Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 31591-31593 [07-2851]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
and other materials relating to the
contemplated exclusive license should
be directed to: Adaku Nwachukwu, J.D.,
Technology Licensing Specialist, Office
of Technology Transfer, National
Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive
Boulevard, Suite 325, Rockville, MD
20852–3804; Telephone: (301) 435–
5560; Facsimile: (301) 402–0220; E-mail:
madua@mail.nih.gov.
The
technology relates to an effective way to
monitor food quality and freshness in
real time. The major factor for food
spoilage is the release of volatile bases
due to the action of enzymes contained
within the food or produced by
microorganisms, such as bacteria, yeasts
and molds growing in the food. The rate
of release of such bases depends on
food’s storage history. In this
technology, a reactive dye locked in a
water-repellent material reacts with the
bases released during food
decomposition, and changes color. Thus
a rapid and informed decision can be
made about quality of food and its shelf
life under the storage conditions used.
Since the detection is based on
biological processes that are the root
cause for food spoilage, these indicators
are much more reliable.
The prospective exclusive license will
be royalty bearing and will comply with
the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C.
209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective
exclusive license may be granted unless
within sixty (60) days from the date of
this published notice, the NIH receives
written evidence and argument that
establishes that the grant of the license
would not be consistent with the
requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37
CFR 404.7.
Applications for a license in the field
of use filed in response to this notice
will be treated as objections to the grant
of the contemplated exclusive license.
Comments and objections submitted to
this notice will not be made available
for public inspection and, to the extent
permitted by law, will not be released
under the Freedom of Information Act,
5 U.S.C. 552.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: May 21, 2007.
Steven M. Ferguson,
Director, Division of Technology Development
and Transfer, Office of Technology Transfer,
National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E7–10963 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substances Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMSHA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMSHA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: Community Mental Health
Services Block Grant Application
Guidance and Instruction, FY 2008–
2010 (OMB No. 0930–0168)—Revisions
Sections 1911 through 1920 of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
300x through 300x–9) provide for
annual allotments to assist States to
establish or expand an organized,
community-based system of care for
adults with serious mental illnesses and
children with serious emotional
disturbances. Under these provision of
the law, States may receive allotments
only after an application is submitted
and approved by the Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human
Services.
For the FY 2008–2010 Community
Mental Health Services Block Grant
application cycle, SAMSHA will
provide States guidance and
instructions to guide development of
comprehensive State applications/plans
and implementation reports. Proposed
revisions to the guidance include:
(1) The integration of mental health
transformation as a guiding principle in
the development of State mental health
plans. State plans for FY 2008–2010 will
describe State mental health
transformation efforts and activities
within the context of the five (5)
legislative criteria, identify mental
health transformation activities funded
by the MHBG and other State funding
sources, identify activities of the State
mental health planning council that
contribute to and support State
transformation efforts, include one State
transformation performance indicator in
the plan, and include a description of
the services provided to older adults
under criterion 4 of the State’s plan.
(2) The introduction of the Web Block
Grant Application System (WebBGAS).
WebBGAS enables States to submit
applications/plans, and implementation
reports electronically thus reducing the
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31591
burden of paperwork required for
submission, revision, and reporting
purposes. In FY 2008, all States and
Territories will be encouraged to submit
State plans using WebBGAS. Other
advantages to using WebBGAS include:
• Eliminating redundancy in data
entry by pre-populating the States’
previous year data in the current year’s
plans and implementation reports.
• Standardizing Mental Health Block
Grant data for reporting and quantitative
analysis.
• Allowing the States’ mental health
planning councils to have access to state
plans and implementation reports
throughout the FY as a means to enable
councils to meet their Federal mandate
of reviewing the plans and providing
recommendations to the State.
• Adhering to the Federal
Government’s e-governments and egrants initiatives, where applicable.
(3) A requirement for States to report
nine CMHS National Outcome Measures
(NOMS) for mental health. All nine
measures are derived from tables in the
Uniform Reporting System (URS) which
was developed in collaboration with the
States. Four (4) of the nine measures
were established, in concert with OMB
PART, to support the long-term goals of
the Mental Health Block Grant program
and SAMSHA’s Government Results
and Performance Act (GPRA) measures.
The nine CMHS measures are:
• Increased access to services
• Reduced utilization of psychiatric
inpatient beds for 30 and 180 days
• Number of evidenced-based
practices and number of persons served
in these programs
• Client perception of care
• Increased/retained employment or
returned to/stayed in school
• Decreased criminal justice
involvement
• Increased stability in housing
• Increased social supports and social
connectedness, and
• Improved level of functioning.
Two of the NOMS, Increased Social
Supports and Social Connectedness,
and Improved Functioning, are
currently under development at
SAMSHA. States that are unable to
report data on these or other indicators
will be required to describe their current
reporting capacity and efforts underway
to make collection of the data possible.
(4) Revisions to tables in the Uniform
Reporting System (URS). Since FY 2001,
States have reported annual data on the
public mental health system to the
MHBG Program through 21 tables in the
URS. For the past three years, CMHS
worked collaboratively with States,
using the Data Infrastructure Grant (DIG)
process, to refine the data and make
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
31592
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
reporting more meaningful to both
States and CMHS. This effort resulted in
a list of revisions to the basic and
development tables in the FY 2005–
2007 MHBG guidance. The revisions to
the URS tables are described below:
REVISIONS TO TABLES IN THE UNIFORM REPORTING SYSTEM
Table description
Table No.
Table name
Change
Table 1 ...................
Table 2 ...................
No Change ............
Minor .....................
Table 3 ...................
Table 4 ...................
Profile of State Population by Diagnosis .............
Total Unduplicated Served by Age, Gender &
Race.
Total Served by Setting, by Age & Gender .........
Employment ..........................................................
Table 5 ...................
Table 6 ...................
Medicaid Status ....................................................
Profile of Client Flow and Turnover .....................
No Change ............
Minor .....................
Table 7 ...................
Table 8 ...................
Table 9 ...................
State MH Expenditures and Revenues ................
Profile of Community MHBG Expenditures ..........
Public Mental Health Service System Inventory
List (Deleted in 2005).
No Change ............
No Change ............
Major .....................
Table 10 .................
Table 11 .................
Profile of Agencies receiving MHBG Funds ........
Consumer Evaluation of Care* ............................
No Change ............
Minor .....................
Table 12 .................
Table 13 .................
State Mental Health Agency Profile .....................
Untreated Prevalence of Mental Illness ...............
No Change ............
No Change ............
Table 14 .................
Minor .....................
Table 15 .................
Table 16 .................
Adults with SMI & SED served by Age, gender,
Race, & Ethnicity.
Living Situation Profile ..........................................
EBPs .....................................................................
Table 17 .................
EBPs .....................................................................
Minor .....................
Table 18 .................
Table 19 .................
Use of New Generation Atypical Antipsychotics ..
Outcomes: Criminal Justice & School Attendance
No Change ............
Minor .....................
Table 20 .................
Table 21 .................
30 and 180 day state hospital readmissions .......
30 and 180 day readmission to any psych bed ...
Minor .....................
Minor .....................
The future of the SAMHSA/CMHS
State mental data reporting program
continues to evolve with a related plan
to implement a State Client level
Initiative project with a few States to
test the feasibility of implementing
client level reporting in the States.
Activities of this pilot in the next three
years will include: (1) Identifying and
No Change ............
Minor .....................
No Change ............
Minor .....................
documenting the States’ most promising
approaches to the collection of clientlevel data; (2) developing
recommendations for expanding clientlevel data collection systems to
incorporate the NOMs; and (3) pilot
testing the most promising approaches
with other interested States to
determine their feasibility. SAMHSA
Number of
respondents
Application
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Proposed change
Combine Age 0–3 with Age 4–12.
Add Optional Table 4a. Reporting of Employment Status by 5 Diagnostic Groupings.
Add Column for Length of Stay for clients in facility more than 1 year.
New table added, ‘‘Social Connectedness and
Improved Functioning’’ for SAMHSA’s newest
NOMS.
Add revisions to table and questions to clarify
the survey instrument and methodology used
to collect data for this domain if the recommended survey was not used.
Continue as developmental until refined by DIG
Workgroup.
Combine Age 0–3 with Age 4–12.
Add two questions at the end of each EBP:
(1) Did the State use the SAMHSA Toolkit
to guide implementation?
(2) Has staff been specifically trained to implement the EBP?
Add two questions at the end of each EBP:
(1) Did the State use the SAMHSA Toolkit
to guide implementation?
(2) Has staff been specifically trained to implement the EBP?
Add new questions for two CMHS NOMS: Arrests, and School Attendance.
Combine Age 0–3 with Age 4–12.
Combine Age 0–3 with Age 4–12.
expects that the results of this effort will
improve the ability of States to report
unduplicated client-level outcomes
comparing Time 2 to Time 1. These data
are expected to support the CMHS Block
Grant in future PART reviews.
The following table summarizes the
annual burden for the revised
application.
Burden
response
(hrs)
Responses/
respondent
Total burden
hours
Plan:
1 year ........................................................................................................
2 year ........................................................................................................
3 year ........................................................................................................
Implementation Report ....................................................................................
URS Tables .....................................................................................................
44
6
9
59
59
1
1
1
1
1
180
150
110
75
40
7,920
900
990
4,425
2,360
Total ..........................................................................................................
59
........................
........................
16,595
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by July 9, 2007 to: SAMHSA
Desk Officer, Human Resources and
Housing Branch, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
through the U.S. Postal Service,
respondents are encouraged to submit
comments by fax to: 202–395–6974.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. 07–2851 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Current List of Laboratories Which
Meet Minimum Standards To Engage in
Urine Drug Testing for Federal
Agencies
Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) notifies Federal
agencies of the laboratories currently
certified to meet the standards of
Subpart C of the Mandatory Guidelines
for Federal Workplace Drug Testing
Programs (Mandatory Guidelines). The
Mandatory Guidelines were first
published in the Federal Register on
April 11, 1988 (53 FR 11970), and
subsequently revised in the Federal
Register on June 9, 1994 (59 FR 29908),
on September 30, 1997 (62 FR 51118),
and on April 13, 2004 (69 FR 19644).
A notice listing all currently certified
laboratories is published in the Federal
Register during the first week of each
month. If any laboratory’s certification
is suspended or revoked, the laboratory
will be omitted from subsequent lists
until such time as it is restored to full
certification under the Mandatory
Guidelines.
If any laboratory has withdrawn from
the HHS National Laboratory
Certification Program (NLCP) during the
past month, it will be listed at the end,
and will be omitted from the monthly
listing thereafter.
This notice is also available on the
Internet at https://workplace.samhsa.gov
and https://www.drugfreeworkplace.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
Giselle Hersh or Dr. Walter Vogl,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Division of Workplace Programs,
SAMHSA/CSAP, Room 2–1035, 1 Choke
Cherry Road, Rockville, Maryland
20857; 240–276–2600 (voice), 240–276–
2610 (fax).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Mandatory Guidelines were developed
in accordance with Executive Order
12564 and section 503 of Public Law
100–71. Subpart C of the Mandatory
Guidelines, ‘‘Certification of
Laboratories Engaged in Urine Drug
Testing for Federal Agencies,’’ sets strict
standards that laboratories must meet in
order to conduct drug and specimen
validity tests on urine specimens for
Federal agencies. To become certified,
an applicant laboratory must undergo
three rounds of performance testing plus
an on-site inspection. To maintain that
certification, a laboratory must
participate in a quarterly performance
testing program plus undergo periodic,
on-site inspections.
Laboratories which claim to be in the
applicant stage of certification are not to
be considered as meeting the minimum
requirements described in the HHS
Mandatory Guidelines. A laboratory
must have its letter of certification from
HHS/SAMHSA (formerly: HHS/NIDA)
which attests that it has met minimum
standards.
In accordance with Subpart C of the
Mandatory Guidelines dated April 13,
2004 (69 FR 19644), the following
laboratories meet the minimum
standards to conduct drug and specimen
validity tests on urine specimens:
ACL Laboratories, 8901 W. Lincoln
Ave., West Allis, WI 53227, 414–328–
7840/800–877–7016, (Formerly:
Bayshore Clinical Laboratory).
ACM Medical Laboratory, Inc., 160
Elmgrove Park, Rochester, NY 14624,
585–429–2264.
Advanced Toxicology Network, 3560
Air Center Cove, Suite 101, Memphis,
TN 38118, 901–794–5770/888–290–
1150.
Aegis Analytical Laboratories, Inc., 345
Hill Ave., Nashville, TN 37210, 615–
255–2400.
Baptist Medical Center-Toxicology
Laboratory, 9601 I–630, Exit 7, Little
Rock, AR 72205–7299, 501–202–2783,
(Formerly: Forensic Toxicology
Laboratory Baptist Medical Center).
Clinical Reference Lab, 8433 Quivira
Road, Lenexa, KS 66215–2802, 800–
445–6917.
Diagnostic Services, Inc., dba DSI,
12700 Westlinks Drive, Fort Myers,
FL 33913, 239–561–8200/800–735–
5416.
Doctors Laboratory, Inc., 2906 Julia
Drive, Valdosta, GA 31602, 229–671–
2281.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31593
DrugScan, Inc., P.O. Box 2969, 1119
Mearns Road, Warminster, PA 18974,
215–674–9310.
Dynacare Kasper Medical Laboratories*,
10150–102 St., Suite 200, Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada T5J 5E2, 780–451–
3702/800–661–9876.
ElSohly Laboratories, Inc., 5 Industrial
Park Drive, Oxford, MS 38655, 662–
236–2609.
Gamma-Dynacare Medical
Laboratories*, A Division of the
Gamma-Dynacare Laboratory
Partnership, 245 Pall Mall Street,
London, ONT, Canada N6A 1P4, 519–
679–1630.
Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc., 1111
Newton St., Gretna, LA 70053, 504–
361–8989/800–433–3823, (Formerly:
Laboratory Specialists, Inc.).
Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc., 450
Southlake Blvd., Richmond, VA
23236, 804–378–9130, (Formerly:
Scientific Testing Laboratories, Inc.;
Kroll Scientific Testing Laboratories,
Inc.).
Laboratory Corporation of America
Holdings, 7207 N. Gessner Road,
Houston, TX 77040, 713–856–8288/
800–800–2387.
Laboratory Corporation of America
Holdings, 69 First Ave., Raritan, NJ
08869, 908–526–2400/800–437–4986,
(Formerly: Roche Biomedical
Laboratories, Inc.).
Laboratory Corporation of America
Holdings, 1904 Alexander Drive,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
919–572–6900/800–833–3984,
(Formerly: LabCorp Occupational
Testing Services, Inc., CompuChem
Laboratories, Inc.; CompuChem
Laboratories, Inc., A Subsidiary of
Roche Biomedical Laboratory; Roche
CompuChem Laboratories, Inc., A
Member of the Roche Group)
Laboratory Corporation of America
Holdings, 13112 Evening Creek Drive,
Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92128, 858–
668–3710/800–882–7272, (Formerly:
Poisonlab, Inc.).
Laboratory Corporation of America
Holdings, 550 17th Ave., Suite 300,
Seattle, WA 98122, 206–923–7020/
800–898–0180 (Formerly: DrugProof,
Division of Dynacare/Laboratory of
Pathology, LLC; Laboratory of
Pathology of Seattle, Inc.; DrugProof,
Division of Laboratory of Pathology of
Seattle, Inc.).
Laboratory Corporation of America
Holdings, 1120 Main Street,
Southaven, MS 38671, 866–827–8042/
800–233–6339. (Formerly: LabCorp
Occupational Testing Services, Inc.;
MedExpress/National Laboratory
Center).
LabOne, Inc. d/b/a Quest Diagnostics,
10101 Renner Blvd., Lenexa, KS
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 109 (Thursday, June 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31591-31593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2851]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substances Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMSHA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMSHA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: Community Mental Health Services Block Grant Application
Guidance and Instruction, FY 2008-2010 (OMB No. 0930-0168)--Revisions
Sections 1911 through 1920 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300x through 300x-9) provide for annual allotments to assist
States to establish or expand an organized, community-based system of
care for adults with serious mental illnesses and children with serious
emotional disturbances. Under these provision of the law, States may
receive allotments only after an application is submitted and approved
by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
For the FY 2008-2010 Community Mental Health Services Block Grant
application cycle, SAMSHA will provide States guidance and instructions
to guide development of comprehensive State applications/plans and
implementation reports. Proposed revisions to the guidance include:
(1) The integration of mental health transformation as a guiding
principle in the development of State mental health plans. State plans
for FY 2008-2010 will describe State mental health transformation
efforts and activities within the context of the five (5) legislative
criteria, identify mental health transformation activities funded by
the MHBG and other State funding sources, identify activities of the
State mental health planning council that contribute to and support
State transformation efforts, include one State transformation
performance indicator in the plan, and include a description of the
services provided to older adults under criterion 4 of the State's
plan.
(2) The introduction of the Web Block Grant Application System
(WebBGAS). WebBGAS enables States to submit applications/plans, and
implementation reports electronically thus reducing the burden of
paperwork required for submission, revision, and reporting purposes. In
FY 2008, all States and Territories will be encouraged to submit State
plans using WebBGAS. Other advantages to using WebBGAS include:
Eliminating redundancy in data entry by pre-populating the
States' previous year data in the current year's plans and
implementation reports.
Standardizing Mental Health Block Grant data for reporting
and quantitative analysis.
Allowing the States' mental health planning councils to
have access to state plans and implementation reports throughout the FY
as a means to enable councils to meet their Federal mandate of
reviewing the plans and providing recommendations to the State.
Adhering to the Federal Government's e-governments and e-
grants initiatives, where applicable.
(3) A requirement for States to report nine CMHS National Outcome
Measures (NOMS) for mental health. All nine measures are derived from
tables in the Uniform Reporting System (URS) which was developed in
collaboration with the States. Four (4) of the nine measures were
established, in concert with OMB PART, to support the long-term goals
of the Mental Health Block Grant program and SAMSHA's Government
Results and Performance Act (GPRA) measures. The nine CMHS measures
are:
Increased access to services
Reduced utilization of psychiatric inpatient beds for 30
and 180 days
Number of evidenced-based practices and number of persons
served in these programs
Client perception of care
Increased/retained employment or returned to/stayed in
school
Decreased criminal justice involvement
Increased stability in housing
Increased social supports and social connectedness, and
Improved level of functioning.
Two of the NOMS, Increased Social Supports and Social
Connectedness, and Improved Functioning, are currently under
development at SAMSHA. States that are unable to report data on these
or other indicators will be required to describe their current
reporting capacity and efforts underway to make collection of the data
possible.
(4) Revisions to tables in the Uniform Reporting System (URS).
Since FY 2001, States have reported annual data on the public mental
health system to the MHBG Program through 21 tables in the URS. For the
past three years, CMHS worked collaboratively with States, using the
Data Infrastructure Grant (DIG) process, to refine the data and make
[[Page 31592]]
reporting more meaningful to both States and CMHS. This effort resulted
in a list of revisions to the basic and development tables in the FY
2005-2007 MHBG guidance. The revisions to the URS tables are described
below:
Revisions to Tables in the Uniform Reporting System
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table description
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table No. Table name Change Proposed change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1........................... Profile of State No Change............ .........................
Population by Diagnosis.
Table 2........................... Total Unduplicated Served Minor................ Combine Age 0-3 with Age
by Age, Gender & Race. 4-12.
Table 3........................... Total Served by Setting, No Change............ .........................
by Age & Gender.
Table 4........................... Employment................ Minor................ Add Optional Table 4a.
Reporting of Employment
Status by 5 Diagnostic
Groupings.
Table 5........................... Medicaid Status........... No Change............ .........................
Table 6........................... Profile of Client Flow and Minor................ Add Column for Length of
Turnover. Stay for clients in
facility more than 1
year.
Table 7........................... State MH Expenditures and No Change............ .........................
Revenues.
Table 8........................... Profile of Community MHBG No Change............ .........................
Expenditures.
Table 9........................... Public Mental Health Major................ New table added, ``Social
Service System Inventory Connectedness and
List (Deleted in 2005). Improved Functioning''
for SAMHSA's newest
NOMS.
Table 10.......................... Profile of Agencies No Change............ .........................
receiving MHBG Funds.
Table 11.......................... Consumer Evaluation of Minor................ Add revisions to table
Care*. and questions to clarify
the survey instrument
and methodology used to
collect data for this
domain if the
recommended survey was
not used.
Table 12.......................... State Mental Health Agency No Change............ .........................
Profile.
Table 13.......................... Untreated Prevalence of No Change............ Continue as developmental
Mental Illness. until refined by DIG
Workgroup.
Table 14.......................... Adults with SMI & SED Minor................ Combine Age 0-3 with Age
served by Age, gender, 4-12.
Race, & Ethnicity.
Table 15.......................... Living Situation Profile.. No Change............ .........................
Table 16.......................... EBPs...................... Minor................ Add two questions at the
end of each EBP:
(1) Did the State use the
SAMHSA Toolkit to guide
implementation?
(2) Has staff been
specifically trained to
implement the EBP?
Table 17.......................... EBPs...................... Minor................ Add two questions at the
end of each EBP:
(1) Did the State use the
SAMHSA Toolkit to guide
implementation?
(2) Has staff been
specifically trained to
implement the EBP?
Table 18.......................... Use of New Generation No Change............ .........................
Atypical Antipsychotics.
Table 19.......................... Outcomes: Criminal Justice Minor................ Add new questions for two
& School Attendance. CMHS NOMS: Arrests, and
School Attendance.
Table 20.......................... 30 and 180 day state Minor................ Combine Age 0-3 with Age
hospital readmissions. 4-12.
Table 21.......................... 30 and 180 day readmission Minor................ Combine Age 0-3 with Age
to any psych bed. 4-12.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the SAMHSA/CMHS State mental data reporting program
continues to evolve with a related plan to implement a State Client
level Initiative project with a few States to test the feasibility of
implementing client level reporting in the States. Activities of this
pilot in the next three years will include: (1) Identifying and
documenting the States' most promising approaches to the collection of
client-level data; (2) developing recommendations for expanding client-
level data collection systems to incorporate the NOMs; and (3) pilot
testing the most promising approaches with other interested States to
determine their feasibility. SAMHSA expects that the results of this
effort will improve the ability of States to report unduplicated
client-level outcomes comparing Time 2 to Time 1. These data are
expected to support the CMHS Block Grant in future PART reviews.
The following table summarizes the annual burden for the revised
application.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden
Application Number of Responses/ response Total burden
respondents respondent (hrs) hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan:
1 year...................................... 44 1 180 7,920
2 year...................................... 6 1 150 900
3 year...................................... 9 1 110 990
Implementation Report........................... 59 1 75 4,425
URS Tables...................................... 59 1 40 2,360
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 59 .............. .............. 16,595
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 31593]]
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by July 9, 2007 to: SAMHSA Desk
Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202-395-6974.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. 07-2851 Filed 6-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-M
