Hard Red Spring Wheat from Canada: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 11326 [E7-4499]
Download as PDF
11326
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Scope of the Countervailing Duty Order
International Trade Administration
Imports covered by this order are all
varieties of HRSW from Canada. This
includes, but is not limited to, varieties
commonly referred to as Canada
Western Red Spring, Canada Western
Extra Strong, and Canada Prairie Spring
Red. The merchandise subject to this
order is currently classifiable under the
following Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’)
subheadings: 1001.90.10.00,
1001.90.20.05, 1001.90.20.11,
1001.90.20.12, 1001.90.20.13,
1001.90.20.14, 1001.90.20.16,
1001.90.20.19, 1001.90.20.21,
1001.90.20.22, 1001.90.20.23,
1001.90.20.24, 1001.90.20.26,
1001.90.20.29, 1001.90.20.35, and
1001.90.20.96. This order does not cover
imports of wheat that enter under the
subheadings 1001.90.10.00 and
1001.90.20.96 that are not classifiable as
HRSW. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive.
[C–122–848]
Hard Red Spring Wheat from Canada:
Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
initiated an administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on hard red
spring wheat from Canada, covering the
period January 1, 2004, through
December 31, 2004. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 71 FR 68535
(November 27, 2006). As a result of a
timely withdrawal of the request for
review by the Canadian Wheat Board,
we are rescinding this review.
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
March 13, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Audrey Twyman or Brandon Farlander,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–3534 and (202)
482–0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
On October 23, 2003, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published a countervailing duty order
on hard red spring wheat (‘‘HRSW’’)
from Canada. See Notice of
Countervailing Duty Order: Hard Red
Spring Wheat from Canada, 68 FR
60642 (October 23, 2003). On October
31, 2005, the Canadian Wheat Board
(‘‘CWB’’) requested an administrative
review of the countervailing duty order
on HRSW from Canada covering the
period January 1, 2004, through
December 31, 2004. At the same time,
the CWB requested that the review be
deferred for one year. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Deferral of
Administrative Reviews, 70 FR 72107
(December 1, 2005). On November 27,
2006, we automatically initiated the
deferred 2004 review. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 71 FR 68535
(November 27, 2006). On February 26,
2007, the CWB withdrew its request for
review.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:46 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 6, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–4499 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 022807C]
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Fishing Permit
Rescission of Review
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
The Department’s regulations at 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1) provide that the
Department will rescind an
administrative review if a party that
requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. The CWB
withdrew its request for an
administrative review on February 26,
2007, which is within the 90-day
deadline. No other party requested a
review of this order. Therefore, the
Department is rescinding this
administrative review.
The Court of International Trade
issued a temporary restraining order,
covering 10 days, effective March 1,
2007, instructing the Department not to
liquidate CWB imports of the subject
merchandise. As long as a temporary
restraining order, or preliminary
injunction, is in place pursuant to the
ongoing litigation, the Department will
not order liquidation of the relevant
entries.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional
Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries,
Northeast Region, NMFS (Assistant
Regional Administrator) has made a
preliminary determination that the
subject Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP)
application from the University of New
Hampshire (UNH) for an exemption
from Gulf of Maine (GOM) Rolling
Closure Areas III and IV requirements of
the Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), for the
purpose of designing and testing a
raised footrope haddock trawl, contains
all of the required information and
warrants further consideration. The EFP
is intended to facilitate research that
would lead to the development of a
viable alternative to traditional fishing
gear for landing haddock, while
minimizing the impact on species of
concern and other bycatch. The
Assistant Regional Administrator has
also made a preliminary determination
that the activities authorized under the
EFP would be consistent with the goals
and objectives of the FMP. However,
further review and consultation may be
necessary before a final determination is
made to issue the EFP. Therefore, NMFS
announces that the Assistant Regional
Administrator proposes to issue an EFP
that would allow vessels to conduct
fishing operations that are otherwise
restricted by the regulations governing
the fisheries of the Northeastern United
States.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4499]
[[Page 11326]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-122-848]
Hard Red Spring Wheat from Canada: Rescission of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce initiated an administrative review
of the countervailing duty order on hard red spring wheat from Canada,
covering the period January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004. See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 71 FR 68535 (November 27,
2006). As a result of a timely withdrawal of the request for review by
the Canadian Wheat Board, we are rescinding this review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Twyman or Brandon Farlander,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3534
and (202) 482-0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 23, 2003, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published a countervailing duty order on hard red spring
wheat (``HRSW'') from Canada. See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order:
Hard Red Spring Wheat from Canada, 68 FR 60642 (October 23, 2003). On
October 31, 2005, the Canadian Wheat Board (``CWB'') requested an
administrative review of the countervailing duty order on HRSW from
Canada covering the period January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004.
At the same time, the CWB requested that the review be deferred for one
year. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Deferral of Administrative Reviews, 70 FR
72107 (December 1, 2005). On November 27, 2006, we automatically
initiated the deferred 2004 review. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation
in Part, 71 FR 68535 (November 27, 2006). On February 26, 2007, the CWB
withdrew its request for review.
Scope of the Countervailing Duty Order
Imports covered by this order are all varieties of HRSW from
Canada. This includes, but is not limited to, varieties commonly
referred to as Canada Western Red Spring, Canada Western Extra Strong,
and Canada Prairie Spring Red. The merchandise subject to this order is
currently classifiable under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings: 1001.90.10.00,
1001.90.20.05, 1001.90.20.11, 1001.90.20.12, 1001.90.20.13,
1001.90.20.14, 1001.90.20.16, 1001.90.20.19, 1001.90.20.21,
1001.90.20.22, 1001.90.20.23, 1001.90.20.24, 1001.90.20.26,
1001.90.20.29, 1001.90.20.35, and 1001.90.20.96. This order does not
cover imports of wheat that enter under the subheadings 1001.90.10.00
and 1001.90.20.96 that are not classifiable as HRSW. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.
Rescission of Review
The Department's regulations at 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) provide that
the Department will rescind an administrative review if a party that
requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The
CWB withdrew its request for an administrative review on February 26,
2007, which is within the 90-day deadline. No other party requested a
review of this order. Therefore, the Department is rescinding this
administrative review.
The Court of International Trade issued a temporary restraining
order, covering 10 days, effective March 1, 2007, instructing the
Department not to liquidate CWB imports of the subject merchandise. As
long as a temporary restraining order, or preliminary injunction, is in
place pursuant to the ongoing litigation, the Department will not order
liquidation of the relevant entries.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 6, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-4499 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S