Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 27853-27856 [E7-9476]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Notices [FR Doc. E7–9475 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–61,083] pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Intel Corporation, Optical Platform Division, Newark, CA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated April 20, 2007, petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice was signed on April 6, 2007 and published in the Federal Register on April 24, 2007 (72 FR 20371). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers at Intel Corporation, Optical Platform Division, Newark, California engaged in production of optical modules for networking and communication equipment was denied because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’ group eligibility requirement of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was not met. The investigation revealed that production of optical modules for networking and communication equipment was shifted to Thailand, however, there were no imports of optical modules into the United States in 2005 and 2006. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that the subject firm also manufactured transponders and that this production was shifted to Malaysia in 2003. The petitioner further stated that the subject firm has been importing transponders back into the United States. A contact with the company official confirmed what was revealed during the initial investigation. It was determined VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 May 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 that the subject firm ceased production of transponders at the end of 2005, when all production of transponders was shifted to Malaysia. In its investigation, the Department must conform to the Trade Act and associated regulations. Therefore, the Department considers production and imports that occurred within a year prior to the date of the petition. Thus the events occurring in 2005 are outside of the relevant period as established by the current petition date of February 28, 2007. Shift in production of transponders and imports of transponders are irrelevant for this investigation as Intel Corporation, Optical Platform Division, Newark, California did not manufacture transponders for sale in 2006 and January through February of 2007. The request for reconsideration also states that production of optical modules for networking and communication equipment was shifted to Thailand and that the subject firm has been progressively increasing imports of optical modules from Thailand into the United States. The review of the initial investigation and further contact with the company official did reveal that the subject firm shifted production of optical modules to Thailand. However, Thailand is not a country that is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States or is a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act. The company official stated that modules, which are manufactured in Thailand are not sold directly to customers, with the exception of one customer in Japan. All modules are shipped from Thailand to Intel’s facility in Malaysia to be further integrated into finished product, transponders. Transponders are further sold to customers, who might import them into the United States. In order to establish import impact, the Department must consider imports that are like or directly competitive with those produced at the subject firm. The company official verified that Intel Corporation, Optical Platform Division, Newark, California did not import optical modules for networking and communication equipment in 2006 and January through February of 2007. Any imports of transponders are not like or directly competitive with optical modules as required by the Trade Act. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27853 facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of May, 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–9477 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of April 30 through May 4, 2007. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM 17MYN1 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES 27854 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Notices subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss or business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 May 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–61,215; Tool Dex, Inc., Warren, MI: March 29, 2006 TA–W–61,247; Anderson Corporation, Bayport Division, Bayport, MN: April 4, 2006 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–61,320; TK Holdings/Moses Lake Inflator Operations, Airbag Inflator Workers, Moses Lake, WA: April 16, 2006 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–61,249; Cintas Corporation, Digitized Logo Worker Group, Mason, OH: March 4, 2006 TA–W–61,250; Thomasville Furniture Industries, Upholstery Plant #8, Hickory, NC: April 4, 2006 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 TA–W–61,297; Melcor Corporation, Thermal Division, dba Laird Technologies, Trenton, NJ: April 5, 2006 TA–W–61,300; McKinney Products Co., Scranton, PA: April 12, 2006 TA–W–61,301; Lexington Furniture Industries, Lexington Home Brands Division, Plant 15, Lexington, NC: April 6, 2006 TA–W–61,305; La-Z-Boy Manufacturing, Inc., Lincolnton, NC: April 10, 2006 TA–W–61,310; Global Heating Solutions, Inc., dba Truheat, Inc., dba Truheat SJB, dba Electro Heat, Inc., Allegan, MI: April 10, 2006 TA–W–61,332; Cooper Tire and Rubber Company, Texarkana, AR: April 17, 2006 TA–W–61,335; Mr. Gasket, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers of Express Personnel and Spherion Staffing, Carson City, NV: April 16, 2006 TA–W–60,945; Missbrenner Wet Printing, Inc., Clifton, NJ: February 7, 2006 TA–W–61,017; Catawissa Lumber and Specialty Co., Plant #1, Catawissa, PA: February 15, 2006 TA–W–61,017A; Catawissa Lumber & Specialty Co., Plant #2, Paxinos, PA: February 15, 2006 TA–W–61,096; Portac, Inc., Tacoma Division, Tacoma, WA: March 6, 2006 TA–W–61,130; Bauhaus USA, Inc., A Division of LA-Z-Boy, Inc., Iuka, MS: March 15, 2006 TA–W–61,183; Duro Textiles LLC, Duro Finishing, Plant 2 and Duro Textile Printers Division, Fall River, MA: April 2, 2007 TA–W–61,186; New London Textile, Inc., Newark, DE: March 20, 2006 TA–W–61,194; Triana Industries, Inc., Leased Workers of Automotive Staffing Agency, Madison, AL: March 26, 2006 TA–W–61,200; Neff Perkins Company, Perry, OH: March 9, 2006 TA–W–61,353; Skip’s Cutting, Inc., OnSite Leased Workers of Gage Personnel and JFC Temp, Ephrata, PA: April 30, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–60,965; Eaton Aviation Corporation, Aviation and Aerospace Components, Aurora, CO: February 13, 2006 TA–W–61,196; Avx Corporation, Raleigh, NC: March 26, 2006 TA–W–61,257; Marathon Electronic Mfg. Corp, A Subsidiary of Regal—Beloit Corporation, Lima, OH: April 5, 2006 E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM 17MYN1 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Notices TA–W–61,270; CNH American LLC, Leased Workers From Armstrong’s CNH Meridian, FBG Service Corp., Belleville, PA: April 9, 2006 TA–W–61,278; ExxonMobil Chemical Co., Films Division, Leased Workers From Express Personnel, Stratford, CT: April 9, 2006 TA–W–61,282; Amphenol Phoenix Interconnect, A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Amphenol Corp., Tustin, CA: April 10, 2006 TA–W–61,286; Nevamar LLC, Subsidiary of Panolam Industries Int’l Inc., Tarboro, NC: April 2, 2006 TA–W–61,289; The Siemon Company, Watertown, CT: April 10, 2006 TA–W–61,296; Valeo Engine Cooling, Jamestown, NY: April 11, 2006 TA–W–61,307; Simply Asia Foods, Inc., Union City, CA: April 4, 2006 TA–W–61,321; Starkey Labs, Starkey— East Division, Mt. Laural, NJ: April 16, 2006 TA–W–61,331; FiberTech Group, Inc., A Subsidiary of Polymer Group Incorporated, Rogers, AR: April 17, 2006 TA–W–61,333; Coats American, Inc., Cherokee Plant, Marble, NC: April 16, 2006 TA–W–61,343; Wentworth Corporation, dba Liberty Textiles, Eden, NC: April 19, 2006 TA–W–61,359; Bayer Clothing Group, Inc., MacClenny Products Facility, MacClenny, FL: March 29, 2006 TA–W–61,398; Commercial Vehicle Group, Statesville Operation Division, Statesville, NC: April 27, 2006 TA–W–61,295; Spang and Company, Magnetics Division, East Butler, PA: April 10, 2006 TA–W–61,387; Yamaha Music Manufacturing, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers of Personnel Options, Thomaston, GA: April 11, 2006 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–61,152; Precision Laser, Inc., High Point, NC: March 19, 2006 TA–W–61,399; Wehadkee Yarn Mills, Talladega Division, Talladega, AL: April 27, 2006 TA–W–61,347; Wellman, Inc., Administrative Offices, Fort Mill, SC: April 11, 2006 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 May 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. TA–W–61,215; Tool Dex, Inc., Warren, MI TA–W–61,320; TK Holdings/Moses Lake Inflator Operations, Airbag Inflator Workers, Moses Lake, WA The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. TA–W–61,247; Anderson Corporation, Bayport Division, Bayport, MN The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers’ industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance And Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. TA–W–61,206; The Hershey Company, Hershey Plant, Hershey, PA TA–W–61,234; Penn Mould Industries, Inc., Washington, PA The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. None. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–60,825; Golden Ratio Woodworks, Emigrant, MT TA–W–60,849; C and D Technologies, Power Electronics Division, Milwaukie, OR PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27855 TA–W–60,950; Northern Hardwoods, Hardwood Lumber and Logs Division, South Range, MI TA–W–60,965A; Eaton Aviation Corporation, Group Support Equipment, Aurora, CO TA–W–61,146; Watson Laboratories, Inc, Phoenix, AZ TA–W–61,160; Bruce Plastics, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA TA–W–61,213; Stark Ceramics, Inc., East Canton, OH TA–W–61,228; Form Tools, Inc., Jackson, MI TA–W–61,271; J.H. Baxter and Company, Eugene, OR The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign country under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports). None. The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–61,269; Auto Truck Transport Corp., Portland, OR TA–W–61,298; American Manufacturing International, Inc., Patterson, NJ TA–W–61,345; Arvato Services, Inc., Melbourne, FL TA–W–61,384; Collezione Europa, USA, Claremont, NC TA–W–61,304; Securitas, Working on the Site at Bosch—Sumter Plant, Sumter, SC TA–W–61,366; Staples, Inc., Information Systems Division, Framingham, MA TA–W–61,383; Kasle Steel Corporation, Corporate Office, Dearborn, MI The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. None. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of April 30 through May 4, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM 17MYN1 27856 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Notices Dated: May 10, 2007. Ralph DiBattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–9476 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice (07–035)] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P NASA Advisory Council; Science Committee; Heliophysics Subcommittee; Meeting LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION AGENCY: Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors The Board of Directors of the Legal Services Corporation will meet on May 22, 2007 via conference call. The meeting will begin at 2 p.m. (EST), and continue until conclusion of the Board’s agenda. LOCATION: 3333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007, 3rd Floor Conference Center. STATUS OF MEETING: Open. Directors will participate by telephone conference in such a manner as to enable interested members of the public to hear and identify all persons participating in the meeting. Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so by joining participating staff at the location indicated above. Members of the public wishing to listen to the meeting by telephone should call 1–888–795–2173 and enter 58581 on the key pad when prompted. To enhance the quality of your listening experience as well as that of others and to eliminate background noises that interfere with the audio recording of the proceeding, please mute your telephone during the meeting. TIME AND DATE: pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Matters To Be Considered 1. Approval of the agenda. 2. Consider and act on Board of Directors’ response to the Inspector General’s Semiannual Report to Congress for the period of October 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007. 3. Consider and act on other business. 4. Public comment. CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Patricia Batie, Manager of Board Operations, at (202) 295–1500. SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 295– 1500. Dated: May 15, 2007. Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary. [FR Doc. 07–2491 Filed 5–15–07; 3:20 pm] BILLING CODE 7050–01–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 May 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION: Notice of meeting. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Heliophysics Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Subcommittee reports to the Science Committee of the NAC. The Meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting from the scientific community and other persons scientific and technical information relevant to program planning. SUMMARY: Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Thursday, June 14, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Friday, June 15, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to noon Eastern Daylight Time. ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, room 6H46, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marian Norris, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–4452, fax (202) 358–4118, or mnorris@nasa.gov. DATES: The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics: —Heliophysics Division Overview and Program Status —New Heliophysics Data Policy —Low Cost Access to Space Program —Final review and approval of Heliophysics Science at the Moon Report —Assessment of Heliophysics Fiscal Year 2007 Science Accomplishments It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Attendees will be requested to sign a register and to comply with NASA security requirements, including the presentation of a valid picture ID, before receiving an access badge. Foreign nationals attending this meeting will be required to provide the following information no less than 5 working days prior to the meeting: Full name; gender; date/place of birth; citizenship; visa/ green card information (number, type, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 expiration date); passport information (number, country, expiration date); employer/affiliation information (name of institution, address, country, telephone); title/position of attendee. To expedite admittance, attendees with U.S. citizenship can provide identifying information 5 working days in advance by contacting Marian Norris via e-mail at mnorris@nasa.gov or by telephone at (202) 358–4452. Dated: May 10, 2007. P. Diane Rausch, Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. [FR Doc. E7–9447 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7510–13–P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice (07–036)] NASA Advisory Council; Science Committee; Planetary Science Subcommittee; Meeting National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Planetary Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Subcommittee reports to the Science Committee of the NAC. The Meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting from the scientific community and other persons scientific and technical information relevant to program planning. Thursday, June 7, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Friday, June 8, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, room 9H40, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marian Norris, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–4452, fax (202) 358–4118, or mnorris@nasa.gov. DATES: The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics: —Reports from Analysis Groups —Review of Government Performance and Results Act Metrics —Planetary Science Division Overview and Program Status —Mars Program Update SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM 17MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27853-27856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment 
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of April 30 
through May 4, 2007.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
have decreased absolutely; and
    C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with 
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed 
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to 
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
    II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or

[[Page 27854]]

subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or 
subdivision; and
    C. One of the following must be satisfied:
    1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United 
States;
    2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference 
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 
Economic Recovery Act; or
    3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of 
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are 
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
    Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for 
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' 
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or 
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially 
separated;
    (2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream 
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers 
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade 
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related 
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) 
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the 
workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or 
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued 
a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
    1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 
50 years of age or older.
    2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are 
not easily transferable.
    3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., 
conditions within the industry are adverse).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

TA-W-61,215; Tool Dex, Inc., Warren, MI: March 29, 2006
TA-W-61,247; Anderson Corporation, Bayport Division, Bayport, MN: April 
4, 2006

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

TA-W-61,320; TK Holdings/Moses Lake Inflator Operations, Airbag 
Inflator Workers, Moses Lake, WA: April 16, 2006

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-61,249; Cintas Corporation, Digitized Logo Worker Group, Mason, 
OH: March 4, 2006
TA-W-61,250; Thomasville Furniture Industries, Upholstery Plant #8, 
Hickory, NC: April 4, 2006
TA-W-61,297; Melcor Corporation, Thermal Division, dba Laird 
Technologies, Trenton, NJ: April 5, 2006
TA-W-61,300; McKinney Products Co., Scranton, PA: April 12, 2006
TA-W-61,301; Lexington Furniture Industries, Lexington Home Brands 
Division, Plant 15, Lexington, NC: April 6, 2006
TA-W-61,305; La-Z-Boy Manufacturing, Inc., Lincolnton, NC: April 10, 
2006
TA-W-61,310; Global Heating Solutions, Inc., dba Truheat, Inc., dba 
Truheat SJB, dba Electro Heat, Inc., Allegan, MI: April 10, 2006
TA-W-61,332; Cooper Tire and Rubber Company, Texarkana, AR: April 17, 
2006
TA-W-61,335; Mr. Gasket, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers of Express 
Personnel and Spherion Staffing, Carson City, NV: April 16, 2006
TA-W-60,945; Missbrenner Wet Printing, Inc., Clifton, NJ: February 7, 
2006
TA-W-61,017; Catawissa Lumber and Specialty Co., Plant #1, Catawissa, 
PA: February 15, 2006
TA-W-61,017A; Catawissa Lumber & Specialty Co., Plant #2, Paxinos, PA: 
February 15, 2006
TA-W-61,096; Portac, Inc., Tacoma Division, Tacoma, WA: March 6, 2006
TA-W-61,130; Bauhaus USA, Inc., A Division of LA-Z-Boy, Inc., Iuka, MS: 
March 15, 2006
TA-W-61,183; Duro Textiles LLC, Duro Finishing, Plant 2 and Duro 
Textile Printers Division, Fall River, MA: April 2, 2007
TA-W-61,186; New London Textile, Inc., Newark, DE: March 20, 2006
TA-W-61,194; Triana Industries, Inc., Leased Workers of Automotive 
Staffing Agency, Madison, AL: March 26, 2006
TA-W-61,200; Neff Perkins Company, Perry, OH: March 9, 2006
TA-W-61,353; Skip's Cutting, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers of Gage 
Personnel and JFC Temp, Ephrata, PA: April 30, 2006.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-60,965; Eaton Aviation Corporation, Aviation and Aerospace 
Components, Aurora, CO: February 13, 2006
TA-W-61,196; Avx Corporation, Raleigh, NC: March 26, 2006
TA-W-61,257; Marathon Electronic Mfg. Corp, A Subsidiary of Regal--
Beloit Corporation, Lima, OH: April 5, 2006

[[Page 27855]]

TA-W-61,270; CNH American LLC, Leased Workers From Armstrong's CNH 
Meridian, FBG Service Corp., Belleville, PA: April 9, 2006
TA-W-61,278; ExxonMobil Chemical Co., Films Division, Leased Workers 
From Express Personnel, Stratford, CT: April 9, 2006
TA-W-61,282; Amphenol Phoenix Interconnect, A Wholly Owned Subsidiary 
of Amphenol Corp., Tustin, CA: April 10, 2006
TA-W-61,286; Nevamar LLC, Subsidiary of Panolam Industries Int'l Inc., 
Tarboro, NC: April 2, 2006
TA-W-61,289; The Siemon Company, Watertown, CT: April 10, 2006
TA-W-61,296; Valeo Engine Cooling, Jamestown, NY: April 11, 2006
TA-W-61,307; Simply Asia Foods, Inc., Union City, CA: April 4, 2006
TA-W-61,321; Starkey Labs, Starkey--East Division, Mt. Laural, NJ: 
April 16, 2006
TA-W-61,331; FiberTech Group, Inc., A Subsidiary of Polymer Group 
Incorporated, Rogers, AR: April 17, 2006
TA-W-61,333; Coats American, Inc., Cherokee Plant, Marble, NC: April 
16, 2006
TA-W-61,343; Wentworth Corporation, dba Liberty Textiles, Eden, NC: 
April 19, 2006
TA-W-61,359; Bayer Clothing Group, Inc., MacClenny Products Facility, 
MacClenny, FL: March 29, 2006
TA-W-61,398; Commercial Vehicle Group, Statesville Operation Division, 
Statesville, NC: April 27, 2006
TA-W-61,295; Spang and Company, Magnetics Division, East Butler, PA: 
April 10, 2006
TA-W-61,387; Yamaha Music Manufacturing, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers 
of Personnel Options, Thomaston, GA: April 11, 2006
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 
been met.

TA-W-61,152; Precision Laser, Inc., High Point, NC: March 19, 2006
TA-W-61,399; Wehadkee Yarn Mills, Talladega Division, Talladega, AL: 
April 27, 2006
TA-W-61,347; Wellman, Inc., Administrative Offices, Fort Mill, SC: 
April 11, 2006

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

None.

Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, it has been determined that the 
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons 
specified.
    The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.

TA-W-61,215; Tool Dex, Inc., Warren, MI
TA-W-61,320; TK Holdings/Moses Lake Inflator Operations, Airbag 
Inflator Workers, Moses Lake, WA

    The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily 
transferable.

TA-W-61,247; Anderson Corporation, Bayport Division, Bayport, MN

    The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are 
not adverse.
None.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance And 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, 
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and 
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.

TA-W-61,206; The Hershey Company, Hershey Plant, Hershey, PA
TA-W-61,234; Penn Mould Industries, Inc., Washington, PA
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 
production to a foreign country) have not been met.

None.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign 
country) have not been met.

TA-W-60,825; Golden Ratio Woodworks, Emigrant, MT
TA-W-60,849; C and D Technologies, Power Electronics Division, 
Milwaukie, OR
TA-W-60,950; Northern Hardwoods, Hardwood Lumber and Logs Division, 
South Range, MI
TA-W-60,965A; Eaton Aviation Corporation, Group Support Equipment, 
Aurora, CO
TA-W-61,146; Watson Laboratories, Inc, Phoenix, AZ
TA-W-61,160; Bruce Plastics, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA
TA-W-61,213; Stark Ceramics, Inc., East Canton, OH
TA-W-61,228; Form Tools, Inc., Jackson, MI
TA-W-61,271; J.H. Baxter and Company, Eugene, OR

    The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker 
separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign country 
under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a 
preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an 
increase in imports).

None.

    The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for 
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-61,269; Auto Truck Transport Corp., Portland, OR
TA-W-61,298; American Manufacturing International, Inc., Patterson, NJ
TA-W-61,345; Arvato Services, Inc., Melbourne, FL
TA-W-61,384; Collezione Europa, USA, Claremont, NC
TA-W-61,304; Securitas, Working on the Site at Bosch--Sumter Plant, 
Sumter, SC
TA-W-61,366; Staples, Inc., Information Systems Division, Framingham, 
MA
TA-W-61,383; Kasle Steel Corporation, Corporate Office, Dearborn, MI

    The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has 
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to 
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified 
eligible to apply for TAA.

None.

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of April 30 through May 4, 2007. Copies of these 
determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. 
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 
during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to 
the above address.


[[Page 27856]]


     Dated: May 10, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-9476 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.