely submission.
The application package must be
received at the designated place by the
date and time specified or it will be
considered unresponsive and will be
rejected. Any application received at the
Procurement Services Center after the
deadline will not be considered unless
it is received before the award is made
and:
A. It is determined by the Government
that the late receipt was due solely to
mishandling by the Government after
receipt at USDOL at the address
indicated; and/or
B. It was sent by registered or certified
mail not later than the fifth calendar day
before the deadline; or
C. It was sent by U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail Next Day Service-Post
Office to Addressee, not later than 5
p.m. at the place of mailing two (2)
working days, excluding weekends and
Federal holidays, prior to the deadline.
The only acceptable evidence to
establish the date of mailing of a late
application sent by registered or
certified mail is the U.S. Postal Service
postmark on the envelope or wrapper
and on the original receipt from the U.S.
Postal Service. The only acceptable
evidence to establish the date of mailing
of a late application sent by U.S. Postal
Service Express Mail Next Day Service-
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32896
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
Post Office to Addressee is the date
entered by the Post Office clerk on the
‘‘Express Mail Next Day Service-Post
Office to Addressee’’ label and the
postmark on the envelope or wrapper on
the original receipt from the U.S. Postal
Service.
If the postmark is not legible, an
application received after the above
closing time and date shall be processed
as if mailed late. ‘‘Postmark’’ means a
printed, stamped, or otherwise placed
impression (not a postage meter
machine impression) that is readily
identifiable without further action as
having been applied and affixed by an
employee of the U.S. Postal Service on
the date of mailing. Therefore,
Applicants should request that the
postal clerk place a legible hand
cancellation ‘‘bull’s-eye’’ postmark on
both the receipt and the envelope or
wrapper.
The only acceptable evidence to
establish the time of receipt at USDOL
is the date/time stamp of the
Procurement Service Center on the
application wrapper or other
documentary evidence of receipt
maintained by that office. Confirmation
of receipt can be obtained from Ms. Lisa
Harvey (see section VII. for contact
information).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Please Note: All Applicants are advised
that U.S. mail delivery in the Washington DC
area can be slow and erratic due to concerns
involving contamination. All Applicants
must take this into consideration when
preparing to meet the application deadline.
Applicants may also apply online at
https://www.grants.gov. Applicants
submitting proposals online are
requested to refrain from mailing a hard
copy application as well. It is strongly
recommended that Applicants using
https://www.grants.gov immediately
initiate and complete the ‘‘Get
Registered’’ registration steps at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
get_registered.jsp. These steps may take
multiple days to complete, and this time
should be factored into plans for
electronic submission in order to avoid
facing unexpected delays that could
result in the rejection of an application.
It is also recommended that Applicants
using https://www.grants.gov consult the
Grants.gov Web site’s Frequently Asked
Questions and Applicant User Guide,
which are available at https://
www.grants.gov/help/faq.jsp, and https://
www.grants.gov/assets/
UserGuide_Applicant.pdf, respectively.
If submitting electronically through
https://www.grants.gov, Applicants must
save the application document as a .doc,
.pdf, .txt or .xls file. Any application
received on https://www.grants.gov after
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
the deadline will be considered as nonresponsive and will not be evaluated.
4. Intergovernmental Review
This funding opportunity is not
subject to Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
5. Restrictions, Unallowable Activities,
and Specific Prohibitions
USDOL–ILAB would like to highlight
the following restrictions, unallowable
activities, and specific prohibitions, as
identified in OMB Circular A–122, 29
CFR Part 95, 29 CFR Part 98, and other
USDOL policy, for all USDOL-funded
child labor technical cooperation
projects. If any Grantee has questions
regarding these or other restrictions,
consultation with USDOL–ILAB is
recommended.
A. Pre-Award Costs
Pre-award costs, including costs
associated with the preparation of an
application submitted in response to
this solicitation, are not reimbursable
under the Cooperative Agreement (see
also section VI.2.E).
B. Alternative Income-Generating
Activities
USDOL funds awarded under all
USDOL–OCFT Cooperative Agreements
may not be used to provide microcredits, revolving funds, or loan
guarantees. Permissible costs related to
alternative income-generating activities
for parents and children may include,
but are not limited to, vocational or
skills training, incidental tools and
equipment, guides, manuals, and market
feasibility studies. USDOL reserves the
right to negotiate the exact nature, form,
or scope of alternative incomegenerating activities and to approve or
disapprove these activities at any time
after award of the Cooperative
Agreement.
C. Direct Cash Transfers to
Communities, Parents, or Children
As a matter of policy, USDOL does
not allow for direct cash transfers to
target beneficiaries. Therefore, Grantees
may not provide direct cash transfers to
communities, parents, or children.
USDOL, however, would support the
purchase of incidental items in the
nature of ‘‘participant support costs,’’ as
defined in OMB Circular A–122,
Attachment B, No. 34, which are
necessary to ensure that proposed direct
beneficiaries are no longer working in
exploitive child labor and that these
children have access to schooling, as
part of the overall strategy to withdraw
children from, and prevent children
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
from entering, exploitive labor.
Participant support costs are direct costs
that may include such items as
uniforms, school supplies, books,
provision of tuition (i.e., in the form of
stipends), and transportation costs. If
approved by USDOL, these items are
expected to be purchased or paid for
directly by the Grantee or its
subcontractor(s) in the form of vouchers,
or payment to the service provider, as
opposed to handing cash directly to
children or other individuals. This
insures that the money goes for its
intended purpose and is not diverted or
lost.
If Applicants propose the provision of
participant support costs, they must
specify: (1) Why these activities and
interventions are necessary, and how
they will contribute to the overall
project goals; and (2) how the
disbursement of funds will be
administered in order to maximize
efficiency and minimize the risk of
misuse. The application must also
address how participant support costs
will be made sustainable once the
project is completed.
D. Construction
Construction with funds under the
Cooperative Agreement is subject to
USDOL approval and ordinarily should
not exceed 10 percent of the project
budget’s direct costs and is expected to
be limited to improving existing school
infrastructure and facilities in the
project’s targeted communities. USDOL
encourages Applicants to cost-share
and/or leverage funds or in-kind
contributions from communities and
local organizations when proposing
construction activities in order to ensure
sustainability.
E. Subgrants
The funding for this program does not
include authority for subgrants.
Therefore, the Grantee may not subgrant
any of the funds obligated under the
Cooperative Agreement. Subgranting
may not be included in the budget as a
line item or in the text of the
application. However, subcontracting
may be included as a budget line item.
Subcontracts must be awarded in
accordance with 29 CFR 95.40–48 and
are subject to audit, in accordance with
the requirements of 29 CFR 95.26(d).
Subcontracts awarded after the
Cooperative Agreement is signed, and
not proposed in the application, must be
awarded through a formal competitive
bidding process, unless prior written
approval is obtained from USDOL.
The determination of whether a
Grantee’s relationship with a
subrecipient would constitute a
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
subgrant or subcontract is determined
primarily with reference to an
agreement’s general purpose,
programmatic functions, and
responsibilities given to the
subrecipient. These three elements
should be closely examined, together
with the usual characteristics (terms and
performance standards, scope of work,
etc.). In case of doubt, consultations are
expected to be held between USDOL
and the Grantee with a view to ensuring
proper determination of the particular
agreement. As a reference tool in
determining whether an agreement is a
subgrant or a subcontract, see Appendix
D. The table in Appendix D is for
reference only and does not create any
legally binding obligation.
See also section IV. I–K for related
references on Grantee and subcontractor
prohibitions related to Prostitution,
Inherently Religious Activities, and
Terrorism. In addition, the debarment
and suspension rule, as outlined in 29
CFR 95.13 and 29 CFR 98, applies to all
subcontracts issued under the
Cooperative Agreement. Grantees are
responsible for ensuring that all
subcontractors meet this requirement.
More detailed information on
subcontracts may be requested by
USDOL during the Best and Final Offer
(BAFO) process.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
F. Lobbying and Intent To Influence
Funds provided by USDOL for project
expenditures under Cooperative
Agreements may not be used with the
intent to influence a member of the U.S.
Congress, a member of any U.S.
Congressional staff, or any official of
any Federal, State, or Local Government
in the United States (hereinafter
‘‘government official(s)’’), to favor,
adopt, or oppose, by vote or otherwise,
any U.S. legislation, law, ratification,
policy, or appropriation, or to influence
in any way the outcome of a political
election in the United States, or to
contribute to any political party or
campaign in the United States, or for
activities carried on for the purpose of
supporting or knowingly preparing for
such efforts. This includes awareness
raising and advocacy activities that
include fund-raising or lobbying of U.S.
Federal, State, or Local Governments.
(See OMB Circular A–122). This does
not include communications for the
purpose of providing information about
the Grantees and their programs or
activities, in response to a request by
any government official, or for
consideration or action on the merits of
a federally-sponsored agreement or
relevant regulatory matter by a
government official.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
APPLICANTS CLASSIFIED UNDER
THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE AS A
501(c)(4) ENTITY (see 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(4)), MAY NOT ENGAGE IN ANY
LOBBYING ACTIVITIES. According to
the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as
codified at 2 U.S.C. 1611, an
organization, as described in Section
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, that engages in lobbying
activities directed toward the U.S.
Government is not eligible for the
receipt of Federal funds constituting an
award, grant, Cooperative Agreement, or
loan.
G. Funds To Host Country Governments
USDOL funds awarded under
Cooperative Agreements are not
intended to duplicate existing foreign
government efforts or substitute for
activities that are the responsibility of
such governments. Therefore, in
general, Grantees may not provide any
of the funds obligated under a
Cooperative Agreement to a foreign
government or entities that are agencies
of, or operated by of for, a foreign state
or government, ministries, officials, or
political parties. However, subcontracts
with foreign government agencies or
entities that are agencies of, or operated
by or for, a foreign state or government
may be awarded to provide direct
services or undertake project activities
subject to applicable laws, but only after
a competitive procurement process has
been conducted and the Grantee has
determined that no other entity in the
country is able to provide these services.
In such cases, Grantees must receive
prior USDOL approval before awarding
the subcontract.
H. Miscellaneous Prohibitions
In addition, USDOL funds may not be
used to provide for:
• The purchase of land;
• The procurement of goods or
services used for private purposes by
the Grantee’s employees;
• Entertainment, including
amusement, diversion, and social
activities and any costs directly
associated with entertainment (such as
tickets, meals, lodging, rentals,
transportation, and gratuities). Costs of
training or meetings and conferences,
when the primary purpose is the
dissemination of technical information,
are allowable. This includes reasonable
costs of meals and refreshments,
transportation, rental of facilities and
other items incidental to such meetings
and conferences. Costs related to child
labor educational activities, such as
street plays and theater, are allowable;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32897
• Alcoholic beverages.
I. Prostitution
The U.S. Government is opposed to
prostitution and related activities which
are inherently harmful and
dehumanizing and contribute to the
phenomenon of trafficking in persons.
U.S. nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs), and their subcontractors,
cannot use funds provided by USDOL to
lobby for, promote or advocate the
legalization or regulation of prostitution
as a legitimate form of work. Foreignbased NGOs, and their subcontractors,
that receive funds provided by USDOL
for projects to combat trafficking in
persons cannot lobby for, promote or
advocate the legalization or regulation
of prostitution as a legitimate form of
work while acting as a subcontractor on
a USDOL-funded project. It is the
responsibility of the Grantee to ensure
its subcontractors meet these criteria,
and this provision must be included in
any applicable subcontract that the
Grantee awards using USDOL funds and
the Grantee will obtain a written
declaration to that effect from the
subcontractor concerned.
J. Inherently Religious Activities
The U.S. Government is generally
prohibited from providing direct
financial assistance for inherently
religious activities. The Grantee and/or
its Associates may work with and
subcontract with religious institutions;
however, Federal funds provided under
a USDOL-awarded Cooperative
Agreement may not be used for religious
instruction, worship, prayer,
proselytizing, other inherently religious
activities, or the purchase of religious
materials. Neutral, non-religious criteria
that neither favor nor disfavor religion
will be employed in the selection of
Grantees and must be employed by the
Grantee and/or its Associates in the
selection of subcontractors. This
provision must be included in all
subcontracts issued under the
Cooperative Agreement. Any inherently
religious activities conducted by the
Grantee must be clearly separated in
time or physical space from activities
funded by USDOL. Additionally, direct
beneficiaries of the project must have a
clear understanding that their
enrollment in a USDOL-funded project
is not conditioned on their participation
in any religious activities and a decision
to not participate in any inherently
religious activity will in no way impact,
or result in any negative consequences
to, their project standing. For additional
guidance, please consult USDOL’s
Center for Faith-Based and Community
Initiatives’ Web site at https://
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32898
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
www.dol.gov/cfbci. In addition, for any
matters of uncertainty, USDOL should
always be consulted for prior approval.
K. Terrorism
Applicants are reminded that U.S.
Executive Orders and U.S. law prohibit
transactions with, and the provision of
resources and support to, individuals
and organizations associated with
terrorism. It is the legal responsibility of
the Grantee to ensure compliance with
these Executive Orders and laws. It is
the policy of USDOL to seek to ensure
that none of its funds are used, directly
or indirectly, to provide support to
individuals or entities associated with
terrorism. Applicants responding to this
solicitation and Grantees subsequently
awarded funding by USDOL under this
solicitation must check the following
Web sites to assess available
information on parties that are excluded
from receiving Federal financial and
nonfinancial assistance and benefits,
pursuant to the provisions of 31 U.S.C.
6101, note, E.O. 12549, E.O. 12689, 48
CFR 9.404: https://www.epls.gov/ and
https://www.treas.gov/offices/
enforcement/ofac/sdn/t11sdn.pdf.
This provision must be included in all
applicable subcontracts issued under
the Cooperative Agreement.
V. Application Review Information
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
1. Application Evaluation Criteria
This section identifies and describes
the criteria that will be used to evaluate
applications submitted in response to
this Solicitation for Cooperative
Agreement Applications. Applications
will be evaluated on a 100 point scale.
Applicants are required to address all of
the following rating factors in their
technical proposal: Project Design/
Budget Cost-Effectiveness (40 points),
Sustainability Plan (15 points),
Organizational Capacity (25 points), and
Key Personnel/Management Plan/
Staffing (20 points). Applicants should
note that additional points may be given
to applications feasibly proposing: (a)
To withdraw or prevent more than 200
children from exploitive child labor
through the provision of direct
educational services and other project
interventions for every $100,000 in
project funding awarded (Additional
Direct Beneficiaries 5 points) and (b) To
include committed non-Federal
resources as described below in sections
V.1.E. and V.1.F (Cost Sharing 5 points).
Please note that all information and
requirements presented in section I.(3)
Scope of Work and Appendix A:
USDOL’s Definitions of Key Terms will
be taken into consideration when
evaluating applications on the basis of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
the technical rating criteria outlined in
this section. Applicants’ cost proposals
will be considered when evaluating the
rating criteria Project Design/Budget
Cost-Effectiveness/Budget CostEfficiency (see section V.A.iv. for
further information on requirements
related to Budget Cost-Effectiveness).
When preparing the technical proposal,
applicants must follow the outline
provided in Appendix B and ensure that
the technical proposal does not exceed
the maximum length of 45 pages.
Project Design/Budget
Cost-Effectiveness/
Budget Cost-Efficiency.
Sustainability Plan ...........
Organizational Capacity ...
Key Personnel/Management Plan/Staffing.
Additional Direct Beneficiaries.
Cost Sharing ......................
40 points.
15 points.
25 points.
20 points.
5 extra points.
5 extra points.
A. Project Design/Budget CostEffectiveness/Budget Cost-Efficiency (40
Points)
This part of the technical proposal
constitutes the ‘‘preliminary project
design document’’ and serves as the
basis of the final Project Document to be
submitted and approved by USDOL
after Cooperative Agreement award. The
Applicant’s preliminary project design
document must describe in detail the
proposed approach to comply with the
requirements listed below and be linked
to a supporting Logical Framework
matrix. The supporting Logical
Framework matrix will not count in the
45-page limit, but should be included as
an annex to the preliminary project
design document. To guide Applicants,
a sample Logical Framework matrix for
a hypothetical USDOL child labor
elimination project is available at:
https://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/
bkgrd.htm.
i. Background and Justification
Applicants will be rated based on
their knowledge and understanding of:
(a) The child labor and education
context in the country(ies) of interest
and in the targeted sectors; (b) the
issues, barriers, and challenges involved
in providing education to children
engaged in, or at-risk of engaging in
exploitive child labor, as a strategy for
ensuring their long-term withdrawal or
prevention from such labor; (c) bestpractice solutions to address their
needs; and (d) the policy and
implementing environment in the
selected country (ies).
Additional factors for consideration
include:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Assessment of the incidence and
nature of exploitive child labor,
particularly the worst forms of child
labor, in geographic area and/or
sector(s) targeted, including hours of
work, conditions of work, age and sex
distribution of the target group,
educational performance relative to
other children, and if available, any
research or data that might indicate
correlations between educational
performance and child labor;
• Identification of the sources of the
relevant literature and documents used
to analyze the child labor and
educational context;
• Demonstrated familiarity with
existing child labor, education and
social welfare policies, plans and
projects and the sector in which the
children work, which Applicants are
using to inform project design for
proposed direct beneficiaries; and
• Demonstrated knowledge of other
relevant programs as they pertain to
child labor or education of proposed
direct beneficiaries in Bolivia,
Cambodia, Colombia, Democratic
Republic of the Congo, the Dominican
Republic, Indonesia, Morocco, the
Philippines, Togo, and Uganda.
ii. Proposed Strategy
Applicants must discuss their
proposed strategy to address the five
goals of USDOL-funded child labor
elimination projects outlined in section
I.1, as well as their proposed strategy for
ensuring direct beneficiaries’
enrollment, retention in, and
completion of, project-supported direct
educational services. Applicants will be
rated based on the quality and relevance
of their proposed strategies.
The proposal must: (1) Identify how
many children the Applicant expects to
withdraw from exploitive child labor
and prevent from entering exploitive
child labor through the provision of
direct educational services and other
project interventions. Based on the
specific cost-efficiency measures
USDOL–OCFT has established with
OMB, a minimum of 172 direct
beneficiaries must be served for each
$100,000 of project funding.
Applications that propose to serve less
than 172 direct beneficiaries per
$100,000 of project funds will be
considered non-responsive; (2) describe
the specific gaps/educational needs of
the children targeted by the project and
explain how the project will address
those gaps/needs/barriers of the
children targeted; (3) provide detailed
information on the forms of direct
educational services that will be
provided to the proposed direct
beneficiaries, including the type(s) of
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
educational and/or training programs in
which the children will be enrolled, as
well as the types of training
opportunities and technical assistance
that will be provided to project staff,
host country nationals, community
groups, and other stakeholders involved
in the project; and (4) provide a detailed
Work Plan that identifies major project
activities, deadlines for completing
these activities, and person(s) or
institution(s) responsible for completing
these activities. (The Work Plan may
vary depending on what is the most
logical form. It may, for example, be
divided by project component, country,
or region.)
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Please Note: The number of children
targeted for withdrawal from exploitive child
labor and the number of children targeted for
prevention from exploitive child labor should
be reported separately. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to propose a balanced
number of children targeted for withdrawal
from exploitive child labor with the number
of children targeted for prevention from
exploitive child labor. Detailed information
on the proposed direct beneficiaries,
including demographics, sectors of work,
geographical location, type(s) of educational
activities to be provided, type(s) of other
project interventions to be provided, and
other relevant characteristics and strategies
must be provided. Applicants are strongly
encouraged to begin providing direct
educational services to at least one-quarter of
the children being targeted for withdrawal or
prevention (i.e. direct beneficiaries) during
the first year of project implementation.
Applicants should also provide information
on how many children are expected to be
indirect beneficiaries of the project (i.e.,
children benefiting solely from project
interventions other than direct educational
services).
To support their strategies, Applicants
are encouraged to leverage project
resources by collaborating with entities
engaged in efforts that could contribute
to the elimination of exploitive child
labor, including efforts that promote
children’s access to educational and
training opportunities and that address
poverty—a major factor that increases
the likelihood that children will engage
in exploitive child labor. Applicants are
also encouraged to include concrete
commitments from business entities and
individual business leaders to engage in
partnerships to reduce child labor and
increase educational opportunities for
direct beneficiaries. Ideas for business
involvement could include, but are not
limited to the following: scholarships,
donations of goods, mentoring and
volunteering by employees, assistance
in awareness raising, provision of
internships for children/youth and/or
teachers during vacation periods that
would help them improve leadership,
skills, and efficiency for implementing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
programs for children engaged in
exploitive child labor.
Additional factors that will be
considered include:
• Demonstrated knowledge of the
school calendar and the requirements of
basic, non-formal and vocational
education systems to develop an
approach that successfully enrolls
children in educational programs with
the shortest delay without missing an
academic year or program cycle;
• The extent to which countryspecific issues that could affect project
results, including those outlined in
section I.3., were meaningfully
incorporated into the proposed strategy,
either to increase opportunities for, or
reduce obstacles to, successful
implementation;
• Incorporation of the economic and
social context of the target country in
the proposed strategy, recognizing that
approaches applicable in one target
country may not be relevant to others;
• The creative and innovative nature
of the Applicant’s approach to promote
policies and services that will enhance
the provision of educational
opportunities for children engaged in, or
at-risk of entering, exploitive child
labor;
• The extent to which the number of
children targeted by the project is
commensurate with the need in the
geographical area and/or sector(s) where
the project will be implemented, and
how this number relates to the project’s
goals for broader impact in the country
and/or sector(s);
• The feasibility and sensibility of the
timeframes for the accomplishment of
tasks and the proposed outcomes;
• The clarity and quality of the
information provided in the Work Plan;
and
• The extent to which the proposed
approach will build upon existing
activities, government policies, and
plans, thereby avoiding needless
duplication.
iii. Project Monitoring and Evaluation
Applicants must describe how
management will ensure that: (1) All
goals, objectives and deliverables of the
project will be met; (2) information and
data will be collected and used to
demonstrate the impacts of the project;
and (3) self-assessment, evaluation, and
continuous improvement will occur
(including a description of the systems
that will be put in place for this
purpose).
Applicants must design and
implement a project monitoring system
that allows for the monitoring of direct
beneficiaries’ work and educational
status throughout the period of service
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32899
provision (including type of work;
working conditions, such as hours of
work and hazardous conditions; and
school attendance). Applications should
describe in detail the methodology that
will be used to monitor the above for all
direct beneficiaries of the project. The
proposal should identify who will be
responsible for monitoring the children
(i.e., teachers, project staff, community
members, parents, employers), what
data will be used (i.e., school attendance
records, work attendance records,
counseling information), and at what
frequency (i.e., weekly, monthly,
quarterly, semi-annually). Proposals
must also describe the Grantee’s quality
control procedures, including how the
Grantee will ensure that all
implementers use the same definitions
and reporting procedures and how the
Grantee will conduct validation checks
(i.e., sample-based checks, school and
workplace site visits). In an effort to
avoid duplication, build on existing
synergies, and increase sustainability,
projects should, to the extent possible,
coordinate their direct beneficiary
monitoring system with existing ILOIPEC or other country-level monitoring
systems. In cases where direct
beneficiaries will complete their direct
educational service(s) prior to the end of
the project period, Applicants are
encouraged to monitor and report on the
work and education status of these
direct beneficiaries beyond the period of
service provision and ideally through
the end of the project.
As project funds are often limited, the
Grantee will need to identify the criteria
that they intend to use to determine
which children will receive direct
educational services from the project. In
addition, the Grantee will need to
determine at what point in the provision
of such services the project can
reasonably and with confidence count a
child as withdrawn or prevented from
exploitive labor.
USDOL–OCFT has developed
common indicators related to its child
labor elimination projects: (1) The
number of children withdrawn or
prevented from exploitive child labor
and provided education and/or training
opportunities; (2) the number of
countries with improved capacity to
address child labor; and direct
beneficiaries’ (3) retention in and (4)
completion of an education and/or
training program. The first two
indicators, as noted in section I.1.,
represent GPRA indicators for USDOL
international child labor programming.
Further guidance on USDOL–OCFT’s
common indicators will be provided
after award; thus, Applicants should
focus their program management and
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32900
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
performance assessment responses
toward the development of their
project’s monitoring strategy to ensure
children are: (a) Withdrawn or
prevented from exploitive child labor;
(b) provided a direct educational
service(s); (c) able to be retained in and
complete their direct educational
service(s); and (d) able to remain out of
exploitive labor. Due to the potentially
significant links between hours worked,
working conditions, and school
performance, Grantees must collect
information to track this correlation
among its direct beneficiaries.
Applicants should describe their
proposed internal project monitoring
strategies for measuring their
performance in meeting the five goals of
USDOL’s child labor elimination
projects outlined in section I.1. and
assessing the impact of proposed direct
educational services on direct
beneficiaries and other project
interventions on indirect beneficiaries,
including a limited number of
additional key indicators of project
performance. These indicators will
serve as a basis for Grantees’ Draft
Performance Monitoring Plan (see
section VI.4.E.).
Additional factors for consideration in
the monitoring strategy include:
• The Applicant’s plan for collecting
baseline data; and
• The Applicant’s proposed
methodologies for evaluating the
correlation between the type of work
and conditions of work (including hours
of work and workplace conditions) of
direct beneficiaries and their school
attendance and performance.
iv. Budget Cost-Effectiveness
This section will be evaluated on the
basis of information contained in
Applicants’ cost proposals in
accordance with applicable Federal
laws and regulations. The budget must
comply with Federal cost principles
(which can be found in the applicable
OMB Circulars). The requirements for
cost proposals, including an outputsbased budget, are listed in section IV.2.
A budget summary must be included in
the application and must include a
detailed breakdown of the Applicant’s
cost. In the detailed budget, Applicants
must (a) show how the budget reflects
program goals and design in a costeffective way and (b) link the budget to
the activities and outputs of the Work
Plan discussed above. USDOL will
evaluate Applicants on the degree to
which the cost of activities will lead to
the outputs they have identified.
Consequently, Applicants should
carefully construct their outputs-based
budget to ensure that costs are both
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
realistic and reasonable to achieve the
results they propose. The evaluation of
this section will focus on budgetperformance integration, including the
extent to which the budget supports a
cost-effective plan for providing direct
educational services. The link between
the allocation of resources in the budget
and the project’s strategy should be
evident.
The largest proportion of project
resources should be allocated to direct
educational services and activities
aimed at targeted children, rather than
direct and indirect administrative costs.
Higher ratings may be given to
Applicants with low administrative
costs and with a budget breakdown that
provides a larger amount of resources to
project activities. All projected costs
should be reported, as they will become
part of the Cooperative Agreement upon
award. In their cost proposal (Part I of
the application), Applicants must
provide a breakdown of the total
administrative costs into direct
administrative costs and indirect
administrative costs. The Grant Officer
reserves the right to negotiate
administrative cost levels prior to
award.
In addition to calculating the number
of direct beneficiaries that a project will
serve per $100,000 of project funding,
Applicants must also identify the cost
per direct beneficiary for withdrawal or
prevention from exploitive child labor
based on the Applicant’s package of
direct educational services and other
project interventions, as well as the
monitoring of direct beneficiaries’ work
and educational status. In addition to
providing the cost per direct beneficiary,
Applicants must also provide an
explanation of how such costs were
calculated, and how they compare to the
costs of similar services in the target
country. When developing this
calculation, Applicants should refer to
the definitions of key terms presented in
Appendix A.
This section of the application must
explain the costs for performing all of
the requirements presented in this
solicitation and for producing all
required reports and other deliverables
(see section VI.4.). The project budget
must therefore include funds to plan,
implement, monitor, report on, and
evaluate programs and activities
(including mid-term and final
evaluations and annual single audits or
attestation engagements, as applicable);
conduct studies pertinent to project
implementation, including baseline
studies; and finance travel by field staff
and key personnel to meet annually
with USDOL officials in Washington,
DC or within the project’s region (e.g.,
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Africa, Asia/Pacific, Latin America,
Caribbean, and Middle East and North
Africa). Applicants based both within
and outside the United States should
budget for travel by field staff and other
key personnel to Washington, DC at the
beginning of the project for a post-award
meeting with USDOL.
Applicants should set aside a total of
at least USD 70,000 in the proposed
budget to cover the costs of a mid-term
and a final evaluation, including: (1)
Labor costs, particularly those
associated with hiring an independent
external evaluator and other staff time;
(2) costs associated with conducting a
stakeholders’ meeting, including
meeting facilities, interpreters (if
necessary) and travel costs of meeting
participants; and (3) site visits including
travel to and within the country (airfare,
ground transportation, meals and
lodging, interpreters (if necessary), etc.).
Applications are expected to allocate
sufficient resources to proposed studies,
assessments, surveys, and monitoring
and evaluation activities, including
costs associated with data collection.
This includes but is not limited to costs
associated with meeting the reporting
requirements discussed in section
V.1.A.iii., including collecting and
reporting on the common indicators (the
number of children withdrawn or
prevented from exploitive child labor
and provided education and/or training
opportunities, countries with improved
capacity to address child labor, direct
beneficiaries’ retention in and
completion of an education and/or
training program), data management,
and assessing the impact of direct
educational services and other project
interventions on proposed direct
beneficiaries and the impact of other
project interventions on indirect
beneficiaries.
In addition, the budget should
include a contingency provision,
calculated at five percent of the project’s
total direct costs. USDOL will not
provide additional funding to cover
unanticipated costs. USDOL has
determined that the use of contingency
provision funds for USDOL-funded
projects is essential to address
circumstances affecting specific budget
lines that relate to one or more of the
following: (1) Inflation affecting specific
project costs; (2) UN System or foreign
government-mandated salary scale or
benefits revisions; and (3) exchange rate
fluctuations. USDOL also recognizes
that certain extraordinary and
unforeseen circumstances may arise that
will lead to a need for exceptions to the
aforementioned uses of contingency
provision funds, related to the need for
modifications to budgets or time
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
extensions. These include but are not
limited to the following: (1) Changes in
a country’s security environment; (2)
natural disasters, (3) civil or political
unrest/upheavals or government
transitions; or (4) delays related to loss
of or damage to project property.
Applicants are also instructed that the
project budget submitted with the
application must include all necessary
and sufficient funds, without reliance
on other contracts, grants, or awards, to
implement the Applicant’s proposed
project activities and to achieve
proposed project goals and objectives
under this solicitation. If anticipated
funding from another contract, grant, or
award fails to materialize, USDOL will
not provide additional funding to cover
these costs.
Additional factors that will be
considered in evaluating the proposed
project budget include:
• The reasonableness and realism of
prices/costs suggested in the budget;
• The extent to which the proposed
budget takes into account the type of
work in which the proposed direct
beneficiaries are currently engaged;
• Demonstration, to the extent
possible, that the proposed costefficiencies are designed to withdraw or
prevent as many children from
exploitive child labor as possible
through direct educational services that
support their enrollment in educational
activities.
Applicants are encouraged to discuss
the possibility of exemption from
customs and Value Added Tax (VAT)
with host government officials during
the preparation of an application for this
Cooperative Agreement. While USDOL
encourages host governments to not
apply customs or VAT taxes to USDOLfunded programs, some host
governments may nevertheless choose
to assess such taxes. USDOL may not be
able to provide assistance in this regard.
Applicants should take into account
such costs in budget preparation. If
major costs are omitted, a Grantee may
not be allowed to include them later.
Note to Applicants: After award, Grantees
must obtain prior approval from USDOL
before using unobligated contingency or
evaluation funds. Twelve months before the
project ends, after calculating the amounts
needed for cost increases in the remaining
life of the project, forecasted remaining funds
in the contingency provision funds may be
used to augment the number of beneficiaries
or increase the provision of services to
existing direct beneficiaries (under the age of
18). Increased services must be provided if
they relate directly to retention in and
completion of a direct educational service, to
an improvement in academic performance,
and/or the job placement of direct
beneficiaries of legal employment age who
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
32901
are involved in vocational or skills training
programs.
project. The evaluation criteria in this
category are as follows:
B. Sustainability Plan (15 Points)
USDOL considers the issue of
sustainability to be of paramount
importance and recognizes that
questions of sustainability must be
addressed at all stages, including Project
Design, implementation, and evaluation.
To USDOL, sustainability is linked to
project impact and the ability of
individuals, communities, and a nation
to ensure that the activities or changes
implemented by a project endure. A
project’s impact is manifested at the
level of individuals, organizations, and
systems. For individual children and
their families, this would mean a
positive and enduring change in their
life conditions as a result of project
interventions. At the level of
organizations and systems, sustained
impact would involve continued
commitment and ability (including
financial commitment and policy
change) by project partners to continue
the actions generated by the project,
including enforcement of existing
policies that target child labor and
schooling. The issue of sustainability is
extremely complex and challenging. It
demands careful definition in each
project, according to the objectives to be
attained. Distinctions are expected to be
made between different types of
sustainability (e.g., institutional and
financial) and it is recognized that these
differences may affect the likelihood of
sustaining project improvements (e.g.,
legislative and policy oriented projects,
as well as those focusing on
institutional strengthening, have a
greater potential for achieving
sustainability than other types of
projects).
Applicants must discuss a proposed
plan for sustainability of project efforts,
taking into account the definition of
Sustainability Plan provided in
Appendix A. Applicants must also
identify local organizations in the target
country, including type (e.g., NGO,
community-based, rural, indigenous),
which could potentially implement or
contribute to a future project. In
addition to the above factors, Applicants
will be rated based on the pertinence
and appropriateness of the proposed
Sustainability Plan. A sample
Sustainability Plan/Matrix is available
from USDOL–ILAB’s Web site at
https://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/
bkgrd.htm.
i. International and U.S. Government
Grant Experience
C. Organizational Capacity (25 Points)
Under this criterion, Applicants must
present the qualifications of the
organization(s) implementing the
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Applicants must have international
experience implementing basic,
transitional, non-formal, or vocational
education programs that aim to
withdraw or prevent children from
exploitive labor and address issues of
educational access, quality, and policy
reform for vulnerable children,
preferably in the country of interest.
The application must include
information on the Applicant’s previous
and current grants, Cooperative
Agreements, or contracts with USDOL
and other Federal agencies that are
relevant to this solicitation, including:
1. The organizations for which the
work was done;
2. A contact person in that
organization with his/her current phone
number;
3. The dollar value of the grant,
contract, or Cooperative Agreement for
the project;
4. The time frame and professional
effort involved in the project;
5. A brief summary of the work
performed; and
6. A brief summary of
accomplishments.
This information on previous grants,
Cooperative Agreements, and contracts
held by the Applicant must be provided
in appendices and will not count
against the maximum page requirement.
USDOL reserves the right to contact the
organizations listed and use the
information provided in evaluating
applications.
Note to All Applicants: In judging
organizational capacity, USDOL will take
into account not only information provided
by an Applicant, but also information from
USDOL and others regarding past
performance of organizations implementing
USDOL-funded child labor and EI projects, or
activities for USDOL and others. Past
performance will be rated by such factors as
the timeliness of deliverables and the
responsiveness of the organization and its
staff to USDOL or grantor communications
regarding deliverables and Cooperative
Agreement or contractual requirements. In
addition, the performance of the
organization’s key personnel on existing
projects with USDOL or other entities,
whether the organization has a history of
replacing key personnel with similarly
qualified staff, and the timeliness of
replacing key personnel, will also be taken
into consideration when rating past
performance. Lack of past experience with
USDOL projects, Cooperative Agreements,
grants, or contracts is not a bar to eligibility
or selection under this solicitation.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32902
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
ii. Country Presence and Host
Government Support
Given the need to provide children
engaged in exploitive labor, particularly
the worst forms of child labor, with
immediate assistance in accessing
educational and training opportunities,
Applicants will be evaluated on their
ability to start up project activities soon
after signing a Cooperative Agreement.
Having country presence, or partnering
with in-country organizations,
represents the best chance of expediting
the delivery of services to children
engaged in, or at-risk of entering,
exploitive child labor. In their
application, Applicants must address
their organization’s country presence;
ability to work directly with government
and NGOs, including local and
community-based organizations; and
ability to start up project activities in a
timely fashion. Applicants may submit
supporting documentation with their
application demonstrating country
presence and/or outreach to host
government ministries and
nongovernmental organizations in the
country. These attachments will not
count toward the page limit.
Within 60 days of award, a Grantee,
either independently or through a
relationship with another
organization(s) with country presence
(i.e., an Association member or
subcontractor), must be formally
recognized by the host government(s)
using the appropriate mechanism, i.e.,
Memorandum of Understanding or local
registration of the organization.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
iii. Fiscal Oversight
Applicants will be evaluated on their
ability to provide evidence that the
organization has a sound financial
system in place. If the Applicant is a
U.S.-based, non-profit organization
already subject to the single audit
requirements, the Applicant’s most
recent single audit, as submitted to the
Federal Audit Clearinghouse, must
accompany the application as an
attachment. In addition, applications
must show that the Applicant has
complied with report submission
timeframes established in OMB Circular
A–133. If an Applicant is not in
compliance with the requirements for
completing their single audit, the
application will be considered
unresponsive and will be rejected. If the
Applicant is a for-profit or foreign-based
organization, a copy of its most current
independent financial audit must
accompany the application as an
attachment.
Applicants should also submit a copy
of the most recent single audit report for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
all proposed U.S.-based, non-profit
partners, Associates and subcontractors
that are subject to the Single Audit Act.
If the proposed Associate(s) or partner(s)
is a for-profit or foreign-based
organization, a copy of its most current
independent financial audit should
accompany the application as an
attachment.
If the audit submitted by the
Applicant reflects any adverse opinions,
the application will not be further
considered by the technical review
panel and will be rejected. USDOL
reserves the right to ask further
questions on any audit report submitted
as part of an application. USDOL also
reserves the right to place special
conditions on Grantees if concerns are
raised in their audit reports.
In order to expedite the screening of
applications and to ensure that the
appropriate audits are attached to the
proposals, Applicants must provide a
cover sheet to the audit attachments
listing all proposed Associates and
subcontractors. These attachments will
not count toward the application page
limit.
D. Key Personnel/Management Plan/
Staffing (20 Points)
Successful performance of the
proposed work depends heavily on the
management skills and qualifications of
the individuals committed to the
project. Accordingly, in its evaluation of
each application, USDOL will place
emphasis on the Applicant’s
management approach and commitment
of personnel qualified for the work
involved in accomplishing the assigned
tasks. This section of the application
must include sufficient information to
judge management and staffing plans,
and the experience and competence of
program staff proposed for the project to
ensure that they meet the required
qualifications.
Management and professional
technical staff members comprising the
Applicant’s proposed team should be
individuals who have prior experience
with organizations working in similar
efforts, and who are fully qualified to
perform the work specified in the Scope
of Work. Where Associations,
subcontractors or outside assistance are
proposed, organizational lines of
authority and responsibility should be
clearly delineated to ensure effective
implementation and responsiveness to
the needs of USDOL.
In order to promote and increase
national and local capacity, USDOL
encourages the hiring of qualified
national experts. USDOL also
encourages Applicants to consider
staffing strategies that aim to develop
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
capacity of national staff over the course
of the project as part of a contribution
to the development of national capacity
for combating exploitive child labor.
Preference may be given to Applicants
who propose such strategies which are
determined to be effective.
i. Key Personnel
Applicants must identify all key
personnel candidates proposed to carry
out the requirements of this solicitation.
‘‘Key personnel’’ are staff (Project
Director, Education Specialist, and
Monitoring and Evaluation Officer) that
are essential to the successful operation
of the project and completion of the
proposed work.
(1) The Project Director will be
responsible for overall project
management, supervision,
administration, and implementation of
the requirements of the Cooperative
Agreement. The Project Director will
establish and maintain systems for
project operations; ensure that all
Cooperative Agreement deadlines are
met and targets are achieved; maintain
working relationships with project
stakeholders and partners; and oversee
the preparation and submission of
progress and financial reports. The
Project Director must have a minimum
of three years of professional experience
in a leadership role in implementation
of child labor and complex basic
education projects in developing
countries in areas such as: education
policy; improving educational quality
and access; educational assessment of
disadvantaged students; development of
community participation in the
improvement of basic education for
disadvantaged children; and monitoring
and evaluation of basic education
projects. Additional consideration will
be given to candidates with additional
years of experience including
experience working with officials of
ministries of labor and/or education.
Preferred candidates must also have
knowledge of exploitive child labor
issues, and experience in the
development of transitional, formal, and
vocational education programs for
children removed from exploitive child
labor. Fluency in English is required
and working knowledge of at least one
of the official languages of the target
country is strongly suggested.
(2) The Education Specialist will
provide leadership in developing the
technical aspects of this project in
collaboration with the Project Director.
This person must have at least three
years experience in basic education
projects in developing countries in areas
including student assessment, teacher
training, educational materials
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
development, educational management,
and educational monitoring and
information systems. This person must
have experience in working successfully
with ministries of education, networks
of educators, employers’ organizations
and trade union representatives or
comparable entities. Additional
experience with exploitive child labor/
education policy and monitoring and
evaluation is an asset. A working
knowledge of English is preferred, as is
a similar knowledge of the official
language(s) spoken in the target country.
(3) The Monitoring and Evaluation
Officer who will oversee the
implementation of the project’s
monitoring and evaluation strategies
and requirements. This person should
have at least three years progressively
responsible experience in the
monitoring and evaluation of
international development projects,
preferably in education and training or
a related field. Related experience can
include strategic planning and
performance measurement, indicator
selection, quantitative and qualitative
data collection and analysis
methodologies, database management,
and knowledge of the GPRA.
Individuals with a demonstrated ability
to build capacity of the project team and
partners in these domains will be given
special consideration.
The application must include a
´
´
resume, as well as a description of the
roles and responsibilities of all key and
other professional personnel (as
described below) being proposed by the
´
´
Applicant. At a minimum, each resume
must include the following:
• The educational background and
previous work experience for each key
and other professional personnel to be
assigned to the project, including
position title, duties, dates, employing
organizations, and clearly defined
duties;
• The special capabilities of key
personnel that demonstrate prior
experience in organizing, managing and
performing similar efforts; and
• The current employment status of
key personnel and availability for this
project.
Applicants must also indicate
whether the proposed work will be
performed by persons currently
employed by the applying
organization(s), and if so, for how long,
or is dependent upon planned
recruitment or subcontracting.
Applicants must also include a
completed salary history form SF 1420
for each key personnel candidate in
their application. This form is available
from the U.S. Agency for International
Development’s Web site at: https://
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
www.usaid.gov/forms/AID1420-17.doc.
A link to this form is also available on
USDOL’s Web site: https://www.dol.gov/
ilab/grants/bkgrd.htm.
All key personnel must allocate 100
percent of their time to the project and
live in the target country. Key personnel
positions must not be combined.
Proposed key personnel candidates
must sign letters of agreement to serve
on the project and indicate their
availability to commence work within
30 calendar days of the Cooperative
Agreement award. In addition, if either
the Education Specialist or Monitoring
and Evaluation Officer are not fluent in
English, the project must assume
responsibility for ensuring that key
personnel have a clear understanding of
USDOL policies and procedures and
that all documents produced by key
staff for submission to USDOL are in
fluent English.
Please Note: If key personnel candidates
are not designated, or if letters of agreement
´
´
to serve on the project or resumes are not
submitted as part of the application for each
key personnel candidate, the application will
be considered unresponsive and will be
rejected.
´
´
The letters of agreement, resumes, and
salary history forms (SF 1420) must be
submitted as attachments to the
application and will not count toward
the page limit.
Key personnel must be employed by
the Grantee, not a subcontractor. In the
case of an Association, the project
director must be employed by the Lead
Grantee. In cases of Associations where
Applicants propose that key personnel
would not all be employed by the Lead
Grantee, a clear indication of the
following must be provided in the
application: the rationale for dividing
key personnel among the Association
members, lines of authority among key
personnel and other staff, the process of
supervision and evaluation of personnel
who are not members of the same
organization, the process by which all
parties would come to agreement on key
implementation issues, and mechanisms
of conflict resolution should the need
arise
ii. Other Professional Personnel
Applicants must identify other
program personnel deemed necessary
for carrying out the requirements of this
solicitation. Applicants must also
indicate whether the proposed work by
other professional personnel will be
performed by persons currently
employed by the organization(s) or is
dependent upon planned recruitment or
subcontracting.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32903
iii. Management Plan
Applicants will be rated based on the
clarity and quality of the information
provided in the management plan. The
plan must include: (a) A description of
the functional relationship between
elements of the project’s management
structure; and (b) the responsibilities of
project staff and management and the
lines of authority between project staff
and other elements of the project.
iv. Staff Loading Plan
The staff loading plan must identify
all key tasks and the person-days
required to complete each task. Labor
estimated for each task must be broken
down by individuals assigned to the
task, including Association member
staff, subcontractors, and consultants.
All key tasks should be charted to show
the time required to perform them by
months or weeks.
E. Additional Direct Beneficiaries (5
Extra Points)
As noted above, Applicants are
required to serve a minimum of 172
direct beneficiaries for each $100,000 of
project funding, in line with the specific
cost-efficiency measures USDOL–OCFT
has established with OMB.
Applicants may receive up to 5
additional rating points by proposing to
effectively serve more than 200 direct
beneficiaries per $100,000 of project
funding. Please note that the proposed
strategy must reflect appropriate
services and monitoring mechanisms to
ensure children are withdrawn from, or
prevented from entering, exploitive
child labor and are benefiting from a
direct educational service provided by
the project.
F. Cost Sharing (5 Extra Points)
USDOL will give up to five (5)
additional rating points to applications
that include committed non-U.S.
Federal Government resources that
significantly expand the dollar amount,
size and scope of the project. In
awarding points, USDOL will determine
whether the Applicant’s proposal to
share costs or provide matching funds is
allowable and realistic within the
context of proposed strategy. These
programs or activities must complement
and enhance project objectives. To be
eligible for the additional points,
Applicants must list the source(s) of
funds, the nature, and possible activities
anticipated with these resources under
this Cooperative Agreement. For
additional information on requirements
associated with this rating criteria, see
section III.3.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32904
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
1. Review and Selection Process
The Office of Procurement Services at
USDOL will screen all applications to
determine whether all required
elements, as identified in section IV.2.
above, are present and clearly
identifiable. If an application does not
include all of the required elements,
including required attachments, it will
be considered unresponsive and will be
rejected. Once an application is deemed
unresponsive, the Office of Procurement
Services will send a letter to the
Applicant, which will state that the
application was incomplete, indicate
which document was missing from the
application, and explain that the
technical review panel will be unable to
rate the application.
The following documents must be
included in the application package in
order for the application to be deemed
complete and responsive:
1. A cost proposal;
2. A technical proposal, including the
Logical Framework and Work Plan;
3. The Applicant’s most recent audit
report, and those of any proposed
Associates or subcontractors (as
applicable);
´
´
4. Resumes of all key personnel and
other professional personnel;
5. Signed letters of agreement to serve
on the project from all key personnel
candidates;
6. Information on the Applicant’s
previous and current grants,
Cooperative Agreements, or contracts
with USDOL and other Federal agencies
that are relevant to this solicitation; and
7. Signed Association agreement(s), if
applicable.
Each complete and responsive
application will be objectively rated by
a technical review panel against the
criteria described in this solicitation.
Applicants are advised that panel
recommendations to the Grant Officer
are advisory in nature. The Grant Officer
may elect to select a Grantee on the
basis of the initial application
submission or the Grant Officer may
establish a competitive or technically
acceptable range from which qualified
Applicants will be selected. If deemed
appropriate, the Grant Officer may call
for the preparation and receipt of final
revisions of applications, following
which the evaluation process described
above may be repeated, in whole or in
part, to consider such revisions. The
Grant Officer will make final selection
determinations based on panel findings
and consideration of factors that
represent the greatest advantage to the
government, such as cost, the
availability of funds, and other factors.
If USDOL does not receive technically
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
acceptable applications in response to
this solicitation, USDOL reserves the
right to terminate the competition and
not make any award. The Grant Officer’s
determinations for awards under this
solicitation are final.
Notification of designation by a
person or entity other than the Grant
Officer is not valid.
Note to All Applicants: Selection of an
organization as a potential Cooperative
Agreement recipient does not constitute
approval of the Cooperative Agreement
application as submitted. Before the actual
Cooperative Agreement is awarded, USDOL
may enter into negotiations about such items
as program components, funding levels, and
administrative systems in place to support
Cooperative Agreement implementation. If
the negotiations do not result in an
acceptable submission, the Grant Officer
reserves the right to terminate the negotiation
and decline to fund the application. In
addition, USDOL reserves the right to
negotiate program components further after
award, during the project design
consolidation phase and Project Document
submission and review process. See section
VI.4.A.
After award, USDOL’s involvement in
a project focuses on working with the
Grantee in order to refine the Project
Design/Project Document and its
corresponding budget; to identify
project performance indicators and
develop a Performance Monitoring Plan
(PMP); to monitor implementation
through technical and financial progress
reports; and to oversee the process of
mid-term and final project evaluations.
USDOL involvement is generally
characterized by written comments and
oral feedback tied to the approval of
deliverables outlined in the Cooperative
Agreement. USDOL staff may also
conduct field visits to the project.
Applicable provisions, including
those provided for in the USDOL
Cooperative Agreement with the
Grantee, apply to subcontracts entered
into under USDOL-funded projects.
Award of a Cooperative Agreement
under this solicitation may also be
contingent upon an exchange of project
support letters between USDOL and the
relevant ministries in the target country.
2. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Designation decisions will be made,
where possible, within 45 days after the
deadline for submission of proposals.
USDOL is not obligated to make any
awards as a result of this solicitation,
and only the Grant Officer can bind
USDOL to the provision of funds under
this solicitation. Unless specifically
provided in the Cooperative Agreement,
USDOL’s acceptance of a proposal and/
or award of Federal funds does not
waive any Cooperative Agreement
requirements and/or procedures.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The Grant Officer will notify
Applicants of designation results as
follows:
Designation Letter: The designation
letter signed by the Grant Officer will
serve as official notice of an
organization’s designation. The
designation letter will be accompanied
by a Cooperative Agreement and
USDOL–OCFT’s 2007 Management
Procedures and Guidelines (MPG).
Non-Designation Letter: Any
organization not designated will be
notified formally of the non-designation.
However, organizations not designated
must formally request a debriefing in
order to be provided with the basic
reasons for the determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Roles and Responsibilities of USDOL
and Grantees
3. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
A. General
Grantees are subject to applicable U.S.
Federal laws (including provisions of
appropriations laws) and regulations,
Executive Orders, applicable OMB
Circulars, and USDOL policies. If during
project implementation a Grantee is
found in violation of U.S. Government
laws and regulations, the terms of the
Cooperative Agreement awarded under
this solicitation may be modified by
USDOL; costs may be disallowed and
recovered; the Cooperative Agreement
may be terminated; and USDOL may
take other action permitted by law.
Determinations of allowable costs will
be made in accordance with the
applicable U.S. Federal cost principles.
B. Project Audits and External Auditing
Arrangements
Applicants are reminded to budget for
compliance with annual single audits or
attestation engagements as applicable
(see below). Costs for these audits or
attestation engagements must be
included in direct or indirect costs,
whichever is appropriate, in accordance
with the cost allocation procedures
approved by the U.S. Federal cognizant
agency. Please note the following
requirements:
i. U.S.-based non-profit Grantees
whose total annual expenditure of
Federal awards is more than $300,000
(more than $500,000 for fiscal years
ending after December 31, 2003) must
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
have an organization-wide audit
conducted in accordance with 29 CFR
parts 96 and 99, which codify the
requirements of the Single Audit Act
and OMB Circular A–133, and must
comply with the timeframes established
in those regulations for the submission
of their audits to the Federal Audit
Clearinghouse. Grantees must send a
copy of their single audit to their
assigned USDOL Grant Officer’s
Technical Representative (GOTR) at the
time it is submitted to the Federal Audit
Clearinghouse.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Please Note: USDOL generally allows the
costs to be allocated based on the following
(applicable to U.S.-based agencies only): (1)
A–133 ‘‘single audit’’ costs as part of the
indirect cost rate/pool for organizations with
more than one Federal source of funding.
Organizations with only one Federal source
could charge the A–133 single audit cost as
direct costs; (2) A–133 ‘‘compliance
supplement’’ costs—as direct costs for
Federal sources only through a cost
allocation methodology approved by the
Federal cognizant agency; or (3) A–133
program specific audits as direct costs. Any
deviations from the above must be explained
and justified in the application.
ii. Foreign-based Grantees and private
for-profit Grantees that are awarded a
Cooperative Agreement under this
solicitation must arrange for the annual
performance of an attestation
engagement, conducted in accordance
with U.S. Government Auditing
Standards, which includes auditor’s
opinions on (1) compliance with
USDOL regulations and the provisions
of the Cooperative Agreement, and (2)
the reliability of the Grantee’s financial
and performance reports. USDOL will
provide an examination guide to be
used by the auditor selected by the
Grantee to perform the attestation
engagement and will provide assistance
in the event a Grantee is unable to
identify an audit firm qualified to
perform an attestation engagement in
accordance with U.S. Government
Auditing Standards. The Grantee’s
contract with the auditor to conduct the
attestation engagement must include
provisions granting access to the
auditor’s documentation (work papers)
to representatives of USDOL, including
the Grant Officer, the GOTR, and
USDOL’s Office of the Inspector
General. The reports for these
engagements are to be submitted to the
Grant Officer with a copy to the GOTR:
(1) 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s
report, or (2) nine months after the end
of the Grantee’s fiscal year, whichever
occurs sooner. Please note that the
attestation engagement should be
allocated as a direct cost to the project.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
In accordance with 29 CFR parts 96
and 99, USDOL has also contracted with
an independent external auditor to
conduct project-specific attestation
engagements at USDOL’s expense to
supplement the coverage provided by
the audits/engagements that Grantees
must arrange. Grantees scheduled for
examination by USDOL’s contractor
shall be notified approximately two to
four weeks prior to the start of the
engagement.
C. Administrative Standards and
Provisions
Cooperative Agreements awarded
under this solicitation are subject to the
following administrative standards and
provisions outlined in the CFR that
pertain to USDOL, and any other
applicable standards that come into
effect during the term of the Cooperative
Agreement, if applicable to a particular
Grantee:
i. 29 CFR Part 2 Subpart D—Equal
Treatment in Department of Labor
Programs for Religious Organizations;
Protection of Religious Liberty of
Department of Labor Social Service
Providers and Beneficiaries.
ii. 29 CFR Part 31—
Nondiscrimination in Federally
Assisted Programs of the Department of
Labor—Effectuation of Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964.
iii. 29 CFR Part 32—
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs and Activities
Receiving or Benefiting from Federal
Financial Assistance.
iv. 29 CFR Part 33—Enforcement of
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs or Activities
Conducted by the Department of Labor.
v. 29 CFR Part 35—Nondiscrimination
on the Basis of Age in Programs or
Activities Receiving Federal Financial
Assistance from the Department of
Labor.
vi. 29 CFR Part 36—Federal Standards
for Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Sex in Education Programs or Activities
Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.
vii. 29 CFR Part 93—New Restrictions
on Lobbying.
viii. 29 CFR Part 95—Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and Other
Non-Profit Organizations, and with
Commercial Organizations, Foreign
Governments, Organizations Under the
Jurisdiction of Foreign Governments
and International Organizations.
ix. 29 CFR Part 96—Federal Standards
for Audit of Federally Funded Grants,
Contracts and Agreements.
x. 29 CFR Part 98—Federal Standards
for Government-wide Debarment and
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32905
Suspension (Nonprocurement) and
Government-wide Requirements for
Drug-Free Workplace (Grants).
xi. 29 CFR Part 99—Federal Standards
for Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Non-Profit Organizations.
Copies of all regulations referenced in
this solicitation are available at no cost,
online, at https://www.dol.gov. A copy of
Title 29 of the CFR referenced in this
solicitation is available at no cost,
online, at https://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/
Title_29/toc.htm.
Grantees should be aware that terms
outlined in this solicitation, the
Cooperative Agreement, and the MPGs
are all applicable to the implementation
of projects awarded under this
solicitation.
D. Key Personnel
As noted in section V.1.D., Applicants
must list all Key Personnel candidates.
The Grantee must inform the GOTR in
the event that key personnel cannot
continue to work on the project as
planned. The Grantee is expected to
nominate, through the submission of a
formal project revision, new personnel.
(Further information on project
revisions will be provided to Grantees
after award). However, the Grantee must
obtain approval from the Grant Officer
before any change to key personnel is
formalized. If the Grant Officer is unable
to approve the personnel change, s/he
reserves the right to terminate the
Cooperative Agreement or disallow
costs.
E. Encumbrance of Cooperative
Agreement Funds
Cooperative Agreement funds may not
be encumbered/obligated by a Grantee
before or after the period of
performance. Encumbrances/obligations
outstanding as of the end of the
Cooperative Agreement period may be
liquidated (paid out) after the end of the
Cooperative Agreement period. Such
encumbrances/obligations may involve
only specified commitments for which a
need existed during the Cooperative
Agreement period and that are
supported by approved contracts,
purchase orders, requisitions, invoices,
bills, or other evidence of liability
consistent with a Grantee’s purchasing
procedures and incurred within the
Cooperative Agreement period. All
encumbrances/obligations incurred
during the Cooperative Agreement
period must be liquidated within 90
calendar days after the end of the
Cooperative Agreement period, unless a
longer period of time is granted by
USDOL.
Federal Regulations require Grantees
to submit annually an inventory listing
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32906
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
of federally-owned property in their
custody to USDOL. See 29 CFR 95.33(a).
Such property must be inventoried and
secured throughout the life of the
project. At the end of the project,
USDOL and the Grantee are expected to
determine how to best allocate such,
and other, property in order to promote
sustainability of efforts in the project’s
implementing areas.
F. Site Visits
USDOL, through its authorized
representatives, has the right, at all
reasonable times, to make site visits to
review project accomplishments and
management control systems and to
provide such technical assistance as
may be required. USDOL intends to
make every effort to notify the Grantee
at least two weeks in advance of any trip
to the USDOL-funded project site. If
USDOL makes any site visit on the
premises of a Grantee or a
subcontractor(s) under the Cooperative
Agreement, the Grantee must provide,
and must require its subcontractors to
provide, all reasonable facilities and
assistance for the safety and
convenience of government
representatives in the performance of
their duties. All site visits and
evaluations are expected to be
performed in a manner designed to not
unduly delay the implementation of the
project.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
4. Reporting and Deliverables
In addition to meeting the above
requirements, a Grantee is expected to
monitor the implementation of the
program; report to USDOL on a semiannual basis or more frequently if
deemed necessary by USDOL; and
undergo independent evaluations of
program results. Guidance on USDOL
procedures and management
requirements will be provided to
Grantees in the MPGs with the
Cooperative Agreement. Unless
otherwise indicated, a Grantee must
submit copies of all required reports to
USDOL by the specified due dates.
Exact timeframes for completion of
deliverables will be addressed in the
Cooperative Agreement and the MPGs.
Specific deliverables include the
following:
A. Project Document
Within 90 calendar days of project
award, the Grantee must deliver an
initial draft of the Project Document,
based on the application submitted in
response to this solicitation and
including the results of additional
consultations with project stakeholders,
government officials in the target
country(ies), local partners, and USDOL.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Within 180 calendar days of project
award, the Grantee must deliver the
final Project Document, which must
include dates for the mid-term and final
evaluations, the Logical Framework
(logframe), initial Sustainability Plan;
and Work Plan. In addition, Applicants
proposing to issue government
subcontracts must submit a table of all
proposed government subcontracts that
includes activities to be carried out and
a justification for why the government is
the most suitable party to carry out the
proposed activities.
B. Baseline Data Collection
Within 180 calendar days of award,
and prior to the finalization of the
Project Document, USDOL expects
Grantees to conduct baseline data
collection. Baseline data and
information measures the existing
conditions of target areas or sectors and
provides information on the
characteristics of the target population,
including their living and working
conditions. The data should be used to:
(1) Develop reliable project targets and
identify project beneficiaries and (2)
inform project design and formulate
activities including the identification of
relevant services to children and
possible stakeholders. When designed
with additional periodic data collection
exercises, baseline data can be used to
establish benchmarks and contribute to
the measurement of project impact.
Information can then be used to inform
management decisions throughout the
project cycle.
C. Technical Progress and Financial
Reports
The format for the technical progress
reports will be provided in the MPG
distributed to Grantees after the award.
Grantees must submit a typed technical
progress report to USDOL on a semiannual basis by 31 March and 30
September of each year during the
Cooperative Agreement period.
However, USDOL reserves the right to
require up to four technical progress
reports a year, as necessary. Grantees
must also submit a quarterly financial
report (SF 269) electronically to USDOL
through the E-Grants system, and a
Federal Cash Transactions Report (PSC
272) to the HHS–PMS.
D. Work Plans
Within 90 calendar days of award, the
Grantee must deliver an initial draft of
the Work Plan, for the life of the project.
Grantees must develop a final Work
Plan within 180 calendar days of project
award for approval by USDOL so as to
ensure coordination with other relevant
social actors throughout the country.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The final Work Plan must include dates
for the mid-term and final evaluations.
An annual Work Plan that updates the
initial Work Plan must be submitted to
USDOL annually with the September
technical progress report.
E. Performance Monitoring Plan
Within 180 calendar days of award,
the Grantee must submit a draft PMP to
USDOL. The PMP must be developed in
conjunction with the Logical Framework
project design and common indicators
for reporting selected by USDOL. The
plan must include a limited number of
additional key indicators that can be
realistically measured within the cost
parameters allocated to project
monitoring. Baseline data collection (as
referenced in section VI.4.B. is expected
to be tied to the indicators of the Project
Document and the PMP. The final PMP
must be submitted after completion of
baseline data collection but no later
than one year after award. (See
background materials available on
OCFT’s Web site https://www.dol.gov/
ilab/grants/bkgrd.htm for a sample
PMP.)
F. Project Evaluations
As specified in the Cooperative
Agreement, mid-term and final
evaluations must take place for the
project. The Grantee must include a line
item in the budget for funding these
evaluations. Mid-term and final
evaluations are generally conducted by
an independent contractor. When
developing Evaluation Plans, Grantees
are expected to tentatively schedule
mid-term evaluations to correspond
with the approximate mid-point of the
project. The date of the final evaluation
is expected to be tentatively set for
approximately two months prior to the
project completion date.
VII. Agency Contacts
All inquiries regarding this
solicitation should be directed to: Ms.
Lisa Harvey, U.S. Department of Labor,
Procurement Services Center, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S–
4307, Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202) 693–4570 (please note that this is
not a toll-free-number) or e-mail:
harvey.lisa@dol.gov. For a list of
frequently asked questions on USDOL’s
Solicitation for Cooperative Agreements,
please visit https://www.dol.gov/ILAB/
faq/faq36.htm.
VIII. Other Information
1. Coordination With the ILO/IPEC,
Other USDOL Grantees, and Other U.S.
Government-Funded Projects
Recognizing the important work of
ILO/IPEC in reducing exploitive child
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
labor worldwide, and USDOL’s
substantial funding and support for this
organization, Grantees are encouraged to
establish good relationships with ILO
and IPEC-specific field offices and other
U.S. Government-funded projects such
as those supported by U.S. Embassies,
the U.S. Department of State’s Global
Trafficking in Persons (GTIP) Office,
and the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) in the country
(ies) where they work. Similarly,
USDOL intends to inform Grantees of
other organizations that are working on
related issues in countries with USDOLfunded projects. Establishing a
productive working relationship with
these organizations is especially
important to avoid duplication of efforts
and to build synergies between
organizations working in the same issue
area. Grantees must also become
familiar with standard concepts and
definitions regarding child labor that are
currently used by the ILO, including
Convention 138 and Convention 182
and their accompanying
recommendations.
2. Privacy and Freedom of Information
Act
Any information submitted in
response to this solicitation will be
subject to the provisions of the Privacy
Act and the Freedom of Information
Act, as appropriate.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of
June, 2007.
Lisa Harvey,
Grant Officer.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Appendix A: USDOL’s Definitions of
Key Terms
Acceptable Work: Work that is performed
by children of legal working age, in
accordance with national legislation and
international standards, namely the
International Labor Organization (ILO)
Conventions 138 and 182; work that is nonexploitive and non-hazardous and does not
prevent a child from receiving the full benefit
of an education. Acceptable work would
generally include, for example, light work
that is compatible with national minimum
age legislation and education laws.
Association: An Association is a
partnership of more than one organization
that becomes a Grantee of USDOL. An
Association is comprised of two or more
organizations that do not constitute a single
legal entity but join in applying for an award
under this solicitation. Each member of the
Association must be individually eligible for
the award, and must sign, and agree to be
bound jointly and severally by the
Cooperative Agreement. The Association
must designate one Associate as the Lead
Grantee. Specific obligations of the Lead
Grantee are included in the Cooperative
Agreement. All references in this solicitation
to ‘‘Applicant(s)’’ and ‘‘Grantee(s)’’ apply to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Associations as well as individual
Applicants.
At-risk: An at-risk situation refers to a set
of conditions or circumstances (family
environment or situation, proximity to
economic activities prone to employ
children, etc.) under which a child lives or
to which it is exposed which make it more
likely that the child will be in employed in
exploitive child labor. A project-specific
definition of ‘‘at-risk,’’ clearly articulating the
defining characteristics of the proposed
direct beneficiaries, must be provided with
the application, though this definition may
be refined after award in the Project
Document as a result of baseline data
collection. For example, siblings of children
formerly engaged in exploitive labor could be
considered ‘‘at-risk.’’
Basic Education: This comprises both
formal schooling (primary and sometimes
lower secondary) as well as a wide array of
non-formal and informal public and private
educational activities offered to meet the
defined basic learning needs of groups of
people of all ages. (Source: UNESCO,
Education for All: Year 2000 Assessment:
Glossary [CD–ROM], Paris, 2001.
Child: For the purposes of this solicitation,
a child is considered to be an individual
under the age of 18 years. This category
includes older children, ‘‘youth,’’ under the
age of 18 years.
Child Labor (see definition of Exploitive
Child Labor).
Child Labor Monitoring System (CLMS):
CLMS involves the identification, referral,
protection and prevention of exploitive child
labor through the development of a
coordinated multi-sector monitoring and
referral process that aims to cover all
children living in a given geographical area,
not just those that are direct beneficiaries of
a project. The principle activities of a CLMS
include regularly repeated direct
observations to identify child laborers and to
determine risks to which they are exposed,
referral of these children to services,
verification that they have been removed and
tracking them afterwards to ensure that they
have satisfactory alternatives.
Children Prevented from Entering
Exploitive Labor (a common indicator): This
comprises part of one of USDOL–OCFT’s
GPRA Indicators and refers to children not
yet engaged in exploitive child labor but who
are considered to be at-risk of entering such
labor, for example, siblings of former working
children. In order to be considered as
‘‘prevented,’’ these children must also have
benefited or be benefiting from a direct
educational service provided by the project.
USDOL considers children prevented from
entering exploitive labor and children
withdrawn from exploitive labor to be
mutually exclusive categories. (For more
information on GPRA, see section I.1.
Background: USDOL Support for the Global
Elimination of Exploitive Child Labor).
Children Withdrawn From Exploitive Labor
(a common indicator): This comprises part of
one of USDOL–OCFT’s GPRA Indicators and
refers to those children who were found to
be working in exploitive child labor and no
longer work under such conditions as a result
of a direct project intervention. This category
includes:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32907
(a) Children who have been completely
withdrawn from work, which is required by
ILO Convention 182 for forms (a)–(c) of
Article 3, and
(b) Children who were involved in
hazardous work (Article 3(d) of C.182) or
work that impedes a child’s education (ILO
Convention 138) but are no longer due to
improved working conditions (i.e., fewer
hours or safer workplaces) or because they
have moved into a new, acceptable form of
work (i.e. acceptable work).
To be considered as withdrawn from
exploitive child labor, each child must also
have benefited or be benefiting from a direct
educational service provided by the project.
USDOL considers children withdrawn from
exploitive labor and children prevented from
entering exploitive labor to be mutually
exclusive categories.
Completion (a common indicator): The
percentage of children withdrawn/prevented
through a USDOL-supported educational or
training program who complete the
program(s).
Cooperative Agreement: A Cooperative
Agreement is a form of a grant where
substantial involvement is anticipated
between the donor (USDOL) and the Grantee
during the performance of the proposed
activities. The level of monitoring and
accountability required by USDOL under a
Cooperative Agreement is less than what is
required in a contract, but more than in a
regular grant.
Direct Beneficiaries: Children and youth
who, as a result of a USDOL-funded project,
are (a) withdrawn from, or prevented from
entering, exploitive child labor AND (b) are
provided with a direct educational service
that results in their enrollment in at least one
of the four categories of educational activities
listed below under the definition of direct
educational service.
Direct Beneficiary Monitoring (see Project
Monitoring System).
Direct Educational Service(s): Direct
Educational Services may involve either:
(a) The provision of at least one of the
following educational activities:
(1) Non-formal or basic literacy
education—This type of educational activity
may include transitional, levelling, or
literacy classes so that a child may either be
mainstreamed into formal education and/or
can participate in vocational training
activities;
(2) Vocational, pre-vocational, or skills
training—This type of training is designed to
develop a particular, marketable skill (e.g.,
mechanics, sewing); or
(b) The provision of goods and/or services
(if lack thereof is a barrier to education) that
meets the specific needs of the proposed
direct beneficiaries and results in their
enrollment or in at least one of the four
categories of educational activities listed
below. Examples of goods and/or services
that may meet the specific gaps/educational
needs of targeted children include tutoring,
school meals, uniforms, school supplies and
materials, books, tuition and transportation
vouchers, or other types of incentives. The
four categories of educational activities that
qualify are:
(1) Non-formal or basic literacy education;
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
32908
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
(2) Vocational, pre-vocational, or skills
training;
(3) Formal education—This is defined as
the formal school system within the target
country; or
(4) Mainstreaming—This type of
educational activity involves a project
transitioning children from non-formal
education into the formal education system.
Generally, mainstreaming involves the
provision of goods and/or services that may
assist in placement testing and enable a child
to attend and stay in school.
Exploitive Child Labor: This term refers to
the worst forms of child labor outlined in ILO
Convention 182, including work which, by
its nature or the circumstances in which it is
carried out, is likely to harm the health,
safety, or morals of children; all other types
of work by children in violation of national
labor laws and international standards, such
as ILO Conventions 138 and 182; and work
that prevents a child from obtaining an
education or impede a child’s ability to learn
as outlined in ILO Convention 138. (See
ILAB’s Web site at https://www.dol.gov/ilab/
grants/bkgrd.htm for a visual presentation of
the categories of exploitive child labor).
ILO Convention 182, Article 3, defines the
worst forms of child labor as comprised of:
(a) All forms of slavery or practices similar
to slavery, such as the sale and trafficking of
children, debt bondage and serfdom and
forced or compulsory labor, including forced
or compulsory recruitment of children for
use in armed conflict;
(b) The use, procuring or offering of a child
for prostitution, the production of
pornography or for pornographic
performances;
(c) The use, procuring or offering of a child
for illicit activities, in particular for the
production and trafficking of drugs as
defined in the relevant international treaties;
(d) Work which, by its nature or the
circumstances in which it is carried out, is
likely to harm the health, safety or morals of
children.
ILO Convention 138, Minimum Age
Convention, Article 7.1(b) is also used to
identify exploitive child labor. Article 7.1(b)
states that children within a particular age
range shall not participate in work that will
‘‘prejudice their attendance at school, their
participation in vocational orientation or
training programmes approved by the
competent authority or their capacity to
benefit from the instruction received.’’
Exploitive Labor: (see definition of
Exploitive Child Labor).
Hazardous Work: This term refers to work
that falls under Article 3(d) of ILO
Convention 182. ILO Recommendation 190,
which accompanies ILO Convention 182 on
the Worst Forms of Child Labor, gives
additional guidance on identifying
hazardous work. Applicants are encouraged
to consult Recommendation 190. ILO
Recommendation 190 states in Section II.
Hazardous work, paragraph 3, ‘‘In
determining the types of work referred to
under Article 3(d) of the Convention [ILO
Convention 182], and in identifying where
they exist, consideration should be given’’ to:
(a) Work which exposes children to
physical, psychological or sexual abuse;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
(b) Work underground, under water, at
dangerous heights or in confined spaces;
(c) Work with dangerous machinery,
equipment and tools, or which involves the
manual handling or transport of heavy loads;
(d) Work in an unhealthy environment
which may, for example, expose children to
hazardous substances, agents or processes, or
to temperatures, noise levels, or vibrations
damaging to their health;
(e) Work under particularly difficult
conditions such as work for long hours or
during the night or work where the child is
unreasonably confined to the premises of the
employer.
In some cases, the work conditions of
children involved in hazardous work may be
improved so as to make the work conditions
acceptable for children. This may include, for
example, reducing hours of work or changing
the type of work children perform (i.e.,
disallowing children in agriculture from
working with heavy machinery or pesticide
applications). However, conditions can only
be improved for children who are legal to
work according to the specific laws of the
target country(ies). If, for example, a child is
9 years old and working in hazardous work
in a country whose minimum age is 15 years,
this child should be completely withdrawn
from child labor since conditions cannot be
improved to make it legally acceptable for the
child to work.
Indirect Beneficiaries: Individuals who do
not receive a direct educational service
provided by the project but who benefit as a
result of a project activity, such as awareness
raising efforts, support for policy change, or
institutional capacity building. These
individuals do not qualify as direct
beneficiaries.
Improved Country Capacity To Address
Child Labor (a common indicator): This is
one of USDOL–OCFT’s GPRA Indicators (see
section I.1. for more information on GPRA)
and can be demonstrated if one or more
actions listed below took place in the target
country(ies) under one of the following four
fields:
1. The adaptation of the legal framework to
international standards.
• List of hazardous work activities for
children approved or revised after tripartite
consultation (among government, employer,
and employee representatives) and officially
adopted (e.g. through law, presidential
decree, etc.);
• Adaptation of labor code or education
laws to include or modify child labor-related
issues;
• Adaptation of criminal code to include
or modify child labor-related issues;
• Adaptation of existing legislation
concerning child labor or education to put it
in line with Conventions 138 or 182; or
• Approval of new legislation concerning
specific forms of child labor.
2. The formulation of specific policies and
programs at the national, regional, or sectoral
level within a country dealing with exploitive
child labor.
Progress in this field can be demonstrated
by the development of a policy, plan or
program document on the worst forms of
child labor, a specific worst form of child
labor, or basic education reforms which
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
address the worst forms of child labor by one
or more of the following entities:
• The Government (at any level);
• The National Steering Committee; or
• Social Partners.
3. The inclusion of child labor concerns in
relevant development, social and antipoverty policies and programs
• The elimination of child labor, including
through basic education reform that benefits
child labor elimination, has been included as
an explicit objective in poverty reduction,
development, educational, or other social
programs;
• Child labor was included as an indicator
in poverty reduction, development or
educational strategies, etc. (e.g., UN
Development Assistance Framework
(UNDAF), Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
(PRSP), Education for All (EFA), Millennium
Development Goals (MDG));
• Child laborers have been considered as
a priority target group in the poverty
reduction, development or educational
strategies, etc.; or
• Ensuring that children go to school and
do not work has been set as a condition for
families that wish to benefit from social and
stipends programs
4. The establishment of a child labor
monitoring system (CLMS) Progress in this
field can be demonstrated if one or several
of the following systems has been established
and is in operation:
• A CLMS covering various forms of child
labor at the national level;
• A CLMS covering various forms of child
labor at the local level:
• A CLMS in any formal or informal sector,
urban or rural; or
• A comprehensive plan and/or pilot
program to develop and establish national,
local or sector specific CLMS.
The characteristics of a comprehensive and
credible CLMS can include the following:
• The system is focused on the child at
work and/or in school;
• It involves all relevant partners in the
field, including labor inspectors if
appropriate;
• It uses regular observation to identify
children in the workplace;
• It refers identified children to the most
appropriate alternative to ensure that they are
withdrawn from hazardous work;
• It verifies whether the children have
actually shifted from hazardous work to an
appropriate situation (school or other); and
• It keeps records on the extent and nature
of child labor and the schooling of identified
child workers.
Logical Framework (Logframe): A tool that
summarizes project design. The logframe is
a matrix that clearly documents the logic and
causal linkages underlying an Applicant’s
strategy. In developing a logframe,
Applicants should document how activities
will lead to outputs (intermediate results),
which, taken together, will lead to the
achievement of the project’s purpose. The
purpose is the overall result for which the
project will be held accountable. The
logframe matrix also includes a contextual
goal that reflects the broader societal issue
that the project hopes to influence. In
addition to requiring Applicants to provide a
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
narrative summary of this hierarchy of results
(activities-outputs-purpose-goal), the
logframe also requires the project to list
performance indicators for each result and
the means by which those indicators will be
measured. Applicants are expected to select
appropriate indicators and targets at both the
output and purpose levels, which are the
most critical results for ensuring that the
project achieves its intended outcomes.
Projects have the option of monitoring
relevant indicators at the lowest, activity
level and the contextual goal level as well.
The final element of the logframe is the
assumptions column, which Applicants
should use to describe those conditions
outside their control which might affect
achievement of project results. Applicants
must carefully consider what might go wrong
that would affect the link of activities to
outputs, the link of outputs to purpose, and
the link of purpose to goal. Any issues that
are outside the Applicant’s control which
might affect the ability to achieve results
should be documented in the assumptions
column so they can be monitored over the
life of the project.
Other Project Interventions: This category
of interventions may include such activities
as awareness raising and social mobilization
campaigns, alternative income generating
activities and business/skills training for
parents, psychosocial services for children,
improvements in curriculum, teacher
training or improvements to school
infrastructure that are also important for
withdrawing and preventing children from
exploitive labor, including by improving
access to and the quality of basic education.
While Grantees are encouraged to address the
needs of children engaged in, or at-risk of
entering, exploitive labor and their families
in a comprehensive manner, these activities
will not be considered as direct educational
services. Therefore, individuals benefiting
solely from these interventions cannot be
counted toward the project’s target number of
direct beneficiaries or in GPRA reporting.
USDOL recognizes that, in many cases, a
combination of services—both direct
educational services and other project
interventions as outlined in this paragraph—
may represent the most effective strategy for
prevention or withdrawal of a child from
exploitive labor. USDOL encourages
Applicants to propose the most effective
package of services for direct beneficiaries to
achieve the goal of withdrawing children
from, and preventing children from entering,
exploitive labor. Grantees should be able to
match a particular service or educational or
training opportunity to an individual child.
Therefore, project interventions such as
school structural improvements, teacher
training, construction of latrines, inclusion of
child labor modules in teacher curriculum, or
the provision of classroom chalkboards are
not considered direct educational services as
defined above.
Outputs-Based Budget: Delineates project
funds allocated for specific activities and
outputs, based on the project design.
Performance Monitoring Plan (PMP): A
PMP serves three primary functions: (1) To
delineate the data collection process; (2) to
ensure data comparability; and (3) to guide
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
data analysis. A PMP, therefore, must contain
the following information:
• Definition of each indicator and unit of
measurement.
• Description of each indicator data
source.
• Method of data collection or calculation.
• Frequency and schedule of data
collection.
• Institution(s) or person(s) responsible for
ensuring data availability.
• Type or frequency of data analysis and
person/institution responsible for data
analysis.
• Cost of data collection.
Appropriate performance indicators are
expected to be selected during the project
design consolidation phase and further
defined as the PMP is finalized. PMP
finalization includes determining precise
indicator definitions, data collection
methodologies, responsibilities, and costs.
Target setting is also a critical part of the
PMP finalization process, as targets are listed
by time period in the PMP’s data tracking
table. (Further information on data tracking
will be provided to Grantees after award).
Prevented from Entering (Exploitive Child
Labor): (see definition of Children Prevented
from Entering Exploitive Child Labor).
Project Design Consolidation Phase: This
phase of a project lasts no longer than one
year after award. During this phase, the
Grantee outlines the goals and objectives of
the project; identifies activities of the project
that support the stated goals and objectives;
establishes specific deadlines and
responsibilities for carrying out the activities
of the project; and determines a timeframe for
measuring the progress and achievements of
the project. The Project Design Consolidation
Phase, therefore, includes the development
of a Project Document, Logical Framework
(logframe), Performance Monitoring Plan
(PMP), Work Plan, Sustainability Plan, and
evaluation plan. Grantees must also address
the minimum requirements identified in the
Cooperative Agreement, which include but is
not limited to defining and describing
children targeted; needs, gaps, and/or
barriers; proposed strategies to address the
needs/gaps/barriers; sustainability and exit
strategies; detailed description of activities;
program management and performance
assessment; and budget and cost
effectiveness. USDOL may provide technical
assistance to Grantees to refine the Project
Document, Logframe, PMP, Work Plan,
Sustainability Plan, and evaluation plan,
which, as deliverables, are subject to
approval by USDOL.
Project Document: The Project Document
serves a number of functions. It describes the
situation that gave rise to a particular project;
explains ‘‘why’’ a project was started;
establishes the plan for what must be done;
and outlines what must be produced, by
when and by whom, and what is expected to
happen after the project ends. It can serve as
a reference point for all of the implementing
partners involved in a project. The Project
Document also provides the basis for
assessing the success of a project. (The format
for the Project Document will be provided to
Grantees after award). The Project Document
is supplemented by the Logical Framework
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32909
(logframe) (see definition above). For the
most part, Grantees are expected to have
already presented an essentially complete
Project Design strategy and logframe as part
of their application submitted in response to
this solicitation. The Project Document
(including a project budget) is a more refined
and revised version of the application and
sets the technical parameters and reference
points for the project according to the
standardized format outlined by USDOL.
The original proposal is expected to serve
as the basis for the Grantee’s Project
Document. The Project Document should
clearly reflect an accurate understanding of
direct beneficiaries and how a child can be
counted as a direct beneficiary for the
purposes of GPRA reporting. The Project
Document must also clearly describe the
strategy for monitoring and reporting the
working and educational status of children
who are direct beneficiaries of the project.
This strategy includes identifying the
responsible persons (i.e., project/partner
staff, school teachers, community members,
parents), how the responsible persons are
expected to collect the information
(assessment form, door-to-door monitoring,
discussions with children), and how, and at
what frequency, the Grantee will obtain the
information. The project’s monitoring
strategy will help inform the Performance
Monitoring Plan (PMP).
Project Monitoring System: USDOL
requires the development and use of a project
monitoring system that incorporates two
components: (1) Direct beneficiary
monitoring that allows for the monitoring of
the work and educational status of children
directly benefiting from the project (i.e. direct
beneficiaries), and (2) a project Performance
Monitoring Plan (PMP) that identifies
indicators and tracks progress regarding the
project’s major objectives. The direct
beneficiary monitoring system is a
component of the overall project PMP, and
allows USDOL to report to Congress and
other interested parties on the number of
children that are withdrawn from, and
prevented from entering, exploitive child
labor by USDOL-funded projects. Grantees
should use their PMPs also to monitor
progress in achieving capacity building
objectives. (The format for the PMP will be
provided to Grantees after award).
The project monitoring system can help
assess the effects and impact of project
results to determine if the project activities
are achieving the intended outcome. Project
monitoring systems include records of the
basic identification information for all direct
beneficiaries receiving direct educational
services (i.e., name, address, sex, and age)
and their work status (working, withdrawn,
or prevented), working conditions, and
educational status (enrollment, retention, and
school performance). Project monitoring
systems should be designed to collect this
kind of detailed information for all direct
beneficiaries that receive and continue to
receive direct educational services and other
project interventions provided by the project.
Retention (a common indicator): The
percentage of children withdrawn/prevented
through a USDOL-supported educational
program(s) who continue in the program (i.e.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32910
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
to subsequent years, periods, and/or levels of
the program or who stay in the program even
if they are not promoted) and who continue
to be withdrawn or prevented from exploitive
child labor.
Sustainability Plan: A Sustainability Plan
provides detailed strategies, assumptions,
and conditions for sustainability, and
includes both (1) a Sustainability Plan/
matrix, and (2) an exit strategy. Strategies are
likely to differ by project and by the type of
sustainability being addressed (i.e., financial,
benefits, programmatic/institutional, and
political). Sustainability Plans must also
include a clear exit strategy that outlines how
a project will transfer responsibility for
project components to local or national
stakeholders by the end of the project, if not
sooner. Activities to address sustainability
issues must be identified together with a list
of (or statement concerning) external factors
that may impact sustainability. Sustainability
Plans must also include a clear process for
monitoring progress towards achieving the
different areas of sustainability and key
partners or institutions involved.
Unconditional Worst Forms of Child Labor:
This term refers to those worst forms of child
labor specifically identified in Article 3 parts
(a)–(c) of ILO Convention 182. Children
involved in the unconditional worst forms of
child labor must no longer be working to be
considered as withdrawn from exploitive
labor. No improvements in the working
conditions of children involved in
unconditional worst forms of child labor,
such as slavery or slavery-like practices,
prostitution or pornography, or illicit
activities, can create an acceptable
environment for children to continue to work
in an unconditional worst forms of child
labor, even for one hour.
Withdrawn from Exploitive Child Labor:
(see definition of Children Withdrawn from
Exploitive Child Labor).
Work Plan: A Work Plan must identify
major project activities, deadlines for
completing those activities, and person(s) or
institution(s) responsible for completing
these activities. The Work Plan must
correspond to activities identified in the
logframe. The Work Plan may vary
depending on what is the most logical form.
It may, for example, be divided by project
component, country, or region.
Worst Forms of Child Labor: This term
refers to the forms of child labor that fall
under ILO Convention 182, Article 3, parts
(a)–(d); includes the forms of work referred
to as ‘‘unconditional worst forms of child
labor’’ [parts (a)–(c)] and ‘‘hazardous work’’
[part (d)], which, according to ILO
Convention 182, ‘‘shall be determined by
national laws or regulations or by the
competent authority, after consultation with
the organizations of employers and workers
concerned, taking into consideration relevant
international standards * * *’’ As this
suggests, forms of work identified as
‘‘hazardous’’ for children [part (d)] may differ
from country to country.
Youth: While individual countries may
define ‘‘youth’’ differently, for the purposes
of this solicitation, direct beneficiaries may
only include children or youth under the age
of 18 years (see definition of Child).
Appendix B: Technical Proposal
Format
Abstract
A. Project Design/Budget-Cost Effectiveness
i. Background and Justification
ii. Proposed Strategy
iii. Project Monitoring and Evaluation
iv. Budget-Cost Effectiveness Narrative
(with cost of activities linked to the
outputs-based budget in Annex B)
B. Sustainability Plan
C. Organizational Capacity
i. International and U.S. Government Grant
Experience
ii. Country Presence and Host Government
Support
iii. Fiscal Oversight
D. Key Personnel/Management Plan/Staffing
i. Key Personnel
ii. Other Professional Personnel
iii. Management Plan
iv. Staff Loading Plan
E. Additional Direct Beneficiaries (optional)
F. Cost Sharing (optional)
Annex A: The Logical Framework Matrix
Annex B: Outputs-Based Budget
(Examples of a Logical Framework Matrix,
a Sustainability Plan, an Outputs-Based
Budget, PMP and other background
documentation for this solicitation are
available from ILAB’s Web site at https://
www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/bkgrd.htm.)
APPENDIX C DEFINITIONS AND USUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBGRANTS VS. SUBCONTRACTS,
[U.S. Department of Labor Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor, and Human Trafficking]
Subgrants
Definitions:
General Purpose* ......................
Focus* .......................................
Recipient Responsibility* ..................
Usual Characteristics: s
Recipients ..................................
Terms & Performance Standards.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Operational Environment ...........
Monitoring ..................................
Scope of Work ...........................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Subcontracts
Subject to an agreement that provides for the transfer of money or property to accomplish a public
purpose of support or stimulation as authorized
under Federal statute.
Carries out one or more major programmatic functions.
Subject to an agreement in which the purpose is
primarily to acquire goods and services.
Has responsibility for programmatic decisionmaking, adherence to applicable Federal program compliance requirements, and is able to
determine which participants are eligible to receive Federal financial assistance.
Awarded largely to non-profits, institutions of higher
education, and state and local governments.
Fewer commercial enterprises are recipients.
Less rigorous according to their terms and conditions than contracts. Performance is measured
against whether the objectives of the Federal
program are met (for example, to eliminate
exploitive child labor).
Less likely to operate in a competitive environment
and usually provides services for a public purpose.
Less regulated. If the task is not accomplished,
there may be fewer legal and financial ramifications.
Scope of work, deliverables and delivery schedule
are more flexible and easier to amend when
changes are necessary.
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Provides goods and services that are ancillary or
supportive to the operation of the Federal program.
Responsibility for programmatic decision making
rests primarily with the party providing payment
and inspecting deliverables. Is subject to procurement regulations, but not programmatic compliance requirements.
Awarded largely to commercial enterprises, although non-profits and state or local governments may respond to a bid or negotiated solicitation.
More rigorous according to their terms and conditions. Performance is measured against the delivery of goods and services.
Operates in a competitive environment and provides goods and services to many different purchasers.
More heavily regulated and more likely to carry
substantial legal or financial risk.
Scope of work may be less flexible and more difficult to amend. Firm delivery schedule with
deliverables subject to rigorous inspection.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
32911
APPENDIX C DEFINITIONS AND USUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBGRANTS VS. SUBCONTRACTS,—Continued
[U.S. Department of Labor Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor, and Human Trafficking]
Subgrants
Payment Schedule ....................
Subcontracts
Funds usually drawn down by recipient or paid in a
lump sum. Payments are based on budgeted
amounts rather than the unit cost of services.
Payment is usually made by invoice only after
goods are delivered or services rendered. Advances are made under specific, limited circumstances. Payments are related to goods delivered or services rendered.
*The distinction between subgrants vs. subcontracts should be made primarily based on these three definitions. Even if an agreement has
some or many of the ‘‘usual characteristics’’ of a subgrant, project managers and auditors should closely examine its purpose, focus, and recipient responsibilities (using the definitions provided above) before determining whether it meets the definition of a subgrant or subcontract.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4910–28–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
EN14JN07.020
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
32912
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32913
EN14JN07.021
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
32914
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
Paperwork Burden Statement
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, no persons are required to respond
to a collection of information unless such
collection displays a valid OMB control
number. The valid OMB control number for
this information collection is 1890–0014. The
time required to complete this information
collection is estimated to average five (5)
minutes per response, including the time to
review instructions, search existing data
resources, gather the data needed, and
complete and review the information
collection. If you have any comments
concerning the accuracy of the time
estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this
form, please write to: The Agency Contact
listed in this grant application package.
[FR Doc. E7–11526 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–28–C
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,876; TA–W–60,876B]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Armstrong Wood Products, Inc.,
Armstrong Hardwood Flooring
Company, Parquet Flooring
Department, Oneida, Tennessee;
Armstrong Wood Products, Inc.,
Armstrong Hardwood Flooring
Company, Pattern Plus Flooring
Department, Oneida, TN; Notice of
Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
TA–W–60,876
On May 2, 2007, the Department of
Labor (Department) issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration of the
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) petition filed on
behalf of workers and former workers of
Armstrong Wood Products, Inc.,
Armstrong Hardwood Flooring
Company, Pattern Plus Flooring
Department, Oneida, Tennessee (TA–
W–60,876B). The Notice of affirmative
determination was published in the
Federal Register on May 9, 2007 (72 FR
26425). Workers covered by TA–W–
60,876B produce Pattern Plus flooring, a
variety of hardwood flooring.
The request for reconsideration
alleged that Armstrong Wood Products,
Inc., Armstrong Hardwood Flooring
Company, Oneida, Tennessee (the
subject firm) increased its imports of
hardwood flooring.
On March 28, 2007, the Department
issued a TAA/ATAA certification for
workers of Armstrong Wood Products,
Inc., Armstrong Hardwood Flooring
Company, Solid Strip Flooring
Department, Oneida, Tennessee (TA–
W–60,876C). Solid Strip is a type of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
hardwood flooring produced by the
subject firm.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department confirmed
that the subject firm increased imports
of hardwood flooring following a shift of
production abroad. The Department also
received new information on the subject
firm’s organization and operation, as
well as information on the various types
of hardwood flooring produced by the
subject firm.
The new information confirmed that
workers at the subject firm are
separately identifiable by product line
and revealed that the three types of
hardwood flooring produced by the
subject firm are essentially the same.
Each type of flooring is made from
hardwood (parquet comprises of small
pieces of hardwood, solid strip
comprises of long strips of solid
hardwood, and Pattern Plus comprises
of large sheets of engineered hardwood)
and each type serves the same
function—covering the floor.
The Department determines that the
types of hardwood flooring produced at
the subject firm are like and directly
competitive with each other. As such,
the Department conducted a
reconsideration investigation of TA–W–
60,876 (parquet flooring) as well as TA–
W–60,876B (Pattern Plus).
The number of workers producing
parquet flooring at the subject firm
declined in 2006 from 2005 numbers,
and sales and production levels of
parquet flooring declined in 2006 from
2005 levels. The subject firm increased
imports of articles like and directly
competitive with parquet flooring
produced by the subject workers.
TA–W–60,876B
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Conclusion
After careful review of the
information obtained in the
reconsideration investigation, I
determine that the subject firm
increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with hardwood
flooring produced by the subject worker
groups following a shift of production
abroad. In accordance with the
provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, I make the following
certification:
All workers of Armstrong Wood Products,
Inc., Armstrong Hardwood Flooring
Company, Parquet Flooring Department,
Oneida, Tennessee (TA–W–60,876),
Armstrong Wood Products, Inc., and
Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company,
Pattern Plus Flooring Department, Oneida,
Tennessee, (TA–W–60,876B), who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after January 31, 2006
through two years from the date of this
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to
apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of
June 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–11479 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
The number of workers producing
Pattern Plus flooring at the subject firm
declined in 2006 from 2005 numbers,
and sales and production levels of
Pattern Plus flooring declined in 2006
from 2005 levels. The subject firm
increased imports of articles like and
directly competitive with Pattern Plus
flooring produced by the subject
workers.
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department herein
presents the results of its investigation
regarding certification of eligibility to
apply for ATAA. The Department has
determined in this case that the group
eligibility requirements of Section 246
have been met by the worker groups
covered by TA–W–60,876 and TA–W–
60,876B.
PO 00000
In both TA–W–60,876 and TA–W–
60,876B, a significant number of
workers at the firm are age 50 or over
and possess skills that are not easily
transferable. Further, in both cases,
competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Sfmt 4703
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–61,373]
Autolign Manufacturing Group, Inc.,
Milan, MI; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 25,
2007, in response to a petition filed by
a state agency representative on behalf
of workers of Autolign Manufacturing
Group, Inc., Milan, Michigan.
The Department was unable to locate
an official of the company to obtain the
information necessary to render a
determination. Consequently, the
investigation has been terminated.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 114 (Thursday, June 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32869-32914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Combating Exploitive Child Labor Through Education in Bolivia,
Cambodia, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Dominican
Republic, Indonesia, Morocco, the Philippines, Togo, and Uganda
June 14, 2007.
AGENCY: Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Department of Labor.
Announcement Type: New. Notice of Availability of Funds and
Solicitation for Cooperative Agreement Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA 07-10.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: Not
applicable.
Key Dates: Deadline for Submission of Application is July 25, 2007.
Executive Summary: The U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
International Labor Affairs, will award up to USD 46.494 million
through 10 or more Cooperative Agreements to one or more qualifying
organizations and/or Associations to combat exploitive child labor in
the following 10 countries: Bolivia (up to $3.344 million), Cambodia
(up to $4 million), Colombia (up to $5.1 million), Democratic Republic
of the Congo (up to $5.5 million), the Dominican Republic (up to $4
million), Indonesia (up to $5.55 million), Morocco (up to $3 million),
the Philippines (up to $5.5 million), Togo (up to $5 million), and
Uganda (up to $5.5 million). Projects funded under this solicitation
will seek to sustainably withdraw and prevent children from entering
exploitive labor through the provision of direct educational services
and other project interventions, and ensure direct beneficiaries'
enrollment, retention, and completion of the education and/or training
program(s) in which they are enrolled. Projects will also seek to build
capacity in target countries to eliminate exploitive child labor and
promote educational alternatives for children. Projects funded aim to
complement and expand upon existing projects and programs aimed at
eliminating exploitive child labor, particularly the worst forms of
child labor, and improving basic education in the target countries.
Applicants must respond to the entire Scope of Work outlined in this
solicitation for each country for which an application is submitted.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL), Bureau of International Labor
Affairs (ILAB), announces the availability of funds to be awarded by
Cooperative Agreement to one or more qualifying organizations and/or
Associations (hereinafter referred to as ``Applicant(s)'') for the
purpose of promoting the elimination of exploitive child labor,
particularly the worst forms of child labor (for additional information
on these key terms, see Appendix A), in target countries. Projects
funded under this solicitation will seek to achieve this goal by
withdrawing children from, and preventing children from entering,
exploitive child labor through the provision of direct educational
services, including education and/or training programs, and improving
the capacity of target countries to address exploitive child labor.
ILAB is authorized to award and administer Cooperative Agreements
for this purpose by Section 20607 of the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007, Pub. L. 110-05, 121 Stat. 8 (2007).
Cooperative Agreements awarded under this solicitation will be managed
by ILAB's Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor, and Human Trafficking
(OCFT). The duration of the projects funded by this solicitation is
three to four years. The start date of program activities will be
negotiated upon award of the Cooperative Agreement, but will be no
later than September 30, 2007.
Please note that Appendix A provides USDOL's definitions for all
key terms denoted in italics throughout the text of this solicitation.
For ease of reference, the term ``child(ren)'' and ``child labor'' have
not been denoted in italics, though definitions of each are included in
Appendix A. Child(ren) are defined by USDOL as individuals under the
age of 18 years. For section I.3.B., Applicants should note that there
may be some differences between USDOL definitions of certain key terms
and the definitions used by foreign governments. For example,
definitions used by USDOL in this solicitation do not necessarily
correspond to a foreign government's own definition of terms such as
``youth'' or ``hazardous work.
1. Background: USDOL Support for the Global Elimination of Exploitive
Child Labor
The International Labor Organization (ILO) estimated that 218
million children ages 5 to 17 were engaged in child labor around the
world in 2004. Children engaged in exploitive child labor on a full-
time basis are generally unable to attend school, and children engaged
in exploitive child labor on a part-time basis balance economic
[[Page 32870]]
survival with schooling from an early age, often to the detriment of
their education.
Since 1995, the U.S. Congress has appropriated $595 million to
USDOL for efforts to combat exploitive child labor internationally.
This funding has been used to support technical cooperation projects to
combat exploitive child labor in more than 75 countries around the
world. Technical cooperation projects funded by USDOL range from
targeted action programs in specific sectors of work to more
comprehensive programs that support national efforts to eliminate the
worst forms of child labor as defined by ILO Convention 182. USDOL-
funded projects seek to achieve five major goals:
1. Withdrawing or preventing children from involvement in
exploitive child labor through the provision of direct educational
services;
2. Strengthening policies on child labor and education, the
capacity of national institutions to combat child labor, and formal and
transitional education systems that encourage children engaged in or
at-risk of engaging in exploitive labor to attend school;
3. Raising awareness of the importance of education for all
children and mobilizing a wide array of actors to improve and expand
education infrastructures.
4. Supporting research and the collection of reliable data on child
labor; and
5. Ensuring the long-term sustainability of these efforts.
By increasing access to basic education, USDOL-funded projects help
nurture the development, health, safety, and enhanced future
employability of children engaged in or at-risk of entering exploitive
labor in geographic areas or economic sectors with a high incidence of
exploitive child labor.
Projects funded by USDOL-OCFT are subject to the provisions of the
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), which was passed by
Congress in 1993 to establish strategic planning and performance
measurement in the federal government to ensure that taxpayers' dollars
were being used efficiently and effectively for the public good. GPRA
requires federal agencies to develop and submit strategic and annual
performance plans that include performance goals and indicators. Each
year federal government agencies receiving appropriated funds are
required to submit to Congress a performance and accountability report.
Congress uses these reports to make informed assessments of program
effectiveness for future funding decisions.
For GPRA purposes, ILAB falls under USDOL's Strategic Goal 2: A
Competitive Workforce: Meet the competitive labor demands of the
worldwide economy by enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the
workforce development and regulatory systems that assist workers and
employers in meeting the challenges of global competition.
Specifically, OCFT is required to measure Indicator 2K: Contribute to
the elimination of the worst forms of child labor internationally. The
GPRA indicators that OCFT measures across all of its child labor
elimination projects, are: (1) The number of children withdrawn or
prevented from exploitive child labor and provided education and/or
training opportunities as a result of a USDOL-funded child labor
elimination project; and (2) The number of countries with improved
capacity to address child labor as a result of USDOL-funded child labor
elimination projects. For more comprehensive definitions of USDOL-
OCFT's GPRA Indicators, see Appendix A. For additional information on
GPRA, please visit https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/mgmt-gpra/
gplaw2m.html.
In addition to its GPRA indicators, OCFT also collects information
on two other non-GPRA, common indicators related to direct
beneficiaries' retention in, and completion, of education and/or
training programs (hereinafter referred to as ``direct educational
services;'' for additional information on this key term, see Appendix
A).
2. Factors Contributing to Exploitive Child Labor and Barriers to
Education
There are complex factors contributing to children's involvement in
exploitive labor, as well as barriers to education for children who are
engaged in, or at-risk of entering, exploitive child labor. These
include poverty; education system barriers; infrastructure barriers;
legal and policy barriers; resource gaps; institutional barriers;
informational gaps; demographic characteristics of children and/or
families; cultural and traditional practices; tenuous labor markets;
and weak child labor law enforcement. While these factors and barriers
tend to exist throughout the world in areas with a high incidence of
exploitive child labor, they manifest themselves in specific ways in
the countries of interest in this solicitation.
Some factors unrelated to education that contribute to children
entering exploitive labor include their families' need for extra
income, children's need to provide a livelihood for themselves and/or
their siblings, lack of parent(s) or caregiver(s), cultural practices,
and lack of awareness of the hazards associated with exploitive child
labor, including the worst forms of child labor. In addition, children
have a variety of educational needs and encounter different barriers
depending on their work status (e.g., children withdrawn from
exploitive labor, underage children at risk of dropping out of school
and joining the labor force, children engaged in exploitive labor in a
particular sector).
3. Scope of Work
A. General Requirements
Each project must promote the five goals for USDOL-funded projects
outlined in section I.1. Applicants should propose an innovative
project strategy that will build on existing efforts to withdraw
children from, or prevent children from entering, exploitive child
labor. Applicants should identify and address the specific needs of
proposed direct beneficiaries' to ensure (1) their long-term withdrawal
from, or prevention from entering, exploitive child labor; (2) their
involvement in acceptable work--for direct beneficiaries of legal
working age, this may be accomplished through a reduction in the number
of hours worked and/or improvement(s) in their working conditions in
accordance with national labor laws and international standards, such
as ILO Conventions 138 (Minimum Age Convention, 1973) and 182 (Worst
Forms of Child Labor Convention, 1999); and (3) their enrollment in,
retention in, and completion of, a direct educational service.
Note: For a child to be counted as a direct beneficiary for the
purposes of USDOL's GPRA reporting requirements (see section I.1
above for more information on the GPRA), the Cooperative Agreement
awardee (hereafter referred to as ``Grantee'') must have completed
the following three (3) steps:
(1) Assess the specific needs of each child targeted by the
project in order for the child to (a) be withdrawn from, or
prevented from entering, exploitive labor and (b) be enrolled in an
educational activity;
(2) Develop and implement an appropriate strategy for the child
that provides a direct educational service; and
(3) Monitor and report to USDOL on the child's work status
(e.g., is the child working in an exploitive labor situation?) and
educational status (e.g., is the child still attending an
educational or training program?).
USDOL considers strengthening legal frameworks and law enforcement
practices that prohibit exploitive child labor and promoting adherence
to national educational requirements that support universal access to
basic education as critical strategies for achieving long-term impact
in
[[Page 32871]]
combating exploitive child labor. Applicants are encouraged to propose
creative ideas that address the nexus between better enforcement of
child labor and education laws and the improvement of educational
opportunities for children. Applicants are expected to consider the
economic, social, and cultural contexts of the target country (ies)
when formulating project strategies and to recognize that approaches
applicable in one country may not be relevant to others. Applicants
must take into account country-specific issues that could affect
project results, including those outlined in section I.3.B. for each
target country, and meaningfully incorporate them into the proposed
strategy, either to increase opportunities for, or reduce obstacles to,
successful implementation. Applicants should demonstrate a thorough
knowledge of previously piloted interventions and good practices to
eliminate child labor in each target county and seek to build upon
progress achieved by such past projects.
i. Focus on Action Research and Data Collection
In order to identify gaps, unmet needs and opportunities that could
be addressed through a USDOL child labor elimination project,
Applicants must conduct a needs assessment in preparing their
application(s) to make a preliminary identification of the current
working and educational status of the children that the Applicant
proposes as direct beneficiaries of the project. It is expected that
the information gathered during this assessment will be refined after
award, although the application should present a clear indication of
the criteria that will likely be used to select proposed direct
beneficiaries. These criteria should be based on the target country's
legislation related to child labor, including the worst forms of child
labor; the minimum age for work; acceptable hours and conditions for
children's work; and national policies related to child labor, such as
a country-specific list of hazardous work for children that has been
submitted to the ILO. The assessment, with data sources, must include
information on the incidence and nature of exploitive child labor,
particularly the worst forms of child labor, among proposed direct
beneficiaries, hours and conditions of work, age and sex distribution
of the proposed direct beneficiaries, educational performance relative
to other children, if available, and any research or other data that
might indicate correlations between educational performance and child
labor. In the proposed strategy, Applicants must consult and make
reference to relevant literature and documents relating to child labor
and the education of proposed direct beneficiaries. Applicants are
encouraged to propose strategies for collecting further data on
exploitive child labor and children's participation in schooling in the
early stages of the project's baseline data collection. In addition,
Applicants are encouraged to conduct small-scale research projects in
support of the project's overall objectives, in particular on the
unconditional worst forms of child labor where there is often a lack of
systematic and reliable data. Applicants are encouraged to disseminate
findings from such research and to use this information in formulating
more targeted and coordinated responses to exploitive child labor,
including the unconditional worst forms of child labor.
ii. Withdrawal or Prevention From Exploitive Child Labor Through Direct
Educational Services and Other Project Interventions
Projects funded under this Cooperative Agreement solicitation must
provide for the long-term withdrawal of children from, and prevention
of children from entering, exploitive child labor through the provision
of direct educational services. USDOL recognizes that the provision of
direct educational services alone may in some cases be insufficient to
ensure the complete or sustained withdrawal of children from exploitive
child labor. For this reason, Applicants are also encouraged to propose
other project interventions as part of a package of services for direct
beneficiaries. Applicants are encouraged to be creative in proposing
comprehensive cost-effective interventions that will have a
demonstrable impact in eliminating exploitive child labor and promoting
direct beneficiaries' enrollment, retention in, and completion of
direct educational services in the geographic areas and/or sectors in
which children are engaged in, or at-risk of engaging in, exploitive
child labor. Applicants should address low rates of school enrollment;
availability of and access to direct educational services, particularly
in rural areas; and the quality of such educational services.
Applicants should develop strategies to increase the perceived
relevance of education and training for children engaged in, or at-risk
of engaging in, exploitive labor, their families and their communities
with an aim toward increasing school enrollment. Applicants should also
address the unique barriers to education for girls, particularly in
rural areas, and incorporate these into the proposed interventions.
Applicants may propose solutions for education delivery, such as non-
formal schools, including multi-grade programs in rural areas where
formal schools may be unavailable, especially at the secondary level.
Projects may also support professional training for teachers and
provide incentives to children, such as books and uniforms, in-school
feeding programs, school supplies, and transportation assistance to
remove educational barriers.
For individual target countries, Applicants must demonstrate
knowledge of the school calendar and the requirements of basic, non-
formal, and vocational education systems; develop an approach that
successfully enrolls children in educational programs with minimal
delay and without missing an academic year or program cycle; and
address the non-education factors contributing to children's
involvement in or risk of entering exploitive labor. If cultural
traditions and norms impact decisions about schooling, Applicants must
show how education programs would be sensitive and responsive to these
traditions, particularly as they relate to girls' education.
Please Note: For the purposes of GPRA, enrollment in a direct
educational service is not the sole criterion that defines a child
as withdrawn from exploitive child labor. For example, a child who
attends a USDOL-supported non-formal education program in the
morning and works under hazardous conditions in mining during the
afternoon and evening should not be counted as withdrawn or
prevented from exploitive child labor. That is, if before program
intervention, a child is not going to school and is working in a
worst form of child labor, and, after program intervention, the
child is now enrolled in school but continues to work in a worst
form of child labor, then that child is not, by definition,
withdrawn from exploitive child labor and should not be counted in
the withdrawn/prevented indicator. The process of withdrawing a
child from exploitive child labor may take some time. Children
should only be counted as withdrawn at the point at which the child
is no longer working in exploitive child labor (this includes no
longer working at all or working under improved working conditions
such as shorter hours and/or safer conditions) and is benefiting
from the education and/or training program(s) provided by the USDOL-
funded project. For more information on GPRA, see section I.1
Background: USDOL Support for the Global Elimination of Exploitive
Child Labor.
iii. Clear and Specific Outcomes
Within the countries identified in this solicitation, the Applicant
must identify
[[Page 32872]]
the geographic areas and/or sectors of greatest need, and establish (1)
the number of children that the project is targeting for withdrawal
from exploitive child labor, and (2) the number of children the project
is targeting for prevention from exploitive child labor through the
provision of direct educational services and other project
interventions. Applicants must use the definitions provided in Appendix
A when establishing these targets. Applicants' strategies should
address the specific and contextual factors that contribute to children
engaging in exploitive labor and the barriers to education that they
face in target countries. Brief background information on these issues
for the target countries is provided in section I.3.B. Country-Specific
Requirements. Applicants must be able to identify the specific needs of
proposed direct beneficiaries in order to ensure (1) their long-term
withdrawal or prevention from exploitive child labor; (2) their
involvement in acceptable work--which for direct beneficiaries of legal
working age, may be accomplished through a reduction in the number of
hours worked and/or improvement(s) in their working conditions in
accordance with national labor laws and international standards, such
as ILO Conventions 138 and 182; and (3) their enrollment, retention in,
and completion of a relevant direct educational service.
Expected outcomes/results of the project include: (1) Reducing the
number of children engaged in, or at-risk of entering, exploitive child
labor; (2) increasing and/or improving educational opportunities for
children who are engaged in, or at-risk of entering, exploitive child
labor, particularly the worst forms of child labor; (3) ensuring direct
beneficiaries' enrollment, retention in, and completion of direct
educational services; (4) facilitating the successful transition of
direct beneficiaries from non-formal education programs into formal
schools, vocational programs, or acceptable work; and (5) ensuring the
sustainable, long-term withdrawal and prevention of direct
beneficiaries from exploitive child labor.
iv. Collaboration and Leveraging Resources
Due to the limited resources available under this award, Applicants
are expected to implement programs that complement existing efforts
and, where appropriate, replicate or enhance successful models to serve
a greater number of children and communities. In order to avoid
duplication, enhance collaboration, expand impact, and develop
synergies, the Grantee must work cooperatively with national
stakeholders in developing project interventions, including the
Ministries of Labor, Education, and other relevant ministries or
government bodies. Applicants are encouraged to work with other key
stakeholders, including international organizations; nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs); national steering/advisory committees on child
labor and education; faith and community-based organizations; trade
unions, employers' and teachers' organizations; and children engaged in
exploitive child labor and their families. Furthermore, Applicants are
strongly encouraged to collaborate with existing projects, particularly
those funded by USDOL, including other EI projects, Timebound Projects
of Support (TBP) and other projects implemented by ILO-IPEC. For
additional information on collaboration, see section VIII.1.
Applicants are encouraged to leverage project resources by
collaborating with entities engaged in efforts that could contribute to
the elimination of exploitive child labor, including efforts that
promote children's access to educational and training opportunities and
that address poverty--a major factor that increases the likelihood that
children will engage in exploitive child labor. Applicants are also
encouraged to secure concrete commitments from business entities and
individual business leaders to engage in partnerships to reduce child
labor and increase educational opportunities for direct beneficiaries.
Ideas for business involvement could include, but are not limited to
the following: scholarships, donations of goods, mentoring and
volunteering by employees, assistance in awareness raising, provision
of internships for children/youth and/or teachers during vacation
periods that would help them improve leadership and other skills for
implementing programs to address exploitive child labor. Please note
that applications that propose non-U.S. Federal Government resources
that significantly expand the dollar amount, size, and scope of the
project, in the form of matching funds or other cost sharing
arrangements, are eligible for up to five (5) extra points, as
discussed in section V.1.F. However, Applicants must not duplicate the
activities of existing efforts and/or projects and are expected to work
within host government child labor and education frameworks and
priorities. Applicants are advised that there are specific requirements
associated with proposing matching funds and cost sharing arrangements,
outlined in section III.3, which do not apply to leveraged resources.
Note to Applicants: USDOL has notified host government ministry
officials of the proposed project. During the preparation of an
application for this Cooperative Agreement solicitation, Applicants
are encouraged to discuss proposed interventions, strategies, and
activities with host government officials and other key stakeholders
noted above.
v. Sustainability
USDOL considers the issue of sustainability to be of paramount
importance and recognizes that questions of sustainability must be
addressed at all stages, including project design, implementation, and
evaluation. From their inception, project strategies should foster
sustainability. To USDOL, sustainability is linked to project impact
and the ability of individuals, communities, and a nation to ensure
that the activities or changes implemented by a project endure. A
project's impact is manifested at the level of individuals,
organizations, and systems. For individual children and their families,
this would mean a positive and enduring change in their life conditions
as a result of project interventions. At the level of organizations and
systems, sustained impact would involve continued commitment and
ability (including financial commitment and policy change) by project
partners to continue the actions generated by the project, including
enforcement of existing policies that target child labor and schooling.
Applicants are encouraged to develop approaches that support child and
youth participation in project efforts to eliminate the worst forms of
child labor. Applicants are encouraged to identify local organizations
in the target country, including type of local organizations (e.g.,
NGO, community-based, rural, indigenous), which could potentially
implement or contribute to a future project. In addition, as child
labor elimination projects tend to be implemented in resource-poor
environments where government education and labor inspection systems
may be limited, Applicants are encouraged to work with local
stakeholders to develop sustainable child labor and education
monitoring systems, including community-based systems, that can
complement government efforts to monitor children's work and
educational status beyond the life of the project and enforce the
country's child labor and education laws.
[[Page 32873]]
B. Country-Specific Requirements
Combating Exploitive Child Labor Through Education in Bolivia
i. Background
Bolivia is a country with numerous socio-economic disparities and
challenges, particularly for members of indigenous groups who,
according to the 2001 Census, constitute approximately 62 percent of
the population. Bolivia has one of the highest rates of poverty and
child labor in the Americas, with over 23 percent of children ages 7 to
14 years working in 2002. Bolivia's socio-economic challenges are made
more acute by natural disasters such as the recent severe flooding and
resulting humanitarian crisis in the Departments of Santa Cruz, Beni
and Cochabamba.
Bolivian children work in agriculture, including in the production
of sugar cane and Brazil nuts in Santa Cruz, Beni, and Pando. In cities
such as Oruro, Potosi, and La Paz, children are engaged in activities
such as begging, street vending, shining shoes, and assisting transport
operators. Children work in industry, construction, small businesses,
hotels and restaurants, and traditional small-scale mining. In the
valleys, children smuggle goods and traffic drugs. The commercial
sexual exploitation of children (CSEC) is a problem in Bolivia,
particularly in the Chapare region and in urban areas. A study
sponsored by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the
Organization for American States (OAS) of urban centers in Bolivia
found commercial sexual exploitation of girls from Argentina, Paraguay,
Brazil, Chile, and Colombia. In some cases, indigenous girls are
brought or sent by their parents from rural to urban areas to work as
domestic servants for higher-income families in exchange for education,
clothing, room, and board. These girls often end up in situations that
amount to indentured servitude and/or forced labor. Bolivian children
are trafficked internally for the purpose of CSEC, agriculture and
mining. In the south of Bolivia, child labor has been observed among
debt-bonded, landless families living on haciendas (large farms).
In January and February 2007, unprecedented rainfall totals nearing
3 times the annual average resulted in severe flooding of the highlands
and the Amazon River, affecting, in particular, the Departments of
Santa Cruz, Beni, and Cochabamba. Rural families working in subsistence
farming were particularly hard hit, and it is likely that the number of
children at-risk of involvement in exploitive child labor has risen in
these areas as a result of the flooding. This natural disaster caused
extreme damage to houses, crops, roads, and other basic infrastructure
including schools, many of which closed down or are being used as
shelters for the displaced. The disaster has also affected the national
debate on land reform and autonomy at the regional, departmental and
municipal levels.
Bolivian law sets the minimum age for employment at 14 years,
except in the case of apprenticeships. Children ages 14 to 18 years
must have the permission of their parents or of government authorities
to work. The law requires employers to grant ``adolescent'' workers
time off to attend school during normal school hours. The 1999 Child
and Adolescent Code defines ``adolescents'' as persons ages 12 to 18
years. The Ministry of Labor is responsible for enforcing child labor
provisions in the formal sector, but only employs 15 labor inspectors
to work throughout the country to enforce child labor regulations and
other labor issues.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and Projects
The Government of Bolivia's policy framework to address child labor
is the National Plan for the Progressive Eradication of Child Labor
(2000-2010). A three-year sub-plan (2006-2008) to combat child labor
prioritizes the elimination of the worst forms of child labor, the
development of national policy against child labor, and inter-
institutional and inter-ministerial coordination. Although resources
for implementation have been limited, the plan focuses on children
working in the mining, sugar cane, and urban sectors of the country. A
2003 Domestic Worker's Law addresses some of the abuses committed
towards child domestic workers. In 2005, the UN Committee on the Rights
of the Child identified hazardous domestic work, the sugar cane and
mining industries, CSEC, and the trafficking of children for CSEC and
other purposes, as the child labor sectors in Bolivia that are in
greatest need of special attention. The Bolivian Congress has approved
reforms to address CSEC, and has criminalized and set penalties for all
types of trafficking in persons.
Bolivia also faces challenges in providing education to its
children and youth under 18, who constitute 45 percent of the country's
population. The Constitution of Bolivia establishes free and compulsory
primary education for children, yet because of the high rate of child
labor and other education and non-education system barriers, many
Bolivian children fall behind in their education. In 2002, despite a
high rate of enrollment in primary schools, only 81 percent of students
were likely to reach grade 5. Although UNESCO estimates a primary to
secondary transition rate of 91 percent in Bolivia, UNICEF estimates
that only 39 percent of working children continue with their schooling.
In order to facilitate children's access to social services such as
health and education, the Government of Bolivia is working with UNICEF
to provide free birth and identity documents to the estimated 12
percent of children ages 0-9 years who lack birth certificates. In the
past, the government instituted programs to benefit both working
children and indigenous children, including the development of a
flexible curriculum designed to keep working children and adolescents
in school by offering night classes through the Ministry of Education's
Vice-Ministry of Alternative Education.
Bolivia's 1994 education reform program led to the creation of
special programs to train teachers in bilingual instruction and
publication of texts and other teaching materials in indigenous
languages. There have been programs, such as those implemented by
UNICEF, to improve educational infrastructure and to increase the
relevance and learning of indigenous children through intercultural
bilingual education. Currently, the Government of Bolivia focuses on
universal literacy, improving access to basic education in rural areas,
and incorporating indigenous languages and cultures into the school
curricula. In the past, the government also supported previous USDOL-
funded programs to combat child labor in small-scale traditional mining
in the Andean region, and to improve access to and quality of basic
education. Given the high rates of poverty and low levels of
involvement in schooling, children in Bolivia, particularly indigenous
children, have historically been highly vulnerable to exploitive forms
of child labor. The Government of Bolivia has identified the importance
of addressing the issues of labor exploitation and education reform.
The government has recently proposed an education reform law that
entails a curriculum change to address historic exclusion and
discrimination of indigenous children, embracing the linguistic
diversity of Bolivia's Quechua, Aymara, and Spanish-speaking
populations.
The enforcement of these plans and laws is challenging because of
limited resources, citizens' lack of faith in the justice system,
corruption, a slow judiciary system, and political divisions
[[Page 32874]]
and turmoil. The OAS Justice Center of the Americas notes that those
who suffer most from this legal situation are the poor indigenous
population and workers in the informal economy.
iii. Scope of Work
Taking into account the challenging implementing environment in
Bolivia and the current government's attention and priority to the
unmet needs of the most disadvantaged sectors of the population,
Applicants must propose a creative and innovative approach to address
the challenges of reintegrating and educating children who have been
engaged in the worst forms of child labor. Applicants must also take
into account any cross-cutting themes (discussed below) that could
affect project results in Bolivia and meaningfully incorporate them
into the proposed strategy, either to increase opportunities for, or
reduce obstacles to, successful implementation.
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/or Geographic Focus
In support of the National Plan for the Progressive Eradication of
Child Labor (2000-2010), Applicants are encouraged to target children
working under hazardous and/or exploitive conditions in urban domestic
service, agriculture, mining, and CSEC. Applicants should pay special
attention to children who may have been trafficked for exploitive labor
and/or engaged in forced labor. Applicants may identify other target
sectors where children are at-risk or involved in other worst forms of
child labor, but should provide a convincing justification for
inclusion of such target sectors. Since indigenous children are the
largest population involved in the worst forms of child labor, the
project should pay special attention to their needs and provide a large
share of benefits to these children. Given the recent humanitarian
assistance needs in the Departments of Santa Cruz, Beni, and
Cochabamba, Applicants may choose to focus on child labor issues that
existed prior to, and/or may have been exacerbated by, the severe
flooding in these areas.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs and/or Links to Specific
National Policies
Applicants should support the Government of Bolivia's policy
framework to address child labor, the National Plan for the Progressive
Eradication of Child Labor 2000-2010, and consider the three-year sub-
plan (2006-2008) that focuses on children working in the mining, sugar
cane, and urban sectors of the country. If focusing on domestic
service, or CSEC and trafficking, Applicants should work to strengthen
the implementation and enforcement of recent legal reforms in these
areas of domestic workers and the commercial sexual exploitation of
minors. If working in areas of the recent floods, Applicants should
coordinate with other donors providing assistance, and complement
rather than duplicate existing efforts.
3. Implementing Environment/Cross-Cutting Themes
Bolivia has experienced recurrent political and economic unrest and
instability, which has an impact on the implementation of development
projects. The government has committed itself to deep political,
economic and social transformations, and the country is engaged in
intense debate on themes including cultural identity, education reform,
judicial reform, land reform, and decentralization and political
autonomy. Furthermore, the severe flooding in January and February 2007
has had a major impact in the highlands and the Amazon River,
affecting, in particular, the Departments of Santa Cruz, Beni, and
Cochabamba, and rural families working in subsistence farming in these
areas. Applicants should consider how these factors might affect the
project in the geographic areas where the project would be implemented
and propose a design that would contribute to mitigating the effects of
these factors.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants must propose a strategy for strengthening the capacity
of Bolivian government and civil society organizations to identify and
assist children engaged in or at-risk of exploitive labor, particularly
the worst forms of child labor. The complexity of the issue of child
labor requires inter-institutional coordination among many public and
private agencies and institutions. Applicants should identify how the
project will productively engage existing public and private service
programs in the intervention area(s) to ensure that project goals will
be met, and project efforts will become sustainable. Evaluations of
USDOL projects in the Andean region have noted incidents of weak local
organizational capacity and recurring social unrest (e.g., strikes,
demonstrations, work-stoppages, road closures). Applicants should
indicate to what extent these challenges might be significant in the
areas where the project would be implemented, how they would be
addressed, and how relationships between indigenous and non-indigenous
organizations working for the benefit of children, leaders, and groups
could be promoted to address the problem of exploitive child labor.
Given the current debates in Bolivia on decentralization and autonomy
at the regional, departmental and municipal levels, Applicants should
also consider how this could lead to changes that might affect
implementation of the project, and focus on building capacity to
promote sustainability.
Since indigenous children represent the largest population involved
in exploitive child labor, it is likely that they will constitute a
significant proportion of the direct beneficiaries served by this
project. Given the current priorities of the government to provide
programs to the benefit of these groups, Applicants should demonstrate
considerable knowledge of Bolivian indigenous culture and movements and
indigenous values regarding education and child labor. This knowledge
should be incorporated into the project design to ensure ownership and
involvement of indigenous groups. Applicants must develop a strategy
that will increase the relevance of education for indigenous children,
their parents, and the urban, rural, and/or peri-urban communities
where they live. Applicants should develop a program that can operate
in the context of the government's emphasis on the use of indigenous
languages and culture as part of the larger education and curricula
reform efforts. Applicants should also identify and address additional
social, cultural, or other factors that should be taken into account in
designing the project. In no way, however, should project strategies
exclude or marginalize non-indigenous children who could also qualify
as direct beneficiaries of this project.
Combating the Worst Forms of Child Labor in Cambodia
i. Background
After decades of violence and armed conflict, the Government of
Cambodia has experienced positive economic growth since 1999 due in
large part to its resilient garment export sector and growing tourism
industry. The long-term development challenges for Cambodia will be to
encourage rural development and build basic infrastructure; bridge the
income gap among citizens; improve access to and quality of education;
and increase economic growth that spurs job creation, in light of the
country's demographic transition. At least 50 percent of the population
is under 21 years old, with many children and
[[Page 32875]]
youth lacking appropriate education and productive skills.
Key to accomplishing Cambodia's development goals will be to remove
and prevent children from the worst forms of child labor, especially
hazardous work in agriculture. Children begin working at a very young
age, some as early as age six, with many dropping out of school to work
exclusively. According to the Understanding Children's Work (UCW)
Project, approximately 45 percent of children ages 5 to 14 years were
found working in 2001. The majority of working children were found in
the rural agricultural sector (76.5 percent), followed by services
(17.7 percent), manufacturing (4.9 percent) and other sectors (0.9
percent). Economically active children in Cambodia work an average of
22 hours per week, which increases to 31 hours when household chores
are taken into account. Non-Khmer children, such as Vietnamese migrant
children, are more likely to be working than Khmer children.
Child labor is most prevalent and severe in three provinces:
Banteay Meanchey, Prey Veng and Siem Reap. However, other provinces
such as Otdar Meanchey Cham, Phnom Penh, Kandal, and Takeo also show
high prevalence rates. Working children facing the most obstacles to
schooling and greatest risk of dropping out are in Kaoh Long, Mondol
Kiri, and Preah Vihear. Children most at-risk of being trafficked to
urban areas in Cambodia or outside the country live in the rural
districts of Kompong Cham, Battambang, Svey Rieng, Prey Veng, Kandal,
and Takeo.
Hazardous work by children occurs in both rural and urban areas,
and includes work on commercial rubber plantations, in salt production,
fish processing, portering, brick-making, and garbage-picking. Children
also work in restaurants and in handicrafts and related industries.
Street children engage in scavenging, begging, and shoe polishing.
Children, primarily girls, also work in domestic service. Most girls
working as child domestic workers are 14 to 17 years of age, though it
is not uncommon to find girls as young as 8 or 9 years of age. Many
child domestic workers typically work 12 to 16 hours a day, 7 days a
week, preventing them from going to school and learning productive
skills.
Children are also involved in other worst forms of child labor.
Certain provinces of the country have higher incidence of the worst
forms of child labor, based on their geographic characteristics,
proximity to borders, levels of poverty, etc. Areas designated as
Special Economic Zones may attract workers, including child workers,
and increase migrant flows and vulnerability. There have been
documented patterns of children migrating to large cities for work,
only to find themselves in various forms of exploitive or abusive
labor. The commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC) is a
problem in Cambodia. Cambodia is reported to be a country of origin,
transit, and destination for trafficking in children for the purposes
of CSEC as well as various forms of work, including forced labor and
begging. Internationally, Vietnamese children are trafficked into
Cambodia for CSEC and forced labor and Cambodian children are
trafficked to Thailand and Vietnam.
Although Cambodia abolished school fees in 2001, the prohibitive
costs of schooling (i.e., school supplies, uniforms); poor quality and
relevance of education (i.e., limited availability of instructional
materials, shortage of trained and motivated teachers); and inadequate
access to schools (i.e., distance/transportation, primary schools
lacking full range of grades, no secondary schools in many communities)
contribute to children entering into exploitive labor, particularly in
rural areas. School enrollment in the rural areas continues to lag
behind urban areas. Only about 20 percent of rural children receive
education in grades 7-9, and rural girls are 47 percent less likely to
receive an education than boys. As of 2003, 60 percent of children who
started primary school were likely to reach grade 5. The situation is
compounded by a shortage of non-formal schools and literacy programs in
rural areas.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and Projects
A number of efforts are currently being undertaken by the
Government of Cambodia, international organizations, and
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to directly address exploitive
child labor in Cambodia, as well as the underlying causes of child
labor such as poverty and lack of resources. In 2006, the Government of
Cambodia ratified both ILO Convention 182 on the Elimination of the
Worst Forms of Child Labor and the United Nations Protocol to Prevent,
Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and
Children. The government has drafted a National Plan of Action for the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor, and has set time-bound
targets for reducing the proportion of children engaging in the worst
forms of child labor by 2015. The National Steering Committee on Child
Labor was reconstituted in September 2006 to guide the country's
efforts toward eliminating child labor under the National Plan of
Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor. Child
labor was included as a priority issue in the first two-year Strategic
Plan of the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training for 2007-08. In
addition, child labor concerns have been incorporated into the
government's major development frameworks, including the National
Strategic Development Plan (NSDP) 2006-2010 and the Education Strategic
Plan (ESP) 2006-2010.
In addition to the unconditional worst forms of child labor
identified under ILO Convention 182, the government has drafted a
ministerial order, known as a Prakas, identifying 16 other categories
of worst forms of child labor to be targeted for elimination. They are:
Portering; domestic service; waste scavenging/rubbish picking; work in
rubber and tobacco plantations; fishing; work in agricultural
plantations; brick making; salt production; handicrafts; processing sea
products; stone and granite breaking; quarrying; coal mining;
restaurant work; and begging. The Ministry of Labour and Vocational
Training has the primary responsibility for enforcement of child labor
laws and regulations. Cambodia's Labor Law defines 15 as the minimum
age for work (18 for hazardous work), although children between 12 and
15 may do light, non-hazardous work that does not prevent regular
attendance at school or other training programs. Employers who violate
the law may be fined 31 to 60 days of the base daily wage. The Labor
Law prohibits work that is hazardous to the mental and physical
development of children under age 18 and prohibits all forced or
compulsory labor, including in agriculture and domestic work. However,
the Labor Law currently applies only to the formal sector, while child
labor exists mostly in the informal sector.
Addressing trafficking in persons is a priority for the Government
of Cambodia, which drafted a National Plan of Action Against
Trafficking in Persons and Sexual Exploitation 2005-2009. The National
Plan of Action Against Trafficking in Persons and Sexual Exploitation
expands the scope of a previous plan to include trafficking for both
sexual and labor exploitation purposes. Along with Burma, Laos, the
People's Republic of China, Thailand, and Vietnam, Cambodia is
signatory to the ``Coordinated Mekong Ministerial Initiative against
Trafficking (COMMIT).''
[[Page 32876]]
Cambodia is currently participating in several USDOL-funded
projects designed to combat exploitive child labor and provide
educational opportunities for children. The ``Support to the Cambodian
National Plan of Action on the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor: A Timebound Approach,'' implemented by ILO-IPEC, aims to
withdraw 4,260 and prevent 5,650 children from working in exploitive
conditions in several sectors: Brick-making (Shanoukville, Siem Riep,
Kampong Cham); portering (Banteay Meancheay); rubber-making (Kampong
Cham); domestic service (Phnom Penh); salt production (Kampot and Kep);
fish processing (Shanoukville, Kampot, Kep); services such as hotel
work, restaurant work, and beer promotion (Siem Riep and Phnom Penh);
and trafficking (Shanoukville, Banteay Meancheay, Prey Veng). In
addition, the project is building a robust enabling environment for the
development and implementation of policies and programs on child labor
and increasing the knowledge and capacity of the government and
stakeholders on child labor.
USDOL is currently funding three child labor and education projects
in Cambodia, implemented by Hagar International, World Education, and
Winrock International. The Hagar International project assists
trafficked women and children by providing temporary shelter,
rehabilitative and counseling services, literacy and vocational
training classes, and assistance with reintegration into their
communities of origin or new communities. The World Education project
works in Prey Veng, Kompong Cham, Banteay Meanchay, and Phnom Penh to
reduce the number of children trafficked and/or involved in CSEC and
domestic labor. As of September 2006, the project had prevented 15,749
children from being trafficked through provision of educational and
other services. Cambodia is also part of CIRCLE, a global project
implemented by Winrock International and funded by USDOL that aims to
reduce the engagement of children in the worst forms of child labor by
funding small-scale projects carried out by community-based
organizations. CIRCLE project strategies in Cambodia have included
awareness-raising among children at high risk of dropping out of
school, and strengthening education systems to better serve children
who have been trafficked and/or involved in CSEC, out-of-school youth,
and child migrants. In addition, external funding to target poverty
reduction, increase access to basic services, and strengthen
institutions from partners such as the World Bank, the Asian
Development Bank, and several other UN agencies continues to support
programs in Cambodia.
iii. Scope of Work
Applicants should design a creative project strategy to build
partnerships to combat exploitive child labor and improve education for
children engaged in, or at-risk of entering, exploitive labor, taking
into account the socio-economic conditions in Cambodia. Applicants must
also take any cross-cutting themes (discussed below) into account that
could affect project results in Cambodia and meaningfully incorporate
them into the proposed strategy, either to increase opportunities for,
or to reduce obstacles to, successful implementation.
1. Specific Target Groups, Sectors, and/or Geographic Focus
The Government of Cambodia has identified priority sectors for
attention under its draft National Plan of Action for the Elimination
of the Worst Forms of Child Labor. In line with the draft National Plan
of Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor, USDOL
has identified hazardous child labor in agriculture as the primary
sector of focus for this project. Specifically, Applicants should
prioritize children engaged in hazardous work on commercial farms and
subsistence agriculture, where children's work prevents them from going
to school, exposes them to harmful chemicals, and places them at risk
of injury from heavy loads, agricultural tools, or machinery. Specific
sub-sectors within agriculture should be clearly identified by
Applicants. Applicants should also propose additional sectors of focus
that are in accordance with the draft National Plan of Action for the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor and can include but are
not limited to, mining, CSEC, scavenging/garbage picking, brick making,
portering, stone quarrying/breaking, fishing, begging, work in
restaurants, hotels, and karaoke bars, and domestic service. A
convincing justification must be included for selection of target
sectors, and justifications should clearly demonstrate knowledge of
existing interventions in those sectors and how the proposed project
will build off of or complement existing or past interventions.
In determining provincial targets, Applicants should take into
consideration priority areas outlined in the draft National Plan of
Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor, as well
as the location of current USDOL-funded activities and ensure that
efforts are not duplicated and that efforts/resources are leveraged
where possible. At a minimum, Applicants should propose four provinces
for project interventions and provide a clear justification for
choices. Applicants are encouraged to target populations that are
particularly disadvantaged, such as girls.
2. Collaboration With Specific Programs and/or Links to Specific
National Policies
Applicants should demonstrate a thorough knowledge of ongoing and
previously piloted interventions and good practices to eliminate child
labor in Cambodia and the Mekong region, at the local, national and
regional levels. Proposals should support and/or build upon the efforts
of past and existing projects to withdraw children from, and prevent
children from entering, the worst forms of child labor in agricultural
and other sectors in rural areas; children's involvement in
prostitution and begging in urban areas; as well as the trafficking of
children for exploitive labor, without duplicating ongoing or previous
efforts. Interventions and activities should support the government's
National Plan of Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor. At minimum, collaborations should take place with the MOLVT; the
Ministry of Social Affairs; Veterans and Youth Rehabilitation (MOSAVY);
the Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport (MOEYS); the National
Steering Committee; provincial and local-level government officials;
ILO-IPEC; World Education; United Nations agencies and other
International Organizations working in Cambodia; the Civil Society
Network Against Child Labor; and other NGO's and local groups working
on child welfare and social service provision.
3. Implementing Environment/Cross-Cutting Themes
Over the past decade, Cambodia's economic growth has improved, but
its history of conflict and resulting negative socio-economic effects
have left the country with significant development challenges that must
be considered when designing project interventions. Applicants should
consider the specific challenges of a lack of basic rural
infrastructure; low capacity of civil society and governmental
institutions; lack of access to quality and relevant
[[Page 32877]]
education, especially in rural areas; and the lack of a skilled
workforce. In addition, Cambodia is a country of origin, transit, and
destination for trafficking in persons. Given children's vulnerability
to being trafficked due to lack of economic resources, lack of
education, and migration patterns in the region, internal and cross-
border trafficking of children should be addressed in the application.
However, the primary focus of the project should not be on trafficking;
rather, trafficking should be addressed within the overall context or
as a project component.
4. Project-Specific Strategies
Applicants must propose a strategy that supports the government's
National Plan of Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child
Labor and contributes toward Cambodia's targets for reducing the
incidence of the worst forms of child labor by 2015. In order to
address the inadequacies of the current education system, the proposed
strategy should assist in increasing the capacity of the Ministry of
Education offices nationally and in target provinces to ensure improved
service delivery, increased budgetary commitments and management, and
awareness of child labor. Service delivery and management should be
further enhanced in both the formal and non-formal system through
teacher and administrator trainings and other approaches as proposed by
the Applicant. Given the lack of alternatives to formal schooling in
rural areas, the Applicant must also design a strategy to assist
children who are not able or are unwilling to attend formal school, by
providing access to non-formal education and vocational training. If
cultural traditions and norms impact decisions about schooling,
Applicants must show how education programs would be sensitive and
responsive to these traditions, particularly as they relate to girls'
education.
Enforcement of existing labor laws is inadequate in Cambodia. To
address this issue, Applicants should propose a strategy for increasing
the capacity of labor inspectors on enforcement of legal provisions
relating to child labor in the formal workplace, and contribute to
ongoing efforts to expand legislation to cover children working in the
informal sector. This strategy should demonstrate how efforts would be
coordinated with, and complementary of, existing efforts of the ILO-
IPEC-supported Timebound Program and the government's National Plan of
Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor. In
addition, Applicants should design activities to support the government
in its review of its current list of hazardous child labor and
finalization of the new list, efforts to raise awareness of the list,
and improve compliance and enforcement of regulations surrounding the
list.
There is a lack of systematic and reliable data on the
unconditional worst forms of child labor in Cambodia. These forms of
child labor are often culturally sensitive and/or illicit, making
information difficult to gather. Applicants are encouraged to conduct
small-scale research projects and disseminate findings on the
unconditional worst forms of child labor in Cambodia, especially on
products made from exploitive child labor or forced labor. This
information should also be used in formulating more targeted and
coordinated responses.
Project of Support to the Colombia Timebound Program on the Elimination
of the Worst Forms of Child Labor
i. Background
In Colombia, 10.4 percent of children ages 5 to 14 years were found
working in 2001. The majority of working children were found in the
services sector (49.9 percent), followed by agriculture (35.6 percent),
and manufacturing (12.6 percent). Approximately 14.1 percent of all
boys 5 to 14 were working compared to 6.6 percent of girls in the same
age group. Children mine and process emeralds, gold, clay, and coal
under dangerous conditions. Some work in aspects of the illegal drug
trade, such as harvesting coca. Child labor is also a problem in the
informal sector, where children work in agriculture, commerce,
industry, and services. Many girls work in domestic service.
Child pornography and commercial sexual exploitation of children
(CSEC), including prostitution and sexual tourism, are reported in
Cartagena and at resorts on the Caribbean Coast. Colombia is a major
source of girls trafficked for the purpose of CSEC. Children are
trafficked internally from rural to urban areas for sexual
exploitation, and are also trafficked abroad. Children in Colombia are
also recruited, sometimes forcibly, by insurgent and paramilitary
groups to serve as combatants in the country's ongoing conflict.
ii. Relevant Policies, Programs, and Projects
There are a number of efforts by the Government of Colombia,
international organizations, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)
to address exploitive child labor. The Government of Colombia's policy
framework to address child labor has been the National Plan for the
Elimination of Child Labor and the Protection of Working Youth (2003-
2006). The government and other relevant actors are drafting a new
national plan, which has not yet been officially approved.
In November of 2006, a new legal framework was put into effect, the
Childhood and Adolescence Code, which replaces most all provisions of
the 1989 Minor's Code, and includes provisions related to child labor.
The 2006 Code establishes the government's obligation to eliminate the
worst forms of child labor. The Ministry of Social Protection (MSP) is
responsible for enforcing child labor laws in the formal sector and
protecting adolescent workers authorized by the government to work.
Labor can only be performed by those under the legal working age of 14
under special circumstances. Various legal provisions regulate the
conditions under which minors may work to ensure that their education
is not compromised. Employers must enroll 12 to 17 year olds who have
not completed basic education in school and allow them sufficient time
to pursue their studies. Schools must report cases to authorities in
which children are involved in the worst forms of child labor. The
National Police is also responsible for detecting and investigating
these cases.
Other important policy frameworks and legal instruments that
address exploitive child labor in Colombia include the National Plan of
Action for the Prevention and Eradication of Commercial Sexual
Exploitation of Boys, Girls, and Adolescents Below 18 Years of Age
(2006-2011), and Colombia's Ten-Year Plan for Children (2004-2015). A
Ministry of Social Protection Resolution prohibiting children under 18
from certain forms of dangerous work was published in December 2005. In
compliance with Colombia's ratification in 2005 of ILO Convention 182
on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, the law prohibits those under age 18
from the worst forms of child labor.
The Government of Colombia participates in several programs to
eliminate exploitive child labor that are funded by international
organizations and foreign governments including the United States.
These programs include a USDOL-funded project implemented by World
Vision to withdraw and prevent children from exploitive labor in the
municipalities of Funza and Madrid. Colombia also participates in a
regional project in four South American countries to withdraw and
prevent
[[Page 32878]]
children from CSEC and child domestic labor, and was part of a global
project on child soldiers, both funded by USDOL and implemen