Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Regarding Penny Price Improvement, 27156-27159 [E7-9179]
Download as PDF
27156
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices
program.6 In Amendment No. 4, the
Exchange proposes to allow the
proposed at-risk crossing procedure to
apply to options classes that are part of
the options penny pilot program.7
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6 of the Act 8 in general and
furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) 9 in particular in that it is
designed to perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and the national
market system, protect investors and the
public interest, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities and
promote just and equitable principles of
trade.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change will impose
no burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received by the Exchange on this
proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55162
(January 24, 2007), 72 FR 4738 (February 1, 2007)
(SR–Amex–2006–106).
7 In addition, Amendment No. 4 makes nonsubstantive rule text changes and shows the text of
the final proposal as marked against the current text
of Amex Rule 950–ANTE(d).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex–2006–17 on the
subject line.
[Release No. 34–55724; File No. SR–CBOE–
2007–39]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Regarding
Penny Price Improvement
May 8, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
• Send paper comments in triplicate
notice is hereby given that on April 24,
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
2007, the Chicago Board Options
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
20549–1090.
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
All submissions should refer to File
change as described in Items I, II, and
Number SR–Amex–2006–17. This file
III below, which Items have been
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the substantially prepared by the CBOE.
The Commission is publishing this
Commission process and review your
notice to solicit comments on the
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will proposed rule change from interested
post all comments on the Commission’s persons.
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
The CBOE proposes to amend its
with respect to the proposed rule
Rules regarding penny price
change that are filed with the
improvement for options not currently
Commission, and all written
quoted in one-cent increments. The text
communications relating to the
of the proposed rule change is set forth
proposed rule change between the
below. Proposed new language is
Commission and any person, other than italicized; and proposed deletions are
[bracketed].
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
*
*
*
*
*
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Rule 6.13B. Penny Price Improvement
available for inspection and copying in
The Exchange may designate one or
the Commission’s Public Reference
more options trading on the Hybrid
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
System for inclusion in the Penny Price
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All Improvement Program. Under this
program, the Exchange will allow all
comments received will be posted
users to provide price improvement
without change; the Commission does
beyond the Exchange’s disseminated
not edit personal identifying
quotation (‘‘Penny Pricing’’) for classes
information from submissions. You
or series that are not already quoted in
should submit only information that
one-cent increments and for which the
you wish to make available publicly. All Simple Auction Liaison system in Rule
submissions should refer to File
6.13A is not in effect.
Number SR–Amex–2006–17 and should
(a) Electronic Penny Pricing.
be submitted on or before May 29, 2007. Electronic penny prices may be
established as follows:
For the Commission, by the Division of
(1) Market-Makers. Market-Makers
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
may electronically provide the Exchange
authority.10
with indications of interest that are
Florence E. Harmon,
superior to their own quotations in
Deputy Secretary.
increments no smaller than one-cent.
[FR Doc. E7–9176 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am]
Such indications shall be firm for all
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
interest received by the Exchange. The
Exchange shall disseminate such
Paper Comments
1 15
10 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices
interest using standard quoting
increments by rounding the limit price
to the nearest standard quoting
increment that does not violate the limit
price.
(2) Orders. Public Customers and all
other users may electronically submit to
the Exchange orders priced in one-cent
increments. The Exchange shall
disseminate such orders using standard
quoting increments by rounding the
limit price to the nearest standard
quoting increment that does not violate
the limit price.
All Penny Pricing submitted pursuant
to (1) or (2) above shall be filed by the
System for order allocation purposes but
shall not be visible. The Exchange may
append an indicator to its disseminated
quotation to indicate the existence of
Penny Pricing in the relevant side of a
series when it exists, but no information
regarding the price and size of the
Penny Pricing shall be made available.
If an order is received by the Hybrid
System that could trade against Penny
Pricing and where the Exchange’s
disseminated quotation is the NBBO, it
will automatically execute against the
Penny Pricing pursuant to the
Exchange’s normal allocation
procedures.
(b) Open Outcry Penny Pricing. Oral
bids (offers) provided by in-crowd
market participants may be expressed in
one-cent increments in response to an
order represented in open outcry
provided that: (1) The oral bids (offers)
better the corresponding bid (offer) in
the Exchange’s disseminated quotation;
and (2) any resulting transaction(s) is
consistent with the requirements of Rule
6.83.
The appropriate Procedure
Committee may also determine on a
class-by-class basis to make the splitprice priority provisions of Rule 6.47
applicable to a class that is subject to
Penny Pricing under this rule.
For purposes of this rule, ‘‘in-crowd
market participants’’ includes in-crowd
Market-Makers, an in-crowd DPM or
LMM, and Floor Brokers or PAR
Officials representing orders in the
trading crowd.
(c) Prior to effecting any transactions
in open outcry in one-cent increments,
Exchange members must electronically
‘‘sweep’’ any Penny Pricing interest in
the Hybrid System so as not to violate
the priority of such Penny Pricing.
(d) All pronouncements regarding the
applicability of this rule will be
announced to the membership via
Regulator Circular.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
Rule 6.45 Priority of Bids and Offers—
Allocation of Trades
Except as provided by Rules,
including but not limited to Rule 6.2A,
6.8, 6.9, 6.13, 6.13B, 6.45A, [Rule] 6.47,
[Rule] 6.74, [Rule] 8.87 and [CBOE]
Exchange Regulatory Circulars
approved by the [SEC] Commission
concerning Participation Entitlements
[Rights], the following rules of priority
shall be observed with respect to bids
and offers:
(a)–(e) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01–.02 No change.
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 6.45A Priority and Allocation of
Equity Option Trades on the CBOE
Hybrid System
6.45A Generally: No change.
(a)–(e) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01 Principal Transactions: Order
entry firms may not execute as principal
against orders they represent as agent
unless: (i) Agency orders are first
exposed on the Hybrid System for at
least three (3) seconds, (ii) the order
entry firm has been bidding or offering
for at least (3) seconds prior to receiving
an agency order that is executable
against such bid or offer, or (iii) the
order entry firm proceeds in accordance
with the crossing rules contained in
Rule 6.74. This paragraph also shall
apply to orders resting on the Hybrid
System in penny increments pursuant to
Rule 6.13B. In such cases, agency orders
priced in penny increments are deemed
‘‘exposed’’ pursuant to (i) above, and
order entry firm orders priced in penny
increments are deemed bids or offers
pursuant to (ii) above.
.02 Solicitation Orders. Order entry
firms must expose orders they represent
as agent for at least three (3) seconds
before such orders may be executed
electronically via the electronic
execution mechanism of the Hybrid
System, in whole or in part, against
orders solicited from members and nonmember broker-dealers to transact with
such orders. This paragraph also shall
apply to agency orders resting on the
Hybrid System in penny increments
pursuant to Rule 6.13B. In such cases,
agency orders priced in penny
increments are deemed ‘‘exposed’’
pursuant to this paragraph.
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 6.45B Priority and Allocation of
Trades in Index Options and Options on
ETFs on the CBOE Hybrid System
6.45B Generally: No change.
(a)–(d) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27157
.01 Principal Transactions: Order
entry firms may not execute as principal
against orders they represent as agent
unless: (i) Agency orders are first
exposed on the Hybrid System for at
least three (3) seconds, (ii) the order
entry firm has been bidding or offering
for at least (3) seconds prior to receiving
an agency order that is executable
against such bid or offer, or (iii) the
order entry firm proceeds in accordance
with the crossing rules contained in
Rule 6.74. This paragraph also shall
apply to orders resting on the Hybrid
System in penny increments pursuant to
Rule 6.13B. In such cases, agency orders
priced in penny increments are deemed
‘‘exposed’’ pursuant to (i) above, and
order entry firm orders priced in penny
increments are deemed bids or offers
pursuant to (ii) above.
.02 Solicitation Orders. Order entry
firms must expose orders they represent
as agent for at least three (3) seconds
before such orders may be executed
electronically via the electronic
execution mechanism of the Hybrid
System, in whole or in part, against
orders solicited from members and nonmember broker-dealers to transact with
such orders. This paragraph also shall
apply to agency orders resting on the
Hybrid System in penny increments
pursuant to Rule 6.13B. In such cases,
agency orders priced in penny
increments are deemed ‘‘exposed’’
pursuant to this paragraph.
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 6.47. Priority on Split-Price
Transactions Occurring in Open Outcry
(a)–(c) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01 No change.
.02 The availability of split-price
priority when an order is executed in a
one-cent increment pursuant to Rule
6.13B shall be determined in
accordance with Rule 6.13B(b).
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 6.74. Crossing Orders
(a)–(f) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01–.08 No change.
.09 For purposes of paragraphs (a),
(b), and (d), the minimum increment for
bids and offers shall be one cent for
orders that are subject to the open
outcry penny price improvement under
Rule 6.13B. Open outcry penny price
improvement under Rule 6.13B shall not
be available for orders executed
pursuant to paragraphs (c) and (f).
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
27158
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
CBOE included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The Exchange has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
The purpose of this filing is to allow
Exchange users the expanded ability to
effect transactions in penny increments
in classes and/or series trading on
CBOE’s Hybrid System that are not
already quoting in penny increments.3
The Exchange would designate the
classes/series eligible for this penny
pricing, and the penny pricing would be
available electronically and in open
outcry. As proposed, all limit orders
electronically sent to CBOE (regardless
of sender origin type) could be
expressed in a one-cent increment. The
Exchange would round the limit price to
the nearest permissible quoted
increment for display purposes, but
would maintain the one-cent increment
limit price for trade allocation purposes.
For example, the CBOE market is 1–1.20
and an order is received to buy 10
contracts at 1.08. CBOE would
disseminate a 1.05 bid for 10 contracts,
and any subsequent sell market order
received by the Exchange would trade at
1.08 for up to 10 contracts (after that,
the quote would revert back to 1–1.20).4
An Exchange Market-Maker could
also provide the Exchange with
indications to trade in one-cent
increments that improve on the MarketMaker’s disseminated quotation. To the
extent there is trading interest from
multiple sources at the same one-cent
increment price, priority will be
established in the exact same manner as
priority at a standard quoting increment
(i.e., normal allocation procedures are
3 In File No. SR–CBOE–2006–42, the Exchange
proposed to allow penny price improvement in
open outcry. That filing has been withdrawn and
most of its provisions have been incorporated into
this filing, which also contemplates electronic
penny price improvement.
4 The Exchange has represented that the system
would not execute an order at a price that would
cause a trade-through of another options exchange.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
used). The Exchange may attach an
indicator to its publicly disseminated
quote indicating the existence of penny
pricing for the series, but the size and
price of any penny pricing will not be
displayed or made available to anyone.
If the indicator feature is activated, it
will apply to all classes/series
participating in the penny pricing
program.
With respect to open outcry, crowd
members would be able to provide price
improvement in one-cent increments
over the Exchange’s Best Bid or Offer
(‘‘BBO’’). The Exchange has represented
that any resulting trade would not cause
a trade-through of another options
exchange. Further, prior to executing
any order in open outcry in one-cent
increments, members would be required
to electronically ‘‘sweep’’ any penny
pricing interest that may exist. The
‘‘sweep’’ would ensure that betterpriced orders resting in one-cent
increments are executed prior to the
open outcry transaction and would also
ensure that same priced orders receive
executions consistent with existing
rules governing priority of orders in the
Hybrid book when trading with an order
represented in open outcry (CBOE Rules
6.45A(b) and 6.45B(b)).
The applicability of split-price
priority under CBOE Rule 6.47 to
transactions effected under proposed
CBOE Rule 6.13B would be determined
by the appropriate option procedure
committee, and the mechanics of splitprice priority in those instances would
be the same as the mechanics of splitprice priority in five- and ten-cent
increments.
In addition, open outcry penny
pricing would generally be available in
instances where a Floor Broker is
attempting to cross an order pursuant to
CBOE Rule 6.74. However, it would not
be available in those instances where (i)
a Floor Broker is attempting to cross
orders during the opening rotation in
open outcry 5 or (ii) a Floor Broker is
utilizing the Exchange’s SizeQuote
Mechanism.6
Lastly, the restrictions contained in
Interpretations and Policies .01 and .02
under CBOE Rules 6.45A and 6.45B
would continue to apply to trading in
penny increments, including the 3second exposure requirements,
contained in those Interpretations and
Policies.
5 See CBOE Rule 6.74(c), which provides
procedures for a floor broker to cross orders during
the opening rotation for a class of options.
6 See CBOE Rule 6.74(f), which describes the
SizeQuote Mechanism.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,8 in particular, in that it is
designed to facilitate transactions in
securities, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In
particular, the Exchange believes that
the proposal will provide an
opportunity for customers to receive
price improvement on their orders.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments on the proposed
rule change were neither solicited nor
received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml; or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
7 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices
No. SR–CBOE–2007–39 on the subject
line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
[Release No. 34–55722; File No. SR–ISE–
2007–24]
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
No. SR–CBOE–2007–39. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site at https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–CBOE–2007–39 and should be
submitted on or before June 4, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–9179 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am]
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendments No. 1 and 2
Thereto Relating to Market Data
Revenue Rebates
May 8, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 11,
2007, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘ISE’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which items
have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change on April 23, 2007, and
Amendment No. 2 on May 3, 2007. The
ISE filed this proposed rule change
which establishes dues, fees or other
charges among its members pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 4 thereunder, and, as
such, it has become effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE is proposing to amend its
Schedule of Fees relating to its sharing
of market data revenues. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the
ISE, the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, and https://www.iseoptions.com/
legal/proposed_rule_changes.asp.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
2 17
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27159
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to amend the Exchange’s
Schedule of Fees to clarify that while
the Exchange will continue to rebate
back to Equity Electronic Access
Members (‘‘EAMs’’) fifty percent (50%)
of its market data revenues, it will now
do so based on the Allocation
Amendment of Regulation NMS enacted
under the Act—i.e., allocated by quoting
shares and trading shares.5 The
Exchange will be retroactively applying
this formula to market data revenues
rebated back to Equity EAMs as of April
1, 2007.
Currently, the ISE rebates back fifty
percent (50%) of the market data
revenue received by the Exchange to
Equity EAMs that are the liquidity
providers on trades executed in the
displayed market. The Allocation
Amendment of Regulation NMS
modifies the existing formulas for
allocating revenues to the SRO
participants, namely, introducing: (1)
‘‘Quoting Shares’’—the allocation of
revenues based on the extent to which
automated quotations displayed by
SROs equal the national best bid or offer
in NMS stocks; and (2) implementing a
new calculation method for allocating
revenue based on ‘‘Trade Shares.’’
Under this new formula fifty percent
(50%) of revenues will be allocated for
Quoting Shares and fifty percent (50%)
will be allocated for Trading Shares.
Accordingly, the Exchange seeks to
continue to rebate back to the Equity
EAMs fifty percent (50%) of market data
revenue the Exchange receives, but to
allocate rebates based on this new
formula—i.e., the ISE will rebate to
Equity EAMs, on a symbol basis, fifty
percent (50%) of the Trading Share
revenue received for that symbol and
fifty percent (50%) of the Quoting Share
revenue for that symbol.
2. Statutory Basis
The basis under the Act for this
proposed rule change is the requirement
under Section 6(b)(4) 6 that an exchange
have an equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53828
(May 18, 2006) (order exempting self-regulatory
organizations (‘‘SROs’’) from compliance with the
Allocation Amendment until April 1, 2007).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27156-27159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9179]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55724; File No. SR-CBOE-2007-39]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Regarding Penny
Price Improvement
May 8, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 24, 2007, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the CBOE. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The CBOE proposes to amend its Rules regarding penny price
improvement for options not currently quoted in one-cent increments.
The text of the proposed rule change is set forth below. Proposed new
language is italicized; and proposed deletions are [bracketed].
* * * * *
Rule 6.13B. Penny Price Improvement
The Exchange may designate one or more options trading on the
Hybrid System for inclusion in the Penny Price Improvement Program.
Under this program, the Exchange will allow all users to provide price
improvement beyond the Exchange's disseminated quotation (``Penny
Pricing'') for classes or series that are not already quoted in one-
cent increments and for which the Simple Auction Liaison system in Rule
6.13A is not in effect.
(a) Electronic Penny Pricing. Electronic penny prices may be
established as follows:
(1) Market-Makers. Market-Makers may electronically provide the
Exchange with indications of interest that are superior to their own
quotations in increments no smaller than one-cent. Such indications
shall be firm for all interest received by the Exchange. The Exchange
shall disseminate such
[[Page 27157]]
interest using standard quoting increments by rounding the limit price
to the nearest standard quoting increment that does not violate the
limit price.
(2) Orders. Public Customers and all other users may electronically
submit to the Exchange orders priced in one-cent increments. The
Exchange shall disseminate such orders using standard quoting
increments by rounding the limit price to the nearest standard quoting
increment that does not violate the limit price.
All Penny Pricing submitted pursuant to (1) or (2) above shall be
filed by the System for order allocation purposes but shall not be
visible. The Exchange may append an indicator to its disseminated
quotation to indicate the existence of Penny Pricing in the relevant
side of a series when it exists, but no information regarding the price
and size of the Penny Pricing shall be made available.
If an order is received by the Hybrid System that could trade
against Penny Pricing and where the Exchange's disseminated quotation
is the NBBO, it will automatically execute against the Penny Pricing
pursuant to the Exchange's normal allocation procedures.
(b) Open Outcry Penny Pricing. Oral bids (offers) provided by in-
crowd market participants may be expressed in one-cent increments in
response to an order represented in open outcry provided that: (1) The
oral bids (offers) better the corresponding bid (offer) in the
Exchange's disseminated quotation; and (2) any resulting transaction(s)
is consistent with the requirements of Rule 6.83.
The appropriate Procedure Committee may also determine on a class-
by-class basis to make the split-price priority provisions of Rule 6.47
applicable to a class that is subject to Penny Pricing under this rule.
For purposes of this rule, ``in-crowd market participants''
includes in-crowd Market-Makers, an in-crowd DPM or LMM, and Floor
Brokers or PAR Officials representing orders in the trading crowd.
(c) Prior to effecting any transactions in open outcry in one-cent
increments, Exchange members must electronically ``sweep'' any Penny
Pricing interest in the Hybrid System so as not to violate the priority
of such Penny Pricing.
(d) All pronouncements regarding the applicability of this rule
will be announced to the membership via Regulator Circular.
* * * * *
Rule 6.45 Priority of Bids and Offers--Allocation of Trades
Except as provided by Rules, including but not limited to Rule
6.2A, 6.8, 6.9, 6.13, 6.13B, 6.45A, [Rule] 6.47, [Rule] 6.74, [Rule]
8.87 and [CBOE] Exchange Regulatory Circulars approved by the [SEC]
Commission concerning Participation Entitlements [Rights], the
following rules of priority shall be observed with respect to bids and
offers:
(a)-(e) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01-.02 No change.
* * * * *
Rule 6.45A Priority and Allocation of Equity Option Trades on the CBOE
Hybrid System
6.45A Generally: No change.
(a)-(e) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01 Principal Transactions: Order entry firms may not execute as
principal against orders they represent as agent unless: (i) Agency
orders are first exposed on the Hybrid System for at least three (3)
seconds, (ii) the order entry firm has been bidding or offering for at
least (3) seconds prior to receiving an agency order that is executable
against such bid or offer, or (iii) the order entry firm proceeds in
accordance with the crossing rules contained in Rule 6.74. This
paragraph also shall apply to orders resting on the Hybrid System in
penny increments pursuant to Rule 6.13B. In such cases, agency orders
priced in penny increments are deemed ``exposed'' pursuant to (i)
above, and order entry firm orders priced in penny increments are
deemed bids or offers pursuant to (ii) above.
.02 Solicitation Orders. Order entry firms must expose orders they
represent as agent for at least three (3) seconds before such orders
may be executed electronically via the electronic execution mechanism
of the Hybrid System, in whole or in part, against orders solicited
from members and non-member broker-dealers to transact with such
orders. This paragraph also shall apply to agency orders resting on the
Hybrid System in penny increments pursuant to Rule 6.13B. In such
cases, agency orders priced in penny increments are deemed ``exposed''
pursuant to this paragraph.
* * * * *
Rule 6.45B Priority and Allocation of Trades in Index Options and
Options on ETFs on the CBOE Hybrid System
6.45B Generally: No change.
(a)-(d) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01 Principal Transactions: Order entry firms may not execute as
principal against orders they represent as agent unless: (i) Agency
orders are first exposed on the Hybrid System for at least three (3)
seconds, (ii) the order entry firm has been bidding or offering for at
least (3) seconds prior to receiving an agency order that is executable
against such bid or offer, or (iii) the order entry firm proceeds in
accordance with the crossing rules contained in Rule 6.74. This
paragraph also shall apply to orders resting on the Hybrid System in
penny increments pursuant to Rule 6.13B. In such cases, agency orders
priced in penny increments are deemed ``exposed'' pursuant to (i)
above, and order entry firm orders priced in penny increments are
deemed bids or offers pursuant to (ii) above.
.02 Solicitation Orders. Order entry firms must expose orders they
represent as agent for at least three (3) seconds before such orders
may be executed electronically via the electronic execution mechanism
of the Hybrid System, in whole or in part, against orders solicited
from members and non-member broker-dealers to transact with such
orders. This paragraph also shall apply to agency orders resting on the
Hybrid System in penny increments pursuant to Rule 6.13B. In such
cases, agency orders priced in penny increments are deemed ``exposed''
pursuant to this paragraph.
* * * * *
Rule 6.47. Priority on Split-Price Transactions Occurring in Open
Outcry
(a)-(c) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01 No change.
.02 The availability of split-price priority when an order is
executed in a one-cent increment pursuant to Rule 6.13B shall be
determined in accordance with Rule 6.13B(b).
* * * * *
Rule 6.74. Crossing Orders
(a)-(f) No change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01-.08 No change.
.09 For purposes of paragraphs (a), (b), and (d), the minimum
increment for bids and offers shall be one cent for orders that are
subject to the open outcry penny price improvement under Rule 6.13B.
Open outcry penny price improvement under Rule 6.13B shall not be
available for orders executed pursuant to paragraphs (c) and (f).
* * * * *
[[Page 27158]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, CBOE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to allow Exchange users the expanded
ability to effect transactions in penny increments in classes and/or
series trading on CBOE's Hybrid System that are not already quoting in
penny increments.\3\ The Exchange would designate the classes/series
eligible for this penny pricing, and the penny pricing would be
available electronically and in open outcry. As proposed, all limit
orders electronically sent to CBOE (regardless of sender origin type)
could be expressed in a one-cent increment. The Exchange would round
the limit price to the nearest permissible quoted increment for display
purposes, but would maintain the one-cent increment limit price for
trade allocation purposes. For example, the CBOE market is 1-1.20 and
an order is received to buy 10 contracts at 1.08. CBOE would
disseminate a 1.05 bid for 10 contracts, and any subsequent sell market
order received by the Exchange would trade at 1.08 for up to 10
contracts (after that, the quote would revert back to 1-1.20).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In File No. SR-CBOE-2006-42, the Exchange proposed to allow
penny price improvement in open outcry. That filing has been
withdrawn and most of its provisions have been incorporated into
this filing, which also contemplates electronic penny price
improvement.
\4\ The Exchange has represented that the system would not
execute an order at a price that would cause a trade-through of
another options exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An Exchange Market-Maker could also provide the Exchange with
indications to trade in one-cent increments that improve on the Market-
Maker's disseminated quotation. To the extent there is trading interest
from multiple sources at the same one-cent increment price, priority
will be established in the exact same manner as priority at a standard
quoting increment (i.e., normal allocation procedures are used). The
Exchange may attach an indicator to its publicly disseminated quote
indicating the existence of penny pricing for the series, but the size
and price of any penny pricing will not be displayed or made available
to anyone. If the indicator feature is activated, it will apply to all
classes/series participating in the penny pricing program.
With respect to open outcry, crowd members would be able to provide
price improvement in one-cent increments over the Exchange's Best Bid
or Offer (``BBO''). The Exchange has represented that any resulting
trade would not cause a trade-through of another options exchange.
Further, prior to executing any order in open outcry in one-cent
increments, members would be required to electronically ``sweep'' any
penny pricing interest that may exist. The ``sweep'' would ensure that
better-priced orders resting in one-cent increments are executed prior
to the open outcry transaction and would also ensure that same priced
orders receive executions consistent with existing rules governing
priority of orders in the Hybrid book when trading with an order
represented in open outcry (CBOE Rules 6.45A(b) and 6.45B(b)).
The applicability of split-price priority under CBOE Rule 6.47 to
transactions effected under proposed CBOE Rule 6.13B would be
determined by the appropriate option procedure committee, and the
mechanics of split-price priority in those instances would be the same
as the mechanics of split-price priority in five- and ten-cent
increments.
In addition, open outcry penny pricing would generally be available
in instances where a Floor Broker is attempting to cross an order
pursuant to CBOE Rule 6.74. However, it would not be available in those
instances where (i) a Floor Broker is attempting to cross orders during
the opening rotation in open outcry \5\ or (ii) a Floor Broker is
utilizing the Exchange's SizeQuote Mechanism.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See CBOE Rule 6.74(c), which provides procedures for a floor
broker to cross orders during the opening rotation for a class of
options.
\6\ See CBOE Rule 6.74(f), which describes the SizeQuote
Mechanism.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the restrictions contained in Interpretations and Policies
.01 and .02 under CBOE Rules 6.45A and 6.45B would continue to apply to
trading in penny increments, including the 3-second exposure
requirements, contained in those Interpretations and Policies.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it
is designed to facilitate transactions in securities, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, and, in general, to protect investors
and the public interest. In particular, the Exchange believes that the
proposal will provide an opportunity for customers to receive price
improvement on their orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml; or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File
[[Page 27159]]
No. SR-CBOE-2007-39 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2007-39. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site at https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-
CBOE-2007-39 and should be submitted on or before June 4, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9179 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P