Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 31614-31616 [E7-11022]
Download as PDF
31614
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,822]
Shiloh Industries, Parma, OH;
Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Shiloh Industries, Parma, Ohio. The
application did not contain new
information supporting a conclusion
that the determination was erroneous,
and also did not provide a justification
for reconsideration of the determination
that was based on either mistaken facts
or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law. Therefore, dismissal of the
application was issued.
TA–W–60,822; Shiloh Industries,
Parma, Ohio (May 22, 2007).
to a foreign country. The determination
also stated that the subject firm sold the
Puerto Rico facility to another company.
In the request for reconsideration, the
workers alleged that the subject firm
shifted production and support
functions abroad.
Following the issuance of the negative
determination, the Department received
new information regarding activities at
the subject firm and the affiliated Puerto
Rico production facility.
Following a careful review of the
workers’ request for reconsideration and
the above-referenced new information,
the Department has determined that
further investigation is appropriate.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of
May 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–11023 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
May 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–11024 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,879]
Via Information Tools, Inc., Troy, MI;
Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Via Information Tools, Inc., Troy,
Michigan. The application did not
contain new information supporting a
conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–60,879; Via Information Tools,
Inc., Troy, Michigan (May 22,
2007).
Signed at Washington, DC this 24th day of
May 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–11026 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–61,568]
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
[TA–W–60,827]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Sun Microsystems, Inc., Louisville, CO;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By letter dated April 16, 2007, a
worker requested administrative
reconsideration by the Department of
Labor (Department) of the Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding
Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance applicable to
workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The negative determination
was issued on March 14, 2007. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on March 30, 2007 (72 FR 15168). The
workers supported production at an
affiliated facility in Puerto Rico.
The negative determination was based
on the Department’s findings that,
during the relevant period, the subject
firm did not shift work performed in
Louisville, Colorado abroad and did not
shift production work from Puerto Rico
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Tenneco Inc., Walker Manufacturing,
Harrisonburg, VA; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on May 23,
2007 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
at Tenneco Inc., Walker Manufacturing,
Harrisonburg, Virginia.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of
May, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–11020 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of May 21, 2007 through May 25,
2007.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issued a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–61,173; Viking Tool and Drill, Inc.,
St Paul, MN: March 22, 2006.
TA–61,181; Pine River Plastics, Inc.,
Westminster, SC: March 22, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA–61,209; Reum Corporation, On-Site
Leased Workers of QPS Companies
and Aerotek Staffing, Waukegan, IL:
March 28, 2006.
TA–61,340; Tube Specialties Co., Inc.,
Troutdale, OR: April 18, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31615
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–61,389; Vaungarde Acquisition,
LLC, Owosso, MI: April 18, 2006.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–61,434; Judith Leiber LLC, New
York, NY: April 18, 2006
TA–61,439; Rugg Manufacturing
Company, Inc., Greenfield, MA:
May 1, 2006.
TA–61,460; Lozier Corporation, On-Site
Lease Workers From Gregg Staffing
Services, Pittsburgh, PA: May 4,
2006.
TA–61,478; Royal Home Fashions, a
subsidiary of Croscill Inc., Plant 8,
Oxford, NC: May 28, 2007.
TA–61,543; KMC Holding LLC, dba
Kennedy Manufacturing Company,
On-Site leased workers of
Manpower, Van Wert, OH: May 10,
2006.
TA–61,224; Opportunity, Inc., Medical
Division, Highland Park, IL: April 2,
2006.
TA–61,313; Circa 1801 Doblin, a
subsidiary of Joan Fabrics Corp.,
EBM Textiles, LLC Division,
Connelly Springs, NC: April 13,
2006.
TA–61,350; Amsea, Inc., Fenton, MI:
April 1, 2006.
TA–61,449; Delphi Corporation,
Automotive Holding Group, On-Site
Leased Workers of Securitas,
Bartech etc., Wichita Falls, TX:
April 30, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–61,231; AAA Human Capital and
Staffmark Investment, LLC, Working
On-Site at Lego Systems, Inc.,
Enfield, CT: March 30, 2006.
TA–61,316; Associated Furniture
Manufacturers, Inc., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Sklar Peppler
of America, Portland, OR: April 13,
2006.
TA–61,325; Metro Furniture, Metal
Frame Department and Upholstery
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
31616
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
Department, Oakland, CA: April 17,
2006.
TA–61,326; Torque Traction
Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., a
subsidiary of Dana Corporation,
Automotive Systems Group,
Syracuse, IN: April 12, 2006.
TA–61,354; J.A.M. Plastics, Inc.,
(Formerly CIPI, Inc.), Anaheim, CA:
April 17, 2006.
TA–61,402; Advanced Decorative
Systems, Inc., dba Kaumagraph
Flint Corporation, Millington, MI:
April 26, 2006.
TA–61,470; General Motors Corporation,
General Motors Springhill Mfg.,
Springhill, TN: May 4, 2006.
TA–61,471; Bond Cote Corporation,
Fiber Loc Plant #2, Knitting
Department, Dublin, VA: May 1,
2006.
TA–61,527; Fleetwood Travel Trailers of
Kentucky, Inc., Travel Trailer
Division, Campbellsville, KY: May
17, 2006.
TA–61,534; Merkle Korff Industries, Inc.,
Richland Center Plant, Richland
Center, WI: May 16, 2006.
TA–61,558; Seagate Technology, LLC,
Longmont Division, Longmont, CO:
May 21, 2006.
TA–61,337; MYOB US, Product
Development, Denville, NJ: April 18,
2006.
TA–61,380; Briggs and Stratton
Corporation, Engine Power Products
Groups, On-Site Leased Workers of
From Adecco, Murray, KY: March
30, 2006.
TA–61,393; Best Artex, LLC, Highland,
IL: April 26, 2006.
TA–61,395; Federal Mogul Corporation,
Systems Protection Group, On-Site
Leased Workers from Kelly Services,
Exton, PA: April 27, 2006.
TA–61,428; Dana Corporation, Heavy
Vehicle Technologies And System
Operations, Product Service Center,
Statesville, NC: April 30, 2006.
TA–61,516; Best Textiles International,
Ltd., Best Artex, LLC, West Point,
MS: May 15, 2006.
TA–61,523; Central Brass
Manufacturing Co., Currently
Known as C.B.N. Supply, Cleveland,
OH: April 27, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–61,312; Ashdale Foam, Inc.,
Conover, NC: April 10, 2006.
TA–61,401; Victor Plastics, Inc., Kalona
Division, On-Site Leased Workers of
Kelly Services, Kalona, IA: April 26,
2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
TA–61,491; Decor Originals, Inc.,
Conover, NC: May 9, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–61,173; Viking Tool and Drill, Inc.,
St. Paul, MN.
TA–61,181; Pine River Plastics, Inc.,
Westminster, SC.
TA–61,209; Reum Corporation, On-Site
Leased Workers of QPS Companies
and Aerotek Staffing, Waukegan, IL.
TA–61,340; Tube Specialties Co., Inc.,
Troutdale, OR.
TA–61,389; Vaungarde Acquisition,
LLC, Owosso, MI.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–61,135; Williamson and Company,
Greer, SC.
TA–61,444; Biltbest Products, Inc.,
Sainte Genevieve, MO.
TA–61,525; Ametek, Commercial Motor
Division, Racine, WI.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA–61,189; Analog Devices, Inc.,
Sunnyvale, CA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–61,256; E.B.I. Holding, Inc., a
subsidiary of Biomet, Inc.,
Allendale, NJ.
TA–61,317; Spacelabs Healthcare LLC,
Spacelabs Medical, aka Delmar
Reynolds Medical, Inc., Irvine, CA.
TA–61,358; Masonite Door Fabrication
Services, Inc., a subsidiary of
Masonite International, Toledo, OH.
TA–61,374; Seaswirl Boats, Inc., a
subsidiary of Genmar Holdings,
Inc., Culver, OR.
TA–61,227; Acument Global
Technologies Camar, Decorah, IA.
TA–61,436; U.P. Plastics, Inc., Baraga,
MI.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–61,382; Tandem Enterprises, Inc.,
Weslaco, TX.
TA–61,473; ICT Group, Inc., Dubois, PA.
TA–61,488; Webb Furniture Plant #1,
Galax, VA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of May 21
through May 25, 2007. Copies of these
determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–11022 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 109 (Thursday, June 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31614-31616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11022]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance andAlternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of May 21,
2007 through May 25, 2007.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or
[[Page 31615]]
an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued
a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-61,173; Viking Tool and Drill, Inc., St Paul, MN:March 22, 2006.
TA-61,181; Pine River Plastics, Inc., Westminster, SC:March 22, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-61,209; Reum Corporation, On-Site Leased Workers of QPSCompanies and
Aerotek Staffing, Waukegan, IL:March 28, 2006.
TA-61,340; Tube Specialties Co., Inc., Troutdale, OR:April 18, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-61,389; Vaungarde Acquisition, LLC, Owosso, MI: April 18, 2006.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-61,434; Judith Leiber LLC, New York, NY: April 18, 2006
TA-61,439; Rugg Manufacturing Company, Inc.,Greenfield, MA: May 1,
2006.
TA-61,460; Lozier Corporation, On-Site Lease Workers FromGregg Staffing
Services, Pittsburgh, PA: May 4, 2006.
TA-61,478; Royal Home Fashions, a subsidiary of CroscillInc., Plant 8,
Oxford, NC: May 28, 2007.
TA-61,543; KMC Holding LLC, dba Kennedy ManufacturingCompany, On-Site
leased workers of Manpower, Van Wert, OH: May 10, 2006.
TA-61,224; Opportunity, Inc., Medical Division, HighlandPark, IL: April
2, 2006.
TA-61,313; Circa 1801 Doblin, a subsidiary of Joan FabricsCorp., EBM
Textiles, LLC Division, Connelly Springs,NC: April 13, 2006.
TA-61,350; Amsea, Inc., Fenton, MI: April 1, 2006.
TA-61,449; Delphi Corporation, Automotive Holding Group, On-Site Leased
Workers of Securitas, Bartech etc.,Wichita Falls, TX: April 30, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-61,231; AAA Human Capital and Staffmark Investment, LLC, Working On-
Site at Lego Systems, Inc., Enfield, CT:March 30, 2006.
TA-61,316; Associated Furniture Manufacturers, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Sklar Peppler of America,Portland, OR: April 13, 2006.
TA-61,325; Metro Furniture, Metal Frame Department andUpholstery
[[Page 31616]]
Department, Oakland, CA: April 17, 2006.
TA-61,326; Torque Traction Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., a
subsidiary of Dana Corporation, AutomotiveSystems Group, Syracuse, IN:
April 12, 2006.
TA-61,354; J.A.M. Plastics, Inc., (Formerly CIPI, Inc.), Anaheim, CA:
April 17, 2006.
TA-61,402; Advanced Decorative Systems, Inc., dbaKaumagraph Flint
Corporation, Millington, MI:April 26, 2006.
TA-61,470; General Motors Corporation, General MotorsSpringhill Mfg.,
Springhill, TN: May 4, 2006.
TA-61,471; Bond Cote Corporation, Fiber Loc Plant #2, Knitting
Department, Dublin, VA: May 1, 2006.
TA-61,527; Fleetwood Travel Trailers of Kentucky, Inc., Travel Trailer
Division, Campbellsville, KY: May 17,2006.
TA-61,534; Merkle Korff Industries, Inc., Richland CenterPlant,
Richland Center, WI: May 16, 2006.
TA-61,558; Seagate Technology, LLC, Longmont Division, Longmont, CO:
May 21, 2006.
TA-61,337; MYOB US, Product Development, Denville, NJ:April 18, 2006.
TA-61,380; Briggs and Stratton Corporation, Engine PowerProducts
Groups, On-Site Leased Workers of FromAdecco, Murray, KY: March 30,
2006.
TA-61,393; Best Artex, LLC, Highland, IL: April 26, 2006.
TA-61,395; Federal Mogul Corporation, Systems ProtectionGroup, On-Site
Leased Workers from Kelly Services,Exton, PA: April 27, 2006.
TA-61,428; Dana Corporation, Heavy Vehicle TechnologiesAnd System
Operations, Product Service Center,Statesville, NC: April 30, 2006.
TA-61,516; Best Textiles International, Ltd., Best Artex, LLC, West
Point, MS: May 15, 2006.
TA-61,523; Central Brass Manufacturing Co., Currently Known as C.B.N.
Supply, Cleveland, OH: April 27, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA-61,312; Ashdale Foam, Inc., Conover, NC: April 10, 2006.
TA-61,401; Victor Plastics, Inc., Kalona Division, On-SiteLeased
Workers of Kelly Services, Kalona, IA:April 26, 2006.
TA-61,491; Decor Originals, Inc., Conover, NC: May 9, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-61,173; Viking Tool and Drill, Inc., St. Paul, MN.
TA-61,181; Pine River Plastics, Inc., Westminster, SC.
TA-61,209; Reum Corporation, On-Site Leased Workers of QPSCompanies and
Aerotek Staffing, Waukegan, IL.
TA-61,340; Tube Specialties Co., Inc., Troutdale, OR.
TA-61,389; Vaungarde Acquisition, LLC, Owosso, MI.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
TA-61,135; Williamson and Company, Greer, SC.
TA-61,444; Biltbest Products, Inc., Sainte Genevieve, MO.
TA-61,525; Ametek, Commercial Motor Division, Racine, WI.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA-61,189; Analog Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-61,256; E.B.I. Holding, Inc., a subsidiary of Biomet, Inc.,
Allendale, NJ.
TA-61,317; Spacelabs Healthcare LLC, Spacelabs Medical, akaDelmar
Reynolds Medical, Inc., Irvine, CA.
TA-61,358; Masonite Door Fabrication Services, Inc., a subsidiary of
Masonite International, Toledo, OH.
TA-61,374; Seaswirl Boats, Inc., a subsidiary of GenmarHoldings, Inc.,
Culver, OR.
TA-61,227; Acument Global Technologies Camar, Decorah, IA.
TA-61,436; U.P. Plastics, Inc., Baraga, MI.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-61,382; Tandem Enterprises, Inc., Weslaco, TX.
TA-61,473; ICT Group, Inc., Dubois, PA.
TA-61,488; Webb Furniture Plant #1, Galax, VA.
The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of May 21 through May 25, 2007. Copies of these
determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to
the above address.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-11022 Filed 6-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P