Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 30402 [E7-10374]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
30402
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Notices
per year.’’ The commenter states that,
‘‘it is not clear why an acceptable design
and operational concept would include
planning for SSC failures, more often
than once per year, that resulted in a
radiation dose,’’ and these should be
considered ‘‘as part of normal
operations as opposed to as a Category
1 event sequence.’’
Response. The Part 63 definition of
‘‘controlled area’’ is found in Subpart
L—‘‘Postclosure Public Health and
Environmental Standards,’’ in section
63.302, and not in Subpart K—
‘‘Preclosure Public Health and
Environmental Standards.’’ Since 10
CFR 63.111(a) requires the GROA to
meet the requirements of Part 20, the
Part 20 definitions are to be applied
within the context of Part 63. The site
boundary is analogous to the controlled
area, defined in Part 20, because the
preclosure limits are based on the
boundary of the site, defined for
preclosure, as that area, surrounding the
GROA, for which DOE exercises
authority over its use, in accordance
with the provisions of Part 63. DOE
should clearly identify the controlled
site boundary in its demonstration of
compliance with Part 20 requirements.
However, NRC agrees that the use of the
term ‘‘controlled area site boundary’’
may be confusing, and thus is deleting
that term from the ISG.
The second term, ‘‘doses from those
Category 1 event sequences that are
expected to occur one or more times per
year’’ is used in the ISG method to
aggregate doses. Although NRC agrees
with the commenter that ITS SSCs
should be designed and maintained in
such a manner to prevent or avoid
frequent failure, this term does not
imply that a design that plans for
frequent occurrences of ITS SSCs will
be acceptable to NRC. Rather, this term
is used to ensure that if the applicant
submits an application with a Category
1 event sequence that occurs more than
once per year, then the reviewer will
include all occurrences of that event,
when determining if the estimated
annual dose meets the performance
objectives of Part 63.
ISG line 21 has been revised by
changing ‘‘controlled site boundary’’ to
‘‘controlled area.’’
ISG lines 36 and 37 have been revised
by deleting the sentence, ‘‘The site
boundary * * * Part 20.’’
ISG lines 55 and 56 have been revised
by changing ‘‘controlled area site
boundaries’’ to ‘‘the boundaries of the
controlled area.’’
ISG line 136 has been revised by
changing ‘‘controlled area site
boundary’’ to ‘‘boundary of the site.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 May 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
ISG line 144 has been revised by
changing ‘‘controlled area site
boundary’’ to ‘‘boundary of the site.’’
ISG lines 169 and 177 have been
revised by changing ‘‘controlled-area
boundary’’ to ‘‘controlled area.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Jon Chen, Project Manager, Division of
High-Level Waste Repository Safety,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001 [Telephone: (301) 415–5526; fax
number: (301) 415–5399; e-mail:
jcc2@nrc.gov];
Robert K. Johnson, Senior Project
Manager, Division of High-Level
Waste Repository Safety, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001 [Telephone: (301) 415–6900; fax
number: (301) 415–5399; e-mail:
rkj@nrc.gov].
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 22nd day
of May, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Sheena Whaley,
Chief, Engineering Branch, Division of HighLevel Waste Repository Safety, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E7–10470 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Rule 15Bc3–1 and Form MSDW SEC File
No. 270–93; OMB Control No. 3235–
0087
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this collection of
information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Rule 15Bc3–1 (17 CFR 240.15Bc3–1)
under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) provides
that a notice of withdrawal from
registration with the Commission as a
bank municipal securities dealer must
be filed on Form MSDW.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Commission uses the information
submitted on Form MSDW in
determining whether it is in the public
interest to permit a bank municipal
securities dealer to withdraw its
registration. This information is also
important to the municipal securities
dealer’s customers and to the public,
because it provides, among other things,
the name and address of a person to
contact regarding any of the municipal
securities dealer’s unfinished business.
Based upon past submissions, the
staff estimates that approximately 20
respondents in total will utilize this
notice procedure annually, with a total
burden of 10 hours for all respondents.
The staff estimates that the average
number of hours necessary for each
respondent to comply with the
requirements of Rule 15Bc3–1 is 0.5
hours. The average cost per hour is
approximately $101. Therefore, the total
cost of compliance for all respondents is
$1010 ($101 × 0.5 × 20 = $1010).
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Direct your written comments to R.
Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria,
VA 22312 or send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 60 days of
this notice.
Dated: May 16, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–10374 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM
31MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 104 (Thursday, May 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 30402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10374]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Rule 15Bc3-1 and Form MSDW SEC File No. 270-93; OMB Control No.
3235-0087
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for
extension and approval.
Rule 15Bc3-1 (17 CFR 240.15Bc3-1) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) provides that a notice of withdrawal
from registration with the Commission as a bank municipal securities
dealer must be filed on Form MSDW.
The Commission uses the information submitted on Form MSDW in
determining whether it is in the public interest to permit a bank
municipal securities dealer to withdraw its registration. This
information is also important to the municipal securities dealer's
customers and to the public, because it provides, among other things,
the name and address of a person to contact regarding any of the
municipal securities dealer's unfinished business.
Based upon past submissions, the staff estimates that approximately
20 respondents in total will utilize this notice procedure annually,
with a total burden of 10 hours for all respondents. The staff
estimates that the average number of hours necessary for each
respondent to comply with the requirements of Rule 15Bc3-1 is 0.5
hours. The average cost per hour is approximately $101. Therefore, the
total cost of compliance for all respondents is $1010 ($101 x 0.5 x 20
= $1010).
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
Direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-
mail to: PRA--Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to OMB within
60 days of this notice.
Dated: May 16, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-10374 Filed 5-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
