Folding Gift Boxes from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 16765-16766 [E7-6404]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices
these reviews within the current time
limit because of the number of
respondents in these reviews and the
complexity of the issues under analysis
such as further–manufacturing
operations in the United States, the
‘‘collapsing’’ of companies, and the use
of constructed value for reseller
respondents for which we need to issue
additional questionnaires. Therefore, we
are extending the time period for issuing
the preliminary results of these reviews
by 59 additional days until May 31,
2007.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: March 30, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–6384 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–866]
Folding Gift Boxes from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2006, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) initiated a sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on folding gift boxes from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (‘‘Act’’). See Initiation of
Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 71 FR
69545 (December 1, 2006) (‘‘Sunset
Initiation’’); see also Notice of
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Folding Gift Boxes From the People’s
Republic of China, 67 FR 864 (January
8, 2002) (‘‘Order’’). Based on the notice
of intent to participate and response
filed by the domestic interested party,
and the lack of response from
respondent interested parties, the
Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the Order pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
C.F.R. 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result
of this sunset review, the Department
finds that revocation of the Order would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Apr 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanita H. Chen or Robert A. Bolling;
AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202–482–1904 and 202–482–3434,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2006, the Department
initiated a sunset review of the Order on
folding gift boxes from the PRC
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.
See Sunset Initiation. On December 15,
2006, the Department timely received a
notice of intent to participate from
Simkins Industries, Inc. (‘‘Simkins’’),
pursuant to 19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(1)(i).
Simkins claimed interested party status
under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a
domestic producer of subject
merchandise. On January 3, 2007, the
Department received a request from
Harvard Folding Box Company, Inc.
(‘‘Harvard Box’’), asking to be
substituted for Simkins as the domestic
interested party in the sunset review.
Both Simkins and Harvard Box are
represented by the same counsel.
Harvard Box also filed a substantive
response within the 30-day deadline as
specified in 19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(3)(i).
The Department did not receive any
objections to Harvard Box’s request to
be substituted for Simkins. The
Department did not receive a
substantive response from any
respondent interested party. As a result,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 19 C.F.R. 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
the Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the Order.
Scope Of The Order
The products covered by the order are
certain folding gift boxes. Folding gift
boxes are a type of folding or knock–
down carton manufactured from paper
or paperboard. Folding gift boxes are
produced from a variety of recycled and
virgin paper or paperboard materials,
including, but not limited to, clay–
coated paper or paperboard and kraft
(bleached or unbleached) paper or
paperboard. The scope of the order
excludes gift boxes manufactured from
paper or paperboard of a thickness of
more than 0.8 millimeters, corrugated
paperboard, or paper mache. The scope
of the order also excludes those gift
boxes for which no side of the box,
when assembled, is at least nine inches
in length.
Folding gift boxes included in the
scope of the order are typically
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16765
decorated with a holiday motif using
various processes, including printing,
embossing, debossing, and foil
stamping, but may also be plain white
or printed with a single color. The
subject merchandise includes folding
gift boxes, with or without handles,
whether finished or unfinished, and
whether in one–piece or multi–piece
configuration. One–piece gift boxes are
die–cut or otherwise formed so that the
top, bottom, and sides form a single,
contiguous unit. Two–piece gift boxes
are those with a folded bottom and a
folded top as separate pieces. Folding
gift boxes are generally packaged in
shrink–wrap, cellophane, or other
packaging materials, in single or multi–
box packs for sale to the retail customer.
The scope of the order excludes folding
gift boxes that have a retailer’s name,
logo, trademark or similar company
information printed prominently on the
box’s top exterior (such folding gift
boxes are often known as ‘‘not–forresale’’ gift boxes or ‘‘give–away’’ gift
boxes and may be provided by
department and specialty stores at no
charge to their retail customers). The
scope of the order also excludes folding
gift boxes where both the outside of the
box is a single color and the box is not
packaged in shrink–wrap, cellophane,
other resin–based packaging films, or
paperboard.
Imports of the subject merchandise
are classified under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 4819.20.0040
and 4819.50.4060. These subheadings
also cover products that are outside the
scope of the order. Furthermore,
although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Analysis Of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in this review are addressed in
the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice. See ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results in
the Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Folding
Gift Boxes from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated March 29, 2007
(‘‘I&D Memo’’). The issues discussed in
the accompanying I&D Memo include
the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the dumping margin likely
to prevail if the Order were revoked.
Parties can obtain a public copy of the
I&D Memo on file in the Central Records
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
16766
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Notices
Unit, room B–099, of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete public version of the I&D
Memo can be accessed directly on the
Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov and clicking
on ‘‘Federal Register Notices.’’ The
paper copy and electronic version of the
I&D Memo are identical in content.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Final Results Of Sunset Review
The Department determines that
revocation of the Order on folding gift
boxes from the PRC would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the rates listed below:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Case or Richard Rimlinger, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3174 and (202)
482–4477, respectively.
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007.
Extension of Deadline
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Apr 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–6406 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration
[A- 570–847]
Polyvinyl Alcohol from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit
Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations,
Import Administration, Room 1870,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–6412.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
At the request of various parties, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated an administrative
Manufacturers/ExportWeighted–Average
review of the antidumping duty order
ers/Producers
Margin (Percent)
on polyethylene retail carrier bags from
Red Point Paper ProdThailand for the peri1od August 1,
ucts Co., Ltd. .............
8.90 % 2005, through July 31, 2006. See
Max Fortune Industrial
Initiation of Antidumping and
Ltd. ............................
1.67 % (de
minimis) Countervailing Duty Administrative
PRC–wide rate .............
164.75 % Reviews, 71 FR 57465 (September 29,
2006). Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
Notification Regarding Administrative
requires the Department to issue
Protective Order
preliminary results of review within 245
This notice also serves as the only
days after the last day of the anniversary
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) month of an order for which a review
is requested and final results within 120
of their responsibility concerning the
days after the date on which the
return or destruction of proprietary
preliminary results were published. If it
information disclosed under APO in
is not practicable to complete the review
accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.305.
within these time periods, section
Timely notification of the return or
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is Department to extend the time limit for
the preliminary results to a maximum of
hereby requested. Failure to comply
365 days after the last day of the
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
anniversary month.
sanction.
We determine that it is not practicable
We are issuing and publishing these
to complete the preliminary results of
results and notice in accordance with
this review within the current time limit
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
because of the number of respondents in
the Act.
this review and the complexity of the
Dated: March 29, 2007.
issues under analysis. Further, we
David M. Spooner,
received below–cost allegations and are
Assistant Secretary for Import
currently conducting below–cost
Administration.
investigations for several of the
[FR Doc. E7–6404 Filed 4–4–07; 8:45 am]
respondents. Accordingly, because we
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
need to analyze and incorporate the
information from recently filed
submissions, we are extending the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
deadline for issuing the preliminary
results of this review by 60 days until
International Trade Administration
July 2, 2007.
[A–549–821]
This notice is published in
Notice of Extension of Deadline for the accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review:
Dated: March 30, 2007.
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from
Stephen J. Claeys,
Thailand
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Background
On October 2, 2006, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on polyvinyl
alcohol (‘‘PVA’’) from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation: Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 71 FR 57920
(October 2, 2006). On October 23, 2006,
Sinopec Sichuan Vinylon Works
(‘‘SVW’’) requested that the Department
conduct an administrative review of
SVW. The Department published a
notice of initiation of the antidumping
duty administrative review of PVA from
the PRC for the period October 1, 2005,
through September 30, 2006. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 71 FR 68535 (November 27, 2006).
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if the party
that requested the review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. On January 18,
2007, SVW withdrew its request for an
administrative review within 90 days of
the publication of the notice of
initiation of this review. Therefore, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
and consistent with its practice, the
Department hereby rescinds the
administrative review of Polyvinyl
Alcohol from the People’s Republic of
China for the period October 1, 2005,
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16765-16766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6404]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-866]
Folding Gift Boxes from the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on folding gift boxes from the People's Republic of China
(``PRC''), pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (``Act''). See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 71
FR 69545 (December 1, 2006) (``Sunset Initiation''); see also Notice of
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Folding Gift Boxes From the People's
Republic of China, 67 FR 864 (January 8, 2002) (``Order''). Based on
the notice of intent to participate and response filed by the domestic
interested party, and the lack of response from respondent interested
parties, the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the
Order pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 C.F.R.
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this sunset review, the
Department finds that revocation of the Order would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the
``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita H. Chen or Robert A. Bolling;
AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-1904 and 202-482-3434,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2006, the Department initiated a sunset review of
the Order on folding gift boxes from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act. See Sunset Initiation. On December 15, 2006, the Department
timely received a notice of intent to participate from Simkins
Industries, Inc. (``Simkins''), pursuant to 19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(1)(i).
Simkins claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the
Act as a domestic producer of subject merchandise. On January 3, 2007,
the Department received a request from Harvard Folding Box Company,
Inc. (``Harvard Box''), asking to be substituted for Simkins as the
domestic interested party in the sunset review. Both Simkins and
Harvard Box are represented by the same counsel. Harvard Box also filed
a substantive response within the 30-day deadline as specified in 19
C.F.R. 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive any objections
to Harvard Box's request to be substituted for Simkins. The Department
did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested
party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
C.F.R. 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the Order.
Scope Of The Order
The products covered by the order are certain folding gift boxes.
Folding gift boxes are a type of folding or knock-down carton
manufactured from paper or paperboard. Folding gift boxes are produced
from a variety of recycled and virgin paper or paperboard materials,
including, but not limited to, clay-coated paper or paperboard and
kraft (bleached or unbleached) paper or paperboard. The scope of the
order excludes gift boxes manufactured from paper or paperboard of a
thickness of more than 0.8 millimeters, corrugated paperboard, or paper
mache. The scope of the order also excludes those gift boxes for which
no side of the box, when assembled, is at least nine inches in length.
Folding gift boxes included in the scope of the order are typically
decorated with a holiday motif using various processes, including
printing, embossing, debossing, and foil stamping, but may also be
plain white or printed with a single color. The subject merchandise
includes folding gift boxes, with or without handles, whether finished
or unfinished, and whether in one-piece or multi-piece configuration.
One-piece gift boxes are die-cut or otherwise formed so that the top,
bottom, and sides form a single, contiguous unit. Two-piece gift boxes
are those with a folded bottom and a folded top as separate pieces.
Folding gift boxes are generally packaged in shrink-wrap, cellophane,
or other packaging materials, in single or multi-box packs for sale to
the retail customer. The scope of the order excludes folding gift boxes
that have a retailer's name, logo, trademark or similar company
information printed prominently on the box's top exterior (such folding
gift boxes are often known as ``not-for-resale'' gift boxes or ``give-
away'' gift boxes and may be provided by department and specialty
stores at no charge to their retail customers). The scope of the order
also excludes folding gift boxes where both the outside of the box is a
single color and the box is not packaged in shrink-wrap, cellophane,
other resin-based packaging films, or paperboard.
Imports of the subject merchandise are classified under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings
4819.20.0040 and 4819.50.4060. These subheadings also cover products
that are outside the scope of the order. Furthermore, although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Analysis Of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this review are
addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is
hereby adopted by this notice. See ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results in the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Folding Gift Boxes from the People's Republic of China,''
from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated March 29,
2007 (``I&D Memo''). The issues discussed in the accompanying I&D Memo
include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the dumping margin likely to prevail if the Order were
revoked. Parties can obtain a public copy of the I&D Memo on file in
the Central Records
[[Page 16766]]
Unit, room B-099, of the main Commerce building. In addition, a
complete public version of the I&D Memo can be accessed directly on the
Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov and clicking on ``Federal Register
Notices.'' The paper copy and electronic version of the I&D Memo are
identical in content.
Final Results Of Sunset Review
The Department determines that revocation of the Order on folding
gift boxes from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping at the rates listed below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Margin (Percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Red Point Paper Products Co., Ltd................... 8.90 [percnt]
Max Fortune Industrial Ltd.......................... 1.67 [percnt] (de
minimis)
PRC-wide rate....................................... 164.75 [percnt]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 29, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-6404 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S