Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 15101 [E7-5929]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / Notices
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
In accordance with section
735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) to continue to suspend
liquidation of all entries of subject
merchandise from the PRC. We will also
instruct CBP to require cash deposits or
the posting of a bond equal to the
estimated amount by which the normal
value exceeds the U.S. price as
indicated in the chart above. These
instructions suspending liquidation will
remain in effect until further notice.
This determination is issued and
published pursuant to sections 735(d)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.224(e).
Dated: March 22, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–5927 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–813]
Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand:
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Myrna Lobo, Office of AD/CVD
Operations 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On August 30, 2006, the Department
of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register the
notice of initiation of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on canned pineapple fruit from
Thailand for Vita Food Factory (1989)
Ltd. (Vita). See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 71 FR 51573
(August 30, 2006). On October 10, 2006
the Department initiated a review for
Tropical Food Industries Co. Ltd.
(Trofco). See Initiation of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Canned
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Mar 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Pineapple Fruit from Thailand, 71 FR
59430 (October 10, 2006). The period of
review for both companies is July 1,
2005 through June 30, 2006.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
section 351.213(h)(1) of the
Department’s regulations require the
Department to issue the preliminary
results of a review within 245 days after
the last day of the anniversary month of
the order or suspension agreement for
which the administrative review was
requested, and final results of the
review within 120 days after the date on
which the notice of the preliminary
results is published in the Federal
Register. However, if the Department
determines that it is not practicable to
complete the review within the
aforementioned specified time limits,
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and
section 351.213(h)(2) of the
Department’s regulations allow the
Department to extend the 245–day
period to 365 days and to extend the
120–day period to 180 days.
Due to the initiation of a cost
investigation for Trofco, together with
the need for further analysis of Vita’s
questionnaire response, the Department
finds that it is not practicable to
complete the preliminary results of this
review within the original time limit.
Therefore, the Department is extending
the deadline for completion of the
preliminary results of this
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on canned
pineapple fruit from Thailand by 120
days from April 2, 2007 until no later
than July 31, 2007.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 751(a)(3)(A) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 26, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–5929 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–892]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Amended Final Determination in
Accordance With Court Decision
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30,
SUMMARY: On December 8,
15101
2007.
2006, the
United States Court of International
Trade (‘‘CIT’’) sustained the final
remand determination made by the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) pursuant to the CIT’s
remand of the final determination of the
less–than-fair–value investigation of
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 (‘‘CVP 23’’)
from the People’s Republic of China.
See Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd., Trust
Chem Co., Ltd., Tianjin Hanchem
International Trading Co., Ltd. v. United
States, and Nation Ford Chemical
Company and Sun Chemical
Corporation, and Clariant Corporation,
Consol. Ct. 05–00060 (CIT Dec. 8, 2006).
As there is now a final and conclusive
court decision in this case, the
Department is amending the final
determination of this investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Riggle at (202) 482–0650, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 17, 2004, the Department
published in the Federal Register its
final determination in the above–
referenced investigation covering the
period of April 1, 2003, through
September 30, 2003. See Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23
from the People’s Republic of China, 69
FR 67304 (November 17, 2004) (‘‘Final
Determination’’). In the Final
Determination, the Department (1)
Applied total adverse facts available
(‘‘AFA’’) to Tianjin Hanchem
International Trading Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Hanchem’’); (2) determined that the
subsidies received by Pidilite Industries,
Ltd. (‘‘Pidilite’’), an Indian producer of
CVP 23, did not distort Pidilite’s
financial ratios; (3) valued benzene
sulfonyl chloride using HTS number
2904.10.10; (4) valued calcium chloride
based on 70–percent chemical
concentration; (5) declined to value
steam because the only steam values on
the record were based on U.S. price
quotes; and (6) did not include terminal
charges and brokerage fees in movement
costs. In Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd.,
Trust Chem Co., Ltd., Tianjin Hanchem
International Trading Co., Ltd. v. United
States, 431 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (CIT May
4, 2006), the CIT remanded the
underlying Final Determination to the
Department: to (1) re–examine its
determination to apply total AFA to
Hanchem; (2) further explain its
determination that the subsidies Pidilite
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5929]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-813]
Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand: Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo, Office of AD/CVD
Operations 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 30, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register the notice of initiation of the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on canned pineapple
fruit from Thailand for Vita Food Factory (1989) Ltd. (Vita). See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 71 FR 51573 (August 30,
2006). On October 10, 2006 the Department initiated a review for
Tropical Food Industries Co. Ltd. (Trofco). See Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Canned Pineapple Fruit from
Thailand, 71 FR 59430 (October 10, 2006). The period of review for both
companies is July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006.
Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), and section 351.213(h)(1) of the Department's regulations require
the Department to issue the preliminary results of a review within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary month of the order or
suspension agreement for which the administrative review was requested,
and final results of the review within 120 days after the date on which
the notice of the preliminary results is published in the Federal
Register. However, if the Department determines that it is not
practicable to complete the review within the aforementioned specified
time limits, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section 351.213(h)(2)
of the Department's regulations allow the Department to extend the 245-
day period to 365 days and to extend the 120-day period to 180 days.
Due to the initiation of a cost investigation for Trofco, together
with the need for further analysis of Vita's questionnaire response,
the Department finds that it is not practicable to complete the
preliminary results of this review within the original time limit.
Therefore, the Department is extending the deadline for completion of
the preliminary results of this administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on canned pineapple fruit from Thailand by 120
days from April 2, 2007 until no later than July 31, 2007.
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 26, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-5929 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
