Tower Automotive, Inc.; Upper Sundusky, OH; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 12833-12834 [E7-5002]

Download as PDF 12833 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Notices APPENDIX—Continued [TAA Petitions Instituted Between 3/5/07 and 3/9/07] TA–W 61061 61062 61063 61064 61065 61066 61067 61068 61069 61070 61071 61072 61073 61074 61075 61076 61077 61078 61079 61080 61081 61082 61083 61084 61085 61086 61087 61088 Location IBM (Wkrs) ..................................................................................... Logistic Services, Inc. (State) ........................................................ General Motors Metal Fabrication Division (Wkrs) ....................... LuMend Inc. (State) ....................................................................... Freight Car America (USWA) ........................................................ ITW Plastic (Comp) ....................................................................... Johnson Controls (Comp) ............................................................. Microfibres, Inc (Comp) ................................................................. Quaker Fabric Corporation of Fall River (State) ........................... Greenfield Research Inc. (Comp) ................................................. American Camshaft Specialties, Inc (Comp) ................................ Jefferson City Manufacturing, Inc. (Wkrs) ..................................... Bassett Furniture Industries (Comp) ............................................. Fleetwood Travel Trailers of Kentucky (Wkrs) .............................. Emerald Performance Chemical (Wkrs) ........................................ Durham Manufacturing (Comp) ..................................................... Adias International (27410) ........................................................... U.S. Traffic Corporation a Quixote Company (State) ................... Western Union LLC (State) ........................................................... A.O. Smith Electrical Products Company (Comp) ........................ SE Wood Products Inc. (Wkrs) ..................................................... Technicolor Home Entertainment Services (Comp) ...................... Intel Corporation (Wkrs) ................................................................ Renfro Corporation (Comp) ........................................................... Verizon Business (Wkrs) ............................................................... Delta Consolidated Inc. (Wkrs) ..................................................... Haz-Waste (Union) ........................................................................ Evans Rule (Comp) ....................................................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... Hazelwood, MO ......................... Oklahoma City, OK ................... Mansfield, OH ............................ Redwood City, CA ..................... Johnstown, PA .......................... Shelby Township, MI ................. Lancaster, SC ............................ Pawtucket, RI ............................ Fall River, MA ............................ Greenfield, OH .......................... Grand Haven, MI ....................... Jefferson City, MO .................... Bassett, VA ................................ Campbellsville, KY .................... Kalama, WA .............................. Fort Payne, AL .......................... Portland, OR .............................. Santa Fe Spring, CA ................. Englewood, CO ......................... McMinnville, TN ......................... Colville, WA ............................... Camarillo, CA ............................ Newark, CA ............................... Mt. Airy, NC ............................... Tulsa, OK .................................. Raleigh, NC ............................... St. Louis, MO ............................ Charleston, SC .......................... [FR Doc. E7–5000 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–60,530] ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES Tower Automotive, Inc.; Upper Sundusky, OH; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration By application of February 19, 2007 a company official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination signed on February 1, 2007 was based on the finding that imports of automotive suspension components and steel stampings did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject plant and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred. The denial was published in the Federal Register on February 14, 2007 (72 FR 7088). VerDate Aug<31>2005 Date of institution Subject firm (petitioners) 15:50 Mar 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided additional information regarding the subject firm’s customers and requested an investigation relating to secondary impact concerning the subject firm as an upstream supplier in the production of fabric. A review of the new facts determined that the workers of the subject firm may be eligible for TAA on the basis of a secondary upstream supplier impact. The Department conducted an investigation of subject firm workers on the basis of secondary impact. It was revealed that Tower Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, Ohio supplied automotive suspension components and steel stampings that were used in the production of motor vehicles, and a loss of business with domestic manufacturers (whose workers were certified eligible to apply for adjustment assistance) contributed importantly to the workers separation or threat of separation. In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older workers. PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 03/05/07 03/05/07 03/05/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/07/07 03/07/07 03/07/07 03/07/07 03/08/07 03/08/07 03/08/07 03/08/07 03/09/07 03/09/07 03/09/07 03/09/07 03/09/07 03/09/07 03/09/07 Date of petition 03/01/07 02/17/07 03/03/07 03/01/07 03/05/07 02/19/07 02/19/07 03/05/07 03/02/07 03/02/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 03/06/07 02/28/07 03/06/07 03/05/07 02/26/07 03/07/07 03/07/07 03/01/07 03/07/07 02/22/07 02/28/07 03/08/07 03/08/07 03/08/07 03/08/07 03/08/07 In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in this case that the requirements of Section 246 have been met. A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation, I determine that all workers of Tower Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, Ohio qualify as adversely affected secondary workers under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of Tower Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 5, 2005, through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1 12834 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Notices Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of March 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–5002 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Bureau of Labor Statistics Proposed Collection, Comment Request ACTION: Notice. ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments concerning the proposed revision of the ‘‘Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses.’’ A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the individual listed below in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this notice on or before May 18, 2007. ADDRESSES: Send comments to Amy A. Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 4080, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Washington, DC 20212, 202–691–7628. (This is not a toll free number.) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy A. Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer, 202–691–7628. (See ADDRESSES section.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Section 24(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires the Secretary of Labor to develop and maintain an effective program of collection, compilation, and analysis of statistics on occupational injuries and illnesses. The Commissioner of Labor VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:50 Mar 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 Statistics has been delegated the responsibility for ‘‘Furthering the purpose of the Occupational Safety and Health Act by developing and maintaining an effective program of collection, compilation, analysis and publication of occupational safety and health statistics.’’ The BLS fulfills this responsibility, in part, by conducting the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses in conjunction with participating State statistical agencies. The BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses provides the Nation’s primary indicator of the progress towards achieving the goal of safer and healthier workplaces. The survey produces the overall rate of occurrence of work injuries and illnesses by industry which can be compared to prior years to produce measures of the rate of change. These data are used to assess the Nation’s progress in improving the safety and health of America’s work places; to prioritize scarce Federal and State resources; to guide the development of injury and illness prevention strategies; and to support Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and State safety and health standards and research. Data are essential for evaluating the effectiveness of Federal and State programs for improving work place safety and health. For these reasons, it is necessary to provide estimates separately for participating States. and illnesses sustained by State and local government workers, including those in such relatively high hazard and high profile occupations as police, firefighters, paramedics, and other public health workers. The BLS regards the collection of these data as a significant expansion in its overall coverage of the American workplace. The BLS will send a letter explaining that the survey is voluntary for State and local government agencies in States that do not require this collection of data. The number of extra sample units needed for State and local government data is approximately 7,000. Beginning with the 2008 survey year, the BLS will test collection of injury and illness cases that require only days of job transfer or restriction. In the two decades prior to the OSHA recordkeeping changes in 2002, incidence rates for cases with days away from work decreased significantly, while incidence rates for cases with only restricted work activity increased significantly. Since the BLS presently collects case and demographic data only for cases with days away from work, data are not obtained about a growing class of injury and illness cases. If the test(s) prove successful, the BLS will explore implementing this practice for additional States beginning with survey year 2009. The BLS regards the collection of these cases with only job transfer or restriction as significant in its coverage of the American workforce. II. Current Action Office of Management and Budget clearance is being sought for the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. The survey measures the overall rate of occurrence of work injuries and illnesses by industry. For the more serious injuries and illnesses, those with days away from work, the survey provides detailed information on the injured/ill worker (age, sex, race, industry, occupation, and length of service), the time in shift, and the circumstances of the injuries and illnesses classified by standardized codes (nature of the injury/illness, part of body affected, primary and secondary sources of the injury/illness, and the event or exposure which produced the injury/illness). Beginning with survey year 2008, the BLS will collect data from State and Local government agencies in all States to support both State and national estimates. Until now, the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses has been restricted to producing national estimates for the private sector only. Consequently, there have been no national estimates of workplace injuries III. Desired Focus of Comments The Bureau of Labor Statistics is particularly interested in comments that: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility. • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used. • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected. • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. Type of Review: Revision of currently approved collection. Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics. PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12833-12834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,530]


Tower Automotive, Inc.; Upper Sundusky, OH; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    By application of February 19, 2007 a company official requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative 
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of 
the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
signed on February 1, 2007 was based on the finding that imports of 
automotive suspension components and steel stampings did not contribute 
importantly to worker separations at the subject plant and no shift of 
production to a foreign source occurred. The denial was published in 
the Federal Register on February 14, 2007 (72 FR 7088).
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information regarding the subject firm's customers and 
requested an investigation relating to secondary impact concerning the 
subject firm as an upstream supplier in the production of fabric. A 
review of the new facts determined that the workers of the subject firm 
may be eligible for TAA on the basis of a secondary upstream supplier 
impact.
    The Department conducted an investigation of subject firm workers 
on the basis of secondary impact. It was revealed that Tower 
Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, Ohio supplied automotive suspension 
components and steel stampings that were used in the production of 
motor vehicles, and a loss of business with domestic manufacturers 
(whose workers were certified eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance) contributed importantly to the workers separation or threat 
of separation.
    In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 
2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results 
of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply 
for alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older workers.
    In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility 
to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of 
the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in this case 
that the requirements of Section 246 have been met.
    A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and 
possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions 
within the industry are adverse.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation, I 
determine that all workers of Tower Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, 
Ohio qualify as adversely affected secondary workers under Section 222 
of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In accordance with the provisions 
of the Act, I make the following certification:

    All workers of Tower Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, Ohio, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
December 5, 2005, through two years from the date of this 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.


[[Page 12834]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of March 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-5002 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.