Hoke, Inc.; Berlin, CT; Notice of Termination of Investigation, 15168 [E7-5850]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
15168
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / Notices
TA–W–61,004; Seydel Companies (The),
Pendergrass, GA: February 12, 2006
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–60,855A; Ixtlan Technology, LLC,
Adrian, MI: January 15, 2006
TA–W–60,870; Lear Corporation,
Interior Systems Division, Sidney,
OH: January 25, 2006
TA–W–60,959; Appalachian Veneer and
Lumber, dba Mundy’s Lumber and
Veneer, Marble, NC: February 12,
2006
TA–W–61,031; Hitachi Transport
System (America), Ltd., Greenville,
SC: February 26, 2006
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
None
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–60,788; Hearth and Home
Technologies, Division of HNI
Industries, Mt. Pleasant, IA.
TA–W–60,893; Wayne Wire Air Bag
Components, Inc., Div. of Wayne
Wire Cloth Products, Inc., Kalkaska,
MI.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:49 Mar 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–61,015; Dan D Company,
Tillamook, OR.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–59,773; Euro Matic Plastics,
Wilson, NC.
TA–W–60,623; Holiday Housewares,
Inc., Leominster, MA.
TA–W–60,734; Primary Staffing
Services, Inc., Workers Employed at
Pearson Artworks, York, PA.
TA–W–60,801; Collins and Aikman—
Tooling and Equipment Group,
Dover, NH.
TA–W–60,821; Hillsdale Automotive, A
Subsidiary of Eaglepicher, Traverse
City, MI.
TA–W–60,882; CAMACO, LLC, Mariana
Division, Marianna, AR.
TA–W–60,883; Gleason Works (The),
Rochester, NY.
TA–W–60,894; Carpenter Company,
Leominster, MA.
TA–W–60,827; Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
Louisville, CO.
TA–W–60,886; Liebert Corporation,
Irvine, CA.
The investigation revealed that the
predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria
(a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a
foreign country under a free trade
agreement or a beneficiary country
under a preferential trade agreement, or
there has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports).
None
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–60,086; Ford Motor Company,
Product Development and
Engineering Center, Dearborn, MI.
TA–W–60,843; Clorox Services
Company, A Subsidiary of the
Clorox Company, Oakland, CA.
TA–W–60,971; PHD Michigan, LLC, A
Subsidiary of PHD Media, LLC,
Troy, MI.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TA–W–61,027; World Aviation Rewind,
Santa Ana, CA.
TA–W–61,052; Allied Systems,
Chesapeake, VA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of March 12
through March 16, 2007. Copies of these
determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
Dated: March 23,2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–5853 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–61,115]
Hoke, Inc.; Berlin, CT; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on March 15,
2007 in response to a petition filed on
behalf of workers of Hoke, Inc., Berlin,
Connecticut.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by a duplicate petition (TA–W–
61,106) instituted on March 15, 2007
that is the subject of an ongoing
investigation for which a determination
has not yet been issued. Further
investigation in this case would
duplicate efforts; therefore the
investigation under this petition has
been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of
March 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–5850 Filed 3–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5850]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-61,115]
Hoke, Inc.; Berlin, CT; Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on March 15, 2007 in response to a petition
filed on behalf of workers of Hoke, Inc., Berlin, Connecticut.
The petitioning group of workers is covered by a duplicate petition
(TA-W-61,106) instituted on March 15, 2007 that is the subject of an
ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been
issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts;
therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-5850 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
