FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments and Allocations and Program Information, 13872-13966 [07-1290]
Download as PDF
13872
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments
and Allocations and Program
Information
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The ‘‘Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007,’’
(Public Law 110–5), signed into law by
President Bush on February 15, 2007,
makes funds available for all of the
surface transportation programs of the
Department of Transportation (DOT) for
the Fiscal Year (FY) ending September
30, 2007. This notice provides
information on the FY 2007 funding
available for the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) assistance
programs, and provides program
guidance and requirements, and
information on several program issues
important in the current year. The
notice also includes tables that show
unobligated carryover funding available
in FY 2007 under certain discretionary
programs from prior years. Finally, this
notice also references separate Notices
of Funding Availability (NOFA)
published concurrently for discretionary
opportunities under the Bus and Bus
Facilities Program and the Alternatives
Analysis Program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information about this notice
contact Mary Martha Churchman,
Director, Office of Transit Programs, at
(202) 366–2053. Please contact the
appropriate FTA regional office for any
specific requests for information or
technical assistance. The Appendix at
the end of this notice includes contact
information for FTA regional offices. An
FTA headquarters contact for each
major program area is also included in
the discussion of that program in the
text of the notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs
A. Funding Based on FY 2007 Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and
SAFETEA–LU Authorization
B. Program Funds Set-aside for Project
Management Oversight
III. FY 2007 FTA Key Program Initiatives and
Changes
A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant
Opportunities
D. Changes in Flexible Funding Procedures
E. National Transit Database (NTD) Strike
Policy
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. FTA Programs
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5303)
B. Statewide Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5304)
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5307)
D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C.
5308)
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—Fixed Guideway Modernization
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—Bus and Bus-Related Facilities
G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—New Starts
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals
and Individuals with Disabilities
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5311)
J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3))
K. Public Transportation on Indian
Reservation Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(c))
L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C.
5314)
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
O. Alternative Transportation in Parks and
Public Lands (49 U.S.C. 5320)
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339)
Q. Growing States and High Density States
Formula (49 U.S.C. 5340)
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note)
V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2007
Grants Requirements
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to
Incur Project Costs
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
C. FTA FY 2007 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
E. Grant Application Procedures
F. Payments
G. Oversight
H. Technical Assistance
Tables
1. FTA FY 2007 Appropriations and
Apportionments for Grant Programs
2. FTA FY 2007 Metropolitan
Transportation Planning Program and
Statewide Transportation Planning
Program Apportionments
3. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 and Section
5340 Urbanized Area Apportionments
4. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307
Apportionment Formula
5. FTA FY 2007 Formula Programs
Apportionments Data Unit Values
6. FTA FY 2007 Small Transit Intensive
Cities Performance Data and
Apportionments
7. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas 200,000 or
More in Population Eligible to Use
Section 5307 Funds for Operating
Assistance
8. FTA FY 2007 Section 5308 Clean Fuels
Grant Program Allocations
9. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5308 Clean Fuels Allocations
10. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Fixed
Guideway Modernization
Apportionments
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11. FTA FY 2007 Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program Apportionment
Formula
12. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Bus and
Bus-Related Allocations
13. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5309 Bus and Bus-Related Facilities
Allocations
14. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 New Starts
Allocations
15. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5309 New Starts Allocations
16. FTA FY 2007 Special Needs for Elderly
Individuals and Individuals With
Disabilities Apportionments
17. FTA FY 2007 Section 5311 and Section
5340 Nonurbanized Area Formula
Apportionments, and Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) Allocations
18. FTA FY 2007 National Research
Program Allocations
19. FTA FY 2007 Section 5316 Job Access
and Reverse Commute (JARC)
Apportionments
20. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Jarc
Allocations
21. FTA FY 2007 Section 5317 New
Freedom Apportionments
22. FTA FY 2007 Section 5339 Alternative
Analysis Allocations
23. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5339 Alternative Analysis Alliocations
Appendix
I. Overview
This document apportions or allocates
the FY 2007 funds available under the
Continuing Appropriations Resolution,
2007, among potential program
recipients according to statutory
formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or
congressional designations in Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU).
For each FTA program included, we
have provided relevant information on
the FY 2007 funding currently available,
requirements, period of availability, and
other related program information and
highlights, as appropriate. A separate
section of the document provides
information on requirements and
guidance that are applicable to all FTA
programs.
II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs
A. Funding Based on FY 2007
Continuing Appropriations Resolution,
2007, and SAFETEA–LU Authorization
The Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007, (Pub.
L. 110–5, February 15, 2007); hereafter
called the Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides general
funds and obligation authority for trust
funds that total $8.97 billion for FTA
programs, through September 30, 2007.
Table 1 of this document shows the
funding for the FTA programs, as
provided for in the Continuing
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and
the reallocation of any prior year funds
to the program. All the Formula
Programs and the Section 5309 Bus and
Bus Facilities Program are entirely
funded from the Mass Transit Account
of the Highway Trust Fund in FY 2007.
The Section 5309 New Starts program,
the Research program, and FTA
administrative expenses are funded by
appropriations from the General Fund of
the Treasury.
Congress has enacted a full year
Continuing Appropriations Resolution,
2007, in lieu of a new Appropriations
Act for FY 2007. This Notice includes
tables of apportionments and allocations
for FTA programs. Allocations based on
SAFETEA–LU are included for some
discretionary programs. In addition,
FTA will issue separate Notices of
Funding Availability to solicit
applications for discretionary funds not
allocated in SAFETEA–LU.
encourage grantees to regularly check
the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.gov
and the DOT docket management Web
site at https://dms.dot.gov for new
issuances and to comment to the docket
established for each document on
relevant issues.
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
FTA and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) are not issuing
new planning emphasis areas for FY
2007, and are rescinding planning
emphasis areas from prior years, in
recognition of the priority that planning
organizations and grantees must pay to
implementing the new and changed
provisions of SAFETEA–LU.
A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation.
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant
Opportunities
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, did not include any
new earmarks under any FTA program.
However, SAFETEA–LU contained
statutory earmarks under several
programs, and they are listed in the
tables in this Notice. FTA will honor
those statutory earmarks. This Notice
also includes tables of unobligated
balances for earmarks from prior years
under the Bus and Bus Facilities
Program, the New Starts Program, the
Clean Fuels Program, and the
Alternatives Analysis Program. FTA
will continue to honor those earmarks.
Because there are no new
appropriations earmarks in FY 2007,
there are unallocated balances available
in several programs to be administered
at FTA’s discretion. FTA has allocated
most of the discretionary New Starts
funds to the projects listed in the
President’s Budget for FY 2007. FTA is
soliciting applications for the
unallocated balance of the Bus and Bus
Facilities program through two Notices
of Funding Availability, one published
in a separate Part of today’s Federal
Register to address priorities identified
by FTA, and the other, published in
another Part of today’s Federal Register,
to support the Department’s Congestion
Initiative. FTA is also issuing a Notice
of Funding Availability to solicit
applications for the Alternatives
Analysis program to advance the state of
the art of planning for New Starts
projects, included in yet another Part of
today’s Federal Register.
In FY 2007, FTA continues to focus
on implementation of SAFETEA–LU
through issuance of new and revised
program guidance and regulations. As
any documents that include binding
obligations on grantees are issued, FTA
makes them available for public
comment prior to finalizing. We
D. Changes in Flexible Funding
Procedures
FHWA has changed the accounting
procedures for flexible funds, high
priority projects and transportation
improvement projects transfers to FTA.
As a result, FTA will no longer be able
to combine these transferred funds in a
B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project
Management Oversight
FTA uses a percentage of funds
appropriated to certain FTA programs
for program oversight activities
conducted by the agency. The funds are
used to provide necessary oversight
activities, including oversight of the
construction of any major project under
these statutory programs; to conduct
safety and security, civil rights,
procurement, management and financial
reviews and audits; and to provide
technical assistance to correct
deficiencies identified in compliance
reviews and audits.
Section 5327 of title 49, U.S.C., 5327
authorizes the takedown of funds from
FTA programs for project management
oversight. Section 5327 provides
oversight takedowns at the following
levels: 0.5 percent of Planning funds,
0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula
funds, 1 percent of Capital Investment
funds, 0.5 percent of Special Needs of
Elderly Individuals and Individuals
with Disabilities formula funds, 0.5
percent of Nonurbanized Area Formula
funds, and 0.5 percent of Alternative
Transportation in the Parks and Public
Lands funds.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
III. FY 2007 FTA Program Initiatives
and Changes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13873
single grant with FTA funds in the
program to which they are transferred.
FTA is establishing new codes and
procedures for grants involving funds
transferred from FHWA. See Section V
D of this Notice for more information.
E. National Transit Database (NTD)
Strike Policy
It has been FTA’s policy not to make
adjustments to the annual funding
apportionment of transit agencies for
strikes, labor disputes or work
stoppages. FTA has changed this policy.
Effective with NTD Report Year (RY)
2005 data, FTA will make ‘‘hold
harmless’’ adjustments due to strikes,
labor disputes, or work stoppages. An
adjustment will be made beginning with
the FY 2008 apportionment.
NTD RY 2005 data are the actual data
used in apportionment of FY 2007
funds. NTD RY 2006 data will be used
in the FY 2008 apportionment. If your
agency had a valid strike, labor dispute
or work stoppage during RY 2005 or RY
2006, please contact the NTD Web site.
Instructions for requesting a ‘‘hold
harmless’’ adjustment can be found in
the 2006 NTD Reporting Manual, https://
www.ntdprogram.gov, under
publications; see Introduction, page 7.
IV. FTA Programs
This section of the notice provides
available FY 2007 funding and other
important program-related information
for the three major FTA funding
accounts included in the notice
(Formula and Bus Grants, Capital
Investment Grants, and Research). Of
the 17 separate FTA programs contained
in this notice that fall under the major
program area headings, the funding for
ten is apportioned by statutory or
administrative formula. Funding for the
other seven is allocated on a
discretionary or competitive basis.
Funding and other important
information for each of the 17 programs
is presented immediately below. This
includes program apportionments or
allocations, certain program
requirements, length of time FY 2007
funding is available to be committed,
and other significant program
information pertaining to FY 2007,
including the availability of competitive
opportunities under several programs.
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5303)
Section 5303 authorizes a cooperative,
continuous, and comprehensive
planning program for transportation
investment decision-making at the
metropolitan area level. State
Departments of Transportation are
direct recipients of funds, which are
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13874
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
then allocated to Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPOs) by formula, for
planning activities that support the
economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and
efficiency; increasing the safety and
security of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users;
increasing the accessibility and mobility
options available to people and for
freight; protecting and enhancing the
environment, promoting energy
conservation, and improving quality of
life; enhancing the integration and
connectivity of the transportation
system, across and between modes, for
people and freight; promoting efficient
system management and operation; and
emphasizing the preservation of the
existing transportation system. For more
about the Metropolitan Planning
Program, contact Candace Noonan,
Office of Planning and Environment at
(202) 366–1648.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $81,892,800
to the Metropolitan Planning Program
(49 U.S.C. 5303). The total amount
apportioned for the Metropolitan
Planning Program (to States for MPOs’
use in urbanized areas (UZAs) is
$82,373,861, as shown in the table
below, after the deduction for oversight
(authorized by 49 U.S.C. Section 5327)
and addition of prior year reapportioned
funds.
complex UZAs. The amount published
for each State is a combined total of
both the basic and supplemental
allocation.
3. Program Requirements
The State allocates Metropolitan
Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or
portions thereof to provide funds for
projects included in an annual work
program (the Unified Planning Work
Program, or UPWP) that includes both
highway and transit planning projects.
Each State has either reaffirmed or
developed, in consultation with their
MPOs, a new allocation formula, as a
result of the 2000 Census. The State
allocation formula may be changed
annually, but any change requires
approval by the FTA regional office
before grant approval. Program guidance
for the Metropolitan Planning Program
is found in FTA Circular C8100.1B,
Program Guidance and Application
Instructions for Metropolitan Planning
Program Grants, dated October 25, 1996.
FTA is in the process of updating this
circular to incorporate references to the
new and changed planning
requirements in sections 5303 and 5305,
as amended by SAFETEA–LU and
associated rulemaking.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the
Metropolitan Planning program remain
available to be obligated by FTA to
recipients for four fiscal years—which
includes the year of apportionment plus
three additional years. Any apportioned
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
funds that remain unobligated at the
PLANNING PROGRAM
close of business on September 30,
2010, will revert to FTA for
Total Appropriation .........
$81,892,800 reapportionment under the
Metropolitan Planning Program.
Oversight Deduction .......
Prior Year Funds Added
¥464,464
890,525
Total Apportioned ........
82,373,861
States’ apportionments for this
program are displayed in Table 2.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
2. Basis for Formula Apportionments
As specified in law, 82.72 percent of
the amounts authorized for Section 5305
are allocated to the Metropolitan
Planning program. FTA allocates
Metropolitan Planning funds to the
States according to a statutory formula.
Eighty percent of the funds are
distributed to the States as a basic
allocation based on each State’s UZA
population, based on the most recent
Census. The remaining 20 percent is
provided to the States as a supplemental
allocation based on an FTA
administrative formula to address
planning needs in the larger, more
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Planning Emphasis Areas (PEAs).
FTA and FHWA are not issuing new
PEAs this year, and are rescinding PEAs
issued in prior years, in light of the
priority given to implementation of
SAFETEA–LU planning and program
provisions.
b. Consolidated Planning Grants. FTA
and FHWA planning funds can be
consolidated into a single consolidated
planning grant (CPG), awarded by either
FTA or FHWA. The CPG eliminates the
need to monitor individual fund
sources, if several have been used, and
ensures that the oldest funds will
always be used first. Unlike ‘‘flex
funds,’’ State planning funds from
FHWA will be able to be combined with
FTA planning funds in a single grant.
Alternatively FTA planning funds can
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
be transferred to FHWA for
administration.
Under the CPG, States can report
metropolitan planning expenditures (to
comply with the Single Audit Act) for
both FTA and FHWA under the
Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance number for FTA’s
Metropolitan Planning Program
(20.505). Additionally, for States with
an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL)
fund-matching ratio greater than 80
percent, the State (through FTA) can
request a waiver of the 20 percent local
share requirement in order that all FTA
funds used for metropolitan planning in
a CPG can be granted at the higher
FHWA rate. For some States, this
Federal match rate can exceed 90
percent.
States interested in transferring
planning funds between FTA and
FHWA should contact the FTA regional
office or FHWA Division Office for more
detailed procedures.
For further information on CPGs,
contact Candace Noonan, Office of
Planning and Environment, FTA, at
(202) 366–1648, or Kenneth Petty, Office
of Planning and Environment, FHWA, at
(202) 366–6654.
B. Statewide Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5304)
This program provides financial
assistance to States for Statewide
planning and other technical assistance
activities (including supplementing the
technical assistance program provided
through the Metropolitan Planning
program), planning support for
nonurbanized areas, research,
development and demonstration
projects, fellowships for training in the
public transportation field, university
research, and human resource
development. For more about the
Statewide Planning and Research
Program contact Candace Noonan,
Office of Planning and Environment, at
(202) 366–1648.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $17,107,200
to the Statewide Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5304). The total
amount apportioned for the Statewide
Planning and Research Program (SPRP)
is $17,252,652, as shown in the table
below, after the deduction for oversight
(authorized by 49 U.S.C. Section 5327)
and addition of prior year reapportioned
funds.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION
PLANNING PROGRAM
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Total Appropriation .........
$17,107,200
The information about Planning
Oversight Deduction .......
¥85,536 Emphasis Areas and CPGs described in
Prior Year Funds Added
230,988 Section A. 5, above for the Metropolitan
Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303), also
Total Apportioned ........
17,252,652 applies to the Statewide Planning
Program.
State apportionments for this program C. Urbanized Area Formula Program
are displayed in Table 2.
(49.U.S.C. 5307)
Section 5307 authorizes Federal
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
capital and operating assistance for
As specified in law, 17.28 percent of
transit in Urbanized Areas (UZAs). A
the amounts authorized for Section 5305 UZA is an area with a population of
are allocated to the Statewide Planning
50,000 or more that has been defined
and Research program. FTA apportions
and designated as such in the most
recent decennial census by the U.S.
funds to States by a statutory formula
Census Bureau. The Urbanized Area
that is based on information received
Formula Program may also be used to
from the latest decennial census, and
the State’s UZA population as compared support planning activities, as a
supplement to that funded under the
to the UZA population of all States.
Metropolitan Planning program
However, a State must receive at least
described above. Urbanized Areas
0.5 percent of the amount apportioned
Formula Program funds used for
under this program.
planning must be shown in the UPWP
3. Requirements
for MPO(s) with responsibility for that
area. Funding is apportioned directly to
Funds are provided to States for
each UZA with a population of 200,000
statewide planning and research
or more, and to the State Governors for
programs. These funds may be used for
UZAs with populations between 50,000
a variety of purposes such as planning,
and 200,000. Eligible applicants are
technical studies and assistance,
limited to entities designated as
demonstrations, management training,
recipients in accordance with 49 U.S.C.
and cooperative research. In addition, a
5307(a)(2) and other public entities with
State may authorize a portion of these
the consent of the Designated Recipient.
funds to be used to supplement
Generally, operating assistance is not an
Metropolitan Planning funds allocated
eligible expense for UZAs with
by the State to its UZAs, as the State
populations of 200,000 or more.
However, there are several exceptions to
deems appropriate. Program guidance
for the Statewide Planning and Research this restriction. The exceptions are
described in section 2(e) below.
program is found in FTA Circular
For more information about the
C8200.1, Program Guidance and
Urbanized Area Formula Program
Application Instructions for State
contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit
Planning and Research Program Grants,
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
dated December 27, 2001. FTA is in the
process of updating this circular to
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
incorporate the new and changed
The Continuing Appropriations
planning requirements in sections 5304
Resolution, 2007, provides
and 5305, as amended by SAFETEA–LU $3,606,175,000 to the Urbanized Area
and associated rulemaking.
Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307). The
total amount apportioned for the
4. Period of Availability
Urbanized Area Formula Program is
$3,924,820,789 as shown in the table
The funds apportioned under the
below, after the deduction for oversight
Statewide Planning and Research
(authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and
program remain available to be
including prior year reapportioned
obligated by FTA to recipients for four
funds and funds apportioned to UZA’s
fiscal years—which include the year of
from the appropriation for Section 5340
apportionment plus three additional
fiscal years. Any apportioned funds that for Growing States and High Density
States.
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2010, will
URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Statewide Planning and
Total Appropriation .........
$3,606,175,000 a
Research Program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13875
URBANIZED AREA FORMULA
PROGRAM—Continued
Oversight Deduction .......
Prior Year Funds Added
Section 5340 Funds
Added ..........................
¥27,046,313
4,957,616
Total Apportioned ........
3,924,820,789
a Includes
aside for
Formula.
340,734,486
$36,061,750 for one percent setSmall Transit Intensive Cities
Table 3 displays the amounts
apportioned under the Urbanized Area
Formula Program.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
FTA apportions Urbanized Area
Formula Program funds based on
legislative formulas. Different formulas
apply to UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more and UZAs with
populations less than 200,000. For
UZAs 50,000 to 199,999 in population,
the formula is based simply on
population and population density. For
UZAs with populations of 200,000 and
more, the formula is based on a
combination of bus revenue vehicle
miles, bus passenger miles, fixed
guideway revenue vehicle miles, and
fixed guideway route miles, as well as
population and population density.
Table 4 includes detailed information
about the formulas.
To calculate a UZA’s FY 2007
apportionment, FTA used population
and population density statistics from
the 2000 Census and (when applicable)
validated mileage and transit service
data from transit providers’ 2005
National Transit Database (NTD) Report
Year. Also, pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
5336(b). FTA used 60 percent of the
directional route miles attributable to
the Alaska Railroad passenger
operations system to calculate the
apportionment for the Anchorage,
Alaska UZA.
We have calculated dollar unit values
for the formula factors used in the
Urbanized Area Formula Program
apportionment calculations. These
values represent the amount of money
each unit of a factor is worth in this
year’s apportionment. The unit values
change each year, based on all of the
data used to calculate the
apportionments. The dollar unit values
for FY 2007 are displayed in Table 5. To
replicate the basic formula component
of a UZA’s apportionment, multiply the
dollar unit value by the appropriate
formula factor (i.e., the population,
population x population density), and
(when applicable, data from the NTD
(i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles,
passenger miles, and operating cost).
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13876
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
In FY 2007, one percent of funds
appropriated for Section 5307,
$36,061,750, is set aside for Small
Transit Intensive Cities (STIC). FTA
apportions these funds to UZAs under
200,000 in population that operate at a
level of service equal to or above the
industry average level of service for all
UZAs with a population of at least
200,000, but not more than 999,999, in
one or more of six performance
categories: passenger miles traveled per
vehicle revenue mile, passenger miles
traveled per vehicle revenue hour,
vehicle revenue miles per capita,
vehicle revenue hours per capita,
passenger miles traveled per capita, and
passengers per capita.
The data for these categories for the
purpose of FY 2007 apportionments
comes from the NTD reports for the
2005 reporting year. This data is used to
determine a UZA’s eligibility under the
STIC formula, and is also used in the
STIC apportionment calculations.
Because this performance data change
with each year’s NTD reports, the UZAs
eligible for STIC funds and the amount
each receives may vary each year. In FY
2007, FTA apportioned $120,608 for
each performance factor/category for
which the urbanized area exceeded the
national average for UZAs with a
population of at least 200,000 but not
more than 999,999.
In addition to the funds apportioned
to UZAs, according to the Section 5307
formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C.
5336, FTA also apportions funds to
urbanized areas under Section 5340
Growing States and High Density States
formula factors. In FY 2007, FTA
apportioned $138,734,486 to 453 UZA’s
in 50 Growing States and $202,000,000
to 46 UZA’s in seven High Density
States. Half of the funds appropriated
for Section 5340 are available to
Growing States and half to High Density
States. FTA apportions Growing States
funds by a formula based on State
population forecasts for 15 years beyond
the most recent Census. FTA distributes
the amounts apportioned for each State
between UZAs and nonurbanized areas
based on the ratio of urbanized/
nonurbanized population within each
State in the 2000 census. FTA
apportions the High Density States
funds to States with population
densities in excess of 370 persons per
square mile. These funds are
apportioned only to UZAs within those
States. FTA pro-rates each UZA’s share
of the High Density funds based on the
population of the UZAs in the State in
the 2000 census.
FTA cannot provide unit values for
the Growing States or High Density
formulas because the allocations to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
individual States and urbanized areas
are based on their relative population
data, rather than on a national per capita
basis.
Based on language in the SAFETEA–
LU conference report that directs FTA to
show a single apportionment amount for
Section 5307, STIC and Section 5340,
FTA shows a single Section 5307
apportionment amount for each UZA in
Table 3, the Urbanized Area Formula
apportionments. The amount includes
funds apportioned based on the Section
5307 formula factors, any STIC funds,
and any Growing States and High
Density States funding allocated to the
area. FTA uses separate formulas
calculations to generate the respective
apportionment amounts for the Section
5307, STIC and Section 5340. For
technical assistance purposes, the UZAs
that received STIC funds are listed in
Table 6. FTA will make available
breakouts of the funding allocated to
each UZA under these formulas, upon
request to the regional office.
3. Program Requirements
Program guidance for the Urbanized
Area Formula Program is presently
found in FTA Circular C9030.1C,
Urbanized Area Formula Program: Grant
Application Instructions, dated October
1, 1998, and supplemented by
additional information or changes
provided in this document. FTA is in
the process of updating the circular to
incorporate changes resulting from
language in SAFETEA–LU. Several
important program requirements are
highlighted below.
a. Urbanized Area Formula
Apportionments to Governors. For small
UZAs, those with a population of less
than 200,000, FTA apportions funds to
the Governor of each State for
distribution. A single total Governor
apportionment amount for the
Urbanized Area Formula, STIC, and
Growing States and High Density States
is shown in the Urbanized Area
Formula Apportionment table 3. The
table also shows the apportionment
amount attributable to each small UZA
within the State. The Governor may
determine the sub-allocation of funds
among the small UZAs except that
funds attributed to a small UZA that is
located within the planning boundaries
of a Transportation Management Area
(TMA) must be obligated to that small
UZA, as discussed in subsection f
below.
b. Transit Enhancements. Section
5307(d)(1)(K) requires that one percent
of Section 5307 funds apportioned to
UZAs with populations of 200,000 or
more be spent on eligible transit
enhancement activities or projects. This
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
requirement is now treated as a
certification, rather than as a set-aside as
was the case under the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA–
21). Designated recipients in UZAs with
populations of 200,000 or more certify
they are spending not less than one
percent of Section 5307 funds for transit
enhancements. In addition, Designated
Recipients must submit an annual
report on how they spent the money
with the Federal fiscal year’s final
quarterly progress report in TEAM-Web.
The report should include the following
elements: (a) Grantee name, (b) UZA
name and number, (c) FTA project
number, (d) transit enhancement
category, (e) brief description of
enhancement and progress towards
project implementation, (f) activity line
item code from the approved budget,
and (g) amount awarded by FTA for the
enhancement. The list of transit
enhancement categories and activity
line item (ALI) codes may be found in
the table of Scope and ALI codes on
TEAM-Web, which can be accessed at
https://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
The term ‘‘transit enhancement’’
includes projects or project elements
that are designed to enhance public
transportation service or use and are
physically or functionally related to
transit facilities. Eligible enhancements
include the following: (1) Historic
preservation, rehabilitation, and
operation of historic mass transportation
buildings, structures, and facilities
(including historic bus and railroad
facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3)
landscaping and other scenic
beautification, including tables,
benches, trash receptacles, and street
lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian
access and walkways; (6) bicycle access,
including bicycle storage facilities and
installing equipment for transporting
bicycles on mass transportation
vehicles; (7) transit connections to parks
within the recipient’s transit service
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced
access for persons with disabilities to
mass transportation.
It is the responsibility of the MPO to
determine how the one-percent for
transit enhancements will be allotted to
transit projects. The one percent
minimum requirement does not
preclude more than one percent from
being expended in a UZA for transit
enhancements. However, activities that
are only eligible as enhancements—in
particular, operating costs for historic
facilities—may be assisted only within
the one-percent funding level.
c. Transit Security Projects. Pursuant
to section 5307(d)(1)(J), each recipient of
Urbanized Area Formula funds must
certify that of the amount received each
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
fiscal year, it will expend at least one
percent on ‘‘public transportation
security projects’’ or must certify that it
has decided the expenditure is not
necessary. For applicants not eligible to
receive Section 5307 funds for operating
assistance, only capital security projects
may be funded with the one percent.
SAFETEA–LU, however, expanded the
definition of eligible ‘‘capital’’ projects
to include specific crime prevention and
security activities, including: (1)
Projects to refine and develop security
and emergency response plans; (2)
projects aimed at detecting chemical
and biological agents in public
transportation; (3) the conduct of
emergency response drills with public
transportation agencies and local first
response agencies; and (4) security
training for public transportation
employees, but excluding all expenses
related to operations, other than such
expenses incurred in conducting
emergency drills and training. New ALI
codes have been established for these
four new capital activities. The one
percent may also include security
expenditures included within other
capital activities, and, where the
recipient is eligible, operating
assistance. The relevant ALI codes
would be used for those activities.
FTA is often called upon to report to
Congress and others on how grantees are
expending Federal funds for security
enhancements. To facilitate tracking of
grantees’ security expenditures, which
are not always evident when included
within larger capital or operating
activity line items in the grant budget,
we have established a non-additive
(‘‘non-add’’) scope code for security
expenditures—Scope 991. The non-add
scope is to be used to aggregate
activities included in other scopes, and
it does not increase the budget total.
Section 5307 grantees should include
this non-add scope in the project budget
for each new Section 5307 grant
application or amendment. Under this
non-add scope, the applicant should
repeat the full amount of any of the line
items in the budget that are exclusively
for security and include the portion of
any other line item in the project budget
that is attributable to security, using
under the non-add scope the same line
item used in the project budget. The
grantee can modify the ALI description
or use the extended text feature, if
necessary, to describe the security
expenditures.
The grantee must provide information
regarding its use of the one percent for
security as part of each Section 5307
grant application, using a special screen
in TEAM–Web. If the grantee has
certified that it is not necessary to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
expend one percent for security, the
Section 5307 grant application must
include information to support that
certification. FTA will not process an
application for a Section 5307 grant
until the security information is
complete.
d. FY 2007 Operating Assistance.
UZAs under 200,000 population may
use Section 5307 funds for operating
assistance. In addition, Section 5307, as
amended by, SAFETEA–LU and TEA–
21, allows some UZAs with a
population of 200,000 or more to use FY
2007 Urbanized Area Formula funds for
operating assistance under certain
conditions. The specific provisions
allowing the limited use of operating
assistance in large UZAs are as follows:
(1) Section 5307(b)(2) allows UZAs
that grew in population from under
200,000 to over 200,000, as a result of
the 2000 Census to use FY 2007 funds
for operating assistance in an amount up
to 25 percent of the grandfathered
amount for FY 2005 funds. (The
provision is completely phased out in
FY 2008.) Table 7 shows the maximum
amount of each eligible UZA’s Section
5307 apportionment that can be used for
operating assistance.
(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for
grants for the operating costs of
equipment and facilities for use in
public transportation in the Evansville,
IN–KY urbanized area, for a portion or
portions of the UZA if: the portion of
the UZA includes only one State; the
population of the portion is less than
30,000; and the grants will be not used
to provide public transportation outside
of the portion of the UZA.
(3) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides
operating costs of equipment and
facilities for use in public transportation
for local governmental authorities in
areas which adopted transit operating
and financing plans that became a part
of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result
of the 2000 decennial census of
population, but lie outside the service
area of the principal public
transportation agency that serves the
Houston UZA.
(4) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the
formula to be used to apportion Section
5307 funds to UZAs with population of
200,000 or more. SAFETEA–LU
amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that
stated, ‘‘* * * except that the amount
apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized
area under subsection (b) shall be
available to the Alaska Railroad for any
costs related to its passenger
operations.’’ This language has the effect
of directing that funds apportioned to
the Anchorage urbanized area, under
the fixed guideway tiers of the Section
5307 apportionment formula, be made
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13877
available to the Alaska Railroad, and
that these funds may be used for any
capital or operating costs related to its
passenger operations.
(5) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA–21, as
amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note),
provides an exception to the restriction
on the use of operating assistance in a
UZA with a population of 200,000 or
more, by allowing transit providers/
grantees that provide service exclusively
to elderly persons and persons with
disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds
apportioned to the UZA for operating
assistance. The total amount of funding
made available for this purpose under
Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million.
Transit providers/grantees eligible
under this provision have already been
identified and notified.
e. Sources of Local Match. Pursuant to
Section 5307(e), the Federal share of an
urbanized area formula grant is 80
percent of net project cost for a capital
project and 50 percent of net project
cost for operating assistance. The
remainder of the net project cost (i.e., 20
percent and 50 percent, respectively)
shall be provided from the following
sources:
1. In cash from non-Government
sources other than revenues from
providing public transportation
services;
2. From revenues derived from the
sale of advertising and concessions;
3. From an undistributed cash
surplus, a replacement or depreciation
cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
4. From amounts received under a
service agreement with a State or local
social service agency or private social
service organization; and
5. Proceeds from the issuance of
revenue bonds.
In addition, funds from Section
403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be
used to match Urbanized Area Formula
funds.
f. Designated Transportation
Management Areas (TMA). Guidance for
setting the boundaries of TMAs is in the
joint transportation planning regulations
codified at 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR
Part 613. In some cases, the TMA
planning boundaries established by the
MPO for the designated TMA includes
one or more small UZAs. In addition,
one small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has
been designated as a TMA. In either of
these situations, the Governor cannot
allocate ‘‘Governor’s Apportionment’’
funds attributed to the small UZAs to
other areas; that is, the Governor only
has discretion to allocate Governor’s
Apportionment funds attributable to
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13878
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
areas that are outside of designated
TMA planning boundaries.
The list of small UZAs included
within the planning boundaries of
Designated TMA
Small urbanized area included in TMA planning boundary
Albany, NY ...............................................
Houston, TX .............................................
Jacksonville, FL .......................................
Orlando, FL ..............................................
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL .........................
Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD .................
Pittsburgh, PA ..........................................
Seattle, WA ..............................................
Washington, DC–VA–MD ........................
Saratoga Springs, NY.
Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX; The Woodlands, TX.
St. Augustine, FL.
Kissimmee, FL.
Titusville, FL.
Pottstown, PA.
Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-Steubenville, OH–PA (PA portion); Uniontown-Connellsville, PA.
Bremerton, WA.
Frederick, MD.
The MPO must notify the Associate
Administrator for Program Management,
Federal Transit Administration, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590, in writing, no later than July 1
of each year, to identify any small UZA
within the planning boundaries of a
TMA.
g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds
Used for Highway Purposes. Funds
apportioned to a TMA are eligible for
transfer to FHWA for highway projects.
However, before funds can be
transferred, the following conditions
must be met: (1) Such use must be
approved by the MPO in writing, after
appropriate notice and opportunity for
comment and appeal are provided to
affected transit providers; (2) in the
determination of the Secretary, such
funds are not needed for investments
required by the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); and (3)
the MPO determines that local transit
needs are being addressed.
The MPO should notify the
appropriate FTA Regional
Administrator of its intent to use FTA
funds for highway purposes, as
prescribed in section V.D below.
Urbanized Area Formula funds that are
designated by the MPO for highway
projects will be transferred to and
administered by FHWA.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
4. Period of Availability
The Urbanized Area Formula Program
funds apportioned in this notice remain
available to be obligated by FTA to
recipients until September 30, 2010.
Any of these apportioned funds that
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2010, will
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Urbanized Area Formula
Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
In each UZA with a population of
200,000 or more, the Governor in
consultation with responsible local
officials, and publicly owned operators
of public transportation has designated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
designated TMAs is provided in the
table below.
Jkt 211001
one or more entities to be the
Designated Recipient for Section 5307
funds apportioned to the UZA. The
same entity(s) may or may not be the
Designated Recipient for the Job Access
and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New
Freedom program funds apportioned to
the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000
population, the State is the Designated
Recipient for Section 5307 as well as
JARC and New Freedom programs. The
Designated Recipient for Section 5307
may authorize other entities to apply
directly to FTA for Section 5307 grants
pursuant to a supplemental agreement.
While the requirement that projects
selected for funding be included in a
locally developed coordinated public
transit/human service transportation
plan is not included in Section 5307 as
it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that
in their role as public transit providers,
recipients of Section 5307 funds will be
participants in the local planning
process for these programs.
D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49.U.S.C.
5308)
The Clean Fuels Grant Program
supports the use of alternative fuels in
air quality maintenance or
nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon
monoxide through capital grants to
urbanized areas for clean fuel vehicles
and facilities. Previously an unfunded
Formula Program under TEA–21, the
program is now a discretionary program.
FTA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking for the discretionary
program on October 16, 2006, and is
now in the process of reviewing
comments and finalizing the rule. For
more information about this program
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $45,000,000
to the Clean Fuels Grant Program (49
U.S.C. 5308). SAFETEA–LU earmarked
$18,721,000 for specific Clean Fuel
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
projects. The balance of $26,279,000
was transferred to the discretionary Bus
Program.
CLEAN FUELS GRANT PROGRAM
Total Appropriation .........
Transfer to Bus and Bus
Facility .........................
Funds Allocated to
SAFETEA–LU Earmarks ..........................
$45,000,000
¥$26,279,000
18,721,000
Allocations to projects earmarked
under the Clean Fuels program in
SAFETEA–LU are displayed in Table 8.
2. Basis for Allocation of Funds.
Section 3044(b) of SAFETEA–LU
included 16 projects to be funded
through the Clean Fuels program. Table
8 displays the amounts available in FY
2007 to the Clean Fuels projects
designated in SAFETEA–LU. FY 2006
carryover funds are shown in Table 9.
No funds are available for competitive
allocation in FY 2007.
3. Requirements
Clean Fuels program funds may be
made available to any grantee in a UZA
that is designated as maintenance or
nonattainment area for ozone or carbon
monoxide as defined in the Clean Air
Act. Eligible recipients include Section
5307 Designated Recipients as well as
recipients in small UZAs. In the case of
a small UZA, the State in which the area
is located will act as the recipient.
Eligible projects include the purchase
or lease of clean fuel buses (including
buses that employ a lightweight
composite primary structure), the
construction or lease of clean fuel buses
or electrical recharging facilities and
related equipment for such buses, and
construction or improvement of public
transportation facilities to accommodate
clean fuel buses.
Legislation will be necessary if a
recipient wishes to use Clean Fuels
funds earmarked in SAFETEA–LU for
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13879
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
eligible program activities outside the
scope of a project description.
Unless otherwise specified in law,
grants made under the Clean Fuels
program must meet all other eligibility
requirements as outlined in Section
5308.
4. Period of Availability
Funds designated for specific Clean
Fuels Program projects remain available
for obligation for three fiscal years,
which includes the year of
appropriation plus two additional fiscal
years. The FY 2007 funding for projects
included in this notice remains
available through September 30, 2009.
Clean Fuels funds not obligated in an
FTA grant for their original purpose at
the end of the period of availability will
generally be made available for other
projects.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
E. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—Fixed Guideway
Modernization
This program provides capital
assistance for the modernization of
existing fixed guideway systems. Funds
are allocated by a statutory formula to
UZAs with fixed guideway systems that
have been in operation for at least seven
years. A ‘‘fixed guideway’’ refers to any
transit service that uses exclusive or
controlled rights-of-way or rails, entirely
or in part. The term includes heavy rail,
commuter rail, light rail, monorail,
trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined
plane, cable car, automated guideway
transit, ferryboats, that portion of motor
bus service operated on exclusive or
controlled rights-of-way, and highoccupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes. Eligible
applicants are the public transit
authorities in those urbanized areas to
which the funds are allocated. For more
information about Fixed Guideway
Modernization contact Scott Faulk,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–
2053.
The FY 2007 Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program apportionments
to eligible areas are displayed in Table
10.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The formula for allocating the Fixed
Guideway Modernization funds
contains seven tiers. The apportionment
of funding under the first four tiers is
based on amounts specified in law and
NTD data used to apportion funds in FY
1997. Funding under the last three tiers
is apportioned based on the latest
available data on route miles and
revenue vehicle miles on segments at
least seven years old, as reported to the
NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C.
provides for the inclusion of
Morgantown, West Virginia (population
55,997) as an eligible UZA for purposes
of apportioning fixed guideway
modernization funds. Also, pursuant to
49 U.S.C. 5336(b) FTA used 60 percent
of the directional route miles
attributable to the Alaska Railroad
passenger operations system to calculate
the apportionment for the Anchorage,
Alaska UZA under the Section 5309
Fixed Guideway Modernization
formula.
FY 2007 Formula apportionments are
based on data grantees provided to the
NTD for the 2005 reporting year. Table
11 provides additional information and
details on the formula. Dollar unit
values for the formula factors used in
the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Program are displayed in Table 5. To
replicate an area’s apportionment,
multiply the dollar unit value by the
appropriate formula factor, i.e., route
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
must be used for capital projects to
maintain, modernize, or improve fixed
guideway systems. Eligible UZAs (those
with a population of 200,000 or more)
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
with fixed guideway systems that are at
The Continuing Appropriations
least seven years old are entitled to
Resolution, 2007, provides
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization
$1,448,000,000 to the Fixed Guideway
funds. A threshold level of more than
Modernization Program. The total
one mile of fixed guideway is required
amount apportioned for the Fixed
in order to receive Fixed Guideway
Guideway Modernization Program is
Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs
$1,433,520,000, after the deduction for
reporting one mile or less of fixed
oversight, as shown in the table below.
guideway mileage under the NTD are
not included. However, funds
FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION
apportioned to an urbanized area may
be used on any fixed guideway segment
PROGRAM
in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed
Total Appropriation .........
$1,448,000,000 Guideway Modernization is presently
found in FTA Circular C9300.1A,
Oversight Deduction .......
¥14,480,000 Capital Program: Grant Application
Total Apportioned ........
1,433,520,000 Instructions, dated October 1, 1998.
FTA is in the process of updating this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
circular to incorporate changes resulting
from language in SAFETEA–LU.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned in this notice
under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program remain
available to be obligated by FTA to
recipients for three fiscal years
following FY 2007. Any of these
apportioned funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on
September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA
for reapportionment under the Fixed
Guideway Modernization Program.
F. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities
This program provides capital
assistance for new and replacement
buses and related facilities. Funds are
allocated on a discretionary basis.
Eligible purposes are acquisition of
buses for fleet and service expansion,
bus maintenance and administrative
facilities, transfer facilities, bus malls,
transportation centers, intermodal
terminals, park-and-ride stations,
acquisition of replacement vehicles, bus
rebuilds, bus preventive maintenance,
passenger amenities such as passenger
shelters and bus stop signs, accessory
and miscellaneous equipment such as
mobile radio units, supervisory
vehicles, fare boxes, computers, and
shop and garage equipment. Eligible
applicants are State and local
governmental authorities. Eligible
subrecipients include other public
agencies, private companies engaged in
public transportation and private nonprofit organizations. For more
information about Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities contact Maria Wright, Office
of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $881,779,000
for the bus and bus facilities program.
This amount includes $855,500,000
provided for the Bus Program and
$26,279,000 transferred from the Clean
Fuels Program. The amount of funding
for projects designated in Section 3044
of SAFETEA–LU for Bus and BusRelated Facilities in FY 2007 is
$459,670,089. The balance remains
unallocated, as shown in the following
table.
BUS AND BUS FACILITY PROGRAM
Total Appropriation .........
$881,779,000 a
Oversight Deduction .......
SAFETEA–LU Statutory
Provisions Projects .....
¥8,817,790
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
459,670,089
13880
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
report language, you must submit your
request for reprogramming to the House
Funds Available for Disand Senate Committees on
cretionary/Competitive
Appropriations for resolution. FTA will
Allocation .....................
413,291,121
not reprogram projects Congress
designated in report language without
Total Funds to be Allocated ........................
872,961,210 direction from the Appropriations
Committees.
a Includes
$26,279,000 transferred from
FTA will honor projects earmarked to
Clean Fuels Grant Program
receive Section 5309 bus funds in
The FY 2007 Bus and Bus Facility
SAFETEA–LU. Legislation will be
Program allocations are displayed in
necessary to amend the earmark if you
Table 12.
wish to use funds for project activities
outside the scope of the project
2. Basis for Allocations
description.
Funds are provided annually under
Grants made under the Bus and BusSection 5309 for discretionary allocation Related Facilities program must meet all
for bus and bus facilities projects.
other eligibility requirements as
SAFETEA–LU listed 646 earmarked
outlined in Section 5309 unless
projects to be funded each year through
otherwise specified in law.
the Bus Program (Section 3044) and
Program guidance for Bus and Busspecified additional projects in Section
Related Facilities is found in FTA
5309(m)(7). Table 12 displays the
Circular C9300.1A, Capital Program:
allocation of the FY 2007 Bus and BusGrant Application Instructions. FTA is
Related Facilities funds by State and
in the process of updating this circular
project for projects earmarked in
to incorporate changes resulting from
SAFETEA–LU. The table includes a
language in SAFETEA–LU.
SAFETEA–LU project number for each
4. Period of Availability
project listed in Section 3044. No
additional projects were earmarked in
The FY 2007 Bus and Bus-Related
the Continuing Appropriations
Facilities funds not obligated for their
Resolution, 2007. In fact, Section 112 of original purpose as of September 30,
the Continuing Appropriations
2009, may be made available for other
Resolution, 2007, (H.J. Res 20)
projects under 49 U.S.C. 5309. The
specifically precluded using FY 2007
unusual appropriations process in FY
funds to award grants for projects
2007 has not yet resulted in directions
designated Section 5309 bus funds in
from Congress to FTA not to reallocate
the statement of managers
unobligated bus program funds for
accompanying the FY 2006 Department
designations that lapsed at the end of
of Transportation Appropriations Act
FY 2006.
(Pub. L. 109–115).
5. Other Program or Allocation Related
3. Requirements
Information and Highlights
Section 125 and Section 113 of the FY
Prior year unobligated balances for
2005 and FY 2006 Department of
Bus and Bus-Related allocations in the
Transportation Appropriations Acts,
amount of $870,471,637 remain
respectively, make projects identified in available for obligation in FY 2007. This
the statement of managers automatically includes $861,331,362 in fiscal years
eligible to receive the funds designated
2005 and 2006 unobligated allocations,
to the project ‘‘notwithstanding any
and $9,140,275 for fiscal years 2002–
other provision of law.’’ Similar
2004 unobligated allocations that were
language was first included as a general extended by previous direction by the
provision in Section 547 of the FY 2004 House and Senate appropriation
Department of Transportation
committees. The unobligated amounts
Appropriations Acts. In addition,
available as of September 30, 2006, are
Section 3044 of SAFETEA–LU
displayed in Table 13.
In two Notices of Funding
earmarked 646 Bus and Bus Facilities
Availability (NOFA), published as
projects in FY 2007. FTA will review
separate parts of today’s Federal
Congressional intent on a case by case
Register, FTA is issuing procedures for
basis.
FTA honors Congressional earmarks
grantees to apply competitively for
for the purpose designated, for purposes discretionary funding for projects
eligible under the program or under the
eligible under the Bus and Bus Facilities
expanded eligibility of a
program. One NOFA invites
‘‘notwithstanding’’ provision. If you
applications from States and from
want to apply to use funds designated
Designated Recipients under the
under the Bus Program in any year for
Urbanized Area Formula Program to
project activities outside the scope of
fund bus and bus facility projects that
the project designation included in
address the following FTA priorities:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
BUS AND BUS FACILITY PROGRAM
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Fleet replacement needs that cannot be
met with formula funds, fleet expansion
for significant service improvements,
purchase of clean fuel vehicles, facility
construction to support increased
service or introduction of clean fuels,
and intermodal terminal projects that
include intercity bus providers, and
Gulf Coast recovery. The other NOFA
addresses the Department of
Transportation Congestion Initiative and
invites proposals from specific
urbanized areas identified as the most
congested in the nation.
G. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—New Starts
The New Starts program provides
funds for construction of new fixed
guideway systems or extensions to
existing fixed guideway systems.
Eligible purposes are light rail, rapid rail
(heavy rail), commuter rail, monorail,
automated fixed guideway system (such
as a ‘‘people mover’’), or a busway/high
occupancy vehicle (HOV) facility, Bus
Rapid Transit that is fixed guideway, or
an extension of any of these. Projects
become candidates for funding under
this program by successfully completing
the appropriate steps in the major
capital investment planning and project
development process. Major new fixed
guideway projects, or extensions to
existing systems, financed with New
Starts funds typically receive these
funds through a full funding grant
agreement (FFGA) that defines the scope
of the project and specifies the total
multi-year Federal commitment to the
project. Beginning in FY 2007, up to
$200,000,000 each year is designated for
‘‘Small Starts’’ (Section 5309(e)) projects
with a New Starts share of less than
$75,000,000 and a net project cost of
less than $250,000,000. The Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007,
however, did not set aside a specific
amount for Small Starts from the
amounts appropriated for Capital
Investment Grants.
Section 5309(m)(6) also made annual
allocations of New Start funding
available to Alaska and Hawaii for
ferryboats and to the Denali
Commission in Anchorage, Alaska
under the terms of Section 307(e) of the
Denali Commission Act of 1998 (42
U.S.C. 3121) for docks, waterfront
development projects and related
transportation infrastructure in rural
Alaska communities.
For more information about New
Starts project development contact Sean
Libberton, Office of Planning and
Environment, at (202) 366–4033, or for
information about published allocations
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
4. Period of Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides
$1,566,000,000 to New Starts. The total
amount allocated for New Starts is
$1,550,340,000, as shown in the table
below.
New Starts funds remain available for
three fiscal years (including the fiscal
year the funds are made available or
appropriated plus two additional years.)
FY 2007 funds remain available through
September 30, 2009. Funds may be
extended by Congress or made available
for other projects after the period of
availability has expired. The unusual
appropriations process in FY 2007 has
not yet resulted in any extensions of
prior year unobligated balances that
lapsed at the end of FY 2006.
NEW STARTS
Total Appropriation .......
$1,566,000,000 a
Oversight Deduction .....
Funds Allocated to Specific Projects in Table
14 ..............................
Unallocated Funds
Available for Discretionary/Competitive
Allocation ...................
¥15,660,000
Total Funds to be Allocated ...................
b 1,284,478,399
265,861,601
1,550,340,000
a Includes
$200 million for Small Starts.
$20 million for the Denali Commission and Alaska and Hawaii Ferry projects.
b Includes
2. Basis for Allocation
Congress included authorizations for
specific New Starts projects in
SAFETEA–LU and in statutory
takedowns from the program for Alaska
and Hawaii Ferryboats and the Denali
Commission. The Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007, did
not include project allocations. FTA has
allocated available FY 2007 New Starts
funding as shown in Table 14, based on
existing FFGAs and the President’s
Budget for FY 2007.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
3. Requirements
Because New Starts projects are
earmarked in law rather than report
language, reprogramming for a purpose
other than that specified must also
occur in law. New Starts projects are
subject to a complex set of approvals
related to planning and project
development set forth in 49 CFR Part
611. FTA has published a number of
rulemakings and interim guidance
documents related to the New Starts
program since the passage of SAFETEA–
LU. Grantees should reference the FTA
Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov for
the most current program guidance
about project developments and
management. Grant related guidance for
New Starts is found in FTA Circular
C9300.1A, Capital Program: Grant
Application Instructions, dated October
1, 1998; and C5200.1A, Full Funding
Grant Agreement Guidance, dated
December 5, 2002. FTA is in the process
of updating these circulars to
incorporate changes resulting from
language in SAFETEA–LU and recent
rulemakings.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated allocations for
New Starts in the amount of
$717,087,493 remain available for
obligation in FY 2007. This amount
includes $118,384,337 in FY 2005 and
$598,703,156 in FY 2006 unobligated
allocations. These unobligated amounts
are displayed in Table 15. Information
on pre-award authority for New Starts
projects is detailed in section V below.
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals
and Individuals With Disabilities
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
This program provides formula
funding to States for capital projects to
assist private nonprofit groups in
meeting the transportation needs of the
elderly and individuals with disabilities
when the public transportation service
provided in the area is unavailable,
insufficient, or inappropriate to meet
these needs. A State agency designated
by the Governor administers the Section
5310 program. The State’s
responsibilities include: notifying
eligible local entities of funding
availability; developing project selection
criteria; determining applicant
eligibility; selecting projects for funding;
and ensuring that all subrecipients
comply with Federal requirements.
Eligible nonprofit organizations or
public bodies must apply directly to the
designated State agency for assistance
under this program. For more
information about the Elderly and
Individuals with Disabilities Program
contact Cheryl Oliver, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $117,000,000
to the Elderly and Individuals with
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310).
After deduction of 0.5 percent for
oversight, and the addition of
reapportioned prior year funds,
$116,659,554 remains available for
allocation to the States.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13881
ELDERLY AND INDIVIDUALS WITH
DISABILITIES PROGRAM
Total Appropriation .........
$117,000,000
Oversight Deduction .......
Prior Year Funds Added
¥585,000
244,554
Total Apportioned ........
116,659,554
The FY 2007 Elderly and Individuals
with Disabilities Program
apportionments to the States are
displayed in Table 16.
2. Basis for Apportionment
FTA allocates funds to the States by
an administrative formula consisting of
a $125,000 floor for each State ($50,000
for smaller territories) with the balance
allocated based on 2000 Census
population data for persons aged 65 and
over and for persons with disabilities.
3. Requirements
Funds are available to support the
capital costs of transportation services
for older adults and people with
disabilities. Uniquely under this
program, eligible capital costs include
the acquisition of service. Seven
specified States (Alaska, Louisiana,
Minnesota, North Carolina, Oregon,
South Carolina, and Wisconsin) may use
up to 33 percent of their apportionment
for operating assistance under the terms
of the SAFETEA–LU Section 3012(b)
pilot program.
Capital assistance is provided on an
80 percent Federal, 20 percent local
matching basis except that Section
5310(c) allows States eligible for a
higher match under the sliding scale for
FHWA programs to use that match ratio
for Section 5310 capital projects.
Operating assistance is 50 percent
Federal, 50 percent local, or the 62.5
percent of the sliding scale Federal
share. Funds provided under other
Federal programs (other than those of
the DOT, with the exception of the
Federal Lands Highway Program
established by 23 U.S.C. 204) may be
used as match. Revenue from service
contracts may also be used as local
match.
While the assistance is intended
primarily for private non-profit
organizations, public bodies approved
by the State to coordinate services for
the elderly and individuals with
disabilities, or any public body that
certifies to the State that there are no
non-profit organizations in the area that
are readily available to carry out the
service, may receive these funds.
States may use up to ten percent of
their annual apportionment to
administer, plan, and provide technical
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13882
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
assistance for a funded project. No local
share is required for these program
administrative funds. Funds used under
this program for planning must be
shown in the United Planning Work
Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The State recipient must certify that:
the projects selected were derived from
a locally developed, coordinated public
transit-human services transportation
plan; and, the plan was developed
through a process that included
representatives of public, private, and
nonprofit transportation and human
services providers and participation by
the public. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP
and STIP) at a level of specificity or
aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Job Access
Reverse Commute program and the New
Freedom program are also required to be
derived from a locally developed
coordinated public transit/human
service transportation plan. FTA
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs.
The Section 5310 program is subject
to the requirements of Section 5307 to
the extent the Secretary determines
appropriate. Program guidance is found
in FTA C 9070.1E, dated October 1,
1998. FTA published a proposed revised
circular for this program and is
currently reviewing comments
submitted to the docket. The new
circular will be posted on the FTA Web
site at https://www.fta.dot.gov when it is
issued.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
4. Period of Availability
FTA has administratively established
a three year period of availability for
Section 5310 funds. Funds allocated to
States under the Elderly and Individuals
with Disabilities Program in this notice
must be obligated by September 30,
2009. Any funding that remains
unobligated as of that date will revert to
FTA for reapportionment among the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
States under the Elderly and Individuals
with Disabilities Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
States may transfer Section 5310
funds to Section 5307 or Section 5311,
but only for projects selected under the
Section 5310 program, not as a general
supplement for those programs. FTA
anticipates that the States would use
this flexibility primarily for projects to
be implemented by a Section 5307
recipient in a small urbanized area, or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes
that elect to receive funds as a direct
recipient from FTA under Section 5311.
A State that transfers Section 5310
funds to Section 5307 must certify that
each project for which the funds are
transferred has been coordinated with
private nonprofit providers of services.
FTA has established a new scope code
(641) to track 5310 projects included
within a Section 5307 or 5311 grant.
Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is
permitted but not required. FTA expects
primarily to award stand-alone Section
5310 grants to the State for any and all
subrecipients.
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311)
This program provides formula
funding to States and Indian Tribes for
the purpose of supporting public
transportation in areas with a
population of less than 50,000. Funding
may be used for capital, operating, State
administration, and project
administration expenses. Eligible
subrecipients include State and local
public agencies, Indian Tribes, private
non-profit organizations, and private
operators of public transportation
services, including intercity bus
companies. Indian Tribes are also
eligible direct recipients under Section
5311, both for funds apportioned to the
States and for projects selected to be
funded with funds set aside for a
separate Tribal Transit Program.
For more information about the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $404,000,000
to the Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program (49 U.S.C. 5311). The total
amount apportioned for the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is
$386,179,139, after take-downs of two
percent for the Rural Transportation
Assistance Program (RTAP), 0.5 percent
for oversight, and $10,000,000 for the
Tribal Transit Program, and the addition
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
of Section 5340 funds and prior year
funds reapportioned, as shown in the
table below.
NONURBANIZED AREA FORMULA
PROGRAM
Total Appropriation .........
$404,000,000
Oversight Deduction .......
RTAP Takedown ............
Tribal Transit Takedown
Prior Year Funds Added
Section 5340 Funds
Added ..........................
2,020,000
8,080,000
10,000,000
2,277,688
63,265,514
Total Apportioned ........
449,443,202
The FY 2007 Nonurbanized Area
Formula apportionments to the States
are displayed in Table 17.
2. Basis for Apportionments
FTA apportions the funds available
for apportionment after take-down for
oversight, the Tribal Transit Program,
and RTAP according to a statutory
formula. FTA apportions the first
twenty percent to the States based on
land area in nonurbanized areas with no
state receiving more than 5 percent of
the amount apportioned. FTA
apportions the remaining eighty percent
based on nonurbanized population of
each State relative to the national
nonurbanized population. FTA does not
apportion Section 5311 funds to the
Virgin Islands, which by a statutory
exception are treated as an urbanized
area for purposes of the Section 5307
formula program.
FTA also allocated $63,265,514 to the
50 States for nonurbanized areas from
the Growing States portion of Section
5340. FTA apportions Growing States
funds by a formula based on State
population forecasts for 15 years beyond
the most recent census. FTA distributes
the amounts apportioned for each State
between UZAs and nonurbanized areas
based on the ratio of urbanized/
nonurbanized population within each
State in the 2000 census.
3. Program Requirements
The Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program provides capital, operating and
administrative assistance for public
transit service in areas under 50,000 in
population.
The Federal share for capital
assistance is 80 percent and for
operating assistance is 50 percent,
except that States eligible for the sliding
scale match under FHWA programs may
use that match ratio for Section 5311
capital projects and 62.5 percent of the
sliding scale capital match ratio for
operating projects.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
Each State must spend no less than 15
percent of its FY 2007 Nonurbanized
Area Formula apportionment for the
development and support of intercity
bus transportation, unless the State
certifies, after consultation with affected
intercity bus service providers, that the
intercity bus service needs of the State
are being adequately met. SAFETEA–LU
added this requirement for consultation
with the industry to strengthen the
certification requirement. FTA also
encourages consultation with other
stakeholders, such as communities
affected by loss of intercity service.
Each State prepares an annual
program of projects, which must
provide for fair and equitable
distribution of funds within the States,
including Indian reservations, and must
provide for maximum feasible
coordination with transportation
services assisted by other Federal
sources.
In order to retain eligibility for
funding, recipients of Section 5311
funding must report data annually to the
NTD, beginning with the 2006 reporting
year.
Program guidance for the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is
found in FTA C 9040.1F, Nonurbanized
Area Formula Program Guidance and
Grant Application Instructions, dated
April 1, 2007, which was revised and
reissued after notice and comment. FTA
announced availability of this circular
in the Federal Register on February 28,
2007, and summarized the response to
comments submitted to the docket.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
4. Period of Availability
Funds apportioned to nonurbanized
areas under the Nonurbanized Area
Formula Program will remain available
for two fiscal years following FY 2007.
Any funds that remain unobligated at
the close of business on September 30,
2009, will revert to FTA for allocation
among the States under the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
By law, FTA requires that each
recipient under the Section 5311
program submit an annual report to the
NTD containing information on capital
investments, operations, and service
provided with funds received under the
Section 5311 program. Section
5311(b)(4), as amended by SAFETEA–
LU, specifies that the report should
include information on total annual
revenue, sources of revenue, total
annual operating costs, total annual
capital costs, fleet size and type, and
related facilities, revenue vehicle miles,
and ridership. In consultation with State
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Departments of Transportation (DOT),
FTA previously developed a voluntary
state-based rural data module for the
NTD. The existing NTD Rural Data
Reporting Module manual and reporting
instructions are posted on the NTD Web
site, https://www.ntdprogram.com. For
each 5311 subrecipient, the State DOT
will complete a one-page form of basic
data. The existing module will serve as
a basis for reporting requirements for
the new, mandatory Rural Reporting
Module of the NTD until FTA can
modify it, in consultation with the
States, among others. Pursuant to
SAFETEA–LU, mandatory reporting
began with the 2006 NTD Report Year.
The first reports were due on October
28, 2006, for those States with State or
local fiscal years ending between
January 1 and June 30, 2006; on January
28, 2007, for those States with State or
local fiscal years ending between July 1
and September 30, 2006; and April 30,
2007, for those States with State or local
fiscal years ending between October 1
and December 31, 2006. Corresponding
dates are applicable to the data for the
2007 NTD Report Year. To enter data
and receive additional instructions,
State DOTs can go to the NTD website.
FTA will issue revised reporting
instructions in the 2007 reporting
manual, based on consultation with the
States and public comment.
J. Rural Transportation Assistance
Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3))
This program provides funding to
assist in the design and implementation
of training and technical assistance
projects, research, and other support
services tailored to meet the needs of
transit operators in nonurbanized areas.
For more information about Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) contact Lorna Wilson, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
13883
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM—Continued
Prior Year Funds Added
Total Apportioned ........
452,588
7,320,588
Table 17 shows the FY 2007 RTAP
allocations to the States.
2. Basis for Allocation
FTA allocates funds to the States by
an administrative formula. First FTA
allocates $65,000 to each State ($10,000
to territories), and then allocates the
balance based on nonurbanized
population in the 2000 census.
3. Program Requirements
States may use the funds to undertake
research, training, technical assistance,
and other support services to meet the
needs of transit operators in
nonurbanized areas. These funds are to
be used in conjunction with a State’s
administration of the Nonurbanized
Area Formula Program, but may also
support the rural components of the
Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom
programs.
4. Period of Availability
Funds apportioned to States under
RTAP remain available for two fiscal
years following FY 2007. Any funds that
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2009, will
revert to FTA for allocation among the
States under the RTAP.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
The National RTAP project is
administered by the American Public
Works Association in consortium with
the Community Transportation
Association of America, under a
cooperative agreement re-competed at
five-year intervals. During FY 2007,
FTA will be soliciting proposals for the
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
National RTAP program services for the
next five years. The projects are guided
The Continuing Appropriations
by a project review board of managers
Resolution, 2007, provides $8,080,000
to RTAP (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(2)), as a two of rural transit systems and State DOT
RTAP programs. National RTAP
percent takedown from the funds
resources also support the biennial TRB
appropriated for Section 5311. FTA has
National Conference on Rural Public
reserved 15 percent for the National
and Intercity Bus Transportation and
RTAP program. After adding prior year
other research and technical assistance
funds eligible for reapportionment,
$7,320,588 is available for allocations to projects of a national nature.
The percentage takedown for RTAP,
the States, as shown in the table below.
combined with rising funding levels for
Section 5311, make additional resources
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE
available at the State RTAP program
PROGRAM
level as well as the national RTAP for
Total Appropriation .........
$8,080,000 projects such as providing technical
assistance for the new tribal transit
program and conducting intercity bus
National RTAP Takedown ............................
1,212,000 needs assessments.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13884
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
K. Public Transportation on Indian
Reservations Program (49 U.S.C.
5311(c)(1))
FTA refers to this program as the
Tribal Transit Program. It is funded as
a takedown from funds appropriated for
the Section 5311 program. Indian Tribes
are defined as eligible direct recipients.
The funds are to be apportioned for
grants to Indian Tribes for any purpose
eligible under Section 5311, which
includes capital, operating, planning,
and administrative assistance for rural
public transit services and rural
intercity bus service. For more
information about the Tribal Transit
Program contact Lorna Wilson, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
intending to apply to FTA as direct
recipients to contact the appropriate
FTA regional office at the earliest
opportunity.
Technical assistance for Tribes may
be available from the State DOT using
the State’s allocation of RTAP or funds
available for State administration under
Section 5311, from the Tribal
Transportation Assistance Program
(TTAP) Centers supported by FHWA,
and from the Community
Transportation Association of America
under a program funded by the United
States Department of Agriculture
(USDA). The National RTAP will also be
developing new resources for Tribal
Transit.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2007
Under the Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, the amount allocated
to the program in FY 2007 is
$10,000,000, as authorized in Section
5311(c)(1)(B).
L. National Research Programs (49
U.S.C. 5314)
2. Basis for Allocation
Based on procedures developed in
consultation with the Tribes, FTA will
issue a Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) soliciting applications for FY
2007 funds.
3. Requirements
FTA developed streamlined program
requirements based on statutory
authority allowing the Secretary to
determine the terms and conditions
appropriate to the program. These
conditions are contained in the annual
NOFA.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
4. Period of Availability
Funds remain available for three fiscal
years, which includes the fiscal year the
funds were apportioned or appropriated
plus two additional years. Funds
appropriated in FY 2007 will remain
available for obligation to the tribes
competitively selected to receive the
funds through September 30, 2009. Any
funds that remain unobligated after
September 30, 2009, will revert to FTA
for reallocation among the Tribes.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
The funds set aside for the Tribal
Transit Program are not meant to
replace or reduce funds that Indian
Tribes receive from states through the
Section 5311 program but are to be used
to enhance public transportation on
Indian reservations and transit serving
tribal communities. Funds allocated to
Tribes by the States may be included in
the State’s Section 5311 application or
awarded by FTA in a grant directly to
the tribe. We encourage Tribes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
FTA’s National Research Programs
include the National Research and
Technology Program (NRTP), the
Transit Cooperative Research Program
(TCRP), the National Transit Institute
(NTI), and the University Transportation
Centers Program (UTC).
Through funding under these
programs, FTA seeks to deliver
solutions that improve public
transportation. FTA’s Strategic Research
Goals are to provide transit research
leadership, increase transit ridership,
improve capital and operating
efficiencies, improve safety and
emergency preparedness, and to protect
the environment and promote energy
independence. For more information
contact Bruce Robinson, Office of
Research, Demonstration and
Innovation, at (202) 366–4209.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2007
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $61,000,000
for the National Research Programs. Of
this amount $9,300,000 is allocated for
TCRP, $4,300,000 for NTI, $7,000,000
for the UTC, and $40,400,000 for NRTP.
Within the NRTP—$22,800,920 is
allocated for specific activities under 49
U.S.C. 5338(d) and in Section 3046 of
SAFETEA–LU. A breakdown of NRP
funds is provided in the table below.
NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS
Total Appropriation .........
Funds Allocated for Specific Programs or Activities ..........................
Small Business Innovative Research Takedown ............................
Funds Available for FTA
Programming ...............
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS—
Continued
Total NPR Funding .....
61,000,000
All research and research and
development projects are subject to a
2.6% reduction for the Small Business
Innovative Research Program (SBIR).
The project allocations are listed in
Table 18.
2. Program Requirements
Application Instructions and Program
Management Guidelines are set forth in
FTA Circular 6100.1C. Research projects
must support FTA’s Strategic Research
Goals and meet the Office of
Management and Budget’s Research and
Development Investment Criteria. All
research recipients are required to work
with FTA to develop approved
Statements of Work and plans to
evaluate research results before award.
Eligible activities under the NRTP
include research, development,
demonstration and deployment projects
as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5312(a); Joint
Partnership projects for deployment of
innovation as defined by 49 U.S.C.
5312(b); International Mass
Transportation Projects as defined by 49
U.S.C. 5312(c); and, human resource
programs as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5322.
Problem Statements for TCRP can be
submitted on TCRP’s website: https://
www.tcrponline.org. Information about
NTI courses can be found at https://
www.ntionline.com. UTC funds are
transferred to the Research and
Innovative Technology Administration
to make awards.
3. Period of Availability
Funds are available until expended.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Funds not designated by Congress for
specific projects and activities will be
programmed by FTA based on national
priorities. Opportunities are posted in
www.grants.gov under Catalogue of
Federal Domestic Assistance Number
20.514.
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
The Job Access and Reverse Commute
(JARC) program provides formula
funding to States and Designated
Recipients to support the development
and maintenance of job access projects
43,400,920 designed to transport welfare recipients
and eligible low-income individuals to
200,000 and from jobs and activities related to
their employment, and for reverse
17,399,080 commute projects designed to transport
residents of UZAs and other than
$61,000,000
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
urbanized to suburban employment
opportunities. For more information
about the JARC program contact Henrika
Buchanan-Smith, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
of these provisions should submit a
request to the FTA regional office. FTA
will assign new accounting codes to the
funds before obligating them in a grant.
3. Requirements
States and Designated Recipients
must solicit grant applications and
select projects competitively, based on
application procedures and
requirements established by the
Designated Recipient, consistent with
the Federal JARC program objectives. In
JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE the case of large UZAs, the area-wide
solicitation shall be conducted in
PROGRAM
cooperation with the appropriate
Total Appropriation .........
$144,000,000 MPO(s).
Funds are available to support the
Total Apportioned ........
144,000,000 planning, capital and operating costs of
transportation services that address the
Table 19 shows the FY 2007 JARC
needs of welfare recipients and eligible
apportionments.
low-income individuals that are not met
by other transportation services. The
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
transportation services may be provided
By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of
by public, non-profit, or private-forfunds available to UZAs with
profit operators. The Federal share is 80
populations of 200,000 or more persons percent of capital expenses and 50
(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for percent of operating expenses. Funds
urbanized areas with populations
provided under other Federal programs
ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 persons
(other than those of the U.S. DOT) may
(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the
be used for local/State match for funds
States for rural and small urban areas
provided under section 5316, and
with populations of less than 50,000
revenue from service contracts may be
persons. FTA apportions funds based
used as local match.
upon the number of low income
Funding is available for transportation
individuals residing in a State or large
services provided by public, non-profit,
urbanized area, using data from the
or private-for-profit operators.
2000 Census for individuals below 150
Assistance may be provided for a variety
percent of poverty. FTA publishes
of transportation services and strategies
apportionments to each State for small
directed at assisting welfare recipients
UZAs and for rural and small urban
and eligible low-income individuals
areas and a single apportionment for
address unmet transportation needs,
each large UZA.
and to provide reverse commute
The Designated Recipient, either for
services.
the State or for a large UZA, is
States and Designated Recipients may
responsible for further allocating the
use up to ten percent of their annual
funds to specific projects and
apportionment to administer, plan, and
subrecipients through a competitive
provide technical assistance for a
selection process. If the Governor has
funded project. No local share is
designated more than one recipient of
required for these program
JARC funds in a large UZA, the
administrative funds. Funds used under
Designated Recipients may agree to
this program for planning must be
conduct a single competitive selection
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
process or sub-allocate funds to each
responsibility for that area.
The Designated Recipient must certify
Designated Recipient, based upon a
that: The projects selected were derived
percentage split agreed upon locally,
from a locally developed, coordinated
and conduct separate competitions.
States may transfer funds between the public transit-human services
small UZA and the nonurbanized
transportation plan; and, the plan was
apportionments, if all of the objectives
developed through a process that
of JARC are met in the size area the
included representatives of public,
funds are taken from. States may also
private, and nonprofit transportation
use funds in the small UZA and
and human services providers and
nonurbanized area apportionments for
participation by the public, including
projects anywhere in the State
those representing the needs of welfare
(including large UZAs) if the State has
recipients and eligible low-income
established a statewide program for
individuals. The locally developed,
meeting the objectives of JARC. A State
coordinated public transit-human
planning to transfer funds under either
services transportation planning process
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1. Funding Availability in FY 2007
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $144,000,000
for the JARC Program. The total amount
apportioned by formula is $144,000,000,
as shown in the table below.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13885
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
or aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Section 5310
program and the New Freedom program
are also required to be derived from a
locally developed coordinated public
transit-human service transportation
plan. FTA anticipates that most areas
will develop one consolidated plan for
all the programs, which may include
separate elements and other human
service transportation programs.
The JARC program is subject to the
relevant requirements of Section 5307,
including the requirement for
certification of labor protections. FTA
published a proposed circular for this
program and is currently reviewing
comments submitted to the docket. The
new circular will be posted on the FTA
Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov when
it is issued.
4. Period of Availability
FTA is establishing a consistent threeyear period of availability for JARC,
New Freedom, and the Section 5310
program, which includes the year of
apportionment plus two additional
years. FY 2007 funding is available
through FY 2009. Any funding that
remains unobligated on September 30,
2009 will revert to FTA for
reapportionment among the States and
large UZAs under the JARC program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Carryover Earmarks. Table 20 lists
prior year carryover of $45,154,056 for
JARC projects designated by Congress in
FYs 2002–2005. JARC earmarks carried
over from TEA–21 are subject to the
terms and conditions under which they
were originally appropriated, including
the requirement for a 50 percent local
share for both capital and operating
assistance. All projects should be in a
regional JARC Plan as required under
TEA–21 or in the new local coordinated
plan required by the new formula JARC
program. FTA will award a grant for a
designated project upon receipt of a
complete application, but can honor
changes to the original designation only
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13886
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
if so directed by the Appropriations
Committee chairs.
b. Designated Recipient. Beginning in
FY 2007, FTA must have received
formal notification from the Governor or
Governor’s designee of the Designated
Recipient for JARC funds apportioned to
a State or large UZA before awarding a
grant to that area for JARC projects.
c. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311.
States may transfer JARC funds to
Section 5307 or Section 5311, but only
for projects competitively selected
under the JARC program, not as a
general supplement for those programs.
FTA anticipates that the States would
use this flexibility primarily for projects
to be implemented by a Section 5307
recipient in a small urbanized area or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes
that elect to receive funds as a direct
recipient from FTA under Section 5311.
FTA has established a new scope code
(646) to track JARC projects included
within a Section 5307 or 5311 grant.
Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is
permitted but not required. FTA will
also award stand-alone Section 5316
grants to the State for any and all
subrecipients. In order to track
disbursements accurately against the
appropriate program, FTA will not
combine JARC funds with Section 5307
funds in a single Section 5307 grant, nor
will FTA combine JARC with New
Freedom funds in a single Section 5307
grant.
d. Evaluation. Section 5316(i)(2), as
added by SAFETEA–LU, requires FTA
to conduct a study to evaluate the
effectiveness of the JARC program. To
support the evaluation, annual GAO
reports on the program, and DOT
Performance Measures, while reducing
the burden grantees previously
experienced from separate reporting
required for the JARC program under
TEA–21, FTA has incorporated
reporting for performance measures into
the annual progress report all JARC
grantees submit in TEAM.
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C.
5317)
SAFETEA–LU established the New
Freedom Program under 49 U.S.C. 5317.
The program purpose is to provide new
public transportation services and
public transportation alternatives
beyond those currently required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) that assist
individuals with disabilities with
transportation, including transportation
to and from jobs and employment
support services. For more information
about the New Freedom program
contact Henrika Buchanan-Smith, Office
of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
1. Funding Availability in FY 2007
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $81,000,000
for the New Freedom Program. The
entire amount is apportioned by
formula, as shown in the table below.
NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM
Designated Recipients may agree to
conduct a single competitive selection
process or sub-allocate funds to each
Designated Recipient, based upon a
percentage split agreed upon locally and
conduct separate competitions.
3. Requirements
States and Designated Recipients
must solicit grant applications and
select projects competitively, based on
Total Apportioned ........
81,000,000 application procedures and
requirements established by the
Table 21 shows the FY 2007 New
Designated Recipient, consistent with
Freedom apportionments.
the Federal New Freedom program
objectives. In the case of large UZAs, the
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
area-wide solicitation shall be
By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of
conducted in cooperation with the
funds available to UZAs with
appropriate MPO(s).
populations of 200,000 or more persons
Funds are available to support the
(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for capital and operating costs of new
urbanized areas with populations
public transportation services and
ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 persons
public transportation alternatives that
(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the
are beyond those required by the
States for rural and small urban areas
Americans with Disabilities Act. Funds
with populations of less than 50,000
provided under other Federal programs
persons. FTA apportions funds based
(other than those of the DOT) may be
upon the number of persons with
used as match for capital funds
disabilities over the age of five residing
provided under Section 5317, and
in a State or large urbanized area, using
revenue from contract services may be
data from the 2000 Census. FTA
used as local match.
publishes apportionments to each State
Funding is available for transportation
for small UZAs and for rural and small
services provided by public, non-profit,
urban areas and a single apportionment
or private-for-profit operators.
for each large UZA.
FTA has learned from the U.S. Bureau Assistance may be provided for a variety
of transportation services and strategies
of the Census that there is a better
directed at assisting persons with
source of disability data from the 2000
Census than the 2000 census file we had disabilities address unmet
transportation needs. Eligible public
previously used for SAFETEA–LU
transportation services and alternatives
projections and for the FY 2006 New
to public transportation funded under
Freedom program apportionments. We
the New Freedom program must be both
have therefore based the FY 2007
new and beyond the ADA. (Note,
apportionments for the New Freedom
however, that FTA has published
program on the information for States
interim guidance holding Designated
and urbanized areas contained in the
Recipients harmless for project
Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF–3)—
selections conducted in good faith based
Sample Data (tables QT–P21 and P42),
on FTA’s earlier preliminary
and Census publication PHC–2, which
determination that eligible services
provides more accurate data for
could be either new or beyond the
individuals with disabilities than the
ADA.)
file based on projections from a sample
The Federal share is 80 percent of
that we had previously used. We will
capital expenses and 50 percent of
also base future apportionments on this
operating expenses. Funds provided
data and will update the SAFETEA–LU
estimates for FY 2008–2009 on the Web under other Federal programs (other
than those of the DOT) may be used for
site. We regret any inconvenience this
local/state match for funds provided
technical change in the source data for
under Section 5317, and revenue from
the formula may cause areas in their
planning and selection of New Freedom service contracts may be used as local
match.
projects.
The Designated Recipient, either for
States and Designated Recipients may
the State or for a large UZA, is
use up to ten percent of their annual
responsible for further allocating the
apportionment to administer, plan, and
funds to specific projects and
provide technical assistance for a
subrecipients through a competitive
funded project. No local share is
selection process. If the Governor has
required for these program
designated more than one recipient of
administrative funds. Funds used under
JARC funds in a large UZA, the
this program for planning must be
Total Appropriation .........
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
$81,000,000
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The Designated Recipient must certify
that: the projects selected were derived
from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit-human services
transportation plan; and, the plan was
developed through a process that
included representatives of public,
private, and nonprofit transportation
and human services providers and
participation by the public, including
those representing the needs of welfare
recipients and eligible low-income
individuals. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes, and funding for the
program must be included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP
and STIP) at a level of specificity or
aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Section 5310
program and the JARC program are also
required to be derived from a locally
developed coordinated public transithuman service transportation plan. FTA
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs.
The New Freedom program is subject
to the relevant requirements of Section
5307, but certification of labor
protections is not required. FTA
published a proposed circular for this
program and is currently reviewing
comments submitted to the docket. The
new circular will be posted on the FTA
Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov when
it is issued.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
4. Period of Availability
FTA is establishing a consistent threeyear period of availability for New
Freedom, JARC, and the Section 5310
program, which includes the year of
apportionment plus two additional
years. FY 2007 funding is available
through FY 2009. Any funding that
remains unobligated on September 30,
2009 will revert to FTA for
reapportionment among the States and
large UZAs under the New Freedom
program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
a. Designated Recipient. Beginning in
FY 2007, FTA must have received
formal notification from the Governor or
Governor’s designee of the Designated
Recipient for New Freedom funds
apportioned to a State or large UZA
before awarding a grant to that area for
New Freedom projects.
b. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311.
States may transfer New Freedom funds
to Section 5307 or Section 5311, but
only for projects competitively selected
under the New Freedom program, not as
a general supplement for those
programs. FTA anticipates that the
States would use this flexibility for
projects to be implemented by a Section
5307 recipient in a small urbanized area
or for Federally recognized Indian
Tribes that elect to receive funds as a
direct recipient from FTA under Section
5311. FTA has established a new scope
code (647) to track New Freedom
projects included within a Section 5307
or 5311 grant. Transfer to Section 5307
or 5311 is permitted but not required.
FTA will also award stand-alone
Section 5317 grants to the State for any
and all subrecipients. In order to track
disbursements accurately against the
appropriate program, FTA will not
combine New Freedom funds with
Section 5307 funds in a single Section
5307 grant, nor will FTA combine New
Freedom with JARC funds in a single
Section 5307 grant.
c. Performance Measures. To support
the evaluation of the program and
Departmental reporting under the
Governmental Performance and Results
Act and the Office of Management and
Budget’s Performance Assessment and
Rating Tool, FTA has incorporated
reporting for performance measures into
the annual progress report all New
Freedom grantees submit in TEAM.
O. Alternative Transportation in Parks
and Public Land (49 U.S.C. 5320)
The Alternative Transportation in
Parks and Public Lands (ATPPL)
program is administered by FTA in
partnership with the Department of the
Interior (DOI) and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture’s Forest Service. The
purpose of the program is to enhance
the protection of national parks and
Federal lands, and increase the
enjoyment of those visiting them. The
program funds capital and planning
expenses for alternative transportation
systems such as buses and trams in
federally managed parks and public
lands. Federal land management
agencies and State, tribal and local
governments acting with the consent of
a Federal land management agency are
eligible to apply. DOI, after consultation
with and in cooperation with FTA,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13887
determines the final selection and
funding of projects.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, makes $23 million
available for the program in FY 2007.
Ten percent of the funds are reserved for
administration and technical assistance.
FTA published a Notice of Funding
Availability (NOFA) in the Federal
Register on December 5, 2006, inviting
applications for projects to be funded in
FY 2007. Applications were due to the
appropriate Federal Land Management
Agency on February 16, 2007.
2. Program Requirements
Projects are competitively selected
based on criteria specified in the Notice
of Funding Availability. The terms and
conditions applicable to the program are
also specified in the NOFA. Projects
must conserve natural, historical, and
cultural resources, reduce congestion
and pollution, and improve visitor
mobility and accessibility. No more than
25 percent may be allocated for any one
project.
3. Period of Availability
The funds under the Alternative
Transportation in Parks and Public
Lands remain available until expended.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Project selections for the FY 2006
funding were published in the Federal
Register on September 12, 2006. Fifteen
projects were awarded through direct
grants to individual State and local
governments. Twenty-seven projects
were funded through reimbursable
interagency agreements with the U.S.
Forest Service, National Park Service,
and Fish and Wildlife Service. Twentyfive of the projects (totaling $16 million)
were capital projects and seventeen
(totaling $3.6 million) were planning
projects.
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339)
The Alternatives Analysis Program
provides grants to States, authorities of
the States, metropolitan planning
organizations, and local government
authorities to develop studies as part of
the transportation planning process.
These studies include an assessment of
a wide range of public transportation
alternatives designed to address a
transportation problem in a corridor or
subarea; sufficient information to enable
the Secretary to make the findings of
project justification and local financial
commitment required; the selection of a
locally preferred alternative; and the
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13888
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
adoption of the locally preferred
alternative as part of the state or
regional long-range transportation plan.
For more information about this
program contact Sean Libberton, Office
of Planning and Environment, at (202)
366–4033.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $25,000,000
to the Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339). The Act made available
$18,900,000 for discretionary allocation
to the projects designated in SAFETEA–
LU. The balance of $6,100,000 will be
made available for competitive
allocation.
Analysis Program must be shown in the
UPWP for MPO(s) with responsibility
for that area. Pre-award authority
applies to these funds after Congress
appropriates funds for these projects
and the allocations are published in an
FTA notice of apportionments and
allocations.
Legislation to amend the earmark is
necessary should a recipient wish to use
funds provided under Section 5339 for
eligible project activities outside the
scope of the project description.
Unless otherwise specified in law,
grants made under the Alternatives
Analysis program must meet all other
eligibility requirements as outlined in
Section 5309.
4. Period of availability
Funds designated for specific
Total Appropriation .........
$25,000,000 Alternatives Analysis Program projects
remain available for obligation for three
Funds Allocated to
fiscal years, which includes the year of
SAFETEA–LU Earappropriation plus two additional fiscal
marks ..........................
6,100,000
years. The FY 2007 funding for projects
Funds Available for Disincluded in this notice remains
cretionary/Competitive
Allocation .....................
18,900,000 available through September 30, 2009.
Alternatives Analysis funds not
obligated in an FTA grant for their
Allocations to projects designated in
original purpose at the end of the period
SAFETEA–LU are displayed in Table
of availability will generally be made
22.
available for other projects.
2. Basis for Allocation of Funds
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Section 3037(c) of SAFETEA–LU
Related Information and Highlights
included 18 projects to be funded
through Alternatives Analysis Program
Table 23 lists prior year carryover of
in FYs 2006 and 2007. Table 22 displays $19,305,000 for Alternative Analysis
the amounts available in FY 2007 to the projects made available in FY 2006.
Alternatives Analysis projects
Q. Growing States and High Density
designated in SAFETEA–LU. In a
States Formula Factors
separate part of today’s Federal
The Continuing Appropriations
Register, FTA is publishing a Notice of
Resolution, 2007, makes $404,000,000
Funding Availability to solicit
available for apportionment in
applications for alternatives analysis
projects that advance the state of the art accordance with the formula factors
for the balance of FY 2007 funds and the prescribed for Growing States and High
Density States in Section 5340 of
carryover funds available for
SAFETEA–LU. Fifty percent of this
competitive allocation from FY 2006.
amount (or $202,000,000) will be
3. Requirements
allotted eligible States and urbanized
Alternatives Analysis program funds
areas using the Growing State formula
may be made available to States,
factors. The other 50 percent is
authorities of the States, metropolitan
apportioned to eligible States and
planning organizations, and local
urbanized areas using the High Density
governmental authorities. The
States formula factors. Based on
Government’s share of the cost of an
application of the formulas,
activity funded may not exceed 80
$138,734,486 of the Growing States
percent of the cost of the activity. The
funding was apportioned to urbanized
funds will be awarded as separate
areas and $63,265,514 to nonurbanized
Section 5339 grants. The grant
areas. All of the $202,000,000 allotted to
requirements will be comparable to
High Density States is apportioned to
those for Section 5309 grants. Eligible
urbanized areas.
projects include planning and corridor
The term ‘‘State’’ is defined only to
studies and the adoption of locally
mean the 50 States. For the Growing
preferred alternatives within the fiscally State portion of Section 5340, funds are
constrained Metropolitan
allocated based on the population
Transportation Plan for that area. Funds forecasts for fifteen years after the date
awarded under the Alternatives
of that census. Forecasts are based on
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
the trend between the most recent
decennial census and Census Bureau
population estimates for the most
current year. Funds allocated to the
States are then sub-allocated to
urbanized and non-urbanized areas
based on forecast population, where
available. If forecasted population data
at the urbanized level is not available,
funds are allocated to current urbanized
and non-urbanized areas on the basis of
current population. Funds allocated to
urbanized areas are included in their
Section 5307apportionment. Funds
allocated for non-urbanized areas are
included in the states’ Section 5311
apportionments.
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 Note)
The Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
(OTRB) Program authorizes FTA to
make grants to operators of over-theroad buses to help finance the
incremental capital and training costs of
complying with the DOT over-the-road
bus accessibility final rule, 49 CFR Part
37, published on September 28, 1998
(63 FR 51670). FTA conducts a national
solicitation of applications, and grantees
are selected on a competitive basis. For
more information about the OTRB
program contact Blenda Younger, Office
of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2007
The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, provides $7,600,000
for the Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
(OTRB) Program, which is the total
amount allocable for OTRB, as shown in
the table below.
Total Appropriation .........
$7,600,000
Funds Available for Competitive Allocation ........
7,600,000
Of this amount, $5,700,000 is
allocable to providers of intercity fixedroute service, and $1,900,000 to other
providers of over-the-road bus services,
including local fixed-route service,
commuter service, and charter and tour
service.
2. Program Requirements
Projects are competitively selected.
The Federal share of the project is 90
percent of net project cost. Program
guidance is provided in the Federal
Register notice soliciting applications.
We will publish a notice in the near
future for applications for applications
for the FY 2007 funding made available
under the Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007. Operators of over the
road buses may apply through
www.grants.gov, or by submitting an
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
application to the appropriate FTA
regional office. Assistance is available to
operators of buses used substantially or
exclusively in intercity, fixed route,
over-the-road bus service. Capital
projects eligible for funding include
projects to add lifts and other
accessibility components to new vehicle
purchases and to purchase lifts to
retrofit existing vehicles. Eligible
training costs include developing
training materials or providing training
for local providers of over-the-road bus
services.
3. Period of Availability
Funds are available until expended.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
A Federal Register notice of FY 2006
project selections was published
December 4, 2007, and is available at
https://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/leg_
reg_federal_register.html/.
V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY
2007 Grants
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority To
Incur Project Costs
1. Caution to New Grantees. While we
provide pre-award authority for many
projects, we do not recommend that
first-time grant recipients utilize the
automatic pre-award authority to incur
expenses before the grant is actually
awarded by FTA. As a new grantee, it
is easy to misunderstand pre-award
authority conditions and not be aware of
all of the applicable FTA requirements
that must be met in order to be
reimbursed for project expenditures
incurred in advance of grant award.
FTA programs have specific statutory
requirements that are often different
from those for other Federal grant
programs with which new grantees may
be familiar. If funds are expended for an
ineligible project or activity, FTA will
be unable to reimburse the project
sponsor.
2. Policy. FTA provides blanket, or
automatic, pre-award authority in
certain program areas described below.
This pre-award authority allows
grantees to incur certain project costs
prior to grant approval and retain their
eligibility for subsequent reimbursement
after grant approval. The grantee
assumes all risk and is responsible for
ensuring that all conditions are met to
retain eligibility. This automatic preaward spending authority permits a
grantee to incur costs on an eligible
transit capital, operating, planning, or
administrative project without prejudice
to possible future Federal participation
in the cost of the project or. In the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Federal Register Notice of November
30, 2006, FTA extended pre-award
authority for capital assistance under all
formula programs through FY 2009, the
duration of SAFETEA–LU. FTA
provides pre-award authority for
planning and operating assistance under
the formula programs without regard to
the period of the authorization. In
addition, we extend pre-award authority
for certain discretionary programs based
on the annual Appropriations Act each
year. All pre-award authority is subject
to conditions and triggers stated below:
a. FTA does not impose additional
conditions on pre-award authority for
operating, planning, or administrative
assistance under the formula grant
programs. Grantees may be reimbursed
for expenses incurred prior to grant
award so long as funds have been
expended in accordance with all
Federal requirements. In addition to
cross-cutting Federal grant
requirements, program specific
requirements must be met. For example,
a planning project must have been
included in a UPWP; a New Freedom
operating assistance project or a JARC
planning or operating project must have
been derived from a coordinated plan
and competitively selected by the
Designated Recipient prior to incurring
expenses; expenditure on State
Administration expenses under State
Administered programs must be
consistent with the State Management
Plan. Designated Recipients for JARC
and New Freedom have pre-award
authority for the ten percent of the
apportionment they may use for
program administration.
b. Pre-Award authority for
Alternatives Analysis planning projects
designated in 49 U.S.C. 5339, as
amended by SAFETEA–LU, is triggered
by the publication of the allocation in
FTA’s Federal Register Notice of
Apportionments and Allocations
following the annual Appropriations
Act and must be included in the UPWP
of the MPO for that metropolitan area.
c. Pre-award authority for design and
environmental work on a capital project
is triggered by the authorization of
formula funds, or the appropriation of
funds for a discretionary project and
publication of the project in FTA’s
annual Federal Register Notice of
apportionments and allocations.
d. Following authorization of formula
funds or appropriation and publication
of discretionary projects, pre-award
authority for capital project
implementation activities including
property acquisition, demolition,
construction, and acquisition of
vehicles, equipment, or construction
materials is triggered by completion of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13889
the environmental review process with
FTA’s concurrence in the categorical
exclusion (CE) determination or signing
of an environmental Record of Decision
(ROD) or Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI). Prior to exercising preaward authority, grantees must comply
with the conditions and Federal
requirements outlined in paragraph 3
below. Failure to do so will render an
otherwise eligible project ineligible for
FTA financial assistance. Capital
projects under the Section 5310, JARC,
and New Freedom programs must
comply with specific program
requirements, including coordinated
planning and competitive selection. In
addition, prior to incurring costs,
grantees are strongly encouraged to
consult with the appropriate FTA
regional office regarding the eligibility
of the project for future FTA funds and
the applicability of the conditions and
Federal requirements.
e. Pre-award authority does not apply
to the Section 5309 Capital Investment
Bus and Bus-Related Facilities and
Clean Fuels program high priority
project designations or any other transit
discretionary projects designated in
SAFETEA–LU until funds have been
appropriated and the allocations
published in the annual Federal
Register Notice. Thus pre-award
authority is extended now only for FY
2006 and FY 2007 project funding. For
such Section 5309 Capital Investment
Bus and Bus-Related, Clean Fuels
Program, or other transit capital
discretionary projects, the date that
costs may be incurred is: (1) For design
and environmental review, the date that
the appropriation bill which funds the
project was enacted; and (2) for property
acquisition, demolition, construction,
and acquisition of vehicles, equipment,
or construction materials, the date that
FTA approves the document (ROD,
FONSI, or CE determination) that
completes the environmental review
process required by the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
its implementing regulations. FTA
introduced this new trigger for preaward authority in FY 2006 in
recognition of the growing prevalence of
new grantees unfamiliar with Federal
and FTA requirements to ensure FTA’s
continued ability to comply with NEPA
and related environmental laws.
Because FTA does not sign a final NEPA
document until MPO and statewide
planning requirements (including air
quality conformity requirements, if
applicable) have been satisfied, this new
trigger for pre-award will ensure
compliance with both planning and
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13890
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
environmental requirements prior to
irreversible action by the grantee.
f. In previous notices FTA extended
pre-award authority to Section 330
projects and those surface transportation
projects commonly referred to as
Section 115 projects administered by
FTA, for which amounts were provided
in the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2004 and Section 117 projects in the
2005 Appropriations Act administered
by FTA. Pre-award authority is now
extended to transit projects in Section
112 of the 2006 Appropriations Act that
are to be administered by FTA. The
same conditions described for bus
projects apply to these projects. We
strongly encourage any prospective
applicant that does not have a previous
relationship with FTA to review Federal
grant requirements with the FTA
regional office before incurring costs.
g. Blanket pre-award authority does
not apply to Section 5309 Capital
Investment New Starts funds. Specific
instances of pre-award authority for
Capital Investment New Starts projects
are described in paragraph 4 below. Preaward authority does not apply to
Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related
or Clean Fuels projects authorized for
funding beyond this fiscal year. Before
an applicant may incur costs for Capital
Investment New Starts projects, Bus and
Bus-Related projects, or any other
projects not yet published in a notice of
apportionments and allocations, it must
first obtain a written Letter of No
Prejudice (LONP) from FTA. To obtain
an LONP, a grantee must submit a
written request accompanied by
adequate information and justification
to the appropriate FTA regional office,
as described below.
3. Conditions. The conditions under
which pre-award authority may be
utilized are specified below:
a. Pre-award authority is not a legal or
implied commitment that the subject
project will be approved for FTA
assistance or that FTA will obligate
Federal funds. Furthermore, it is not a
legal or implied commitment that all
items undertaken by the applicant will
be eligible for inclusion in the project.
b. All FTA statutory, procedural, and
contractual requirements must be met.
c. No action will be taken by the
grantee that prejudices the legal and
administrative findings that the Federal
Transit Administrator must make in
order to approve a project.
d. Local funds expended by the
grantee pursuant to and after the date of
the pre-award authority will be eligible
for credit toward local match or
reimbursement if FTA later makes a
grant or grant amendment for the
project. Local funds expended by the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
grantee prior to the date of the preaward authority will not be eligible for
credit toward local match or
reimbursement. Furthermore, the
expenditure of local funds on activities
such as land acquisition, demolition, or
construction prior to the date of preaward authority for those activities (i.e.,
the completion of the NEPA process)
would compromise FTA’s ability to
comply with Federal environmental
laws and may render the project
ineligible for FTA funding.
e. The Federal amount of any future
FTA assistance awarded to the grantee
for the project will be determined on the
basis of the overall scope of activities
and the prevailing statutory provisions
with respect to the Federal/local match
ratio at the time the funds are obligated.
f. For funds to which the pre-award
authority applies, the authority expires
with the lapsing of the fiscal year funds.
g. When a grant for the project is
subsequently awarded, the Financial
Status Report, in TEAM-Web, must
indicate the use of pre-award authority.
h. Environmental, Planning, and
Other Federal Requirements.
All Federal grant requirements must
be met at the appropriate time for the
project to remain eligible for Federal
funding. The growth of the Federal
transit program has resulted in a
growing number of inexperienced
grantees who make compliance with
Federal planning and environmental
laws increasingly challenging. FTA has
therefore modified its approach to preaward authority to use the completion
of the NEPA process, which has as a
prerequisite the completion of planning
and air quality requirements, as the
trigger for pre-award authority for all
activities except design and
environmental review.
i. The requirement that a project be
included in a locally adopted
metropolitan transportation plan, the
metropolitan transportation
improvement program and Federallyapproved statewide transportation
improvement program (23 CFR Part 450)
must be satisfied before the grantee may
advance the project beyond planning
and preliminary design with nonFederal funds under pre-award
authority. If the project is located within
an EPA-designated nonattainment area
for air quality, the conformity
requirements of the Clean Air Act, 40
CFR Part 93, must also be met before the
project may be advanced into
implementation-related activities under
pre-award authority. Compliance with
NEPA and other environmental laws
and executive orders (e.g., protection of
parklands, wetlands, and historic
properties) must be completed before
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
State or local funds are spent on
implementation activities, such as site
preparation, construction, and
acquisition, for a project that is expected
to be subsequently funded with FTA
funds. The grantee may not advance the
project beyond planning and
preliminary design before FTA has
determined the project to be a
categorical exclusion, or has issued a
finding of no significant impact (FONSI)
or an environmental record of decision
(ROD), in accordance with FTA
environmental regulations, 23 CFR Part
771. For planning projects, the project
must be included in a locally-approved
Planning Work Program that has been
coordinated with the State.
j. In addition, Federal procurement
procedures, as well as the whole range
of applicable Federal requirements (e.g.,
Buy America, Davis-Bacon Act,
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise)
must be followed for projects in which
Federal funding will be sought in the
future. Failure to follow any such
requirements could make the project
ineligible for Federal funding. In short,
this increased administrative flexibility
requires a grantee to make certain that
no Federal requirements are
circumvented through the use of preaward authority. If a grantee has
questions or concerns regarding the
environmental requirements, or any
other Federal requirements that must be
met before incurring costs, it should
contact the appropriate regional office.
4. Pre-Award Authority for New Starts
Projects.
a. Preliminary Engineering (PE) and
Final Design (FD). Projects proposed for
Section 5309 New Starts funds are
required to follow a Federally defined
New Starts project development
process. This New Starts process
includes, among other things, FTA
approval of the entry of the project into
PE and into FD. In accordance with
Section 5309(d), FTA considers the
merits of the project, the strength of its
financial plan, and its readiness to enter
the next phase in deciding whether or
not to approve entry into PE or FD.
Upon FTA approval to enter PE, FTA
extends pre-award authority to incur
costs for PE activities. Upon FTA
approval to enter FD, FTA extends preaward authority to incur costs for FD
activities. The pre-award authority for
each phase is automatic upon FTA’s
signing of a letter to the project sponsor
approving entry into that phase. PE and
FD are defined in the New Starts
regulation entitled Major Capital
Investment Projects, found at 49 CFR
Part 611.
b. Real Property Acquisition
Activities. FTA extends automatic pre-
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
award authority for the acquisition of
real property and real property rights for
a New Starts project upon completion of
the NEPA process for that project. The
NEPA process is completed when FTA
signs an environmental Record of
Decision (ROD) or Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), or makes a
Categorical Exclusion (CE)
determination. With the limitations and
caveats described below, real estate
acquisition for a New Starts project may
commence, at the project sponsor’s risk,
upon completion of the NEPA process.
For FTA-assisted projects, any
acquisition of real property or real
property rights must be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act (URA)
and its implementing regulations, 49
CFR Part 24. This pre-award authority is
strictly limited to costs incurred: (i) to
acquire real property and real property
rights in accordance with the URA
regulation, and (ii) to provide relocation
assistance in accordance with the URA
regulation. This pre-award authority is
limited to the acquisition of real
property and real property rights that
are explicitly identified in the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS),
environmental assessment (EA), or CE
document, as needed for the selected
alternative that is the subject of the
FTA-signed ROD or FONSI, or CE
determination. This pre-award authority
does not cover site preparation,
demolition, or any other activity that is
not strictly necessary to comply with
the URA, with one exception. That
exception is when a building that has
been acquired, has been emptied of its
occupants, and awaits demolition poses
a potential fire-safety hazard or other
hazard to the community in which it is
located, or is susceptible to
reoccupation by vagrants, demolition of
the building is also covered by this preaward authority upon FTA’s written
agreement that the adverse condition
exists.
Pre-award authority for property
acquisition is also provided when FTA
makes a CE determination for a
protective buy or hardship acquisition
in accordance with 23 CFR
771.117(d)(12), and when FTA makes a
CE determination for the acquisition of
a pre-existing railroad right-of-way in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5324(c).
When a tiered environmental review in
accordance with 23 CFR 771.111(g) is
being used, pre-award authority is NOT
provided upon completion of the firsttier environmental document except
when the Tier-1 ROD or FONSI signed
by FTA explicitly provides such pre-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
award authority for a particular
identified acquisition.
FTA’s rationale for providing this preaward authority was described in the FY
2003 Apportionments and Allocations
Notice published in the Federal
Register on March 12, 2003 (68 FR 1106
et seq.). The FY 2003 Notice may be
found on the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov/library/legal/
federalregister/2003/fr31203.pdf. Project
sponsors should use pre-award
authority for real property acquisition
and relocation assistance very carefully,
with a clear understanding that it does
not constitute a funding commitment by
FTA.
c. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Activities. NEPA requires that
major projects proposed for FTA
funding assistance be subjected to a
public and interagency review of the
need for the project, its environmental
and community impacts, and
alternatives to avoid and reduce adverse
impacts. Projects of more limited scope
also need a level of environmental
review, either to support an FTA finding
of no significant impact (FONSI) or to
demonstrate that the action is
categorically excluded from the more
rigorous level of NEPA review.
FTA’s regulation entitled
Environmental Impact and Related
Procedures at 23 CFR Part 771 states
that the costs incurred by a grant
applicant for the preparation of
environmental documents requested by
FTA are eligible for FTA financial
assistance (23 CFR 771.105(e)).
Accordingly, FTA extends automatic
pre-award authority for costs incurred to
comply with NEPA regulations and to
conduct NEPA-related activities for a
proposed New Starts project, effective as
of the date of the Federal approval of the
relevant STIP or STIP amendment that
includes the project or any phase of the
project. NEPA-related activities include,
but are not limited to, public
involvement activities, historic
preservation reviews, section 4(f)
evaluations, wetlands evaluations,
endangered species consultations, and
biological assessments. This pre-award
authority is strictly limited to costs
incurred to conduct the NEPA process,
and to prepare environmental, historic
preservation and related documents. It
does not cover PE activities beyond
those necessary for NEPA compliance.
As with any pre-award authority, FTA
reimbursement for costs incurred is not
guaranteed.
d. Other New Starts Activities
Requiring Letter of No Prejudice (LONP).
Except as discussed in paragraphs a)
through c) above, a grant applicant must
obtain a written LONP from FTA before
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13891
incurring costs for any activity expected
to be funded by New Start funds not yet
granted. To obtain an LONP, an
applicant must submit a written request
accompanied by adequate information
and justification to the appropriate FTA
regional office, as described in B below.
5. Pre-Award Authority for Small
Starts. When FTA issues a Project
Development approval letter for a Small
Starts project, FTA grants pre-award
authority for the design and preliminary
engineering activities associated with
project development. When FTA issues
a Project Construction Grant Agreement
(PCGA), FTA grants pre-award authority
for the construction phase of the project.
Pre-award authority for NEPA-related
work on a Small Starts project is granted
under the same conditions and for the
same reasons as New Starts projects,
described in paragraph 4.c above. Preaward authority for real property
acquisition activities for a Small Starts
project is granted under the same
conditions and for the same reasons as
New Starts projects, describe in
paragraph 4.b above.
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
1. Policy
LONP authority allows an applicant
to incur costs on a project utilizing nonFederal resources, with the
understanding that the costs incurred
subsequent to the issuance of the LONP
may be reimbursable as eligible
expenses or eligible for credit toward
the local match should FTA approve the
project at a later date. LONPs are
applicable to projects and project
activities not covered by automatic preaward authority. The majority of LONPs
will be for Section 5309 New Starts
funds not covered under a full funding
grant agreement, or for Section 5309 Bus
and Bus-Related funds not yet
appropriated by Congress. At the end of
an authorization period, LONPs may be
issued for formula funds beyond the life
of the current authorization or FTA’s
extension of automatic pre-award
authority.
2. Conditions and Federal Requirements
The conditions for pre-award
authority specified in section VIII A2
above apply to all LONPs. The
Environmental, Planning and Other
Federal Requirements described in
section V.A.3, also apply to all LONPs.
Because project implementation
activities may not be initiated prior to
NEPA completion, FTA will normally
not issue an LONP for such activities
until the NEPA process has been
completed with a ROD, FONSI, or
Categorical Exclusion determination.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13892
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
3. Request for LONP
Before incurring costs for a project not
covered by automatic pre-award
authority, the project sponsor must first
submit a written request for an LONP,
accompanied by adequate information
and justification, to the appropriate
regional office and obtain written
approval. As a prerequisite to FTA
approval of an LONP for a New Starts
project, FTA will require project
sponsors to demonstrate project
worthiness and readiness that establish
the project as a candidate for an FFGA.
Projects will be assessed based upon the
criteria considered in the New Start
evaluation process. Specifically, upon
the request for an LONP, the applicant
shall provide sufficient information to
allow FTA to consider the following
items:
a. Description of the activities to be
covered by the LONP.
b. Justification for advancing the
identified activities.
c. Data that indicates that the project
will maintain its ability to receive a
rating of ‘‘medium’’, or better and that
its cost-effectiveness rating will be
‘‘medium’’ or better, unless such project
has been specifically exempt from such
a requirement.
d. Allocated level of risk and
contingency for the activity requested.
e. Status of procurement progress,
including, if appropriate, submittal of
bids for the activities covered by the
LONP.
f. Strength of the capital and operating
financial plan for the New Starts project
and the future transit system.
g. Adequacy of the Project
Management Plan.
h. Resolution of any readiness issues
that would affect the project, such as
land acquisition and technical capacity
to carry out the project.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
C. FTA FY 2007 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances
The full text of the FY 2007
Certifications and Assurances was
published in the Federal Register on
November 7, 2006, and is available on
the FTA Web site and in TEAM-Web.
The FY 2007 Certifications and
Assurances must be used for all grants
made in FY 2007, including obligation
of carryover. All grantees with active
grants were required to have signed the
FY 2007 Certifications and Assurances
within 90 days after publication. Any
questions regarding this document may
be addressed to the appropriate
Regional Office or to Pat Simpich, in the
FTA Office of Program Management, at
(202) 366–1662.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit
Purposes
SAFETEA–LU continues provisions
in the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(ISTEA) and TEA–21 that expanded
modal choice in transportation funding
by including substantial flexibility to
transfer funds between FTA and FHWA
formula program funding categories. In
addition SAFETEA–LU included a
provision allowing for transfer of certain
discretionary program funds for
administration of highway projects by
FHWA and transit projects by FTA. FTA
and FHWA execute Flex Funding
Transfers between the Formula and Bus
Grants Transit programs and the Federal
Aid Highway programs. This has also
included the transfer of State planning
set-aside funds from FHWA to FTA to
be combined with metropolitan and
statewide planning resources as
Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG).
These transfers are based on States
requests to transfer funding from the
Highway and/or Transit programs to
fund States and local project priorities,
and joint planning needs. This practice
can result in transfers to the Federal
Transit Program from the Federal Aid
Highway Program or vice versa.
1. Transfer Process for funds
SAFETEA–LU was enacted in August,
2005. With the enactment of SAFETEA–
LU, beginning in FY2006, mass transit
programs are funded solely from general
funds or trust funds. The transit formula
and bus grant programs are now funded
from the Mass Transit Account of the
Highway Trust Fund. The Formula and
Bus Grant Programs receive flex funding
transfers from the Federal Aid Highway
Program.
As a result of the changes to program
funding mechanisms, there is no longer
a requirement to transfer budget
authority and liquidating cash resources
simultaneously upon the execution of a
Flex Funding transfer request by a State.
Since the transfers are between trust
fund accounts, the only requirement is
to transfer budget authority (obligation
limitation) between the Federal Aid
Program trust fund account and the
Federal Transit Formula and Bus Grant
Program account. At the point in time
that the obligation resulting from the
transfer of budgetary authority is
expended, a transfer of liquidating cash
will be required.
Beginning in FY 2007, the accounting
process is changing for transfers of flex
funds and other specific programs to
allow budget authority to be transferred
and the cash to be transferred
separately. FTA is requiring that flexed
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
fund transfers to FTA be in separate and
identifiable grants in order to ensure
that the draw-down of flexed funds can
be tracked, thus securing the internal
controls for monitoring these resources
from the Federal Highway
Administration to avoid deficiencies in
FTA’s Formula and Bus Grants account.
FTA will need to monitor the
expenditures of flexed funded grants
and request the transfer of liquidating
cash from FHWA to ensure sufficient
funds are available to meet
expenditures. To facilitate tracking of
grantees’ flex funding expenditures,
FTA developed new codes to provide
distinct identification of ‘‘flex funds.’’
The process for transferring flexible
funds between FTA and FHWA
programs is described below. Note that
the new transfer process for ‘‘flex
funds’’ beginning in FY 2007 does not
apply to the transfer of State planning
set-aside funds from FHWA to FTA to
be combined with metropolitan and
statewide planning resources as
Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG).
These transfers are based on States
requests to transfer funding from the
Highway and/or Transit programs to
fund States and local project priorities,
and joint planning needs. Planning
funds transferred will be allowed to be
merged in a single grant with FTA
planning resources using the same
process implemented in FY 2006. For
information on the process for the
transfer of funds between FTA and
FHWA planning programs refer to
section IV.A and B.
Note also that certain prior year
appropriations earmarks (Sections 330,
115, 117, and 112) are allotted annually
for administration rather than being
transferred. For information regarding
these procedures, please contact Kristen
D. Clarke, FTA Budget Office, at (202)
366–1686; or Elissa Konove, FHWA
Budget Division, at (202) 366–2845.
a. Transfer from FHWA to FTA.
FHWA funds designated for use in
transit capital projects must be derived
from the metropolitan and statewide
planning and programming process, and
must be included in an approved STIP
before the funds can be transferred. By
letter, the State DOT requests the FHWA
Division Office to transfer highway
funds for a transit project. The letter
should specify the project, amount to be
transferred, apportionment year, State,
urbanized area, Federal aid
apportionment category (i.e., Surface
Transportation Program (STP),
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) or identification of the earmark
and indication of the intended FTA
formula program (i.e., Section 5307,
5311 or 5310) and should include a
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
description of the project as contained
in the STIP. Note that FTA may also
administer certain transfers of statutory
earmarks under the Section 5309 bus
program, for tracking purposes.
The FHWA Division Office confirms
that the apportionment amount is
available for transfer and concurs in the
transfer, by letter to the State DOT and
FTA. The FHWA Office of Budget and
Finance then transfers obligation
authority and an equal amount of cash
to FTA. All FHWA CMAQ and STP
funds transferred to FTA will be
transferred to one of the three FTA
formula programs (i.e. Urbanized Area
Formula (Section 5307), Nonurbanized
Area Formula (Section 5311) or Elderly
and Persons with Disabilities (Section
5310). High Priority projects in
SAFETEA–LU Section 1702 or
Transportation Improvement projects in
SAFETEA–LU Section 1934 and other
Congressional earmarks when necessary
that are transferred to FTA will be
aligned and administered through FTA’s
discretionary Bus Program (Section
5309).
The FTA grantee’s application for the
project must specify which program the
funds will be used for, and the
application must be prepared in
accordance with the requirements and
procedures governing that program.
Upon review and approval of the
grantee’s application, FTA obligates
funds for the project.
Transferred funds are treated as FTA
formula or discretionary funds, but are
assigned a distinct identifying code for
tracking purposes. The funds may be
transferred for any capital purpose
eligible under the FTA formula program
to which they are transferred and, in the
case of CMAQ, for certain operating
costs. FHWA issued revised interim
guidance on project eligibility under the
CMAQ program in a Notice at 71 FR
76038 et seq. (December 19, 2006)
incorporating changes made by
SAFETEA–LU. In accordance with 23
U.S.C. 104(k), all FTA requirements
except local share are applicable to
transferred funds. Earmarks that are
transferred to the Section 5309 Bus
Program for administration, however,
can be used for the Congressionally
designated transit purpose and are not
limited to eligibility under the Bus
Program.
In the event that transferred formula
funds are not obligated for the intended
purpose within the period of availability
of the formula program to which they
were transferred, they become available
to the Governor for any eligible capital
transit project.
b. Transfers from FTA to FHWA. The
MPO submits a written request to the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
FTA regional office for a transfer of FTA
Section 5307 formula funds
(apportioned to a UZA 200,000 and over
in population) to FHWA based on
approved use of the funds for highway
purposes, as contained in the
Governor’s approved State
Transportation Improvement Program.
The MPO must certify that: (1) The
funds are not needed for capital
investments required by the Americans
with Disabilities Act; (2) notice and
opportunity for comment and appeal
has been provided to affected transit
providers; and (3) local funds used for
non-Federal match are eligible to
provide assistance for either highway or
transit projects. The FTA Regional
Administrator reviews and concurs in
the request, then forwards the approval
in written format to FTA Headquarters,
where a reduction equal to the dollar
amount being transferred to FHWA is
made to the grantee’s Urbanized Area
Formula Program apportionment.
Transfers of discretionary earmarks
for administration by FHWA are
handled on a case by case basis, by the
FTA regional office, in consultation
with the FTA Office of Program
Management and Office of Budget and
Policy.
c. Matching Share for FHWA
Transfers. The provisions of Title 23
U.S.C. regarding the non-Federal share
apply to Title 23 funds used for transit
projects. Thus, FHWA funds transferred
to FTA retain the same matching share
that the funds would have if used for
highway purposes and administered by
FHWA.
There are three instances in which a
Federal share higher than 80 percent
would be permitted. First, in States with
large areas of Indian and certain public
domain lands and national forests, parks
and monuments, the local share for
highway projects is determined by a
sliding scale rate, calculated based on
the percentage of public lands within
that State. This sliding scale, which
permits a greater Federal share, but not
to exceed 95 percent, is applicable to
transfers used to fund transit projects in
these public land States. FHWA
develops the sliding scale matching
ratios for the increased Federal share.
Second, commuter carpooling and
vanpooling projects and transit safety
projects using FHWA transfers
administered by FTA may retain the
same 100 percent Federal share that
would be allowed for ride-sharing or
safety projects administered by FHWA.
The third instance is the 100 percent
Federally-funded safety projects;
however, these are subject to a
nationwide 10 percent program
limitation.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
13893
d. Miscellaneous Transit Earmarks in
FHWA Programs. The FY 2002 and FY
2003 Appropriations Acts and
accompanying reports included Section
330, which identified a number of
transit projects among projects
designated to receive funding from
certain FHWA funding sources. The FY
2004 Appropriations Act similarly
included transit projects among projects
designated to receive funding from
certain FHWA sources in Section 115,
the FY 2005 Appropriations Act
included a set of designations under
Section 117, and the FY 2006
Appropriations Act included
designations under Section 112, which
may include some projects that FHWA
will identify to be administered by FTA.
For those projects identified by FHWA
as transit in nature, FHWA allots the
funds to FTA to administer. The funds
are available for the designated project
until obligated and expended. Some of
these FY 2002–2006 designations for
transit projects have not yet been
obligated. However, because these are
FHWA funds, funds for projects
unobligated at the end of the fiscal year
are not automatically available as carry
over made available in the following
fiscal year. Instead FHWA re-allots
obligation authority to FTA annually,
after reconciling account balances.
Because the requirements and
procedures associated with these
projects differ in some cases from those
for the FTA programs that FTA grantees
are familiar with, and the availability of
funds for obligation by FTA depends on
allotments from FHWA, transit
applicants seeking funding under these
miscellaneous FHWA designations must
work closely with the appropriate FTA
regional office and FHWA Division
Office when applying for a grant under
these designations.
E. Grant Application Procedures
1. Grantees must provide a Dun and
Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number for
inclusion in all applications for a
Federal grant or cooperative agreement.
The DUNS number should be entered
into the grantee profile in TEAM-Web.
Additional information about this and
other Federal grant streamlining
initiatives mandated by the Federal
Financial Assistance Management
Improvement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–
107) can be accessed on OMB’s Web site
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants/reform.html.
2. All applications for FTA funds
should be submitted electronically to
the appropriate FTA regional office
through TEAM-Web, an Internetaccessible electronic grant application
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
13894
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
system. FTA has provided limited
exceptions to the requirement for
electronic filing of applications.
3. In FY 2007, FTA remains
committed to processing applications
promptly upon receipt of a completed
application by the appropriate regional
office. In order for an application to be
considered complete and for FTA to
assign a grant number, enabling
submission in TEAM-Web, the
following requirements must be met:
a. The project is listed in a currently
FTA approved Metropolitan
Transportation Plan, Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP); Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), or
Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP).
b. All eligibility issues have been
resolved.
c. Required environmental findings
have been made.
d. The project budget’s Activity Line
Items (ALI), scope, and project
description meet FTA requirements.
e. Local share funding source(s) have
been identified.
f. The grantee’s required Civil Rights
submissions are current.
g. Certifications and assurances are
properly submitted.
h. Funding is available, including any
flexible funds included in the budget.
i. For projects involving new
construction (using at least $100 million
in New Starts or formula funds), FTA
engineering staff has reviewed the
project management plan and given
approval.
j. When required for grants related to
New Starts projects, PE and/or FD has
been approved.
k. Milestone information is complete,
or FTA determines that milestone
information can be finalized before the
grant is ready for award. The grant must
include sufficient milestones
appropriate to the scale of the project to
allow adequate oversight to monitor the
progress of projects from the start
through completion and closeout.
4. Under most FTA programs, grants
involving funding related to transit
operations, must be submitted to the
Department of Labor for certification of
labor protective arrangements, prior to
grant award. In addition, before FTA
can award grants for discretionary
projects and activities designated by
Congress, notification must be given to
members of Congress, and in the case of
awards greater than $1 million, to the
House and Senate authorizing and
appropriations committees.
Discretionary grants allocated by FTA
also go through the Congressional
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
notification process if they are greater
than $1 million.
5. Other important issues that impact
FTA grant processing activities are
discussed below.
a. Change in Budget Structure.
Because SAFETEA–LU restructured
FTA’s accounts from all general funded
accounts to one solely trust funded
account and three general funded
accounts, we are not able to mix funds
from years prior to FY 2006 in the same
grant with funds appropriated in FY
2006 and beyond (except for New Starts
and research grants). Previously all
programs were funded approximately 80
percent trust funds from the Mass
Transit Account (MTA) of the Highway
Trust Fund and 20 percent General
Funds from the U.S. Treasury. The trust
funds were transferred into the general
funded accounts at the beginning of the
year. Under SAFETEA–LU most
programs are funded entirely from trust
funds derived from the Mass Transit
Account, while the New Starts and
Research programs are funded with
general funds. Carryover FY 2005 and
prior funds currently available for
obligation as well as FY 2006 and FY
2007 funds may be included in an
amendment to an existing grant for a
New Starts or research project.
For formula programs funded solely
from trust funds beginning in FY 2006,
grantees may not combine FY 2006 and
FY 2007 funds in the same grant with
FY 2005 and prior year funds. Grant
amendments cannot be made to add FY
2006 and later year funds to a grant that
includes FY 2005 or prior funds.
Obligations of FY 2005 and prior year
carryover funds must be made in the
original program accounts established
under TEA–21 (either as an amendment
to an existing grant or as a new grant)
and cannot be combined with funds
appropriated in FY 2006 or later.
However, grantees are able to amend
new grants established with FY 2006 or
later year funds to add funds made
available after FY 2006. We regret any
inconvenience this accounting change
may cause as we implement new
statutory requirements under
SAFETEA–LU. We encourage grantees
to spend down and close out old grants
as quickly as possible to minimize the
inconvenience.
b. Grant Budgets—SCOPE and ALI
Codes. FTA uses the SCOPE and
Activity Line Item (ALI) Codes in the
grant budgets to track program trends, to
report to Congress, and to respond to
requests from the Inspector General and
the Government Accountability Office
(GAO), as well as to manage grants. The
accuracy of the data is dependent on the
careful and correct use of codes. We
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
have revised the SCOPE and ALI table
to include new codes for the newly
eligible capital items, to better track
certain expenditures, and to
accommodate the new programs. We
encourage grantees to review the table
before selecting codes from the dropdown menus in TEAM-Web while
creating a grant budget and to consult
with the regional office in the correct
use of codes. Additional information
about how to use the SCOPE and ALI
codes to accurately code budgets will be
added to the resources available through
TEAM-Web.
c. Earmark and Discretionary Program
Tracking. FTA has implemented new
procedures in TEAM-Web for relating
grants to earmarks or projects selected
by FTA under discretionary programs.
Each earmark or selected discretionary
project published in the Federal
Register will have a unique identifier
associated with it. Tables of earmarks
and selected discretionary projects have
also been established in TEAM-Web.
When applying for a grant using funding
designated by Congress or FTA for a
particular project, grantees are asked to
identify the amount of funding
associated with specific earmark or
discretionary project used in the grant.
Further instructions are posted on the
TEAM-Web site and regional staff can
provide additional assistance.
d. New Freedom and JARC—
Administering Agency. The Governor
must designate the state agency or
agencies charged with administering the
New Freedom and JARC formula
programs and the recipient(s)
designated to administer the program in
each large urbanized area before FTA
can award a grant to that State or large
urbanized area. FTA will award grants
for these programs only to the
Designated Recipient for JARC or New
Freedom, or, in the case of a large
urbanized area, pursuant to a
supplemental agreement with the
Designated Recipient for JARC or New
Freedom, to another entity that is the
Designated Recipient for the Section
5307 program. For Small Urbanized
areas (under 200,000 population), the
State Designated Recipient can transfer
funds to the Section 5307 program for
FTA to award direct grants to small
urbanized area recipients.
F. Payments
Once a grant has been awarded and
executed, requests for payment can be
processed. To process payments FTA
uses ECHO-Web, an Internet accessible
system that provides grantees the
capability to submit payment requests
on-line, as well as receive user-IDs and
passwords via e-mail. New applicants
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
should contact the appropriate FTA
regional office to obtain and submit the
registration package necessary for set-up
under ECHO-Web.
G. Oversight
FTA conducts periodic oversight
reviews to assess grantee compliance
with Federal requirements. Each UZA
grantee is reviewed every three years (a
Triennial Review). States are reviewed
periodically for their management of the
Section 5310 and 5311 programs. Other
more detailed reviews are scheduled
based on an annual grantee risk
assessment, for example, reviews in the
areas of Procurement, Financial
Management, Safety and Civil Rights.
FTA is developing appropriate oversight
procedures for the new programs
authorized by SAFETEA–LU.
H. Technical Assistance
FTA headquarters and regional staff
will be pleased to answer your
questions and provide any technical
assistance you may need to apply for
FTA program funds and manage the
grants you receive. This notice and the
program guidance circulars previously
identified in this document may be
accessed via the FTA Web site at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
In addition, copies of the following
circulars and other useful information
are available on the FTA Web site and
may be obtained from FTA regional
offices: 4220.1E, Third Party Contracting
Requirements, dated June 19, 2003; and
C5010.1C, Grant Management
Guidelines, dated October 1, 1998. The
FY 2007 Annual List of Certifications
and Assurances and Master Agreement
are also posted on the FTA Web site.
The DOT final rule on ‘‘Participation by
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in
Department of Transportation Financial
Assistance Programs,’’ which was
effective July 16, 2003, can be found at
https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/
waisidx_04/49cfr26_04.html/.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 12th day of
March, 2007.
James S. Simpson,
Administrator.
Appendix A—FTA Regional Offices
Richard H. Doyle, Regional
Administrator, Region 1-Boston,
Kendall Square, 55 Broadway, Suite
920, Cambridge, MA 02142–1093, Tel.
617 494–2055
States served: Connecticut, Maine,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
Rhode Island, and Vermont
Brigid Hynes-Cherin, Regional
Administrator, Region 2-New York,
One Bowling Green, Room 429, New
York, NY 10004–1415, Tel. no. 212
668–2170
States served: New Jersey, New York
Herman Shipman, Deputy Regional
Administrator, Region 3-Philadelphia,
1760 Market Street, Suite 500,
Philadelphia, PA 19103–4124, Tel.
215 656–7100
States served: Delaware, Maryland,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia,
and District of Columbia
Yvette Taylor, Regional Administrator,
Region 4-Atlanta, Atlanta Federal
Center, Suite 17T50, 61 Forsyth Street
SW, Atlanta, GA 30303, Tel. 404 562–
3500
States served: Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina,
Tennessee, and Virgin Islands
13895
Robert C. Patrick, Regional
Administrator, Region 6-Ft. Worth,
819 Taylor Street, Room 8A36, Ft.
Worth, TX 76102, Tel. 817 978–0550
States served: Arkansas, Louisiana,
Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas
Mokhtee Ahmad, Regional
Administrator, Region 7-Kansas City,
MO, 901 Locust Street, Room 404,
Kansas City, MO 64106, Tel. 816 329–
3920
States served: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri,
and Nebraska
Letitia Thompson, Acting Regional
Administrator, Region 8-Denver,
12300 West Dakota Ave., Suite 310,
Lakewood, CO 80228–2583, Tel. 720–
963–3300
States served: Colorado, Montana, North
Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and
Wyoming
Leslie T. Rogers, Regional
Administrator, Region 9-San
Francisco, 201 Mission Street, Room
2210, San Francisco, CA 94105–1926,
Tel. 415 744–3133
States served: American Samoa,
Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii,
Nevada, and the Northern Mariana
Islands
Marisol Simon, Regional Administrator,
Region 5-Chicago, 200 West Adams
Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606,
Tel. 312 353–2789
States served: Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and
Wisconsin
Rick Krochalis, Regional Administrator,
Region 10-Seattle, Jackson Federal
Building, 915 Second Avenue, Suite
3142, Seattle, WA 98174–1002, Tel.
206 220–7954
States served: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon,
and Washington
TABLE 1.—FY 2007 APPROPRIATIONS AND APPORTIONMENTS FOR GRANT PROGRAMS
FORMULA AND BUS GRANTS
Section 5303 Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Oversight (one-half percent) ..........................................................................................................................................
Reapportioned Funds .............................................................................................................................................................
$81,892,800
(409,464)
890,525
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5304 Statewide Transportation Planning Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Oversight (one-half percent) ..........................................................................................................................................
Reapportioned Funds .............................................................................................................................................................
82,373,861
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Oversight (three-fourths percent) ..................................................................................................................................
Reapportioned Funds .............................................................................................................................................................
17,252,652
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5308 Clean Fuels Program ............................................................................................................................................
Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facility Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
17,107,200
(85,536)
230,988
3,606,175,000
(27,046,313)
4,957,616
3,584,086,303
1 18,721,000
2 881,779,000
13896
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 1.—FY 2007 APPROPRIATIONS AND APPORTIONMENTS FOR GRANT PROGRAMS—Continued
Less Oversight (one percent) .................................................................................................................................................
(8,817,790)
Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................
Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Oversight (one percent) .................................................................................................................................................
872,961,210
1,448,000,000
(14,480,000)
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5310 Special Needs for Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Oversight (one-half percent) ..........................................................................................................................................
Reapportioned Funds .............................................................................................................................................................
1,433,520,000
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5311 Nonurbanized Area Formula Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Oversight (one-half percent) ..........................................................................................................................................
Reapportioned Funds .............................................................................................................................................................
116,659,554
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5311(b)(3) Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP):
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Amount Reserved for National RTAP ...........................................................................................................................
Reapportioned Funds .............................................................................................................................................................
386,177,688
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5311(c) Public Transportation on Indian Reservations .................................................................................................
Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
7,320,588
10,000,000
117,000,000
(585,000)
244,554
385,920,000
(2,020,000)
2,277,688
8,080,000
(1,212,000)
452,588
144,000,000
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5317 New Freedom Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
144,000,000
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5320 Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Oversight (one-half percent) ..........................................................................................................................................
81,000,000
Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................
Section 5339 Alternative Analysis Program:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
22,885,000
Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................
Section 5340 Growing States and High Density States Formula:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
25,000,000
3 404,000,000
Total Apportioned ...................................................................................................................................................................
Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (Pub. L. 105–85, Section 3038) ................................................................................
404,000,000
7,600,000
81,000,000
23,000,000
(115,000)
25,000,000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS
Section 5309 New Starts:
Total Available ........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Oversight (one percent) .................................................................................................................................................
1,566,000,000
(15,660,000)
Funds Available for Allocation ................................................................................................................................................
1,550,340,000
RESEARCH
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Section 5314 National Research Program .................................................................................................................................
Total Appropriation (Above Grant Programs) .................................................................................................................
Total Apportionment/Allocation (Above Grant Programs) ...............................................................................................
1 Funding
61,000,000
4 8,886,275,000
8,802,012,856
available for Cleans Fuels after $26,279,000 is transferred to the Bus and Bus Facility program.
$26,279,000 transferred from the Clean Fuels program.
3 Apportionments derived from the Section 5340 formula are combined with the Section 5307 or Section 5311 apportionments, as appropriate,
in accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report. The amount of FY 2007 Section 5340 funds allotted to Sections 5307 and
5311 apportionments is $340,734,486 and $63,265,514, respectively.
4 The total amount appropriated for FTA programs in the 2007 Appropriations Act is $8.97 billion. The amount shown here only includes funding for the programs included in this notice and shown above.
2 Includes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13897
TABLE 2.—FY 2007 SECTION 5303 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAM AND SECTION 5304
STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAM APPORTIONMENTS
Section 5303
Apportionment
State
Section 5304
Apportionment
Alabama .......................................................................................................................................................
Alaska ..........................................................................................................................................................
Arizona .........................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas ......................................................................................................................................................
California ......................................................................................................................................................
Colorado ......................................................................................................................................................
Connecticut ..................................................................................................................................................
Delaware ......................................................................................................................................................
District of Columbia .....................................................................................................................................
Florida ..........................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ........................................................................................................................................................
Hawaii ..........................................................................................................................................................
Idaho ............................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ...........................................................................................................................................................
Indiana .........................................................................................................................................................
Iowa .............................................................................................................................................................
Kansas .........................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky ......................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ......................................................................................................................................................
Maine ...........................................................................................................................................................
Maryland ......................................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts .............................................................................................................................................
Michigan .......................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ....................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ....................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ........................................................................................................................................................
Montana .......................................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ......................................................................................................................................................
Nevada .........................................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ...........................................................................................................................................
New Jersey ..................................................................................................................................................
New Mexico .................................................................................................................................................
New York .....................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ..............................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ................................................................................................................................................
Ohio .............................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .....................................................................................................................................................
Oregon .........................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ................................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ..................................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island ................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina .............................................................................................................................................
South Dakota ...............................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ...................................................................................................................................................
Texas ...........................................................................................................................................................
Utah .............................................................................................................................................................
Vermont .......................................................................................................................................................
Virginia .........................................................................................................................................................
Washington ..................................................................................................................................................
West Virginia ................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .....................................................................................................................................................
Wyoming ......................................................................................................................................................
$623,537
329,495
1,647,393
329,495
12,958,856
1,234,513
915,017
329,495
329,495
5,383,172
2,123,217
329,495
329,495
4,568,170
1,241,016
358,083
418,685
522,554
816,375
329,495
1,846,450
2,426,009
2,709,982
1,156,508
329,495
1,219,834
329,495
329,495
603,074
329,495
3,821,314
329,495
7,283,541
1,208,033
329,495
2,621,420
476,561
733,094
3,384,274
1,366,861
340,461
601,892
329,495
952,301
6,046,857
561,502
329,495
1,869,384
1,755,960
329,495
976,546
329,495
$163,245
86,263
328,654
86,263
2,524,485
270,193
239,542
86,263
86,263
1,132,759
421,322
86,263
86,263
818,866
286,840
93,748
101,572
131,756
213,231
86,263
361,392
473,882
553,221
228,043
86,263
259,906
86,263
86,263
140,968
86,263
652,050
86,263
1,303,850
316,268
86,263
614,838
124,766
166,181
690,499
292,370
86,263
157,578
86,263
249,316
1,244,248
147,004
86,263
396,362
361,925
86,263
239,038
86,263
Total ......................................................................................................................................................
82,373,861
17,252,652
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
1,000,000 or more in Population ...................................................................................................................................................
200,000–999,999 in Population .....................................................................................................................................................
50,000–199,999 in Population .......................................................................................................................................................
$2,813,049,899
703,215,992
408,554,898
National Total .........................................................................................................................................................................
3,924,820,789
Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 1,000,000 or more in Population:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13898
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
$55,761,620
49,089,558
127,815,567
217,715,515
17,033,068
27,673,490
10,928,770
59,020,474
39,136,659
38,094,061
58,301,315
10,248,899
12,881,212
20,777,680
252,472,410
90,748,583
19,252,383
44,372,728
15,985,953
773,326,809
17,277,382
128,386,607
41,539,986
32,625,253
33,570,887
29,223,529
24,442,636
19,060,682
20,220,591
50,877,342
116,823,368
35,547,337
34,245,529
81,229,871
29,347,313
21,325,746
15,781,255
140,887,831
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Atlanta, GA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Baltimore, MD .........................................................................................................................................................................
Boston, MA—NH—RI .............................................................................................................................................................
Chicago, IL—IN ......................................................................................................................................................................
Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN .........................................................................................................................................................
Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................
Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................
Dallas—Fort Worth—Arlington, TX ........................................................................................................................................
Denver—Aurora, CO ..............................................................................................................................................................
Detroit, MI ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................
Indianapolis, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas City, MO—KS ............................................................................................................................................................
Las Vegas, NV .......................................................................................................................................................................
Los Angeles—Long Beach—Santa Ana, CA .........................................................................................................................
Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................
Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................
Minneapolis—St. Paul, MN ....................................................................................................................................................
New Orleans, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................
New York—Newark, NY—NJ—CT .........................................................................................................................................
Orlando, FL .............................................................................................................................................................................
Philadelphia, PA—NJ—DE—MD ...........................................................................................................................................
Phoenix—Mesa, AZ ................................................................................................................................................................
Pittsburgh, PA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Portland, OR—WA .................................................................................................................................................................
Providence, RI—MA ...............................................................................................................................................................
Riverside—San Bernardino, CA .............................................................................................................................................
Sacramento, CA .....................................................................................................................................................................
San Antonio, TX .....................................................................................................................................................................
San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................
San Francisco—Oakland, CA ................................................................................................................................................
San Jose, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
San Juan, PR .........................................................................................................................................................................
Seattle, WA .............................................................................................................................................................................
St. Louis, MO—IL ...................................................................................................................................................................
Tampa—St. Petersburg, FL ...................................................................................................................................................
Virginia Beach, VA .................................................................................................................................................................
Washington, DC—VA—MD ....................................................................................................................................................
2,813,049,899
Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 to 999,999 in Population:
Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ...............................................................................................................................
Akron, OH ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Albany, NY ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Albuquerque, NM ....................................................................................................................................................................
Allentown—Bethlehem, PA—NJ ............................................................................................................................................
Anchorage, AK .......................................................................................................................................................................
Ann Arbor, MI .........................................................................................................................................................................
Antioch, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Asheville, NC ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Atlantic City, NJ ......................................................................................................................................................................
Augusta—Richmond County, GA—SC ..................................................................................................................................
Austin, TX ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Bakersfield, CA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Barnstable Town, MA .............................................................................................................................................................
Baton Rouge, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................
Birmingham, AL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Boise City, ID ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ...................................................................................................................................................
Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY .............................................................................................................................................
Buffalo, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................
Canton, OH .............................................................................................................................................................................
Cape Coral, FL .......................................................................................................................................................................
Charleston—North Charleston, SC ........................................................................................................................................
Charlotte, NC—SC .................................................................................................................................................................
Chattanooga, TN—GA ...........................................................................................................................................................
Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................
Columbia, SC .........................................................................................................................................................................
4,430,621
6,012,478
9,379,662
7,085,159
7,088,907
21,287,890
4,224,205
5,500,312
1,628,856
9,300,302
2,235,714
16,379,355
5,451,483
4,652,919
4,313,787
5,778,323
2,373,419
2,379,398
22,465,747
15,491,573
3,462,625
3,793,233
3,164,700
13,294,549
2,944,537
5,130,742
3,838,851
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13899
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
Columbus, GA—AL ................................................................................................................................................................
Concord, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Corpus Christi, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................
Davenport, IA—IL ...................................................................................................................................................................
Dayton, OH .............................................................................................................................................................................
Daytona Beach—Port Orange, FL .........................................................................................................................................
Denton—Lewisville, TX ..........................................................................................................................................................
Des Moines, IA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................
El Paso, TX—NM ...................................................................................................................................................................
Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................
Evansville, IN—KY .................................................................................................................................................................
Fayetteville, NC ......................................................................................................................................................................
Flint, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Fort Collins, CO ......................................................................................................................................................................
Fort Wayne, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................
Fresno, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Grand Rapids, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................
Greensboro, NC .....................................................................................................................................................................
Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................
Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ...............................................................................................................................................................
Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................
Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................
Huntsville, AL ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA .............................................................................................................................
Jackson, MS ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Jacksonville, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Knoxville, TN ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Lancaster, PA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Lancaster—Palmdale, CA ......................................................................................................................................................
Lansing, MI .............................................................................................................................................................................
Lexington—Fayette, KY ..........................................................................................................................................................
Lincoln, NE .............................................................................................................................................................................
Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................
Louisville, KY—IN ...................................................................................................................................................................
Lubbock, TX ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................
McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................
Memphis, TN—MS—AR .........................................................................................................................................................
Mission Viejo, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................
Mobile, AL ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Modesto, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Nashville—Davidson, TN ........................................................................................................................................................
New Haven, CT ......................................................................................................................................................................
Ogden—Layton, UT ................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma City, OK .................................................................................................................................................................
Omaha, NE—IA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Oxnard, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Palm Bay—Melbourne, FL .....................................................................................................................................................
Pensacola, FL—AL .................................................................................................................................................................
Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................
Port St. Lucie, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................
Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY ..............................................................................................................................................
Provo—Orem, UT ...................................................................................................................................................................
Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................
Reading, PA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................
Richmond, VA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................
Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................
Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI ..............................................................................................................
Salem, OR ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Salt Lake City, UT ..................................................................................................................................................................
Santa Rosa, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Sarasota—Bradenton, FL .......................................................................................................................................................
Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Scranton, PA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
1,993,783
18,526,133
4,293,492
3,381,015
13,892,841
4,045,922
2,476,542
4,951,610
5,433,693
9,813,797
4,011,179
1,889,514
2,141,034
5,533,594
2,205,831
2,617,543
7,498,898
6,374,744
3,562,705
1,949,452
1,682,238
4,565,188
18,191,100
24,359,495
1,649,487
3,241,472
2,277,259
14,212,171
3,765,878
3,506,448
6,532,964
4,609,169
2,893,966
2,467,031
3,579,121
11,007,849
2,550,878
6,222,444
2,996,078
11,980,593
8,662,702
2,668,998
3,649,709
7,261,045
16,872,742
5,501,787
6,652,716
6,472,286
6,883,603
4,152,721
2,688,166
2,688,082
2,108,150
14,577,592
4,449,426
5,621,983
2,714,080
4,727,812
9,102,781
10,423,380
2,428,345
3,667,889
3,516,835
20,100,518
3,565,829
5,903,675
2,877,433
3,764,506
2,913,954
13900
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
3,723,608
6,434,323
11,353,845
1,966,333
7,171,540
6,281,223
2,354,393
2,272,609
2,596,721
5,842,150
8,347,699
10,230,078
5,489,623
2,303,151
4,440,719
2,647,492
7,858,481
3,309,761
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
703,215,992
Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population:
ALABAMA ......................................................................................................................................................................................
7,250,334
Anniston, AL ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Auburn, AL ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Decatur, AL .............................................................................................................................................................................
Dothan, AL ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Florence, AL ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Gadsden, AL ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Montgomery, AL .....................................................................................................................................................................
Tuscaloosa, AL .......................................................................................................................................................................
673,045
622,422
592,014
567,616
713,416
558,511
2,302,892
1,220,418
ALASKA .........................................................................................................................................................................................
738,556
Fairbanks, AK .........................................................................................................................................................................
738,556
ARIZONA .......................................................................................................................................................................................
3,452,918
Avondale, AZ ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Flagstaff, AZ ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Prescott, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................
Yuma, AZ—CA .......................................................................................................................................................................
869,823
645,037
672,195
1,265,863
ARKANSAS ...................................................................................................................................................................................
4,901,814
Fayetteville—Springdale, AR ..................................................................................................................................................
Fort Smith, AR—OK ...............................................................................................................................................................
Hot Springs, AR ......................................................................................................................................................................
Jonesboro, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................
Pine Bluff, AR .........................................................................................................................................................................
Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR ............................................................................................................................................
1,829,368
1,205,345
485,409
508,041
631,462
242,189
CALIFORNIA .................................................................................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
South Bend, IN—MI ...............................................................................................................................................................
Spokane, WA—ID ..................................................................................................................................................................
Springfield, MA—CT ...............................................................................................................................................................
Springfield, MO .......................................................................................................................................................................
Stockton, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Syracuse, NY ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Tallahassee, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Temecula—Murrieta, CA ........................................................................................................................................................
Thousand Oaks, CA ...............................................................................................................................................................
Toledo, OH—MI ......................................................................................................................................................................
Trenton, NJ .............................................................................................................................................................................
Tucson, AZ .............................................................................................................................................................................
Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................
Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ...............................................................................................................................
Wichita, KS .............................................................................................................................................................................
Winston—Salem, NC ..............................................................................................................................................................
Worcester, MA—CT ...............................................................................................................................................................
Youngstown, OH—PA ............................................................................................................................................................
55,440,609
Atascadero—El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA ............................................................................................................
Camarillo, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Chico, CA ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Davis, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................
El Centro, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Fairfield, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................
Gilroy—Morgan Hill, CA .........................................................................................................................................................
Hanford, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................
Hemet, CA ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Livermore, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Lodi, CA ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Lompoc, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................
Madera, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................
Manteca, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
611,677
903,008
1,307,534
2,018,338
799,940
2,174,306
1,045,584
960,929
1,639,472
1,217,592
1,345,377
732,286
773,862
850,706
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13901
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
1,868,541
1,488,607
911,852
851,929
1,212,665
3,092,358
1,349,204
3,728,441
3,265,667
2,952,024
1,875,199
2,577,731
2,108,442
1,121,151
1,148,728
1,572,378
3,769,659
1,747,001
1,053,998
1,354,634
9,789
COLORADO ..................................................................................................................................................................................
8,293,228
Boulder, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................
Grand Junction, CO ................................................................................................................................................................
Greeley, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................
Lafayette—Louisville, CO .......................................................................................................................................................
Longmont, CO ........................................................................................................................................................................
Pueblo, CO .............................................................................................................................................................................
2,127,250
1,002,471
1,312,260
823,076
1,468,975
1,559,196
CONNECTICUT .............................................................................................................................................................................
17,987,220
Danbury, CT—NY ...................................................................................................................................................................
Norwich—New London, CT ....................................................................................................................................................
Waterbury, CT ........................................................................................................................................................................
6,896,204
3,177,682
7,913,334
DELAWARE ...................................................................................................................................................................................
1,317,343
Dover, DE ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Salisbury, MD—DE .................................................................................................................................................................
1,288,816
28,527
FLORIDA .......................................................................................................................................................................................
21,357,992
Brooksville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................
Deltona, FL .............................................................................................................................................................................
Fort Walton Beach, FL ...........................................................................................................................................................
Gainesville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................
Kissimmee, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................
Lady Lake, FL .........................................................................................................................................................................
Lakeland, FL ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Leesburg—Eustis, FL .............................................................................................................................................................
North Port—Punta Gorda, FL .................................................................................................................................................
Ocala, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................
Panama City, FL .....................................................................................................................................................................
St. Augustine, FL ....................................................................................................................................................................
Titusville, FL ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Vero Beach—Sebastian, FL ...................................................................................................................................................
Winter Haven, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................
Zephyrhills, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................
993,287
1,610,174
1,636,390
2,641,987
2,102,630
464,231
2,417,959
988,439
1,240,112
1,028,813
1,316,602
568,072
942,936
1,263,626
1,604,997
537,737
GEORGIA ......................................................................................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Merced, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Napa, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................
Petaluma, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Porterville, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Redding, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Salinas, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
San Luis Obispo, CA ..............................................................................................................................................................
Santa Barbara, CA .................................................................................................................................................................
Santa Clarita, CA ....................................................................................................................................................................
Santa Cruz, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Santa Maria, CA .....................................................................................................................................................................
Seaside—Monterey—Marina, CA ..........................................................................................................................................
Simi Valley, CA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Tracy, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................
Turlock, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Vacaville, CA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Vallejo, CA ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Visalia, CA ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Watsonville, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Yuba City, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Yuma, AZ—CA .......................................................................................................................................................................
8,760,015
Albany, GA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Athens—Clarke County, GA ...................................................................................................................................................
Brunswick, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Dalton, GA ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Gainesville, GA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Hinesville, GA .........................................................................................................................................................................
989,427
1,312,463
500,167
536,009
805,000
578,175
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13902
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
1,486,745
1,083,099
608,832
860,098
HAWAII ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
2,026,247
Kailua (Honolulu County)—Kaneohe, HI ................................................................................................................................
2,026,247
IDAHO ............................................................................................................................................................................................
3,939,639
Coeur d’Alene, ID ...................................................................................................................................................................
Idaho Falls, ID ........................................................................................................................................................................
Lewiston, ID—WA ..................................................................................................................................................................
Nampa, ID ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Pocatello, ID ...........................................................................................................................................................................
841,280
824,600
356,711
1,160,278
756,770
ILLINOIS ........................................................................................................................................................................................
10,882,018
Alton, IL ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Beloit, WI—IL ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Bloomington—Normal, IL .......................................................................................................................................................
Champaign, IL ........................................................................................................................................................................
Danville, IL ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Decatur, IL ..............................................................................................................................................................................
DeKalb, IL ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Dubuque, IA—IL .....................................................................................................................................................................
Kankakee, IL ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Springfield, IL ..........................................................................................................................................................................
910,786
141,978
1,874,630
2,523,127
582,432
1,350,371
825,760
28,816
826,220
1,817,898
INDIANA ........................................................................................................................................................................................
10,733,698
Anderson, IN ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Bloomington, IN ......................................................................................................................................................................
Columbus, IN ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Elkhart, IN—MI .......................................................................................................................................................................
Kokomo, IN .............................................................................................................................................................................
Lafayette, IN ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan City, IN—MI .............................................................................................................................................................
Muncie, IN ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Terre Haute, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................
1,012,189
1,483,511
580,600
1,409,420
831,958
2,300,689
769,298
1,451,646
894,387
IOWA .............................................................................................................................................................................................
8,071,720
Ames, IA .................................................................................................................................................................................
Cedar Rapids, IA ....................................................................................................................................................................
Dubuque, IA—IL .....................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa City, IA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Sioux City, IA—NE—SD .........................................................................................................................................................
Waterloo, IA ............................................................................................................................................................................
1,365,236
2,080,013
762,548
1,569,025
1,013,167
1,281,731
KANSAS ........................................................................................................................................................................................
3,073,575
Lawrence, KS .........................................................................................................................................................................
St. Joseph, MO—KS ..............................................................................................................................................................
Topeka, KS .............................................................................................................................................................................
1,383,389
12,124
1,678,062
KENTUCKY ...................................................................................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Macon, GA ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Rome, GA ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Valdosta, GA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Warner Robins, GA ................................................................................................................................................................
2,857,079
Bowling Green, KY .................................................................................................................................................................
Clarksville, TN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................
Huntington, WV—KY—OH .....................................................................................................................................................
Owensboro, KY ......................................................................................................................................................................
Radcliff—Elizabethtown, KY ...................................................................................................................................................
619,391
267,824
557,729
747,772
664,363
LOUISIANA ....................................................................................................................................................................................
8,036,529
Alexandria, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Houma, LA ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Lafayette, LA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
769,069
1,334,550
2,026,465
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13903
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
1,341,153
617,428
1,147,923
799,941
MAINE ............................................................................................................................................................................................
4,381,796
Bangor, ME .............................................................................................................................................................................
Dover—Rochester, NH—ME ..................................................................................................................................................
Lewiston, ME ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Portland, ME ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Portsmouth, NH—ME .............................................................................................................................................................
613,623
109,513
896,326
2,678,244
84,090
MARYLAND ...................................................................................................................................................................................
10,670,642
Aberdeen—Havre de Grace—Bel Air, MD .............................................................................................................................
Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ...................................................................................................................................................
Frederick, MD .........................................................................................................................................................................
Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ...................................................................................................................................................
Salisbury, MD—DE .................................................................................................................................................................
St. Charles, MD ......................................................................................................................................................................
Westminster, MD ....................................................................................................................................................................
2,900,711
810,873
1,915,132
1,441,127
905,376
1,464,195
1,233,228
MASSACHUSETTS .......................................................................................................................................................................
6,662,936
Leominster—Fitchburg, MA ....................................................................................................................................................
Nashua, NH—MA ...................................................................................................................................................................
New Bedford, MA ...................................................................................................................................................................
Pittsfield, MA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
2,398,315
504
3,106,662
1,157,455
MICHIGAN .....................................................................................................................................................................................
13,046,789
Battle Creek, MI ......................................................................................................................................................................
Bay City, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................
Benton Harbor—St. Joseph, MI .............................................................................................................................................
Elkhart, IN—MI .......................................................................................................................................................................
Holland, MI .............................................................................................................................................................................
Jackson, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................
Kalamazoo, MI ........................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan City, IN—MI .............................................................................................................................................................
Monroe, MI .............................................................................................................................................................................
Muskegon, MI .........................................................................................................................................................................
Port Huron, MI ........................................................................................................................................................................
Saginaw, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................
South Lyon—Howell—Brighton, MI ........................................................................................................................................
825,952
1,078,081
612,662
17,527
1,053,030
1,198,756
2,305,463
5,021
591,206
1,617,501
1,146,273
1,613,157
982,160
MINNESOTA ..................................................................................................................................................................................
5,052,284
Duluth, MN—WI ......................................................................................................................................................................
Fargo, ND—MN ......................................................................................................................................................................
Grand Forks, ND—MN ...........................................................................................................................................................
La Crosse, WI—MN ...............................................................................................................................................................
Rochester, MN ........................................................................................................................................................................
St. Cloud, MN .........................................................................................................................................................................
1,369,705
489,703
104,502
75,927
1,500,230
1,512,217
MISSISSIPPI ..................................................................................................................................................................................
1,220,077
Hattiesburg, MS ......................................................................................................................................................................
Pascagoula, MS .....................................................................................................................................................................
647,302
572,775
MISSOURI .....................................................................................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Lake Charles, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................
Mandeville—Covington, LA ....................................................................................................................................................
Monroe, LA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Slidell, LA ................................................................................................................................................................................
4,104,533
Columbia, MO .........................................................................................................................................................................
Jefferson City, MO ..................................................................................................................................................................
Joplin, MO ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Lee’s Summit, MO ..................................................................................................................................................................
St. Joseph, MO—KS ..............................................................................................................................................................
1,135,945
542,439
698,235
714,301
1,013,613
MONTANA .....................................................................................................................................................................................
2,826,793
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13904
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
1,230,011
798,682
798,100
N. MARIANA ISLANDS .................................................................................................................................................................
697,739
Saipan, MP .............................................................................................................................................................................
697,739
NEBRASKA ...................................................................................................................................................................................
197,384
Sioux City, IA—NE—SD .........................................................................................................................................................
197,384
NEVADA ........................................................................................................................................................................................
713,838
Carson City, NV ......................................................................................................................................................................
713,838
NEW HAMPSHIRE ........................................................................................................................................................................
5,262,172
Dover—Rochester, NH—ME ..................................................................................................................................................
Manchester, NH ......................................................................................................................................................................
Nashua, NH—MA ...................................................................................................................................................................
Portsmouth, NH—ME .............................................................................................................................................................
1,156,340
1,695,898
2,009,813
400,121
NEW JERSEY ...............................................................................................................................................................................
3,960,617
Hightstown, NJ .......................................................................................................................................................................
Vineland, NJ ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Wildwood—North Wildwood—Cape May, NJ ........................................................................................................................
1,431,763
1,596,004
932,850
NEW MEXICO ...............................................................................................................................................................................
2,771,368
Farmington, NM ......................................................................................................................................................................
Las Cruces, NM ......................................................................................................................................................................
Santa Fe, NM .........................................................................................................................................................................
515,759
1,119,267
1,136,342
NEW YORK ...................................................................................................................................................................................
10,570,026
Binghamton, NY—PA .............................................................................................................................................................
Danbury, CT—NY ...................................................................................................................................................................
Elmira, NY ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Glens Falls, NY ......................................................................................................................................................................
Ithaca, NY ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Kingston, NY ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Middletown, NY ......................................................................................................................................................................
Saratoga Springs, NY .............................................................................................................................................................
Utica, NY ................................................................................................................................................................................
2,695,012
73,552
1,224,805
794,650
1,245,902
1,334,020
710,718
792,015
1,699,352
NORTH CAROLINA .......................................................................................................................................................................
11,251,514
Burlington, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................
Concord, NC ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Gastonia, NC ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Goldsboro, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................
Greenville, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................
Hickory, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................
High Point, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................
Jacksonville, NC .....................................................................................................................................................................
Rocky Mount, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................
Wilmington, NC .......................................................................................................................................................................
972,420
1,125,674
1,355,445
576,504
963,326
1,645,632
1,354,550
994,423
645,662
1,617,878
NORTH DAKOTA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Billings, MT .............................................................................................................................................................................
Great Falls, MT .......................................................................................................................................................................
Missoula, MT ..........................................................................................................................................................................
3,535,331
Bismarck, ND ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Fargo, ND—MN ......................................................................................................................................................................
Grand Forks, ND—MN ...........................................................................................................................................................
1,158,007
1,608,082
769,242
OHIO ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
9,376,620
Huntington, WV—KY—OH .....................................................................................................................................................
Lima, OH ................................................................................................................................................................................
365,291
783,147
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13905
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
2,613,598
836,717
1,092,416
1,054,173
257,045
554,395
1,058,335
441,368
320,135
OKLAHOMA ...................................................................................................................................................................................
2,197,292
Fort Smith, AR—OK ...............................................................................................................................................................
Lawton, OK .............................................................................................................................................................................
Norman, OK ............................................................................................................................................................................
22,819
956,432
1,218,041
OREGON .......................................................................................................................................................................................
2,902,420
Bend, OR ................................................................................................................................................................................
Corvallis, OR ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Longview, WA—OR ................................................................................................................................................................
Medford, OR ...........................................................................................................................................................................
611,658
687,751
16,389
1,586,622
PENNSYLVANIA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
14,667,053
Altoona, PA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Binghamton, NY—PA .............................................................................................................................................................
Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ...................................................................................................................................................
Erie, PA ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ...................................................................................................................................................
Hazleton, PA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Johnstown, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Lebanon, PA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Monessen, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Pottstown, PA .........................................................................................................................................................................
State College, PA ...................................................................................................................................................................
Uniontown—Connellsville, PA ................................................................................................................................................
Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA ....................................................................................................................................
Williamsport, PA .....................................................................................................................................................................
York, PA .................................................................................................................................................................................
1,008,352
43,896
137
2,890,238
12,605
574,760
1,204,512
767,631
1,192,580
725,687
1,817,883
812,804
2,733
1,437,612
2,175,623
PUERTO RICO ..............................................................................................................................................................................
10,639,870
Arecibo, PR ............................................................................................................................................................................
Fajardo, PR ............................................................................................................................................................................
Florida—Barceloneta—Bajadero, PR .....................................................................................................................................
Guayama, PR .........................................................................................................................................................................
Juana Diaz, PR ......................................................................................................................................................................
Mayaguez, PR ........................................................................................................................................................................
Ponce, PR ..............................................................................................................................................................................
San German—Cabo Rojo—Sabana Grande, PR ..................................................................................................................
Yauco, PR ..............................................................................................................................................................................
1,449,086
828,071
644,671
842,124
565,662
1,310,689
2,884,958
1,013,945
1,100,664
RHODE ISLAND ............................................................................................................................................................................
0
SOUTH CAROLINA .......................................................................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Lorain—Elyria, OH ..................................................................................................................................................................
Mansfield, OH .........................................................................................................................................................................
Middletown, OH ......................................................................................................................................................................
Newark, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................
Parkersburg, WV—OH ...........................................................................................................................................................
Sandusky, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................
Springfield, OH .......................................................................................................................................................................
Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA ....................................................................................................................................
Wheeling, WV—OH ................................................................................................................................................................
6,726,460
Anderson, SC .........................................................................................................................................................................
Florence, SC ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Mauldin—Simpsonville, SC ....................................................................................................................................................
Myrtle Beach, SC ...................................................................................................................................................................
Rock Hill, SC ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Spartanburg, SC .....................................................................................................................................................................
Sumter, SC .............................................................................................................................................................................
640,244
983,511
786,738
1,425,464
659,663
1,331,315
899,525
SOUTH DAKOTA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
2,675,777
Rapid City, SD ........................................................................................................................................................................
Sioux City, IA—NE—SD .........................................................................................................................................................
818,753
33,565
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13906
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
1,823,459
TENNESSEE .................................................................................................................................................................................
6,725,215
Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA ..........................................................................................................................................................
Clarksville, TN—KY ................................................................................................................................................................
Cleveland, TN .........................................................................................................................................................................
Jackson, TN ............................................................................................................................................................................
Johnson City, TN ....................................................................................................................................................................
Kingsport, TN—VA .................................................................................................................................................................
Morristown, TN .......................................................................................................................................................................
Murfreesboro, TN ...................................................................................................................................................................
347,289
1,010,092
556,853
948,789
958,145
840,182
519,063
1,544,802
TEXAS ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
34,766,686
Abilene, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................
Amarillo, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................
Beaumont, TX .........................................................................................................................................................................
Brownsville, TX .......................................................................................................................................................................
College Station—Bryan, TX ...................................................................................................................................................
Galveston, TX .........................................................................................................................................................................
Harlingen, TX ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Killeen, TX ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Lake Jackson—Angleton, TX .................................................................................................................................................
Laredo, TX ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Longview, TX ..........................................................................................................................................................................
McKinney, TX .........................................................................................................................................................................
Midland, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................
Odessa, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................
Port Arthur, TX .......................................................................................................................................................................
San Angelo, TX ......................................................................................................................................................................
Sherman, TX ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Temple, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................
Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR ............................................................................................................................................
Texas City, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................
The Woodlands, TX ................................................................................................................................................................
Tyler, TX .................................................................................................................................................................................
Victoria, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................
Waco, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................
Wichita Falls, TX ....................................................................................................................................................................
1,343,172
2,333,958
1,540,933
2,734,539
1,824,951
1,392,401
1,274,698
2,279,352
905,070
3,593,958
827,477
648,017
1,228,930
1,349,048
1,517,318
1,025,875
629,197
801,485
462,132
1,170,152
1,096,274
1,138,058
595,076
1,899,585
1,155,030
UTAH .............................................................................................................................................................................................
1,863,771
Logan, UT ...............................................................................................................................................................................
St. George, UT .......................................................................................................................................................................
1,143,363
720,408
VERMONT .....................................................................................................................................................................................
1,508,546
Burlington, VT .........................................................................................................................................................................
1,508,546
VIRGIN ISLANDS ..........................................................................................................................................................................
1 843,840
VIRGINIA .......................................................................................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Sioux Falls, SD .......................................................................................................................................................................
9,280,295
Blacksburg, VA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA ..........................................................................................................................................................
Charlottesville, VA ..................................................................................................................................................................
Danville, VA ............................................................................................................................................................................
Fredericksburg, VA .................................................................................................................................................................
Harrisonburg, VA ....................................................................................................................................................................
Kingsport, TN—VA .................................................................................................................................................................
Lynchburg, VA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Roanoke, VA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Winchester, VA .......................................................................................................................................................................
1,063,831
202,992
1,481,189
538,282
1,006,793
857,517
15,906
1,220,972
2,318,325
574,488
WASHINGTON ..............................................................................................................................................................................
14,358,531
Bellingham, WA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Bremerton, WA .......................................................................................................................................................................
1,564,038
2,349,035
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13907
TABLE 3.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report, an urbanized area apportionments for Section 5307 and Section
5340 were combined to show a single amount. An area’s apportionment amount includes regular Section 5307 funds, Small Transit Intensive Cities funds, and Growing States and High Density States formula funds, as appropriate.]
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
Kennewick—Richland, WA .....................................................................................................................................................
Lewiston, ID—WA ..................................................................................................................................................................
Longview, WA—OR ................................................................................................................................................................
Marysville, WA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Mount Vernon, WA .................................................................................................................................................................
Olympia—Lacey, WA .............................................................................................................................................................
Wenatchee, WA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Yakima, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................
2,459,462
208,036
737,928
1,208,535
790,127
2,246,977
1,148,346
1,646,047
WEST VIRGINIA ............................................................................................................................................................................
5,794,143
Charleston, WV ......................................................................................................................................................................
Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ...................................................................................................................................................
Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ...................................................................................................................................................
Huntington, WV—KY—OH .....................................................................................................................................................
Morgantown, WV ....................................................................................................................................................................
Parkersburg, WV—OH ...........................................................................................................................................................
Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—PA ....................................................................................................................................
Wheeling, WV—OH ................................................................................................................................................................
2,181,992
22,703
297,138
987,340
718,666
670,607
306,355
609,342
WISCONSIN ..................................................................................................................................................................................
16,669,410
Appleton, WI ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Beloit, WI—IL ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Duluth, MN—WI ......................................................................................................................................................................
Eau Claire, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................
Fond du Lac, WI .....................................................................................................................................................................
Green Bay, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................
Janesville, WI .........................................................................................................................................................................
Kenosha, WI ...........................................................................................................................................................................
La Crosse, WI—MN ...............................................................................................................................................................
Oshkosh, WI ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Racine, WI ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Sheboygan, WI .......................................................................................................................................................................
Wausau, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................
2,492,784
523,641
430,307
1,329,387
649,706
2,339,401
819,067
1,613,367
1,275,881
1,326,506
1,811,896
1,049,497
1,007,970
WYOMING .....................................................................................................................................................................................
1,512,596
Casper, WY ............................................................................................................................................................................
Cheyenne, WY .......................................................................................................................................................................
710,204
802,392
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
408,554,898
1 Language
in section 5307(l) provides for the treatment of the Virgin Islands as an urbanized area.
TABLE 4.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307
APPORTIONMENT FORMULA
Distribution of Available Funds
Of the funds made available to the Section 5307 program, a one percent takedown is authorized for Small Transit Intensive Cities. This amount
is apportioned to the Governors based on a separate formula that uses criteria related to specific service performance categories.
The remaining 99% is apportioned to small, medium, and large sized urbanized areas (UZAs). 9.32% is made available for UZAs 50,000–
199,999 in population, and 90.68% to UZAs 200,000 or more in population.
UZA Population and Weighting Factors
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
50,000–199,999 in population (Apportioned to Governors).
200,000 and greater in population (Apportioned to
UZAs).
9.32% of available Section 5307 funds.
50% apportioned based on population.
50% apportioned based on population × population density.
90.68% of available Section 5307 funds.
33.29% (Fixed Guideway Tier*).
95.61% (Non-incentive Portion of Tier).
—at least 0.75% to each UZA with commuter rail and pop. 750,000 or greater.
60%—fixed guideway revenue vehicle miles.
40%—fixed guideway route miles.
4.39% (‘‘Incentive Portion’’ of Tier).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13908
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 4.—FY 2007 SECTION 5307
APPORTIONMENT FORMULA—Continued
—at least 0.75% to each UZA with commuter rail and pop. 750,000 or greater.
—fixed guideway passenger miles × fixed guideway passenger miles/operating cost.
66.71% (‘‘Bus’’ Tier).
90.8% (Non-incentive Portion of Tier).
73.39% for UZAs with population 1,000,000 or greater.
50%—bus revenue vehicle miles.
25%—population.
25%—population × population density.
26.61% for UZAs pop. < 1,000,000.
50%—bus revenue vehicle miles.
25%— population.
25%—population × density.
9.2% (‘‘Incentive’’ Portion of Tier).
—bus passenger miles × bus passenger miles/operating cost.
* Includes all fixed guideway modes, such as heavy rail, commuter rail, light rail, trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car, automated guideway transit, ferryboats, exclusive busways, and HOV lanes.
TABLE 5.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 FORMULA PROGRAMS APPORTIONMENT DATA UNIT VALUES
Apportionment
data unit value
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Bus Tier:
Urbanized Areas Over 1,000,000:
Population ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Population × Density .........................................................................................................................................................
Bus Revenue Vehicle Mile ................................................................................................................................................
Urbanized Areas Under 1,000,000:
Population ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Population × Density .........................................................................................................................................................
Bus Revenue Vehicle Mile ................................................................................................................................................
Bus Incentive (PM denotes Passenger Mile):
Bus PM × Bus PM = Operating Cost ................................................................................................................................
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Fixed Guideway Tier:
Fixed Guideway Revenue Vehicle Mile ............................................................................................................................
Fixed Guideway Route Mile ..............................................................................................................................................
Commuter Rail Floor ..................................................................................................................................................
Fixed Guideway Incentive:
Fixed Guideway PM × Fixed Guideway PM = Operating Cost ........................................................................................
Commuter Rail Incentive Floor ..................................................................................................................................
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Areas Under 200,000:
Population ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Population × Density .........................................................................................................................................................
Section 5307 Small Transit Intensive Cities:
For Each Qualifying Performance Category .....................................................................................................................
Section 5311 Urbanized Area Formula Program—Areas Under 50,000
Population ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Section 5309 Capital Program—Fixed Guideway Modernization:
Tier 2
Legislatively Specified Areas:
Revenue Vehicle Mile ........................
Route Mile .........................................
Other Urbanized Areas:
Revenue Vehicle Mile ........................
Route Mile .........................................
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
$3.00227624
0.00076177
0.39097622
2.75146798
0.00120387
0.51070792
0.00750408
0.58113740
30,545
7,680,270
0.00065678
352,645
$5.53398866
0.00275286
120,608
4.31350350
Tier 6
Tier 7
$0.03043443
2,122.43
........................
........................
$0.13671435
7,825.39
$0.03477564
2,620.89
$0.02292899
1,728.06
$0.21152760
15,941.94
0.16288440
4,758.70
0.00576164
168.33
0.13671435
7,825.39
0.06921684
2,017.29
0.05650354
1,646.77
0.78189598
22,787.98
Notes:
1. Unit values for Section 5307 do not take into account Section 5340 funding added to the program.
2. The unit value for Section 5311 is based on the total nonurbanized/rural population for the States and territories. It does not take into account Section 5311 funds allocated based on land area in nonurbanized areas, or Section 5340 funding added to the program.
TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750]
State
Urbanized area (UZA) description
Alabama .............
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
mile
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
hour
5.561
95.935
10.951
0.000
0.000
0.000
Average for UZAs with populations
200,000–999,999.
Anniston, AL ...................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Vehicle
revenue
mile per
capita
Sfmt 4703
Vehicle
revenue
hour per
capita
Passenger
miles per
capita
Passenger
trips per
capita
0.729
72.570
0.000
0.000
STIC funding: @
$120,608
per factor
met or
exceeded
0
$0
13.348
0.000
Number of
performance factors met or
exceeded
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13909
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750]
Urbanized area (UZA) description
Alabama .............
Alabama .............
Alabama .............
Alabama .............
Alabama .............
Alabama .............
Alabama .............
Alaska .................
Arizona ...............
Arizona ...............
Arizona ...............
Arizona ...............
Arkansas ............
Arkansas ............
Arkansas ............
Arkansas ............
Arkansas ............
California ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
mile
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
hour
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.093
0.000
2.897
2.680
6.859
4.349
2.540
0.000
1.515
3.371
2.081
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
16.716
16.772
22.792
15.975
0.000
46.236
28.693
105.298
0.000
34.781
0.000
16.822
40.016
29.584
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.719
7.733
6.700
8.252
0.000
6.732
2.829
8.463
0.743
7.905
0.000
8.028
4.768
4.734
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
3.425
8.983
0.000
3.274
0.000
0.000
1.893
3.248
1.944
7.519
0.000
0.000
1.929
2.778
5.103
3.225
3.438
0.000
22.048
10.352
12.879
8.392
1.945
6.765
4.548
0.000
0.000
5.892
9.476
4.902
0.000
5.329
9.335
4.163
3.305
7.445
7.004
3.762
21.337
5.761
20.385
2.786
1.683
3.296
1.057
9.524
0.000
0.000
2.378
0.000
1.008
3.569
1.196
0.000
6.329
0.000
0.000
42.826
151.628
0.000
63.781
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
21.289
112.958
0.000
0.000
34.230
39.639
0.000
48.188
55.384
0.000
263.797
140.225
418.549
125.105
27.602
103.062
118.010
0.000
0.000
0.000
244.654
65.558
0.000
83.369
0.000
57.198
39.308
0.000
0.000
53.996
1614.082
177.809
1130.418
0.000
26.954
0.000
16.369
109.979
0.000
0.000
38.374
0.000
15.649
49.160
19.087
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
9.354
18.082
0.000
13.171
0.000
0.000
7.263
5.338
6.952
8.249
0.000
0.000
13.968
13.360
2.804
8.955
11.285
0.000
7.402
13.451
31.535
24.349
4.997
28.289
10.348
0.000
0.000
0.805
24.678
9.659
0.000
9.914
15.645
7.201
5.685
9.349
22.598
6.932
41.055
10.620
34.678
29.906
3.095
9.152
8.221
18.039
0.000
0.000
20.144
0.000
4.250
3.921
8.866
0.000
15.557
0.000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Auburn, AL .....................................
Decatur, AL ....................................
Dothan, AL .....................................
Florence, AL ...................................
Gadsden, AL ..................................
Montgomery, AL .............................
Tuscaloosa, AL ...............................
Fairbanks, AK .................................
Avondale, AZ ..................................
Flagstaff, AZ ...................................
Prescott, AZ ....................................
Yuma, AZ—CA ...............................
Fayetteville-Springdale, AR ............
Fort Smith, AR—OK .......................
Hot Springs, AR .............................
Jonesboro, AR ................................
Pine Bluff, AR .................................
Atascadero—El Paso de Robles
(Paso Robles), CA.
Camarillo, CA .................................
Chico, CA .......................................
Davis, CA .......................................
El Centro, CA .................................
Fairfield, CA ....................................
Gilroy—Morgan Hill, CA .................
Hanford, CA ....................................
Hemet, CA ......................................
Livermore, CA ................................
Lodi, CA ..........................................
Lompoc, CA ....................................
Madera, CA ....................................
Manteca, CA ...................................
Merced, CA ....................................
Napa, CA ........................................
Petaluma, CA .................................
Porterville, CA ................................
Redding, CA ...................................
Salinas, CA .....................................
San Luis Obispo, CA ......................
Santa Barbara, CA .........................
Santa Clarita, CA ...........................
Santa Cruz, CA ..............................
Santa Maria, CA .............................
Seaside—Monterey—Marina, CA ..
Simi Valley, CA ..............................
Tracy, CA .......................................
Turlock, CA .....................................
Vacaville, CA ..................................
Vallejo, CA ......................................
Visalia, CA ......................................
Watsonville, CA ..............................
Yuba City, CA .................................
Boulder, CO ....................................
Grand Junction, CO .......................
Greeley, CO ...................................
Lafayette—Louisville, CO ...............
Longmont, CO ................................
Pueblo, CO .....................................
Danbury, CT—NY ..........................
Norwich—New London, CT ............
Waterbury, CT ................................
Dover, DE .......................................
Brooksville, FL ................................
Deltona, FL .....................................
Fort Walton Beach, FL ...................
Gainesville, FL ................................
Kissimmee, FL ................................
Lady Lake, FL ................................
Lakeland, FL ...................................
Leesburg—Eustis, FL .....................
North Port—Punta Gorda, FL ........
Ocala, FL ........................................
Panama City, FL ............................
St. Augustine, FL ............................
Titusville, FL ...................................
Vero Beach—Sebastian, FL ...........
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
California ............
Colorado .............
Colorado .............
Colorado .............
Colorado .............
Colorado .............
Colorado .............
Connecticut ........
Connecticut ........
Connecticut ........
Delaware ............
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
Florida ................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Vehicle
revenue
mile per
capita
Sfmt 4703
Passenger
miles per
capita
Passenger
trips per
capita
Number of
performance factors met or
exceeded
STIC funding: @
$120,608
per factor
met or
exceeded
0.342
0.461
0.294
0.565
0.000
0.422
0.264
0.551
0.000
0.577
0.000
0.723
0.402
0.333
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.719
7.733
6.700
9.021
0.000
19.501
7.579
58.051
3.233
20.076
0.000
12.167
16.072
9.852
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.732
2.780
2.391
2.577
0.000
3.807
1.181
8.092
0.000
7.800
0.000
1.719
8.268
2.108
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
0.748
1.071
0.000
0.676
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.635
0.549
0.000
0.000
0.787
0.936
0.000
0.599
0.701
0.000
0.619
0.993
0.970
1.633
0.352
1.857
0.399
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.956
0.722
0.000
0.634
0.000
0.524
0.478
0.000
0.000
0.483
0.543
0.344
0.625
0.000
0.193
0.000
0.531
1.562
0.000
0.000
1.248
0.000
0.274
0.285
0.556
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
32.041
162.432
0.000
43.116
0.000
0.000
13.749
17.337
13.511
62.028
0.000
0.000
26.946
37.120
14.312
28.880
38.801
0.000
163.195
139.238
406.124
204.347
9.716
191.379
47.063
0.000
0.000
4.745
233.857
47.347
0.000
52.829
146.044
29.978
18.788
69.608
158.281
26.081
875.975
61.178
706.904
83.304
5.209
30.164
8.691
171.808
0.000
0.000
47.893
0.000
4.284
13.991
10.605
0.000
98.453
0.000
0.000
10.019
51.747
0.000
7.041
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.269
5.958
0.000
0.000
9.535
9.813
0.000
8.041
7.876
0.000
16.362
36.757
20.689
35.654
6.582
38.283
4.209
0.000
0.000
0.000
18.416
10.970
0.000
6.911
0.000
7.385
4.955
0.000
0.000
8.324
5.407
5.395
10.075
0.000
1.325
0.000
1.340
50.648
0.000
0.000
11.172
0.000
0.568
2.870
3.401
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
1
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
0
4
6
6
6
0
6
1
0
0
1
6
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
3
0
4
2
4
2
0
0
0
6
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
120,608
723,646
0
120,608
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
0
0
241,216
241,216
0
0
120,608
0
482,431
723,646
723,646
723,646
0
723,646
120,608
0
0
120,608
723,646
0
0
0
361,824
0
0
120,608
361,824
0
482,431
241,216
482,431
241,216
0
0
0
723,646
0
0
241,216
0
0
0
0
0
361,824
0
Vehicle
revenue
hour per
capita
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13910
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750]
State
Urbanized area (UZA) description
Florida ................
Florida ................
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Georgia ...............
Hawaii .................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Maryland .............
Maryland .............
Maryland .............
Maryland .............
Maryland .............
Maryland .............
Massachusetts ...
Massachusetts ...
Massachusetts ...
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Passenger
trips per
capita
Number of
performance factors met or
exceeded
STIC funding: @
$120,608
per factor
met or
exceeded
0.000
0.000
0.443
0.575
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.575
0.496
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
36.576
46.617
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
35.796
142.038
0.000
0.000
19.322
0.000
0.000
7.233
14.020
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
7.774
14.248
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
241,216
0
0
0
0
0
482,431
0
0
120,608
0.000
0.000
0.000
4.135
6.859
4.451
11.621
22.557
5.963
11.160
0.000
0.000
9.442
4.726
10.499
0.000
6.212
10.834
11.821
0.000
12.793
4.395
20.602
9.023
8.520
20.356
5.960
8.615
10.318
9.245
0.000
0.000
0.000
7.022
0.000
4.853
0.000
0.000
6.234
0.000
9.264
16.243
15.863
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.565
0.000
0.864
1.982
0.333
0.821
0.000
0.000
0.746
0.418
0.986
0.000
0.394
1.057
0.997
0.000
0.996
0.471
1.930
0.625
0.657
1.831
0.535
0.556
0.813
0.627
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.462
0.000
0.353
0.000
0.000
0.441
0.000
0.707
1.094
0.775
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
12.538
36.414
19.774
43.618
207.674
12.117
31.746
0.000
0.000
24.154
6.473
71.691
0.000
10.167
11.073
110.553
0.000
55.505
4.898
120.547
32.126
26.917
88.575
22.362
9.014
15.915
36.121
0.000
0.000
0.000
33.834
0.000
34.146
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
46.842
24.344
174.722
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
7.586
0.000
11.694
81.684
6.539
10.814
0.000
0.000
8.734
2.135
23.619
0.000
2.245
2.473
33.814
0.000
20.253
2.523
84.629
7.288
9.730
60.513
7.686
4.238
6.362
9.979
0.000
0.000
0.000
8.149
0.000
7.735
0.000
0.000
8.528
0.000
11.554
6.553
14.007
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
0
2
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
1
6
0
3
0
5
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
723,646
0
241,216
0
0
120,608
0
361,824
0
0
120,608
723,646
0
361,824
0
603,039
0
0
482,431
0
0
120,608
0
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
723,646
0
0.000
8.215
4.055
0.000
16.509
11.387
24.328
16.915
15.536
7.142
22.091
6.443
6.855
14.478
10.919
8.699
3.575
0.000
0.697
0.273
0.000
1.002
1.008
1.847
0.917
0.822
0.486
1.279
0.493
0.498
0.895
0.908
0.000
0.270
0.000
23.881
9.595
0.000
16.509
14.630
75.075
50.617
15.536
23.747
39.296
9.370
6.942
28.301
46.721
19.426
13.467
0.000
4.644
2.563
0.000
5.497
2.398
10.259
11.564
9.641
6.658
7.846
2.625
2.009
8.040
15.554
0.000
2.830
0
0
0
0
2
2
3
2
2
0
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
241,216
361,824
241,216
241,216
0
241,216
0
0
241,216
241,216
0
0
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
hour
0.000
0.000
5.160
6.103
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
4.353
15.144
0.000
0.000
9.044
0.000
0.000
82.472
81.046
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
62.271
286.192
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
7.089
7.639
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
8.223
9.379
0.000
0.000
2.136
0.000
0.000
0.000
3.032
5.309
4.442
3.753
9.207
2.032
2.845
0.000
0.000
2.558
1.370
6.828
0.000
1.637
1.022
9.352
0.000
4.339
1.114
5.851
3.561
3.159
4.351
3.752
1.046
1.542
3.907
0.000
0.000
0.000
4.818
0.000
7.035
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.056
1.499
11.014
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
64.497
0.000
50.475
104.802
36.342
38.648
0.000
0.000
32.374
15.495
72.674
0.000
25.774
10.475
110.918
0.000
55.708
10.396
62.469
51.368
40.963
48.382
41.819
16.200
19.585
57.593
0.000
0.000
0.000
73.290
0.000
96.853
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
66.260
22.244
225.504
0.000
0.000
2.907
2.366
0.000
1.000
1.285
3.086
2.992
1.000
3.325
1.779
1.454
1.013
1.955
4.279
2.233
3.767
0.000
34.264
35.097
0.000
16.484
14.512
40.653
55.171
18.899
48.817
30.715
18.988
13.938
31.619
51.456
0.000
49.825
Winter Haven, FL ...........................
Zephyrhills, FL ................................
Albany, GA .....................................
Athens—Clarke County, GA ..........
Brunswick, GA ................................
Dalton, GA ......................................
Gainesville, GA ...............................
Hinesville, GA .................................
Macon, GA .....................................
Rome, GA .......................................
Valdosta, GA ..................................
Warner Robins, GA ........................
Kailua
(Honolulu
County)—
Kaneohe, HI.
Coeur d’Alene, ID ...........................
Idaho Falls, ID ................................
Lewiston, ID—WA ..........................
Nampa, ID ......................................
Pocatello, ID ...................................
Alton, IL ..........................................
Bloomington—Normal, IL ...............
Champaign, IL ................................
Danville, IL ......................................
Decatur, IL ......................................
DeKalb, IL .......................................
Kankakee, IL ..................................
Springfield, IL .................................
Anderson, IN ..................................
Bloomington, IN ..............................
Columbus, IN ..................................
Elkhart, IN—MI ...............................
Kokomo, IN .....................................
Lafayette, IN ...................................
Michigan City, IN—MI ....................
Muncie, IN ......................................
Terre Haute, IN ..............................
Ames, IA .........................................
Cedar Rapids, IA ............................
Dubuque, IA—IL .............................
Iowa City, IA ...................................
Sioux City, IA—NE—SD ................
Waterloo, IA ....................................
Lawrence, KS .................................
Topeka, KS .....................................
Bowling Green, KY .........................
Owensboro, KY ..............................
Radcliff—Elizabethtown, KY ...........
Alexandria, LA ................................
Houma, LA .....................................
Lafayette, LA ..................................
Lake Charles, LA ............................
Mandeville—Covington, LA ............
Monroe, LA .....................................
Slidell, LA .......................................
Bangor, ME ....................................
Lewiston, ME ..................................
Portland, ME ...................................
Aberdeen—Havre de Grace—Bel
Air, MD.
Cumberland, MD—WV—PA ..........
Frederick, MD .................................
Hagerstown, MD—WV—PA ...........
Salisbury, MD—DE ........................
St. Charles, MD ..............................
Westminster, MD ............................
Leominster—Fitchburg, MA ............
New Bedford, MA ...........................
Pittsfield, MA ..................................
Battle Creek, MI .............................
Bay City, MI ....................................
Benton Harbor—St. Joseph, MI .....
Holland, MI .....................................
Jackson, MI ....................................
Kalamazoo, MI ...............................
Monroe, MI .....................................
Muskegon, MI .................................
Idaho ..................
Idaho ..................
Idaho ..................
Idaho ..................
Idaho ..................
Illinois .................
Illinois .................
Illinois .................
Illinois .................
Illinois .................
Illinois .................
Illinois .................
Illinois .................
Indiana ...............
Indiana ...............
Indiana ...............
Indiana ...............
Indiana ...............
Indiana ...............
Indiana ...............
Indiana ...............
Indiana ...............
Iowa ....................
Iowa ....................
Iowa ....................
Iowa ....................
Iowa ....................
Iowa ....................
Kansas ...............
Kansas ...............
Kentucky .............
Kentucky .............
Kentucky .............
Louisiana ............
Louisiana ............
Louisiana ............
Louisiana ............
Louisiana ............
Louisiana ............
Louisiana ............
Maine .................
Maine .................
Maine .................
Maryland .............
Passenger
miles per
capita
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
mile
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Vehicle
revenue
mile per
capita
Sfmt 4703
Vehicle
revenue
hour per
capita
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13911
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750]
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
mile
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
hour
Vehicle
revenue
mile per
capita
Vehicle
revenue
hour per
capita
Passenger
miles per
capita
Passenger
trips per
capita
Number of
performance factors met or
exceeded
STIC funding: @
$120,608
per factor
met or
exceeded
State
Urbanized area (UZA) description
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
Michigan .............
Minnesota ...........
Minnesota ...........
Minnesota ...........
Mississippi ..........
Mississippi ..........
Missouri ..............
Missouri ..............
Missouri ..............
Missouri ..............
Missouri ..............
Montana .............
Montana .............
Montana .............
N. Mariana Islands.
Nevada ...............
New Hampshire ..
New Hampshire ..
New Hampshire ..
New Hampshire ..
New Jersey ........
New Jersey ........
New Jersey ........
Port Huron, MI ................................
Saginaw, MI ....................................
South Lyon—Howell—Brighton, MI
Duluth, MN—WI .............................
Rochester, MN ...............................
St. Cloud, MN .................................
Hattiesburg, MS ..............................
Pascagoula, MS .............................
Columbia, MO ................................
Jefferson City, MO .........................
Joplin, MO ......................................
Lee’s Summit, MO ..........................
St. Joseph, MO—KS ......................
Billings, MT .....................................
Great Falls, MT ..............................
Missoula, MT ..................................
Saipan, MP .....................................
1.262
4.331
0.000
4.716
5.253
4.256
0.000
2.585
3.873
2.682
0.000
1.709
2.035
3.115
1.599
4.097
0.000
19.105
45.565
0.000
61.291
75.693
57.593
0.000
0.000
45.856
38.910
0.000
0.000
20.631
46.552
18.232
59.850
0.000
21.936
4.239
0.000
15.634
11.377
15.536
0.000
0.913
5.470
9.855
0.000
0.340
8.766
8.029
8.128
9.654
0.000
1.449
0.403
0.000
1.203
0.790
1.148
0.000
0.000
0.462
0.679
0.000
0.000
0.865
0.537
0.713
0.661
0.000
27.675
18.358
0.000
73.725
59.761
66.127
0.000
2.360
21.185
26.428
0.000
0.581
17.839
25.008
12.996
39.554
0.000
10.026
4.558
0.000
23.122
14.724
20.310
0.000
0.000
5.469
7.530
0.000
0.000
3.750
7.198
7.075
9.587
0.000
2
0
0
4
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
241,216
0
0
482,431
361,824
361,824
0
0
0
0
0
0
120,608
0
0
0
0
Carson City, NV .............................
Dover—Rochester, NH—ME ..........
Manchester, NH .............................
Nashua, NH—MA ...........................
Portsmouth, NH—ME .....................
Hightstown, NJ ...............................
Vineland, NJ ...................................
Wildwood—North Wildwood—Cape
May, NJ.
Farmington, NM ..............................
Las Cruces, NM .............................
Santa Fe, NM .................................
Binghamton, NY—PA .....................
Elmira, NY ......................................
Glens Falls, NY ..............................
Ithaca, NY .......................................
Kingston, NY ..................................
Middletown, NY ..............................
Saratoga Springs, NY ....................
Utica, NY ........................................
Burlington, NC ................................
Concord, NC ...................................
Gastonia, NC ..................................
Goldsboro, NC ................................
Greenville, NC ................................
Hickory, NC ....................................
High Point, NC ...............................
Jacksonville, NC .............................
Rocky Mount, NC ...........................
Wilmington, NC ..............................
Bismarck, ND .................................
Fargo, ND—MN ..............................
Grand Forks, ND—MN ...................
Lima, OH ........................................
Lorain—Elyria, OH .........................
Mansfield, OH .................................
Middletown, OH ..............................
Newark, OH ....................................
Sandusky, OH ................................
Springfield, OH ...............................
Weirton, WV—Steubenville, OH—
PA.
Lawton, OK .....................................
Norman, OK ...................................
Bend, OR ........................................
Corvallis, OR ..................................
Medford, OR ...................................
Altoona, PA ....................................
Erie, PA ..........................................
Hazleton, PA ..................................
Johnstown, PA ...............................
Lebanon, PA ...................................
Monessen, PA ................................
Pottstown, PA .................................
State College, PA ...........................
Uniontown—Connellsville, PA ........
Williamsport, PA .............................
York, PA .........................................
0.000
7.043
2.422
3.974
5.238
0.000
1.000
0.000
0.000
200.293
30.917
51.853
0.000
0.000
12.815
0.000
0.000
11.188
3.789
2.325
2.790
0.000
7.706
0.000
0.000
0.393
0.297
0.178
0.000
0.000
0.601
0.000
0.000
78.799
9.176
9.238
14.614
0.000
7.706
0.000
0.000
3.921
2.950
1.794
0.000
0.000
1.666
0.000
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
482,431
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
3.994
2.025
3.711
2.463
3.323
4.114
15.198
0.000
5.826
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.229
0.000
0.000
2.721
1.015
3.316
0.944
0.000
3.159
3.190
4.599
0.578
1.538
2.853
0.000
0.000
49.054
25.982
49.460
49.413
51.206
55.888
761.431
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
45.998
0.000
0.000
33.338
13.622
43.693
15.058
0.000
112.180
34.016
65.193
8.976
19.927
34.643
0.000
0.000
5.472
12.897
16.368
15.358
5.420
35.366
37.582
0.000
2.680
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.640
0.000
0.000
7.116
13.516
7.275
10.318
0.000
16.299
3.869
2.723
16.137
4.907
2.889
0.000
0.000
0.446
1.005
1.228
0.765
0.352
2.603
0.750
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.322
0.000
0.000
0.581
1.007
0.552
0.647
0.000
0.459
0.363
0.192
1.040
0.379
0.238
0.000
0.000
21.855
26.112
60.741
37.821
18.009
145.491
571.166
0.000
15.616
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
14.802
0.000
0.000
19.363
13.719
24.124
9.738
0.000
51.489
12.339
12.523
9.331
7.547
8.242
0.000
0.000
6.431
7.556
18.853
8.935
5.009
58.887
8.743
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.357
0.000
0.000
7.643
3.750
8.410
5.550
0.000
4.421
4.090
2.477
3.358
1.755
3.452
0.000
0
0
2
3
2
0
4
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
361,824
241,216
0
482,431
603,039
0
120,608
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
0
0
0
241,216
0
0
241,216
0
0
0
2.437
4.961
0.000
0.000
3.065
3.895
3.512
0.000
7.474
0.000
13.967
0.000
10.498
2.255
7.269
3.332
35.614
57.268
0.000
0.000
35.614
51.980
42.414
0.000
82.666
0.000
275.664
0.000
107.483
43.590
113.177
42.664
6.546
5.082
0.000
0.000
7.111
6.838
13.364
0.000
9.135
0.000
15.981
0.000
16.299
16.953
12.912
10.778
0.448
0.440
0.000
0.000
0.612
0.512
1.107
0.000
0.826
0.000
0.810
0.000
1.592
0.877
0.829
0.842
15.951
25.210
0.000
0.000
21.793
26.631
46.937
0.000
68.280
0.000
223.212
0.000
171.115
38.229
93.853
35.916
2.944
11.149
0.000
0.000
10.218
8.142
14.458
0.000
16.500
0.000
6.348
0.000
84.811
4.163
21.403
8.523
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
5
0
6
2
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
361,824
0
361,824
0
603,039
0
723,646
241,216
723,646
120,608
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
New Mexico ........
New Mexico ........
New Mexico ........
New York ............
New York ............
New York ............
New York ............
New York ............
New York ............
New York ............
New York ............
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Carolina ....
North Dakota ......
North Dakota ......
North Dakota ......
Ohio ....................
Ohio ....................
Ohio ....................
Ohio ....................
Ohio ....................
Ohio ....................
Ohio ....................
Ohio ....................
Oklahoma ...........
Oklahoma ...........
Oregon ...............
Oregon ...............
Oregon ...............
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
Pennsylvania ......
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13912
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750]
State
Urbanized area (UZA) description
Puerto Rico ........
Puerto Rico ........
Puerto Rico ........
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Rico
Rico
Rico
Rico
Rico
........
........
........
........
........
Puerto Rico ........
South Carolina ...
South Carolina ...
South Carolina ...
South Carolina ...
South Carolina ...
South Carolina ...
South Carolina ...
South Dakota .....
South Dakota .....
Tennessee ..........
Tennessee ..........
Tennessee ..........
Tennessee ..........
Tennessee ..........
Tennessee ..........
Tennessee ..........
Tennessee ..........
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Texas .................
Utah ....................
Utah ....................
Vermont ..............
Virgin Islands ......
Virginia ...............
Virginia ...............
Virginia ...............
Virginia ...............
Virginia ...............
Virginia ...............
Virginia ...............
Virginia ...............
Washington ........
Washington ........
Washington ........
Washington ........
Washington ........
Washington ........
Washington ........
Washington ........
Washington ........
West Virginia ......
West Virginia ......
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Passenger
trips per
capita
Number of
performance factors met or
exceeded
STIC funding: @
$120,608
per factor
met or
exceeded
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
0.000
49.005
0.000
17.376
0.000
8.842
31.545
5.780
9.870
0.000
8.544
0.000
11.140
4.374
0.000
0.000
0.296
9.894
4.882
6.096
5.245
6.826
16.687
0.283
6.495
1.380
11.315
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.105
2.780
5.438
6.888
0.000
0.000
13.093
0.000
0.000
5.992
4.880
0.000
10.754
0.000
14.331
0.000
12.573
16.451
6.207
6.073
9.156
11.470
10.001
0.000
24.068
33.516
50.971
5.856
9.283
18.337
31.193
30.350
12.519
16.392
6.202
0.000
0.000
2.062
0.000
0.894
0.000
0.532
1.600
0.487
0.793
0.000
0.532
0.000
0.825
0.394
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.714
0.311
0.437
0.456
0.335
1.470
0.000
0.414
0.000
1.093
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.394
0.180
0.392
0.417
0.000
0.000
0.427
0.000
0.000
0.450
0.356
0.000
0.906
0.000
1.067
0.000
1.275
1.195
0.434
0.395
0.884
0.763
0.738
0.000
1.761
1.795
2.313
0.511
0.000
1.041
1.696
1.669
0.809
0.976
0.423
0.000
0.000
154.059
0.000
33.411
0.000
33.192
57.515
15.597
26.206
0.000
30.086
0.000
33.257
14.250
0.000
0.000
2.128
24.320
8.623
21.218
85.964
9.613
22.614
0.260
12.900
2.761
69.573
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
8.127
12.160
14.027
0.000
0.000
26.110
0.000
0.000
0.000
21.668
0.000
50.478
0.000
61.670
0.000
0.522
76.658
6.006
25.120
49.699
63.424
46.597
0.000
129.709
163.367
343.693
24.665
48.307
0.000
180.913
154.813
47.488
59.487
19.762
0.000
0.000
9.948
0.000
5.704
0.000
4.622
5.492
3.823
6.659
0.000
5.265
0.000
6.949
3.909
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.667
2.161
4.820
10.111
4.643
16.695
0.000
2.590
0.000
22.498
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.812
1.196
2.047
2.420
0.000
0.000
1.091
0.000
0.000
2.597
3.723
0.000
19.840
0.000
18.301
0.000
41.869
17.780
4.356
3.385
21.843
11.329
9.954
0.000
41.983
29.793
28.448
6.044
0.000
6.933
23.426
14.543
10.799
11.786
4.101
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
3
4
0
0
2
2
1
0
4
4
6
0
0
2
6
4
2
2
0
0
0
361,824
0
241,216
0
0
241,216
0
120,608
0
0
0
241,216
0
0
0
120,608
0
0
0
361,824
0
361,824
0
0
0
482,431
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
120,608
0
0
0
0
0
241,216
0
361,824
0
361,824
482,431
0
0
241,216
241,216
120,608
0
482,431
482,431
723,647
0
0
241,216
723,647
482,431
241,216
241,216
0
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
hour
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
3.144
0.000
1.923
0.000
3.754
1.823
2.698
2.655
0.000
3.521
0.000
2.985
3.258
0.000
0.000
7.178
2.458
1.766
3.481
16.391
1.408
1.355
0.919
1.986
2.001
6.149
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.923
2.236
2.037
0.000
0.000
1.994
0.000
0.000
0.000
4.440
0.000
4.694
0.000
4.303
0.000
0.042
4.660
0.968
4.136
5.428
5.530
4.659
0.000
5.389
4.874
6.743
4.212
5.204
0.000
5.800
5.101
3.793
3.629
3.187
0.000
0.000
74.706
0.000
37.376
0.000
62.435
35.954
32.025
33.059
0.000
56.530
0.000
40.313
36.171
0.000
0.000
0.000
34.052
27.759
48.579
188.614
28.726
15.379
0.000
31.134
0.000
63.678
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
45.102
31.010
33.628
0.000
0.000
61.129
0.000
0.000
0.000
60.950
0.000
55.718
0.000
57.819
0.000
0.410
64.138
13.828
63.583
56.195
83.076
63.125
0.000
73.671
91.030
148.616
48.298
0.000
0.000
106.663
92.754
58.670
60.941
46.737
Arecibo, PR ....................................
Fajardo, PR ....................................
Florida—Barceloneta—Bajadero,
PR.
Guayama, PR .................................
Juana Diaz, PR ..............................
Mayaguez, PR ................................
Ponce, PR ......................................
San
German—Cabo
Rojo—
Sabana Grande, PR.
Yauco, PR ......................................
Anderson, SC .................................
Florence, SC ..................................
Mauldin-Simpsonville, SC ..............
Myrtle Beach, SC ...........................
Rock Hill, SC ..................................
Spartanburg, SC .............................
Sumter, SC .....................................
Rapid City, SD ................................
Sioux Falls, SD ...............................
Bristol, TN—Bristol, VA ..................
Clarksville, TN—KY ........................
Cleveland, TN .................................
Jackson, TN ...................................
Johnson City, TN ............................
Kingsport, TN—VA .........................
Morristown, TN ...............................
Murfreesboro, TN ...........................
Abilene, TX .....................................
Amarillo, TX ....................................
Beaumont, TX ................................
Brownsville, TX ...............................
College Station—Bryan, TX ...........
Galveston, TX .................................
Harlingen, TX .................................
Killeen, TX ......................................
Lake Jackson—Angleton, TX .........
Laredo, TX ......................................
Longview, TX ..................................
McKinney, TX .................................
Midland, TX ....................................
Odessa, TX ....................................
Port Arthur, TX ...............................
San Angelo, TX ..............................
Sherman, TX ..................................
Temple, TX .....................................
Texarkana, TX—Texarkana, AR ....
Texas City, TX ................................
The Woodlands, TX .......................
Tyler, TX .........................................
Victoria, TX .....................................
Waco, TX ........................................
Wichita Falls, TX ............................
Logan, UT .......................................
St. George, UT ...............................
Burlington, VT .................................
Virgin Islands ..................................
Blacksburg, VA ...............................
Charlottesville, VA ..........................
Danville, VA ....................................
Fredericksburg, VA .........................
Harrisonburg, VA ............................
Lynchburg, VA ................................
Roanoke, VA ..................................
Winchester, VA ...............................
Bellingham, WA ..............................
Bremerton, WA ...............................
Kennewick—Richland, WA .............
Longview, WA—OR .......................
Marysville, WA ................................
Mount Vernon, WA .........................
Olympia—Lacey, WA .....................
Wenatchee, WA .............................
Yakima, WA ....................................
Charleston, WV ..............................
Huntington, WV—KY—OH .............
Puerto
Puerto
Puerto
Puerto
Puerto
Passenger
miles per
capita
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
mile
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Vehicle
revenue
mile per
capita
Sfmt 4703
Vehicle
revenue
hour per
capita
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13913
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 6.—FY 2007 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Total funding available for apportionment = $36,061,750]
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
mile
Passenger
miles per
vehicle
revenue
hour
Vehicle
revenue
mile per
capita
Vehicle
revenue
hour per
capita
Passenger
miles per
capita
Passenger
trips per
capita
Number of
performance factors met or
exceeded
STIC funding: @
$120,608
per factor
met or
exceeded
State
Urbanized area (UZA) description
West Virginia ......
West Virginia ......
West Virginia ......
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wisconsin ...........
Wyoming ............
Wyoming ............
Morgantown, WV ............................
Parkersburg, WV—OH ...................
Wheeling, WV—OH ........................
Appleton, WI ...................................
Beloit, WI-IL ....................................
Eau Claire, WI ................................
Fond du Lac, WI .............................
Green Bay, WI ................................
Janesville, WI .................................
Kenosha, WI ...................................
La Crosse, WI—MN .......................
Oshkosh, WI ...................................
Racine, WI ......................................
Sheboygan, WI ...............................
Wausau, WI ....................................
Casper, WY ....................................
Cheyenne, WY ...............................
0.246
0.000
2.672
3.362
2.809
3.212
0.000
3.555
3.951
5.066
3.332
2.906
4.294
2.687
3.426
1.000
1.520
4.153
0.000
33.877
51.983
45.416
47.703
0.000
52.536
61.073
74.233
45.203
45.383
58.394
33.331
50.537
12.032
22.089
11.403
0.000
8.607
9.456
6.251
16.319
7.694
10.398
7.152
10.673
12.191
16.840
9.696
10.450
11.298
5.675
7.253
0.676
0.000
0.679
0.612
0.387
1.099
0.628
0.704
0.463
0.728
0.899
1.078
0.713
0.842
0.766
0.472
0.499
2.806
0.000
23.002
31.790
17.559
52.412
0.000
36.963
28.259
54.073
40.626
48.932
41.631
28.076
38.709
5.675
11.025
7.006
0.000
5.737
6.161
4.850
14.366
3.752
9.781
7.840
14.949
12.520
15.821
11.738
7.943
12.237
1.651
2.842
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
0
0
120,608
0
0
0
0
361,824
0
0
0
120,608
241,216
361,824
0
120,608
241,216
0
0
Total ............
.........................................................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
299
$36,061,750
TABLE 7.—URBANIZED AREAS 200,000 OR MORE IN POPULATION ELIGIBLE TO USE SECTION 5307 FUNDS FOR
OPERATING ASSISTANCE
State
2000 Census urbanized area description
AL ........
CA .......
CA .......
Huntsville, AL .............................................................................................................
Antioch, CA ................................................................................................................
Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA ................................................................
(Indio—Coachella, CA—$621,797)
(Palm Springs, CA—$1,227,811)
Lancaster—Palmdale, CA ..........................................................................................
Santa Rosa, CA .........................................................................................................
Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ...................................................................
Temecula—Murrieta, CA ...........................................................................................
Fort Collins, CO .........................................................................................................
Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY .................................................................................
(Stamford, CT—NY—5,332,860)
(Norwalk, CT—$4,343,565)
Hartford, CT ...............................................................................................................
(Bristol, CT—$983,277)
(New Britain, CT—$1,841,176)
Port St. Lucie, FL .......................................................................................................
(Fort Pierce, FL—$1,142,501)
(Stuart, FL—$839,705)
Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ......................................................................................
Tallahassee, FL .........................................................................................................
Savannah, GA ............................................................................................................
Boise City, ID .............................................................................................................
Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI .................................................
Chicago, IL—IN ..........................................................................................................
(Aurora, IL—$2,290,318)
(Crystal Lake, IL—$746,464)
(Elgin, IL—$1,652,124)
(Joliet, IL—$1,910,334)
Evansville, IN—KY .....................................................................................................
Barnstable Town, MA ................................................................................................
Boston, MA—NH—RI ................................................................................................
(Brockton, MA—$1,906,558)
(Lowell, MA—NH—2,366,926)
(Taunton, MA—$487,189)
Baltimore, MD ............................................................................................................
(Annapolis, MD—$858,335)
Springfield, MO ..........................................................................................................
Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ...................................................................................................
Winston-Salem, NC ...................................................................................................
Asheville, NC .............................................................................................................
CA .......
CA .......
CA .......
CA .......
CO .......
CT ........
CT ........
FL ........
FL ........
FL ........
GA .......
ID .........
IL .........
IL .........
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
IN .........
MA .......
MA .......
MD .......
MO
MS
NC
NC
.......
.......
.......
.......
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
FY 2002
Apportionment
FY 2007
Apportionment
operating limitation a
213,253
217,591
254,856
$1,677,473
1,914,688
1,849,608
$419,368
478,672
462,402
263,532
285,408
200,436
229,810
206,757
888,890
2,206,544
2,636,339
1,311,837
1,156,197
9,676,425
551,636
659,085
327,959
311,908
289,049
2,419,106
851,535
2,824,453
706,113
270,774
1,982,206
495,552
221,251
204,260
208,886
272,625
226,848
8,307,904
954,953
1,617,975
1,824,225
2,021,464
1,088,609
6,599,240
238,738
404,494
456,056
505,366
272,152
1,649,810
211,989
243,667
4,032,484
2,251,898
538,120
4,760,673
562,975
134,530
1,190,168
2,076,354
858,335
214,584
215,004
205,754
299,290
221,570
1,748,930
1,687,127
1,811,413
968,044
437,233
421,782
452,853
242,011
Population
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
13914
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 7.—URBANIZED AREAS 200,000 OR MORE IN POPULATION ELIGIBLE TO USE SECTION 5307 FUNDS FOR
OPERATING ASSISTANCE—Continued
State
2000 Census urbanized area description
NC .......
NE .......
NJ ........
NY .......
Greensboro, NC .........................................................................................................
Lincoln, NE .................................................................................................................
Atlantic City, NJ .........................................................................................................
Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY .................................................................................
(Poughkeepsie, NY—$1,507,504)
(Newburgh, NY—$717,643)
Youngstown, OH—PA ...............................................................................................
(Sharon, PA—OH—$465,043)
Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN ............................................................................................
(Hamilton, OH—$1,384,842)
Eugene, OR ...............................................................................................................
Salem, OR .................................................................................................................
Reading, PA ...............................................................................................................
Lancaster, PA ............................................................................................................
Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ...................................................................
San Juan, PR .............................................................................................................
(Caguas, PR—$2,811,557)
(Cayey, PR—$831,273)
(Humacao, PR—$719,451)
(Vega Baja—Manati, PR—$1,562,942)
Providence, RI—MA ..................................................................................................
(Newport, RI—$644,329)
(Fall River, MA—RI—$2,051,153)
Lubbock, TX ...............................................................................................................
Denton—Lewisville, TX ..............................................................................................
(Denton, TX—$599,570)
(Lewisville, TX—$692,152)
Richmond, VA ............................................................................................................
(Petersburg, VA—$1,016,957)
OH .......
OH .......
OR .......
OR .......
PA ........
PA ........
PR .......
PR .......
RI .........
TX ........
TX ........
VA ........
FY 2002
Apportionment
FY 2007
Apportionment
operating limitation a
267,884
226,582
227,180
351,982
2,211,540
2,658,761
1,842,968
2,225,147
552,885
664,690
460,742
556,287
417,437
465,043
116,261
1,503,262
1,384,842
346,211
224,049
207,229
240,264
323,554
299,086
2,216,616
2,559,936
2,070,221
2,636,837
2,258,871
1,148,984
5,925,223
639,984
517,555
659,209
564,718
287,246
1,481,306
1,174,548
2,695,482
673,871
202,225
299,823
1,939,424
1,291,722
484,856
322,931
818,836
1,016,957
254,239
Population
a The amount shown represents the maximum amount allowable, in accordance with section 5307(b)(2), based on funding provided in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007. In cases where an urbanized area’s FY 2007 apportionment is less than the maximum, FTA will set the
operating assistance budget, in TEAM-Web, at an amount not to exceed the FY 2007 aortionment.
Note: For informational purposes, the affected 1990 census small urbanized areas (less than 200,000 population) that were merged into an
existing urbanized area of at least 200,000 population are shown in parentheses immediately below the eligible 2000 census urbanized area.
FTA is unable to identify the urbanized areas which now incorporate rural areas that received Section 5311 in FY 2002 and they are not included
in this table.
TABLE 8.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS
SAFETEA–LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
California .................
E2007–CLNF–001 ..............
611
Colorado ..................
Delaware .................
E2007–CLNF–002 ..............
E2007–CLNF–003 ..............
519
517
Delaware .................
Georgia ...................
E2007–CLNF–004 ..............
E2007–CLNF–005 ..............
648
578
Kentucky .................
E2007–CLNF–006 ..............
640
Kentucky .................
E2007–CLNF–007 ..............
641
New Mexico ............
Nevada ....................
New York ................
Ohio .........................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–CLNF–008
E2007–CLNF–009
E2007–CLNF–010
E2007–CLNF–011
..............
..............
..............
..............
497
612
557
659
Rhode Island ...........
Tennessee ..............
E2007–CLNF–012 ..............
E2007–CLNF–013 ..............
631
605
Texas ......................
Texas ......................
Texas ......................
E2007–CLNF–014 ..............
E2007–CLNF–015 ..............
E2007–CLNF–016 ..............
614
575
638
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Unobligated
allocation
Project
San Joaquin Region Transit District, California, Hybrid
Diesel—Electric Replacement Buses.
Denver Regional Transit District—Bus Replacements ...
Delaware Statewide Bus and Bus Replacement (with
Clean Fuel (hybrid) vehicles)).
University of Delaware Fuel Cell Bus Program ..............
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority—Clean
Fuel Buses.
Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky—TANK Bus Replacement Project.
Transit Authority of River City—New Hybrid Electric
Bus.
Santa Fe, NM, Trails Bus and Bus Facilities ..................
Lake Tahoe, NV, MPO Bus Replacement ......................
Westchester, NY, Bee Line Bus Replacement ...............
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority—Bus Replacements.
Rhode Island, Statewide Bus and Van Replacement ....
Sevierville County, TN, Transportation Board—Alternative Fuel Buses.
City of El Paso—Sun Metro—Bus Replacements ..........
METRO of Harris County—Discretionary Bus Program
The District, The Woodlands, TX—Bus Replacement
Program.
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$250,000
952,000
2,000,000
165,000
2,380,000
476,000
714,000
714,000
500,000
1,000,000
500,000
714,000
5,500,000
238,000
2,380,000
238,000
13915
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 8.—FISCAL YEAR 2007 SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
Unobligated
allocation
Project
Total Allocation .............................................................................................................................................................................
a Funds
a 18,721,000
in the amount of $26,279,000 were transferred to the Bus and Bus Facilities program.
TABLE 9.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS ALLOCATIONS
State
Earmark ID
Project location and description
FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations:
CO ........ E2006–CLNF–001 ............................
DE ........ E2006–CLNF–002 ............................
Unobligated
allocation
Denver Regional Transit District—Bus Replacements ...............................
Delaware Statewide Bus and Bus Replacement (with Clean Fuel (hybrid)
vehicles)).
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority—Clean Fuel Buses ..............
Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky—TANK Bus Replacement Project
Transit Authority of River City—New Hybrid Electric Bus ..........................
Lake Tahoe, NV MPO Bus Replacement ...................................................
Westchester, NY, Bee Line Bus Replacement ...........................................
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority—Bus Replacements ..............
Rhode Island, Statewide Bus and Van Replacement ................................
The District, The Woodlands, TX—Bus Replacement Program ................
City of El Paso—Sun Metro—Bus Replacements ......................................
METRO of Harris County—Discretionary Bus Program .............................
$906,840
1,732,500
Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................
16,529,040
GA ........
KY ........
KY ........
NV ........
NY ........
OH ........
RI ..........
TX .........
TX .........
TX .........
E2006–CLNF–004
E2006–CLNF–005
E2006–CLNF–006
E2006–CLNF–009
E2006–CLNF–010
E2006–CLNF–011
E2006–CLNF–012
E2006–CLNF–015
E2006–CLNF–007
E2006–CLNF–014
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
2,268,090
453,420
680,130
990,000
445,500
680,130
5,197,500
226,710
680,130
2,268,090
TABLE 10.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION APPORTIONMENTS
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
Area
Alaska ......................................................................................
Arizona .....................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
Colorado ..................................................................................
Connecticut ..............................................................................
Connecticut ..............................................................................
District of Columbia .................................................................
Florida ......................................................................................
Florida ......................................................................................
Florida ......................................................................................
Florida ......................................................................................
Georgia ....................................................................................
Hawaii ......................................................................................
Illinois .......................................................................................
Illinois .......................................................................................
Indiana .....................................................................................
Louisiana ..................................................................................
Maryland ..................................................................................
Maryland ..................................................................................
Massachusetts .........................................................................
Massachusetts .........................................................................
Michigan ...................................................................................
Minnesota ................................................................................
Missouri ....................................................................................
Missouri ....................................................................................
New Jersey ..............................................................................
New Jersey ..............................................................................
New Jersey ..............................................................................
Anchorage, AK-Alaska Railroad ..............................................
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ ...................................................................
Antioch, CA .............................................................................
Concord, CA ............................................................................
Lancaster-Palmdale, CA .........................................................
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA ...............................
Mission Viejo, CA ....................................................................
Oxnard, CA ..............................................................................
Riverside-San Bernardino, CA ................................................
Sacramento, CA ......................................................................
San Diego, CA ........................................................................
San Francisco-Oakland, CA ....................................................
San Jose, CA ..........................................................................
Stockton, CA ...........................................................................
Thousand Oaks, CA ................................................................
Denver-Aurora, CO .................................................................
Hartford, CT .............................................................................
Southwestern Connecticut ......................................................
Washington, DC-VA-MD .........................................................
Jacksonville, FL .......................................................................
Miami, FL .................................................................................
Orlando, FL .............................................................................
Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL .......................................................
Atlanta, GA ..............................................................................
Honolulu, HI .............................................................................
Chicago, IL–IN .........................................................................
Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL–WI ................
South Bend, IN-MI ...................................................................
New Orleans, LA .....................................................................
Baltimore Commuter Rail ........................................................
Baltimore, MD ..........................................................................
Boston, MA ..............................................................................
Worcester, MA–CT ..................................................................
Detroit, MI ................................................................................
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN ........................................................
Kansas City, MO–KS ..............................................................
St. Louis, MO–IL .....................................................................
Atlantic City, NJ .......................................................................
Northeastern New Jersey ........................................................
Trenton, NJ ..............................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
Apportionment
23MRN2
$15,304,279
2,727,749
2,397,573
14,827,853
2,472,963
47,162,438
1,669,337
1,361,410
4,674,142
4,217,137
17,096,411
78,470,061
15,813,901
1,858,672
749,991
3,817,847
1,857,763
42,377,921
88,798,182
339,321
23,791,654
194,236
153,077
31,502,427
1,469,728
158,124,928
2,661,899
929,785
3,344,890
21,514,734
10,875,752
82,507,419
1,196,344
633,165
9,206,554
36,707
4,511,230
1,344,854
98,770,666
1,817,555
13916
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 10.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
State
Area
Apportionment
New York .................................................................................
New York .................................................................................
New York .................................................................................
North Carolina ..........................................................................
Ohio .........................................................................................
Ohio .........................................................................................
Oregon .....................................................................................
Pennsylvania ............................................................................
Pennsylvania ............................................................................
Pennsylvania ............................................................................
Puerto Rico ..............................................................................
Rhode Island ............................................................................
Tennessee ...............................................................................
Tennessee ...............................................................................
Texas .......................................................................................
Texas .......................................................................................
Virginia .....................................................................................
Washington ..............................................................................
West Virginia ............................................................................
Wisconsin .................................................................................
Wisconsin .................................................................................
Buffalo, NY ..............................................................................
New York .................................................................................
Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY ...............................................
Charlotte, NC–SC ....................................................................
Cleveland, OH .........................................................................
Dayton, OH ..............................................................................
Portland, OR–WA ....................................................................
Harrisburg, PA .........................................................................
Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD .................................................
Pittsburgh, PA .........................................................................
San Juan, PR ..........................................................................
Providence, RI-MA ..................................................................
Chattanooga, TN–GA ..............................................................
Memphis, TN–MS–AR .............................................................
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ..............................................
Houston, TX ............................................................................
Virginia Beach, VA ..................................................................
Seattle, WA .............................................................................
Morgantown, WV .....................................................................
Madison, WI ............................................................................
Milwaukee, WI .........................................................................
1,433,849
413,117,471
2,602,812
193,962
13,568,489
6,101,723
8,508,419
900,502
103,056,750
21,369,178
2,695,830
2,817,164
99,359
442,377
7,350,589
9,430,395
1,430,582
31,857,041
2,772,852
869,698
318,403
Total ..................................................................................
..................................................................................................
$1,433,520,000
TABLE 11.—FY 2007 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION PROGRAM APPORTIONMENT FORMULA
Tier 1 ............
Tier 2 ............
Tier 3 ............
Tier 4 ............
Tier 5 ............
Tier 6 ............
Tier 7 ............
First $497,7000,000 to the following areas:
Baltimore ..........................................................................
$8,372,000
Boston ..............................................................................
38,948,000
Chicago/NW. Indiana .......................................................
78,169,000
Cleveland .........................................................................
9,509,500
New Orleans ....................................................................
1,730,588
New York .........................................................................
176,034,461
NE. New Jersey ...............................................................
50,604,653
Philadelphia/So. New Jersey ...........................................
58,924,764
Pittsburgh .........................................................................
13,662,463
San Francisco ..................................................................
33,989,571
SW. Connecticut ..............................................................
27,755,000
Next $70,000,000 as follows: Tier 2(A): 50 percent is allocated to areas identified in Tier 1; Tier 2(B): 50 percent is allocated to
other urbanized areas with fixed guideway tiers in operation at least seven years. Funds are allocated by the Urbanized Area
Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors that were used to apportion funds for the fixed guideway modernization
program in FY 1997.
Next $5,700,000 as follows: Pittsburgh 61.76%; Cleveland 10.73%; New Orleans 5.79%; and 21.72% is allocated to all other
areas in Tier 2(B) by the same fixed guideway tier formula factors used in fiscal year 1997.
Next $186,600,000 as follows: All eligible areas using the same year fixed guideway tier formula factors used in fiscal year 1997.
Next $70,000,000 as follows: 65% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 35% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors. Any segment that is less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database.
Next $50,000,000 as follows: 60% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 40% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway tier formula factors. Any segment less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database.
Remaining amounts as follows: 50% to the 11 areas identified in Tier 1, and 50% to all other areas using the most current Urbanized Area Formula Program fixed guideway formula factors. Any segment that is less than 7 years old in the year of the apportionment will be deleted from the database.
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
Earmark ID
AK ............
AK ............
AK ............
E2007–BUSP–0001 .........
E2007–BUSP–0002 .........
E2007–BUSP–0003 .........
427
466
422
AK ............
E2007–BUSP–0004 .........
425
AK ............
AK ............
AK ............
E2007–BUSP–0005 .........
E2007–BUSP–0006 .........
E2007–BUSP–0007 .........
541
416
436
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal parking facility ......................
Anchorage-Transit Needs .......................................................................
C Street Expanded bus facility and inter-modal parking garage, Anchorage, AK.
CITC Non-profit Services Center inter-modal parking facility, Anchorage, AK.
Hoonah, AK–Intermodal Ferry Dock ......................................................
Improve marine inter-modal facilities in Ketchikan ................................
Intermodal facility improvements at the Port of Anchorage ...................
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$1,200,000
238,000
1,200,000
720,000
476,000
3,360,000
6,000,000
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13917
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
............
............
............
............
............
E2007–BUSP–0008
E2007–BUSP–0009
E2007–BUSP–0010
E2007–BUSP–0011
E2007–BUSP–0012
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
236
550
553
574
423
AK
AK
AK
AK
AL
AL
AL
............
............
............
............
.............
.............
.............
E2007–BUSP–0013
E2007–BUSP–0014
E2007–BUSP–0015
E2007–BUSP–0016
E2007–BUSP–0017
E2007–BUSP–0018
E2007–BUSP–0019
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
596
597
616
664
461
462
437
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
E2007–BUSP–0020 .........
E2007–BUSP–0021 .........
E2007–BUSP–0022 .........
469
98
496
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AL .............
AR ............
AR ............
AR ............
AZ .............
AZ .............
E2007–BUSP–0023
E2007–BUSP–0024
E2007–BUSP–0025
E2007–BUSP–0026
E2007–BUSP–0027
E2007–BUSP–0028
E2007–BUSP–0029
E2007–BUSP–0030
E2007–BUSP–0031
E2007–BUSP–0032
E2007–BUSP–0033
E2007–BUSP–0034
E2007–BUSP–0035
E2007–BUSP–0036
E2007–BUSP–0037
E2007–BUSP–0038
E2007–BUSP–0039
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
501
503
504
507
528
534
582
644
645
646
647
650
487
231
263
304
229
AZ .............
E2007–BUSP–0040 .........
47
AZ .............
AZ .............
AZ .............
AZ .............
CA ............
CA ............
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0041
E2007–BUSP–0042
E2007–BUSP–0043
E2007–BUSP–0044
E2007–BUSP–0045
E2007–BUSP–0046
E2007–BUSP–0047
E2007–BUSP–0048
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
346
150
26
203
75
288
398
76
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0049 .........
227
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0050 .........
119
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0051 .........
396
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
E2007–BUSP–0052
E2007–BUSP–0053
E2007–BUSP–0054
E2007–BUSP–0055
E2007–BUSP–0056
E2007–BUSP–0057
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
190
132
407
108
54
155
CA ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
E2007–BUSP–0058 .........
158
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0059 .........
207
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0060 .........
17
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0061 .........
11
............
............
............
............
............
............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Juneau, Alaska-transit bus acquisition and transit center .....................
Juneau-Transit Bus Acquisition and Transit Center ..............................
Ketchikan, Alaska-Transit Needs ...........................................................
Matsu, Alaska-Transit Needs .................................................................
Morris Thompson Cultural and Visitors Center intermodal parking facility, Fairbanks, AK.
North Slope Borough, AK–Transit Purposes .........................................
North Star Borough, AK–Transit Purposes ............................................
Sitka, Alaska-Transit Needs ...................................................................
Wrangell, AK–Ferry Infrastructure ..........................................................
Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind-Bus project ..................................
Alabama State Port Authority-Choctaw Point Terminal .........................
American Village/Montevallo, Alabama construction of closed loop Access Road, bus lanes and parking facility.
Auburn University-Intermodal Parking Garage ......................................
Birmingham, AL Expansion of Downtown Intermodal Facility, Phase II
City of Birmingham, AL–Birmingham Downtown Intermodal Terminal,
Phase II.
City of Huntsville, AL-Cummings Park Intermodal Center .....................
City of Montgomery, AL–ITS Acquisition and Implementation ..............
City of Montgomery, AL–Montgomery Airport Intermodal Center ..........
City of Tuscaloosa, AL–Intermodal Facility ............................................
Gadsden, AL–Community Buses ...........................................................
Gulf Shores, AL–Community Bases .......................................................
Mobile County, AL Commission-Bus project ..........................................
University of Alabama in Birmingham Intermodal Facility .....................
University of Alabama in Huntsville Intermodal Facility .........................
University of Alabama Intermodal Facility South ...................................
University of Alabama Transit System ...................................................
US Space and Rocket Center, AL–Tramway Expansion ......................
Central Arkansas Transit Authority Facility Upgrades ...........................
Harrison, Arkansas-Trolley Barn ............................................................
Wilmar, AR Develop the Southeast Arkansas Intermodal Facility .........
Coconino County buses and bus facilities for Flagstaff, AZ ..................
Coconino County, Arizona-Bus and bus facilities for the Sedona Transit System.
Phoenix, AZ Construct City of Phoenix para-transit facility (Dial-ARide).
Phoenix, AZ Construct metro bus facility in Phoenix’s West Valley ......
Phoenix, AZ Construct regional heavy bus maintenance facility ...........
Scottsdale, Arizona-Plan, design, and construct intermodal center ......
Tempe, Arizona-Construct East Valley Metro Bus Facility ....................
Alameda County, CA AC Transit Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project ...
Alameda County, CA AC Transit Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project ...
Amador County, California-Regional Transit Center ..............................
Baldwin Park, CA Construct vehicle and bicycle parking lot and pedestrian rest area at transit center.
Berkeley, CA Construct Ed Roberts Campus Intermodal Transit Disability Center.
Burbank, CA CNG Transit Vehicles Purchase for Local Transit Network Expansion.
Burbank, CA Construction of Empire Area Transit Center near Burbank Airport.
Calexico, CA Purchase new buses for the Calexico Transit System ....
Carson, CA Purchase one bus ..............................................................
Carson, CA Purchase one trolley-bus vehicle .......................................
Carson, CA Purchase two transfer facility .............................................
City of Alameda, CA Plan, design, and construct intermodal facility ....
City of Livermore, CA Construct Bus Facility for Livermore Amador
Valley Transit Authority.
Covina, El Monte, Baldwin Park, Upland, CA Parking and Electronic
Signage Improvements.
Culver City, CA Purchase compressed natural gas buses and expand
natural gas fueling facility.
Davis, CA Davis Multi-Modal Station to improve entrance to Amtrak
Depot and parking lot, provide additional parking and improve service.
Development of Gold Country Stage Transit Transfer Center, Nevada
County, CA.
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
360,000
357,000
60,000
119,000
600,000
476,000
238,000
60,000
238,000
119,000
4,760,000
80,256
a/ 952,000
401,280
1,190,000
1,190,000
952,000
952,000
1,428,000
119,000
238,000
119,000
1,666,000
1,428,000
2,142,000
357,000
238,000
550,000
8,026
401,280
250,800
190,608
200,640
1,003,200
200,640
501,600
1,304,160
100,320
401,280
200,640
401,280
601,920
90,288
50,160
60,192
50,160
50,160
100,320
401,280
451,440
351,120
742,368
200,640
186,659
13918
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0062 .........
339
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0063 .........
101
CA ............
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0064 .........
E2007–BUSP–0065 .........
E2007–BUSP–0066 .........
222
387
260
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0067 .........
E2007–BUSP–0068 .........
212
1
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0069 .........
E2007–BUSP–0070 .........
414
276
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0071 .........
E2007–BUSP–0072 .........
332
295
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0073 .........
E2007–BUSP–0074 .........
410
443
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0075 .........
E2007–BUSP–0076 .........
140
223
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0077 .........
307
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0078 .........
121
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0079 .........
326
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0080 .........
E2007–BUSP–0081 .........
36
6
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0082 .........
E2007–BUSP–0083 .........
567
566
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0084 .........
E2007–BUSP–0085 .........
311
112
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0086 .........
E2007–BUSP–0087 .........
266
285
CA
CA
CA
CA
E2007–BUSP–0088
E2007–BUSP–0089
E2007–BUSP–0090
E2007–BUSP–0091
.........
.........
.........
.........
39
200
321
191
CA ............
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0092 .........
E2007–BUSP–0093 .........
E2007–BUSP–0094 .........
375
43
92
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0095 .........
392
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0096 .........
352
CA ............
CA ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0097 .........
E2007–BUSP–0098 .........
173
194
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0099 .........
E2007–BUSP–0100 .........
244
366
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0101 .........
E2007–BUSP–0102 .........
45
70
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0103 .........
E2007–BUSP–0104 .........
399
116
............
............
............
............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
East San Diego County, California-Bus Maintenance Facility Expansion.
Emeryville, CA Expand & Improve Inter-modal Transit Center at Amtrak Station.
Escondido, CA-Construct Bus Maintenance Facility ..............................
Fresno, CA–Develop program of low-emission transit vehicles ............
Gardena, CA Purchase of alternative fuel buses for service expansion, on-board security system and bus facility training equipment.
Glendale, CA Construction of Downtown Streetcar Project ..................
Glendale, CA Purchase of CNG Buses for Glendale Beeline Transit
System.
Hercules, CA Inter-modal Rail Station Improvements ...........................
Long Beach, Ca Museum of Latin American Art, Long Beach, to build
intermodal park and ride facility.
Long Beach, CA Park and Ride Facility ................................................
Long Beach, CA Purchase one larger (75 passengers) and two smaller (40 passengers) ferryboats and construct related dock work to
facilitate the use and accessibility of the ferryboats.
Long Beach, CA Purchase ten clean fuel buses ...................................
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, CA capital funds
for facility improvements to support the Cal State Northridge tram
system.
Los Angeles, CA Crenshaw Bus Rapid Transit .....................................
Los Angeles, CA Design and construct improved transit and pedestrian linkages between Los Angeles Community College and nearby
MTA rail stop and bus lines.
Los Angeles, CA Improve safety, mobility and access between
LATTC, Metro line and nearby bus stops on Grand Ave between
Washington and 23rd.
Los Angeles, CA Improve transit shelters, sidewalks lighting and landscaping around Cedar’s-Sinai Medical Center.
Los Angeles, CA Install permanent irrigation system and enhanced
landscaping on San Fernando Valley rapid bus transit way.
Los Angeles, CA Wilshire-Vermont subway station reconstruction .......
Los Angeles, CA, Construction of Intermodal Transit Center at California State University Los Angeles.
Los Angeles, CA, Fly-Away Bus System Expansion .............................
Los Angeles, CA, LAX Intermodal Transportation Center Rail and Bus
System Expansion.
Mammoth Lakes, California-Regional Transit Maintenance Facility ......
Mariposa, CA-Yosemite National Park CNG-Hydrogen transit buses
and facilities.
Martinez, CA Inter-modal Facility Restoration .......................................
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Light Rail Transit Project from
Pasadena, CA to Montclair, CA.
Monrovia, California-Transit Village Project ...........................................
Montebello, CA Bus Lines Bus Fleet Replacement Project ..................
Monterey Park, CA Catch Basins at Transit Stop Installation ...............
Monterey Park, CA Safety improvements at a bus stop including creation of bus loading areas and street improvements.
Monterey, CA Purchase bus equipment ................................................
Needles, California-El Garces Intermodal Facility .................................
Norwalk, CA Transit System Bus Procurement and Los Angeles
World Airport Remote Fly-Away Facility Project.
Oakland, CA Construct Bay Trail between Coliseum BART station
and Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline.
Oakland, CA Construct streetscape & intermodal improvements at
BART Station Transit Villages.
Ontario, CA Construct Omnitrans Transcenter ......................................
Orange County Transit Authority, California-Security surveillance and
monitoring equipment.
Orange County, CA Purchase buses for rapid transit ...........................
Orange County, CA Transportation Projects to Encourage Use of
Transit to Reduce Congestion.
Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit bus purchase ........................
Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit: CalStrat-Weststart fuel cell
bus program.
Pasadena, CA ITS Improvements ..........................................................
Pleasant Hill, CA Construct Diablo Valley College Bus Transit Center
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
401,280
200,640
100,320
200,640
1,229,923
200,640
92,696
300,960
401,280
200,640
601,920
601,920
65,208
1,711,058
300,960
100,320
300,960
601,920
200,640
158,506
550,000
550,000
100,320
501,600
300,960
3,009,600
601,920
140,448
64,205
321,024
200,640
401,280
160,512
180,576
200,640
200,640
1,061,386
200,640
200,640
100,320
200,640
200,640
300,960
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13919
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0105 .........
251
CA ............
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0106 .........
E2007–BUSP–0107 .........
E2007–BUSP–0108 .........
286
171
189
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0109 .........
84
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0110 .........
253
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0111 .........
282
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0112 .........
314
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0113 .........
E2007–BUSP–0114 .........
183
127
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0115 .........
377
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0116 .........
E2007–BUSP–0117 .........
287
403
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0118 .........
381
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0119 .........
E2007–BUSP–0120 .........
341
254
CA
CA
CA
CA
E2007–BUSP–0121
E2007–BUSP–0122
E2007–BUSP–0123
E2007–BUSP–0124
.........
.........
.........
.........
382
145
147
364
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0125 .........
172
CA
CA
CA
CA
E2007–BUSP–0126
E2007–BUSP–0127
E2007–BUSP–0128
E2007–BUSP–0129
.........
.........
.........
.........
313
27
401
383
CA ............
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0130 .........
E2007–BUSP–0131 .........
E2007–BUSP–0132 .........
388
315
85
CA ............
CA ............
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0133 .........
E2007–BUSP–0134 .........
E2007–BUSP–0135 .........
459
35
195
CA ............
E2007–BUSP–0136 .........
83
CO ............
CO ............
CO ............
E2007–BUSP–0137 .........
E2007–BUSP–0138 .........
E2007–BUSP–0139 .........
449
448
509
CO ............
CO ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0140 .........
E2007–BUSP–0141 .........
518
520
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
E2007–BUSP–0142
E2007–BUSP–0143
E2007–BUSP–0144
E2007–BUSP–0145
E2007–BUSP–0146
E2007–BUSP–0147
E2007–BUSP–0148
E2007–BUSP–0149
521
167
435
441
188
444
445
446
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Redondo Beach, CA Capital Equipment procurement of 12. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Transit Vehicles for Coastal Shuttle
Services by Beach Cities Transit.
Richmond, CA BART Parking Structure ................................................
Riverside, California-RTA Advanced Traveler Information System .......
Sacramento, CA Bus enhancement and improvements-construct
maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve transit service.
Sacramento, CA Construct intermodal station and related improvements.
San Bernardino, CA Implement Santa Fe Depot improvements in San
Bernardino.
San Diego, CA Completion of San Diego Joint Transportation Operations Center (JTOC).
San Diego, CA Widen sidewalks and bus stop entrance, and provide
diagonal parking, in the Skyline Paradise Hills neighborhood (Reo
Drive).
San Fernando Valley, CA Reseda Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Route .......
San Fernando, CA Purchase CNG buses and related equipment and
construct facilities.
San Francisco, CA Construct San Francisco Muni Islais Creek Maintenance Facility.
San Francisco, CA Implement ITS on Muni Transit System .................
San Francisco, CA Implement Transbay Terminal-Caltrain Downtown
Extension Project.
San Francisco, CA Redesign and renovate intermodal facility at Glen
Park Community.
San Gabriel Valley, CA-Foothill Transit Park and Rides .......................
San Joaquin, California Regional Rail-Altamont Commuter Express
Corridor inter-modal centers.
San Luis Ray, California-Transit Center Project ....................................
Santa Ana, CA Improve Santa Ana transit terminal ..............................
Santa Barbara, CA-Expansion of Regional Intermodal Transit Center
Santa Monica, CA Construct intermodal park-and-ride facility at Santa
Monica College campus on South Bundy Drive near Airport Avenue.
Santa Monica, CA Purchase and service LNG buses for Santa
Monica’s Big Blue Bus to meet increased ridership needs and reduce emissions.
Solana Beach, CA-Construct Intermodal Facility ...................................
Sonoma County, CA Purchase of CNG buses ......................................
South Pasadena, CA Silent Night Grade Crossing Project ...................
South San Francisco, CA Construction of Ferry Terminal at Oyster
Point in South San Francisco to the San Francisco Bay Water
Transit Authority.
Sylmar, CA Los Angeles Mission College Transit Center construction
Temecula, California-Intermodal Transit Facility ....................................
Torrance Transit System, CA Acquisition of EPA and CARB-certified
low emission replacement buses.
Transbay Terminal/ Caltrain Downtown Extension Project ....................
Union City, CA Inter-modal Station, Phase 1: Modify BART station .....
Woodland Hills, CA Los Angeles Pierce College Bus Rapid Transit
Station Extension.
Woodland, CA Yolobus operations, maintenance, administration facility expansion and improvements to increase bus service with alternative fuel buses.
City of Aspen, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .............................................
City of Durango, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ..........................................
Colorado Association of Transit Agencies/Colorado Transit CoalitionColorado Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities.
Denver Regional Transit District-Bus Maintenance Facility ...................
Denver Regional Transit District-Denver Union Station Multimodal
Renovations.
Denver Regional Transit District-US 36 Corridor BRT ..........................
Denver, CO Denver Union Station Inter-modal Center .........................
Denver, Colorado-Regional Transportation District Bus Replacement ..
Grand Valley Transit, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ..................................
Mountain Express, Crested Butte, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ..............
Pueblo Transit, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ............................................
Roaring Fork Transit Authority, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ..................
Steamboat Springs, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ....................................
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
160,512
1,003,200
100,320
401,280
1,404,480
100,320
401,280
60,192
120,384
609,946
1,203,840
601,920
2,808,960
827,640
1,906,080
802,560
100,320
200,640
60,192
200,640
752,400
300,960
100,320
180,576
953,040
50,160
100,320
601,920
4,200,000
852,720
200,640
401,280
140,448
50,160
6,188,000
714,000
476,000
1,666,000
1,103,520
401,280
100,320
100,320
50,160
150,480
150,480
13920
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
CO ............
CO ............
CT ............
E2007–BUSP–0150 .........
E2007–BUSP–0151 .........
E2007–BUSP–0152 .........
450
447
44
CT ............
CT ............
CT ............
E2007–BUSP–0153 .........
E2007–BUSP–0154 .........
E2007–BUSP–0155 .........
478
90
523
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
E2007–BUSP–0156
E2007–BUSP–0157
E2007–BUSP–0158
E2007–BUSP–0159
E2007–BUSP–0160
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
218
394
267
589
269
CT ............
E2007–BUSP–0161 .........
369
CT ............
E2007–BUSP–0162 .........
131
CT ............
E2007–BUSP–0163 .........
32
CT ............
CT ............
DE ............
FL .............
FL .............
FL .............
FL .............
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0164
E2007–BUSP–0165
E2007–BUSP–0166
E2007–BUSP–0167
E2007–BUSP–0168
E2007–BUSP–0169
E2007–BUSP–0170
E2007–BUSP–0171
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
270
657
169
470
297
69
479
117
FL .............
FL .............
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0172 .........
E2007–BUSP–0173 .........
E2007–BUSP–0174 .........
439
453
488
FL .............
FL .............
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0175 .........
E2007–BUSP–0176 .........
E2007–BUSP–0177 .........
498
508
23
FL .............
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0178 .........
E2007–BUSP–0179 .........
80
527
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
E2007–BUSP–0180
E2007–BUSP–0181
E2007–BUSP–0182
E2007–BUSP–0183
E2007–BUSP–0184
E2007–BUSP–0185
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
344
213
95
538
539
548
FL
FL
FL
FL
.............
.............
.............
.............
E2007–BUSP–0186
E2007–BUSP–0187
E2007–BUSP–0188
E2007–BUSP–0189
.........
.........
.........
.........
306
107
549
558
FL .............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0190 .........
238
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
E2007–BUSP–0191
E2007–BUSP–0192
E2007–BUSP–0193
E2007–BUSP–0194
E2007–BUSP–0195
E2007–BUSP–0196
E2007–BUSP–0197
E2007–BUSP–0198
E2007–BUSP–0199
E2007–BUSP–0200
E2007–BUSP–0201
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
103
308
211
432
133
580
454
136
294
14
125
E2007–BUSP–0202 .........
E2007–BUSP–0203 .........
367
248
............
............
............
............
............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
FL .............
FL .............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Town of Snowmass Village, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .......................
Town of Telluride, CO Bus and Bus Facilities .......................................
Bridgeport, Connecticut-Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority Bus Facility.
Bridgeport, CT Facility Expansion/Improvement ....................................
Buses and bus related facilities throughout the State of Connecticut ...
Downtown Middletown, CT, Transportation Infrastructure Improvement
Project.
Enfield, Connecticut-intermodal station ..................................................
Hartford, CT Buses and bus-related facilities ........................................
Middletown, CT Construct intermodal center .........................................
New Haven, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ............................................
New London, Connecticut-Intermodal Transportation Center and
Streetscapes.
Norwalk, Connecticut-Pulse Point Joint Development inter-modal facility.
Stonington and Mystic, Connecticut-Intermodal Center parking facility
and Streetscape.
Torrington, CT Construct bus-related facility (Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit District).
Vernon, Connecticut-Intermodal Center, Parking and Streetscapes .....
Waterbury, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ...............................................
Delaware-University of Delaware Fuel Cell Bus Deployment ................
Bay County, FL - Transit Facility ............................................................
Broward County, FL - Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities .....
Broward County, FL Buses & Bus Facilities ..........................................
Broward County-Bus and Bus Facilities .................................................
Broward, FL Purchase new articulated buses and bus stop improvements on State Road 7. (SR 7) between Golden Glades Interchange and Glades Road.
Central Florida Commuter Rail intermodal facilities ...............................
Central Florida Commuter Rail Intermodal Facilities .............................
Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority-LYNX Bus Fleet Expansion Program.
City of Gainesville Regional Transit System-Facility Expansion ...........
Collier County Transit-Transit Facility ....................................................
Construct intermodal transportation & parking facility, City of Winter
Park, Florida.
Flagler County, Florida-bus facility .........................................................
Florida Department of Transportation-Palm Beach County Replacement Buses.
Gainesville, FL Bus Facility Expansion ..................................................
Gainesville, FL Bus Rapid Transit Study ...............................................
Gainesville, FL Bus Replacement ..........................................................
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit-Bus Rapid Transit Improvements
Hillsborough, FL, Hillsborough Area regional Transit Authority .............
Jacksonville Transportation Authority-Bus Fleet Replacement and
Equipment.
Jacksonville, FL Bus Replacement ........................................................
Jacksonville, FL Paratransit Vehicles .....................................................
Jacksonville, FL Transportation Authority Paratransit Program .............
Lakeland Area Mass Transit District/Citrus Connection-Capital Funding Needs.
Levy County, Florida-Purchase 2. wheel chair equipped passenger
buses and related equipment.
Longwood, Florida-Construct Intermodal Transportation Facility ..........
Miami Dade, FL N.W. 7th Avenue Transit Hub .....................................
Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ............................
Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ............................
Miami-Dade County, Florida-Transit Security System ...........................
Miami-Dade Transit 7th Avenue NW Transit Hub .................................
Miami-Dade Transit Dadeland South Intermodal Center .......................
Ocala and Marion County, Florida-replacement buses .........................
Orlando, FL Bus Replacement ...............................................................
Orlando, Florida-LYNX Bus Fleet Expansion Program ..........................
Palm Beach County, FL Plan and Construct Belle Glade Combined
Passenger Transit Facility.
Palm Beach, FL 20 New Buses for Palm Tran ......................................
Palm Beach, FL Palm Tran AVL–APC system with smart card fare
boxes.
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
60,192
64,821
100,320
400,000
1,203,840
2,150,000
601,920
802,560
300,960
2,150,000
100,320
100,320
489,562
401,280
1,524,846
2,300,000
100,320
476,000
401,280
1,304,160
476,000
100,320
1,003,200
720,000
1,190,000
238,000
238,000
100,320
120,384
238,000
802,560
100,320
802,560
476,000
1,000,000
1,190,000
1,404,480
902,880
0
476,000
60,192
100,320
601,920
1,203,840
802,560
599,914
238,000
480,000
601,920
802,560
180,576
702,240
300,960
50,160
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13921
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0204 .........
600
FL .............
FL .............
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0205 .........
E2007–BUSP–0206 .........
E2007–BUSP–0207 .........
415
420
400
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0208 .........
623
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0209 .........
622
FL .............
E2007–BUSP–0210 .........
31
FL .............
FL .............
FL .............
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
E2007–BUSP–0211
E2007–BUSP–0212
E2007–BUSP–0213
E2007–BUSP–0214
E2007–BUSP–0215
E2007–BUSP–0216
E2007–BUSP–0217
E2007–BUSP–0218
E2007–BUSP–0219
E2007–BUSP–0220
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
390
402
148
355
255
357
247
384
144
110
GA ............
GA ............
E2007–BUSP–0221 .........
E2007–BUSP–0222 .........
91
510
GA ............
GA ............
E2007–BUSP–0223 .........
E2007–BUSP–0224 .........
49
530
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
E2007–BUSP–0225 .........
E2007–BUSP–0226 .........
E2007–BUSP–0227 .........
60
275
374
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
GA ............
HI ..............
IA ..............
IA ..............
IA ..............
IA ..............
E2007–BUSP–0228
E2007–BUSP–0229
E2007–BUSP–0230
E2007–BUSP–0231
E2007–BUSP–0232
E2007–BUSP–0233
E2007–BUSP–0234
E2007–BUSP–0235
E2007–BUSP–0236
E2007–BUSP–0237
E2007–BUSP–0238
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
406
329
256
348
206
298
540
440
475
242
545
ID ..............
ID ..............
E2007–BUSP–0239 .........
E2007–BUSP–0240 .........
176
543
ID ..............
IL ..............
IL ..............
E2007–BUSP–0241 .........
E2007–BUSP–0242 .........
E2007–BUSP–0243 .........
652
433
226
IL ..............
E2007–BUSP–0244 .........
221
IL ..............
E2007–BUSP–0245 .........
219
IL ..............
IL ..............
E2007–BUSP–0246 .........
E2007–BUSP–0247 .........
491
358
IL ..............
E2007–BUSP–0248 .........
4
IL ..............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0249 .........
296
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
E2007–BUSP–0250
E2007–BUSP–0251
E2007–BUSP–0252
E2007–BUSP–0253
E2007–BUSP–0254
114
291
250
186
429
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization-Pinellas Mobility
Initiative: BRT and Guide way.
Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL ....
Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL ....
South FL Region, FL Regional Universal Automated Fare Collection
System (UAFC) (for bus system).
South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Beach
Intermodal Facility.
South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Improvements, for any activity eligible under section 5309.
St. Augustine, Florida-Intermodal Transportation Center and related
pedestrian and landscape improvements.
St. Lucie County, FL Purchase Buses ...................................................
Tampa, FL Establish Transit Emphasis Corridor Project .......................
Tampa, FL Purchase buses and construct bus facilities .......................
Albany, GA Bus replacement .................................................................
Albany, GA Multimodal Facility ..............................................................
Athens, GA Buses and Bus Facilities ....................................................
Atlanta, GA Inter-modal Passenger Facility Improvements ...................
Atlanta, GA MARTA Clean Fuel Bus Acquisition ...................................
Augusta, GA Buses and Bus Facilities ..................................................
Cobb County, GA Cobb County Smart Card Technology/ Bus Facility
Improvements.
Columbus, GA Bus replacement ............................................................
Columbus, Georgia/Phoenix City, Alabama-National Infantry Museum
Multimodal Facility.
Columbus, Georgia-Buses & Bus Facilities ...........................................
Georgia Department of Transportation-Georgia Statewide Bus and
Bus Facilities.
Georgia Statewide Bus Program ............................................................
Jesup, Georgia-Train Depot intermodal center ......................................
Metro-Atlanta, GA MARTA Automated Smart-Card Fare Collection
System.
Moultrie, GA Inter-modal facility .............................................................
Quitman, Clay, Randolph, Stewart Co., GA Bus project .......................
Savannah, GA Bus and Bus Facilities-Chatham Area Transit ..............
Savannah, Georgia-Water Ferry River walk intermodal facilities ..........
Sylvester, GA Inter-modal Facility ..........................................................
Thomasville, GA Bus Replacement .......................................................
Honolulu, HI, Bus Facilities ....................................................................
Ames, Iowa-Expansion of CyRide Bus Maintenance Facility ................
Black Hawk County, IA UNI Multimodal Project ....................................
Des Moines, IA Purchase 40 foot buses ...............................................
Iowa Department of Transportation-Iowa Statewide Buses and Bus
Replacement.
Boise, ID-Multimodal facility ...................................................................
Idaho Department of Transportation— Idaho Statewide ITS for Public
Transportation.
Valley Regional Transit, ID–Downtown Boise Multimodal .....................
Centralia, Illinois-South Central Mass Transit District Improvements ....
Champaign, IL-Construct park and ride lot with attached daycare facility.
Chicago, IL Construct intermodal facility at 35th Street at Metra Ride
Line (Northside).
Chicago, IL Feasibility Study for intermodal station on the Metra Rock
Island near Kennedy-King College.
Chicago, IL, Cermak Road, Bus Rapid Transit ......................................
Cicero, Chicago Establish Transit Signal Priority, Cicero Ave., Pace
Suburban Bus.
Des Plaines, Wauconda, Cook and Lake Counties, IL Rand Road
Transit Signal Priority.
Elgin to Rockford, Illinois-Intermodal stations along planned Metra
Union Pacific West Line extension alignment, including necessary
alternatives analysis.
Geneva, Illinois-Construct commuter parking deck for Metra Service ..
Joliet, Illinois-Union Station commuter parking facility ...........................
Maywood, IL Purchase buses ................................................................
Mattoon, Illinois— historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center
Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center .................................
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
238,000
451,440
401,280
401,280
476,000
3,570,000
200,640
200,640
150,480
451,440
60,192
160,512
284,909
401,280
1,203,840
80,256
200,640
60,192
405,000
194,420
2,142,000
40,128
200,640
200,640
60,192
50,160
1,003,200
401,280
40,128
40,128
1,300,000
401,280
714,000
200,640
2,856,000
902,880
357,000
1,381,000
80,256
300,690
1,003,200
60,192
250,000
200,640
160,512
100,320
802,560
576,840
10,032
b 321,024
401,280
13922
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
IL ..............
E2007–BUSP–0255 .........
163
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
E2007–BUSP–0256
E2007–BUSP–0257
E2007–BUSP–0258
E2007–BUSP–0259
E2007–BUSP–0260
E2007–BUSP–0261
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
365
404
608
632
259
265
IL ..............
IN ..............
IN ..............
E2007–BUSP–0262 .........
E2007–BUSP–0263 .........
E2007–BUSP–0264 .........
135
109
529
IN ..............
IN ..............
E2007–BUSP–0265 .........
E2007–BUSP–0266 .........
544
235
IN ..............
IN ..............
E2007–BUSP–0267 .........
E2007–BUSP–0268 .........
5
220
IN ..............
E2007–BUSP–0269 .........
378
IN ..............
IN ..............
IN ..............
IN ..............
IN ..............
IN ..............
KS ............
E2007–BUSP–0270
E2007–BUSP–0271
E2007–BUSP–0272
E2007–BUSP–0273
E2007–BUSP–0274
E2007–BUSP–0275
E2007–BUSP–0276
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
417
546
556
617
141
637
53
KS ............
KS ............
E2007–BUSP–0277 .........
E2007–BUSP–0278 .........
551
552
KY ............
KY ............
E2007–BUSP–0279 .........
E2007–BUSP–0280 .........
372
639
LA .............
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0281 .........
E2007–BUSP–0282 .........
484
72
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0283 .........
555
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0284 .........
239
LA .............
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0285 .........
E2007–BUSP–0286 .........
356
568
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0287 .........
170
LA .............
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0288 .........
E2007–BUSP–0289 .........
55
67
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0290 .........
243
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0291 .........
310
LA .............
E2007–BUSP–0292 .........
606
LA .............
LA .............
LA .............
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0293
E2007–BUSP–0294
E2007–BUSP–0295
E2007–BUSP–0296
.........
.........
.........
.........
277
625
283
118
MA ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0297 .........
472
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0298 .........
59
MA ............
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0299 .........
E2007–BUSP–0300 .........
273
174
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0301 .........
330
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center, including facilities
for adjacent public and nonprofit uses.
Pace Suburban Bus, IL South Suburban BRT Mobility Network ...........
Rock Island, IL Improve Rock Island Mass Transit District Bus Facility
Rock Island, Illinois, Metrolink Transit Maintenance Facility .................
Springfield, IL, Multimodal Transit Terminal ...........................................
St. Charles, IL-Intermodal Parking Structures .......................................
Village of Tinley Park, Illinois, 80th Avenue Commuter Rail Station reconstruction and site enhancements.
Wheaton, IL Pace Suburban Bus-Purchase buses ...............................
Bloomington, IN-Bus and transfer facility ...............................................
Gary, Indiana, Gary Airport Station Modernization and Shuttle Service
Project.
Indianapolis Downtown Transit Center ..................................................
Indianapolis, IN Construct the Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal Facility.
Indianapolis, IN Downtown Transit Center .............................................
Indianapolis, IN IndySMART program to relieve congestion, improve
safety and air quality.
Indianapolis, IN Relocate and improve inter-modal transportation for
pedestrian to Children’s Museum of Indianapolis.
Indianapolis, Indiana-Children’s Museum Intermodal Center ................
Ivy Tech State College, Indiana Multimodal Center ..............................
Lafayette, Indiana, City Bus of Greater Lafayette ..................................
South Bend, Indiana, TRANSPO Bus Operations Center .....................
South Bend, Indiana-Construct South Bend Bus Operations Center ....
Terre Haute, Indiana-Cherry Street Joint Development Project ............
Johnson Co., KS Bus and bus related facilities [I–35. corridor], Johnson Co. Transit.
Kansas City Area Transportation Authority-Bus Project ........................
Kansas Department of Transportation-Kansas Statewide Transit
Buses, Bus Facilities, and Bus ITS.
Richmond, KY Purchase buses, bus equipment and facilities ..............
Transit Authority of Lexington, KY-Rehabilitation of Building for Maintenance and Administration.
Capital Area Transit System-Baton Rouge BRT ....................................
Hammond, Louisiana-Passenger Intermodal facility at Southeastern
University.
Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, LA-Lafayette
Multimodal Transportation Facility.
Lafayette, Louisiana-Lafayette Transit System bus replacement program.
Lafayette, Louisiana-Multimodal center, Final Phase ............................
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development-Statewide
Vehicles and Equipment.
Louisiana-Construct pedestrian walkways between Caddo St. and
Milam St. along Edwards St. in Shreveport, LA.
New Orleans, LA Inter-modal Riverfront Center ....................................
New Orleans, LA Plan and construct New Orleans Union Passenger
Terminal intermodal facilities.
New Orleans, LA Regional Planning Commission, bus and bus facilities.
River Parishes, LA South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities.
River Parishes, Louisiana, South Central Planning and Development
Commission, bus and bus facilities.
Shreveport, LA-intermodal Transit Facility .............................................
Southeastern Louisiana University Intermodal Facility ..........................
St. Bernard Parish, LA Intermodal facility improvements ......................
Attleboro, MA Construction, engineering and site improvements at the
Attleboro Intermodal Center.
Berkshire, MA, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bus Maintenance
Facility.
Beverly, MA Design and Construct Beverly Deport Intermodal Transportation Center.
Boston, MA Harbor Park Pavilion & Inter-modal Station .......................
Brockton, MA Bus replacement for the Brockton Area Transit Authority.
Framingham, MA Local Intra-Framingham Transit System enhancements.
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
1,003,200
100,320
100,320
250,000
1,100,000
902,880
160,512
200,640
965,078
400,000
900,000
1,003,200
2,808,960
401,280
2,808,960
200,640
200,000
c 550,000
900,000
200,640
900,000
401,280
2,380,000
2,856,000
144,461
952,000
714,000
40,128
238,000
180,576
601,920
238,000
203,640
100,320
200,640
100,320
200,640
180,000
672,144
450,000
200,640
401,280
30,000
401,280
250,800
300,960
361,152
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13923
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
State
Earmark ID
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0302 .........
124
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0303 .........
21
MA
MA
MA
MA
E2007–BUSP–0304
E2007–BUSP–0305
E2007–BUSP–0306
E2007–BUSP–0307
.........
.........
.........
.........
563
280
569
42
MA ............
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0308 .........
E2007–BUSP–0309 .........
257
139
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0310 .........
161
MA ............
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0311 .........
E2007–BUSP–0312 .........
88
370
MA ............
E2007–BUSP–0313 .........
205
MD ............
MD ............
E2007–BUSP–0314 .........
E2007–BUSP–0315 .........
122
303
MD ............
E2007–BUSP–0316 .........
542
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
E2007–BUSP–0317
E2007–BUSP–0318
E2007–BUSP–0319
E2007–BUSP–0320
E2007–BUSP–0321
E2007–BUSP–0322
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
571
573
224
214
615
8
MD ............
ME ............
E2007–BUSP–0323 .........
E2007–BUSP–0324 .........
629
19
ME ............
ME ............
MI .............
E2007–BUSP–0325 .........
E2007–BUSP–0326 .........
E2007–BUSP–0327 .........
483
570
301
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
E2007–BUSP–0328
E2007–BUSP–0329
E2007–BUSP–0330
E2007–BUSP–0331
E2007–BUSP–0332
E2007–BUSP–0333
E2007–BUSP–0334
E2007–BUSP–0335
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
204
502
319
522
2
156
320
9
MI .............
E2007–BUSP–0336 .........
208
MI
MI
MI
MI
E2007–BUSP–0337
E2007–BUSP–0338
E2007–BUSP–0339
E2007–BUSP–0340
.........
.........
.........
.........
526
531
249
79
MI .............
E2007–BUSP–0341 .........
560
MI .............
MI .............
MI .............
E2007–BUSP–0342 .........
E2007–BUSP–0343 .........
E2007–BUSP–0344 .........
572
581
293
MI .............
E2007–BUSP–0345 .........
601
MI .............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
............
............
............
............
E2007–BUSP–0346 .........
634
MN
MN
MN
MN
E2007–BUSP–0347
E2007–BUSP–0348
E2007–BUSP–0349
E2007–BUSP–0350
.........
.........
.........
.........
40
177
577
185
E2007–BUSP–0351 .........
342
............
............
............
............
............
............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
............
............
............
............
MN ............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Haverhill, MA Design and Construct Inter-modal Transit Parking Improvements.
Hingham, MA Higham Marine Intermodal Center Improvements: Enhance public transportation infrastructure/parking.
Lawrence, MA, Gateway Intermodal and Quadant Area Reuse Project
Lowell, MA Implementation of LRTA bus replacement plan ..................
Lowell, MA, Lowell Regional Transit ......................................................
Medford, MA Downtown revitalization featuring construction of a 200
space Park and Ride Facility.
Newburyport, MA Design and Construct Intermodal Facility .................
Quincy, MA MBTA Purchase high speed catamaran ferry for Quincy
Harbor Express Service.
Revere, MA Inter-modal transit improvements in the Wonderland station (MBTA) area.
Rockport, MA Rockport Commuter Rail Station Improvements ............
Salem, MA Design and Construct Salem Intermodal Transportation
Center.
Woburn, MA Construction of an 89 space park and ride facility to be
located on Magazine Hill, in the Heart of Woburn Square.
Baltimore, MD Construct Intercity Bus Intermodal Terminal ..................
Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations
and Maintenance Facility.
Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations
and Maintenance Facility.
MARC Intermodal Odenton and Edgewood Station Improvements ......
Maryland Statewide Bus Facilities and Buses .......................................
Montgomery County, MD Wheaton CBD Intermodal Access Program
Mount Rainier, MD Intermodal and Pedestrian Project .........................
Silver Spring, Maryland, Transit Center .................................................
Silver Spring, MD Construct Silver Spring Transit Center in downtown
Silver Spring.
Southern Maryland Commuter Initiative .................................................
Bar Harbor, ME Purchase new buses to enhance commuting near the
Jackson Labs.
Campobello Park, ME, Bus Acquisition .................................................
Maine Department of Transportation-Acadia Intermodal Facility ...........
Barry County, MI-Barry County Transit equipments and dispatching
software.
Boysville of Michigan Transportation System ........................................
City of Kalamazoo, MI bus Replacement ...............................................
Detroit Bus Maintenance Facility ............................................................
Detroit Department of Transportation Bus Replacement .......................
Detroit Fare Collection System ..............................................................
Detroit Replacement Buses ....................................................................
Detroit, MI Bus Replacement .................................................................
Detroit, MI Enclosed heavy-duty maintenance facility with full operational functions for up to 300 buses.
Eastern Upper Peninsula, MI Ferry Dock and Facility upgrades for
Drummond Island Ferry Services.
Flint, MI, Mass Transportation Authority Bus Maintenance Facility .......
Grand Rapids, Michigan, The Rapid, Bus Replacement .......................
Grand Rapids, MI-Purchase replacement and expansion buses ..........
Ionia County, MI-Purchase and Implementation of communication
equipment improvements.
Lansing, MI, Capital Area Transportation Authority, Bus Replacement
and Bus Related ITS.
Marquette County, Michigan Transit Authority Bus passenger facility ..
Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Bus Replacement .....
Muskegon, Michigan-Muskegon Area Transit Terminal and related improvements.
Port Huron, Michigan, Blue Water Area Transportation Commission,
Bus Maintenance Facility.
Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) Bus
Maintenance Facility.
Duluth, MN Downtown Duluth Area Transit facility improvements ........
Fond du Lac Reservation, MN Purchase buses ....................................
Metro Transit/Metropolitan Council, MN-Bus/Bus Capital ......................
St. Paul to Hinckley, MN Construct bus amenities along Rush Line
Corridor.
St. Paul, MN Union Depot Multi Modal Transit Facility .........................
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
1,123,584
1,805,760
800,000
200,640
800,000
401,280
401,280
401,280
361,152
551,760
401,280
361,152
1,003,200
1,003,200
220,000
380,000
5,750,000
100,320
90,288
6,000,000
732,336
2,800,000
60,192
34,000
714,000
30,096
674,150
1,800,000
1,805,760
2,100,000
802,560
1,003,200
1,504,800
902,880
50,160
650,000
1,100,000
2,939,376
118,378
850,000
300,000
2,200,000
401,280
1,250,000
1,750,000
401,280
30,096
2,261,000
300,960
401,280
13924
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
MO ...........
E2007–BUSP–0352 .........
473
MO ...........
E2007–BUSP–0353 .........
474
MO ...........
MO ...........
E2007–BUSP–0354 .........
E2007–BUSP–0355 .........
345
598
MO ...........
MS ............
E2007–BUSP–0356 .........
E2007–BUSP–0357 .........
624
130
MS
MT
MT
MT
E2007–BUSP–0358
E2007–BUSP–0359
E2007–BUSP–0360
E2007–BUSP–0361
.........
.........
.........
.........
547
129
476
584
NC ............
E2007–BUSP–0362 .........
490
NC
NC
NC
NC
E2007–BUSP–0363
E2007–BUSP–0364
E2007–BUSP–0365
E2007–BUSP–0366
.........
.........
.........
.........
217
351
228
154
NC ............
E2007–BUSP–0367 .........
324
NC ............
E2007–BUSP–0368 .........
302
NC
NC
NC
NC
E2007–BUSP–0369
E2007–BUSP–0370
E2007–BUSP–0371
E2007–BUSP–0372
.........
.........
.........
.........
52
537
335
594
NC ............
E2007–BUSP–0373 .........
143
NC
NC
ND
NE
NE
E2007–BUSP–0374
E2007–BUSP–0375
E2007–BUSP–0376
E2007–BUSP–0377
E2007–BUSP–0378
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
134
57
595
505
160
NE ............
E2007–BUSP–0379 .........
586
NE ............
E2007–BUSP–0380 .........
587
NE ............
NE ............
NH ............
E2007–BUSP–0381 .........
E2007–BUSP–0382 .........
E2007–BUSP–0383 .........
240
599
418
NJ .............
NJ .............
E2007–BUSP–0384 .........
E2007–BUSP–0385 .........
468
86
NJ .............
E2007–BUSP–0386 .........
28
NJ .............
NJ .............
E2007–BUSP–0387 .........
E2007–BUSP–0388 .........
12
102
NJ .............
NJ .............
E2007–BUSP–0389 .........
E2007–BUSP–0390 .........
389
138
NJ .............
E2007–BUSP–0391 .........
38
NJ .............
NJ .............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0392 .........
E2007–BUSP–0393 .........
209
46
NJ .............
NJ .............
NJ .............
E2007–BUSP–0394 .........
E2007–BUSP–0395 .........
E2007–BUSP–0396 .........
340
328
13
NJ .............
E2007–BUSP–0397 .........
29
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Bi-State Development Agency-St. Louis Bridge Repair/Reconstruction,
for any activity eligible under section 5309.
Bi-State Development Agency-St. Louis Metro Bus Fare Collection
Program.
Kansas City, MO Bus Transit Infrastructure ..........................................
OATS, Incorporated, MO–ITS Information and Billing System and Bus
Facilities.
Southeast Missouri Transportation Service-Bus Project ........................
Coahoma County, Mississippi Purchase buses for the Aaron E. Henry
Community Health Services Center, Inc./DARTS transit service.
Jackson State University, MS-Busing Project ........................................
Bozeman, Montana-Vehicular Parking Facility ......................................
Bozeman, MT, Intermodal and parking facility .......................................
Montana Department of Transportation-Statewide Bus Facilities and
Buses.
Charlotte Area Transit System/City of Charlotte-Charlotte Multimodal
Station.
Charlotte, NC Construct Charlotte Multimodal Station ..........................
Charlotte, North Carolina-Eastland Community Transit Center .............
Charlotte, North Carolina-Multimodal Station .........................................
City of Greenville, NC Expansion Buses and Greenville Intermodal
Center.
Elon, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation
buses and bus facilities.
Greensboro, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation Multimodal Transportation Center.
Greensboro, North Carolina-Replacement buses ..................................
High Point, NC-Intermodal Facility .........................................................
High Point, North Carolina-Bus Terminal ...............................................
North Carolina Department of Transportation-North Carolina Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities.
Raleigh, NC Purchase eighteen replacement buses to replace buses
that have reached their useful life according to Federal Transit Administration regulations.
Town of Chapel Hill, NC Park and Ride Lot ..........................................
Wilmington, NC Build Intermodal Center ...............................................
North Dakota Department of Transportation/Statewide Bus ..................
City of Omaha-Creighton University Intermodal Facility ........................
Kearney, Nebraska-RYDE Transit Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility.
Nebraska Department of Roads-Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility for RYDE in Kearney, NE.
Nebraska Department of Roads-Statewide Vehicles, Facilities, and
Related Equipment Purchases.
Nebraska-statewide transit vehicles, facilities, and related equipment
Omaha, NE, Buses and Fare boxes ......................................................
Windham, New Hampshire—Construction of Park and Ride Bus facility at Exit 3.
Atlantic City, NJ Jitney ...........................................................................
Burlington County, NJ-BurLink and Burlington County Transportation
System vehicles and equipment.
Camden, NJ Construction of the Camden County Intermodal Facility
in Cramer Hill.
Hoboken, NJ Rehabilitation of Hoboken Inter-modal Terminal .............
Jersey City, NJ Construct West Entrance to Pavonia-Newport PATH
Station.
Lakewood, NJ-Ocean County Bus service and parking facilities ..........
Long Branch, NJ Design and construct facilities for ferry service from
Long Branch, NJ to New York City and other destinations.
Monmouth County, NJ Construction of main bus facility for Freehold
Township, including a terminal and repair shop.
Morristown, New Jersey-Intermodal Historic Station .............................
National Park Service Design and construct 2.1-mile segment to complete Sandy Hook multiuse pathway in Sandy Hook, NJ.
New Jersey Inter-modal Facilities and Bus Rolling Stock .....................
New Jersey Transit Community Shuttle Buses ......................................
Newark, NJ Penn Station Intermodal Improvements including the rehabilitation of boarding areas.
Sandy Hook, NJ National Park Service Construct year-round ferry
dock at Sandy Hook Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area.
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
d 1,190,000
d 3,808,000
200,640
4,046,000
476,000
30,096
1,190,000
802,560
171,000
714,000
2,380,000
1,564,992
401,280
802,560
715,081
240,768
2,512,013
e 1,159,699
286,000
1,203,840
5,950,000
401,280
300,960
200,640
1,100,000
714,000
401,280
476,000
952,000
802,560
650,000
742,368
750,000
802,560
200,640
762,432
401,280
601,920
802,560
401,280
200,640
200,640
601,920
100,320
200,640
200,640
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13925
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
NJ .............
E2007–BUSP–0398 .........
393
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
E2007–BUSP–0399
E2007–BUSP–0400
E2007–BUSP–0401
E2007–BUSP–0402
E2007–BUSP–0403
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
618
643
61
181
62
NM ............
NM ............
NV ............
E2007–BUSP–0404 .........
E2007–BUSP–0405 .........
E2007–BUSP–0406 .........
464
562
405
NV ............
E2007–BUSP–0407 .........
199
NV ............
NV ............
E2007–BUSP–0408 .........
E2007–BUSP–0409 .........
371
603
NV ............
E2007–BUSP–0410 .........
18
NV ............
NV ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0411 .........
E2007–BUSP–0412 .........
E2007–BUSP–0413 .........
630
656
74
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0414 .........
463
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0415 .........
271
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0416 .........
20
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0417 .........
279
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0418 .........
166
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0419 .........
E2007–BUSP–0420 .........
338
234
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0421 .........
10
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0422 .........
E2007–BUSP–0423 .........
197
408
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0424 .........
41
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0425 .........
E2007–BUSP–0426 .........
56
419
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0427 .........
E2007–BUSP–0428 .........
192
245
NY
NY
NY
NY
E2007–BUSP–0429
E2007–BUSP–0430
E2007–BUSP–0431
E2007–BUSP–0432
.........
.........
.........
.........
230
146
363
512
NY ............
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0433 .........
E2007–BUSP–0434 .........
E2007–BUSP–0435 .........
284
300
317
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0436 .........
E2007–BUSP–0437 .........
343
368
NY ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0438 .........
585
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0439 .........
25
NY ............
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0440 .........
E2007–BUSP–0441 .........
E2007–BUSP–0442 .........
376
590
591
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
............
............
............
............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
South Amboy, NJ Construction of improvements to facilities at South
Amboy Station under S Amboy, NJ Regional Intermodal Initiative.
South Brunswick, NJ Transit System .....................................................
Trenton Intermodal Station .....................................................................
Trenton, New Jersey-Trenton Train Station Rehabilitation ....................
Trenton, NJ Development of Trenton Trolley System ...........................
Trenton, NJ Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Trenton Train
Station.
Albuquerque, NM, Ride Bus and Bus Facilities .....................................
Las Cruces, NM, Road Runner Bus and Bus Facilities .........................
Las Vegas, NV Construct Boulder Highway BRT system and purchase vehicles and related equipment.
Las Vegas, NV Construct Central City Inter-modal Transportation Terminal.
Las Vegas, NV Construct Las Vegas West Care Intermodal Facility ...
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada-Central City
Intermodal Transportation Terminal.
Reno-Sparks, Nevada-Intermodal Transportation Terminals and Related Development.
Southern Nevada Transit Coalition, Public Transit Building Acquisition
Washoe County, NV Bus and Bus Facilities ..........................................
Albany-Schenectady, NY Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY
Route 5. Corridor.
Albany-Schenectady, NY, Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY
Route 5.
Bronx, NY Botanical Garden metro North Rail station Intermodal Facility.
Bronx, NY Establish an intermodal transportation facility at the Wildlife
Conservation Society Bronx Zoo.
Bronx, NY Establish an intermodal transportation facility at the Wildlife
Conservation Society Bronx Zoo.
Bronx, NY Hebrew Home for the Aged elderly and disabled transportation support.
Bronx, NY Intermodal Facility near Exit 6. of the Bronx River Parkway
Bronx, NY Jacobi Intermodal Center to North Central Bronx Hospital
bus system.
Bronx, NY Wildlife Conservation Society intermodal transportation facility at the Bronx Zoo.
Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility .................
Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility in the vicinity of Downstate Medical Center.
Brooklyn, NY New Urban Center-Broadway Junction Intermodal Center.
Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station
Brooklyn, NY—Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station.
Buffalo, NY Inter-modal Center Parking Facility ....................................
Bus to provide York-town, New York internal circulator to provide
transportation throughout the Town.
Construction of Third Bus Depot on Staten Island ................................
Cooperstown, New York-Intermodal Transit Center ..............................
Corning, New York-Transportation Center .............................................
Corning, NY, Phase II Corning Preserve Transportation Enhancement
Project.
Cornwall, NY-Purchase Bus ...................................................................
Geneva, New York-Multimodal facility-Construct passenger rail center
Jamestown, NY Rehabilitation of Intermodal Facility and associated
property.
Kings County, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility .........
Nassau County, NY Conduct planning and engineering for transportation system (HUB).
Nassau County, NY, Conduct planning, engineering, and construction
for transportation system (HUB).
New York City, NY First Phase Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit
System.
New York City, NY Purchase Handicapped-Accessible Livery Vehicles
New York City, NY, Bronx Zoo Intermodal Facility ................................
New York City, NY, Enhance Transportation Facilities Near W. 65th
Street and Broadway.
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
1,605,120
1,000,000
4,250,000
300,960
200,640
1,404,480
1,500,000
250,000
401,280
1,203,840
50,160
952,000
802,560
300,000
1,500,000
200,640
800,000
200,640
200,640
200,640
37,620
50,160
62,700
87,780
280,896
200,640
192,614
802,560
802,560
200,640
37,118
2,407,680
1,003,200
1,003,200
450,000
17,456
100,320
401,280
200,640
1,404,480
1,200,000
200,640
220,640
450,000
450,000
13926
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0443 .........
592
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0444 .........
E2007–BUSP–0445 .........
593
77
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
E2007–BUSP–0446
E2007–BUSP–0447
E2007–BUSP–0448
E2007–BUSP–0449
E2007–BUSP–0450
E2007–BUSP–0451
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
373
322
379
252
430
607
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0452 .........
E2007–BUSP–0453 .........
609
386
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0454 .........
353
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0455 .........
635
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0456 .........
261
NY ............
NY ............
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0457 .........
E2007–BUSP–0458 .........
E2007–BUSP–0459 .........
289
451
78
NY ............
E2007–BUSP–0460 .........
182
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
E2007–BUSP–0461
E2007–BUSP–0462
E2007–BUSP–0463
E2007–BUSP–0464
E2007–BUSP–0465
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
264
149
362
318
105
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0466 .........
489
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0467 .........
241
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0468 .........
89
OH ............
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0469 .........
E2007–BUSP–0470 .........
327
202
OH ............
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0471 .........
E2007–BUSP–0472 .........
179
411
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0473 .........
51
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0474 .........
258
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
............
............
............
............
............
E2007–BUSP–0475
E2007–BUSP–0476
E2007–BUSP–0477
E2007–BUSP–0478
E2007–BUSP–0479
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
198
50
380
7
292
OH
OH
OH
OH
............
............
............
............
E2007–BUSP–0480
E2007–BUSP–0481
E2007–BUSP–0482
E2007–BUSP–0483
.........
.........
.........
.........
120
516
347
309
OH ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0484 .........
349
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0485 .........
104
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0486 .........
576
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0487 .........
87
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
New York City, NY, Highline Project, for Studies, Design, and Construction.
New York, Improvements to Moynihan Station ......................................
Niagara Falls, NY Relocation, Development, and Enhancement of Niagara Falls International Railway Station/Intermodal Transportation
Center.
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, NY Replacement Buses .....
Oneonta, New York-bus replacement ....................................................
Ramapo, NY Transportation Safety Field Bus .......................................
Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square transit center ....................
Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square Transit Center ..................
Rochester, NY, Renaissance Square Intermodal Facility, Design and
Construction.
Rockland County, NY Express Bus .......................................................
Suffolk County, NY Design and construction of intermodal transit facility in Wyandanch.
Suffolk County, NY Purchase four handicapped accessible vans to
transport veterans to and from the VA facility in Northport.
Syracuse, New York, Syracuse University Connective Corridor Transit
Project.
Thendra-Webb and Utica, New York-Install handicap lifts in intermodal centers.
Town of Warwick, NY Bus Facility Warwick Transit System .................
Utica, New York Transit Multimodal Facilities ........................................
Utica, New York-Union Station Boehlert Center siding track improvements.
Utica, New York-Union Station rehabilitation and related infrastructure
improvements.
Westchester County, NY Bus replacement program .............................
Yonkers, NY Trolley Bus Acquisition .....................................................
Akron, OH Construct City of Akron Commuter Bus Transit Facility ......
Akron, Ohio Construct Downtown Multi-modal Transportation Center ..
Akron, Ohio-West Market Street transit center and related pedestrian
improvements.
Central Ohio Transit Authority-Paratransit and Small Bus Service Facility.
Cincinnati, Ohio-Construct Uptown Crossings Joint Development
Transit Project.
Cincinnati, Ohio-Metro Regional Transit Hub Network Eastern Neighborhoods.
Cleveland, OH Construct East Side Transit Center ...............................
Cleveland, OH Construct Fare Collection System Project, Cuyahoga
County.
Cleveland, OH Construct passenger inter-modal center near Dock 32
Cleveland, OH Construction of an inter-modal facility and related improvements at University Hospitals facility on Euclid Avenue.
Cleveland, Ohio acquisition of buses Greater Cleveland Regional
Transit Authority.
Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue and East 93rd Street intermodal facility.
Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue University Hospital intermodal facility
Cleveland, Ohio-University Circle Intermodal facility .............................
Columbiana County, OH Construct Inter-modal Facility ........................
Columbus, OH-Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility ........
Cuyahoga County, Ohio-Ohio Department of Transportation transit improvements.
Dayton Airport Inter-modal Rail Feasibility Study ..................................
Dayton-Wright Stop Plaza ......................................................................
Eastlake, Ohio-Eastlake Stadium transit intermodal facility ...................
Elyria, OH Construct the New York Central Train Station into an intermodal transportation hub.
Kent, OH Construct Kent State University Intermodal Facility serving
students and the general public.
Marietta, Ohio Construction of transportation hub to accommodate regional bus traffic.
Metro Regional Transit Authority/City of Akron-Downtown Transit Center/Akron.
Niles, OH Acquisition of bus operational and service equipment of
Niles Trumbull Transit.
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
1,200,000
1,200,000
1,123,584
200,640
30,096
50,160
902,880
451,440
1,400,000
700,000
922,944
56,179
950,000
20,064
110,352
1,200,000
20,064
100,320
752,400
75,240
300,960
802,560
130,416
476,000
601,920
185,592
601,920
100,320
172,550
200,640
200,640
1,705,440
902,880
1,705,440
1,003,200
1,203,840
30,096
150,480
476,000
852,720
410,911
200,640
100,320
1,666,000
40,128
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13927
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
State
Earmark ID
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0488 .........
385
OH ............
E2007–BUSP–0489 .........
34
OH
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
E2007–BUSP–0490
E2007–BUSP–0491
E2007–BUSP–0492
E2007–BUSP–0493
E2007–BUSP–0494
E2007–BUSP–0495
E2007–BUSP–0496
E2007–BUSP–0497
E2007–BUSP–0498
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
64
442
165
272
66
187
299
159
325
OR ............
E2007–BUSP–0499 .........
99
OR ............
E2007–BUSP–0500 .........
168
OR ............
OR ............
OR ............
E2007–BUSP–0501 .........
E2007–BUSP–0502 .........
E2007–BUSP–0503 .........
323
175
16
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
E2007–BUSP–0504
E2007–BUSP–0505
E2007–BUSP–0506
E2007–BUSP–0507
E2007–BUSP–0508
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
93
106
180
216
82
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0509 .........
225
PA ............
PA ............
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0510 .........
E2007–BUSP–0511 .........
E2007–BUSP–0512 .........
456
465
467
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0513 .........
471
PA
PA
PA
PA
E2007–BUSP–0514
E2007–BUSP–0515
E2007–BUSP–0516
E2007–BUSP–0517
.........
.........
.........
.........
481
428
482
123
PA ............
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0518 .........
E2007–BUSP–0519 .........
500
513
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0520 .........
514
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0521 .........
81
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
E2007–BUSP–0522
E2007–BUSP–0523
E2007–BUSP–0524
E2007–BUSP–0525
E2007–BUSP–0526
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
524
431
331
458
233
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0527 .........
457
PA ............
PA ............
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0528 .........
E2007–BUSP–0529 .........
E2007–BUSP–0530 .........
37
559
564
PA ............
PA ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
............
............
............
............
............
E2007–BUSP–0531 .........
E2007–BUSP–0532 .........
583
588
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0533 .........
201
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0534 .........
137
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0535 .........
413
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Springfield, OH-City of Springfield Bus Transfer Station and Associated Parking.
Toledo, OH TARTA/TARPS Passenger Inter-modal Facility construction.
Zanesville, OH-bus system signage and shelters ..................................
Albany, OR North Albany Park and Ride ...............................................
Albany, OR Rehabilitate Building At Multimodal Transit Station ...........
Bend, Oregon-replacement vans ...........................................................
Canby, OR bus and bus facilities ...........................................................
Columbia County, OR To purchase buses ............................................
Corvallis, OR Bus Replacement .............................................................
Eugene, OR Lane Transit District, Vehicle Replacement ......................
Grants Pass, OR Purchase Vehicles For Use By Josephine Community Transit.
Gresham, Oregon Construct a new light rail station and transit plaza
on Portland MAX system and serve Gresham Civic neighborhood.
Lane Transit District, Bus Rapid Transit Progressive Corridor Enhancements.
Lincoln, County, OR bus purchase ........................................................
Molalla, OR South Clackamas Transportation District, bus purchase ...
Portland, OR Renovation of Union Station, including structural reinforcement and public safety upgrades.
Salem, OR bus and bus facilities ...........................................................
Sandy, Oregon Transit Bus Facility .......................................................
Tillamook, OR construction of a transit facility .......................................
Wilsonville, OR South Metro Area Rapid Transit, bus and bus facilities
Yamhill County, OR For the construction of bus shelters, park and
ride facilities, and a signage strategy to increase ridership.
Allentown, Pennsylvania-Design and Construct Intermodal Transportation Center.
Altoona Multimodal Transportation Facility Parking Garage ..................
AMTRAN Altoona, PA-Buses and Transit System Improvements ........
Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania-Vehicle
Replacements.
Beaver County, PA Transit Authority Bus Replacement/ Related
Equipment Replacement.
Butler Township, PA-Cranbury Area Transit Service .............................
Butler, PA-Multimodal Transit Center Construction ...............................
Cambria County, PA Transit Authority-Bus Replacements ...................
Cheltenham, PA Glenside Rail Station Parking Garage project involving the construction of a 300–400 space parking lot at Easton Road
and Glenside Avenue.
City of Hazleton, PA-Hazleton Intermodal Center .................................
County of Lackawanna Transit System-Scranton Intermodal Transportation Center.
Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority-Purchase of Buses
and Spare Units.
Easton, Pennsylvania-Design and construct Intermodal Transportation
Center.
Erie, PA Metropolitan Transit Authority-Bus Acquisitions ......................
Erie, PA–EMTA Vehicle Acquisition .......................................................
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania-transit transfer center ...................................
Hershey, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Garage ...........
Intermodal Facilities in Bucks County (Croydon and Levittown Stations).
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Facility.
Lancaster, PA-bus replacement .............................................................
Lancaster, PA-Intermodal Project ..........................................................
Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority, PA-Allentown Intermodal Transportation Center.
Monroe Township, PA-Clarion County Buses ........................................
New Castle, PA Area Transit Authority-Bus Purchases/Park and Ride
Facility.
Philadelphia, PA Cruise Terminal Transportation Ctr. Phila. Naval
Shipyard.
Philadelphia, PA Improvements to the existing Penn’s Landing Ferry
Terminal.
Philadelphia, PA Penn’s Landing water shuttle parking lot expansion
and water shuttle ramp infrastructure construction.
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
50,160
1,504,800
16,302
191,086
305,737
200,640
30,096
28,090
296,183
716,571
40,845
280,896
594,621
50,160
20,064
20,064
401,280
140,448
20,064
50,160
22,070
401,280
240,000
714,000
238,000
238,000
833,000
200,640
714,000
200,640
333,000
238,000
238,000
401,280
238,000
401,280
180,375
60,000
601,920
60,000
190,608
167,000
476,000
157,000
176,000
702,240
802,560
220,704
13928
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0536 .........
22
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0537 .........
274
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0538 .........
316
PA ............
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0539 .........
E2007–BUSP–0540 .........
126
397
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0541 .........
48
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0542 .........
96
PA ............
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0543 .........
E2007–BUSP–0544 .........
424
626
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0545 .........
627
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0546 .........
628
PA ............
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0547 .........
E2007–BUSP–0548 .........
642
33
PA ............
PA ............
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0549 .........
E2007–BUSP–0550 .........
E2007–BUSP–0551 .........
660
661
662
PA ............
E2007–BUSP–0552 .........
65
PR ............
PR ............
PR ............
E2007–BUSP–0553 .........
E2007–BUSP–0554 .........
E2007–BUSP–0555 .........
128
421
3
PR ............
PR ............
PR ............
PR ............
RI ..............
E2007–BUSP–0556
E2007–BUSP–0557
E2007–BUSP–0558
E2007–BUSP–0559
E2007–BUSP–0560
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
164
152
71
58
246
RI ..............
RI ..............
SC ............
E2007–BUSP–0561 .........
E2007–BUSP–0562 .........
E2007–BUSP–0563 .........
604
115
533
SC ............
E2007–BUSP–0564 .........
619
SC ............
E2007–BUSP–0565 .........
620
SD ............
E2007–BUSP–0566 .........
621
TN
TN
TN
TN
E2007–BUSP–0567
E2007–BUSP–0568
E2007–BUSP–0569
E2007–BUSP–0570
.........
.........
.........
.........
237
554
565
579
TN ............
E2007–BUSP–0571 .........
268
TN ............
TN ............
TN ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0572 .........
E2007–BUSP–0573 .........
E2007–BUSP–0574 .........
412
30
636
TN ............
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0575 .........
E2007–BUSP–0576 .........
649
426
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0577 .........
480
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0578 .........
162
............
............
............
............
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia Zoo Intermodal Transportation project
w/parking consolidation, pedestrian walkways, public transportation
complements & landscape improvements to surface parking lots.
Philadelphia, PA SEPTA’s Market St. Elevated Rail project in conjunction with Philadelphia Commercial Development Corporation for improvements and assistance to entities along rail corridor.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-SEPTA Market Street Elevated Line parking facility.
Pittsburgh, PA Clean Fuel Bus Procurement .........................................
Pottsville, PA Union Street Trade and Transfer Center Intermodal Facility.
Project provides for the engineering and construction of a transportation center in Paoli, Chester County.
SEPTA Montgomery County Intermodal Improvements at Glenside
and Jenkintown Station Parking Garages.
Sharon, PA–Bus Facility Construction ...................................................
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Bucks County
Intermodal (Croydon and Levittown).
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Paoli Transportation Center.
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Villanova-SEPTA
Intermodal.
Transit Authority of Warren County, PA-Impact Warren ........................
Warren, PA-Construct Intermodal Transportation Center and related
pedestrian and landscape improvements.
Westmoreland County Transit Authority, PA-Bus Replacement ............
Wilkes-Barre Intermodal Facility .............................................................
Williamsport, PA Bureau of Transportation-Williamsport Trade and
Transit Centre Expansion.
York, Pennsylvania-Rabbit Transit facilities and communications
equipment.
Bayamon, Puerto Rico-bus terminal ......................................................
Bayamon, Puerto Rico-Purchase of Trolley Cars ..................................
Lares, PR-Trolley buses-for the purchase of two trolley buses that will
offer transportation through the urban zone in the Municipality of
Lares.
Puerto Rico-Caribbean National Forest buses and nonprofit uses .......
San Juan, Puerto Rico-bus security equipment .....................................
San Juan, Puerto Rico-Buses ................................................................
Yabucoca, Puerto Rico-Trolley Buses ...................................................
Providence, RI Expansion of Elmwood Paratransit Maintenance Facility.
Rhode Island, RIPTA Elmwood Facility Expansion ...............................
Rhode Island Statewide Bus Fleet .........................................................
Greensville, SC Transit Authority-City of Greenville Multimodal Transportation Center Improvements.
South Carolina Department of Transportation-Transit Facilities Construction Program.
South Carolina Department of Transportation-Vehicle Acquisition Program.
South Dakota Department of Transportation-Statewide Buses and Bus
Facilities.
Knoxville, Tennessee-Central Station Transit Center ............................
Knoxville, TN-Central Station .................................................................
Lipscomb University, TN-Intermodal Parking Garage ............................
Metropolitan Transit Authority-Nashville Downtown Transit Transfer
Facility.
Nashville, TN Construct a parking garage on the campus of Lipscomb
University, Nashville.
Nashville, TN Construct Downtown Nashville Transit Transfer Facility
Sevier County, Tennessee-U.S. 441 bus rapid transit ..........................
Tennessee Department of Transportation-Statewide Tennessee Transit ITS and Bus Replacement Project.
University of Memphis-Pedestrian Bridge ..............................................
Abilene, TX Vehicle replacement and facility improvements for transit
system.
Brownsville Urban System, TX—City-Wide Transit Improvement
Project.
Brownsville, TX Brownsville Urban System City-Wide Transit Improvement Project.
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
1,003,200
280,896
802,560
100,320
401,280
200,640
a 1,003,200
100,320
714,000
714,000
714,000
238,000
300,960
238,000
1,428,000
714,000
555,873
120,384
170,544
52,969
601,920
601,920
200,640
35,112
1,003,200
1,700,000
1,203,840
238,000
476,000
1,904,000
3,452,000
2,046,528
595,000
357,000
2,856,000
401,280
300,960
50,160
2,856,000
714,000
80,256
952,000
501,600
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13929
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
Earmark ID
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0579 .........
153
TX .............
TX .............
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0580 .........
E2007–BUSP–0581 .........
E2007–BUSP–0582 .........
485
455
506
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0583 .........
111
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0584 .........
438
TX .............
TX .............
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0585 .........
E2007–BUSP–0586 .........
E2007–BUSP–0587 .........
515
336
196
TX .............
TX .............
E2007–BUSP–0588 .........
E2007–BUSP–0589 .........
290
536
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
E2007–BUSP–0590
E2007–BUSP–0591
E2007–BUSP–0592
E2007–BUSP–0593
E2007–BUSP–0594
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
561
24
610
210
653
TX .............
UT ............
E2007–BUSP–0595 .........
E2007–BUSP–0596 .........
63
178
UT ............
VA ............
E2007–BUSP–0597 .........
E2007–BUSP–0598 .........
651
409
VA ............
VA ............
VA ............
E2007–BUSP–0599 .........
E2007–BUSP–0600 .........
E2007–BUSP–0601 .........
232
278
142
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
E2007–BUSP–0602
E2007–BUSP–0603
E2007–BUSP–0604
E2007–BUSP–0605
E2007–BUSP–0606
E2007–BUSP–0607
E2007–BUSP–0608
E2007–BUSP–0609
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
359
157
492
493
494
495
511
15
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
............
............
............
............
............
............
E2007–BUSP–0610
E2007–BUSP–0611
E2007–BUSP–0612
E2007–BUSP–0613
E2007–BUSP–0614
E2007–BUSP–0615
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
525
281
97
532
535
391
VA ............
VA ............
E2007–BUSP–0616 .........
E2007–BUSP–0617 .........
354
68
VA ............
E2007–BUSP–0618 .........
602
VA ............
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–BUSP–0619 .........
360
VA ............
VA ............
VA ............
VA ............
VA ............
VT .............
VT .............
VT .............
WA ...........
E2007–BUSP–0620
E2007–BUSP–0621
E2007–BUSP–0622
E2007–BUSP–0623
E2007–BUSP–0624
E2007–BUSP–0625
E2007–BUSP–0626
E2007–BUSP–0627
E2007–BUSP–0628
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
184
434
312
305
361
477
486
633
94
WA
WA
WA
WA
E2007–BUSP–0629
E2007–BUSP–0630
E2007–BUSP–0631
E2007–BUSP–0632
.........
.........
.........
.........
395
337
193
334
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
...........
...........
...........
...........
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project description
Allocation
Bryan, TX The District-Bryan Intermodal Transit Terminal and Parking
Facility.
Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, TX-Bus Replacements
Carrollton, Texas Downtown Regional Multimodal Transit Hub ............
City of Round Rock, TX-Downtown Intermodal Transportation Terminal.
Construct West Houston and Fort Bend County, Texas-bus transit
corridor.
Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Regional Transit Authority for maintenance
facility improvements.
Dallas Area Rapid Transit-Bus passenger Facilities ..............................
Dallas, TX Bus Passenger Facilities ......................................................
Design Downtown Carrollton, Texas Regional Multi-Modal Transit Hub
Station.
Galveston, Texas-Intermodal center and parking facility, The Strand ...
Harris County-West Houston-Fort Bend Bus Transit Corridor: Uptown
Westpark Terminal.
Laredo-North Laredo Transit Hub-Bus Maintenance Facility .................
Roma, TX Bus Facility ............................................................................
San Angelo, TX Street Railroad Company-Transit Fleet Replacement
San Antonio, TX Improve VIA bus facility and purchase new buses ....
VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority, TX-Bus & Bus Facility Improvements.
Zapata, Texas Purchase Bus vehicles ...................................................
Sandy City, UT Construct transit hub station and TRAX station at
9400 South.
Utah Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities ..................................................
Alexandria, VA Eisenhower Avenue Intermodal Station improvements,
including purchase of buses and construction of bus shelters.
Alexandria, VA Royal Street Bus Garage Replacement ........................
Arlington County, VA Columbia Pike Bus Improvements ......................
Arlington County, VA Crystal City-Potomac Yard Busway, including
construction of bus shelters.
Arlington County, VA Pentagon City Multimodal Improvements ...........
Bealeton, Virginia-Intermodal Station Depot Refurbishment .................
City of Alexandria, VA-City-Wide Transit Improvements .......................
City of Alexandria, VA-Potomac Yard Transit Improvements ................
City of Alexandria, VA-Replace Royal Street Bus Garage ....................
City of Alexandria, VA-Valley Pedestrian & Transit ...............................
Commonwealth of Virginia-Statewide Bus Capital Program ..................
Fairfax County, VA Richmond Highway (U.S. Route 1) Public Transportation Improvements.
Fairfax County, Virginia-Richmond Highway Initiative ...........................
Falls Church, VA Falls Church Intermodal Transportation Center ........
Fredericksburg, Virginia-Improve and repair Fredericksburg Station ....
Greater Richmond Transit, VA-Bus Operations/Maintenance Facility ...
Hampton Roads Transit, VA-Southside Bus Facility .............................
Hampton Roads, VA Final design and construction for a Hampton
Roads Transit Southside Bus Facility.
Norfolk, Virginia-Final Design and Construction Southside Bus Facility
Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula, Virginia-Bay Transit Multimodal
Facilities.
Potomac & Rappahannock Transportation Commission, VA-Buses for
Service Expansion.
Richmond, VA Design and construction for a bus operations and
maintenance facility for Greater Richmond Transit Company.
Richmond, VA Renovation and construction for Main Street Station ....
Roanoke, VA-Bus restoration in the City of Roanoke ...........................
Roanoke, Virginia-Improve Virginian Railway Station ............................
Roanoke, Virginia-Intermodal Facility .....................................................
Roanoke, Virginia-Roanoke Railway and Link Passenger facility .........
Brattleborough, VT, Intermodal Center ..................................................
CCTA, VT, Bus, Facilities and Equipment .............................................
State of Vermont Buses, Facilities and Equipment ...............................
Ilwaco, WA Procure shuttles for Lewis and Clark National Historical
Park.
Ilwaco, WA Construct park and ride ......................................................
Island Transit, WA Operations Base Facilities Project ..........................
Mukilteo, WA Multi-Modal Terminal .......................................................
North Bend, Washington-Park and Ride ................................................
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
601,920
2,380,000
240,000
238,000
401,280
501,600
238,000
2,568,192
401,280
902,880
238,000
714,000
105,336
238,000
1,404,480
1,190,000
62,700
401,280
7,148,000
501,600
100,320
702,240
601,920
401,280
55,176
238,000
238,000
714,000
238,000
3,570,000
401,280
476,000
401,280
501,600
1,190,000
238,000
401,280
351,120
652,080
238,000
300,960
220,704
50,160
50,160
40,128
100,320
200,000
400,000
350,000
20,064
20,064
481,536
1,163,712
160,512
13930
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 12.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS FACILITY ALLOCATIONS—Continued
SAFETEA–
LU
Project No.
State
Earmark ID
WA ...........
WA ...........
WA ...........
E2007–BUSP–0633 .........
E2007–BUSP–0634 .........
E2007–BUSP–0635 .........
333
613
113
WA ...........
WA ...........
WA ...........
E2007–BUSP–0636 .........
E2007–BUSP–0637 .........
E2007–BUSP–0638 .........
151
654
655
WI .............
E2007–BUSP–0639 .........
350
WI .............
WI .............
WI .............
WV ...........
E2007–BUSP–0640
E2007–BUSP–0641
E2007–BUSP–0642
E2007–BUSP–0643
.........
.........
.........
.........
100
452
663
73
WV ...........
WY ...........
E2007–BUSP–0644 .........
E2007–BUSP–0645 .........
658
665
Project description
Allocation
Oak Harbor, WA Multimodal Facility ......................................................
Seattle, WA Multimodal Terminal Redevelopment & Expansion ...........
Snohomish County, WA Community Transit bus purchases and facility
enhancement.
Thurston County, WA Replace Thurston County Buses .......................
Washington Southworth Terminal Redevelopment ................................
Washington, King Street Transportation Center-Intercity Bus Terminal
Component.
Milwaukee, WI Rehabilitate Intermodal transportation facility at downtown Milwaukee’s Amtrak Station, increase parking for bus passengers.
State of Wisconsin buses and bus facilities ...........................................
State of Wisconsin Transit Intermodal Facilities ....................................
Wisconsin, Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities ....................................
West Virginia Construct Beckley Intermodal Gateway pursuant to the
eligibility provisions for projects listed under section 3030(d)(3) of
P.L. 105–178.
West Virginia, Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities ...................................
Wyoming Department of Transportation-Wyoming Statewide Bus and
Bus Related Facilities.
200,640
900,000
601,920
180,576
1,150,000
60,000
902,880
3,280,464
1,200,000
610,000
4,815,360
5,000,000
714,000
Subtotal ...........................................................................................
Other Projects:
--E2007–BUSP–0654 .........
PA ..... E2007–BUSP–0655 .........
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
Grand Total .............................................
San Francisco Water Transit Authority ..................................................
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ferry System ..................
Maine State Ferry Service, Rockland ....................................................
Swans Island, Maine Ferry Service .......................................................
Camden, New Jersey Ferry System ......................................................
Governor’s Island, New York Ferry System ...........................................
Staten Island Ferry .................................................................................
Philadelphia Penn’s Landing Ferry Terminal .........................................
2,500,000
2,500,000
650,000
350,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
10,000,000
Fuel Cell Bus Program ...........................................................................
Bus Testing ............................................................................................
11,500,000
3,000,000
Subtotal ...........................................................................................
Unallocated Amount Transferred from Clean Fuels ..............................
Unallocated Amount ...............................................................................
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
435,170,089
Subtotal ...........................................................................................
Ferry Boat Systems Projects:
CA ..... E2007–BUSP–0646
MA ..... E2007–BUSP–0647
ME ..... E2007–BUSP–0648
ME ..... E2007–BUSP–0649
NJ ...... E2007–BUSP–0650
NY ..... E2007–BUSP–0651
NY ..... E2007–BUSP–0652
PA ..... E2007–BUSP–0653
14,500,000
26,279,000
413,291,121
.................................................................................................................
872,961,210
a This
allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006.
State and description for the project listed are incorrectly shown as CA-Monterey Park, CA bus enchancement and improvements - construct maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve transit service. The correct State is IL and the correct project description is
Mattoon, Illinois—historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006.
c This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Louisiana project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006.
d This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Illinois project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006.
e This Amount was incorrectly listed as $1,156,699 in Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006.
b The
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations:
AK ..... E2005–BUSP–000 ...........
AK ..... E2005–BUSP–001 ...........
AK ..... E2005–BUSP–002 ...........
AK ..... E2005–BUSP–004 ...........
AK ..... E2005–BUSP–005 ...........
AK ..... E2005–BUSP–008 ...........
AK ..... E2005–BUSP–011 ...........
AL ...... E2005–BUSP–012 ...........
AL ...... E2005–BUSP–013 ...........
AL ...... E2005–BUSP–014 ...........
AL ...... E2005–BUSP–016 ...........
AL ...... E2005–BUSP–018 ...........
AL ...... E2005–BUSP–021 ...........
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Project
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Alaska Mental Health Trust bus program, Alaska ..............................
Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal bus/parking facility, Alaska
Anchorage Museum/Transit intermodal depot, Alaska .......................
Anchorage Ship Creek intermodal facility, Alaska .............................
Copper River Transit program, Alaska ...............................................
Knik Arm intermodal facility terminal, Alaska .....................................
Whittier Intermodal Facility, Alaska ....................................................
Alabama State Docks intermodal facility, Alabama ............................
Birmingham Intermodel Facility-Phase II, Alabama ...........................
City of Orange Beach senior activity bus, Alabama ...........................
Jacksonville State University buses, Alabama ...................................
Oakwood College shuttle bus project, Alabama ................................
Vans, CASA of Marshall County, Alabama ........................................
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
Unobligated allocation
23MRN2
$189,844
675,686
1,457,667
2,429,445
1,457,667
506,764
1,181,937
3,378,430
3,401,224
33,784
1,943,557
90,572
97,177
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13931
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E2005–BUSP–023
E2005–BUSP–024
E2005–BUSP–027
E2005–BUSP–035
E2005–BUSP–709
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E2005–BUSP–036
E2005–BUSP–037
E2005–BUSP–041
E2005–BUSP–044
E2005–BUSP–045
E2005–BUSP–046
E2005–BUSP–048
E2005–BUSP–049
E2005–BUSP–050
E2005–BUSP–051
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
CA .....
E2005–BUSP–054 ...........
....................
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
CO .....
CT .....
CT .....
CT .....
CT .....
CT .....
CT .....
DC .....
DE .....
FL ......
E2005–BUSP–055
E2005–BUSP–058
E2005–BUSP–060
E2005–BUSP–061
E2005–BUSP–063
E2005–BUSP–064
E2005–BUSP–065
E2005–BUSP–071
E2005–BUSP–072
E2005–BUSP–077
E2005–BUSP–083
E2005–BUSP–089
E2005–BUSP–090
E2005–BUSP–092
E2005–BUSP–093
E2005–BUSP–094
E2005–BUSP–095
E2005–BUSP–096
E2005–BUSP–098
E2005–BUSP–099
E2005–BUSP–710
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
IA .......
ID ......
IL .......
E2005–BUSP–101
E2005–BUSP–103
E2005–BUSP–105
E2005–BUSP–106
E2005–BUSP–110
E2005–BUSP–111
E2005–BUSP–112
E2005–BUSP–113
E2005–BUSP–114
E2005–BUSP–116
E2005–BUSP–119
E2005–BUSP–121
E2005–BUSP–124
E2005–BUSP–126
E2005–BUSP–130
E2005–BUSP–700
E2005–BUSP–135
E2005–BUSP–144
E2005–BUSP–145
E2005–BUSP–146
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
IL .......
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AR
AR
AZ
CA
CA
E2005–BUSP–147 ...........
....................
IL .......
E2005–BUSP–148 ...........
....................
IL .......
E2005–BUSP–149 ...........
....................
IN ......
IN ......
E2005–BUSP–155 ...........
E2005–BUSP–157 ...........
....................
....................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Arkansas Statewide buses and bus facilities .....................................
CATA bus replacement, Arkansas .....................................................
Coconino County-Sedona bus system, Arizona .................................
Bellflower Dial-a-Ride, California ........................................................
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for bus
and bus facility improvements.
Calabasas Transit, California ..............................................................
Catalina Transit Terminal, Redondo Beach, California ......................
Downtown transit center ITS, California .............................................
Elk Grove Park and Ride Facilities, California ...................................
Fairfield/Vacaville Intermodal Transit Station, California ....................
Fresno Area Express bus program, California ...................................
Hemet Transit Center bus facility, California ......................................
I–15 Managed Lanes/Bus Rapid Transit, San Diego, California .......
LAVTA buses and bus facilities, California ........................................
LAVTA satellite maintenance, operations and administrative facility,
California.
Los Angeles Trade Tech intermodal links with bus and Metro, California.
Los Angeles Valley College bus station extension, California ...........
Modesto bus facility, California ...........................................................
Municipal Transit Operators Coalition, California ...............................
Napa Transit Center construction, California .....................................
Palm Springs bus station relocation, California ..................................
Palo Alto Intermodal Transit Center, California ..................................
Riverbank vehicle garage renovation, California ................................
San Luis Rey Transit Center, California .............................................
Santa Clara VTA bus signal priority project, California ......................
South Gate Clean Air buses, California .............................................
Transit Oriented Neighborhood Program, California ..........................
Colorado Statewide buses and bus facilities ......................................
Bridgeport Intermodal Transportation Center, Connecticut ................
Hartford/New Britain Busway, Connecticut .........................................
Pulse Point Joint Development safety improvements, Connecticut ...
Stamford Urban Transitway Phase II, Connecticut ............................
Waterbury bus maintenance facility, Connecticut ..............................
West Haven/Orange Intermodal Facility, Connecticut ........................
Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center, Washington, DC ...
Delaware Statewide buses and bus facilities .....................................
Bus stop, bus pullout and transit improvements consistent with the
City of Ft. Lauderdale Community Redevelopment Agency plan.
DeBary Intermodal Transportation Facility, Florida ............................
Gainesville Regional Airport multi-modal facility, Florida ...................
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART), Florida .........................
Homestead East-West bus connector, Florida ...................................
Miami Beach Intermodal Greenway Transit Facility, Florida ..............
Miami Beach Intermodal Transit Facility, Florida ...............................
Miami Intermodal Center, Florida .......................................................
Miami-Dade County bus procurement, Florida ...................................
Miramar Parkway transit shelter enhancements, Florida ...................
North Florida and West Coast Transit Coalition Bus Acquisition .......
Putnam County RideSolutions buses and bus facilities, Florida ........
Southwest Broward bus facility, Florida .............................................
St. Petersburg intermodal facility, Florida ...........................................
Trolley System, Boynton Beach, Florida ............................................
Atlantic Station, Georgia .....................................................................
Georgia Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA) ...........................
Moultrie Intermodal Facility, Georgia ..................................................
UNI multimodal project, Iowa ..............................................................
Idaho Transit Coalition Statewide buses and bus facilities ................
Bus facilities for Bloomington, Macomb, Peoria, and Rock Island
(from Illinois Statewide buses and bus facilities).
Champaign Day Care Center/Park-n-Ride (from Illinois Statewide
buses and bus facilities).
City of Chicago’s Free Trolley System (from Illinois Statewide buses
and bus facilities).
Downstate Illinois replacement buses (from Illinois Statewide buses
and bus facilities).
Citilink, Indiana ....................................................................................
Ivy Tech State College multmodal facility, Indiana ............................
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
6,893,126
388,711
800,000
116,614
a g 728,834
485,888
971,779
97,177
971,779
485,888
971,779
340,123
1,652,023
168,921
101,353
485,888
485,888
337,843
971,779
485,888
29,154
728,834
121,472
388,711
728,834
242,945
121,541
2,738,091
583,427
3,887,113
168,921
5,830,669
485,888
971,779
728,834
1,278,334
b g 971,779
242,945
291,534
485,888
242,945
680,245
680,245
5,830,669
485,888
97,177
834,466
1,457,667
1,166,133
485,888
242,945
1,068,956
4,373,003
485,888
2,797,380
1,069,753
1,181,668
728,834
728,833
2,915,335
514,687
485,888
13932
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
E2005–BUSP–164
E2005–BUSP–165
E2005–BUSP–166
E2005–BUSP–167
E2005–BUSP–171
E2005–BUSP–172
E2005–BUSP–175
E2005–BUSP–177
E2005–BUSP–178
E2005–BUSP–180
E2005–BUSP–183
E2005–BUSP–190
E2005–BUSP–194
E2005–BUSP–195
E2005–BUSP–196
E2005–BUSP–197
E2005–BUSP–198
E2005–BUSP–199
E2005–BUSP–200
E2005–BUSP–201
E2005–BUSP–206
E2005–BUSP–207
E2005–BUSP–209
E2005–BUSP–223
E2005–BUSP–237
E2005–BUSP–246
E2005–BUSP–248
E2005–BUSP–711
E2005–BUSP–258
E2005–BUSP–259
E2005–BUSP–260
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
MS .....
MS .....
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
KS .....
KS .....
KS .....
KS .....
KY .....
KY .....
KY .....
KY .....
KY .....
LA ......
MA .....
MA .....
MA .....
MA .....
MA .....
MA .....
MD ....
MD ....
MD ....
MD ....
ME .....
MI ......
MI ......
MI ......
MI ......
MN ....
MN ....
MN ....
MO ....
MO ....
MS .....
E2005–BUSP–704 ...........
E2005–BUSP–263 ...........
....................
....................
MT .....
NC .....
NC .....
NC .....
NC .....
ND .....
NE .....
NJ ......
NJ ......
NJ ......
NM ....
NM ....
NV .....
NV .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
OH .....
OH .....
E2005–BUSP–266
E2005–BUSP–268
E2005–BUSP–269
E2005–BUSP–271
E2005–BUSP–272
E2005–BUSP–273
E2005–BUSP–274
E2005–BUSP–280
E2005–BUSP–281
E2005–BUSP–285
E2005–BUSP–289
E2005–BUSP–291
E2005–BUSP–292
E2005–BUSP–294
E2005–BUSP–296
E2005–BUSP–297
E2005–BUSP–298
E2005–BUSP–300
E2005–BUSP–301
E2005–BUSP–302
E2005–BUSP–303
E2005–BUSP–304
E2005–BUSP–305
E2005–BUSP–306
E2005–BUSP–308
E2005–BUSP–309
E2005–BUSP–310
E2005–BUSP–311
E2005–BUSP–314
E2005–BUSP–316
E2005–BUSP–317
E2005–BUSP–318
E2005–BUSP–319
E2005–BUSP–321
E2005–BUSP–322
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
VerDate Aug<31>2005
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Kansas statewide bus and bus facilities .............................................
Lawrence Transit System maintenance facility, Kansas ....................
Regional maintenance/paratransit scheduling facility, Kansas ..........
Wichita Transit Authority buses and bus facilities, Kansas ................
Manchester, Clay County Intermodal Facility, Kentucky ....................
Murray/Calloway County Transit Authority, Kentucky ........................
Southern and Eastern Kentucky buses and bus facilities ..................
Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, Kentucky ...........................
University of Louisville bus shuttle program, Kentucky ......................
Louisiana Statewide buses and bus facilities .....................................
Attleboro Intermodal Transportation Center, Massachusetts .............
Lechmere Station intermodal, Massachusetts ....................................
Salem Intermodal Center improvement project, Massachusetts ........
Springfield Union Station, Springfield, Massachusetts .......................
UMass Transit RTIC and training facility, Massachusetts ..................
Wonderland Station improvements, Revere, Massachusetts .............
Glenmont Metrorail parking garage expansion, Maryland .................
Howard County Transit repair facility, Maryland ................................
Maryland Statewide buses and bus facilities .....................................
Rockville Town Center transit project, Maryland ................................
Millinocket Airport transfer bus project, Maine ...................................
Allegan County Transportation, Michigan ...........................................
Ann Arbor Transit Authority (AATA) transit center, Michigan ............
Harbor Transit, Michigan ....................................................................
Muskegon Area Transit System, Michigan .........................................
Como Rider program, Minnesota .......................................................
Greater Minnesota Transit ..................................................................
White Earth Tribal Nation bus and bus related activities, MN ...........
Missouri statewide bus and bus facilities ...........................................
Southern Missouri buses and bus facilities ........................................
Harrison County HOV/Bus rapid transit Canal Road intermodal connector, Mississippi.
City of Jackson, Mississippi ................................................................
Mississippi Valley State University mass transit program expansion,
Mississippi.
Billings public bus and medical transfer facility, Montana ..................
Chapel Hill replacement buses, North Carolina .................................
Charlotte Multi-modal Transportation Center, North Carolina ............
North Carolina Statewide buses and bus facilities .............................
Triangle Transit Authority replacement buses, North Carolina ..........
North Dakota Statewide buses and bus facilities ...............................
Kearney RYDE Transit, Nebraska ......................................................
Bergen Intermodal Stations and Park N’Rides, New Jersey .............
Englewood bus purchase, New Jersey ..............................................
Park and Ride for the Edison Train Station, New Jersey ..................
New Mexico Statewide bus and bus facilities ....................................
West Side transit facility, New Mexico ...............................................
Bus Rapid Transit, Virginia Street Phase 1, Nevada .........................
Las Vegas buses, Nevada ..................................................................
Boro Park JCC bus purchase, New York ...........................................
Brookhaven Town Senior Citizen Jitney Bus, New York ...................
Broome County hybrid buses, New York ...........................................
Bus Facility, 65th Street Intermodal Station, New York .....................
Central New York Regional Transportation Authority, New York ......
Fort Edward Intermodal Station, New York ........................................
Irvington Intermodal Upgrades, New York .........................................
Jacobi Transportation Facility, New York ...........................................
Jamaica Intermodal Facilities, New York ...........................................
JCC of Coney Island Bus Purchase, New York .................................
Pelham Intermodal Improvements, New York ....................................
Renaissance Square, New York .........................................................
Rochester Central Bus Terminal, New York ......................................
Senior Bus Service Bus Replacement, North Hempstead, New York
Sullivan County buses and bus facilities, New York ..........................
Tuckahoe Intermodal Improvements, New York ................................
Ulster County Hybrid Buses, New York .............................................
Westchester County Bee Line Bus Replacement, New York ............
White Plains Downtown Circulator, New York ...................................
Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility .............................
Central Ohio Transity Authority ITS Phase III ....................................
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
491,839
388,711
777,422
242,945
1,943,557
1,447,701
500,000
203,212
2,429,445
3,417,992
1,943,557
971,779
971,779
6,505,083
3,887,113
1,943,557
485,888
485,888
3,609,668
971,779
34,012
1,132,067
337,843
194,357
485,888
1,457,667
112,000
c g 971,779
855,797
320,297
1,943,557
d 2,915,334
194,357
2,429,445
24,422
17,839
2,682,851
971,779
626,797
1,020,367
1,943,557
364,417
971,779
93,097
371,779
291,779
971,779
194,357
121,472
1,554,845
7,288,337
3,158,279
291,534
242,945
971,779
1,943,557
97,177
485,888
6,316,558
5,441,959
291,534
485,888
38,872
1
3,887,113
242,945
534,478
194,357
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13933
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
OK .....
OK .....
E2005–BUSP–334 ...........
E2005–BUSP–706 ...........
....................
....................
OR .....
OR .....
E2005–BUSP–338 ...........
E2005–BUSP–341 ...........
....................
....................
OR
PA
PA
PA
.....
.....
.....
.....
E2005–BUSP–343
E2005–BUSP–346
E2005–BUSP–347
E2005–BUSP–348
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E2005–BUSP–357
E2005–BUSP–360
E2005–BUSP–362
E2005–BUSP–363
E2005–BUSP–364
E2005–BUSP–366
E2005–BUSP–368
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
PA
PR
RI
SC
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
VA
VA
VA
VA
VT
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OK
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E2005–BUSP–323
E2005–BUSP–324
E2005–BUSP–325
E2005–BUSP–328
E2005–BUSP–330
E2005–BUSP–331
E2005–BUSP–333
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E2005–BUSP–369
E2005–BUSP–372
E2005–BUSP–373
E2005–BUSP–376
E2005–BUSP–381
E2005–BUSP–382
E2005–BUSP–383
E2005–BUSP–386
E2005–BUSP–387
E2005–BUSP–388
E2005–BUSP–389
E2005–BUSP–390
E2005–BUSP–392
E2005–BUSP–393
E2005–BUSP–395
E2005–BUSP–396
E2005–BUSP–399
E2005–BUSP–401
E2005–BUSP–403
E2005–BUSP–405
E2005–BUSP–406
E2005–BUSP–415
E2005–BUSP–416
E2005–BUSP–417
E2005–BUSP–419
E2005–BUSP–712
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
VT .....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
E2005–BUSP–425
E2005–BUSP–426
E2005–BUSP–429
E2005–BUSP–430
E2005–BUSP–433
E2005–BUSP–438
E2005–BUSP–441
E2005–BUSP–446
E2005–BUSP–447
E2005–BUSP–437
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Unobligated allocation
Project
Cincinnati Local Community bus enhancements, Ohio ......................
Cleveland Clinic Pedestrian Access Tunnel, Ohio .............................
Cuyahoga County Plan for Senior Transportation, Ohio ....................
Ohio statewide buses and bus facilities .............................................
TARTA/TARPS Intermodal Facility, Ohio ...........................................
Lawton buses and bus facilities, Oklahoma .......................................
Northern Oklahoma regional multimodal facilities and transit system, Oklahoma.
Oklahoma DOT Transit Program, Oklahoma .....................................
Tulsa transit buses and equipment/Tulsa Transit Multi-use facility in
Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Lewis and Clark explorer shuttle parking, Oregon .............................
South Metro Area Rapid Transit park-and-ride facility and transit
center, Oregon.
Yamhill County Transit bus and bus facilities, Oregon ......................
Ardmore transit center, Pennsylvania .................................................
Area Transit Authority, Pennsylvania .................................................
Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania passenger terminal, Pennsylvania.
Cruise Terminal Intermodal Facility, Pennsylvania ............................
Harrisburg Transportation Center, Pennsylvania ...............................
Incline Plane Cable Replacement, Johnstown, Pennsylvania ...........
Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority, Charleroi, Pennsylvania ...............
Mid-County Transit Authority Kittanning, Pennsylvania .....................
Northumberland County Transportation, Pennsylvania ......................
Union Station Intermodal Trade and Transit Center, Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Union/Snyder Transportation Alliance, Union County, Pennsylvania
Carolina Mini-Buses, Puerto Rico .......................................................
Elmwood Facility Expansion, Rhode Island .......................................
South Carolina Statewide buses and bus facilities ............................
Memphis Airport Intermodal Facility, Tennessee ...............................
Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency ..............................
Tennessee Statewide buses and bus facilities ..................................
Brazos Transit District passenger shelter program, Texas ................
Bryan Intermodel Transit Terminal with Parking, Texas ....................
Bryan/College Station Bus Replacement Program, Texas ................
Capital Metro North Operating Facility, Texas ...................................
Capitol Metro buses and bus facilities, Texas ....................................
CNG bus replacement, Texas ............................................................
Corpus Christi buses and bus facilities, Texas ..................................
Denton Downtown multimodal transit facility, Texas ..........................
EL Paso buses, Texas ........................................................................
Houston METRO, Park and Rides, Texas .........................................
Hunt County Committee on Aging Transit Vehicles, Texas ...............
Laredo Bus Hub and Maintenance Facility, Texas ............................
The Woodlands Capital Cost of Contracting Program, Texas ...........
Waco Transit Alternative Fueled Bus Purchase, Texas .....................
Hampton Roads Transit New Maintenance Facilities, Virginia ..........
I–66/Vienna Metrorail Accessibility Improvements, Virginia ...............
James City County natural gas buses, Virginia .................................
Potomac Yard Transit Way, Virginia ..................................................
Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont.
Vermont Statewide buses and bus facilities .......................................
Ben Franklin Transit Facility Improvements, Washington ..................
Community Transit Bus and Van Replacement, Washington ............
Edmonds Crossing Mulitmodal Transportation Project, Washington
Grant Transit Authority vehicle replacement, Washington .................
Jefferson Transit operations/maintenance facility, Washington .........
King County Metro, King County Airfield Transfer Area, Washington
Pierce Transit Base expansion, Washington ......................................
Port Angeles International Gateway Center, Washington ..................
Jefferson Transit (Washington Small Bus System Program of
Projects, Washington).
Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations .......................................................................................................................
FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations:
AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–000 ......... .................... Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal bus/parking facility ...........
AK ..... E–2006–BUSP–001 .........
427 Alaska Native Medical Center intermodal parking facility ..................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
777,422
971,779
971,779
529,163
1,457,667
201,158
4,858,891
2,300,771
e 1,943,557
485,888
485,888
81,028
5,404,669
1,384,784
766,724
485,888
971,779
116,614
585,013
213,792
97,177
1,943,557
1,457,667
1,846,378
1,943,557
858,714
2,915,334
728,834
3,714,644
485,888
317,061
1,259,424
405,411
675,686
388,711
691,008
3,109,690
1
4,581,945
971,779
1,943,557
437,301
3,887,113
2,186,501
583,067
815,334
777,422
ab 1,943,557
700,481
1,020,367
971,779
337,843
777,422
202,706
1,443,557
971,779
f 971,779
728,834
$249,592,772
742,500
1,138,500
13934
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
E–2006–BUSP–002 .........
E–2006–BUSP–003 .........
466
422
AK .....
E–2006–BUSP–004 .........
425
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–005
E–2006–BUSP–006
E–2006–BUSP–007
E–2006–BUSP–008
E–2006–BUSP–009
E–2006–BUSP–010
E–2006–BUSP–011
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
541
416
236
550
553
574
423
AK .....
AK .....
AK .....
AK .....
AK .....
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
E–2006–BUSP–012
E–2006–BUSP–013
E–2006–BUSP–014
E–2006–BUSP–015
E–2006–BUSP–016
E–2006–BUSP–018
E–2006–BUSP–019
E–2006–BUSP–020
E–2006–BUSP–021
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
596
597
616
....................
664
461
....................
462
437
AL ......
AL ......
E–2006–BUSP–329 .........
E–2006–BUSP–022 .........
469
98
AL ......
E–2006–BUSP–023 .........
496
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AL ......
AR .....
AR .....
AR .....
AZ .....
AZ .....
AZ .....
E–2006–BUSP–024
E–2006–BUSP–026
E–2006–BUSP–027
E–2006–BUSP–028
E–2006–BUSP–029
E–2006–BUSP–030
E–2006–BUSP–032
E–2006–BUSP–033
E–2006–BUSP–034
E–2006–BUSP–036
E–2006–BUSP–037
E–2006–BUSP–038
E–2006–BUSP–039
E–2006–BUSP–040
E–2006–BUSP–041
E–2006–BUSP–042
E–2006–BUSP–044
E–2006–BUSP–045
E–2006–BUSP–047
E–2006–BUSP–048
E–2006–BUSP–049
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
501
504
507
....................
....................
528
....................
582
....................
....................
644
645
646
647
650
487
231
....................
....................
304
229
AZ .....
AZ .....
AZ .....
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AK .....
AK .....
E–2006–BUSP–050 .........
E–2006–BUSP–051 .........
E–2006–BUSP–052 .........
....................
....................
47
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–053 .........
E–2006–BUSP–054 .........
E–2006–BUSP–055 .........
E–2006–BUSP–056 .........
E–2006–BUSP–057 .........
E–2006–BUSP–1113 .......
E–2006–BUSP–059 .........
E–2006–BUSP–060 .........
E–2006–BUSP–061 .........
E–2006–BUSP–062 .........
E–2006–BUSP–065 .........
E–2006–BUSP–066 .........
346
150
....................
....................
26
....................
203
....................
....................
....................
398
76
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–067 .........
227
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–068 .........
....................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Anchorage-Transit Needs ...................................................................
C Street Expanded bus facility and inter-modal parking garage, Anchorage, AK.
CITC Non-profit Services Center inter-modal parking facility, Anchorage, AK.
Hoonah, AK-Intermodal Ferry Dock ...................................................
Improve marine inter-modal facilities in Ketchikan .............................
Juneau, Alaska-transit bus acquisition and transit center ..................
Juneau-Transit Bus Acquisition and Transit Center ...........................
Ketchikan, Alaska-Transit Needs ........................................................
Matsu, Alaska-Transit Needs ..............................................................
Morris Thompson Cultural and Visitors Center intermodal parking
facility, Fairbanks, AK.
North Slope Borough, AK-Transit Purposes .......................................
North Star Borough, AK-Transit Purposes .........................................
Sitka, Alaska-Transit Needs ...............................................................
Skagway Intermodal facility, Alaska ...................................................
Wrangell, AK-Ferry Infrastructure .......................................................
Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind-Bus project ..............................
Alabama State Docks Choctaw Point Terminal .................................
Alabama State Port Authority-Choctaw Point Terminal .....................
American Village/Montevallo, Alabama construction of closed loop
Access Road, bus lanes and parking facility.
Auburn University-Intermodal Parking Garage ...................................
Birmingham, AL Expansion of Downtown Intermodal Facility, Phase
II.
City of Birmingham, AL-Birmingham Downtown Intermodal Terminal, Phase II.
City of Huntsville, AL-Cummings Park Intermodal Center .................
City of Montgomery, AL-Montgomery Airport Intermodal Center .......
City of Tuscaloosa, AL-Intermodal Facility .........................................
Family Connection of Shelby County Trans Project, AL ....................
Gadsden State Community College Transit Project, AL ....................
Gadsden, AL-Community Buses ........................................................
Lawson State Community College, Alabama .....................................
Mobile County, AL Commission-Bus project ......................................
Mobile Waterfront Infrastructure Development, AL ............................
Trolley Plaza, AL .................................................................................
University of Alabama in Birmingham Intermodal Facility ..................
University of Alabama in Huntsville Intermodal Facility .....................
University of Alabama Intermodal Facility South ................................
University of Alabama Transit System ...............................................
US Space and Rocket Center, AL-Tramway Expansion ....................
Central Arkansas Transit Authority Facility Upgrades ........................
Harrison, Arkansas-Trolley Barn .........................................................
State of Arkansas-Bus and Bus Facilities ..........................................
Coconino County Bus Facilities, AZ ...................................................
Coconino County buses and bus facilities for Flagstaff, AZ ..............
Coconino County, Arizona-Bus and bus facilities for the Sedona
Transit System.
East Valley Bus Maintenance Facility, AZ ..........................................
Intermodal Center, Scottsdale, AZ .....................................................
Phoenix, AZ Construct City of Phoenix para-transit facility (Dial-ARide).
Phoenix, AZ Construct metro bus facility in Phoenix’s West Valley ..
Phoenix, AZ Construct regional heavy bus maintenance facility .......
Phoenix/Avondale/Glendale Bus Expansion, Arizona ........................
Phoenix/Glendale West Valley Operating Facility, Arizona ................
Scottsdale, Arizona-Plan, design, and construct intermodal center ...
Bio-diesel vehicles in Tucson, AZ ......................................................
Tempe, Arizona-Construct East Valley Metro Bus Facility ................
Tucson SunTran Alternative Fuel Bus Replacement, AZ ..................
Tucson SunTran Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility, AZ ............
ADA Paratransit Vehicles, San Diego, CA .........................................
Amador County, California-Regional Transit Center ..........................
Baldwin Park, CA Construct vehicle and bicycle parking lot and pedestrian rest area at transit center.
Berkeley, CA Construct Ed Roberts Campus Intermodal Transit Disability Center.
Blue Line Trolley Shelter Improvements, CA .....................................
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
226,710
1,138,500
683,100
453,420
3,187,800
341,550
340,560
56,430
113,850
569,250
453,420
226,710
56,430
425,793
226,710
113,850
2,138,400
4,536,180
76,143
906,840
380,714
1,133,550
1,133,550
906,840
h 1,360,260
49,500
594,000
113,850
445,500
113,850
594,000
123,750
1,587,960
1,360,260
2,041,380
340,560
226,710
445,500
7,614
3,960,000
990,000
237,947
180,839
990,000
801,900
190,357
951,786
190,357
1,485,000
990,000
475,893
i 1,980,000
1,237,322
1,485,000
4,950,000
495,000
190,357
380,714
571,072
346,500
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13935
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
Earmark ID
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–069 .........
E–2006–BUSP–070 .........
....................
119
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–071 .........
396
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–072
E–2006–BUSP–073
E–2006–BUSP–074
E–2006–BUSP–075
E–2006–BUSP–076
E–2006–BUSP–077
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
190
132
407
108
54
155
CA
CA
CA
CA
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–078
E–2006–BUSP–079
E–2006–BUSP–080
E–2006–BUSP–081
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
158
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–082 .........
207
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–083 .........
17
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–084 .........
11
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–087 .........
E–2006–BUSP–088 .........
E–2006–BUSP–089 .........
....................
....................
101
CA
CA
CA
CA
E–2006–BUSP–091
E–2006–BUSP–092
E–2006–BUSP–093
E–2006–BUSP–094
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
387
260
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–095 .........
E–2006–BUSP–096 .........
212
1
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–097 .........
E–2006–BUSP–098 .........
....................
....................
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–099 .........
E–2006–BUSP–1107 .......
414
....................
CA
CA
CA
CA
E–2006–BUSP–101
E–2006–BUSP–103
E–2006–BUSP–104
E–2006–BUSP–105
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
....................
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–106 .........
E–2006–BUSP–107 .........
....................
276
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–108 .........
E–2006–BUSP–109 .........
332
295
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–110 .........
E–2006–BUSP–111 .........
410
443
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–112 .........
E–2006–BUSP–113 .........
E–2006–BUSP–114 .........
....................
140
223
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–115 .........
307
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–116 .........
121
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–118 .........
36
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Burbank Airport Hybrid Shuttle Demonstration Project, CA ...............
Burbank, CA CNG Transit Vehicles Purchase for Local Transit Network Expansion.
Burbank, CA Construction of Empire Area Transit Center near Burbank Airport.
Calexico, CA Purchase new buses for the Calexico Transit System
Carson, CA Purchase one bus ...........................................................
Carson, CA Purchase one trolley-bus vehicle ....................................
Carson, CA Purchase two transfer facility ..........................................
City of Alameda, CA Plan, design, and construct intermodal facility
City of Livermore, CA Construct Bus Facility for Livermore Amador
Valley Transit Authority.
City of Modesto’s Bus Maintenance Facility, CA ...............................
Construct bus shelters in Bellflower, CA ............................................
Corona Transit Center, CA .................................................................
Covina, El Monte, Baldwin Park, Upland, CA Parking and Electronic
Signage Improvements.
Culver City, CA Purchase compressed natural gas buses and expand natural gas fueling facility.
Davis, CA Davis Multi-Modal Station to improve entrance to Amtrak
Depot and parking lot, provide additional parking and improve
service.
Development of Gold Country Stage Transit Transfer Center, Nevada County, CA.
Ed Roberts Campus, Berkeley, CA ....................................................
El Garces Intermodal Station, Needles, CA .......................................
Emeryville, CA Expand & Improve Inter-modal Transit Center at
Amtrak Station.
Fairfield/Vacaville Intermodal Station, CA ..........................................
Foothill Transit, San Gabriel Valley, CA .............................................
Fresno, CA-Develop program of low-emission transit vehicles .........
Gardena, CA Purchase of alternative fuel buses for service expansion, on-board security system and bus facility training equipment.
Glendale, CA Construction of Downtown Streetcar Project ...............
Glendale, CA Purchase of CNG Buses for Glendale Beeline Transit
System.
Golden Empire Transit traffic signal priority project, CA ....................
Greater Sacramento Regional Bus Replacement/Bus Facility Expansion, CA.
Hercules, CA Inter-modal Rail Station Improvements ........................
Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery Science Center,
Santa Ana, CA.
Intermodal Transit Center, Bell Gardens, CA .....................................
La Habra Shuttle Senior Transportation Program, CA .......................
Lakewood Bus Stop Improvements, Lakewood, California ................
Livermoore Amador Valley Satellite Maintenance and Operations
Facility, California.
Long Beach Transit Bus Purchase, California ...................................
Long Beach, Ca Museum of Latin American Art, Long Beach, to
build intermodal park and ride facility.
Long Beach, CA Park and Ride Facility .............................................
Long Beach, CA Purchase one larger (75. passengers) and two
smaller (40 passengers) ferryboats and construct related dock
work to facilitate the use and accessibility of the ferryboats.
Long Beach, CA Purchase ten clean fuel buses ...............................
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, CA capital
funds for facility improvements to support the Cal State
Northridge tram system.
Los Angeles Valley College Bus Station Extension, California ..........
Los Angeles, CA Crenshaw Bus Rapid Transit .................................
Los Angeles, CA Design and construct improved transit and pedestrian linkages between Los Angeles Community College and
nearby MTA rail stop and bus lines.
Los Angeles, CA Improve safety, mobility and access between
LATTC, Metro line and nearby bus stops on Grand Ave between
Washington and 23rd.
Los Angeles, CA Improve transit shelters, sidewalks lighting and
landscaping around Cedar’s-Sinai Medical Center.
Los Angeles, CA Wilshire-Vermont subway station reconstruction ...
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
495,000
85,661
47,589
57,107
47,589
47,589
95,179
380,714
428,304
495,000
247,500
495,000
333,125
704,322
190,357
177,093
297,000
1,980,000
190,357
495,000
3,267,000
190,357
1,166,889
190,357
87,945
247,500
990,000
285,536
j 297,000
396,000
155,430
396,000
990,000
742,500
380,714
190,357
571,072
571,072
61,866
742,500
1,623,366
285,536
95,179
285,536
190,357
13936
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
E–2006–BUSP–119 .........
6
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–120 .........
E–2006–BUSP–121 .........
567
566
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–122 .........
E–2006–BUSP–123 .........
311
112
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–124 .........
E–2006–BUSP–125 .........
266
285
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–126
E–2006–BUSP–127
E–2006–BUSP–128
E–2006–BUSP–130
E–2006–BUSP–131
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
39
....................
200
321
191
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–132
E–2006–BUSP–133
E–2006–BUSP–134
E–2006–BUSP–135
E–2006–BUSP–136
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
375
43
....................
92
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–137 .........
392
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–138 .........
352
CA .....
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–139 .........
E–2006–BUSP–142 .........
E–2006–BUSP–143 .........
....................
173
194
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–144 .........
E–2006–BUSP–145 .........
244
366
CA
CA
CA
CA
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–146
E–2006–BUSP–147
E–2006–BUSP–148
E–2006–BUSP–149
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
45
70
CA
CA
CA
CA
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–150
E–2006–BUSP–151
E–2006–BUSP–395
E–2006–BUSP–152
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
399
....................
116
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–153 .........
E–2006–BUSP–154 .........
....................
251
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
E–2006–BUSP–155
E–2006–BUSP–156
E–2006–BUSP–157
E–2006–BUSP–158
E–2006–BUSP–159
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
286
....................
171
....................
189
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–160 .........
84
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–162 .........
253
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–164 .........
282
CA .....
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–165 .........
314
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–166 .........
E–2006–BUSP–167 .........
183
127
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–173 .........
E–2006–BUSP–174 .........
341
254
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Los Angeles, CA, Construction of Intermodal Transit Center at California State University Los Angeles.
Los Angeles, CA, Fly-Away Bus System Expansion .........................
Los Angeles, CA, LAX Intermodal Transportation Center Rail and
Bus System Expansion.
Mammoth Lakes, California-Regional Transit Maintenance Facility ..
Mariposa, CA-Yosemite National Park CNG-Hydrogen transit buses
and facilities.
Martinez, CA Inter-modal Facility Restoration ....................................
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Light Rail Transit Project from
Pasadena, CA to Montclair, CA.
Monrovia, California-Transit Village Project .......................................
Monrovia, Los Angeles County, CA, Transit Village ..........................
Montebello, CA Bus Lines Bus Fleet Replacement Project ...............
Monterey Park, CA Catch Basins at Transit Stop Installation ...........
Monterey Park, CA Safety improvements at a bus stop including
creation of bus loading areas and street improvements.
Monterey Salinas Transit, Monterey, California .................................
Monterey, CA Purchase bus equipment .............................................
Needles, California-El Garces Intermodal Facility ..............................
New Bus Facility Capital Improvements, California (San Joaquin) ....
Norwalk, CA Transit System Bus Procurement and Los Angeles
World Airport Remote Fly-Away Facility Project.
Oakland, CA Construct Bay Trail between Coliseum BART station
and Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline.
Oakland, CA Construct streetscape & intermodal improvements at
BART Station Transit Villages.
OCTA BRT ..........................................................................................
Ontario, CA Construct Omnitrans Transcenter ..................................
Orange County Transit Authority, California-Security surveillance
and monitoring equipment.
Orange County, CA Purchase buses for rapid transit ........................
Orange County, CA Transportation Projects to Encourage Use of
Transit to Reduce Congestion.
Pacific Station Multimodal Facility, Santa Cruz, California ................
Palm Springs Aerial Tramway Bus Project, CA .................................
Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit bus purchase .....................
Palm Springs, California-Sunline Transit: CalStrat-Weststart fuel cell
bus program.
Paramount Easy Rider Clean-Air Buses, Paramount, California .......
Pasadena, CA ITS Improvements ......................................................
Placerville Station II ............................................................................
Pleasant Hill, CA Construct Diablo Valley College Bus Transit Center.
Redondo Beach Coastal Shuttle Transit Vehicles, California ............
Redondo Beach, CA Capital Equipment procurement of 12. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Transit Vehicles for Coastal Shuttle
Services by Beach Cities Transit.
Richmond, CA BART Parking Structure .............................................
Riverside Transit Center, CA ..............................................................
Riverside, California-RTA Advanced Traveler Information System ...
Rosemary Children’s Services’ Transportation Program, California ..
Sacramento, CA Bus enhancement and improvements-construct
maintenance facility and purchase clean-fuel buses to improve
transit service.
Sacramento, CA Construct intermodal station and related improvements.
San Bernardino, CA Implement Santa Fe Depot improvements in
San Bernardino.
San Diego, CA Completion of San Diego Joint Transportation Operations Center (JTOC).
San Diego, CA Widen sidewalks and bus stop entrance, and provide diagonal parking, in the Skyline Paradise Hills neighborhood
(Reo Drive).
San Fernando Valley, CA Reseda Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Route ...
San Fernando, CA Purchase CNG buses and related equipment
and construct facilities.
San Gabriel Valley, CA-Foothill Transit Park and Rides ....................
San Joaquin, California Regional Rail-Altamont Commuter Express
Corridor inter-modal centers.
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
150,382
495,000
495,000
95,179
475,893
285,536
2,855,358
571,072
1,485,000
133,250
60,915
304,572
396,000
190,357
380,714
990,000
152,286
171,321
190,357
1,485,000
190,654
1,006,989
190,357
190,357
396,000
594,000
95,179
190,357
198,000
190,357
k 990,000
285,536
693,000
152,286
951,786
742,500
95,179
74,250
380,714
1,332,500
95,179
380,714
57,107
114,214
578,686
1,808,393
761,429
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13937
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
CA
CA
CA
CA
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
.....
.....
.....
.....
.........
.........
.........
.........
382
....................
145
147
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–180 .........
364
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–181 .........
172
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
E–2006–BUSP–182
E–2006–BUSP–183
E–2006–BUSP–186
E–2006–BUSP–187
E–2006–BUSP–188
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–175
E–2006–BUSP–176
E–2006–BUSP–177
E–2006–BUSP–178
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
27
401
383
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–189 .........
E–2006–BUSP–190 .........
....................
388
CA .....
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–191 .........
E–2006–BUSP–192 .........
315
85
CA
CA
CA
CA
E–2006–BUSP–193
E–2006–BUSP–195
E–2006–BUSP–197
E–2006–BUSP–200
.....
.....
.....
.....
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
35
....................
195
CA .....
E–2006–BUSP–201 .........
83
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
E–2006–BUSP–202
E–2006–BUSP–203
E–2006–BUSP–204
E–2006–BUSP–206
E–2006–BUSP–207
E–2006–BUSP–208
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
449
448
509
CO .....
CO .....
E–2006–BUSP–210 .........
E–2006–BUSP–211 .........
518
520
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CT
CT
E–2006–BUSP–212
E–2006–BUSP–213
E–2006–BUSP–216
E–2006–BUSP–218
E–2006–BUSP–220
E–2006–BUSP–222
E–2006–BUSP–223
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
521
167
188
445
450
....................
44
CT .....
CT .....
CT .....
E–2006–BUSP–224 .........
E–2006–BUSP–225 .........
E–2006–BUSP–226 .........
478
90
523
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
E–2006–BUSP–227
E–2006–BUSP–229
E–2006–BUSP–230
E–2006–BUSP–231
E–2006–BUSP–232
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
218
....................
267
589
269
CT .....
CT .....
CT .....
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–233 .........
E–2006–BUSP–234 .........
E–2006–BUSP–235 .........
....................
....................
369
CT .....
CT .....
CT .....
E–2006–BUSP–236 .........
E–2006–BUSP–237 .........
E–2006–BUSP–238 .........
....................
....................
131
CT .....
E–2006–BUSP–239 .........
32
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
San Luis Ray, California-Transit Center Project ................................
San Luis Rey Transit Center ..............................................................
Santa Ana, CA Improve Santa Ana transit terminal ...........................
Santa Barbara, CA-Expansion of Regional Intermodal Transit Center.
Santa Monica, CA Construct intermodal park-and-ride facility at
Santa Monica College campus on South Bundy Drive near Airport Avenue.
Santa Monica, CA Purchase and service LNG buses for Santa
Monica’s Big Blue Bus to meet increased ridership needs and reduce emissions.
Shuttle bus to transport seniors in Bell Gardens, California ..............
Simi Valley Public Transit Radio Communications, CA .....................
Sonoma County, CA Purchase of CNG buses ..................................
South Pasadena, CA Silent Night Grade Crossing Project ...............
South San Francisco, CA Construction of Ferry Terminal at Oyster
Point in South San Francisco to the San Francisco Bay Water
Transit Authority.
Spencer Avenue Bus Transfer Center, Oroville, CA ..........................
Sylmar, CA Los Angeles Mission College Transit Center construction.
Temecula, California-Intermodal Transit Facility ................................
Torrance Transit System, CA Acquisition of EPA and CARB-certified low emission replacement buses.
Torrance Transit System, California ...................................................
Union City, CA Inter-modal Station, Phase 1: Modify BART station
Victor Valley Trans Operation/Maintenance Facility ...........................
Woodland Hills, CA Los Angeles Pierce College Bus Rapid Transit
Station Extension.
Woodland, CA Yolobus operations, maintenance, administration facility expansion and improvements to increase bus service with
alternative fuel buses.
Yorba Linda Senior Mobility Program—TRAILS ................................
Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System ...............................
Zero Emission Bus Demonstration, Santa Clara, California ..............
City of Aspen, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ..........................................
City of Durango, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ......................................
Colorado Association of Transit Agencies/Colorado Transit Coalition-Colorado Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities.
Denver Regional Transit District-Bus Maintenance Facility ...............
Denver Regional Transit District-Denver Union Station Multimodal
Renovations.
Denver Regional Transit District-US 36 Corridor BRT .......................
Denver, CO Denver Union Station Inter-modal Center ......................
Mountain Express, Crested Butte, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ..........
Roaring Fork Transit Authority, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ...............
Town of Snowmass Village, CO Bus and Bus Facilities ....................
Bridgeport Intermodal Transport Center, CT ......................................
Bridgeport, Connecticut-Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority Bus
Facility.
Bridgeport, CT Facility Expansion/Improvement ................................
Buses and bus related facilities throughout the State of Connecticut
Downtown Middletown, CT, Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Project.
Enfield, Connecticut-intermodal station ..............................................
Inter-Modal Center, Middletown, CT ...................................................
Middletown, CT Construct intermodal center .....................................
New Haven, CT Bus Maintenance Facility .........................................
New London, Connecticut-Intermodal Transportation Center and
Streetscapes.
Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit Facility .............................
Norwalk Pulse Point Joint Improvements, CT ....................................
Norwalk, Connecticut-Pulse Point Joint Development inter-modal facility.
South Norwalk Intermodal Facility, Norwalk, CT ................................
Stamford Urban Transitway Phase II, CT ..........................................
Stonington and Mystic, Connecticut-Intermodal Center parking facility and Streetscape.
Torrington, CT Construct bus-related facility (Northwestern Connecticut Central Transit District).
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
95,179
495,000
190,357
57,107
190,357
713,840
99,000
247,500
95,179
171,321
904,197
346,500
47,589
95,179
571,072
396,000
809,018
742,500
190,357
380,714
40,590
247,500
396,000
133,250
47,589
4,029,135
680,130
453,420
1,587,960
1,046,965
95,179
142,768
57,107
3,960,000
95,179
346,500
1,142,143
1,980,000
571,072
297,000
285,536
1,980,000
95,179
297,000
247,500
95,179
990,000
2,970,000
464,471
380,714
13938
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
E–2006–BUSP–240
E–2006–BUSP–241
E–2006–BUSP–242
E–2006–BUSP–243
E–2006–BUSP–245
E–2006–BUSP–247
E–2006–BUSP–248
E–2006–BUSP–249
E–2006–BUSP–250
E–2006–BUSP–251
E–2006–BUSP–252
E–2006–BUSP–253
E–2006–BUSP–254
E–2006–BUSP–255
E–2006–BUSP–256
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
270
657
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
470
....................
....................
297
69
479
117
FL
FL
FL
FL
E–2006–BUSP–257
E–2006–BUSP–258
E–2006–BUSP–262
E–2006–BUSP–263
.........
.........
.........
.........
439
453
508
23
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
E–2006–BUSP–264 .........
E–2006–BUSP–265 .........
E–2006–BUSP–266 .........
....................
80
527
FL ......
FL ......
E–2006–BUSP–267 .........
E–2006–BUSP–270 .........
344
538
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–271
E–2006–BUSP–272
E–2006–BUSP–273
E–2006–BUSP–274
E–2006–BUSP–279
E–2006–BUSP–280
E–2006–BUSP–281
E–2006–BUSP–282
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
539
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
558
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–284
E–2006–BUSP–285
E–2006–BUSP–286
E–2006–BUSP–287
E–2006–BUSP–288
E–2006–BUSP–289
E–2006–BUSP–290
E–2006–BUSP–291
E–2006–BUSP–293
E–2006–BUSP–296
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
103
308
211
432
133
580
454
....................
136
125
FL ......
FL ......
E–2006–BUSP–297 .........
E–2006–BUSP–298 .........
367
248
FL ......
FL ......
E–2006–BUSP–299 .........
E–2006–BUSP–303 .........
....................
600
FL
FL
FL
FL
E–2006–BUSP–304
E–2006–BUSP–305
E–2006–BUSP–307
E–2006–BUSP–309
.........
.........
.........
.........
415
420
....................
623
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
CT .....
CT .....
DC .....
DC .....
DE .....
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
FL ......
E–2006–BUSP–311 .........
E–2006–BUSP–312 .........
E–2006–BUSP–313 .........
....................
....................
31
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
E–2006–BUSP–314
E–2006–BUSP–317
E–2006–BUSP–318
E–2006–BUSP–319
E–2006–BUSP–320
E–2006–BUSP–321
390
402
148
....................
....................
....................
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Vernon, Connecticut-Intermodal Center, Parking and Streetscapes
Waterbury, CT Bus Maintenance Facility ...........................................
Union Station Intermodal Transportation Center, Washington, D.C ..
WMATA Bus Purchase .......................................................................
Bus Replacement and Facilities, DE ..................................................
2nd St/Andrews Ave/3rd St Enhancements, Fort Lauderdale, FL .....
7th Avenue Transit Hub, FL ...............................................................
Alternative fuel buses, Broward County, FL .......................................
Bay County, FL-Transit Facility ..........................................................
Broward County Alternative Fuel Buses, FL ......................................
Broward County Southwest Bus Facility, FL ......................................
Broward County, FL-Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities ....
Broward County, FL Buses & Bus Facilities ......................................
Broward County-Bus and Bus Facilities .............................................
Broward, FL Purchase new articulated buses and bus stop improvements on State Road 7. (SR 7) between Golden Glades
Interchange and Glades Road.
Central Florida Commuter Rail intermodal facilities ...........................
Central Florida Commuter Rail Intermodal facilities ...........................
Collier County Transit-Transit Facility .................................................
Construct intermodal transportation & parking facility, City of Winter
Park, Florida.
Flagler County Buses and Bus Facilities, FL .....................................
Flagler County, Florida-bus facility .....................................................
Florida Department of Transportation-Palm Beach County Replacement Buses.
Gainesville, FL Bus Facility Expansion ..............................................
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit-Bus Rapid Transit Improvements.
Hillsborough, FL, Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority ........
Homestead East-West Bus Connector, FL ........................................
Intermodal Terminal Center, Jacksonville, FL ....................................
Jacksonville Transportation Authority Bus and Bus Facilities, FL .....
JARC Hartline, Hillsborough County, FL ............................................
Key West Buses and Bus Facilities, FL .............................................
Lakeland Area Citrus Connection Transit Systems ............................
Lakeland Area Mass Transit District/Citrus Connection-Capital
Funding Needs.
Longwood, Florida-Construct Intermodal Transportation Facility .......
Miami Dade, FL N.W. 7th Avenue Transit Hub ..................................
Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ........................
Miami-Dade County, Florida-buses and bus facilities ........................
Miami-Dade County, Florida-Transit Security System .......................
Miami-Dade Transit 7th Avenue NW Transit Hub ..............................
Miami-Dade Transit Dadeland South Intermodal Center ...................
Miramar Town Center Transit Hub, Miramar, Florida ........................
Ocala and Marion County, Florida-replacement buses ......................
Palm Beach County, FL Plan and Construct Belle Glade Combined
Passenger Transit Facility.
Palm Beach, FL 20 New Buses for Palm Tran ..................................
Palm Beach, FL Palm Tran AVL–APC system with smart card fare
boxes.
Palm Tran, Palm Beach County, FL ...................................................
Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization-Pinellas Mobility Initiative: BRT and Guide way.
Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL
Purchase Buses and construct bus facilities in Broward County, FL
Putnam County, FL Ride Solutions Buses .........................................
South Florida Regional Transportation Authority-West Palm Beach
Intermodal Facility.
Space Coast Area Transit Bus Terminal, FL .....................................
St. Johns County, FL Council on Aging Buses ..................................
St. Augustine, Florida-Intermodal Transportation Center and related
pedestrian and landscape improvements.
St. Lucie County, FL Purchase Buses ...............................................
Tampa, FL Establish Transit Emphasis Corridor Project ...................
Tampa, FL Purchase buses and construct bus facilities ...................
Treasure Coast Connector, St. Lucie County, FL ..............................
Trolley Shelter, West Palm Beach, Florida ........................................
Trolley System, Boynton Beach, FL ...................................................
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
1,446,715
1,980,000
693,000
1,485,000
990,000
495,000
396,000
990,000
453,420
113,850
990,000
380,714
1,237,322
453,420
95,179
951,786
683,100
226,710
95,179
297,000
114,214
226,710
761,429
453,420
990,000
495,000
990,000
336,600
247,500
495,000
247,500
453,420
95,179
571,072
1,142,143
761,429
569,168
226,710
455,400
495,000
571,072
666,250
285,536
47,589
247,500
226,710
428,304
380,714
742,500
453,420
198,000
495,000
190,357
190,357
142,768
428,304
495,000
247,500
247,500
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13939
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
355
255
357
247
144
....................
....................
....................
91
510
GA .....
GA .....
E–2006–BUSP–337 .........
E–2006–BUSP–338 .........
49
530
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
GA .....
GU .....
HI ......
HI ......
IA .......
IA .......
IA .......
IA .......
IA .......
IA .......
ID ......
ID ......
ID ......
ID ......
ID ......
IL .......
IL .......
E–2006–BUSP–339
E–2006–BUSP–340
E–2006–BUSP–341
E–2006–BUSP–346
E–2006–BUSP–347
E–2006–BUSP–348
E–2006–BUSP–349
E–2006–BUSP–350
E–2006–BUSP–352
E–2006–BUSP–353
E–2006–BUSP–354
E–2006–BUSP–355
E–2006–BUSP–356
E–2006–BUSP–358
E–2006–BUSP–360
E–2006–BUSP–361
E–2006–BUSP–365
E–2006–BUSP–367
E–2006–BUSP–368
E–2006–BUSP–369
E–2006–BUSP–371
E–2006–BUSP–372
E–2006–BUSP–373
E–2006–BUSP–374
E–2006–BUSP–378
E–2006–BUSP–379
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
60
275
406
....................
329
256
348
206
298
....................
....................
540
....................
475
....................
....................
....................
....................
176
....................
....................
....................
652
433
226
IL .......
IL .......
E–2006–BUSP–382 .........
E–2006–BUSP–383 .........
491
358
IL .......
E–2006–BUSP–384 .........
4
IL .......
E–2006–BUSP–385 .........
296
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
E–2006–BUSP–386
E–2006–BUSP–387
E–2006–BUSP–388
E–2006–BUSP–129
E–2006–BUSP–389
E–2006–BUSP–390
E–2006–BUSP–391
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
114
....................
291
186
250
429
163
IL .......
IL .......
IL .......
IL .......
IL .......
IL .......
IL .......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
E–2006–BUSP–392
E–2006–BUSP–393
E–2006–BUSP–394
E–2006–BUSP–398
E–2006–BUSP–399
E–2006–BUSP–400
E–2006–BUSP–402
E–2006–BUSP–403
E–2006–BUSP–404
E–2006–BUSP–405
E–2006–BUSP–408
E–2006–BUSP–409
E–2006–BUSP–410
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
365
632
259
....................
135
....................
109
....................
....................
....................
529
VerDate Aug<31>2005
E–2006–BUSP–324
E–2006–BUSP–325
E–2006–BUSP–326
E–2006–BUSP–327
E–2006–BUSP–330
E–2006–BUSP–331
E–2006–BUSP–332
E–2006–BUSP–333
E–2006–BUSP–335
E–2006–BUSP–336
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Albany, GA Bus replacement .............................................................
Albany, GA Multimodal Facility ...........................................................
Athens, GA Buses and Bus Facilities .................................................
Atlanta, GA Inter-modal Passenger Facility Improvements ...............
Augusta, GA Buses and Bus Facilities ...............................................
Buses and Bus Facilities, GA .............................................................
Chatham Area Transit Authority bus and facility, GA ........................
City of Moultrie, Georgia, Intermodal Facility .....................................
Columbus, GA Bus replacement ........................................................
Columbus, Georgia/Phoenix City, Alabama-National Infantry Museum Multimodal Facility.
Columbus, Georgia-Buses & Bus Facilities ........................................
Georgia Department of Transportation-Georgia Statewide Bus and
Bus Facilities.
Georgia GRTA Xpress Implementation Buses ...................................
Georgia Statewide Bus Program ........................................................
Jesup, Georgia-Train Depot intermodal center ..................................
Moultrie, GA Inter-modal facility .........................................................
Purchase Transit Buses for Macon Transit Authority, Georgia ..........
Quitman, Clay, Randolph, Stewart Co., GA Bus project ....................
Savannah, GA Bus and Bus Facilities-Chatham Area Transit ...........
Savannah, Georgia-Water Ferry River walk intermodal facilities .......
Sylvester, GA Inter-modal Facility ......................................................
Thomasville, GA Bus Replacement ....................................................
MTA transit vehicles for disabled persons, Guam .............................
Honolulu Bus and Bus Facilities, HI ...................................................
Honolulu, HI, Bus Facilities .................................................................
10 new fixed-route buses, Cedar Rapids, IA .....................................
Black Hawk County, IA UNI Multimodal Project .................................
City of Coralville Intermodal Facility, IA ..............................................
Johnson County SEATS Para-Transit Facility Program, IA ...............
UNI Multimodal Project, Cedar Falls, Iowa ........................................
University of Northern Iowa Multi .......................................................
Boise, ID-Multimodal facility ................................................................
Idaho Statewide ITS ...........................................................................
Idaho Transit Coalition Bus Capital Investment .................................
Idaho Transit Coalition Buses and Bus Facilities ...............................
Valley Regional Transit, ID-Downtown Boise Multimodal ..................
Centralia, Illinois-South Central Mass Transit District Improvements
Champaign, IL-Construct park and ride lot with attached daycare facility.
Chicago, IL, Cermak Road, Bus Rapid Transit ..................................
Cicero, Chicago Establish Transit Signal Priority, Cicero Ave., Pace
Suburban Bus.
Des Plaines, Wauconda, Cook and Lake Counties, IL Rand Road
Transit Signal Priority.
Elgin to Rockford, Illinois-Intermodal stations along planned Metra
Union Pacific West Line extension alignment, including necessary
alternatives analysis.
Geneva, Illinois-Construct commuter parking deck for Metra Service
IL Statewide buses and facilities ........................................................
Joliet, Illinois-Union Station commuter parking facility .......................
Mattoon, Illinois-historic railroad depot restoration/intermodal center
Maywood, IL Purchase buses ............................................................
Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center .............................
Normal, Illinois-Multimodal Transportation Center, including facilities
for adjacent public and nonprofit uses.
PACE Bus Service to the College of DuPage, Glen Ellyn, IL ............
Pace Suburban Bus Transit Signal Priority, Illinois ............................
Pace Suburban Bus, IL South Suburban BRT Mobility Network .......
Springfield, IL, Multimodal Transit Terminal .......................................
St. Charles, IL-Intermodal Parking Structures ....................................
Town of Normal Multimodal Transportation Center, IL ......................
Wheaton, IL Pace Suburban Bus-Purchase buses ............................
Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation, IN ...........................
Bloomington, IN-Bus and transfer facility ...........................................
Bloomington, Indiana University Campus Bus System, IN ................
City of Anderson Intermodal Center Project, IN .................................
Fort Wayne Citilink, IN ........................................................................
Gary, Indiana, Gary Airport Station Modernization and Shuttle Service Project.
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
57,107
152,286
270,308
380,714
76,143
495,000
495,000
495,000
57,107
385,110
184,456
2,041,380
l 2,227,500
38,071
190,357
57,107
495,000
47,589
951,786
380,714
38,071
38,071
297,000
2,800,000
1,336,500
148,500
680,130
569,250
99,000
1,559,250
247,500
456,607
99,000
2,128,500
742,500
1,315,710
76,143
285,536
198,000
190,357
152,286
95,179
761,429
7,920,000
547,277
m 304,572
9,518
380,714
951,786
198,000
495,000
95,179
792,000
856,607
1,980,000
190,357
272,382
915,618
594,000
123,750
123,750
346,500
13940
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
E–2006–BUSP–411 .........
E–2006–BUSP–412 .........
544
235
IN ......
IN ......
E–2006–BUSP–413 .........
E–2006–BUSP–414 .........
5
220
IN ......
E–2006–BUSP–415 .........
378
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
IN ......
KS .....
E–2006–BUSP–416
E–2006–BUSP–417
E–2006–BUSP–418
E–2006–BUSP–419
E–2006–BUSP–421
E–2006–BUSP–423
E–2006–BUSP–424
E–2006–BUSP–425
E–2006–BUSP–426
E–2006–BUSP–428
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
417
....................
....................
546
....................
....................
....................
617
141
53
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–429
E–2006–BUSP–432
E–2006–BUSP–433
E–2006–BUSP–434
E–2006–BUSP–435
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
KY .....
KY .....
KY .....
KY .....
KY .....
LA ......
LA ......
LA ......
LA ......
E–2006–BUSP–437
E–2006–BUSP–439
E–2006–BUSP–442
E–2006–BUSP–443
E–2006–BUSP–444
E–2006–BUSP–446
E–2006–BUSP–447
E–2006–BUSP–448
E–2006–BUSP–449
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
372
....................
....................
....................
484
....................
72
LA ......
LA ......
LA ......
E–2006–BUSP–450 .........
E–2006–BUSP–451 .........
E–2006–BUSP–452 .........
....................
....................
555
LA ......
LA ......
E–2006–BUSP–453 .........
E–2006–BUSP–455 .........
....................
239
LA ......
LA ......
E–2006–BUSP–456 .........
E–2006–BUSP–458 .........
356
170
LA ......
LA ......
LA ......
E–2006–BUSP–459 .........
E–2006–BUSP–460 .........
E–2006–BUSP–462 .........
....................
55
243
LA ......
E–2006–BUSP–463 .........
310
LA ......
E–2006–BUSP–464 .........
606
LA ......
LA ......
LA ......
LA ......
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–465
E–2006–BUSP–466
E–2006–BUSP–467
E–2006–BUSP–468
E–2006–BUSP–470
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
277
625
283
118
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–471 .........
472
MA .....
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
IN ......
IN ......
E–2006–BUSP–472 .........
59
MA .....
MA .....
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–473 .........
E–2006–BUSP–476 .........
E–2006–BUSP–477 .........
273
....................
330
MA .....
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–478 .........
E–2006–BUSP–480 .........
....................
124
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Indianapolis Downtown Transit Center ...............................................
Indianapolis, IN Construct the Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal
Facility.
Indianapolis, IN Downtown Transit Center .........................................
Indianapolis, IN IndySMART program to relieve congestion, improve
safety and air quality.
Indianapolis, IN Relocate and improve inter-modal transportation for
pedestrian to Children’s Museum of Indianapolis.
Indianapolis, Indiana-Children’s Museum Intermodal Center .............
Ivy Tech Multi-Modal Facility, Indianapolis, IN ...................................
Ivy Tech State College Multi-Modal Facility, IN .................................
Ivy Tech State College, Indiana Multimodal Center ...........................
Lake County Bus Systems, IN ............................................................
N. Indiana Mental Health Trans. Partnership .....................................
NIMHTP, Madison Center, South Bend, IN ........................................
South Bend, Indiana, TRANSPO Bus Operations Center .................
South Bend, Indiana-Construct South Bend Bus Operations Center
Johnson Co., KS Bus and bus related facilities [I–35. corridor],
Johnson Co. Transit.
Johnson County Fleet Vehicle Replacement, KS ..............................
Kansas Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, KS ...................................
Wichita Transit Authority, KS ..............................................................
Wyandotte County Unified Government Transit, KS ..........................
Foothills Community Action Partnership Foothills Express Transit
Expansion Project, KY.
Harlan County Transit Center, KY ......................................................
Lincoln County Senior Citizen Bus, Kentucky ....................................
Richmond, KY Purchase buses, bus equipment and facilities ...........
Southern and Eastern Ky Bus and Bus Facilities ..............................
TARC—purchase of 10 hybrid electric buses ....................................
Bus Terminal and Support Facility, Lake Charles, LA .......................
Capital Area Transit System-Baton Rouge BRT ................................
Greater Ouachita Port intermodal facility, LA .....................................
Hammond, Louisiana-Passenger Intermodal facility at Southeastern
University.
Intermodal Facility, Ouachita Parish, LA ............................................
LA Statewide buses and facilities .......................................................
Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, LA-Lafayette
Multimodal Transportation Facility.
Lafayette Louisiana Multimodal Transportation Facility .....................
Lafayette, Louisiana-Lafayette Transit System bus replacement program.
Lafayette, Louisiana-Multimodal center, Final Phase .........................
Louisiana-Construct pedestrian walkways between Caddo St. and
Milam St. along Edwards St. in Shreveport, LA.
New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal Rehab, Louisiana ..............
New Orleans, LA Inter-modal Riverfront Center ................................
New Orleans, LA Regional Planning Commission, bus and bus facilities.
River Parishes, LA South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities.
River Parishes, Louisiana, South Central Planning and Development Commission, bus and bus facilities.
RiverSphere Multimodal Facility, Louisiana ........................................
Shreveport, LA-intermodal Transit Facility .........................................
Southeastern Louisiana University Intermodal Facility .......................
St. Bernard Parish, LA Intermodal facility improvements ...................
Attleboro, MA Construction, engineering and site improvements at
the Attleboro Intermodal Center.
Berkshire, MA, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bus Maintenance Facility.
Beverly, MA Design and Construct Beverly Deport Intermodal
Transportation Center.
Boston, MA Harbor Park Pavilion & Inter-modal Station ...................
Construction of Amesbury Bus Facility, MA .......................................
Framingham, MA Local Intra-Framingham Transit System enhancements.
Franklin Multimodal Center, MA .........................................................
Haverhill, MA Design and Construct Inter-modal Transit Parking Improvements.
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
792,000
951,786
2,665,001
380,714
2,665,001
190,357
297,000
173,250
148,500
148,500
247,500
495,000
792,000
190,357
380,714
346,500
693,000
792,000
495,000
346,500
495,000
n 54,000
137,058
495,000
495,000
990,000
680,130
396,000
38,071
495,000
3,781,065
226,710
148,500
171,321
571,072
193,327
990,000
95,179
95,179
190,357
158,400
198,000
637,697
297,000
190,357
380,714
49,500
380,714
237,947
1,188,000
342,643
1,485,000
1,066,000
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13941
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
E–2006–BUSP–481 .........
21
MA .....
MA .....
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–482 .........
E–2006–BUSP–483 .........
E–2006–BUSP–484 .........
....................
....................
563
MA .....
MA .....
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–487 .........
E–2006–BUSP–1108 .......
E–2006–BUSP–490 .........
....................
....................
42
MA
MA
MA
MA
E–2006–BUSP–491
E–2006–BUSP–492
E–2006–BUSP–493
E–2006–BUSP–494
.........
.........
.........
.........
257
....................
....................
139
MA .....
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–495 .........
E–2006–BUSP–496 .........
....................
161
MA .....
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–497 .........
E–2006–BUSP–498 .........
88
370
MA .....
E–2006–BUSP–499 .........
205
MD ....
MD ....
E–2006–BUSP–500 .........
E–2006–BUSP–501 .........
122
499
MD ....
E–2006–BUSP–502 .........
303
MD ....
E–2006–BUSP–503 .........
542
MD
MD
MD
MD
....
....
....
....
E–2006–BUSP–504
E–2006–BUSP–505
E–2006–BUSP–506
E–2006–BUSP–507
.........
.........
.........
.........
571
573
....................
224
MD
MD
MD
MD
....
....
....
....
E–2006–BUSP–508
E–2006–BUSP–509
E–2006–BUSP–510
E–2006–BUSP–511
.........
.........
.........
.........
214
....................
615
8
MD ....
MD ....
ME .....
E–2006–BUSP–512 .........
E–2006–BUSP–513 .........
E–2006–BUSP–514 .........
....................
629
19
ME .....
ME .....
MI ......
MI ......
MI ......
MI ......
MI ......
E–2006–BUSP–515 .........
E–2006–BUSP–516 .........
E–2006–BUSP–518 .........
E–2006–BUSP–519 .........
E–2006–BUSP–1109 .......
E2006–BUSP–520 ...........
E–2006–BUSP–521 .........
483
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
301
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
MA .....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–524
E–2006–BUSP–525
E–2006–BUSP–527
E–2006–BUSP–528
E–2006–BUSP–529
E–2006–BUSP–530
E–2006–BUSP–531
E–2006–BUSP–532
E–2006–BUSP–540
E–2006–BUSP–541
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
204
....................
502
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
208
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
......
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–543
E–2006–BUSP–546
E–2006–BUSP–547
E–2006–BUSP–548
E–2006–BUSP–549
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
526
....................
....................
....................
79
E–2006–BUSP–550 .........
....................
.....
.....
.....
.....
MI ......
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Hingham, MA Higham Marine Intermodal Center Improvements: Enhance public transportation infrastructure/parking.
Holyoke Multimodal Center, MA .........................................................
Intermodal Station Improvements, Salem and Beverly, MA ..............
Lawrence, MA, Gateway Intermodal and Quadant Area Reuse
Project.
MART Advanced Vehicle Locator System (AVL), Massachusetts .....
MART Maintenance facility expansion, Worcester County, MA .........
Medford, MA Downtown revitalization featuring construction of a
200 space Park and Ride Facility.
Newburyport, MA Design and Construct Intermodal Facility .............
North Leomister Parking Improvements, Massachusetts ...................
Public Transit for STCC College Students, Massachusetts ...............
Quincy, MA MBTA Purchase high speed catamaran ferry for Quincy
Harbor Express Service.
Rapid Transit Handicap Accessibility, Newton, Massachusetts .........
Revere, MA Inter-modal transit improvements in the Wonderland
station (MBTA) area.
Rockport, MA Rockport Commuter Rail Station Improvements .........
Salem, MA Design and Construct Salem Intermodal Transportation
Center.
Woburn, MA Construction of an 89 space park and ride facility to
be located on Magazine Hill, in the Heart of Woburn Square.
Baltimore, MD Construct Intercity Bus Intermodal Terminal ..............
City of Gaithersburg, Maryland-Bus and paratransit vehicle for seniors.
Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations
and Maintenance Facility.
Howard County, MD Construct Central Maryland Transit Operations
and Maintenance Facility.
MARC Intermodal Odenton and Edgewood Station Improvements ...
Maryland Statewide Bus Facilities and Buses ...................................
Maryland Statewide Bus Program ......................................................
Montgomery County, MD Wheaton CBD Intermodal Access Program.
Mount Rainier, MD Intermodal and Pedestrian Project ......................
Silver Spring Transit Center, Maryland ..............................................
Silver Spring, Maryland, Transit Center .............................................
Silver Spring, MD Construct Silver Spring Transit Center in downtown Silver Spring.
Southern Maryland Commuter Bus Initiative ......................................
Southern Maryland Commuter Initiative .............................................
Bar Harbor, ME Purchase new buses to enhance commuting near
the Jackson Labs.
Campobello Park, ME, Bus Acquisition ..............................................
Intermodal Facility, Augusta, ME ........................................................
1st District Bus Replacement and Facilities, MI .................................
Allegan County Transportation Services, MI ......................................
The Rapid ...........................................................................................
Automation Alley/BUSolutions, MI ......................................................
Barry County, MI-Barry County Transit equipments and dispatching
software.
Berrien County Public Transportation, MI ..........................................
Boysville of Michigan Transportation System .....................................
Cass County Transit, MI .....................................................................
City of Kalamazoo, MI bus Replacement ...........................................
City of Midland Dial-A-Ride Section 5309, MI ....................................
Clare County Transit Administration Facility, MI ................................
Communication Equipment and Bus, Belding, MI ..............................
Deneka Maintenance Facility, MI .......................................................
Dowagiac Dial A Ride, MI ...................................................................
Eastern Upper Peninsula, MI Ferry Dock and Facility upgrades for
Drummond Island Ferry Services.
Flint, MI, Mass Transportation Authority Bus Maintenance Facility ...
Greater Lapeer Transportation Authority, MI ......................................
Harbor Transit, MI ...............................................................................
Hillsdale Dial-A-Ride, MI .....................................................................
Ionia County, MI-Purchase and Implementation of communication
equipment improvements.
Kalamazoo Metro Transit, MI .............................................................
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
1,713,215
1,732,500
1,188,000
594,000
495,000
o 1,188,000
380,714
380,714
712,800
381,000
380,714
1,188,000
342,643
523,482
380,714
342,643
951,786
110,880
951,786
247,500
364,320
5,445,000
495,000
95,179
85,661
2,970,000
6,930,000
694,804
1,980,000
2,673,000
57,107
21,780
693,000
1,980,000
88,110
p 1,287,000
p 693,000
28,554
148,500
639,600
79,200
2,475,000
362,340
455,400
75,240
495,000
49,500
47,589
742,500
495,000
399,960
495,000
112,311
990,000
13942
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–551
E–2006–BUSP–555
E–2006–BUSP–556
E–2006–BUSP–557
E–2006–BUSP–558
E–2006–BUSP–976
E–2006–BUSP–559
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
572
581
....................
293
MI
MI
MI
MI
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–561
E–2006–BUSP–562
E–2006–BUSP–563
E–2006–BUSP–564
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
634
MI ......
MI ......
MI ......
MN ....
MN ....
MN ....
MN ....
MN ....
MN ....
E–2006–BUSP–566
E–2006–BUSP–567
E–2006–BUSP–581
E–2006–BUSP–568
E–2006–BUSP–569
E–2006–BUSP–570
E–2006–BUSP–571
E–2006–BUSP–572
E–2006–BUSP–573
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
40
177
....................
....................
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
E–2006–BUSP–574
E–2006–BUSP–575
E–2006–BUSP–576
E–2006–BUSP–577
E–2006–BUSP–578
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
577
....................
....................
185
MN ....
MN ....
E–2006–BUSP–579 .........
E–2006–BUSP–580 .........
342
....................
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
E–2006–BUSP–585 .........
E–2006–BUSP–587 .........
E–2006–BUSP–589 .........
E–2006–BUSP–1110 .......
E–2006–BUSP–593 .........
....................
....................
345
....................
598
MO ....
MO ....
MO ....
MS .....
E–2006–BUSP–595
E–2006–BUSP–596
E–2006–BUSP–597
E–2006–BUSP–598
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
624
....................
130
MS
MS
MS
MS
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–599
E–2006–BUSP–600
E–2006–BUSP–601
E–2006–BUSP–602
E–2006–BUSP–603
E–2006–BUSP–604
E–2006–BUSP–605
E–2006–BUSP–606
E–2006–BUSP–607
E–2006–BUSP–608
E–2006–BUSP–609
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
547
....................
....................
129
476
....................
....................
....................
584
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
NC
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–610
E–2006–BUSP–611
E–2006–BUSP–612
E–2006–BUSP–613
E–2006–BUSP–614
E–2006–BUSP–615
E–2006–BUSP–616
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
490
NC
NC
NC
NC
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–617
E–2006–BUSP–618
E–2006–BUSP–619
E–2006–BUSP–620
.........
.........
.........
.........
217
351
228
154
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Kalkaska County Transportation Facility, MI ......................................
Ludington Mass Transportation Authority ...........................................
Macatawa Area Express .....................................................................
Marquette County, Michigan Transit Authority Bus passenger facility
Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Bus Replacement
Midland County Board of Commissioners Connection .......................
Muskegon, Michigan-Muskegon Area Transit Terminal and related
improvements.
Roscommon Transportation Authority Route Service ........................
Sanilac Co. Transit Authority, MI ........................................................
St. Joseph County Transit ..................................................................
Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART)
Bus Maintenance Facility.
Vehicle Acquisition for Ionia Dial-A-Ride, MI ......................................
Yates Township Dial-A-Ride Transportation System, MI ...................
Twin Cities Dial A Ride .......................................................................
Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit, Dakota County, MN .....................
City of Northfield, MN Transit Station .................................................
Duluth, MN Downtown Duluth Area Transit facility improvements ....
Fond du Lac Reservation, MN Purchase buses ................................
Greater Minnesota Transit Capital ......................................................
Greater Minnesota Transit Capitol—5309 Buses and Bus Facilities,
Rock County.
I–35W BRT 46th Street Station, Minneapolis, MN .............................
Metro Transit/Metropolitan Council, MN-Bus/Bus Capital ..................
Minnesota Transit Cap.—5309 Buses and Bus Facilities—St. Peter
Northwest Busway, Minneapolis, Minnesota ......................................
St. Paul to Hinckley, MN Construct bus amenities along Rush Line
Corridor.
St. Paul, MN Union Depot Multi Modal Transit Facility ......................
The UEL Bus Stop, University of Minnesota Twin Cities Transitway,
MN.
City Utilities of Springfield bus facilities, MO ......................................
Intermodal Transfer Facility at Duncan and Boyle, MO .....................
Kansas City, MO Bus Transit Infrastructure .......................................
METRO Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. ...............
OATS, Incorporated, MO–ITS Information and Billing System and
Bus Facilities.
South East Missouri Transportation Service, Missouri .......................
Southeast Missouri Transportation Service-Bus Project ....................
Southern Missouri Buses and Bus Facilities ......................................
Coahoma County, Mississippi Purchase buses for the Aaron E.
Henry Community Health Services Center, Inc./DARTS transit
service.
Handicap Buses Desoto County, MS .................................................
Inter-city Transit Companies, Meridian, MS .......................................
Jackson State University, MS-Busing Project ....................................
JATRAN bus replacement, MS ...........................................................
Billings Public Bus and Transfer, MT .................................................
Bozeman, Montana-Vehicular Parking Facility ...................................
Bozeman, MT, Intermodal and parking facility ...................................
Helena Transit Facility, MT .................................................................
Kalispell Buses, MT ............................................................................
Lewistown Bus Facility, Montana .......................................................
Montana Department of Transportation-Statewide Bus Facilities and
Buses.
Mountain Line Bus, Montana ..............................................................
Pablo Bus Facility, Montana ...............................................................
Pablo Buses, Montana .......................................................................
Poplar Transit Facility Renovation, Montana ......................................
Public Bus Transfer and Parking Facility, MT ....................................
University of Montana bus maintenance facility .................................
Charlotte Area Transit System/City of Charlotte-Charlotte
Multimodal Station.
Charlotte, NC Construct Charlotte Multimodal Station .......................
Charlotte, North Carolina-Eastland Community Transit Center .........
Charlotte, North Carolina-Multimodal Station .....................................
City of Greenville, NC Expansion Buses and Greenville Intermodal
Center.
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
396,000
316,801
247,500
297,000
1,980,000
495,000
380,714
198,000
495,000
79,200
880,000
142,560
396,000
88,110
742,500
277,200
380,714
28,554
560,000
495,000
990,000
2,154,240
247,500
990,000
285,536
380,714
49,500
1,633,500
693,000
61,005
q 742,500
3,855,060
635,580
453,420
1,144,144
28,554
148,500
198,000
1,133,550
544,500
1,237,500
761,459
166,320
247,500
99,000
297,000
680,130
498,250
198,000
148,500
79,200
1,237,500
247,500
203,030
1,484,786
380,714
761,429
678,433
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13943
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
NC .....
E–2006–BUSP–622 .........
302
NC .....
NC .....
E–2006–BUSP–623 .........
E–2006–BUSP–627 .........
52
594
NC
NC
NC
NC
ND
ND
NE
NE
E–2006–BUSP–629
E–2006–BUSP–632
E–2006–BUSP–633
E–2006–BUSP–634
E–2006–BUSP–635
E–2006–BUSP–636
E–2006–BUSP–637
E–2006–BUSP–638
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
57
....................
595
....................
505
160
NE .....
E–2006–BUSP–639 .........
586
NE .....
E–2006–BUSP–640 .........
587
NE .....
E–2006–BUSP–641 .........
240
NE .....
NE .....
NH .....
E–2006–BUSP–642 .........
E–2006–BUSP–643 .........
E–2006–BUSP–644 .........
599
....................
418
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
E–2006–BUSP–645
E–2006–BUSP–646
E–2006–BUSP–647
E–2006–BUSP–648
E–2006–BUSP–649
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
468
....................
....................
86
NJ ......
E–2006–BUSP–650 .........
28
NJ ......
NJ ......
NJ ......
E–2006–BUSP–651 .........
E–2006–BUSP–652 .........
E–2006–BUSP–653 .........
....................
12
102
NJ ......
NJ ......
NJ ......
E–2006–BUSP–654 .........
E–2006–BUSP–655 .........
E–2006–BUSP–656 .........
....................
389
138
NJ ......
E–2006–BUSP–657 .........
38
NJ ......
NJ ......
NJ ......
E–2006–BUSP–658 .........
E–2006–BUSP–659 .........
E–2006–BUSP–660 .........
....................
209
46
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–661
E–2006–BUSP–662
E–2006–BUSP–663
E–2006–BUSP–664
.........
.........
.........
.........
340
328
....................
13
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
......
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–665
E–2006–BUSP–666
E–2006–BUSP–667
E–2006–BUSP–668
E–2006–BUSP–669
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
....................
29
NJ ......
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–670 .........
393
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
......
......
......
......
......
E–2006–BUSP–671
E–2006–BUSP–672
E–2006–BUSP–673
E–2006–BUSP–674
E–2006–BUSP–675
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
618
643
61
181
62
NJ ......
NM ....
NM ....
NM ....
E–2006–BUSP–676
E–2006–BUSP–681
E–2006–BUSP–682
E–2006–BUSP–684
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
562
....................
....................
......
......
......
......
......
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Greensboro, North Carolina-Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation Multimodal Transportation Center.
Greensboro, North Carolina-Replacement buses ..............................
North Carolina Department of Transportation-North Carolina Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities.
Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, NC ................................................
Triangle Transit Authority Replacement Buses, North Carolina ........
Wilmington, NC Build Intermodal Center ............................................
Winston-Salem Union Station Intermodal Facility, NC .......................
North Dakota Department of Transportation/Statewide Bus ..............
North Dakota Statewide Transit ..........................................................
City of Omaha-Creighton University Intermodal Facility ....................
Kearney, Nebraska-RYDE Transit Bus Maintenance and Storage
Facility.
Nebraska Department of Roads-Bus Maintenance and Storage Facility for RYDE in Kearney, NE.
Nebraska Department of Roads-Statewide Vehicles, Facilities, and
Related Equipment Purchases.
Nebraska-statewide transit vehicles, facilities, and related equipment.
Omaha, NE, Buses and Fare boxes ..................................................
StarTran Farebox Technology Upgrades, Nebraska ..........................
Windham, New Hampshire-Construction of Park and Ride Bus facility at Exit 3.
Atlantic City Regional Medical Center Bus Project, NJ ......................
Atlantic City, NJ Jitney ........................................................................
Bergen Intermodal Stations and Park N’Rides, NJ ............................
Bloomfield Intermodal Facilities and Park-and-Ride, NJ ....................
Burlington County, NJ-BurLink and Burlington County Transportation System vehicles and equipment.
Camden, NJ Construction of the Camden County Intermodal Facility in Cramer Hill.
Central NJ Intermodal Stations and Park & Rides .............................
Hoboken, NJ Rehabilitation of Hoboken Inter-modal Terminal ..........
Jersey City, NJ Construct West Entrance to Pavonia-Newport
PATH Station.
Kapkowski Road Transportation Planning Area Project, NJ ..............
Lakewood, NJ-Ocean County Bus service and parking facilities .......
Long Branch, NJ Design and construct facilities for ferry service
from Long Branch, NJ to New York City and other destinations.
Monmouth County, NJ Construction of main bus facility for Freehold
Township, including a terminal and repair shop.
Morristown Intermodal Historic Station, NJ ........................................
Morristown, New Jersey-Intermodal Historic Station ..........................
National Park Service Design and construct 2.1-mile segment to
complete Sandy Hook multiuse pathway in Sandy Hook, NJ.
New Jersey Inter-modal Facilities and Bus Rolling Stock ..................
New Jersey Transit Community Shuttle Buses ..................................
Newark Penn Station Intermodal Improvements, New Jersey ...........
Newark, NJ Penn Station Intermodal Improvements including the
rehabilitation of boarding areas.
NJ Transit Jitney Bus Replacement, Atlantic City ..............................
NW NJ Multi-County Intermodal Transit Initiative ..............................
Regional Intermodal Transportation, South Amboy, New Jersey ......
Saint Peter’s McGrinley Square Intermodal Facility, New Jersey ......
Sandy Hook, NJ National Park Service Construct year-round ferry
dock at Sandy Hook Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area.
South Amboy, NJ Construction of improvements to facilities at
South Amboy Station under S Amboy, NJ Regional Intermodal
Initiative.
South Brunswick, NJ Transit System .................................................
Trenton Intermodal Station .................................................................
Trenton, New Jersey-Trenton Train Station Rehabilitation ................
Trenton, NJ Development of Trenton Trolley System ........................
Trenton, NJ Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Trenton Train
Station.
Valley Hospital Bus Transportation, NJ ..............................................
Las Cruces, NM, Road Runner Bus and Bus Facilities .....................
Northern New Mexico Park and Ride .................................................
West Side Transit Facility, Albuquerque, NM .....................................
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
2,383,273
1,100,264
2,645,730
43,600
495,000
190,357
247,500
990,000
1,237,500
680,130
380,714
453,420
906,840
761,429
603,900
64,350
704,322
247,500
742,500
1,980,000
495,000
761,429
190,357
495,000
723,357
380,714
495,000
571,072
761,429
380,714
2,970,000
190,357
190,357
571,072
95,179
990,000
190,357
247,500
990,000
495,000
792,000
190,357
1,522,858
990,000
5,445,000
285,536
190,357
1,332,500
74,250
198,000
445,500
816,750
13944
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
Earmark ID
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
NV .....
NV .....
E–2006–BUSP–685 .........
E–2006–BUSP–686 .........
....................
405
NV .....
E–2006–BUSP–687 .........
199
NV .....
NV .....
NV .....
E–2006–BUSP–688 .........
E–2006–BUSP–689 .........
E–2006–BUSP–690 .........
371
....................
603
NV .....
NV .....
E–2006–BUSP–693 .........
E–2006–BUSP–694 .........
....................
630
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–696 .........
....................
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–698 .........
E–2006–BUSP–699 .........
E–2006–BUSP–700 .........
....................
....................
271
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–703 .........
166
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–704 .........
338
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–705 .........
234
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–706 .........
10
NY .....
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–707 .........
E–2006–BUSP–708 .........
197
408
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–709 .........
41
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–710 .........
56
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–711 .........
419
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–712 .........
E–2006–BUSP–1111 .......
E–2006–BUSP–1112 .......
E–2006–BUSP–714 .........
E–2006–BUSP–715 .........
192
....................
....................
....................
245
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–716
E–2006–BUSP–717
E–2006–BUSP–718
E–2006–BUSP–719
E–2006–BUSP–720
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
230
146
363
512
NY .....
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–721 .........
E–2006–BUSP–722 .........
284
....................
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–723 .........
300
NY .....
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–724 .........
E–2006–BUSP–725 .........
....................
317
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
E–2006–BUSP–726
E–2006–BUSP–727
E–2006–BUSP–728
E–2006–BUSP–729
E–2006–BUSP–730
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
343
....................
....................
....................
368
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–731 .........
585
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–732 .........
25
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–733 .........
376
NY .....
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–734 .........
E–2006–BUSP–735 .........
590
591
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Boulder Highway Max Bus Rapid Transit System, NV ......................
Las Vegas, NV Construct Boulder Highway BRT system and purchase vehicles and related equipment.
Las Vegas, NV Construct Central City Inter-modal Transportation
Terminal.
Las Vegas, NV Construct Las Vegas West Care Intermodal Facility
Nevada Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, NV ..................................
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada-Central
City Intermodal Transportation Terminal.
RTC Transit Maintenance Facility, NV ...............................................
Southern Nevada Transit Coalition, Public Transit Building Acquisition.
Albany-Schenectady, NY Bus Rapid Transit Improvements in NY
Route 5, Corridor.
Automated Light study along Route 59, NY .......................................
Boro Park JCC Bus Purchase, NY .....................................................
Bronx, NY Botanical Garden metro North Rail station Intermodal
Facility.
Bronx, NY Hebrew Home for the Aged elderly and disabled transportation support.
Bronx, NY Intermodal Facility near Exit 6. of the Bronx River Parkway.
Bronx, NY Jacobi Intermodal Center to North Central Bronx Hospital bus system.
Bronx, NY Wildlife Conservation Society intermodal transportation
facility at the Bronx Zoo.
Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility .............
Brooklyn, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility in the
vicinity of Downstate Medical Center.
Brooklyn, NY New Urban Center-Broadway Junction Intermodal
Center.
Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station.
Brooklyn, NY-Rehabilitation of Bay Ridge 86th Street Subway Station.
Buffalo, NY Inter-modal Center Parking Facility .................................
White Plains for bus and bus facilities ...............................................
Rockland County, NY , mini-buses for service in Clarkstown, NY ....
Bus Facility 65th Intermodal Station, NY ............................................
Bus to provide Yorktown, New York internal circulator to provide
transportation throughout the Town.
Central New York Regional Transportation Authority ........................
Construction of Third Bus Depot on Staten Island .............................
Cooperstown, New York-Intermodal Transit Center ...........................
Corning, New York-Transportation Center .........................................
Corning, NY, Phase II Corning Preserve Transportation Enhancement Project.
Cornwall, NY-Purchase Bus ...............................................................
Electric, Next-Generation Transit Buses, Broome County Transit,
NY.
Geneva, New York-Multimodal facility-Construct passenger rail center.
Intermodal transportation facility, Huntington Hospital, NY ................
Jamestown, NY Rehabilitation of Intermodal Facility and associated
property.
Kings County, NY Construct a multi-modal transportation facility .....
Lakeside Center Hub, Prospect Park, Brooklyn, New York ...............
Nassau County Hub and Centre, NY .................................................
Nassau County, New York Bus Replacement ....................................
Nassau County, NY Conduct planning and engineering for transportation system (HUB).
Nassau County, NY, Conduct planning, engineering, and construction for transportation system (HUB).
New York City, NY First Phase Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit System.
New York City, NY Purchase Handicapped-Accessible Livery Vehicles.
New York City, NY, Bronx Zoo Intermodal Facility ............................
New York City, NY, Enhance Transportation Facilities Near W. 65th
Street and Broadway.
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
445,500
380,714
1,142,143
47,589
2,970,000
906,840
495,000
297,000
57
99,000
247,500
190,357
35,692
47,589
59,487
83,282
266,500
190,357
182,743
761,429
761,429
190,357
r 198,000
r 99,000
990,000
35,216
1,485,000
2,284,286
951,786
951,786
346,500
16,561
792,000
95,179
495,000
380,714
190,357
693,000
990,000
990,000
1,332,500
990,000
190,357
190,357
346,500
346,500
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13945
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–736 .........
592
NY .....
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–738 .........
E–2006–BUSP–739 .........
....................
77
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–740
E–2006–BUSP–741
E–2006–BUSP–742
E–2006–BUSP–743
E–2006–BUSP–744
E–2006–BUSP–745
E–2006–BUSP–747
E–2006–BUSP–748
E–2006–BUSP–749
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
373
....................
322
379
....................
252
430
607
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–750
E–2006–BUSP–751
E–2006–BUSP–752
E–2006–BUSP–753
E–2006–BUSP–754
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
609
....................
....................
....................
386
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–755 .........
353
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–756 .........
635
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–757 .........
261
NY
NY
NY
NY
E–2006–BUSP–758
E–2006–BUSP–759
E–2006–BUSP–760
E–2006–BUSP–761
.....
.....
.....
.....
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
289
451
78
NY .....
E–2006–BUSP–762 .........
182
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
E–2006–BUSP–763
E–2006–BUSP–764
E–2006–BUSP–765
E–2006–BUSP–766
E–2006–BUSP–767
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
264
149
362
318
OH .....
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–769 .........
E–2006–BUSP–770 .........
....................
489
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–771 .........
241
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–772 .........
89
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–774 .........
202
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–775 .........
179
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–776 .........
411
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–777 .........
....................
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–778 .........
258
OH .....
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–779 .........
198
OH .....
OH .....
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–780 .........
E–2006–BUSP–782 .........
E–2006–BUSP–783 .........
50
7
292
OH
OH
OH
OH
E–2006–BUSP–784
E–2006–BUSP–785
E–2006–BUSP–786
E–2006–BUSP–788
.....
.....
.....
.....
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
.........
.........
.........
.........
Jkt 211001
120
516
....................
309
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
New York City, NY, Highline Project, for Studies, Design, and Construction.
NFTA Hybrid Buses, Amherst, Erie County, New York .....................
Niagara Falls, NY Relocation, Development, and Enhancement of
Niagara Falls International Railway Station/Intermodal Transportation Center.
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Buses, New York .............
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, NY Replacement Buses
North Hempstead Green Bus Fleet, New York ..................................
Oneonta, New York-bus replacement ................................................
Ramapo, NY Transportation Safety Field Bus ...................................
Renaissance Square, NY ...................................................................
Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square transit center .................
Rochester, New York-Renaissance Square Transit Center ...............
Rochester, NY, Renaissance Square Intermodal Facility, Design
and Construction.
Rockland County, NY Express Bus ....................................................
Seniors Transportation, Inc. Buses and Bus Facilities, New York .....
St. George Terminal, Staten Island, NY .............................................
Suffolk County Buses and Bus Facilities, New York ..........................
Suffolk County, NY Design and construction of intermodal transit facility in Wyandanch.
Suffolk County, NY Purchase four handicapped accessible vans to
transport veterans to and from the VA facility in Northport.
Syracuse, New York, Syracuse University Connective Corridor
Transit Project.
Thendra-Webb and Utica, New York-Install handicap lifts in intermodal centers.
Third Bus Depot on Staten Island, NY—South Shore .......................
Town of Warwick, NY Bus Facility Warwick Transit System .............
Utica, New York Transit Multimodal Facilities ....................................
Utica, New York-Union Station Boehlert Center siding track improvements.
Utica, New York-Union Station rehabilitation and related infrastructure improvements.
Westchester County Bee-Line Bus Replacement, New York ............
Westchester County, NY Bus replacement program .........................
Yonkers, NY Trolley Bus Acquisition ..................................................
Akron, OH Construct City of Akron Commuter Bus Transit Facility ..
Akron, Ohio Construct Downtown Multi-modal Transportation Center.
Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility .............................
Central Ohio Transit Authority-Paratransit and Small Bus Service
Facility.
Cincinnati, Ohio-Construct Uptown Crossings Joint Development
Transit Project.
Cincinnati, Ohio-Metro Regional Transit Hub Network Eastern
Neighborhoods.
Cleveland, OH Construct Fare Collection System Project, Cuyahoga County.
Cleveland, OH Construct passenger inter-modal center near Dock
32.
Cleveland, OH Construction of an inter-modal facility and related
improvements at University Hospitals facility on Euclid Avenue.
Cleveland, Ohio acquisition of buses Greater Cleveland Regional
Transit Authority.
Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue and East 93rd Street intermodal facility.
Cleveland, Ohio-Euclid Avenue University Hospital intermodal facility.
Cleveland, Ohio-University Circle Intermodal facility ..........................
Columbus, OH-Central Ohio Transit Authority Paratransit Facility ....
Cuyahoga County, Ohio-Ohio Department of Transportation transit
improvements.
Dayton Airport Inter-modal Rail Feasibility Study ...............................
Dayton-Wright Stop Plaza ..................................................................
Downtown Akron Transportation Center, OH .....................................
Elyria, OH Construct the New York Central Train Station into an
intermodal transportation hub.
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
990,000
742,500
1,066,000
495,000
190,357
594,000
28,554
47,589
4,950,000
856,607
428,304
990,000
594,000
99,000
990,000
396,000
875,643
53,300
792,000
19,036
1,980,000
104,696
1,138,500
19,036
95,179
247,500
713,840
71,384
285,536
761,429
1,485,000
453,420
571,072
176,080
95,179
163,707
190,357
190,357
1,618,036
856,607
1,618,036
532,478
28,554
142,768
453,420
297,000
389,851
13946
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
E–2006–BUSP–789 .........
349
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–790 .........
104
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–791 .........
576
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–792 .........
87
OH .....
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–793 .........
E–2006–BUSP–795 .........
....................
385
OH .....
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–796 .........
E–2006–BUSP–797 .........
....................
34
OH .....
E–2006–BUSP–798 .........
....................
OH
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
E–2006–BUSP–799
E–2006–BUSP–800
E–2006–BUSP–801
E–2006–BUSP–802
E–2006–BUSP–803
E–2006–BUSP–804
E–2006–BUSP–805
E–2006–BUSP–806
E–2006–BUSP–809
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
64
....................
....................
442
165
272
66
187
325
OR .....
E–2006–BUSP–810 .........
99
OR
OR
OR
OR
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–812
E–2006–BUSP–813
E–2006–BUSP–814
E–2006–BUSP–815
.........
.........
.........
.........
323
175
....................
16
OR
OR
OR
OR
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–816
E–2006–BUSP–817
E–2006–BUSP–818
E–2006–BUSP–819
.........
.........
.........
.........
93
....................
106
....................
OR .....
OR .....
E–2006–BUSP–820 .........
E–2006–BUSP–821 .........
180
216
OR .....
E–2006–BUSP–822 .........
82
PA .....
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–823 .........
E–2006–BUSP–824 .........
....................
225
PA .....
PA .....
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–825 .........
E–2006–BUSP–827 .........
E–2006–BUSP–828 .........
456
....................
467
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–831 .........
471
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
OH .....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–832
E–2006–BUSP–833
E–2006–BUSP–835
E–2006–BUSP–839
E–2006–BUSP–840
E–2006–BUSP–841
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
481
....................
....................
123
PA
PA
PA
PA
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–842
E–2006–BUSP–843
E–2006–BUSP–845
E–2006–BUSP–846
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
513
E–2006–BUSP–847 .........
E–2006–BUSP–848 .........
E–2006–BUSP–849 .........
....................
....................
514
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
PA .....
PA .....
PA .....
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Kent, OH Construct Kent State University Intermodal Facility serving students and the general public.
Marietta, Ohio Construction of transportation hub to accommodate
regional bus traffic.
Metro Regional Transit Authority/City of Akron-Downtown Transit
Center/Akron.
Niles, OH Acquisition of bus operational and service equipment of
Niles Trumbull Transit.
Ohio Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities ...........................................
Springfield, OH-City of Springfield Bus Transfer Station and Associated Parking.
Tech Town Transportation Center, OH ..............................................
Toledo, OH TARTA/TARPS Passenger Inter-modal Facility construction.
Uptown Crossings Joint Development Transit Project, Cincinnati,
OH.
Zanesville, OH-bus system signage and shelters ..............................
Enhance Oklahoma Transit Association Public System ....................
Oklahoma DOT Transit Program Division ..........................................
Albany, OR North Albany Park and Ride ...........................................
Albany, OR Rehabilitate Building at Multimodal Transit Station ........
Bend, Oregon-replacement vans ........................................................
Canby, OR bus and bus facilities .......................................................
Columbia County, OR To purchase buses .........................................
Grants Pass, OR Purchase Vehicles For Use By Josephine Community Transit.
Gresham, Oregon Construct a new light rail station and transit
plaza on Portland MAX system and serve Gresham Civic neighborhood.
Lincoln, County, OR bus purchase .....................................................
Molalla, OR South Clackamas Transportation District, bus purchase
Park and Ride Facility, Ashland, OR ..................................................
Portland, OR Renovation of Union Station, including structural reinforcement and public safety upgrades.
Salem, OR bus and bus facilities .......................................................
Sandy Transit Bus Facility, Oregon ....................................................
Sandy, Oregon Transit Bus Facility ....................................................
SMART Multi-Modal Transit Center and Bus Maintenance Facility,
Oregon.
Tillamook, OR construction of a transit facility ...................................
Wilsonville, OR South Metro Area Rapid Transit, bus and bus facilities.
Yamhill County, OR For the construction of bus shelters, park and
ride facilities, and a signage strategy to increase ridership.
Adams Co. Transit Authority purchase of buses, PA .........................
Allentown, Pennsylvania-Design and Construct Intermodal Transportation Center.
Altoona Multimodal Transportation Facility Parking Garage ..............
Area Transit Authority, PA ..................................................................
Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania-Vehicle Replacements.
Beaver County, PA Transit Authority Bus Replacement/Related
Equipment Replacement.
Bucks County Intermodal Facility, PA ................................................
Bus Purchase for Red Rose Transit Authority, Lancaster, PA ..........
Butler Township, PA-Cranbury Area Transit Service .........................
Capital Area Transit (CAT), PA ..........................................................
Centre Area Transportation Intermodal Facility, PA ...........................
Cheltenham, PA Glenside Rail Station Parking Garage project involving the construction of a 300–400 space parking lot at Easton
Road and Glenside Avenue.
Chestnut Hill Parking Foundation, Cheltenham, PA ..........................
Church Street Transportation Center, PA ..........................................
Coatesville Train Station, Coatesville, PA ..........................................
County of Lackawanna Transit System-Scranton Intermodal Transportation Center.
County of Lebanon Transit (COLT), PA .............................................
Crawford Intermodal Transportation Facility, PA ................................
Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority-Purchase of
Buses and Spare Units.
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
190,357
95,179
1,587,960
38,071
5,204,615
47,589
742,500
1,427,679
990,000
15,467
495,000
495,000
181,293
290,068
190,357
28,554
26,650
38,752
266,500
47,589
19,036
247,500
19,036
380,714
371,250
133,250
495,000
19,036
47,589
20,939
495,000
380,714
227,700
990,000
226,710
226,710
495,000
742,500
793,980
742,500
495,000
190,357
247,500
222,750
990,000
226,710
297,000
346,500
226,710
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13947
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
Earmark ID
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
PA .....
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–850 .........
E–2006–BUSP–851 .........
....................
81
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
E–2006–BUSP–852
E–2006–BUSP–853
E–2006–BUSP–854
E–2006–BUSP–855
E–2006–BUSP–856
E–2006–BUSP–857
E–2006–BUSP–859
E–2006–BUSP–860
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
524
431
....................
....................
331
458
233
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–861 .........
457
PA
PA
PA
PA
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–862
E–2006–BUSP–863
E–2006–BUSP–864
E–2006–BUSP–865
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
37
559
564
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–866
E–2006–BUSP–867
E–2006–BUSP–868
E–2006–BUSP–869
E–2006–BUSP–870
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
583
....................
....................
588
PA .....
PA .....
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–871 .........
E–2006–BUSP–872 .........
E–2006–BUSP–873 .........
....................
....................
201
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–874 .........
137
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–875 .........
413
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–876 .........
22
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–877 .........
274
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–878 .........
316
PA .....
PA .....
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–879 .........
E–2006–BUSP–880 .........
E–2006–BUSP–881 .........
126
....................
397
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–882 .........
48
PA .....
PA .....
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–884 .........
E–2006–BUSP–885 .........
E–2006–BUSP–351 .........
424
....................
96
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–886 .........
626
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–887 .........
627
PA .....
E–2006–BUSP–888 .........
628
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
E–2006–BUSP–890
E–2006–BUSP–891
E–2006–BUSP–893
E–2006–BUSP–894
E–2006–BUSP–896
E–2006–BUSP–897
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
PR .....
PR .....
PR .....
VerDate Aug<31>2005
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
660
....................
....................
662
E–2006–BUSP–900 .........
E–2006–BUSP–901 .........
E–2006–BUSP–902 .........
128
421
3
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Easton Intermodal, PA ........................................................................
Easton, Pennsylvania-Design and construct Intermodal Transportation Center.
Endless Mountain Transportation Authority, Bradford County, PA ....
Erie, PA Metropolitan Transit Authority-Bus Acquisitions ..................
Erie, PA-EMTA Vehicle Acquisition ....................................................
Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation, PA ...................................
Gettysburg Bus and Bus Facilities, PA ..............................................
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania-transit transfer center ...............................
Hershey, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Garage .......
Intermodal Facilities in Bucks County (Croydon and Levittown Stations).
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Intermodal Center and Parking Facility.
Lancaster Intermodal, Pennsylvania ...................................................
Lancaster, PA-bus replacement .........................................................
Lancaster, PA-Intermodal Project .......................................................
Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority, PA-Allentown
Intermodal Transportation Center.
Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority, Pennsylvania ................................
Monroe Township, PA-Clarion County Buses ....................................
Monroe Township/Clarion University Transit ......................................
Montgomery County Intermodal, Pennsylvania ..................................
New Castle, PA Area Transit Authority-Bus Purchases/Park and
Ride Facility.
Northumberland County Transportation, PA ......................................
Paoli Transportation Center ................................................................
Philadelphia, PA Cruise Terminal Transportation Ctr. Phila. Naval
Shipyard.
Philadelphia, PA Improvements to the existing Penn’s Landing
Ferry Terminal.
Philadelphia, PA Penn’s Landing water shuttle parking lot expansion and water shuttle ramp infrastructure construction.
Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia Zoo Intermodal Transportation project
w/parking consolidation, pedestrian walkways, public transportation complements & landscape improvements to surface parking lots.
Philadelphia, PA SEPTA’s Market St. Elevated Rail project in conjunction with Philadelphia Commercial Development Corporation
for improvements and assistance to entities along rail corridor.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-SEPTA Market Street Elevated Line
parking facility.
Pittsburgh, PA Clean Fuel Bus Procurement .....................................
Port Authority of Allegheny County Bus Acquisition, Pennsylvania ...
Pottsville, PA Union Street Trade and Transfer Center Intermodal
Facility.
Project provides for the engineering and construction of a transportation center in Paoli, Chester County.
Sharon, PA-Bus Facility Construction ................................................
Shenango Valley Shuttle Service, Pennsylvania ................................
SEPTA Montgomery County Intermodal Improvements at Glenside
and Jenkintown Station Parking Garages.
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Bucks County
Intermodal (Croydon and Levittown).
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-Paoli Transportation Center.
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-VillanovaSEPTA Intermodal.
Union Station Intermodal Trade and Transit Center, Pennsylvania ...
Union/Snyder Transportation Authority Union County, PA ................
Westmoreland County Transit Authority, PA-Bus Replacement ........
Westmoreland Transit Authority, Pennsylvania ..................................
Williamsport Trade and Transit Centre Expansion, Pennsylvania .....
Williamsport, PA Bureau of Transportation-Williamsport Trade and
Transit Centre Expansion.
Bayamon, Puerto Rico-bus terminal ...................................................
Bayamon, Puerto Rico-Purchase of Trolley Cars ..............................
Lares, PR-Trolley buses-for the purchase of two trolley buses that
will offer transportation through the urban zone in the Municipality
of Lares.
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
396,000
380,714
297,000
226,710
380,714
1,485,000
247,500
171,131
56,925
571,072
56,925
1,980,000
180,839
158,400
453,420
1,485,000
149,490
653,400
495,000
168,300
198,000
1,980,000
666,250
761,429
209,393
951,786
266,500
761,429
95,179
3,069,000
380,714
190,357
95,179
247,500
s 951,786
680,130
680,130
680,130
1,237,500
990,000
226,710
742,500
668,250
680,130
114,214
161,804
50,254
13948
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
E–2006–BUSP–903
E–2006–BUSP–904
E–2006–BUSP–905
E–2006–BUSP–906
E–2006–BUSP–907
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
164
152
71
58
246
RI ......
E–2006–BUSP–908 .........
....................
RI ......
E–2006–BUSP–909 .........
....................
RI ......
RI ......
RI ......
RI ......
SC .....
E–2006–BUSP–910
E–2006–BUSP–911
E–2006–BUSP–912
E–2006–BUSP–913
E–2006–BUSP–914
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
115
....................
604
....................
533
SC .....
E–2006–BUSP–915 .........
619
SC .....
E–2006–BUSP–916 .........
620
SC .....
SD .....
SD .....
E–2006–BUSP–917 .........
E–2006–BUSP–918 .........
E–2006–BUSP–919 .........
....................
....................
621
SD
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–920
E–2006–BUSP–922
E–2006–BUSP–923
E–2006–BUSP–924
E–2006–BUSP–925
E–2006–BUSP–926
E–2006–BUSP–928
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
237
554
565
....................
268
TN
TN
TN
TN
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–930
E–2006–BUSP–931
E–2006–BUSP–932
E–2006–BUSP–933
.........
.........
.........
.........
30
....................
....................
636
TN
TN
TN
TN
TX
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–934
E–2006–BUSP–935
E–2006–BUSP–936
E–2006–BUSP–937
E–2006–BUSP–938
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
649
....................
426
TX .....
TX .....
TX .....
E–2006–BUSP–939 .........
E–2006–BUSP–940 .........
E–2006–BUSP–943 .........
....................
....................
153
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–945
E–2006–BUSP–946
E–2006–BUSP–947
E–2006–BUSP–948
E–2006–BUSP–949
E–2006–BUSP–950
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
485
TX
TX
TX
TX
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–951
E–2006–BUSP–953
E–2006–BUSP–954
E–2006–BUSP–955
.........
.........
.........
.........
455
....................
....................
506
TX .....
TX .....
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
PR .....
PR .....
PR .....
PR .....
RI ......
E–2006–BUSP–957 .........
E–2006–BUSP–958 .........
....................
111
TX .....
TX .....
E–2006–BUSP–959 .........
E–2006–BUSP–960 .........
....................
438
TX .....
TX .....
TX .....
E–2006–BUSP–961 .........
E–2006–BUSP–962 .........
E–2006–BUSP–963 .........
515
336
196
TX .....
E–2006–BUSP–964 .........
....................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Puerto Rico-Caribbean National Forest bus and bus facilities ..........
San Juan, Puerto Rico-bus security equipment .................................
San Juan, Puerto Rico-Buses ............................................................
Yabucoca, Puerto Rico-Trolley Buses ................................................
Providence, RI Expansion of Elmwood Paratransit Maintenance Facility.
Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Elmwood Avenue Maintenance Facility Improvements.
Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Transit Security Improvements.
Rhode Island Statewide Bus Fleet .....................................................
Rhode Island Statewide Vehicle Replacement ..................................
Rhode Island, RIPTA Elmwood Facility Expansion ............................
Warwick Para-Transit Vehicles, Rhode Island ...................................
Greensville, SC Transit Authority-City of Greenville Multimodal
Transportation Center Improvements.
South Carolina Department of Transportation-Transit Facilities Construction Program.
South Carolina Department of Transportation-Vehicle Acquisition
Program.
Vehicle Acquisition, SC .......................................................................
Pine Ridge Transit System, South Dakota .........................................
South Dakota Department of Transportation-Statewide Buses and
Bus Facilities.
Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, SD ................................................
Knoxville Electric Transit Intermodal Center, TN ...............................
Knoxville, Tennessee-Central Station Transit Center ........................
Knoxville, TN-Central Station ..............................................................
Lipscomb University, TN-Intermodal Parking Garage ........................
Memphis Airport Intermodal Facility, Tennessee ...............................
Nashville, TN Construct a parking garage on the campus of
Lipscomb University, Nashville.
Sevier County, Tennessee-U.S. 441 bus rapid transit .......................
Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency ..............................
Tennessee Department of Transportation Buses and Bus Facilities
Tennessee Department of Transportation-Statewide Tennessee
Transit ITS and Bus Replacement Project.
TN DOT Job Access Reverse Commute ...........................................
TN Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities .................................................
University of Memphis-Pedestrian Bridge ..........................................
Upper Cumberland Human Resource Agency, Tennessee ...............
Abilene, TX Vehicle replacement and facility improvements for transit system.
Brazos Transit District Bus Replacement, TX ....................................
Brazos Transit District, Capital Cost Contracting, TX ........................
Bryan, TX The District-Bryan Intermodal Transit Terminal and Parking Facility.
Bus Shelters, Dallas, TX .....................................................................
Bus/Vehicle Replacement, Lufkin, TX ................................................
Capital Metro Expansion and Improvement, TX ................................
Capital Metro North Operating Facility, TX ........................................
Capital Metro Rapid Bus Project, TX .................................................
Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, TX-Bus Replacements.
Carrollton, Texas Downtown Regional Multimodal Transit Hub .........
City of El Paso Sun Metro Bus Replacement, TX .............................
City of Lubbock Citibus Improvement, TX ..........................................
City of Round Rock, TX-Downtown Intermodal Transportation Terminal.
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Buses, TX ......................................
Construct West Houston and Fort Bend County, Texas-bus transit
corridor.
Corpus Christi Bus and Bus Facilities, TX .........................................
Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Regional Transit Authority for maintenance facility improvements.
Dallas Area Rapid Transit-Bus passenger Facilities ..........................
Dallas, TX Bus Passenger Facilities ..................................................
Design Downtown Carrollton, Texas Regional Multi-Modal Transit
Hub Station.
Enhancements to Bus Terminal in McAllen, TX .................................
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
571,072
571,072
190,357
33,313
951,786
1,227,600
198,000
1,142,143
495,000
1,584,000
133,650
226,710
453,420
1,814,670
1,584,000
594,000
1,380,820
1,665,660
990,000
1,941,643
567,270
340,560
1,361,250
380,714
47,589
495,000
477,570
2,721,510
495,000
5,102,430
680,130
346,500
76,143
123,750
990,000
571,072
495,000
297,000
2,079,000
495,000
742,500
2,268,090
227,700
1,980,000
495,000
226,710
990,000
380,714
79,200
475,893
226,710
2,436,572
380,714
495,000
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13949
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
Earmark ID
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
TX .....
TX .....
TX .....
E–2006–BUSP–965 .........
E–2006–BUSP–966 .........
E–2006–BUSP–967 .........
....................
290
536
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–968
E–2006–BUSP–969
E–2006–BUSP–970
E–2006–BUSP–972
E–2006–BUSP–973
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
561
....................
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–974
E–2006–BUSP–975
E–2006–BUSP–977
E–2006–BUSP–978
E–2006–BUSP–979
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
24
610
TX
TX
UT
UT
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–982
E–2006–BUSP–984
E–2006–BUSP–985
E–2006–BUSP–986
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
63
....................
....................
UT
UT
UT
UT
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–987
E–2006–BUSP–990
E–2006–BUSP–995
E–2006–BUSP–996
.........
.........
.........
.........
....................
....................
....................
....................
VA .....
VA .....
E–2006–BUSP–997 .........
E–2006–BUSP–998 .........
....................
409
VA
VA
VA
VA
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–999 .........
E–2006–BUSP–1000 .......
E–2006–BUSP–1001 .......
E–2006–BUSP–1002 .......
232
....................
278
142
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–1003
E–2006–BUSP–1004
E–2006–BUSP–1005
E–2006–BUSP–1006
E–2006–BUSP–1007
E–2006–BUSP–1008
E–2006–BUSP–1009
E–2006–BUSP–1010
E–2006–BUSP–1011
E–2006–BUSP–1012
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
359
157
....................
....................
492
493
494
495
511
15
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
E–2006–BUSP–1013
E–2006–BUSP–1014
E–2006–BUSP–1015
E–2006–BUSP–1016
E–2006–BUSP–1019
E–2006–BUSP–1020
E–2006–BUSP–1021
E–2006–BUSP–1022
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
525
281
97
....................
....................
....................
535
391
VA .....
VA .....
E–2006–BUSP–1023 .......
E–2006–BUSP–1024 .......
....................
354
VA .....
E–2006–BUSP–1025 .......
68
VA
VA
VA
VA
E–2006–BUSP–1026
E–2006–BUSP–1027
E–2006–BUSP–1028
E–2006–BUSP–1029
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
.....
.....
.....
.....
.......
.......
.......
.......
....................
....................
....................
602
VA .....
E–2006–BUSP–1030 .......
....................
VA .....
VA .....
VA .....
E–2006–BUSP–1031 .......
E–2006–BUSP–1033 .......
E–2006–BUSP–1034 .......
....................
184
434
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Unobligated allocation
Project
Fort Bend Co, TX, Park & Ride ..........................................................
Galveston, Texas-Intermodal center and parking facility, The Strand
Harris County-West Houston-Fort Bend Bus Transit Corridor: Uptown Westpark Terminal.
Hill County Transit Administration Facility, TX ...................................
Houston METRO Bus Transit Centers, TX ........................................
Hunt County Committee on Aging, TX ...............................................
Laredo-North Laredo Transit Hub-Bus Maintenance Facility .............
Lubbock/Citibus Low-Floor Buses, Paratransit Vans and Facilities,
and Passenger Amenities, TX.
Midland Bus Facilities, Texas .............................................................
Midland Bus Facilities, TX ..................................................................
Rolling Stock for HCTD Urban System, TX .......................................
Roma, TX Bus Facility ........................................................................
San Angelo, TX Street Railroad Company-Transit Fleet Replacement.
The District-Bryan/College Station Bus Replacement, Texas ............
Zapata, Texas Purchase Bus vehicles ...............................................
Brigham City Buses and Bus Facilities, UT .......................................
Commuter Rail Hub Planning and Renovation of the Historic
Brigham City Train Depot, UT.
Ogden Buses and Bus Facilities, UT .................................................
Statewide Bus and Bus Facilities, Utah .............................................
West Valley City Intermodal Terminal, Utah ......................................
Westminster College Intermodal Transportation Facilities Expansion
for Shuttle Buses, Utah.
Alexandria Transit Service Improvements, VA ...................................
Alexandria, VA Eisenhower Avenue Inter-modal Station improvements, including purchase of buses and construction of bus shelters.
Alexandria, VA Royal Street Bus Garage Replacement ....................
Arlington County Bus Transfer Facility, VA ........................................
Arlington County, VA Columbia Pike Bus Improvements ..................
Arlington County, VA Crystal City-Potomac Yard Busway, including
construction of bus shelters.
Arlington County, VA Pentagon City Multimodal Improvements ........
Bealeton, Virginia-Intermodal Station Depot Refurbishment ..............
Blacksburg Transit Intermodal Facility, VA .........................................
Buses and Bus Facilities, Danville, VA ..............................................
City of Alexandria, VA-City-Wide Transit Improvements ....................
City of Alexandria, VA-Potomac Yard Transit Improvements ............
City of Alexandria, VA-Replace Royal Street Bus Garage ................
City of Alexandria, VA-Valley Pedestrian & Transit ...........................
Commonwealth of Virginia-Statewide Bus Capital Program ..............
Fairfax County, VA Richmond Highway (U.S. Route1) Public Transportation Improvements.
Fairfax County, Virginia-Richmond Highway Initiative ........................
Falls Church, VA Falls Church Intermodal Transportation Center .....
Fredericksburg, Virginia-Improve and repair Fredericksburg Station
Greater Lynchburg Transit Company Vehicle Replacement, VA .......
Hampton Roads Southside Bus Facility, VA ......................................
Hampton Roads Transit Bus Facilities, VA ........................................
Hampton Roads Transit, VA-Southside Bus Facility ..........................
Hampton Roads, VA Final design and construction for a Hampton
Roads Transit Southside Bus Facility.
Jamestown 2007 Natural Gas Bus purchase, VA ..............................
Norfolk, Virginia-Final Design and Construction Southside Bus Facility.
Northern Neck and Middle Peninsula, Virginia-Bay Transit
Multimodal Facilities.
Park-and-Ride Lot, Springfield, VA .....................................................
Petersburg Multi-Modal Transit Center, VA ........................................
Petersburg Transit Intermodal Facility, VA .........................................
Potomac & Rappahannock Transportation Commission, VA-Buses
for Service Expansion.
Potomac and Rappahannock Transit Commission Buses for service
expansion, VA.
Richmond Highway Public Transportation Initiative, VA ....................
Richmond, VA Renovation and construction for Main Street Station
Roanoke, VA-Bus restoration in the City of Roanoke ........................
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
495,000
856,607
226,710
337,000
2,009,700
495,000
680,130
79,200
79,200
49,500
1,485,000
99,938
226,710
495,000
59,487
148,500
74,250
247,500
1,274,427
211,250
1,237,500
990,000
475,893
95,179
396,000
666,250
571,072
380,714
52,348
198,000
297,000
226,710
226,710
680,130
226,710
3,401,640
380,714
453,420
380,714
475,893
396,000
990,000
2,227,500
226,710
380,714
247,500
333,125
618,661
990,000
495,000
297,000
226,710
1,188,000
2,376,000
209,393
47,589
13950
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Earmark ID
VA .....
VA .....
VA .....
VI .......
VT .....
E–2006–BUSP–1035
E–2006–BUSP–1036
E–2006–BUSP–1037
E–2006–BUSP–1038
E–2006–BUSP–1116
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
312
305
361
....................
....................
VT .....
VT .....
VT .....
VT .....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
E–2006–BUSP–1040
E–2006–BUSP–1041
E–2006–BUSP–1042
E–2006–BUSP–1043
E–2006–BUSP–1044
E–2006–BUSP–1046
E–2006–BUSP–1048
E–2006–BUSP–1050
E–2006–BUSP–1051
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
477
....................
486
633
....................
....................
....................
395
94
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
E–2006–BUSP–1053
E–2006–BUSP–1055
E–2006–BUSP–1058
E–2006–BUSP–1061
E–2006–BUSP–1062
E–2006–BUSP–1063
E–2006–BUSP–1065
E–2006–BUSP–1066
E–2006–BUSP–1068
E–2006–BUSP–1069
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
337
....................
....................
334
333
....................
....................
613
....................
113
WA ....
E–2006–BUSP–1071 .......
....................
WA ....
WA ....
WA ....
E–2006–BUSP–1072 .......
E–2006–BUSP–1075 .......
E–2006–BUSP–1076 .......
151
654
655
WI ......
WI ......
WI ......
WV ....
E–2006–BUSP–1077
E–2006–BUSP–1080
E–2006–BUSP–1081
E–2006–BUSP–1083
.......
.......
.......
.......
....................
452
....................
73
WY ....
E–2006–BUSP–1085 .......
665
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
Unobligated allocation
Project
Roanoke, Virginia-Improve Virginian Railway Station ........................
Roanoke, Virginia-Intermodal Facility .................................................
Roanoke, Virginia-Roanoke Railway and Link Passenger facility ......
Virgin Island Transit VITRAN, Virgin Islands ......................................
Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont.
Brattleborough, VT, Intermodal Center ...............................................
Burlington Transit Facilities, VT ..........................................................
CCTA, VT, Bus, Facilities and Equipment .........................................
State of Vermont Buses, Facilities and Equipment ............................
Ben Franklin Transit, Maintenance and Operations Facility, WA ......
Everett Transit, Bus and Paratransit Vehicle Replacement, WA .......
Grays Harbor Transit, Transit Center Expansion, WA .......................
Ilwaco, WA Construct park and ride ...................................................
Ilwaco, WA Procure shuttles for Lewis and Clark National Historical
Park.
Island Transit, WA Operations Base Facilities Project .......................
King County Airfield Transfer Area, WA .............................................
Link Transit Low Floor Coaches Chelan/Leavenworth, WA ...............
North Bend, Washington-Park and Ride ............................................
Oak Harbor, WA Multimodal Facility ..................................................
Port Angeles International Gateway Project, Washington .................
Puyallup Transit Center Park and Ride, Washington .........................
Seattle, WA Multimodal Terminal Redevelopment & Expansion .......
Skagit Transit Chuckanut Dr. Station in Burlington, Washington .......
Snohomish County, WA Community Transit bus purchases and facility enhancement.
SW King County-Highline CC Intermodal Transit Facility and Parking Garage.
Thurston County, WA Replace Thurston County Buses ....................
Washington Southworth Terminal Redevelopment ............................
Washington, King Street Transportation Center-Intercity Bus Terminal Component.
7th District Buses and Bus Facilities, WI ...........................................
State of Wisconsin Transit Intermodal Facilities ................................
Wisconsin Statewide Buses and Bus Facilities ..................................
West Virginia Construct Beckley Intermodal Gateway pursuant to
the eligibility provisions for projects listed under section
3030(d)(3) of P.L. 105–178.
Wyoming Department of Transportation-Wyoming Statewide Bus
and Bus Related Facilities.
47,589
38,071
95,179
297,000
t 990,000
594,000
990,000
297,000
247,500
495,000
816,750
772,200
19,036
19,036
456,857
1,188,000
495,000
152,286
190,357
792,000
772,200
792,000
297,000
571,072
841,500
171,321
990,000
49,500
968,547
1,138,500
8,000
4,568,573
680,130
$565,807,839
Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Ferry Boat Systems Allocations ......................................................................................
FY 2006 Unobligated Other Project Allocations:
E–2006–BUSP–1094 ....... .................... Fuel Cell Bus Program .......................................................................
$9,900,000
Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Other Project Allocations .................................................................................................
FY 2006 Unallocated
.................... .............................................................................................................
Amount.
Total FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations .............................................................................................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations .......................................................................................................................
FY 2006 Unobligated Ferry Boat Systems Allocations:
CA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1086 ....... .................... San Francisco Water Transit Authority ...............................................
MA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1087 ....... .................... Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ferry System ..............
ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–1088 ....... .................... Maine State Ferry Service, Rockland .................................................
ME ..... E–2006–BUSP–1089 ....... .................... Swans Island, Maine Ferry Service ....................................................
NJ ...... E–2006–BUSP–1090 ....... .................... Camden, New Jersey Ferry System ...................................................
NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–1091 ....... .................... Governor’s Island, New York Ferry System .......................................
NY ..... E–2006–BUSP–1092 ....... .................... Staten Island Ferry .............................................................................
PA ..... E–2006–BUSP–1093 ....... .................... Philadelphia Penn’s Landing Ferry Terminal ......................................
$11,137,500
24,893,251
Unobligated Allocations Grand Total ................................................................................................................................
Fiscal Years 2002, 2003 and 2004 Extended Allocations:
AK ..... E–2003–BUSP–801 ......... .................... Anchorage International Airport Intermodal Facility, 2003 .................
CA ..... E–2002–BUSP–601 ......... .................... Orange County Transportation Authority ............................................
CA ..... E–2004–BUSP–049 ......... .................... Hybrid buses in Eureka, CA 2004 ......................................................
MT ..... E–2002–BUSP–319 ......... .................... Statewide bus and bus facilities, MT 2002 .........................................
NV ..... E–2003–BUSP–802 ......... .................... Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada for bus
facilities, including bus rapid transit projects.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
2,475,000
2,475,000
643,500
346,500
990,000
990,000
990,000
990,000
11,137,500
$611,738,590
$861,331,362
u $1,967,357
v $247,507
w 242,718
x 806,496
y 4,918,393
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13951
TABLE 13.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS—Continued
Earmark ID
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
Project
E–2003–BUSP–705 .........
E–2002–BUSP–600 .........
E–2003–BUSP–706 .........
....................
....................
....................
Buffalo, New York Inner Harbor Redevelopment Project ...................
City of Poughkeepsie for bus and bus facilities .................................
Oneida County buses and transit items, 2003 ...................................
z 4,918,393
Total Extended Allocations ................................................................................................................................................
$14,306,175
State
NY .....
NY .....
NY .....
Unobligated allocation
aa 320,000
ab 885,311
a Funds
originally designated for the Metro Red Line Wilshire Vermont Station (E–2005–BUSP–057) shall be available to the Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for bus and bus facility improvements. (July 7, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter
May 12, 2006).
b Funds originally designated for Sistrunk Transit and Pedestrian Access Improvement, FL (E–2005–BUSP–120) are now made available to implement bus stop, bus pullout and transit improvements consistent with the City of Ft. Lauderdale Community Redevelopment Agency plan. (July
7, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 12, 2006).
c Funds originally designated for White Earth Tribal Nation Transit Center, MN/White Earth Tribal Nation Transit Center (E–2005–BUSP–703)
shall be available for the purchase of buses for the White Earth Tribal Nation bus and bus related activities, MN. (July 7, 2006, DOT response to
Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 25, 2005).
d Funds originally designated for JATRAN fixed route vehicles, Mississippi shall now be made available to the City of Jackson, Mississippi, of
which up to $2,000,000 shall be available for pedestrian access to the Jackson intermodal facility, beautification to bridge structure and brickwork. (October 13, 2005 response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter May 25, 2005).
e Funds originally designated for Tulsa Transit Multi-Use facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma shall be available for Transit buses and equipment in
Tulsa. (October 13, 2005, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter of May 25, 2005).
f The project is a multimodal parking facility. (October 13, 2005 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond Letter of May 25, 2005).
g Period of availability extended to September 30, 2008 by reprogramming.
h This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006.
i Funds originally designated for Sun Tran CNG Buses and Facilities made available to purchase bio-diesel vehicles in Tucson, AZ. (July 7,
2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter May 12, 2006).
j Funds originally designated for Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery, CA (E–2006–BUSP–100) shall now be available to the Intermodal Park and Ride Facility at Discovery Science Center, Santa Ana, CA. The redirected funds are awarded to a State or local government entity and expended on activities that meet the buses criteria set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5309. (July 7, 2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter
May 12, 2006).
k This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Illinois project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006.
l The Statement of the Managers accompanying in the Fiscal Year 2006 DOT Appropriations bill includes $2,250,000 for GRTA Xpress Implement Buses. The funds shall be made available for both bus and bus facilities. (July 7, 2006 DOT response to Knollenbeng/Bond letter May 12,
2006).
m This allocation was incorrectly listed as a California project and had the wrong project description in the Federal Register Notice of February
3, 2006.
n April 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006, listed specific projects for which funds were made available.
$342,000 was previously obligated leaving a remaining balance of $54,000, for Lincoln County Senior Citizen Bus, Kentucky.
o Funds originally designated for MART Maintenance Facility, Fitchburg, MA. (E–2006–BUSP–488), shall be available for the MART maintenance facility expansion, Worcester County, MA. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006).
p Funds originally designated for Automation Alley/BUSolutions, MI (E–2006–BUSP–520), $1,300,000 made available to The Rapid, the transit
provider in the Grand Rapids, Michigan area, for bus acquisition. $700,000 remains available to Automation Alley/BUSsolutions in Michigan.
(April 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006).
q Funds originally designated for METRO St. Louis Downtown Shuttle Trolley, MO. (E–2006–BUSP–591), shall be available for the METRO
Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006).
r Funds originally designated for bus and bus facilities Clarkstown and White Plains, NY (E–2006–BUSP–713), $200,000 made available to
White Plains for bus and bus facilities. $100,000 made available to Rockland County, NY, to procure mini-buses for service in Clarkstown, NY.
(April 12, 2006 DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter January 12, 2006).
s This allocation was incorrectly listed as a Georgia project in the Federal Register Notice of February 3, 2006.
t The Statement of the Managers accompanying the Fiscal Year 2005 DOT Appropriations bill (H. Rpt. 108–792) includes $2,000,000 under the
Bus and Bus Facilities for Bellows Falls Transit Improvements, Vermont (E–2005–BUSP–424). In addition, the Statement of the Managers accompanying the Fiscal Year 2006 DOT Appropriations bill includes $1,000,000 under the Bus and Bus Facilities for the Bellows Falls Multimodal
Facility, VT (E–2006–BUSP–1039). It is the intent of the conferees that remaining funds be made available to a State or local governmental entity, who may apply on behalf of Connecticut River Transit for bus and bus related projects in Southeastern Vermont. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of December 19, 2006).
u It is the intent of the conferees that these funds shall be available for projects related to this facility through Fiscal Year 2007, including related surface transportation projects. (November 26, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006).
v The committee directs that amounts made available in Fiscal Year 2002 for Costa Mesa CNG facility, shall now be made available for Orange County Transportation Authority. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of December 19, 2006).
w Funds originally designated for Bus and Bus facilities for the Eureka Intermodal Depot, CA (E–2004–BUSP–049), shall be available for the
purchase of hybrid buses in Eureka, CA. (November 20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006).
x Reprogrammed in FY 2005 (H. Rept. 108–792).
y The committee directs that amounts made available in fiscal year 2003 for Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, shall
now be made available for the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada for bus and bus facilities, including bus rapid transit
projects. (February 7, 2007, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of September 29, 2006).
z Reprogrammed in FY 2005 (H. Rept. 4818, Sec. 527).
aa The committee directs that amounts made available in Fiscal Year 2002 for the City of Middletown buses and bus facilities shall be redirected for the City of Poughkeepsie for bus and bus facilities. (April 12, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter of January 12, 2006).
ab Reprogrammed in FY 2005 from original earmark Utica Transit Authority Buses (H. Rept. 108–192).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
TABLE 14.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS
State
Alaska ....................................
Alaska/Hawaii ........................
Arizona ...................................
California ................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Earmark ID
D2007–NWST–001
D2007–NWST–002
D2007–NWST–003
D2007–NWST–004
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Project location and description
...............
...............
...............
...............
Frm 00081
Denali Commission ...............................................................
Alaska and Hawaii Ferry .......................................................
Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT ..........................................
Metro Gold Line Eastside Light Rail Extension ....................
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Allocation
$5,000,000
15,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
13952
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 14.—FY 2007 SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
Earmark ID
Project location and description
Allocation
California ................................
California ................................
California ................................
Colorado ................................
Colorado ................................
District of Columbia/Maryland
Illinois .....................................
Illinois .....................................
Illinois .....................................
Maryland ................................
North Carolina ........................
New Jersey ............................
New York ...............................
Ohio .......................................
Oregon ...................................
Oregon ...................................
Oregon ...................................
Pennsylvania ..........................
Puerto Rico ............................
Texas .....................................
Utah .......................................
Washington ............................
................................................
D2007–NWST–005 ...............
D2007–NWST–006 ...............
D2007–NWST–007 ...............
D2007–NWST–008 ...............
D2007–NWST–009 ...............
D2007–NWST–026 ...............
D2007–NWST–010 ...............
D2007–NWST–011 ...............
D2007–NWST–012 ...............
D2007–NWST–013 ...............
D2007–NWST–014 ...............
D2007–NWST–015 ...............
D2007–NWST–016 ...............
D2007–NWST–017 ...............
D2007–NWST–018 ...............
D2007–NWST–019 ...............
D2007–NWST–020 ...............
D2007–NWST–021 ...............
D2007–NWST–022 ...............
D2007–NWST–023 ...............
D2007–NWST–024 ...............
D2007–NWST–025 ...............
................................................
Mission Valley East ...............................................................
Oceanside Escondido Rail Project ........................................
BART Extension to San Francisco International Airport .......
Southeast Corridor LRT ........................................................
West Corridor LRT ................................................................
Largo Metrorail Extension .....................................................
Douglas Branch Reconstruction ............................................
Ravenswood Line Extension .................................................
Union–Pacific West Line Extension ......................................
Central Light Rail Double Track ............................................
South Corridor LRT ...............................................................
Hudson–Bergen MOS–2 .......................................................
Long Island Rail Road Eastside Access ...............................
Euclid Corridor Transportation Project ..................................
Interstate MAX LRT Extension ..............................................
South Corridor I–205/Portland Mall LRT ...............................
Wilsonville to Beaverton ........................................................
North Shore LRT Connector .................................................
Tren Urbano ..........................................................................
Northwest/Southeast LRT MOS ............................................
Weber County to Salt Lake City Commuter Rail ..................
Central Link Initial Segment ..................................................
Unallocated Balance .............................................................
806,654
684,040
2,424,694
80,000,000
35,000,000
35,000,000
1,573,675
40,000,000
1,255,978
482,822
70,744,065
100,000,000
300,000,000
693,013
542,940
80,000,000
27,600,000
55,000,000
2,670,518
80,000,000
80,000,000
80,000,000
265,861,601
Total Allocation .......................................................................................................................................................................
$1,550,340,000
TABLE 15.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS
State
Earmark ID
FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations:
AK, HI E2005–NWST–000 ..........
AL ..... E2005–NWST–001 ..........
CA ..... E2005–NWST–007 ..........
CA ..... E2005–NWST–012 ..........
LA ..... E2005–NWST–022 ..........
MN .... E2005–NWST–027 ..........
NV ..... E2005–NWST–035 ..........
NV ..... E2005–NWST–036 ..........
PA ..... E2005–NWST–042 ..........
PA ..... E2005–NWST–043 ..........
PR ..... E2005–NWST–046 ..........
RI ...... E2005–NWST–047 ..........
TX ..... E2005–NWST–049 ..........
TX ..... E2005–NWST–051 ..........
VA ..... E2005–NWST–055 ..........
..........................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Unobligated allocation
Project Location and Description
Hawaii and Alaska Ferry Boats ..................................................................................
Birmingham, Alabama, Transit Corridor .....................................................................
San Diego, California, Mid-Coast Light Rail Extension ..............................................
Santa Clara County, California, Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor ......................
New Orleans, Louisiana, Canal Street Streetcar Project ...........................................
Minneapolis, Minnesota, Northstar Commuter Rail Project ........................................
CATRAIL RTC Rail Project, Nevada ..........................................................................
Las Vegas, Nevada, Resort Corridor Fixed Guideway Project ..................................
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Corridor One .....................................................................
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Schuylkill Valley MetroRail ............................................
San Juan, Puerto Rico, Tren Urbano Rapid Transit System .....................................
Rhode Island, Integrated Intermodal Project ..............................................................
Capital Metro–Bus Rapid Transit Texas .....................................................................
Houston Advanced Metro Transit Plan, Texas ...........................................................
Dulles Corridor Rapid Transit Project, Virginia ...........................................................
Unallocated Amount
$3,000,000
992,000
340,320
2,480,000
16,455,206
4,960,000
992,000
29,760,000
1,284,000
9,920,000
16,853,570
4,436,537
992,000
446,360
24,800,000
672,344
Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations .......................................................................................................................
FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations:
AK, HI E2006–NWST–001 .......... Alaska and Hawaii Ferry .............................................................................................
CA ..... E2006–NWST–010 .......... Santa Barbara Coast Rail Track Improvement Project ..............................................
CA ..... E2006–NWST–003 .......... ACE Gap Closure San Joaquin County .....................................................................
CA ..... E2006–NWST–011 .......... Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor Project, Santa Clara County ...........................
CA ..... E2006–NWST–005 .......... Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit Extension ......................................................................
CA ..... E2006–NWST–006 .......... Mission Valley East .....................................................................................................
CT ..... E2006–NWST–014 .......... Hartford-New Britain Busway Project .........................................................................
CT ..... E2006–NWST–015 .......... Stamford Urban Transitway ........................................................................................
DE ..... E2006–NWST–016 .......... Northeast Corridor Commuter Rail Project .................................................................
FL ..... E2006–NWST–019 .......... Ft. Lauderdale Downtown Rail Link ............................................................................
FL ..... E2006–NWST–018 .......... City of Miami Streetcar ...............................................................................................
FL ..... E2006–NWST–020 .......... Miami-Dade Transit County Metrorail Extension ........................................................
FL ..... E2006–NWST–017 .......... Central Florida Commuter Rail System ......................................................................
GA .... E2006–NWST–021 .......... Atlanta—Georgia 400 North Line Corridor Project .....................................................
IL ....... E2006–NWST–024 .......... CTA Yellow Line .........................................................................................................
IL ....... E2006–NWST–026 .......... Ogden Avenue Transit Corridor/Circle Line ................................................................
MA .... E2006–NWST–028 .......... North Shore Corridor Blue Line Extension .................................................................
MA .... E2006–NWST–030 .......... Boston/Fitchburg Massachusetts Rail Corridor ..........................................................
MA .... E2006–NWST–029 .......... Silver Line Phase III ....................................................................................................
MD .... E2006–NWST–032 .......... Baltimore Red Line and Green Line ...........................................................................
$118,384,337
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$5,262,406
980,100
4,900,500
6,370,650
7,017,516
7,546,770
5,880,600
9,801,000
1,396,643
980,100
1,960,200
9,801,000
10,781,100
980,100
980,100
980,100
1,960,200
1,960,200
3,920,400
1,960,200
13953
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 15.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
Earmark ID
Unobligated allocation
Project Location and Description
MD .... E2006–NWST–031 .......... Baltimore Central Light Rail Double Track Project .....................................................
MI ...... E2006–NWST–034 .......... Detroit Center City Loop .............................................................................................
MI ...... E2006–NWST–033 .......... Ann Arbor/Detroit Commuter Rail ...............................................................................
MN .... E2006–NWST–035 .......... North Star Corridor Commuter Rail Project ................................................................
MN .... E2006–NWST–036 .......... St. Paul Central Corridor, St. Paul/Minneapolis .........................................................
MO .... E2006–NWST–037 .......... Kansas City, Missouri—Southtown BRT ....................................................................
NC .... E2006–NWST–039 .......... Triangle Transit Authority Regional Rail System (Raleigh-Durham) ..........................
NJ ..... E2006–NWST–041 .......... Northern Branch Bergen County ................................................................................
NJ ..... E2006–NWST–042 .......... Northwest New Jersey-Northeast Pennsylvania Passenger Rail ...............................
NJ ..... E2006–NWST–043 .......... Trans Hudson Midtown Corridor .................................................................................
NM .... E2006–NWST–044 .......... Commuter Rail, Albuquerque to Santa Fe .................................................................
NV ..... E2006–NWST–045 .......... Regional Fixed Guideway Project ...............................................................................
NY ..... E2006–NWST–046 .......... Eastside Access Project .............................................................................................
OH .... E2006–NWST–048 .......... Cleveland-Euclid Corridor Transportation Project ......................................................
OR .... E2006–NWST–050 .......... Washington County Commuter Rail Project ...............................................................
PA ..... E2006–NWST–051 .......... Corridor One Regional Rail Project ............................................................................
PA ..... E2006–NWST–053 .......... Schuylkill Valley Metro ................................................................................................
PR ..... E2006–NWST–054 .......... San Juan Tren Urbano ...............................................................................................
RI ...... E2006–NWST–055 .......... Rhode Island Integrated Commuter Rail Project ........................................................
SC ..... E2006–NWST–056 .......... City of Rockhill Trolley Study ......................................................................................
TX ..... E2006–NWST–059 .......... Houston Metro .............................................................................................................
UT ..... E2006–NWST–061 .......... Mid-Jordan Light Rail Transit Line ..............................................................................
VA ..... E2006–NWST–063 .......... Gainesville-Haymarket VRE Service Extension .........................................................
VA ..... E2006–NWST–062 .......... Dulles Corridor Rapid Transit Project, Virginia ...........................................................
Subtotal FY 2006 Unobligated Allocations .......................................................................................................................
12,172,842
3,920,400
4,900,500
1,960,200
1,960,200
12,055,230
19,602,000
2,450,250
9,801,000
12,069,932
490,050
2,940,300
333,234,000
24,281,500
14,701,500
1,470,150
3,920,400
7,885,382
5,880,600
392,040
5,880,600
490,050
1,421,145
29,403,000
$598,703,156
Total Unobligated Allocations ............................................................................................................................................
$717,087,493
TABLE 16.—FY 2007 SECTION 5310 SPECIAL NEEDS FOR ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES
APPORTIONMENTS
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
Apportionment
Alabama .........................................................................................................................................................................................
Alaska ............................................................................................................................................................................................
American Samoa ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Arizona ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas ........................................................................................................................................................................................
California ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Colorado ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Connecticut ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Delaware ........................................................................................................................................................................................
District of Columbia .......................................................................................................................................................................
Florida ............................................................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
Guam .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Hawaii ............................................................................................................................................................................................
Idaho ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Illinois .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Indiana ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Maine .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Maryland ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan .........................................................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
Montana .........................................................................................................................................................................................
N. Mariana Islands .........................................................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Nevada ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire .............................................................................................................................................................................
New Jersey ....................................................................................................................................................................................
New Mexico ...................................................................................................................................................................................
New York .......................................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ................................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$2,035,366
276,085
63,219
2,126,988
1,310,682
12,394,851
1,481,207
1,440,108
423,747
366,156
7,908,221
2,969,256
167,228
585,120
558,416
4,581,777
2,413,518
1,246,465
1,117,777
1,876,704
1,868,467
659,726
1,986,299
2,636,140
3,812,077
1,751,132
1,314,415
2,305,142
465,011
64,411
742,834
907,190
561,147
3,352,052
819,747
7,942,602
3,320,537
13954
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 16.—FY 2007 SECTION 5310 SPECIAL NEEDS FOR ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES
APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
State
Apportionment
North Dakota ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Ohio ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Oregon ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island ..................................................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina ...............................................................................................................................................................................
South Dakota .................................................................................................................................................................................
Tennessee .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Texas .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Utah ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Vermont .........................................................................................................................................................................................
Virgin Islands .................................................................................................................................................................................
Virginia ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Washington ....................................................................................................................................................................................
West Virginia ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Wyoming ........................................................................................................................................................................................
368,361
4,457,215
1,544,612
1,432,073
5,260,761
1,795,292
567,897
1,773,741
405,811
2,470,273
7,357,444
737,346
347,005
158,769
2,605,065
2,216,199
988,942
2,024,203
296,725
Total ........................................................................................................................................................................................
$116,659,554
TABLE 17.—FY 2007 SECTION 5311 AND SECTION 5340 NONURBANIZED APPORTIONMENTS AND SECTION 5311(B)(3)
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP) APPORTIONMENTS
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report apportionments for Section 5311 and Section 5340 were combined
to show a single amount. The State’s apportionment under the column heading ‘‘Sections 5311 and 5340 apportionment’’ includes Section
5311 and Growing States funds.]
Sections 5311 and
5340 apportionment
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
Alabama .......................................................................................................................................................
Alaska ..........................................................................................................................................................
American Samoa .........................................................................................................................................
Arizona .........................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas ......................................................................................................................................................
California ......................................................................................................................................................
Colorado ......................................................................................................................................................
Connecticut ..................................................................................................................................................
Delaware ......................................................................................................................................................
Florida ..........................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ........................................................................................................................................................
Guam ...........................................................................................................................................................
Hawaii ..........................................................................................................................................................
Idaho ............................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ...........................................................................................................................................................
Indiana .........................................................................................................................................................
Iowa .............................................................................................................................................................
Kansas .........................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky ......................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ......................................................................................................................................................
Maine ...........................................................................................................................................................
Maryland ......................................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts .............................................................................................................................................
Michigan .......................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ....................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ....................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ........................................................................................................................................................
Montana .......................................................................................................................................................
N. Mariana Islands .......................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ......................................................................................................................................................
Nevada .........................................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ...........................................................................................................................................
New Jersey ..................................................................................................................................................
New Mexico .................................................................................................................................................
New York .....................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ..............................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ................................................................................................................................................
Ohio .............................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
Section 5311(b)(3)
apportionment
$11,637,807
5,320,819
199,704
8,323,026
8,882,775
19,998,674
7,315,810
2,377,249
1,108,746
12,017,749
15,087,041
539,792
1,729,098
5,126,780
12,445,383
11,927,818
8,889,211
8,235,807
11,260,036
8,866,858
4,775,042
4,376,645
3,058,310
15,184,764
11,178,461
10,115,947
12,150,008
6,603,066
30,743
5,755,218
4,319,300
3,077,790
2,852,281
7,194,716
15,385,473
19,341,692
3,485,128
17,519,593
$176,277
80,509
12,544
119,285
145,493
236,053
113,327
89,737
76,216
176,561
206,049
16,874
81,680
95,647
184,090
183,545
145,443
130,747
174,906
150,853
107,673
109,363
96,705
214,199
163,037
161,128
176,218
94,663
10,334
105,239
79,297
95,372
94,333
107,484
219,171
255,434
83,269
244,483
23MRN2
13955
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 17.—FY 2007 SECTION 5311 AND SECTION 5340 NONURBANIZED APPORTIONMENTS AND SECTION 5311(B)(3)
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP) APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
[Note: In accordance with language in the SAFETEA–LU conference report apportionments for Section 5311 and Section 5340 were combined
to show a single amount. The State’s apportionment under the column heading ‘‘Sections 5311 and 5340 apportionment’’ includes Section
5311 and Growing States funds.]
Sections 5311 and
5340 apportionment
Section 5311(b)(3)
apportionment
Oklahoma .....................................................................................................................................................
Oregon .........................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ................................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ..................................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island ................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina .............................................................................................................................................
South Dakota ...............................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ...................................................................................................................................................
Texas ...........................................................................................................................................................
Utah .............................................................................................................................................................
Vermont .......................................................................................................................................................
Virginia .........................................................................................................................................................
Washington ..................................................................................................................................................
West Virginia ................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .....................................................................................................................................................
Wyoming ......................................................................................................................................................
9,914,012
8,581,134
17,741,333
1,235,686
510,592
9,718,038
4,310,749
12,388,999
29,710,596
4,232,444
2,311,127
10,912,491
8,392,208
5,902,440
11,806,200
4,080,793
152,348
129,179
245,736
79,739
70,338
159,949
89,879
185,988
333,925
86,541
87,357
170,030
135,620
122,430
176,956
81,335
Total ......................................................................................................................................................
$449,443,202
$7,320,588
State
TABLE 18.—FY 2007 NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS ALLOCATIONS
Allocation 1
Earmark ID
Project
Alabama .................
E2007–NATR–6701 .....................
Alabama .................
E2007–NATR–6702 .....................
Alabama .................
E2007–NATR–6703 .....................
California ................
E2007–NATR–6704 .....................
California ................
Connecticut ............
E2007–NATR–7101 .....................
E2007–NATR–6705 .....................
Connecticut ............
E2007–NATR–6706 .....................
District of Columbia
District of Columbia
E2007–NATR–6501 .....................
E2007–NATR–6707 .....................
Florida ....................
Kentucky ................
E2007–NATR–6708 .....................
E2007–NATR–6709 .....................
Maryland ................
New Jersey ............
E2007–NATR–6710 .....................
E2007–NATR–6711 .....................
New Jersey ............
E2007–NATR–7102 .....................
North Dakota .........
E2007–NATR–6712 .....................
Ohio .......................
E2007–NATR–6713 .....................
Oregon ...................
E2007–NATR–6714 .....................
Pennsylvania .........
E2007–NATR–6715 .....................
Pennsylvania .........
E2007–NATR–6716 .....................
Pennsylvania .........
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
State
E2007–NATR–6717 .....................
Wisconsin ..............
E2007–NATR–8501 .....................
................................
................................
E2007–NATR–6502 .....................
E2007–NATR–6503 .....................
................................
E2007–NATR–6718 .....................
Transportation Hybrid Electric Vehicle and Fuel Cell Research—
University of Alabama.
Transportation Infrastructure and Logistics Research—University of
Alabama—Huntsville.
Trauma Care System Research and Development—University of
Alabama—Birmingham.
Regional Transit Training Consortium Pilot Program—Southern CA
Regional Transit Training Consortium.
Center for Transit Oriented Development ..........................................
Advanced Technology Bus Rapid Transit Project—Southeastern CT
Advanced Technology BRT Project.
Greater New Haven Transit District Fuel Cell-Powered Bus Research.
Project ACTION ..................................................................................
Public Transportation National Security Study—National Academy
of Sciences.
National Bus Rapid Transit Institute—University of South Florida .....
Application of Information Technology to Transportation Logistics
and Security—Northern Kentucky University.
Transit Career Ladder Training Program ...........................................
Center for Advanced Transportation Initiatives—Rutgers Center for
Advanced Transportation Initiatives.
Institute of Technology’s Transportation, Economic, and Land Use
System—NJ TELUS.
Small Urban and Rural Transit Center—North Dakota State University.
Intelligent Transportation System Pilot Project—Ohio State University.
Portland, Oregon Streetcar Prototype Purchase and Deployment—
TriMet.
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Shuttle Deployment Demonstration Project—Allentown, PA.
Regional Public Safety Training Center—Lehigh-Carbon Community
College.
Transit Security Training Facility—Chester County Community College.
Wisconsin Supplemental Transportation Rural Assistance Program—WI DOT.
Human Services Transportation Coordination ....................................
National Technical Assistance Center for Senior Transportation
(Section 5314(b)).
Pilot Program for Remote Infrared Audible Signs ..............................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$487,000
487,000
500,000
380,000
1,000,000
540,000
525,960
3,000,000
250,000
1,750,000
400,000
1,000,000
525,960
540,000
800,000
465,000
1,000,000
800,000
500,000
750,000
2,000,000
1,600,000
1,000,000
500,000
13956
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 18.—FY 2007 NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS ALLOCATIONS—Continued
Allocation 1
State
Earmark ID
Project
................................
................................
E2007–NATR–7103 .....................
E2007–NATR–6801 .....................
Public Transportation Participation Pilot Program ..............................
Transportation Equity Research Program ..........................................
1,000,000
1,000,000
Subtotal Allocation National Research and Technology Program ......................................................................................
District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6719 ..................... Transit Cooperative Research Program .............................................
District of Columbia E2007–NATR–6720 ..................... University Transportation Centers Program .......................................
New Jersey ............ E2007–NATR–6721 ..................... National Transit Institute .....................................................................
$22,800,920
9,300,000
7,000,000
4,300,000
Total Allocation National Research Programs ....................................................................................................................
$43,400,920
1 Allocations
include Small Business Innovative Research takedown when applicable.
TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
200,000 or more in Population ......................................................................................................................................................
50,000–199,999 in Population .......................................................................................................................................................
Nonurbanized .................................................................................................................................................................................
$86,400,000
28,800,000
28,800,000
National Total .........................................................................................................................................................................
Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 or more in Population:
Aguadilla—Isabela—San Sebastian, PR ...............................................................................................................................
Akron, OH ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Albany, NY ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Albuquerque, NM ....................................................................................................................................................................
Allentown—Bethlehem, PA—NJ ............................................................................................................................................
Anchorage, AK .......................................................................................................................................................................
Ann Arbor, MI .........................................................................................................................................................................
Antioch, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Asheville, NC ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Atlanta, GA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Atlantic City, NJ ......................................................................................................................................................................
Augusta-Richmond County, GA—SC .....................................................................................................................................
Austin, TX ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Bakersfield, CA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Baltimore, MD .........................................................................................................................................................................
Barnstable Town, MA .............................................................................................................................................................
Baton Rouge, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................
Birmingham, AL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Boise City, ID ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Bonita Springs—Naples, FL ...................................................................................................................................................
Boston, MA—NH—RI .............................................................................................................................................................
Bridgeport—Stamford, CT—NY .............................................................................................................................................
Buffalo, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................
Canton, OH .............................................................................................................................................................................
Cape Coral, FL .......................................................................................................................................................................
Charleston—North Charleston, SC ........................................................................................................................................
Charlotte, NC—SC .................................................................................................................................................................
Chattanooga, TN—GA ...........................................................................................................................................................
Chicago, IL—IN ......................................................................................................................................................................
Cincinnati, OH—KY—IN .........................................................................................................................................................
Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................
Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................
Columbia, SC .........................................................................................................................................................................
Columbus, GA—AL ................................................................................................................................................................
Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................
Concord, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Corpus Christi, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................
Dallas—Fort Worth—Arlington, TX ........................................................................................................................................
Davenport, IA—IL ...................................................................................................................................................................
Dayton, OH .............................................................................................................................................................................
Daytona Beach—Port Orange, FL .........................................................................................................................................
Denton—Lewisville, TX ..........................................................................................................................................................
Denver—Aurora, CO ..............................................................................................................................................................
Des Moines, IA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Detroit, MI ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................
El Paso, TX—NM ...................................................................................................................................................................
Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................
Evansville, IN—KY .................................................................................................................................................................
Fayetteville, NC ......................................................................................................................................................................
144,000,000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$559,566
262,301
243,289
343,932
228,109
88,502
127,800
89,316
120,215
1,415,682
102,367
201,825
428,056
335,486
918,141
79,179
310,627
375,374
102,516
77,282
1,448,238
274,601
510,836
119,001
155,494
231,598
292,995
178,019
3,729,369
610,517
819,481
178,625
202,042
157,239
514,252
106,069
211,359
2,095,014
132,714
319,945
143,926
87,808
736,267
134,315
1,776,059
160,702
675,416
140,201
104,713
160,308
13957
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
Flint, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Fort Collins, CO ......................................................................................................................................................................
Fort Wayne, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................
Fresno, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Grand Rapids, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................
Greensboro, NC .....................................................................................................................................................................
Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................
Gulfport—Biloxi, MS ...............................................................................................................................................................
Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................
Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................
Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................
Huntsville, AL ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Indianapolis, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................
Indio—Cathedral City—Palm Springs, CA .............................................................................................................................
Jackson, MS ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Jacksonville, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas City, MO—KS ............................................................................................................................................................
Knoxville, TN ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Lancaster, PA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Lancaster—Palmdale, CA ......................................................................................................................................................
Lansing, MI .............................................................................................................................................................................
Las Vegas, NV .......................................................................................................................................................................
Lexington-Fayette, KY ............................................................................................................................................................
Lincoln, NE .............................................................................................................................................................................
Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................
Los Angeles—Long Beach—Santa Ana, CA .........................................................................................................................
Louisville, KY—IN ...................................................................................................................................................................
Lubbock, TX ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................
McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................
Memphis, TN—MS—AR .........................................................................................................................................................
Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................
Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................
Minneapolis—St. Paul, MN ....................................................................................................................................................
Mission Viejo, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................
Mobile, AL ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Modesto, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Nashville-Davidson, TN ..........................................................................................................................................................
New Haven, CT ......................................................................................................................................................................
New Orleans, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................
New York—Newark, NY—NJ—CT .........................................................................................................................................
Ogden—Layton, UT ................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma City, OK .................................................................................................................................................................
Omaha, NE—IA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Orlando, FL .............................................................................................................................................................................
Oxnard, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Palm Bay—Melbourne, FL .....................................................................................................................................................
Pensacola, FL—AL .................................................................................................................................................................
Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................
Philadelphia, PA—NJ—DE—MD ...........................................................................................................................................
Phoenix—Mesa, AZ ................................................................................................................................................................
Pittsburgh, PA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Port St. Lucie, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................
Portland, OR—WA .................................................................................................................................................................
Poughkeepsie—Newburgh, NY ..............................................................................................................................................
Providence, RI—MA ...............................................................................................................................................................
Provo—Orem, UT ...................................................................................................................................................................
Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................
Reading, PA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................
Richmond, VA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Riverside—San Bernardino, CA .............................................................................................................................................
Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................
Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................
Round Lake Beach—McHenry—Grayslake, IL—WI ..............................................................................................................
Sacramento, CA .....................................................................................................................................................................
Salem, OR ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Salt Lake City, UT ..................................................................................................................................................................
San Antonio, TX .....................................................................................................................................................................
San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................
San Francisco—Oakland, CA ................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
218,413
90,407
126,707
505,727
218,475
121,991
163,180
123,033
124,755
331,675
312,074
2,346,350
96,032
487,963
176,743
198,363
417,039
548,699
221,837
115,080
172,608
158,895
644,125
131,848
99,023
204,063
8,442,199
424,761
150,887
141,454
703,574
613,956
2,950,084
618,079
752,458
116,753
242,851
217,635
351,465
211,127
787,518
9,542,399
148,268
448,031
271,986
579,092
196,151
171,388
187,713
125,072
2,295,088
1,515,115
795,971
141,358
687,146
145,723
580,123
174,644
176,769
114,391
142,722
342,650
1,081,019
318,702
117,454
48,662
775,462
215,814
341,093
907,380
1,476,858
1,318,167
13958
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
San Jose, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
San Juan, PR .........................................................................................................................................................................
Santa Rosa, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Sarasota—Bradenton, FL .......................................................................................................................................................
Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Scranton, PA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Seattle, WA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................
South Bend, IN—MI ...............................................................................................................................................................
Spokane, WA—ID ..................................................................................................................................................................
Springfield, MA—CT ...............................................................................................................................................................
Springfield, MO .......................................................................................................................................................................
St. Louis, MO—IL ...................................................................................................................................................................
Stockton, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Syracuse, NY ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Tallahassee, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Tampa—St. Petersburg, FL ...................................................................................................................................................
Temecula—Murrieta, CA ........................................................................................................................................................
Thousand Oaks, CA ...............................................................................................................................................................
Toledo, OH—MI ......................................................................................................................................................................
Trenton, NJ .............................................................................................................................................................................
Tucson, AZ .............................................................................................................................................................................
Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................
Victorville—Hesperia—Apple Valley, CA ...............................................................................................................................
Virginia Beach, VA .................................................................................................................................................................
Washington, DC—VA—MD ....................................................................................................................................................
Wichita, KS .............................................................................................................................................................................
Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................................................................................
Worcester, MA—CT ...............................................................................................................................................................
Youngstown, OH—PA ............................................................................................................................................................
486,612
3,347,537
110,882
236,321
141,828
203,254
1,013,784
210,674
128,602
188,373
291,029
125,052
899,591
277,437
215,397
139,757
1,030,946
91,840
49,642
265,835
104,396
465,291
300,717
137,860
650,859
1,256,532
191,748
139,386
189,020
230,793
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population:
Alabama ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Alaska .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Arizona ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas .................................................................................................................................................................................
California .................................................................................................................................................................................
Colorado .................................................................................................................................................................................
Connecticut .............................................................................................................................................................................
Delaware .................................................................................................................................................................................
Florida .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Hawaii .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Idaho .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Indiana ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky .................................................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................
Maine ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Maryland .................................................................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan .................................................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Montana ..................................................................................................................................................................................
N. Mariana Islands .................................................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................
Nevada ...................................................................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ......................................................................................................................................................................
New Jersey .............................................................................................................................................................................
New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................
New York ................................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Oregon ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ..........................................................................................................................................................................
86,400,000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$805,905
36,316
290,494
518,014
3,000,086
483,031
294,526
49,569
1,678,878
919,739
54,443
311,710
662,248
708,815
426,122
194,919
264,981
836,620
254,427
316,406
270,424
897,332
243,496
150,126
300,193
230,052
83,476
15,349
39,745
230,658
147,701
285,184
541,073
919,021
174,497
675,417
182,912
233,689
884,906
13959
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 19.—FY 2007 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Puerto Rico .............................................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................
South Dakota ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Texas ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Vermont ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Virginia ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Washington .............................................................................................................................................................................
West Virginia ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Wyoming .................................................................................................................................................................................
2,710,414
516,851
130,637
600,676
3,230,936
132,974
68,962
614,054
799,167
547,326
732,721
102,782
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Nonurbanized Areas Less than 50,000 in Population:
Alabama ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Alaska .....................................................................................................................................................................................
American Samoa ....................................................................................................................................................................
Arizona ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas .................................................................................................................................................................................
California .................................................................................................................................................................................
Colorado .................................................................................................................................................................................
Connecticut .............................................................................................................................................................................
Delaware .................................................................................................................................................................................
Florida .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Guam ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Hawaii .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Idaho .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Indiana ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky .................................................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................
Maine ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Maryland .................................................................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan .................................................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Montana ..................................................................................................................................................................................
N. Mariana Islands .................................................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................
Nevada ...................................................................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ......................................................................................................................................................................
New Jersey .............................................................................................................................................................................
New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................
New York ................................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Oregon ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico .............................................................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island ..........................................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................
South Dakota ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Texas ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Vermont ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Virgin Islands ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Virginia ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Washington .............................................................................................................................................................................
West Virginia ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Wyoming .................................................................................................................................................................................
28,800,000
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
28,800,000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$963,952
93,888
86,625
518,262
726,832
1,467,032
272,602
70,243
64,011
832,051
1,141,655
86,742
114,590
248,790
649,149
580,869
414,410
412,799
1,050,459
899,286
277,815
179,234
111,986
772,911
494,688
1,041,935
847,599
250,847
49,282
257,380
77,213
120,326
95,639
485,438
923,625
1,452,051
132,630
988,407
782,108
395,978
1,049,729
373,348
16,431
804,861
198,975
938,280
2,297,782
141,546
128,000
87,089
675,288
486,768
568,900
491,171
110,493
13960
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 20.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE ALLOCATIONS
State
Earmark ID
Unobligated
allocation
Project and description
FY 2002 Unobligated Congressional Allocations:
AR
E2002–JARC–005 ..............................
CA
E2002–JARC–008 ..............................
NY
E2002–JARC–054 ..............................
VA
E2002–JARC–082 ..............................
Central Arkansas Transit Authority ..................................................................
Del Norte County, California ............................................................................
Columbia County, New York ............................................................................
Winchester, Virginia .........................................................................................
$500,000
73,400
100,000
1,000,000
...........................................................................................................................
1,673,400
LA County UTRANS .........................................................................................
City of Colorado Springs, CO ..........................................................................
Chemung County Transit .................................................................................
Columbia County ..............................................................................................
STEP–UP Job Access Project Dayton ............................................................
495,335
100,284
74,300
99,067
123,834
Subtotal FY 2003 Unobligated Allocations ...........................................................................................................................
FY 2004 Unobligated Congressional Allocations:
AK
E2004–JARC–000 .............................. Craig Transit Service JARC Program ..............................................................
AL
E2004–JARC–006 .............................. Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program [ADA] Rural Transportation Services.
CA
E2004–JARC–013 .............................. City of Irwindale Senior Transportation Services .............................................
CA
E2004–JARC–014 .............................. Guaranteed Ride Home, Santa Clarita ............................................................
FL
E2004–JARC–024 .............................. Key West, Florida Job Access Reverse Commute ..........................................
IA .. E2004–JARC–026 .............................. Iowa Statewide JARC ......................................................................................
KS
E2004–JARC–031 .............................. ADA Mobility Planning ......................................................................................
MD E2004–JARC–040 .............................. VoxLinx Voice-Enabled Transit Trip Planner ...................................................
NJ
E2004–JARC–050 .............................. New Jersey Community Development Corporation Transportation Opportunity Center.
NY
E2004–JARC–055 .............................. Broome County Transit JARC ..........................................................................
NY
E2004–JARC–061 .............................. Essex County Job Access Reverse Commute Project ....................................
NY
E2004–JARC–063 .............................. MTA Long Island Bus Job Access Reverse Commute Project .......................
NY
E2004–JARC–065 .............................. North Country County Consortium ...................................................................
NY
E2004–JARC–070 .............................. Ulster County Area Transit Rural Feeder Service ...........................................
NV
E2004–JARC–053 .............................. Lake Tahoe Public Transit Services JARC Project .........................................
SD
E2004–JARC–083 .............................. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Public Bus System ............................................
TN
E2004–JARC–087 .............................. Monroe County TN Job Access Reverse Commute Program .........................
TX
E2004–JARC–090 .............................. Corpus Christi Welfare to Work Project ...........................................................
TX
E2004–JARC–094 .............................. San Antonio VIA Metropolitan Transit JARC Program ....................................
TX
E2004–JARC–096 .............................. Texas Colonias JARC Initiative ........................................................................
VA
E2004–JARC–101 .............................. Virginia Beach Paratransit Services .................................................................
WI
E2004–JARC–109 .............................. Wisconsin Statewide JARC ..............................................................................
892,820
Subtotal FY 2002 Unobligated Allocations
FY 2003 Unobligated Congressional Allocations:
CA
E2003–JARC–011 ..............................
CO
E2003–JARC–020 ..............................
NY
E2003–JARC–065 ..............................
NY
E2003–JARC–066 ..............................
OH
E2003–JARC–078 ..............................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Subtotal FY 2004 Unobligated Allocations
FY 2005 Unobligated Congressional Allocations:
AK
E2005–JARC–000 ..............................
AK
E2005–JARC–001 ..............................
AK
E2005–JARC–003 ..............................
AK
E2005–JARC–004 ..............................
AK
E2005–JARC–005 ..............................
AL
E2005–JARC–007 ..............................
AL
E2005–JARC–008 ..............................
AL
E2005–JARC–009 ..............................
CA
E2005–JARC–013 ..............................
CA
E2005–JARC–014 ..............................
CO
E2005–JARC–017 ..............................
DC
E2005–JARC–097 ..............................
DC
E2005–JARC–020 ..............................
DC
GA
GA
IL ..
IN ..
LA
ME
MI
MN
MO
MO
NJ
NY
NY
E2005–JARC–021
E2005–JARC–025
E2005–JARC–026
E2005–JARC–028
E2005–JARC–031
E2005–JARC–037
E2005–JARC–041
E2005–JARC–042
E2005–JARC–047
E2005–JARC–049
E2005–JARC–050
E2005–JARC–053
E2005–JARC–057
E2005–JARC–058
VerDate Aug<31>2005
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
49,563
495,630
64,432
396,504
495,630
159,980
361,810
1,288,638
297,378
99,126
99,126
247,815
456,299
49,563
99,126
247,815
99,126
372,714
136,298
2,379,023
198,252
2,577,275
...........................................................................................................................
10,671,123
Craig Transit JARC, Alaska .............................................................................
Kenai Peninsula JARC, Alaska ........................................................................
Mobility Coalition, Alaska .................................................................................
North Star Borough Transit JARC, Alaska ......................................................
Seward Transit JARC, Alaska ..........................................................................
ARC of Madison County, Alabama ..................................................................
Easter Seals Central Alabama JARC ..............................................................
Gees Bend Ferry, Alabama .............................................................................
Guaranteed Ride Program, California ..............................................................
Job Access Transit, Hayward, California .........................................................
Colorado Transit Coalition JARC .....................................................................
Community Transportation JOBLINKS Demonstration ....................................
Technical Assistance Support & Performance Reviews of the JARC Grants
Program.
Washington Metro Job Access Initiative ..........................................................
Chatham JARC, Georgia .................................................................................
Dooly-Crisp Unified Transportation System, Georgia ......................................
Illinois Statewide JARC ....................................................................................
IndyFlex, Indiana ..............................................................................................
Louisiana Statewide JARC ...............................................................................
Maine Statewide JARC Program .....................................................................
DCC Community Health & Safety Transport Project, Michigan ......................
Metropolitan Council Job Access, Minneapolis, Minnesota .............................
Metro St. Louis Downtown Shuttle Trolley, Missouri .......................................
Missouri Statewide JARC .................................................................................
New Jersey Statewide JARC ...........................................................................
Broome County Transit, Binghamton, New York .............................................
Central New York Job Access Reverse Commute, New York ........................
49,559
594,709
495,590
74,338
198,236
79,734
495,590
1,982,362
136,687
211
529,310
620,899
7,073
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
569,530
1,982,362
198,236
145,842
1,238,976
2,115,329
442,389
297,354
991,182
a 941,622
385,000
5,203,702
247,796
495,590
13961
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 20.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
Unobligated
allocation
Earmark ID
Project and description
NV
E2005–JARC–056 ..............................
OH
PA
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
WA
WA
WA
WI
WI
WV
E2005–JARC–066
E2005–JARC–071
E2005–JARC–077
E2005–JARC–080
E2005–JARC–081
E2005–JARC–082
E2005–JARC–083
E2005–JARC–089
E2005–JARC–090
E2005–JARC–092
E2005–JARC–094
E2005–JARC–095
E2005–JARC–096
Statewide Small Urban and Rural Public/Specialized Transportation Services (JARC), Nevada.
Western Reserve Transit Job Access Program, Ohio .....................................
Philadelphia Unemployment Project (PUP), Pennsylvania ..............................
Children’s Health Fund JARC, Tennessee ......................................................
Tennessee Statewide JARC ............................................................................
Abilene JARC, Texas .......................................................................................
El Paso JARC, Texas ......................................................................................
Island Transit JARC, Texas .............................................................................
North Central Puget Sound Vehicle Trip Reduction Incentives, Washington
Okanogan County Senior Citizens JARC, Washington ...................................
WorkFirst Transportation Initiative, Washington ..............................................
Ways to Work, Wisconsin ................................................................................
Wisconsin Statewide JARC ..............................................................................
West Virginia Statewide JARC .........................................................................
79,734
1,106,772
495,590
3,784,745
148,677
495,590
136,687
991,182
65,142
775,447
170,591
2,577,071
114,653
Subtotal FY 2005 Unobligated Allocations ...........................................................................................................................
31,916,713
Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................
45,154,056
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
455,624
a November
20, 2006, DOT response to Knollenberg/Bond letter September 29, 2006, funds made available for the continuation and expansion
of existing JARC bus service on five north county bus routes servicing the METRO Downtown Bus Transfer Center in St. Louis, MO. Funds may
be expended on JARC activities authorized under Section 3037 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century.
TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
UZAs 200,000 or more in Population ............................................................................................................................................
UZAs 50,000–199,999 in Population .............................................................................................................................................
Nonurbanized .................................................................................................................................................................................
$48,600,000
16,200,000
16,200,000
National Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
Amounts Apportioned to Urbanized Areas 200,000 or more in Population:
Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian, PR ....................................................................................................................................
Akron, OH ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Albany, NY ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Albuquerque, NM ....................................................................................................................................................................
Allentown-Bethlehem, PA–NJ ................................................................................................................................................
Anchorage, AK .......................................................................................................................................................................
Ann Arbor, MI .........................................................................................................................................................................
Antioch, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Asheville, NC ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Atlanta, GA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Atlantic City, NJ ......................................................................................................................................................................
Augusta-Richmond County, GA–SC ......................................................................................................................................
Austin, TX ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Bakersfield, CA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Baltimore, MD .........................................................................................................................................................................
Barnstable Town, MA .............................................................................................................................................................
Baton Rouge, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................
Birmingham, AL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Boise City, ID ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Bonita Springs-Naples, FL .....................................................................................................................................................
Boston, MA–NH–RI ................................................................................................................................................................
Bridgeport-Stamford, CT–NY .................................................................................................................................................
Buffalo, NY .............................................................................................................................................................................
Canton, OH .............................................................................................................................................................................
Cape Coral, FL .......................................................................................................................................................................
Charleston-North Charleston, SC ...........................................................................................................................................
Charlotte, NC–SC ...................................................................................................................................................................
Chattanooga, TN–GA .............................................................................................................................................................
Chicago, IL–IN ........................................................................................................................................................................
Cincinnati, OH–KY–IN ............................................................................................................................................................
Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................
Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................
Columbia, SC .........................................................................................................................................................................
Columbus, GA–AL ..................................................................................................................................................................
Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................
Concord, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Corpus Christi, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX .............................................................................................................................................
81,000,000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
$126,100
162,675
156,364
182,730
156,018
52,136
61,401
60,601
77,517
888,971
73,829
108,159
198,836
131,079
635,438
78,928
140,317
216,937
63,948
73,189
1,123,648
237,663
302,048
74,387
117,307
129,823
193,086
114,462
2,281,657
402,647
516,455
108,709
115,920
79,731
287,416
121,779
92,875
1,133,868
13962
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
Davenport, IA–IL .....................................................................................................................................................................
Dayton, OH .............................................................................................................................................................................
Daytona Beach-Port Orange, FL ............................................................................................................................................
Denton-Lewisville, TX .............................................................................................................................................................
Denver-Aurora, CO .................................................................................................................................................................
Des Moines, IA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Detroit, MI ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Durham, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................
El Paso, TX–NM .....................................................................................................................................................................
Eugene, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................
Evansville, IN–KY ...................................................................................................................................................................
Fayetteville, NC ......................................................................................................................................................................
Flint, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Fort Collins, CO ......................................................................................................................................................................
Fort Wayne, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................
Fresno, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Grand Rapids, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................
Greensboro, NC .....................................................................................................................................................................
Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................
Gulfport-Biloxi, MS ..................................................................................................................................................................
Harrisburg, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Hartford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................................
Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................
Houston, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................
Huntsville, AL ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Indianapolis, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................
Indio-Cathedral City-Palm Springs, CA ..................................................................................................................................
Jackson, MS ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Jacksonville, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas City, MO–KS ..............................................................................................................................................................
Knoxville, TN ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Lancaster, PA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Lancaster-Palmdale, CA .........................................................................................................................................................
Lansing, MI .............................................................................................................................................................................
Las Vegas, NV .......................................................................................................................................................................
Lexington-Fayette, KY ............................................................................................................................................................
Lincoln, NE .............................................................................................................................................................................
Little Rock, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA ..............................................................................................................................
Louisville, KY–IN ....................................................................................................................................................................
Lubbock, TX ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Madison, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................
McAllen, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................
Memphis, TN–MS–AR ............................................................................................................................................................
Miami, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................
Milwaukee, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN .......................................................................................................................................................
Mission Viejo, CA ...................................................................................................................................................................
Mobile, AL ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Modesto, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Nashville-Davidson, TN ..........................................................................................................................................................
New Haven, CT ......................................................................................................................................................................
New Orleans, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................
New York-Newark, NY–NJ–CT ..............................................................................................................................................
Ogden-Layton, UT ..................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma City, OK .................................................................................................................................................................
Omaha, NE–IA .......................................................................................................................................................................
Orlando, FL .............................................................................................................................................................................
Oxnard, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL ........................................................................................................................................................
Pensacola, FL–AL ..................................................................................................................................................................
Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................
Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ................................................................................................................................................
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ ..................................................................................................................................................................
Pittsburgh, PA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Port St. Lucie, FL ...................................................................................................................................................................
Portland, OR–WA ...................................................................................................................................................................
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ................................................................................................................................................
Providence, RI–MA .................................................................................................................................................................
Provo-Orem, UT .....................................................................................................................................................................
Raleigh, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................
Reading, PA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
73,714
202,124
96,642
52,171
508,189
92,618
1,191,993
71,810
202,578
63,190
68,566
78,091
121,282
43,094
75,827
182,740
134,163
75,458
98,271
73,167
92,218
246,950
199,316
1,058,478
55,983
344,829
89,378
88,265
273,094
372,884
133,250
84,704
75,358
78,317
427,045
69,302
51,472
116,028
3,618,995
270,486
59,515
68,449
163,731
306,107
1,677,667
354,185
524,419
108,270
116,538
105,141
216,456
150,505
346,048
5,715,679
92,104
235,978
151,226
351,306
102,398
133,980
104,064
69,322
1,501,297
817,306
497,805
102,434
422,056
91,165
381,175
51,869
109,008
70,151
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
13963
TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Reno, NV ................................................................................................................................................................................
Richmond, VA .........................................................................................................................................................................
Riverside-San Bernardino, CA ...............................................................................................................................................
Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................
Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................
Round Lake Beach-McHenry-Grayslake, IL–WI ....................................................................................................................
Sacramento, CA .....................................................................................................................................................................
Salem, OR ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Salt Lake City, UT ..................................................................................................................................................................
San Antonio, TX .....................................................................................................................................................................
San Diego, CA ........................................................................................................................................................................
San Francisco-Oakland, CA ...................................................................................................................................................
San Jose, CA .........................................................................................................................................................................
San Juan, PR .........................................................................................................................................................................
Santa Rosa, CA ......................................................................................................................................................................
Sarasota-Bradenton, FL .........................................................................................................................................................
Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................
Scranton, PA ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Seattle, WA .............................................................................................................................................................................
Shreveport, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................
South Bend, IN–MI .................................................................................................................................................................
Spokane, WA–ID ....................................................................................................................................................................
Springfield, MA–CT ................................................................................................................................................................
Springfield, MO .......................................................................................................................................................................
St. Louis, MO–IL .....................................................................................................................................................................
Stockton, CA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Syracuse, NY ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Tallahassee, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................
Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL ......................................................................................................................................................
Temecula-Murrieta, CA ..........................................................................................................................................................
Thousand Oaks, CA ...............................................................................................................................................................
Toledo, OH–MI .......................................................................................................................................................................
Trenton, NJ .............................................................................................................................................................................
Tucson, AZ .............................................................................................................................................................................
Tulsa, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................
Victorville-Hesperia-Apple Valley, CA ....................................................................................................................................
Virginia Beach, VA .................................................................................................................................................................
Washington, DC–VA–MD .......................................................................................................................................................
Wichita, KS .............................................................................................................................................................................
Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................................................................................
Worcester, MA–CT .................................................................................................................................................................
Youngstown, OH–PA ..............................................................................................................................................................
91,383
228,332
451,996
192,186
77,674
46,333
423,003
61,392
219,483
419,240
724,318
950,208
399,440
907,212
80,089
201,463
70,682
136,965
719,018
89,205
81,200
102,142
190,613
61,769
569,735
108,677
114,968
42,761
750,519
59,215
45,968
153,366
79,784
223,339
169,347
63,305
374,754
921,237
118,285
83,765
134,039
133,542
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Urbanized Areas 50,000 to 199,999 in Population:
Alabama ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Alaska .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Arizona ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas .................................................................................................................................................................................
California .................................................................................................................................................................................
Colorado .................................................................................................................................................................................
Connecticut .............................................................................................................................................................................
Delaware .................................................................................................................................................................................
Florida .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Hawaii .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Idaho .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Indiana ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky .................................................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................
Maine ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Maryland .................................................................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan .................................................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Montana ..................................................................................................................................................................................
N. Mariana Islands .................................................................................................................................................................
48,600,000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
427,039
19,990
138,375
285,216
1,658,388
275,030
263,340
32,717
1,243,752
450,350
46,626
162,054
366,849
416,387
242,588
114,329
156,206
439,286
178,554
283,609
192,974
600,838
142,564
69,215
169,381
117,871
25,394
13964
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................
Nevada ...................................................................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ......................................................................................................................................................................
New Jersey .............................................................................................................................................................................
New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................
New York ................................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Oregon ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico .............................................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................
South Dakota ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Texas ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Vermont ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Virginia ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Washington .............................................................................................................................................................................
West Virginia ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Wyoming .................................................................................................................................................................................
7,069
32,221
221,356
117,951
126,052
329,549
668,035
101,329
457,729
78,177
119,717
538,542
725,592
369,859
89,214
377,480
1,424,599
50,707
42,435
370,909
513,614
323,652
530,634
64,656
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
Amounts Apportioned to State Governors for Nonurbanized Areas Less than 50,000 in Population:
Alabama ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Alaska .....................................................................................................................................................................................
American Samoa ....................................................................................................................................................................
Arizona ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas .................................................................................................................................................................................
California .................................................................................................................................................................................
Colorado .................................................................................................................................................................................
Connecticut .............................................................................................................................................................................
Delaware .................................................................................................................................................................................
Florida .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Guam ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Hawaii .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Idaho .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Indiana ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky .................................................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ................................................................................................................................................................................
Maine ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Maryland .................................................................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts ........................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan .................................................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Montana ..................................................................................................................................................................................
N. Mariana Islands .................................................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ................................................................................................................................................................................
Nevada ...................................................................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ......................................................................................................................................................................
New Jersey .............................................................................................................................................................................
New Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................................
New York ................................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Ohio ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Oregon ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico .............................................................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island ..........................................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina ........................................................................................................................................................................
South Dakota ..........................................................................................................................................................................
16,200,000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
549,123
44,556
7,815
233,977
395,881
681,111
153,515
73,375
47,217
529,045
625,568
22,802
64,695
106,683
417,599
457,793
271,824
236,728
574,365
384,804
174,703
154,259
97,120
548,108
313,216
466,476
453,812
104,314
751
136,742
56,657
118,285
73,896
178,338
570,674
892,873
62,960
657,623
399,258
269,190
661,768
83,167
17,292
453,680
83,154
13965
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 21.—FY 2007 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS—Continued
Urbanized area/state
Apportionment
Tennessee ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Texas ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Utah ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Vermont ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Virgin Islands ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Virginia ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Washington .............................................................................................................................................................................
West Virginia ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Wyoming .................................................................................................................................................................................
584,492
1,111,556
64,976
81,040
15,756
456,910
272,757
296,767
354,454
54,500
Total .................................................................................................................................................................................
16,200,000
TABLE 22.—FY 2007 SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS
SAFETEA–
LU Project
No.
State
Earmark ID
Project location and description
California ...........
E2007–ALTA–001 ..................
Illinois .................
Illinois .................
Maryland ............
Minnesota ..........
E2007–ALTA–002
E2007–ALTA–003
E2007–ALTA–004
E2007–ALTA–005
..................
..................
..................
..................
7
13
12
1
Mississippi .........
E2007–ALTA–006 ..................
14
North Carolina ...
E2007–ALTA–007 ..................
11
New Jersey ........
New Jersey ........
E2007–ALTA–008 ..................
E2007–ALTA–009 ..................
2
6
New Jersey ........
New Mexico .......
E2007–ALTA–010 ..................
E2007–ALTA–011 ..................
18
10
Oregon ...............
E2007–ALTA–012 ..................
3
Oregon ...............
South Carolina ...
E2007–ALTA–013 ..................
E2007–ALTA–014 ..................
4
15
Utah ...................
E2007–ALTA–015 ..................
17
Utah ...................
Washington ........
Wisconsin ..........
E2007–ALTA–016 ..................
E2007–ALTA–017 ..................
E2007–ALTA–018 ..................
16
9
8
5
Allocation
San Gabriel Valley—Gold Line Foothill Extension Corridor
Study.
Metra BNSF Naperville to Aurora Corridor Study ..................
Metra-West Line Extension, Elgin to Rockford Study ............
Baltimore Red Line/Green Line Transit Project Study ...........
Minnesota Red Rock Corridor/Rush Line/Central Corridors
Studies.
Madison-Ridgeland Transportation Commission, Mississippi,
Madison LRT Corridor Study.
Piedmont Authority Regional Transportation East-West Corridor Study.
Trans-Hudson Midtown Corridor Study ..................................
Monmouth-Ocean-Middlesex Counties, New Jersey Corridor
Study.
New Jersey Transit Midtown Project Study ............................
Middle Rio Grande Coalition of Governments, Albuquerque
to Santa Fe Corridor Study.
Lane County, Oregon Bus Rapid Transit Phase II Corridor
Study.
Portland Streetcar, Oregon Corridor Study ............................
South Carolina Department of Transportation Light Rail
Study.
Sevierville County Transportation Board, Sevier County BRT
Study.
Provo Orem BRT Study ..........................................................
Sound Transit I–90 Long-Range Plan Corridor Studies .........
Madison and Dane Counties, Wisconsin Transport 2020
Corridor Study.
$1,250,000
Unallocated Amount .........................................................
Total Allocation .............................................................................................................................................................................
6,100,000
25,000,000
1,250,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
350,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
1,250,000
2,500,000
500,000
500,000
1,500,000
300,000
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
TABLE 23.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS
State
Earmark ID
Project location and description
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
FY 2006 Unobligated
California .........
Illinois ..............
Maryland ..........
Michigan ..........
Allocations
E2006–ALTA–000
E2006–ALTA–001
E2006–ALTA–003
E2006–ALTA–005
........................
........................
........................
........................
Minnesota ........
New Jersey .....
New Jersey .....
New Jersey .....
New Mexico .....
E2006–ALTA–004
E2006–ALTA–007
E2006–ALTA–009
E2006–ALTA–008
E2006–ALTA–010
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
South Carolina
Utah .................
Utah .................
E2006–ALTA–013 ........................
E2006–ALTA–014 ........................
E2006–ALTA–015 ........................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
San Gabriel Valley-Gold Line Foothill Extension Corridor Study ........
Metra BNSF Naperville to Aurora Corridor Study ...............................
Baltimore Red Line/Green Line Transit Project Study ........................
Madison-Ridgeland Transportation Commission, Mississippi, Madison LRT Corridor Study.
Minnesota Red Rock Corridor/Rush Line/Central Corridors Studies ..
Trans-Hudson Midtown Corridor Study ...............................................
New Jersey Transit Midtown Project Study ........................................
Monmouth-Ocean-Middlesex Counties, New Jersey Corridor Study ..
Middle Rio Grande Coalition of Governments, Albuquerque to Santa
Fe Corridor Study.
South Carolina Department of Transportation Light Rail Study ..........
Sevierville County Transportation Board, Sevier County BRT Study
Provo Orem BRT Study .......................................................................
Frm 00095
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Unobligated
allocation
$1,237,500
1,237,500
1,485,000
346,500
1,980,000
1,485,000
2,475,000
1,237,500
495,000
297,000
495,000
495,000
13966
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 23.—PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS—Continued
State
Unobligated
allocation
Earmark ID
Project location and description
.......................................................
Unallocated Amount ............................................................................
6,039,000
Total Unobligated Allocations ................................................................................................................................................
19,305,000
.........................
[FR Doc. 07–1290 Filed 3–15–07; 3:11pm]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Mar 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23MRN2.SGM
23MRN2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 56 (Friday, March 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13872-13966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1290]
[[Page 13871]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Transit Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments and Allocations and Program
Information; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 /
Notices
[[Page 13872]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2007 Apportionments and Allocations and Program
Information
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The ``Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007,''
(Public Law 110-5), signed into law by President Bush on February 15,
2007, makes funds available for all of the surface transportation
programs of the Department of Transportation (DOT) for the Fiscal Year
(FY) ending September 30, 2007. This notice provides information on the
FY 2007 funding available for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
assistance programs, and provides program guidance and requirements,
and information on several program issues important in the current
year. The notice also includes tables that show unobligated carryover
funding available in FY 2007 under certain discretionary programs from
prior years. Finally, this notice also references separate Notices of
Funding Availability (NOFA) published concurrently for discretionary
opportunities under the Bus and Bus Facilities Program and the
Alternatives Analysis Program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about this
notice contact Mary Martha Churchman, Director, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366-2053. Please contact the appropriate FTA
regional office for any specific requests for information or technical
assistance. The Appendix at the end of this notice includes contact
information for FTA regional offices. An FTA headquarters contact for
each major program area is also included in the discussion of that
program in the text of the notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs
A. Funding Based on FY 2007 Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, and SAFETEA-LU Authorization
B. Program Funds Set-aside for Project Management Oversight
III. FY 2007 FTA Key Program Initiatives and Changes
A. SAFETEA-LU Implementation
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities
D. Changes in Flexible Funding Procedures
E. National Transit Database (NTD) Strike Policy
IV. FTA Programs
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303)
B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5304)
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307)
D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5308)
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway
Modernization
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Bus and Bus-
Related Facilities
G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--New Starts
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals with
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311)
J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program (49 U.S.C.
5311(b)(3))
K. Public Transportation on Indian Reservation Program (49
U.S.C. 5311(c))
L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5314)
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
O. Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands (49
U.S.C. 5320)
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. 5339)
Q. Growing States and High Density States Formula (49 U.S.C.
5340)
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note)
V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2007 Grants Requirements
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to Incur Project Costs
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
C. FTA FY 2007 Annual List of Certifications and Assurances
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
E. Grant Application Procedures
F. Payments
G. Oversight
H. Technical Assistance
Tables
1. FTA FY 2007 Appropriations and Apportionments for Grant
Programs
2. FTA FY 2007 Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program and
Statewide Transportation Planning Program Apportionments
3. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 and Section 5340 Urbanized Area
Apportionments
4. FTA FY 2007 Section 5307 Apportionment Formula
5. FTA FY 2007 Formula Programs Apportionments Data Unit Values
6. FTA FY 2007 Small Transit Intensive Cities Performance Data
and Apportionments
7. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas 200,000 or More in Population
Eligible to Use Section 5307 Funds for Operating Assistance
8. FTA FY 2007 Section 5308 Clean Fuels Grant Program
Allocations
9. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5308 Clean Fuels
Allocations
10. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization
Apportionments
11. FTA FY 2007 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
Apportionment Formula
12. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related Allocations
13. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities Allocations
14. FTA FY 2007 Section 5309 New Starts Allocations
15. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 New Starts
Allocations
16. FTA FY 2007 Special Needs for Elderly Individuals and
Individuals With Disabilities Apportionments
17. FTA FY 2007 Section 5311 and Section 5340 Nonurbanized Area
Formula Apportionments, and Rural Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) Allocations
18. FTA FY 2007 National Research Program Allocations
19. FTA FY 2007 Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute
(JARC) Apportionments
20. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Jarc Allocations
21. FTA FY 2007 Section 5317 New Freedom Apportionments
22. FTA FY 2007 Section 5339 Alternative Analysis Allocations
23. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5339 Alternative Analysis
Alliocations
Appendix
I. Overview
This document apportions or allocates the FY 2007 funds available
under the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, among potential
program recipients according to statutory formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter
53 or congressional designations in Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU).
For each FTA program included, we have provided relevant
information on the FY 2007 funding currently available, requirements,
period of availability, and other related program information and
highlights, as appropriate. A separate section of the document provides
information on requirements and guidance that are applicable to all FTA
programs.
II. FY 2007 Funding for FTA Programs
A. Funding Based on FY 2007 Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007,
and SAFETEA-LU Authorization
The Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, (Pub. L.
110-5, February 15, 2007); hereafter called the Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides general funds and obligation
authority for trust funds that total $8.97 billion for FTA programs,
through September 30, 2007. Table 1 of this document shows the funding
for the FTA programs, as provided for in the Continuing
[[Page 13873]]
Appropriations Resolution, 2007, and the reallocation of any prior year
funds to the program. All the Formula Programs and the Section 5309 Bus
and Bus Facilities Program are entirely funded from the Mass Transit
Account of the Highway Trust Fund in FY 2007. The Section 5309 New
Starts program, the Research program, and FTA administrative expenses
are funded by appropriations from the General Fund of the Treasury.
Congress has enacted a full year Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007, in lieu of a new Appropriations Act for FY 2007. This
Notice includes tables of apportionments and allocations for FTA
programs. Allocations based on SAFETEA-LU are included for some
discretionary programs. In addition, FTA will issue separate Notices of
Funding Availability to solicit applications for discretionary funds
not allocated in SAFETEA-LU.
B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project Management Oversight
FTA uses a percentage of funds appropriated to certain FTA programs
for program oversight activities conducted by the agency. The funds are
used to provide necessary oversight activities, including oversight of
the construction of any major project under these statutory programs;
to conduct safety and security, civil rights, procurement, management
and financial reviews and audits; and to provide technical assistance
to correct deficiencies identified in compliance reviews and audits.
Section 5327 of title 49, U.S.C., 5327 authorizes the takedown of
funds from FTA programs for project management oversight. Section 5327
provides oversight takedowns at the following levels: 0.5 percent of
Planning funds, 0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula funds, 1 percent
of Capital Investment funds, 0.5 percent of Special Needs of Elderly
Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities formula funds, 0.5
percent of Nonurbanized Area Formula funds, and 0.5 percent of
Alternative Transportation in the Parks and Public Lands funds.
III. FY 2007 FTA Program Initiatives and Changes
A. SAFETEA-LU Implementation.
In FY 2007, FTA continues to focus on implementation of SAFETEA-LU
through issuance of new and revised program guidance and regulations.
As any documents that include binding obligations on grantees are
issued, FTA makes them available for public comment prior to
finalizing. We encourage grantees to regularly check the FTA Web site
at https://www.fta.gov and the DOT docket management Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov for new issuances and to comment to the docket established
for each document on relevant issues.
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
FTA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are not issuing
new planning emphasis areas for FY 2007, and are rescinding planning
emphasis areas from prior years, in recognition of the priority that
planning organizations and grantees must pay to implementing the new
and changed provisions of SAFETEA-LU.
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, did not include any
new earmarks under any FTA program. However, SAFETEA-LU contained
statutory earmarks under several programs, and they are listed in the
tables in this Notice. FTA will honor those statutory earmarks. This
Notice also includes tables of unobligated balances for earmarks from
prior years under the Bus and Bus Facilities Program, the New Starts
Program, the Clean Fuels Program, and the Alternatives Analysis
Program. FTA will continue to honor those earmarks.
Because there are no new appropriations earmarks in FY 2007, there
are unallocated balances available in several programs to be
administered at FTA's discretion. FTA has allocated most of the
discretionary New Starts funds to the projects listed in the
President's Budget for FY 2007. FTA is soliciting applications for the
unallocated balance of the Bus and Bus Facilities program through two
Notices of Funding Availability, one published in a separate Part of
today's Federal Register to address priorities identified by FTA, and
the other, published in another Part of today's Federal Register, to
support the Department's Congestion Initiative. FTA is also issuing a
Notice of Funding Availability to solicit applications for the
Alternatives Analysis program to advance the state of the art of
planning for New Starts projects, included in yet another Part of
today's Federal Register.
D. Changes in Flexible Funding Procedures
FHWA has changed the accounting procedures for flexible funds, high
priority projects and transportation improvement projects transfers to
FTA. As a result, FTA will no longer be able to combine these
transferred funds in a single grant with FTA funds in the program to
which they are transferred. FTA is establishing new codes and
procedures for grants involving funds transferred from FHWA. See
Section V D of this Notice for more information.
E. National Transit Database (NTD) Strike Policy
It has been FTA's policy not to make adjustments to the annual
funding apportionment of transit agencies for strikes, labor disputes
or work stoppages. FTA has changed this policy. Effective with NTD
Report Year (RY) 2005 data, FTA will make ``hold harmless'' adjustments
due to strikes, labor disputes, or work stoppages. An adjustment will
be made beginning with the FY 2008 apportionment.
NTD RY 2005 data are the actual data used in apportionment of FY
2007 funds. NTD RY 2006 data will be used in the FY 2008 apportionment.
If your agency had a valid strike, labor dispute or work stoppage
during RY 2005 or RY 2006, please contact the NTD Web site.
Instructions for requesting a ``hold harmless'' adjustment can be
found in the 2006 NTD Reporting Manual, https://www.ntdprogram.gov,
under publications; see Introduction, page 7.
IV. FTA Programs
This section of the notice provides available FY 2007 funding and
other important program-related information for the three major FTA
funding accounts included in the notice (Formula and Bus Grants,
Capital Investment Grants, and Research). Of the 17 separate FTA
programs contained in this notice that fall under the major program
area headings, the funding for ten is apportioned by statutory or
administrative formula. Funding for the other seven is allocated on a
discretionary or competitive basis.
Funding and other important information for each of the 17 programs
is presented immediately below. This includes program apportionments or
allocations, certain program requirements, length of time FY 2007
funding is available to be committed, and other significant program
information pertaining to FY 2007, including the availability of
competitive opportunities under several programs.
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303)
Section 5303 authorizes a cooperative, continuous, and
comprehensive planning program for transportation investment decision-
making at the metropolitan area level. State Departments of
Transportation are direct recipients of funds, which are
[[Page 13874]]
then allocated to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) by
formula, for planning activities that support the economic vitality of
the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,
productivity, and efficiency; increasing the safety and security of the
transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users; increasing
the accessibility and mobility options available to people and for
freight; protecting and enhancing the environment, promoting energy
conservation, and improving quality of life; enhancing the integration
and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight; promoting efficient system management
and operation; and emphasizing the preservation of the existing
transportation system. For more about the Metropolitan Planning
Program, contact Candace Noonan, Office of Planning and Environment at
(202) 366-1648.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides
$81,892,800 to the Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303). The
total amount apportioned for the Metropolitan Planning Program (to
States for MPOs' use in urbanized areas (UZAs) is $82,373,861, as shown
in the table below, after the deduction for oversight (authorized by 49
U.S.C. Section 5327) and addition of prior year reapportioned funds.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation.................................. $81,892,800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction.................................. -464,464
Prior Year Funds Added............................... 890,525
------------------
Total Apportioned.................................. 82,373,861
------------------------------------------------------------------------
States' apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionments
As specified in law, 82.72 percent of the amounts authorized for
Section 5305 are allocated to the Metropolitan Planning program. FTA
allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to the States according to a
statutory formula. Eighty percent of the funds are distributed to the
States as a basic allocation based on each State's UZA population,
based on the most recent Census. The remaining 20 percent is provided
to the States as a supplemental allocation based on an FTA
administrative formula to address planning needs in the larger, more
complex UZAs. The amount published for each State is a combined total
of both the basic and supplemental allocation.
3. Program Requirements
The State allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or
portions thereof to provide funds for projects included in an annual
work program (the Unified Planning Work Program, or UPWP) that includes
both highway and transit planning projects. Each State has either
reaffirmed or developed, in consultation with their MPOs, a new
allocation formula, as a result of the 2000 Census. The State
allocation formula may be changed annually, but any change requires
approval by the FTA regional office before grant approval. Program
guidance for the Metropolitan Planning Program is found in FTA Circular
C8100.1B, Program Guidance and Application Instructions for
Metropolitan Planning Program Grants, dated October 25, 1996. FTA is in
the process of updating this circular to incorporate references to the
new and changed planning requirements in sections 5303 and 5305, as
amended by SAFETEA-LU and associated rulemaking.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the Metropolitan Planning program
remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients for four fiscal
years--which includes the year of apportionment plus three additional
years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Metropolitan Planning Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
a. Planning Emphasis Areas (PEAs). FTA and FHWA are not issuing new
PEAs this year, and are rescinding PEAs issued in prior years, in light
of the priority given to implementation of SAFETEA-LU planning and
program provisions.
b. Consolidated Planning Grants. FTA and FHWA planning funds can be
consolidated into a single consolidated planning grant (CPG), awarded
by either FTA or FHWA. The CPG eliminates the need to monitor
individual fund sources, if several have been used, and ensures that
the oldest funds will always be used first. Unlike ``flex funds,''
State planning funds from FHWA will be able to be combined with FTA
planning funds in a single grant. Alternatively FTA planning funds can
be transferred to FHWA for administration.
Under the CPG, States can report metropolitan planning expenditures
(to comply with the Single Audit Act) for both FTA and FHWA under the
Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance number for FTA's Metropolitan
Planning Program (20.505). Additionally, for States with an FHWA
Metropolitan Planning (PL) fund-matching ratio greater than 80 percent,
the State (through FTA) can request a waiver of the 20 percent local
share requirement in order that all FTA funds used for metropolitan
planning in a CPG can be granted at the higher FHWA rate. For some
States, this Federal match rate can exceed 90 percent.
States interested in transferring planning funds between FTA and
FHWA should contact the FTA regional office or FHWA Division Office for
more detailed procedures.
For further information on CPGs, contact Candace Noonan, Office of
Planning and Environment, FTA, at (202) 366-1648, or Kenneth Petty,
Office of Planning and Environment, FHWA, at (202) 366-6654.
B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5304)
This program provides financial assistance to States for Statewide
planning and other technical assistance activities (including
supplementing the technical assistance program provided through the
Metropolitan Planning program), planning support for nonurbanized
areas, research, development and demonstration projects, fellowships
for training in the public transportation field, university research,
and human resource development. For more about the Statewide Planning
and Research Program contact Candace Noonan, Office of Planning and
Environment, at (202) 366-1648.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides
$17,107,200 to the Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C.
5304). The total amount apportioned for the Statewide Planning and
Research Program (SPRP) is $17,252,652, as shown in the table below,
after the deduction for oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C. Section
5327) and addition of prior year reapportioned funds.
[[Page 13875]]
Statewide Transportation Planning Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation.................................. $17,107,200
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction.................................. -85,536
Prior Year Funds Added............................... 230,988
------------------
Total Apportioned.................................. 17,252,652
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
As specified in law, 17.28 percent of the amounts authorized for
Section 5305 are allocated to the Statewide Planning and Research
program. FTA apportions funds to States by a statutory formula that is
based on information received from the latest decennial census, and the
State's UZA population as compared to the UZA population of all States.
However, a State must receive at least 0.5 percent of the amount
apportioned under this program.
3. Requirements
Funds are provided to States for statewide planning and research
programs. These funds may be used for a variety of purposes such as
planning, technical studies and assistance, demonstrations, management
training, and cooperative research. In addition, a State may authorize
a portion of these funds to be used to supplement Metropolitan Planning
funds allocated by the State to its UZAs, as the State deems
appropriate. Program guidance for the Statewide Planning and Research
program is found in FTA Circular C8200.1, Program Guidance and
Application Instructions for State Planning and Research Program
Grants, dated December 27, 2001. FTA is in the process of updating this
circular to incorporate the new and changed planning requirements in
sections 5304 and 5305, as amended by SAFETEA-LU and associated
rulemaking.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the Statewide Planning and Research
program remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients for four
fiscal years--which include the year of apportionment plus three
additional fiscal years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated
at the close of business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment under the Statewide Planning and Research Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
The information about Planning Emphasis Areas and CPGs described in
Section A. 5, above for the Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C.
5303), also applies to the Statewide Planning Program.
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49.U.S.C. 5307)
Section 5307 authorizes Federal capital and operating assistance
for transit in Urbanized Areas (UZAs). A UZA is an area with a
population of 50,000 or more that has been defined and designated as
such in the most recent decennial census by the U.S. Census Bureau. The
Urbanized Area Formula Program may also be used to support planning
activities, as a supplement to that funded under the Metropolitan
Planning program described above. Urbanized Areas Formula Program funds
used for planning must be shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area. Funding is apportioned directly to each
UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, and to the State Governors
for UZAs with populations between 50,000 and 200,000. Eligible
applicants are limited to entities designated as recipients in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5307(a)(2) and other public entities with the
consent of the Designated Recipient. Generally, operating assistance is
not an eligible expense for UZAs with populations of 200,000 or more.
However, there are several exceptions to this restriction. The
exceptions are described in section 2(e) below.
For more information about the Urbanized Area Formula Program
contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides
$3,606,175,000 to the Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307).
The total amount apportioned for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is
$3,924,820,789 as shown in the table below, after the deduction for
oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and including prior year
reapportioned funds and funds apportioned to UZA's from the
appropriation for Section 5340 for Growing States and High Density
States.
Urbanized Area Formula Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation.................................. $3,606,175,000
\a\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction.................................. -27,046,313
Prior Year Funds Added............................... 4,957,616
Section 5340 Funds Added............................. 340,734,486
------------------
Total Apportioned.................................. 3,924,820,789
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes $36,061,750 for one percent set-aside for Small Transit
Intensive Cities Formula.
Table 3 displays the amounts apportioned under the Urbanized Area
Formula Program.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
FTA apportions Urbanized Area Formula Program funds based on
legislative formulas. Different formulas apply to UZAs with populations
of 200,000 or more and UZAs with populations less than 200,000. For
UZAs 50,000 to 199,999 in population, the formula is based simply on
population and population density. For UZAs with populations of 200,000
and more, the formula is based on a combination of bus revenue vehicle
miles, bus passenger miles, fixed guideway revenue vehicle miles, and
fixed guideway route miles, as well as population and population
density. Table 4 includes detailed information about the formulas.
To calculate a UZA's FY 2007 apportionment, FTA used population and
population density statistics from the 2000 Census and (when
applicable) validated mileage and transit service data from transit
providers' 2005 National Transit Database (NTD) Report Year. Also,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b). FTA used 60 percent of the directional
route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger operations
system to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage, Alaska UZA.
We have calculated dollar unit values for the formula factors used
in the Urbanized Area Formula Program apportionment calculations. These
values represent the amount of money each unit of a factor is worth in
this year's apportionment. The unit values change each year, based on
all of the data used to calculate the apportionments. The dollar unit
values for FY 2007 are displayed in Table 5. To replicate the basic
formula component of a UZA's apportionment, multiply the dollar unit
value by the appropriate formula factor (i.e., the population,
population x population density), and (when applicable, data from the
NTD (i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles, passenger miles, and
operating cost).
[[Page 13876]]
In FY 2007, one percent of funds appropriated for Section 5307,
$36,061,750, is set aside for Small Transit Intensive Cities (STIC).
FTA apportions these funds to UZAs under 200,000 in population that
operate at a level of service equal to or above the industry average
level of service for all UZAs with a population of at least 200,000,
but not more than 999,999, in one or more of six performance
categories: passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue mile,
passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue hour, vehicle revenue
miles per capita, vehicle revenue hours per capita, passenger miles
traveled per capita, and passengers per capita.
The data for these categories for the purpose of FY 2007
apportionments comes from the NTD reports for the 2005 reporting year.
This data is used to determine a UZA's eligibility under the STIC
formula, and is also used in the STIC apportionment calculations.
Because this performance data change with each year's NTD reports, the
UZAs eligible for STIC funds and the amount each receives may vary each
year. In FY 2007, FTA apportioned $120,608 for each performance factor/
category for which the urbanized area exceeded the national average for
UZAs with a population of at least 200,000 but not more than 999,999.
In addition to the funds apportioned to UZAs, according to the
Section 5307 formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C. 5336, FTA also
apportions funds to urbanized areas under Section 5340 Growing States
and High Density States formula factors. In FY 2007, FTA apportioned
$138,734,486 to 453 UZA's in 50 Growing States and $202,000,000 to 46
UZA's in seven High Density States. Half of the funds appropriated for
Section 5340 are available to Growing States and half to High Density
States. FTA apportions Growing States funds by a formula based on State
population forecasts for 15 years beyond the most recent Census. FTA
distributes the amounts apportioned for each State between UZAs and
nonurbanized areas based on the ratio of urbanized/nonurbanized
population within each State in the 2000 census. FTA apportions the
High Density States funds to States with population densities in excess
of 370 persons per square mile. These funds are apportioned only to
UZAs within those States. FTA pro-rates each UZA's share of the High
Density funds based on the population of the UZAs in the State in the
2000 census.
FTA cannot provide unit values for the Growing States or High
Density formulas because the allocations to individual States and
urbanized areas are based on their relative population data, rather
than on a national per capita basis.
Based on language in the SAFETEA-LU conference report that directs
FTA to show a single apportionment amount for Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340, FTA shows a single Section 5307 apportionment amount for
each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized Area Formula apportionments. The
amount includes funds apportioned based on the Section 5307 formula
factors, any STIC funds, and any Growing States and High Density States
funding allocated to the area. FTA uses separate formulas calculations
to generate the respective apportionment amounts for the Section 5307,
STIC and Section 5340. For technical assistance purposes, the UZAs that
received STIC funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will make available
breakouts of the funding allocated to each UZA under these formulas,
upon request to the regional office.
3. Program Requirements
Program guidance for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is
presently found in FTA Circular C9030.1C, Urbanized Area Formula
Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated October 1, 1998, and
supplemented by additional information or changes provided in this
document. FTA is in the process of updating the circular to incorporate
changes resulting from language in SAFETEA-LU. Several important
program requirements are highlighted below.
a. Urbanized Area Formula Apportionments to Governors. For small
UZAs, those with a population of less than 200,000, FTA apportions
funds to the Governor of each State for distribution. A single total
Governor apportionment amount for the Urbanized Area Formula, STIC, and
Growing States and High Density States is shown in the Urbanized Area
Formula Apportionment table 3. The table also shows the apportionment
amount attributable to each small UZA within the State. The Governor
may determine the sub-allocation of funds among the small UZAs except
that funds attributed to a small UZA that is located within the
planning boundaries of a Transportation Management Area (TMA) must be
obligated to that small UZA, as discussed in subsection f below.
b. Transit Enhancements. Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that one
percent of Section 5307 funds apportioned to UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more be spent on eligible transit enhancement activities or
projects. This requirement is now treated as a certification, rather
than as a set-aside as was the case under the Transportation Equity Act
for the 21st Century (TEA-21). Designated recipients in UZAs with
populations of 200,000 or more certify they are spending not less than
one percent of Section 5307 funds for transit enhancements. In
addition, Designated Recipients must submit an annual report on how
they spent the money with the Federal fiscal year's final quarterly
progress report in TEAM-Web. The report should include the following
elements: (a) Grantee name, (b) UZA name and number, (c) FTA project
number, (d) transit enhancement category, (e) brief description of
enhancement and progress towards project implementation, (f) activity
line item code from the approved budget, and (g) amount awarded by FTA
for the enhancement. The list of transit enhancement categories and
activity line item (ALI) codes may be found in the table of Scope and
ALI codes on TEAM-Web, which can be accessed at https://
FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
The term ``transit enhancement'' includes projects or project
elements that are designed to enhance public transportation service or
use and are physically or functionally related to transit facilities.
Eligible enhancements include the following: (1) Historic preservation,
rehabilitation, and operation of historic mass transportation
buildings, structures, and facilities (including historic bus and
railroad facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3) landscaping and other
scenic beautification, including tables, benches, trash receptacles,
and street lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian access and walkways;
(6) bicycle access, including bicycle storage facilities and installing
equipment for transporting bicycles on mass transportation vehicles;
(7) transit connections to parks within the recipient's transit service
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced access for persons with
disabilities to mass transportation.
It is the responsibility of the MPO to determine how the one-
percent for transit enhancements will be allotted to transit projects.
The one percent minimum requirement does not preclude more than one
percent from being expended in a UZA for transit enhancements. However,
activities that are only eligible as enhancements--in particular,
operating costs for historic facilities--may be assisted only within
the one-percent funding level.
c. Transit Security Projects. Pursuant to section 5307(d)(1)(J),
each recipient of Urbanized Area Formula funds must certify that of the
amount received each
[[Page 13877]]
fiscal year, it will expend at least one percent on ``public
transportation security projects'' or must certify that it has decided
the expenditure is not necessary. For applicants not eligible to
receive Section 5307 funds for operating assistance, only capital
security projects may be funded with the one percent. SAFETEA-LU,
however, expanded the definition of eligible ``capital'' projects to
include specific crime prevention and security activities, including:
(1) Projects to refine and develop security and emergency response
plans; (2) projects aimed at detecting chemical and biological agents
in public transportation; (3) the conduct of emergency response drills
with public transportation agencies and local first response agencies;
and (4) security training for public transportation employees, but
excluding all expenses related to operations, other than such expenses
incurred in conducting emergency drills and training. New ALI codes
have been established for these four new capital activities. The one
percent may also include security expenditures included within other
capital activities, and, where the recipient is eligible, operating
assistance. The relevant ALI codes would be used for those activities.
FTA is often called upon to report to Congress and others on how
grantees are expending Federal funds for security enhancements. To
facilitate tracking of grantees' security expenditures, which are not
always evident when included within larger capital or operating
activity line items in the grant budget, we have established a non-
additive (``non-add'') scope code for security expenditures--Scope 991.
The non-add scope is to be used to aggregate activities included in
other scopes, and it does not increase the budget total. Section 5307
grantees should include this non-add scope in the project budget for
each new Section 5307 grant application or amendment. Under this non-
add scope, the applicant should repeat the full amount of any of the
line items in the budget that are exclusively for security and include
the portion of any other line item in the project budget that is
attributable to security, using under the non-add scope the same line
item used in the project budget. The grantee can modify the ALI
description or use the extended text feature, if necessary, to describe
the security expenditures.
The grantee must provide information regarding its use of the one
percent for security as part of each Section 5307 grant application,
using a special screen in TEAM-Web. If the grantee has certified that
it is not necessary to expend one percent for security, the Section
5307 grant application must include information to support that
certification. FTA will not process an application for a Section 5307
grant until the security information is complete.
d. FY 2007 Operating Assistance. UZAs under 200,000 population may
use Section 5307 funds for operating assistance. In addition, Section
5307, as amended by, SAFETEA-LU and TEA-21, allows some UZAs with a
population of 200,000 or more to use FY 2007 Urbanized Area Formula
funds for operating assistance under certain conditions. The specific
provisions allowing the limited use of operating assistance in large
UZAs are as follows:
(1) Section 5307(b)(2) allows UZAs that grew in population from
under 200,000 to over 200,000, as a result of the 2000 Census to use FY
2007 funds for operating assistance in an amount up to 25 percent of
the grandfathered amount for FY 2005 funds. (The provision is
completely phased out in FY 2008.) Table 7 shows the maximum amount of
each eligible UZA's Section 5307 apportionment that can be used for
operating assistance.
(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for grants for the operating
costs of equipment and facilities for use in public transportation in
the Evansville, IN-KY urbanized area, for a portion or portions of the
UZA if: the portion of the UZA includes only one State; the population
of the portion is less than 30,000; and the grants will be not used to
provide public transportation outside of the portion of the UZA.
(3) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides operating costs of equipment and
facilities for use in public transportation for local governmental
authorities in areas which adopted transit operating and financing
plans that became a part of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result of the
2000 decennial census of population, but lie outside the service area
of the principal public transportation agency that serves the Houston
UZA.
(4) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the formula to be used to
apportion Section 5307 funds to UZAs with population of 200,000 or
more. SAFETEA-LU amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that stated, ``* *
* except that the amount apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized area
under subsection (b) shall be available to the Alaska Railroad for any
costs related to its passenger operations.'' This language has the
effect of directing that funds apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized
area, under the fixed guideway tiers of the Section 5307 apportionment
formula, be made available to the Alaska Railroad, and that these funds
may be used for any capital or operating costs related to its passenger
operations.
(5) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA-21, as amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note),
provides an exception to the restriction on the use of operating
assistance in a UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, by allowing
transit providers/grantees that provide service exclusively to elderly
persons and persons with disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds apportioned to the UZA for operating
assistance. The total amount of funding made available for this purpose
under Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million. Transit providers/grantees
eligible under this provision have already been identified and
notified.
e. Sources of Local Match. Pursuant to Section 5307(e), the Federal
share of an urbanized area formula grant is 80 percent of net project
cost for a capital project and 50 percent of net project cost for
operating assistance. The remainder of the net project cost (i.e., 20
percent and 50 percent, respectively) shall be provided from the
following sources:
1. In cash from non-Government sources other than revenues from
providing public transportation services;
2. From revenues derived from the sale of advertising and
concessions;
3. From an undistributed cash surplus, a replacement or
depreciation cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
4. From amounts received under a service agreement with a State or
local social service agency or private social service organization; and
5. Proceeds from the issuance of revenue bonds.
In addition, funds from Section 403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be used to match
Urbanized Area Formula funds.
f. Designated Transportation Management Areas (TMA). Guidance for
setting the boundaries of TMAs is in the joint transportation planning
regulations codified at 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613. In some
cases, the TMA planning boundaries established by the MPO for the
designated TMA includes one or more small UZAs. In addition, one small
UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has been designated as a TMA. In either of
these situations, the Governor cannot allocate ``Governor's
Apportionment'' funds attributed to the small UZAs to other areas; that
is, the Governor only has discretion to allocate Governor's
Apportionment funds attributable to
[[Page 13878]]
areas that are outside of designated TMA planning boundaries.
The list of small UZAs included within the planning boundaries of
designated TMAs is provided in the table below.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small urbanized area included in
Designated TMA TMA planning boundary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albany, NY........................... Saratoga Springs, NY.
Houston, TX.......................... Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-
Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX;
The Woodlands, TX.
Jacksonville, FL..................... St. Augustine, FL.
Orlando, FL.......................... Kissimmee, FL.
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL............... Titusville, FL.
Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD............ Pottstown, PA.
Pittsburgh, PA....................... Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-
Steubenville, OH-PA (PA
portion); Uniontown-
Connellsville, PA.
Seattle, WA.......................... Bremerton, WA.
Washington, DC-VA-MD................. Frederick, MD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MPO must notify the Associate Administrator for Program
Management, Federal Transit Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590, in writing, no later than July 1 of each year, to
identify any small UZA within the planning boundaries of a TMA.
g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used for Highway Purposes. Funds
apportioned to a TMA are eligible for transfer to FHWA for highway
projects. However, before funds can be transferred, the following
conditions must be met: (1) Such use must be approved by the MPO in
writing, after appropriate notice and opportunity for comment and
appeal are provided to affected transit providers; (2) in the
determination of the Secretary, such funds are not needed for
investments required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(ADA); and (3) the MPO determines that local transit needs are being
addressed.
The MPO should notify the appropriate FTA Regional Administrator of
its intent to use FTA funds for highway purposes, as prescribed in
section V.D below. Urbanized Area Formula funds that are designated by
the MPO for highway projects will be transferred to and administered by
FHWA.
4. Period of Availability
The Urbanized Area Formula Program funds apportioned in this notice
remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients until September
30, 2010. Any of these apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the
close of business on September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment under the Urbanized Area Formula Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
In each UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, the Governor in
consultation with responsible local officials, and publicly owned
operators of public transportation has designated one or more entities
to be the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 funds apportioned to
the UZA. The same entity(s) may or may not be the Designated Recipient
for the Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom program
funds apportioned to the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 population, the
State is the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 as well as JARC and
New Freedom programs. The Designated Recipient for Section 5307 may
authorize other entities to apply directly to FTA for Section 5307
grants pursuant to a supplemental agreement. While the requirement that
projects selected for funding be included in a locally developed
coordinated public transit/human service transportation plan is not
included in Section 5307 as it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that in their role as public transit
providers, recipients of Section 5307 funds will be participants in the
local planning process for these programs.
D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49.U.S.C. 5308)
The Clean Fuels Grant Program supports the use of alternative fuels
in air quality maintenance or nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon
monoxide through capital grants to urbanized areas for clean fuel
vehicles and facilities. Previously an unfunded Formula Program under
TEA-21, the program is now a discretionary program. FTA published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the discretionary program on October
16, 2006, and is now in the process of reviewing comments and
finalizing the rule. For more information about this program contact
Kimberly Sledge, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides
$45,000,000 to the Clean Fuels Grant Program (49 U.S.C. 5308). SAFETEA-
LU earmarked $18,721,000 for specific Clean Fuel projects. The balance
of $26,279,000 was transferred to the discretionary Bus Program.
Clean Fuels Grant Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation.................................. $45,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transfer to Bus and Bus Facility..................... -$26,279,000
Funds Allocated to SAFETEA-LU Earmarks............... 18,721,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocations to projects earmarked under the Clean Fuels program in
SAFETEA-LU are displayed in Table 8.
2. Basis for Allocation of Funds.
Section 3044(b) of SAFETEA-LU included 16 projects to be funded
through the Clean Fuels program. Table 8 displays the amounts available
in FY 2007 to the Clean Fuels projects designated in SAFETEA-LU. FY
2006 carryover funds are shown in Table 9. No funds are available for
competitive allocation in FY 2007.
3. Requirements
Clean Fuels program funds may be made available to any grantee in a
UZA that is designated as maintenance or nonattainment area for ozone
or carbon monoxide as defined in the Clean Air Act. Eligible recipients
include Section 5307 Designated Recipients as well as recipients in
small UZAs. In the case of a small UZA, the State in which the area is
located will act as the recipient.
Eligible projects include the purchase or lease of clean fuel buses
(including buses that employ a lightweight composite primary
structure), the construction or lease of clean fuel buses or electrical
recharging facilities and related equipment for such buses, and
construction or improvement of public transportation facilities to
accommodate clean fuel buses.
Legislation will be necessary if a recipient wishes to use Clean
Fuels funds earmarked in SAFETEA-LU for
[[Page 13879]]
eligible program activities outside the scope of a project description.
Unless otherwise specified in law, grants made under the Clean
Fuels program must meet all other eligibility requirements as outlined
in Section 5308.
4. Period of Availability
Funds designated for specific Clean Fuels Program projects remain
available for obligation for three fiscal years, which includes the
year of appropriation plus two additional fiscal years. The FY 2007
funding for projects included in this notice remains available through
September 30, 2009. Clean Fuels funds not obligated in an FTA grant for
their original purpose at the end of the period of availability will
generally be made available for other projects.
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway
Modernization
This program provides capital assistance for the modernization of
existing fixed guideway systems. Funds are allocated by a statutory
formula to UZAs with fixed guideway systems that have been in operation
for at least seven years. A ``fixed guideway'' refers to any transit
service that uses exclusive or controlled rights-of-way or rails,
entirely or in part. The term includes heavy rail, commuter rail, light
rail, monorail, trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car,
automated guideway transit, ferryboats, that portion of motor bus
service operated on exclusive or controlled rights-of-way, and high-
occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes. Eligible applicants are the public
transit authorities in those urbanized areas to which the funds are
allocated. For more information about Fixed Guideway Modernization
contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides
$1,448,000,000 to the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program. The total
amount apportioned for the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program is
$1,433,520,000, after the deduction for oversight, as shown in the
table below.
Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation.................................. $1,448,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction.................................. -14,480,000
������������������������������������������������������
Total Apportioned.................................. 1,433,520,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FY 2007 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program apportionments to
eligible areas are displayed in Table 10.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The formula for allocating the Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
contains seven tiers. The apportionment of funding under the first four
tiers is based on amounts specified in law and NTD data used to
apportion funds in FY 1997. Funding under the last three tiers is
apportioned based on the latest available data on route miles and
revenue vehicle miles on segments at least seven years old, as reported
to the NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C. provides for the
inclusion of Morgantown, West Virginia (population 55,997) as an
eligible UZA for purposes of apportioning fixed guideway modernization
funds. Also, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b) FTA used 60 percent of the
directional route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger
operations system to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage,
Alaska UZA under the Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization formula.
FY 2007 Formula apportionments are based on data grantees provided
to the NTD for the 2005 reporting year. Table 11 provides additional
information and details on the formula. Dollar unit values for the
formula factors used in the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program are
displayed in Table 5. To replicate an area's apportionment, multiply
the dollar unit value by the appropriate formula factor, i.e., route
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds must be used for capital
projects to maintain, modernize, or improve fixed guideway systems.
Eligible UZAs (those with a population of 200,000 or more) with fixed
guideway systems that are at least seven years old are entitled to
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization funds. A threshold level of more
than one mile of fixed guideway is required in order to receive Fixed
Guideway Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs reporting one mile or
less of fixed guideway mileage under the NTD are not included. However,
funds apportioned to an urbanized area may be used on any fixed
guideway segment in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed Guideway
Modernization is presently found in FTA Circular C9300.1A, Capital
Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated October 1, 1998. FTA is
in the process of updating this circular to incorporate changes
resulting from language in SAFETEA-LU.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned in this notice under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program remain available to be obligated by FTA to
recipients for three fiscal years following FY 2007. Any of these
apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of business on
September 30, 2010, will revert to FTA for reapportionment under the
Fixed Guideway Modernization Program.
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities
This program provides capital assistance for new and replacement
buses and related facilities. Funds are allocated on a discretionary
basis. Eligible purposes are acquisition of buses for fleet and service
expansion, bus maintenance and administrative facilities, transfer
facilities, bus malls, transportation centers, intermodal terminals,
park-and-ride stations, acquisition of replacement vehicles, bus
rebuilds, bus preventive maintenance, passenger amenities such as
passenger shelters and bus stop signs, accessory and miscellaneous
equipment such as mobile radio units, supervisory vehicles, fare boxes,
computers, and shop and garage equipment. Eligible applicants are State
and local governmental authorities. Eligible subrecipients include
other public agencies, private companies engaged in public
transportation and private non-profit organizations. For more
information about Bus and Bus-Related Facilities contact Maria Wright,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2007 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, provides
$881,779,000 for the bus and bus facilities program. This amount
includes $855,500,000 provided for the Bus Program and $26,279,000
transferred from the Clean Fuels Program. The amount of funding for
projects designated in Section 3044 of SAFETEA-LU for Bus and Bus-
Related Facilities in FY 2007 is $459,670,089. The balance remains
unallocated, as shown in the following table.
Bus and Bus Facility Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation.................................. $881,779,000 a
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight Deduction.................................. -8,817,790
SAFETEA-LU Statutory Provisions Projects............. 459,670,089
[[Page 13880]]
Funds Available for Discretionary/Competitive 413,291,121
Allocation..........................................
------------------
Total Funds to be Allocated........................ 872,961,210
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Includes $26,279,000 transferred from Clean Fuels Grant Program
The FY 2007 Bus and Bus Facility Program allocations are displayed
in Table 12.
2. Basis for Allocations
Funds are provided annually under Section 5309 for discretionary
allocation for bus and bus facilities projects. SAFETEA-LU listed 646
earmarked projects to be funded each year through the Bus Program
(Section 3044) and specified additional projects in Section 5309(m)(7).
Table 12 displays the allocation of the FY 2007 Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities funds by State and project for projects earmarked in
SAFETEA-LU. The table includes a SAFETEA-LU project number for each
project listed in Section 3044. No additional projects were earmarked
in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007. In fact, Section 112
of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, (H.J. Res 20)
specifically precluded using FY 2007 funds to award grants for projects
designated Section 5309 bus funds in the statement of managers
accompanying the FY 2006 Department of Transportation Appropriations
Act (Pub. L. 109-115).
3. Requirements
Section 125 and Section 113 of the FY 2005 and FY 2006 Department
of Transportation Appropriations Acts, respectively, make projects
identified in the statement of managers automatically eligible to
receive the funds designated to the project ``notwithstanding any other
provision of law.'' Similar language was first included as a general
provision in Section 547 of the FY 2004 Department of Transportation
Appropriations Acts. In addition, Section 3044 of SAFETEA-LU earmarked
646 Bus and Bus Facilities projects in FY 2007. FTA will review
Congressional intent on a case by case basis.
FTA honors Congressional earmarks for the purpose designated, for
purposes eligible under the program or under the expanded eligibility
of a ``notwithstanding'' provision. If you want to apply to use funds
designated under the Bus Program in any year for project activities
outside the scope of the project designation included in report
language, you must submit your request for reprogramming to the House
and Senate Committees on Appropriations for resolution. FTA will not
reprogram projects Congress designated in report language without
direction from the Appropriations Committees.
FTA will honor projects earmarked to receive Section 5309 bus funds
in SAFETEA-LU. Legislation will be necessary to amend the earmark if
you wish to use funds for project activities outside the scope of the
project description.
Grants made under the Bus and Bus-Related Facilities program must
meet all other eligibility requirements as outlined in Section 5309
unless otherwise specified in law.
Program guidance for Bus and Bus-Related Facilities is found in FTA
Circular C9300.1A, Capital Program: Grant Application Instructions. FTA
is in the process of updating this circular to incorporate changes
resulting from language in SAFETEA-LU.
4. Period of Availability
The FY 2007 Bus and Bus-Related Facilities funds not obligated for
their original purpose as of September 30, 2009, may be made available
for other projects under 49 U.S.C. 5309. The unusual appropriations
process in FY 2007 has not yet resulted in directions from Congress to
FTA not to reallocate unobligated bus program funds for designations
that lapsed at the end of FY 2006.
5. Other Program or Allocation Related Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated balances for Bus and Bus-Related allocations
in the amount of $870,471,637 remain available for obligation in FY
2007. This includes $861,331,362 in fiscal years 2005 and 2006
unobligated allocations, and $9,140,275 for fiscal years 2002-2004
unobligated allocations that were extended by previous direction by the
House and Senate appropriation committees. The unobligated amounts
available as of September 30, 2006, are displayed in Table 13.
In two Notices of Funding Availability (NOFA), published as
separate parts of today's Federal Register, FTA is issuing procedures
for grantees to apply competitively for discretionary funding for
projects eligible under the Bus and Bus Facilities program. One NOFA
invites applications from States and from Designated Recipients under
the Urbanized Area Formula Program to fund bus and bus facility
projects that address the following FTA priorities: Fleet replacement
needs that cannot be met with formula funds, fleet expansion for
significant service improvements, purchase of clean fuel vehicles,
facility construction to support increased service or introduction of
clean fuels, and intermodal terminal projects that include intercity
bus providers, and Gulf Coast recovery. The other NOFA addresses the
Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative and invites
proposals from specific urbanized areas identified as the most
congested in the nation.
G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--New Starts
The New Starts program provides funds for construction of new fixed
guideway systems or extensions to existing fixed guideway systems.
Eligible purposes are light rail