Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendments No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 Thereto and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of the Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendments No. 2 and 4 Thereto Adopting Generic Listing Standards for Exchange-Traded Funds Based on International or Global Indexes or Indexes Described in Exchange Rules Previously Approved by the Commission as Underlying Benchmarks for Derivative Securities, 19571-19577 [E7-7324]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 18, 2007 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the forgoing rule change does
not: (1) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (3) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
this filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 9 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.10
NYSE has asked that the Commission
waive the 30-day operative delay
contained in Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under
the Act.11 The Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because the immediate removal of the
temporary rule should eliminate
potential confusion relating to the usage
of ISOs on the Exchange. For this
reason, the Commission designates the
proposed rule change to be effective and
operative upon filing with the
Commission.12
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.13
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
also requires that the self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief description
and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as
designated by the Commission. The Commission
grants the Exchange’s request for a waiver of the
five-day pre-filing requirement.
12 For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
13 For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
within which the Commission may summarily
abrogate the proposed rule change under Section
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C), the
Commission considers the period to commence on
April 9, 2007, the date NYSE filed Amendment No.
1 to the proposed rule change.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
10 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Apr 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. Solicitation of Comments
nterested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2007–32 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2007–32. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2007–32 and should
be submitted on or before May 9, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–7323 Filed 4–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
14 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19571
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55621; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2006–86]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendments No. 1,
2, 3, and 4 Thereto and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of the Proposed
Rule Change as Modified by
Amendments No. 2 and 4 Thereto
Adopting Generic Listing Standards
for Exchange-Traded Funds Based on
International or Global Indexes or
Indexes Described in Exchange Rules
Previously Approved by the
Commission as Underlying
Benchmarks for Derivative Securities
April 12, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on November 13, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. On March 19, 2007, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposal. On March 20, 2007, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposal.3 On April 4, 2007, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 3 to the
filing. On April 10, 2007, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 4 to the filing.4
This order provides notice of the
proposal, as amended, and approves the
proposal on an accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NYSE Arca, through its wholly owned
subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’), proposes to
amend its rules governing NYSE Arca,
L.L.C. (also referred to as the ‘‘NYSE
Arca Marketplace’’), the equities trading
facility of NYSE Arca Equities. The
Exchange proposes to amend NYSE
Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3), 5.5(g)(2),
and 8.100 to include generic listing
standards for Investment Company
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded the
original filing and Amendment No. 1 in their
entirety.
4 Amendment No. 4 superseded Amendment No.
3 in its entirety. In Amendment No. 4, the Exchange
made clarifying changes to Exhibit 5 and the
purpose section, including reflecting a recent
approval of an exchange rule that changed the
current rule text.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
19572
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 18, 2007 / Notices
Units (‘‘Units’’) and Portfolio Depositary
Receipts (‘‘PDRs’’) (‘‘Units’’ and ‘‘PDRs’’
together referred to herein as ‘‘exchangetraded funds’’ or ‘‘ETFs’’) that are based
on international or global indexes or on
indexes described in exchange rules that
have been previously approved by the
Commission for the trading of ETFs and
other index-based securities. The text of
the proposed rule change is available at
the Exchange, from the Commission’s
Public Reference Room, and on NYSE
Arca’s Web site (www.nysearca.com).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item III below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3),
5.5(g)(2), and 8.100 to include generic
listing standards for series of Units and
PDRs that are based on international or
global indexes or on indexes described
in rules previously approved by the
Commission under Section 19(b)(2) of
the Exchange Act 5 for the trading of
ETFs, options, or other specified indexbased securities. This proposal would
enable the Exchange to list and trade
ETFs pursuant to Rule 19b–4(e) under
the Exchange Act 6 if each of the
conditions set forth in Commentary .01
to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) or
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 8.100 is satisfied. Rule 19b–4(e)
provides that the listing and trading of
a new derivative securities product by a
self-regulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’)
shall not be deemed a proposed rule
change, pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of
Rule 19b–4, if the Commission has
approved, pursuant to Section 19(b) of
the Exchange Act, the SRO’s trading
rules, procedures, and listing standards
for the product class that would include
the new derivatives securities product,
5 15
6 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 240.19b–4(e).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Apr 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
and the SRO has a surveillance program
for the product class.7 Similar proposals
for the New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’), The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’), and the American
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’) have
been approved by the Commission.8
Exchange-Traded Funds
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3)
and 5.5(g)(2) provide standards for
initial and continued listing of Units,
which are securities representing
interests in a registered investment
company that could be organized as a
unit investment trust, an open-end
management investment company, or a
similar entity. The investment company
must hold securities comprising, or
otherwise based on or representing an
interest in, an index or portfolio of
securities, or the investment company
must hold securities in another
registered investment company that
holds securities in such a manner.9
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 allows
for the listing and trading on the
Exchange of PDRs. PDRs represent
securities based on a unit investment
trust that holds the securities that
comprise an index or portfolio
underlying a series of PDRs. Pursuant to
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3) and
8.100, Units and PDRs must be issued
in a specified aggregate minimum
number in return for a deposit of
specified securities and/or a cash
amount. When aggregated in the same
specified minimum number, Units and
PDRs must be redeemable by the issuer
for the underlying securities and/or
cash.
To meet the objective of providing
investment returns that correspond to
the price, dividend, and yield
performance of the underlying index, an
ETF may use a ‘‘replication’’ strategy or
a ‘‘representative sampling’’ strategy
with respect to the ETF portfolio.10 An
7 When relying on Rule 19b–4(e), the SRO must
submit Form 19b–4(e) to the Commission within
five business days after the exchange begins trading
a new derivative securities product. See 17 CFR
240.19b–4(e)(2)(ii). See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 40761 (December 8, 1998), 63 FR
70952 (December 22, 1998).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55269
(February 9, 2007), 72 FR 7490 (February 15, 2007)
(SR–Nasdaq–2006–050); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 55113 (January 18, 2007), 72 FR 3179
(January 24, 2007) (SR–NYSE–2006–101); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 54739 (November 9,
2006), 71 FR 66993 (November 17, 2006) (SR–
Amex–2006–78); and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 55018 (December 28, 2006), 72 FR 1040
(January 9, 2007) (SR–Amex–2006–109) (making
clarifying changes to the generic listing standards
set forth in SR–Amex–2006–78).
9 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3)(A)(i)(a)–
(b).
10 In either case, an ETF, by its terms, may be
considered invested in the securities of the
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ETF using a replication strategy invests
in each stock of the underlying index in
about the same proportion as that stock
is represented in the index itself. An
ETF using a representative sampling
strategy generally invests in a significant
number but not all of the component
securities of its underlying index, and
will hold stocks that, in the aggregate,
are intended to approximate the full
index in terms of key characteristics,
such as price/earnings ratio, earnings
growth, and dividend yield.
In addition, an ETF portfolio may be
adjusted in accordance with changes in
the composition of the underlying index
or to maintain compliance with
requirements applicable to a regulated
investment company under the Internal
Revenue Code (‘‘IRC’’).11
Generic Listing Standards for ExchangeTraded Funds
The Commission has previously
approved generic listing standards for
ETFs based on indexes that consist of
stocks listed on U.S. exchanges.12 In
general, the proposed criteria for the
underlying component securities in the
international and global indexes are
similar to those for the domestic
indexes, but with modifications as
appropriate for the issues and risks
associated with non-U.S. securities.
In addition, the Commission has
previously approved rules governing the
listing and trading of ETFs based on
international indexes—those based on
non-U.S. component stocks—as well as
global indexes—those based on nonU.S. and U.S. component stocks.13
The Commission has also approved
rules of other exchanges that permit the
listing pursuant to Rule 19b–4(e) of
index-based derivatives where the
Commission had previously approved
rules contemplating the trading of
underlying index to the extent the ETF invests in
sponsored American Depositary Receipts (‘‘ADRs’’),
Global Depositary Receipts (‘‘GDRs’’), or European
Depositary Receipts (‘‘EDRs’’) that trade on
exchanges with last-sale reporting of securities in
the underlying index.
11 For an ETF to qualify for tax treatment as a
regulated investment company, it must meet several
requirements under the IRC, including
requirements with respect to the nature and the
value of the ETF’s assets.
12 See Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5.2(j)(3); Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100; Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 44551 (July 12, 2001), 66 FR 37716
(July 19, 2001) (SR–PCX–2001–14) (approving
generic listing standards for Units and PDRs).
13 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
53999 (June 15, 2006), 71 FR 35981 (June 22, 2006)
(SR–NYSEArca–2006–30) (approving the trading of
certain Wisdom Trade exchange-traded funds); and
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53230
(February 6, 2006), 71 FR 7594 (February 13, 2006)
(SR–PCX–2005–116) (approving the listing and
trading of funds of iShares, Inc. based on certain
MSCI country-specific indexes).
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 18, 2007 / Notices
specified index-based derivatives on the
same index, on the condition that all of
the standards set forth in those orders,
in particular with respect to
surveillance sharing agreements,
continued to be satisfied.14
The Exchange believes that adopting
additional generic listing standards for
ETFs and applying Rule 19b–4(e)
thereto should fulfill the intended
objective of that rule by allowing those
ETFs that satisfy the proposed generic
listing standards to commence trading
without the need for the public
comment period and Commission
approval. The proposed rules have the
potential to reduce the time frame for
bringing ETFs to market, thereby
reducing the burdens on issuers and
other market participants. The failure of
a particular ETF to comply with the
proposed generic listing standards
under Rule 19b–4(e) would not,
however, preclude the Exchange from
submitting a separate filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) requesting Commission
approval to list and trade a particular
ETF.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Requirements for Listing and Trading
ETFs Based on International and Global
Indexes or Previously Approved Indexes
ETFs listed pursuant to these
proposed generic listing standards for
international and global indexes, and for
indexes described in rules previously
approved by the Commission for trading
of options or other derivative securities,
would be traded, in all other respects,
under the Exchange’s existing trading
rules and procedures that apply to
ETFs 15 and would be covered under the
Exchange’s surveillance program for
derivative products. The Exchange
represents that its surveillance
procedures are adequate to properly
monitor the trading of Units and PDRs
listed pursuant to the proposed new
listing standards and those traded
pursuant to UTP. Specifically, the
Exchange will rely on its existing
surveillance procedures governing
derivative products, which apply both
to Exchange-listed Units and PDRs and
those traded pursuant to UTP. In
addition, the Exchange also has a
general policy prohibiting the
distribution of material, non-public
information by its employees.
To list an ETF pursuant to the
proposed generic listing standards for
international or global indexes, and for
14 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(6);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52204 (August
3, 2005), 70 FR 46559 (August 10, 2005) (SR–PCX–
2005–63) (approving generic listing standards for
index-linked securities).
15 See NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3),
5.5(g)(2), and 8.100.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Apr 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
indexes described in exchange rules
previously approved by the Commission
for trading of options or other derivative
securities, the index underlying the
Units or PDRs must satisfy all the
conditions contained in proposed
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5.2(j)(3) (for Units) or proposed
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 8.100 (for PDRs). However, for
Units or PDRs traded on the Exchange
pursuant to UTP, only the provisions of
paragraphs (c), (e), (f), (g), and (h) of
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5.2(j) and NYSE Arca Equities Rule
8.100(c) and paragraphs (c), (e), (f), and
(g) of Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100 would apply. These
paragraphs relate to trading increments,
trading hours, dissemination of IIV,
implementation of surveillance
procedures, information circulars, and
prospectus delivery.
As with the existing generic standards
for ETFs based on domestic indexes,
these generic listing standards are
intended to ensure that stocks with
substantial market capitalization and
trading volume account for a substantial
portion of the weight of an index or
portfolio. While the standards in this
proposal are based on the standards
contained in the current generic listing
standards for ETFs based on domestic
indexes, they have been adapted as
appropriate to apply to international
and global indexes.
As proposed, the definition section of
each of NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3) and 8.100 would be revised to
include definitions of U.S. Component
Stock and Non-U.S. Component Stock.
These new definitions would provide
the basis for the standards for indexes
with either domestic or international
stocks, or a combination of both. A
‘‘Non-U.S. Component Stock’’ would
mean an equity security that is not
registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g)
of the Exchange Act,16 and that is issued
by an entity that (1) is not organized,
domiciled, or incorporated in the
United States, and (2) is an operating
company (including a real estate
investment trust) or income trust, but
excluding an investment trust, unit
trust, mutual fund, or derivative). This
definition is designed to create a
category of component stocks that are
issued by companies that are not based
in the United States, but that also are
not subject to oversight through
Commission registration, and would
include sponsored GDRs and EDRs. This
definition would appear in an amended
introductory paragraph in NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and new
16 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 781(b) or (g).
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19573
subsection (4) of NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 8.100(a).
A ‘‘U.S. Component Stock’’ would
mean an equity security that is
registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g)
of the Exchange Act or an ADR, the
underlying equity security of which is
registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g)
of the Exchange Act. An ADR with an
underlying equity security that is
registered pursuant to the Exchange Act
is considered a U.S. Component Stock
because the issuer of that underlying
security is subject to Commission
jurisdiction and must comply with
Commission rules. This definition
would appear in an amended
introductory paragraph in NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and new
subsection (3) of NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 8.100(a).
The Exchange proposes that, to list a
Unit or PDR based on an international
or global index or portfolio pursuant to
the generic listing standards, such index
or portfolio must meet the following
criteria:
• Component stocks that in the
aggregate account for at least 90% of the
weight of the index or portfolio each
shall have a minimum market value of
at least $100 million (proposed NYSE
Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3),
Commentary .01(a)(B)(1), and 8.100,
Commentary .01(a)(B)(1));
• Component stocks that in the
aggregate account for at least 90% of the
weight of the index or portfolio each
shall have a minimum worldwide
monthly trading volume during each of
the last six months of at least 250,000
shares (proposed NYSE Arca Equities
Rules 5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(a)(B)(2)
and 8.100, Commentary .01(a)(B)(2));
• The most heavily weighted
component stock may not exceed 25%
of the weight of the index or portfolio
and the five most heavily weighted
component stocks may not exceed 60%
of the weight of the index or portfolio
(proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(a)(B)(3) and
8.100, Commentary .01(a)(B)(3));
• The index or portfolio shall include
a minimum of 20 component stocks
(proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(a)(B)(4) and
8.100, Commentary .01(a)(B)(4)); and
• Each U.S. Component Stock in the
index or portfolio shall be listed on a
national securities exchange and shall
be an NMS Stock as defined in Rule 600
of Regulation NMS under the Exchange
Act, and each Non-U.S. Component
Stock in the index or portfolio shall be
listed on an exchange that has last-sale
reporting (proposed NYSE Arca Equities
Rules 5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(a)(B)(5)
and 8.100, Commentary .01(a)(B)(5)).
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
19574
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 18, 2007 / Notices
The Exchange believes that these
proposed standards are reasonable for
international and global indexes, and,
when applied in conjunction with the
other listing requirements, would result
in the listing and trading on the
Exchange of ETFs that are sufficiently
broad-based in scope and not readily
susceptible to manipulation. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed standards would result in
ETFs that are adequately diversified in
weighting for any single security or
small group of securities, which should
significantly reduce concerns that
trading in an ETF based on an
international or global index could
become a surrogate for the trading of
securities not registered in the United
States.
The Exchange further notes that,
while these standards are similar to
those for indexes that include only U.S.
Component Stocks, they differ in certain
important respects and are generally
more restrictive, reflecting greater
concerns over portfolio diversification
with respect to ETFs investing in
components that are not individually
registered with the Commission. First,
in the proposed standards, component
stocks that in the aggregate account for
at least 90% of the weight of the index
or portfolio each shall have a minimum
market value of at least $100 million,
compared to a minimum market value
of at least $75 million for indexes with
only U.S. Component Stocks.17 Second,
in the proposed standards, the most
heavily weighted component stock may
not exceed 25% of the weight of the
index or portfolio, in contrast to a 30%
standard for an index or portfolio
comprised of only U.S. Component
Stocks (in the case of Units, but not
PDRs, which has a 25% standard).
Third, in the proposed standards, the
five most heavily weighted component
stocks may not exceed 60% of the
weight of the index or portfolio,
compared to a 65% standard for indexes
comprised of only U.S. Component
Stocks. Fourth, the minimum number of
component stocks in the proposed
standards is 20, in contrast to a
minimum of 13 in the standards for an
index or portfolio with only U.S.
Component Stocks. Finally, the
proposed standards require that each
Non-U.S. Component Stock included in
the index or portfolio be listed and
traded on an exchange that has last-sale
reporting.
The Exchange also proposes to modify
Commentary .01(b)(2) to NYSE Arca
17 Market value is calculated by multiplying the
total shares outstanding by the price per share of
the component stock.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Apr 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and Commentary
.01(b)(3) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
8.100 to require that the index value for
an ETF listed pursuant to the proposed
standards for international and global
indexes be widely disseminated by one
or more major market data vendors at
least every 60 seconds during the time
when the ETF shares trade on the NYSE
Arca Marketplace. In contrast, the index
value for an ETF listed pursuant to the
existing standards for domestic indexes
must be disseminated at least every 15
seconds during the trading day. This 60second standard reflects limitations, in
some instances, on the frequency of
intra-day trading information with
respect to Non-U.S. Component Stocks
and that in many cases, trading hours
for overseas markets overlap only in
part, or not at all, with NYSE Arca
Marketplace trading hours.
In addition, Commentary .01(c) to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and
Commentary .01(c) to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100 are being modified
to define the term ‘‘Intraday Indicative
Value’’ (‘‘IIV’’) as the estimate, updated
at least every 15 seconds, during the
Core Trading Session (9:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Eastern Time), and, if applicable
the Opening Session (4 a.m. to 9:30
a.m., Eastern Time) of the value of a
share of each ETF, for ease of reference
in these rules and also in NYSE Arca
Equities Rules 5.5(g)(2)(b) and
8.100(e)(2)(ii) regarding continued
listing standards. The Exchange also
proposes to clarify in Commentary
.01(c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(3) and Commentary .01(c) to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 that the
IIV would be updated at least every 15
seconds during regular market hours
and during any pre-market trading
sessions for the ETF to reflect changes
in the exchange rate between the U.S.
dollar and the currency in which any
component stock is denominated. In
addition, if the IIV does not change
during some or all of the period when
trading is occurring on the Exchange,
then the last official calculated IIV must
remain available throughout Exchange
trading hours.
The Exchange is proposing that it may
designate a series of Units or PDRs for
trading during the Opening Session or
Late Trading Session (4 p.m. to 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time) as long as the index value
and IIV dissemination requirements of
Commentary .01(b)(2) and (c) to NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and
Commentary .01(b)(3) and (c) to NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 8.100 are met. If
there is no overlap with the trading
hours of the primary market trading the
underlying components of a series of
Units or PDRs, the Exchange may
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
designate such series for trading in the
Opening Session as long as the last
official calculated IIV remains available.
Although the IIV does not need to be
calculated during the Exchange’s Late
Trading Session, the last official
calculated IIV must also remain
available during such session.
The Exchange is also proposing to add
a subsection (i) to Commentary .01 to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and a
subsection (h) to Commentary .01 to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100
regarding the creation and redemption
process for ETFs and compliance with
Federal securities laws for ETFs listed
pursuant to the new generic listing
standards. These new subsections
would apply to Units listed pursuant to
Commentary .01(a)(B) or (C) to NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and for PDRs
listed pursuant to Commentary .01(a)(B)
or (C) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100.
They would require that the statutory
prospectus or the application for
exemption from provisions of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 for the
ETF being listed pursuant to these new
standards must state that the ETF must
comply with the federal securities laws
in accepting securities for deposits and
satisfying redemptions with redemption
securities, including that the securities
accepted for deposits and the securities
used to satisfy redemption requests are
sold in transactions that would be
exempt from registration under the
Securities Act of 1933.
The Commission has approved
generic standards providing for the
listing pursuant to Rule 19b–4(e) of
other derivative products based on
indexes described in rules previously
approved by the Commission under
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act.18
The Exchange proposes to include in
the generic standards for the listing of
Units and PDRs, in new Commentary
.01(a)(C) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(3) and Commentary .01(a)(C) to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100, indexes
described in rule changes that have been
approved by the Commission in
connection with the trading of options,
PDRs, Units, Index-Linked
Exchangeable Notes, or Index-Linked
Securities. The Exchange believes that
the application of that standard to ETFs
is appropriate because the underlying
index would have been subject to
Commission review in the context of the
approval of rules contemplating the
trading of other derivatives. This new
generic standard would be limited to
stock indexes and portfolios and would
require that each component stock be
either: (1) A U.S. Component Stock that
18 See
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
supra note 12.
18APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 18, 2007 / Notices
is listed on a national securities
exchange and is an NMS Stock as
defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS
under the Exchange Act; or (2) a NonU.S. Component Stock that is listed and
traded on an exchange that has last-sale
reporting.
The Exchange proposes to modify the
initial and continued listing standards
relating to disseminated information
relating to ETFs to formalize in the rules
existing best practices for providing
equal access to material information
about the value of ETFs. Pursuant to
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3)(A)(v)
and NYSE Arca Equities 8.100(e)(1)(ii),
prior to approving an ETF for listing, the
Exchange would obtain a representation
from the ETF issuer that the net asset
value (‘‘NAV’’) per share would be
calculated daily and made available to
all market participants at the same time.
Proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.5(g)(2)(b) and 8.100(e)(2)(ii) would set
forth the trading halt parameters for
ETFs. In particular, the proposed rules
specifically provide that, if the IIV (as
defined in Commentary .01 to NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 8.100) or the index value
applicable to that series of ETFs is not
being disseminated as required when
the Exchange is the listing market, the
Exchange may halt trading during the
day in which the interruption to the
dissemination of the IIV or the index
value occurs. If the interruption to the
dissemination of the IIV or the index
value persists past the trading day in
which it occurred, the Exchange would
halt trading no later than the beginning
of the trading day following the
interruption.
In addition, proposed NYSE Arca
Equities Rules 5.5(g)(2)(b) and
8.100(e)(2)(ii) have been modified to
provide that the Exchange: (1) Would
halt trading in a series of ETFs if the
circuit breaker parameters of Rule 7.12
have been reached; and (2) in exercising
its discretion to halt trading in a series
of ETFs, would consider factors such as
the extent to which trading in the
underlying securities is not occurring or
whether other unusual conditions or
circumstances detrimental to the
maintenance of a fair and orderly
market are present, in addition to other
relevant factors.
The Exchange is proposing other
minor and clarifying changes to NYSE
Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3) and 8.100.
The standards set forth in Commentary
.01(a)(A) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(3) and Commentary .01(a)(A) to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 are
being modified to make the wording of
each requirement consistent. In
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Apr 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
addition, Commentary .01(a)(A)(5) to
each of NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3) and 8.100 would be modified to
reflect the adoption of Regulation NMS.
Proposed Commentary .01(b)(4) to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and
Commentary .01(b)(4) to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100 would be added to
make sure that an entity that advises
index providers or calculators has in
place procedures designed to prevent
the use and dissemination of material
non-public information regarding the
index underlying the ETF.
The Exchange is also proposing the
following clean-up changes to NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 8.100 in order to
make it consistent with NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). The Exchange
proposes changing the term ‘‘Reporting
Authority’’ to ‘‘one or more major
market data vendors’’ in Commentary
.01(c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
8.100.19 Also, Commentary .01(c) to
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3) and
8.100 would be modified to clarify that
the obligation to disseminate an IIV
applies to Units and PDRs that are listed
or traded on the Exchange (which
would include Units or PDRs traded
pursuant to UTP).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Exchange Act,20 in
general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5),21 in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities,
and to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
19 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52809
(November 18, 2005), 70 FR 71590 (November 29,
2005) (SR–PCX–2005–108) (approving change to
listing standards for Units to allow ‘‘one or more
major market data vendors’’ to satisfy dissemination
requirements rather than ‘‘Reporting Authority’’).
20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19575
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange
Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2006–86 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2006–86. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of NYSE Arca. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2006–86 and
should be submitted on or before May
9, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
19576
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 18, 2007 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of the
Proposed Rule Change
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change, as
amended, is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.22 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Exchange Act 23 in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
Currently, the Exchange must file a
proposed rule change with the
Commission pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Exchange Act 24 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder 25 to list and trade any
ETF based on an index comprised of
foreign securities. The Exchange also
must file a proposed rule change to list
and trade ETFs based on indexes or
portfolios described in rule changes that
have previously been approved by the
Commission as underlying benchmarks
for derivative securities. However, Rule
19b–4(e) provides that the listing and
trading of a new derivative securities
product by an SRO will not be deemed
a proposed rule change pursuant to Rule
19b–4(c)(1) if the Commission has
approved, pursuant to Section 19(b) of
the Exchange Act, the SRO’s trading
rules, procedures, and listing standards
for the product class that would include
the new derivative securities product,
and the SRO has a surveillance program
for the product class. The Exchange’s
proposed rules for the listing and
trading of ETFs pursuant to Rule 19b–
4(e) based on (1) certain indexes with
components that include foreign
securities or (2) indexes or portfolios
previously described in exchange rules
that have been approved by the
Commission as underlying benchmarks
for derivative securities, fulfill these
requirements. Use of Rule 19b–4(e) by
NYSE Arca to list and trade such ETFs
should promote competition, reduce
22 In approving this rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
24 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
25 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Apr 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
burdens on issuers and other market
participants, and make such ETFs
available to investors more quickly.26
The Commission previously has
approved generic listing standards for
other exchanges that are substantially
similar to those proposed here by NYSE
Arca.27 This proposal does not appear to
raise any novel regulatory issues.
Therefore, the Commission finds that
NYSE Arca’s proposal is consistent with
the Exchange Act on the same basis that
it approved the other exchanges’ generic
listing standards for ETFs based on
international or global indexes or on
indexes or portfolios described in
exchange rules that have been
previously approved by the Commission
as underlying benchmarks for derivative
securities.
Proposed Commentary .01(a)(A) and
(B) to NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3)
and 8.100 establish standards for the
composition of an index or portfolio
underlying an ETF. These requirements
are designed, among other things, to
require that components of an index or
portfolio underlying the ETF are
adequately capitalized and sufficiently
liquid, and that no one security
dominates the index. The Commission
believes that, taken together, these
standards are reasonably designed to
ensure that securities with substantial
market capitalization and trading
volume account for a substantial portion
of any underlying index or portfolio,
and that when applied in conjunction
with the other applicable listing
requirements, will permit the listing and
trading only of ETFs that are sufficiently
broad-based in scope to minimize
potential manipulation. The
Commission further believes that the
proposed listing standards are
reasonably designed to preclude NYSE
Arca from listing and trading ETFs that
might be used as surrogate for trading in
unregistered securities. The requirement
that each component security
underlying an ETF be an NMS Stock (in
the case of a U.S. Component Stock) or
listed on an exchange and subject to
last-sale reporting (in the case of a NonU.S. Component Stock) also should
contribute to the transparency of the
market for these ETFs.
The proposed generic listing
standards will permit NYSE Arca to list
and trade an ETF if the Commission has
previously approved an SRO rule
change that contemplates listing and
trading a derivative product based on
the same underlying index. NYSE Arca
would be able to rely on that earlier
approval order, provided that: (1) The
securities comprising the underlying
index consist of U.S. Component Stocks
or Non-U.S. Component Stocks, as set
forth in proposed NYSE Arca Equities
Rules 5.2(j)(3), 8.100(a)(3), and
8.100(a)(4); and (2) NYSE Arca complies
with the commitments undertaken by
the other SRO set forth in the prior
order, including any surveillancesharing arrangements with a foreign
market.
The Commission believes that NYSE
Arca’s proposal is consistent with
Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of the Exchange
Act,28 which sets forth Congress’ finding
that it is in the public interest and
appropriate for the protection of
investors and the maintenance of fair
and orderly markets to assure the
availability to brokers, dealers, and
investors of information with respect to
quotations for and transactions in
securities. The Exchange’s proposal
requires the value of the index or
portfolio underlying an ETF based on a
global or international index to be
disseminated at least once every 60
seconds during Exchange trading
hours.29 Furthermore, these generic
listing standards provide that the issuer
of an ETF must represent that it will
calculate the NAV and make it available
daily to all market participants at the
same time.30 In addition, an IIV, which
represents an estimate of the value of a
share of each ETF, must be updated and
disseminated at least once every 15
seconds during the time an ETF trades
on the Exchange.31 The IIV will be
updated to reflect changes in the
exchange rate between the U.S. dollar
and the currency in which any index or
portfolio component stock is
denominated.32 When there is no
overlap with the trading hours of the
primary market or markets trading the
underlying components of an ETF,
28 15
26 The
Commission notes, however, that the
failure of a particular ETF to meet these generic
listing standards would not preclude the Exchange
from submitting a separate proposed rule change to
list and trade the ETF.
27 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55269
(February 9, 2007), 72 FR 7490 (February 15, 2007)
(SR–Nasdaq–2006–050); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 55113 (January 18, 2007), 72 FR 3179
(January 24, 2007) (SR–NYSE–2006–101); and
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54739
(November 9, 2006), 71 FR 66993 (November 17,
2006) (SR–Amex–2006–78).
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1)(C)(iii).
proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(b)(2) and 8.100,
Commentary .01(b)(3). If an index or portfolio value
does not change for some of the time that the ETF
trades on the Exchange, the last official calculated
value must remain available throughout Exchange
trading hours.
30 See proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3)(A)(v) and 8.100(e)(1)(ii).
31 See proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(c) and 8.100,
Commentary .01(c).
32 See id.
29 See
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 18, 2007 / Notices
NYSE Arca may trade such ETF during
the Opening Session without an IIV
being updated, as long as the last official
calculated IIV remains available.
Although the IIV is not calculated
during the Late Trading Session, the last
official calculated IIV must also remain
available during such session. The
Commission believes that the proposed
rules regarding the dissemination of the
index value and the IIV are reasonably
designed to promote transparency in the
pricing of ETFs and thus are consistent
with the Exchange Act.
Similarly, the Exchange’s trading halt
rules are reasonably designed to prevent
trading in an ETF when transparency
cannot be assured. Proposed NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.5(g)(2)(b) provides that,
when the Exchange is the listing market,
if the IIV or index value applicable to an
ETF is not disseminated as required, the
Exchange may halt trading during the
day in which the interruption occurs. If
the interruption continues, the
Exchange will halt trading no later than
the beginning of the next trading day.33
This proposed rule is substantially
similar to those recently adopted by
other exchanges and found by the
Commission to be consistent with the
Exchange Act.34
In approving this proposal, the
Commission relied on NYSE Arca’s
representation that its surveillance
procedures are adequate to properly
monitor the trading of the Units and
PDRs listed pursuant to the proposed
new listing standards or traded on a
UTP basis. This approval is conditioned
on the continuing accuracy of that
representation.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Acceleration
The Commission finds good cause for
approving the proposed rule change, as
amended, prior to the 30th day after the
date of publication of the notice of the
amended proposal in the Federal
Register. The Commission notes that
NYSE Arca’s proposal is substantially
similar to other proposals that have
been approved by the Commission.35
The Commission does not believe that
NYSE Arca’s proposal raises any novel
regulatory issues and, therefore, that
good cause exists for approving the
filing before the conclusion of a noticeand-comment period. Accelerated
approval of the proposal will expedite
the listing and trading of additional
ETFs by the Exchange, subject to
33 In addition, NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34 sets
forth trading halt procedures when the Exchange
trades ETFs pursuant to UTP.
34 See e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
54997 (December 21, 2006), 71 FR 78501 (December
29, 2006) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–77).
35 See supra note 27.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Apr 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
consistent and reasonable standards.
Therefore, the Commission finds good
cause, consistent with Section 19(b)(2)
of the Exchange Act,36 to approve the
proposed rule change, as amended, on
an accelerated basis.
V. Conclusion
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.38
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–7324 Filed 4–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Public Federal Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Hearing; Region
I Regulatory Fairness Board
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) Region I
Regulatory Fairness Board and the SBA
Office of the National Ombudsman will
hold a National Regulatory Fairness
Hearing on Tuesday, May 1, 2007, at 1
p.m. The forum will take place at the
Rhode Island Convention Center, 1
Sabin Street, Room 558, Providence, RI
02903. The purpose of the meeting is for
Business Organizations, Trade
Associations, Chambers of Commerce
and related organizations serving small
business concerns to report experiences
regarding unfair or excessive Federal
regulatory enforcement issues affecting
their members.
Anyone wishing to attend or to make
a presentation must contact Norm
Deragon, in writing or by fax in order to
be placed on the agenda. Norm Deragon,
Public Information Officer, SBA,
Providence District Office, 380
Westminster Street, Room 511,
Providence, RI 02903, phone (401) 528–
4561, Ext. 4576 and fax (401) 528–4539,
e-mail: Norm.deragon@sba.gov.
For more information, see our Web
site at https://www.sba.gov/ombudsman.
Matthew Teague,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–7363 Filed 4–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
37 Id.
38 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
FAA Approval of Noise Compatibility
Program 14 CFR Part 150; Spirit of St.
Louis Airport, Chesterfield, MO
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,37
that the proposed rule change (SR–
NYSEArca–2006–86), as amended, be,
and it hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
36 15
19577
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces its
findings on the noise compatibility
program submitted by St. Louis County
under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. (the
Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement
Act, hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the Act’’)
and 14 CFR part 150. These findings are
made in recognition of the description
of Federal and nonfederal
responsibilities in Senate Report No.
96–52 (1980). On December 12, 2006,
the FAA determined that the noise
exposure maps submitted by St. Louis
County under Part 150 were in
compliance with applicable
requirements. On April 6, 2007, the
FAA approved the Spirit of St. Louis
Airport noise compatibility program. All
but one of the recommendations of the
program was approved.
DATES: Effective date: The effective date
of the FAA’s approval of the Spirit of St.
Louis Airport noise compatibility
program is April 6, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Schenkelberg, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri, 816–329–2645.
Documents reflecting this FAA action
may be reviewed at this same location.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces that the FAA has
given its overall approval to the noise
compatibility program for Spirit of St.
Louis Airport, effective April 6, 2007.
Under section 47504 of the Act, an
airport operator who has previously
submitted a noise exposure map may
submit to the FAA a noise compatibility
program which sets forth the measures
taken or proposed by the airport
operator for the reduction of existing
non-compatible land uses and
prevention of additional non-compatible
land uses within the area covered by the
noise exposure maps. The Act requires
such programs to be developed in
consultation with interested and
affected parties including local
communities, government agencies,
airport users, and FAA personnel.
Each airport noise compatibility
program developed in accordance with
Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part
150 is a local program, not a Federal
program. The FAA does not substitute
its judgment for that of the airport
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19571-19577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7324]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55621; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2006-86]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change and Amendments No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 Thereto and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval of the Proposed Rule Change as
Modified by Amendments No. 2 and 4 Thereto Adopting Generic Listing
Standards for Exchange-Traded Funds Based on International or Global
Indexes or Indexes Described in Exchange Rules Previously Approved by
the Commission as Underlying Benchmarks for Derivative Securities
April 12, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby
given that on November 13, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
On March 19, 2007, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposal.
On March 20, 2007, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposal.\3\ On April 4, 2007, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 3 to
the filing. On April 10, 2007, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 4 to
the filing.\4\ This order provides notice of the proposal, as amended,
and approves the proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded the original filing
and Amendment No. 1 in their entirety.
\4\ Amendment No. 4 superseded Amendment No. 3 in its entirety.
In Amendment No. 4, the Exchange made clarifying changes to Exhibit
5 and the purpose section, including reflecting a recent approval of
an exchange rule that changed the current rule text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
NYSE Arca, through its wholly owned subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities,
Inc. (``NYSE Arca Equities''), proposes to amend its rules governing
NYSE Arca, L.L.C. (also referred to as the ``NYSE Arca Marketplace''),
the equities trading facility of NYSE Arca Equities. The Exchange
proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3), 5.5(g)(2), and
8.100 to include generic listing standards for Investment Company
[[Page 19572]]
Units (``Units'') and Portfolio Depositary Receipts (``PDRs'')
(``Units'' and ``PDRs'' together referred to herein as ``exchange-
traded funds'' or ``ETFs'') that are based on international or global
indexes or on indexes described in exchange rules that have been
previously approved by the Commission for the trading of ETFs and other
index-based securities. The text of the proposed rule change is
available at the Exchange, from the Commission's Public Reference Room,
and on NYSE Arca's Web site (www.nysearca.com).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3),
5.5(g)(2), and 8.100 to include generic listing standards for series of
Units and PDRs that are based on international or global indexes or on
indexes described in rules previously approved by the Commission under
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act \5\ for the trading of ETFs,
options, or other specified index-based securities. This proposal would
enable the Exchange to list and trade ETFs pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e)
under the Exchange Act \6\ if each of the conditions set forth in
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) or Commentary .01
to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 is satisfied. Rule 19b-4(e) provides
that the listing and trading of a new derivative securities product by
a self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') shall not be deemed a proposed
rule change, pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of Rule 19b-4, if the
Commission has approved, pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act,
the SRO's trading rules, procedures, and listing standards for the
product class that would include the new derivatives securities
product, and the SRO has a surveillance program for the product
class.\7 \Similar proposals for the New York Stock Exchange LLC
(``NYSE''), The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), and the American
Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'') have been approved by the Commission.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(e).
\7\ When relying on Rule 19b-4(e), the SRO must submit Form 19b-
4(e) to the Commission within five business days after the exchange
begins trading a new derivative securities product. See 17 CFR
240.19b-4(e)(2)(ii). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No.
40761 (December 8, 1998), 63 FR 70952 (December 22, 1998).
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55269 (February 9,
2007), 72 FR 7490 (February 15, 2007) (SR-Nasdaq-2006-050);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55113 (January 18, 2007), 72 FR
3179 (January 24, 2007) (SR-NYSE-2006-101); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 54739 (November 9, 2006), 71 FR 66993 (November 17,
2006) (SR-Amex-2006-78); and Securities Exchange Act Release No.
55018 (December 28, 2006), 72 FR 1040 (January 9, 2007) (SR-Amex-
2006-109) (making clarifying changes to the generic listing
standards set forth in SR-Amex-2006-78).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exchange-Traded Funds
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3) and 5.5(g)(2) provide standards
for initial and continued listing of Units, which are securities
representing interests in a registered investment company that could be
organized as a unit investment trust, an open-end management investment
company, or a similar entity. The investment company must hold
securities comprising, or otherwise based on or representing an
interest in, an index or portfolio of securities, or the investment
company must hold securities in another registered investment company
that holds securities in such a manner.\9\ NYSE Arca Equities Rule
8.100 allows for the listing and trading on the Exchange of PDRs. PDRs
represent securities based on a unit investment trust that holds the
securities that comprise an index or portfolio underlying a series of
PDRs. Pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3) and 8.100, Units
and PDRs must be issued in a specified aggregate minimum number in
return for a deposit of specified securities and/or a cash amount. When
aggregated in the same specified minimum number, Units and PDRs must be
redeemable by the issuer for the underlying securities and/or cash.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3)(A)(i)(a)-(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To meet the objective of providing investment returns that
correspond to the price, dividend, and yield performance of the
underlying index, an ETF may use a ``replication'' strategy or a
``representative sampling'' strategy with respect to the ETF
portfolio.\10\ An ETF using a replication strategy invests in each
stock of the underlying index in about the same proportion as that
stock is represented in the index itself. An ETF using a representative
sampling strategy generally invests in a significant number but not all
of the component securities of its underlying index, and will hold
stocks that, in the aggregate, are intended to approximate the full
index in terms of key characteristics, such as price/earnings ratio,
earnings growth, and dividend yield.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In either case, an ETF, by its terms, may be considered
invested in the securities of the underlying index to the extent the
ETF invests in sponsored American Depositary Receipts (``ADRs''),
Global Depositary Receipts (``GDRs''), or European Depositary
Receipts (``EDRs'') that trade on exchanges with last-sale reporting
of securities in the underlying index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, an ETF portfolio may be adjusted in accordance with
changes in the composition of the underlying index or to maintain
compliance with requirements applicable to a regulated investment
company under the Internal Revenue Code (``IRC'').\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ For an ETF to qualify for tax treatment as a regulated
investment company, it must meet several requirements under the IRC,
including requirements with respect to the nature and the value of
the ETF's assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generic Listing Standards for Exchange-Traded Funds
The Commission has previously approved generic listing standards
for ETFs based on indexes that consist of stocks listed on U.S.
exchanges.\12\ In general, the proposed criteria for the underlying
component securities in the international and global indexes are
similar to those for the domestic indexes, but with modifications as
appropriate for the issues and risks associated with non-U.S.
securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3);
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100; Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 44551 (July 12, 2001), 66 FR 37716 (July 19, 2001)
(SR-PCX-2001-14) (approving generic listing standards for Units and
PDRs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Commission has previously approved rules governing
the listing and trading of ETFs based on international indexes--those
based on non-U.S. component stocks--as well as global indexes--those
based on non-U.S. and U.S. component stocks.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53999 (June
15, 2006), 71 FR 35981 (June 22, 2006) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-30)
(approving the trading of certain Wisdom Trade exchange-traded
funds); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53230 (February 6,
2006), 71 FR 7594 (February 13, 2006) (SR-PCX-2005-116) (approving
the listing and trading of funds of iShares, Inc. based on certain
MSCI country-specific indexes).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission has also approved rules of other exchanges that
permit the listing pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e) of index-based derivatives
where the Commission had previously approved rules contemplating the
trading of
[[Page 19573]]
specified index-based derivatives on the same index, on the condition
that all of the standards set forth in those orders, in particular with
respect to surveillance sharing agreements, continued to be
satisfied.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(6); Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 52204 (August 3, 2005), 70 FR 46559 (August 10,
2005) (SR-PCX-2005-63) (approving generic listing standards for
index-linked securities).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that adopting additional generic listing
standards for ETFs and applying Rule 19b-4(e) thereto should fulfill
the intended objective of that rule by allowing those ETFs that satisfy
the proposed generic listing standards to commence trading without the
need for the public comment period and Commission approval. The
proposed rules have the potential to reduce the time frame for bringing
ETFs to market, thereby reducing the burdens on issuers and other
market participants. The failure of a particular ETF to comply with the
proposed generic listing standards under Rule 19b-4(e) would not,
however, preclude the Exchange from submitting a separate filing
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) requesting Commission approval to list and
trade a particular ETF.
Requirements for Listing and Trading ETFs Based on International and
Global Indexes or Previously Approved Indexes
ETFs listed pursuant to these proposed generic listing standards
for international and global indexes, and for indexes described in
rules previously approved by the Commission for trading of options or
other derivative securities, would be traded, in all other respects,
under the Exchange's existing trading rules and procedures that apply
to ETFs \15\ and would be covered under the Exchange's surveillance
program for derivative products. The Exchange represents that its
surveillance procedures are adequate to properly monitor the trading of
Units and PDRs listed pursuant to the proposed new listing standards
and those traded pursuant to UTP. Specifically, the Exchange will rely
on its existing surveillance procedures governing derivative products,
which apply both to Exchange-listed Units and PDRs and those traded
pursuant to UTP. In addition, the Exchange also has a general policy
prohibiting the distribution of material, non-public information by its
employees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3), 5.5(g)(2), and
8.100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To list an ETF pursuant to the proposed generic listing standards
for international or global indexes, and for indexes described in
exchange rules previously approved by the Commission for trading of
options or other derivative securities, the index underlying the Units
or PDRs must satisfy all the conditions contained in proposed
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) (for Units) or
proposed Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 (for PDRs).
However, for Units or PDRs traded on the Exchange pursuant to UTP, only
the provisions of paragraphs (c), (e), (f), (g), and (h) of Commentary
.01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j) and NYSE Arca Equities Rule
8.100(c) and paragraphs (c), (e), (f), and (g) of Commentary .01 to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 would apply. These paragraphs relate to
trading increments, trading hours, dissemination of IIV, implementation
of surveillance procedures, information circulars, and prospectus
delivery.
As with the existing generic standards for ETFs based on domestic
indexes, these generic listing standards are intended to ensure that
stocks with substantial market capitalization and trading volume
account for a substantial portion of the weight of an index or
portfolio. While the standards in this proposal are based on the
standards contained in the current generic listing standards for ETFs
based on domestic indexes, they have been adapted as appropriate to
apply to international and global indexes.
As proposed, the definition section of each of NYSE Arca Equities
Rules 5.2(j)(3) and 8.100 would be revised to include definitions of
U.S. Component Stock and Non-U.S. Component Stock. These new
definitions would provide the basis for the standards for indexes with
either domestic or international stocks, or a combination of both. A
``Non-U.S. Component Stock'' would mean an equity security that is not
registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act,\16\ and
that is issued by an entity that (1) is not organized, domiciled, or
incorporated in the United States, and (2) is an operating company
(including a real estate investment trust) or income trust, but
excluding an investment trust, unit trust, mutual fund, or derivative).
This definition is designed to create a category of component stocks
that are issued by companies that are not based in the United States,
but that also are not subject to oversight through Commission
registration, and would include sponsored GDRs and EDRs. This
definition would appear in an amended introductory paragraph in NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and new subsection (4) of NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 781(b) or (g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A ``U.S. Component Stock'' would mean an equity security that is
registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act or an ADR,
the underlying equity security of which is registered under Section
12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act. An ADR with an underlying equity
security that is registered pursuant to the Exchange Act is considered
a U.S. Component Stock because the issuer of that underlying security
is subject to Commission jurisdiction and must comply with Commission
rules. This definition would appear in an amended introductory
paragraph in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and new subsection (3)
of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100(a).
The Exchange proposes that, to list a Unit or PDR based on an
international or global index or portfolio pursuant to the generic
listing standards, such index or portfolio must meet the following
criteria:
Component stocks that in the aggregate account for at
least 90% of the weight of the index or portfolio each shall have a
minimum market value of at least $100 million (proposed NYSE Arca
Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(a)(B)(1), and 8.100,
Commentary .01(a)(B)(1));
Component stocks that in the aggregate account for at
least 90% of the weight of the index or portfolio each shall have a
minimum worldwide monthly trading volume during each of the last six
months of at least 250,000 shares (proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(a)(B)(2) and 8.100, Commentary .01(a)(B)(2));
The most heavily weighted component stock may not exceed
25% of the weight of the index or portfolio and the five most heavily
weighted component stocks may not exceed 60% of the weight of the index
or portfolio (proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3), Commentary
.01(a)(B)(3) and 8.100, Commentary .01(a)(B)(3));
The index or portfolio shall include a minimum of 20
component stocks (proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3),
Commentary .01(a)(B)(4) and 8.100, Commentary .01(a)(B)(4)); and
Each U.S. Component Stock in the index or portfolio shall
be listed on a national securities exchange and shall be an NMS Stock
as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act, and
each Non-U.S. Component Stock in the index or portfolio shall be listed
on an exchange that has last-sale reporting (proposed NYSE Arca
Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3), Commentary .01(a)(B)(5) and 8.100, Commentary
.01(a)(B)(5)).
[[Page 19574]]
The Exchange believes that these proposed standards are reasonable
for international and global indexes, and, when applied in conjunction
with the other listing requirements, would result in the listing and
trading on the Exchange of ETFs that are sufficiently broad-based in
scope and not readily susceptible to manipulation. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed standards would result in ETFs that are
adequately diversified in weighting for any single security or small
group of securities, which should significantly reduce concerns that
trading in an ETF based on an international or global index could
become a surrogate for the trading of securities not registered in the
United States.
The Exchange further notes that, while these standards are similar
to those for indexes that include only U.S. Component Stocks, they
differ in certain important respects and are generally more
restrictive, reflecting greater concerns over portfolio diversification
with respect to ETFs investing in components that are not individually
registered with the Commission. First, in the proposed standards,
component stocks that in the aggregate account for at least 90% of the
weight of the index or portfolio each shall have a minimum market value
of at least $100 million, compared to a minimum market value of at
least $75 million for indexes with only U.S. Component Stocks.\17\
Second, in the proposed standards, the most heavily weighted component
stock may not exceed 25% of the weight of the index or portfolio, in
contrast to a 30% standard for an index or portfolio comprised of only
U.S. Component Stocks (in the case of Units, but not PDRs, which has a
25% standard). Third, in the proposed standards, the five most heavily
weighted component stocks may not exceed 60% of the weight of the index
or portfolio, compared to a 65% standard for indexes comprised of only
U.S. Component Stocks. Fourth, the minimum number of component stocks
in the proposed standards is 20, in contrast to a minimum of 13 in the
standards for an index or portfolio with only U.S. Component Stocks.
Finally, the proposed standards require that each Non-U.S. Component
Stock included in the index or portfolio be listed and traded on an
exchange that has last-sale reporting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Market value is calculated by multiplying the total shares
outstanding by the price per share of the component stock.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to modify Commentary .01(b)(2) to NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and Commentary .01(b)(3) to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100 to require that the index value for an ETF listed
pursuant to the proposed standards for international and global indexes
be widely disseminated by one or more major market data vendors at
least every 60 seconds during the time when the ETF shares trade on the
NYSE Arca Marketplace. In contrast, the index value for an ETF listed
pursuant to the existing standards for domestic indexes must be
disseminated at least every 15 seconds during the trading day. This 60-
second standard reflects limitations, in some instances, on the
frequency of intra-day trading information with respect to Non-U.S.
Component Stocks and that in many cases, trading hours for overseas
markets overlap only in part, or not at all, with NYSE Arca Marketplace
trading hours.
In addition, Commentary .01(c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3)
and Commentary .01(c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 are being
modified to define the term ``Intraday Indicative Value'' (``IIV'') as
the estimate, updated at least every 15 seconds, during the Core
Trading Session (9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Eastern Time), and, if applicable
the Opening Session (4 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., Eastern Time) of the value of
a share of each ETF, for ease of reference in these rules and also in
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.5(g)(2)(b) and 8.100(e)(2)(ii) regarding
continued listing standards. The Exchange also proposes to clarify in
Commentary .01(c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and Commentary
.01(c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 that the IIV would be updated
at least every 15 seconds during regular market hours and during any
pre-market trading sessions for the ETF to reflect changes in the
exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the currency in which any
component stock is denominated. In addition, if the IIV does not change
during some or all of the period when trading is occurring on the
Exchange, then the last official calculated IIV must remain available
throughout Exchange trading hours.
The Exchange is proposing that it may designate a series of Units
or PDRs for trading during the Opening Session or Late Trading Session
(4 p.m. to 8 p.m., Eastern Time) as long as the index value and IIV
dissemination requirements of Commentary .01(b)(2) and (c) to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and Commentary .01(b)(3) and (c) to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100 are met. If there is no overlap with the trading
hours of the primary market trading the underlying components of a
series of Units or PDRs, the Exchange may designate such series for
trading in the Opening Session as long as the last official calculated
IIV remains available. Although the IIV does not need to be calculated
during the Exchange's Late Trading Session, the last official
calculated IIV must also remain available during such session.
The Exchange is also proposing to add a subsection (i) to
Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and a subsection
(h) to Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 regarding the
creation and redemption process for ETFs and compliance with Federal
securities laws for ETFs listed pursuant to the new generic listing
standards. These new subsections would apply to Units listed pursuant
to Commentary .01(a)(B) or (C) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and
for PDRs listed pursuant to Commentary .01(a)(B) or (C) to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100. They would require that the statutory prospectus
or the application for exemption from provisions of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 for the ETF being listed pursuant to these new
standards must state that the ETF must comply with the federal
securities laws in accepting securities for deposits and satisfying
redemptions with redemption securities, including that the securities
accepted for deposits and the securities used to satisfy redemption
requests are sold in transactions that would be exempt from
registration under the Securities Act of 1933.
The Commission has approved generic standards providing for the
listing pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e) of other derivative products based on
indexes described in rules previously approved by the Commission under
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act.\18\ The Exchange proposes to
include in the generic standards for the listing of Units and PDRs, in
new Commentary .01(a)(C) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and
Commentary .01(a)(C) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100, indexes
described in rule changes that have been approved by the Commission in
connection with the trading of options, PDRs, Units, Index-Linked
Exchangeable Notes, or Index-Linked Securities. The Exchange believes
that the application of that standard to ETFs is appropriate because
the underlying index would have been subject to Commission review in
the context of the approval of rules contemplating the trading of other
derivatives. This new generic standard would be limited to stock
indexes and portfolios and would require that each component stock be
either: (1) A U.S. Component Stock that
[[Page 19575]]
is listed on a national securities exchange and is an NMS Stock as
defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act; or (2) a
Non-U.S. Component Stock that is listed and traded on an exchange that
has last-sale reporting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See supra note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to modify the initial and continued listing
standards relating to disseminated information relating to ETFs to
formalize in the rules existing best practices for providing equal
access to material information about the value of ETFs. Pursuant to
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3)(A)(v) and NYSE Arca Equities
8.100(e)(1)(ii), prior to approving an ETF for listing, the Exchange
would obtain a representation from the ETF issuer that the net asset
value (``NAV'') per share would be calculated daily and made available
to all market participants at the same time. Proposed NYSE Arca
Equities Rules 5.5(g)(2)(b) and 8.100(e)(2)(ii) would set forth the
trading halt parameters for ETFs. In particular, the proposed rules
specifically provide that, if the IIV (as defined in Commentary .01 to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.100) or the index value applicable to that series of
ETFs is not being disseminated as required when the Exchange is the
listing market, the Exchange may halt trading during the day in which
the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the index value
occurs. If the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the
index value persists past the trading day in which it occurred, the
Exchange would halt trading no later than the beginning of the trading
day following the interruption.
In addition, proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.5(g)(2)(b) and
8.100(e)(2)(ii) have been modified to provide that the Exchange: (1)
Would halt trading in a series of ETFs if the circuit breaker
parameters of Rule 7.12 have been reached; and (2) in exercising its
discretion to halt trading in a series of ETFs, would consider factors
such as the extent to which trading in the underlying securities is not
occurring or whether other unusual conditions or circumstances
detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly market are
present, in addition to other relevant factors.
The Exchange is proposing other minor and clarifying changes to
NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3) and 8.100. The standards set forth
in Commentary .01(a)(A) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) and
Commentary .01(a)(A) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 are being
modified to make the wording of each requirement consistent. In
addition, Commentary .01(a)(A)(5) to each of NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3) and 8.100 would be modified to reflect the adoption of
Regulation NMS. Proposed Commentary .01(b)(4) to NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5.2(j)(3) and Commentary .01(b)(4) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
8.100 would be added to make sure that an entity that advises index
providers or calculators has in place procedures designed to prevent
the use and dissemination of material non-public information regarding
the index underlying the ETF.
The Exchange is also proposing the following clean-up changes to
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100 in order to make it consistent with NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). The Exchange proposes changing the term
``Reporting Authority'' to ``one or more major market data vendors'' in
Commentary .01(c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.100.\19\ Also,
Commentary .01(c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3) and 8.100 would
be modified to clarify that the obligation to disseminate an IIV
applies to Units and PDRs that are listed or traded on the Exchange
(which would include Units or PDRs traded pursuant to UTP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52809 (November 18,
2005), 70 FR 71590 (November 29, 2005) (SR-PCX-2005-108) (approving
change to listing standards for Units to allow ``one or more major
market data vendors'' to satisfy dissemination requirements rather
than ``Reporting Authority'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Exchange Act,\20\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\21\ in particular, in that it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-86 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-86. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of NYSE Arca. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-86 and should be submitted on or before
May 9, 2007.
[[Page 19576]]
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\22\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act \23\ in
that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the Exchange must file a proposed rule change with the
Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Exchange Act \24\ and
Rule 19b-4 thereunder \25\ to list and trade any ETF based on an index
comprised of foreign securities. The Exchange also must file a proposed
rule change to list and trade ETFs based on indexes or portfolios
described in rule changes that have previously been approved by the
Commission as underlying benchmarks for derivative securities. However,
Rule 19b-4(e) provides that the listing and trading of a new derivative
securities product by an SRO will not be deemed a proposed rule change
pursuant to Rule 19b-4(c)(1) if the Commission has approved, pursuant
to Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act, the SRO's trading rules,
procedures, and listing standards for the product class that would
include the new derivative securities product, and the SRO has a
surveillance program for the product class. The Exchange's proposed
rules for the listing and trading of ETFs pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e)
based on (1) certain indexes with components that include foreign
securities or (2) indexes or portfolios previously described in
exchange rules that have been approved by the Commission as underlying
benchmarks for derivative securities, fulfill these requirements. Use
of Rule 19b-4(e) by NYSE Arca to list and trade such ETFs should
promote competition, reduce burdens on issuers and other market
participants, and make such ETFs available to investors more
quickly.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\26\ The Commission notes, however, that the failure of a
particular ETF to meet these generic listing standards would not
preclude the Exchange from submitting a separate proposed rule
change to list and trade the ETF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission previously has approved generic listing standards
for other exchanges that are substantially similar to those proposed
here by NYSE Arca.\27\ This proposal does not appear to raise any novel
regulatory issues. Therefore, the Commission finds that NYSE Arca's
proposal is consistent with the Exchange Act on the same basis that it
approved the other exchanges' generic listing standards for ETFs based
on international or global indexes or on indexes or portfolios
described in exchange rules that have been previously approved by the
Commission as underlying benchmarks for derivative securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55269 (February 9,
2007), 72 FR 7490 (February 15, 2007) (SR-Nasdaq-2006-050);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55113 (January 18, 2007), 72 FR
3179 (January 24, 2007) (SR-NYSE-2006-101); and Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 54739 (November 9, 2006), 71 FR 66993 (November 17,
2006) (SR-Amex-2006-78).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Commentary .01(a)(A) and (B) to NYSE Arca Equities Rules
5.2(j)(3) and 8.100 establish standards for the composition of an index
or portfolio underlying an ETF. These requirements are designed, among
other things, to require that components of an index or portfolio
underlying the ETF are adequately capitalized and sufficiently liquid,
and that no one security dominates the index. The Commission believes
that, taken together, these standards are reasonably designed to ensure
that securities with substantial market capitalization and trading
volume account for a substantial portion of any underlying index or
portfolio, and that when applied in conjunction with the other
applicable listing requirements, will permit the listing and trading
only of ETFs that are sufficiently broad-based in scope to minimize
potential manipulation. The Commission further believes that the
proposed listing standards are reasonably designed to preclude NYSE
Arca from listing and trading ETFs that might be used as surrogate for
trading in unregistered securities. The requirement that each component
security underlying an ETF be an NMS Stock (in the case of a U.S.
Component Stock) or listed on an exchange and subject to last-sale
reporting (in the case of a Non-U.S. Component Stock) also should
contribute to the transparency of the market for these ETFs.
The proposed generic listing standards will permit NYSE Arca to
list and trade an ETF if the Commission has previously approved an SRO
rule change that contemplates listing and trading a derivative product
based on the same underlying index. NYSE Arca would be able to rely on
that earlier approval order, provided that: (1) The securities
comprising the underlying index consist of U.S. Component Stocks or
Non-U.S. Component Stocks, as set forth in proposed NYSE Arca Equities
Rules 5.2(j)(3), 8.100(a)(3), and 8.100(a)(4); and (2) NYSE Arca
complies with the commitments undertaken by the other SRO set forth in
the prior order, including any surveillance-sharing arrangements with a
foreign market.
The Commission believes that NYSE Arca's proposal is consistent
with Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of the Exchange Act,\28\ which sets
forth Congress' finding that it is in the public interest and
appropriate for the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair
and orderly markets to assure the availability to brokers, dealers, and
investors of information with respect to quotations for and
transactions in securities. The Exchange's proposal requires the value
of the index or portfolio underlying an ETF based on a global or
international index to be disseminated at least once every 60 seconds
during Exchange trading hours.\29\ Furthermore, these generic listing
standards provide that the issuer of an ETF must represent that it will
calculate the NAV and make it available daily to all market
participants at the same time.\30\ In addition, an IIV, which
represents an estimate of the value of a share of each ETF, must be
updated and disseminated at least once every 15 seconds during the time
an ETF trades on the Exchange.\31\ The IIV will be updated to reflect
changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the currency
in which any index or portfolio component stock is denominated.\32\
When there is no overlap with the trading hours of the primary market
or markets trading the underlying components of an ETF,
[[Page 19577]]
NYSE Arca may trade such ETF during the Opening Session without an IIV
being updated, as long as the last official calculated IIV remains
available. Although the IIV is not calculated during the Late Trading
Session, the last official calculated IIV must also remain available
during such session. The Commission believes that the proposed rules
regarding the dissemination of the index value and the IIV are
reasonably designed to promote transparency in the pricing of ETFs and
thus are consistent with the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1)(C)(iii).
\29\ See proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3), Commentary
.01(b)(2) and 8.100, Commentary .01(b)(3). If an index or portfolio
value does not change for some of the time that the ETF trades on
the Exchange, the last official calculated value must remain
available throughout Exchange trading hours.
\30\ See proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3)(A)(v) and
8.100(e)(1)(ii).
\31\ See proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rules 5.2(j)(3), Commentary
.01(c) and 8.100, Commentary .01(c).
\32\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, the Exchange's trading halt rules are reasonably
designed to prevent trading in an ETF when transparency cannot be
assured. Proposed NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.5(g)(2)(b) provides that,
when the Exchange is the listing market, if the IIV or index value
applicable to an ETF is not disseminated as required, the Exchange may
halt trading during the day in which the interruption occurs. If the
interruption continues, the Exchange will halt trading no later than
the beginning of the next trading day.\33\ This proposed rule is
substantially similar to those recently adopted by other exchanges and
found by the Commission to be consistent with the Exchange Act.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ In addition, NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34 sets forth
trading halt procedures when the Exchange trades ETFs pursuant to
UTP.
\34\ See e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54997
(December 21, 2006), 71 FR 78501 (December 29, 2006) (SR-NYSEArca-
2006-77).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In approving this proposal, the Commission relied on NYSE Arca's
representation that its surveillance procedures are adequate to
properly monitor the trading of the Units and PDRs listed pursuant to
the proposed new listing standards or traded on a UTP basis. This
approval is conditioned on the continuing accuracy of that
representation.
Acceleration
The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule
change, as amended, prior to the 30th day after the date of publication
of the notice of the amended proposal in the Federal Register. The
Commission notes that NYSE Arca's proposal is substantially similar to
other proposals that have been approved by the Commission.\35\ The
Commission does not believe that NYSE Arca's proposal raises any novel
regulatory issues and, therefore, that good cause exists for approving
the filing before the conclusion of a notice-and-comment period.
Accelerated approval of the proposal will expedite the listing and
trading of additional ETFs by the Exchange, subject to consistent and
reasonable standards. Therefore, the Commission finds good cause,
consistent with Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\36\ to approve
the proposed rule change, as amended, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See supra note 27.
\36\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act,\37\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2006-86),
as amended, be, and it hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ Id.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7324 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P