Information for Self-Certification Under FAQ 6 of the United States European Union Safe Harbor Privacy Framework, 19172-19173 [E7-7215]
Download as PDF
19172
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 17, 2007 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 750.
Estimated Total Annual Costs:
$45,000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on (a) whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and costs) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: April 11, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–7209 Filed 4–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Information for Self-Certification Under
FAQ 6 of the United States European
Union Safe Harbor Privacy Framework
International Trade
Administration, United States
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed information
collection; comment request.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burdens, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on the
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before June 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork, Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:39 Apr 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to: Damon Greer, U.S.
Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration, Room 2003, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; Phone number: (202) 482–
5023 and fax number: (202) 482–5522.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
In response to the European Union
Directive on Data Protection that
restricts transfers of personal
information from Europe to countries
whose privacy practices are not deemed
‘‘adequate,’’ the U.S. Department of
Commerce (DOC) has developed a ‘‘Safe
Harbor’’ framework that will allow U.S.
organizations to satisfy the European
Directive’s requirements and ensure that
personal data flows to the United States
are not interrupted. In this process, the
DOC repeatedly consulted with U.S.
organizations affected by the European
Directive and interested nongovernment organizations. On July 27,
2000, the European Commission issued
its decision in accordance with Article
25.6 of the Directive that the Safe
Harbor Privacy Principles provide
adequate privacy protection. The Safe
Harbor framework bridges the
differences between the European
Union (EU) and U.S. approaches to
privacy protection. The complete set of
Safe Harbor documents and additional
guidance materials may be found at
https://export.gov/safeharbor.
Once the Safe Harbor was deemed
‘‘adequate’’ by the European
Commission on July 27, 2000, DOC
began working on the requirements that
are necessary to put this accord into
effect. The European Member States
implemented the decision made by the
Commission within 90 days. Therefore,
the Safe Harbor became operational on
November 1, 2000. The DOC created a
list for U.S. organizations to sign up to
the Safe Harbor and provided guidance
on the mechanics of signing up to this
list. As of March 1, 2007, 1,100 U.S.
organizations have been placed on the
Safe Harbor List, located at https://
export.gov/safeharbor.
Organizations that have signed up to
this list are deemed ‘‘adequate’’ under
the Directive and do not have to provide
further documentation to European
officials. This list will be used by EU
organizations to determine whether
further information and contracts will
be needed for a U.S. organization to
receive personally identifiable
information. This list is necessary to
make the Safe Harbor accord
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
operational, and was a key demand of
the Europeans in agreeing that the
Principles were providing ‘‘adequate’’
privacy protection.
The Safe Harbor provides a number of
important benefits to U.S. firms. Most
importantly, it provides predictability
and continuity for U.S. organizations
that receive personal information from
the European Union. Personally
identifiable information is defined as
any information that can be identified to
a specific person, for example an
employee’s name and extension would
be considered personally identifiable
information. All 15 member countries
are bound by the European
Commission’s finding of ‘‘adequacy’’.
The Safe Harbor also eliminates the
need for prior approval to begin data
transfers, or makes approval from the
appropriate EU member countries
automatic. The Safe Harbor principles
offer a simpler and cheaper means of
complying with the adequacy
requirements of the Directive, which
should particularly benefit small and
medium enterprises.
The decision to enter the Safe Harbor
is entirely voluntary. Organizations that
decide to participate in the Safe Harbor
must comply with the safe harbor’s
requirements and publicly declare that
they do so. To be assured of Safe Harbor
benefits, an organization needs to
reaffirm its self-certification annually to
the Department of Commerce that it
agrees to adhere to the safe harbor’s
requirements, which includes elements
such as notice, choice, access, data
integrity, security and enforcement.
This list will be most regularly used
by European Union organizations to
determine whether further information
and contracts will be needed by a U.S.
organization to receive personally
identifiable information. It will be used
by the European Data Protection
Authorities to determine whether a
company is providing ‘‘adequate’’
protection, and whether a company has
requested to cooperate with the Data
Protection Authority. This list will be
accessed when there is a complaint
logged in the EU against a U.S.
organization. This will be on a monthly
basis. It will be used by the Federal
Trade Commission and the Department
of Transportation to determine whether
a company is part of the Safe Harbor.
This will be accessed if a company is
practicing ‘‘unfair and deceptive’’
practices and has misrepresented itself
to the public. It will be used by the
Department of Commerce and the
European Commission to determine if
organizations are signing up to the list.
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 17, 2007 / Notices
II. Method of Collection
EFFECTIVE DATE:
The self-certification form is provided
via the Internet at https://export.gov/
safeharbor and by mail to requesting
U.S. firms.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
III. Data
OMB Number: 0625–0239.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
500.
Estimated Time per Response: Web
site, 20 minutes; and paper format, 40
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 400.
Estimated Total Annual Costs to
Public: $20,000.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and costs) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: April 11, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–7215 Filed 4–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
[A–570–888]
Floor–Standing, Metal–Top Ironing
Tables and Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China: Extension
of the Time Limit for the Preliminary
Results of the 2005/2006
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:39 Apr 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
April 17, 2007.
Anya Naschak or Bobby Wong, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6375 or (202) 482–
0409, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 6, 2004, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published in
the Federal Register an antidumping
duty order on floor standing, metal–top
ironing tables and parts thereof from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See
Notice of Amended Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Floor–
Standing, Metal–Top Ironing Tables and
Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s
Republic of China, 69 FR 47868 (August
6, 2004). The Department received
timely requests from Since Hardware
(Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Since
Hardware’’) and Foshan Shunde
Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Foshan Shunde’’), in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2), for an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on ironing
tables and parts thereof from the PRC,
which has an August annual
anniversary month. Home Products
International Inc., the petitioner, also
requested, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b)(1), an administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
ironing tables and parts thereof from the
PRC for Since Hardware. On September
26, 2006, the Department initiated an
administrative review with respect to
Since Hardware and Foshan Shunde.
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 71 FR 57465 (September 29,
2006).
On January 23, 2007, the Department
rescinded the administrative review
with respect to Foshan Shunde because
it withdrew its request for an
administrative review in a timely
manner, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1). See Floor–Standing,
Metal–Top Ironing Tables and Certain
Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 2856
(January 23, 2007).
The deadline for completion of the
preliminary results in the administrative
review for Since Hardware is currently
May 3, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19173
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and
section 351.213(h)(1) of the
Department’s regulations require the
Department to issue the preliminary
results of an administrative review
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of the order or
suspension agreement for which the
administrative review was requested,
and the final results of the review
within 120 days after the date on which
the notice of the preliminary results was
published in the Federal Register.
However, if the Department determines
that it is not practicable to complete the
review within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section
351.213(h)(2) of the Department’s
regulations allow the Department to
extend the 245-day period to 365 days
and the 120-day period to 180 days.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act and section 351.213(h) of the
Department’s regulations, we determine
that it is not practicable to complete this
administrative review within the
statutory time limit of 245 days. The
Department requires additional time to
analyze questionnaire responses, issue
supplemental questionnaires, and
possibly conduct verification. In
particular, there are complex factors of
production methodology issues that the
Department requires additional time to
review. Therefore, in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and
section 351.213(h)(2) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department is extending the time limit
for the completion of these preliminary
results by an additional 120 days to
August 31, 2007. The final results, in
turn, will be due 120 days after the date
of issuance of the preliminary results,
unless extended.
Dated: April 11, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–7286 Filed 4–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19172-19173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7215]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Information for Self-Certification Under FAQ 6 of the United
States European Union Safe Harbor Privacy Framework
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, United States Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed information collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the
continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before June 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork, Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to: Damon Greer, U.S. Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration, Room 2003, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; Phone number: (202) 482-5023 and fax number:
(202) 482-5522.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
In response to the European Union Directive on Data Protection that
restricts transfers of personal information from Europe to countries
whose privacy practices are not deemed ``adequate,'' the U.S.
Department of Commerce (DOC) has developed a ``Safe Harbor'' framework
that will allow U.S. organizations to satisfy the European Directive's
requirements and ensure that personal data flows to the United States
are not interrupted. In this process, the DOC repeatedly consulted with
U.S. organizations affected by the European Directive and interested
non-government organizations. On July 27, 2000, the European Commission
issued its decision in accordance with Article 25.6 of the Directive
that the Safe Harbor Privacy Principles provide adequate privacy
protection. The Safe Harbor framework bridges the differences between
the European Union (EU) and U.S. approaches to privacy protection. The
complete set of Safe Harbor documents and additional guidance materials
may be found at https://export.gov/safeharbor.
Once the Safe Harbor was deemed ``adequate'' by the European
Commission on July 27, 2000, DOC began working on the requirements that
are necessary to put this accord into effect. The European Member
States implemented the decision made by the Commission within 90 days.
Therefore, the Safe Harbor became operational on November 1, 2000. The
DOC created a list for U.S. organizations to sign up to the Safe Harbor
and provided guidance on the mechanics of signing up to this list. As
of March 1, 2007, 1,100 U.S. organizations have been placed on the Safe
Harbor List, located at https://export.gov/safeharbor.
Organizations that have signed up to this list are deemed
``adequate'' under the Directive and do not have to provide further
documentation to European officials. This list will be used by EU
organizations to determine whether further information and contracts
will be needed for a U.S. organization to receive personally
identifiable information. This list is necessary to make the Safe
Harbor accord operational, and was a key demand of the Europeans in
agreeing that the Principles were providing ``adequate'' privacy
protection.
The Safe Harbor provides a number of important benefits to U.S.
firms. Most importantly, it provides predictability and continuity for
U.S. organizations that receive personal information from the European
Union. Personally identifiable information is defined as any
information that can be identified to a specific person, for example an
employee's name and extension would be considered personally
identifiable information. All 15 member countries are bound by the
European Commission's finding of ``adequacy''. The Safe Harbor also
eliminates the need for prior approval to begin data transfers, or
makes approval from the appropriate EU member countries automatic. The
Safe Harbor principles offer a simpler and cheaper means of complying
with the adequacy requirements of the Directive, which should
particularly benefit small and medium enterprises.
The decision to enter the Safe Harbor is entirely voluntary.
Organizations that decide to participate in the Safe Harbor must comply
with the safe harbor's requirements and publicly declare that they do
so. To be assured of Safe Harbor benefits, an organization needs to
reaffirm its self-certification annually to the Department of Commerce
that it agrees to adhere to the safe harbor's requirements, which
includes elements such as notice, choice, access, data integrity,
security and enforcement.
This list will be most regularly used by European Union
organizations to determine whether further information and contracts
will be needed by a U.S. organization to receive personally
identifiable information. It will be used by the European Data
Protection Authorities to determine whether a company is providing
``adequate'' protection, and whether a company has requested to
cooperate with the Data Protection Authority. This list will be
accessed when there is a complaint logged in the EU against a U.S.
organization. This will be on a monthly basis. It will be used by the
Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Transportation to
determine whether a company is part of the Safe Harbor. This will be
accessed if a company is practicing ``unfair and deceptive'' practices
and has misrepresented itself to the public. It will be used by the
Department of Commerce and the European Commission to determine if
organizations are signing up to the list.
[[Page 19173]]
II. Method of Collection
The self-certification form is provided via the Internet at https://
export.gov/safeharbor and by mail to requesting U.S. firms.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0625-0239.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 500.
Estimated Time per Response: Web site, 20 minutes; and paper
format, 40 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 400.
Estimated Total Annual Costs to Public: $20,000.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and costs) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: April 11, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-7215 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P