Oneida Ltd.,Distribution Facility Sherrill, New York; Oneida Ltd, Sales Office Oneida, New York; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 32918 [E7-11475]

Download as PDF 32918 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices TA–W–61,476; Eureka Manufacturing Company, Division of Reed and Barton, Norton, MA: May 8, 2006. TA–W–61,532; GHS Corporation, dba GHS Strings, Battle Creek, MI: May 16, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–61,446; Bosal Industries Tennessee, A Subsidiary of Bosal North America, Columbia, TN: April 24, 2006. TA–W–61,446A; Bosal Industries Georgia, Saturn Department, A Subsidiary of Bosal North America, Lavonia, GA: April 24, 2006. TA–W–61,501; Visteon Regional Assembly and Manufacturing, LLC, Chesapeake, VA: May 10, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. None. The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. TA–W–61,528; Laneventure Furniture, A Subsidiary of Lane Furniture Industries, Inc., Conover, NC. TA–W–61,521; Durham Manufacturing Co., Injection Molding Department, On-Site Leased Workers of Outsource Solutions, Durham, CT. The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers’ industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:22 Jun 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. TA–W–60,809; Woods Equipment Company, Wainroy Division, Gardner, MA. TA–W–61,291; RR Donnelley, Liberty Division, Liberty, MO. TA–W–61,539; Interlake Material Handling, Inc., Lodi, CA. TA–W–61,586; Reis Associated Company, Inc., Ballwin, MO. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–61,306; Analog Devices, Inc, Santa Clara, CA. TA–W–61,348; Nortech Systems, Inc., Bemidji, MN. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–61,339; Klote International Corp., Maryville, TN. TA–W–61,438; TMP Directional Marketing, LLC, Graphics Division, Fort Wayne, IN. The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–61,480; Elston Richards, Inc., Anderson, IN. TA–W–61,487; Pennsylvania House Showroom, Hickory, NC. TA–W–61,542; Kenakore Solutions, Van Wert, OH. The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. None. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of May 28 through June 1, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: June 6, 2007. Ralph DiBattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–11476 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–61,237; TA–W–61,237A] Oneida Ltd.,Distribution Facility Sherrill, New York; Oneida Ltd, Sales Office Oneida, New York; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Oneida Ltd, Distribution Facility, Sherrill, New York and Oneida Ltd, Sales Office, Oneida, New York. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA–W–61,237; Oneida Ltd, Distribution Facility Sherrill, New York and TA–W–61,237A; Oneida Ltd, Sales Office, Oneida, New York (June 6, 2007). Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of June 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–11475 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Request for Certification of Compliance—Rural Industrialization Loan and Grant Program Employment and Training Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration is issuing this notice to announce the receipt of a ‘‘Certification of Non-Relocation and Market and Capacity Information Report’’ (Form 4279–2) for the following: E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 114 (Thursday, June 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 32918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,237; TA-W-61,237A]


Oneida Ltd.,Distribution Facility Sherrill, New York; Oneida Ltd, 
Sales Office Oneida, New York; Dismissal of Application for 
Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Oneida Ltd, Distribution Facility, 
Sherrill, New York and Oneida Ltd, Sales Office, Oneida, New York. The 
application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion 
that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a 
justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based 
on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. 
Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-61,237; Oneida Ltd, Distribution Facility Sherrill, New York and
TA-W-61,237A; Oneida Ltd, Sales Office, Oneida, New York (June 6, 
2007).

    Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of June 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-11475 Filed 6-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.