Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 29181-29183 [E7-10015]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
29181
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 100 / Thursday, May 24, 2007 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[TAA petitions instituted between 5/7/07 and 5/11/07]
TA–W
61497
61498
61499
61500
61501
................
................
................
................
................
Location
Sentinel Consumer Products, Inc. (Comp) ..........................
Sentinel Consumer Products, Inc. (Comp) ..........................
Sentinel Consumer Products, Inc. (Comp) ..........................
Lancaster Glass Corporation (USW) ....................................
Visteon Regional Assembly and Mfg., LLC (Union) ............
Mentor, OH ...........................
Anniston, AL ..........................
Clearfield, UT ........................
Lancaster, OH .......................
Chesapeake, VA ...................
[FR Doc. E7–10014 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of May 7 through May 11, 2007.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A), all of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B), both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Date of
institution
Subject firm (petitioners)
15:52 May 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
05/11/07
05/11/07
05/11/07
05/11/07
05/11/07
Date of
petition
05/10/07
05/10/07
05/10/07
04/17/07
05/10/07
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–61, 241; Navisa, Inc., Brenham,
TX: April 2, 2006.
TA–W–61, 254; American and Efird,
Inc., dba Robison Anton Textile
Company, Fairview Division,
Fairview, NJ: April 5, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–61, 162; Hoffman LaRoche, Inc.,
Quality Management—Analytical
Development Division, Nutley, NJ:
March 20, 2006.
TA–W–61, 230; Transwitch Corporation,
Reference Systems Development
Department, Shelton, CT: March 27,
2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
29182
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 100 / Thursday, May 24, 2007 / Notices
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–61,381; Distel Tool and Machine
Company, Warren, MI: April 24,
2006.
TA–W–61,403; WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Formerly know as Westport Stevens,
Bed Products Div. Finishing Plant,
Opelika, AL: April 24, 2006.
TA–W–60,857; Asec Manufacturing, A
Subsidiary of Delphi Corp.,
Catoosa, OK: January 22, 2006.
TA–W–61,075; Emerald Kalama
Chemical, LLC, Kalama, WA: March
6, 2006.
TA–W–61,184; Diversified Precision
Products, Spring Arbor, MI: March
21, 2006.
TA–W–61,244; IAC Sheboygan, LLC,
Formerly Known as Lear,
Sheboygan, WI: March 9, 2006.
TA–W–61,432; Deluxe Media Services
LLC, Distribution Facility, Pleasant
Prairie, WI: May 2, 2006.
TA–W–61,245; Addison Shoe Company,
A Division and of Munro and Co.,
Inc., Wynne, AR: May 13, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–61,252; Wetherill Associates,
Transpo Division, Orlando, FL:
March 27, 2006.
TA–W–61,330; Valeo Electrical Systems,
Inc., North American Wipers
Division, Rochester, NY: March 17,
2007.
TA–W–61,391; B. Braun of Puerto Rico,
Inc., B. Braun Medical Division,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 May 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
Leased Workers of Addeco, Sabana
Grande, PR: April 23, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
TA–W–61,254; American and Efird, Inc.,
dba Robison Anton Textile
Company, Fairview Division,
Fairview, NJ.
TA–W–61,230; Transwitch Corporation,
Reference Systems Development
Department, Shelton, CT.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–61,241; Navisa, Inc., Brenham,
TX.
TA–W–61,162; Hoffman LaRoche, Inc.,
Quality Management—Analytical
Development Division, Nutley, NJ.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA–W–61,136; Electric Mills Kentucky,
Division of EMF Corporation,
Burkesville, KY.
TA–W–61,149; Johnson Controls Battery
Group, Inc., Fullerton Distribution
Center, Fullerton, CA.
TA–W–61,185; Loparex, Inc., Dixon, IL.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–60,949; National Apparel, LLC,
San Francisco, CA.
TA–W–61,214; Llink Technologies, LLC,
Brown City, MI.
TA–W–61,281; Form Tech Industries
LLC, Canal Fulton, OH.
TA–W–61,293; Georgia Pacific
Corrugated Number 1 LLC, aka
Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.,
Ridgeway, VA.
TA–W–61,324; Ford Motor Company,
Vehicle Operation Division, Wixom
Assembly, Leased Workers of G–
Tech, MSX, Wixom, MI.
TA–W–61,416; Golden Manufacturing
Company, Inc., Marietta, MS.
The investigation revealed that the
predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria
(a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a
foreign country under a free trade
agreement or a beneficiary country
under a preferential trade agreement, or
there has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports).
None.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–61,199; Emerson Network Power,
Energy Systems, North America,
Lorain, OH.
TA–W–61,299; Isaco International
Corp., Miami Lakes, FL.
TA–W–61,369; Wood Tech Enterprises,
Inc., Fairview, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of May 7
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 100 / Thursday, May 24, 2007 / Notices
through May 11, 2007. Copies of these
determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
Dated: May 16, 2007.
Ralph Dibattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–10015 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–61,265]
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
O’Bryan Brothers, Inc., Leon, IA;
Notice of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
By application of April 27, 2007,
petitioners requested administrative
reconsideration regarding the
Department’s Negative Determination
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance,
applicable to the workers of the subject
firm.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination issued on April
13, 2007, was based on the finding that
the petitioning workers did not produce
an article within the meaning of Section
222 of the Act. The denial notice was
published in the Federal Register on
April 26, 2007 (72 FR 20873).
To support the request for
reconsideration, petitioners supplied
additional information regarding
production at the subject facility and a
shift in production to Mexico.
Upon further contact with the subject
firm’s company official, it was revealed
that the workers also produced marker
patterns in 2006 and January through
April of 2007.
During a detailed investigation on
reconsideration, it was revealed that the
subject firm shifted sewing functions
and production of marker patterns to
Mexico during the relevant period and
that this shift contributed importantly to
layoffs at the subject firm.
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older
workers.
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 May 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
ATAA, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act must be met. The Department
has determined in this case that the
requirements of Section 246 have been
met.
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts
obtained in the investigation, I
determine that there was a shift in
production from the workers’ firm or
subdivision to Mexico of articles that
are like or directly competitive with
those produced by the subject firm or
subdivision. In accordance with the
provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of O’Bryan Brothers, Inc.,
Leon, Iowa, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after April
6, 2006 through two years from the date of
this certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to
apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC this 16th day of
May 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–10013 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–61,201; TA–W–61,201A]
Photronics, Incorporated; Brookfield,
CT Including an Employee of
Photronics, Incorporated, Brookfield,
CT, Who Received Wages Paid by PLI
Management Corp., Located in Palm
Bay, FL; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on April 19,
2007, applicable to workers of
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29183
Photronics, Inc., Brookfield,
Connecticut. The notice was published
in the Federal Register on May 9, 2007
(72 FR 26424).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. New
information shows that a worker
separation occurred involving an
employee of the Brookfield, Connecticut
facility of Photronics, Incorporated
located in Palm Bay, Florida.
Information also shows that PLI
Management Corp. was contracted by
the subject firm to provide payroll
function services to workers employed
on-site at the Palm Bay, Florida location
of the subject firm.
Ms. Bonnie Mitchell provided sales
function services for the production of
photomasks produced by the subject
firm.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include an employee of
the Brookfield, Connecticut facility of
Photronics, Incorporated, located in
Palm Bay, Florida whose wages were
reported under a separate
unemployment insurance (UI) tax
account for by PLI Management Corp.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Photronics, Incorporated, Brookfield,
Connecticut who were adversely
affected by increased imports.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–61,201 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Photronics, Inc., Brookfield,
Connecticut (TA–W–61,201), and including
an employee of Photronics, Inc., Brookfield,
Connecticut located in Palm Bay, Florida,
who’s wages were reported by PLI
Management Corp. (TA–W–61,201A), who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after March 23, 2006,
through April 19, 2009, are eligible to apply
for adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also eligible
to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC this 15th day of
May 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–10017 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 100 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29181-29183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10015]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of May 7
through May 11, 2007.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A), all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B), both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-61, 241; Navisa, Inc., Brenham, TX: April 2, 2006.
TA-W-61, 254; American and Efird, Inc., dba Robison Anton Textile
Company, Fairview Division, Fairview, NJ: April 5, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-61, 162; Hoffman LaRoche, Inc., Quality Management--Analytical
Development Division, Nutley, NJ: March 20, 2006.
TA-W-61, 230; Transwitch Corporation, Reference Systems Development
Department, Shelton, CT: March 27, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section
[[Page 29182]]
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-61,381; Distel Tool and Machine Company, Warren, MI: April 24,
2006.
TA-W-61,403; WestPoint Home, Inc., Formerly know as Westport Stevens,
Bed Products Div. Finishing Plant, Opelika, AL: April 24, 2006.
TA-W-60,857; Asec Manufacturing, A Subsidiary of Delphi Corp., Catoosa,
OK: January 22, 2006.
TA-W-61,075; Emerald Kalama Chemical, LLC, Kalama, WA: March 6, 2006.
TA-W-61,184; Diversified Precision Products, Spring Arbor, MI: March
21, 2006.
TA-W-61,244; IAC Sheboygan, LLC, Formerly Known as Lear, Sheboygan, WI:
March 9, 2006.
TA-W-61,432; Deluxe Media Services LLC, Distribution Facility, Pleasant
Prairie, WI: May 2, 2006.
TA-W-61,245; Addison Shoe Company, A Division and of Munro and Co.,
Inc., Wynne, AR: May 13, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-61,252; Wetherill Associates, Transpo Division, Orlando, FL: March
27, 2006.
TA-W-61,330; Valeo Electrical Systems, Inc., North American Wipers
Division, Rochester, NY: March 17, 2007.
TA-W-61,391; B. Braun of Puerto Rico, Inc., B. Braun Medical Division,
Leased Workers of Addeco, Sabana Grande, PR: April 23, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
TA-W-61,254; American and Efird, Inc., dba Robison Anton Textile
Company, Fairview Division, Fairview, NJ.
TA-W-61,230; Transwitch Corporation, Reference Systems Development
Department, Shelton, CT.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-61,241; Navisa, Inc., Brenham, TX.
TA-W-61,162; Hoffman LaRoche, Inc., Quality Management--Analytical
Development Division, Nutley, NJ.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA-W-61,136; Electric Mills Kentucky, Division of EMF Corporation,
Burkesville, KY.
TA-W-61,149; Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc., Fullerton
Distribution Center, Fullerton, CA.
TA-W-61,185; Loparex, Inc., Dixon, IL.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-60,949; National Apparel, LLC, San Francisco, CA.
TA-W-61,214; Llink Technologies, LLC, Brown City, MI.
TA-W-61,281; Form Tech Industries LLC, Canal Fulton, OH.
TA-W-61,293; Georgia Pacific Corrugated Number 1 LLC, aka Great
Northern Nekoosa Corp., Ridgeway, VA.
TA-W-61,324; Ford Motor Company, Vehicle Operation Division, Wixom
Assembly, Leased Workers of G-Tech, MSX, Wixom, MI.
TA-W-61,416; Golden Manufacturing Company, Inc., Marietta, MS.
The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign country
under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a
preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports).
None.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-61,199; Emerson Network Power, Energy Systems, North America,
Lorain, OH.
TA-W-61,299; Isaco International Corp., Miami Lakes, FL.
TA-W-61,369; Wood Tech Enterprises, Inc., Fairview, NC.
The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of May 7
[[Page 29183]]
through May 11, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for
inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will
be mailed to persons who write to the above address.
Dated: May 16, 2007.
Ralph Dibattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-10015 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
