Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 15105-15106 [E7-5864]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / Notices
flanges to the United States. Therefore,
we find that Pradeep is not a new
shipper pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)
of the Act, and that Pradeep’s request
for new shipper review does not meet
the requirements of 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iv)(A),(B) and (C).
Accordingly, we are rescinding the new
shipper review of Pradeep.
Assessment
The Department will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For Pradeep,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(I). The Department will
issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15
days after the publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to any parties that are subject
to administrative protective order (APO)
of their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO material or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanctions.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(f)(3).
Dated: March 23, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–5934 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Mar 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Time
Limits for the Final Results of the 11th
Administrative Review and New
Shipper Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Walker, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0413.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 11, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review and
new shipper review of fresh garlic from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’),
covering the period November 1, 2004,
through October 31, 2005. See Fresh
Garlic from the People’s Republic of
China: Partial Rescission and
Preliminary Results of the Eleventh
Administrative Review and New
Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 71510
(December 11, 2006).
Extension of Time Limit of Final
Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), and section 351.213(h)(1) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department shall issue the preliminary
results of an administrative review
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of the date of
publication of the antidumping duty
order. The Act further provides that the
Department shall issue the final results
of a review within 120 days after the
date on which the notice of the
preliminary results was published in the
Federal Register. However, if the
Department determines that it is not
practicable to complete the review
within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section
351.213(h)(2) of the Department’s
regulations allow the Department to
extend the 245-day period to 365 days
and the 120-day period to 180 days.
Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act also
provides that we may extend the
deadlines in a new shipper review if we
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15105
determine that the case is
extraordinarily complicated.
The Department determines that it
would not be practicable to complete
the final results of the aligned
administrative review and new shipper
reviews within the statutory time
period. The Department requires
additional time to analyze voluminous
comments regarding the nine companies
involved in the instant reviews. This
includes several issues the Department
considers to be extraordinarily
complicated, including, but not limited
to, the intermediate valuation of the
garlic bulb. Therefore, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the
Department is extending the time period
for issuing the final results of this
review by 60 days until June 9, 2007.
However, since June 9th falls on a
Saturday, the actual due date is June 11,
2007.
This notice is published pursuant to
sections 751(c)(3)(A) and
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, and section
351.214(h)(i)(1) of the Department’s
Regulations.
Dated: March 19, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–5861 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–421–807]
Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products from the Netherlands: Notice
of Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
Nucor Corporation (Nucor), Mittal Steel
USA Inc. (Mittal) and United States
Steel Corporation (USSC) (collectively,
petitioners), the U.S. Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products from
the Netherlands for Corus Staal BV
(Corus) for the period November 1,
2005, through October 31, 2006. No
other interested party requested a
review of Corus for this period of
review. For the reasons discussed
below, the Department is rescinding this
administrative review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2007.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
15106
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0408 or at (202)
482–0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
On November 1, 2006, the Department
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products from
the Netherlands, (71 FR 64240). On
November 30, 2006, we received
requests from USSC, Mittal and Nucor
to conduct an administrative review of
Corus’ sales of certain hot–rolled carbon
steel flat products to the United States
during the period November 1, 2005,
through October 31, 2006. On December
27, 2006, the Department initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products from
the Netherlands for the period
November 1, 2005 through October 31,
2006, in order to determine whether
merchandise imported into the United
States was sold at less than fair value by
Corus. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 71 FR 77720 (December 27,
2006).
On February 27, 2007 USSC Mittal
and Nucor withdrew their requests for
review. On March 9, 2007, Corus
submitted comments in regards to the
withdrawal requests. These comments
are summarized and addressed in an
accompanying memorandum, which is
being released in conjunction with this
notice. See memorandum to Richard
Weible, Office Director, through Robert
James, Program Manager, from David
Cordell, entitled ‘‘Comments on
Domestic Interested Parties Requests for
Withdrawal.’’
Rescission of Review
Section 351.213(d)(1) of the
Department’s regulations provide that
the Department will rescind an
administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request for review within 90 days of the
date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws at a later date if the
Department determines that it is
reasonable to extend the time limit for
withdrawing the request. As all parties
that requested this review have
withdrawn those requests within 90
days of the date of publication of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Mar 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
notice of initiation of the requested
review, this review is rescinded. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after
the date of the publication of this notice.
The Department will direct CBP to
assess antidumping duties for Corus
Staal BVat the cash deposit rate in effect
on the date of entry for entries during
the period November 1, 2005, through
October 31, 2006.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under section 351.402(f) of the
Department’s regulations to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s assumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with section 351.305(a)(3) of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is in accordance with
section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 23, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–5864 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–412–822]
Stainless Steel Bar from the United
Kingdom: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a timely
request by Firth Rixson Ltd., the
Department of Commerce (the
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from the United Kingdom with
respect to Enpar Special Alloys Ltd.
(Enpar). The period of review (POR) is
March 1, 2005, through February 28,
2006.
We preliminarily determine that sales
have been made below normal value
(NV). If these preliminary results are
adopted in our final results of
administrative review, we will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries.
In addition, the Department has
received information sufficient to
warrant a successor–in-interest analysis
in this administrative review. Based on
this information, we preliminarily
determine that Enpar is the successor–
in-interest to Firth Rixson Special Steels
Ltd. for purposes of determining
antidumping duty liability. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Johnson or Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4929 or (202) 482–
4007, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 7, 2002, the Department
published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from the United Kingdom. See
Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless
Steel Bar from the United Kingdom, 67
FR 10381 (March 7, 2002).
In response to timely requests by
manufacturer/exporters, Firth Rixson
Ltd.1 and Corus Engineering Steels
(Corus), the Department published a
notice of initiation of an administrative
review with respect to these companies.
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 71 FR 25145 (April 28, 2006).
The POR is March 1, 2005, through
February 28, 2006.
On April 25, 2006, we issued
antidumping duty questionnaires to the
above–mentioned companies. On May
16, 2006, Enpar requested that the
Department allow it to limit its
reporting of home market sales and cost
of production information in this
1 Firth Rixson Ltd. is the parent company of
Enpar, the respondent in this review, which was
formerly known as Firth Rixson Special Steels Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15105-15106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5864]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-421-807]
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the
Netherlands: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from Nucor Corporation (Nucor), Mittal
Steel USA Inc. (Mittal) and United States Steel Corporation (USSC)
(collectively, petitioners), the U.S. Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from the
Netherlands for Corus Staal BV (Corus) for the period November 1, 2005,
through October 31, 2006. No other interested party requested a review
of Corus for this period of review. For the reasons discussed below,
the Department is rescinding this administrative review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2007.
[[Page 15106]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0408
or at (202) 482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2006, the Department published a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from the
Netherlands, (71 FR 64240). On November 30, 2006, we received requests
from USSC, Mittal and Nucor to conduct an administrative review of
Corus' sales of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products to the
United States during the period November 1, 2005, through October 31,
2006. On December 27, 2006, the Department initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel
flat products from the Netherlands for the period November 1, 2005
through October 31, 2006, in order to determine whether merchandise
imported into the United States was sold at less than fair value by
Corus. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 71 FR 77720 (December 27, 2006).
On February 27, 2007 USSC Mittal and Nucor withdrew their requests
for review. On March 9, 2007, Corus submitted comments in regards to
the withdrawal requests. These comments are summarized and addressed in
an accompanying memorandum, which is being released in conjunction with
this notice. See memorandum to Richard Weible, Office Director, through
Robert James, Program Manager, from David Cordell, entitled ``Comments
on Domestic Interested Parties Requests for Withdrawal.''
Rescission of Review
Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department's regulations provide that
the Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested
review, or withdraws at a later date if the Department determines that
it is reasonable to extend the time limit for withdrawing the request.
As all parties that requested this review have withdrawn those requests
within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation
of the requested review, this review is rescinded. The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the date of the publication of
this notice. The Department will direct CBP to assess antidumping
duties for Corus Staal BVat the cash deposit rate in effect on the date
of entry for entries during the period November 1, 2005, through
October 31, 2006.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under section 351.402(f) of the Department's regulations
to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's
assumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with section 351.305(a)(3) of the Department's
regulations. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 23, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-5864 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
