Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the 2005-2006 Administrative and New Shipper Reviews, 32071-32072 [E7-11251]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
rmajette on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 111 / Monday, June 11, 2007 / Notices
to be selected into the Demonstration
Program:
1. The project must have been
awarded tax credits.
2. The project must have a loan to cost
(LTC) ratio equal to or lower than 50%.
3. The Lender must have submitted
[for this project] a loan guarantee
application under either the GRRHP’s
2007 Notice at 72 FR 8339 (Feb. 26,
2007) or the GRRHP’s 2006 Notice at 71
FR 4559 (Jan. 27, 2006). Additionally,
the application to be considered must
have been obligated from October 1,
2006 to July 31, 2007.
4. The Lender must have submitted a
timely response to this NOFA in
accordance with the ‘‘Demonstration
Program Response Submission Address’’
section of this NOFA.
Demonstration Program Selection
Process: Selections from qualified
obligations that have requested
consideration will be made based on
their interest credit scores, with the
highest scoring obligations, being
selected first, until all available
Demonstration Program funds are
allocated. In the event of a tie, priority
will be given to the project that: is in the
smaller rural community, and in case of
a subsequent tie has the lowest LTC
ratio.
Selections into the Demonstration
Program will be made on August 14,
2007, from the qualified pool of
applications that were obligated from
October 1, 2006 to July 31, 2007. In the
event there are not enough qualified
requests for selection into the
Demonstration Program to utilize all the
available Demonstration Program setaside funds of approximately $10
million, then the selection process for
any remaining funds will be conducted
again on September 11, 2007, and will
include all applications obligated from
October 1, 2006 to August 31, 2007. All
applicants will be notified of the
selection results no later than 15
business days from the date of selection.
Demonstration Program Response
Submission Address: Eligible lenders
wishing to have their obligated
applications considered for selection
into the Demonstration Program must
submit a signed request (not to exceed
one page) on its letterhead that includes
the following information:
1. Developer’s Name.
2. Borrower’s Name.
3. Project’s Name.
4. Project’s Address (City and State).
5. Project Type (Family, Senior, or
Mixed).
6. Project’s Total Units.
7. Project’s Total Development Cost
(TDC).
8. Amount of 538 Loan Guarantee.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:15 Mar 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
9. Amount of Tax Credits Awarded.
10. Amount and Source of Other
Financing.
11. Loan to Cost (LTC) %.
12. Area Population.
13. Date obligated or date of
Conditional Commitment.
Send the Demonstration Program
Response Submission Letter with all of
the information listed above, along with
a copy of the State Office’s ‘‘Proceed
with Application/NOFA Response
Selection’’ letter and a copy of the tax
credit award notification to: C.B.
Alonso, Senior Loan Specialist, MultiFamily Housing Processing Division,
Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing
Program, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, South Agriculture Building,
Room 1271, Stop 0781, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0781.
Requests may also be faxed to 202–
205–5066 or sent by e-mail (signed PDF
copies of the above submissions) to
cb.alonso@wdc.usda.gov. Eligible
lenders mailing a request must provide
sufficient time to permit delivery to the
SUBMISSION ADDRESS on or before
August 13, 2007. Acceptance by a U.S.
Post Office or private mailer does not
constitute delivery. Postage due
responses and applications will not be
accepted.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) prohibits discrimination in all
its programs and activities on the basis
of race, color, national origin, sex,
religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, marital status or
family status (not all prohibited basis
apply to all programs). Persons with
disabilities who require alternative
means for communication of program
information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact the
USDA’s Target Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice or TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination,
write USDA, Director, Office of Civil
Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call toll
free (866) 632–9992 (Voice). TDD users
can contact USDA through local relay
(800) 720–6382 (TDD) or (866) 377–8642
(relay voice users). USDA is an equal
opportunity provider and employer.
Dated: June 4, 2007.
David J. Villano,
Acting Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. E7–11169 Filed 6–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32071
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–846]
Brake Rotors from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Time
Limit for the Final Results of the 2005–
2006 Administrative and New Shipper
Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Moats, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–5047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On February 15, 2007, the Department
of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’)
published the preliminary results of the
2005–2006 administrative and new
shipper reviews and partial rescission of
the 2005–2006 administrative review of
the antidumping order on brake rotors
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’) for the April 1, 2005, through
March 31, 2006, period. See Brake
Rotors from the People’s Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of the 2005–
2006 Administrative and New Shipper
Reviews and Partial Rescission of the
2005–2006 Administrative Review, 72
FR 7405 (February 15, 2007). The final
results of the review are currently due
on June 15, 2007. On March 5, 2007,
Longkou Haimeng Machinery Co., Ltd.,
Qingdao Meita Automotive Industry
Co., Ltd., Yantai Winhere Auto–Part
Manufacturing Co., Ltd, Laizhou Auto
Brake Equipment Company Ltd.,
Laizhou Hongda Auto Replacement
Parts Co., Ltd., and Laizhou City Luqi
Machinery Co., Ltd., requested a 28-day
extension of time to submit publicly
available information to value the
factors of production. On March 6, 2007,
the Department issued a letter to all
interested parties granting the requested
28-day extension of time to submit
publicly available information to value
the factors of production. In that letter,
the Department stated that it was
postponing the briefing schedule until
further notice pending the release of the
verification report of Shandong Huanri
Group Co., Ltd., Shandong Huanri
Group General Co., and Laizhou Huanri
Automobile Parts Co., Ltd. (collectively
‘‘Huanri’’). From March 20, 2007,
E:\ERIC\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
32072
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 111 / Monday, June 11, 2007 / Notices
through March 22, 2007, the Department
verified the Section A and quantity and
value questionnaire response of Huanri
in Panjia Village, Laizhou, PRC. On May
4, 2007, the Department issued the
verification report for Huanri. See
Memorandum to the File through
Wendy J. Frankel, Office Director, and
Robert Bolling, Program Manager, From
Eugene Degnan, Senior International
Trade Analyst, and Paul Stolz,
International Trade Compliance
Analyst, entitled, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Brake Rotors
from the People’s Republic of China:
Verification of Section A and Quantity
and Value Response of Shandong
Huanri Group Co., Ltd., Laizhou Huanri
Automobile Parts Co., Ltd., and
Shandong Huanri Group General Co.’’
On May 10, 2007, the Department set
the deadlines for submission of case and
rebuttal briefs as May 21, 2007, and May
29, 2007, respectively. On May 10, 2007,
the Coalition for the Preservation of
American Brake Drum and Rotor
Aftermarket Manufacturers (‘‘the
Petitioner’’), requested a 5-day extension
of time to submit rebuttal briefs. On
May 15, 2007, the Department granted
the Petitioner’s request and extended
the deadline for submission of rebuttal
briefs to June 5, 2007, for all parties.
rmajette on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Extension of Time Limit of Final
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930 (the ‘‘Act’’) requires the
Department to issue the final results
within 120 days after the date on which
the preliminary results are published.
However, if it is not practicable to
complete this review within the time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
allows the Department to extend the
deadline for the final results to a
maximum of 180 days after the
publication date of the preliminary
results.
The Department determines that
completion of the final results of these
reviews within the statutory time period
is not practicable. The Department
requires additional time to analyze
comments regarding the 19 respondents,
including 15 separate–rate respondents
and three mandatory respondents in the
administrative review and one
respondent in the new shipper review.
Therefore, given the number and
complexity of issues and companies in
this case, and in accordance with
sections 751(a)(3)(A) and
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, we are
extending the time period for issuing
the final results of review by 46 days to
166 days after the publication of the
preliminary results. Therefore, the final
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:15 Mar 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
results will be due no later than July 31,
2007.
This notice is published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the
Act.
Dated: June 5, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–11251 Filed 6–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–865]
Preliminary Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products
from the People’s Republic of China
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Bertrand or Christopher Riker,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3207
and (202) 482–3441, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 1, 2006, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published
a notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
for the period of review (‘‘POR’’)
November 1, 2005, through October 31,
2006. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 71
FR 64240 (November 1, 2006). On
November 30, 2006, United States Steel
(‘‘Petitioner’’), a domestic producer of
certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat
products, requested that the Department
conduct an administrative review of
Anshan Iron & Steel Group Corp.,
Angang Group International Trade
Corporation, Angang New Iron and Steel
Co., Angang New Steel Co., Ltd., and
Angang Group Hong Kong Co., Ltd.
(collectively ‘‘Angang’’) and Baosteel
Group Corporation, Shanghai Baosteel
International Economic & Trading Co.,
Ltd., and Baoshan Iron and Steel Co.,
Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Baosteel’’). On
December 27, 2006, the Department
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
published a notice of initiation of an
antidumping duty administrative review
on certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat
products from the PRC. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part (‘‘Notice of
Initiation’’), 71 FR 77720 (December 27,
2006).
On January 4, 2007, the Department
issued a quantity and value
questionnaire to Angang and Baosteel.
On January 18, 2007, Angang submitted
a letter stating that Angang had no sales,
shipments, or entries of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR. Also on January 18, 2007,
Baosteel submitted a letter stating that it
had no sales of subject merchandise to
the United States during the POR.
On February 7, 2007, Petitioner
submitted information on the record of
this review, in the form of Port Import
Export Reporting Service (‘‘PIERS’’) data,
which is a subscription service based
upon shipping manifests, alleging that
there were entries made of subject
merchandise into the United States
during the POR by Angang and Baosteel.
On February 13, 2007, the Department
requested that Angang and Baosteel
provide comments on the PIERS data
placed on the record by Petitioner. Also,
on February 13, 2007, the Department
requested that Petitioner provide the
Harmonized Tariff Codes for the data it
provided from PIERS and explain how
the information it placed on the record
could be tied to actual entry
documentation from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’). Baosteel
submitted comments on February 16,
2007, and on March 6, 2007, again
stating that it had no shipments, sales,
or entries of subject merchandise during
the POR to the United States, and
provided supporting sales
documentation for the entries listed in
the PIERS data to demonstrate that those
entries were not subject merchandise.
On February 20, 2007, Angang
responded to the Department’s February
13, 2007, questionnaire, and stated
again that it had no shipments, sales, or
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR, and alleged that the PIERS
data placed on the record by Petitioner
was not reflective of the actual material
that was shipped by Angang. Also, on
February 20, 2007, Petitioner submitted
a response to the Department’s February
13, 2007, questionnaire, and placed a
revised version of the PIERS data on the
record which contained the tariff code
numbers.
The Department conducted a CBP
data query for possible entries of subject
merchandise into the United States
during the POR by Angang and Baosteel.
E:\ERIC\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 111 (Monday, June 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32071-32072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11251]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-846]
Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of China: Extension of
Time Limit for the Final Results of the 2005-2006 Administrative and
New Shipper Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Moats, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 15, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the
``Department'') published the preliminary results of the 2005-2006
administrative and new shipper reviews and partial rescission of the
2005-2006 administrative review of the antidumping order on brake
rotors from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') for the April 1,
2005, through March 31, 2006, period. See Brake Rotors from the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 2005-2006
Administrative and New Shipper Reviews and Partial Rescission of the
2005-2006 Administrative Review, 72 FR 7405 (February 15, 2007). The
final results of the review are currently due on June 15, 2007. On
March 5, 2007, Longkou Haimeng Machinery Co., Ltd., Qingdao Meita
Automotive Industry Co., Ltd., Yantai Winhere Auto-Part Manufacturing
Co., Ltd, Laizhou Auto Brake Equipment Company Ltd., Laizhou Hongda
Auto Replacement Parts Co., Ltd., and Laizhou City Luqi Machinery Co.,
Ltd., requested a 28-day extension of time to submit publicly available
information to value the factors of production. On March 6, 2007, the
Department issued a letter to all interested parties granting the
requested 28-day extension of time to submit publicly available
information to value the factors of production. In that letter, the
Department stated that it was postponing the briefing schedule until
further notice pending the release of the verification report of
Shandong Huanri Group Co., Ltd., Shandong Huanri Group General Co., and
Laizhou Huanri Automobile Parts Co., Ltd. (collectively ``Huanri'').
From March 20, 2007,
[[Page 32072]]
through March 22, 2007, the Department verified the Section A and
quantity and value questionnaire response of Huanri in Panjia Village,
Laizhou, PRC. On May 4, 2007, the Department issued the verification
report for Huanri. See Memorandum to the File through Wendy J. Frankel,
Office Director, and Robert Bolling, Program Manager, From Eugene
Degnan, Senior International Trade Analyst, and Paul Stolz,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, entitled, ``Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of
China: Verification of Section A and Quantity and Value Response of
Shandong Huanri Group Co., Ltd., Laizhou Huanri Automobile Parts Co.,
Ltd., and Shandong Huanri Group General Co.'' On May 10, 2007, the
Department set the deadlines for submission of case and rebuttal briefs
as May 21, 2007, and May 29, 2007, respectively. On May 10, 2007, the
Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum and Rotor
Aftermarket Manufacturers (``the Petitioner''), requested a 5-day
extension of time to submit rebuttal briefs. On May 15, 2007, the
Department granted the Petitioner's request and extended the deadline
for submission of rebuttal briefs to June 5, 2007, for all parties.
Extension of Time Limit of Final Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the ``Act'')
requires the Department to issue the final results within 120 days
after the date on which the preliminary results are published. However,
if it is not practicable to complete this review within the time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend
the deadline for the final results to a maximum of 180 days after the
publication date of the preliminary results.
The Department determines that completion of the final results of
these reviews within the statutory time period is not practicable. The
Department requires additional time to analyze comments regarding the
19 respondents, including 15 separate-rate respondents and three
mandatory respondents in the administrative review and one respondent
in the new shipper review. Therefore, given the number and complexity
of issues and companies in this case, and in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, we are extending the time
period for issuing the final results of review by 46 days to 166 days
after the publication of the preliminary results. Therefore, the final
results will be due no later than July 31, 2007.
This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(3)(A) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: June 5, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-11251 Filed 6-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
