Tower Automotive, Inc.; Upper Sundusky, OH; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 12833-12834 [E7-5002]
Download as PDF
12833
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[TAA Petitions Instituted Between 3/5/07 and 3/9/07]
TA–W
61061
61062
61063
61064
61065
61066
61067
61068
61069
61070
61071
61072
61073
61074
61075
61076
61077
61078
61079
61080
61081
61082
61083
61084
61085
61086
61087
61088
Location
IBM (Wkrs) .....................................................................................
Logistic Services, Inc. (State) ........................................................
General Motors Metal Fabrication Division (Wkrs) .......................
LuMend Inc. (State) .......................................................................
Freight Car America (USWA) ........................................................
ITW Plastic (Comp) .......................................................................
Johnson Controls (Comp) .............................................................
Microfibres, Inc (Comp) .................................................................
Quaker Fabric Corporation of Fall River (State) ...........................
Greenfield Research Inc. (Comp) .................................................
American Camshaft Specialties, Inc (Comp) ................................
Jefferson City Manufacturing, Inc. (Wkrs) .....................................
Bassett Furniture Industries (Comp) .............................................
Fleetwood Travel Trailers of Kentucky (Wkrs) ..............................
Emerald Performance Chemical (Wkrs) ........................................
Durham Manufacturing (Comp) .....................................................
Adias International (27410) ...........................................................
U.S. Traffic Corporation a Quixote Company (State) ...................
Western Union LLC (State) ...........................................................
A.O. Smith Electrical Products Company (Comp) ........................
SE Wood Products Inc. (Wkrs) .....................................................
Technicolor Home Entertainment Services (Comp) ......................
Intel Corporation (Wkrs) ................................................................
Renfro Corporation (Comp) ...........................................................
Verizon Business (Wkrs) ...............................................................
Delta Consolidated Inc. (Wkrs) .....................................................
Haz-Waste (Union) ........................................................................
Evans Rule (Comp) .......................................................................
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
Hazelwood, MO .........................
Oklahoma City, OK ...................
Mansfield, OH ............................
Redwood City, CA .....................
Johnstown, PA ..........................
Shelby Township, MI .................
Lancaster, SC ............................
Pawtucket, RI ............................
Fall River, MA ............................
Greenfield, OH ..........................
Grand Haven, MI .......................
Jefferson City, MO ....................
Bassett, VA ................................
Campbellsville, KY ....................
Kalama, WA ..............................
Fort Payne, AL ..........................
Portland, OR ..............................
Santa Fe Spring, CA .................
Englewood, CO .........................
McMinnville, TN .........................
Colville, WA ...............................
Camarillo, CA ............................
Newark, CA ...............................
Mt. Airy, NC ...............................
Tulsa, OK ..................................
Raleigh, NC ...............................
St. Louis, MO ............................
Charleston, SC ..........................
[FR Doc. E7–5000 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,530]
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Tower Automotive, Inc.; Upper
Sundusky, OH; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By application of February 19, 2007 a
company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility for workers and
former workers of the subject firm to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination signed on
February 1, 2007 was based on the
finding that imports of automotive
suspension components and steel
stampings did not contribute
importantly to worker separations at the
subject plant and no shift of production
to a foreign source occurred. The denial
was published in the Federal Register
on February 14, 2007 (72 FR 7088).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Date of
institution
Subject firm (petitioners)
15:50 Mar 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner provided additional
information regarding the subject firm’s
customers and requested an
investigation relating to secondary
impact concerning the subject firm as an
upstream supplier in the production of
fabric. A review of the new facts
determined that the workers of the
subject firm may be eligible for TAA on
the basis of a secondary upstream
supplier impact.
The Department conducted an
investigation of subject firm workers on
the basis of secondary impact. It was
revealed that Tower Automotive, Inc.,
Upper Sandusky, Ohio supplied
automotive suspension components and
steel stampings that were used in the
production of motor vehicles, and a loss
of business with domestic
manufacturers (whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance) contributed importantly to
the workers separation or threat of
separation.
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older
workers.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
03/05/07
03/05/07
03/05/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/07/07
03/07/07
03/07/07
03/07/07
03/08/07
03/08/07
03/08/07
03/08/07
03/09/07
03/09/07
03/09/07
03/09/07
03/09/07
03/09/07
03/09/07
Date of
petition
03/01/07
02/17/07
03/03/07
03/01/07
03/05/07
02/19/07
02/19/07
03/05/07
03/02/07
03/02/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
03/06/07
02/28/07
03/06/07
03/05/07
02/26/07
03/07/07
03/07/07
03/01/07
03/07/07
02/22/07
02/28/07
03/08/07
03/08/07
03/08/07
03/08/07
03/08/07
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act must be met. The Department
has determined in this case that the
requirements of Section 246 have been
met.
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts
obtained in the investigation, I
determine that all workers of Tower
Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky,
Ohio qualify as adversely affected
secondary workers under Section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In
accordance with the provisions of the
Act, I make the following certification:
All workers of Tower Automotive, Inc.,
Upper Sandusky, Ohio, who became totally
or partially separated from employment on or
after December 5, 2005, through two years
from the date of this certification, are eligible
to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
12834
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 52 / Monday, March 19, 2007 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
March 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–5002 Filed 3–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed revision of the
‘‘Survey of Occupational Injuries and
Illnesses.’’ A copy of the proposed
information collection request (ICR) can
be obtained by contacting the individual
listed below in the ADDRESSES section of
this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice on or
before May 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Amy A.
Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer, Division
of Management Systems, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Room 4080, 2
Massachusetts Avenue, NE.,
Washington, DC 20212, 202–691–7628.
(This is not a toll free number.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy A. Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer,
202–691–7628. (See ADDRESSES section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 24(a) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires
the Secretary of Labor to develop and
maintain an effective program of
collection, compilation, and analysis of
statistics on occupational injuries and
illnesses. The Commissioner of Labor
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:50 Mar 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Statistics has been delegated the
responsibility for ‘‘Furthering the
purpose of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act by developing and
maintaining an effective program of
collection, compilation, analysis and
publication of occupational safety and
health statistics.’’ The BLS fulfills this
responsibility, in part, by conducting
the Survey of Occupational Injuries and
Illnesses in conjunction with
participating State statistical agencies.
The BLS Survey of Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses provides the
Nation’s primary indicator of the
progress towards achieving the goal of
safer and healthier workplaces. The
survey produces the overall rate of
occurrence of work injuries and
illnesses by industry which can be
compared to prior years to produce
measures of the rate of change. These
data are used to assess the Nation’s
progress in improving the safety and
health of America’s work places; to
prioritize scarce Federal and State
resources; to guide the development of
injury and illness prevention strategies;
and to support Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) and
State safety and health standards and
research. Data are essential for
evaluating the effectiveness of Federal
and State programs for improving work
place safety and health. For these
reasons, it is necessary to provide
estimates separately for participating
States.
and illnesses sustained by State and
local government workers, including
those in such relatively high hazard and
high profile occupations as police,
firefighters, paramedics, and other
public health workers. The BLS regards
the collection of these data as a
significant expansion in its overall
coverage of the American workplace.
The BLS will send a letter explaining
that the survey is voluntary for State
and local government agencies in States
that do not require this collection of
data. The number of extra sample units
needed for State and local government
data is approximately 7,000.
Beginning with the 2008 survey year,
the BLS will test collection of injury and
illness cases that require only days of
job transfer or restriction. In the two
decades prior to the OSHA
recordkeeping changes in 2002,
incidence rates for cases with days away
from work decreased significantly,
while incidence rates for cases with
only restricted work activity increased
significantly. Since the BLS presently
collects case and demographic data only
for cases with days away from work,
data are not obtained about a growing
class of injury and illness cases. If the
test(s) prove successful, the BLS will
explore implementing this practice for
additional States beginning with survey
year 2009. The BLS regards the
collection of these cases with only job
transfer or restriction as significant in its
coverage of the American workforce.
II. Current Action
Office of Management and Budget
clearance is being sought for the Survey
of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses.
The survey measures the overall rate of
occurrence of work injuries and
illnesses by industry. For the more
serious injuries and illnesses, those with
days away from work, the survey
provides detailed information on the
injured/ill worker (age, sex, race,
industry, occupation, and length of
service), the time in shift, and the
circumstances of the injuries and
illnesses classified by standardized
codes (nature of the injury/illness, part
of body affected, primary and secondary
sources of the injury/illness, and the
event or exposure which produced the
injury/illness).
Beginning with survey year 2008, the
BLS will collect data from State and
Local government agencies in all States
to support both State and national
estimates. Until now, the Survey of
Occupational Injuries and Illnesses has
been restricted to producing national
estimates for the private sector only.
Consequently, there have been no
national estimates of workplace injuries
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility.
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Type of Review: Revision of currently
approved collection.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 52 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12833-12834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-5002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-60,530]
Tower Automotive, Inc.; Upper Sundusky, OH; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By application of February 19, 2007 a company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of
the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA).
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
signed on February 1, 2007 was based on the finding that imports of
automotive suspension components and steel stampings did not contribute
importantly to worker separations at the subject plant and no shift of
production to a foreign source occurred. The denial was published in
the Federal Register on February 14, 2007 (72 FR 7088).
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided
additional information regarding the subject firm's customers and
requested an investigation relating to secondary impact concerning the
subject firm as an upstream supplier in the production of fabric. A
review of the new facts determined that the workers of the subject firm
may be eligible for TAA on the basis of a secondary upstream supplier
impact.
The Department conducted an investigation of subject firm workers
on the basis of secondary impact. It was revealed that Tower
Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, Ohio supplied automotive suspension
components and steel stampings that were used in the production of
motor vehicles, and a loss of business with domestic manufacturers
(whose workers were certified eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance) contributed importantly to the workers separation or threat
of separation.
In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C.
2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results
of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply
for alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility
to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of
the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in this case
that the requirements of Section 246 have been met.
A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and
possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions
within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation, I
determine that all workers of Tower Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky,
Ohio qualify as adversely affected secondary workers under Section 222
of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In accordance with the provisions
of the Act, I make the following certification:
All workers of Tower Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, Ohio, who
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after
December 5, 2005, through two years from the date of this
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
[[Page 12834]]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of March 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-5002 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P