FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments and Allocations and Program Information, 13872-13966 [07-1290]

Download as PDF 13872 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit Administration FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments and Allocations and Program Information Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The ‘‘Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007,’’ (Public Law 110–5), signed into law by President Bush on February 15, 2007, makes funds available for all of the surface transportation programs of the Department of Transportation (DOT) for the Fiscal Year (FY) ending September 30, 2007. This notice provides information on the FY 2007 funding available for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) assistance programs, and provides program guidance and requirements, and information on several program issues important in the current year. The notice also includes tables that show unobligated carryover funding available in FY 2007 under certain discretionary programs from prior years. Finally, this notice also references separate Notices of Funding Availability (NOFA) published concurrently for discretionary opportunities under the Bus and Bus Facilities Program and the Alternatives Analysis Program. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about this notice contact Mary Martha Churchman, Director, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. Please contact the appropriate FTA regional office for any specific requests for information or technical assistance. The Appendix at the end of this notice includes contact information for FTA regional offices. An FTA headquarters contact for each major program area is also included in the discussion of that program in the text of the notice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Table of Contents I. Overview II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs A. Funding Based on FY 2007 Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and SAFETEA–LU Authorization B. Program Funds Set-aside for Project Management Oversight III. FY 2007 FTA Key Program Initiatives and Changes A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation B. Planning Emphasis Areas C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities D. Changes in Flexible Funding Procedures E. National Transit Database (NTD) Strike Policy VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 IV. FTA Programs A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303) B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5304) C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307) D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5308) E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)—Fixed Guideway Modernization F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)—Bus and Bus-Related Facilities G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)—New Starts H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310) I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311) J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3)) K. Public Transportation on Indian Reservation Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(c)) L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5314) M. Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (49 U.S.C. 5316) N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317) O. Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands (49 U.S.C. 5320) P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. 5339) Q. Growing States and High Density States Formula (49 U.S.C. 5340) R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note) V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2007 Grants Requirements A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to Incur Project Costs B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy C. FTA FY 2007 Annual List of Certifications and Assurances D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes E. Grant Application Procedures F. Payments G. Oversight H. Technical Assistance Tables 1. FTA FY 2007 Appropriations and Apportionments for Grant Programs 2. FTA FY 2007 Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program and Statewide Transportation Planning Program Apportionments 3. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 and Section 5340 Urbanized Area Apportionments 4. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 Apportionment Formula 5. FTA FY 2007 Formula Programs Apportionments Data Unit Values 6. FTA FY 2007 Small Transit Intensive Cities Performance Data and Apportionments 7. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas 200,000 or More in Population Eligible to Use Section 5307 Funds for Operating Assistance 8. FTA FY 2007 Section 5308 Clean Fuels Grant Program Allocations 9. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5308 Clean Fuels Allocations 10. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization Apportionments PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 11. FTA FY 2007 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program Apportionment Formula 12. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related Allocations 13. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related Facilities Allocations 14. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 New Starts Allocations 15. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 New Starts Allocations 16. FTA FY 2007 Special Needs for Elderly Individuals and Individuals With Disabilities Apportionments 17. FTA FY 2007 Section 5311 and Section 5340 Nonurbanized Area Formula Apportionments, and Rural Transportation Assistance Program (RTAP) Allocations 18. FTA FY 2007 National Research Program Allocations 19. FTA FY 2007 Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) Apportionments 20. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Jarc Allocations 21. FTA FY 2007 Section 5317 New Freedom Apportionments 22. FTA FY 2007 Section 5339 Alternative Analysis Allocations 23. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5339 Alternative Analysis Alliocations Appendix I. Overview This document apportions or allocates the FY 2007 funds available under the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, among potential program recipients according to statutory formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or congressional designations in Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU). For each FTA program included, we have provided relevant information on the FY 2007 funding currently available, requirements, period of availability, and other related program information and highlights, as appropriate. A separate section of the document provides information on requirements and guidance that are applicable to all FTA programs. II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs A. Funding Based on FY 2007 Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and SAFETEA–LU Authorization The Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, (Pub. L. 110–5, February 15, 2007); hereafter called the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides general funds and obligation authority for trust funds that total $8.97 billion for FTA programs, through September 30, 2007. Table 1 of this document shows the funding for the FTA programs, as provided for in the Continuing E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and the reallocation of any prior year funds to the program. All the Formula Programs and the Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facilities Program are entirely funded from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust Fund in FY 2007. The Section 5309 New Starts program, the Research program, and FTA administrative expenses are funded by appropriations from the General Fund of the Treasury. Congress has enacted a full year Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, in lieu of a new Appropriations Act for FY 2007. This Notice includes tables of apportionments and allocations for FTA programs. Allocations based on SAFETEA–LU are included for some discretionary programs. In addition, FTA will issue separate Notices of Funding Availability to solicit applications for discretionary funds not allocated in SAFETEA–LU. encourage grantees to regularly check the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.gov and the DOT docket management Web site at https://dms.dot.gov for new issuances and to comment to the docket established for each document on relevant issues. B. Planning Emphasis Areas FTA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are not issuing new planning emphasis areas for FY 2007, and are rescinding planning emphasis areas from prior years, in recognition of the priority that planning organizations and grantees must pay to implementing the new and changed provisions of SAFETEA–LU. A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation. C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, did not include any new earmarks under any FTA program. However, SAFETEA–LU contained statutory earmarks under several programs, and they are listed in the tables in this Notice. FTA will honor those statutory earmarks. This Notice also includes tables of unobligated balances for earmarks from prior years under the Bus and Bus Facilities Program, the New Starts Program, the Clean Fuels Program, and the Alternatives Analysis Program. FTA will continue to honor those earmarks. Because there are no new appropriations earmarks in FY 2007, there are unallocated balances available in several programs to be administered at FTA’s discretion. FTA has allocated most of the discretionary New Starts funds to the projects listed in the President’s Budget for FY 2007. FTA is soliciting applications for the unallocated balance of the Bus and Bus Facilities program through two Notices of Funding Availability, one published in a separate Part of today’s Federal Register to address priorities identified by FTA, and the other, published in another Part of today’s Federal Register, to support the Department’s Congestion Initiative. FTA is also issuing a Notice of Funding Availability to solicit applications for the Alternatives Analysis program to advance the state of the art of planning for New Starts projects, included in yet another Part of today’s Federal Register. In FY 2007, FTA continues to focus on implementation of SAFETEA–LU through issuance of new and revised program guidance and regulations. As any documents that include binding obligations on grantees are issued, FTA makes them available for public comment prior to finalizing. We D. Changes in Flexible Funding Procedures FHWA has changed the accounting procedures for flexible funds, high priority projects and transportation improvement projects transfers to FTA. As a result, FTA will no longer be able to combine these transferred funds in a B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project Management Oversight FTA uses a percentage of funds appropriated to certain FTA programs for program oversight activities conducted by the agency. The funds are used to provide necessary oversight activities, including oversight of the construction of any major project under these statutory programs; to conduct safety and security, civil rights, procurement, management and financial reviews and audits; and to provide technical assistance to correct deficiencies identified in compliance reviews and audits. Section 5327 of title 49, U.S.C., 5327 authorizes the takedown of funds from FTA programs for project management oversight. Section 5327 provides oversight takedowns at the following levels: 0.5 percent of Planning funds, 0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula funds, 1 percent of Capital Investment funds, 0.5 percent of Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities formula funds, 0.5 percent of Nonurbanized Area Formula funds, and 0.5 percent of Alternative Transportation in the Parks and Public Lands funds. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES III. FY 2007 FTA Program Initiatives and Changes VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13873 single grant with FTA funds in the program to which they are transferred. FTA is establishing new codes and procedures for grants involving funds transferred from FHWA. See Section V D of this Notice for more information. E. National Transit Database (NTD) Strike Policy It has been FTA’s policy not to make adjustments to the annual funding apportionment of transit agencies for strikes, labor disputes or work stoppages. FTA has changed this policy. Effective with NTD Report Year (RY) 2005 data, FTA will make ‘‘hold harmless’’ adjustments due to strikes, labor disputes, or work stoppages. An adjustment will be made beginning with the FY 2008 apportionment. NTD RY 2005 data are the actual data used in apportionment of FY 2007 funds. NTD RY 2006 data will be used in the FY 2008 apportionment. If your agency had a valid strike, labor dispute or work stoppage during RY 2005 or RY 2006, please contact the NTD Web site. Instructions for requesting a ‘‘hold harmless’’ adjustment can be found in the 2006 NTD Reporting Manual, https:// www.ntdprogram.gov, under publications; see Introduction, page 7. IV. FTA Programs This section of the notice provides available FY 2007 funding and other important program-related information for the three major FTA funding accounts included in the notice (Formula and Bus Grants, Capital Investment Grants, and Research). Of the 17 separate FTA programs contained in this notice that fall under the major program area headings, the funding for ten is apportioned by statutory or administrative formula. Funding for the other seven is allocated on a discretionary or competitive basis. Funding and other important information for each of the 17 programs is presented immediately below. This includes program apportionments or allocations, certain program requirements, length of time FY 2007 funding is available to be committed, and other significant program information pertaining to FY 2007, including the availability of competitive opportunities under several programs. A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303) Section 5303 authorizes a cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive planning program for transportation investment decision-making at the metropolitan area level. State Departments of Transportation are direct recipients of funds, which are E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13874 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices then allocated to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) by formula, for planning activities that support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; increasing the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users; increasing the accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight; protecting and enhancing the environment, promoting energy conservation, and improving quality of life; enhancing the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; promoting efficient system management and operation; and emphasizing the preservation of the existing transportation system. For more about the Metropolitan Planning Program, contact Candace Noonan, Office of Planning and Environment at (202) 366–1648. 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $81,892,800 to the Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303). The total amount apportioned for the Metropolitan Planning Program (to States for MPOs’ use in urbanized areas (UZAs) is $82,373,861, as shown in the table below, after the deduction for oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C. Section 5327) and addition of prior year reapportioned funds. complex UZAs. The amount published for each State is a combined total of both the basic and supplemental allocation. 3. Program Requirements The State allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or portions thereof to provide funds for projects included in an annual work program (the Unified Planning Work Program, or UPWP) that includes both highway and transit planning projects. Each State has either reaffirmed or developed, in consultation with their MPOs, a new allocation formula, as a result of the 2000 Census. The State allocation formula may be changed annually, but any change requires approval by the FTA regional office before grant approval. Program guidance for the Metropolitan Planning Program is found in FTA Circular C8100.1B, Program Guidance and Application Instructions for Metropolitan Planning Program Grants, dated October 25, 1996. FTA is in the process of updating this circular to incorporate references to the new and changed planning requirements in sections 5303 and 5305, as amended by SAFETEA–LU and associated rulemaking. 4. Period of Availability The funds apportioned under the Metropolitan Planning program remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients for four fiscal years—which includes the year of apportionment plus three additional years. Any apportioned METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION funds that remain unobligated at the PLANNING PROGRAM close of business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for Total Appropriation ......... $81,892,800 reapportionment under the Metropolitan Planning Program. Oversight Deduction ....... Prior Year Funds Added ¥464,464 890,525 Total Apportioned ........ 82,373,861 States’ apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 2. Basis for Formula Apportionments As specified in law, 82.72 percent of the amounts authorized for Section 5305 are allocated to the Metropolitan Planning program. FTA allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to the States according to a statutory formula. Eighty percent of the funds are distributed to the States as a basic allocation based on each State’s UZA population, based on the most recent Census. The remaining 20 percent is provided to the States as a supplemental allocation based on an FTA administrative formula to address planning needs in the larger, more VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights a. Planning Emphasis Areas (PEAs). FTA and FHWA are not issuing new PEAs this year, and are rescinding PEAs issued in prior years, in light of the priority given to implementation of SAFETEA–LU planning and program provisions. b. Consolidated Planning Grants. FTA and FHWA planning funds can be consolidated into a single consolidated planning grant (CPG), awarded by either FTA or FHWA. The CPG eliminates the need to monitor individual fund sources, if several have been used, and ensures that the oldest funds will always be used first. Unlike ‘‘flex funds,’’ State planning funds from FHWA will be able to be combined with FTA planning funds in a single grant. Alternatively FTA planning funds can PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 be transferred to FHWA for administration. Under the CPG, States can report metropolitan planning expenditures (to comply with the Single Audit Act) for both FTA and FHWA under the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance number for FTA’s Metropolitan Planning Program (20.505). Additionally, for States with an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL) fund-matching ratio greater than 80 percent, the State (through FTA) can request a waiver of the 20 percent local share requirement in order that all FTA funds used for metropolitan planning in a CPG can be granted at the higher FHWA rate. For some States, this Federal match rate can exceed 90 percent. States interested in transferring planning funds between FTA and FHWA should contact the FTA regional office or FHWA Division Office for more detailed procedures. For further information on CPGs, contact Candace Noonan, Office of Planning and Environment, FTA, at (202) 366–1648, or Kenneth Petty, Office of Planning and Environment, FHWA, at (202) 366–6654. B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5304) This program provides financial assistance to States for Statewide planning and other technical assistance activities (including supplementing the technical assistance program provided through the Metropolitan Planning program), planning support for nonurbanized areas, research, development and demonstration projects, fellowships for training in the public transportation field, university research, and human resource development. For more about the Statewide Planning and Research Program contact Candace Noonan, Office of Planning and Environment, at (202) 366–1648. 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $17,107,200 to the Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5304). The total amount apportioned for the Statewide Planning and Research Program (SPRP) is $17,252,652, as shown in the table below, after the deduction for oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C. Section 5327) and addition of prior year reapportioned funds. E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAM 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights Total Appropriation ......... $17,107,200 The information about Planning Oversight Deduction ....... ¥85,536 Emphasis Areas and CPGs described in Prior Year Funds Added 230,988 Section A. 5, above for the Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303), also Total Apportioned ........ 17,252,652 applies to the Statewide Planning Program. State apportionments for this program C. Urbanized Area Formula Program are displayed in Table 2. (49.U.S.C. 5307) Section 5307 authorizes Federal 2. Basis for Apportionment Formula capital and operating assistance for As specified in law, 17.28 percent of transit in Urbanized Areas (UZAs). A the amounts authorized for Section 5305 UZA is an area with a population of are allocated to the Statewide Planning 50,000 or more that has been defined and Research program. FTA apportions and designated as such in the most recent decennial census by the U.S. funds to States by a statutory formula Census Bureau. The Urbanized Area that is based on information received Formula Program may also be used to from the latest decennial census, and the State’s UZA population as compared support planning activities, as a supplement to that funded under the to the UZA population of all States. Metropolitan Planning program However, a State must receive at least described above. Urbanized Areas 0.5 percent of the amount apportioned Formula Program funds used for under this program. planning must be shown in the UPWP 3. Requirements for MPO(s) with responsibility for that area. Funding is apportioned directly to Funds are provided to States for each UZA with a population of 200,000 statewide planning and research or more, and to the State Governors for programs. These funds may be used for UZAs with populations between 50,000 a variety of purposes such as planning, and 200,000. Eligible applicants are technical studies and assistance, limited to entities designated as demonstrations, management training, recipients in accordance with 49 U.S.C. and cooperative research. In addition, a 5307(a)(2) and other public entities with State may authorize a portion of these the consent of the Designated Recipient. funds to be used to supplement Generally, operating assistance is not an Metropolitan Planning funds allocated eligible expense for UZAs with by the State to its UZAs, as the State populations of 200,000 or more. However, there are several exceptions to deems appropriate. Program guidance for the Statewide Planning and Research this restriction. The exceptions are described in section 2(e) below. program is found in FTA Circular For more information about the C8200.1, Program Guidance and Urbanized Area Formula Program Application Instructions for State contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit Planning and Research Program Grants, Programs, at (202) 366–2053. dated December 27, 2001. FTA is in the process of updating this circular to 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability incorporate the new and changed The Continuing Appropriations planning requirements in sections 5304 Resolution, 2007, provides and 5305, as amended by SAFETEA–LU $3,606,175,000 to the Urbanized Area and associated rulemaking. Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307). The total amount apportioned for the 4. Period of Availability Urbanized Area Formula Program is $3,924,820,789 as shown in the table The funds apportioned under the below, after the deduction for oversight Statewide Planning and Research (authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and program remain available to be including prior year reapportioned obligated by FTA to recipients for four funds and funds apportioned to UZA’s fiscal years—which include the year of from the appropriation for Section 5340 apportionment plus three additional fiscal years. Any apportioned funds that for Growing States and High Density States. remain unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2010, will URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM revert to FTA for reapportionment under the Statewide Planning and Total Appropriation ......... $3,606,175,000 a Research Program. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13875 URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM—Continued Oversight Deduction ....... Prior Year Funds Added Section 5340 Funds Added .......................... ¥27,046,313 4,957,616 Total Apportioned ........ 3,924,820,789 a Includes aside for Formula. 340,734,486 $36,061,750 for one percent setSmall Transit Intensive Cities Table 3 displays the amounts apportioned under the Urbanized Area Formula Program. 2. Basis for Formula Apportionment FTA apportions Urbanized Area Formula Program funds based on legislative formulas. Different formulas apply to UZAs with populations of 200,000 or more and UZAs with populations less than 200,000. For UZAs 50,000 to 199,999 in population, the formula is based simply on population and population density. For UZAs with populations of 200,000 and more, the formula is based on a combination of bus revenue vehicle miles, bus passenger miles, fixed guideway revenue vehicle miles, and fixed guideway route miles, as well as population and population density. Table 4 includes detailed information about the formulas. To calculate a UZA’s FY 2007 apportionment, FTA used population and population density statistics from the 2000 Census and (when applicable) validated mileage and transit service data from transit providers’ 2005 National Transit Database (NTD) Report Year. Also, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b). FTA used 60 percent of the directional route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger operations system to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage, Alaska UZA. We have calculated dollar unit values for the formula factors used in the Urbanized Area Formula Program apportionment calculations. These values represent the amount of money each unit of a factor is worth in this year’s apportionment. The unit values change each year, based on all of the data used to calculate the apportionments. The dollar unit values for FY 2007 are displayed in Table 5. To replicate the basic formula component of a UZA’s apportionment, multiply the dollar unit value by the appropriate formula factor (i.e., the population, population x population density), and (when applicable, data from the NTD (i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles, passenger miles, and operating cost). E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 13876 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices In FY 2007, one percent of funds appropriated for Section 5307, $36,061,750, is set aside for Small Transit Intensive Cities (STIC). FTA apportions these funds to UZAs under 200,000 in population that operate at a level of service equal to or above the industry average level of service for all UZAs with a population of at least 200,000, but not more than 999,999, in one or more of six performance categories: passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue mile, passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue hour, vehicle revenue miles per capita, vehicle revenue hours per capita, passenger miles traveled per capita, and passengers per capita. The data for these categories for the purpose of FY 2007 apportionments comes from the NTD reports for the 2005 reporting year. This data is used to determine a UZA’s eligibility under the STIC formula, and is also used in the STIC apportionment calculations. Because this performance data change with each year’s NTD reports, the UZAs eligible for STIC funds and the amount each receives may vary each year. In FY 2007, FTA apportioned $120,608 for each performance factor/category for which the urbanized area exceeded the national average for UZAs with a population of at least 200,000 but not more than 999,999. In addition to the funds apportioned to UZAs, according to the Section 5307 formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C. 5336, FTA also apportions funds to urbanized areas under Section 5340 Growing States and High Density States formula factors. In FY 2007, FTA apportioned $138,734,486 to 453 UZA’s in 50 Growing States and $202,000,000 to 46 UZA’s in seven High Density States. Half of the funds appropriated for Section 5340 are available to Growing States and half to High Density States. FTA apportions Growing States funds by a formula based on State population forecasts for 15 years beyond the most recent Census. FTA distributes the amounts apportioned for each State between UZAs and nonurbanized areas based on the ratio of urbanized/ nonurbanized population within each State in the 2000 census. FTA apportions the High Density States funds to States with population densities in excess of 370 persons per square mile. These funds are apportioned only to UZAs within those States. FTA pro-rates each UZA’s share of the High Density funds based on the population of the UZAs in the State in the 2000 census. FTA cannot provide unit values for the Growing States or High Density formulas because the allocations to VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 individual States and urbanized areas are based on their relative population data, rather than on a national per capita basis. Based on language in the SAFETEA– LU conference report that directs FTA to show a single apportionment amount for Section 5307, STIC and Section 5340, FTA shows a single Section 5307 apportionment amount for each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized Area Formula apportionments. The amount includes funds apportioned based on the Section 5307 formula factors, any STIC funds, and any Growing States and High Density States funding allocated to the area. FTA uses separate formulas calculations to generate the respective apportionment amounts for the Section 5307, STIC and Section 5340. For technical assistance purposes, the UZAs that received STIC funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will make available breakouts of the funding allocated to each UZA under these formulas, upon request to the regional office. 3. Program Requirements Program guidance for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is presently found in FTA Circular C9030.1C, Urbanized Area Formula Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated October 1, 1998, and supplemented by additional information or changes provided in this document. FTA is in the process of updating the circular to incorporate changes resulting from language in SAFETEA–LU. Several important program requirements are highlighted below. a. Urbanized Area Formula Apportionments to Governors. For small UZAs, those with a population of less than 200,000, FTA apportions funds to the Governor of each State for distribution. A single total Governor apportionment amount for the Urbanized Area Formula, STIC, and Growing States and High Density States is shown in the Urbanized Area Formula Apportionment table 3. The table also shows the apportionment amount attributable to each small UZA within the State. The Governor may determine the sub-allocation of funds among the small UZAs except that funds attributed to a small UZA that is located within the planning boundaries of a Transportation Management Area (TMA) must be obligated to that small UZA, as discussed in subsection f below. b. Transit Enhancements. Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that one percent of Section 5307 funds apportioned to UZAs with populations of 200,000 or more be spent on eligible transit enhancement activities or projects. This PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 requirement is now treated as a certification, rather than as a set-aside as was the case under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA– 21). Designated recipients in UZAs with populations of 200,000 or more certify they are spending not less than one percent of Section 5307 funds for transit enhancements. In addition, Designated Recipients must submit an annual report on how they spent the money with the Federal fiscal year’s final quarterly progress report in TEAM-Web. The report should include the following elements: (a) Grantee name, (b) UZA name and number, (c) FTA project number, (d) transit enhancement category, (e) brief description of enhancement and progress towards project implementation, (f) activity line item code from the approved budget, and (g) amount awarded by FTA for the enhancement. The list of transit enhancement categories and activity line item (ALI) codes may be found in the table of Scope and ALI codes on TEAM-Web, which can be accessed at https://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov. The term ‘‘transit enhancement’’ includes projects or project elements that are designed to enhance public transportation service or use and are physically or functionally related to transit facilities. Eligible enhancements include the following: (1) Historic preservation, rehabilitation, and operation of historic mass transportation buildings, structures, and facilities (including historic bus and railroad facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3) landscaping and other scenic beautification, including tables, benches, trash receptacles, and street lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian access and walkways; (6) bicycle access, including bicycle storage facilities and installing equipment for transporting bicycles on mass transportation vehicles; (7) transit connections to parks within the recipient’s transit service area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced access for persons with disabilities to mass transportation. It is the responsibility of the MPO to determine how the one-percent for transit enhancements will be allotted to transit projects. The one percent minimum requirement does not preclude more than one percent from being expended in a UZA for transit enhancements. However, activities that are only eligible as enhancements—in particular, operating costs for historic facilities—may be assisted only within the one-percent funding level. c. Transit Security Projects. Pursuant to section 5307(d)(1)(J), each recipient of Urbanized Area Formula funds must certify that of the amount received each E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices fiscal year, it will expend at least one percent on ‘‘public transportation security projects’’ or must certify that it has decided the expenditure is not necessary. For applicants not eligible to receive Section 5307 funds for operating assistance, only capital security projects may be funded with the one percent. SAFETEA–LU, however, expanded the definition of eligible ‘‘capital’’ projects to include specific crime prevention and security activities, including: (1) Projects to refine and develop security and emergency response plans; (2) projects aimed at detecting chemical and biological agents in public transportation; (3) the conduct of emergency response drills with public transportation agencies and local first response agencies; and (4) security training for public transportation employees, but excluding all expenses related to operations, other than such expenses incurred in conducting emergency drills and training. New ALI codes have been established for these four new capital activities. The one percent may also include security expenditures included within other capital activities, and, where the recipient is eligible, operating assistance. The relevant ALI codes would be used for those activities. FTA is often called upon to report to Congress and others on how grantees are expending Federal funds for security enhancements. To facilitate tracking of grantees’ security expenditures, which are not always evident when included within larger capital or operating activity line items in the grant budget, we have established a non-additive (‘‘non-add’’) scope code for security expenditures—Scope 991. The non-add scope is to be used to aggregate activities included in other scopes, and it does not increase the budget total. Section 5307 grantees should include this non-add scope in the project budget for each new Section 5307 grant application or amendment. Under this non-add scope, the applicant should repeat the full amount of any of the line items in the budget that are exclusively for security and include the portion of any other line item in the project budget that is attributable to security, using under the non-add scope the same line item used in the project budget. The grantee can modify the ALI description or use the extended text feature, if necessary, to describe the security expenditures. The grantee must provide information regarding its use of the one percent for security as part of each Section 5307 grant application, using a special screen in TEAM–Web. If the grantee has certified that it is not necessary to VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 expend one percent for security, the Section 5307 grant application must include information to support that certification. FTA will not process an application for a Section 5307 grant until the security information is complete. d. FY 2007 Operating Assistance. UZAs under 200,000 population may use Section 5307 funds for operating assistance. In addition, Section 5307, as amended by, SAFETEA–LU and TEA– 21, allows some UZAs with a population of 200,000 or more to use FY 2007 Urbanized Area Formula funds for operating assistance under certain conditions. The specific provisions allowing the limited use of operating assistance in large UZAs are as follows: (1) Section 5307(b)(2) allows UZAs that grew in population from under 200,000 to over 200,000, as a result of the 2000 Census to use FY 2007 funds for operating assistance in an amount up to 25 percent of the grandfathered amount for FY 2005 funds. (The provision is completely phased out in FY 2008.) Table 7 shows the maximum amount of each eligible UZA’s Section 5307 apportionment that can be used for operating assistance. (2) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for grants for the operating costs of equipment and facilities for use in public transportation in the Evansville, IN–KY urbanized area, for a portion or portions of the UZA if: the portion of the UZA includes only one State; the population of the portion is less than 30,000; and the grants will be not used to provide public transportation outside of the portion of the UZA. (3) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides operating costs of equipment and facilities for use in public transportation for local governmental authorities in areas which adopted transit operating and financing plans that became a part of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result of the 2000 decennial census of population, but lie outside the service area of the principal public transportation agency that serves the Houston UZA. (4) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the formula to be used to apportion Section 5307 funds to UZAs with population of 200,000 or more. SAFETEA–LU amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that stated, ‘‘* * * except that the amount apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized area under subsection (b) shall be available to the Alaska Railroad for any costs related to its passenger operations.’’ This language has the effect of directing that funds apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized area, under the fixed guideway tiers of the Section 5307 apportionment formula, be made PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13877 available to the Alaska Railroad, and that these funds may be used for any capital or operating costs related to its passenger operations. (5) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA–21, as amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note), provides an exception to the restriction on the use of operating assistance in a UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, by allowing transit providers/ grantees that provide service exclusively to elderly persons and persons with disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer vehicles to use Section 5307 funds apportioned to the UZA for operating assistance. The total amount of funding made available for this purpose under Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million. Transit providers/grantees eligible under this provision have already been identified and notified. e. Sources of Local Match. Pursuant to Section 5307(e), the Federal share of an urbanized area formula grant is 80 percent of net project cost for a capital project and 50 percent of net project cost for operating assistance. The remainder of the net project cost (i.e., 20 percent and 50 percent, respectively) shall be provided from the following sources: 1. In cash from non-Government sources other than revenues from providing public transportation services; 2. From revenues derived from the sale of advertising and concessions; 3. From an undistributed cash surplus, a replacement or depreciation cash fund or reserve, or new capital; 4. From amounts received under a service agreement with a State or local social service agency or private social service organization; and 5. Proceeds from the issuance of revenue bonds. In addition, funds from Section 403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be used to match Urbanized Area Formula funds. f. Designated Transportation Management Areas (TMA). Guidance for setting the boundaries of TMAs is in the joint transportation planning regulations codified at 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613. In some cases, the TMA planning boundaries established by the MPO for the designated TMA includes one or more small UZAs. In addition, one small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has been designated as a TMA. In either of these situations, the Governor cannot allocate ‘‘Governor’s Apportionment’’ funds attributed to the small UZAs to other areas; that is, the Governor only has discretion to allocate Governor’s Apportionment funds attributable to E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13878 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices areas that are outside of designated TMA planning boundaries. The list of small UZAs included within the planning boundaries of Designated TMA Small urbanized area included in TMA planning boundary Albany, NY ............................................... Houston, TX ............................................. Jacksonville, FL ....................................... Orlando, FL .............................................. Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL ......................... Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ................. Pittsburgh, PA .......................................... Seattle, WA .............................................. Washington, DC–VA–MD ........................ Saratoga Springs, NY. Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX; The Woodlands, TX. St. Augustine, FL. Kissimmee, FL. Titusville, FL. Pottstown, PA. Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-Steubenville, OH–PA (PA portion); Uniontown-Connellsville, PA. Bremerton, WA. Frederick, MD. The MPO must notify the Associate Administrator for Program Management, Federal Transit Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, in writing, no later than July 1 of each year, to identify any small UZA within the planning boundaries of a TMA. g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used for Highway Purposes. Funds apportioned to a TMA are eligible for transfer to FHWA for highway projects. However, before funds can be transferred, the following conditions must be met: (1) Such use must be approved by the MPO in writing, after appropriate notice and opportunity for comment and appeal are provided to affected transit providers; (2) in the determination of the Secretary, such funds are not needed for investments required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); and (3) the MPO determines that local transit needs are being addressed. The MPO should notify the appropriate FTA Regional Administrator of its intent to use FTA funds for highway purposes, as prescribed in section V.D below. Urbanized Area Formula funds that are designated by the MPO for highway projects will be transferred to and administered by FHWA. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 4. Period of Availability The Urbanized Area Formula Program funds apportioned in this notice remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients until September 30, 2010. Any of these apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for reapportionment under the Urbanized Area Formula Program. 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights In each UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, the Governor in consultation with responsible local officials, and publicly owned operators of public transportation has designated VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 designated TMAs is provided in the table below. Jkt 211001 one or more entities to be the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 funds apportioned to the UZA. The same entity(s) may or may not be the Designated Recipient for the Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom program funds apportioned to the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 population, the State is the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 as well as JARC and New Freedom programs. The Designated Recipient for Section 5307 may authorize other entities to apply directly to FTA for Section 5307 grants pursuant to a supplemental agreement. While the requirement that projects selected for funding be included in a locally developed coordinated public transit/human service transportation plan is not included in Section 5307 as it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and 5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that in their role as public transit providers, recipients of Section 5307 funds will be participants in the local planning process for these programs. D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49.U.S.C. 5308) The Clean Fuels Grant Program supports the use of alternative fuels in air quality maintenance or nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon monoxide through capital grants to urbanized areas for clean fuel vehicles and facilities. Previously an unfunded Formula Program under TEA–21, the program is now a discretionary program. FTA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the discretionary program on October 16, 2006, and is now in the process of reviewing comments and finalizing the rule. For more information about this program contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $45,000,000 to the Clean Fuels Grant Program (49 U.S.C. 5308). SAFETEA–LU earmarked $18,721,000 for specific Clean Fuel PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 projects. The balance of $26,279,000 was transferred to the discretionary Bus Program. CLEAN FUELS GRANT PROGRAM Total Appropriation ......... Transfer to Bus and Bus Facility ......................... Funds Allocated to SAFETEA–LU Earmarks .......................... $45,000,000 ¥$26,279,000 18,721,000 Allocations to projects earmarked under the Clean Fuels program in SAFETEA–LU are displayed in Table 8. 2. Basis for Allocation of Funds. Section 3044(b) of SAFETEA–LU included 16 projects to be funded through the Clean Fuels program. Table 8 displays the amounts available in FY 2007 to the Clean Fuels projects designated in SAFETEA–LU. FY 2006 carryover funds are shown in Table 9. No funds are available for competitive allocation in FY 2007. 3. Requirements Clean Fuels program funds may be made available to any grantee in a UZA that is designated as maintenance or nonattainment area for ozone or carbon monoxide as defined in the Clean Air Act. Eligible recipients include Section 5307 Designated Recipients as well as recipients in small UZAs. In the case of a small UZA, the State in which the area is located will act as the recipient. Eligible projects include the purchase or lease of clean fuel buses (including buses that employ a lightweight composite primary structure), the construction or lease of clean fuel buses or electrical recharging facilities and related equipment for such buses, and construction or improvement of public transportation facilities to accommodate clean fuel buses. Legislation will be necessary if a recipient wishes to use Clean Fuels funds earmarked in SAFETEA–LU for E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13879 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices eligible program activities outside the scope of a project description. Unless otherwise specified in law, grants made under the Clean Fuels program must meet all other eligibility requirements as outlined in Section 5308. 4. Period of Availability Funds designated for specific Clean Fuels Program projects remain available for obligation for three fiscal years, which includes the year of appropriation plus two additional fiscal years. The FY 2007 funding for projects included in this notice remains available through September 30, 2009. Clean Fuels funds not obligated in an FTA grant for their original purpose at the end of the period of availability will generally be made available for other projects. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)—Fixed Guideway Modernization This program provides capital assistance for the modernization of existing fixed guideway systems. Funds are allocated by a statutory formula to UZAs with fixed guideway systems that have been in operation for at least seven years. A ‘‘fixed guideway’’ refers to any transit service that uses exclusive or controlled rights-of-way or rails, entirely or in part. The term includes heavy rail, commuter rail, light rail, monorail, trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car, automated guideway transit, ferryboats, that portion of motor bus service operated on exclusive or controlled rights-of-way, and highoccupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes. Eligible applicants are the public transit authorities in those urbanized areas to which the funds are allocated. For more information about Fixed Guideway Modernization contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366– 2053. The FY 2007 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program apportionments to eligible areas are displayed in Table 10. 2. Basis for Formula Apportionment The formula for allocating the Fixed Guideway Modernization funds contains seven tiers. The apportionment of funding under the first four tiers is based on amounts specified in law and NTD data used to apportion funds in FY 1997. Funding under the last three tiers is apportioned based on the latest available data on route miles and revenue vehicle miles on segments at least seven years old, as reported to the NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C. provides for the inclusion of Morgantown, West Virginia (population 55,997) as an eligible UZA for purposes of apportioning fixed guideway modernization funds. Also, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b) FTA used 60 percent of the directional route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger operations system to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage, Alaska UZA under the Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization formula. FY 2007 Formula apportionments are based on data grantees provided to the NTD for the 2005 reporting year. Table 11 provides additional information and details on the formula. Dollar unit values for the formula factors used in the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program are displayed in Table 5. To replicate an area’s apportionment, multiply the dollar unit value by the appropriate formula factor, i.e., route miles and revenue vehicle miles. 3. Program Requirements Fixed Guideway Modernization funds must be used for capital projects to maintain, modernize, or improve fixed guideway systems. Eligible UZAs (those with a population of 200,000 or more) 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability with fixed guideway systems that are at The Continuing Appropriations least seven years old are entitled to Resolution, 2007, provides receive Fixed Guideway Modernization $1,448,000,000 to the Fixed Guideway funds. A threshold level of more than Modernization Program. The total one mile of fixed guideway is required amount apportioned for the Fixed in order to receive Fixed Guideway Guideway Modernization Program is Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs $1,433,520,000, after the deduction for reporting one mile or less of fixed oversight, as shown in the table below. guideway mileage under the NTD are not included. However, funds FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION apportioned to an urbanized area may be used on any fixed guideway segment PROGRAM in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed Total Appropriation ......... $1,448,000,000 Guideway Modernization is presently found in FTA Circular C9300.1A, Oversight Deduction ....... ¥14,480,000 Capital Program: Grant Application Total Apportioned ........ 1,433,520,000 Instructions, dated October 1, 1998. FTA is in the process of updating this VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 circular to incorporate changes resulting from language in SAFETEA–LU. 4. Period of Availability The funds apportioned in this notice under the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients for three fiscal years following FY 2007. Any of these apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for reapportionment under the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program. F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)—Bus and Bus-Related Facilities This program provides capital assistance for new and replacement buses and related facilities. Funds are allocated on a discretionary basis. Eligible purposes are acquisition of buses for fleet and service expansion, bus maintenance and administrative facilities, transfer facilities, bus malls, transportation centers, intermodal terminals, park-and-ride stations, acquisition of replacement vehicles, bus rebuilds, bus preventive maintenance, passenger amenities such as passenger shelters and bus stop signs, accessory and miscellaneous equipment such as mobile radio units, supervisory vehicles, fare boxes, computers, and shop and garage equipment. Eligible applicants are State and local governmental authorities. Eligible subrecipients include other public agencies, private companies engaged in public transportation and private nonprofit organizations. For more information about Bus and Bus-Related Facilities contact Maria Wright, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $881,779,000 for the bus and bus facilities program. This amount includes $855,500,000 provided for the Bus Program and $26,279,000 transferred from the Clean Fuels Program. The amount of funding for projects designated in Section 3044 of SAFETEA–LU for Bus and BusRelated Facilities in FY 2007 is $459,670,089. The balance remains unallocated, as shown in the following table. BUS AND BUS FACILITY PROGRAM Total Appropriation ......... $881,779,000 a Oversight Deduction ....... SAFETEA–LU Statutory Provisions Projects ..... ¥8,817,790 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 459,670,089 13880 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices report language, you must submit your request for reprogramming to the House Funds Available for Disand Senate Committees on cretionary/Competitive Appropriations for resolution. FTA will Allocation ..................... 413,291,121 not reprogram projects Congress designated in report language without Total Funds to be Allocated ........................ 872,961,210 direction from the Appropriations Committees. a Includes $26,279,000 transferred from FTA will honor projects earmarked to Clean Fuels Grant Program receive Section 5309 bus funds in The FY 2007 Bus and Bus Facility SAFETEA–LU. Legislation will be Program allocations are displayed in necessary to amend the earmark if you Table 12. wish to use funds for project activities outside the scope of the project 2. Basis for Allocations description. Funds are provided annually under Grants made under the Bus and BusSection 5309 for discretionary allocation Related Facilities program must meet all for bus and bus facilities projects. other eligibility requirements as SAFETEA–LU listed 646 earmarked outlined in Section 5309 unless projects to be funded each year through otherwise specified in law. the Bus Program (Section 3044) and Program guidance for Bus and Busspecified additional projects in Section Related Facilities is found in FTA 5309(m)(7). Table 12 displays the Circular C9300.1A, Capital Program: allocation of the FY 2007 Bus and BusGrant Application Instructions. FTA is Related Facilities funds by State and in the process of updating this circular project for projects earmarked in to incorporate changes resulting from SAFETEA–LU. The table includes a language in SAFETEA–LU. SAFETEA–LU project number for each 4. Period of Availability project listed in Section 3044. No additional projects were earmarked in The FY 2007 Bus and Bus-Related the Continuing Appropriations Facilities funds not obligated for their Resolution, 2007. In fact, Section 112 of original purpose as of September 30, the Continuing Appropriations 2009, may be made available for other Resolution, 2007, (H.J. Res 20) projects under 49 U.S.C. 5309. The specifically precluded using FY 2007 unusual appropriations process in FY funds to award grants for projects 2007 has not yet resulted in directions designated Section 5309 bus funds in from Congress to FTA not to reallocate the statement of managers unobligated bus program funds for accompanying the FY 2006 Department designations that lapsed at the end of of Transportation Appropriations Act FY 2006. (Pub. L. 109–115). 5. Other Program or Allocation Related 3. Requirements Information and Highlights Section 125 and Section 113 of the FY Prior year unobligated balances for 2005 and FY 2006 Department of Bus and Bus-Related allocations in the Transportation Appropriations Acts, amount of $870,471,637 remain respectively, make projects identified in available for obligation in FY 2007. This the statement of managers automatically includes $861,331,362 in fiscal years eligible to receive the funds designated 2005 and 2006 unobligated allocations, to the project ‘‘notwithstanding any and $9,140,275 for fiscal years 2002– other provision of law.’’ Similar 2004 unobligated allocations that were language was first included as a general extended by previous direction by the provision in Section 547 of the FY 2004 House and Senate appropriation Department of Transportation committees. The unobligated amounts Appropriations Acts. In addition, available as of September 30, 2006, are Section 3044 of SAFETEA–LU displayed in Table 13. In two Notices of Funding earmarked 646 Bus and Bus Facilities Availability (NOFA), published as projects in FY 2007. FTA will review separate parts of today’s Federal Congressional intent on a case by case Register, FTA is issuing procedures for basis. FTA honors Congressional earmarks grantees to apply competitively for for the purpose designated, for purposes discretionary funding for projects eligible under the program or under the eligible under the Bus and Bus Facilities expanded eligibility of a program. One NOFA invites ‘‘notwithstanding’’ provision. If you applications from States and from want to apply to use funds designated Designated Recipients under the under the Bus Program in any year for Urbanized Area Formula Program to project activities outside the scope of fund bus and bus facility projects that the project designation included in address the following FTA priorities: sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES BUS AND BUS FACILITY PROGRAM VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 Fleet replacement needs that cannot be met with formula funds, fleet expansion for significant service improvements, purchase of clean fuel vehicles, facility construction to support increased service or introduction of clean fuels, and intermodal terminal projects that include intercity bus providers, and Gulf Coast recovery. The other NOFA addresses the Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative and invites proposals from specific urbanized areas identified as the most congested in the nation. G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)—New Starts The New Starts program provides funds for construction of new fixed guideway systems or extensions to existing fixed guideway systems. Eligible purposes are light rail, rapid rail (heavy rail), commuter rail, monorail, automated fixed guideway system (such as a ‘‘people mover’’), or a busway/high occupancy vehicle (HOV) facility, Bus Rapid Transit that is fixed guideway, or an extension of any of these. Projects become candidates for funding under this program by successfully completing the appropriate steps in the major capital investment planning and project development process. Major new fixed guideway projects, or extensions to existing systems, financed with New Starts funds typically receive these funds through a full funding grant agreement (FFGA) that defines the scope of the project and specifies the total multi-year Federal commitment to the project. Beginning in FY 2007, up to $200,000,000 each year is designated for ‘‘Small Starts’’ (Section 5309(e)) projects with a New Starts share of less than $75,000,000 and a net project cost of less than $250,000,000. The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, however, did not set aside a specific amount for Small Starts from the amounts appropriated for Capital Investment Grants. Section 5309(m)(6) also made annual allocations of New Start funding available to Alaska and Hawaii for ferryboats and to the Denali Commission in Anchorage, Alaska under the terms of Section 307(e) of the Denali Commission Act of 1998 (42 U.S.C. 3121) for docks, waterfront development projects and related transportation infrastructure in rural Alaska communities. For more information about New Starts project development contact Sean Libberton, Office of Planning and Environment, at (202) 366–4033, or for information about published allocations contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability 4. Period of Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $1,566,000,000 to New Starts. The total amount allocated for New Starts is $1,550,340,000, as shown in the table below. New Starts funds remain available for three fiscal years (including the fiscal year the funds are made available or appropriated plus two additional years.) FY 2007 funds remain available through September 30, 2009. Funds may be extended by Congress or made available for other projects after the period of availability has expired. The unusual appropriations process in FY 2007 has not yet resulted in any extensions of prior year unobligated balances that lapsed at the end of FY 2006. NEW STARTS Total Appropriation ....... $1,566,000,000 a Oversight Deduction ..... Funds Allocated to Specific Projects in Table 14 .............................. Unallocated Funds Available for Discretionary/Competitive Allocation ................... ¥15,660,000 Total Funds to be Allocated ................... b 1,284,478,399 265,861,601 1,550,340,000 a Includes $200 million for Small Starts. $20 million for the Denali Commission and Alaska and Hawaii Ferry projects. b Includes 2. Basis for Allocation Congress included authorizations for specific New Starts projects in SAFETEA–LU and in statutory takedowns from the program for Alaska and Hawaii Ferryboats and the Denali Commission. The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, did not include project allocations. FTA has allocated available FY 2007 New Starts funding as shown in Table 14, based on existing FFGAs and the President’s Budget for FY 2007. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 3. Requirements Because New Starts projects are earmarked in law rather than report language, reprogramming for a purpose other than that specified must also occur in law. New Starts projects are subject to a complex set of approvals related to planning and project development set forth in 49 CFR Part 611. FTA has published a number of rulemakings and interim guidance documents related to the New Starts program since the passage of SAFETEA– LU. Grantees should reference the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov for the most current program guidance about project developments and management. Grant related guidance for New Starts is found in FTA Circular C9300.1A, Capital Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated October 1, 1998; and C5200.1A, Full Funding Grant Agreement Guidance, dated December 5, 2002. FTA is in the process of updating these circulars to incorporate changes resulting from language in SAFETEA–LU and recent rulemakings. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights Prior year unobligated allocations for New Starts in the amount of $717,087,493 remain available for obligation in FY 2007. This amount includes $118,384,337 in FY 2005 and $598,703,156 in FY 2006 unobligated allocations. These unobligated amounts are displayed in Table 15. Information on pre-award authority for New Starts projects is detailed in section V below. H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals With Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310) This program provides formula funding to States for capital projects to assist private nonprofit groups in meeting the transportation needs of the elderly and individuals with disabilities when the public transportation service provided in the area is unavailable, insufficient, or inappropriate to meet these needs. A State agency designated by the Governor administers the Section 5310 program. The State’s responsibilities include: notifying eligible local entities of funding availability; developing project selection criteria; determining applicant eligibility; selecting projects for funding; and ensuring that all subrecipients comply with Federal requirements. Eligible nonprofit organizations or public bodies must apply directly to the designated State agency for assistance under this program. For more information about the Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities Program contact Cheryl Oliver, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $117,000,000 to the Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310). After deduction of 0.5 percent for oversight, and the addition of reapportioned prior year funds, $116,659,554 remains available for allocation to the States. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13881 ELDERLY AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM Total Appropriation ......... $117,000,000 Oversight Deduction ....... Prior Year Funds Added ¥585,000 244,554 Total Apportioned ........ 116,659,554 The FY 2007 Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities Program apportionments to the States are displayed in Table 16. 2. Basis for Apportionment FTA allocates funds to the States by an administrative formula consisting of a $125,000 floor for each State ($50,000 for smaller territories) with the balance allocated based on 2000 Census population data for persons aged 65 and over and for persons with disabilities. 3. Requirements Funds are available to support the capital costs of transportation services for older adults and people with disabilities. Uniquely under this program, eligible capital costs include the acquisition of service. Seven specified States (Alaska, Louisiana, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, and Wisconsin) may use up to 33 percent of their apportionment for operating assistance under the terms of the SAFETEA–LU Section 3012(b) pilot program. Capital assistance is provided on an 80 percent Federal, 20 percent local matching basis except that Section 5310(c) allows States eligible for a higher match under the sliding scale for FHWA programs to use that match ratio for Section 5310 capital projects. Operating assistance is 50 percent Federal, 50 percent local, or the 62.5 percent of the sliding scale Federal share. Funds provided under other Federal programs (other than those of the DOT, with the exception of the Federal Lands Highway Program established by 23 U.S.C. 204) may be used as match. Revenue from service contracts may also be used as local match. While the assistance is intended primarily for private non-profit organizations, public bodies approved by the State to coordinate services for the elderly and individuals with disabilities, or any public body that certifies to the State that there are no non-profit organizations in the area that are readily available to carry out the service, may receive these funds. States may use up to ten percent of their annual apportionment to administer, plan, and provide technical E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13882 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices assistance for a funded project. No local share is required for these program administrative funds. Funds used under this program for planning must be shown in the United Planning Work Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with responsibility for that area. The State recipient must certify that: the projects selected were derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan; and, the plan was developed through a process that included representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public. The locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation planning process must be coordinated and consistent with the metropolitan and statewide planning processes and funding for the program must included in the metropolitan and statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity or aggregation consistent with State and local policies and procedures. Finally, the State must certify that allocations of the grant to subrecipients are made on a fair and equitable basis. The coordinated planning requirement is also a requirement in two additional programs. Projects selected for funding under the Job Access Reverse Commute program and the New Freedom program are also required to be derived from a locally developed coordinated public transit/human service transportation plan. FTA anticipates that most areas will develop one consolidated plan for all the programs, which may include separate elements and other human service transportation programs. The Section 5310 program is subject to the requirements of Section 5307 to the extent the Secretary determines appropriate. Program guidance is found in FTA C 9070.1E, dated October 1, 1998. FTA published a proposed revised circular for this program and is currently reviewing comments submitted to the docket. The new circular will be posted on the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov when it is issued. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 4. Period of Availability FTA has administratively established a three year period of availability for Section 5310 funds. Funds allocated to States under the Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities Program in this notice must be obligated by September 30, 2009. Any funding that remains unobligated as of that date will revert to FTA for reapportionment among the VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 States under the Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities Program. 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights States may transfer Section 5310 funds to Section 5307 or Section 5311, but only for projects selected under the Section 5310 program, not as a general supplement for those programs. FTA anticipates that the States would use this flexibility primarily for projects to be implemented by a Section 5307 recipient in a small urbanized area, or for Federally recognized Indian Tribes that elect to receive funds as a direct recipient from FTA under Section 5311. A State that transfers Section 5310 funds to Section 5307 must certify that each project for which the funds are transferred has been coordinated with private nonprofit providers of services. FTA has established a new scope code (641) to track 5310 projects included within a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is permitted but not required. FTA expects primarily to award stand-alone Section 5310 grants to the State for any and all subrecipients. I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311) This program provides formula funding to States and Indian Tribes for the purpose of supporting public transportation in areas with a population of less than 50,000. Funding may be used for capital, operating, State administration, and project administration expenses. Eligible subrecipients include State and local public agencies, Indian Tribes, private non-profit organizations, and private operators of public transportation services, including intercity bus companies. Indian Tribes are also eligible direct recipients under Section 5311, both for funds apportioned to the States and for projects selected to be funded with funds set aside for a separate Tribal Transit Program. For more information about the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $404,000,000 to the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311). The total amount apportioned for the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is $386,179,139, after take-downs of two percent for the Rural Transportation Assistance Program (RTAP), 0.5 percent for oversight, and $10,000,000 for the Tribal Transit Program, and the addition PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 of Section 5340 funds and prior year funds reapportioned, as shown in the table below. NONURBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM Total Appropriation ......... $404,000,000 Oversight Deduction ....... RTAP Takedown ............ Tribal Transit Takedown Prior Year Funds Added Section 5340 Funds Added .......................... 2,020,000 8,080,000 10,000,000 2,277,688 63,265,514 Total Apportioned ........ 449,443,202 The FY 2007 Nonurbanized Area Formula apportionments to the States are displayed in Table 17. 2. Basis for Apportionments FTA apportions the funds available for apportionment after take-down for oversight, the Tribal Transit Program, and RTAP according to a statutory formula. FTA apportions the first twenty percent to the States based on land area in nonurbanized areas with no state receiving more than 5 percent of the amount apportioned. FTA apportions the remaining eighty percent based on nonurbanized population of each State relative to the national nonurbanized population. FTA does not apportion Section 5311 funds to the Virgin Islands, which by a statutory exception are treated as an urbanized area for purposes of the Section 5307 formula program. FTA also allocated $63,265,514 to the 50 States for nonurbanized areas from the Growing States portion of Section 5340. FTA apportions Growing States funds by a formula based on State population forecasts for 15 years beyond the most recent census. FTA distributes the amounts apportioned for each State between UZAs and nonurbanized areas based on the ratio of urbanized/ nonurbanized population within each State in the 2000 census. 3. Program Requirements The Nonurbanized Area Formula Program provides capital, operating and administrative assistance for public transit service in areas under 50,000 in population. The Federal share for capital assistance is 80 percent and for operating assistance is 50 percent, except that States eligible for the sliding scale match under FHWA programs may use that match ratio for Section 5311 capital projects and 62.5 percent of the sliding scale capital match ratio for operating projects. E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices Each State must spend no less than 15 percent of its FY 2007 Nonurbanized Area Formula apportionment for the development and support of intercity bus transportation, unless the State certifies, after consultation with affected intercity bus service providers, that the intercity bus service needs of the State are being adequately met. SAFETEA–LU added this requirement for consultation with the industry to strengthen the certification requirement. FTA also encourages consultation with other stakeholders, such as communities affected by loss of intercity service. Each State prepares an annual program of projects, which must provide for fair and equitable distribution of funds within the States, including Indian reservations, and must provide for maximum feasible coordination with transportation services assisted by other Federal sources. In order to retain eligibility for funding, recipients of Section 5311 funding must report data annually to the NTD, beginning with the 2006 reporting year. Program guidance for the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is found in FTA C 9040.1F, Nonurbanized Area Formula Program Guidance and Grant Application Instructions, dated April 1, 2007, which was revised and reissued after notice and comment. FTA announced availability of this circular in the Federal Register on February 28, 2007, and summarized the response to comments submitted to the docket. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 4. Period of Availability Funds apportioned to nonurbanized areas under the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program will remain available for two fiscal years following FY 2007. Any funds that remain unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2009, will revert to FTA for allocation among the States under the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program. 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights By law, FTA requires that each recipient under the Section 5311 program submit an annual report to the NTD containing information on capital investments, operations, and service provided with funds received under the Section 5311 program. Section 5311(b)(4), as amended by SAFETEA– LU, specifies that the report should include information on total annual revenue, sources of revenue, total annual operating costs, total annual capital costs, fleet size and type, and related facilities, revenue vehicle miles, and ridership. In consultation with State VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 Departments of Transportation (DOT), FTA previously developed a voluntary state-based rural data module for the NTD. The existing NTD Rural Data Reporting Module manual and reporting instructions are posted on the NTD Web site, https://www.ntdprogram.com. For each 5311 subrecipient, the State DOT will complete a one-page form of basic data. The existing module will serve as a basis for reporting requirements for the new, mandatory Rural Reporting Module of the NTD until FTA can modify it, in consultation with the States, among others. Pursuant to SAFETEA–LU, mandatory reporting began with the 2006 NTD Report Year. The first reports were due on October 28, 2006, for those States with State or local fiscal years ending between January 1 and June 30, 2006; on January 28, 2007, for those States with State or local fiscal years ending between July 1 and September 30, 2006; and April 30, 2007, for those States with State or local fiscal years ending between October 1 and December 31, 2006. Corresponding dates are applicable to the data for the 2007 NTD Report Year. To enter data and receive additional instructions, State DOTs can go to the NTD website. FTA will issue revised reporting instructions in the 2007 reporting manual, based on consultation with the States and public comment. J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3)) This program provides funding to assist in the design and implementation of training and technical assistance projects, research, and other support services tailored to meet the needs of transit operators in nonurbanized areas. For more information about Rural Transportation Assistance Program (RTAP) contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 13883 RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM—Continued Prior Year Funds Added Total Apportioned ........ 452,588 7,320,588 Table 17 shows the FY 2007 RTAP allocations to the States. 2. Basis for Allocation FTA allocates funds to the States by an administrative formula. First FTA allocates $65,000 to each State ($10,000 to territories), and then allocates the balance based on nonurbanized population in the 2000 census. 3. Program Requirements States may use the funds to undertake research, training, technical assistance, and other support services to meet the needs of transit operators in nonurbanized areas. These funds are to be used in conjunction with a State’s administration of the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program, but may also support the rural components of the Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom programs. 4. Period of Availability Funds apportioned to States under RTAP remain available for two fiscal years following FY 2007. Any funds that remain unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2009, will revert to FTA for allocation among the States under the RTAP. 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights The National RTAP project is administered by the American Public Works Association in consortium with the Community Transportation Association of America, under a cooperative agreement re-competed at five-year intervals. During FY 2007, FTA will be soliciting proposals for the 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability National RTAP program services for the next five years. The projects are guided The Continuing Appropriations by a project review board of managers Resolution, 2007, provides $8,080,000 to RTAP (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(2)), as a two of rural transit systems and State DOT RTAP programs. National RTAP percent takedown from the funds resources also support the biennial TRB appropriated for Section 5311. FTA has National Conference on Rural Public reserved 15 percent for the National and Intercity Bus Transportation and RTAP program. After adding prior year other research and technical assistance funds eligible for reapportionment, $7,320,588 is available for allocations to projects of a national nature. The percentage takedown for RTAP, the States, as shown in the table below. combined with rising funding levels for Section 5311, make additional resources RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE available at the State RTAP program PROGRAM level as well as the national RTAP for Total Appropriation ......... $8,080,000 projects such as providing technical assistance for the new tribal transit program and conducting intercity bus National RTAP Takedown ............................ 1,212,000 needs assessments. PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13884 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices K. Public Transportation on Indian Reservations Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(c)(1)) FTA refers to this program as the Tribal Transit Program. It is funded as a takedown from funds appropriated for the Section 5311 program. Indian Tribes are defined as eligible direct recipients. The funds are to be apportioned for grants to Indian Tribes for any purpose eligible under Section 5311, which includes capital, operating, planning, and administrative assistance for rural public transit services and rural intercity bus service. For more information about the Tribal Transit Program contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. intending to apply to FTA as direct recipients to contact the appropriate FTA regional office at the earliest opportunity. Technical assistance for Tribes may be available from the State DOT using the State’s allocation of RTAP or funds available for State administration under Section 5311, from the Tribal Transportation Assistance Program (TTAP) Centers supported by FHWA, and from the Community Transportation Association of America under a program funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The National RTAP will also be developing new resources for Tribal Transit. 1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 Under the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, the amount allocated to the program in FY 2007 is $10,000,000, as authorized in Section 5311(c)(1)(B). L. National Research Programs (49 U.S.C. 5314) 2. Basis for Allocation Based on procedures developed in consultation with the Tribes, FTA will issue a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) soliciting applications for FY 2007 funds. 3. Requirements FTA developed streamlined program requirements based on statutory authority allowing the Secretary to determine the terms and conditions appropriate to the program. These conditions are contained in the annual NOFA. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 4. Period of Availability Funds remain available for three fiscal years, which includes the fiscal year the funds were apportioned or appropriated plus two additional years. Funds appropriated in FY 2007 will remain available for obligation to the tribes competitively selected to receive the funds through September 30, 2009. Any funds that remain unobligated after September 30, 2009, will revert to FTA for reallocation among the Tribes. 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights The funds set aside for the Tribal Transit Program are not meant to replace or reduce funds that Indian Tribes receive from states through the Section 5311 program but are to be used to enhance public transportation on Indian reservations and transit serving tribal communities. Funds allocated to Tribes by the States may be included in the State’s Section 5311 application or awarded by FTA in a grant directly to the tribe. We encourage Tribes VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 FTA’s National Research Programs include the National Research and Technology Program (NRTP), the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP), the National Transit Institute (NTI), and the University Transportation Centers Program (UTC). Through funding under these programs, FTA seeks to deliver solutions that improve public transportation. FTA’s Strategic Research Goals are to provide transit research leadership, increase transit ridership, improve capital and operating efficiencies, improve safety and emergency preparedness, and to protect the environment and promote energy independence. For more information contact Bruce Robinson, Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation, at (202) 366–4209. 1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $61,000,000 for the National Research Programs. Of this amount $9,300,000 is allocated for TCRP, $4,300,000 for NTI, $7,000,000 for the UTC, and $40,400,000 for NRTP. Within the NRTP—$22,800,920 is allocated for specific activities under 49 U.S.C. 5338(d) and in Section 3046 of SAFETEA–LU. A breakdown of NRP funds is provided in the table below. NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS Total Appropriation ......... Funds Allocated for Specific Programs or Activities .......................... Small Business Innovative Research Takedown ............................ Funds Available for FTA Programming ............... PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS— Continued Total NPR Funding ..... 61,000,000 All research and research and development projects are subject to a 2.6% reduction for the Small Business Innovative Research Program (SBIR). The project allocations are listed in Table 18. 2. Program Requirements Application Instructions and Program Management Guidelines are set forth in FTA Circular 6100.1C. Research projects must support FTA’s Strategic Research Goals and meet the Office of Management and Budget’s Research and Development Investment Criteria. All research recipients are required to work with FTA to develop approved Statements of Work and plans to evaluate research results before award. Eligible activities under the NRTP include research, development, demonstration and deployment projects as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5312(a); Joint Partnership projects for deployment of innovation as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5312(b); International Mass Transportation Projects as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5312(c); and, human resource programs as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5322. Problem Statements for TCRP can be submitted on TCRP’s website: https:// www.tcrponline.org. Information about NTI courses can be found at https:// www.ntionline.com. UTC funds are transferred to the Research and Innovative Technology Administration to make awards. 3. Period of Availability Funds are available until expended. 4. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights Funds not designated by Congress for specific projects and activities will be programmed by FTA based on national priorities. Opportunities are posted in www.grants.gov under Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 20.514. M. Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (49 U.S.C. 5316) The Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) program provides formula funding to States and Designated Recipients to support the development and maintenance of job access projects 43,400,920 designed to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to 200,000 and from jobs and activities related to their employment, and for reverse 17,399,080 commute projects designed to transport residents of UZAs and other than $61,000,000 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices urbanized to suburban employment opportunities. For more information about the JARC program contact Henrika Buchanan-Smith, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. of these provisions should submit a request to the FTA regional office. FTA will assign new accounting codes to the funds before obligating them in a grant. 3. Requirements States and Designated Recipients must solicit grant applications and select projects competitively, based on application procedures and requirements established by the Designated Recipient, consistent with the Federal JARC program objectives. In JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE the case of large UZAs, the area-wide solicitation shall be conducted in PROGRAM cooperation with the appropriate Total Appropriation ......... $144,000,000 MPO(s). Funds are available to support the Total Apportioned ........ 144,000,000 planning, capital and operating costs of transportation services that address the Table 19 shows the FY 2007 JARC needs of welfare recipients and eligible apportionments. low-income individuals that are not met by other transportation services. The 2. Basis for Formula Apportionment transportation services may be provided By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of by public, non-profit, or private-forfunds available to UZAs with profit operators. The Federal share is 80 populations of 200,000 or more persons percent of capital expenses and 50 (large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for percent of operating expenses. Funds urbanized areas with populations provided under other Federal programs ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 persons (other than those of the U.S. DOT) may (small UZAs), and 20 percent to the be used for local/State match for funds States for rural and small urban areas provided under section 5316, and with populations of less than 50,000 revenue from service contracts may be persons. FTA apportions funds based used as local match. upon the number of low income Funding is available for transportation individuals residing in a State or large services provided by public, non-profit, urbanized area, using data from the or private-for-profit operators. 2000 Census for individuals below 150 Assistance may be provided for a variety percent of poverty. FTA publishes of transportation services and strategies apportionments to each State for small directed at assisting welfare recipients UZAs and for rural and small urban and eligible low-income individuals areas and a single apportionment for address unmet transportation needs, each large UZA. and to provide reverse commute The Designated Recipient, either for services. the State or for a large UZA, is States and Designated Recipients may responsible for further allocating the use up to ten percent of their annual funds to specific projects and apportionment to administer, plan, and subrecipients through a competitive provide technical assistance for a selection process. If the Governor has funded project. No local share is designated more than one recipient of required for these program JARC funds in a large UZA, the administrative funds. Funds used under Designated Recipients may agree to this program for planning must be conduct a single competitive selection shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with process or sub-allocate funds to each responsibility for that area. The Designated Recipient must certify Designated Recipient, based upon a that: The projects selected were derived percentage split agreed upon locally, from a locally developed, coordinated and conduct separate competitions. States may transfer funds between the public transit-human services small UZA and the nonurbanized transportation plan; and, the plan was apportionments, if all of the objectives developed through a process that of JARC are met in the size area the included representatives of public, funds are taken from. States may also private, and nonprofit transportation use funds in the small UZA and and human services providers and nonurbanized area apportionments for participation by the public, including projects anywhere in the State those representing the needs of welfare (including large UZAs) if the State has recipients and eligible low-income established a statewide program for individuals. The locally developed, meeting the objectives of JARC. A State coordinated public transit-human planning to transfer funds under either services transportation planning process sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $144,000,000 for the JARC Program. The total amount apportioned by formula is $144,000,000, as shown in the table below. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13885 must be coordinated and consistent with the metropolitan and statewide planning processes and funding for the program must included in the metropolitan and statewide Transportation Improvement Program (TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity or aggregation consistent with State and local policies and procedures. Finally, the State must certify that allocations of the grant to subrecipients are made on a fair and equitable basis. The coordinated planning requirement is also a requirement in two additional programs. Projects selected for funding under the Section 5310 program and the New Freedom program are also required to be derived from a locally developed coordinated public transit-human service transportation plan. FTA anticipates that most areas will develop one consolidated plan for all the programs, which may include separate elements and other human service transportation programs. The JARC program is subject to the relevant requirements of Section 5307, including the requirement for certification of labor protections. FTA published a proposed circular for this program and is currently reviewing comments submitted to the docket. The new circular will be posted on the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov when it is issued. 4. Period of Availability FTA is establishing a consistent threeyear period of availability for JARC, New Freedom, and the Section 5310 program, which includes the year of apportionment plus two additional years. FY 2007 funding is available through FY 2009. Any funding that remains unobligated on September 30, 2009 will revert to FTA for reapportionment among the States and large UZAs under the JARC program. 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights a. Carryover Earmarks. Table 20 lists prior year carryover of $45,154,056 for JARC projects designated by Congress in FYs 2002–2005. JARC earmarks carried over from TEA–21 are subject to the terms and conditions under which they were originally appropriated, including the requirement for a 50 percent local share for both capital and operating assistance. All projects should be in a regional JARC Plan as required under TEA–21 or in the new local coordinated plan required by the new formula JARC program. FTA will award a grant for a designated project upon receipt of a complete application, but can honor changes to the original designation only E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13886 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES if so directed by the Appropriations Committee chairs. b. Designated Recipient. Beginning in FY 2007, FTA must have received formal notification from the Governor or Governor’s designee of the Designated Recipient for JARC funds apportioned to a State or large UZA before awarding a grant to that area for JARC projects. c. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311. States may transfer JARC funds to Section 5307 or Section 5311, but only for projects competitively selected under the JARC program, not as a general supplement for those programs. FTA anticipates that the States would use this flexibility primarily for projects to be implemented by a Section 5307 recipient in a small urbanized area or for Federally recognized Indian Tribes that elect to receive funds as a direct recipient from FTA under Section 5311. FTA has established a new scope code (646) to track JARC projects included within a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is permitted but not required. FTA will also award stand-alone Section 5316 grants to the State for any and all subrecipients. In order to track disbursements accurately against the appropriate program, FTA will not combine JARC funds with Section 5307 funds in a single Section 5307 grant, nor will FTA combine JARC with New Freedom funds in a single Section 5307 grant. d. Evaluation. Section 5316(i)(2), as added by SAFETEA–LU, requires FTA to conduct a study to evaluate the effectiveness of the JARC program. To support the evaluation, annual GAO reports on the program, and DOT Performance Measures, while reducing the burden grantees previously experienced from separate reporting required for the JARC program under TEA–21, FTA has incorporated reporting for performance measures into the annual progress report all JARC grantees submit in TEAM. N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317) SAFETEA–LU established the New Freedom Program under 49 U.S.C. 5317. The program purpose is to provide new public transportation services and public transportation alternatives beyond those currently required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) that assist individuals with disabilities with transportation, including transportation to and from jobs and employment support services. For more information about the New Freedom program contact Henrika Buchanan-Smith, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $81,000,000 for the New Freedom Program. The entire amount is apportioned by formula, as shown in the table below. NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM Designated Recipients may agree to conduct a single competitive selection process or sub-allocate funds to each Designated Recipient, based upon a percentage split agreed upon locally and conduct separate competitions. 3. Requirements States and Designated Recipients must solicit grant applications and select projects competitively, based on Total Apportioned ........ 81,000,000 application procedures and requirements established by the Table 21 shows the FY 2007 New Designated Recipient, consistent with Freedom apportionments. the Federal New Freedom program objectives. In the case of large UZAs, the 2. Basis for Formula Apportionment area-wide solicitation shall be By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of conducted in cooperation with the funds available to UZAs with appropriate MPO(s). populations of 200,000 or more persons Funds are available to support the (large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for capital and operating costs of new urbanized areas with populations public transportation services and ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 persons public transportation alternatives that (small UZAs), and 20 percent to the are beyond those required by the States for rural and small urban areas Americans with Disabilities Act. Funds with populations of less than 50,000 provided under other Federal programs persons. FTA apportions funds based (other than those of the DOT) may be upon the number of persons with used as match for capital funds disabilities over the age of five residing provided under Section 5317, and in a State or large urbanized area, using revenue from contract services may be data from the 2000 Census. FTA used as local match. publishes apportionments to each State Funding is available for transportation for small UZAs and for rural and small services provided by public, non-profit, urban areas and a single apportionment or private-for-profit operators. for each large UZA. FTA has learned from the U.S. Bureau Assistance may be provided for a variety of transportation services and strategies of the Census that there is a better directed at assisting persons with source of disability data from the 2000 Census than the 2000 census file we had disabilities address unmet transportation needs. Eligible public previously used for SAFETEA–LU transportation services and alternatives projections and for the FY 2006 New to public transportation funded under Freedom program apportionments. We the New Freedom program must be both have therefore based the FY 2007 new and beyond the ADA. (Note, apportionments for the New Freedom however, that FTA has published program on the information for States interim guidance holding Designated and urbanized areas contained in the Recipients harmless for project Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF–3)— selections conducted in good faith based Sample Data (tables QT–P21 and P42), on FTA’s earlier preliminary and Census publication PHC–2, which determination that eligible services provides more accurate data for could be either new or beyond the individuals with disabilities than the ADA.) file based on projections from a sample The Federal share is 80 percent of that we had previously used. We will capital expenses and 50 percent of also base future apportionments on this operating expenses. Funds provided data and will update the SAFETEA–LU estimates for FY 2008–2009 on the Web under other Federal programs (other than those of the DOT) may be used for site. We regret any inconvenience this local/state match for funds provided technical change in the source data for under Section 5317, and revenue from the formula may cause areas in their planning and selection of New Freedom service contracts may be used as local match. projects. The Designated Recipient, either for States and Designated Recipients may the State or for a large UZA, is use up to ten percent of their annual responsible for further allocating the apportionment to administer, plan, and funds to specific projects and provide technical assistance for a subrecipients through a competitive funded project. No local share is selection process. If the Governor has required for these program designated more than one recipient of administrative funds. Funds used under JARC funds in a large UZA, the this program for planning must be Total Appropriation ......... PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 $81,000,000 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with responsibility for that area. The Designated Recipient must certify that: the projects selected were derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan; and, the plan was developed through a process that included representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public, including those representing the needs of welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals. The locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation planning process must be coordinated and consistent with the metropolitan and statewide planning processes, and funding for the program must be included in the metropolitan and statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity or aggregation consistent with State and local policies and procedures. Finally, the State must certify that allocations of the grant to subrecipients are made on a fair and equitable basis. The coordinated planning requirement is also a requirement in two additional programs. Projects selected for funding under the Section 5310 program and the JARC program are also required to be derived from a locally developed coordinated public transithuman service transportation plan. FTA anticipates that most areas will develop one consolidated plan for all the programs, which may include separate elements and other human service transportation programs. The New Freedom program is subject to the relevant requirements of Section 5307, but certification of labor protections is not required. FTA published a proposed circular for this program and is currently reviewing comments submitted to the docket. The new circular will be posted on the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov when it is issued. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 4. Period of Availability FTA is establishing a consistent threeyear period of availability for New Freedom, JARC, and the Section 5310 program, which includes the year of apportionment plus two additional years. FY 2007 funding is available through FY 2009. Any funding that remains unobligated on September 30, 2009 will revert to FTA for reapportionment among the States and large UZAs under the New Freedom program. 5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 a. Designated Recipient. Beginning in FY 2007, FTA must have received formal notification from the Governor or Governor’s designee of the Designated Recipient for New Freedom funds apportioned to a State or large UZA before awarding a grant to that area for New Freedom projects. b. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311. States may transfer New Freedom funds to Section 5307 or Section 5311, but only for projects competitively selected under the New Freedom program, not as a general supplement for those programs. FTA anticipates that the States would use this flexibility for projects to be implemented by a Section 5307 recipient in a small urbanized area or for Federally recognized Indian Tribes that elect to receive funds as a direct recipient from FTA under Section 5311. FTA has established a new scope code (647) to track New Freedom projects included within a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is permitted but not required. FTA will also award stand-alone Section 5317 grants to the State for any and all subrecipients. In order to track disbursements accurately against the appropriate program, FTA will not combine New Freedom funds with Section 5307 funds in a single Section 5307 grant, nor will FTA combine New Freedom with JARC funds in a single Section 5307 grant. c. Performance Measures. To support the evaluation of the program and Departmental reporting under the Governmental Performance and Results Act and the Office of Management and Budget’s Performance Assessment and Rating Tool, FTA has incorporated reporting for performance measures into the annual progress report all New Freedom grantees submit in TEAM. O. Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Land (49 U.S.C. 5320) The Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands (ATPPL) program is administered by FTA in partnership with the Department of the Interior (DOI) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. The purpose of the program is to enhance the protection of national parks and Federal lands, and increase the enjoyment of those visiting them. The program funds capital and planning expenses for alternative transportation systems such as buses and trams in federally managed parks and public lands. Federal land management agencies and State, tribal and local governments acting with the consent of a Federal land management agency are eligible to apply. DOI, after consultation with and in cooperation with FTA, PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13887 determines the final selection and funding of projects. 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, makes $23 million available for the program in FY 2007. Ten percent of the funds are reserved for administration and technical assistance. FTA published a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) in the Federal Register on December 5, 2006, inviting applications for projects to be funded in FY 2007. Applications were due to the appropriate Federal Land Management Agency on February 16, 2007. 2. Program Requirements Projects are competitively selected based on criteria specified in the Notice of Funding Availability. The terms and conditions applicable to the program are also specified in the NOFA. Projects must conserve natural, historical, and cultural resources, reduce congestion and pollution, and improve visitor mobility and accessibility. No more than 25 percent may be allocated for any one project. 3. Period of Availability The funds under the Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands remain available until expended. 4. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights Project selections for the FY 2006 funding were published in the Federal Register on September 12, 2006. Fifteen projects were awarded through direct grants to individual State and local governments. Twenty-seven projects were funded through reimbursable interagency agreements with the U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service. Twentyfive of the projects (totaling $16 million) were capital projects and seventeen (totaling $3.6 million) were planning projects. P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. 5339) The Alternatives Analysis Program provides grants to States, authorities of the States, metropolitan planning organizations, and local government authorities to develop studies as part of the transportation planning process. These studies include an assessment of a wide range of public transportation alternatives designed to address a transportation problem in a corridor or subarea; sufficient information to enable the Secretary to make the findings of project justification and local financial commitment required; the selection of a locally preferred alternative; and the E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13888 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices adoption of the locally preferred alternative as part of the state or regional long-range transportation plan. For more information about this program contact Sean Libberton, Office of Planning and Environment, at (202) 366–4033. 1. FY 2007 Funding Availability The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $25,000,000 to the Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. 5339). The Act made available $18,900,000 for discretionary allocation to the projects designated in SAFETEA– LU. The balance of $6,100,000 will be made available for competitive allocation. Analysis Program must be shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with responsibility for that area. Pre-award authority applies to these funds after Congress appropriates funds for these projects and the allocations are published in an FTA notice of apportionments and allocations. Legislation to amend the earmark is necessary should a recipient wish to use funds provided under Section 5339 for eligible project activities outside the scope of the project description. Unless otherwise specified in law, grants made under the Alternatives Analysis program must meet all other eligibility requirements as outlined in Section 5309. 4. Period of availability Funds designated for specific Total Appropriation ......... $25,000,000 Alternatives Analysis Program projects remain available for obligation for three Funds Allocated to fiscal years, which includes the year of SAFETEA–LU Earappropriation plus two additional fiscal marks .......................... 6,100,000 years. The FY 2007 funding for projects Funds Available for Disincluded in this notice remains cretionary/Competitive Allocation ..................... 18,900,000 available through September 30, 2009. Alternatives Analysis funds not obligated in an FTA grant for their Allocations to projects designated in original purpose at the end of the period SAFETEA–LU are displayed in Table of availability will generally be made 22. available for other projects. 2. Basis for Allocation of Funds 5. Other Program or Apportionment Section 3037(c) of SAFETEA–LU Related Information and Highlights included 18 projects to be funded through Alternatives Analysis Program Table 23 lists prior year carryover of in FYs 2006 and 2007. Table 22 displays $19,305,000 for Alternative Analysis the amounts available in FY 2007 to the projects made available in FY 2006. Alternatives Analysis projects Q. Growing States and High Density designated in SAFETEA–LU. In a States Formula Factors separate part of today’s Federal The Continuing Appropriations Register, FTA is publishing a Notice of Resolution, 2007, makes $404,000,000 Funding Availability to solicit available for apportionment in applications for alternatives analysis projects that advance the state of the art accordance with the formula factors for the balance of FY 2007 funds and the prescribed for Growing States and High Density States in Section 5340 of carryover funds available for SAFETEA–LU. Fifty percent of this competitive allocation from FY 2006. amount (or $202,000,000) will be 3. Requirements allotted eligible States and urbanized Alternatives Analysis program funds areas using the Growing State formula may be made available to States, factors. The other 50 percent is authorities of the States, metropolitan apportioned to eligible States and planning organizations, and local urbanized areas using the High Density governmental authorities. The States formula factors. Based on Government’s share of the cost of an application of the formulas, activity funded may not exceed 80 $138,734,486 of the Growing States percent of the cost of the activity. The funding was apportioned to urbanized funds will be awarded as separate areas and $63,265,514 to nonurbanized Section 5339 grants. The grant areas. All of the $202,000,000 allotted to requirements will be comparable to High Density States is apportioned to those for Section 5309 grants. Eligible urbanized areas. projects include planning and corridor The term ‘‘State’’ is defined only to studies and the adoption of locally mean the 50 States. For the Growing preferred alternatives within the fiscally State portion of Section 5340, funds are constrained Metropolitan allocated based on the population Transportation Plan for that area. Funds forecasts for fifteen years after the date awarded under the Alternatives of that census. Forecasts are based on sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 the trend between the most recent decennial census and Census Bureau population estimates for the most current year. Funds allocated to the States are then sub-allocated to urbanized and non-urbanized areas based on forecast population, where available. If forecasted population data at the urbanized level is not available, funds are allocated to current urbanized and non-urbanized areas on the basis of current population. Funds allocated to urbanized areas are included in their Section 5307apportionment. Funds allocated for non-urbanized areas are included in the states’ Section 5311 apportionments. R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 Note) The Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility (OTRB) Program authorizes FTA to make grants to operators of over-theroad buses to help finance the incremental capital and training costs of complying with the DOT over-the-road bus accessibility final rule, 49 CFR Part 37, published on September 28, 1998 (63 FR 51670). FTA conducts a national solicitation of applications, and grantees are selected on a competitive basis. For more information about the OTRB program contact Blenda Younger, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053. 1. Funding Availability in FY 2007 The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides $7,600,000 for the Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility (OTRB) Program, which is the total amount allocable for OTRB, as shown in the table below. Total Appropriation ......... $7,600,000 Funds Available for Competitive Allocation ........ 7,600,000 Of this amount, $5,700,000 is allocable to providers of intercity fixedroute service, and $1,900,000 to other providers of over-the-road bus services, including local fixed-route service, commuter service, and charter and tour service. 2. Program Requirements Projects are competitively selected. The Federal share of the project is 90 percent of net project cost. Program guidance is provided in the Federal Register notice soliciting applications. We will publish a notice in the near future for applications for applications for the FY 2007 funding made available under the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007. Operators of over the road buses may apply through www.grants.gov, or by submitting an E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices application to the appropriate FTA regional office. Assistance is available to operators of buses used substantially or exclusively in intercity, fixed route, over-the-road bus service. Capital projects eligible for funding include projects to add lifts and other accessibility components to new vehicle purchases and to purchase lifts to retrofit existing vehicles. Eligible training costs include developing training materials or providing training for local providers of over-the-road bus services. 3. Period of Availability Funds are available until expended. 4. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights A Federal Register notice of FY 2006 project selections was published December 4, 2007, and is available at https://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/leg_ reg_federal_register.html/. V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2007 Grants sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority To Incur Project Costs 1. Caution to New Grantees. While we provide pre-award authority for many projects, we do not recommend that first-time grant recipients utilize the automatic pre-award authority to incur expenses before the grant is actually awarded by FTA. As a new grantee, it is easy to misunderstand pre-award authority conditions and not be aware of all of the applicable FTA requirements that must be met in order to be reimbursed for project expenditures incurred in advance of grant award. FTA programs have specific statutory requirements that are often different from those for other Federal grant programs with which new grantees may be familiar. If funds are expended for an ineligible project or activity, FTA will be unable to reimburse the project sponsor. 2. Policy. FTA provides blanket, or automatic, pre-award authority in certain program areas described below. This pre-award authority allows grantees to incur certain project costs prior to grant approval and retain their eligibility for subsequent reimbursement after grant approval. The grantee assumes all risk and is responsible for ensuring that all conditions are met to retain eligibility. This automatic preaward spending authority permits a grantee to incur costs on an eligible transit capital, operating, planning, or administrative project without prejudice to possible future Federal participation in the cost of the project or. In the VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 Federal Register Notice of November 30, 2006, FTA extended pre-award authority for capital assistance under all formula programs through FY 2009, the duration of SAFETEA–LU. FTA provides pre-award authority for planning and operating assistance under the formula programs without regard to the period of the authorization. In addition, we extend pre-award authority for certain discretionary programs based on the annual Appropriations Act each year. All pre-award authority is subject to conditions and triggers stated below: a. FTA does not impose additional conditions on pre-award authority for operating, planning, or administrative assistance under the formula grant programs. Grantees may be reimbursed for expenses incurred prior to grant award so long as funds have been expended in accordance with all Federal requirements. In addition to cross-cutting Federal grant requirements, program specific requirements must be met. For example, a planning project must have been included in a UPWP; a New Freedom operating assistance project or a JARC planning or operating project must have been derived from a coordinated plan and competitively selected by the Designated Recipient prior to incurring expenses; expenditure on State Administration expenses under State Administered programs must be consistent with the State Management Plan. Designated Recipients for JARC and New Freedom have pre-award authority for the ten percent of the apportionment they may use for program administration. b. Pre-Award authority for Alternatives Analysis planning projects designated in 49 U.S.C. 5339, as amended by SAFETEA–LU, is triggered by the publication of the allocation in FTA’s Federal Register Notice of Apportionments and Allocations following the annual Appropriations Act and must be included in the UPWP of the MPO for that metropolitan area. c. Pre-award authority for design and environmental work on a capital project is triggered by the authorization of formula funds, or the appropriation of funds for a discretionary project and publication of the project in FTA’s annual Federal Register Notice of apportionments and allocations. d. Following authorization of formula funds or appropriation and publication of discretionary projects, pre-award authority for capital project implementation activities including property acquisition, demolition, construction, and acquisition of vehicles, equipment, or construction materials is triggered by completion of PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13889 the environmental review process with FTA’s concurrence in the categorical exclusion (CE) determination or signing of an environmental Record of Decision (ROD) or Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Prior to exercising preaward authority, grantees must comply with the conditions and Federal requirements outlined in paragraph 3 below. Failure to do so will render an otherwise eligible project ineligible for FTA financial assistance. Capital projects under the Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom programs must comply with specific program requirements, including coordinated planning and competitive selection. In addition, prior to incurring costs, grantees are strongly encouraged to consult with the appropriate FTA regional office regarding the eligibility of the project for future FTA funds and the applicability of the conditions and Federal requirements. e. Pre-award authority does not apply to the Section 5309 Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related Facilities and Clean Fuels program high priority project designations or any other transit discretionary projects designated in SAFETEA–LU until funds have been appropriated and the allocations published in the annual Federal Register Notice. Thus pre-award authority is extended now only for FY 2006 and FY 2007 project funding. For such Section 5309 Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related, Clean Fuels Program, or other transit capital discretionary projects, the date that costs may be incurred is: (1) For design and environmental review, the date that the appropriation bill which funds the project was enacted; and (2) for property acquisition, demolition, construction, and acquisition of vehicles, equipment, or construction materials, the date that FTA approves the document (ROD, FONSI, or CE determination) that completes the environmental review process required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its implementing regulations. FTA introduced this new trigger for preaward authority in FY 2006 in recognition of the growing prevalence of new grantees unfamiliar with Federal and FTA requirements to ensure FTA’s continued ability to comply with NEPA and related environmental laws. Because FTA does not sign a final NEPA document until MPO and statewide planning requirements (including air quality conformity requirements, if applicable) have been satisfied, this new trigger for pre-award will ensure compliance with both planning and E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 13890 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices environmental requirements prior to irreversible action by the grantee. f. In previous notices FTA extended pre-award authority to Section 330 projects and those surface transportation projects commonly referred to as Section 115 projects administered by FTA, for which amounts were provided in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004 and Section 117 projects in the 2005 Appropriations Act administered by FTA. Pre-award authority is now extended to transit projects in Section 112 of the 2006 Appropriations Act that are to be administered by FTA. The same conditions described for bus projects apply to these projects. We strongly encourage any prospective applicant that does not have a previous relationship with FTA to review Federal grant requirements with the FTA regional office before incurring costs. g. Blanket pre-award authority does not apply to Section 5309 Capital Investment New Starts funds. Specific instances of pre-award authority for Capital Investment New Starts projects are described in paragraph 4 below. Preaward authority does not apply to Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related or Clean Fuels projects authorized for funding beyond this fiscal year. Before an applicant may incur costs for Capital Investment New Starts projects, Bus and Bus-Related projects, or any other projects not yet published in a notice of apportionments and allocations, it must first obtain a written Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) from FTA. To obtain an LONP, a grantee must submit a written request accompanied by adequate information and justification to the appropriate FTA regional office, as described below. 3. Conditions. The conditions under which pre-award authority may be utilized are specified below: a. Pre-award authority is not a legal or implied commitment that the subject project will be approved for FTA assistance or that FTA will obligate Federal funds. Furthermore, it is not a legal or implied commitment that all items undertaken by the applicant will be eligible for inclusion in the project. b. All FTA statutory, procedural, and contractual requirements must be met. c. No action will be taken by the grantee that prejudices the legal and administrative findings that the Federal Transit Administrator must make in order to approve a project. d. Local funds expended by the grantee pursuant to and after the date of the pre-award authority will be eligible for credit toward local match or reimbursement if FTA later makes a grant or grant amendment for the project. Local funds expended by the VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 grantee prior to the date of the preaward authority will not be eligible for credit toward local match or reimbursement. Furthermore, the expenditure of local funds on activities such as land acquisition, demolition, or construction prior to the date of preaward authority for those activities (i.e., the completion of the NEPA process) would compromise FTA’s ability to comply with Federal environmental laws and may render the project ineligible for FTA funding. e. The Federal amount of any future FTA assistance awarded to the grantee for the project will be determined on the basis of the overall scope of activities and the prevailing statutory provisions with respect to the Federal/local match ratio at the time the funds are obligated. f. For funds to which the pre-award authority applies, the authority expires with the lapsing of the fiscal year funds. g. When a grant for the project is subsequently awarded, the Financial Status Report, in TEAM-Web, must indicate the use of pre-award authority. h. Environmental, Planning, and Other Federal Requirements. All Federal grant requirements must be met at the appropriate time for the project to remain eligible for Federal funding. The growth of the Federal transit program has resulted in a growing number of inexperienced grantees who make compliance with Federal planning and environmental laws increasingly challenging. FTA has therefore modified its approach to preaward authority to use the completion of the NEPA process, which has as a prerequisite the completion of planning and air quality requirements, as the trigger for pre-award authority for all activities except design and environmental review. i. The requirement that a project be included in a locally adopted metropolitan transportation plan, the metropolitan transportation improvement program and Federallyapproved statewide transportation improvement program (23 CFR Part 450) must be satisfied before the grantee may advance the project beyond planning and preliminary design with nonFederal funds under pre-award authority. If the project is located within an EPA-designated nonattainment area for air quality, the conformity requirements of the Clean Air Act, 40 CFR Part 93, must also be met before the project may be advanced into implementation-related activities under pre-award authority. Compliance with NEPA and other environmental laws and executive orders (e.g., protection of parklands, wetlands, and historic properties) must be completed before PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 State or local funds are spent on implementation activities, such as site preparation, construction, and acquisition, for a project that is expected to be subsequently funded with FTA funds. The grantee may not advance the project beyond planning and preliminary design before FTA has determined the project to be a categorical exclusion, or has issued a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) or an environmental record of decision (ROD), in accordance with FTA environmental regulations, 23 CFR Part 771. For planning projects, the project must be included in a locally-approved Planning Work Program that has been coordinated with the State. j. In addition, Federal procurement procedures, as well as the whole range of applicable Federal requirements (e.g., Buy America, Davis-Bacon Act, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise) must be followed for projects in which Federal funding will be sought in the future. Failure to follow any such requirements could make the project ineligible for Federal funding. In short, this increased administrative flexibility requires a grantee to make certain that no Federal requirements are circumvented through the use of preaward authority. If a grantee has questions or concerns regarding the environmental requirements, or any other Federal requirements that must be met before incurring costs, it should contact the appropriate regional office. 4. Pre-Award Authority for New Starts Projects. a. Preliminary Engineering (PE) and Final Design (FD). Projects proposed for Section 5309 New Starts funds are required to follow a Federally defined New Starts project development process. This New Starts process includes, among other things, FTA approval of the entry of the project into PE and into FD. In accordance with Section 5309(d), FTA considers the merits of the project, the strength of its financial plan, and its readiness to enter the next phase in deciding whether or not to approve entry into PE or FD. Upon FTA approval to enter PE, FTA extends pre-award authority to incur costs for PE activities. Upon FTA approval to enter FD, FTA extends preaward authority to incur costs for FD activities. The pre-award authority for each phase is automatic upon FTA’s signing of a letter to the project sponsor approving entry into that phase. PE and FD are defined in the New Starts regulation entitled Major Capital Investment Projects, found at 49 CFR Part 611. b. Real Property Acquisition Activities. FTA extends automatic pre- E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices award authority for the acquisition of real property and real property rights for a New Starts project upon completion of the NEPA process for that project. The NEPA process is completed when FTA signs an environmental Record of Decision (ROD) or Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), or makes a Categorical Exclusion (CE) determination. With the limitations and caveats described below, real estate acquisition for a New Starts project may commence, at the project sponsor’s risk, upon completion of the NEPA process. For FTA-assisted projects, any acquisition of real property or real property rights must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (URA) and its implementing regulations, 49 CFR Part 24. This pre-award authority is strictly limited to costs incurred: (i) to acquire real property and real property rights in accordance with the URA regulation, and (ii) to provide relocation assistance in accordance with the URA regulation. This pre-award authority is limited to the acquisition of real property and real property rights that are explicitly identified in the final environmental impact statement (FEIS), environmental assessment (EA), or CE document, as needed for the selected alternative that is the subject of the FTA-signed ROD or FONSI, or CE determination. This pre-award authority does not cover site preparation, demolition, or any other activity that is not strictly necessary to comply with the URA, with one exception. That exception is when a building that has been acquired, has been emptied of its occupants, and awaits demolition poses a potential fire-safety hazard or other hazard to the community in which it is located, or is susceptible to reoccupation by vagrants, demolition of the building is also covered by this preaward authority upon FTA’s written agreement that the adverse condition exists. Pre-award authority for property acquisition is also provided when FTA makes a CE determination for a protective buy or hardship acquisition in accordance with 23 CFR 771.117(d)(12), and when FTA makes a CE determination for the acquisition of a pre-existing railroad right-of-way in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5324(c). When a tiered environmental review in accordance with 23 CFR 771.111(g) is being used, pre-award authority is NOT provided upon completion of the firsttier environmental document except when the Tier-1 ROD or FONSI signed by FTA explicitly provides such pre- VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 award authority for a particular identified acquisition. FTA’s rationale for providing this preaward authority was described in the FY 2003 Apportionments and Allocations Notice published in the Federal Register on March 12, 2003 (68 FR 1106 et seq.). The FY 2003 Notice may be found on the FTA Web site at https:// www.fta.dot.gov/library/legal/ federalregister/2003/fr31203.pdf. Project sponsors should use pre-award authority for real property acquisition and relocation assistance very carefully, with a clear understanding that it does not constitute a funding commitment by FTA. c. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Activities. NEPA requires that major projects proposed for FTA funding assistance be subjected to a public and interagency review of the need for the project, its environmental and community impacts, and alternatives to avoid and reduce adverse impacts. Projects of more limited scope also need a level of environmental review, either to support an FTA finding of no significant impact (FONSI) or to demonstrate that the action is categorically excluded from the more rigorous level of NEPA review. FTA’s regulation entitled Environmental Impact and Related Procedures at 23 CFR Part 771 states that the costs incurred by a grant applicant for the preparation of environmental documents requested by FTA are eligible for FTA financial assistance (23 CFR 771.105(e)). Accordingly, FTA extends automatic pre-award authority for costs incurred to comply with NEPA regulations and to conduct NEPA-related activities for a proposed New Starts project, effective as of the date of the Federal approval of the relevant STIP or STIP amendment that includes the project or any phase of the project. NEPA-related activities include, but are not limited to, public involvement activities, historic preservation reviews, section 4(f) evaluations, wetlands evaluations, endangered species consultations, and biological assessments. This pre-award authority is strictly limited to costs incurred to conduct the NEPA process, and to prepare environmental, historic preservation and related documents. It does not cover PE activities beyond those necessary for NEPA compliance. As with any pre-award authority, FTA reimbursement for costs incurred is not guaranteed. d. Other New Starts Activities Requiring Letter of No Prejudice (LONP). Except as discussed in paragraphs a) through c) above, a grant applicant must obtain a written LONP from FTA before PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13891 incurring costs for any activity expected to be funded by New Start funds not yet granted. To obtain an LONP, an applicant must submit a written request accompanied by adequate information and justification to the appropriate FTA regional office, as described in B below. 5. Pre-Award Authority for Small Starts. When FTA issues a Project Development approval letter for a Small Starts project, FTA grants pre-award authority for the design and preliminary engineering activities associated with project development. When FTA issues a Project Construction Grant Agreement (PCGA), FTA grants pre-award authority for the construction phase of the project. Pre-award authority for NEPA-related work on a Small Starts project is granted under the same conditions and for the same reasons as New Starts projects, described in paragraph 4.c above. Preaward authority for real property acquisition activities for a Small Starts project is granted under the same conditions and for the same reasons as New Starts projects, describe in paragraph 4.b above. B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy 1. Policy LONP authority allows an applicant to incur costs on a project utilizing nonFederal resources, with the understanding that the costs incurred subsequent to the issuance of the LONP may be reimbursable as eligible expenses or eligible for credit toward the local match should FTA approve the project at a later date. LONPs are applicable to projects and project activities not covered by automatic preaward authority. The majority of LONPs will be for Section 5309 New Starts funds not covered under a full funding grant agreement, or for Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related funds not yet appropriated by Congress. At the end of an authorization period, LONPs may be issued for formula funds beyond the life of the current authorization or FTA’s extension of automatic pre-award authority. 2. Conditions and Federal Requirements The conditions for pre-award authority specified in section VIII A2 above apply to all LONPs. The Environmental, Planning and Other Federal Requirements described in section V.A.3, also apply to all LONPs. Because project implementation activities may not be initiated prior to NEPA completion, FTA will normally not issue an LONP for such activities until the NEPA process has been completed with a ROD, FONSI, or Categorical Exclusion determination. E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13892 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 3. Request for LONP Before incurring costs for a project not covered by automatic pre-award authority, the project sponsor must first submit a written request for an LONP, accompanied by adequate information and justification, to the appropriate regional office and obtain written approval. As a prerequisite to FTA approval of an LONP for a New Starts project, FTA will require project sponsors to demonstrate project worthiness and readiness that establish the project as a candidate for an FFGA. Projects will be assessed based upon the criteria considered in the New Start evaluation process. Specifically, upon the request for an LONP, the applicant shall provide sufficient information to allow FTA to consider the following items: a. Description of the activities to be covered by the LONP. b. Justification for advancing the identified activities. c. Data that indicates that the project will maintain its ability to receive a rating of ‘‘medium’’, or better and that its cost-effectiveness rating will be ‘‘medium’’ or better, unless such project has been specifically exempt from such a requirement. d. Allocated level of risk and contingency for the activity requested. e. Status of procurement progress, including, if appropriate, submittal of bids for the activities covered by the LONP. f. Strength of the capital and operating financial plan for the New Starts project and the future transit system. g. Adequacy of the Project Management Plan. h. Resolution of any readiness issues that would affect the project, such as land acquisition and technical capacity to carry out the project. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES C. FTA FY 2007 Annual List of Certifications and Assurances The full text of the FY 2007 Certifications and Assurances was published in the Federal Register on November 7, 2006, and is available on the FTA Web site and in TEAM-Web. The FY 2007 Certifications and Assurances must be used for all grants made in FY 2007, including obligation of carryover. All grantees with active grants were required to have signed the FY 2007 Certifications and Assurances within 90 days after publication. Any questions regarding this document may be addressed to the appropriate Regional Office or to Pat Simpich, in the FTA Office of Program Management, at (202) 366–1662. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes SAFETEA–LU continues provisions in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and TEA–21 that expanded modal choice in transportation funding by including substantial flexibility to transfer funds between FTA and FHWA formula program funding categories. In addition SAFETEA–LU included a provision allowing for transfer of certain discretionary program funds for administration of highway projects by FHWA and transit projects by FTA. FTA and FHWA execute Flex Funding Transfers between the Formula and Bus Grants Transit programs and the Federal Aid Highway programs. This has also included the transfer of State planning set-aside funds from FHWA to FTA to be combined with metropolitan and statewide planning resources as Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG). These transfers are based on States requests to transfer funding from the Highway and/or Transit programs to fund States and local project priorities, and joint planning needs. This practice can result in transfers to the Federal Transit Program from the Federal Aid Highway Program or vice versa. 1. Transfer Process for funds SAFETEA–LU was enacted in August, 2005. With the enactment of SAFETEA– LU, beginning in FY2006, mass transit programs are funded solely from general funds or trust funds. The transit formula and bus grant programs are now funded from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust Fund. The Formula and Bus Grant Programs receive flex funding transfers from the Federal Aid Highway Program. As a result of the changes to program funding mechanisms, there is no longer a requirement to transfer budget authority and liquidating cash resources simultaneously upon the execution of a Flex Funding transfer request by a State. Since the transfers are between trust fund accounts, the only requirement is to transfer budget authority (obligation limitation) between the Federal Aid Program trust fund account and the Federal Transit Formula and Bus Grant Program account. At the point in time that the obligation resulting from the transfer of budgetary authority is expended, a transfer of liquidating cash will be required. Beginning in FY 2007, the accounting process is changing for transfers of flex funds and other specific programs to allow budget authority to be transferred and the cash to be transferred separately. FTA is requiring that flexed PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 fund transfers to FTA be in separate and identifiable grants in order to ensure that the draw-down of flexed funds can be tracked, thus securing the internal controls for monitoring these resources from the Federal Highway Administration to avoid deficiencies in FTA’s Formula and Bus Grants account. FTA will need to monitor the expenditures of flexed funded grants and request the transfer of liquidating cash from FHWA to ensure sufficient funds are available to meet expenditures. To facilitate tracking of grantees’ flex funding expenditures, FTA developed new codes to provide distinct identification of ‘‘flex funds.’’ The process for transferring flexible funds between FTA and FHWA programs is described below. Note that the new transfer process for ‘‘flex funds’’ beginning in FY 2007 does not apply to the transfer of State planning set-aside funds from FHWA to FTA to be combined with metropolitan and statewide planning resources as Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG). These transfers are based on States requests to transfer funding from the Highway and/or Transit programs to fund States and local project priorities, and joint planning needs. Planning funds transferred will be allowed to be merged in a single grant with FTA planning resources using the same process implemented in FY 2006. For information on the process for the transfer of funds between FTA and FHWA planning programs refer to section IV.A and B. Note also that certain prior year appropriations earmarks (Sections 330, 115, 117, and 112) are allotted annually for administration rather than being transferred. For information regarding these procedures, please contact Kristen D. Clarke, FTA Budget Office, at (202) 366–1686; or Elissa Konove, FHWA Budget Division, at (202) 366–2845. a. Transfer from FHWA to FTA. FHWA funds designated for use in transit capital projects must be derived from the metropolitan and statewide planning and programming process, and must be included in an approved STIP before the funds can be transferred. By letter, the State DOT requests the FHWA Division Office to transfer highway funds for a transit project. The letter should specify the project, amount to be transferred, apportionment year, State, urbanized area, Federal aid apportionment category (i.e., Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) or identification of the earmark and indication of the intended FTA formula program (i.e., Section 5307, 5311 or 5310) and should include a E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices description of the project as contained in the STIP. Note that FTA may also administer certain transfers of statutory earmarks under the Section 5309 bus program, for tracking purposes. The FHWA Division Office confirms that the apportionment amount is available for transfer and concurs in the transfer, by letter to the State DOT and FTA. The FHWA Office of Budget and Finance then transfers obligation authority and an equal amount of cash to FTA. All FHWA CMAQ and STP funds transferred to FTA will be transferred to one of the three FTA formula programs (i.e. Urbanized Area Formula (Section 5307), Nonurbanized Area Formula (Section 5311) or Elderly and Persons with Disabilities (Section 5310). High Priority projects in SAFETEA–LU Section 1702 or Transportation Improvement projects in SAFETEA–LU Section 1934 and other Congressional earmarks when necessary that are transferred to FTA will be aligned and administered through FTA’s discretionary Bus Program (Section 5309). The FTA grantee’s application for the project must specify which program the funds will be used for, and the application must be prepared in accordance with the requirements and procedures governing that program. Upon review and approval of the grantee’s application, FTA obligates funds for the project. Transferred funds are treated as FTA formula or discretionary funds, but are assigned a distinct identifying code for tracking purposes. The funds may be transferred for any capital purpose eligible under the FTA formula program to which they are transferred and, in the case of CMAQ, for certain operating costs. FHWA issued revised interim guidance on project eligibility under the CMAQ program in a Notice at 71 FR 76038 et seq. (December 19, 2006) incorporating changes made by SAFETEA–LU. In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 104(k), all FTA requirements except local share are applicable to transferred funds. Earmarks that are transferred to the Section 5309 Bus Program for administration, however, can be used for the Congressionally designated transit purpose and are not limited to eligibility under the Bus Program. In the event that transferred formula funds are not obligated for the intended purpose within the period of availability of the formula program to which they were transferred, they become available to the Governor for any eligible capital transit project. b. Transfers from FTA to FHWA. The MPO submits a written request to the VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 FTA regional office for a transfer of FTA Section 5307 formula funds (apportioned to a UZA 200,000 and over in population) to FHWA based on approved use of the funds for highway purposes, as contained in the Governor’s approved State Transportation Improvement Program. The MPO must certify that: (1) The funds are not needed for capital investments required by the Americans with Disabilities Act; (2) notice and opportunity for comment and appeal has been provided to affected transit providers; and (3) local funds used for non-Federal match are eligible to provide assistance for either highway or transit projects. The FTA Regional Administrator reviews and concurs in the request, then forwards the approval in written format to FTA Headquarters, where a reduction equal to the dollar amount being transferred to FHWA is made to the grantee’s Urbanized Area Formula Program apportionment. Transfers of discretionary earmarks for administration by FHWA are handled on a case by case basis, by the FTA regional office, in consultation with the FTA Office of Program Management and Office of Budget and Policy. c. Matching Share for FHWA Transfers. The provisions of Title 23 U.S.C. regarding the non-Federal share apply to Title 23 funds used for transit projects. Thus, FHWA funds transferred to FTA retain the same matching share that the funds would have if used for highway purposes and administered by FHWA. There are three instances in which a Federal share higher than 80 percent would be permitted. First, in States with large areas of Indian and certain public domain lands and national forests, parks and monuments, the local share for highway projects is determined by a sliding scale rate, calculated based on the percentage of public lands within that State. This sliding scale, which permits a greater Federal share, but not to exceed 95 percent, is applicable to transfers used to fund transit projects in these public land States. FHWA develops the sliding scale matching ratios for the increased Federal share. Second, commuter carpooling and vanpooling projects and transit safety projects using FHWA transfers administered by FTA may retain the same 100 percent Federal share that would be allowed for ride-sharing or safety projects administered by FHWA. The third instance is the 100 percent Federally-funded safety projects; however, these are subject to a nationwide 10 percent program limitation. PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 13893 d. Miscellaneous Transit Earmarks in FHWA Programs. The FY 2002 and FY 2003 Appropriations Acts and accompanying reports included Section 330, which identified a number of transit projects among projects designated to receive funding from certain FHWA funding sources. The FY 2004 Appropriations Act similarly included transit projects among projects designated to receive funding from certain FHWA sources in Section 115, the FY 2005 Appropriations Act included a set of designations under Section 117, and the FY 2006 Appropriations Act included designations under Section 112, which may include some projects that FHWA will identify to be administered by FTA. For those projects identified by FHWA as transit in nature, FHWA allots the funds to FTA to administer. The funds are available for the designated project until obligated and expended. Some of these FY 2002–2006 designations for transit projects have not yet been obligated. However, because these are FHWA funds, funds for projects unobligated at the end of the fiscal year are not automatically available as carry over made available in the following fiscal year. Instead FHWA re-allots obligation authority to FTA annually, after reconciling account balances. Because the requirements and procedures associated with these projects differ in some cases from those for the FTA programs that FTA grantees are familiar with, and the availability of funds for obligation by FTA depends on allotments from FHWA, transit applicants seeking funding under these miscellaneous FHWA designations must work closely with the appropriate FTA regional office and FHWA Division Office when applying for a grant under these designations. E. Grant Application Procedures 1. Grantees must provide a Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number for inclusion in all applications for a Federal grant or cooperative agreement. The DUNS number should be entered into the grantee profile in TEAM-Web. Additional information about this and other Federal grant streamlining initiatives mandated by the Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106– 107) can be accessed on OMB’s Web site at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ grants/reform.html. 2. All applications for FTA funds should be submitted electronically to the appropriate FTA regional office through TEAM-Web, an Internetaccessible electronic grant application E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 13894 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices system. FTA has provided limited exceptions to the requirement for electronic filing of applications. 3. In FY 2007, FTA remains committed to processing applications promptly upon receipt of a completed application by the appropriate regional office. In order for an application to be considered complete and for FTA to assign a grant number, enabling submission in TEAM-Web, the following requirements must be met: a. The project is listed in a currently FTA approved Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), or Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). b. All eligibility issues have been resolved. c. Required environmental findings have been made. d. The project budget’s Activity Line Items (ALI), scope, and project description meet FTA requirements. e. Local share funding source(s) have been identified. f. The grantee’s required Civil Rights submissions are current. g. Certifications and assurances are properly submitted. h. Funding is available, including any flexible funds included in the budget. i. For projects involving new construction (using at least $100 million in New Starts or formula funds), FTA engineering staff has reviewed the project management plan and given approval. j. When required for grants related to New Starts projects, PE and/or FD has been approved. k. Milestone information is complete, or FTA determines that milestone information can be finalized before the grant is ready for award. The grant must include sufficient milestones appropriate to the scale of the project to allow adequate oversight to monitor the progress of projects from the start through completion and closeout. 4. Under most FTA programs, grants involving funding related to transit operations, must be submitted to the Department of Labor for certification of labor protective arrangements, prior to grant award. In addition, before FTA can award grants for discretionary projects and activities designated by Congress, notification must be given to members of Congress, and in the case of awards greater than $1 million, to the House and Senate authorizing and appropriations committees. Discretionary grants allocated by FTA also go through the Congressional VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 notification process if they are greater than $1 million. 5. Other important issues that impact FTA grant processing activities are discussed below. a. Change in Budget Structure. Because SAFETEA–LU restructured FTA’s accounts from all general funded accounts to one solely trust funded account and three general funded accounts, we are not able to mix funds from years prior to FY 2006 in the same grant with funds appropriated in FY 2006 and beyond (except for New Starts and research grants). Previously all programs were funded approximately 80 percent trust funds from the Mass Transit Account (MTA) of the Highway Trust Fund and 20 percent General Funds from the U.S. Treasury. The trust funds were transferred into the general funded accounts at the beginning of the year. Under SAFETEA–LU most programs are funded entirely from trust funds derived from the Mass Transit Account, while the New Starts and Research programs are funded with general funds. Carryover FY 2005 and prior funds currently available for obligation as well as FY 2006 and FY 2007 funds may be included in an amendment to an existing grant for a New Starts or research project. For formula programs funded solely from trust funds beginning in FY 2006, grantees may not combine FY 2006 and FY 2007 funds in the same grant with FY 2005 and prior year funds. Grant amendments cannot be made to add FY 2006 and later year funds to a grant that includes FY 2005 or prior funds. Obligations of FY 2005 and prior year carryover funds must be made in the original program accounts established under TEA–21 (either as an amendment to an existing grant or as a new grant) and cannot be combined with funds appropriated in FY 2006 or later. However, grantees are able to amend new grants established with FY 2006 or later year funds to add funds made available after FY 2006. We regret any inconvenience this accounting change may cause as we implement new statutory requirements under SAFETEA–LU. We encourage grantees to spend down and close out old grants as quickly as possible to minimize the inconvenience. b. Grant Budgets—SCOPE and ALI Codes. FTA uses the SCOPE and Activity Line Item (ALI) Codes in the grant budgets to track program trends, to report to Congress, and to respond to requests from the Inspector General and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), as well as to manage grants. The accuracy of the data is dependent on the careful and correct use of codes. We PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 have revised the SCOPE and ALI table to include new codes for the newly eligible capital items, to better track certain expenditures, and to accommodate the new programs. We encourage grantees to review the table before selecting codes from the dropdown menus in TEAM-Web while creating a grant budget and to consult with the regional office in the correct use of codes. Additional information about how to use the SCOPE and ALI codes to accurately code budgets will be added to the resources available through TEAM-Web. c. Earmark and Discretionary Program Tracking. FTA has implemented new procedures in TEAM-Web for relating grants to earmarks or projects selected by FTA under discretionary programs. Each earmark or selected discretionary project published in the Federal Register will have a unique identifier associated with it. Tables of earmarks and selected discretionary projects have also been established in TEAM-Web. When applying for a grant using funding designated by Congress or FTA for a particular project, grantees are asked to identify the amount of funding associated with specific earmark or discretionary project used in the grant. Further instructions are posted on the TEAM-Web site and regional staff can provide additional assistance. d. New Freedom and JARC— Administering Agency. The Governor must designate the state agency or agencies charged with administering the New Freedom and JARC formula programs and the recipient(s) designated to administer the program in each large urbanized area before FTA can award a grant to that State or large urbanized area. FTA will award grants for these programs only to the Designated Recipient for JARC or New Freedom, or, in the case of a large urbanized area, pursuant to a supplemental agreement with the Designated Recipient for JARC or New Freedom, to another entity that is the Designated Recipient for the Section 5307 program. For Small Urbanized areas (under 200,000 population), the State Designated Recipient can transfer funds to the Section 5307 program for FTA to award direct grants to small urbanized area recipients. F. Payments Once a grant has been awarded and executed, requests for payment can be processed. To process payments FTA uses ECHO-Web, an Internet accessible system that provides grantees the capability to submit payment requests on-line, as well as receive user-IDs and passwords via e-mail. New applicants E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices should contact the appropriate FTA regional office to obtain and submit the registration package necessary for set-up under ECHO-Web. G. Oversight FTA conducts periodic oversight reviews to assess grantee compliance with Federal requirements. Each UZA grantee is reviewed every three years (a Triennial Review). States are reviewed periodically for their management of the Section 5310 and 5311 programs. Other more detailed reviews are scheduled based on an annual grantee risk assessment, for example, reviews in the areas of Procurement, Financial Management, Safety and Civil Rights. FTA is developing appropriate oversight procedures for the new programs authorized by SAFETEA–LU. H. Technical Assistance FTA headquarters and regional staff will be pleased to answer your questions and provide any technical assistance you may need to apply for FTA program funds and manage the grants you receive. This notice and the program guidance circulars previously identified in this document may be accessed via the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov. In addition, copies of the following circulars and other useful information are available on the FTA Web site and may be obtained from FTA regional offices: 4220.1E, Third Party Contracting Requirements, dated June 19, 2003; and C5010.1C, Grant Management Guidelines, dated October 1, 1998. The FY 2007 Annual List of Certifications and Assurances and Master Agreement are also posted on the FTA Web site. The DOT final rule on ‘‘Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs,’’ which was effective July 16, 2003, can be found at https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/ waisidx_04/49cfr26_04.html/. Issued in Washington, DC, this 12th day of March, 2007. James S. Simpson, Administrator. Appendix A—FTA Regional Offices Richard H. Doyle, Regional Administrator, Region 1-Boston, Kendall Square, 55 Broadway, Suite 920, Cambridge, MA 02142–1093, Tel. 617 494–2055 States served: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont Brigid Hynes-Cherin, Regional Administrator, Region 2-New York, One Bowling Green, Room 429, New York, NY 10004–1415, Tel. no. 212 668–2170 States served: New Jersey, New York Herman Shipman, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 3-Philadelphia, 1760 Market Street, Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19103–4124, Tel. 215 656–7100 States served: Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and District of Columbia Yvette Taylor, Regional Administrator, Region 4-Atlanta, Atlanta Federal Center, Suite 17T50, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303, Tel. 404 562– 3500 States served: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virgin Islands 13895 Robert C. Patrick, Regional Administrator, Region 6-Ft. Worth, 819 Taylor Street, Room 8A36, Ft. Worth, TX 76102, Tel. 817 978–0550 States served: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas Mokhtee Ahmad, Regional Administrator, Region 7-Kansas City, MO, 901 Locust Street, Room 404, Kansas City, MO 64106, Tel. 816 329– 3920 States served: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska Letitia Thompson, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8-Denver, 12300 West Dakota Ave., Suite 310, Lakewood, CO 80228–2583, Tel. 720– 963–3300 States served: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming Leslie T. Rogers, Regional Administrator, Region 9-San Francisco, 201 Mission Street, Room 2210, San Francisco, CA 94105–1926, Tel. 415 744–3133 States served: American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada, and the Northern Mariana Islands Marisol Simon, Regional Administrator, Region 5-Chicago, 200 West Adams Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606, Tel. 312 353–2789 States served: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin Rick Krochalis, Regional Administrator, Region 10-Seattle, Jackson Federal Building, 915 Second Avenue, Suite 3142, Seattle, WA 98174–1002, Tel. 206 220–7954 States served: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington TABLE 1.—FY 2007 APPROPRIATIONS AND APPORTIONMENTS FOR GRANT PROGRAMS FORMULA AND BUS GRANTS Section 5303 Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. $81,892,800 (409,464) 890,525 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5304 Statewide Transportation Planning Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 82,373,861 Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Oversight (three-fourths percent) .................................................................................................................................. Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 17,252,652 Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5308 Clean Fuels Program ............................................................................................................................................ Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facility Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 17,107,200 (85,536) 230,988 3,606,175,000 (27,046,313) 4,957,616 3,584,086,303 1 18,721,000 2 881,779,000 13896 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 1.—FY 2007 APPROPRIATIONS AND APPORTIONMENTS FOR GRANT PROGRAMS—Continued Less Oversight (one percent) ................................................................................................................................................. (8,817,790) Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................ Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Oversight (one percent) ................................................................................................................................................. 872,961,210 1,448,000,000 (14,480,000) Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5310 Special Needs for Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 1,433,520,000 Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5311 Nonurbanized Area Formula Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 116,659,554 Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5311(b)(3) Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP): Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Amount Reserved for National RTAP ........................................................................................................................... Reapportioned Funds ............................................................................................................................................................. 386,177,688 Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5311(c) Public Transportation on Indian Reservations ................................................................................................. Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7,320,588 10,000,000 117,000,000 (585,000) 244,554 385,920,000 (2,020,000) 2,277,688 8,080,000 (1,212,000) 452,588 144,000,000 Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5317 New Freedom Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 144,000,000 Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5320 Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Oversight (one-half percent) .......................................................................................................................................... 81,000,000 Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................ Section 5339 Alternative Analysis Program: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 22,885,000 Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................ Section 5340 Growing States and High Density States Formula: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ 25,000,000 3 404,000,000 Total Apportioned ................................................................................................................................................................... Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (Pub. L. 105–85, Section 3038) ................................................................................ 404,000,000 7,600,000 81,000,000 23,000,000 (115,000) 25,000,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS Section 5309 New Starts: Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................ Less Oversight (one percent) ................................................................................................................................................. 1,566,000,000 (15,660,000) Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................ 1,550,340,000 RESEARCH sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Section 5314 National Research Program ................................................................................................................................. Total Appropriation (Above Grant Programs) ................................................................................................................. Total Apportionment/Allocation (Above Grant Programs) ............................................................................................... 1 Funding 61,000,000 4 8,886,275,000 8,802,012,856 available for Cleans Fuels after $26,279,000 is transferred to the Bus and Bus Facility program. $26,279,000 transferred from the Clean Fuels program. 3 Apportionments derived from the Section 5340 formula are combined with the Section 5307 or Section 5311 apportionments, as appropriate, in accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report. The amount of FY 2007 Section 5340 funds allotted to Sections 5307 and 5311 apportionments is $340,734,486 and $63,265,514, respectively. 4 The total amount appropriated for FTA programs in the 2007 Appropriations Act is $8.97 billion. The amount shown here only includes funding for the programs included in this notice and shown above. 2 Includes VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13897 TABLE 2.—FY 2007 SECTION 5303 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAM AND SECTION 5304 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAM APPORTIONMENTS Section 5303 Apportionment State Section 5304 Apportionment Alabama ....................................................................................................................................................... Alaska .......................................................................................................................................................... Arizona ......................................................................................................................................................... Arkansas ...................................................................................................................................................... California ...................................................................................................................................................... Colorado ...................................................................................................................................................... Connecticut .................................................................................................................................................. Delaware ...................................................................................................................................................... District of Columbia ..................................................................................................................................... Florida .......................................................................................................................................................... Georgia ........................................................................................................................................................ Hawaii .......................................................................................................................................................... Idaho ............................................................................................................................................................ Illinois ........................................................................................................................................................... Indiana ......................................................................................................................................................... Iowa ............................................................................................................................................................. Kansas ......................................................................................................................................................... Kentucky ...................................................................................................................................................... Louisiana ...................................................................................................................................................... Maine ........................................................................................................................................................... Maryland ...................................................................................................................................................... Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................................. Michigan ....................................................................................................................................................... Minnesota .................................................................................................................................................... Mississippi .................................................................................................................................................... Missouri ........................................................................................................................................................ Montana ....................................................................................................................................................... Nebraska ...................................................................................................................................................... Nevada ......................................................................................................................................................... New Hampshire ........................................................................................................................................... New Jersey .................................................................................................................................................. New Mexico ................................................................................................................................................. New York ..................................................................................................................................................... North Carolina .............................................................................................................................................. North Dakota ................................................................................................................................................ Ohio ............................................................................................................................................................. Oklahoma ..................................................................................................................................................... Oregon ......................................................................................................................................................... Pennsylvania ................................................................................................................................................ Puerto Rico .................................................................................................................................................. Rhode Island ................................................................................................................................................ South Carolina ............................................................................................................................................. South Dakota ............................................................................................................................................... Tennessee ................................................................................................................................................... Texas ........................................................................................................................................................... Utah ............................................................................................................................................................. Vermont ....................................................................................................................................................... Virginia ......................................................................................................................................................... Washington .................................................................................................................................................. West Virginia ................................................................................................................................................ Wisconsin ..................................................................................................................................................... Wyoming ...................................................................................................................................................... $623,537 329,495 1,647,393 329,495 12,958,856 1,234,513 915,017 329,495 329,495 5,383,172 2,123,217 329,495 329,495 4,568,170 1,241,016 358,083 418,685 522,554 816,375 329,495 1,846,450 2,426,009 2,709,982 1,156,508 329,495 1,219,834 329,495 329,495 603,074 329,495 3,821,314 329,495 7,283,541 1,208,033 329,495 2,621,420 476,561 733,094 3,384,274 1,366,861 340,461 601,892 329,495 952,301 6,046,857 561,502 329,495 1,869,384 1,755,960 329,495 976,546 329,495 $163,245 86,263 328,654 86,263 2,524,485 270,193 239,542 86,263 86,263 1,132,759 421,322 86,263 86,263 818,866 286,840 93,748 101,572 131,756 213,231 86,263 361,392 473,882 553,221 228,043 86,263 259,906 86,263 86,263 140,968 86,263 652,050 86,263 1,303,850 316,268 86,263 614,838 124,766 166,181 690,499 292,370 86,263 157,578 86,263 249,316 1,244,248 147,004 86,263 396,362 361,925 86,263 239,038 86,263 Total ...................................................................................................................................................... 82,373,861 17,252,652 TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Urbanized area/state Apportionment 1,000,000 or more in Population ................................................................................................................................................... 200,000–999,999 in Population ..................................................................................................................................................... 50,000–199,999 in Population ....................................................................................................................................................... $2,813,049,899 703,215,992 408,554,898 National Total ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,924,820,789 Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 1,000,000 or more in Population: VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13898 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment $55,761,620 49,089,558 127,815,567 217,715,515 17,033,068 27,673,490 10,928,770 59,020,474 39,136,659 38,094,061 58,301,315 10,248,899 12,881,212 20,777,680 252,472,410 90,748,583 19,252,383 44,372,728 15,985,953 773,326,809 17,277,382 128,386,607 41,539,986 32,625,253 33,570,887 29,223,529 24,442,636 19,060,682 20,220,591 50,877,342 116,823,368 35,547,337 34,245,529 81,229,871 29,347,313 21,325,746 15,781,255 140,887,831 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Atlanta, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Baltimore, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................... Boston, MA—NH—RI ............................................................................................................................................................. Chicago, IL—IN ...................................................................................................................................................................... Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN ......................................................................................................................................................... Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ Dallas—Fort Worth—Arlington, TX ........................................................................................................................................ Denver—Aurora, CO .............................................................................................................................................................. Detroit, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................... Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ Indianapolis, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... Kansas City, MO—KS ............................................................................................................................................................ Las Vegas, NV ....................................................................................................................................................................... Los Angeles—Long Beach—Santa Ana, CA ......................................................................................................................... Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................ Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Minneapolis—St. Paul, MN .................................................................................................................................................... New Orleans, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... New York—Newark, NY—NJ—CT ......................................................................................................................................... Orlando, FL ............................................................................................................................................................................. Philadelphia, PA—NJ—DE—MD ........................................................................................................................................... Phoenix—Mesa, AZ ................................................................................................................................................................ Pittsburgh, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Portland, OR—WA ................................................................................................................................................................. Providence, RI—MA ............................................................................................................................................................... Riverside—San Bernardino, CA ............................................................................................................................................. Sacramento, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................... San Antonio, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................... San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................ San Francisco—Oakland, CA ................................................................................................................................................ San Jose, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... San Juan, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................... Seattle, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................. St. Louis, MO—IL ................................................................................................................................................................... Tampa—St. Petersburg, FL ................................................................................................................................................... Virginia Beach, VA ................................................................................................................................................................. Washington, DC—VA—MD .................................................................................................................................................... 2,813,049,899 Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 to 999,999 in Population: Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ............................................................................................................................... Akron, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................... Albany, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................. Albuquerque, NM .................................................................................................................................................................... Allentown—Bethlehem, PA—NJ ............................................................................................................................................ Anchorage, AK ....................................................................................................................................................................... Ann Arbor, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................... Antioch, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Asheville, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................... Atlantic City, NJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... Augusta—Richmond County, GA—SC .................................................................................................................................. Austin, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... Bakersfield, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Barnstable Town, MA ............................................................................................................................................................. Baton Rouge, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... Birmingham, AL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Boise City, ID .......................................................................................................................................................................... Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ................................................................................................................................................... Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY ............................................................................................................................................. Buffalo, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................. Canton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. Cape Coral, FL ....................................................................................................................................................................... Charleston—North Charleston, SC ........................................................................................................................................ Charlotte, NC—SC ................................................................................................................................................................. Chattanooga, TN—GA ........................................................................................................................................................... Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................ Columbia, SC ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4,430,621 6,012,478 9,379,662 7,085,159 7,088,907 21,287,890 4,224,205 5,500,312 1,628,856 9,300,302 2,235,714 16,379,355 5,451,483 4,652,919 4,313,787 5,778,323 2,373,419 2,379,398 22,465,747 15,491,573 3,462,625 3,793,233 3,164,700 13,294,549 2,944,537 5,130,742 3,838,851 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13899 TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Urbanized area/state Apportionment Columbus, GA—AL ................................................................................................................................................................ Concord, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Corpus Christi, TX .................................................................................................................................................................. Davenport, IA—IL ................................................................................................................................................................... Dayton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. Daytona Beach—Port Orange, FL ......................................................................................................................................... Denton—Lewisville, TX .......................................................................................................................................................... Des Moines, IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ El Paso, TX—NM ................................................................................................................................................................... Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................ Evansville, IN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................. Fayetteville, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................... Flint, MI ................................................................................................................................................................................... Fort Collins, CO ...................................................................................................................................................................... Fort Wayne, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... Fresno, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Grand Rapids, MI ................................................................................................................................................................... Greensboro, NC ..................................................................................................................................................................... Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ............................................................................................................................................................... Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................ Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................ Huntsville, AL .......................................................................................................................................................................... Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA ............................................................................................................................. Jackson, MS ........................................................................................................................................................................... Jacksonville, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Knoxville, TN .......................................................................................................................................................................... Lancaster, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Lancaster—Palmdale, CA ...................................................................................................................................................... Lansing, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. Lexington—Fayette, KY .......................................................................................................................................................... Lincoln, NE ............................................................................................................................................................................. Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ Louisville, KY—IN ................................................................................................................................................................... Lubbock, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................... Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ Memphis, TN—MS—AR ......................................................................................................................................................... Mission Viejo, CA ................................................................................................................................................................... Mobile, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................... Modesto, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Nashville—Davidson, TN ........................................................................................................................................................ New Haven, CT ...................................................................................................................................................................... Ogden—Layton, UT ................................................................................................................................................................ Oklahoma City, OK ................................................................................................................................................................. Omaha, NE—IA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Oxnard, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Palm Bay—Melbourne, FL ..................................................................................................................................................... Pensacola, FL—AL ................................................................................................................................................................. Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................ Port St. Lucie, FL ................................................................................................................................................................... Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY .............................................................................................................................................. Provo—Orem, UT ................................................................................................................................................................... Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ Reading, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................ Richmond, VA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................ Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................ Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI .............................................................................................................. Salem, OR .............................................................................................................................................................................. Salt Lake City, UT .................................................................................................................................................................. Santa Rosa, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Sarasota—Bradenton, FL ....................................................................................................................................................... Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Scranton, PA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 1,993,783 18,526,133 4,293,492 3,381,015 13,892,841 4,045,922 2,476,542 4,951,610 5,433,693 9,813,797 4,011,179 1,889,514 2,141,034 5,533,594 2,205,831 2,617,543 7,498,898 6,374,744 3,562,705 1,949,452 1,682,238 4,565,188 18,191,100 24,359,495 1,649,487 3,241,472 2,277,259 14,212,171 3,765,878 3,506,448 6,532,964 4,609,169 2,893,966 2,467,031 3,579,121 11,007,849 2,550,878 6,222,444 2,996,078 11,980,593 8,662,702 2,668,998 3,649,709 7,261,045 16,872,742 5,501,787 6,652,716 6,472,286 6,883,603 4,152,721 2,688,166 2,688,082 2,108,150 14,577,592 4,449,426 5,621,983 2,714,080 4,727,812 9,102,781 10,423,380 2,428,345 3,667,889 3,516,835 20,100,518 3,565,829 5,903,675 2,877,433 3,764,506 2,913,954 13900 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment 3,723,608 6,434,323 11,353,845 1,966,333 7,171,540 6,281,223 2,354,393 2,272,609 2,596,721 5,842,150 8,347,699 10,230,078 5,489,623 2,303,151 4,440,719 2,647,492 7,858,481 3,309,761 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 703,215,992 Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population: ALABAMA ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 7,250,334 Anniston, AL ........................................................................................................................................................................... Auburn, AL .............................................................................................................................................................................. Decatur, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................. Dothan, AL .............................................................................................................................................................................. Florence, AL ........................................................................................................................................................................... Gadsden, AL ........................................................................................................................................................................... Montgomery, AL ..................................................................................................................................................................... Tuscaloosa, AL ....................................................................................................................................................................... 673,045 622,422 592,014 567,616 713,416 558,511 2,302,892 1,220,418 ALASKA ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 738,556 Fairbanks, AK ......................................................................................................................................................................... 738,556 ARIZONA ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3,452,918 Avondale, AZ .......................................................................................................................................................................... Flagstaff, AZ ........................................................................................................................................................................... Prescott, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................ Yuma, AZ—CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 869,823 645,037 672,195 1,265,863 ARKANSAS ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4,901,814 Fayetteville—Springdale, AR .................................................................................................................................................. Fort Smith, AR—OK ............................................................................................................................................................... Hot Springs, AR ...................................................................................................................................................................... Jonesboro, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ Pine Bluff, AR ......................................................................................................................................................................... Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR ............................................................................................................................................ 1,829,368 1,205,345 485,409 508,041 631,462 242,189 CALIFORNIA ................................................................................................................................................................................. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES South Bend, IN—MI ............................................................................................................................................................... Spokane, WA—ID .................................................................................................................................................................. Springfield, MA—CT ............................................................................................................................................................... Springfield, MO ....................................................................................................................................................................... Stockton, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Syracuse, NY .......................................................................................................................................................................... Tallahassee, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Temecula—Murrieta, CA ........................................................................................................................................................ Thousand Oaks, CA ............................................................................................................................................................... Toledo, OH—MI ...................................................................................................................................................................... Trenton, NJ ............................................................................................................................................................................. Tucson, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................. Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................ Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ............................................................................................................................... Wichita, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................. Winston—Salem, NC .............................................................................................................................................................. Worcester, MA—CT ............................................................................................................................................................... Youngstown, OH—PA ............................................................................................................................................................ 55,440,609 Atascadero—El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA ............................................................................................................ Camarillo, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Chico, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................... Davis, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................ El Centro, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Fairfield, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Gilroy—Morgan Hill, CA ......................................................................................................................................................... Hanford, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Hemet, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Livermore, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Lodi, CA .................................................................................................................................................................................. Lompoc, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Madera, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Manteca, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 611,677 903,008 1,307,534 2,018,338 799,940 2,174,306 1,045,584 960,929 1,639,472 1,217,592 1,345,377 732,286 773,862 850,706 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13901 TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment 1,868,541 1,488,607 911,852 851,929 1,212,665 3,092,358 1,349,204 3,728,441 3,265,667 2,952,024 1,875,199 2,577,731 2,108,442 1,121,151 1,148,728 1,572,378 3,769,659 1,747,001 1,053,998 1,354,634 9,789 COLORADO .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8,293,228 Boulder, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................ Grand Junction, CO ................................................................................................................................................................ Greeley, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................ Lafayette—Louisville, CO ....................................................................................................................................................... Longmont, CO ........................................................................................................................................................................ Pueblo, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2,127,250 1,002,471 1,312,260 823,076 1,468,975 1,559,196 CONNECTICUT ............................................................................................................................................................................. 17,987,220 Danbury, CT—NY ................................................................................................................................................................... Norwich—New London, CT .................................................................................................................................................... Waterbury, CT ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6,896,204 3,177,682 7,913,334 DELAWARE ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,317,343 Dover, DE ............................................................................................................................................................................... Salisbury, MD—DE ................................................................................................................................................................. 1,288,816 28,527 FLORIDA ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 21,357,992 Brooksville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ Deltona, FL ............................................................................................................................................................................. Fort Walton Beach, FL ........................................................................................................................................................... Gainesville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ Kissimmee, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ Lady Lake, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................... Lakeland, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................... Leesburg—Eustis, FL ............................................................................................................................................................. North Port—Punta Gorda, FL ................................................................................................................................................. Ocala, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................ Panama City, FL ..................................................................................................................................................................... St. Augustine, FL .................................................................................................................................................................... Titusville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................... Vero Beach—Sebastian, FL ................................................................................................................................................... Winter Haven, FL ................................................................................................................................................................... Zephyrhills, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ 993,287 1,610,174 1,636,390 2,641,987 2,102,630 464,231 2,417,959 988,439 1,240,112 1,028,813 1,316,602 568,072 942,936 1,263,626 1,604,997 537,737 GEORGIA ...................................................................................................................................................................................... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Merced, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Napa, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................ Petaluma, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Porterville, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Redding, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Salinas, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. San Luis Obispo, CA .............................................................................................................................................................. Santa Barbara, CA ................................................................................................................................................................. Santa Clarita, CA .................................................................................................................................................................... Santa Cruz, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Santa Maria, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................... Seaside—Monterey—Marina, CA .......................................................................................................................................... Simi Valley, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Tracy, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................ Turlock, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Vacaville, CA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Vallejo, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Visalia, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Watsonville, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Yuba City, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Yuma, AZ—CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8,760,015 Albany, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Athens—Clarke County, GA ................................................................................................................................................... Brunswick, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Dalton, GA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Gainesville, GA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Hinesville, GA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 989,427 1,312,463 500,167 536,009 805,000 578,175 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13902 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment 1,486,745 1,083,099 608,832 860,098 HAWAII .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,026,247 Kailua (Honolulu County)—Kaneohe, HI ................................................................................................................................ 2,026,247 IDAHO ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 3,939,639 Coeur d’Alene, ID ................................................................................................................................................................... Idaho Falls, ID ........................................................................................................................................................................ Lewiston, ID—WA .................................................................................................................................................................. Nampa, ID .............................................................................................................................................................................. Pocatello, ID ........................................................................................................................................................................... 841,280 824,600 356,711 1,160,278 756,770 ILLINOIS ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 10,882,018 Alton, IL .................................................................................................................................................................................. Beloit, WI—IL .......................................................................................................................................................................... Bloomington—Normal, IL ....................................................................................................................................................... Champaign, IL ........................................................................................................................................................................ Danville, IL .............................................................................................................................................................................. Decatur, IL .............................................................................................................................................................................. DeKalb, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................... Dubuque, IA—IL ..................................................................................................................................................................... Kankakee, IL ........................................................................................................................................................................... Springfield, IL .......................................................................................................................................................................... 910,786 141,978 1,874,630 2,523,127 582,432 1,350,371 825,760 28,816 826,220 1,817,898 INDIANA ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 10,733,698 Anderson, IN ........................................................................................................................................................................... Bloomington, IN ...................................................................................................................................................................... Columbus, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................... Elkhart, IN—MI ....................................................................................................................................................................... Kokomo, IN ............................................................................................................................................................................. Lafayette, IN ........................................................................................................................................................................... Michigan City, IN—MI ............................................................................................................................................................. Muncie, IN .............................................................................................................................................................................. Terre Haute, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,012,189 1,483,511 580,600 1,409,420 831,958 2,300,689 769,298 1,451,646 894,387 IOWA ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 8,071,720 Ames, IA ................................................................................................................................................................................. Cedar Rapids, IA .................................................................................................................................................................... Dubuque, IA—IL ..................................................................................................................................................................... Iowa City, IA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ......................................................................................................................................................... Waterloo, IA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1,365,236 2,080,013 762,548 1,569,025 1,013,167 1,281,731 KANSAS ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3,073,575 Lawrence, KS ......................................................................................................................................................................... St. Joseph, MO—KS .............................................................................................................................................................. Topeka, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,383,389 12,124 1,678,062 KENTUCKY ................................................................................................................................................................................... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Macon, GA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Rome, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................... Valdosta, GA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Warner Robins, GA ................................................................................................................................................................ 2,857,079 Bowling Green, KY ................................................................................................................................................................. Clarksville, TN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................ Huntington, WV—KY—OH ..................................................................................................................................................... Owensboro, KY ...................................................................................................................................................................... Radcliff—Elizabethtown, KY ................................................................................................................................................... 619,391 267,824 557,729 747,772 664,363 LOUISIANA .................................................................................................................................................................................... 8,036,529 Alexandria, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Houma, LA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Lafayette, LA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 769,069 1,334,550 2,026,465 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13903 TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment 1,341,153 617,428 1,147,923 799,941 MAINE ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 4,381,796 Bangor, ME ............................................................................................................................................................................. Dover—Rochester, NH—ME .................................................................................................................................................. Lewiston, ME .......................................................................................................................................................................... Portland, ME ........................................................................................................................................................................... Portsmouth, NH—ME ............................................................................................................................................................. 613,623 109,513 896,326 2,678,244 84,090 MARYLAND ................................................................................................................................................................................... 10,670,642 Aberdeen—Havre de Grace—Bel Air, MD ............................................................................................................................. Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... Frederick, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................... Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... Salisbury, MD—DE ................................................................................................................................................................. St. Charles, MD ...................................................................................................................................................................... Westminster, MD .................................................................................................................................................................... 2,900,711 810,873 1,915,132 1,441,127 905,376 1,464,195 1,233,228 MASSACHUSETTS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6,662,936 Leominster—Fitchburg, MA .................................................................................................................................................... Nashua, NH—MA ................................................................................................................................................................... New Bedford, MA ................................................................................................................................................................... Pittsfield, MA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2,398,315 504 3,106,662 1,157,455 MICHIGAN ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 13,046,789 Battle Creek, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................... Bay City, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................ Benton Harbor—St. Joseph, MI ............................................................................................................................................. Elkhart, IN—MI ....................................................................................................................................................................... Holland, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. Jackson, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................ Kalamazoo, MI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Michigan City, IN—MI ............................................................................................................................................................. Monroe, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. Muskegon, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................... Port Huron, MI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Saginaw, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................ South Lyon—Howell—Brighton, MI ........................................................................................................................................ 825,952 1,078,081 612,662 17,527 1,053,030 1,198,756 2,305,463 5,021 591,206 1,617,501 1,146,273 1,613,157 982,160 MINNESOTA .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5,052,284 Duluth, MN—WI ...................................................................................................................................................................... Fargo, ND—MN ...................................................................................................................................................................... Grand Forks, ND—MN ........................................................................................................................................................... La Crosse, WI—MN ............................................................................................................................................................... Rochester, MN ........................................................................................................................................................................ St. Cloud, MN ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,369,705 489,703 104,502 75,927 1,500,230 1,512,217 MISSISSIPPI .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,220,077 Hattiesburg, MS ...................................................................................................................................................................... Pascagoula, MS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 647,302 572,775 MISSOURI ..................................................................................................................................................................................... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Lake Charles, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... Mandeville—Covington, LA .................................................................................................................................................... Monroe, LA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Slidell, LA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4,104,533 Columbia, MO ......................................................................................................................................................................... Jefferson City, MO .................................................................................................................................................................. Joplin, MO .............................................................................................................................................................................. Lee’s Summit, MO .................................................................................................................................................................. St. Joseph, MO—KS .............................................................................................................................................................. 1,135,945 542,439 698,235 714,301 1,013,613 MONTANA ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,826,793 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13904 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment 1,230,011 798,682 798,100 N. MARIANA ISLANDS ................................................................................................................................................................. 697,739 Saipan, MP ............................................................................................................................................................................. 697,739 NEBRASKA ................................................................................................................................................................................... 197,384 Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ......................................................................................................................................................... 197,384 NEVADA ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 713,838 Carson City, NV ...................................................................................................................................................................... 713,838 NEW HAMPSHIRE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5,262,172 Dover—Rochester, NH—ME .................................................................................................................................................. Manchester, NH ...................................................................................................................................................................... Nashua, NH—MA ................................................................................................................................................................... Portsmouth, NH—ME ............................................................................................................................................................. 1,156,340 1,695,898 2,009,813 400,121 NEW JERSEY ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3,960,617 Hightstown, NJ ....................................................................................................................................................................... Vineland, NJ ........................................................................................................................................................................... Wildwood—North Wildwood—Cape May, NJ ........................................................................................................................ 1,431,763 1,596,004 932,850 NEW MEXICO ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2,771,368 Farmington, NM ...................................................................................................................................................................... Las Cruces, NM ...................................................................................................................................................................... Santa Fe, NM ......................................................................................................................................................................... 515,759 1,119,267 1,136,342 NEW YORK ................................................................................................................................................................................... 10,570,026 Binghamton, NY—PA ............................................................................................................................................................. Danbury, CT—NY ................................................................................................................................................................... Elmira, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................. Glens Falls, NY ...................................................................................................................................................................... Ithaca, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................... Kingston, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................... Middletown, NY ...................................................................................................................................................................... Saratoga Springs, NY ............................................................................................................................................................. Utica, NY ................................................................................................................................................................................ 2,695,012 73,552 1,224,805 794,650 1,245,902 1,334,020 710,718 792,015 1,699,352 NORTH CAROLINA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 11,251,514 Burlington, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Concord, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................... Gastonia, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................... Goldsboro, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Greenville, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Hickory, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ High Point, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Jacksonville, NC ..................................................................................................................................................................... Rocky Mount, NC ................................................................................................................................................................... Wilmington, NC ....................................................................................................................................................................... 972,420 1,125,674 1,355,445 576,504 963,326 1,645,632 1,354,550 994,423 645,662 1,617,878 NORTH DAKOTA .......................................................................................................................................................................... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Billings, MT ............................................................................................................................................................................. Great Falls, MT ....................................................................................................................................................................... Missoula, MT .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3,535,331 Bismarck, ND .......................................................................................................................................................................... Fargo, ND—MN ...................................................................................................................................................................... Grand Forks, ND—MN ........................................................................................................................................................... 1,158,007 1,608,082 769,242 OHIO .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 9,376,620 Huntington, WV—KY—OH ..................................................................................................................................................... Lima, OH ................................................................................................................................................................................ 365,291 783,147 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13905 TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment 2,613,598 836,717 1,092,416 1,054,173 257,045 554,395 1,058,335 441,368 320,135 OKLAHOMA ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,197,292 Fort Smith, AR—OK ............................................................................................................................................................... Lawton, OK ............................................................................................................................................................................. Norman, OK ............................................................................................................................................................................ 22,819 956,432 1,218,041 OREGON ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,902,420 Bend, OR ................................................................................................................................................................................ Corvallis, OR .......................................................................................................................................................................... Longview, WA—OR ................................................................................................................................................................ Medford, OR ........................................................................................................................................................................... 611,658 687,751 16,389 1,586,622 PENNSYLVANIA ........................................................................................................................................................................... 14,667,053 Altoona, PA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Binghamton, NY—PA ............................................................................................................................................................. Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... Erie, PA .................................................................................................................................................................................. Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... Hazleton, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Johnstown, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Lebanon, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Monessen, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Pottstown, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... State College, PA ................................................................................................................................................................... Uniontown—Connellsville, PA ................................................................................................................................................ Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA .................................................................................................................................... Williamsport, PA ..................................................................................................................................................................... York, PA ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,008,352 43,896 137 2,890,238 12,605 574,760 1,204,512 767,631 1,192,580 725,687 1,817,883 812,804 2,733 1,437,612 2,175,623 PUERTO RICO .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10,639,870 Arecibo, PR ............................................................................................................................................................................ Fajardo, PR ............................................................................................................................................................................ Florida—Barceloneta—Bajadero, PR ..................................................................................................................................... Guayama, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................... Juana Diaz, PR ...................................................................................................................................................................... Mayaguez, PR ........................................................................................................................................................................ Ponce, PR .............................................................................................................................................................................. San German—Cabo Rojo—Sabana Grande, PR .................................................................................................................. Yauco, PR .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1,449,086 828,071 644,671 842,124 565,662 1,310,689 2,884,958 1,013,945 1,100,664 RHODE ISLAND ............................................................................................................................................................................ 0 SOUTH CAROLINA ....................................................................................................................................................................... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Lorain—Elyria, OH .................................................................................................................................................................. Mansfield, OH ......................................................................................................................................................................... Middletown, OH ...................................................................................................................................................................... Newark, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................ Parkersburg, WV—OH ........................................................................................................................................................... Sandusky, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ Springfield, OH ....................................................................................................................................................................... Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA .................................................................................................................................... Wheeling, WV—OH ................................................................................................................................................................ 6,726,460 Anderson, SC ......................................................................................................................................................................... Florence, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................... Mauldin—Simpsonville, SC .................................................................................................................................................... Myrtle Beach, SC ................................................................................................................................................................... Rock Hill, SC .......................................................................................................................................................................... Spartanburg, SC ..................................................................................................................................................................... Sumter, SC ............................................................................................................................................................................. 640,244 983,511 786,738 1,425,464 659,663 1,331,315 899,525 SOUTH DAKOTA .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2,675,777 Rapid City, SD ........................................................................................................................................................................ Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ......................................................................................................................................................... 818,753 33,565 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13906 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment 1,823,459 TENNESSEE ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6,725,215 Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA .......................................................................................................................................................... Clarksville, TN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................ Cleveland, TN ......................................................................................................................................................................... Jackson, TN ............................................................................................................................................................................ Johnson City, TN .................................................................................................................................................................... Kingsport, TN—VA ................................................................................................................................................................. Morristown, TN ....................................................................................................................................................................... Murfreesboro, TN ................................................................................................................................................................... 347,289 1,010,092 556,853 948,789 958,145 840,182 519,063 1,544,802 TEXAS ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 34,766,686 Abilene, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. Amarillo, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ Beaumont, TX ......................................................................................................................................................................... Brownsville, TX ....................................................................................................................................................................... College Station—Bryan, TX ................................................................................................................................................... Galveston, TX ......................................................................................................................................................................... Harlingen, TX .......................................................................................................................................................................... Killeen, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................. Lake Jackson—Angleton, TX ................................................................................................................................................. Laredo, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................. Longview, TX .......................................................................................................................................................................... McKinney, TX ......................................................................................................................................................................... Midland, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ Odessa, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. Port Arthur, TX ....................................................................................................................................................................... San Angelo, TX ...................................................................................................................................................................... Sherman, TX .......................................................................................................................................................................... Temple, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR ............................................................................................................................................ Texas City, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................ The Woodlands, TX ................................................................................................................................................................ Tyler, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................. Victoria, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. Waco, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................ Wichita Falls, TX .................................................................................................................................................................... 1,343,172 2,333,958 1,540,933 2,734,539 1,824,951 1,392,401 1,274,698 2,279,352 905,070 3,593,958 827,477 648,017 1,228,930 1,349,048 1,517,318 1,025,875 629,197 801,485 462,132 1,170,152 1,096,274 1,138,058 595,076 1,899,585 1,155,030 UTAH ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1,863,771 Logan, UT ............................................................................................................................................................................... St. George, UT ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,143,363 720,408 VERMONT ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,508,546 Burlington, VT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,508,546 VIRGIN ISLANDS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 843,840 VIRGINIA ....................................................................................................................................................................................... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Sioux Falls, SD ....................................................................................................................................................................... 9,280,295 Blacksburg, VA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA .......................................................................................................................................................... Charlottesville, VA .................................................................................................................................................................. Danville, VA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Fredericksburg, VA ................................................................................................................................................................. Harrisonburg, VA .................................................................................................................................................................... Kingsport, TN—VA ................................................................................................................................................................. Lynchburg, VA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Roanoke, VA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Winchester, VA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,063,831 202,992 1,481,189 538,282 1,006,793 857,517 15,906 1,220,972 2,318,325 574,488 WASHINGTON .............................................................................................................................................................................. 14,358,531 Bellingham, WA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Bremerton, WA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1,564,038 2,349,035 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13907 TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.] Urbanized area/state Apportionment Kennewick—Richland, WA ..................................................................................................................................................... Lewiston, ID—WA .................................................................................................................................................................. Longview, WA—OR ................................................................................................................................................................ Marysville, WA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Mount Vernon, WA ................................................................................................................................................................. Olympia—Lacey, WA ............................................................................................................................................................. Wenatchee, WA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Yakima, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,459,462 208,036 737,928 1,208,535 790,127 2,246,977 1,148,346 1,646,047 WEST VIRGINIA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5,794,143 Charleston, WV ...................................................................................................................................................................... Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ................................................................................................................................................... Huntington, WV—KY—OH ..................................................................................................................................................... Morgantown, WV .................................................................................................................................................................... Parkersburg, WV—OH ........................................................................................................................................................... Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA .................................................................................................................................... Wheeling, WV—OH ................................................................................................................................................................ 2,181,992 22,703 297,138 987,340 718,666 670,607 306,355 609,342 WISCONSIN .................................................................................................................................................................................. 16,669,410 Appleton, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... Beloit, WI—IL .......................................................................................................................................................................... Duluth, MN—WI ...................................................................................................................................................................... Eau Claire, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Fond du Lac, WI ..................................................................................................................................................................... Green Bay, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Janesville, WI ......................................................................................................................................................................... Kenosha, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... La Crosse, WI—MN ............................................................................................................................................................... Oshkosh, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... Racine, WI .............................................................................................................................................................................. Sheboygan, WI ....................................................................................................................................................................... Wausau, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,492,784 523,641 430,307 1,329,387 649,706 2,339,401 819,067 1,613,367 1,275,881 1,326,506 1,811,896 1,049,497 1,007,970 WYOMING ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1,512,596 Casper, WY ............................................................................................................................................................................ Cheyenne, WY ....................................................................................................................................................................... 710,204 802,392 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 408,554,898 1 Language in section 5307(l) provides for the treatment of the Virgin Islands as an urbanized area. TABLE 4.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 APPORTIONMENT FORMULA Distribution of Available Funds Of the funds made available to the Section 5307 program, a one percent takedown is authorized for Small Transit Intensive Cities. This amount is apportioned to the Governors based on a separate formula that uses criteria related to specific service performance categories. The remaining 99% is apportioned to small, medium, and large sized urbanized areas (UZAs). 9.32% is made available for UZAs 50,000– 199,999 in population, and 90.68% to UZAs 200,000 or more in population. UZA Population and Weighting Factors sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 50,000–199,999 in population (Apportioned to Governors). 200,000 and greater in population (Apportioned to UZAs). 9.32% of available Section 5307 funds. 50% apportioned based on population. 50% apportioned based on population × population density. 90.68% of available Section 5307 funds. 33.29% (Fixed Guideway Tier*). 95.61% (Non-incentive Portion of Tier). —at least 0.75% to each UZA with commuter rail and pop. 750,000 or greater. 60%—fixed guideway revenue vehicle miles. 40%—fixed guideway route miles. 4.39% (‘‘Incentive Portion’’ of Tier). VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13908 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 4.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 APPORTIONMENT FORMULA—Continued —at least 0.75% to each UZA with commuter rail and pop. 750,000 or greater. —fixed guideway passenger miles × fixed guideway passenger miles/operating cost. 66.71% (‘‘Bus’’ Tier). 90.8% (Non-incentive Portion of Tier). 73.39% for UZAs with population 1,000,000 or greater. 50%—bus revenue vehicle miles. 25%—population. 25%—population × population density. 26.61% for UZAs pop. < 1,000,000. 50%—bus revenue vehicle miles. 25%— population. 25%—population × density. 9.2% (‘‘Incentive’’ Portion of Tier). —bus passenger miles × bus passenger miles/operating cost. * Includes all fixed guideway modes, such as heavy rail, commuter rail, light rail, trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car, automated guideway transit, ferryboats, exclusive busways, and HOV lanes. TABLE 5.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 FORMULA PROGRAMS APPORTIONMENT DATA UNIT VALUES Apportionment data unit value Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Bus Tier: Urbanized Areas Over 1,000,000: Population .......................................................................................................................................................................... Population × Density ......................................................................................................................................................... Bus Revenue Vehicle Mile ................................................................................................................................................ Urbanized Areas Under 1,000,000: Population .......................................................................................................................................................................... Population × Density ......................................................................................................................................................... Bus Revenue Vehicle Mile ................................................................................................................................................ Bus Incentive (PM denotes Passenger Mile): Bus PM × Bus PM = Operating Cost ................................................................................................................................ Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Fixed Guideway Tier: Fixed Guideway Revenue Vehicle Mile ............................................................................................................................ Fixed Guideway Route Mile .............................................................................................................................................. Commuter Rail Floor .................................................................................................................................................. Fixed Guideway Incentive: Fixed Guideway PM × Fixed Guideway PM = Operating Cost ........................................................................................ Commuter Rail Incentive Floor .................................................................................................................................. Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Areas Under 200,000: Population .......................................................................................................................................................................... Population × Density ......................................................................................................................................................... Section 5307 Small Transit Intensive Cities: For Each Qualifying Performance Category ..................................................................................................................... Section 5311 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Areas Under 50,000 Population .......................................................................................................................................................................... Section 5309 Capital Program—Fixed Guideway Modernization: Tier 2 Legislatively Specified Areas: Revenue Vehicle Mile ........................ Route Mile ......................................... Other Urbanized Areas: Revenue Vehicle Mile ........................ Route Mile ......................................... Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 $3.00227624 0.00076177 0.39097622 2.75146798 0.00120387 0.51070792 0.00750408 0.58113740 30,545 7,680,270 0.00065678 352,645 $5.53398866 0.00275286 120,608 4.31350350 Tier 6 Tier 7 $0.03043443 2,122.43 ........................ ........................ $0.13671435 7,825.39 $0.03477564 2,620.89 $0.02292899 1,728.06 $0.21152760 15,941.94 0.16288440 4,758.70 0.00576164 168.33 0.13671435 7,825.39 0.06921684 2,017.29 0.05650354 1,646.77 0.78189598 22,787.98 Notes: 1. Unit values for Section 5307 do not take into account Section 5340 funding added to the program. 2. The unit value for Section 5311 is based on the total nonurbanized/rural population for the States and territories. It does not take into account Section 5311 funds allocated based on land area in nonurbanized areas, or Section 5340 funding added to the program. TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES [Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] State Urbanized area (UZA) description Alabama ............. Passenger miles per vehicle revenue mile Passenger miles per vehicle revenue hour 5.561 95.935 10.951 0.000 0.000 0.000 Average for UZAs with populations 200,000–999,999. Anniston, AL ................................... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Vehicle revenue mile per capita Sfmt 4703 Vehicle revenue hour per capita Passenger miles per capita Passenger trips per capita 0.729 72.570 0.000 0.000 STIC funding: @ $120,608 per factor met or exceeded 0 $0 13.348 0.000 Number of performance factors met or exceeded E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13909 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] Urbanized area (UZA) description Alabama ............. Alabama ............. Alabama ............. Alabama ............. Alabama ............. Alabama ............. Alabama ............. Alaska ................. Arizona ............... Arizona ............... Arizona ............... Arizona ............... Arkansas ............ Arkansas ............ Arkansas ............ Arkansas ............ Arkansas ............ California ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State Passenger miles per vehicle revenue mile Passenger miles per vehicle revenue hour 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.093 0.000 2.897 2.680 6.859 4.349 2.540 0.000 1.515 3.371 2.081 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.716 16.772 22.792 15.975 0.000 46.236 28.693 105.298 0.000 34.781 0.000 16.822 40.016 29.584 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.719 7.733 6.700 8.252 0.000 6.732 2.829 8.463 0.743 7.905 0.000 8.028 4.768 4.734 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.425 8.983 0.000 3.274 0.000 0.000 1.893 3.248 1.944 7.519 0.000 0.000 1.929 2.778 5.103 3.225 3.438 0.000 22.048 10.352 12.879 8.392 1.945 6.765 4.548 0.000 0.000 5.892 9.476 4.902 0.000 5.329 9.335 4.163 3.305 7.445 7.004 3.762 21.337 5.761 20.385 2.786 1.683 3.296 1.057 9.524 0.000 0.000 2.378 0.000 1.008 3.569 1.196 0.000 6.329 0.000 0.000 42.826 151.628 0.000 63.781 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 21.289 112.958 0.000 0.000 34.230 39.639 0.000 48.188 55.384 0.000 263.797 140.225 418.549 125.105 27.602 103.062 118.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 244.654 65.558 0.000 83.369 0.000 57.198 39.308 0.000 0.000 53.996 1614.082 177.809 1130.418 0.000 26.954 0.000 16.369 109.979 0.000 0.000 38.374 0.000 15.649 49.160 19.087 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 9.354 18.082 0.000 13.171 0.000 0.000 7.263 5.338 6.952 8.249 0.000 0.000 13.968 13.360 2.804 8.955 11.285 0.000 7.402 13.451 31.535 24.349 4.997 28.289 10.348 0.000 0.000 0.805 24.678 9.659 0.000 9.914 15.645 7.201 5.685 9.349 22.598 6.932 41.055 10.620 34.678 29.906 3.095 9.152 8.221 18.039 0.000 0.000 20.144 0.000 4.250 3.921 8.866 0.000 15.557 0.000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Auburn, AL ..................................... Decatur, AL .................................... Dothan, AL ..................................... Florence, AL ................................... Gadsden, AL .................................. Montgomery, AL ............................. Tuscaloosa, AL ............................... Fairbanks, AK ................................. Avondale, AZ .................................. Flagstaff, AZ ................................... Prescott, AZ .................................... Yuma, AZ—CA ............................... Fayetteville-Springdale, AR ............ Fort Smith, AR—OK ....................... Hot Springs, AR ............................. Jonesboro, AR ................................ Pine Bluff, AR ................................. Atascadero—El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA. Camarillo, CA ................................. Chico, CA ....................................... Davis, CA ....................................... El Centro, CA ................................. Fairfield, CA .................................... Gilroy—Morgan Hill, CA ................. Hanford, CA .................................... Hemet, CA ...................................... Livermore, CA ................................ Lodi, CA .......................................... Lompoc, CA .................................... Madera, CA .................................... Manteca, CA ................................... Merced, CA .................................... Napa, CA ........................................ Petaluma, CA ................................. Porterville, CA ................................ Redding, CA ................................... Salinas, CA ..................................... San Luis Obispo, CA ...................... Santa Barbara, CA ......................... Santa Clarita, CA ........................... Santa Cruz, CA .............................. Santa Maria, CA ............................. Seaside—Monterey—Marina, CA .. Simi Valley, CA .............................. Tracy, CA ....................................... Turlock, CA ..................................... Vacaville, CA .................................. Vallejo, CA ...................................... Visalia, CA ...................................... Watsonville, CA .............................. Yuba City, CA ................................. Boulder, CO .................................... Grand Junction, CO ....................... Greeley, CO ................................... Lafayette—Louisville, CO ............... Longmont, CO ................................ Pueblo, CO ..................................... Danbury, CT—NY .......................... Norwich—New London, CT ............ Waterbury, CT ................................ Dover, DE ....................................... Brooksville, FL ................................ Deltona, FL ..................................... Fort Walton Beach, FL ................... Gainesville, FL ................................ Kissimmee, FL ................................ Lady Lake, FL ................................ Lakeland, FL ................................... Leesburg—Eustis, FL ..................... North Port—Punta Gorda, FL ........ Ocala, FL ........................................ Panama City, FL ............................ St. Augustine, FL ............................ Titusville, FL ................................... Vero Beach—Sebastian, FL ........... California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ California ............ Colorado ............. Colorado ............. Colorado ............. Colorado ............. Colorado ............. Colorado ............. Connecticut ........ Connecticut ........ Connecticut ........ Delaware ............ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ Florida ................ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Vehicle revenue mile per capita Sfmt 4703 Passenger miles per capita Passenger trips per capita Number of performance factors met or exceeded STIC funding: @ $120,608 per factor met or exceeded 0.342 0.461 0.294 0.565 0.000 0.422 0.264 0.551 0.000 0.577 0.000 0.723 0.402 0.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.719 7.733 6.700 9.021 0.000 19.501 7.579 58.051 3.233 20.076 0.000 12.167 16.072 9.852 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.732 2.780 2.391 2.577 0.000 3.807 1.181 8.092 0.000 7.800 0.000 1.719 8.268 2.108 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.748 1.071 0.000 0.676 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.635 0.549 0.000 0.000 0.787 0.936 0.000 0.599 0.701 0.000 0.619 0.993 0.970 1.633 0.352 1.857 0.399 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.956 0.722 0.000 0.634 0.000 0.524 0.478 0.000 0.000 0.483 0.543 0.344 0.625 0.000 0.193 0.000 0.531 1.562 0.000 0.000 1.248 0.000 0.274 0.285 0.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 32.041 162.432 0.000 43.116 0.000 0.000 13.749 17.337 13.511 62.028 0.000 0.000 26.946 37.120 14.312 28.880 38.801 0.000 163.195 139.238 406.124 204.347 9.716 191.379 47.063 0.000 0.000 4.745 233.857 47.347 0.000 52.829 146.044 29.978 18.788 69.608 158.281 26.081 875.975 61.178 706.904 83.304 5.209 30.164 8.691 171.808 0.000 0.000 47.893 0.000 4.284 13.991 10.605 0.000 98.453 0.000 0.000 10.019 51.747 0.000 7.041 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.269 5.958 0.000 0.000 9.535 9.813 0.000 8.041 7.876 0.000 16.362 36.757 20.689 35.654 6.582 38.283 4.209 0.000 0.000 0.000 18.416 10.970 0.000 6.911 0.000 7.385 4.955 0.000 0.000 8.324 5.407 5.395 10.075 0.000 1.325 0.000 1.340 50.648 0.000 0.000 11.172 0.000 0.568 2.870 3.401 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 4 6 6 6 0 6 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 3 0 4 2 4 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 120,608 723,646 0 120,608 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 0 0 241,216 241,216 0 0 120,608 0 482,431 723,646 723,646 723,646 0 723,646 120,608 0 0 120,608 723,646 0 0 0 361,824 0 0 120,608 361,824 0 482,431 241,216 482,431 241,216 0 0 0 723,646 0 0 241,216 0 0 0 0 0 361,824 0 Vehicle revenue hour per capita E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13910 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] State Urbanized area (UZA) description Florida ................ Florida ................ Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Georgia ............... Hawaii ................. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Maryland ............. Maryland ............. Maryland ............. Maryland ............. Maryland ............. Maryland ............. Massachusetts ... Massachusetts ... Massachusetts ... Michigan ............. Michigan ............. Michigan ............. Michigan ............. Michigan ............. Michigan ............. Michigan ............. Michigan ............. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 Passenger trips per capita Number of performance factors met or exceeded STIC funding: @ $120,608 per factor met or exceeded 0.000 0.000 0.443 0.575 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.575 0.496 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 36.576 46.617 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 35.796 142.038 0.000 0.000 19.322 0.000 0.000 7.233 14.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.774 14.248 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 241,216 0 0 0 0 0 482,431 0 0 120,608 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.135 6.859 4.451 11.621 22.557 5.963 11.160 0.000 0.000 9.442 4.726 10.499 0.000 6.212 10.834 11.821 0.000 12.793 4.395 20.602 9.023 8.520 20.356 5.960 8.615 10.318 9.245 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.022 0.000 4.853 0.000 0.000 6.234 0.000 9.264 16.243 15.863 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.565 0.000 0.864 1.982 0.333 0.821 0.000 0.000 0.746 0.418 0.986 0.000 0.394 1.057 0.997 0.000 0.996 0.471 1.930 0.625 0.657 1.831 0.535 0.556 0.813 0.627 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.462 0.000 0.353 0.000 0.000 0.441 0.000 0.707 1.094 0.775 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 12.538 36.414 19.774 43.618 207.674 12.117 31.746 0.000 0.000 24.154 6.473 71.691 0.000 10.167 11.073 110.553 0.000 55.505 4.898 120.547 32.126 26.917 88.575 22.362 9.014 15.915 36.121 0.000 0.000 0.000 33.834 0.000 34.146 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 46.842 24.344 174.722 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.586 0.000 11.694 81.684 6.539 10.814 0.000 0.000 8.734 2.135 23.619 0.000 2.245 2.473 33.814 0.000 20.253 2.523 84.629 7.288 9.730 60.513 7.686 4.238 6.362 9.979 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.149 0.000 7.735 0.000 0.000 8.528 0.000 11.554 6.553 14.007 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 6 0 3 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 723,646 0 241,216 0 0 120,608 0 361,824 0 0 120,608 723,646 0 361,824 0 603,039 0 0 482,431 0 0 120,608 0 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 723,646 0 0.000 8.215 4.055 0.000 16.509 11.387 24.328 16.915 15.536 7.142 22.091 6.443 6.855 14.478 10.919 8.699 3.575 0.000 0.697 0.273 0.000 1.002 1.008 1.847 0.917 0.822 0.486 1.279 0.493 0.498 0.895 0.908 0.000 0.270 0.000 23.881 9.595 0.000 16.509 14.630 75.075 50.617 15.536 23.747 39.296 9.370 6.942 28.301 46.721 19.426 13.467 0.000 4.644 2.563 0.000 5.497 2.398 10.259 11.564 9.641 6.658 7.846 2.625 2.009 8.040 15.554 0.000 2.830 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 241,216 361,824 241,216 241,216 0 241,216 0 0 241,216 241,216 0 0 Passenger miles per vehicle revenue hour 0.000 0.000 5.160 6.103 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.353 15.144 0.000 0.000 9.044 0.000 0.000 82.472 81.046 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 62.271 286.192 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.089 7.639 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.223 9.379 0.000 0.000 2.136 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.032 5.309 4.442 3.753 9.207 2.032 2.845 0.000 0.000 2.558 1.370 6.828 0.000 1.637 1.022 9.352 0.000 4.339 1.114 5.851 3.561 3.159 4.351 3.752 1.046 1.542 3.907 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.818 0.000 7.035 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.056 1.499 11.014 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 64.497 0.000 50.475 104.802 36.342 38.648 0.000 0.000 32.374 15.495 72.674 0.000 25.774 10.475 110.918 0.000 55.708 10.396 62.469 51.368 40.963 48.382 41.819 16.200 19.585 57.593 0.000 0.000 0.000 73.290 0.000 96.853 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 66.260 22.244 225.504 0.000 0.000 2.907 2.366 0.000 1.000 1.285 3.086 2.992 1.000 3.325 1.779 1.454 1.013 1.955 4.279 2.233 3.767 0.000 34.264 35.097 0.000 16.484 14.512 40.653 55.171 18.899 48.817 30.715 18.988 13.938 31.619 51.456 0.000 49.825 Winter Haven, FL ........................... Zephyrhills, FL ................................ Albany, GA ..................................... Athens—Clarke County, GA .......... Brunswick, GA ................................ Dalton, GA ...................................... Gainesville, GA ............................... Hinesville, GA ................................. Macon, GA ..................................... Rome, GA ....................................... Valdosta, GA .................................. Warner Robins, GA ........................ Kailua (Honolulu County)— Kaneohe, HI. Coeur d’Alene, ID ........................... Idaho Falls, ID ................................ Lewiston, ID—WA .......................... Nampa, ID ...................................... Pocatello, ID ................................... Alton, IL .......................................... Bloomington—Normal, IL ............... Champaign, IL ................................ Danville, IL ...................................... Decatur, IL ...................................... DeKalb, IL ....................................... Kankakee, IL .................................. Springfield, IL ................................. Anderson, IN .................................. Bloomington, IN .............................. Columbus, IN .................................. Elkhart, IN—MI ............................... Kokomo, IN ..................................... Lafayette, IN ................................... Michigan City, IN—MI .................... Muncie, IN ...................................... Terre Haute, IN .............................. Ames, IA ......................................... Cedar Rapids, IA ............................ Dubuque, IA—IL ............................. Iowa City, IA ................................... Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ................ Waterloo, IA .................................... Lawrence, KS ................................. Topeka, KS ..................................... Bowling Green, KY ......................... Owensboro, KY .............................. Radcliff—Elizabethtown, KY ........... Alexandria, LA ................................ Houma, LA ..................................... Lafayette, LA .................................. Lake Charles, LA ............................ Mandeville—Covington, LA ............ Monroe, LA ..................................... Slidell, LA ....................................... Bangor, ME .................................... Lewiston, ME .................................. Portland, ME ................................... Aberdeen—Havre de Grace—Bel Air, MD. Cumberland, MD—WV—PA .......... Frederick, MD ................................. Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ........... Salisbury, MD—DE ........................ St. Charles, MD .............................. Westminster, MD ............................ Leominster—Fitchburg, MA ............ New Bedford, MA ........................... Pittsfield, MA .................................. Battle Creek, MI ............................. Bay City, MI .................................... Benton Harbor—St. Joseph, MI ..... Holland, MI ..................................... Jackson, MI .................................... Kalamazoo, MI ............................... Monroe, MI ..................................... Muskegon, MI ................................. Idaho .................. Idaho .................. Idaho .................. Idaho .................. Idaho .................. Illinois ................. Illinois ................. Illinois ................. Illinois ................. Illinois ................. Illinois ................. Illinois ................. Illinois ................. Indiana ............... Indiana ............... Indiana ............... Indiana ............... Indiana ............... Indiana ............... Indiana ............... Indiana ............... Indiana ............... Iowa .................... Iowa .................... Iowa .................... Iowa .................... Iowa .................... Iowa .................... Kansas ............... Kansas ............... Kentucky ............. Kentucky ............. Kentucky ............. Louisiana ............ Louisiana ............ Louisiana ............ Louisiana ............ Louisiana ............ Louisiana ............ Louisiana ............ Maine ................. Maine ................. Maine ................. Maryland ............. Passenger miles per capita Passenger miles per vehicle revenue mile PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Vehicle revenue mile per capita Sfmt 4703 Vehicle revenue hour per capita E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13911 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] Passenger miles per vehicle revenue mile Passenger miles per vehicle revenue hour Vehicle revenue mile per capita Vehicle revenue hour per capita Passenger miles per capita Passenger trips per capita Number of performance factors met or exceeded STIC funding: @ $120,608 per factor met or exceeded State Urbanized area (UZA) description Michigan ............. Michigan ............. Michigan ............. Minnesota ........... Minnesota ........... Minnesota ........... Mississippi .......... Mississippi .......... Missouri .............. Missouri .............. Missouri .............. Missouri .............. Missouri .............. Montana ............. Montana ............. Montana ............. N. Mariana Islands. Nevada ............... New Hampshire .. New Hampshire .. New Hampshire .. New Hampshire .. New Jersey ........ New Jersey ........ New Jersey ........ Port Huron, MI ................................ Saginaw, MI .................................... South Lyon—Howell—Brighton, MI Duluth, MN—WI ............................. Rochester, MN ............................... St. Cloud, MN ................................. Hattiesburg, MS .............................. Pascagoula, MS ............................. Columbia, MO ................................ Jefferson City, MO ......................... Joplin, MO ...................................... Lee’s Summit, MO .......................... St. Joseph, MO—KS ...................... Billings, MT ..................................... Great Falls, MT .............................. Missoula, MT .................................. Saipan, MP ..................................... 1.262 4.331 0.000 4.716 5.253 4.256 0.000 2.585 3.873 2.682 0.000 1.709 2.035 3.115 1.599 4.097 0.000 19.105 45.565 0.000 61.291 75.693 57.593 0.000 0.000 45.856 38.910 0.000 0.000 20.631 46.552 18.232 59.850 0.000 21.936 4.239 0.000 15.634 11.377 15.536 0.000 0.913 5.470 9.855 0.000 0.340 8.766 8.029 8.128 9.654 0.000 1.449 0.403 0.000 1.203 0.790 1.148 0.000 0.000 0.462 0.679 0.000 0.000 0.865 0.537 0.713 0.661 0.000 27.675 18.358 0.000 73.725 59.761 66.127 0.000 2.360 21.185 26.428 0.000 0.581 17.839 25.008 12.996 39.554 0.000 10.026 4.558 0.000 23.122 14.724 20.310 0.000 0.000 5.469 7.530 0.000 0.000 3.750 7.198 7.075 9.587 0.000 2 0 0 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 241,216 0 0 482,431 361,824 361,824 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,608 0 0 0 0 Carson City, NV ............................. Dover—Rochester, NH—ME .......... Manchester, NH ............................. Nashua, NH—MA ........................... Portsmouth, NH—ME ..................... Hightstown, NJ ............................... Vineland, NJ ................................... Wildwood—North Wildwood—Cape May, NJ. Farmington, NM .............................. Las Cruces, NM ............................. Santa Fe, NM ................................. Binghamton, NY—PA ..................... Elmira, NY ...................................... Glens Falls, NY .............................. Ithaca, NY ....................................... Kingston, NY .................................. Middletown, NY .............................. Saratoga Springs, NY .................... Utica, NY ........................................ Burlington, NC ................................ Concord, NC ................................... Gastonia, NC .................................. Goldsboro, NC ................................ Greenville, NC ................................ Hickory, NC .................................... High Point, NC ............................... Jacksonville, NC ............................. Rocky Mount, NC ........................... Wilmington, NC .............................. Bismarck, ND ................................. Fargo, ND—MN .............................. Grand Forks, ND—MN ................... Lima, OH ........................................ Lorain—Elyria, OH ......................... Mansfield, OH ................................. Middletown, OH .............................. Newark, OH .................................... Sandusky, OH ................................ Springfield, OH ............................... Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH— PA. Lawton, OK ..................................... Norman, OK ................................... Bend, OR ........................................ Corvallis, OR .................................. Medford, OR ................................... Altoona, PA .................................... Erie, PA .......................................... Hazleton, PA .................................. Johnstown, PA ............................... Lebanon, PA ................................... Monessen, PA ................................ Pottstown, PA ................................. State College, PA ........................... Uniontown—Connellsville, PA ........ Williamsport, PA ............................. York, PA ......................................... 0.000 7.043 2.422 3.974 5.238 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 200.293 30.917 51.853 0.000 0.000 12.815 0.000 0.000 11.188 3.789 2.325 2.790 0.000 7.706 0.000 0.000 0.393 0.297 0.178 0.000 0.000 0.601 0.000 0.000 78.799 9.176 9.238 14.614 0.000 7.706 0.000 0.000 3.921 2.950 1.794 0.000 0.000 1.666 0.000 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 482,431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 3.994 2.025 3.711 2.463 3.323 4.114 15.198 0.000 5.826 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.229 0.000 0.000 2.721 1.015 3.316 0.944 0.000 3.159 3.190 4.599 0.578 1.538 2.853 0.000 0.000 49.054 25.982 49.460 49.413 51.206 55.888 761.431 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 45.998 0.000 0.000 33.338 13.622 43.693 15.058 0.000 112.180 34.016 65.193 8.976 19.927 34.643 0.000 0.000 5.472 12.897 16.368 15.358 5.420 35.366 37.582 0.000 2.680 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 6.640 0.000 0.000 7.116 13.516 7.275 10.318 0.000 16.299 3.869 2.723 16.137 4.907 2.889 0.000 0.000 0.446 1.005 1.228 0.765 0.352 2.603 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.322 0.000 0.000 0.581 1.007 0.552 0.647 0.000 0.459 0.363 0.192 1.040 0.379 0.238 0.000 0.000 21.855 26.112 60.741 37.821 18.009 145.491 571.166 0.000 15.616 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 14.802 0.000 0.000 19.363 13.719 24.124 9.738 0.000 51.489 12.339 12.523 9.331 7.547 8.242 0.000 0.000 6.431 7.556 18.853 8.935 5.009 58.887 8.743 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.357 0.000 0.000 7.643 3.750 8.410 5.550 0.000 4.421 4.090 2.477 3.358 1.755 3.452 0.000 0 0 2 3 2 0 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 361,824 241,216 0 482,431 603,039 0 120,608 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 0 0 0 241,216 0 0 241,216 0 0 0 2.437 4.961 0.000 0.000 3.065 3.895 3.512 0.000 7.474 0.000 13.967 0.000 10.498 2.255 7.269 3.332 35.614 57.268 0.000 0.000 35.614 51.980 42.414 0.000 82.666 0.000 275.664 0.000 107.483 43.590 113.177 42.664 6.546 5.082 0.000 0.000 7.111 6.838 13.364 0.000 9.135 0.000 15.981 0.000 16.299 16.953 12.912 10.778 0.448 0.440 0.000 0.000 0.612 0.512 1.107 0.000 0.826 0.000 0.810 0.000 1.592 0.877 0.829 0.842 15.951 25.210 0.000 0.000 21.793 26.631 46.937 0.000 68.280 0.000 223.212 0.000 171.115 38.229 93.853 35.916 2.944 11.149 0.000 0.000 10.218 8.142 14.458 0.000 16.500 0.000 6.348 0.000 84.811 4.163 21.403 8.523 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 6 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 361,824 0 361,824 0 603,039 0 723,646 241,216 723,646 120,608 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES New Mexico ........ New Mexico ........ New Mexico ........ New York ............ New York ............ New York ............ New York ............ New York ............ New York ............ New York ............ New York ............ North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Carolina .... North Dakota ...... North Dakota ...... North Dakota ...... Ohio .................... Ohio .................... Ohio .................... Ohio .................... Ohio .................... Ohio .................... Ohio .................... Ohio .................... Oklahoma ........... Oklahoma ........... Oregon ............... Oregon ............... Oregon ............... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... Pennsylvania ...... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13912 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] State Urbanized area (UZA) description Puerto Rico ........ Puerto Rico ........ Puerto Rico ........ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Rico Rico Rico Rico Rico ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ Puerto Rico ........ South Carolina ... South Carolina ... South Carolina ... South Carolina ... South Carolina ... South Carolina ... South Carolina ... South Dakota ..... South Dakota ..... Tennessee .......... Tennessee .......... Tennessee .......... Tennessee .......... Tennessee .......... Tennessee .......... Tennessee .......... Tennessee .......... Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Texas ................. Utah .................... Utah .................... Vermont .............. Virgin Islands ...... Virginia ............... Virginia ............... Virginia ............... Virginia ............... Virginia ............... Virginia ............... Virginia ............... Virginia ............... Washington ........ Washington ........ Washington ........ Washington ........ Washington ........ Washington ........ Washington ........ Washington ........ Washington ........ West Virginia ...... West Virginia ...... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 Passenger trips per capita Number of performance factors met or exceeded STIC funding: @ $120,608 per factor met or exceeded 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 49.005 0.000 17.376 0.000 8.842 31.545 5.780 9.870 0.000 8.544 0.000 11.140 4.374 0.000 0.000 0.296 9.894 4.882 6.096 5.245 6.826 16.687 0.283 6.495 1.380 11.315 0.000 0.000 0.000 6.105 2.780 5.438 6.888 0.000 0.000 13.093 0.000 0.000 5.992 4.880 0.000 10.754 0.000 14.331 0.000 12.573 16.451 6.207 6.073 9.156 11.470 10.001 0.000 24.068 33.516 50.971 5.856 9.283 18.337 31.193 30.350 12.519 16.392 6.202 0.000 0.000 2.062 0.000 0.894 0.000 0.532 1.600 0.487 0.793 0.000 0.532 0.000 0.825 0.394 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.714 0.311 0.437 0.456 0.335 1.470 0.000 0.414 0.000 1.093 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.394 0.180 0.392 0.417 0.000 0.000 0.427 0.000 0.000 0.450 0.356 0.000 0.906 0.000 1.067 0.000 1.275 1.195 0.434 0.395 0.884 0.763 0.738 0.000 1.761 1.795 2.313 0.511 0.000 1.041 1.696 1.669 0.809 0.976 0.423 0.000 0.000 154.059 0.000 33.411 0.000 33.192 57.515 15.597 26.206 0.000 30.086 0.000 33.257 14.250 0.000 0.000 2.128 24.320 8.623 21.218 85.964 9.613 22.614 0.260 12.900 2.761 69.573 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.127 12.160 14.027 0.000 0.000 26.110 0.000 0.000 0.000 21.668 0.000 50.478 0.000 61.670 0.000 0.522 76.658 6.006 25.120 49.699 63.424 46.597 0.000 129.709 163.367 343.693 24.665 48.307 0.000 180.913 154.813 47.488 59.487 19.762 0.000 0.000 9.948 0.000 5.704 0.000 4.622 5.492 3.823 6.659 0.000 5.265 0.000 6.949 3.909 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.667 2.161 4.820 10.111 4.643 16.695 0.000 2.590 0.000 22.498 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.812 1.196 2.047 2.420 0.000 0.000 1.091 0.000 0.000 2.597 3.723 0.000 19.840 0.000 18.301 0.000 41.869 17.780 4.356 3.385 21.843 11.329 9.954 0.000 41.983 29.793 28.448 6.044 0.000 6.933 23.426 14.543 10.799 11.786 4.101 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 4 0 0 2 2 1 0 4 4 6 0 0 2 6 4 2 2 0 0 0 361,824 0 241,216 0 0 241,216 0 120,608 0 0 0 241,216 0 0 0 120,608 0 0 0 361,824 0 361,824 0 0 0 482,431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,608 0 0 0 0 0 241,216 0 361,824 0 361,824 482,431 0 0 241,216 241,216 120,608 0 482,431 482,431 723,647 0 0 241,216 723,647 482,431 241,216 241,216 0 Passenger miles per vehicle revenue hour 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.144 0.000 1.923 0.000 3.754 1.823 2.698 2.655 0.000 3.521 0.000 2.985 3.258 0.000 0.000 7.178 2.458 1.766 3.481 16.391 1.408 1.355 0.919 1.986 2.001 6.149 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.923 2.236 2.037 0.000 0.000 1.994 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.440 0.000 4.694 0.000 4.303 0.000 0.042 4.660 0.968 4.136 5.428 5.530 4.659 0.000 5.389 4.874 6.743 4.212 5.204 0.000 5.800 5.101 3.793 3.629 3.187 0.000 0.000 74.706 0.000 37.376 0.000 62.435 35.954 32.025 33.059 0.000 56.530 0.000 40.313 36.171 0.000 0.000 0.000 34.052 27.759 48.579 188.614 28.726 15.379 0.000 31.134 0.000 63.678 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 45.102 31.010 33.628 0.000 0.000 61.129 0.000 0.000 0.000 60.950 0.000 55.718 0.000 57.819 0.000 0.410 64.138 13.828 63.583 56.195 83.076 63.125 0.000 73.671 91.030 148.616 48.298 0.000 0.000 106.663 92.754 58.670 60.941 46.737 Arecibo, PR .................................... Fajardo, PR .................................... Florida—Barceloneta—Bajadero, PR. Guayama, PR ................................. Juana Diaz, PR .............................. Mayaguez, PR ................................ Ponce, PR ...................................... San German—Cabo Rojo— Sabana Grande, PR. Yauco, PR ...................................... Anderson, SC ................................. Florence, SC .................................. Mauldin-Simpsonville, SC .............. Myrtle Beach, SC ........................... Rock Hill, SC .................................. Spartanburg, SC ............................. Sumter, SC ..................................... Rapid City, SD ................................ Sioux Falls, SD ............................... Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA .................. Clarksville, TN—KY ........................ Cleveland, TN ................................. Jackson, TN ................................... Johnson City, TN ............................ Kingsport, TN—VA ......................... Morristown, TN ............................... Murfreesboro, TN ........................... Abilene, TX ..................................... Amarillo, TX .................................... Beaumont, TX ................................ Brownsville, TX ............................... College Station—Bryan, TX ........... Galveston, TX ................................. Harlingen, TX ................................. Killeen, TX ...................................... Lake Jackson—Angleton, TX ......... Laredo, TX ...................................... Longview, TX .................................. McKinney, TX ................................. Midland, TX .................................... Odessa, TX .................................... Port Arthur, TX ............................... San Angelo, TX .............................. Sherman, TX .................................. Temple, TX ..................................... Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR .... Texas City, TX ................................ The Woodlands, TX ....................... Tyler, TX ......................................... Victoria, TX ..................................... Waco, TX ........................................ Wichita Falls, TX ............................ Logan, UT ....................................... St. George, UT ............................... Burlington, VT ................................. Virgin Islands .................................. Blacksburg, VA ............................... Charlottesville, VA .......................... Danville, VA .................................... Fredericksburg, VA ......................... Harrisonburg, VA ............................ Lynchburg, VA ................................ Roanoke, VA .................................. Winchester, VA ............................... Bellingham, WA .............................. Bremerton, WA ............................... Kennewick—Richland, WA ............. Longview, WA—OR ....................... Marysville, WA ................................ Mount Vernon, WA ......................... Olympia—Lacey, WA ..................... Wenatchee, WA ............................. Yakima, WA .................................... Charleston, WV .............................. Huntington, WV—KY—OH ............. Puerto Puerto Puerto Puerto Puerto Passenger miles per capita Passenger miles per vehicle revenue mile PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Vehicle revenue mile per capita Sfmt 4703 Vehicle revenue hour per capita E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13913 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750] Passenger miles per vehicle revenue mile Passenger miles per vehicle revenue hour Vehicle revenue mile per capita Vehicle revenue hour per capita Passenger miles per capita Passenger trips per capita Number of performance factors met or exceeded STIC funding: @ $120,608 per factor met or exceeded State Urbanized area (UZA) description West Virginia ...... West Virginia ...... West Virginia ...... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wisconsin ........... Wyoming ............ Wyoming ............ Morgantown, WV ............................ Parkersburg, WV—OH ................... Wheeling, WV—OH ........................ Appleton, WI ................................... Beloit, WI-IL .................................... Eau Claire, WI ................................ Fond du Lac, WI ............................. Green Bay, WI ................................ Janesville, WI ................................. Kenosha, WI ................................... La Crosse, WI—MN ....................... Oshkosh, WI ................................... Racine, WI ...................................... Sheboygan, WI ............................... Wausau, WI .................................... Casper, WY .................................... Cheyenne, WY ............................... 0.246 0.000 2.672 3.362 2.809 3.212 0.000 3.555 3.951 5.066 3.332 2.906 4.294 2.687 3.426 1.000 1.520 4.153 0.000 33.877 51.983 45.416 47.703 0.000 52.536 61.073 74.233 45.203 45.383 58.394 33.331 50.537 12.032 22.089 11.403 0.000 8.607 9.456 6.251 16.319 7.694 10.398 7.152 10.673 12.191 16.840 9.696 10.450 11.298 5.675 7.253 0.676 0.000 0.679 0.612 0.387 1.099 0.628 0.704 0.463 0.728 0.899 1.078 0.713 0.842 0.766 0.472 0.499 2.806 0.000 23.002 31.790 17.559 52.412 0.000 36.963 28.259 54.073 40.626 48.932 41.631 28.076 38.709 5.675 11.025 7.006 0.000 5.737 6.161 4.850 14.366 3.752 9.781 7.840 14.949 12.520 15.821 11.738 7.943 12.237 1.651 2.842 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 0 0 120,608 0 0 0 0 361,824 0 0 0 120,608 241,216 361,824 0 120,608 241,216 0 0 Total ............ ......................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. 299 $36,061,750 TABLE 7.—URBANIZED AREAS 200,000 OR MORE IN POPULATION ELIGIBLE TO USE SECTION 5307 FUNDS FOR OPERATING ASSISTANCE State 2000 Census urbanized area description AL ........ CA ....... CA ....... Huntsville, AL ............................................................................................................. Antioch, CA ................................................................................................................ Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA ................................................................ (Indio—Coachella, CA—$621,797) (Palm Springs, CA—$1,227,811) Lancaster—Palmdale, CA .......................................................................................... Santa Rosa, CA ......................................................................................................... Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ................................................................... Temecula—Murrieta, CA ........................................................................................... Fort Collins, CO ......................................................................................................... Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY ................................................................................. (Stamford, CT—NY—5,332,860) (Norwalk, CT—$4,343,565) Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................... (Bristol, CT—$983,277) (New Britain, CT—$1,841,176) Port St. Lucie, FL ....................................................................................................... (Fort Pierce, FL—$1,142,501) (Stuart, FL—$839,705) Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ...................................................................................... Tallahassee, FL ......................................................................................................... Savannah, GA ............................................................................................................ Boise City, ID ............................................................................................................. Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI ................................................. Chicago, IL—IN .......................................................................................................... (Aurora, IL—$2,290,318) (Crystal Lake, IL—$746,464) (Elgin, IL—$1,652,124) (Joliet, IL—$1,910,334) Evansville, IN—KY ..................................................................................................... Barnstable Town, MA ................................................................................................ Boston, MA—NH—RI ................................................................................................ (Brockton, MA—$1,906,558) (Lowell, MA—NH—2,366,926) (Taunton, MA—$487,189) Baltimore, MD ............................................................................................................ (Annapolis, MD—$858,335) Springfield, MO .......................................................................................................... Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ................................................................................................... Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................... Asheville, NC ............................................................................................................. CA ....... CA ....... CA ....... CA ....... CO ....... CT ........ CT ........ FL ........ FL ........ FL ........ GA ....... ID ......... IL ......... IL ......... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES IN ......... MA ....... MA ....... MD ....... MO MS NC NC ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 FY 2002 Apportionment FY 2007 Apportionment operating limitation a 213,253 217,591 254,856 $1,677,473 1,914,688 1,849,608 $419,368 478,672 462,402 263,532 285,408 200,436 229,810 206,757 888,890 2,206,544 2,636,339 1,311,837 1,156,197 9,676,425 551,636 659,085 327,959 311,908 289,049 2,419,106 851,535 2,824,453 706,113 270,774 1,982,206 495,552 221,251 204,260 208,886 272,625 226,848 8,307,904 954,953 1,617,975 1,824,225 2,021,464 1,088,609 6,599,240 238,738 404,494 456,056 505,366 272,152 1,649,810 211,989 243,667 4,032,484 2,251,898 538,120 4,760,673 562,975 134,530 1,190,168 2,076,354 858,335 214,584 215,004 205,754 299,290 221,570 1,748,930 1,687,127 1,811,413 968,044 437,233 421,782 452,853 242,011 Population Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 13914 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 7.—URBANIZED AREAS 200,000 OR MORE IN POPULATION ELIGIBLE TO USE SECTION 5307 FUNDS FOR OPERATING ASSISTANCE—Continued State 2000 Census urbanized area description NC ....... NE ....... NJ ........ NY ....... Greensboro, NC ......................................................................................................... Lincoln, NE ................................................................................................................. Atlantic City, NJ ......................................................................................................... Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY ................................................................................. (Poughkeepsie, NY—$1,507,504) (Newburgh, NY—$717,643) Youngstown, OH—PA ............................................................................................... (Sharon, PA—OH—$465,043) Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN ............................................................................................ (Hamilton, OH—$1,384,842) Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................... Salem, OR ................................................................................................................. Reading, PA ............................................................................................................... Lancaster, PA ............................................................................................................ Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ................................................................... San Juan, PR ............................................................................................................. (Caguas, PR—$2,811,557) (Cayey, PR—$831,273) (Humacao, PR—$719,451) (Vega Baja—Manati, PR—$1,562,942) Providence, RI—MA .................................................................................................. (Newport, RI—$644,329) (Fall River, MA—RI—$2,051,153) Lubbock, TX ............................................................................................................... Denton—Lewisville, TX .............................................................................................. (Denton, TX—$599,570) (Lewisville, TX—$692,152) Richmond, VA ............................................................................................................ (Petersburg, VA—$1,016,957) OH ....... OH ....... OR ....... OR ....... PA ........ PA ........ PR ....... PR ....... RI ......... TX ........ TX ........ VA ........ FY 2002 Apportionment FY 2007 Apportionment operating limitation a 267,884 226,582 227,180 351,982 2,211,540 2,658,761 1,842,968 2,225,147 552,885 664,690 460,742 556,287 417,437 465,043 116,261 1,503,262 1,384,842 346,211 224,049 207,229 240,264 323,554 299,086 2,216,616 2,559,936 2,070,221 2,636,837 2,258,871 1,148,984 5,925,223 639,984 517,555 659,209 564,718 287,246 1,481,306 1,174,548 2,695,482 673,871 202,225 299,823 1,939,424 1,291,722 484,856 322,931 818,836 1,016,957 254,239 Population a The amount shown represents the maximum amount allowable, in accordance with section 5307(b)(2), based on funding provided in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007. In cases where an urbanized area’s FY 2007 apportionment is less than the maximum, FTA will set the operating assistance budget, in TEAM-Web, at an amount not to exceed the FY 2007 aortionment. Note: For informational purposes, the affected 1990 census small urbanized areas (less than 200,000 population) that were merged into an existing urbanized area of at least 200,000 population are shown in parentheses immediately below the eligible 2000 census urbanized area. FTA is unable to identify the urbanized areas which now incorporate rural areas that received Section 5311 in FY 2002 and they are not included in this table. TABLE 8.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS SAFETEA–LU Project No. Earmark ID California ................. E2007–CLNF–001 .............. 611 Colorado .................. Delaware ................. E2007–CLNF–002 .............. E2007–CLNF–003 .............. 519 517 Delaware ................. Georgia ................... E2007–CLNF–004 .............. E2007–CLNF–005 .............. 648 578 Kentucky ................. E2007–CLNF–006 .............. 640 Kentucky ................. E2007–CLNF–007 .............. 641 New Mexico ............ Nevada .................... New York ................ Ohio ......................... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–CLNF–008 E2007–CLNF–009 E2007–CLNF–010 E2007–CLNF–011 .............. .............. .............. .............. 497 612 557 659 Rhode Island ........... Tennessee .............. E2007–CLNF–012 .............. E2007–CLNF–013 .............. 631 605 Texas ...................... Texas ...................... Texas ...................... E2007–CLNF–014 .............. E2007–CLNF–015 .............. E2007–CLNF–016 .............. 614 575 638 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Unobligated allocation Project San Joaquin Region Transit District, California, Hybrid Diesel—Electric Replacement Buses. Denver Regional Transit District—Bus Replacements ... Delaware Statewide Bus and Bus Replacement (with Clean Fuel (hybrid) vehicles)). University of Delaware Fuel Cell Bus Program .............. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority—Clean Fuel Buses. Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky—TANK Bus Replacement Project. Transit Authority of River City—New Hybrid Electric Bus. Santa Fe, NM, Trails Bus and Bus Facilities .................. Lake Tahoe, NV, MPO Bus Replacement ...................... Westchester, NY, Bee Line Bus Replacement ............... Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority—Bus Replacements. Rhode Island, Statewide Bus and Van Replacement .... Sevierville County, TN, Transportation Board—Alternative Fuel Buses. City of El Paso—Sun Metro—Bus Replacements .......... METRO of Harris County—Discretionary Bus Program The District, The Woodlands, TX—Bus Replacement Program. Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $250,000 952,000 2,000,000 165,000 2,380,000 476,000 714,000 714,000 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 714,000 5,500,000 238,000 2,380,000 238,000 13915 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 8.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA–LU Project No. Earmark ID Unobligated allocation Project Total Allocation ............................................................................................................................................................................. a Funds a 18,721,000 in the amount of $26,279,000 were transferred to the Bus and Bus Facilities program. TABLE 9.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS ALLOCATIONS State Earmark ID Project location and description FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations: CO ........ E2006–CLNF–001 ............................ DE ........ E2006–CLNF–002 ............................ Unobligated allocation Denver Regional Transit District—Bus Replacements ............................... Delaware Statewide Bus and Bus Replacement (with Clean Fuel (hybrid) vehicles)). Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority—Clean Fuel Buses .............. Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky—TANK Bus Replacement Project Transit Authority of River City—New Hybrid Electric Bus .......................... Lake Tahoe, NV MPO Bus Replacement ................................................... Westchester, NY, Bee Line Bus Replacement ........................................... Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority—Bus Replacements .............. Rhode Island, Statewide Bus and Van Replacement ................................ The District, The Woodlands, TX—Bus Replacement Program ................ City of El Paso—Sun Metro—Bus Replacements ...................................... METRO of Harris County—Discretionary Bus Program ............................. $906,840 1,732,500 Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................ 16,529,040 GA ........ KY ........ KY ........ NV ........ NY ........ OH ........ RI .......... TX ......... TX ......... TX ......... E2006–CLNF–004 E2006–CLNF–005 E2006–CLNF–006 E2006–CLNF–009 E2006–CLNF–010 E2006–CLNF–011 E2006–CLNF–012 E2006–CLNF–015 E2006–CLNF–007 E2006–CLNF–014 ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ 2,268,090 453,420 680,130 990,000 445,500 680,130 5,197,500 226,710 680,130 2,268,090 TABLE 10.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION APPORTIONMENTS sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State Area Alaska ...................................................................................... Arizona ..................................................................................... California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. California .................................................................................. Colorado .................................................................................. Connecticut .............................................................................. Connecticut .............................................................................. District of Columbia ................................................................. Florida ...................................................................................... Florida ...................................................................................... Florida ...................................................................................... Florida ...................................................................................... Georgia .................................................................................... Hawaii ...................................................................................... Illinois ....................................................................................... Illinois ....................................................................................... Indiana ..................................................................................... Louisiana .................................................................................. Maryland .................................................................................. Maryland .................................................................................. Massachusetts ......................................................................... Massachusetts ......................................................................... Michigan ................................................................................... Minnesota ................................................................................ Missouri .................................................................................... Missouri .................................................................................... New Jersey .............................................................................. New Jersey .............................................................................. New Jersey .............................................................................. Anchorage, AK-Alaska Railroad .............................................. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ ................................................................... Antioch, CA ............................................................................. Concord, CA ............................................................................ Lancaster-Palmdale, CA ......................................................... Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA ............................... Mission Viejo, CA .................................................................... Oxnard, CA .............................................................................. Riverside-San Bernardino, CA ................................................ Sacramento, CA ...................................................................... San Diego, CA ........................................................................ San Francisco-Oakland, CA .................................................... San Jose, CA .......................................................................... Stockton, CA ........................................................................... Thousand Oaks, CA ................................................................ Denver-Aurora, CO ................................................................. Hartford, CT ............................................................................. Southwestern Connecticut ...................................................... Washington, DC-VA-MD ......................................................... Jacksonville, FL ....................................................................... Miami, FL ................................................................................. Orlando, FL ............................................................................. Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL ....................................................... Atlanta, GA .............................................................................. Honolulu, HI ............................................................................. Chicago, IL–IN ......................................................................... Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL–WI ................ South Bend, IN-MI ................................................................... New Orleans, LA ..................................................................... Baltimore Commuter Rail ........................................................ Baltimore, MD .......................................................................... Boston, MA .............................................................................. Worcester, MA–CT .................................................................. Detroit, MI ................................................................................ Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN ........................................................ Kansas City, MO–KS .............................................................. St. Louis, MO–IL ..................................................................... Atlantic City, NJ ....................................................................... Northeastern New Jersey ........................................................ Trenton, NJ .............................................................................. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM Apportionment 23MRN2 $15,304,279 2,727,749 2,397,573 14,827,853 2,472,963 47,162,438 1,669,337 1,361,410 4,674,142 4,217,137 17,096,411 78,470,061 15,813,901 1,858,672 749,991 3,817,847 1,857,763 42,377,921 88,798,182 339,321 23,791,654 194,236 153,077 31,502,427 1,469,728 158,124,928 2,661,899 929,785 3,344,890 21,514,734 10,875,752 82,507,419 1,196,344 633,165 9,206,554 36,707 4,511,230 1,344,854 98,770,666 1,817,555 13916 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 10.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION APPORTIONMENTS—Continued State Area Apportionment New York ................................................................................. New York ................................................................................. New York ................................................................................. North Carolina .......................................................................... Ohio ......................................................................................... Ohio ......................................................................................... Oregon ..................................................................................... Pennsylvania ............................................................................ Pennsylvania ............................................................................ Pennsylvania ............................................................................ Puerto Rico .............................................................................. Rhode Island ............................................................................ Tennessee ............................................................................... Tennessee ............................................................................... Texas ....................................................................................... Texas ....................................................................................... Virginia ..................................................................................... Washington .............................................................................. West Virginia ............................................................................ Wisconsin ................................................................................. Wisconsin ................................................................................. Buffalo, NY .............................................................................. New York ................................................................................. Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY ............................................... Charlotte, NC–SC .................................................................... Cleveland, OH ......................................................................... Dayton, OH .............................................................................. Portland, OR–WA .................................................................... Harrisburg, PA ......................................................................... Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ................................................. Pittsburgh, PA ......................................................................... San Juan, PR .......................................................................... Providence, RI-MA .................................................................. Chattanooga, TN–GA .............................................................. Memphis, TN–MS–AR ............................................................. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX .............................................. Houston, TX ............................................................................ Virginia Beach, VA .................................................................. Seattle, WA ............................................................................. Morgantown, WV ..................................................................... Madison, WI ............................................................................ Milwaukee, WI ......................................................................... 1,433,849 413,117,471 2,602,812 193,962 13,568,489 6,101,723 8,508,419 900,502 103,056,750 21,369,178 2,695,830 2,817,164 99,359 442,377 7,350,589 9,430,395 1,430,582 31,857,041 2,772,852 869,698 318,403 Total .................................................................................. .................................................................................................. $1,433,520,000 TABLE 11.—FY 2007 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION PROGRAM APPORTIONMENT FORMULA Tier 1 ............ Tier 2 ............ Tier 3 ............ Tier 4 ............ Tier 5 ............ Tier 6 ............ Tier 7 ............ First $497,7000,000 to the following areas: Baltimore .......................................................................... $8,372,000 Boston .............................................................................. 38,948,000 Chicago/NW. Indiana ....................................................... 78,169,000 Cleveland ......................................................................... 9,509,500 New Orleans .................................................................... 1,730,588 New York ......................................................................... 176,034,461 NE. New Jersey ............................................................... 50,604,653 Philadelphia/So. New Jersey ........................................... 58,924,764 Pittsburgh ......................................................................... 13,662,463 San Francisco .................................................................. 33,989,571 SW. Connecticut .............................................................. 27,755,000 Next $70,000,000 as follows: Tier 2(A): 50 percent is allocated to areas identified in Tier 1; Tier 2(B): 50 percent is allocated to other urbanized areas with fixed guideway tiers in operation at least seven years. Funds are allocated by the Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors that were used to apportion funds for the fixed guideway modernization program in FY 1997. Next $5,700,000 as follows: Pittsburgh 61.76%; Cleveland 10.73%; New Orleans 5.79%; and 21.72% is allocated to all other areas in Tier 2(B) by the same fixed guideway tier formula factors used in fiscal year 1997. Next $186,600,000 as follows: All eligible areas using the same year fixed guideway tier formula factors used in fiscal year 1997. Next $70,000,000 as follows: 65% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 35% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors. Any segment that is less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database. Next $50,000,000 as follows: 60% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 40% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors. Any segment less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database. Remaining amounts as follows: 50% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 50% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway formula factors. Any segment that is less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database. TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS SAFETEA– LU Project No. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State Earmark ID AK ............ AK ............ AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0001 ......... E2007–BUSP–0002 ......... E2007–BUSP–0003 ......... 427 466 422 AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0004 ......... 425 AK ............ AK ............ AK ............ E2007–BUSP–0005 ......... E2007–BUSP–0006 ......... E2007–BUSP–0007 ......... 541 416 436 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal parking facility ...................... Anchorage-Transit Needs ....................................................................... C Street Expanded bus facility and inter-modal parking garage, Anchorage, AK. CITC Non-profit Services Center inter-modal parking facility, Anchorage, AK. Hoonah, AK–Intermodal Ferry Dock ...................................................... Improve marine inter-modal facilities in Ketchikan ................................ Intermodal facility improvements at the Port of Anchorage ................... Frm 00046 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $1,200,000 238,000 1,200,000 720,000 476,000 3,360,000 6,000,000 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13917 TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ E2007–BUSP–0008 E2007–BUSP–0009 E2007–BUSP–0010 E2007–BUSP–0011 E2007–BUSP–0012 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 236 550 553 574 423 AK AK AK AK AL AL AL ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. ............. ............. E2007–BUSP–0013 E2007–BUSP–0014 E2007–BUSP–0015 E2007–BUSP–0016 E2007–BUSP–0017 E2007–BUSP–0018 E2007–BUSP–0019 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 596 597 616 664 461 462 437 AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. E2007–BUSP–0020 ......... E2007–BUSP–0021 ......... E2007–BUSP–0022 ......... 469 98 496 AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AL ............. AR ............ AR ............ AR ............ AZ ............. AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0023 E2007–BUSP–0024 E2007–BUSP–0025 E2007–BUSP–0026 E2007–BUSP–0027 E2007–BUSP–0028 E2007–BUSP–0029 E2007–BUSP–0030 E2007–BUSP–0031 E2007–BUSP–0032 E2007–BUSP–0033 E2007–BUSP–0034 E2007–BUSP–0035 E2007–BUSP–0036 E2007–BUSP–0037 E2007–BUSP–0038 E2007–BUSP–0039 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 501 503 504 507 528 534 582 644 645 646 647 650 487 231 263 304 229 AZ ............. E2007–BUSP–0040 ......... 47 AZ ............. AZ ............. AZ ............. AZ ............. CA ............ CA ............ CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0041 E2007–BUSP–0042 E2007–BUSP–0043 E2007–BUSP–0044 E2007–BUSP–0045 E2007–BUSP–0046 E2007–BUSP–0047 E2007–BUSP–0048 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 346 150 26 203 75 288 398 76 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0049 ......... 227 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0050 ......... 119 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0051 ......... 396 CA CA CA CA CA CA E2007–BUSP–0052 E2007–BUSP–0053 E2007–BUSP–0054 E2007–BUSP–0055 E2007–BUSP–0056 E2007–BUSP–0057 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 190 132 407 108 54 155 CA ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AK AK AK AK AK E2007–BUSP–0058 ......... 158 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0059 ......... 207 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0060 ......... 17 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0061 ......... 11 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Juneau, Alaska-transit bus acquisition and transit center ..................... Juneau-Transit Bus Acquisition and Transit Center .............................. Ketchikan, Alaska-Transit Needs ........................................................... Matsu, Alaska-Transit Needs ................................................................. Morris Thompson Cultural and Visitors Center intermodal parking facility, Fairbanks, AK. North Slope Borough, AK–Transit Purposes ......................................... North Star Borough, AK–Transit Purposes ............................................ Sitka, Alaska-Transit Needs ................................................................... Wrangell, AK–Ferry Infrastructure .......................................................... Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind-Bus project .................................. Alabama State Port Authority-Choctaw Point Terminal ......................... American Village/Montevallo, Alabama construction of closed loop Access Road, bus lanes and parking facility. Auburn University-Intermodal Parking Garage ...................................... Birmingham, AL Expansion of Downtown Intermodal Facility, Phase II City of Birmingham, AL–Birmingham Downtown Intermodal Terminal, Phase II. City of Huntsville, AL-Cummings Park Intermodal Center ..................... City of Montgomery, AL–ITS Acquisition and Implementation .............. City of Montgomery, AL–Montgomery Airport Intermodal Center .......... City of Tuscaloosa, AL–Intermodal Facility ............................................ Gadsden, AL–Community Buses ........................................................... Gulf Shores, AL–Community Bases ....................................................... Mobile County, AL Commission-Bus project .......................................... University of Alabama in Birmingham Intermodal Facility ..................... University of Alabama in Huntsville Intermodal Facility ......................... University of Alabama Intermodal Facility South ................................... University of Alabama Transit System ................................................... US Space and Rocket Center, AL–Tramway Expansion ...................... Central Arkansas Transit Authority Facility Upgrades ........................... Harrison, Arkansas-Trolley Barn ............................................................ Wilmar, AR Develop the Southeast Arkansas Intermodal Facility ......... Coconino County buses and bus facilities for Flagstaff, AZ .................. Coconino County, Arizona-Bus and bus facilities for the Sedona Transit System. Phoenix, AZ Construct City of Phoenix para-transit facility (Dial-ARide). Phoenix, AZ Construct metro bus facility in Phoenix’s West Valley ...... Phoenix, AZ Construct regional heavy bus maintenance facility ........... Scottsdale, Arizona-Plan, design, and construct intermodal center ...... Tempe, Arizona-Construct East Valley Metro Bus Facility .................... Alameda County, CA AC Transit Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project ... Alameda County, CA AC Transit Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project ... Amador County, California-Regional Transit Center .............................. Baldwin Park, CA Construct vehicle and bicycle parking lot and pedestrian rest area at transit center. Berkeley, CA Construct Ed Roberts Campus Intermodal Transit Disability Center. Burbank, CA CNG Transit Vehicles Purchase for Local Transit Network Expansion. Burbank, CA Construction of Empire Area Transit Center near Burbank Airport. Calexico, CA Purchase new buses for the Calexico Transit System .... Carson, CA Purchase one bus .............................................................. Carson, CA Purchase one trolley-bus vehicle ....................................... Carson, CA Purchase two transfer facility ............................................. City of Alameda, CA Plan, design, and construct intermodal facility .... City of Livermore, CA Construct Bus Facility for Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority. Covina, El Monte, Baldwin Park, Upland, CA Parking and Electronic Signage Improvements. Culver City, CA Purchase compressed natural gas buses and expand natural gas fueling facility. Davis, CA Davis Multi-Modal Station to improve entrance to Amtrak Depot and parking lot, provide additional parking and improve service. Development of Gold Country Stage Transit Transfer Center, Nevada County, CA. Frm 00047 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 360,000 357,000 60,000 119,000 600,000 476,000 238,000 60,000 238,000 119,000 4,760,000 80,256 a/ 952,000 401,280 1,190,000 1,190,000 952,000 952,000 1,428,000 119,000 238,000 119,000 1,666,000 1,428,000 2,142,000 357,000 238,000 550,000 8,026 401,280 250,800 190,608 200,640 1,003,200 200,640 501,600 1,304,160 100,320 401,280 200,640 401,280 601,920 90,288 50,160 60,192 50,160 50,160 100,320 401,280 451,440 351,120 742,368 200,640 186,659 13918 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0062 ......... 339 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0063 ......... 101 CA ............ CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0064 ......... E2007–BUSP–0065 ......... E2007–BUSP–0066 ......... 222 387 260 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0067 ......... E2007–BUSP–0068 ......... 212 1 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0069 ......... E2007–BUSP–0070 ......... 414 276 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0071 ......... E2007–BUSP–0072 ......... 332 295 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0073 ......... E2007–BUSP–0074 ......... 410 443 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0075 ......... E2007–BUSP–0076 ......... 140 223 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0077 ......... 307 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0078 ......... 121 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0079 ......... 326 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0080 ......... E2007–BUSP–0081 ......... 36 6 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0082 ......... E2007–BUSP–0083 ......... 567 566 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0084 ......... E2007–BUSP–0085 ......... 311 112 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0086 ......... E2007–BUSP–0087 ......... 266 285 CA CA CA CA E2007–BUSP–0088 E2007–BUSP–0089 E2007–BUSP–0090 E2007–BUSP–0091 ......... ......... ......... ......... 39 200 321 191 CA ............ CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0092 ......... E2007–BUSP–0093 ......... E2007–BUSP–0094 ......... 375 43 92 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0095 ......... 392 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0096 ......... 352 CA ............ CA ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0097 ......... E2007–BUSP–0098 ......... 173 194 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0099 ......... E2007–BUSP–0100 ......... 244 366 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0101 ......... E2007–BUSP–0102 ......... 45 70 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0103 ......... E2007–BUSP–0104 ......... 399 116 ............ ............ ............ ............ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation East San Diego County, California-Bus Maintenance Facility Expansion. Emeryville, CA Expand & Improve Inter-modal Transit Center at Amtrak Station. Escondido, CA-Construct Bus Maintenance Facility .............................. Fresno, CA–Develop program of low-emission transit vehicles ............ Gardena, CA Purchase of alternative fuel buses for service expansion, on-board security system and bus facility training equipment. Glendale, CA Construction of Downtown Streetcar Project .................. Glendale, CA Purchase of CNG Buses for Glendale Beeline Transit System. Hercules, CA Inter-modal Rail Station Improvements ........................... Long Beach, Ca Museum of Latin American Art, Long Beach, to build intermodal park and ride facility. Long Beach, CA Park and Ride Facility ................................................ Long Beach, CA Purchase one larger (75 passengers) and two smaller (40 passengers) ferryboats and construct related dock work to facilitate the use and accessibility of the ferryboats. Long Beach, CA Purchase ten clean fuel buses ................................... Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, CA capital funds for facility improvements to support the Cal State Northridge tram system. Los Angeles, CA Crenshaw Bus Rapid Transit ..................................... Los Angeles, CA Design and construct improved transit and pedestrian linkages between Los Angeles Community College and nearby MTA rail stop and bus lines. Los Angeles, CA Improve safety, mobility and access between LATTC, Metro line and nearby bus stops on Grand Ave between Washington and 23rd. Los Angeles, CA Improve transit shelters, sidewalks lighting and landscaping around Cedar’s-Sinai Medical Center. Los Angeles, CA Install permanent irrigation system and enhanced landscaping on San Fernando Valley rapid bus transit way. Los Angeles, CA Wilshire-Vermont subway station reconstruction ....... Los Angeles, CA, Construction of Intermodal Transit Center at California State University Los Angeles. Los Angeles, CA, Fly-Away Bus System Expansion ............................. Los Angeles, CA, LAX Intermodal Transportation Center Rail and Bus System Expansion. Mammoth Lakes, California-Regional Transit Maintenance Facility ...... Mariposa, CA-Yosemite National Park CNG-Hydrogen transit buses and facilities. Martinez, CA Inter-modal Facility Restoration ....................................... Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Light Rail Transit Project from Pasadena, CA to Montclair, CA. Monrovia, California-Transit Village Project ........................................... Montebello, CA Bus Lines Bus Fleet Replacement Project .................. Monterey Park, CA Catch Basins at Transit Stop Installation ............... Monterey Park, CA Safety improvements at a bus stop including creation of bus loading areas and street improvements. Monterey, CA Purchase bus equipment ................................................ Needles, California-El Garces Intermodal Facility ................................. Norwalk, CA Transit System Bus Procurement and Los Angeles World Airport Remote Fly-Away Facility Project. Oakland, CA Construct Bay Trail between Coliseum BART station and Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline. Oakland, CA Construct streetscape & intermodal improvements at BART Station Transit Villages. Ontario, CA Construct Omnitrans Transcenter ...................................... Orange County Transit Authority, California-Security surveillance and monitoring equipment. Orange County, CA Purchase buses for rapid transit ........................... Orange County, CA Transportation Projects to Encourage Use of Transit to Reduce Congestion. Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit bus purchase ........................ Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit: CalStrat-Weststart fuel cell bus program. Pasadena, CA ITS Improvements .......................................................... Pleasant Hill, CA Construct Diablo Valley College Bus Transit Center Frm 00048 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 401,280 200,640 100,320 200,640 1,229,923 200,640 92,696 300,960 401,280 200,640 601,920 601,920 65,208 1,711,058 300,960 100,320 300,960 601,920 200,640 158,506 550,000 550,000 100,320 501,600 300,960 3,009,600 601,920 140,448 64,205 321,024 200,640 401,280 160,512 180,576 200,640 200,640 1,061,386 200,640 200,640 100,320 200,640 200,640 300,960 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13919 TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0105 ......... 251 CA ............ CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0106 ......... E2007–BUSP–0107 ......... E2007–BUSP–0108 ......... 286 171 189 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0109 ......... 84 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0110 ......... 253 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0111 ......... 282 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0112 ......... 314 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0113 ......... E2007–BUSP–0114 ......... 183 127 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0115 ......... 377 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0116 ......... E2007–BUSP–0117 ......... 287 403 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0118 ......... 381 CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0119 ......... E2007–BUSP–0120 ......... 341 254 CA CA CA CA E2007–BUSP–0121 E2007–BUSP–0122 E2007–BUSP–0123 E2007–BUSP–0124 ......... ......... ......... ......... 382 145 147 364 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0125 ......... 172 CA CA CA CA E2007–BUSP–0126 E2007–BUSP–0127 E2007–BUSP–0128 E2007–BUSP–0129 ......... ......... ......... ......... 313 27 401 383 CA ............ CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0130 ......... E2007–BUSP–0131 ......... E2007–BUSP–0132 ......... 388 315 85 CA ............ CA ............ CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0133 ......... E2007–BUSP–0134 ......... E2007–BUSP–0135 ......... 459 35 195 CA ............ E2007–BUSP–0136 ......... 83 CO ............ CO ............ CO ............ E2007–BUSP–0137 ......... E2007–BUSP–0138 ......... E2007–BUSP–0139 ......... 449 448 509 CO ............ CO ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0140 ......... E2007–BUSP–0141 ......... 518 520 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO E2007–BUSP–0142 E2007–BUSP–0143 E2007–BUSP–0144 E2007–BUSP–0145 E2007–BUSP–0146 E2007–BUSP–0147 E2007–BUSP–0148 E2007–BUSP–0149 521 167 435 441 188 444 445 446 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Redondo Beach, CA Capital Equipment procurement of 12. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Transit Vehicles for Coastal Shuttle Services by Beach Cities Transit. Richmond, CA BART Parking Structure ................................................ Riverside, California-RTA Advanced Traveler Information System ....... Sacramento, CA Bus enhancement and improvements-construct maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve transit service. Sacramento, CA Construct intermodal station and related improvements. San Bernardino, CA Implement Santa Fe Depot improvements in San Bernardino. San Diego, CA Completion of San Diego Joint Transportation Operations Center (JTOC). San Diego, CA Widen sidewalks and bus stop entrance, and provide diagonal parking, in the Skyline Paradise Hills neighborhood (Reo Drive). San Fernando Valley, CA Reseda Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Route ....... San Fernando, CA Purchase CNG buses and related equipment and construct facilities. San Francisco, CA Construct San Francisco Muni Islais Creek Maintenance Facility. San Francisco, CA Implement ITS on Muni Transit System ................. San Francisco, CA Implement Transbay Terminal-Caltrain Downtown Extension Project. San Francisco, CA Redesign and renovate intermodal facility at Glen Park Community. San Gabriel Valley, CA-Foothill Transit Park and Rides ....................... San Joaquin, California Regional Rail-Altamont Commuter Express Corridor inter-modal centers. San Luis Ray, California-Transit Center Project .................................... Santa Ana, CA Improve Santa Ana transit terminal .............................. Santa Barbara, CA-Expansion of Regional Intermodal Transit Center Santa Monica, CA Construct intermodal park-and-ride facility at Santa Monica College campus on South Bundy Drive near Airport Avenue. Santa Monica, CA Purchase and service LNG buses for Santa Monica’s Big Blue Bus to meet increased ridership needs and reduce emissions. Solana Beach, CA-Construct Intermodal Facility ................................... Sonoma County, CA Purchase of CNG buses ...................................... South Pasadena, CA Silent Night Grade Crossing Project ................... South San Francisco, CA Construction of Ferry Terminal at Oyster Point in South San Francisco to the San Francisco Bay Water Transit Authority. Sylmar, CA Los Angeles Mission College Transit Center construction Temecula, California-Intermodal Transit Facility .................................... Torrance Transit System, CA Acquisition of EPA and CARB-certified low emission replacement buses. Transbay Terminal/ Caltrain Downtown Extension Project .................... Union City, CA Inter-modal Station, Phase 1: Modify BART station ..... Woodland Hills, CA Los Angeles Pierce College Bus Rapid Transit Station Extension. Woodland, CA Yolobus operations, maintenance, administration facility expansion and improvements to increase bus service with alternative fuel buses. City of Aspen, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ............................................. City of Durango, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................... Colorado Association of Transit Agencies/Colorado Transit CoalitionColorado Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities. Denver Regional Transit District-Bus Maintenance Facility ................... Denver Regional Transit District-Denver Union Station Multimodal Renovations. Denver Regional Transit District-US 36 Corridor BRT .......................... Denver, CO Denver Union Station Inter-modal Center ......................... Denver, Colorado-Regional Transportation District Bus Replacement .. Grand Valley Transit, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .................................. Mountain Express, Crested Butte, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .............. Pueblo Transit, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ............................................ Roaring Fork Transit Authority, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .................. Steamboat Springs, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .................................... Frm 00049 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 160,512 1,003,200 100,320 401,280 1,404,480 100,320 401,280 60,192 120,384 609,946 1,203,840 601,920 2,808,960 827,640 1,906,080 802,560 100,320 200,640 60,192 200,640 752,400 300,960 100,320 180,576 953,040 50,160 100,320 601,920 4,200,000 852,720 200,640 401,280 140,448 50,160 6,188,000 714,000 476,000 1,666,000 1,103,520 401,280 100,320 100,320 50,160 150,480 150,480 13920 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID CO ............ CO ............ CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0150 ......... E2007–BUSP–0151 ......... E2007–BUSP–0152 ......... 450 447 44 CT ............ CT ............ CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0153 ......... E2007–BUSP–0154 ......... E2007–BUSP–0155 ......... 478 90 523 CT CT CT CT CT E2007–BUSP–0156 E2007–BUSP–0157 E2007–BUSP–0158 E2007–BUSP–0159 E2007–BUSP–0160 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 218 394 267 589 269 CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0161 ......... 369 CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0162 ......... 131 CT ............ E2007–BUSP–0163 ......... 32 CT ............ CT ............ DE ............ FL ............. FL ............. FL ............. FL ............. FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0164 E2007–BUSP–0165 E2007–BUSP–0166 E2007–BUSP–0167 E2007–BUSP–0168 E2007–BUSP–0169 E2007–BUSP–0170 E2007–BUSP–0171 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 270 657 169 470 297 69 479 117 FL ............. FL ............. FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0172 ......... E2007–BUSP–0173 ......... E2007–BUSP–0174 ......... 439 453 488 FL ............. FL ............. FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0175 ......... E2007–BUSP–0176 ......... E2007–BUSP–0177 ......... 498 508 23 FL ............. FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0178 ......... E2007–BUSP–0179 ......... 80 527 FL FL FL FL FL FL ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. E2007–BUSP–0180 E2007–BUSP–0181 E2007–BUSP–0182 E2007–BUSP–0183 E2007–BUSP–0184 E2007–BUSP–0185 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 344 213 95 538 539 548 FL FL FL FL ............. ............. ............. ............. E2007–BUSP–0186 E2007–BUSP–0187 E2007–BUSP–0188 E2007–BUSP–0189 ......... ......... ......... ......... 306 107 549 558 FL ............. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0190 ......... 238 FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL E2007–BUSP–0191 E2007–BUSP–0192 E2007–BUSP–0193 E2007–BUSP–0194 E2007–BUSP–0195 E2007–BUSP–0196 E2007–BUSP–0197 E2007–BUSP–0198 E2007–BUSP–0199 E2007–BUSP–0200 E2007–BUSP–0201 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 103 308 211 432 133 580 454 136 294 14 125 E2007–BUSP–0202 ......... E2007–BUSP–0203 ......... 367 248 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. FL ............. FL ............. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Town of Snowmass Village, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ....................... Town of Telluride, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ....................................... Bridgeport, Connecticut-Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority Bus Facility. Bridgeport, CT Facility Expansion/Improvement .................................... Buses and bus related facilities throughout the State of Connecticut ... Downtown Middletown, CT, Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Project. Enfield, Connecticut-intermodal station .................................................. Hartford, CT Buses and bus-related facilities ........................................ Middletown, CT Construct intermodal center ......................................... New Haven, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ............................................ New London, Connecticut-Intermodal Transportation Center and Streetscapes. Norwalk, Connecticut-Pulse Point Joint Development inter-modal facility. Stonington and Mystic, Connecticut-Intermodal Center parking facility and Streetscape. Torrington, CT Construct bus-related facility (Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit District). Vernon, Connecticut-Intermodal Center, Parking and Streetscapes ..... Waterbury, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ............................................... Delaware-University of Delaware Fuel Cell Bus Deployment ................ Bay County, FL - Transit Facility ............................................................ Broward County, FL - Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities ..... Broward County, FL Buses & Bus Facilities .......................................... Broward County-Bus and Bus Facilities ................................................. Broward, FL Purchase new articulated buses and bus stop improvements on State Road 7. (SR 7) between Golden Glades Interchange and Glades Road. Central Florida Commuter Rail intermodal facilities ............................... Central Florida Commuter Rail Intermodal Facilities ............................. Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority-LYNX Bus Fleet Expansion Program. City of Gainesville Regional Transit System-Facility Expansion ........... Collier County Transit-Transit Facility .................................................... Construct intermodal transportation & parking facility, City of Winter Park, Florida. Flagler County, Florida-bus facility ......................................................... Florida Department of Transportation-Palm Beach County Replacement Buses. Gainesville, FL Bus Facility Expansion .................................................. Gainesville, FL Bus Rapid Transit Study ............................................... Gainesville, FL Bus Replacement .......................................................... Hillsborough Area Regional Transit-Bus Rapid Transit Improvements Hillsborough, FL, Hillsborough Area regional Transit Authority ............. Jacksonville Transportation Authority-Bus Fleet Replacement and Equipment. Jacksonville, FL Bus Replacement ........................................................ Jacksonville, FL Paratransit Vehicles ..................................................... Jacksonville, FL Transportation Authority Paratransit Program ............. Lakeland Area Mass Transit District/Citrus Connection-Capital Funding Needs. Levy County, Florida-Purchase 2. wheel chair equipped passenger buses and related equipment. Longwood, Florida-Construct Intermodal Transportation Facility .......... Miami Dade, FL N.W. 7th Avenue Transit Hub ..................................... Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ............................ Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ............................ Miami-Dade County, Florida-Transit Security System ........................... Miami-Dade Transit 7th Avenue NW Transit Hub ................................. Miami-Dade Transit Dadeland South Intermodal Center ....................... Ocala and Marion County, Florida-replacement buses ......................... Orlando, FL Bus Replacement ............................................................... Orlando, Florida-LYNX Bus Fleet Expansion Program .......................... Palm Beach County, FL Plan and Construct Belle Glade Combined Passenger Transit Facility. Palm Beach, FL 20 New Buses for Palm Tran ...................................... Palm Beach, FL Palm Tran AVL–APC system with smart card fare boxes. Frm 00050 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 60,192 64,821 100,320 400,000 1,203,840 2,150,000 601,920 802,560 300,960 2,150,000 100,320 100,320 489,562 401,280 1,524,846 2,300,000 100,320 476,000 401,280 1,304,160 476,000 100,320 1,003,200 720,000 1,190,000 238,000 238,000 100,320 120,384 238,000 802,560 100,320 802,560 476,000 1,000,000 1,190,000 1,404,480 902,880 0 476,000 60,192 100,320 601,920 1,203,840 802,560 599,914 238,000 480,000 601,920 802,560 180,576 702,240 300,960 50,160 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13921 TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0204 ......... 600 FL ............. FL ............. FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0205 ......... E2007–BUSP–0206 ......... E2007–BUSP–0207 ......... 415 420 400 FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0208 ......... 623 FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0209 ......... 622 FL ............. E2007–BUSP–0210 ......... 31 FL ............. FL ............. FL ............. GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0211 E2007–BUSP–0212 E2007–BUSP–0213 E2007–BUSP–0214 E2007–BUSP–0215 E2007–BUSP–0216 E2007–BUSP–0217 E2007–BUSP–0218 E2007–BUSP–0219 E2007–BUSP–0220 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 390 402 148 355 255 357 247 384 144 110 GA ............ GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0221 ......... E2007–BUSP–0222 ......... 91 510 GA ............ GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0223 ......... E2007–BUSP–0224 ......... 49 530 GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ E2007–BUSP–0225 ......... E2007–BUSP–0226 ......... E2007–BUSP–0227 ......... 60 275 374 GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ GA ............ HI .............. IA .............. IA .............. IA .............. IA .............. E2007–BUSP–0228 E2007–BUSP–0229 E2007–BUSP–0230 E2007–BUSP–0231 E2007–BUSP–0232 E2007–BUSP–0233 E2007–BUSP–0234 E2007–BUSP–0235 E2007–BUSP–0236 E2007–BUSP–0237 E2007–BUSP–0238 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 406 329 256 348 206 298 540 440 475 242 545 ID .............. ID .............. E2007–BUSP–0239 ......... E2007–BUSP–0240 ......... 176 543 ID .............. IL .............. IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0241 ......... E2007–BUSP–0242 ......... E2007–BUSP–0243 ......... 652 433 226 IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0244 ......... 221 IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0245 ......... 219 IL .............. IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0246 ......... E2007–BUSP–0247 ......... 491 358 IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0248 ......... 4 IL .............. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0249 ......... 296 IL IL IL IL IL E2007–BUSP–0250 E2007–BUSP–0251 E2007–BUSP–0252 E2007–BUSP–0253 E2007–BUSP–0254 114 291 250 186 429 .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization-Pinellas Mobility Initiative: BRT and Guide way. Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL .... Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL .... South FL Region, FL Regional Universal Automated Fare Collection System (UAFC) (for bus system). South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Beach Intermodal Facility. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Improvements, for any activity eligible under section 5309. St. Augustine, Florida-Intermodal Transportation Center and related pedestrian and landscape improvements. St. Lucie County, FL Purchase Buses ................................................... Tampa, FL Establish Transit Emphasis Corridor Project ....................... Tampa, FL Purchase buses and construct bus facilities ....................... Albany, GA Bus replacement ................................................................. Albany, GA Multimodal Facility .............................................................. Athens, GA Buses and Bus Facilities .................................................... Atlanta, GA Inter-modal Passenger Facility Improvements ................... Atlanta, GA MARTA Clean Fuel Bus Acquisition ................................... Augusta, GA Buses and Bus Facilities .................................................. Cobb County, GA Cobb County Smart Card Technology/ Bus Facility Improvements. Columbus, GA Bus replacement ............................................................ Columbus, Georgia/Phoenix City, Alabama-National Infantry Museum Multimodal Facility. Columbus, Georgia-Buses & Bus Facilities ........................................... Georgia Department of Transportation-Georgia Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities. Georgia Statewide Bus Program ............................................................ Jesup, Georgia-Train Depot intermodal center ...................................... Metro-Atlanta, GA MARTA Automated Smart-Card Fare Collection System. Moultrie, GA Inter-modal facility ............................................................. Quitman, Clay, Randolph, Stewart Co., GA Bus project ....................... Savannah, GA Bus and Bus Facilities-Chatham Area Transit .............. Savannah, Georgia-Water Ferry River walk intermodal facilities .......... Sylvester, GA Inter-modal Facility .......................................................... Thomasville, GA Bus Replacement ....................................................... Honolulu, HI, Bus Facilities .................................................................... Ames, Iowa-Expansion of CyRide Bus Maintenance Facility ................ Black Hawk County, IA UNI Multimodal Project .................................... Des Moines, IA Purchase 40 foot buses ............................................... Iowa Department of Transportation-Iowa Statewide Buses and Bus Replacement. Boise, ID-Multimodal facility ................................................................... Idaho Department of Transportation— Idaho Statewide ITS for Public Transportation. Valley Regional Transit, ID–Downtown Boise Multimodal ..................... Centralia, Illinois-South Central Mass Transit District Improvements .... Champaign, IL-Construct park and ride lot with attached daycare facility. Chicago, IL Construct intermodal facility at 35th Street at Metra Ride Line (Northside). Chicago, IL Feasibility Study for intermodal station on the Metra Rock Island near Kennedy-King College. Chicago, IL, Cermak Road, Bus Rapid Transit ...................................... Cicero, Chicago Establish Transit Signal Priority, Cicero Ave., Pace Suburban Bus. Des Plaines, Wauconda, Cook and Lake Counties, IL Rand Road Transit Signal Priority. Elgin to Rockford, Illinois-Intermodal stations along planned Metra Union Pacific West Line extension alignment, including necessary alternatives analysis. Geneva, Illinois-Construct commuter parking deck for Metra Service .. Joliet, Illinois-Union Station commuter parking facility ........................... Maywood, IL Purchase buses ................................................................ Mattoon, Illinois— historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center ................................. Frm 00051 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 238,000 451,440 401,280 401,280 476,000 3,570,000 200,640 200,640 150,480 451,440 60,192 160,512 284,909 401,280 1,203,840 80,256 200,640 60,192 405,000 194,420 2,142,000 40,128 200,640 200,640 60,192 50,160 1,003,200 401,280 40,128 40,128 1,300,000 401,280 714,000 200,640 2,856,000 902,880 357,000 1,381,000 80,256 300,690 1,003,200 60,192 250,000 200,640 160,512 100,320 802,560 576,840 10,032 b 321,024 401,280 13922 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID IL .............. E2007–BUSP–0255 ......... 163 IL IL IL IL IL IL E2007–BUSP–0256 E2007–BUSP–0257 E2007–BUSP–0258 E2007–BUSP–0259 E2007–BUSP–0260 E2007–BUSP–0261 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 365 404 608 632 259 265 IL .............. IN .............. IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0262 ......... E2007–BUSP–0263 ......... E2007–BUSP–0264 ......... 135 109 529 IN .............. IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0265 ......... E2007–BUSP–0266 ......... 544 235 IN .............. IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0267 ......... E2007–BUSP–0268 ......... 5 220 IN .............. E2007–BUSP–0269 ......... 378 IN .............. IN .............. IN .............. IN .............. IN .............. IN .............. KS ............ E2007–BUSP–0270 E2007–BUSP–0271 E2007–BUSP–0272 E2007–BUSP–0273 E2007–BUSP–0274 E2007–BUSP–0275 E2007–BUSP–0276 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 417 546 556 617 141 637 53 KS ............ KS ............ E2007–BUSP–0277 ......... E2007–BUSP–0278 ......... 551 552 KY ............ KY ............ E2007–BUSP–0279 ......... E2007–BUSP–0280 ......... 372 639 LA ............. LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0281 ......... E2007–BUSP–0282 ......... 484 72 LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0283 ......... 555 LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0284 ......... 239 LA ............. LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0285 ......... E2007–BUSP–0286 ......... 356 568 LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0287 ......... 170 LA ............. LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0288 ......... E2007–BUSP–0289 ......... 55 67 LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0290 ......... 243 LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0291 ......... 310 LA ............. E2007–BUSP–0292 ......... 606 LA ............. LA ............. LA ............. MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0293 E2007–BUSP–0294 E2007–BUSP–0295 E2007–BUSP–0296 ......... ......... ......... ......... 277 625 283 118 MA ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0297 ......... 472 MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0298 ......... 59 MA ............ MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0299 ......... E2007–BUSP–0300 ......... 273 174 MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0301 ......... 330 .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center, including facilities for adjacent public and nonprofit uses. Pace Suburban Bus, IL South Suburban BRT Mobility Network ........... Rock Island, IL Improve Rock Island Mass Transit District Bus Facility Rock Island, Illinois, Metrolink Transit Maintenance Facility ................. Springfield, IL, Multimodal Transit Terminal ........................................... St. Charles, IL-Intermodal Parking Structures ....................................... Village of Tinley Park, Illinois, 80th Avenue Commuter Rail Station reconstruction and site enhancements. Wheaton, IL Pace Suburban Bus-Purchase buses ............................... Bloomington, IN-Bus and transfer facility ............................................... Gary, Indiana, Gary Airport Station Modernization and Shuttle Service Project. Indianapolis Downtown Transit Center .................................................. Indianapolis, IN Construct the Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal Facility. Indianapolis, IN Downtown Transit Center ............................................. Indianapolis, IN IndySMART program to relieve congestion, improve safety and air quality. Indianapolis, IN Relocate and improve inter-modal transportation for pedestrian to Children’s Museum of Indianapolis. Indianapolis, Indiana-Children’s Museum Intermodal Center ................ Ivy Tech State College, Indiana Multimodal Center .............................. Lafayette, Indiana, City Bus of Greater Lafayette .................................. South Bend, Indiana, TRANSPO Bus Operations Center ..................... South Bend, Indiana-Construct South Bend Bus Operations Center .... Terre Haute, Indiana-Cherry Street Joint Development Project ............ Johnson Co., KS Bus and bus related facilities [I–35. corridor], Johnson Co. Transit. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority-Bus Project ........................ Kansas Department of Transportation-Kansas Statewide Transit Buses, Bus Facilities, and Bus ITS. Richmond, KY Purchase buses, bus equipment and facilities .............. Transit Authority of Lexington, KY-Rehabilitation of Building for Maintenance and Administration. Capital Area Transit System-Baton Rouge BRT .................................... Hammond, Louisiana-Passenger Intermodal facility at Southeastern University. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, LA-Lafayette Multimodal Transportation Facility. Lafayette, Louisiana-Lafayette Transit System bus replacement program. Lafayette, Louisiana-Multimodal center, Final Phase ............................ Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development-Statewide Vehicles and Equipment. Louisiana-Construct pedestrian walkways between Caddo St. and Milam St. along Edwards St. in Shreveport, LA. New Orleans, LA Inter-modal Riverfront Center .................................... New Orleans, LA Plan and construct New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal intermodal facilities. New Orleans, LA Regional Planning Commission, bus and bus facilities. River Parishes, LA South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities. River Parishes, Louisiana, South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities. Shreveport, LA-intermodal Transit Facility ............................................. Southeastern Louisiana University Intermodal Facility .......................... St. Bernard Parish, LA Intermodal facility improvements ...................... Attleboro, MA Construction, engineering and site improvements at the Attleboro Intermodal Center. Berkshire, MA, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bus Maintenance Facility. Beverly, MA Design and Construct Beverly Deport Intermodal Transportation Center. Boston, MA Harbor Park Pavilion & Inter-modal Station ....................... Brockton, MA Bus replacement for the Brockton Area Transit Authority. Framingham, MA Local Intra-Framingham Transit System enhancements. Frm 00052 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 1,003,200 100,320 100,320 250,000 1,100,000 902,880 160,512 200,640 965,078 400,000 900,000 1,003,200 2,808,960 401,280 2,808,960 200,640 200,000 c 550,000 900,000 200,640 900,000 401,280 2,380,000 2,856,000 144,461 952,000 714,000 40,128 238,000 180,576 601,920 238,000 203,640 100,320 200,640 100,320 200,640 180,000 672,144 450,000 200,640 401,280 30,000 401,280 250,800 300,960 361,152 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13923 TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. State Earmark ID MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0302 ......... 124 MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0303 ......... 21 MA MA MA MA E2007–BUSP–0304 E2007–BUSP–0305 E2007–BUSP–0306 E2007–BUSP–0307 ......... ......... ......... ......... 563 280 569 42 MA ............ MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0308 ......... E2007–BUSP–0309 ......... 257 139 MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0310 ......... 161 MA ............ MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0311 ......... E2007–BUSP–0312 ......... 88 370 MA ............ E2007–BUSP–0313 ......... 205 MD ............ MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0314 ......... E2007–BUSP–0315 ......... 122 303 MD ............ E2007–BUSP–0316 ......... 542 MD MD MD MD MD MD E2007–BUSP–0317 E2007–BUSP–0318 E2007–BUSP–0319 E2007–BUSP–0320 E2007–BUSP–0321 E2007–BUSP–0322 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 571 573 224 214 615 8 MD ............ ME ............ E2007–BUSP–0323 ......... E2007–BUSP–0324 ......... 629 19 ME ............ ME ............ MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0325 ......... E2007–BUSP–0326 ......... E2007–BUSP–0327 ......... 483 570 301 MI MI MI MI MI MI MI MI E2007–BUSP–0328 E2007–BUSP–0329 E2007–BUSP–0330 E2007–BUSP–0331 E2007–BUSP–0332 E2007–BUSP–0333 E2007–BUSP–0334 E2007–BUSP–0335 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 204 502 319 522 2 156 320 9 MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0336 ......... 208 MI MI MI MI E2007–BUSP–0337 E2007–BUSP–0338 E2007–BUSP–0339 E2007–BUSP–0340 ......... ......... ......... ......... 526 531 249 79 MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0341 ......... 560 MI ............. MI ............. MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0342 ......... E2007–BUSP–0343 ......... E2007–BUSP–0344 ......... 572 581 293 MI ............. E2007–BUSP–0345 ......... 601 MI ............. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES ............ ............ ............ ............ E2007–BUSP–0346 ......... 634 MN MN MN MN E2007–BUSP–0347 E2007–BUSP–0348 E2007–BUSP–0349 E2007–BUSP–0350 ......... ......... ......... ......... 40 177 577 185 E2007–BUSP–0351 ......... 342 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............ ............ ............ ............ MN ............ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Haverhill, MA Design and Construct Inter-modal Transit Parking Improvements. Hingham, MA Higham Marine Intermodal Center Improvements: Enhance public transportation infrastructure/parking. Lawrence, MA, Gateway Intermodal and Quadant Area Reuse Project Lowell, MA Implementation of LRTA bus replacement plan .................. Lowell, MA, Lowell Regional Transit ...................................................... Medford, MA Downtown revitalization featuring construction of a 200 space Park and Ride Facility. Newburyport, MA Design and Construct Intermodal Facility ................. Quincy, MA MBTA Purchase high speed catamaran ferry for Quincy Harbor Express Service. Revere, MA Inter-modal transit improvements in the Wonderland station (MBTA) area. Rockport, MA Rockport Commuter Rail Station Improvements ............ Salem, MA Design and Construct Salem Intermodal Transportation Center. Woburn, MA Construction of an 89 space park and ride facility to be located on Magazine Hill, in the Heart of Woburn Square. Baltimore, MD Construct Intercity Bus Intermodal Terminal .................. Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations and Maintenance Facility. Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations and Maintenance Facility. MARC Intermodal Odenton and Edgewood Station Improvements ...... Maryland Statewide Bus Facilities and Buses ....................................... Montgomery County, MD Wheaton CBD Intermodal Access Program Mount Rainier, MD Intermodal and Pedestrian Project ......................... Silver Spring, Maryland, Transit Center ................................................. Silver Spring, MD Construct Silver Spring Transit Center in downtown Silver Spring. Southern Maryland Commuter Initiative ................................................. Bar Harbor, ME Purchase new buses to enhance commuting near the Jackson Labs. Campobello Park, ME, Bus Acquisition ................................................. Maine Department of Transportation-Acadia Intermodal Facility ........... Barry County, MI-Barry County Transit equipments and dispatching software. Boysville of Michigan Transportation System ........................................ City of Kalamazoo, MI bus Replacement ............................................... Detroit Bus Maintenance Facility ............................................................ Detroit Department of Transportation Bus Replacement ....................... Detroit Fare Collection System .............................................................. Detroit Replacement Buses .................................................................... Detroit, MI Bus Replacement ................................................................. Detroit, MI Enclosed heavy-duty maintenance facility with full operational functions for up to 300 buses. Eastern Upper Peninsula, MI Ferry Dock and Facility upgrades for Drummond Island Ferry Services. Flint, MI, Mass Transportation Authority Bus Maintenance Facility ....... Grand Rapids, Michigan, The Rapid, Bus Replacement ....................... Grand Rapids, MI-Purchase replacement and expansion buses .......... Ionia County, MI-Purchase and Implementation of communication equipment improvements. Lansing, MI, Capital Area Transportation Authority, Bus Replacement and Bus Related ITS. Marquette County, Michigan Transit Authority Bus passenger facility .. Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Bus Replacement ..... Muskegon, Michigan-Muskegon Area Transit Terminal and related improvements. Port Huron, Michigan, Blue Water Area Transportation Commission, Bus Maintenance Facility. Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) Bus Maintenance Facility. Duluth, MN Downtown Duluth Area Transit facility improvements ........ Fond du Lac Reservation, MN Purchase buses .................................... Metro Transit/Metropolitan Council, MN-Bus/Bus Capital ...................... St. Paul to Hinckley, MN Construct bus amenities along Rush Line Corridor. St. Paul, MN Union Depot Multi Modal Transit Facility ......................... Frm 00053 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 1,123,584 1,805,760 800,000 200,640 800,000 401,280 401,280 401,280 361,152 551,760 401,280 361,152 1,003,200 1,003,200 220,000 380,000 5,750,000 100,320 90,288 6,000,000 732,336 2,800,000 60,192 34,000 714,000 30,096 674,150 1,800,000 1,805,760 2,100,000 802,560 1,003,200 1,504,800 902,880 50,160 650,000 1,100,000 2,939,376 118,378 850,000 300,000 2,200,000 401,280 1,250,000 1,750,000 401,280 30,096 2,261,000 300,960 401,280 13924 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID MO ........... E2007–BUSP–0352 ......... 473 MO ........... E2007–BUSP–0353 ......... 474 MO ........... MO ........... E2007–BUSP–0354 ......... E2007–BUSP–0355 ......... 345 598 MO ........... MS ............ E2007–BUSP–0356 ......... E2007–BUSP–0357 ......... 624 130 MS MT MT MT E2007–BUSP–0358 E2007–BUSP–0359 E2007–BUSP–0360 E2007–BUSP–0361 ......... ......... ......... ......... 547 129 476 584 NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0362 ......... 490 NC NC NC NC E2007–BUSP–0363 E2007–BUSP–0364 E2007–BUSP–0365 E2007–BUSP–0366 ......... ......... ......... ......... 217 351 228 154 NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0367 ......... 324 NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0368 ......... 302 NC NC NC NC E2007–BUSP–0369 E2007–BUSP–0370 E2007–BUSP–0371 E2007–BUSP–0372 ......... ......... ......... ......... 52 537 335 594 NC ............ E2007–BUSP–0373 ......... 143 NC NC ND NE NE E2007–BUSP–0374 E2007–BUSP–0375 E2007–BUSP–0376 E2007–BUSP–0377 E2007–BUSP–0378 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 134 57 595 505 160 NE ............ E2007–BUSP–0379 ......... 586 NE ............ E2007–BUSP–0380 ......... 587 NE ............ NE ............ NH ............ E2007–BUSP–0381 ......... E2007–BUSP–0382 ......... E2007–BUSP–0383 ......... 240 599 418 NJ ............. NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0384 ......... E2007–BUSP–0385 ......... 468 86 NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0386 ......... 28 NJ ............. NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0387 ......... E2007–BUSP–0388 ......... 12 102 NJ ............. NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0389 ......... E2007–BUSP–0390 ......... 389 138 NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0391 ......... 38 NJ ............. NJ ............. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0392 ......... E2007–BUSP–0393 ......... 209 46 NJ ............. NJ ............. NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0394 ......... E2007–BUSP–0395 ......... E2007–BUSP–0396 ......... 340 328 13 NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0397 ......... 29 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Bi-State Development Agency-St. Louis Bridge Repair/Reconstruction, for any activity eligible under section 5309. Bi-State Development Agency-St. Louis Metro Bus Fare Collection Program. Kansas City, MO Bus Transit Infrastructure .......................................... OATS, Incorporated, MO–ITS Information and Billing System and Bus Facilities. Southeast Missouri Transportation Service-Bus Project ........................ Coahoma County, Mississippi Purchase buses for the Aaron E. Henry Community Health Services Center, Inc./DARTS transit service. Jackson State University, MS-Busing Project ........................................ Bozeman, Montana-Vehicular Parking Facility ...................................... Bozeman, MT, Intermodal and parking facility ....................................... Montana Department of Transportation-Statewide Bus Facilities and Buses. Charlotte Area Transit System/City of Charlotte-Charlotte Multimodal Station. Charlotte, NC Construct Charlotte Multimodal Station .......................... Charlotte, North Carolina-Eastland Community Transit Center ............. Charlotte, North Carolina-Multimodal Station ......................................... City of Greenville, NC Expansion Buses and Greenville Intermodal Center. Elon, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation buses and bus facilities. Greensboro, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation Multimodal Transportation Center. Greensboro, North Carolina-Replacement buses .................................. High Point, NC-Intermodal Facility ......................................................... High Point, North Carolina-Bus Terminal ............................................... North Carolina Department of Transportation-North Carolina Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities. Raleigh, NC Purchase eighteen replacement buses to replace buses that have reached their useful life according to Federal Transit Administration regulations. Town of Chapel Hill, NC Park and Ride Lot .......................................... Wilmington, NC Build Intermodal Center ............................................... North Dakota Department of Transportation/Statewide Bus .................. City of Omaha-Creighton University Intermodal Facility ........................ Kearney, Nebraska-RYDE Transit Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility. Nebraska Department of Roads-Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility for RYDE in Kearney, NE. Nebraska Department of Roads-Statewide Vehicles, Facilities, and Related Equipment Purchases. Nebraska-statewide transit vehicles, facilities, and related equipment Omaha, NE, Buses and Fare boxes ...................................................... Windham, New Hampshire—Construction of Park and Ride Bus facility at Exit 3. Atlantic City, NJ Jitney ........................................................................... Burlington County, NJ-BurLink and Burlington County Transportation System vehicles and equipment. Camden, NJ Construction of the Camden County Intermodal Facility in Cramer Hill. Hoboken, NJ Rehabilitation of Hoboken Inter-modal Terminal ............. Jersey City, NJ Construct West Entrance to Pavonia-Newport PATH Station. Lakewood, NJ-Ocean County Bus service and parking facilities .......... Long Branch, NJ Design and construct facilities for ferry service from Long Branch, NJ to New York City and other destinations. Monmouth County, NJ Construction of main bus facility for Freehold Township, including a terminal and repair shop. Morristown, New Jersey-Intermodal Historic Station ............................. National Park Service Design and construct 2.1-mile segment to complete Sandy Hook multiuse pathway in Sandy Hook, NJ. New Jersey Inter-modal Facilities and Bus Rolling Stock ..................... New Jersey Transit Community Shuttle Buses ...................................... Newark, NJ Penn Station Intermodal Improvements including the rehabilitation of boarding areas. Sandy Hook, NJ National Park Service Construct year-round ferry dock at Sandy Hook Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area. Frm 00054 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 d 1,190,000 d 3,808,000 200,640 4,046,000 476,000 30,096 1,190,000 802,560 171,000 714,000 2,380,000 1,564,992 401,280 802,560 715,081 240,768 2,512,013 e 1,159,699 286,000 1,203,840 5,950,000 401,280 300,960 200,640 1,100,000 714,000 401,280 476,000 952,000 802,560 650,000 742,368 750,000 802,560 200,640 762,432 401,280 601,920 802,560 401,280 200,640 200,640 601,920 100,320 200,640 200,640 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13925 TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID NJ ............. E2007–BUSP–0398 ......... 393 NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ E2007–BUSP–0399 E2007–BUSP–0400 E2007–BUSP–0401 E2007–BUSP–0402 E2007–BUSP–0403 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 618 643 61 181 62 NM ............ NM ............ NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0404 ......... E2007–BUSP–0405 ......... E2007–BUSP–0406 ......... 464 562 405 NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0407 ......... 199 NV ............ NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0408 ......... E2007–BUSP–0409 ......... 371 603 NV ............ E2007–BUSP–0410 ......... 18 NV ............ NV ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0411 ......... E2007–BUSP–0412 ......... E2007–BUSP–0413 ......... 630 656 74 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0414 ......... 463 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0415 ......... 271 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0416 ......... 20 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0417 ......... 279 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0418 ......... 166 NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0419 ......... E2007–BUSP–0420 ......... 338 234 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0421 ......... 10 NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0422 ......... E2007–BUSP–0423 ......... 197 408 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0424 ......... 41 NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0425 ......... E2007–BUSP–0426 ......... 56 419 NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0427 ......... E2007–BUSP–0428 ......... 192 245 NY NY NY NY E2007–BUSP–0429 E2007–BUSP–0430 E2007–BUSP–0431 E2007–BUSP–0432 ......... ......... ......... ......... 230 146 363 512 NY ............ NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0433 ......... E2007–BUSP–0434 ......... E2007–BUSP–0435 ......... 284 300 317 NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0436 ......... E2007–BUSP–0437 ......... 343 368 NY ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0438 ......... 585 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0439 ......... 25 NY ............ NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0440 ......... E2007–BUSP–0441 ......... E2007–BUSP–0442 ......... 376 590 591 ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............ ............ ............ ............ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation South Amboy, NJ Construction of improvements to facilities at South Amboy Station under S Amboy, NJ Regional Intermodal Initiative. South Brunswick, NJ Transit System ..................................................... Trenton Intermodal Station ..................................................................... Trenton, New Jersey-Trenton Train Station Rehabilitation .................... Trenton, NJ Development of Trenton Trolley System ........................... Trenton, NJ Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Trenton Train Station. Albuquerque, NM, Ride Bus and Bus Facilities ..................................... Las Cruces, NM, Road Runner Bus and Bus Facilities ......................... Las Vegas, NV Construct Boulder Highway BRT system and purchase vehicles and related equipment. Las Vegas, NV Construct Central City Inter-modal Transportation Terminal. Las Vegas, NV Construct Las Vegas West Care Intermodal Facility ... Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada-Central City Intermodal Transportation Terminal. Reno-Sparks, Nevada-Intermodal Transportation Terminals and Related Development. Southern Nevada Transit Coalition, Public Transit Building Acquisition Washoe County, NV Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................... Albany-Schenectady, NY Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY Route 5. Corridor. Albany-Schenectady, NY, Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY Route 5. Bronx, NY Botanical Garden metro North Rail station Intermodal Facility. Bronx, NY Establish an intermodal transportation facility at the Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx Zoo. Bronx, NY Establish an intermodal transportation facility at the Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx Zoo. Bronx, NY Hebrew Home for the Aged elderly and disabled transportation support. Bronx, NY Intermodal Facility near Exit 6. of the Bronx River Parkway Bronx, NY Jacobi Intermodal Center to North Central Bronx Hospital bus system. Bronx, NY Wildlife Conservation Society intermodal transportation facility at the Bronx Zoo. Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility ................. Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility in the vicinity of Downstate Medical Center. Brooklyn, NY New Urban Center-Broadway Junction Intermodal Center. Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station Brooklyn, NY—Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station. Buffalo, NY Inter-modal Center Parking Facility .................................... Bus to provide York-town, New York internal circulator to provide transportation throughout the Town. Construction of Third Bus Depot on Staten Island ................................ Cooperstown, New York-Intermodal Transit Center .............................. Corning, New York-Transportation Center ............................................. Corning, NY, Phase II Corning Preserve Transportation Enhancement Project. Cornwall, NY-Purchase Bus ................................................................... Geneva, New York-Multimodal facility-Construct passenger rail center Jamestown, NY Rehabilitation of Intermodal Facility and associated property. Kings County, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility ......... Nassau County, NY Conduct planning and engineering for transportation system (HUB). Nassau County, NY, Conduct planning, engineering, and construction for transportation system (HUB). New York City, NY First Phase Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit System. New York City, NY Purchase Handicapped-Accessible Livery Vehicles New York City, NY, Bronx Zoo Intermodal Facility ................................ New York City, NY, Enhance Transportation Facilities Near W. 65th Street and Broadway. Frm 00055 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 1,605,120 1,000,000 4,250,000 300,960 200,640 1,404,480 1,500,000 250,000 401,280 1,203,840 50,160 952,000 802,560 300,000 1,500,000 200,640 800,000 200,640 200,640 200,640 37,620 50,160 62,700 87,780 280,896 200,640 192,614 802,560 802,560 200,640 37,118 2,407,680 1,003,200 1,003,200 450,000 17,456 100,320 401,280 200,640 1,404,480 1,200,000 200,640 220,640 450,000 450,000 13926 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0443 ......... 592 NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0444 ......... E2007–BUSP–0445 ......... 593 77 NY NY NY NY NY NY E2007–BUSP–0446 E2007–BUSP–0447 E2007–BUSP–0448 E2007–BUSP–0449 E2007–BUSP–0450 E2007–BUSP–0451 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 373 322 379 252 430 607 NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0452 ......... E2007–BUSP–0453 ......... 609 386 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0454 ......... 353 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0455 ......... 635 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0456 ......... 261 NY ............ NY ............ NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0457 ......... E2007–BUSP–0458 ......... E2007–BUSP–0459 ......... 289 451 78 NY ............ E2007–BUSP–0460 ......... 182 NY NY OH OH OH E2007–BUSP–0461 E2007–BUSP–0462 E2007–BUSP–0463 E2007–BUSP–0464 E2007–BUSP–0465 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 264 149 362 318 105 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0466 ......... 489 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0467 ......... 241 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0468 ......... 89 OH ............ OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0469 ......... E2007–BUSP–0470 ......... 327 202 OH ............ OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0471 ......... E2007–BUSP–0472 ......... 179 411 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0473 ......... 51 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0474 ......... 258 OH OH OH OH OH ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ E2007–BUSP–0475 E2007–BUSP–0476 E2007–BUSP–0477 E2007–BUSP–0478 E2007–BUSP–0479 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 198 50 380 7 292 OH OH OH OH ............ ............ ............ ............ E2007–BUSP–0480 E2007–BUSP–0481 E2007–BUSP–0482 E2007–BUSP–0483 ......... ......... ......... ......... 120 516 347 309 OH ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0484 ......... 349 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0485 ......... 104 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0486 ......... 576 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0487 ......... 87 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation New York City, NY, Highline Project, for Studies, Design, and Construction. New York, Improvements to Moynihan Station ...................................... Niagara Falls, NY Relocation, Development, and Enhancement of Niagara Falls International Railway Station/Intermodal Transportation Center. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, NY Replacement Buses ..... Oneonta, New York-bus replacement .................................................... Ramapo, NY Transportation Safety Field Bus ....................................... Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square transit center .................... Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square Transit Center .................. Rochester, NY, Renaissance Square Intermodal Facility, Design and Construction. Rockland County, NY Express Bus ....................................................... Suffolk County, NY Design and construction of intermodal transit facility in Wyandanch. Suffolk County, NY Purchase four handicapped accessible vans to transport veterans to and from the VA facility in Northport. Syracuse, New York, Syracuse University Connective Corridor Transit Project. Thendra-Webb and Utica, New York-Install handicap lifts in intermodal centers. Town of Warwick, NY Bus Facility Warwick Transit System ................. Utica, New York Transit Multimodal Facilities ........................................ Utica, New York-Union Station Boehlert Center siding track improvements. Utica, New York-Union Station rehabilitation and related infrastructure improvements. Westchester County, NY Bus replacement program ............................. Yonkers, NY Trolley Bus Acquisition ..................................................... Akron, OH Construct City of Akron Commuter Bus Transit Facility ...... Akron, Ohio Construct Downtown Multi-modal Transportation Center .. Akron, Ohio-West Market Street transit center and related pedestrian improvements. Central Ohio Transit Authority-Paratransit and Small Bus Service Facility. Cincinnati, Ohio-Construct Uptown Crossings Joint Development Transit Project. Cincinnati, Ohio-Metro Regional Transit Hub Network Eastern Neighborhoods. Cleveland, OH Construct East Side Transit Center ............................... Cleveland, OH Construct Fare Collection System Project, Cuyahoga County. Cleveland, OH Construct passenger inter-modal center near Dock 32 Cleveland, OH Construction of an inter-modal facility and related improvements at University Hospitals facility on Euclid Avenue. Cleveland, Ohio acquisition of buses Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue and East 93rd Street intermodal facility. Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue University Hospital intermodal facility Cleveland, Ohio-University Circle Intermodal facility ............................. Columbiana County, OH Construct Inter-modal Facility ........................ Columbus, OH-Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility ........ Cuyahoga County, Ohio-Ohio Department of Transportation transit improvements. Dayton Airport Inter-modal Rail Feasibility Study .................................. Dayton-Wright Stop Plaza ...................................................................... Eastlake, Ohio-Eastlake Stadium transit intermodal facility ................... Elyria, OH Construct the New York Central Train Station into an intermodal transportation hub. Kent, OH Construct Kent State University Intermodal Facility serving students and the general public. Marietta, Ohio Construction of transportation hub to accommodate regional bus traffic. Metro Regional Transit Authority/City of Akron-Downtown Transit Center/Akron. Niles, OH Acquisition of bus operational and service equipment of Niles Trumbull Transit. Frm 00056 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,123,584 200,640 30,096 50,160 902,880 451,440 1,400,000 700,000 922,944 56,179 950,000 20,064 110,352 1,200,000 20,064 100,320 752,400 75,240 300,960 802,560 130,416 476,000 601,920 185,592 601,920 100,320 172,550 200,640 200,640 1,705,440 902,880 1,705,440 1,003,200 1,203,840 30,096 150,480 476,000 852,720 410,911 200,640 100,320 1,666,000 40,128 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13927 TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. State Earmark ID OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0488 ......... 385 OH ............ E2007–BUSP–0489 ......... 34 OH OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR E2007–BUSP–0490 E2007–BUSP–0491 E2007–BUSP–0492 E2007–BUSP–0493 E2007–BUSP–0494 E2007–BUSP–0495 E2007–BUSP–0496 E2007–BUSP–0497 E2007–BUSP–0498 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 64 442 165 272 66 187 299 159 325 OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0499 ......... 99 OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0500 ......... 168 OR ............ OR ............ OR ............ E2007–BUSP–0501 ......... E2007–BUSP–0502 ......... E2007–BUSP–0503 ......... 323 175 16 OR OR OR OR OR E2007–BUSP–0504 E2007–BUSP–0505 E2007–BUSP–0506 E2007–BUSP–0507 E2007–BUSP–0508 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 93 106 180 216 82 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0509 ......... 225 PA ............ PA ............ PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0510 ......... E2007–BUSP–0511 ......... E2007–BUSP–0512 ......... 456 465 467 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0513 ......... 471 PA PA PA PA E2007–BUSP–0514 E2007–BUSP–0515 E2007–BUSP–0516 E2007–BUSP–0517 ......... ......... ......... ......... 481 428 482 123 PA ............ PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0518 ......... E2007–BUSP–0519 ......... 500 513 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0520 ......... 514 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0521 ......... 81 PA PA PA PA PA E2007–BUSP–0522 E2007–BUSP–0523 E2007–BUSP–0524 E2007–BUSP–0525 E2007–BUSP–0526 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 524 431 331 458 233 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0527 ......... 457 PA ............ PA ............ PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0528 ......... E2007–BUSP–0529 ......... E2007–BUSP–0530 ......... 37 559 564 PA ............ PA ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ E2007–BUSP–0531 ......... E2007–BUSP–0532 ......... 583 588 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0533 ......... 201 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0534 ......... 137 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0535 ......... 413 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Springfield, OH-City of Springfield Bus Transfer Station and Associated Parking. Toledo, OH TARTA/TARPS Passenger Inter-modal Facility construction. Zanesville, OH-bus system signage and shelters .................................. Albany, OR North Albany Park and Ride ............................................... Albany, OR Rehabilitate Building At Multimodal Transit Station ........... Bend, Oregon-replacement vans ........................................................... Canby, OR bus and bus facilities ........................................................... Columbia County, OR To purchase buses ............................................ Corvallis, OR Bus Replacement ............................................................. Eugene, OR Lane Transit District, Vehicle Replacement ...................... Grants Pass, OR Purchase Vehicles For Use By Josephine Community Transit. Gresham, Oregon Construct a new light rail station and transit plaza on Portland MAX system and serve Gresham Civic neighborhood. Lane Transit District, Bus Rapid Transit Progressive Corridor Enhancements. Lincoln, County, OR bus purchase ........................................................ Molalla, OR South Clackamas Transportation District, bus purchase ... Portland, OR Renovation of Union Station, including structural reinforcement and public safety upgrades. Salem, OR bus and bus facilities ........................................................... Sandy, Oregon Transit Bus Facility ....................................................... Tillamook, OR construction of a transit facility ....................................... Wilsonville, OR South Metro Area Rapid Transit, bus and bus facilities Yamhill County, OR For the construction of bus shelters, park and ride facilities, and a signage strategy to increase ridership. Allentown, Pennsylvania-Design and Construct Intermodal Transportation Center. Altoona Multimodal Transportation Facility Parking Garage .................. AMTRAN Altoona, PA-Buses and Transit System Improvements ........ Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania-Vehicle Replacements. Beaver County, PA Transit Authority Bus Replacement/ Related Equipment Replacement. Butler Township, PA-Cranbury Area Transit Service ............................. Butler, PA-Multimodal Transit Center Construction ............................... Cambria County, PA Transit Authority-Bus Replacements ................... Cheltenham, PA Glenside Rail Station Parking Garage project involving the construction of a 300–400 space parking lot at Easton Road and Glenside Avenue. City of Hazleton, PA-Hazleton Intermodal Center ................................. County of Lackawanna Transit System-Scranton Intermodal Transportation Center. Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority-Purchase of Buses and Spare Units. Easton, Pennsylvania-Design and construct Intermodal Transportation Center. Erie, PA Metropolitan Transit Authority-Bus Acquisitions ...................... Erie, PA–EMTA Vehicle Acquisition ....................................................... Gettysburg, Pennsylvania-transit transfer center ................................... Hershey, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Garage ........... Intermodal Facilities in Bucks County (Croydon and Levittown Stations). Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Facility. Lancaster, PA-bus replacement ............................................................. Lancaster, PA-Intermodal Project .......................................................... Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority, PA-Allentown Intermodal Transportation Center. Monroe Township, PA-Clarion County Buses ........................................ New Castle, PA Area Transit Authority-Bus Purchases/Park and Ride Facility. Philadelphia, PA Cruise Terminal Transportation Ctr. Phila. Naval Shipyard. Philadelphia, PA Improvements to the existing Penn’s Landing Ferry Terminal. Philadelphia, PA Penn’s Landing water shuttle parking lot expansion and water shuttle ramp infrastructure construction. Frm 00057 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 50,160 1,504,800 16,302 191,086 305,737 200,640 30,096 28,090 296,183 716,571 40,845 280,896 594,621 50,160 20,064 20,064 401,280 140,448 20,064 50,160 22,070 401,280 240,000 714,000 238,000 238,000 833,000 200,640 714,000 200,640 333,000 238,000 238,000 401,280 238,000 401,280 180,375 60,000 601,920 60,000 190,608 167,000 476,000 157,000 176,000 702,240 802,560 220,704 13928 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0536 ......... 22 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0537 ......... 274 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0538 ......... 316 PA ............ PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0539 ......... E2007–BUSP–0540 ......... 126 397 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0541 ......... 48 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0542 ......... 96 PA ............ PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0543 ......... E2007–BUSP–0544 ......... 424 626 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0545 ......... 627 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0546 ......... 628 PA ............ PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0547 ......... E2007–BUSP–0548 ......... 642 33 PA ............ PA ............ PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0549 ......... E2007–BUSP–0550 ......... E2007–BUSP–0551 ......... 660 661 662 PA ............ E2007–BUSP–0552 ......... 65 PR ............ PR ............ PR ............ E2007–BUSP–0553 ......... E2007–BUSP–0554 ......... E2007–BUSP–0555 ......... 128 421 3 PR ............ PR ............ PR ............ PR ............ RI .............. E2007–BUSP–0556 E2007–BUSP–0557 E2007–BUSP–0558 E2007–BUSP–0559 E2007–BUSP–0560 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 164 152 71 58 246 RI .............. RI .............. SC ............ E2007–BUSP–0561 ......... E2007–BUSP–0562 ......... E2007–BUSP–0563 ......... 604 115 533 SC ............ E2007–BUSP–0564 ......... 619 SC ............ E2007–BUSP–0565 ......... 620 SD ............ E2007–BUSP–0566 ......... 621 TN TN TN TN E2007–BUSP–0567 E2007–BUSP–0568 E2007–BUSP–0569 E2007–BUSP–0570 ......... ......... ......... ......... 237 554 565 579 TN ............ E2007–BUSP–0571 ......... 268 TN ............ TN ............ TN ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0572 ......... E2007–BUSP–0573 ......... E2007–BUSP–0574 ......... 412 30 636 TN ............ TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0575 ......... E2007–BUSP–0576 ......... 649 426 TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0577 ......... 480 TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0578 ......... 162 ............ ............ ............ ............ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia Zoo Intermodal Transportation project w/parking consolidation, pedestrian walkways, public transportation complements & landscape improvements to surface parking lots. Philadelphia, PA SEPTA’s Market St. Elevated Rail project in conjunction with Philadelphia Commercial Development Corporation for improvements and assistance to entities along rail corridor. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-SEPTA Market Street Elevated Line parking facility. Pittsburgh, PA Clean Fuel Bus Procurement ......................................... Pottsville, PA Union Street Trade and Transfer Center Intermodal Facility. Project provides for the engineering and construction of a transportation center in Paoli, Chester County. SEPTA Montgomery County Intermodal Improvements at Glenside and Jenkintown Station Parking Garages. Sharon, PA–Bus Facility Construction ................................................... Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Bucks County Intermodal (Croydon and Levittown). Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Paoli Transportation Center. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Villanova-SEPTA Intermodal. Transit Authority of Warren County, PA-Impact Warren ........................ Warren, PA-Construct Intermodal Transportation Center and related pedestrian and landscape improvements. Westmoreland County Transit Authority, PA-Bus Replacement ............ Wilkes-Barre Intermodal Facility ............................................................. Williamsport, PA Bureau of Transportation-Williamsport Trade and Transit Centre Expansion. York, Pennsylvania-Rabbit Transit facilities and communications equipment. Bayamon, Puerto Rico-bus terminal ...................................................... Bayamon, Puerto Rico-Purchase of Trolley Cars .................................. Lares, PR-Trolley buses-for the purchase of two trolley buses that will offer transportation through the urban zone in the Municipality of Lares. Puerto Rico-Caribbean National Forest buses and nonprofit uses ....... San Juan, Puerto Rico-bus security equipment ..................................... San Juan, Puerto Rico-Buses ................................................................ Yabucoca, Puerto Rico-Trolley Buses ................................................... Providence, RI Expansion of Elmwood Paratransit Maintenance Facility. Rhode Island, RIPTA Elmwood Facility Expansion ............................... Rhode Island Statewide Bus Fleet ......................................................... Greensville, SC Transit Authority-City of Greenville Multimodal Transportation Center Improvements. South Carolina Department of Transportation-Transit Facilities Construction Program. South Carolina Department of Transportation-Vehicle Acquisition Program. South Dakota Department of Transportation-Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities. Knoxville, Tennessee-Central Station Transit Center ............................ Knoxville, TN-Central Station ................................................................. Lipscomb University, TN-Intermodal Parking Garage ............................ Metropolitan Transit Authority-Nashville Downtown Transit Transfer Facility. Nashville, TN Construct a parking garage on the campus of Lipscomb University, Nashville. Nashville, TN Construct Downtown Nashville Transit Transfer Facility Sevier County, Tennessee-U.S. 441 bus rapid transit .......................... Tennessee Department of Transportation-Statewide Tennessee Transit ITS and Bus Replacement Project. University of Memphis-Pedestrian Bridge .............................................. Abilene, TX Vehicle replacement and facility improvements for transit system. Brownsville Urban System, TX—City-Wide Transit Improvement Project. Brownsville, TX Brownsville Urban System City-Wide Transit Improvement Project. Frm 00058 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 1,003,200 280,896 802,560 100,320 401,280 200,640 a 1,003,200 100,320 714,000 714,000 714,000 238,000 300,960 238,000 1,428,000 714,000 555,873 120,384 170,544 52,969 601,920 601,920 200,640 35,112 1,003,200 1,700,000 1,203,840 238,000 476,000 1,904,000 3,452,000 2,046,528 595,000 357,000 2,856,000 401,280 300,960 50,160 2,856,000 714,000 80,256 952,000 501,600 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13929 TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0579 ......... 153 TX ............. TX ............. TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0580 ......... E2007–BUSP–0581 ......... E2007–BUSP–0582 ......... 485 455 506 TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0583 ......... 111 TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0584 ......... 438 TX ............. TX ............. TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0585 ......... E2007–BUSP–0586 ......... E2007–BUSP–0587 ......... 515 336 196 TX ............. TX ............. E2007–BUSP–0588 ......... E2007–BUSP–0589 ......... 290 536 TX TX TX TX TX E2007–BUSP–0590 E2007–BUSP–0591 E2007–BUSP–0592 E2007–BUSP–0593 E2007–BUSP–0594 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 561 24 610 210 653 TX ............. UT ............ E2007–BUSP–0595 ......... E2007–BUSP–0596 ......... 63 178 UT ............ VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0597 ......... E2007–BUSP–0598 ......... 651 409 VA ............ VA ............ VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0599 ......... E2007–BUSP–0600 ......... E2007–BUSP–0601 ......... 232 278 142 VA VA VA VA VA VA VA VA ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ E2007–BUSP–0602 E2007–BUSP–0603 E2007–BUSP–0604 E2007–BUSP–0605 E2007–BUSP–0606 E2007–BUSP–0607 E2007–BUSP–0608 E2007–BUSP–0609 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 359 157 492 493 494 495 511 15 VA VA VA VA VA VA ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ E2007–BUSP–0610 E2007–BUSP–0611 E2007–BUSP–0612 E2007–BUSP–0613 E2007–BUSP–0614 E2007–BUSP–0615 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 525 281 97 532 535 391 VA ............ VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0616 ......... E2007–BUSP–0617 ......... 354 68 VA ............ E2007–BUSP–0618 ......... 602 VA ............ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–BUSP–0619 ......... 360 VA ............ VA ............ VA ............ VA ............ VA ............ VT ............. VT ............. VT ............. WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0620 E2007–BUSP–0621 E2007–BUSP–0622 E2007–BUSP–0623 E2007–BUSP–0624 E2007–BUSP–0625 E2007–BUSP–0626 E2007–BUSP–0627 E2007–BUSP–0628 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 184 434 312 305 361 477 486 633 94 WA WA WA WA E2007–BUSP–0629 E2007–BUSP–0630 E2007–BUSP–0631 E2007–BUSP–0632 ......... ......... ......... ......... 395 337 193 334 ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ........... ........... ........... ........... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project description Allocation Bryan, TX The District-Bryan Intermodal Transit Terminal and Parking Facility. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, TX-Bus Replacements Carrollton, Texas Downtown Regional Multimodal Transit Hub ............ City of Round Rock, TX-Downtown Intermodal Transportation Terminal. Construct West Houston and Fort Bend County, Texas-bus transit corridor. Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Regional Transit Authority for maintenance facility improvements. Dallas Area Rapid Transit-Bus passenger Facilities .............................. Dallas, TX Bus Passenger Facilities ...................................................... Design Downtown Carrollton, Texas Regional Multi-Modal Transit Hub Station. Galveston, Texas-Intermodal center and parking facility, The Strand ... Harris County-West Houston-Fort Bend Bus Transit Corridor: Uptown Westpark Terminal. Laredo-North Laredo Transit Hub-Bus Maintenance Facility ................. Roma, TX Bus Facility ............................................................................ San Angelo, TX Street Railroad Company-Transit Fleet Replacement San Antonio, TX Improve VIA bus facility and purchase new buses .... VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority, TX-Bus & Bus Facility Improvements. Zapata, Texas Purchase Bus vehicles ................................................... Sandy City, UT Construct transit hub station and TRAX station at 9400 South. Utah Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities .................................................. Alexandria, VA Eisenhower Avenue Intermodal Station improvements, including purchase of buses and construction of bus shelters. Alexandria, VA Royal Street Bus Garage Replacement ........................ Arlington County, VA Columbia Pike Bus Improvements ...................... Arlington County, VA Crystal City-Potomac Yard Busway, including construction of bus shelters. Arlington County, VA Pentagon City Multimodal Improvements ........... Bealeton, Virginia-Intermodal Station Depot Refurbishment ................. City of Alexandria, VA-City-Wide Transit Improvements ....................... City of Alexandria, VA-Potomac Yard Transit Improvements ................ City of Alexandria, VA-Replace Royal Street Bus Garage .................... City of Alexandria, VA-Valley Pedestrian & Transit ............................... Commonwealth of Virginia-Statewide Bus Capital Program .................. Fairfax County, VA Richmond Highway (U.S. Route 1) Public Transportation Improvements. Fairfax County, Virginia-Richmond Highway Initiative ........................... Falls Church, VA Falls Church Intermodal Transportation Center ........ Fredericksburg, Virginia-Improve and repair Fredericksburg Station .... Greater Richmond Transit, VA-Bus Operations/Maintenance Facility ... Hampton Roads Transit, VA-Southside Bus Facility ............................. Hampton Roads, VA Final design and construction for a Hampton Roads Transit Southside Bus Facility. Norfolk, Virginia-Final Design and Construction Southside Bus Facility Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula, Virginia-Bay Transit Multimodal Facilities. Potomac & Rappahannock Transportation Commission, VA-Buses for Service Expansion. Richmond, VA Design and construction for a bus operations and maintenance facility for Greater Richmond Transit Company. Richmond, VA Renovation and construction for Main Street Station .... Roanoke, VA-Bus restoration in the City of Roanoke ........................... Roanoke, Virginia-Improve Virginian Railway Station ............................ Roanoke, Virginia-Intermodal Facility ..................................................... Roanoke, Virginia-Roanoke Railway and Link Passenger facility ......... Brattleborough, VT, Intermodal Center .................................................. CCTA, VT, Bus, Facilities and Equipment ............................................. State of Vermont Buses, Facilities and Equipment ............................... Ilwaco, WA Procure shuttles for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park. Ilwaco, WA Construct park and ride ...................................................... Island Transit, WA Operations Base Facilities Project .......................... Mukilteo, WA Multi-Modal Terminal ....................................................... North Bend, Washington-Park and Ride ................................................ Frm 00059 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 601,920 2,380,000 240,000 238,000 401,280 501,600 238,000 2,568,192 401,280 902,880 238,000 714,000 105,336 238,000 1,404,480 1,190,000 62,700 401,280 7,148,000 501,600 100,320 702,240 601,920 401,280 55,176 238,000 238,000 714,000 238,000 3,570,000 401,280 476,000 401,280 501,600 1,190,000 238,000 401,280 351,120 652,080 238,000 300,960 220,704 50,160 50,160 40,128 100,320 200,000 400,000 350,000 20,064 20,064 481,536 1,163,712 160,512 13930 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued SAFETEA– LU Project No. State Earmark ID WA ........... WA ........... WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0633 ......... E2007–BUSP–0634 ......... E2007–BUSP–0635 ......... 333 613 113 WA ........... WA ........... WA ........... E2007–BUSP–0636 ......... E2007–BUSP–0637 ......... E2007–BUSP–0638 ......... 151 654 655 WI ............. E2007–BUSP–0639 ......... 350 WI ............. WI ............. WI ............. WV ........... E2007–BUSP–0640 E2007–BUSP–0641 E2007–BUSP–0642 E2007–BUSP–0643 ......... ......... ......... ......... 100 452 663 73 WV ........... WY ........... E2007–BUSP–0644 ......... E2007–BUSP–0645 ......... 658 665 Project description Allocation Oak Harbor, WA Multimodal Facility ...................................................... Seattle, WA Multimodal Terminal Redevelopment & Expansion ........... Snohomish County, WA Community Transit bus purchases and facility enhancement. Thurston County, WA Replace Thurston County Buses ....................... Washington Southworth Terminal Redevelopment ................................ Washington, King Street Transportation Center-Intercity Bus Terminal Component. Milwaukee, WI Rehabilitate Intermodal transportation facility at downtown Milwaukee’s Amtrak Station, increase parking for bus passengers. State of Wisconsin buses and bus facilities ........................................... State of Wisconsin Transit Intermodal Facilities .................................... Wisconsin, Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities .................................... West Virginia Construct Beckley Intermodal Gateway pursuant to the eligibility provisions for projects listed under section 3030(d)(3) of P.L. 105–178. West Virginia, Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities ................................... Wyoming Department of Transportation-Wyoming Statewide Bus and Bus Related Facilities. 200,640 900,000 601,920 180,576 1,150,000 60,000 902,880 3,280,464 1,200,000 610,000 4,815,360 5,000,000 714,000 Subtotal ........................................................................................... Other Projects: --E2007–BUSP–0654 ......... PA ..... E2007–BUSP–0655 ......... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. Grand Total ............................................. San Francisco Water Transit Authority .................................................. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ferry System .................. Maine State Ferry Service, Rockland .................................................... Swans Island, Maine Ferry Service ....................................................... Camden, New Jersey Ferry System ...................................................... Governor’s Island, New York Ferry System ........................................... Staten Island Ferry ................................................................................. Philadelphia Penn’s Landing Ferry Terminal ......................................... 2,500,000 2,500,000 650,000 350,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,000,000 Fuel Cell Bus Program ........................................................................... Bus Testing ............................................................................................ 11,500,000 3,000,000 Subtotal ........................................................................................... Unallocated Amount Transferred from Clean Fuels .............................. Unallocated Amount ............................................................................... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 435,170,089 Subtotal ........................................................................................... Ferry Boat Systems Projects: CA ..... E2007–BUSP–0646 MA ..... E2007–BUSP–0647 ME ..... E2007–BUSP–0648 ME ..... E2007–BUSP–0649 NJ ...... E2007–BUSP–0650 NY ..... E2007–BUSP–0651 NY ..... E2007–BUSP–0652 PA ..... E2007–BUSP–0653 14,500,000 26,279,000 413,291,121 ................................................................................................................. 872,961,210 a This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. State and description for the project listed are incorrectly shown as CA-Monterey Park, CA bus enchancement and improvements - construct maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve transit service. The correct State is IL and the correct project description is Mattoon, Illinois—historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. c This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Louisiana project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. d This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Illinois project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. e This Amount was incorrectly listed as $1,156,699 in Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. b The TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations: AK ..... E2005–BUSP–000 ........... AK ..... E2005–BUSP–001 ........... AK ..... E2005–BUSP–002 ........... AK ..... E2005–BUSP–004 ........... AK ..... E2005–BUSP–005 ........... AK ..... E2005–BUSP–008 ........... AK ..... E2005–BUSP–011 ........... AL ...... E2005–BUSP–012 ........... AL ...... E2005–BUSP–013 ........... AL ...... E2005–BUSP–014 ........... AL ...... E2005–BUSP–016 ........... AL ...... E2005–BUSP–018 ........... AL ...... E2005–BUSP–021 ........... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 Project .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... Alaska Mental Health Trust bus program, Alaska .............................. Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal bus/parking facility, Alaska Anchorage Museum/Transit intermodal depot, Alaska ....................... Anchorage Ship Creek intermodal facility, Alaska ............................. Copper River Transit program, Alaska ............................................... Knik Arm intermodal facility terminal, Alaska ..................................... Whittier Intermodal Facility, Alaska .................................................... Alabama State Docks intermodal facility, Alabama ............................ Birmingham Intermodel Facility-Phase II, Alabama ........................... City of Orange Beach senior activity bus, Alabama ........................... Jacksonville State University buses, Alabama ................................... Oakwood College shuttle bus project, Alabama ................................ Vans, CASA of Marshall County, Alabama ........................................ PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM Unobligated allocation 23MRN2 $189,844 675,686 1,457,667 2,429,445 1,457,667 506,764 1,181,937 3,378,430 3,401,224 33,784 1,943,557 90,572 97,177 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13931 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E2005–BUSP–023 E2005–BUSP–024 E2005–BUSP–027 E2005–BUSP–035 E2005–BUSP–709 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E2005–BUSP–036 E2005–BUSP–037 E2005–BUSP–041 E2005–BUSP–044 E2005–BUSP–045 E2005–BUSP–046 E2005–BUSP–048 E2005–BUSP–049 E2005–BUSP–050 E2005–BUSP–051 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... CA ..... E2005–BUSP–054 ........... .................... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... CO ..... CT ..... CT ..... CT ..... CT ..... CT ..... CT ..... DC ..... DE ..... FL ...... E2005–BUSP–055 E2005–BUSP–058 E2005–BUSP–060 E2005–BUSP–061 E2005–BUSP–063 E2005–BUSP–064 E2005–BUSP–065 E2005–BUSP–071 E2005–BUSP–072 E2005–BUSP–077 E2005–BUSP–083 E2005–BUSP–089 E2005–BUSP–090 E2005–BUSP–092 E2005–BUSP–093 E2005–BUSP–094 E2005–BUSP–095 E2005–BUSP–096 E2005–BUSP–098 E2005–BUSP–099 E2005–BUSP–710 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... IA ....... ID ...... IL ....... E2005–BUSP–101 E2005–BUSP–103 E2005–BUSP–105 E2005–BUSP–106 E2005–BUSP–110 E2005–BUSP–111 E2005–BUSP–112 E2005–BUSP–113 E2005–BUSP–114 E2005–BUSP–116 E2005–BUSP–119 E2005–BUSP–121 E2005–BUSP–124 E2005–BUSP–126 E2005–BUSP–130 E2005–BUSP–700 E2005–BUSP–135 E2005–BUSP–144 E2005–BUSP–145 E2005–BUSP–146 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... IL ....... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AR AR AZ CA CA E2005–BUSP–147 ........... .................... IL ....... E2005–BUSP–148 ........... .................... IL ....... E2005–BUSP–149 ........... .................... IN ...... IN ...... E2005–BUSP–155 ........... E2005–BUSP–157 ........... .................... .................... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Arkansas Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................... CATA bus replacement, Arkansas ..................................................... Coconino County-Sedona bus system, Arizona ................................. Bellflower Dial-a-Ride, California ........................................................ Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for bus and bus facility improvements. Calabasas Transit, California .............................................................. Catalina Transit Terminal, Redondo Beach, California ...................... Downtown transit center ITS, California ............................................. Elk Grove Park and Ride Facilities, California ................................... Fairfield/Vacaville Intermodal Transit Station, California .................... Fresno Area Express bus program, California ................................... Hemet Transit Center bus facility, California ...................................... I–15 Managed Lanes/Bus Rapid Transit, San Diego, California ....... LAVTA buses and bus facilities, California ........................................ LAVTA satellite maintenance, operations and administrative facility, California. Los Angeles Trade Tech intermodal links with bus and Metro, California. Los Angeles Valley College bus station extension, California ........... Modesto bus facility, California ........................................................... Municipal Transit Operators Coalition, California ............................... Napa Transit Center construction, California ..................................... Palm Springs bus station relocation, California .................................. Palo Alto Intermodal Transit Center, California .................................. Riverbank vehicle garage renovation, California ................................ San Luis Rey Transit Center, California ............................................. Santa Clara VTA bus signal priority project, California ...................... South Gate Clean Air buses, California ............................................. Transit Oriented Neighborhood Program, California .......................... Colorado Statewide buses and bus facilities ...................................... Bridgeport Intermodal Transportation Center, Connecticut ................ Hartford/New Britain Busway, Connecticut ......................................... Pulse Point Joint Development safety improvements, Connecticut ... Stamford Urban Transitway Phase II, Connecticut ............................ Waterbury bus maintenance facility, Connecticut .............................. West Haven/Orange Intermodal Facility, Connecticut ........................ Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center, Washington, DC ... Delaware Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................... Bus stop, bus pullout and transit improvements consistent with the City of Ft. Lauderdale Community Redevelopment Agency plan. DeBary Intermodal Transportation Facility, Florida ............................ Gainesville Regional Airport multi-modal facility, Florida ................... Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART), Florida ......................... Homestead East-West bus connector, Florida ................................... Miami Beach Intermodal Greenway Transit Facility, Florida .............. Miami Beach Intermodal Transit Facility, Florida ............................... Miami Intermodal Center, Florida ....................................................... Miami-Dade County bus procurement, Florida ................................... Miramar Parkway transit shelter enhancements, Florida ................... North Florida and West Coast Transit Coalition Bus Acquisition ....... Putnam County RideSolutions buses and bus facilities, Florida ........ Southwest Broward bus facility, Florida ............................................. St. Petersburg intermodal facility, Florida ........................................... Trolley System, Boynton Beach, Florida ............................................ Atlantic Station, Georgia ..................................................................... Georgia Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA) ........................... Moultrie Intermodal Facility, Georgia .................................................. UNI multimodal project, Iowa .............................................................. Idaho Transit Coalition Statewide buses and bus facilities ................ Bus facilities for Bloomington, Macomb, Peoria, and Rock Island (from Illinois Statewide buses and bus facilities). Champaign Day Care Center/Park-n-Ride (from Illinois Statewide buses and bus facilities). City of Chicago’s Free Trolley System (from Illinois Statewide buses and bus facilities). Downstate Illinois replacement buses (from Illinois Statewide buses and bus facilities). Citilink, Indiana .................................................................................... Ivy Tech State College multmodal facility, Indiana ............................ Frm 00061 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 6,893,126 388,711 800,000 116,614 a g 728,834 485,888 971,779 97,177 971,779 485,888 971,779 340,123 1,652,023 168,921 101,353 485,888 485,888 337,843 971,779 485,888 29,154 728,834 121,472 388,711 728,834 242,945 121,541 2,738,091 583,427 3,887,113 168,921 5,830,669 485,888 971,779 728,834 1,278,334 b g 971,779 242,945 291,534 485,888 242,945 680,245 680,245 5,830,669 485,888 97,177 834,466 1,457,667 1,166,133 485,888 242,945 1,068,956 4,373,003 485,888 2,797,380 1,069,753 1,181,668 728,834 728,833 2,915,335 514,687 485,888 13932 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID E2005–BUSP–164 E2005–BUSP–165 E2005–BUSP–166 E2005–BUSP–167 E2005–BUSP–171 E2005–BUSP–172 E2005–BUSP–175 E2005–BUSP–177 E2005–BUSP–178 E2005–BUSP–180 E2005–BUSP–183 E2005–BUSP–190 E2005–BUSP–194 E2005–BUSP–195 E2005–BUSP–196 E2005–BUSP–197 E2005–BUSP–198 E2005–BUSP–199 E2005–BUSP–200 E2005–BUSP–201 E2005–BUSP–206 E2005–BUSP–207 E2005–BUSP–209 E2005–BUSP–223 E2005–BUSP–237 E2005–BUSP–246 E2005–BUSP–248 E2005–BUSP–711 E2005–BUSP–258 E2005–BUSP–259 E2005–BUSP–260 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... MS ..... MS ..... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES KS ..... KS ..... KS ..... KS ..... KY ..... KY ..... KY ..... KY ..... KY ..... LA ...... MA ..... MA ..... MA ..... MA ..... MA ..... MA ..... MD .... MD .... MD .... MD .... ME ..... MI ...... MI ...... MI ...... MI ...... MN .... MN .... MN .... MO .... MO .... MS ..... E2005–BUSP–704 ........... E2005–BUSP–263 ........... .................... .................... MT ..... NC ..... NC ..... NC ..... NC ..... ND ..... NE ..... NJ ...... NJ ...... NJ ...... NM .... NM .... NV ..... NV ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... OH ..... OH ..... E2005–BUSP–266 E2005–BUSP–268 E2005–BUSP–269 E2005–BUSP–271 E2005–BUSP–272 E2005–BUSP–273 E2005–BUSP–274 E2005–BUSP–280 E2005–BUSP–281 E2005–BUSP–285 E2005–BUSP–289 E2005–BUSP–291 E2005–BUSP–292 E2005–BUSP–294 E2005–BUSP–296 E2005–BUSP–297 E2005–BUSP–298 E2005–BUSP–300 E2005–BUSP–301 E2005–BUSP–302 E2005–BUSP–303 E2005–BUSP–304 E2005–BUSP–305 E2005–BUSP–306 E2005–BUSP–308 E2005–BUSP–309 E2005–BUSP–310 E2005–BUSP–311 E2005–BUSP–314 E2005–BUSP–316 E2005–BUSP–317 E2005–BUSP–318 E2005–BUSP–319 E2005–BUSP–321 E2005–BUSP–322 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 VerDate Aug<31>2005 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Kansas statewide bus and bus facilities ............................................. Lawrence Transit System maintenance facility, Kansas .................... Regional maintenance/paratransit scheduling facility, Kansas .......... Wichita Transit Authority buses and bus facilities, Kansas ................ Manchester, Clay County Intermodal Facility, Kentucky .................... Murray/Calloway County Transit Authority, Kentucky ........................ Southern and Eastern Kentucky buses and bus facilities .................. Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, Kentucky ........................... University of Louisville bus shuttle program, Kentucky ...................... Louisiana Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................... Attleboro Intermodal Transportation Center, Massachusetts ............. Lechmere Station intermodal, Massachusetts .................................... Salem Intermodal Center improvement project, Massachusetts ........ Springfield Union Station, Springfield, Massachusetts ....................... UMass Transit RTIC and training facility, Massachusetts .................. Wonderland Station improvements, Revere, Massachusetts ............. Glenmont Metrorail parking garage expansion, Maryland ................. Howard County Transit repair facility, Maryland ................................ Maryland Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................... Rockville Town Center transit project, Maryland ................................ Millinocket Airport transfer bus project, Maine ................................... Allegan County Transportation, Michigan ........................................... Ann Arbor Transit Authority (AATA) transit center, Michigan ............ Harbor Transit, Michigan .................................................................... Muskegon Area Transit System, Michigan ......................................... Como Rider program, Minnesota ....................................................... Greater Minnesota Transit .................................................................. White Earth Tribal Nation bus and bus related activities, MN ........... Missouri statewide bus and bus facilities ........................................... Southern Missouri buses and bus facilities ........................................ Harrison County HOV/Bus rapid transit Canal Road intermodal connector, Mississippi. City of Jackson, Mississippi ................................................................ Mississippi Valley State University mass transit program expansion, Mississippi. Billings public bus and medical transfer facility, Montana .................. Chapel Hill replacement buses, North Carolina ................................. Charlotte Multi-modal Transportation Center, North Carolina ............ North Carolina Statewide buses and bus facilities ............................. Triangle Transit Authority replacement buses, North Carolina .......... North Dakota Statewide buses and bus facilities ............................... Kearney RYDE Transit, Nebraska ...................................................... Bergen Intermodal Stations and Park N’Rides, New Jersey ............. Englewood bus purchase, New Jersey .............................................. Park and Ride for the Edison Train Station, New Jersey .................. New Mexico Statewide bus and bus facilities .................................... West Side transit facility, New Mexico ............................................... Bus Rapid Transit, Virginia Street Phase 1, Nevada ......................... Las Vegas buses, Nevada .................................................................. Boro Park JCC bus purchase, New York ........................................... Brookhaven Town Senior Citizen Jitney Bus, New York ................... Broome County hybrid buses, New York ........................................... Bus Facility, 65th Street Intermodal Station, New York ..................... Central New York Regional Transportation Authority, New York ...... Fort Edward Intermodal Station, New York ........................................ Irvington Intermodal Upgrades, New York ......................................... Jacobi Transportation Facility, New York ........................................... Jamaica Intermodal Facilities, New York ........................................... JCC of Coney Island Bus Purchase, New York ................................. Pelham Intermodal Improvements, New York .................................... Renaissance Square, New York ......................................................... Rochester Central Bus Terminal, New York ...................................... Senior Bus Service Bus Replacement, North Hempstead, New York Sullivan County buses and bus facilities, New York .......................... Tuckahoe Intermodal Improvements, New York ................................ Ulster County Hybrid Buses, New York ............................................. Westchester County Bee Line Bus Replacement, New York ............ White Plains Downtown Circulator, New York ................................... Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility ............................. Central Ohio Transity Authority ITS Phase III .................................... Frm 00062 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 491,839 388,711 777,422 242,945 1,943,557 1,447,701 500,000 203,212 2,429,445 3,417,992 1,943,557 971,779 971,779 6,505,083 3,887,113 1,943,557 485,888 485,888 3,609,668 971,779 34,012 1,132,067 337,843 194,357 485,888 1,457,667 112,000 c g 971,779 855,797 320,297 1,943,557 d 2,915,334 194,357 2,429,445 24,422 17,839 2,682,851 971,779 626,797 1,020,367 1,943,557 364,417 971,779 93,097 371,779 291,779 971,779 194,357 121,472 1,554,845 7,288,337 3,158,279 291,534 242,945 971,779 1,943,557 97,177 485,888 6,316,558 5,441,959 291,534 485,888 38,872 1 3,887,113 242,945 534,478 194,357 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13933 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... OK ..... OK ..... E2005–BUSP–334 ........... E2005–BUSP–706 ........... .................... .................... OR ..... OR ..... E2005–BUSP–338 ........... E2005–BUSP–341 ........... .................... .................... OR PA PA PA ..... ..... ..... ..... E2005–BUSP–343 E2005–BUSP–346 E2005–BUSP–347 E2005–BUSP–348 ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... PA PA PA PA PA PA PA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E2005–BUSP–357 E2005–BUSP–360 E2005–BUSP–362 E2005–BUSP–363 E2005–BUSP–364 E2005–BUSP–366 E2005–BUSP–368 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... PA PR RI SC TN TN TN TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX VA VA VA VA VT sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES OH OH OH OH OH OK OK SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E2005–BUSP–323 E2005–BUSP–324 E2005–BUSP–325 E2005–BUSP–328 E2005–BUSP–330 E2005–BUSP–331 E2005–BUSP–333 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E2005–BUSP–369 E2005–BUSP–372 E2005–BUSP–373 E2005–BUSP–376 E2005–BUSP–381 E2005–BUSP–382 E2005–BUSP–383 E2005–BUSP–386 E2005–BUSP–387 E2005–BUSP–388 E2005–BUSP–389 E2005–BUSP–390 E2005–BUSP–392 E2005–BUSP–393 E2005–BUSP–395 E2005–BUSP–396 E2005–BUSP–399 E2005–BUSP–401 E2005–BUSP–403 E2005–BUSP–405 E2005–BUSP–406 E2005–BUSP–415 E2005–BUSP–416 E2005–BUSP–417 E2005–BUSP–419 E2005–BUSP–712 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... VT ..... WA .... WA .... WA .... WA .... WA .... WA .... WA .... WA .... WA .... E2005–BUSP–425 E2005–BUSP–426 E2005–BUSP–429 E2005–BUSP–430 E2005–BUSP–433 E2005–BUSP–438 E2005–BUSP–441 E2005–BUSP–446 E2005–BUSP–447 E2005–BUSP–437 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... Unobligated allocation Project Cincinnati Local Community bus enhancements, Ohio ...................... Cleveland Clinic Pedestrian Access Tunnel, Ohio ............................. Cuyahoga County Plan for Senior Transportation, Ohio .................... Ohio statewide buses and bus facilities ............................................. TARTA/TARPS Intermodal Facility, Ohio ........................................... Lawton buses and bus facilities, Oklahoma ....................................... Northern Oklahoma regional multimodal facilities and transit system, Oklahoma. Oklahoma DOT Transit Program, Oklahoma ..................................... Tulsa transit buses and equipment/Tulsa Transit Multi-use facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Lewis and Clark explorer shuttle parking, Oregon ............................. South Metro Area Rapid Transit park-and-ride facility and transit center, Oregon. Yamhill County Transit bus and bus facilities, Oregon ...................... Ardmore transit center, Pennsylvania ................................................. Area Transit Authority, Pennsylvania ................................................. Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania passenger terminal, Pennsylvania. Cruise Terminal Intermodal Facility, Pennsylvania ............................ Harrisburg Transportation Center, Pennsylvania ............................... Incline Plane Cable Replacement, Johnstown, Pennsylvania ........... Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority, Charleroi, Pennsylvania ............... Mid-County Transit Authority Kittanning, Pennsylvania ..................... Northumberland County Transportation, Pennsylvania ...................... Union Station Intermodal Trade and Transit Center, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. Union/Snyder Transportation Alliance, Union County, Pennsylvania Carolina Mini-Buses, Puerto Rico ....................................................... Elmwood Facility Expansion, Rhode Island ....................................... South Carolina Statewide buses and bus facilities ............................ Memphis Airport Intermodal Facility, Tennessee ............................... Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency .............................. Tennessee Statewide buses and bus facilities .................................. Brazos Transit District passenger shelter program, Texas ................ Bryan Intermodel Transit Terminal with Parking, Texas .................... Bryan/College Station Bus Replacement Program, Texas ................ Capital Metro North Operating Facility, Texas ................................... Capitol Metro buses and bus facilities, Texas .................................... CNG bus replacement, Texas ............................................................ Corpus Christi buses and bus facilities, Texas .................................. Denton Downtown multimodal transit facility, Texas .......................... EL Paso buses, Texas ........................................................................ Houston METRO, Park and Rides, Texas ......................................... Hunt County Committee on Aging Transit Vehicles, Texas ............... Laredo Bus Hub and Maintenance Facility, Texas ............................ The Woodlands Capital Cost of Contracting Program, Texas ........... Waco Transit Alternative Fueled Bus Purchase, Texas ..................... Hampton Roads Transit New Maintenance Facilities, Virginia .......... I–66/Vienna Metrorail Accessibility Improvements, Virginia ............... James City County natural gas buses, Virginia ................................. Potomac Yard Transit Way, Virginia .................................................. Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont. Vermont Statewide buses and bus facilities ....................................... Ben Franklin Transit Facility Improvements, Washington .................. Community Transit Bus and Van Replacement, Washington ............ Edmonds Crossing Mulitmodal Transportation Project, Washington Grant Transit Authority vehicle replacement, Washington ................. Jefferson Transit operations/maintenance facility, Washington ......... King County Metro, King County Airfield Transfer Area, Washington Pierce Transit Base expansion, Washington ...................................... Port Angeles International Gateway Center, Washington .................. Jefferson Transit (Washington Small Bus System Program of Projects, Washington). Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations ....................................................................................................................... FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations: AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–000 ......... .................... Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal bus/parking facility ........... AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–001 ......... 427 Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal parking facility .................. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 777,422 971,779 971,779 529,163 1,457,667 201,158 4,858,891 2,300,771 e 1,943,557 485,888 485,888 81,028 5,404,669 1,384,784 766,724 485,888 971,779 116,614 585,013 213,792 97,177 1,943,557 1,457,667 1,846,378 1,943,557 858,714 2,915,334 728,834 3,714,644 485,888 317,061 1,259,424 405,411 675,686 388,711 691,008 3,109,690 1 4,581,945 971,779 1,943,557 437,301 3,887,113 2,186,501 583,067 815,334 777,422 ab 1,943,557 700,481 1,020,367 971,779 337,843 777,422 202,706 1,443,557 971,779 f 971,779 728,834 $249,592,772 742,500 1,138,500 13934 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID E–2006–BUSP–002 ......... E–2006–BUSP–003 ......... 466 422 AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–004 ......... 425 AK AK AK AK AK AK AK ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–005 E–2006–BUSP–006 E–2006–BUSP–007 E–2006–BUSP–008 E–2006–BUSP–009 E–2006–BUSP–010 E–2006–BUSP–011 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 541 416 236 550 553 574 423 AK ..... AK ..... AK ..... AK ..... AK ..... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–012 E–2006–BUSP–013 E–2006–BUSP–014 E–2006–BUSP–015 E–2006–BUSP–016 E–2006–BUSP–018 E–2006–BUSP–019 E–2006–BUSP–020 E–2006–BUSP–021 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 596 597 616 .................... 664 461 .................... 462 437 AL ...... AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–329 ......... E–2006–BUSP–022 ......... 469 98 AL ...... E–2006–BUSP–023 ......... 496 AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AL ...... AR ..... AR ..... AR ..... AZ ..... AZ ..... AZ ..... E–2006–BUSP–024 E–2006–BUSP–026 E–2006–BUSP–027 E–2006–BUSP–028 E–2006–BUSP–029 E–2006–BUSP–030 E–2006–BUSP–032 E–2006–BUSP–033 E–2006–BUSP–034 E–2006–BUSP–036 E–2006–BUSP–037 E–2006–BUSP–038 E–2006–BUSP–039 E–2006–BUSP–040 E–2006–BUSP–041 E–2006–BUSP–042 E–2006–BUSP–044 E–2006–BUSP–045 E–2006–BUSP–047 E–2006–BUSP–048 E–2006–BUSP–049 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 501 504 507 .................... .................... 528 .................... 582 .................... .................... 644 645 646 647 650 487 231 .................... .................... 304 229 AZ ..... AZ ..... AZ ..... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AK ..... AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–050 ......... E–2006–BUSP–051 ......... E–2006–BUSP–052 ......... .................... .................... 47 AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ CA CA CA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–053 ......... E–2006–BUSP–054 ......... E–2006–BUSP–055 ......... E–2006–BUSP–056 ......... E–2006–BUSP–057 ......... E–2006–BUSP–1113 ....... E–2006–BUSP–059 ......... E–2006–BUSP–060 ......... E–2006–BUSP–061 ......... E–2006–BUSP–062 ......... E–2006–BUSP–065 ......... E–2006–BUSP–066 ......... 346 150 .................... .................... 26 .................... 203 .................... .................... .................... 398 76 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–067 ......... 227 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–068 ......... .................... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Anchorage-Transit Needs ................................................................... C Street Expanded bus facility and inter-modal parking garage, Anchorage, AK. CITC Non-profit Services Center inter-modal parking facility, Anchorage, AK. Hoonah, AK-Intermodal Ferry Dock ................................................... Improve marine inter-modal facilities in Ketchikan ............................. Juneau, Alaska-transit bus acquisition and transit center .................. Juneau-Transit Bus Acquisition and Transit Center ........................... Ketchikan, Alaska-Transit Needs ........................................................ Matsu, Alaska-Transit Needs .............................................................. Morris Thompson Cultural and Visitors Center intermodal parking facility, Fairbanks, AK. North Slope Borough, AK-Transit Purposes ....................................... North Star Borough, AK-Transit Purposes ......................................... Sitka, Alaska-Transit Needs ............................................................... Skagway Intermodal facility, Alaska ................................................... Wrangell, AK-Ferry Infrastructure ....................................................... Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind-Bus project .............................. Alabama State Docks Choctaw Point Terminal ................................. Alabama State Port Authority-Choctaw Point Terminal ..................... American Village/Montevallo, Alabama construction of closed loop Access Road, bus lanes and parking facility. Auburn University-Intermodal Parking Garage ................................... Birmingham, AL Expansion of Downtown Intermodal Facility, Phase II. City of Birmingham, AL-Birmingham Downtown Intermodal Terminal, Phase II. City of Huntsville, AL-Cummings Park Intermodal Center ................. City of Montgomery, AL-Montgomery Airport Intermodal Center ....... City of Tuscaloosa, AL-Intermodal Facility ......................................... Family Connection of Shelby County Trans Project, AL .................... Gadsden State Community College Transit Project, AL .................... Gadsden, AL-Community Buses ........................................................ Lawson State Community College, Alabama ..................................... Mobile County, AL Commission-Bus project ...................................... Mobile Waterfront Infrastructure Development, AL ............................ Trolley Plaza, AL ................................................................................. University of Alabama in Birmingham Intermodal Facility .................. University of Alabama in Huntsville Intermodal Facility ..................... University of Alabama Intermodal Facility South ................................ University of Alabama Transit System ............................................... US Space and Rocket Center, AL-Tramway Expansion .................... Central Arkansas Transit Authority Facility Upgrades ........................ Harrison, Arkansas-Trolley Barn ......................................................... State of Arkansas-Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................... Coconino County Bus Facilities, AZ ................................................... Coconino County buses and bus facilities for Flagstaff, AZ .............. Coconino County, Arizona-Bus and bus facilities for the Sedona Transit System. East Valley Bus Maintenance Facility, AZ .......................................... Intermodal Center, Scottsdale, AZ ..................................................... Phoenix, AZ Construct City of Phoenix para-transit facility (Dial-ARide). Phoenix, AZ Construct metro bus facility in Phoenix’s West Valley .. Phoenix, AZ Construct regional heavy bus maintenance facility ....... Phoenix/Avondale/Glendale Bus Expansion, Arizona ........................ Phoenix/Glendale West Valley Operating Facility, Arizona ................ Scottsdale, Arizona-Plan, design, and construct intermodal center ... Bio-diesel vehicles in Tucson, AZ ...................................................... Tempe, Arizona-Construct East Valley Metro Bus Facility ................ Tucson SunTran Alternative Fuel Bus Replacement, AZ .................. Tucson SunTran Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility, AZ ............ ADA Paratransit Vehicles, San Diego, CA ......................................... Amador County, California-Regional Transit Center .......................... Baldwin Park, CA Construct vehicle and bicycle parking lot and pedestrian rest area at transit center. Berkeley, CA Construct Ed Roberts Campus Intermodal Transit Disability Center. Blue Line Trolley Shelter Improvements, CA ..................................... Frm 00064 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 226,710 1,138,500 683,100 453,420 3,187,800 341,550 340,560 56,430 113,850 569,250 453,420 226,710 56,430 425,793 226,710 113,850 2,138,400 4,536,180 76,143 906,840 380,714 1,133,550 1,133,550 906,840 h 1,360,260 49,500 594,000 113,850 445,500 113,850 594,000 123,750 1,587,960 1,360,260 2,041,380 340,560 226,710 445,500 7,614 3,960,000 990,000 237,947 180,839 990,000 801,900 190,357 951,786 190,357 1,485,000 990,000 475,893 i 1,980,000 1,237,322 1,485,000 4,950,000 495,000 190,357 380,714 571,072 346,500 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13935 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued Earmark ID SAFETEA– LU Project No. CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–069 ......... E–2006–BUSP–070 ......... .................... 119 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–071 ......... 396 CA CA CA CA CA CA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–072 E–2006–BUSP–073 E–2006–BUSP–074 E–2006–BUSP–075 E–2006–BUSP–076 E–2006–BUSP–077 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 190 132 407 108 54 155 CA CA CA CA ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–078 E–2006–BUSP–079 E–2006–BUSP–080 E–2006–BUSP–081 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... 158 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–082 ......... 207 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–083 ......... 17 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–084 ......... 11 CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–087 ......... E–2006–BUSP–088 ......... E–2006–BUSP–089 ......... .................... .................... 101 CA CA CA CA E–2006–BUSP–091 E–2006–BUSP–092 E–2006–BUSP–093 E–2006–BUSP–094 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 387 260 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–095 ......... E–2006–BUSP–096 ......... 212 1 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–097 ......... E–2006–BUSP–098 ......... .................... .................... CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–099 ......... E–2006–BUSP–1107 ....... 414 .................... CA CA CA CA E–2006–BUSP–101 E–2006–BUSP–103 E–2006–BUSP–104 E–2006–BUSP–105 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... .................... CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–106 ......... E–2006–BUSP–107 ......... .................... 276 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–108 ......... E–2006–BUSP–109 ......... 332 295 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–110 ......... E–2006–BUSP–111 ......... 410 443 CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–112 ......... E–2006–BUSP–113 ......... E–2006–BUSP–114 ......... .................... 140 223 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–115 ......... 307 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–116 ......... 121 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–118 ......... 36 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Burbank Airport Hybrid Shuttle Demonstration Project, CA ............... Burbank, CA CNG Transit Vehicles Purchase for Local Transit Network Expansion. Burbank, CA Construction of Empire Area Transit Center near Burbank Airport. Calexico, CA Purchase new buses for the Calexico Transit System Carson, CA Purchase one bus ........................................................... Carson, CA Purchase one trolley-bus vehicle .................................... Carson, CA Purchase two transfer facility .......................................... City of Alameda, CA Plan, design, and construct intermodal facility City of Livermore, CA Construct Bus Facility for Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority. City of Modesto’s Bus Maintenance Facility, CA ............................... Construct bus shelters in Bellflower, CA ............................................ Corona Transit Center, CA ................................................................. Covina, El Monte, Baldwin Park, Upland, CA Parking and Electronic Signage Improvements. Culver City, CA Purchase compressed natural gas buses and expand natural gas fueling facility. Davis, CA Davis Multi-Modal Station to improve entrance to Amtrak Depot and parking lot, provide additional parking and improve service. Development of Gold Country Stage Transit Transfer Center, Nevada County, CA. Ed Roberts Campus, Berkeley, CA .................................................... El Garces Intermodal Station, Needles, CA ....................................... Emeryville, CA Expand & Improve Inter-modal Transit Center at Amtrak Station. Fairfield/Vacaville Intermodal Station, CA .......................................... Foothill Transit, San Gabriel Valley, CA ............................................. Fresno, CA-Develop program of low-emission transit vehicles ......... Gardena, CA Purchase of alternative fuel buses for service expansion, on-board security system and bus facility training equipment. Glendale, CA Construction of Downtown Streetcar Project ............... Glendale, CA Purchase of CNG Buses for Glendale Beeline Transit System. Golden Empire Transit traffic signal priority project, CA .................... Greater Sacramento Regional Bus Replacement/Bus Facility Expansion, CA. Hercules, CA Inter-modal Rail Station Improvements ........................ Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery Science Center, Santa Ana, CA. Intermodal Transit Center, Bell Gardens, CA ..................................... La Habra Shuttle Senior Transportation Program, CA ....................... Lakewood Bus Stop Improvements, Lakewood, California ................ Livermoore Amador Valley Satellite Maintenance and Operations Facility, California. Long Beach Transit Bus Purchase, California ................................... Long Beach, Ca Museum of Latin American Art, Long Beach, to build intermodal park and ride facility. Long Beach, CA Park and Ride Facility ............................................. Long Beach, CA Purchase one larger (75. passengers) and two smaller (40 passengers) ferryboats and construct related dock work to facilitate the use and accessibility of the ferryboats. Long Beach, CA Purchase ten clean fuel buses ............................... Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, CA capital funds for facility improvements to support the Cal State Northridge tram system. Los Angeles Valley College Bus Station Extension, California .......... Los Angeles, CA Crenshaw Bus Rapid Transit ................................. Los Angeles, CA Design and construct improved transit and pedestrian linkages between Los Angeles Community College and nearby MTA rail stop and bus lines. Los Angeles, CA Improve safety, mobility and access between LATTC, Metro line and nearby bus stops on Grand Ave between Washington and 23rd. Los Angeles, CA Improve transit shelters, sidewalks lighting and landscaping around Cedar’s-Sinai Medical Center. Los Angeles, CA Wilshire-Vermont subway station reconstruction ... Frm 00065 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 495,000 85,661 47,589 57,107 47,589 47,589 95,179 380,714 428,304 495,000 247,500 495,000 333,125 704,322 190,357 177,093 297,000 1,980,000 190,357 495,000 3,267,000 190,357 1,166,889 190,357 87,945 247,500 990,000 285,536 j 297,000 396,000 155,430 396,000 990,000 742,500 380,714 190,357 571,072 571,072 61,866 742,500 1,623,366 285,536 95,179 285,536 190,357 13936 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID E–2006–BUSP–119 ......... 6 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–120 ......... E–2006–BUSP–121 ......... 567 566 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–122 ......... E–2006–BUSP–123 ......... 311 112 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–124 ......... E–2006–BUSP–125 ......... 266 285 CA CA CA CA CA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–126 E–2006–BUSP–127 E–2006–BUSP–128 E–2006–BUSP–130 E–2006–BUSP–131 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 39 .................... 200 321 191 CA CA CA CA CA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–132 E–2006–BUSP–133 E–2006–BUSP–134 E–2006–BUSP–135 E–2006–BUSP–136 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 375 43 .................... 92 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–137 ......... 392 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–138 ......... 352 CA ..... CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–139 ......... E–2006–BUSP–142 ......... E–2006–BUSP–143 ......... .................... 173 194 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–144 ......... E–2006–BUSP–145 ......... 244 366 CA CA CA CA ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–146 E–2006–BUSP–147 E–2006–BUSP–148 E–2006–BUSP–149 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 45 70 CA CA CA CA ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–150 E–2006–BUSP–151 E–2006–BUSP–395 E–2006–BUSP–152 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 399 .................... 116 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–153 ......... E–2006–BUSP–154 ......... .................... 251 CA CA CA CA CA E–2006–BUSP–155 E–2006–BUSP–156 E–2006–BUSP–157 E–2006–BUSP–158 E–2006–BUSP–159 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 286 .................... 171 .................... 189 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–160 ......... 84 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–162 ......... 253 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–164 ......... 282 CA ..... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–165 ......... 314 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–166 ......... E–2006–BUSP–167 ......... 183 127 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–173 ......... E–2006–BUSP–174 ......... 341 254 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Los Angeles, CA, Construction of Intermodal Transit Center at California State University Los Angeles. Los Angeles, CA, Fly-Away Bus System Expansion ......................... Los Angeles, CA, LAX Intermodal Transportation Center Rail and Bus System Expansion. Mammoth Lakes, California-Regional Transit Maintenance Facility .. Mariposa, CA-Yosemite National Park CNG-Hydrogen transit buses and facilities. Martinez, CA Inter-modal Facility Restoration .................................... Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Light Rail Transit Project from Pasadena, CA to Montclair, CA. Monrovia, California-Transit Village Project ....................................... Monrovia, Los Angeles County, CA, Transit Village .......................... Montebello, CA Bus Lines Bus Fleet Replacement Project ............... Monterey Park, CA Catch Basins at Transit Stop Installation ........... Monterey Park, CA Safety improvements at a bus stop including creation of bus loading areas and street improvements. Monterey Salinas Transit, Monterey, California ................................. Monterey, CA Purchase bus equipment ............................................. Needles, California-El Garces Intermodal Facility .............................. New Bus Facility Capital Improvements, California (San Joaquin) .... Norwalk, CA Transit System Bus Procurement and Los Angeles World Airport Remote Fly-Away Facility Project. Oakland, CA Construct Bay Trail between Coliseum BART station and Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline. Oakland, CA Construct streetscape & intermodal improvements at BART Station Transit Villages. OCTA BRT .......................................................................................... Ontario, CA Construct Omnitrans Transcenter .................................. Orange County Transit Authority, California-Security surveillance and monitoring equipment. Orange County, CA Purchase buses for rapid transit ........................ Orange County, CA Transportation Projects to Encourage Use of Transit to Reduce Congestion. Pacific Station Multimodal Facility, Santa Cruz, California ................ Palm Springs Aerial Tramway Bus Project, CA ................................. Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit bus purchase ..................... Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit: CalStrat-Weststart fuel cell bus program. Paramount Easy Rider Clean-Air Buses, Paramount, California ....... Pasadena, CA ITS Improvements ...................................................... Placerville Station II ............................................................................ Pleasant Hill, CA Construct Diablo Valley College Bus Transit Center. Redondo Beach Coastal Shuttle Transit Vehicles, California ............ Redondo Beach, CA Capital Equipment procurement of 12. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Transit Vehicles for Coastal Shuttle Services by Beach Cities Transit. Richmond, CA BART Parking Structure ............................................. Riverside Transit Center, CA .............................................................. Riverside, California-RTA Advanced Traveler Information System ... Rosemary Children’s Services’ Transportation Program, California .. Sacramento, CA Bus enhancement and improvements-construct maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve transit service. Sacramento, CA Construct intermodal station and related improvements. San Bernardino, CA Implement Santa Fe Depot improvements in San Bernardino. San Diego, CA Completion of San Diego Joint Transportation Operations Center (JTOC). San Diego, CA Widen sidewalks and bus stop entrance, and provide diagonal parking, in the Skyline Paradise Hills neighborhood (Reo Drive). San Fernando Valley, CA Reseda Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Route ... San Fernando, CA Purchase CNG buses and related equipment and construct facilities. San Gabriel Valley, CA-Foothill Transit Park and Rides .................... San Joaquin, California Regional Rail-Altamont Commuter Express Corridor inter-modal centers. Frm 00066 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 150,382 495,000 495,000 95,179 475,893 285,536 2,855,358 571,072 1,485,000 133,250 60,915 304,572 396,000 190,357 380,714 990,000 152,286 171,321 190,357 1,485,000 190,654 1,006,989 190,357 190,357 396,000 594,000 95,179 190,357 198,000 190,357 k 990,000 285,536 693,000 152,286 951,786 742,500 95,179 74,250 380,714 1,332,500 95,179 380,714 57,107 114,214 578,686 1,808,393 761,429 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13937 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State CA CA CA CA SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID ..... ..... ..... ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... 382 .................... 145 147 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–180 ......... 364 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–181 ......... 172 CA CA CA CA CA E–2006–BUSP–182 E–2006–BUSP–183 E–2006–BUSP–186 E–2006–BUSP–187 E–2006–BUSP–188 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–175 E–2006–BUSP–176 E–2006–BUSP–177 E–2006–BUSP–178 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 27 401 383 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–189 ......... E–2006–BUSP–190 ......... .................... 388 CA ..... CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–191 ......... E–2006–BUSP–192 ......... 315 85 CA CA CA CA E–2006–BUSP–193 E–2006–BUSP–195 E–2006–BUSP–197 E–2006–BUSP–200 ..... ..... ..... ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 35 .................... 195 CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–201 ......... 83 CA CA CA CO CO CO E–2006–BUSP–202 E–2006–BUSP–203 E–2006–BUSP–204 E–2006–BUSP–206 E–2006–BUSP–207 E–2006–BUSP–208 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... 449 448 509 CO ..... CO ..... E–2006–BUSP–210 ......... E–2006–BUSP–211 ......... 518 520 CO CO CO CO CO CT CT E–2006–BUSP–212 E–2006–BUSP–213 E–2006–BUSP–216 E–2006–BUSP–218 E–2006–BUSP–220 E–2006–BUSP–222 E–2006–BUSP–223 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 521 167 188 445 450 .................... 44 CT ..... CT ..... CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–224 ......... E–2006–BUSP–225 ......... E–2006–BUSP–226 ......... 478 90 523 CT CT CT CT CT E–2006–BUSP–227 E–2006–BUSP–229 E–2006–BUSP–230 E–2006–BUSP–231 E–2006–BUSP–232 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 218 .................... 267 589 269 CT ..... CT ..... CT ..... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–233 ......... E–2006–BUSP–234 ......... E–2006–BUSP–235 ......... .................... .................... 369 CT ..... CT ..... CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–236 ......... E–2006–BUSP–237 ......... E–2006–BUSP–238 ......... .................... .................... 131 CT ..... E–2006–BUSP–239 ......... 32 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project San Luis Ray, California-Transit Center Project ................................ San Luis Rey Transit Center .............................................................. Santa Ana, CA Improve Santa Ana transit terminal ........................... Santa Barbara, CA-Expansion of Regional Intermodal Transit Center. Santa Monica, CA Construct intermodal park-and-ride facility at Santa Monica College campus on South Bundy Drive near Airport Avenue. Santa Monica, CA Purchase and service LNG buses for Santa Monica’s Big Blue Bus to meet increased ridership needs and reduce emissions. Shuttle bus to transport seniors in Bell Gardens, California .............. Simi Valley Public Transit Radio Communications, CA ..................... Sonoma County, CA Purchase of CNG buses .................................. South Pasadena, CA Silent Night Grade Crossing Project ............... South San Francisco, CA Construction of Ferry Terminal at Oyster Point in South San Francisco to the San Francisco Bay Water Transit Authority. Spencer Avenue Bus Transfer Center, Oroville, CA .......................... Sylmar, CA Los Angeles Mission College Transit Center construction. Temecula, California-Intermodal Transit Facility ................................ Torrance Transit System, CA Acquisition of EPA and CARB-certified low emission replacement buses. Torrance Transit System, California ................................................... Union City, CA Inter-modal Station, Phase 1: Modify BART station Victor Valley Trans Operation/Maintenance Facility ........................... Woodland Hills, CA Los Angeles Pierce College Bus Rapid Transit Station Extension. Woodland, CA Yolobus operations, maintenance, administration facility expansion and improvements to increase bus service with alternative fuel buses. Yorba Linda Senior Mobility Program—TRAILS ................................ Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System ............................... Zero Emission Bus Demonstration, Santa Clara, California .............. City of Aspen, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................... City of Durango, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ...................................... Colorado Association of Transit Agencies/Colorado Transit Coalition-Colorado Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities. Denver Regional Transit District-Bus Maintenance Facility ............... Denver Regional Transit District-Denver Union Station Multimodal Renovations. Denver Regional Transit District-US 36 Corridor BRT ....................... Denver, CO Denver Union Station Inter-modal Center ...................... Mountain Express, Crested Butte, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .......... Roaring Fork Transit Authority, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ............... Town of Snowmass Village, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .................... Bridgeport Intermodal Transport Center, CT ...................................... Bridgeport, Connecticut-Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority Bus Facility. Bridgeport, CT Facility Expansion/Improvement ................................ Buses and bus related facilities throughout the State of Connecticut Downtown Middletown, CT, Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Project. Enfield, Connecticut-intermodal station .............................................. Inter-Modal Center, Middletown, CT ................................................... Middletown, CT Construct intermodal center ..................................... New Haven, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ......................................... New London, Connecticut-Intermodal Transportation Center and Streetscapes. Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit Facility ............................. Norwalk Pulse Point Joint Improvements, CT .................................... Norwalk, Connecticut-Pulse Point Joint Development inter-modal facility. South Norwalk Intermodal Facility, Norwalk, CT ................................ Stamford Urban Transitway Phase II, CT .......................................... Stonington and Mystic, Connecticut-Intermodal Center parking facility and Streetscape. Torrington, CT Construct bus-related facility (Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit District). Frm 00067 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 95,179 495,000 190,357 57,107 190,357 713,840 99,000 247,500 95,179 171,321 904,197 346,500 47,589 95,179 571,072 396,000 809,018 742,500 190,357 380,714 40,590 247,500 396,000 133,250 47,589 4,029,135 680,130 453,420 1,587,960 1,046,965 95,179 142,768 57,107 3,960,000 95,179 346,500 1,142,143 1,980,000 571,072 297,000 285,536 1,980,000 95,179 297,000 247,500 95,179 990,000 2,970,000 464,471 380,714 13938 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID E–2006–BUSP–240 E–2006–BUSP–241 E–2006–BUSP–242 E–2006–BUSP–243 E–2006–BUSP–245 E–2006–BUSP–247 E–2006–BUSP–248 E–2006–BUSP–249 E–2006–BUSP–250 E–2006–BUSP–251 E–2006–BUSP–252 E–2006–BUSP–253 E–2006–BUSP–254 E–2006–BUSP–255 E–2006–BUSP–256 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 270 657 .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 470 .................... .................... 297 69 479 117 FL FL FL FL E–2006–BUSP–257 E–2006–BUSP–258 E–2006–BUSP–262 E–2006–BUSP–263 ......... ......... ......... ......... 439 453 508 23 FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–264 ......... E–2006–BUSP–265 ......... E–2006–BUSP–266 ......... .................... 80 527 FL ...... FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–267 ......... E–2006–BUSP–270 ......... 344 538 FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–271 E–2006–BUSP–272 E–2006–BUSP–273 E–2006–BUSP–274 E–2006–BUSP–279 E–2006–BUSP–280 E–2006–BUSP–281 E–2006–BUSP–282 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 539 .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 558 FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–284 E–2006–BUSP–285 E–2006–BUSP–286 E–2006–BUSP–287 E–2006–BUSP–288 E–2006–BUSP–289 E–2006–BUSP–290 E–2006–BUSP–291 E–2006–BUSP–293 E–2006–BUSP–296 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 103 308 211 432 133 580 454 .................... 136 125 FL ...... FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–297 ......... E–2006–BUSP–298 ......... 367 248 FL ...... FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–299 ......... E–2006–BUSP–303 ......... .................... 600 FL FL FL FL E–2006–BUSP–304 E–2006–BUSP–305 E–2006–BUSP–307 E–2006–BUSP–309 ......... ......... ......... ......... 415 420 .................... 623 FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES CT ..... CT ..... DC ..... DC ..... DE ..... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... FL ...... E–2006–BUSP–311 ......... E–2006–BUSP–312 ......... E–2006–BUSP–313 ......... .................... .................... 31 FL FL FL FL FL FL E–2006–BUSP–314 E–2006–BUSP–317 E–2006–BUSP–318 E–2006–BUSP–319 E–2006–BUSP–320 E–2006–BUSP–321 390 402 148 .................... .................... .................... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Vernon, Connecticut-Intermodal Center, Parking and Streetscapes Waterbury, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ........................................... Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center, Washington, D.C .. WMATA Bus Purchase ....................................................................... Bus Replacement and Facilities, DE .................................................. 2nd St/Andrews Ave/3rd St Enhancements, Fort Lauderdale, FL ..... 7th Avenue Transit Hub, FL ............................................................... Alternative fuel buses, Broward County, FL ....................................... Bay County, FL-Transit Facility .......................................................... Broward County Alternative Fuel Buses, FL ...................................... Broward County Southwest Bus Facility, FL ...................................... Broward County, FL-Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities .... Broward County, FL Buses & Bus Facilities ...................................... Broward County-Bus and Bus Facilities ............................................. Broward, FL Purchase new articulated buses and bus stop improvements on State Road 7. (SR 7) between Golden Glades Interchange and Glades Road. Central Florida Commuter Rail intermodal facilities ........................... Central Florida Commuter Rail Intermodal facilities ........................... Collier County Transit-Transit Facility ................................................. Construct intermodal transportation & parking facility, City of Winter Park, Florida. Flagler County Buses and Bus Facilities, FL ..................................... Flagler County, Florida-bus facility ..................................................... Florida Department of Transportation-Palm Beach County Replacement Buses. Gainesville, FL Bus Facility Expansion .............................................. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit-Bus Rapid Transit Improvements. Hillsborough, FL, Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority ........ Homestead East-West Bus Connector, FL ........................................ Intermodal Terminal Center, Jacksonville, FL .................................... Jacksonville Transportation Authority Bus and Bus Facilities, FL ..... JARC Hartline, Hillsborough County, FL ............................................ Key West Buses and Bus Facilities, FL ............................................. Lakeland Area Citrus Connection Transit Systems ............................ Lakeland Area Mass Transit District/Citrus Connection-Capital Funding Needs. Longwood, Florida-Construct Intermodal Transportation Facility ....... Miami Dade, FL N.W. 7th Avenue Transit Hub .................................. Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ........................ Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ........................ Miami-Dade County, Florida-Transit Security System ....................... Miami-Dade Transit 7th Avenue NW Transit Hub .............................. Miami-Dade Transit Dadeland South Intermodal Center ................... Miramar Town Center Transit Hub, Miramar, Florida ........................ Ocala and Marion County, Florida-replacement buses ...................... Palm Beach County, FL Plan and Construct Belle Glade Combined Passenger Transit Facility. Palm Beach, FL 20 New Buses for Palm Tran .................................. Palm Beach, FL Palm Tran AVL–APC system with smart card fare boxes. Palm Tran, Palm Beach County, FL ................................................... Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization-Pinellas Mobility Initiative: BRT and Guide way. Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL Putnam County, FL Ride Solutions Buses ......................................... South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Beach Intermodal Facility. Space Coast Area Transit Bus Terminal, FL ..................................... St. Johns County, FL Council on Aging Buses .................................. St. Augustine, Florida-Intermodal Transportation Center and related pedestrian and landscape improvements. St. Lucie County, FL Purchase Buses ............................................... Tampa, FL Establish Transit Emphasis Corridor Project ................... Tampa, FL Purchase buses and construct bus facilities ................... Treasure Coast Connector, St. Lucie County, FL .............................. Trolley Shelter, West Palm Beach, Florida ........................................ Trolley System, Boynton Beach, FL ................................................... Frm 00068 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 1,446,715 1,980,000 693,000 1,485,000 990,000 495,000 396,000 990,000 453,420 113,850 990,000 380,714 1,237,322 453,420 95,179 951,786 683,100 226,710 95,179 297,000 114,214 226,710 761,429 453,420 990,000 495,000 990,000 336,600 247,500 495,000 247,500 453,420 95,179 571,072 1,142,143 761,429 569,168 226,710 455,400 495,000 571,072 666,250 285,536 47,589 247,500 226,710 428,304 380,714 742,500 453,420 198,000 495,000 190,357 190,357 142,768 428,304 495,000 247,500 247,500 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13939 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 355 255 357 247 144 .................... .................... .................... 91 510 GA ..... GA ..... E–2006–BUSP–337 ......... E–2006–BUSP–338 ......... 49 530 GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... GA ..... GU ..... HI ...... HI ...... IA ....... IA ....... IA ....... IA ....... IA ....... IA ....... ID ...... ID ...... ID ...... ID ...... ID ...... IL ....... IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–339 E–2006–BUSP–340 E–2006–BUSP–341 E–2006–BUSP–346 E–2006–BUSP–347 E–2006–BUSP–348 E–2006–BUSP–349 E–2006–BUSP–350 E–2006–BUSP–352 E–2006–BUSP–353 E–2006–BUSP–354 E–2006–BUSP–355 E–2006–BUSP–356 E–2006–BUSP–358 E–2006–BUSP–360 E–2006–BUSP–361 E–2006–BUSP–365 E–2006–BUSP–367 E–2006–BUSP–368 E–2006–BUSP–369 E–2006–BUSP–371 E–2006–BUSP–372 E–2006–BUSP–373 E–2006–BUSP–374 E–2006–BUSP–378 E–2006–BUSP–379 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 60 275 406 .................... 329 256 348 206 298 .................... .................... 540 .................... 475 .................... .................... .................... .................... 176 .................... .................... .................... 652 433 226 IL ....... IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–382 ......... E–2006–BUSP–383 ......... 491 358 IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–384 ......... 4 IL ....... E–2006–BUSP–385 ......... 296 IL IL IL IL IL IL IL sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES GA GA GA GA GA GA GA GA GA GA SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... E–2006–BUSP–386 E–2006–BUSP–387 E–2006–BUSP–388 E–2006–BUSP–129 E–2006–BUSP–389 E–2006–BUSP–390 E–2006–BUSP–391 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 114 .................... 291 186 250 429 163 IL ....... IL ....... IL ....... IL ....... IL ....... IL ....... IL ....... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–392 E–2006–BUSP–393 E–2006–BUSP–394 E–2006–BUSP–398 E–2006–BUSP–399 E–2006–BUSP–400 E–2006–BUSP–402 E–2006–BUSP–403 E–2006–BUSP–404 E–2006–BUSP–405 E–2006–BUSP–408 E–2006–BUSP–409 E–2006–BUSP–410 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 365 632 259 .................... 135 .................... 109 .................... .................... .................... 529 VerDate Aug<31>2005 E–2006–BUSP–324 E–2006–BUSP–325 E–2006–BUSP–326 E–2006–BUSP–327 E–2006–BUSP–330 E–2006–BUSP–331 E–2006–BUSP–332 E–2006–BUSP–333 E–2006–BUSP–335 E–2006–BUSP–336 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Albany, GA Bus replacement ............................................................. Albany, GA Multimodal Facility ........................................................... Athens, GA Buses and Bus Facilities ................................................. Atlanta, GA Inter-modal Passenger Facility Improvements ............... Augusta, GA Buses and Bus Facilities ............................................... Buses and Bus Facilities, GA ............................................................. Chatham Area Transit Authority bus and facility, GA ........................ City of Moultrie, Georgia, Intermodal Facility ..................................... Columbus, GA Bus replacement ........................................................ Columbus, Georgia/Phoenix City, Alabama-National Infantry Museum Multimodal Facility. Columbus, Georgia-Buses & Bus Facilities ........................................ Georgia Department of Transportation-Georgia Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities. Georgia GRTA Xpress Implementation Buses ................................... Georgia Statewide Bus Program ........................................................ Jesup, Georgia-Train Depot intermodal center .................................. Moultrie, GA Inter-modal facility ......................................................... Purchase Transit Buses for Macon Transit Authority, Georgia .......... Quitman, Clay, Randolph, Stewart Co., GA Bus project .................... Savannah, GA Bus and Bus Facilities-Chatham Area Transit ........... Savannah, Georgia-Water Ferry River walk intermodal facilities ....... Sylvester, GA Inter-modal Facility ...................................................... Thomasville, GA Bus Replacement .................................................... MTA transit vehicles for disabled persons, Guam ............................. Honolulu Bus and Bus Facilities, HI ................................................... Honolulu, HI, Bus Facilities ................................................................. 10 new fixed-route buses, Cedar Rapids, IA ..................................... Black Hawk County, IA UNI Multimodal Project ................................. City of Coralville Intermodal Facility, IA .............................................. Johnson County SEATS Para-Transit Facility Program, IA ............... UNI Multimodal Project, Cedar Falls, Iowa ........................................ University of Northern Iowa Multi ....................................................... Boise, ID-Multimodal facility ................................................................ Idaho Statewide ITS ........................................................................... Idaho Transit Coalition Bus Capital Investment ................................. Idaho Transit Coalition Buses and Bus Facilities ............................... Valley Regional Transit, ID-Downtown Boise Multimodal .................. Centralia, Illinois-South Central Mass Transit District Improvements Champaign, IL-Construct park and ride lot with attached daycare facility. Chicago, IL, Cermak Road, Bus Rapid Transit .................................. Cicero, Chicago Establish Transit Signal Priority, Cicero Ave., Pace Suburban Bus. Des Plaines, Wauconda, Cook and Lake Counties, IL Rand Road Transit Signal Priority. Elgin to Rockford, Illinois-Intermodal stations along planned Metra Union Pacific West Line extension alignment, including necessary alternatives analysis. Geneva, Illinois-Construct commuter parking deck for Metra Service IL Statewide buses and facilities ........................................................ Joliet, Illinois-Union Station commuter parking facility ....................... Mattoon, Illinois-historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center Maywood, IL Purchase buses ............................................................ Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center ............................. Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center, including facilities for adjacent public and nonprofit uses. PACE Bus Service to the College of DuPage, Glen Ellyn, IL ............ Pace Suburban Bus Transit Signal Priority, Illinois ............................ Pace Suburban Bus, IL South Suburban BRT Mobility Network ....... Springfield, IL, Multimodal Transit Terminal ....................................... St. Charles, IL-Intermodal Parking Structures .................................... Town of Normal Multimodal Transportation Center, IL ...................... Wheaton, IL Pace Suburban Bus-Purchase buses ............................ Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation, IN ........................... Bloomington, IN-Bus and transfer facility ........................................... Bloomington, Indiana University Campus Bus System, IN ................ City of Anderson Intermodal Center Project, IN ................................. Fort Wayne Citilink, IN ........................................................................ Gary, Indiana, Gary Airport Station Modernization and Shuttle Service Project. Frm 00069 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 57,107 152,286 270,308 380,714 76,143 495,000 495,000 495,000 57,107 385,110 184,456 2,041,380 l 2,227,500 38,071 190,357 57,107 495,000 47,589 951,786 380,714 38,071 38,071 297,000 2,800,000 1,336,500 148,500 680,130 569,250 99,000 1,559,250 247,500 456,607 99,000 2,128,500 742,500 1,315,710 76,143 285,536 198,000 190,357 152,286 95,179 761,429 7,920,000 547,277 m 304,572 9,518 380,714 951,786 198,000 495,000 95,179 792,000 856,607 1,980,000 190,357 272,382 915,618 594,000 123,750 123,750 346,500 13940 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID E–2006–BUSP–411 ......... E–2006–BUSP–412 ......... 544 235 IN ...... IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–413 ......... E–2006–BUSP–414 ......... 5 220 IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–415 ......... 378 IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... IN ...... KS ..... E–2006–BUSP–416 E–2006–BUSP–417 E–2006–BUSP–418 E–2006–BUSP–419 E–2006–BUSP–421 E–2006–BUSP–423 E–2006–BUSP–424 E–2006–BUSP–425 E–2006–BUSP–426 E–2006–BUSP–428 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 417 .................... .................... 546 .................... .................... .................... 617 141 53 KS KS KS KS KY ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–429 E–2006–BUSP–432 E–2006–BUSP–433 E–2006–BUSP–434 E–2006–BUSP–435 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... KY ..... KY ..... KY ..... KY ..... KY ..... LA ...... LA ...... LA ...... LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–437 E–2006–BUSP–439 E–2006–BUSP–442 E–2006–BUSP–443 E–2006–BUSP–444 E–2006–BUSP–446 E–2006–BUSP–447 E–2006–BUSP–448 E–2006–BUSP–449 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 372 .................... .................... .................... 484 .................... 72 LA ...... LA ...... LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–450 ......... E–2006–BUSP–451 ......... E–2006–BUSP–452 ......... .................... .................... 555 LA ...... LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–453 ......... E–2006–BUSP–455 ......... .................... 239 LA ...... LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–456 ......... E–2006–BUSP–458 ......... 356 170 LA ...... LA ...... LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–459 ......... E–2006–BUSP–460 ......... E–2006–BUSP–462 ......... .................... 55 243 LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–463 ......... 310 LA ...... E–2006–BUSP–464 ......... 606 LA ...... LA ...... LA ...... LA ...... MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–465 E–2006–BUSP–466 E–2006–BUSP–467 E–2006–BUSP–468 E–2006–BUSP–470 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 277 625 283 118 MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–471 ......... 472 MA ..... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES IN ...... IN ...... E–2006–BUSP–472 ......... 59 MA ..... MA ..... MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–473 ......... E–2006–BUSP–476 ......... E–2006–BUSP–477 ......... 273 .................... 330 MA ..... MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–478 ......... E–2006–BUSP–480 ......... .................... 124 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Indianapolis Downtown Transit Center ............................................... Indianapolis, IN Construct the Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal Facility. Indianapolis, IN Downtown Transit Center ......................................... Indianapolis, IN IndySMART program to relieve congestion, improve safety and air quality. Indianapolis, IN Relocate and improve inter-modal transportation for pedestrian to Children’s Museum of Indianapolis. Indianapolis, Indiana-Children’s Museum Intermodal Center ............. Ivy Tech Multi-Modal Facility, Indianapolis, IN ................................... Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal Facility, IN ................................. Ivy Tech State College, Indiana Multimodal Center ........................... Lake County Bus Systems, IN ............................................................ N. Indiana Mental Health Trans. Partnership ..................................... NIMHTP, Madison Center, South Bend, IN ........................................ South Bend, Indiana, TRANSPO Bus Operations Center ................. South Bend, Indiana-Construct South Bend Bus Operations Center Johnson Co., KS Bus and bus related facilities [I–35. corridor], Johnson Co. Transit. Johnson County Fleet Vehicle Replacement, KS .............................. Kansas Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, KS ................................... Wichita Transit Authority, KS .............................................................. Wyandotte County Unified Government Transit, KS .......................... Foothills Community Action Partnership Foothills Express Transit Expansion Project, KY. Harlan County Transit Center, KY ...................................................... Lincoln County Senior Citizen Bus, Kentucky .................................... Richmond, KY Purchase buses, bus equipment and facilities ........... Southern and Eastern Ky Bus and Bus Facilities .............................. TARC—purchase of 10 hybrid electric buses .................................... Bus Terminal and Support Facility, Lake Charles, LA ....................... Capital Area Transit System-Baton Rouge BRT ................................ Greater Ouachita Port intermodal facility, LA ..................................... Hammond, Louisiana-Passenger Intermodal facility at Southeastern University. Intermodal Facility, Ouachita Parish, LA ............................................ LA Statewide buses and facilities ....................................................... Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, LA-Lafayette Multimodal Transportation Facility. Lafayette Louisiana Multimodal Transportation Facility ..................... Lafayette, Louisiana-Lafayette Transit System bus replacement program. Lafayette, Louisiana-Multimodal center, Final Phase ......................... Louisiana-Construct pedestrian walkways between Caddo St. and Milam St. along Edwards St. in Shreveport, LA. New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal Rehab, Louisiana .............. New Orleans, LA Inter-modal Riverfront Center ................................ New Orleans, LA Regional Planning Commission, bus and bus facilities. River Parishes, LA South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities. River Parishes, Louisiana, South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities. RiverSphere Multimodal Facility, Louisiana ........................................ Shreveport, LA-intermodal Transit Facility ......................................... Southeastern Louisiana University Intermodal Facility ....................... St. Bernard Parish, LA Intermodal facility improvements ................... Attleboro, MA Construction, engineering and site improvements at the Attleboro Intermodal Center. Berkshire, MA, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bus Maintenance Facility. Beverly, MA Design and Construct Beverly Deport Intermodal Transportation Center. Boston, MA Harbor Park Pavilion & Inter-modal Station ................... Construction of Amesbury Bus Facility, MA ....................................... Framingham, MA Local Intra-Framingham Transit System enhancements. Franklin Multimodal Center, MA ......................................................... Haverhill, MA Design and Construct Inter-modal Transit Parking Improvements. Frm 00070 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 792,000 951,786 2,665,001 380,714 2,665,001 190,357 297,000 173,250 148,500 148,500 247,500 495,000 792,000 190,357 380,714 346,500 693,000 792,000 495,000 346,500 495,000 n 54,000 137,058 495,000 495,000 990,000 680,130 396,000 38,071 495,000 3,781,065 226,710 148,500 171,321 571,072 193,327 990,000 95,179 95,179 190,357 158,400 198,000 637,697 297,000 190,357 380,714 49,500 380,714 237,947 1,188,000 342,643 1,485,000 1,066,000 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13941 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID E–2006–BUSP–481 ......... 21 MA ..... MA ..... MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–482 ......... E–2006–BUSP–483 ......... E–2006–BUSP–484 ......... .................... .................... 563 MA ..... MA ..... MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–487 ......... E–2006–BUSP–1108 ....... E–2006–BUSP–490 ......... .................... .................... 42 MA MA MA MA E–2006–BUSP–491 E–2006–BUSP–492 E–2006–BUSP–493 E–2006–BUSP–494 ......... ......... ......... ......... 257 .................... .................... 139 MA ..... MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–495 ......... E–2006–BUSP–496 ......... .................... 161 MA ..... MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–497 ......... E–2006–BUSP–498 ......... 88 370 MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–499 ......... 205 MD .... MD .... E–2006–BUSP–500 ......... E–2006–BUSP–501 ......... 122 499 MD .... E–2006–BUSP–502 ......... 303 MD .... E–2006–BUSP–503 ......... 542 MD MD MD MD .... .... .... .... E–2006–BUSP–504 E–2006–BUSP–505 E–2006–BUSP–506 E–2006–BUSP–507 ......... ......... ......... ......... 571 573 .................... 224 MD MD MD MD .... .... .... .... E–2006–BUSP–508 E–2006–BUSP–509 E–2006–BUSP–510 E–2006–BUSP–511 ......... ......... ......... ......... 214 .................... 615 8 MD .... MD .... ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–512 ......... E–2006–BUSP–513 ......... E–2006–BUSP–514 ......... .................... 629 19 ME ..... ME ..... MI ...... MI ...... MI ...... MI ...... MI ...... E–2006–BUSP–515 ......... E–2006–BUSP–516 ......... E–2006–BUSP–518 ......... E–2006–BUSP–519 ......... E–2006–BUSP–1109 ....... E2006–BUSP–520 ........... E–2006–BUSP–521 ......... 483 .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 301 MI MI MI MI MI MI MI MI MI MI sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES MA ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–524 E–2006–BUSP–525 E–2006–BUSP–527 E–2006–BUSP–528 E–2006–BUSP–529 E–2006–BUSP–530 E–2006–BUSP–531 E–2006–BUSP–532 E–2006–BUSP–540 E–2006–BUSP–541 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 204 .................... 502 .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 208 MI MI MI MI MI ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–543 E–2006–BUSP–546 E–2006–BUSP–547 E–2006–BUSP–548 E–2006–BUSP–549 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 526 .................... .................... .................... 79 E–2006–BUSP–550 ......... .................... ..... ..... ..... ..... MI ...... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Hingham, MA Higham Marine Intermodal Center Improvements: Enhance public transportation infrastructure/parking. Holyoke Multimodal Center, MA ......................................................... Intermodal Station Improvements, Salem and Beverly, MA .............. Lawrence, MA, Gateway Intermodal and Quadant Area Reuse Project. MART Advanced Vehicle Locator System (AVL), Massachusetts ..... MART Maintenance facility expansion, Worcester County, MA ......... Medford, MA Downtown revitalization featuring construction of a 200 space Park and Ride Facility. Newburyport, MA Design and Construct Intermodal Facility ............. North Leomister Parking Improvements, Massachusetts ................... Public Transit for STCC College Students, Massachusetts ............... Quincy, MA MBTA Purchase high speed catamaran ferry for Quincy Harbor Express Service. Rapid Transit Handicap Accessibility, Newton, Massachusetts ......... Revere, MA Inter-modal transit improvements in the Wonderland station (MBTA) area. Rockport, MA Rockport Commuter Rail Station Improvements ......... Salem, MA Design and Construct Salem Intermodal Transportation Center. Woburn, MA Construction of an 89 space park and ride facility to be located on Magazine Hill, in the Heart of Woburn Square. Baltimore, MD Construct Intercity Bus Intermodal Terminal .............. City of Gaithersburg, Maryland-Bus and paratransit vehicle for seniors. Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations and Maintenance Facility. Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations and Maintenance Facility. MARC Intermodal Odenton and Edgewood Station Improvements ... Maryland Statewide Bus Facilities and Buses ................................... Maryland Statewide Bus Program ...................................................... Montgomery County, MD Wheaton CBD Intermodal Access Program. Mount Rainier, MD Intermodal and Pedestrian Project ...................... Silver Spring Transit Center, Maryland .............................................. Silver Spring, Maryland, Transit Center ............................................. Silver Spring, MD Construct Silver Spring Transit Center in downtown Silver Spring. Southern Maryland Commuter Bus Initiative ...................................... Southern Maryland Commuter Initiative ............................................. Bar Harbor, ME Purchase new buses to enhance commuting near the Jackson Labs. Campobello Park, ME, Bus Acquisition .............................................. Intermodal Facility, Augusta, ME ........................................................ 1st District Bus Replacement and Facilities, MI ................................. Allegan County Transportation Services, MI ...................................... The Rapid ........................................................................................... Automation Alley/BUSolutions, MI ...................................................... Barry County, MI-Barry County Transit equipments and dispatching software. Berrien County Public Transportation, MI .......................................... Boysville of Michigan Transportation System ..................................... Cass County Transit, MI ..................................................................... City of Kalamazoo, MI bus Replacement ........................................... City of Midland Dial-A-Ride Section 5309, MI .................................... Clare County Transit Administration Facility, MI ................................ Communication Equipment and Bus, Belding, MI .............................. Deneka Maintenance Facility, MI ....................................................... Dowagiac Dial A Ride, MI ................................................................... Eastern Upper Peninsula, MI Ferry Dock and Facility upgrades for Drummond Island Ferry Services. Flint, MI, Mass Transportation Authority Bus Maintenance Facility ... Greater Lapeer Transportation Authority, MI ...................................... Harbor Transit, MI ............................................................................... Hillsdale Dial-A-Ride, MI ..................................................................... Ionia County, MI-Purchase and Implementation of communication equipment improvements. Kalamazoo Metro Transit, MI ............................................................. Frm 00071 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 1,713,215 1,732,500 1,188,000 594,000 495,000 o 1,188,000 380,714 380,714 712,800 381,000 380,714 1,188,000 342,643 523,482 380,714 342,643 951,786 110,880 951,786 247,500 364,320 5,445,000 495,000 95,179 85,661 2,970,000 6,930,000 694,804 1,980,000 2,673,000 57,107 21,780 693,000 1,980,000 88,110 p 1,287,000 p 693,000 28,554 148,500 639,600 79,200 2,475,000 362,340 455,400 75,240 495,000 49,500 47,589 742,500 495,000 399,960 495,000 112,311 990,000 13942 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–551 E–2006–BUSP–555 E–2006–BUSP–556 E–2006–BUSP–557 E–2006–BUSP–558 E–2006–BUSP–976 E–2006–BUSP–559 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... 572 581 .................... 293 MI MI MI MI ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–561 E–2006–BUSP–562 E–2006–BUSP–563 E–2006–BUSP–564 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... 634 MI ...... MI ...... MI ...... MN .... MN .... MN .... MN .... MN .... MN .... E–2006–BUSP–566 E–2006–BUSP–567 E–2006–BUSP–581 E–2006–BUSP–568 E–2006–BUSP–569 E–2006–BUSP–570 E–2006–BUSP–571 E–2006–BUSP–572 E–2006–BUSP–573 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 40 177 .................... .................... MN MN MN MN MN E–2006–BUSP–574 E–2006–BUSP–575 E–2006–BUSP–576 E–2006–BUSP–577 E–2006–BUSP–578 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 577 .................... .................... 185 MN .... MN .... E–2006–BUSP–579 ......... E–2006–BUSP–580 ......... 342 .................... MO MO MO MO MO E–2006–BUSP–585 ......... E–2006–BUSP–587 ......... E–2006–BUSP–589 ......... E–2006–BUSP–1110 ....... E–2006–BUSP–593 ......... .................... .................... 345 .................... 598 MO .... MO .... MO .... MS ..... E–2006–BUSP–595 E–2006–BUSP–596 E–2006–BUSP–597 E–2006–BUSP–598 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 624 .................... 130 MS MS MS MS MT MT MT MT MT MT MT sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES MI MI MI MI MI MI MI ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–599 E–2006–BUSP–600 E–2006–BUSP–601 E–2006–BUSP–602 E–2006–BUSP–603 E–2006–BUSP–604 E–2006–BUSP–605 E–2006–BUSP–606 E–2006–BUSP–607 E–2006–BUSP–608 E–2006–BUSP–609 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 547 .................... .................... 129 476 .................... .................... .................... 584 MT MT MT MT MT MT NC ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–610 E–2006–BUSP–611 E–2006–BUSP–612 E–2006–BUSP–613 E–2006–BUSP–614 E–2006–BUSP–615 E–2006–BUSP–616 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 490 NC NC NC NC ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–617 E–2006–BUSP–618 E–2006–BUSP–619 E–2006–BUSP–620 ......... ......... ......... ......... 217 351 228 154 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Kalkaska County Transportation Facility, MI ...................................... Ludington Mass Transportation Authority ........................................... Macatawa Area Express ..................................................................... Marquette County, Michigan Transit Authority Bus passenger facility Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Bus Replacement Midland County Board of Commissioners Connection ....................... Muskegon, Michigan-Muskegon Area Transit Terminal and related improvements. Roscommon Transportation Authority Route Service ........................ Sanilac Co. Transit Authority, MI ........................................................ St. Joseph County Transit .................................................................. Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) Bus Maintenance Facility. Vehicle Acquisition for Ionia Dial-A-Ride, MI ...................................... Yates Township Dial-A-Ride Transportation System, MI ................... Twin Cities Dial A Ride ....................................................................... Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit, Dakota County, MN ..................... City of Northfield, MN Transit Station ................................................. Duluth, MN Downtown Duluth Area Transit facility improvements .... Fond du Lac Reservation, MN Purchase buses ................................ Greater Minnesota Transit Capital ...................................................... Greater Minnesota Transit Capitol—5309 Buses and Bus Facilities, Rock County. I–35W BRT 46th Street Station, Minneapolis, MN ............................. Metro Transit/Metropolitan Council, MN-Bus/Bus Capital .................. Minnesota Transit Cap.—5309 Buses and Bus Facilities—St. Peter Northwest Busway, Minneapolis, Minnesota ...................................... St. Paul to Hinckley, MN Construct bus amenities along Rush Line Corridor. St. Paul, MN Union Depot Multi Modal Transit Facility ...................... The UEL Bus Stop, University of Minnesota Twin Cities Transitway, MN. City Utilities of Springfield bus facilities, MO ...................................... Intermodal Transfer Facility at Duncan and Boyle, MO ..................... Kansas City, MO Bus Transit Infrastructure ....................................... METRO Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. ............... OATS, Incorporated, MO–ITS Information and Billing System and Bus Facilities. South East Missouri Transportation Service, Missouri ....................... Southeast Missouri Transportation Service-Bus Project .................... Southern Missouri Buses and Bus Facilities ...................................... Coahoma County, Mississippi Purchase buses for the Aaron E. Henry Community Health Services Center, Inc./DARTS transit service. Handicap Buses Desoto County, MS ................................................. Inter-city Transit Companies, Meridian, MS ....................................... Jackson State University, MS-Busing Project .................................... JATRAN bus replacement, MS ........................................................... Billings Public Bus and Transfer, MT ................................................. Bozeman, Montana-Vehicular Parking Facility ................................... Bozeman, MT, Intermodal and parking facility ................................... Helena Transit Facility, MT ................................................................. Kalispell Buses, MT ............................................................................ Lewistown Bus Facility, Montana ....................................................... Montana Department of Transportation-Statewide Bus Facilities and Buses. Mountain Line Bus, Montana .............................................................. Pablo Bus Facility, Montana ............................................................... Pablo Buses, Montana ....................................................................... Poplar Transit Facility Renovation, Montana ...................................... Public Bus Transfer and Parking Facility, MT .................................... University of Montana bus maintenance facility ................................. Charlotte Area Transit System/City of Charlotte-Charlotte Multimodal Station. Charlotte, NC Construct Charlotte Multimodal Station ....................... Charlotte, North Carolina-Eastland Community Transit Center ......... Charlotte, North Carolina-Multimodal Station ..................................... City of Greenville, NC Expansion Buses and Greenville Intermodal Center. Frm 00072 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 396,000 316,801 247,500 297,000 1,980,000 495,000 380,714 198,000 495,000 79,200 880,000 142,560 396,000 88,110 742,500 277,200 380,714 28,554 560,000 495,000 990,000 2,154,240 247,500 990,000 285,536 380,714 49,500 1,633,500 693,000 61,005 q 742,500 3,855,060 635,580 453,420 1,144,144 28,554 148,500 198,000 1,133,550 544,500 1,237,500 761,459 166,320 247,500 99,000 297,000 680,130 498,250 198,000 148,500 79,200 1,237,500 247,500 203,030 1,484,786 380,714 761,429 678,433 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13943 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–622 ......... 302 NC ..... NC ..... E–2006–BUSP–623 ......... E–2006–BUSP–627 ......... 52 594 NC NC NC NC ND ND NE NE E–2006–BUSP–629 E–2006–BUSP–632 E–2006–BUSP–633 E–2006–BUSP–634 E–2006–BUSP–635 E–2006–BUSP–636 E–2006–BUSP–637 E–2006–BUSP–638 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 57 .................... 595 .................... 505 160 NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–639 ......... 586 NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–640 ......... 587 NE ..... E–2006–BUSP–641 ......... 240 NE ..... NE ..... NH ..... E–2006–BUSP–642 ......... E–2006–BUSP–643 ......... E–2006–BUSP–644 ......... 599 .................... 418 NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ E–2006–BUSP–645 E–2006–BUSP–646 E–2006–BUSP–647 E–2006–BUSP–648 E–2006–BUSP–649 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 468 .................... .................... 86 NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–650 ......... 28 NJ ...... NJ ...... NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–651 ......... E–2006–BUSP–652 ......... E–2006–BUSP–653 ......... .................... 12 102 NJ ...... NJ ...... NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–654 ......... E–2006–BUSP–655 ......... E–2006–BUSP–656 ......... .................... 389 138 NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–657 ......... 38 NJ ...... NJ ...... NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–658 ......... E–2006–BUSP–659 ......... E–2006–BUSP–660 ......... .................... 209 46 NJ NJ NJ NJ ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–661 E–2006–BUSP–662 E–2006–BUSP–663 E–2006–BUSP–664 ......... ......... ......... ......... 340 328 .................... 13 NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–665 E–2006–BUSP–666 E–2006–BUSP–667 E–2006–BUSP–668 E–2006–BUSP–669 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... .................... 29 NJ ...... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–670 ......... 393 NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... E–2006–BUSP–671 E–2006–BUSP–672 E–2006–BUSP–673 E–2006–BUSP–674 E–2006–BUSP–675 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 618 643 61 181 62 NJ ...... NM .... NM .... NM .... E–2006–BUSP–676 E–2006–BUSP–681 E–2006–BUSP–682 E–2006–BUSP–684 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 562 .................... .................... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Greensboro, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation Multimodal Transportation Center. Greensboro, North Carolina-Replacement buses .............................. North Carolina Department of Transportation-North Carolina Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities. Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, NC ................................................ Triangle Transit Authority Replacement Buses, North Carolina ........ Wilmington, NC Build Intermodal Center ............................................ Winston-Salem Union Station Intermodal Facility, NC ....................... North Dakota Department of Transportation/Statewide Bus .............. North Dakota Statewide Transit .......................................................... City of Omaha-Creighton University Intermodal Facility .................... Kearney, Nebraska-RYDE Transit Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility. Nebraska Department of Roads-Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility for RYDE in Kearney, NE. Nebraska Department of Roads-Statewide Vehicles, Facilities, and Related Equipment Purchases. Nebraska-statewide transit vehicles, facilities, and related equipment. Omaha, NE, Buses and Fare boxes .................................................. StarTran Farebox Technology Upgrades, Nebraska .......................... Windham, New Hampshire-Construction of Park and Ride Bus facility at Exit 3. Atlantic City Regional Medical Center Bus Project, NJ ...................... Atlantic City, NJ Jitney ........................................................................ Bergen Intermodal Stations and Park N’Rides, NJ ............................ Bloomfield Intermodal Facilities and Park-and-Ride, NJ .................... Burlington County, NJ-BurLink and Burlington County Transportation System vehicles and equipment. Camden, NJ Construction of the Camden County Intermodal Facility in Cramer Hill. Central NJ Intermodal Stations and Park & Rides ............................. Hoboken, NJ Rehabilitation of Hoboken Inter-modal Terminal .......... Jersey City, NJ Construct West Entrance to Pavonia-Newport PATH Station. Kapkowski Road Transportation Planning Area Project, NJ .............. Lakewood, NJ-Ocean County Bus service and parking facilities ....... Long Branch, NJ Design and construct facilities for ferry service from Long Branch, NJ to New York City and other destinations. Monmouth County, NJ Construction of main bus facility for Freehold Township, including a terminal and repair shop. Morristown Intermodal Historic Station, NJ ........................................ Morristown, New Jersey-Intermodal Historic Station .......................... National Park Service Design and construct 2.1-mile segment to complete Sandy Hook multiuse pathway in Sandy Hook, NJ. New Jersey Inter-modal Facilities and Bus Rolling Stock .................. New Jersey Transit Community Shuttle Buses .................................. Newark Penn Station Intermodal Improvements, New Jersey ........... Newark, NJ Penn Station Intermodal Improvements including the rehabilitation of boarding areas. NJ Transit Jitney Bus Replacement, Atlantic City .............................. NW NJ Multi-County Intermodal Transit Initiative .............................. Regional Intermodal Transportation, South Amboy, New Jersey ...... Saint Peter’s McGrinley Square Intermodal Facility, New Jersey ...... Sandy Hook, NJ National Park Service Construct year-round ferry dock at Sandy Hook Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area. South Amboy, NJ Construction of improvements to facilities at South Amboy Station under S Amboy, NJ Regional Intermodal Initiative. South Brunswick, NJ Transit System ................................................. Trenton Intermodal Station ................................................................. Trenton, New Jersey-Trenton Train Station Rehabilitation ................ Trenton, NJ Development of Trenton Trolley System ........................ Trenton, NJ Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Trenton Train Station. Valley Hospital Bus Transportation, NJ .............................................. Las Cruces, NM, Road Runner Bus and Bus Facilities ..................... Northern New Mexico Park and Ride ................................................. West Side Transit Facility, Albuquerque, NM ..................................... Frm 00073 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 2,383,273 1,100,264 2,645,730 43,600 495,000 190,357 247,500 990,000 1,237,500 680,130 380,714 453,420 906,840 761,429 603,900 64,350 704,322 247,500 742,500 1,980,000 495,000 761,429 190,357 495,000 723,357 380,714 495,000 571,072 761,429 380,714 2,970,000 190,357 190,357 571,072 95,179 990,000 190,357 247,500 990,000 495,000 792,000 190,357 1,522,858 990,000 5,445,000 285,536 190,357 1,332,500 74,250 198,000 445,500 816,750 13944 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued Earmark ID SAFETEA– LU Project No. NV ..... NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–685 ......... E–2006–BUSP–686 ......... .................... 405 NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–687 ......... 199 NV ..... NV ..... NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–688 ......... E–2006–BUSP–689 ......... E–2006–BUSP–690 ......... 371 .................... 603 NV ..... NV ..... E–2006–BUSP–693 ......... E–2006–BUSP–694 ......... .................... 630 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–696 ......... .................... NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–698 ......... E–2006–BUSP–699 ......... E–2006–BUSP–700 ......... .................... .................... 271 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–703 ......... 166 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–704 ......... 338 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–705 ......... 234 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–706 ......... 10 NY ..... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–707 ......... E–2006–BUSP–708 ......... 197 408 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–709 ......... 41 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–710 ......... 56 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–711 ......... 419 NY NY NY NY NY ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–712 ......... E–2006–BUSP–1111 ....... E–2006–BUSP–1112 ....... E–2006–BUSP–714 ......... E–2006–BUSP–715 ......... 192 .................... .................... .................... 245 NY NY NY NY NY ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–716 E–2006–BUSP–717 E–2006–BUSP–718 E–2006–BUSP–719 E–2006–BUSP–720 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 230 146 363 512 NY ..... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–721 ......... E–2006–BUSP–722 ......... 284 .................... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–723 ......... 300 NY ..... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–724 ......... E–2006–BUSP–725 ......... .................... 317 NY NY NY NY NY E–2006–BUSP–726 E–2006–BUSP–727 E–2006–BUSP–728 E–2006–BUSP–729 E–2006–BUSP–730 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 343 .................... .................... .................... 368 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–731 ......... 585 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–732 ......... 25 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–733 ......... 376 NY ..... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–734 ......... E–2006–BUSP–735 ......... 590 591 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Boulder Highway Max Bus Rapid Transit System, NV ...................... Las Vegas, NV Construct Boulder Highway BRT system and purchase vehicles and related equipment. Las Vegas, NV Construct Central City Inter-modal Transportation Terminal. Las Vegas, NV Construct Las Vegas West Care Intermodal Facility Nevada Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, NV .................................. Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada-Central City Intermodal Transportation Terminal. RTC Transit Maintenance Facility, NV ............................................... Southern Nevada Transit Coalition, Public Transit Building Acquisition. Albany-Schenectady, NY Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY Route 5, Corridor. Automated Light study along Route 59, NY ....................................... Boro Park JCC Bus Purchase, NY ..................................................... Bronx, NY Botanical Garden metro North Rail station Intermodal Facility. Bronx, NY Hebrew Home for the Aged elderly and disabled transportation support. Bronx, NY Intermodal Facility near Exit 6. of the Bronx River Parkway. Bronx, NY Jacobi Intermodal Center to North Central Bronx Hospital bus system. Bronx, NY Wildlife Conservation Society intermodal transportation facility at the Bronx Zoo. Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility ............. Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility in the vicinity of Downstate Medical Center. Brooklyn, NY New Urban Center-Broadway Junction Intermodal Center. Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station. Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station. Buffalo, NY Inter-modal Center Parking Facility ................................. White Plains for bus and bus facilities ............................................... Rockland County, NY , mini-buses for service in Clarkstown, NY .... Bus Facility 65th Intermodal Station, NY ............................................ Bus to provide Yorktown, New York internal circulator to provide transportation throughout the Town. Central New York Regional Transportation Authority ........................ Construction of Third Bus Depot on Staten Island ............................. Cooperstown, New York-Intermodal Transit Center ........................... Corning, New York-Transportation Center ......................................... Corning, NY, Phase II Corning Preserve Transportation Enhancement Project. Cornwall, NY-Purchase Bus ............................................................... Electric, Next-Generation Transit Buses, Broome County Transit, NY. Geneva, New York-Multimodal facility-Construct passenger rail center. Intermodal transportation facility, Huntington Hospital, NY ................ Jamestown, NY Rehabilitation of Intermodal Facility and associated property. Kings County, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility ..... Lakeside Center Hub, Prospect Park, Brooklyn, New York ............... Nassau County Hub and Centre, NY ................................................. Nassau County, New York Bus Replacement .................................... Nassau County, NY Conduct planning and engineering for transportation system (HUB). Nassau County, NY, Conduct planning, engineering, and construction for transportation system (HUB). New York City, NY First Phase Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit System. New York City, NY Purchase Handicapped-Accessible Livery Vehicles. New York City, NY, Bronx Zoo Intermodal Facility ............................ New York City, NY, Enhance Transportation Facilities Near W. 65th Street and Broadway. Frm 00074 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 445,500 380,714 1,142,143 47,589 2,970,000 906,840 495,000 297,000 57 99,000 247,500 190,357 35,692 47,589 59,487 83,282 266,500 190,357 182,743 761,429 761,429 190,357 r 198,000 r 99,000 990,000 35,216 1,485,000 2,284,286 951,786 951,786 346,500 16,561 792,000 95,179 495,000 380,714 190,357 693,000 990,000 990,000 1,332,500 990,000 190,357 190,357 346,500 346,500 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13945 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–736 ......... 592 NY ..... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–738 ......... E–2006–BUSP–739 ......... .................... 77 NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–740 E–2006–BUSP–741 E–2006–BUSP–742 E–2006–BUSP–743 E–2006–BUSP–744 E–2006–BUSP–745 E–2006–BUSP–747 E–2006–BUSP–748 E–2006–BUSP–749 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 373 .................... 322 379 .................... 252 430 607 NY NY NY NY NY ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–750 E–2006–BUSP–751 E–2006–BUSP–752 E–2006–BUSP–753 E–2006–BUSP–754 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 609 .................... .................... .................... 386 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–755 ......... 353 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–756 ......... 635 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–757 ......... 261 NY NY NY NY E–2006–BUSP–758 E–2006–BUSP–759 E–2006–BUSP–760 E–2006–BUSP–761 ..... ..... ..... ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 289 451 78 NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–762 ......... 182 NY NY NY OH OH E–2006–BUSP–763 E–2006–BUSP–764 E–2006–BUSP–765 E–2006–BUSP–766 E–2006–BUSP–767 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 264 149 362 318 OH ..... OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–769 ......... E–2006–BUSP–770 ......... .................... 489 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–771 ......... 241 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–772 ......... 89 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–774 ......... 202 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–775 ......... 179 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–776 ......... 411 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–777 ......... .................... OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–778 ......... 258 OH ..... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–779 ......... 198 OH ..... OH ..... OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–780 ......... E–2006–BUSP–782 ......... E–2006–BUSP–783 ......... 50 7 292 OH OH OH OH E–2006–BUSP–784 E–2006–BUSP–785 E–2006–BUSP–786 E–2006–BUSP–788 ..... ..... ..... ..... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 ......... ......... ......... ......... Jkt 211001 120 516 .................... 309 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project New York City, NY, Highline Project, for Studies, Design, and Construction. NFTA Hybrid Buses, Amherst, Erie County, New York ..................... Niagara Falls, NY Relocation, Development, and Enhancement of Niagara Falls International Railway Station/Intermodal Transportation Center. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Buses, New York ............. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, NY Replacement Buses North Hempstead Green Bus Fleet, New York .................................. Oneonta, New York-bus replacement ................................................ Ramapo, NY Transportation Safety Field Bus ................................... Renaissance Square, NY ................................................................... Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square transit center ................. Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square Transit Center ............... Rochester, NY, Renaissance Square Intermodal Facility, Design and Construction. Rockland County, NY Express Bus .................................................... Seniors Transportation, Inc. Buses and Bus Facilities, New York ..... St. George Terminal, Staten Island, NY ............................................. Suffolk County Buses and Bus Facilities, New York .......................... Suffolk County, NY Design and construction of intermodal transit facility in Wyandanch. Suffolk County, NY Purchase four handicapped accessible vans to transport veterans to and from the VA facility in Northport. Syracuse, New York, Syracuse University Connective Corridor Transit Project. Thendra-Webb and Utica, New York-Install handicap lifts in intermodal centers. Third Bus Depot on Staten Island, NY—South Shore ....................... Town of Warwick, NY Bus Facility Warwick Transit System ............. Utica, New York Transit Multimodal Facilities .................................... Utica, New York-Union Station Boehlert Center siding track improvements. Utica, New York-Union Station rehabilitation and related infrastructure improvements. Westchester County Bee-Line Bus Replacement, New York ............ Westchester County, NY Bus replacement program ......................... Yonkers, NY Trolley Bus Acquisition .................................................. Akron, OH Construct City of Akron Commuter Bus Transit Facility .. Akron, Ohio Construct Downtown Multi-modal Transportation Center. Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility ............................. Central Ohio Transit Authority-Paratransit and Small Bus Service Facility. Cincinnati, Ohio-Construct Uptown Crossings Joint Development Transit Project. Cincinnati, Ohio-Metro Regional Transit Hub Network Eastern Neighborhoods. Cleveland, OH Construct Fare Collection System Project, Cuyahoga County. Cleveland, OH Construct passenger inter-modal center near Dock 32. Cleveland, OH Construction of an inter-modal facility and related improvements at University Hospitals facility on Euclid Avenue. Cleveland, Ohio acquisition of buses Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue and East 93rd Street intermodal facility. Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue University Hospital intermodal facility. Cleveland, Ohio-University Circle Intermodal facility .......................... Columbus, OH-Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility .... Cuyahoga County, Ohio-Ohio Department of Transportation transit improvements. Dayton Airport Inter-modal Rail Feasibility Study ............................... Dayton-Wright Stop Plaza .................................................................. Downtown Akron Transportation Center, OH ..................................... Elyria, OH Construct the New York Central Train Station into an intermodal transportation hub. Frm 00075 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 990,000 742,500 1,066,000 495,000 190,357 594,000 28,554 47,589 4,950,000 856,607 428,304 990,000 594,000 99,000 990,000 396,000 875,643 53,300 792,000 19,036 1,980,000 104,696 1,138,500 19,036 95,179 247,500 713,840 71,384 285,536 761,429 1,485,000 453,420 571,072 176,080 95,179 163,707 190,357 190,357 1,618,036 856,607 1,618,036 532,478 28,554 142,768 453,420 297,000 389,851 13946 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID E–2006–BUSP–789 ......... 349 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–790 ......... 104 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–791 ......... 576 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–792 ......... 87 OH ..... OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–793 ......... E–2006–BUSP–795 ......... .................... 385 OH ..... OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–796 ......... E–2006–BUSP–797 ......... .................... 34 OH ..... E–2006–BUSP–798 ......... .................... OH OK OK OR OR OR OR OR OR E–2006–BUSP–799 E–2006–BUSP–800 E–2006–BUSP–801 E–2006–BUSP–802 E–2006–BUSP–803 E–2006–BUSP–804 E–2006–BUSP–805 E–2006–BUSP–806 E–2006–BUSP–809 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 64 .................... .................... 442 165 272 66 187 325 OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–810 ......... 99 OR OR OR OR ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–812 E–2006–BUSP–813 E–2006–BUSP–814 E–2006–BUSP–815 ......... ......... ......... ......... 323 175 .................... 16 OR OR OR OR ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–816 E–2006–BUSP–817 E–2006–BUSP–818 E–2006–BUSP–819 ......... ......... ......... ......... 93 .................... 106 .................... OR ..... OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–820 ......... E–2006–BUSP–821 ......... 180 216 OR ..... E–2006–BUSP–822 ......... 82 PA ..... PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–823 ......... E–2006–BUSP–824 ......... .................... 225 PA ..... PA ..... PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–825 ......... E–2006–BUSP–827 ......... E–2006–BUSP–828 ......... 456 .................... 467 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–831 ......... 471 PA PA PA PA PA PA sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES OH ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–832 E–2006–BUSP–833 E–2006–BUSP–835 E–2006–BUSP–839 E–2006–BUSP–840 E–2006–BUSP–841 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 481 .................... .................... 123 PA PA PA PA ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–842 E–2006–BUSP–843 E–2006–BUSP–845 E–2006–BUSP–846 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... 513 E–2006–BUSP–847 ......... E–2006–BUSP–848 ......... E–2006–BUSP–849 ......... .................... .................... 514 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... PA ..... PA ..... PA ..... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Kent, OH Construct Kent State University Intermodal Facility serving students and the general public. Marietta, Ohio Construction of transportation hub to accommodate regional bus traffic. Metro Regional Transit Authority/City of Akron-Downtown Transit Center/Akron. Niles, OH Acquisition of bus operational and service equipment of Niles Trumbull Transit. Ohio Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities ........................................... Springfield, OH-City of Springfield Bus Transfer Station and Associated Parking. Tech Town Transportation Center, OH .............................................. Toledo, OH TARTA/TARPS Passenger Inter-modal Facility construction. Uptown Crossings Joint Development Transit Project, Cincinnati, OH. Zanesville, OH-bus system signage and shelters .............................. Enhance Oklahoma Transit Association Public System .................... Oklahoma DOT Transit Program Division .......................................... Albany, OR North Albany Park and Ride ........................................... Albany, OR Rehabilitate Building at Multimodal Transit Station ........ Bend, Oregon-replacement vans ........................................................ Canby, OR bus and bus facilities ....................................................... Columbia County, OR To purchase buses ......................................... Grants Pass, OR Purchase Vehicles For Use By Josephine Community Transit. Gresham, Oregon Construct a new light rail station and transit plaza on Portland MAX system and serve Gresham Civic neighborhood. Lincoln, County, OR bus purchase ..................................................... Molalla, OR South Clackamas Transportation District, bus purchase Park and Ride Facility, Ashland, OR .................................................. Portland, OR Renovation of Union Station, including structural reinforcement and public safety upgrades. Salem, OR bus and bus facilities ....................................................... Sandy Transit Bus Facility, Oregon .................................................... Sandy, Oregon Transit Bus Facility .................................................... SMART Multi-Modal Transit Center and Bus Maintenance Facility, Oregon. Tillamook, OR construction of a transit facility ................................... Wilsonville, OR South Metro Area Rapid Transit, bus and bus facilities. Yamhill County, OR For the construction of bus shelters, park and ride facilities, and a signage strategy to increase ridership. Adams Co. Transit Authority purchase of buses, PA ......................... Allentown, Pennsylvania-Design and Construct Intermodal Transportation Center. Altoona Multimodal Transportation Facility Parking Garage .............. Area Transit Authority, PA .................................................................. Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania-Vehicle Replacements. Beaver County, PA Transit Authority Bus Replacement/Related Equipment Replacement. Bucks County Intermodal Facility, PA ................................................ Bus Purchase for Red Rose Transit Authority, Lancaster, PA .......... Butler Township, PA-Cranbury Area Transit Service ......................... Capital Area Transit (CAT), PA .......................................................... Centre Area Transportation Intermodal Facility, PA ........................... Cheltenham, PA Glenside Rail Station Parking Garage project involving the construction of a 300–400 space parking lot at Easton Road and Glenside Avenue. Chestnut Hill Parking Foundation, Cheltenham, PA .......................... Church Street Transportation Center, PA .......................................... Coatesville Train Station, Coatesville, PA .......................................... County of Lackawanna Transit System-Scranton Intermodal Transportation Center. County of Lebanon Transit (COLT), PA ............................................. Crawford Intermodal Transportation Facility, PA ................................ Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority-Purchase of Buses and Spare Units. Frm 00076 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 190,357 95,179 1,587,960 38,071 5,204,615 47,589 742,500 1,427,679 990,000 15,467 495,000 495,000 181,293 290,068 190,357 28,554 26,650 38,752 266,500 47,589 19,036 247,500 19,036 380,714 371,250 133,250 495,000 19,036 47,589 20,939 495,000 380,714 227,700 990,000 226,710 226,710 495,000 742,500 793,980 742,500 495,000 190,357 247,500 222,750 990,000 226,710 297,000 346,500 226,710 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13947 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued Earmark ID SAFETEA– LU Project No. PA ..... PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–850 ......... E–2006–BUSP–851 ......... .................... 81 PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA E–2006–BUSP–852 E–2006–BUSP–853 E–2006–BUSP–854 E–2006–BUSP–855 E–2006–BUSP–856 E–2006–BUSP–857 E–2006–BUSP–859 E–2006–BUSP–860 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 524 431 .................... .................... 331 458 233 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–861 ......... 457 PA PA PA PA ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–862 E–2006–BUSP–863 E–2006–BUSP–864 E–2006–BUSP–865 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 37 559 564 PA PA PA PA PA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–866 E–2006–BUSP–867 E–2006–BUSP–868 E–2006–BUSP–869 E–2006–BUSP–870 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 583 .................... .................... 588 PA ..... PA ..... PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–871 ......... E–2006–BUSP–872 ......... E–2006–BUSP–873 ......... .................... .................... 201 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–874 ......... 137 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–875 ......... 413 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–876 ......... 22 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–877 ......... 274 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–878 ......... 316 PA ..... PA ..... PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–879 ......... E–2006–BUSP–880 ......... E–2006–BUSP–881 ......... 126 .................... 397 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–882 ......... 48 PA ..... PA ..... PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–884 ......... E–2006–BUSP–885 ......... E–2006–BUSP–351 ......... 424 .................... 96 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–886 ......... 626 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–887 ......... 627 PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–888 ......... 628 PA PA PA PA PA PA E–2006–BUSP–890 E–2006–BUSP–891 E–2006–BUSP–893 E–2006–BUSP–894 E–2006–BUSP–896 E–2006–BUSP–897 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... PR ..... PR ..... PR ..... VerDate Aug<31>2005 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 660 .................... .................... 662 E–2006–BUSP–900 ......... E–2006–BUSP–901 ......... E–2006–BUSP–902 ......... 128 421 3 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Easton Intermodal, PA ........................................................................ Easton, Pennsylvania-Design and construct Intermodal Transportation Center. Endless Mountain Transportation Authority, Bradford County, PA .... Erie, PA Metropolitan Transit Authority-Bus Acquisitions .................. Erie, PA-EMTA Vehicle Acquisition .................................................... Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation, PA ................................... Gettysburg Bus and Bus Facilities, PA .............................................. Gettysburg, Pennsylvania-transit transfer center ............................... Hershey, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Garage ....... Intermodal Facilities in Bucks County (Croydon and Levittown Stations). Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Facility. Lancaster Intermodal, Pennsylvania ................................................... Lancaster, PA-bus replacement ......................................................... Lancaster, PA-Intermodal Project ....................................................... Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority, PA-Allentown Intermodal Transportation Center. Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority, Pennsylvania ................................ Monroe Township, PA-Clarion County Buses .................................... Monroe Township/Clarion University Transit ...................................... Montgomery County Intermodal, Pennsylvania .................................. New Castle, PA Area Transit Authority-Bus Purchases/Park and Ride Facility. Northumberland County Transportation, PA ...................................... Paoli Transportation Center ................................................................ Philadelphia, PA Cruise Terminal Transportation Ctr. Phila. Naval Shipyard. Philadelphia, PA Improvements to the existing Penn’s Landing Ferry Terminal. Philadelphia, PA Penn’s Landing water shuttle parking lot expansion and water shuttle ramp infrastructure construction. Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia Zoo Intermodal Transportation project w/parking consolidation, pedestrian walkways, public transportation complements & landscape improvements to surface parking lots. Philadelphia, PA SEPTA’s Market St. Elevated Rail project in conjunction with Philadelphia Commercial Development Corporation for improvements and assistance to entities along rail corridor. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-SEPTA Market Street Elevated Line parking facility. Pittsburgh, PA Clean Fuel Bus Procurement ..................................... Port Authority of Allegheny County Bus Acquisition, Pennsylvania ... Pottsville, PA Union Street Trade and Transfer Center Intermodal Facility. Project provides for the engineering and construction of a transportation center in Paoli, Chester County. Sharon, PA-Bus Facility Construction ................................................ Shenango Valley Shuttle Service, Pennsylvania ................................ SEPTA Montgomery County Intermodal Improvements at Glenside and Jenkintown Station Parking Garages. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Bucks County Intermodal (Croydon and Levittown). Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Paoli Transportation Center. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-VillanovaSEPTA Intermodal. Union Station Intermodal Trade and Transit Center, Pennsylvania ... Union/Snyder Transportation Authority Union County, PA ................ Westmoreland County Transit Authority, PA-Bus Replacement ........ Westmoreland Transit Authority, Pennsylvania .................................. Williamsport Trade and Transit Centre Expansion, Pennsylvania ..... Williamsport, PA Bureau of Transportation-Williamsport Trade and Transit Centre Expansion. Bayamon, Puerto Rico-bus terminal ................................................... Bayamon, Puerto Rico-Purchase of Trolley Cars .............................. Lares, PR-Trolley buses-for the purchase of two trolley buses that will offer transportation through the urban zone in the Municipality of Lares. Frm 00077 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 396,000 380,714 297,000 226,710 380,714 1,485,000 247,500 171,131 56,925 571,072 56,925 1,980,000 180,839 158,400 453,420 1,485,000 149,490 653,400 495,000 168,300 198,000 1,980,000 666,250 761,429 209,393 951,786 266,500 761,429 95,179 3,069,000 380,714 190,357 95,179 247,500 s 951,786 680,130 680,130 680,130 1,237,500 990,000 226,710 742,500 668,250 680,130 114,214 161,804 50,254 13948 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID E–2006–BUSP–903 E–2006–BUSP–904 E–2006–BUSP–905 E–2006–BUSP–906 E–2006–BUSP–907 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 164 152 71 58 246 RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–908 ......... .................... RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–909 ......... .................... RI ...... RI ...... RI ...... RI ...... SC ..... E–2006–BUSP–910 E–2006–BUSP–911 E–2006–BUSP–912 E–2006–BUSP–913 E–2006–BUSP–914 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 115 .................... 604 .................... 533 SC ..... E–2006–BUSP–915 ......... 619 SC ..... E–2006–BUSP–916 ......... 620 SC ..... SD ..... SD ..... E–2006–BUSP–917 ......... E–2006–BUSP–918 ......... E–2006–BUSP–919 ......... .................... .................... 621 SD TN TN TN TN TN TN ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–920 E–2006–BUSP–922 E–2006–BUSP–923 E–2006–BUSP–924 E–2006–BUSP–925 E–2006–BUSP–926 E–2006–BUSP–928 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 237 554 565 .................... 268 TN TN TN TN ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–930 E–2006–BUSP–931 E–2006–BUSP–932 E–2006–BUSP–933 ......... ......... ......... ......... 30 .................... .................... 636 TN TN TN TN TX ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–934 E–2006–BUSP–935 E–2006–BUSP–936 E–2006–BUSP–937 E–2006–BUSP–938 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... 649 .................... 426 TX ..... TX ..... TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–939 ......... E–2006–BUSP–940 ......... E–2006–BUSP–943 ......... .................... .................... 153 TX TX TX TX TX TX ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–945 E–2006–BUSP–946 E–2006–BUSP–947 E–2006–BUSP–948 E–2006–BUSP–949 E–2006–BUSP–950 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 485 TX TX TX TX ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–951 E–2006–BUSP–953 E–2006–BUSP–954 E–2006–BUSP–955 ......... ......... ......... ......... 455 .................... .................... 506 TX ..... TX ..... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES PR ..... PR ..... PR ..... PR ..... RI ...... E–2006–BUSP–957 ......... E–2006–BUSP–958 ......... .................... 111 TX ..... TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–959 ......... E–2006–BUSP–960 ......... .................... 438 TX ..... TX ..... TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–961 ......... E–2006–BUSP–962 ......... E–2006–BUSP–963 ......... 515 336 196 TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–964 ......... .................... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Puerto Rico-Caribbean National Forest bus and bus facilities .......... San Juan, Puerto Rico-bus security equipment ................................. San Juan, Puerto Rico-Buses ............................................................ Yabucoca, Puerto Rico-Trolley Buses ................................................ Providence, RI Expansion of Elmwood Paratransit Maintenance Facility. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Elmwood Avenue Maintenance Facility Improvements. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Transit Security Improvements. Rhode Island Statewide Bus Fleet ..................................................... Rhode Island Statewide Vehicle Replacement .................................. Rhode Island, RIPTA Elmwood Facility Expansion ............................ Warwick Para-Transit Vehicles, Rhode Island ................................... Greensville, SC Transit Authority-City of Greenville Multimodal Transportation Center Improvements. South Carolina Department of Transportation-Transit Facilities Construction Program. South Carolina Department of Transportation-Vehicle Acquisition Program. Vehicle Acquisition, SC ....................................................................... Pine Ridge Transit System, South Dakota ......................................... South Dakota Department of Transportation-Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities. Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, SD ................................................ Knoxville Electric Transit Intermodal Center, TN ............................... Knoxville, Tennessee-Central Station Transit Center ........................ Knoxville, TN-Central Station .............................................................. Lipscomb University, TN-Intermodal Parking Garage ........................ Memphis Airport Intermodal Facility, Tennessee ............................... Nashville, TN Construct a parking garage on the campus of Lipscomb University, Nashville. Sevier County, Tennessee-U.S. 441 bus rapid transit ....................... Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency .............................. Tennessee Department of Transportation Buses and Bus Facilities Tennessee Department of Transportation-Statewide Tennessee Transit ITS and Bus Replacement Project. TN DOT Job Access Reverse Commute ........................................... TN Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities ................................................. University of Memphis-Pedestrian Bridge .......................................... Upper Cumberland Human Resource Agency, Tennessee ............... Abilene, TX Vehicle replacement and facility improvements for transit system. Brazos Transit District Bus Replacement, TX .................................... Brazos Transit District, Capital Cost Contracting, TX ........................ Bryan, TX The District-Bryan Intermodal Transit Terminal and Parking Facility. Bus Shelters, Dallas, TX ..................................................................... Bus/Vehicle Replacement, Lufkin, TX ................................................ Capital Metro Expansion and Improvement, TX ................................ Capital Metro North Operating Facility, TX ........................................ Capital Metro Rapid Bus Project, TX ................................................. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, TX-Bus Replacements. Carrollton, Texas Downtown Regional Multimodal Transit Hub ......... City of El Paso Sun Metro Bus Replacement, TX ............................. City of Lubbock Citibus Improvement, TX .......................................... City of Round Rock, TX-Downtown Intermodal Transportation Terminal. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Buses, TX ...................................... Construct West Houston and Fort Bend County, Texas-bus transit corridor. Corpus Christi Bus and Bus Facilities, TX ......................................... Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Regional Transit Authority for maintenance facility improvements. Dallas Area Rapid Transit-Bus passenger Facilities .......................... Dallas, TX Bus Passenger Facilities .................................................. Design Downtown Carrollton, Texas Regional Multi-Modal Transit Hub Station. Enhancements to Bus Terminal in McAllen, TX ................................. Frm 00078 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 571,072 571,072 190,357 33,313 951,786 1,227,600 198,000 1,142,143 495,000 1,584,000 133,650 226,710 453,420 1,814,670 1,584,000 594,000 1,380,820 1,665,660 990,000 1,941,643 567,270 340,560 1,361,250 380,714 47,589 495,000 477,570 2,721,510 495,000 5,102,430 680,130 346,500 76,143 123,750 990,000 571,072 495,000 297,000 2,079,000 495,000 742,500 2,268,090 227,700 1,980,000 495,000 226,710 990,000 380,714 79,200 475,893 226,710 2,436,572 380,714 495,000 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13949 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued Earmark ID SAFETEA– LU Project No. TX ..... TX ..... TX ..... E–2006–BUSP–965 ......... E–2006–BUSP–966 ......... E–2006–BUSP–967 ......... .................... 290 536 TX TX TX TX TX ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–968 E–2006–BUSP–969 E–2006–BUSP–970 E–2006–BUSP–972 E–2006–BUSP–973 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... 561 .................... TX TX TX TX TX ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–974 E–2006–BUSP–975 E–2006–BUSP–977 E–2006–BUSP–978 E–2006–BUSP–979 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... 24 610 TX TX UT UT ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–982 E–2006–BUSP–984 E–2006–BUSP–985 E–2006–BUSP–986 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... 63 .................... .................... UT UT UT UT ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–987 E–2006–BUSP–990 E–2006–BUSP–995 E–2006–BUSP–996 ......... ......... ......... ......... .................... .................... .................... .................... VA ..... VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–997 ......... E–2006–BUSP–998 ......... .................... 409 VA VA VA VA ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–999 ......... E–2006–BUSP–1000 ....... E–2006–BUSP–1001 ....... E–2006–BUSP–1002 ....... 232 .................... 278 142 VA VA VA VA VA VA VA VA VA VA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–1003 E–2006–BUSP–1004 E–2006–BUSP–1005 E–2006–BUSP–1006 E–2006–BUSP–1007 E–2006–BUSP–1008 E–2006–BUSP–1009 E–2006–BUSP–1010 E–2006–BUSP–1011 E–2006–BUSP–1012 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 359 157 .................... .................... 492 493 494 495 511 15 VA VA VA VA VA VA VA VA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... E–2006–BUSP–1013 E–2006–BUSP–1014 E–2006–BUSP–1015 E–2006–BUSP–1016 E–2006–BUSP–1019 E–2006–BUSP–1020 E–2006–BUSP–1021 E–2006–BUSP–1022 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 525 281 97 .................... .................... .................... 535 391 VA ..... VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1023 ....... E–2006–BUSP–1024 ....... .................... 354 VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1025 ....... 68 VA VA VA VA E–2006–BUSP–1026 E–2006–BUSP–1027 E–2006–BUSP–1028 E–2006–BUSP–1029 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State ..... ..... ..... ..... ....... ....... ....... ....... .................... .................... .................... 602 VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1030 ....... .................... VA ..... VA ..... VA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1031 ....... E–2006–BUSP–1033 ....... E–2006–BUSP–1034 ....... .................... 184 434 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Unobligated allocation Project Fort Bend Co, TX, Park & Ride .......................................................... Galveston, Texas-Intermodal center and parking facility, The Strand Harris County-West Houston-Fort Bend Bus Transit Corridor: Uptown Westpark Terminal. Hill County Transit Administration Facility, TX ................................... Houston METRO Bus Transit Centers, TX ........................................ Hunt County Committee on Aging, TX ............................................... Laredo-North Laredo Transit Hub-Bus Maintenance Facility ............. Lubbock/Citibus Low-Floor Buses, Paratransit Vans and Facilities, and Passenger Amenities, TX. Midland Bus Facilities, Texas ............................................................. Midland Bus Facilities, TX .................................................................. Rolling Stock for HCTD Urban System, TX ....................................... Roma, TX Bus Facility ........................................................................ San Angelo, TX Street Railroad Company-Transit Fleet Replacement. The District-Bryan/College Station Bus Replacement, Texas ............ Zapata, Texas Purchase Bus vehicles ............................................... Brigham City Buses and Bus Facilities, UT ....................................... Commuter Rail Hub Planning and Renovation of the Historic Brigham City Train Depot, UT. Ogden Buses and Bus Facilities, UT ................................................. Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, Utah ............................................. West Valley City Intermodal Terminal, Utah ...................................... Westminster College Intermodal Transportation Facilities Expansion for Shuttle Buses, Utah. Alexandria Transit Service Improvements, VA ................................... Alexandria, VA Eisenhower Avenue Inter-modal Station improvements, including purchase of buses and construction of bus shelters. Alexandria, VA Royal Street Bus Garage Replacement .................... Arlington County Bus Transfer Facility, VA ........................................ Arlington County, VA Columbia Pike Bus Improvements .................. Arlington County, VA Crystal City-Potomac Yard Busway, including construction of bus shelters. Arlington County, VA Pentagon City Multimodal Improvements ........ Bealeton, Virginia-Intermodal Station Depot Refurbishment .............. Blacksburg Transit Intermodal Facility, VA ......................................... Buses and Bus Facilities, Danville, VA .............................................. City of Alexandria, VA-City-Wide Transit Improvements .................... City of Alexandria, VA-Potomac Yard Transit Improvements ............ City of Alexandria, VA-Replace Royal Street Bus Garage ................ City of Alexandria, VA-Valley Pedestrian & Transit ........................... Commonwealth of Virginia-Statewide Bus Capital Program .............. Fairfax County, VA Richmond Highway (U.S. Route1) Public Transportation Improvements. Fairfax County, Virginia-Richmond Highway Initiative ........................ Falls Church, VA Falls Church Intermodal Transportation Center ..... Fredericksburg, Virginia-Improve and repair Fredericksburg Station Greater Lynchburg Transit Company Vehicle Replacement, VA ....... Hampton Roads Southside Bus Facility, VA ...................................... Hampton Roads Transit Bus Facilities, VA ........................................ Hampton Roads Transit, VA-Southside Bus Facility .......................... Hampton Roads, VA Final design and construction for a Hampton Roads Transit Southside Bus Facility. Jamestown 2007 Natural Gas Bus purchase, VA .............................. Norfolk, Virginia-Final Design and Construction Southside Bus Facility. Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula, Virginia-Bay Transit Multimodal Facilities. Park-and-Ride Lot, Springfield, VA ..................................................... Petersburg Multi-Modal Transit Center, VA ........................................ Petersburg Transit Intermodal Facility, VA ......................................... Potomac & Rappahannock Transportation Commission, VA-Buses for Service Expansion. Potomac and Rappahannock Transit Commission Buses for service expansion, VA. Richmond Highway Public Transportation Initiative, VA .................... Richmond, VA Renovation and construction for Main Street Station Roanoke, VA-Bus restoration in the City of Roanoke ........................ Frm 00079 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 495,000 856,607 226,710 337,000 2,009,700 495,000 680,130 79,200 79,200 49,500 1,485,000 99,938 226,710 495,000 59,487 148,500 74,250 247,500 1,274,427 211,250 1,237,500 990,000 475,893 95,179 396,000 666,250 571,072 380,714 52,348 198,000 297,000 226,710 226,710 680,130 226,710 3,401,640 380,714 453,420 380,714 475,893 396,000 990,000 2,227,500 226,710 380,714 247,500 333,125 618,661 990,000 495,000 297,000 226,710 1,188,000 2,376,000 209,393 47,589 13950 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued State SAFETEA– LU Project No. Earmark ID VA ..... VA ..... VA ..... VI ....... VT ..... E–2006–BUSP–1035 E–2006–BUSP–1036 E–2006–BUSP–1037 E–2006–BUSP–1038 E–2006–BUSP–1116 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 312 305 361 .................... .................... VT ..... VT ..... VT ..... VT ..... WA .... WA .... WA .... WA .... WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1040 E–2006–BUSP–1041 E–2006–BUSP–1042 E–2006–BUSP–1043 E–2006–BUSP–1044 E–2006–BUSP–1046 E–2006–BUSP–1048 E–2006–BUSP–1050 E–2006–BUSP–1051 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 477 .................... 486 633 .................... .................... .................... 395 94 WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA E–2006–BUSP–1053 E–2006–BUSP–1055 E–2006–BUSP–1058 E–2006–BUSP–1061 E–2006–BUSP–1062 E–2006–BUSP–1063 E–2006–BUSP–1065 E–2006–BUSP–1066 E–2006–BUSP–1068 E–2006–BUSP–1069 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 337 .................... .................... 334 333 .................... .................... 613 .................... 113 WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1071 ....... .................... WA .... WA .... WA .... E–2006–BUSP–1072 ....... E–2006–BUSP–1075 ....... E–2006–BUSP–1076 ....... 151 654 655 WI ...... WI ...... WI ...... WV .... E–2006–BUSP–1077 E–2006–BUSP–1080 E–2006–BUSP–1081 E–2006–BUSP–1083 ....... ....... ....... ....... .................... 452 .................... 73 WY .... E–2006–BUSP–1085 ....... 665 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... Unobligated allocation Project Roanoke, Virginia-Improve Virginian Railway Station ........................ Roanoke, Virginia-Intermodal Facility ................................................. Roanoke, Virginia-Roanoke Railway and Link Passenger facility ...... Virgin Island Transit VITRAN, Virgin Islands ...................................... Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont. Brattleborough, VT, Intermodal Center ............................................... Burlington Transit Facilities, VT .......................................................... CCTA, VT, Bus, Facilities and Equipment ......................................... State of Vermont Buses, Facilities and Equipment ............................ Ben Franklin Transit, Maintenance and Operations Facility, WA ...... Everett Transit, Bus and Paratransit Vehicle Replacement, WA ....... Grays Harbor Transit, Transit Center Expansion, WA ....................... Ilwaco, WA Construct park and ride ................................................... Ilwaco, WA Procure shuttles for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park. Island Transit, WA Operations Base Facilities Project ....................... King County Airfield Transfer Area, WA ............................................. Link Transit Low Floor Coaches Chelan/Leavenworth, WA ............... North Bend, Washington-Park and Ride ............................................ Oak Harbor, WA Multimodal Facility .................................................. Port Angeles International Gateway Project, Washington ................. Puyallup Transit Center Park and Ride, Washington ......................... Seattle, WA Multimodal Terminal Redevelopment & Expansion ....... Skagit Transit Chuckanut Dr. Station in Burlington, Washington ....... Snohomish County, WA Community Transit bus purchases and facility enhancement. SW King County-Highline CC Intermodal Transit Facility and Parking Garage. Thurston County, WA Replace Thurston County Buses .................... Washington Southworth Terminal Redevelopment ............................ Washington, King Street Transportation Center-Intercity Bus Terminal Component. 7th District Buses and Bus Facilities, WI ........................................... State of Wisconsin Transit Intermodal Facilities ................................ Wisconsin Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities .................................. West Virginia Construct Beckley Intermodal Gateway pursuant to the eligibility provisions for projects listed under section 3030(d)(3) of P.L. 105–178. Wyoming Department of Transportation-Wyoming Statewide Bus and Bus Related Facilities. 47,589 38,071 95,179 297,000 t 990,000 594,000 990,000 297,000 247,500 495,000 816,750 772,200 19,036 19,036 456,857 1,188,000 495,000 152,286 190,357 792,000 772,200 792,000 297,000 571,072 841,500 171,321 990,000 49,500 968,547 1,138,500 8,000 4,568,573 680,130 $565,807,839 Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Ferry Boat Systems Allocations ...................................................................................... FY 2006 Unobligated Other Project Allocations: E–2006–BUSP–1094 ....... .................... Fuel Cell Bus Program ....................................................................... $9,900,000 Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Other Project Allocations ................................................................................................. FY 2006 Unallocated .................... ............................................................................................................. Amount. Total FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations ............................................................................................................................. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations ....................................................................................................................... FY 2006 Unobligated Ferry Boat Systems Allocations: CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1086 ....... .................... San Francisco Water Transit Authority ............................................... MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1087 ....... .................... Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ferry System .............. ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–1088 ....... .................... Maine State Ferry Service, Rockland ................................................. ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–1089 ....... .................... Swans Island, Maine Ferry Service .................................................... NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–1090 ....... .................... Camden, New Jersey Ferry System ................................................... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–1091 ....... .................... Governor’s Island, New York Ferry System ....................................... NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–1092 ....... .................... Staten Island Ferry ............................................................................. PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1093 ....... .................... Philadelphia Penn’s Landing Ferry Terminal ...................................... $11,137,500 24,893,251 Unobligated Allocations Grand Total ................................................................................................................................ Fiscal Years 2002, 2003 and 2004 Extended Allocations: AK ..... E–2003–BUSP–801 ......... .................... Anchorage International Airport Intermodal Facility, 2003 ................. CA ..... E–2002–BUSP–601 ......... .................... Orange County Transportation Authority ............................................ CA ..... E–2004–BUSP–049 ......... .................... Hybrid buses in Eureka, CA 2004 ...................................................... MT ..... E–2002–BUSP–319 ......... .................... Statewide bus and bus facilities, MT 2002 ......................................... NV ..... E–2003–BUSP–802 ......... .................... Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada for bus facilities, including bus rapid transit projects. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 2,475,000 2,475,000 643,500 346,500 990,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 11,137,500 $611,738,590 $861,331,362 u $1,967,357 v $247,507 w 242,718 x 806,496 y 4,918,393 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13951 TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued Earmark ID SAFETEA– LU Project No. Project E–2003–BUSP–705 ......... E–2002–BUSP–600 ......... E–2003–BUSP–706 ......... .................... .................... .................... Buffalo, New York Inner Harbor Redevelopment Project ................... City of Poughkeepsie for bus and bus facilities ................................. Oneida County buses and transit items, 2003 ................................... z 4,918,393 Total Extended Allocations ................................................................................................................................................ $14,306,175 State NY ..... NY ..... NY ..... Unobligated allocation aa 320,000 ab 885,311 a Funds originally designated for the Metro Red Line Wilshire Vermont Station (E–2005–BUSP–057) shall be available to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for bus and bus facility improvements. (July 7, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 12, 2006). b Funds originally designated for Sistrunk Transit and Pedestrian Access Improvement, FL (E–2005–BUSP–120) are now made available to implement bus stop, bus pullout and transit improvements consistent with the City of Ft. Lauderdale Community Redevelopment Agency plan. (July 7, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 12, 2006). c Funds originally designated for White Earth Tribal Nation Transit Center, MN/White Earth Tribal Nation Transit Center (E–2005–BUSP–703) shall be available for the purchase of buses for the White Earth Tribal Nation bus and bus related activities, MN. (July 7, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 25, 2005). d Funds originally designated for JATRAN fixed route vehicles, Mississippi shall now be made available to the City of Jackson, Mississippi, of which up to $2,000,000 shall be available for pedestrian access to the Jackson intermodal facility, beautification to bridge structure and brickwork. (October 13, 2005 response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 25, 2005). e Funds originally designated for Tulsa Transit Multi-Use facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma shall be available for Transit buses and equipment in Tulsa. (October 13, 2005, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter of May 25, 2005). f The project is a multimodal parking facility. (October 13, 2005 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter of May 25, 2005). g Period of availability extended to September 30, 2008 by reprogramming. h This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. i Funds originally designated for Sun Tran CNG Buses and Facilities made available to purchase bio-diesel vehicles in Tucson, AZ. (July 7, 2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter May 12, 2006). j Funds originally designated for Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery, CA (E–2006–BUSP–100) shall now be available to the Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery Science Center, Santa Ana, CA. The redirected funds are awarded to a State or local government entity and expended on activities that meet the buses criteria set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5309. (July 7, 2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter May 12, 2006). k This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Illinois project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. l The Statement of the Managers accompanying in the Fiscal Year 2006 DOT Appropriations bill includes $2,250,000 for GRTA Xpress Implement Buses. The funds shall be made available for both bus and bus facilities. (July 7, 2006 DOT response to Knollenbeng/Bond letter May 12, 2006). m This allocation was incorrectly listed as a California project and had the wrong project description in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. n April 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006, listed specific projects for which funds were made available. $342,000 was previously obligated leaving a remaining balance of $54,000, for Lincoln County Senior Citizen Bus, Kentucky. o Funds originally designated for MART Maintenance Facility, Fitchburg, MA. (E–2006–BUSP–488), shall be available for the MART maintenance facility expansion, Worcester County, MA. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006). p Funds originally designated for Automation Alley/BUSolutions, MI (E–2006–BUSP–520), $1,300,000 made available to The Rapid, the transit provider in the Grand Rapids, Michigan area, for bus acquisition. $700,000 remains available to Automation Alley/BUSsolutions in Michigan. (April 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006). q Funds originally designated for METRO St. Louis Downtown Shuttle Trolley, MO. (E–2006–BUSP–591), shall be available for the METRO Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006). r Funds originally designated for bus and bus facilities Clarkstown and White Plains, NY (E–2006–BUSP–713), $200,000 made available to White Plains for bus and bus facilities. $100,000 made available to Rockland County, NY, to procure mini-buses for service in Clarkstown, NY. (April 12, 2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006). s This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006. t The Statement of the Managers accompanying the Fiscal Year 2005 DOT Appropriations bill (H. Rpt. 108–792) includes $2,000,000 under the Bus and Bus Facilities for Bellows Falls Transit Improvements, Vermont (E–2005–BUSP–424). In addition, the Statement of the Managers accompanying the Fiscal Year 2006 DOT Appropriations bill includes $1,000,000 under the Bus and Bus Facilities for the Bellows Falls Multimodal Facility, VT (E–2006–BUSP–1039). It is the intent of the conferees that remaining funds be made available to a State or local governmental entity, who may apply on behalf of Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of December 19, 2006). u It is the intent of the conferees that these funds shall be available for projects related to this facility through Fiscal Year 2007, including related surface transportation projects. (November 26, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006). v The committee directs that amounts made available in Fiscal Year 2002 for Costa Mesa CNG facility, shall now be made available for Orange County Transportation Authority. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of December 19, 2006). w Funds originally designated for Bus and Bus facilities for the Eureka Intermodal Depot, CA (E–2004–BUSP–049), shall be available for the purchase of hybrid buses in Eureka, CA. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006). x Reprogrammed in FY 2005 (H. Rept. 108–792). y The committee directs that amounts made available in fiscal year 2003 for Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, shall now be made available for the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada for bus and bus facilities, including bus rapid transit projects. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of September 29, 2006). z Reprogrammed in FY 2005 (H. Rept. 4818, Sec. 527). aa The committee directs that amounts made available in Fiscal Year 2002 for the City of Middletown buses and bus facilities shall be redirected for the City of Poughkeepsie for bus and bus facilities. (April 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of January 12, 2006). ab Reprogrammed in FY 2005 from original earmark Utica Transit Authority Buses (H. Rept. 108–192). sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES TABLE 14.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS State Alaska .................................... Alaska/Hawaii ........................ Arizona ................................... California ................................ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Earmark ID D2007–NWST–001 D2007–NWST–002 D2007–NWST–003 D2007–NWST–004 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Project location and description ............... ............... ............... ............... Frm 00081 Denali Commission ............................................................... Alaska and Hawaii Ferry ....................................................... Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT .......................................... Metro Gold Line Eastside Light Rail Extension .................... Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Allocation $5,000,000 15,000,000 90,000,000 100,000,000 13952 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 14.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS—Continued State Earmark ID Project location and description Allocation California ................................ California ................................ California ................................ Colorado ................................ Colorado ................................ District of Columbia/Maryland Illinois ..................................... Illinois ..................................... Illinois ..................................... Maryland ................................ North Carolina ........................ New Jersey ............................ New York ............................... Ohio ....................................... Oregon ................................... Oregon ................................... Oregon ................................... Pennsylvania .......................... Puerto Rico ............................ Texas ..................................... Utah ....................................... Washington ............................ ................................................ D2007–NWST–005 ............... D2007–NWST–006 ............... D2007–NWST–007 ............... D2007–NWST–008 ............... D2007–NWST–009 ............... D2007–NWST–026 ............... D2007–NWST–010 ............... D2007–NWST–011 ............... D2007–NWST–012 ............... D2007–NWST–013 ............... D2007–NWST–014 ............... D2007–NWST–015 ............... D2007–NWST–016 ............... D2007–NWST–017 ............... D2007–NWST–018 ............... D2007–NWST–019 ............... D2007–NWST–020 ............... D2007–NWST–021 ............... D2007–NWST–022 ............... D2007–NWST–023 ............... D2007–NWST–024 ............... D2007–NWST–025 ............... ................................................ Mission Valley East ............................................................... Oceanside Escondido Rail Project ........................................ BART Extension to San Francisco International Airport ....... Southeast Corridor LRT ........................................................ West Corridor LRT ................................................................ Largo Metrorail Extension ..................................................... Douglas Branch Reconstruction ............................................ Ravenswood Line Extension ................................................. Union–Pacific West Line Extension ...................................... Central Light Rail Double Track ............................................ South Corridor LRT ............................................................... Hudson–Bergen MOS–2 ....................................................... Long Island Rail Road Eastside Access ............................... Euclid Corridor Transportation Project .................................. Interstate MAX LRT Extension .............................................. South Corridor I–205/Portland Mall LRT ............................... Wilsonville to Beaverton ........................................................ North Shore LRT Connector ................................................. Tren Urbano .......................................................................... Northwest/Southeast LRT MOS ............................................ Weber County to Salt Lake City Commuter Rail .................. Central Link Initial Segment .................................................. Unallocated Balance ............................................................. 806,654 684,040 2,424,694 80,000,000 35,000,000 35,000,000 1,573,675 40,000,000 1,255,978 482,822 70,744,065 100,000,000 300,000,000 693,013 542,940 80,000,000 27,600,000 55,000,000 2,670,518 80,000,000 80,000,000 80,000,000 265,861,601 Total Allocation ....................................................................................................................................................................... $1,550,340,000 TABLE 15.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS State Earmark ID FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations: AK, HI E2005–NWST–000 .......... AL ..... E2005–NWST–001 .......... CA ..... E2005–NWST–007 .......... CA ..... E2005–NWST–012 .......... LA ..... E2005–NWST–022 .......... MN .... E2005–NWST–027 .......... NV ..... E2005–NWST–035 .......... NV ..... E2005–NWST–036 .......... PA ..... E2005–NWST–042 .......... PA ..... E2005–NWST–043 .......... PR ..... E2005–NWST–046 .......... RI ...... E2005–NWST–047 .......... TX ..... E2005–NWST–049 .......... TX ..... E2005–NWST–051 .......... VA ..... E2005–NWST–055 .......... .......................................... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Unobligated allocation Project Location and Description Hawaii and Alaska Ferry Boats .................................................................................. Birmingham, Alabama, Transit Corridor ..................................................................... San Diego, California, Mid-Coast Light Rail Extension .............................................. Santa Clara County, California, Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor ...................... New Orleans, Louisiana, Canal Street Streetcar Project ........................................... Minneapolis, Minnesota, Northstar Commuter Rail Project ........................................ CATRAIL RTC Rail Project, Nevada .......................................................................... Las Vegas, Nevada, Resort Corridor Fixed Guideway Project .................................. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Corridor One ..................................................................... Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Schuylkill Valley MetroRail ............................................ San Juan, Puerto Rico, Tren Urbano Rapid Transit System ..................................... Rhode Island, Integrated Intermodal Project .............................................................. Capital Metro–Bus Rapid Transit Texas ..................................................................... Houston Advanced Metro Transit Plan, Texas ........................................................... Dulles Corridor Rapid Transit Project, Virginia ........................................................... Unallocated Amount $3,000,000 992,000 340,320 2,480,000 16,455,206 4,960,000 992,000 29,760,000 1,284,000 9,920,000 16,853,570 4,436,537 992,000 446,360 24,800,000 672,344 Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations ....................................................................................................................... FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations: AK, HI E2006–NWST–001 .......... Alaska and Hawaii Ferry ............................................................................................. CA ..... E2006–NWST–010 .......... Santa Barbara Coast Rail Track Improvement Project .............................................. CA ..... E2006–NWST–003 .......... ACE Gap Closure San Joaquin County ..................................................................... CA ..... E2006–NWST–011 .......... Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor Project, Santa Clara County ........................... CA ..... E2006–NWST–005 .......... Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit Extension ...................................................................... CA ..... E2006–NWST–006 .......... Mission Valley East ..................................................................................................... CT ..... E2006–NWST–014 .......... Hartford-New Britain Busway Project ......................................................................... CT ..... E2006–NWST–015 .......... Stamford Urban Transitway ........................................................................................ DE ..... E2006–NWST–016 .......... Northeast Corridor Commuter Rail Project ................................................................. FL ..... E2006–NWST–019 .......... Ft. Lauderdale Downtown Rail Link ............................................................................ FL ..... E2006–NWST–018 .......... City of Miami Streetcar ............................................................................................... FL ..... E2006–NWST–020 .......... Miami-Dade Transit County Metrorail Extension ........................................................ FL ..... E2006–NWST–017 .......... Central Florida Commuter Rail System ...................................................................... GA .... E2006–NWST–021 .......... Atlanta—Georgia 400 North Line Corridor Project ..................................................... IL ....... E2006–NWST–024 .......... CTA Yellow Line ......................................................................................................... IL ....... E2006–NWST–026 .......... Ogden Avenue Transit Corridor/Circle Line ................................................................ MA .... E2006–NWST–028 .......... North Shore Corridor Blue Line Extension ................................................................. MA .... E2006–NWST–030 .......... Boston/Fitchburg Massachusetts Rail Corridor .......................................................... MA .... E2006–NWST–029 .......... Silver Line Phase III .................................................................................................... MD .... E2006–NWST–032 .......... Baltimore Red Line and Green Line ........................................................................... $118,384,337 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $5,262,406 980,100 4,900,500 6,370,650 7,017,516 7,546,770 5,880,600 9,801,000 1,396,643 980,100 1,960,200 9,801,000 10,781,100 980,100 980,100 980,100 1,960,200 1,960,200 3,920,400 1,960,200 13953 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 15.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS—Continued State Earmark ID Unobligated allocation Project Location and Description MD .... E2006–NWST–031 .......... Baltimore Central Light Rail Double Track Project ..................................................... MI ...... E2006–NWST–034 .......... Detroit Center City Loop ............................................................................................. MI ...... E2006–NWST–033 .......... Ann Arbor/Detroit Commuter Rail ............................................................................... MN .... E2006–NWST–035 .......... North Star Corridor Commuter Rail Project ................................................................ MN .... E2006–NWST–036 .......... St. Paul Central Corridor, St. Paul/Minneapolis ......................................................... MO .... E2006–NWST–037 .......... Kansas City, Missouri—Southtown BRT .................................................................... NC .... E2006–NWST–039 .......... Triangle Transit Authority Regional Rail System (Raleigh-Durham) .......................... NJ ..... E2006–NWST–041 .......... Northern Branch Bergen County ................................................................................ NJ ..... E2006–NWST–042 .......... Northwest New Jersey-Northeast Pennsylvania Passenger Rail ............................... NJ ..... E2006–NWST–043 .......... Trans Hudson Midtown Corridor ................................................................................. NM .... E2006–NWST–044 .......... Commuter Rail, Albuquerque to Santa Fe ................................................................. NV ..... E2006–NWST–045 .......... Regional Fixed Guideway Project ............................................................................... NY ..... E2006–NWST–046 .......... Eastside Access Project ............................................................................................. OH .... E2006–NWST–048 .......... Cleveland-Euclid Corridor Transportation Project ...................................................... OR .... E2006–NWST–050 .......... Washington County Commuter Rail Project ............................................................... PA ..... E2006–NWST–051 .......... Corridor One Regional Rail Project ............................................................................ PA ..... E2006–NWST–053 .......... Schuylkill Valley Metro ................................................................................................ PR ..... E2006–NWST–054 .......... San Juan Tren Urbano ............................................................................................... RI ...... E2006–NWST–055 .......... Rhode Island Integrated Commuter Rail Project ........................................................ SC ..... E2006–NWST–056 .......... City of Rockhill Trolley Study ...................................................................................... TX ..... E2006–NWST–059 .......... Houston Metro ............................................................................................................. UT ..... E2006–NWST–061 .......... Mid-Jordan Light Rail Transit Line .............................................................................. VA ..... E2006–NWST–063 .......... Gainesville-Haymarket VRE Service Extension ......................................................... VA ..... E2006–NWST–062 .......... Dulles Corridor Rapid Transit Project, Virginia ........................................................... Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations ....................................................................................................................... 12,172,842 3,920,400 4,900,500 1,960,200 1,960,200 12,055,230 19,602,000 2,450,250 9,801,000 12,069,932 490,050 2,940,300 333,234,000 24,281,500 14,701,500 1,470,150 3,920,400 7,885,382 5,880,600 392,040 5,880,600 490,050 1,421,145 29,403,000 $598,703,156 Total Unobligated Allocations ............................................................................................................................................ $717,087,493 TABLE 16.—FY 2007 SECTION 5310 SPECIAL NEEDS FOR ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES APPORTIONMENTS sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State Apportionment Alabama ......................................................................................................................................................................................... Alaska ............................................................................................................................................................................................ American Samoa ........................................................................................................................................................................... Arizona ........................................................................................................................................................................................... Arkansas ........................................................................................................................................................................................ California ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Colorado ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Connecticut .................................................................................................................................................................................... Delaware ........................................................................................................................................................................................ District of Columbia ....................................................................................................................................................................... Florida ............................................................................................................................................................................................ Georgia .......................................................................................................................................................................................... Guam ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................................................................ Idaho .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Illinois ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Indiana ........................................................................................................................................................................................... Iowa ............................................................................................................................................................................................... Kansas ........................................................................................................................................................................................... Kentucky ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Louisiana ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Maine ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Maryland ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................................................................... Michigan ......................................................................................................................................................................................... Minnesota ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Mississippi ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Missouri .......................................................................................................................................................................................... Montana ......................................................................................................................................................................................... N. Mariana Islands ......................................................................................................................................................................... Nebraska ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Nevada ........................................................................................................................................................................................... New Hampshire ............................................................................................................................................................................. New Jersey .................................................................................................................................................................................... New Mexico ................................................................................................................................................................................... New York ....................................................................................................................................................................................... North Carolina ................................................................................................................................................................................ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $2,035,366 276,085 63,219 2,126,988 1,310,682 12,394,851 1,481,207 1,440,108 423,747 366,156 7,908,221 2,969,256 167,228 585,120 558,416 4,581,777 2,413,518 1,246,465 1,117,777 1,876,704 1,868,467 659,726 1,986,299 2,636,140 3,812,077 1,751,132 1,314,415 2,305,142 465,011 64,411 742,834 907,190 561,147 3,352,052 819,747 7,942,602 3,320,537 13954 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 16.—FY 2007 SECTION 5310 SPECIAL NEEDS FOR ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES APPORTIONMENTS—Continued State Apportionment North Dakota .................................................................................................................................................................................. Ohio ............................................................................................................................................................................................... Oklahoma ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Oregon ........................................................................................................................................................................................... Pennsylvania .................................................................................................................................................................................. Puerto Rico .................................................................................................................................................................................... Rhode Island .................................................................................................................................................................................. South Carolina ............................................................................................................................................................................... South Dakota ................................................................................................................................................................................. Tennessee ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Texas ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Utah ............................................................................................................................................................................................... Vermont ......................................................................................................................................................................................... Virgin Islands ................................................................................................................................................................................. Virginia ........................................................................................................................................................................................... Washington .................................................................................................................................................................................... West Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................. Wisconsin ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Wyoming ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 368,361 4,457,215 1,544,612 1,432,073 5,260,761 1,795,292 567,897 1,773,741 405,811 2,470,273 7,357,444 737,346 347,005 158,769 2,605,065 2,216,199 988,942 2,024,203 296,725 Total ........................................................................................................................................................................................ $116,659,554 TABLE 17.—FY 2007 SECTION 5311 AND SECTION 5340 NONURBANIZED APPORTIONMENTS AND SECTION 5311(B)(3) RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP) APPORTIONMENTS [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report apportionments for Section 5311 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. The State’s apportionment under the column heading ‘‘Sections 5311 and 5340 apportionment’’ includes Section 5311 and Growing States funds.] Sections 5311 and 5340 apportionment sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State Alabama ....................................................................................................................................................... Alaska .......................................................................................................................................................... American Samoa ......................................................................................................................................... Arizona ......................................................................................................................................................... Arkansas ...................................................................................................................................................... California ...................................................................................................................................................... Colorado ...................................................................................................................................................... Connecticut .................................................................................................................................................. Delaware ...................................................................................................................................................... Florida .......................................................................................................................................................... Georgia ........................................................................................................................................................ Guam ........................................................................................................................................................... Hawaii .......................................................................................................................................................... Idaho ............................................................................................................................................................ Illinois ........................................................................................................................................................... Indiana ......................................................................................................................................................... Iowa ............................................................................................................................................................. Kansas ......................................................................................................................................................... Kentucky ...................................................................................................................................................... Louisiana ...................................................................................................................................................... Maine ........................................................................................................................................................... Maryland ...................................................................................................................................................... Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................................. Michigan ....................................................................................................................................................... Minnesota .................................................................................................................................................... Mississippi .................................................................................................................................................... Missouri ........................................................................................................................................................ Montana ....................................................................................................................................................... N. Mariana Islands ....................................................................................................................................... Nebraska ...................................................................................................................................................... Nevada ......................................................................................................................................................... New Hampshire ........................................................................................................................................... New Jersey .................................................................................................................................................. New Mexico ................................................................................................................................................. New York ..................................................................................................................................................... North Carolina .............................................................................................................................................. North Dakota ................................................................................................................................................ Ohio ............................................................................................................................................................. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM Section 5311(b)(3) apportionment $11,637,807 5,320,819 199,704 8,323,026 8,882,775 19,998,674 7,315,810 2,377,249 1,108,746 12,017,749 15,087,041 539,792 1,729,098 5,126,780 12,445,383 11,927,818 8,889,211 8,235,807 11,260,036 8,866,858 4,775,042 4,376,645 3,058,310 15,184,764 11,178,461 10,115,947 12,150,008 6,603,066 30,743 5,755,218 4,319,300 3,077,790 2,852,281 7,194,716 15,385,473 19,341,692 3,485,128 17,519,593 $176,277 80,509 12,544 119,285 145,493 236,053 113,327 89,737 76,216 176,561 206,049 16,874 81,680 95,647 184,090 183,545 145,443 130,747 174,906 150,853 107,673 109,363 96,705 214,199 163,037 161,128 176,218 94,663 10,334 105,239 79,297 95,372 94,333 107,484 219,171 255,434 83,269 244,483 23MRN2 13955 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 17.—FY 2007 SECTION 5311 AND SECTION 5340 NONURBANIZED APPORTIONMENTS AND SECTION 5311(B)(3) RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP) APPORTIONMENTS—Continued [Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report apportionments for Section 5311 and Section 5340 were combined to show a single amount. The State’s apportionment under the column heading ‘‘Sections 5311 and 5340 apportionment’’ includes Section 5311 and Growing States funds.] Sections 5311 and 5340 apportionment Section 5311(b)(3) apportionment Oklahoma ..................................................................................................................................................... Oregon ......................................................................................................................................................... Pennsylvania ................................................................................................................................................ Puerto Rico .................................................................................................................................................. Rhode Island ................................................................................................................................................ South Carolina ............................................................................................................................................. South Dakota ............................................................................................................................................... Tennessee ................................................................................................................................................... Texas ........................................................................................................................................................... Utah ............................................................................................................................................................. Vermont ....................................................................................................................................................... Virginia ......................................................................................................................................................... Washington .................................................................................................................................................. West Virginia ................................................................................................................................................ Wisconsin ..................................................................................................................................................... Wyoming ...................................................................................................................................................... 9,914,012 8,581,134 17,741,333 1,235,686 510,592 9,718,038 4,310,749 12,388,999 29,710,596 4,232,444 2,311,127 10,912,491 8,392,208 5,902,440 11,806,200 4,080,793 152,348 129,179 245,736 79,739 70,338 159,949 89,879 185,988 333,925 86,541 87,357 170,030 135,620 122,430 176,956 81,335 Total ...................................................................................................................................................... $449,443,202 $7,320,588 State TABLE 18.—FY 2007 NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS ALLOCATIONS Allocation 1 Earmark ID Project Alabama ................. E2007–NATR–6701 ..................... Alabama ................. E2007–NATR–6702 ..................... Alabama ................. E2007–NATR–6703 ..................... California ................ E2007–NATR–6704 ..................... California ................ Connecticut ............ E2007–NATR–7101 ..................... E2007–NATR–6705 ..................... Connecticut ............ E2007–NATR–6706 ..................... District of Columbia District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6501 ..................... E2007–NATR–6707 ..................... Florida .................... Kentucky ................ E2007–NATR–6708 ..................... E2007–NATR–6709 ..................... Maryland ................ New Jersey ............ E2007–NATR–6710 ..................... E2007–NATR–6711 ..................... New Jersey ............ E2007–NATR–7102 ..................... North Dakota ......... E2007–NATR–6712 ..................... Ohio ....................... E2007–NATR–6713 ..................... Oregon ................... E2007–NATR–6714 ..................... Pennsylvania ......... E2007–NATR–6715 ..................... Pennsylvania ......... E2007–NATR–6716 ..................... Pennsylvania ......... sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES State E2007–NATR–6717 ..................... Wisconsin .............. E2007–NATR–8501 ..................... ................................ ................................ E2007–NATR–6502 ..................... E2007–NATR–6503 ..................... ................................ E2007–NATR–6718 ..................... Transportation Hybrid Electric Vehicle and Fuel Cell Research— University of Alabama. Transportation Infrastructure and Logistics Research—University of Alabama—Huntsville. Trauma Care System Research and Development—University of Alabama—Birmingham. Regional Transit Training Consortium Pilot Program—Southern CA Regional Transit Training Consortium. Center for Transit Oriented Development .......................................... Advanced Technology Bus Rapid Transit Project—Southeastern CT Advanced Technology BRT Project. Greater New Haven Transit District Fuel Cell-Powered Bus Research. Project ACTION .................................................................................. Public Transportation National Security Study—National Academy of Sciences. National Bus Rapid Transit Institute—University of South Florida ..... Application of Information Technology to Transportation Logistics and Security—Northern Kentucky University. Transit Career Ladder Training Program ........................................... Center for Advanced Transportation Initiatives—Rutgers Center for Advanced Transportation Initiatives. Institute of Technology’s Transportation, Economic, and Land Use System—NJ TELUS. Small Urban and Rural Transit Center—North Dakota State University. Intelligent Transportation System Pilot Project—Ohio State University. Portland, Oregon Streetcar Prototype Purchase and Deployment— TriMet. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Shuttle Deployment Demonstration Project—Allentown, PA. Regional Public Safety Training Center—Lehigh-Carbon Community College. Transit Security Training Facility—Chester County Community College. Wisconsin Supplemental Transportation Rural Assistance Program—WI DOT. Human Services Transportation Coordination .................................... National Technical Assistance Center for Senior Transportation (Section 5314(b)). Pilot Program for Remote Infrared Audible Signs .............................. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $487,000 487,000 500,000 380,000 1,000,000 540,000 525,960 3,000,000 250,000 1,750,000 400,000 1,000,000 525,960 540,000 800,000 465,000 1,000,000 800,000 500,000 750,000 2,000,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 500,000 13956 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 18.—FY 2007 NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS ALLOCATIONS—Continued Allocation 1 State Earmark ID Project ................................ ................................ E2007–NATR–7103 ..................... E2007–NATR–6801 ..................... Public Transportation Participation Pilot Program .............................. Transportation Equity Research Program .......................................... 1,000,000 1,000,000 Subtotal Allocation National Research and Technology Program ...................................................................................... District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6719 ..................... Transit Cooperative Research Program ............................................. District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6720 ..................... University Transportation Centers Program ....................................... New Jersey ............ E2007–NATR–6721 ..................... National Transit Institute ..................................................................... $22,800,920 9,300,000 7,000,000 4,300,000 Total Allocation National Research Programs .................................................................................................................... $43,400,920 1 Allocations include Small Business Innovative Research takedown when applicable. TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS Urbanized area/state Apportionment sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 200,000 or more in Population ...................................................................................................................................................... 50,000–199,999 in Population ....................................................................................................................................................... Nonurbanized ................................................................................................................................................................................. $86,400,000 28,800,000 28,800,000 National Total ......................................................................................................................................................................... Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 or more in Population: Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ............................................................................................................................... Akron, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................... Albany, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................. Albuquerque, NM .................................................................................................................................................................... Allentown—Bethlehem, PA—NJ ............................................................................................................................................ Anchorage, AK ....................................................................................................................................................................... Ann Arbor, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................... Antioch, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Asheville, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................... Atlanta, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Atlantic City, NJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... Augusta-Richmond County, GA—SC ..................................................................................................................................... Austin, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... Bakersfield, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Baltimore, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................... Barnstable Town, MA ............................................................................................................................................................. Baton Rouge, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... Birmingham, AL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Boise City, ID .......................................................................................................................................................................... Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ................................................................................................................................................... Boston, MA—NH—RI ............................................................................................................................................................. Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY ............................................................................................................................................. Buffalo, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................. Canton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. Cape Coral, FL ....................................................................................................................................................................... Charleston—North Charleston, SC ........................................................................................................................................ Charlotte, NC—SC ................................................................................................................................................................. Chattanooga, TN—GA ........................................................................................................................................................... Chicago, IL—IN ...................................................................................................................................................................... Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN ......................................................................................................................................................... Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................ Columbia, SC ......................................................................................................................................................................... Columbus, GA—AL ................................................................................................................................................................ Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ Concord, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Corpus Christi, TX .................................................................................................................................................................. Dallas—Fort Worth—Arlington, TX ........................................................................................................................................ Davenport, IA—IL ................................................................................................................................................................... Dayton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. Daytona Beach—Port Orange, FL ......................................................................................................................................... Denton—Lewisville, TX .......................................................................................................................................................... Denver—Aurora, CO .............................................................................................................................................................. Des Moines, IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Detroit, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................... Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ El Paso, TX—NM ................................................................................................................................................................... Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................ Evansville, IN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................. Fayetteville, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................... 144,000,000 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $559,566 262,301 243,289 343,932 228,109 88,502 127,800 89,316 120,215 1,415,682 102,367 201,825 428,056 335,486 918,141 79,179 310,627 375,374 102,516 77,282 1,448,238 274,601 510,836 119,001 155,494 231,598 292,995 178,019 3,729,369 610,517 819,481 178,625 202,042 157,239 514,252 106,069 211,359 2,095,014 132,714 319,945 143,926 87,808 736,267 134,315 1,776,059 160,702 675,416 140,201 104,713 160,308 13957 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Urbanized area/state Apportionment Flint, MI ................................................................................................................................................................................... Fort Collins, CO ...................................................................................................................................................................... Fort Wayne, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... Fresno, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Grand Rapids, MI ................................................................................................................................................................... Greensboro, NC ..................................................................................................................................................................... Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ............................................................................................................................................................... Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................ Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................ Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ Huntsville, AL .......................................................................................................................................................................... Indianapolis, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA ............................................................................................................................. Jackson, MS ........................................................................................................................................................................... Jacksonville, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Kansas City, MO—KS ............................................................................................................................................................ Knoxville, TN .......................................................................................................................................................................... Lancaster, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Lancaster—Palmdale, CA ...................................................................................................................................................... Lansing, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. Las Vegas, NV ....................................................................................................................................................................... Lexington-Fayette, KY ............................................................................................................................................................ Lincoln, NE ............................................................................................................................................................................. Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ Los Angeles—Long Beach—Santa Ana, CA ......................................................................................................................... Louisville, KY—IN ................................................................................................................................................................... Lubbock, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................... Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ Memphis, TN—MS—AR ......................................................................................................................................................... Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................ Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Minneapolis—St. Paul, MN .................................................................................................................................................... Mission Viejo, CA ................................................................................................................................................................... Mobile, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................... Modesto, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Nashville-Davidson, TN .......................................................................................................................................................... New Haven, CT ...................................................................................................................................................................... New Orleans, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... New York—Newark, NY—NJ—CT ......................................................................................................................................... Ogden—Layton, UT ................................................................................................................................................................ Oklahoma City, OK ................................................................................................................................................................. Omaha, NE—IA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Orlando, FL ............................................................................................................................................................................. Oxnard, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Palm Bay—Melbourne, FL ..................................................................................................................................................... Pensacola, FL—AL ................................................................................................................................................................. Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................ Philadelphia, PA—NJ—DE—MD ........................................................................................................................................... Phoenix—Mesa, AZ ................................................................................................................................................................ Pittsburgh, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Port St. Lucie, FL ................................................................................................................................................................... Portland, OR—WA ................................................................................................................................................................. Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY .............................................................................................................................................. Providence, RI—MA ............................................................................................................................................................... Provo—Orem, UT ................................................................................................................................................................... Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ Reading, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................ Richmond, VA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Riverside—San Bernardino, CA ............................................................................................................................................. Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................ Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................ Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI .............................................................................................................. Sacramento, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................... Salem, OR .............................................................................................................................................................................. Salt Lake City, UT .................................................................................................................................................................. San Antonio, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................... San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................ San Francisco—Oakland, CA ................................................................................................................................................ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 218,413 90,407 126,707 505,727 218,475 121,991 163,180 123,033 124,755 331,675 312,074 2,346,350 96,032 487,963 176,743 198,363 417,039 548,699 221,837 115,080 172,608 158,895 644,125 131,848 99,023 204,063 8,442,199 424,761 150,887 141,454 703,574 613,956 2,950,084 618,079 752,458 116,753 242,851 217,635 351,465 211,127 787,518 9,542,399 148,268 448,031 271,986 579,092 196,151 171,388 187,713 125,072 2,295,088 1,515,115 795,971 141,358 687,146 145,723 580,123 174,644 176,769 114,391 142,722 342,650 1,081,019 318,702 117,454 48,662 775,462 215,814 341,093 907,380 1,476,858 1,318,167 13958 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued Urbanized area/state Apportionment sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES San Jose, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... San Juan, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................... Santa Rosa, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Sarasota—Bradenton, FL ....................................................................................................................................................... Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Scranton, PA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Seattle, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................ South Bend, IN—MI ............................................................................................................................................................... Spokane, WA—ID .................................................................................................................................................................. Springfield, MA—CT ............................................................................................................................................................... Springfield, MO ....................................................................................................................................................................... St. Louis, MO—IL ................................................................................................................................................................... Stockton, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Syracuse, NY .......................................................................................................................................................................... Tallahassee, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Tampa—St. Petersburg, FL ................................................................................................................................................... Temecula—Murrieta, CA ........................................................................................................................................................ Thousand Oaks, CA ............................................................................................................................................................... Toledo, OH—MI ...................................................................................................................................................................... Trenton, NJ ............................................................................................................................................................................. Tucson, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................. Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................ Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ............................................................................................................................... Virginia Beach, VA ................................................................................................................................................................. Washington, DC—VA—MD .................................................................................................................................................... Wichita, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................. Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................................................................................ Worcester, MA—CT ............................................................................................................................................................... Youngstown, OH—PA ............................................................................................................................................................ 486,612 3,347,537 110,882 236,321 141,828 203,254 1,013,784 210,674 128,602 188,373 291,029 125,052 899,591 277,437 215,397 139,757 1,030,946 91,840 49,642 265,835 104,396 465,291 300,717 137,860 650,859 1,256,532 191,748 139,386 189,020 230,793 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population: Alabama .................................................................................................................................................................................. Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Arizona .................................................................................................................................................................................... Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................................. California ................................................................................................................................................................................. Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................................. Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................................................. Delaware ................................................................................................................................................................................. Florida ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................... Hawaii ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................... Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................... Kentucky ................................................................................................................................................................................. Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................ Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................................. Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................ Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................................. Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................... Mississippi .............................................................................................................................................................................. Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................................. Montana .................................................................................................................................................................................. N. Mariana Islands ................................................................................................................................................................. Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................ Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................................... New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................... New Jersey ............................................................................................................................................................................. New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................ New York ................................................................................................................................................................................ North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ North Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................................... Oregon .................................................................................................................................................................................... Pennsylvania .......................................................................................................................................................................... 86,400,000 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $805,905 36,316 290,494 518,014 3,000,086 483,031 294,526 49,569 1,678,878 919,739 54,443 311,710 662,248 708,815 426,122 194,919 264,981 836,620 254,427 316,406 270,424 897,332 243,496 150,126 300,193 230,052 83,476 15,349 39,745 230,658 147,701 285,184 541,073 919,021 174,497 675,417 182,912 233,689 884,906 13959 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued Urbanized area/state Apportionment sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Puerto Rico ............................................................................................................................................................................. South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... Tennessee .............................................................................................................................................................................. Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Vermont .................................................................................................................................................................................. Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................... Washington ............................................................................................................................................................................. West Virginia .......................................................................................................................................................................... Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................................... Wyoming ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2,710,414 516,851 130,637 600,676 3,230,936 132,974 68,962 614,054 799,167 547,326 732,721 102,782 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Nonurbanized Areas Less than 50,000 in Population: Alabama .................................................................................................................................................................................. Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................... American Samoa .................................................................................................................................................................... Arizona .................................................................................................................................................................................... Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................................. California ................................................................................................................................................................................. Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................................. Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................................................. Delaware ................................................................................................................................................................................. Florida ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................... Guam ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Hawaii ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................... Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................... Kentucky ................................................................................................................................................................................. Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................ Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................................. Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................ Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................................. Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................... Mississippi .............................................................................................................................................................................. Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................................. Montana .................................................................................................................................................................................. N. Mariana Islands ................................................................................................................................................................. Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................ Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................................... New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................... New Jersey ............................................................................................................................................................................. New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................ New York ................................................................................................................................................................................ North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ North Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................................... Oregon .................................................................................................................................................................................... Pennsylvania .......................................................................................................................................................................... Puerto Rico ............................................................................................................................................................................. Rhode Island .......................................................................................................................................................................... South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... Tennessee .............................................................................................................................................................................. Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Vermont .................................................................................................................................................................................. Virgin Islands .......................................................................................................................................................................... Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................... Washington ............................................................................................................................................................................. West Virginia .......................................................................................................................................................................... Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................................... Wyoming ................................................................................................................................................................................. 28,800,000 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 28,800,000 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $963,952 93,888 86,625 518,262 726,832 1,467,032 272,602 70,243 64,011 832,051 1,141,655 86,742 114,590 248,790 649,149 580,869 414,410 412,799 1,050,459 899,286 277,815 179,234 111,986 772,911 494,688 1,041,935 847,599 250,847 49,282 257,380 77,213 120,326 95,639 485,438 923,625 1,452,051 132,630 988,407 782,108 395,978 1,049,729 373,348 16,431 804,861 198,975 938,280 2,297,782 141,546 128,000 87,089 675,288 486,768 568,900 491,171 110,493 13960 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 20.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE ALLOCATIONS State Earmark ID Unobligated allocation Project and description FY 2002 Unobligated Congressional Allocations: AR E2002–JARC–005 .............................. CA E2002–JARC–008 .............................. NY E2002–JARC–054 .............................. VA E2002–JARC–082 .............................. Central Arkansas Transit Authority .................................................................. Del Norte County, California ............................................................................ Columbia County, New York ............................................................................ Winchester, Virginia ......................................................................................... $500,000 73,400 100,000 1,000,000 ........................................................................................................................... 1,673,400 LA County UTRANS ......................................................................................... City of Colorado Springs, CO .......................................................................... Chemung County Transit ................................................................................. Columbia County .............................................................................................. STEP–UP Job Access Project Dayton ............................................................ 495,335 100,284 74,300 99,067 123,834 Subtotal FY 2003 Unobligated Allocations ........................................................................................................................... FY 2004 Unobligated Congressional Allocations: AK E2004–JARC–000 .............................. Craig Transit Service JARC Program .............................................................. AL E2004–JARC–006 .............................. Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program [ADA] Rural Transportation Services. CA E2004–JARC–013 .............................. City of Irwindale Senior Transportation Services ............................................. CA E2004–JARC–014 .............................. Guaranteed Ride Home, Santa Clarita ............................................................ FL E2004–JARC–024 .............................. Key West, Florida Job Access Reverse Commute .......................................... IA .. E2004–JARC–026 .............................. Iowa Statewide JARC ...................................................................................... KS E2004–JARC–031 .............................. ADA Mobility Planning ...................................................................................... MD E2004–JARC–040 .............................. VoxLinx Voice-Enabled Transit Trip Planner ................................................... NJ E2004–JARC–050 .............................. New Jersey Community Development Corporation Transportation Opportunity Center. NY E2004–JARC–055 .............................. Broome County Transit JARC .......................................................................... NY E2004–JARC–061 .............................. Essex County Job Access Reverse Commute Project .................................... NY E2004–JARC–063 .............................. MTA Long Island Bus Job Access Reverse Commute Project ....................... NY E2004–JARC–065 .............................. North Country County Consortium ................................................................... NY E2004–JARC–070 .............................. Ulster County Area Transit Rural Feeder Service ........................................... NV E2004–JARC–053 .............................. Lake Tahoe Public Transit Services JARC Project ......................................... SD E2004–JARC–083 .............................. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Public Bus System ............................................ TN E2004–JARC–087 .............................. Monroe County TN Job Access Reverse Commute Program ......................... TX E2004–JARC–090 .............................. Corpus Christi Welfare to Work Project ........................................................... TX E2004–JARC–094 .............................. San Antonio VIA Metropolitan Transit JARC Program .................................... TX E2004–JARC–096 .............................. Texas Colonias JARC Initiative ........................................................................ VA E2004–JARC–101 .............................. Virginia Beach Paratransit Services ................................................................. WI E2004–JARC–109 .............................. Wisconsin Statewide JARC .............................................................................. 892,820 Subtotal FY 2002 Unobligated Allocations FY 2003 Unobligated Congressional Allocations: CA E2003–JARC–011 .............................. CO E2003–JARC–020 .............................. NY E2003–JARC–065 .............................. NY E2003–JARC–066 .............................. OH E2003–JARC–078 .............................. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Subtotal FY 2004 Unobligated Allocations FY 2005 Unobligated Congressional Allocations: AK E2005–JARC–000 .............................. AK E2005–JARC–001 .............................. AK E2005–JARC–003 .............................. AK E2005–JARC–004 .............................. AK E2005–JARC–005 .............................. AL E2005–JARC–007 .............................. AL E2005–JARC–008 .............................. AL E2005–JARC–009 .............................. CA E2005–JARC–013 .............................. CA E2005–JARC–014 .............................. CO E2005–JARC–017 .............................. DC E2005–JARC–097 .............................. DC E2005–JARC–020 .............................. DC GA GA IL .. IN .. LA ME MI MN MO MO NJ NY NY E2005–JARC–021 E2005–JARC–025 E2005–JARC–026 E2005–JARC–028 E2005–JARC–031 E2005–JARC–037 E2005–JARC–041 E2005–JARC–042 E2005–JARC–047 E2005–JARC–049 E2005–JARC–050 E2005–JARC–053 E2005–JARC–057 E2005–JARC–058 VerDate Aug<31>2005 .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 49,563 495,630 64,432 396,504 495,630 159,980 361,810 1,288,638 297,378 99,126 99,126 247,815 456,299 49,563 99,126 247,815 99,126 372,714 136,298 2,379,023 198,252 2,577,275 ........................................................................................................................... 10,671,123 Craig Transit JARC, Alaska ............................................................................. Kenai Peninsula JARC, Alaska ........................................................................ Mobility Coalition, Alaska ................................................................................. North Star Borough Transit JARC, Alaska ...................................................... Seward Transit JARC, Alaska .......................................................................... ARC of Madison County, Alabama .................................................................. Easter Seals Central Alabama JARC .............................................................. Gees Bend Ferry, Alabama ............................................................................. Guaranteed Ride Program, California .............................................................. Job Access Transit, Hayward, California ......................................................... Colorado Transit Coalition JARC ..................................................................... Community Transportation JOBLINKS Demonstration .................................... Technical Assistance Support & Performance Reviews of the JARC Grants Program. Washington Metro Job Access Initiative .......................................................... Chatham JARC, Georgia ................................................................................. Dooly-Crisp Unified Transportation System, Georgia ...................................... Illinois Statewide JARC .................................................................................... IndyFlex, Indiana .............................................................................................. Louisiana Statewide JARC ............................................................................... Maine Statewide JARC Program ..................................................................... DCC Community Health & Safety Transport Project, Michigan ...................... Metropolitan Council Job Access, Minneapolis, Minnesota ............................. Metro St. Louis Downtown Shuttle Trolley, Missouri ....................................... Missouri Statewide JARC ................................................................................. New Jersey Statewide JARC ........................................................................... Broome County Transit, Binghamton, New York ............................................. Central New York Job Access Reverse Commute, New York ........................ 49,559 594,709 495,590 74,338 198,236 79,734 495,590 1,982,362 136,687 211 529,310 620,899 7,073 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 569,530 1,982,362 198,236 145,842 1,238,976 2,115,329 442,389 297,354 991,182 a 941,622 385,000 5,203,702 247,796 495,590 13961 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 20.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE ALLOCATIONS—Continued State Unobligated allocation Earmark ID Project and description NV E2005–JARC–056 .............................. OH PA TN TN TX TX TX WA WA WA WI WI WV E2005–JARC–066 E2005–JARC–071 E2005–JARC–077 E2005–JARC–080 E2005–JARC–081 E2005–JARC–082 E2005–JARC–083 E2005–JARC–089 E2005–JARC–090 E2005–JARC–092 E2005–JARC–094 E2005–JARC–095 E2005–JARC–096 Statewide Small Urban and Rural Public/Specialized Transportation Services (JARC), Nevada. Western Reserve Transit Job Access Program, Ohio ..................................... Philadelphia Unemployment Project (PUP), Pennsylvania .............................. Children’s Health Fund JARC, Tennessee ...................................................... Tennessee Statewide JARC ............................................................................ Abilene JARC, Texas ....................................................................................... El Paso JARC, Texas ...................................................................................... Island Transit JARC, Texas ............................................................................. North Central Puget Sound Vehicle Trip Reduction Incentives, Washington Okanogan County Senior Citizens JARC, Washington ................................... WorkFirst Transportation Initiative, Washington .............................................. Ways to Work, Wisconsin ................................................................................ Wisconsin Statewide JARC .............................................................................. West Virginia Statewide JARC ......................................................................... 79,734 1,106,772 495,590 3,784,745 148,677 495,590 136,687 991,182 65,142 775,447 170,591 2,577,071 114,653 Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations ........................................................................................................................... 31,916,713 Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................ 45,154,056 .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. 455,624 a November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006, funds made available for the continuation and expansion of existing JARC bus service on five north county bus routes servicing the METRO Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. Funds may be expended on JARC activities authorized under Section 3037 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS Urbanized area/state Apportionment sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES UZAs 200,000 or more in Population ............................................................................................................................................ UZAs 50,000–199,999 in Population ............................................................................................................................................. Nonurbanized ................................................................................................................................................................................. $48,600,000 16,200,000 16,200,000 National Total .................................................................................................................................................................. Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 or more in Population: Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian, PR .................................................................................................................................... Akron, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................... Albany, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................. Albuquerque, NM .................................................................................................................................................................... Allentown-Bethlehem, PA–NJ ................................................................................................................................................ Anchorage, AK ....................................................................................................................................................................... Ann Arbor, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................... Antioch, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Asheville, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................... Atlanta, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Atlantic City, NJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... Augusta-Richmond County, GA–SC ...................................................................................................................................... Austin, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... Bakersfield, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Baltimore, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................... Barnstable Town, MA ............................................................................................................................................................. Baton Rouge, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... Birmingham, AL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Boise City, ID .......................................................................................................................................................................... Bonita Springs-Naples, FL ..................................................................................................................................................... Boston, MA–NH–RI ................................................................................................................................................................ Bridgeport-Stamford, CT–NY ................................................................................................................................................. Buffalo, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................. Canton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. Cape Coral, FL ....................................................................................................................................................................... Charleston-North Charleston, SC ........................................................................................................................................... Charlotte, NC–SC ................................................................................................................................................................... Chattanooga, TN–GA ............................................................................................................................................................. Chicago, IL–IN ........................................................................................................................................................................ Cincinnati, OH–KY–IN ............................................................................................................................................................ Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................ Columbia, SC ......................................................................................................................................................................... Columbus, GA–AL .................................................................................................................................................................. Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................ Concord, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Corpus Christi, TX .................................................................................................................................................................. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ............................................................................................................................................. 81,000,000 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 $126,100 162,675 156,364 182,730 156,018 52,136 61,401 60,601 77,517 888,971 73,829 108,159 198,836 131,079 635,438 78,928 140,317 216,937 63,948 73,189 1,123,648 237,663 302,048 74,387 117,307 129,823 193,086 114,462 2,281,657 402,647 516,455 108,709 115,920 79,731 287,416 121,779 92,875 1,133,868 13962 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Urbanized area/state Apportionment Davenport, IA–IL ..................................................................................................................................................................... Dayton, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................. Daytona Beach-Port Orange, FL ............................................................................................................................................ Denton-Lewisville, TX ............................................................................................................................................................. Denver-Aurora, CO ................................................................................................................................................................. Des Moines, IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Detroit, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................... Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ El Paso, TX–NM ..................................................................................................................................................................... Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................ Evansville, IN–KY ................................................................................................................................................................... Fayetteville, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................... Flint, MI ................................................................................................................................................................................... Fort Collins, CO ...................................................................................................................................................................... Fort Wayne, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... Fresno, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Grand Rapids, MI ................................................................................................................................................................... Greensboro, NC ..................................................................................................................................................................... Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Gulfport-Biloxi, MS .................................................................................................................................................................. Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................ Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................ Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ Huntsville, AL .......................................................................................................................................................................... Indianapolis, IN ....................................................................................................................................................................... Indio-Cathedral City-Palm Springs, CA .................................................................................................................................. Jackson, MS ........................................................................................................................................................................... Jacksonville, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Kansas City, MO–KS .............................................................................................................................................................. Knoxville, TN .......................................................................................................................................................................... Lancaster, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Lancaster-Palmdale, CA ......................................................................................................................................................... Lansing, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................. Las Vegas, NV ....................................................................................................................................................................... Lexington-Fayette, KY ............................................................................................................................................................ Lincoln, NE ............................................................................................................................................................................. Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA .............................................................................................................................. Louisville, KY–IN .................................................................................................................................................................... Lubbock, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................... Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................ Memphis, TN–MS–AR ............................................................................................................................................................ Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................ Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN ....................................................................................................................................................... Mission Viejo, CA ................................................................................................................................................................... Mobile, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................... Modesto, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Nashville-Davidson, TN .......................................................................................................................................................... New Haven, CT ...................................................................................................................................................................... New Orleans, LA .................................................................................................................................................................... New York-Newark, NY–NJ–CT .............................................................................................................................................. Ogden-Layton, UT .................................................................................................................................................................. Oklahoma City, OK ................................................................................................................................................................. Omaha, NE–IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Orlando, FL ............................................................................................................................................................................. Oxnard, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL ........................................................................................................................................................ Pensacola, FL–AL .................................................................................................................................................................. Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................ Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ................................................................................................................................................ Phoenix-Mesa, AZ .................................................................................................................................................................. Pittsburgh, PA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Port St. Lucie, FL ................................................................................................................................................................... Portland, OR–WA ................................................................................................................................................................... Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ................................................................................................................................................ Providence, RI–MA ................................................................................................................................................................. Provo-Orem, UT ..................................................................................................................................................................... Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................ Reading, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 73,714 202,124 96,642 52,171 508,189 92,618 1,191,993 71,810 202,578 63,190 68,566 78,091 121,282 43,094 75,827 182,740 134,163 75,458 98,271 73,167 92,218 246,950 199,316 1,058,478 55,983 344,829 89,378 88,265 273,094 372,884 133,250 84,704 75,358 78,317 427,045 69,302 51,472 116,028 3,618,995 270,486 59,515 68,449 163,731 306,107 1,677,667 354,185 524,419 108,270 116,538 105,141 216,456 150,505 346,048 5,715,679 92,104 235,978 151,226 351,306 102,398 133,980 104,064 69,322 1,501,297 817,306 497,805 102,434 422,056 91,165 381,175 51,869 109,008 70,151 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices 13963 TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued Urbanized area/state Apportionment sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................ Richmond, VA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Riverside-San Bernardino, CA ............................................................................................................................................... Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................ Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................ Round Lake Beach-McHenry-Grayslake, IL–WI .................................................................................................................... Sacramento, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................... Salem, OR .............................................................................................................................................................................. Salt Lake City, UT .................................................................................................................................................................. San Antonio, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................... San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................ San Francisco-Oakland, CA ................................................................................................................................................... San Jose, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................... San Juan, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................... Santa Rosa, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Sarasota-Bradenton, FL ......................................................................................................................................................... Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Scranton, PA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Seattle, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................ South Bend, IN–MI ................................................................................................................................................................. Spokane, WA–ID .................................................................................................................................................................... Springfield, MA–CT ................................................................................................................................................................ Springfield, MO ....................................................................................................................................................................... St. Louis, MO–IL ..................................................................................................................................................................... Stockton, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Syracuse, NY .......................................................................................................................................................................... Tallahassee, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................... Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL ...................................................................................................................................................... Temecula-Murrieta, CA .......................................................................................................................................................... Thousand Oaks, CA ............................................................................................................................................................... Toledo, OH–MI ....................................................................................................................................................................... Trenton, NJ ............................................................................................................................................................................. Tucson, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................. Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................ Victorville-Hesperia-Apple Valley, CA .................................................................................................................................... Virginia Beach, VA ................................................................................................................................................................. Washington, DC–VA–MD ....................................................................................................................................................... Wichita, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................. Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................................................................................ Worcester, MA–CT ................................................................................................................................................................. Youngstown, OH–PA .............................................................................................................................................................. 91,383 228,332 451,996 192,186 77,674 46,333 423,003 61,392 219,483 419,240 724,318 950,208 399,440 907,212 80,089 201,463 70,682 136,965 719,018 89,205 81,200 102,142 190,613 61,769 569,735 108,677 114,968 42,761 750,519 59,215 45,968 153,366 79,784 223,339 169,347 63,305 374,754 921,237 118,285 83,765 134,039 133,542 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population: Alabama .................................................................................................................................................................................. Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Arizona .................................................................................................................................................................................... Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................................. California ................................................................................................................................................................................. Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................................. Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................................................. Delaware ................................................................................................................................................................................. Florida ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................... Hawaii ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................... Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................... Kentucky ................................................................................................................................................................................. Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................ Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................................. Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................ Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................................. Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................... Mississippi .............................................................................................................................................................................. Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................................. Montana .................................................................................................................................................................................. N. Mariana Islands ................................................................................................................................................................. 48,600,000 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 427,039 19,990 138,375 285,216 1,658,388 275,030 263,340 32,717 1,243,752 450,350 46,626 162,054 366,849 416,387 242,588 114,329 156,206 439,286 178,554 283,609 192,974 600,838 142,564 69,215 169,381 117,871 25,394 13964 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued Urbanized area/state Apportionment sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................ Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................................... New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................... New Jersey ............................................................................................................................................................................. New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................ New York ................................................................................................................................................................................ North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ North Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................................... Oregon .................................................................................................................................................................................... Pennsylvania .......................................................................................................................................................................... Puerto Rico ............................................................................................................................................................................. South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... Tennessee .............................................................................................................................................................................. Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Vermont .................................................................................................................................................................................. Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................... Washington ............................................................................................................................................................................. West Virginia .......................................................................................................................................................................... Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................................... Wyoming ................................................................................................................................................................................. 7,069 32,221 221,356 117,951 126,052 329,549 668,035 101,329 457,729 78,177 119,717 538,542 725,592 369,859 89,214 377,480 1,424,599 50,707 42,435 370,909 513,614 323,652 530,634 64,656 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Nonurbanized Areas Less than 50,000 in Population: Alabama .................................................................................................................................................................................. Alaska ..................................................................................................................................................................................... American Samoa .................................................................................................................................................................... Arizona .................................................................................................................................................................................... Arkansas ................................................................................................................................................................................. California ................................................................................................................................................................................. Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................................. Connecticut ............................................................................................................................................................................. Delaware ................................................................................................................................................................................. Florida ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................... Guam ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Hawaii ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Idaho ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................... Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................... Kentucky ................................................................................................................................................................................. Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................ Maine ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................................. Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................ Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................................. Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................... Mississippi .............................................................................................................................................................................. Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................................. Montana .................................................................................................................................................................................. N. Mariana Islands ................................................................................................................................................................. Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................ Nevada ................................................................................................................................................................................... New Hampshire ...................................................................................................................................................................... New Jersey ............................................................................................................................................................................. New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................ New York ................................................................................................................................................................................ North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ North Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Oklahoma ............................................................................................................................................................................... Oregon .................................................................................................................................................................................... Pennsylvania .......................................................................................................................................................................... Puerto Rico ............................................................................................................................................................................. Rhode Island .......................................................................................................................................................................... South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................ South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................... 16,200,000 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 549,123 44,556 7,815 233,977 395,881 681,111 153,515 73,375 47,217 529,045 625,568 22,802 64,695 106,683 417,599 457,793 271,824 236,728 574,365 384,804 174,703 154,259 97,120 548,108 313,216 466,476 453,812 104,314 751 136,742 56,657 118,285 73,896 178,338 570,674 892,873 62,960 657,623 399,258 269,190 661,768 83,167 17,292 453,680 83,154 13965 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued Urbanized area/state Apportionment Tennessee .............................................................................................................................................................................. Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Vermont .................................................................................................................................................................................. Virgin Islands .......................................................................................................................................................................... Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................... Washington ............................................................................................................................................................................. West Virginia .......................................................................................................................................................................... Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................................................... Wyoming ................................................................................................................................................................................. 584,492 1,111,556 64,976 81,040 15,756 456,910 272,757 296,767 354,454 54,500 Total ................................................................................................................................................................................. 16,200,000 TABLE 22.—FY 2007 SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS SAFETEA– LU Project No. State Earmark ID Project location and description California ........... E2007–ALTA–001 .................. Illinois ................. Illinois ................. Maryland ............ Minnesota .......... E2007–ALTA–002 E2007–ALTA–003 E2007–ALTA–004 E2007–ALTA–005 .................. .................. .................. .................. 7 13 12 1 Mississippi ......... E2007–ALTA–006 .................. 14 North Carolina ... E2007–ALTA–007 .................. 11 New Jersey ........ New Jersey ........ E2007–ALTA–008 .................. E2007–ALTA–009 .................. 2 6 New Jersey ........ New Mexico ....... E2007–ALTA–010 .................. E2007–ALTA–011 .................. 18 10 Oregon ............... E2007–ALTA–012 .................. 3 Oregon ............... South Carolina ... E2007–ALTA–013 .................. E2007–ALTA–014 .................. 4 15 Utah ................... E2007–ALTA–015 .................. 17 Utah ................... Washington ........ Wisconsin .......... E2007–ALTA–016 .................. E2007–ALTA–017 .................. E2007–ALTA–018 .................. 16 9 8 5 Allocation San Gabriel Valley—Gold Line Foothill Extension Corridor Study. Metra BNSF Naperville to Aurora Corridor Study .................. Metra-West Line Extension, Elgin to Rockford Study ............ Baltimore Red Line/Green Line Transit Project Study ........... Minnesota Red Rock Corridor/Rush Line/Central Corridors Studies. Madison-Ridgeland Transportation Commission, Mississippi, Madison LRT Corridor Study. Piedmont Authority Regional Transportation East-West Corridor Study. Trans-Hudson Midtown Corridor Study .................................. Monmouth-Ocean-Middlesex Counties, New Jersey Corridor Study. New Jersey Transit Midtown Project Study ............................ Middle Rio Grande Coalition of Governments, Albuquerque to Santa Fe Corridor Study. Lane County, Oregon Bus Rapid Transit Phase II Corridor Study. Portland Streetcar, Oregon Corridor Study ............................ South Carolina Department of Transportation Light Rail Study. Sevierville County Transportation Board, Sevier County BRT Study. Provo Orem BRT Study .......................................................... Sound Transit I–90 Long-Range Plan Corridor Studies ......... Madison and Dane Counties, Wisconsin Transport 2020 Corridor Study. $1,250,000 Unallocated Amount ......................................................... Total Allocation ............................................................................................................................................................................. 6,100,000 25,000,000 1,250,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 350,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,250,000 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 1,500,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 750,000 750,000 TABLE 23.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS State Earmark ID Project location and description sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES FY 2006 Unobligated California ......... Illinois .............. Maryland .......... Michigan .......... Allocations E2006–ALTA–000 E2006–ALTA–001 E2006–ALTA–003 E2006–ALTA–005 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ Minnesota ........ New Jersey ..... New Jersey ..... New Jersey ..... New Mexico ..... E2006–ALTA–004 E2006–ALTA–007 E2006–ALTA–009 E2006–ALTA–008 E2006–ALTA–010 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ South Carolina Utah ................. Utah ................. E2006–ALTA–013 ........................ E2006–ALTA–014 ........................ E2006–ALTA–015 ........................ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 San Gabriel Valley-Gold Line Foothill Extension Corridor Study ........ Metra BNSF Naperville to Aurora Corridor Study ............................... Baltimore Red Line/Green Line Transit Project Study ........................ Madison-Ridgeland Transportation Commission, Mississippi, Madison LRT Corridor Study. Minnesota Red Rock Corridor/Rush Line/Central Corridors Studies .. Trans-Hudson Midtown Corridor Study ............................................... New Jersey Transit Midtown Project Study ........................................ Monmouth-Ocean-Middlesex Counties, New Jersey Corridor Study .. Middle Rio Grande Coalition of Governments, Albuquerque to Santa Fe Corridor Study. South Carolina Department of Transportation Light Rail Study .......... Sevierville County Transportation Board, Sevier County BRT Study Provo Orem BRT Study ....................................................................... Frm 00095 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2 Unobligated allocation $1,237,500 1,237,500 1,485,000 346,500 1,980,000 1,485,000 2,475,000 1,237,500 495,000 297,000 495,000 495,000 13966 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices TABLE 23.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS—Continued State Unobligated allocation Earmark ID Project location and description ....................................................... Unallocated Amount ............................................................................ 6,039,000 Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................ 19,305,000 ......................... [FR Doc. 07–1290 Filed 3–15–07; 3:11pm] sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4910–57–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 Mar 22, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM 23MRN2

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13872-13966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1290]



[[Page 13871]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





Department of Transportation





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Federal Transit Administration



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments and Allocations and Program 
Information; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 13872]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Transit Administration


FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments and Allocations and Program 
Information

AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The ``Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007,'' 
(Public Law 110-5), signed into law by President Bush on February 15, 
2007, makes funds available for all of the surface transportation 
programs of the Department of Transportation (DOT) for the Fiscal Year 
(FY) ending September 30, 2007. This notice provides information on the 
FY 2007 funding available for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 
assistance programs, and provides program guidance and requirements, 
and information on several program issues important in the current 
year. The notice also includes tables that show unobligated carryover 
funding available in FY 2007 under certain discretionary programs from 
prior years. Finally, this notice also references separate Notices of 
Funding Availability (NOFA) published concurrently for discretionary 
opportunities under the Bus and Bus Facilities Program and the 
Alternatives Analysis Program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about this 
notice contact Mary Martha Churchman, Director, Office of Transit 
Programs, at (202) 366-2053. Please contact the appropriate FTA 
regional office for any specific requests for information or technical 
assistance. The Appendix at the end of this notice includes contact 
information for FTA regional offices. An FTA headquarters contact for 
each major program area is also included in the discussion of that 
program in the text of the notice.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Overview
II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs
    A. Funding Based on FY 2007 Continuing Appropriations 
Resolution, 2007, and SAFETEA-LU Authorization
    B. Program Funds Set-aside for Project Management Oversight
III. FY 2007 FTA Key Program Initiatives and Changes
    A. SAFETEA-LU Implementation
    B. Planning Emphasis Areas
    C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities
    D. Changes in Flexible Funding Procedures
    E. National Transit Database (NTD) Strike Policy
IV. FTA Programs
    A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303)
    B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5304)
    C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307)
    D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5308)
    E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway 
Modernization
    F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Bus and Bus-
Related Facilities
    G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--New Starts
    H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals with 
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
    I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311)
    J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program (49 U.S.C. 
5311(b)(3))
    K. Public Transportation on Indian Reservation Program (49 
U.S.C. 5311(c))
    L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5314)
    M. Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
    N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
    O. Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands (49 
U.S.C. 5320)
    P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. 5339)
    Q. Growing States and High Density States Formula (49 U.S.C. 
5340)
    R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note)
V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2007 Grants Requirements
    A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to Incur Project Costs
    B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
    C. FTA FY 2007 Annual List of Certifications and Assurances
    D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
    E. Grant Application Procedures
    F. Payments
    G. Oversight
    H. Technical Assistance
Tables
    1. FTA FY 2007 Appropriations and Apportionments for Grant 
Programs
    2. FTA FY 2007 Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program and 
Statewide Transportation Planning Program Apportionments
    3. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 and Section 5340 Urbanized Area 
Apportionments
    4. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 Apportionment Formula
    5. FTA FY 2007 Formula Programs Apportionments Data Unit Values
    6. FTA FY 2007 Small Transit Intensive Cities Performance Data 
and Apportionments
    7. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas 200,000 or More in Population 
Eligible to Use Section 5307 Funds for Operating Assistance
    8. FTA FY 2007 Section 5308 Clean Fuels Grant Program 
Allocations
    9. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5308 Clean Fuels 
Allocations
    10. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization 
Apportionments
    11. FTA FY 2007 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program 
Apportionment Formula
    12. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related Allocations
    13. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related 
Facilities Allocations
    14. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 New Starts Allocations
    15. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 New Starts 
Allocations
    16. FTA FY 2007 Special Needs for Elderly Individuals and 
Individuals With Disabilities Apportionments
    17. FTA FY 2007 Section 5311 and Section 5340 Nonurbanized Area 
Formula Apportionments, and Rural Transportation Assistance Program 
(RTAP) Allocations
    18. FTA FY 2007 National Research Program Allocations
    19. FTA FY 2007 Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute 
(JARC) Apportionments
    20. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Jarc Allocations
    21. FTA FY 2007 Section 5317 New Freedom Apportionments
    22. FTA FY 2007 Section 5339 Alternative Analysis Allocations
    23. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5339 Alternative Analysis 
Alliocations
Appendix

I. Overview

    This document apportions or allocates the FY 2007 funds available 
under the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, among potential 
program recipients according to statutory formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 
53 or congressional designations in Safe, Accountable, Flexible, 
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU).
    For each FTA program included, we have provided relevant 
information on the FY 2007 funding currently available, requirements, 
period of availability, and other related program information and 
highlights, as appropriate. A separate section of the document provides 
information on requirements and guidance that are applicable to all FTA 
programs.

II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs

A. Funding Based on FY 2007 Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, 
and SAFETEA-LU Authorization

    The Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, (Pub. L. 
110-5, February 15, 2007); hereafter called the Continuing 
Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides general funds and obligation 
authority for trust funds that total $8.97 billion for FTA programs, 
through September 30, 2007. Table 1 of this document shows the funding 
for the FTA programs, as provided for in the Continuing

[[Page 13873]]

Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and the reallocation of any prior year 
funds to the program. All the Formula Programs and the Section 5309 Bus 
and Bus Facilities Program are entirely funded from the Mass Transit 
Account of the Highway Trust Fund in FY 2007. The Section 5309 New 
Starts program, the Research program, and FTA administrative expenses 
are funded by appropriations from the General Fund of the Treasury.
    Congress has enacted a full year Continuing Appropriations 
Resolution, 2007, in lieu of a new Appropriations Act for FY 2007. This 
Notice includes tables of apportionments and allocations for FTA 
programs. Allocations based on SAFETEA-LU are included for some 
discretionary programs. In addition, FTA will issue separate Notices of 
Funding Availability to solicit applications for discretionary funds 
not allocated in SAFETEA-LU.

B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project Management Oversight

    FTA uses a percentage of funds appropriated to certain FTA programs 
for program oversight activities conducted by the agency. The funds are 
used to provide necessary oversight activities, including oversight of 
the construction of any major project under these statutory programs; 
to conduct safety and security, civil rights, procurement, management 
and financial reviews and audits; and to provide technical assistance 
to correct deficiencies identified in compliance reviews and audits.
    Section 5327 of title 49, U.S.C., 5327 authorizes the takedown of 
funds from FTA programs for project management oversight. Section 5327 
provides oversight takedowns at the following levels: 0.5 percent of 
Planning funds, 0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula funds, 1 percent 
of Capital Investment funds, 0.5 percent of Special Needs of Elderly 
Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities formula funds, 0.5 
percent of Nonurbanized Area Formula funds, and 0.5 percent of 
Alternative Transportation in the Parks and Public Lands funds.

III. FY 2007 FTA Program Initiatives and Changes

A. SAFETEA-LU Implementation.

    In FY 2007, FTA continues to focus on implementation of SAFETEA-LU 
through issuance of new and revised program guidance and regulations. 
As any documents that include binding obligations on grantees are 
issued, FTA makes them available for public comment prior to 
finalizing. We encourage grantees to regularly check the FTA Web site 
at https://www.fta.gov and the DOT docket management Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov for new issuances and to comment to the docket established 
for each document on relevant issues.

B. Planning Emphasis Areas

    FTA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are not issuing 
new planning emphasis areas for FY 2007, and are rescinding planning 
emphasis areas from prior years, in recognition of the priority that 
planning organizations and grantees must pay to implementing the new 
and changed provisions of SAFETEA-LU.

C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities

    The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, did not include any 
new earmarks under any FTA program. However, SAFETEA-LU contained 
statutory earmarks under several programs, and they are listed in the 
tables in this Notice. FTA will honor those statutory earmarks. This 
Notice also includes tables of unobligated balances for earmarks from 
prior years under the Bus and Bus Facilities Program, the New Starts 
Program, the Clean Fuels Program, and the Alternatives Analysis 
Program. FTA will continue to honor those earmarks.
    Because there are no new appropriations earmarks in FY 2007, there 
are unallocated balances available in several programs to be 
administered at FTA's discretion. FTA has allocated most of the 
discretionary New Starts funds to the projects listed in the 
President's Budget for FY 2007. FTA is soliciting applications for the 
unallocated balance of the Bus and Bus Facilities program through two 
Notices of Funding Availability, one published in a separate Part of 
today's Federal Register to address priorities identified by FTA, and 
the other, published in another Part of today's Federal Register, to 
support the Department's Congestion Initiative. FTA is also issuing a 
Notice of Funding Availability to solicit applications for the 
Alternatives Analysis program to advance the state of the art of 
planning for New Starts projects, included in yet another Part of 
today's Federal Register.

D. Changes in Flexible Funding Procedures

    FHWA has changed the accounting procedures for flexible funds, high 
priority projects and transportation improvement projects transfers to 
FTA. As a result, FTA will no longer be able to combine these 
transferred funds in a single grant with FTA funds in the program to 
which they are transferred. FTA is establishing new codes and 
procedures for grants involving funds transferred from FHWA. See 
Section V D of this Notice for more information.

E. National Transit Database (NTD) Strike Policy

    It has been FTA's policy not to make adjustments to the annual 
funding apportionment of transit agencies for strikes, labor disputes 
or work stoppages. FTA has changed this policy. Effective with NTD 
Report Year (RY) 2005 data, FTA will make ``hold harmless'' adjustments 
due to strikes, labor disputes, or work stoppages. An adjustment will 
be made beginning with the FY 2008 apportionment.
    NTD RY 2005 data are the actual data used in apportionment of FY 
2007 funds. NTD RY 2006 data will be used in the FY 2008 apportionment. 
If your agency had a valid strike, labor dispute or work stoppage 
during RY 2005 or RY 2006, please contact the NTD Web site.
    Instructions for requesting a ``hold harmless'' adjustment can be 
found in the 2006 NTD Reporting Manual, https://www.ntdprogram.gov, 
under publications; see Introduction, page 7.

IV. FTA Programs

    This section of the notice provides available FY 2007 funding and 
other important program-related information for the three major FTA 
funding accounts included in the notice (Formula and Bus Grants, 
Capital Investment Grants, and Research). Of the 17 separate FTA 
programs contained in this notice that fall under the major program 
area headings, the funding for ten is apportioned by statutory or 
administrative formula. Funding for the other seven is allocated on a 
discretionary or competitive basis.
    Funding and other important information for each of the 17 programs 
is presented immediately below. This includes program apportionments or 
allocations, certain program requirements, length of time FY 2007 
funding is available to be committed, and other significant program 
information pertaining to FY 2007, including the availability of 
competitive opportunities under several programs.

A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303)

    Section 5303 authorizes a cooperative, continuous, and 
comprehensive planning program for transportation investment decision-
making at the metropolitan area level. State Departments of 
Transportation are direct recipients of funds, which are

[[Page 13874]]

then allocated to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) by 
formula, for planning activities that support the economic vitality of 
the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, 
productivity, and efficiency; increasing the safety and security of the 
transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users; increasing 
the accessibility and mobility options available to people and for 
freight; protecting and enhancing the environment, promoting energy 
conservation, and improving quality of life; enhancing the integration 
and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between 
modes, for people and freight; promoting efficient system management 
and operation; and emphasizing the preservation of the existing 
transportation system. For more about the Metropolitan Planning 
Program, contact Candace Noonan, Office of Planning and Environment at 
(202) 366-1648.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
    The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides 
$81,892,800 to the Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303). The 
total amount apportioned for the Metropolitan Planning Program (to 
States for MPOs' use in urbanized areas (UZAs) is $82,373,861, as shown 
in the table below, after the deduction for oversight (authorized by 49 
U.S.C. Section 5327) and addition of prior year reapportioned funds.

              Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................        $81,892,800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction..................................           -464,464
Prior Year Funds Added...............................            890,525
                                                      ------------------
  Total Apportioned..................................         82,373,861
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    States' apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.

2. Basis for Formula Apportionments

    As specified in law, 82.72 percent of the amounts authorized for 
Section 5305 are allocated to the Metropolitan Planning program. FTA 
allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to the States according to a 
statutory formula. Eighty percent of the funds are distributed to the 
States as a basic allocation based on each State's UZA population, 
based on the most recent Census. The remaining 20 percent is provided 
to the States as a supplemental allocation based on an FTA 
administrative formula to address planning needs in the larger, more 
complex UZAs. The amount published for each State is a combined total 
of both the basic and supplemental allocation.
3. Program Requirements
    The State allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or 
portions thereof to provide funds for projects included in an annual 
work program (the Unified Planning Work Program, or UPWP) that includes 
both highway and transit planning projects. Each State has either 
reaffirmed or developed, in consultation with their MPOs, a new 
allocation formula, as a result of the 2000 Census. The State 
allocation formula may be changed annually, but any change requires 
approval by the FTA regional office before grant approval. Program 
guidance for the Metropolitan Planning Program is found in FTA Circular 
C8100.1B, Program Guidance and Application Instructions for 
Metropolitan Planning Program Grants, dated October 25, 1996. FTA is in 
the process of updating this circular to incorporate references to the 
new and changed planning requirements in sections 5303 and 5305, as 
amended by SAFETEA-LU and associated rulemaking.
4. Period of Availability
    The funds apportioned under the Metropolitan Planning program 
remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients for four fiscal 
years--which includes the year of apportionment plus three additional 
years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of 
business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for reapportionment 
under the Metropolitan Planning Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
    a. Planning Emphasis Areas (PEAs). FTA and FHWA are not issuing new 
PEAs this year, and are rescinding PEAs issued in prior years, in light 
of the priority given to implementation of SAFETEA-LU planning and 
program provisions.
    b. Consolidated Planning Grants. FTA and FHWA planning funds can be 
consolidated into a single consolidated planning grant (CPG), awarded 
by either FTA or FHWA. The CPG eliminates the need to monitor 
individual fund sources, if several have been used, and ensures that 
the oldest funds will always be used first. Unlike ``flex funds,'' 
State planning funds from FHWA will be able to be combined with FTA 
planning funds in a single grant. Alternatively FTA planning funds can 
be transferred to FHWA for administration.
    Under the CPG, States can report metropolitan planning expenditures 
(to comply with the Single Audit Act) for both FTA and FHWA under the 
Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance number for FTA's Metropolitan 
Planning Program (20.505). Additionally, for States with an FHWA 
Metropolitan Planning (PL) fund-matching ratio greater than 80 percent, 
the State (through FTA) can request a waiver of the 20 percent local 
share requirement in order that all FTA funds used for metropolitan 
planning in a CPG can be granted at the higher FHWA rate. For some 
States, this Federal match rate can exceed 90 percent.
    States interested in transferring planning funds between FTA and 
FHWA should contact the FTA regional office or FHWA Division Office for 
more detailed procedures.
    For further information on CPGs, contact Candace Noonan, Office of 
Planning and Environment, FTA, at (202) 366-1648, or Kenneth Petty, 
Office of Planning and Environment, FHWA, at (202) 366-6654.

B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5304)

    This program provides financial assistance to States for Statewide 
planning and other technical assistance activities (including 
supplementing the technical assistance program provided through the 
Metropolitan Planning program), planning support for nonurbanized 
areas, research, development and demonstration projects, fellowships 
for training in the public transportation field, university research, 
and human resource development. For more about the Statewide Planning 
and Research Program contact Candace Noonan, Office of Planning and 
Environment, at (202) 366-1648.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
    The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides 
$17,107,200 to the Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 
5304). The total amount apportioned for the Statewide Planning and 
Research Program (SPRP) is $17,252,652, as shown in the table below, 
after the deduction for oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C. Section 
5327) and addition of prior year reapportioned funds.

[[Page 13875]]



                Statewide Transportation Planning Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................        $17,107,200
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction..................................            -85,536
Prior Year Funds Added...............................            230,988
                                                      ------------------
  Total Apportioned..................................         17,252,652
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    State apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
    As specified in law, 17.28 percent of the amounts authorized for 
Section 5305 are allocated to the Statewide Planning and Research 
program. FTA apportions funds to States by a statutory formula that is 
based on information received from the latest decennial census, and the 
State's UZA population as compared to the UZA population of all States. 
However, a State must receive at least 0.5 percent of the amount 
apportioned under this program.
3. Requirements
    Funds are provided to States for statewide planning and research 
programs. These funds may be used for a variety of purposes such as 
planning, technical studies and assistance, demonstrations, management 
training, and cooperative research. In addition, a State may authorize 
a portion of these funds to be used to supplement Metropolitan Planning 
funds allocated by the State to its UZAs, as the State deems 
appropriate. Program guidance for the Statewide Planning and Research 
program is found in FTA Circular C8200.1, Program Guidance and 
Application Instructions for State Planning and Research Program 
Grants, dated December 27, 2001. FTA is in the process of updating this 
circular to incorporate the new and changed planning requirements in 
sections 5304 and 5305, as amended by SAFETEA-LU and associated 
rulemaking.
4. Period of Availability
    The funds apportioned under the Statewide Planning and Research 
program remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients for four 
fiscal years--which include the year of apportionment plus three 
additional fiscal years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated 
at the close of business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for 
reapportionment under the Statewide Planning and Research Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
    The information about Planning Emphasis Areas and CPGs described in 
Section A. 5, above for the Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 
5303), also applies to the Statewide Planning Program.

C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49.U.S.C. 5307)

    Section 5307 authorizes Federal capital and operating assistance 
for transit in Urbanized Areas (UZAs). A UZA is an area with a 
population of 50,000 or more that has been defined and designated as 
such in the most recent decennial census by the U.S. Census Bureau. The 
Urbanized Area Formula Program may also be used to support planning 
activities, as a supplement to that funded under the Metropolitan 
Planning program described above. Urbanized Areas Formula Program funds 
used for planning must be shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with 
responsibility for that area. Funding is apportioned directly to each 
UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, and to the State Governors 
for UZAs with populations between 50,000 and 200,000. Eligible 
applicants are limited to entities designated as recipients in 
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5307(a)(2) and other public entities with the 
consent of the Designated Recipient. Generally, operating assistance is 
not an eligible expense for UZAs with populations of 200,000 or more. 
However, there are several exceptions to this restriction. The 
exceptions are described in section 2(e) below.
    For more information about the Urbanized Area Formula Program 
contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
    The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides 
$3,606,175,000 to the Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307). 
The total amount apportioned for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is 
$3,924,820,789 as shown in the table below, after the deduction for 
oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and including prior year 
reapportioned funds and funds apportioned to UZA's from the 
appropriation for Section 5340 for Growing States and High Density 
States.

                     Urbanized Area Formula Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................     $3,606,175,000
                                                                     \a\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction..................................        -27,046,313
Prior Year Funds Added...............................          4,957,616
Section 5340 Funds Added.............................        340,734,486
                                                      ------------------
  Total Apportioned..................................     3,924,820,789
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes $36,061,750 for one percent set-aside for Small Transit
  Intensive Cities Formula.

    Table 3 displays the amounts apportioned under the Urbanized Area 
Formula Program.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
    FTA apportions Urbanized Area Formula Program funds based on 
legislative formulas. Different formulas apply to UZAs with populations 
of 200,000 or more and UZAs with populations less than 200,000. For 
UZAs 50,000 to 199,999 in population, the formula is based simply on 
population and population density. For UZAs with populations of 200,000 
and more, the formula is based on a combination of bus revenue vehicle 
miles, bus passenger miles, fixed guideway revenue vehicle miles, and 
fixed guideway route miles, as well as population and population 
density. Table 4 includes detailed information about the formulas.
    To calculate a UZA's FY 2007 apportionment, FTA used population and 
population density statistics from the 2000 Census and (when 
applicable) validated mileage and transit service data from transit 
providers' 2005 National Transit Database (NTD) Report Year. Also, 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b). FTA used 60 percent of the directional 
route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger operations 
system to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage, Alaska UZA.
    We have calculated dollar unit values for the formula factors used 
in the Urbanized Area Formula Program apportionment calculations. These 
values represent the amount of money each unit of a factor is worth in 
this year's apportionment. The unit values change each year, based on 
all of the data used to calculate the apportionments. The dollar unit 
values for FY 2007 are displayed in Table 5. To replicate the basic 
formula component of a UZA's apportionment, multiply the dollar unit 
value by the appropriate formula factor (i.e., the population, 
population x population density), and (when applicable, data from the 
NTD (i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles, passenger miles, and 
operating cost).

[[Page 13876]]

    In FY 2007, one percent of funds appropriated for Section 5307, 
$36,061,750, is set aside for Small Transit Intensive Cities (STIC). 
FTA apportions these funds to UZAs under 200,000 in population that 
operate at a level of service equal to or above the industry average 
level of service for all UZAs with a population of at least 200,000, 
but not more than 999,999, in one or more of six performance 
categories: passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue mile, 
passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue hour, vehicle revenue 
miles per capita, vehicle revenue hours per capita, passenger miles 
traveled per capita, and passengers per capita.
    The data for these categories for the purpose of FY 2007 
apportionments comes from the NTD reports for the 2005 reporting year. 
This data is used to determine a UZA's eligibility under the STIC 
formula, and is also used in the STIC apportionment calculations. 
Because this performance data change with each year's NTD reports, the 
UZAs eligible for STIC funds and the amount each receives may vary each 
year. In FY 2007, FTA apportioned $120,608 for each performance factor/
category for which the urbanized area exceeded the national average for 
UZAs with a population of at least 200,000 but not more than 999,999.
    In addition to the funds apportioned to UZAs, according to the 
Section 5307 formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C. 5336, FTA also 
apportions funds to urbanized areas under Section 5340 Growing States 
and High Density States formula factors. In FY 2007, FTA apportioned 
$138,734,486 to 453 UZA's in 50 Growing States and $202,000,000 to 46 
UZA's in seven High Density States. Half of the funds appropriated for 
Section 5340 are available to Growing States and half to High Density 
States. FTA apportions Growing States funds by a formula based on State 
population forecasts for 15 years beyond the most recent Census. FTA 
distributes the amounts apportioned for each State between UZAs and 
nonurbanized areas based on the ratio of urbanized/nonurbanized 
population within each State in the 2000 census. FTA apportions the 
High Density States funds to States with population densities in excess 
of 370 persons per square mile. These funds are apportioned only to 
UZAs within those States. FTA pro-rates each UZA's share of the High 
Density funds based on the population of the UZAs in the State in the 
2000 census.
    FTA cannot provide unit values for the Growing States or High 
Density formulas because the allocations to individual States and 
urbanized areas are based on their relative population data, rather 
than on a national per capita basis.
    Based on language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report that directs 
FTA to show a single apportionment amount for Section 5307, STIC and 
Section 5340, FTA shows a single Section 5307 apportionment amount for 
each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized Area Formula apportionments. The 
amount includes funds apportioned based on the Section 5307 formula 
factors, any STIC funds, and any Growing States and High Density States 
funding allocated to the area. FTA uses separate formulas calculations 
to generate the respective apportionment amounts for the Section 5307, 
STIC and Section 5340. For technical assistance purposes, the UZAs that 
received STIC funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will make available 
breakouts of the funding allocated to each UZA under these formulas, 
upon request to the regional office.
3. Program Requirements
    Program guidance for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is 
presently found in FTA Circular C9030.1C, Urbanized Area Formula 
Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated October 1, 1998, and 
supplemented by additional information or changes provided in this 
document. FTA is in the process of updating the circular to incorporate 
changes resulting from language in SAFETEA-LU. Several important 
program requirements are highlighted below.
    a. Urbanized Area Formula Apportionments to Governors. For small 
UZAs, those with a population of less than 200,000, FTA apportions 
funds to the Governor of each State for distribution. A single total 
Governor apportionment amount for the Urbanized Area Formula, STIC, and 
Growing States and High Density States is shown in the Urbanized Area 
Formula Apportionment table 3. The table also shows the apportionment 
amount attributable to each small UZA within the State. The Governor 
may determine the sub-allocation of funds among the small UZAs except 
that funds attributed to a small UZA that is located within the 
planning boundaries of a Transportation Management Area (TMA) must be 
obligated to that small UZA, as discussed in subsection f below.
    b. Transit Enhancements. Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that one 
percent of Section 5307 funds apportioned to UZAs with populations of 
200,000 or more be spent on eligible transit enhancement activities or 
projects. This requirement is now treated as a certification, rather 
than as a set-aside as was the case under the Transportation Equity Act 
for the 21st Century (TEA-21). Designated recipients in UZAs with 
populations of 200,000 or more certify they are spending not less than 
one percent of Section 5307 funds for transit enhancements. In 
addition, Designated Recipients must submit an annual report on how 
they spent the money with the Federal fiscal year's final quarterly 
progress report in TEAM-Web. The report should include the following 
elements: (a) Grantee name, (b) UZA name and number, (c) FTA project 
number, (d) transit enhancement category, (e) brief description of 
enhancement and progress towards project implementation, (f) activity 
line item code from the approved budget, and (g) amount awarded by FTA 
for the enhancement. The list of transit enhancement categories and 
activity line item (ALI) codes may be found in the table of Scope and 
ALI codes on TEAM-Web, which can be accessed at https://
FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
    The term ``transit enhancement'' includes projects or project 
elements that are designed to enhance public transportation service or 
use and are physically or functionally related to transit facilities. 
Eligible enhancements include the following: (1) Historic preservation, 
rehabilitation, and operation of historic mass transportation 
buildings, structures, and facilities (including historic bus and 
railroad facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3) landscaping and other 
scenic beautification, including tables, benches, trash receptacles, 
and street lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian access and walkways; 
(6) bicycle access, including bicycle storage facilities and installing 
equipment for transporting bicycles on mass transportation vehicles; 
(7) transit connections to parks within the recipient's transit service 
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced access for persons with 
disabilities to mass transportation.
    It is the responsibility of the MPO to determine how the one-
percent for transit enhancements will be allotted to transit projects. 
The one percent minimum requirement does not preclude more than one 
percent from being expended in a UZA for transit enhancements. However, 
activities that are only eligible as enhancements--in particular, 
operating costs for historic facilities--may be assisted only within 
the one-percent funding level.
    c. Transit Security Projects. Pursuant to section 5307(d)(1)(J), 
each recipient of Urbanized Area Formula funds must certify that of the 
amount received each

[[Page 13877]]

fiscal year, it will expend at least one percent on ``public 
transportation security projects'' or must certify that it has decided 
the expenditure is not necessary. For applicants not eligible to 
receive Section 5307 funds for operating assistance, only capital 
security projects may be funded with the one percent. SAFETEA-LU, 
however, expanded the definition of eligible ``capital'' projects to 
include specific crime prevention and security activities, including: 
(1) Projects to refine and develop security and emergency response 
plans; (2) projects aimed at detecting chemical and biological agents 
in public transportation; (3) the conduct of emergency response drills 
with public transportation agencies and local first response agencies; 
and (4) security training for public transportation employees, but 
excluding all expenses related to operations, other than such expenses 
incurred in conducting emergency drills and training. New ALI codes 
have been established for these four new capital activities. The one 
percent may also include security expenditures included within other 
capital activities, and, where the recipient is eligible, operating 
assistance. The relevant ALI codes would be used for those activities.
    FTA is often called upon to report to Congress and others on how 
grantees are expending Federal funds for security enhancements. To 
facilitate tracking of grantees' security expenditures, which are not 
always evident when included within larger capital or operating 
activity line items in the grant budget, we have established a non-
additive (``non-add'') scope code for security expenditures--Scope 991. 
The non-add scope is to be used to aggregate activities included in 
other scopes, and it does not increase the budget total. Section 5307 
grantees should include this non-add scope in the project budget for 
each new Section 5307 grant application or amendment. Under this non-
add scope, the applicant should repeat the full amount of any of the 
line items in the budget that are exclusively for security and include 
the portion of any other line item in the project budget that is 
attributable to security, using under the non-add scope the same line 
item used in the project budget. The grantee can modify the ALI 
description or use the extended text feature, if necessary, to describe 
the security expenditures.
    The grantee must provide information regarding its use of the one 
percent for security as part of each Section 5307 grant application, 
using a special screen in TEAM-Web. If the grantee has certified that 
it is not necessary to expend one percent for security, the Section 
5307 grant application must include information to support that 
certification. FTA will not process an application for a Section 5307 
grant until the security information is complete.
    d. FY 2007 Operating Assistance. UZAs under 200,000 population may 
use Section 5307 funds for operating assistance. In addition, Section 
5307, as amended by, SAFETEA-LU and TEA-21, allows some UZAs with a 
population of 200,000 or more to use FY 2007 Urbanized Area Formula 
funds for operating assistance under certain conditions. The specific 
provisions allowing the limited use of operating assistance in large 
UZAs are as follows:
    (1) Section 5307(b)(2) allows UZAs that grew in population from 
under 200,000 to over 200,000, as a result of the 2000 Census to use FY 
2007 funds for operating assistance in an amount up to 25 percent of 
the grandfathered amount for FY 2005 funds. (The provision is 
completely phased out in FY 2008.) Table 7 shows the maximum amount of 
each eligible UZA's Section 5307 apportionment that can be used for 
operating assistance.
    (2) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for grants for the operating 
costs of equipment and facilities for use in public transportation in 
the Evansville, IN-KY urbanized area, for a portion or portions of the 
UZA if: the portion of the UZA includes only one State; the population 
of the portion is less than 30,000; and the grants will be not used to 
provide public transportation outside of the portion of the UZA.
    (3) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides operating costs of equipment and 
facilities for use in public transportation for local governmental 
authorities in areas which adopted transit operating and financing 
plans that became a part of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result of the 
2000 decennial census of population, but lie outside the service area 
of the principal public transportation agency that serves the Houston 
UZA.
    (4) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the formula to be used to 
apportion Section 5307 funds to UZAs with population of 200,000 or 
more. SAFETEA-LU amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that stated, ``* * 
* except that the amount apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized area 
under subsection (b) shall be available to the Alaska Railroad for any 
costs related to its passenger operations.'' This language has the 
effect of directing that funds apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized 
area, under the fixed guideway tiers of the Section 5307 apportionment 
formula, be made available to the Alaska Railroad, and that these funds 
may be used for any capital or operating costs related to its passenger 
operations.
    (5) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA-21, as amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note), 
provides an exception to the restriction on the use of operating 
assistance in a UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, by allowing 
transit providers/grantees that provide service exclusively to elderly 
persons and persons with disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer 
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds apportioned to the UZA for operating 
assistance. The total amount of funding made available for this purpose 
under Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million. Transit providers/grantees 
eligible under this provision have already been identified and 
notified.
    e. Sources of Local Match. Pursuant to Section 5307(e), the Federal 
share of an urbanized area formula grant is 80 percent of net project 
cost for a capital project and 50 percent of net project cost for 
operating assistance. The remainder of the net project cost (i.e., 20 
percent and 50 percent, respectively) shall be provided from the 
following sources:
    1. In cash from non-Government sources other than revenues from 
providing public transportation services;
    2. From revenues derived from the sale of advertising and 
concessions;
    3. From an undistributed cash surplus, a replacement or 
depreciation cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
    4. From amounts received under a service agreement with a State or 
local social service agency or private social service organization; and
    5. Proceeds from the issuance of revenue bonds.
    In addition, funds from Section 403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be used to match 
Urbanized Area Formula funds.
    f. Designated Transportation Management Areas (TMA). Guidance for 
setting the boundaries of TMAs is in the joint transportation planning 
regulations codified at 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613. In some 
cases, the TMA planning boundaries established by the MPO for the 
designated TMA includes one or more small UZAs. In addition, one small 
UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has been designated as a TMA. In either of 
these situations, the Governor cannot allocate ``Governor's 
Apportionment'' funds attributed to the small UZAs to other areas; that 
is, the Governor only has discretion to allocate Governor's 
Apportionment funds attributable to

[[Page 13878]]

areas that are outside of designated TMA planning boundaries.
    The list of small UZAs included within the planning boundaries of 
designated TMAs is provided in the table below.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Small urbanized area included in
            Designated TMA                   TMA planning boundary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albany, NY...........................  Saratoga Springs, NY.
Houston, TX..........................  Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-
                                        Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX;
                                        The Woodlands, TX.
Jacksonville, FL.....................  St. Augustine, FL.
Orlando, FL..........................  Kissimmee, FL.
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL...............  Titusville, FL.
Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD............  Pottstown, PA.
Pittsburgh, PA.......................  Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-
                                        Steubenville, OH-PA (PA
                                        portion); Uniontown-
                                        Connellsville, PA.
Seattle, WA..........................  Bremerton, WA.
Washington, DC-VA-MD.................  Frederick, MD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The MPO must notify the Associate Administrator for Program 
Management, Federal Transit Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20590, in writing, no later than July 1 of each year, to 
identify any small UZA within the planning boundaries of a TMA.
    g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used for Highway Purposes. Funds 
apportioned to a TMA are eligible for transfer to FHWA for highway 
projects. However, before funds can be transferred, the following 
conditions must be met: (1) Such use must be approved by the MPO in 
writing, after appropriate notice and opportunity for comment and 
appeal are provided to affected transit providers; (2) in the 
determination of the Secretary, such funds are not needed for 
investments required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 
(ADA); and (3) the MPO determines that local transit needs are being 
addressed.
    The MPO should notify the appropriate FTA Regional Administrator of 
its intent to use FTA funds for highway purposes, as prescribed in 
section V.D below. Urbanized Area Formula funds that are designated by 
the MPO for highway projects will be transferred to and administered by 
FHWA.
4. Period of Availability
    The Urbanized Area Formula Program funds apportioned in this notice 
remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients until September 
30, 2010. Any of these apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the 
close of business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for 
reapportionment under the Urbanized Area Formula Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
    In each UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, the Governor in 
consultation with responsible local officials, and publicly owned 
operators of public transportation has designated one or more entities 
to be the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 funds apportioned to 
the UZA. The same entity(s) may or may not be the Designated Recipient 
for the Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom program 
funds apportioned to the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 population, the 
State is the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 as well as JARC and 
New Freedom programs. The Designated Recipient for Section 5307 may 
authorize other entities to apply directly to FTA for Section 5307 
grants pursuant to a supplemental agreement. While the requirement that 
projects selected for funding be included in a locally developed 
coordinated public transit/human service transportation plan is not 
included in Section 5307 as it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and 
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that in their role as public transit 
providers, recipients of Section 5307 funds will be participants in the 
local planning process for these programs.

D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49.U.S.C. 5308)

    The Clean Fuels Grant Program supports the use of alternative fuels 
in air quality maintenance or nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon 
monoxide through capital grants to urbanized areas for clean fuel 
vehicles and facilities. Previously an unfunded Formula Program under 
TEA-21, the program is now a discretionary program. FTA published a 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the discretionary program on October 
16, 2006, and is now in the process of reviewing comments and 
finalizing the rule. For more information about this program contact 
Kimberly Sledge, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
    The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides 
$45,000,000 to the Clean Fuels Grant Program (49 U.S.C. 5308). SAFETEA-
LU earmarked $18,721,000 for specific Clean Fuel projects. The balance 
of $26,279,000 was transferred to the discretionary Bus Program.

                        Clean Fuels Grant Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................        $45,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transfer to Bus and Bus Facility.....................       -$26,279,000
Funds Allocated to SAFETEA-LU Earmarks...............         18,721,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Allocations to projects earmarked under the Clean Fuels program in 
SAFETEA-LU are displayed in Table 8.
2. Basis for Allocation of Funds.
    Section 3044(b) of SAFETEA-LU included 16 projects to be funded 
through the Clean Fuels program. Table 8 displays the amounts available 
in FY 2007 to the Clean Fuels projects designated in SAFETEA-LU. FY 
2006 carryover funds are shown in Table 9. No funds are available for 
competitive allocation in FY 2007.
3. Requirements
    Clean Fuels program funds may be made available to any grantee in a 
UZA that is designated as maintenance or nonattainment area for ozone 
or carbon monoxide as defined in the Clean Air Act. Eligible recipients 
include Section 5307 Designated Recipients as well as recipients in 
small UZAs. In the case of a small UZA, the State in which the area is 
located will act as the recipient.
    Eligible projects include the purchase or lease of clean fuel buses 
(including buses that employ a lightweight composite primary 
structure), the construction or lease of clean fuel buses or electrical 
recharging facilities and related equipment for such buses, and 
construction or improvement of public transportation facilities to 
accommodate clean fuel buses.
    Legislation will be necessary if a recipient wishes to use Clean 
Fuels funds earmarked in SAFETEA-LU for

[[Page 13879]]

eligible program activities outside the scope of a project description.
    Unless otherwise specified in law, grants made under the Clean 
Fuels program must meet all other eligibility requirements as outlined 
in Section 5308.
4. Period of Availability
    Funds designated for specific Clean Fuels Program projects remain 
available for obligation for three fiscal years, which includes the 
year of appropriation plus two additional fiscal years. The FY 2007 
funding for projects included in this notice remains available through 
September 30, 2009. Clean Fuels funds not obligated in an FTA grant for 
their original purpose at the end of the period of availability will 
generally be made available for other projects.

E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway 
Modernization

    This program provides capital assistance for the modernization of 
existing fixed guideway systems. Funds are allocated by a statutory 
formula to UZAs with fixed guideway systems that have been in operation 
for at least seven years. A ``fixed guideway'' refers to any transit 
service that uses exclusive or controlled rights-of-way or rails, 
entirely or in part. The term includes heavy rail, commuter rail, light 
rail, monorail, trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car, 
automated guideway transit, ferryboats, that portion of motor bus 
service operated on exclusive or controlled rights-of-way, and high-
occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes. Eligible applicants are the public 
transit authorities in those urbanized areas to which the funds are 
allocated. For more information about Fixed Guideway Modernization 
contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
    The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides 
$1,448,000,000 to the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program. The total 
amount apportioned for the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program is 
$1,433,520,000, after the deduction for oversight, as shown in the 
table below.

                  Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................     $1,448,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction..................................        -14,480,000
������������������������������������������������������
  Total Apportioned..................................      1,433,520,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FY 2007 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program apportionments to 
eligible areas are displayed in Table 10.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
    The formula for allocating the Fixed Guideway Modernization funds 
contains seven tiers. The apportionment of funding under the first four 
tiers is based on amounts specified in law and NTD data used to 
apportion funds in FY 1997. Funding under the last three tiers is 
apportioned based on the latest available data on route miles and 
revenue vehicle miles on segments at least seven years old, as reported 
to the NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C. provides for the 
inclusion of Morgantown, West Virginia (population 55,997) as an 
eligible UZA for purposes of apportioning fixed guideway modernization 
funds. Also, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b) FTA used 60 percent of the 
directional route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger 
operations system to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage, 
Alaska UZA under the Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization formula.
    FY 2007 Formula apportionments are based on data grantees provided 
to the NTD for the 2005 reporting year. Table 11 provides additional 
information and details on the formula. Dollar unit values for the 
formula factors used in the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program are 
displayed in Table 5. To replicate an area's apportionment, multiply 
the dollar unit value by the appropriate formula factor, i.e., route 
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
    Fixed Guideway Modernization funds must be used for capital 
projects to maintain, modernize, or improve fixed guideway systems. 
Eligible UZAs (those with a population of 200,000 or more) with fixed 
guideway systems that are at least seven years old are entitled to 
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization funds. A threshold level of more 
than one mile of fixed guideway is required in order to receive Fixed 
Guideway Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs reporting one mile or 
less of fixed guideway mileage under the NTD are not included. However, 
funds apportioned to an urbanized area may be used on any fixed 
guideway segment in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed Guideway 
Modernization is presently found in FTA Circular C9300.1A, Capital 
Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated October 1, 1998. FTA is 
in the process of updating this circular to incorporate changes 
resulting from language in SAFETEA-LU.
4. Period of Availability
    The funds apportioned in this notice under the Fixed Guideway 
Modernization Program remain available to be obligated by FTA to 
recipients for three fiscal years following FY 2007. Any of these 
apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of business on 
September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for reapportionment under the 
Fixed Guideway Modernization Program.

F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Bus and Bus-Related 
Facilities

    This program provides capital assistance for new and replacement 
buses and related facilities. Funds are allocated on a discretionary 
basis. Eligible purposes are acquisition of buses for fleet and service 
expansion, bus maintenance and administrative facilities, transfer 
facilities, bus malls, transportation centers, intermodal terminals, 
park-and-ride stations, acquisition of replacement vehicles, bus 
rebuilds, bus preventive maintenance, passenger amenities such as 
passenger shelters and bus stop signs, accessory and miscellaneous 
equipment such as mobile radio units, supervisory vehicles, fare boxes, 
computers, and shop and garage equipment. Eligible applicants are State 
and local governmental authorities. Eligible subrecipients include 
other public agencies, private companies engaged in public 
transportation and private non-profit organizations. For more 
information about Bus and Bus-Related Facilities contact Maria Wright, 
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
    The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides 
$881,779,000 for the bus and bus facilities program. This amount 
includes $855,500,000 provided for the Bus Program and $26,279,000 
transferred from the Clean Fuels Program. The amount of funding for 
projects designated in Section 3044 of SAFETEA-LU for Bus and Bus-
Related Facilities in FY 2007 is $459,670,089. The balance remains 
unallocated, as shown in the following table.

                       Bus and Bus Facility Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................     $881,779,000 a
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction..................................         -8,817,790
SAFETEA-LU Statutory Provisions Projects.............        459,670,089

[[Page 13880]]

 
Funds Available for Discretionary/Competitive                413,291,121
 Allocation..........................................
                                                      ------------------
  Total Funds to be Allocated........................        872,961,210
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Includes $26,279,000 transferred from Clean Fuels Grant Program

    The FY 2007 Bus and Bus Facility Program allocations are displayed 
in Table 12.
2. Basis for Allocations
    Funds are provided annually under Section 5309 for discretionary 
allocation for bus and bus facilities projects. SAFETEA-LU listed 646 
earmarked projects to be funded each year through the Bus Program 
(Section 3044) and specified additional projects in Section 5309(m)(7). 
Table 12 displays the allocation of the FY 2007 Bus and Bus-Related 
Facilities funds by State and project for projects earmarked in 
SAFETEA-LU. The table includes a SAFETEA-LU project number for each 
project listed in Section 3044. No additional projects were earmarked 
in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007. In fact, Section 112 
of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, (H.J. Res 20) 
specifically precluded using FY 2007 funds to award grants for projects 
designated Section 5309 bus funds in the statement of managers 
accompanying the FY 2006 Department of Transportation Appropriations 
Act (Pub. L. 109-115).
3. Requirements
    Section 125 and Section 113 of the FY 2005 and FY 2006 Department 
of Transportation Appropriations Acts, respectively, make projects 
identified in the statement of managers automatically eligible to 
receive the funds designated to the project ``notwithstanding any other 
provision of law.'' Similar language was first included as a general 
provision in Section 547 of the FY 2004 Department of Transportation 
Appropriations Acts. In addition, Section 3044 of SAFETEA-LU earmarked 
646 Bus and Bus Facilities projects in FY 2007. FTA will review 
Congressional intent on a case by case basis.
    FTA honors Congressional earmarks for the purpose designated, for 
purposes eligible under the program or under the expanded eligibility 
of a ``notwithstanding'' provision. If you want to apply to use funds 
designated under the Bus Program in any year for project activities 
outside the scope of the project designation included in report 
language, you must submit your request for reprogramming to the House 
and Senate Committees on Appropriations for resolution. FTA will not 
reprogram projects Congress designated in report language without 
direction from the Appropriations Committees.
    FTA will honor projects earmarked to receive Section 5309 bus funds 
in SAFETEA-LU. Legislation will be necessary to amend the earmark if 
you wish to use funds for project activities outside the scope of the 
project description.
    Grants made under the Bus and Bus-Related Facilities program must 
meet all other eligibility requirements as outlined in Section 5309 
unless otherwise specified in law.
    Program guidance for Bus and Bus-Related Facilities is found in FTA 
Circular C9300.1A, Capital Program: Grant Application Instructions. FTA 
is in the process of updating this circular to incorporate changes 
resulting from language in SAFETEA-LU.
4. Period of Availability
    The FY 2007 Bus and Bus-Related Facilities funds not obligated for 
their original purpose as of September 30, 2009, may be made available 
for other projects under 49 U.S.C. 5309. The unusual appropriations 
process in FY 2007 has not yet resulted in directions from Congress to 
FTA not to reallocate unobligated bus program funds for designations 
that lapsed at the end of FY 2006.
5. Other Program or Allocation Related Information and Highlights
    Prior year unobligated balances for Bus and Bus-Related allocations 
in the amount of $870,471,637 remain available for obligation in FY 
2007. This includes $861,331,362 in fiscal years 2005 and 2006 
unobligated allocations, and $9,140,275 for fiscal years 2002-2004 
unobligated allocations that were extended by previous direction by the 
House and Senate appropriation committees. The unobligated amounts 
available as of September 30, 2006, are displayed in Table 13.
    In two Notices of Funding Availability (NOFA), published as 
separate parts of today's Federal Register, FTA is issuing procedures 
for grantees to apply competitively for discretionary funding for 
projects eligible under the Bus and Bus Facilities program. One NOFA 
invites applications from States and from Designated Recipients under 
the Urbanized Area Formula Program to fund bus and bus facility 
projects that address the following FTA priorities: Fleet replacement 
needs that cannot be met with formula funds, fleet expansion for 
significant service improvements, purchase of clean fuel vehicles, 
facility construction to support increased service or introduction of 
clean fuels, and intermodal terminal projects that include intercity 
bus providers, and Gulf Coast recovery. The other NOFA addresses the 
Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative and invites 
proposals from specific urbanized areas identified as the most 
congested in the nation.

G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--New Starts

    The New Starts program provides funds for construction of new fixed 
guideway systems or extensions to existing fixed guideway systems. 
Eligible purposes are light rail
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.