Fiscal Year 2007 SuperNOFA for HUD's Discretionary Programs, 11434-11772 [07-974]
Download as PDF
11434
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5100–N–01A]
Fiscal Year 2007 SuperNOFA for HUD’s
Discretionary Programs
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Notice of HUD’s Fiscal Year
(FY) 2007 Notice of Funding
Availability (NOFA) for HUD’s
Discretionary Programs (SuperNOFA).
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
ACTION:
SUMMARY: On January 18, 2007, HUD
published its Notice of FY2007 Notice
of Funding Availability Policy
Requirements and General Section to
the SuperNOFA (General Section). HUD
published the General Section of the
FY2007 SuperNOFA in advance of the
individual NOFAs to give prospective
applicants sufficient time to begin
preparing their applications, and to
register early with Grants.gov in order to
facilitate their application submission
process. Today’s publication contains
the 38 funding opportunities or program
NOFAs that constitute HUD’s FY2007
SuperNOFA. In addition, today’s
publication provides a revised listing of
programs contained in the FY2007
SuperNOFA and corrects two items
contained in the General Section
published on January 18, 2007.
DATES: Application deadline and other
key dates that apply to all HUD federal
financial assistance made available
through HUD’s FY2007 SuperNOFA are
contained in each individual program
NOFA and in Appendix A of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
individual program NOFA identifies the
applicable agency contact(s) for each
program. Questions regarding today’s
Introduction to the SuperNOFA should
be directed to the NOFA Information
Center between the hours 10 a.m. and
6:30 p.m. eastern time at (800) HUD–
8929. Hearing-impaired persons may
access this telephone via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339. Questions
regarding specific program requirements
should be directed to the agency
contact(s) identified in each program
NOFA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HUD
published the General Section of the
FY2007 SuperNOFA on January 18,
2007 (72 FR 2396). HUD published the
General Section in advance of the
individual program NOFAs to give
prospective applicants sufficient time to
begin preparing their applications, and
to register early with Grants.gov in order
to facilitate their application submission
process. Today’s publication contains
the 38 individual funding opportunities,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
or program NOFAs, that constitute
HUD’s FY2007 SuperNOFA. Through
the FY2007 SuperNOFA, HUD is
making available approximately $2
billion in federal financial assistance. In
addition, today’s publication provides a
revised listing of programs contained in
the FY2007 SuperNOFA and corrects
one item contained in the General
Section published on January 18, 2007.
Each program NOFA provides the
statutory and regulatory requirements,
threshold requirements, and rating
factors applicable to funding made
available through the individual NOFA.
Applicants must also review, however,
the January 18, 2007, General Section
for important application information
and requirements, including submission
requirements that provide explicit
instructions on file formats acceptable
to HUD.
Appendix A to the January 18, 2007,
General Section identified the funding
opportunities anticipated to be included
in the FY2007 SuperNOFA. HUD is
revising and republishing Appendix A
(Revised Appendix A) as part of today’s
FY2007 SuperNOFA publication.
Revised Appendix A provides an up-todate funding chart that lists the funding
opportunities included in today’s
FY2007 SuperNOFA publication, along
with the application deadline.
In reviewing Revised Appendix A,
applicants should note that the
Youthbuild NOFA, Brownfields
Economic Development Initiative (BEDI)
NOFA, and the Public Housing
Neighborhood Networks (PH–NN)
NOFA are not part of today’s FY2007
SuperNOFA publication. The
Youthbuild program was transferred to
the U.S. Department of Labor on
September 22, 2006, in accordance with
Public Law 109–281, and will not be
included in the FY2007 SuperNOFA.
Persons interested in funding
opportunities under the Youthbuild
program should contact the U.S.
Department of Labor. The BEDI and PH–
NN were not funded in FY2007. HUD is
also providing NOFAs for three
programs that were not contained in its
FY2006 SuperNOFA, specifically the
Housing Counseling Training Program,
Early Doctoral Student Research Grant
Program, and the Doctoral Dissertation
Research Program NOFAs.
HUD is also using today’s publication
to correct two items contained in the
General Section published on January
18, 2007. Initially, HUD noted in section
V.A.1. (third column beginning on page
2408 and continuing to page 2409), that:
‘‘For each program NOFA, the points
awarded for the rating factors total 100.
Depending on the program for which
you are seeking funding, the funding
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
opportunity may provide up to four
bonus points, as provided below:’’
In fact, since the FY2007 SuperNOFA
offers bonus points only for applicants
that certify that their activities or
projects are located in, intended to serve
the residents of, or are consistent with
the strategic plan for an empowerment
zone (EZ), utilization plan for an urban
or rural renewal community designated
by HUD (RC), or strategic plan for an
enterprise community designated in
round II by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (EZ–II), collectively referred
to as ‘‘RC/EZ/EC–IIs,’’ only two bonus
points are available. As a result, section
V.A.1. (third column beginning on page
2408 and continuing to page 2409),
should read: ‘‘For each program NOFA,
the points awarded for the rating factors
total 100. Depending on the program for
which you are seeking funding, the
funding opportunity may provide up to
two bonus points, as provided below:’’
HUD is also correcting instructions
regarding the completion of the Logic
Model form (HUD–96010). In the third
sentence of section VI.C.5.b. (middle
column, page 2414), HUD stated that
applicants should include all activities
and outcomes expected per year of the
period of performance. To be consistent
with and correctly complete the Logic
Model forms, applicants are advised
that they must include all activities and
outcomes expected per year of the
period of performance. As a result, the
third sentence of section VI.C.5.b. is
corrected to read, ‘‘[T]o provide for
greater consistency in reporting,
applicants must include all activities
and outcomes expected per year of the
period of performance as defined in the
program logic model for the program
NOFA that they apply for.’’
HUD published the General Section of
the FY2007 SuperNOFA early to
provide its applicant community with
the opportunity to become familiar with
cross-cutting requirements, and to
remind prospective applicants to
register or renew their registration in
order to successfully submit an
application via Grants.gov.
Applicants are required to complete a
five-step registration process in order to
submit their applications electronically
and previously registered applicants
must annually update their information
in the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR) for the registration to remain
viable. HUD has developed the
following brochures and guidance,
found at https://www.hud.gov/offices/
adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm, to assist
applicants with the registration, CCR
update, and application processes:
• STEP BY STEP: Your Guide to
Registering for Grant Opportunities.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
• Finding and Applying for Grant
Opportunities.
• Desktop User Guide for Submitting
Grant Applications.
For FY2007, the Continuum of Care
remains a paper application process.
HUD continues to encourage Continuum
of Care agencies to become familiar with
Grants.gov requirements to facilitate the
future transition to Grants.gov. If you
have questions concerning the
registration process or renewal, or have
a question about a NOFA requirement,
contact HUD staff listed in the program
NOFAs. HUD staff cannot help you
write your application, but can clarify
requirements contained in this Notice
and HUD’s registration materials.
Finally, applicants are invited and
encouraged to participate in HUD’s
satellite training and webcast sessions
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
designed to provide a detailed
explanation of the general section and
program section requirements for each
of the SuperNOFA programs. The
interactive broadcasts provide an
opportunity to ask questions of HUD
staff. These broadcasts are archived and
accessible from HUD’s Grants page at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm. HUD also encourages
applicants to subscribe to the Grants.gov
free notification service. By doing so,
applicants will receive e-mail
notification as soon as items are posted
to Grants.gov and will have access to a
significant amount of useful
information, including responses to
frequently asked questions that arise
during the funding application period.
The address to subscribe to the
Grants.gov free notification service is
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11435
https://www.grants.gov/search/email.do.
Modifications to the General Section,
any of the program NOFAs, or the
application are posted to
www.Grants.gov as soon as they are
available (except for the Continuum of
Care NOFA). Modifications to the
Continuum of Care NOFA, or the
Continuum of Care application are
posted to HUD’s grants page at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
As stated in the General Section, HUD
hopes that the steps that it has taken to
provide information early in the FY2007
funding process will be of benefit to
you, our applicants.
Dated: February 26, 2007.
Roy A. Bernardi,
Deputy Secretary.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.000
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11436
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11437
EN13MR07.001
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.002
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11438
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11439
EN13MR07.003
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.004
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11440
11441
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
BILLING CODE 4210–01–C
Full Text of Announcement
Community Development Technical
Assistance
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. CD–TA Purpose. The purpose of
the CD–TA program is to provide
assistance to achieve the highest level of
performance and results for four
separate community development
program areas: (1) HOME; (2) CHDO
(HOME); (3) Homeless and; (4) HOPWA.
Information about the four community
development programs and their
missions, goals, and activities can be
found on the HUD Web site at
www.hud.gov.
B. Description of National TA and
Local TA. There are two types of
technical assistance (TA) funding
available in this NOFA: National TA
and Local TA.
National TA activities are those that
address, at a nationwide level, one or
more of the CD–TA program activities
and/or priorities identified in Section
III.C. of this NOFA. National TA
activities may include the development
of written products, development of online materials, development of training
courses, delivery of training courses
previously approved by HUD,
organization and delivery of workshops
and conferences, and delivery of direct
TA as part of a national program.
Applicants for National TA must also be
willing to work in any HUD field office
area, although work in the field office
areas is likely to be a negligible portion
of National TA activities. National TA
activities are administered by a
Government Technical Representative
(GTR) and Government Technical
Monitor (GTM) at HUD Headquarters.
Local TA activities also must address
the CD–TA program activities and/or
priorities identified in this NOFA;
however the Local TA is targeted to the
specific needs of the HUD community
development program recipients in the
field office area in which the TA is
proposed. Local TA activities are
limited to the development of need
assessments, direct TA to HUD
community development program
recipients, organization and delivery of
workshops and conferences, and
customization and delivery of
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Community Planning and
Development.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Community Development Technical
Assistance (CD–TA).
C. Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–08; OMB Approval Numbers:
2506–0166 for HOME Investment
Partnerships Program (HOME), HOME
Investment Partnerships Program for
Community Housing Development
Organizations (CHDO (HOME)), and
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance
(Homeless), 2506–0133 for Housing
Opportunities for Persons With AIDS
(HOPWA).
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Numbers: 14.239,
HOME and CHDO (HOME); 14.235,
Homeless; 14.241, HOPWA.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 25, 2007.
G. Additional Overview Information:
Applicants interested in providing
technical assistance to entities
participating in HUD’s community
development programs should carefully
review the General Section and the
information listed in this CD–TA NOFA.
Funds are available to provide technical
assistance for four separate program
areas: HOME, CHDO (HOME),
Homeless, and HOPWA. Applicants
may apply for one, two, three, or all four
CD–TA program areas. The application
submission information is contained in
this CD–TA NOFA at Section IV.B.
Approximately $25.4 million is
available. No cost sharing is required.
Grants will be administered under
cooperative agreements with significant
HUD involvement (see Section II.C of
this NOFA).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Local TA Area
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
II. Award Information
A. Available Funds. Approximately
$25.4 million is available for the CD–TA
program. Additional funds may become
available as a result of recapturing
unused funds. This chart shows how the
funds are divided among National TA
and Local TA activities:
Program
HOME .......
CHDO
(HOME)
Homeless ..
HOPWA ....
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
National TA
Local TA
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
2,000,000
3,500,000
900,000
6,000,000
3,000,000
0
The Local TA funds are divided
among HUD’s field office jurisdictions
for the HOME, CHDO (HOME), and
Homeless programs. No Local TA funds
are available for HOPWA. In the case of
the national CHDO (HOME) program, if
less than the total amount of available
funds is awarded, the balance may be
used to make awards under the national
HOME TA program, subject to
congressional reprogramming approval,
if applicable. The chart below shows the
amounts available in dollars for Local
TA by CD–TA program:
HOME
Alabama .......................................................................................................................................
Alaska ..........................................................................................................................................
Arkansas ......................................................................................................................................
California—Northern and Arizona, Nevada .................................................................................
California—Southern ....................................................................................................................
Caribbean ....................................................................................................................................
Colorado and Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming .....................................
Connecticut ..................................................................................................................................
District of Columbia area .............................................................................................................
Florida—Southern ........................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
previously HUD-approved trainings.
Local TA will be administered by a GTR
and GTM in the respective HUD field
office.
C. Authority. HOME TA is authorized
by the HOME Investment Partnerships
Act (42 U.S.C. 12781–12783); 24 CFR
part 92. CHDO (HOME) TA is
authorized by the HOME Investment
Partnerships Act (42 U.S.C. 12773); 24
CFR part 92. For the McKinney-Vento
Act Homeless Assistance Programs TA,
the Supportive Housing Program is
authorized under 42 U.S.C. 11381 et
seq.; 24 CFR 583.140; Emergency
Shelter Grants, Section 8 Moderate
Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy
Program, and Shelter Plus Care TA are
authorized by the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007).
HOPWA TA is also authorized under
the continuing resolution.
$75,000
45,000
50,000
400,000
425,000
125,000
175,000
70,000
70,000
75,000
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
CHDO
(HOME)
$50,000
50,000
75,000
425,000
450,000
100,000
195,000
80,000
80,000
60,000
Homeless
$55,000
30,000
55,000
300,000
275,000
40,000
60,000
40,000
50,000
25,000
11442
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Local TA Area
HOME
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Florida—Northern ........................................................................................................................
Georgia ........................................................................................................................................
Hawaii ..........................................................................................................................................
Illinois ...........................................................................................................................................
Indiana .........................................................................................................................................
Kansas and Missouri—Western ..................................................................................................
Missouri—Eastern ........................................................................................................................
Kentucky ......................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ......................................................................................................................................
Maryland, except District of Columbia area ................................................................................
Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont ..............................................
Michigan .......................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ....................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ....................................................................................................................................
Nebraska and Iowa ......................................................................................................................
New Jersey ..................................................................................................................................
New Mexico .................................................................................................................................
New York—Downstate .................................................................................................................
New York—Upstate .....................................................................................................................
North Carolina ..............................................................................................................................
Ohio .............................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .....................................................................................................................................
Oregon and Idaho ........................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania—Eastern and Delaware ........................................................................................
Pennsylvania—Western and West Virginia .................................................................................
South Carolina .............................................................................................................................
Tennessee ...................................................................................................................................
Texas—Northern ..........................................................................................................................
Texas—Southern .........................................................................................................................
Virginia, except District of Columbia area ...................................................................................
Washington ..................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .....................................................................................................................................
Houston ........................................................................................................................................
B. Performance Period. Awards will
be for a period of up to 36 months.
HUD, however, reserves the right to
withdraw funds from a specific TA
provider if HUD determines that the
urgency of need for the assistance is
greater in other field office jurisdictions
or the need for assistance is not
commensurate with the award.
C. Terms of Award. HUD will enter
into a cooperative agreement with
selected applicants for the performance
period. Because CD–TA awards are
made as cooperative agreements,
implementation entails significant HUD
involvement. Significant HUD
involvement is required in all aspects of
TA planning, delivery, and follow-up.
In addition to the requirements listed
in the General Section, selected
applicants are subject to the following
requirements:
1. Demand-Response System. All CD–
TA awardees must operate within the
structure of the demand-response
system. Under the demand-response
system, TA providers are required to:
a. When requested by a GTR, market
the availability of their services to
existing and potential recipients within
the jurisdictions in which the assistance
will be delivered;
b. Respond to requests for assistance
from the GTR;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
c. When requested by a GTR, conduct
a needs assessment to identify the type
and nature of the assistance needed by
the recipient of the assistance;
d. Obtain the local HUD field office’s
approval before responding to direct
requests for technical assistance from
HOME Participating Jurisdictions (PJs),
Community Housing Development
Organizations (CHDOs), and McKinneyVento Act Homeless Assistance and
HOPWA grantees; and
e. For CHDO (HOME) TA providers,
secure a letter from a PJ stating that a
CHDO, or prospective CHDO to be
assisted by the provider, is a recipient
or intended recipient of HOME funds
and indicating, at its option, subject
areas of assistance that are most
important to the PJ.
2. Training. When conducting training
sessions as part of its CD–TA activities,
CD–TA providers are required to:
a. Design the course materials as
‘‘step-in’’ packages so that HUD or other
CD–TA providers may independently
conduct the course on their own;
b. Make the course materials available
to the GTR in sufficient time for review
(minimum of three weeks) and receive
concurrence from the GTR on the
content and quality prior to delivery;
c. Provide all course materials in an
electronic format that will permit wide
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
125,000
125,000
65,000
180,000
130,000
100,000
40,000
250,000
100,000
60,000
310,000
175,000
100,000
150,000
90,000
150,000
200,000
200,000
125,000
300,000
150,000
55,000
85,000
225,000
150,000
65,000
150,000
150,000
85,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
CHDO
(HOME)
76,000
100,000
65,000
175,000
75,000
75,000
55,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
300,000
225,000
140,000
250,000
55,000
75,000
275,000
425,000
75,000
300,000
190,000
40,000
75,000
125,000
100,000
34,000
175,000
175,000
40,000
100,000
65,000
150,000
125,000
Homeless
85,000
55,000
45,000
160,000
25,000
50,000
40,000
55,000
54,000
30,000
200,000
150,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
40,000
60,000
210,000
40,000
55,000
70,000
15,000
30,000
50,000
49,000
40,000
40,000
85,000
0
40,000
40,000
70,000
37,000
distribution among TA providers, field
offices, and HUD grantees;
d. Arrange for joint delivery of the
training with HUD participation when
requested by the GTR;
e. Deliver HUD-approved training
courses that have been designed and
developed by others on a ‘‘step-in’’ basis
when requested; and
f. Send trainers to approved ‘‘trainthe-trainers’’ sessions. The costs
associated with attending these required
sessions are eligible under the
cooperative agreement.
3. Field Office Involvement under
National TA awards. When National TA
providers are undertaking activities in
field office jurisdictions, the National
TA providers must work cooperatively
with HUD field offices. Providers must
notify the applicable HUD field office of
the planned activities; consider the
views or recommendations of that
office, if any; follow those
recommendations, to the degree
practicable; and report to the applicable
field office on the accomplishments of
the assistance.
D. Certification of HOME and CHDO
TA Providers Required–Beginning
FY2008.
Many technical assistance providers
have taken the HOME Certified
Specialist—Regulations training and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
have passed the certification exam.
Please note that beginning with the
FY2008 NOFA, HUD intends to award
higher points, under Rating Factor 1, to
applicants delivering HOME or CHDO
technical assistance that have staff who
have taken and passed the HOME
Certified Specialist—Regulations
training and exam.
At least ten HOME Certified
Specialist—Regulations training
deliveries are scheduled for 2007 and a
number of slots are set aside for TA
providers at each of these deliveries.
Registration information for these
deliveries can be found on the web at:
https://www.icfhosting.com/hcd/cpd/
hcdcpd.nsf/webpages/Welcome.html.
11443
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. The eligible
applicants for each of the four CD–TA
programs are listed in the chart below.
In accordance with the President’s faithbased initiative, HUD welcomes the
participation of eligible faith-based and
other community organizations in the
CD–TA programs.
Program
Eligible applicants
HOME ...................
A for-profit or nonprofit professional and technical services company or firm that has demonstrated knowledge of the
HOME program and the capacity to provide technical assistance services;
A HOME Participating Jurisdiction (PJ);
A public purpose organization, established pursuant to state or local legislation, responsible to the chief elected officer of a
PJ;
An agency or authority established by two or more PJs to carry out activities consistent with the purposes of the HOME
program; or
A national or regional nonprofit organization that has membership comprised predominantly of entities or officials of entities
of PJs or PJs’ agencies or established organizations.
A public or private nonprofit intermediary organization that customarily provides services, in more than one community, related to the provision of decent housing that is affordable to low-income and moderate-income persons or related to the
revitalization of deteriorating neighborhoods; has demonstrated experience in providing a range of assistance (such as financing, technical assistance, construction and property management assistance) to CHDOs or similar organizations
that engage in community revitalization; and has demonstrated the ability to provide technical assistance and training for
community-based developers of affordable housing.
Note: Any organization funded to assist CHDOs under CD–TA may not undertake CHDO set-aside activities itself within its
service area while under cooperative agreement with HUD.
A state;
A unit of general local government;
A public housing authority; or
A public or private nonprofit or for profit organization, including educational institutions and area-wide planning organizations.
A for-profit or nonprofit organization;
A state; or
A unit of general local government.
CHDO (HOME)
Homeless ..............
HOPWA .................
Applicants must also meet the
threshold requirements of the General
Section, including the Civil Rights
threshold in Section III (C).
A consortium of organizations may
apply for one or more CD–TA programs,
but one organization must be designated
as the applicant.
Applicants may propose assistance
using in house staff, sub contractors, sub
recipients, and local organizations with
the requisite experience and
capabilities. Where appropriate,
applicants should make use of TA
providers located in the field office
jurisdiction receiving services.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. None.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities and Priorities.
Funds may be used to provide TA to
grantees, prospective applicants, and
project sponsors of the HOME, CHDO
(HOME), Homeless, and HOPWA
programs. For each of the TA programs,
activities may include but are not
limited to written information such as
papers, manuals, guides, and brochures;
assistance to individual communities;
needs assessments; and training. TA
should include information needed by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the grantee to meet all Fair Housing and
section 504 requirements. The priority
TA areas for each of the four program
areas are:
a. HOME TA. HUD has identified four
HOME program technical assistance
priorities. These priorities that result in
measurable performance outputs and
outcomes are:
(1) Improve the ability of PJs to design
and implement housing programs that
reflect sound underwriting,
management, and fiscal controls;
demonstrate measurable outcomes in
the use of public funds; and provide
accurate and timely reporting of HOME
program accomplishments.
(2) Encourage public-private
partnerships that yield an increase in
the amount of private dollars leveraged
for HOME-assisted projects and result in
an increase in the commitment and
production of HOME-assisted units.
(3) Assist PJs in developing strategies
that ameliorate the affordability gap
between rapidly increasing housing
costs and the less rapid growth in
incomes among low-income
households, especially among
underserved populations (e.g., residents
of the Colonias, homeless persons,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
persons with disabilities, and residents
of an empowerment zone (EZ)
designated by HUD or the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA), an
urban or rural renewal community
designated by HUD (RC), or an
enterprise community designated in
round II by USDA (EC–II).
(4) Assist PJs in developing strategies
that increase and help sustain
homeownership opportunities for lowincome households—particularly lowincome, minority households—and
directly result in the commitment and
completion of HOME-assisted units.
Some examples of measurable
performance outputs and outcomes are
given in Rating Factor 5.
b. CHDO (HOME) TA.
(1) HUD has identified three CHDOspecific technical assistance priorities.
These priorities that result in
measurable performance outputs and
outcomes are:
(a) Assist new CHDOs and potential
CHDOs in developing the organizational
capacity to own, develop, and sponsor
HOME-assisted projects. A new CHDO
is defined as a nonprofit organization
that within three years of the
publication of this NOFA was
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11444
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
determined by a PJ to qualify as a
CHDO. A potential CHDO is defined as
a nonprofit organization that is expected
by the PJ to qualify as a CHDO and is
expected to enter into a written
agreement with that PJ to own, develop,
or sponsor HOME-assisted housing
within 24 months of the PJ determining
the organization qualifies as a CHDO.
(b) Improve the HOME program
production and performance of existing
CHDOs in the areas of:
(i) Program design and management,
including underwriting, project
financing, property management, and
compliance; and
(ii) Organizational management and
capacity, including fiscal controls,
board development, contract
administration, and compliance
systems.
(c) Provide organizational support,
technical assistance, and training to
community groups for the establishment
of community land trusts, as defined in
section 233(f) of the Cranston-Gonzales
National Affordable Housing Act.
(2) Additional CHDO (HOME) eligible
activities are:
(a) Under the ‘‘Pass-Through’’
provision, CD–TA providers may
propose to fund various operating
expenses for eligible CHDOs that own,
develop, or sponsor HOME-assisted
housing. Such operating expenses may
include reasonable and necessary costs
for the operation of the CHDO including
salaries, wages, and other employee
compensation and benefits; employee
education, training and travel; rent;
utilities; communication costs; taxes;
insurance; equipment, materials, and
supplies.
(b) CD–TA providers must establish
written criteria for selection of CHDOs
receiving pass-through funds. PJs must
designate the organizations as CHDOs;
and, generally, the organizations should
not have been in existence more than
three years.
CD–TA providers must enter into an
agreement with the CHDO that the
agreement and pass-through funding
may be terminated at the discretion of
HUD if no written legally binding
agreement to provide assistance for a
specific housing project (for acquisition,
rehabilitation, new construction, or
tenant-based rental assistance) has been
made by the PJ with the CHDO within
24 months of initially receiving passthrough funding. The pass-through
amount, when combined with other
capacity building and operating support
available through the HOME program,
cannot exceed the greater of 50 percent
of the CHDO’s operating budget for the
year in which it receives funds, or
$50,000 annually.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
c. Homeless TA. Homeless TA funds
are available to provide McKinneyVento Homeless Assistance Act, HUDfunded grantees, project sponsors, and
potential recipients with skills and
knowledge needed to develop and
operate projects and activities. The
assistance may include, but is not
limited to, developing and
disseminating written information such
as papers, monographs, manuals,
curriculums, guides, and brochures; and
person-to-person exchanges,
conferences, training and use of
technology. TA activities are focused on
these priorities that result in measurable
performance outputs and outcomes:
(1) Assist CoCs with Homeless
Management Information System
(HMIS) implementation. National
technical assistance will relate to data
collection, data quality, data analysis,
provider participation, reporting,
performance measurement, data
warehousing, and HMIS Data and
Technical Standards.
(2) Maintain and enhance the HMIS
Web site portal as the vehicle for
collection and dissemination of HMIS
information.
(3) Support collaboration between
metropolitan, regional and statewide
HMISs. Assistance may include
providing state and/or regional HMIS
technical assistance coordinators and/or
technology to promote effectuating longdistance meeting, conferencing and
networking.
(4) Support collaboration between
metropolitan, regional, and statewide
HMISs for use in disaster preparedness
and recovery efforts, utilizing the
experience of communities that
experienced Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita.
(5) Improve participation in the
Annual Homeless Assessment Report
(AHAR) by CoCs and providers in their
geographic areas through outreach and
capacity building. Develop materials
and training for: Reporting bed
coverage; extrapolation and data
analysis methodologies and documents;
data integration; data quality
assessments; utilization of AHAR data at
the program and/or CoC level; and the
collection and analysis of CoC data for
Congressionally-directed HMIS-related
reports to Congress.
d. HOPWA TA. HOPWA funds are
available for technical assistance,
training, and oversight activities which
can be used to provide grantees, project
sponsors, and potential recipients with
the skills and knowledge to effectively
develop, operate, and support HOPWAeligible project activities that result in
measurable performance outputs and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
outcomes. TA activities are focused on
these priorities:
(1) Improve the capacity of HOPWA
grantees and project sponsors to execute
long-term comprehensive housing
strategies by developing housing plans
that integrate permanent housing and
supportive services, thereby promoting
HOPWA’s national performance goals of
increasing housing stability, reducing
risks of homelessness, and improving
access to care for HOPWA beneficiaries.
(2) Develop national models that
effectively integrate AIDS housing
strategies into consolidated planning
and Continuum of Care planning
processes.
(3) Develop curriculums and related
training tools to assist grantees and
project sponsors in coordinating
HOPWA permanent housing assistance
with mainstream medical and
supportive service resources, including
Ryan White CARE Act, state, local, and
private resources.
(4) Conduct training activities to
improve the capacity of grantees and
project sponsors to increase the
availability of affordable housing
opportunities for eligible persons in
high incidence HIV/AIDS communities
with substantial unmet housing needs
(e.g., emerging populations, in major
disaster areas and underserved rural
areas.)
(5) Develop training materials to
promote use of Homeless Management
Information Systems in the provision of
HOPWA-assisted housing and
coordination of supportive services for
eligible homeless persons.
(6) Develop technical assistance plans
in collaboration with HUD field office
oversight for local HOPWA-assisted
housing programs. It is estimated that
up to 40 percent of HOPWA TA funds
will be made available for this purpose.
2. DUNS Requirement. Refer to the
General Section for information
regarding the DUNS requirement.
Applicants must obtain a DUNS number
to receive an award from HUD.
3. Other Eligibility Requirements. All
applicants requesting funding from
programs under this NOFA must be in
compliance with the applicable
threshold requirements found in the
General Section. Applicants that do not
meet these requirements will be
ineligible for funding.
4. False Statements. An applicant’s
false statement in an application is
grounds for denial or termination of an
award and grounds for possible
punishment as provided in 18 U.S.C.
1001.
5. Environmental review. Most
activities under the CD–TA program are
categorically excluded and not subject
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
to environmental review under 24 CFR
50.19(b)(9) or (13), but in the case of
CHDO (HOME) TA eligible activities, a
proposal for payment of rent as part of
CHDO operational costs will be subject
to environmental review by HUD under
24 CFR part 50. If an applicant proposes
to assist CHDO operating expenses that
include rent, the application constitutes
an assurance that the applicant and
CHDO will assist HUD to comply with
24 CFR part 50; will supply HUD with
all available and relevant information to
perform an environmental review for
the proposed property to be rented; will
carry out mitigating measures required
by HUD or select an alternate property;
and will not lease or rent, construct,
rehabilitate, convert or repair the
property, or commit or expend HUD or
non-HUD funds for these activities on
the property to be rented, until HUD has
completed an environmental review to
the extent required by 24 CFR part 50.
The results of the environmental review
may require that the proposed property
be rejected.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Addresses to Request Application
Package. Applications must be received
and validated by Grants.gov no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. Eastern time on the
application deadline date. HUD must
receive paper copy applications from
applicants that received a waiver no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. on the
application deadline date. See the
General Section for application
submission and timely receipt
procedures and for instructions on how
to request a waiver. Paper applications
will not be accepted unless the
applicant has received a waiver of the
electronic submission requirement.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission. Applicants must submit a
separate application for each National
TA and Local TA area program for
which they are applying. For example,
an applicant for National TA for HOME
and for Local TA in three field office
jurisdictions would submit four separate
and distinct applications.
A completed application consists of
an application submitted by an
authorized official of the organization
and contains all relevant sections of the
application, as shown in the checklist
below in Section IV.B.4.
1. Number of Copies. This
information will be included in
approval letters to applicants submitting
a waiver request.
2. Page Limitation. Narratives
addressing Factors 1–5 are limited to no
more than 25 typed pages. That is,
reviewers will not review more than 25
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
pages for all five factors combined,
except that the page limit does not
include the Form HUD–96010, Logic
Model.
3. Prohibition on Materials Not
Required. Materials other than what is
requested in this NOFA are prohibited.
´
´
Reviewers will not consider resumes,
charts, letters, or any other documents
attached to the application.
4. Checklist for Application
Submission. Applicants submitting
electronic copies should follow the
procedures in Sections IV.B. and F. of
the General Section. The following
checklist is provided as a guide to help
ensure that you submit all the required
elements. For applicants receiving a
waiver of the electronic submission, the
paper submission must be in the order
provided below. All applicants should
enter the applicant name, DUNS
number, and page numbers on the
narrative pages of the application. All
forms are available when you download
the application and instructions from
https://apply.grants.gov/
forms_apps_idx.html.
—SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance (see General Section)
—An Application Cover Page indicating
in bold (a) the type of TA proposed
in the application whether HOME
National, CHDO National, CHDO
Local, Homeless National, Homeless
Local, or HOPWA National (b) the
amount of funds requested; and (c) for
Local TA, the jurisdiction proposed in
the application.
—A one-page Summary describing (a)
each major component of the
proposed TA approach; (b) the
proposed cost of each major
component; and (c) whether the
component is integrally related to
another component in order to be
successful.
—Narrative addressing Factors 1–5
—HUD–96010, Logic Model
—HUD–424–CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget Form (see General
Section)
—HUD–424–CBW, Detailed Budget
Worksheet for Non-Construction
Projects (see General Section)
—If applying for CHDO (HOME) TA,
statement as to whether the
organization proposes to pass through
funds to new CHDOs.
—If applying for the CHDO (HOME) TA,
a certification as to whether the
organization qualifies as a primarily
single-state provider under section
233(e) of the Cranston-Gonzales
Affordable Housing Act.
—SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities (see General Section)
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11445
—HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (see
General Section)
—SF–424, Supplement, Survey on
Equal Opportunity for Applicants
—HUD–96011, Facsimile Transmittal
(required for electronic submissions
of third party documents)
C. Submission Dates and Times. Your
completed application must be received
and validated electronically by
Grants.gov no later than 11:59:59 p.m.
eastern time on the deadline date.
D. Intergovernmental Review.
Intergovernmental review is not
applicable to CD–TA applications.
E. Funding Restrictions. An
organization may not provide assistance
to itself. An organization may not
provide assistance to another
organization with which it contracts or
sub-awards funds to carry out activities
under the TA award.
Funding from HOME and from CHDO
(HOME) TA to any single eligible
organization (excluding funds for
organizational support and housing
education ‘‘passed through’’ to CHDOs),
whether as an applicant or sub-recipient
is limited to not more than 20 percent
of the operating budget of the recipient
organization for any one-year period of
each cooperative agreement. In addition,
funding under either HOME or CHDO
(HOME) TA to any single organization
is limited to 20 percent of the
$18,000,000 made available for HOME
and CHDO (HOME) TA in FY2007.
Not less than 40 percent of the
approximately $8,000,000 for CHDO
(HOME) shall be made available for
eligible TA providers that have worked
primarily in one state. HUD will
consider an applicant as a primarily
single state TA provider if it can
document that more than 50 percent of
its past activities in working with
CHDOs or similar nonprofit and other
organizations (on the production of
affordable housing, revitalization of
deteriorating neighborhoods, and/or the
delivery of technical assistance to these
groups) was confined to the geographic
limits of a single state.
No fee or profit may be paid to any
recipient or sub-recipient of an award
under this CD–TA NOFA.
F. Other Submission Requirements.
The General Section describes
application submission procedures and
how applicants may obtain proof of
timely submission.
Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirements. Applicants interested in
applying for funding under this NOFA
must submit their applications
electronically or request a waiver from
the Community Development Technical
Assistance program. Applicants should
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11446
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
submit their waiver requests in writing
by e-mail. Waiver requests must be
submitted no later than 15 days prior to
the application deadline date and
should be submitted to
Mark_A._Horwath@hud.gov.
Instructions regarding the number of
copies to submit and the address where
they must be submitted will be
contained in any approval of the waiver
request. Paper submissions must be
received at the appropriate HUD
office(s) no later than the deadline date.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria. The maximum number of
points to be awarded for a CD–TA
application is 100. The minimum score
for an application to be considered for
funding is 75 with a minimum of 20
points on Factor 1. The CD–TA program
is not subject to bonus points, as
described in the General Section.
Points are assigned on five factors.
When addressing Factors 2–5,
applicants should discuss the specific
TA activities that will be carried out
during the term of the cooperative
agreement. Applicants should provide
relevant examples to support the
proposal, where appropriate. Applicants
should also be specific when describing
the communities, populations, and
organizations that they propose to serve
and the specific outcomes expected as a
result of the TA.
Factor 1 relates to the capacity of the
applicant and its relevant organizational
experience. Rating of the ‘‘applicant’’ or
the ‘‘applicant’s organization and staff’’
includes in-house staff and any subcontractors and sub-recipients which
are firmly committed to the project. In
responding to Factor 1, applicants
should specify the experience,
knowledge, skills, and abilities of the
applicant’s organization and staff, and
any persons and organizations firmly
committed to the project.
Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (30 points) (Minimum for
Funding Eligibility—20 points)
a. (10 points) Recent and successful
experience of the applicant’s
organization in providing TA in eligible
activities and to eligible entities for the
HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless, or
HOPWA. CD–TA programs, as
applicable.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider the extent to which the
application demonstrates successful
experience within the last four years of
providing TA related to the applicable
CD–TA program.
b. (10 points) Depth of experience in
managing multiple TA tasks, to multiple
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
entities, and in more than one
geographic area.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider the extent to which the
application demonstrates ability to
manage TA assignments effectively.
c. (10 points) Knowledgeable key
personnel skilled in providing TA in
one or more of the eligible activities for
HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless, and/
or HOPWA programs, as applicable; a
sufficient number of staff or ability to
procure qualified experts or
professionals with the knowledge,
skills, and abilities to deliver the
proposed level of TA in the proposed
service area in a timely and effective
fashion; and an ability to provide CD–
TA in a geographic area larger than a
single city or county.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider the extent to which the
application demonstrates the
organization has an adequate number of
key staff or ability to procure
individuals with the knowledge of
effective TA approaches and knowledge
of HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless, or
HOPWA, as applicable.
Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (10 points)
a. For National TA applications:
Sound and extensive understanding of
need for TA in relation to the priorities
listed in Section III C of this NOFA as
demonstrated by objective information
and/or data, such as information from
HOME Snapshots, current census data,
the American Housing Survey, or other
relevant data sources.
b. For Local TA applications: Sound
and extensive understanding of high
priority needs for TA in the jurisdiction
as demonstrated by objective
information and/or data, such as
information from HOME Snapshots,
current census data, the American
Housing Survey, or other relevant data
sources.
In rating this factor, HUD will
evaluate the extent to which the
application demonstrates an
understanding of the specific needs for
TA and supports the description of need
with reliable, program-specific,
quantitative information. Applicants for
HOME should, at a minimum, draw on
HOME Snapshot information to
demonstrate PJs’ needs, in an area or
nationwide, for additional training and
capacity building. See https://
www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/
affordablehousing/programs/home/
snapshot/index.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Rating Factor 3: Soundness of Approach
(40 points)
a. (25 points) (1) For National TA
applications: A sound approach for
addressing the need for eligible TA
activities in relation to the priorities
listed in Section III C of this NOFA that
will result in positive outcomes.
(2) For Local TA applications: A
sound approach for addressing high
priority needs for TA in the jurisdiction
that will result in positive outcomes.
In rating this factor, HUD will
evaluate the extent to which the
application presents and supports a
detailed, feasible, practical approach for
addressing TA needs (Local TA
applications) or CD–TA program
priorities (National TA applications),
including techniques, timeframes, goals,
and intended beneficiaries, and the
likelihood that these activities will be
cost-effective and will result in positive
outcomes.
b. (10 points) A feasible work plan for
designing, organizing, managing, and
carrying out the proposed TA activities
under the demand-response system.
In rating this factor, HUD will
evaluate the applicant’s understanding
of the demand-response system and the
extent to which the application
demonstrates the efficiency of the
design, organization, and management
of the proposed activities.
c. (5 points) An effective assistance
program to specific disadvantaged
communities, populations, and/or
organizations which previously have
been underserved and have the
potential to participate in the CD–TA
program (such as the Colonias, an
empowerment zone (EZ) designated by
HUD or the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), an urban or rural
renewal community designated by HUD
(RC), an enterprise community
designated in round II by USDA (EC–II),
or homeless persons and persons with
disabilities).
In rating this factor, HUD will
evaluate the extent to which the
applicant has identified and has
documented, using reliable data,
specific communities, populations, or
organizations that have been
disadvantaged or previously
underserved communities, populations,
or organizations and has developed an
effective strategy for engaging their
participation in the HOME, CHDO
(HOME), Homeless, or HOPWA
program, as applicable.
Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(10 points)
An efficient practical method to
transfer manuals, guides, assessment
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
forms, other work products, models, and
lessons learned in its CD–TA activities
to other CD–TA grantees and/or HOME,
CHDO (HOME), Homeless, or HOPWA
program beneficiaries.
In rating this factor, HUD will
evaluate the extent to which the
application demonstrates a costeffective means of sharing resources
developed under the CD–TA activities
with a wide audience, including sharing
information with other TA providers in
the CD–TA program.
Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (10 points)
a. (5 points) An effective, quantifiable
evaluation plan for measuring
performance using the Logic Model with
specific outcome measures and
benchmarks, including—for HOME
applicants—performance improvements
as measured by the HOME Snapshot
indicators.
In rating this factor, HUD will
evaluate the extent to which the
application has an evaluation plan that
includes outcomes and is specific,
measurable, and appropriate in relation
to the activities proposed.
b. (5 points) Successful past
performance in administering HUD CD–
TA programs or, for applicants new to
HUD’s CD–TA Programs, successful past
performance in providing TA in other
community development programs.
Applicants should include, as
applicable, increases in CPD or
community development program
accomplishments as a result of TA (e.g.,
number of homeless people or persons
with HIV/AIDS receiving housing and
services, efficiency or effectiveness of
administration of CPD or community
development programs, number of
affordable housing units, HOME
Snapshot indicators, timeliness of use of
CPD or community development
program funds).
In rating this factor, HUD will
evaluate the extent to which the
application demonstrates successful
past performance that was timely and
resulted in positive outcomes in the
delivery of community development
TA. HUD will also consider past
performance of current CD–TA
providers, including financial and other
information in HUD’s files.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Review Types. Two types of
reviews will be conducted. First, HUD
will review each application to
determine whether it meets threshold
eligibility requirements.
Second, HUD will review and assign
scores to applications using the Factors
for Award noted in Section V.A.
2. Ranked Order.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
a. Once rating scores are assigned,
rated applications submitted for each
National TA program and for each Local
TA program will be listed in ranked
order. Applications within the fundable
range (score of 75+ points with 20+
points for Factor 1) may then be funded
in ranked order under the CD–TA
program and service area for which they
applied.
b. For purposes of coordinating
activities on a national basis, HUD
reserves the right to select a single
national provider to carry out activities,
as follows:
(1) one for HOPWA technical
assistance activities, including national
products and local support;
(2) one for HMIS technical assistance
activities;
(3) one for HOME and one for CHDO
technical assistance activities.
3. Threshold Eligibility Requirements.
All applicants requesting CD–TA must
be in compliance with the applicable
threshold requirements found in the
General Section and the eligibility
requirements listed in Section III of this
NOFA in order to be reviewed, scored,
and ranked. Applications that do not
meet these requirements and
applications that were received after the
deadline (see Section IV.C of the
General Section) will be considered
ineligible for funding.
4. Award Adjustment. In addition to
the funding adjustment authority
provided for in the General Section,
HUD reserves the right to adjust funding
amounts for each CD–TA selectee. The
amounts listed in the charts in Section
II.A are provided to assist applicants to
develop Local TA or National TA
budgets and do not represent the exact
amounts to be awarded. Once TA
applicants are selected for award, HUD
will determine the total amount to be
awarded to any selected applicant based
upon the size and needs of each of the
selected applicant’s service areas, the
funds available for that area and CD–TA
program, the number of other CD–TA
applicants selected in that area or CD–
TA program, and the scope of the TA to
be provided.
Additionally, HUD may reduce the
amount of funds allocated for field
office jurisdictions to fund National CD–
TA providers and other CD–TA
providers for activities that cannot be
fully budgeted for or estimated by HUD
Headquarters or field offices at the time
this NOFA was published. HUD may
also require selected applicants, as a
condition of funding, to provide
coverage on a geographically broader
basis than proposed in order to
supplement or strengthen the CD–TA
network in terms of the size of the area
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11447
covered and types and scope of TA
proposed.
If funds remain after all selections
have been made, the remaining funds
may be distributed among field offices
for Local TA and/or used for National
TA, or made available for other CD–TA
program competitions.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices. HUD will send
written notifications to both successful
and unsuccessful applicants. A
notification sent to a successful
applicant is not an authorization to
begin performance.
After selection, HUD requires that all
selected applicants participate in
negotiations to determine the specific
terms of the cooperative agreement,
including the budget. Costs may be
denied or modified if HUD determines
that they are not allowable, allocable,
and/or reasonable. In cases where HUD
cannot successfully conclude
negotiations with a selected applicant or
a selected applicant fails to provide
HUD with requested information, an
award will not be made to that
applicant. In this instance, HUD may
offer an award, and proceed with
negotiations with the next highestranking applicant.
After selection for funding but prior to
executing the cooperative agreement,
the selected applicant must develop in
consultation with the GTR, a Technical
Assistance Delivery Plan (TADP) for
each National TA award. The TADP
must be approved by the GTR and
delineate the tasks for each CD–TA
program the applicant will undertake
during the performance period. For
Local TA awards and generally for
National TA awards, prior to
undertaking individual tasks, the
selected applicant must develop in
consultation with the GTR a Work Plan
for specific activities. The TADP and the
Work Plans must specify the location of
the proposed CD–TA activities, the
amount of CD–TA funding and
proposed activities by location, the
improved program performance or other
results expected from the CD–TA
activities, and the methodology to be
used for measuring the success of the
CD–TA. A detailed time schedule for
delivery of the activities, budget
summary, budget-by-task, and staffing
plan must be included in the TADP and
Work Plans.
After selection, but prior to award,
applicants selected for funding will be
required to provide HUD with their
written Code of Conduct if they have
not previously done so and it is
recorded on the HUD Web site at https://
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11448
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
codeofconduct/sconduct.cfm.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements. After selection for
funding but prior to award, applicants
must submit financial and
administrative information to comply
with applicable requirements. These
requirements are found in 24 CFR part
84 for all organizations except states and
local governments whose requirements
are found in 24 CFR Part 85. Cost
principles requirements are found at
OMB Circular A–122 for nonprofit
organizations, OMB Circular A–21 for
institutions of higher education, OMB
Circular A–87 for states and local
governments, and at 48 CFR 31.2 for
commercial organizations. Applicants
must submit a certification from an
Independent Public Accountant or the
cognizant government auditor, stating
that the applicant’s financial
management system meets prescribed
standards for fund control and
accountability.
See the General Section for
requirements for Procurement of
Recovered Materials.
The requirements to Affirmatively
Further Fair Housing do not apply.
C. Reporting. CD-TA awardees will be
required to report to the GTR on, at a
minimum, a quarterly basis unless
otherwise specified in the cooperative
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
agreement. As part of the required
report to HUD, grant recipients must
include a completed Logic Model (HUD
96010), which identifies output and
outcome achievements. For FY 2007,
HUD is considering a new concept for
the Logic Model. The new concept is a
Return on Investment (ROI) statement.
HUD will be publishing a separate
notice on the ROI concept.
VII. Agency Contacts
A. For Assistance. Applicants may
contact HUD Headquarters at 202–708–
3176, or they may contact the HUD field
office serving their area shown in
Section VII.B. Persons with hearing and
speech challenges may access the above
numbers via TTY (text telephone) by
calling the Federal Relay Service at 800–
877–8339 (this is a toll-free number).
Information may also be obtained
through the HUD Web site on the
Internet at www.hud.gov.
B. List of Field Office Addresses.
Applicants that receive a waiver of the
electronic application submission
requirements and need to submit copies
of their application to HUD field offices
should consult the following Web site
for a listing of the HUD field office
addresses to send Local TA
applications: https://www.hud.gov/
offices/cpd/about/staff/fodirectors/
index.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
At the site, the map allows the user
to click on an area to obtain the field
office address and other contact
information.
VIII. Other Information
A. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
numbers 2506–0166 and 2506–0133. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 60 hours for the application and
grant administration. This includes the
time for collecting, reviewing, and
reporting the data. The information will
be used for grantee selection and
monitoring the administration of funds.
Response to this request for information
is required in order to receive the
benefits to be derived.
B. HUD Reform Act. The provisions of
the HUD Reform Act of 1989 that apply
to the CD-TA program are explained in
the General Section.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11449
EN13MR07.005
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11450
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Community Development Block Grant
Program for Indian Tribes and Alaska
Native Villages
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Public and Indian Housing, Office of
Native American Programs (ONAP).
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Community Development Block Grant
(ICDBG) Program for Indian Tribes and
Alaska Native Villages.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: The
Federal Register number is FR 5100-N–
22. The OMB Approval Number is
2577–0191.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): The
Catalog of Federal Assistance (CFDA)
Number for the ICDBG program is
14.862.
F. Dates: Application Deadline:
Applications must be received and
validated no later than the deadline date
of June 1, 2007. Please see Section IV of
this NOFA for application submission
and timely receipt requirements.
G. Additional Information:
1. Applicants for funding should
carefully review the requirements
identified in this NOFA and the General
Section. Unless otherwise stated in this
NOFA, the requirements of the General
Section apply.
2. The total approximate amount of
funding available for the ICDBG
program for fiscal year 2007 is $59.4
million less $3.96 million retained to
fund Imminent Threat Grants, for a total
of $55.4 million. Funds that are carried
over from previous fiscal years or are
recaptured may also be used for grant
awards under this NOFA.
3. Eligible applicants are Indian tribes
or tribal organizations on behalf of
Indian tribes. Specific information on
eligibility is located in Section III.A. of
this NOFA.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. General. Title I of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974,
which authorizes Community
Development Block Grants, requires that
grants for Indian tribes be awarded on
a competitive basis. All grant funds
awarded in accordance with this NOFA
are subject to the requirements of 24
CFR part 1003. Applicants within an
Area ONAP’s geographic jurisdiction
compete only against each other for that
Area ONAP’s allocation of funds.
B. Authority. The authority for this
program is Title I of the Housing and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Community Development Act of 1974
(42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) and the program
regulations in 24 CFR part 1003.
C. Program Description. The purpose
of the ICDBG program is the
development of viable Indian and
Alaska Native communities, including
the creation of decent housing, suitable
living environments, and economic
opportunities primarily for persons with
low- and moderate-incomes as defined
in 24 CFR 1003.4. The ONAP in HUD’s
Office of Public and Indian Housing
administers the program.
Projects funded by the ICDBG
program must meet the primary
objective, defined at 24 CFR 1003.2, to
principally benefit low- and moderateincome persons. Consistent with this
objective, not less than 70 percent of the
expenditures of each single-purpose
grant shall be for activities that meet the
regulatory criteria at 24 CFR 1003.208
for:
1. Area Benefit Activities
2. Limited Clientele Activities
3. Housing Activities
4. Job Creation or Retention Activities
ICDBG funds may be used to improve
housing stock, provide community
facilities, improve infrastructure, and
expand job opportunities by supporting
the economic development of the
communities, especially by nonprofit
tribal organizations or local
development corporations.
ICDBG single-purpose grants are
distributed as annual competitive
grants, in response to this NOFA.
ICDBG imminent threat grants are
intended to alleviate or remove threats
to health or safety that require an
immediate solution as described at 24
CFR part 1003, subpart E. The problem
to be addressed must be such that an
emergency situation exists or would
exist if the problem were not addressed.
You do not have to submit a request
for imminent threat funds by the
deadline established in this NOFA. The
deadline applies only to applications
submitted for assistance under 24 CFR
part 1003, subpart D, single-purpose
grants. Imminent threat requests may be
submitted at any time after NOFA
publication, and if the following criteria
are met, the request may be funded until
the amount set aside for this purpose is
expended:
1. Independent verification from a
third party (i.e., Indian Health Service,
Bureau of Indian Affairs) of the
existence, immediacy, and urgency of
the threat must be provided;
2. The threat must not be recurring in
nature, i.e., it must represent a unique
and unusual circumstance that has been
clearly identified by the tribe or village;
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3. The threat must affect or impact an
entire service area and not solely an
individual family or household; and
4. It must be established that funds
are not available from other local, state,
or federal sources to address the
problem. The tribe or village must verify
that federal or local agencies that would
normally provide assistance for such
improvements have no funds available
by providing a written statement to that
effect. The tribe or village must also
verify in the form of a tribal council
resolution (or equivalent) that it has no
available funds, including Indian
Housing Block Grant funds, for this
purpose.
If, in response to a request for
assistance, an Area ONAP issues you a
letter to proceed under the authority of
24 CFR 1003.401(a), then your
application must be submitted to and
approved by the Area ONAP before a
grant agreement may be executed.
Contact your Area ONAP office for more
information on imminent threat grants.
D. Definitions Used in this NOFA
1. Adopt. To approve by formal tribal
resolution.
2. Document. To supply supporting
written information and/or data in the
application that satisfies the NOFA
requirement. Documentation should
clearly and concisely support your
response to the rating factor.
3. Entity Other than Tribe. A
distinction is made between the
requirements for point award under
Rating Factor 3 if a tribe or an entity
other than the tribe will assume
maintenance and related responsibilities
for projects other than economic
development, and land acquisition to
support new housing. Entities other
than the tribe must have the following
characteristics:
(a) Must be legally distinct from the
tribal government; (b) their assets and
liabilities cannot be considered to be
assets and liabilities of the tribal
government; (c) claims against such
entities cannot be made against the
tribal government; and (d) must have
governing boards, boards of directors, or
groups or individuals similar in
function and responsibility to such
boards which are separate from the
tribe’s general council, tribal council, or
business council, as applicable.
4. Homeownership Assistance
Programs. Tribes may apply for
assistance to provide direct
homeownership assistance to low- and
moderate-income households to: (a)
Subsidize interest rates and mortgage
principal amounts for low- and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
moderate-income homebuyers; (b)
finance the acquisition by low- and
moderate-income homebuyers of
housing that is occupied by the
homebuyers; (c) acquire guarantees for
mortgage financing obtained by lowand moderate-income homebuyers from
private lenders (except that ICDBG
funds may not be used to guarantee
such mortgage financing directly, and
grantees may not provide such
guarantees directly); (d) provide up to
50 percent of any down payment
required from a low- and moderateincome homebuyer; or (e) pay
reasonable closing costs (normally
associated with the purchase of a home)
incurred by a low- or moderate-income
homebuyer.
5. Leveraged Resources. Leveraged
resources are resources that you will use
in conjunction with ICDBG funds to
achieve the objectives of the project.
Leveraged resources include, but are not
limited to: tribal trust funds, loans from
individuals or organizations, business
investments, private foundations, state
or federal loans or guarantees, other
grants, and non-cash contributions and
donated services. (See Rating Factor 4
for documentation requirements for
leveraged resources.)
6. Microenterprise Programs. Tribes
may apply for assistance to operate
programs to fund the development,
expansion, and stabilization of
microenterprises. Microenterprises are
defined as commercial entities with five
or fewer employees, including the
owner. Microenterprise program
activities may entail the following
assistance to eligible businesses: (a)
Providing credit, including, but not
limited to, grants, loans, loan
guarantees, and other forms of financial
support for the establishment,
stabilization, and expansion of
microenterprises; (b) providing
technical assistance, advice, and
business support services to owners of
microenterprises and persons
developing microenterprises; and (c)
providing general support, including,
but not limited to, peer support
programs, counseling, child care,
transportation, and other similar
services to owners of microenterprises
and persons developing
microenterprises.
7. Operations and Maintenance
(O&M) for Public Facilities and
Improvements. While various items of
cost will vary in importance and
significance depending on the type of
facility proposed, there are items of
expense related to the operation of the
physical plant that must be addressed in
an O&M plan (the tribe assumes
responsibility) or in a letter of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
commitment (an entity other than tribe
will assume these responsibilities).
Although the tribe no longer has to
submit the O&M plan with the
application, it must provide a written
statement that it has adopted an O&M
plan and that the plan addresses several
items. These items include daily or
other periodic maintenance activities,
repairs such as replacing broken
windows, capital improvements or
replacement reserves for repairs such as
replacing the roof, fire and liability
insurance (may not be applicable to
most types of infrastructure projects
such as water and sewer lines), and
security (may not be applicable to many
types of infrastructure projects such as
roads). (Please note that while it is
possible that the service provider may,
in its agreement with a tribe, commit
itself to cover certain or all facility O&M
costs, these costs do not include the
program service provision costs related
to the delivery of services (social,
health, recreational, educational, or
other) that may be provided in a
facility).
8. Outcomes. The ultimate impact you
hope to achieve with the proposed
project. Outcomes should be
quantifiable measures or indicators and
identified in terms of the change in the
community, people’s lives, economic
status, etc. Common outcomes could
include increases in percent of housing
units in standard condition,
homeownership rates, or employment
rates.
9. Outputs. Outputs are the direct
products of a program’s activities. They
are usually measured in terms of the
volume of work accomplished, such as
the number of low-income households
served, number of units constructed or
rehabilitated, linear feet of curbs and
gutters installed, or number of jobs
created or retained. Outputs should be
clear enough to allow HUD to monitor
and assess your proposed project’s
progress if funded.
10. Project Cost. The total cost to
implement the project. Project costs may
be covered by both ICDBG and nonICDBG funds and resources.
11. Standard Housing/Standard
Condition. Housing that meets the
housing quality standards (HQS)
adopted by the applicant. The HQS
adopted by the applicant must be at
least as stringent as the Section 8 HQS
contained in 24 CFR 982.401 (Section 8
Tenant-Based Assistance: Housing
Choice Voucher program) unless the
ONAPs approve less stringent standards
based on a determination that local
conditions make the use of Section 8
HQS unfeasible. Before the application
deadline, you may submit a request for
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11451
the approval of standards less stringent
than Section 8 HQS. If you submit the
request with your application, you
should not assume automatic approval
by ONAP. The adopted standards must
provide for (a) a safe house, in
physically sound condition with all
systems performing their intended
design functions; (b) a livable home
environment and an energy efficient
building and systems that incorporate
energy conservation measures; and (c)
an adequate space and privacy for all
intended household members.
12. Statement. When a ‘‘written
statement’’ is requested for any
threshold, program requirement, or
rating factor, the applicant must address
in writing the specific item cited.
13. Tribe. The word ‘‘tribe’’ means an
Indian tribe, band, group or nation,
including Alaska Indians, Aleuts,
Eskimos, Alaska Native Villages, Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
Village Corporations, and ANCSA
Regional Corporations.
II. Award Information
A. Available Funds. The fiscal year
2007 appropriation for the ICDBG
program is $59.4 million, less $3.96
million retained to fund Imminent
threat grants, for a total of
approximately $55.4. Funds that are
carried over from previous fiscal years
or are recaptured may also be used for
grant awards under this NOFA. In
accordance with the provisions of 24
CFR part 1003, subpart E, HUD has
retained $3.96 million of the FY 2007
appropriation to meet the funding needs
of imminent threat requests submitted
to any of the Area ONAPs. The grant
ceiling for imminent threat requests for
FY 2007 is $450,000. This ceiling has
been established pursuant to the
provisions of 24 CFR 1003.400(c).
B. Allocations to Area ONAPs. The
requirements for allocating funds to
Area ONAPs responsible for program
administration are found at 24 CFR
1003.101. Following these requirements,
based on an appropriation of $59.4
million less $3.96 million for imminent
threat grants, the allocations for FY 2007
are approximately as follows: Eastern/
Woodlands: $6,325,737; Southern
Plains: $11,864,746; Northern Plains:
$7,917,788; Southwest: $20,525,637;
Northwest: $2,891,489; Alaska:
$5,914,603; Total $55,400,000.
C. Compliance with Regulations,
Guidelines, and Requirements.
Applicants awarded a grant under this
NOFA are required to comply with the
regulations, guidelines, and
requirements with respect to the
acceptance and use of federal funds for
this federally assisted program. Also,
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11452
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the grantee, by accepting the grant,
provides assurance with respect to the
grant that:
1. It possesses the legal authority to
apply for the grant and execute the
proposed program.
2. The governing body has duly
authorized the filing of the application,
including all understandings and
assurances contained in the application,
and has directed and authorized the
person identified as the official
representative of the applicant to act in
connection with the application and to
provide such additional information as
may be required.
3. It will comply with HUD general
administration requirements in 24 CFR
Part 85.
4. It will comply with the
requirements of Title II of Public Law
90–284 (25 U.S.C. 1301), the Indian
Civil Rights Act. Federally recognized
Indian tribes and their instrumentalities
are subject to the requirements of: Title
II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, known
as the Indian Civil Rights Act; Section
109 prohibitions against discrimination
based on age, sex, religion and
disability; the Age Discrimination Act of
1975; and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
5. It will comply with the Indian
preference provisions required in 24
CFR 1003.510.
6. It will establish written safeguards
to prevent employees from using
positions funded under the ICDBG
programs for a purpose that is, or gives
the appearance of being, motivated by
private gain for themselves, their
immediate family, or business
associates. Employees are not otherwise
limited from benefiting from program
activities for which they are otherwise
eligible.
7. Neither the applicant nor its
principals are presently excluded from
participation in any HUD programs, as
required by 24 CFR part 24.
8. The chief executive officer or other
official of the applicant approved by
HUD:
a. Consents to assume the status of a
responsible federal official under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 insofar as the provisions of the Act
apply to the applicant’s proposed
program pursuant to 24 CFR 1003.605.
b. Is authorized and consents on
behalf of the applicant and him/herself
to accept the jurisdiction of the federal
courts for the purpose of enforcement of
his/her responsibilities as such an
official.
Note: Applicants for whom HUD has
approved a claim of incapacity to accept the
responsibilities of the federal government for
purposes of complying with the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
environmental review requirements of 24
CFR part 58, pursuant to 24 CFR 1003.605,
are not subject to the provision of paragraph
8.
9. It will comply with the
requirements of Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 and the regulations in 24 CFR part
135 (Economic Opportunities for Low
and Very Low Income Persons) to the
maximum extent consistent with, but
not in derogation of, compliance with
Section 7(b) of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (25 USC. 450e(b)). Two
points will be awarded under Rating
Factor 3 in fiscal year 2007 for
applicants who demonstrate how they
will incorporate Section 3 principles
into their proposed projects.
10. It will comply with the
requirements of the Fire Authorization
Administration Act of 1992 (Pub. L.
102–522).
11. It will comply with 24 CFR, part
4, subpart A, showing full disclosure of
all benefits of the project as collected by
form HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure Report.
12. Prior to submission of its
application to HUD, the grantee has met
the citizen participation requirements,
which include following traditional
means of member involvement, as
required in 24 CFR 1003.604.
13. It will administer and enforce the
labor standards requirements prescribed
in 24 CFR 1003.603.
14. The project has been developed so
that not less than 70 percent of the
funds received under this grant will be
used for activities that benefit low- and
moderate-income persons.
15. Executive Order 13202,
‘‘Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Construction Projects’’ applies
to projects funded under this NOFA.
See the General Section for more
information.
D. Period of Performance. The period
of performance for any grant awarded
under this NOFA must be included in
the Implementation Schedule, form
HUD–4125, and approved by HUD.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Eligible applicants are Indian tribes or
tribal organizations on behalf of Indian
tribes. To apply for funding, you must
be eligible as an Indian tribe (or as a
tribal organization), as required by 24
CFR 1003.5, by the application deadline
date.
Tribal organizations are permitted to
submit applications under 24 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
1003.5(b) on behalf of eligible tribes
when one or more eligible tribe(s)
authorize the organization to do so
under concurring resolutions. The tribal
organization must itself be eligible
under Title I of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act. The Bureau of Indian
Affairs (BIA) or the Indian Health
Service (IHS), as appropriate, must
make a determination of such eligibility.
This determination must be provided to
the Area ONAP by the application
deadline.
If a tribe or tribal organization claims
that it is a successor to an eligible entity,
the Area ONAP must review the
documentation to determine whether it
is in fact the successor entity.
Applicants from within Alaska: Due
to the unique structure of tribal entities
eligible to submit ICDBG applications in
Alaska, and as only one ICDBG
application may be submitted for each
area within the jurisdiction of an entity
eligible under 24 CFR 1003.5, a tribal
organization that submits an application
for activities in the jurisdiction of one
or more eligible tribes or villages must
include a concurring resolution from
each such tribe or village authorizing
the submission of the application. An
application submitted by a tribal
organization on behalf of a specific tribe
will not be accepted if the tribe itself
submits an application for the same
funding round. The hierarchy for
funding priority continues to be the IRA
Council, the Traditional Village
Council, the ANCSA Village
Corporation, and the ANCSA Regional
Corporation.
On November 25, 2005, the BIA
published a Federal Register notice
entitled, ‘‘Indian Entities Recognized
and Eligible to Receive Services From
the United States Bureau of Indian
Affairs’’ (70 FR 71194). This notice
provides a listing of Indian Tribal
Entities in Alaska found to be Indian
tribes as the term is defined and used in
25 CFR part 83. Additionally, pursuant
to Title I of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act, ANCSA Village
Corporations and Regional Corporations
are also considered tribes and therefore
eligible applicants for the ICDBG
program.
Any questions regarding eligibility
determinations and related
documentation requirements for entities
in Alaska should be referred to the
Alaska Area ONAP prior to the
application deadline. (See 24 CFR
1003.5 for a complete description of
eligible applicants.)
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
B. Cost Sharing or Matching.
Cost sharing or matching is not
required under this grant; however,
applicants who leverage this grant with
other funds receive points. See Section
V. (A) Rating Factor 4.
C. Other
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
1. HUD Requirements.
Applicants for single purpose grants
must comply with the HUD Threshold
Requirements listed in the General
Section, Section III, C. in order to
receive an award of funds.
2. Program and Project Specific
Requirements
a. Low- and Moderate-Income Status
for Rehabilitation Projects. Your
application must contain information
that shows that all households that
receive ICDBG grant assistance under a
housing rehabilitation project are of
low- and moderate-income status.
b. Housing Rehabilitation Cost Limits.
Grant funds spent on rehabilitation
must fall within the following per-unit
limits for each Area ONAP jurisdiction:
Eastern/Woodlands: $35,000; Southern
Plains: $35,000; Northern Plains:
$50,000; Southwest: $50,000; Northwest
$40,000; Alaska: $55,000.
c. Commitment to Housing for Land
Acquisition to Support New Housing
Projects. For land acquisition to support
new housing projects, your application
must include evidence of financial
commitment and an ability to construct
at least 25 percent of the housing units
on the land proposed for acquisition.
This evidence must consist of one (or
more) of the following: a firm or
conditional commitment to construct (or
to finance the construction of) the units;
documentation that an approvable
application for the construction of these
units has been submitted to a funding
source or entity; or documentation that
these units are specifically identified in
the Indian Housing Plan (IHP), (oneYear Financial Resources Narrative;
Table 2, Financial Resources, Part I,
Line 1E; and Table 2, Financial
Resources, Part II) submitted by or on
behalf of the applicant as an affordable
housing resource with a commensurate
commitment of Indian Housing Block
Grant (IHBG) (also known as NAHBG)
resources. If the IHP for the IHBG (also
known as NAHBG) program year that
coincides with the implementation of
the ICDBG proposed project has not
been submitted, you must provide an
assurance that the IHP will specifically
reference the proposed project. The IHP
submission must occur within three
years from the date the land is acquired
and ready for development.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
d. Health Care Facilities. If you
propose a facility that would provide
health care services funded by the
Indian Health Service (IHS), you must
assure that the facility meets all
applicable IHS facility requirements.
HUD recognizes that tribes that are
contracting services from the IHS may
establish other facility standards. These
tribes must assure that these standards
at least compare to nationally accepted
minimum standards.
3. Program-Related Threshold
Requirements
a. Outstanding ICDBG Obligation.
According to 24 CFR 1003.301(a), an
applicant who has an outstanding
ICDBG obligation to HUD that is in
arrears, or one that has not agreed to a
repayment schedule, will be
disqualified from the competition.
b. Compliance with Fair Housing and
Civil Rights Laws. Applicants and
subrecipients that are not federally
recognized Indian tribes or
instrumentalities of a tribe are subject to
the Civil Rights threshold requirements
found in the General Section. Federally
recognized Indian tribes and
instrumentalities of tribes are subject to
the requirements of Title II of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, known as the Indian
Civil Rights Act; Section 109
prohibitions against discrimination
based on age, sex, religion and
disability; the Age Discrimination Act of
1975; and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. To be
eligible to apply, there must be no
outstanding violations of these civil
rights provisions at the time of
application.
4. Project-Specific Threshold
Requirements. Applicants must meet all
parts of the project-specific threshold
applicable to the proposed project. The
thresholds are:
a. Housing Rehabilitation Project
Thresholds. In accordance with 24 CFR
1003.302(a), for housing rehabilitation
projects, you must adopt rehabilitation
standards and rehabilitation policies
before you submit an application. In
addition, you must state that you have
in place rehabilitation policies and
standards that have been adopted in
accordance with tribal law or practice.
Do not submit your policies or
standards with the application. You
must also provide a written statement
that project funds will be used to
rehabilitate HUD-assisted houses only
when the homebuyer’s payments are
current or the homebuyer is current in
a repayment agreement except because
of an emergency situation. For purposes
of meeting this threshold, HUD-assisted
houses are houses that are owned and/
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11453
or managed by the tribe or tribally
designated housing entity (TDHE). The
ONAP Administrator, on a case-by-case
basis, may approve exceptions to this
requirement if the applicant provides
adequate justification for the exception
with its application.
b. New Housing Construction Project
Thresholds
1. In accordance with 24 CFR
1003.302(b), new housing construction
can only be implemented when
necessary through a Community Based
Development Organization (CBDO).
Eligible CBDOs are described in 24 CFR
1003.204(c). You must provide
documentation establishing that the
entity implementing your new housing
construction project qualifies as a
CBDO.
2. In accordance with 24 CFR
1003.302, you must have a current, in
effect, tribal resolution adopting and
identifying construction standards.
3. In accordance with 24 CFR
1003.302, you must also include in your
application documentation affirming the
following:
(a) All households to be assisted
under a new housing construction
project must be of low- or moderateincome status;
(b) No other housing is available in
the immediate reservation area that is
suitable for the households to be
assisted;
(c) No other sources, including an
Indian Housing Block Grants (IHBG),
can meet the needs of the household(s)
to be served; and
(d) Rehabilitation of the unit occupied
by the household(s) to be assisted is not
economically feasible, the household(s)
to be housed is currently in an
overcrowded house (more than one
household per house), or the household
to be assisted has no current residence.
c. Economic Development Project
Thresholds. In accordance with 24 CFR
1003.302, for economic development
assistance projects, you must provide a
financial analysis. The financial
analysis must demonstrate that the
project is financially feasible and the
project has a reasonable chance of
success. The analysis must also
demonstrate the public benefit resulting
from the ICDBG assistance. The more
funds you request, the greater the public
benefit you must demonstrate. The
analysis must also establish that to the
extent practicable, reasonable financial
support will be committed from nonfederal sources prior to disbursement of
federal funds; any grant amount
provided will not substantially reduce
the amount of non-federal financial
support for the activity; not more than
a reasonable rate of return on
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11454
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
investment is provided to the owner;
and that grant funds used for the project
will be disbursed on a pro-rata basis
with amounts from other sources.
d. There are no project specific
thresholds for Land Acquisition to
Support New Housing, Homeownership
Assistance, Public Facilities and
Improvements, and Microenterprise
Projects.
5. Public Service Projects. Because
there is a regulatory 15 percent cap on
the amount of grant funds that may be
used for public service activities, you
may not receive a single-purpose grant
solely to fund public service activities.
Your application, however, may contain
a public service component for up to 15
percent of the total grant, and this
component may be unrelated to the
other project(s) in your application. If
your application does not receive full
funding, HUD will reduce the public
service allocation proportionately so
that it comprises no more than 15
percent of the total grant award. In
making such reductions, the feasibility
of the proposed project will be taken
into consideration. If a proportionate
reduction of the public service
allocation renders such a project
infeasible, the project will not be
funded. A complete description of
public service projects is located at 24
CFR part 1003.201.
6. Restrictions on Eligible Activities.
A complete description of activities that
are eligible for ICDBG funding are
identified at 24 CFR part 1003, subpart
C. Please note that although this subpart
has not yet been revised to include the
restrictions on the ineligible activity
that was added to Section 105 of the
CDBG statute by Section 588 of the
Quality Housing and Work
Responsibility Act of 1998, this
restriction applies. Specifically, ICDBG
funds may not be used to assist directly
in the relocation of any industrial or
commercial plant, facility, or operation,
from one area to another, if the
relocation is likely to result in a
significant loss of employment in the
labor market area from which the
relocation occurs. Rating Factors 2 and
3 included under Section V specify
many of the activities listed as eligible
under part 1003, subpart C. Those listed
include new housing construction (in
certain circumstances, as described in
Rating Factors 2 and 3), housing
rehabilitation, land acquisition to
support new housing, homeownership
assistance, public facilities and
improvements, economic development,
and microenterprise programs.
However, the following eligible
activities not clearly identified by the
rating factors may be proposed and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
rated as described below. During the
past few years, many tribes have
experienced high incidences of mold
growth in tribal homes and buildings.
Renovation of affected buildings is
eligible under housing rehabilitation or
public facility improvement projects.
a. Acquisition of property. This
activity can be proposed as acquisition
of land or other real property to support
New Housing Construction, Housing
Rehabilitation, Public Facilities and
Improvements, or Economic
Development, depending on the
purpose of the acquisition.
b. Assistance to Institutions of Higher
Learning. If such entities have the
capacity, they can help the ICDBG
grantees implement eligible projects.
c. Assistance to Community Based
Development Organizations (CBDOs).
Grantees may provide assistance to
these organizations to undertake
activities related to neighborhood
revitalization, community economic
development, or energy conservation.
d. Clearance and Demolition. These
activities can be proposed as part of
Housing Rehabilitation, New Housing
Construction, Public Facilities and
Improvements, Economic Development,
or Land to Support New Housing.
Section 1003.201 (d) states, ‘‘Demolition
of HUD-assisted housing units may be
undertaken only with the prior approval
of HUD.’’
e. Code Enforcement. This activity
can be proposed as Housing
Rehabilitation. The activity must
comply with the requirements at 24 CFR
1003.202.
f. Comprehensive Planning. This
activity is eligible, and can be proposed
as part of any otherwise-eligible project
to the extent allowed by the 20 percent
cap on the grant for planning/
administration.
g. Energy Efficiency. Associated
activities can be proposed under
Housing Rehabilitation or Public
Facilities and Improvements, depending
upon the type of energy efficiency
activity.
h. Lead-Based Paint Evaluation and
Abatement. These activities can be
proposed under Housing Rehabilitation.
i. Non-Federal Share. ICDBG funds
can be used as a match for any nonICDBG funding to the extent allowed by
such funding and the activity is eligible
under 24 CFR part 1003, subpart C.
j. Privately and Publicly Owned
Commercial or Industrial Buildings (real
property improvements). These
activities can be proposed under
Economic Development. Privately
owned commercial rehabilitation is
subject to the requirements at 24 CFR
1003.202.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
k. Privately Owned Utilities.
Assistance to privately owned utilities
can be proposed under Public Facilities
and Improvements.
l. Removal of Architectural Barriers.
This includes removing barriers that
restrict mobility and access for elderly
and persons with disabilities. In
addition, accommodation should be
made for persons with all varieties of
disabilities to enable them to benefit
from these activities. This activity can
be proposed under Housing
Rehabilitation or Public Facilities and
Improvements, depending upon the
type of structure where the barrier will
be removed.
7. Application Screening. The Area
ONAP will screen applications for
single-purpose grants. The Area ONAP
will reject an application that fails this
screening and will return the
application unrated. The Area ONAP
will accept your application if it meets
all the criteria listed below as items a
through f.
a. Your application is received or
submitted in accordance with the
requirements set forth under
Application and Submission Procedures
in Section IV of this NOFA;
b. You are eligible;
c. The proposed project is eligible;
d. Your application contains all the
components specified in Section IV. B.
of this NOFA;
e. Your application shows that at least
70 percent of the grant funds are to be
used for activities that benefit low- and
moderate-income persons, in
accordance with the requirements of 24
CFR 1003.208. For screening purposes
only, HUD will use the 2000 census data
if the data you submitted does not meet
this screening requirement; and
f. Only one ICDBG application may be
submitted for each area within the
jurisdiction of an entity eligible under
24 CFR 1003. An application may
include more than one project, but it
cannot exceed the grant ceilings listed
in Section IV.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Addresses to Request Application
Package. Applicants are required to
submit an electronic application, unless
they receive a waiver of the
requirement. See the General Section for
information on electronic application
submission and timely submission and
receipt requirements. Waiver requests
must be submitted to the Headquarters
ONAP, Office of Grants Management in
writing, using mail, e-mail or fax.
Waiver requests must be submitted no
later than 15 days prior to the
application deadline date and should be
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
sent to Deborah M. Lalancette, HUD,
ONAP, 1670 Broadway, 23rd Floor
Denver CO 80202; by e-mail to
Deborah_M._Lalancette@hud.gov or by
fax to 303–675–1660.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Application Information. All
information required to complete a valid
application is included in the General
Section and this NOFA. Copies of the
General Section and ICDBG NOFA may
be downloaded from the grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. If you
experience any problems with
downloading the General Section or the
ICDBG NOFA, call the Grants.gov help
desk at 800–518-GRANTS. Before
preparing an application, applicants
should carefully review the program
description, ineligible activities,
program and threshold requirements,
and the General Section. Applicants
should carefully review each rating
factor listed in Section V of this NOFA,
before writing a narrative response.
Indicate on the first page of each project
submission the type of project(s) you are
proposing: Economic Development,
Homeownership Assistance, Housing
Rehabilitation, Land Acquisition to
Support New Housing, Microenterprise
Programs, New Housing Construction,
or Public Facilities and Improvements.
This will help to ensure that the
appropriate project-specific thresholds
and rating subfactors will be applied.
Narrative statements submitted to
support your application should be
individually labeled to reflect the item
the narrative is responding to, e.g.,
Factor 1, Factor 2, etc. Applicants
should not submit third party
documents, such as audits, resolutions,
policies, unless specifically asked to do
so. Additional information regarding
electronic submissions can be found in
the General Section.
If you received a waiver to the
electronic application submission
requirements and are submitting a paper
application, please use separate tabs for
each rating factor and rating subfactor.
In order to be rated, make sure the
response is beneath the appropriate
heading. Keep the responses in the same
order as the NOFA. It is recommended
that you limit your narrative
explanations to 200 words or less and
provide the necessary data such as a
market analysis, a pro forma, housing
survey data, etc., that support the
response. Include all relevant material
to a response under the same tab. Only
include documentation that will clearly
and concisely support your response to
the rating criteria.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
HUD suggests that you do a
preliminary rating for your project,
providing a score according to the point
system in Section V of this NOFA. This
will show you how reviewers might
score your project and identify its
strengths and weaknesses. This will
help you determine where you can
make improvements prior to its
submission. An application checklist for
you to use to ensure that you have
submitted all required components is
found in this section under item 2c.
2. Content of Application, Forms, and
Required Elements. The applicant must
respond in narrative form to all five of
the rating factors listed in Section V.A.
of this NOFA. In addition, the applicant
must submit all of the forms required in
this section, along with other data listed
below.
a. Demographic data. You may submit
data that are unpublished, not generally
available, and not older than three
years, in order to meet the requirements
of this section. Your application must
contain a statement that the following
criteria have been met:
(1) Generally available published data
are substantially inaccurate or
incomplete;
(2) Data that you submit have been
collected systematically and are
statistically reliable;
(3) Data are, to the greatest extent
feasible, independently verifiable; and
(4) Data differentiate between
reservation and BIA service area
populations, when applicable.
b. Publication of Community
Development Statement. You must
prepare and publish or post the
community development statement
portion of your application according to
the citizen participation requirements of
24 CFR 1003.604. You may post or
publish a statement that indicates that
the entire Community Development
Statement is available for public
viewing and include the location, dates,
and time it will be available for review.
c. Application Submission. Your
application must contain the items
listed below.
(1) Application for Federal Assistance
(SF–424);
(2) SF–424 SUPP, Supplement Survey
on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
(3) HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov); and
(4) Acknowledgement of Application
Receipt (HUD–2993). (This is relevant
only to applicants granted a waiver of
the electronic submission requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11455
and who are submitting a paper
application.)
If the application has been submitted
by a tribal organization as defined in 24
CFR 1003.5(b), on behalf of an Indian
tribe, you must submit concurring
resolutions from the Indian tribe stating
that the tribal organization is applying
on the tribe’s behalf. Applicants must
submit the resolution by attaching it as
a file to your electronic application
submission, or sending it via facsimile
transmittal.
The other required items are as
follows:
(5) Community Development
Statement that includes:
(a) Components that address the
general threshold requirement and the
relevant project-specific thresholds and
rating factors;
(b) A schedule for implementing the
project (form HUD–4125,
Implementation Schedule); and
(c) Cost information for each separate
project, including specific activity costs,
administration, planning, technical
assistance, and total HUD share (Form
HUD–4123, Cost Summary).
(6) A map showing project location, if
appropriate.
(7) If the proposed project will result
in displacement or temporary
relocation, a statement that identifies:
(a) The number of persons (families,
individuals, businesses, and nonprofit
organizations) occupying the property
on the date of the submission of the
application (or date of initial site
control, if later);
(b) The number to be displaced or
temporarily relocated;
(c) The estimated cost of relocation
payments and other services;
(d) The source of funds for relocation;
and
(e) The organization that will carry
out the relocation activities.
(8) If applicable, evidence of the
disclosure required by 24 CFR
1003.606(e) regarding conflict of
interest.
(9) If applicable, the demographic
data statement described in Section
IV.B.2.a and Section V.A., Rating Factor
2 of this NOFA. The data accompanying
the statement must identify the total
number of persons benefiting from the
project and the total number of low- and
moderate-income persons benefiting
from the project. To be considered,
supporting documentation must include
all of the following: a sample copy of a
completed survey form, an explanation
of the methods used to collect the data,
and a listing of incomes by household
including household size.
(10) Optional submissions are:
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11456
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
(a) You Are Our Client Grant
Applicant Survey (HUD 2994–A)
(Optional); and
(b) Program Outcome Logic Model,
HUD–96010.
3. Planning and Administrative Costs.
Applicants must report project planning
and administration costs on Form HUD–
4123, Cost Summary. Planning and
administrative costs cannot exceed 20
percent of the grant. The following
criteria applies to planning and
administrative costs:
a. Planning and administrative
activities may be funded only in
conjunction with a physical
development activity.
b. If you are submitting an application
for more than one project, costs must be
broken down by project. Submit one
form HUD–4123 for each proposed
project in addition to a consolidated
form HUD–4123 that includes costs for
all proposed projects.
c. Do not include project costs (i.e.,
architectural/engineering,
environmental, technical assistance,
staff/overhead costs) directly related to
the project.
C. Submission Dates and Times
1. Application Submission Deadline.
The application deadline date is June 1,
2007. Applications submitted through
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp must be received
and validated by Grants.gov no later
than 11:59:59 PM eastern time on the
application deadline date. Upon
submission, Grants.gov will provide the
applicant a confirmation of receipt and
then validate the application. Within 24
to 48 hours of receipt, the application
will be validated by Grants.gov. If the
application does not pass validation, the
submitter will receive a rejection notice
indicating why the application was
rejected, thus giving the applicant (if
time permits) an opportunity to make
the correction in the application
package and resubmit. The General
Section provides details of a validation
check. HUD advises applicants to
submit at least 72 hours prior to the
deadline date so that if an application
is rejected during the validation process,
applicants can correct the errors and
resubmit the application prior to the
deadline date and time. If you are
granted a waiver of the electronic
submission requirements, and are
submitting a paper application, your
completed application must be received
by HUD no later than 11:59:59 p.m. on
the application deadline date. HUD will
not accept any applications sent by
e-mail or on a diskette, compact disc, or
by facsimile unless HUD specifically
requests an applicant to do so. Please
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
carefully follow the instructions in
Sections IV.B and F. of the General
Section for detailed information
regarding application submission,
delivery, and timely receipt
requirements.
D. Intergovernmental Review. Indian
tribes are not subject to the
Intergovernmental Review process.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Ineligible Activities. In general, any
activity that is not authorized under the
provisions of 24 CFR 1003.201–
1003.206 is ineligible to be assisted with
ICDBG funds. The regulations at 24 CFR
1003.207 govern ineligible activities and
should be referred to for details. The
following guidance is provided for
determining the eligibility of other
activities frequently associated with
ICDBG projects.
a. Government Office Space.
Buildings, or portions thereof, used
predominantly for the general conduct
of government cannot be assisted with
ICDBG funds. Those buildings include,
but are not limited to, local government
office buildings, courthouses, and other
headquarters of government where the
governing body meets regularly.
Buildings that contain both
governmental and non-governmental
services can be assisted so long as the
ICDBG funds are used only for the nongovernmental sections. An example of
an ineligible building is a building to
house the community development
division or a tribal administration
building. Your Area ONAP office should
be consulted for projects of this nature.
b. General Government Expenses.
Except as authorized in the regulations
or under OMB Circular A–87, expenses
required to carry out the regular
responsibilities of the unit of general
local government are not eligible for
assistance with ICDBG funds.
c. Maintenance and Operation
Expenses. In general, any expenses
associated with repairing, operating, or
maintaining public facilities and
services are not eligible for assistance.
Specific exceptions to this general rule
are operating and maintenance expenses
associated with public service activities
[24 CFR 1003.201(e)], office space for
program staff employed in carrying out
the ICDBG program [24 CFR
1003.206(a)(4)], and interim assistance
[24 CFR 1003.201(f)]. For example,
where a public service is being assisted
with CDBG funds, the cost of operating
and maintaining that portion of the
facility in which the service is located
is eligible as part of the public service.
Examples of ineligible operating and
maintenance expenses are routine and
non-routine maintenance and repair of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
streets, parks, playgrounds, water and
sewer facilities, neighborhood facilities,
senior centers, centers for persons with
disabilities, parking facilities, and
similar public facilities, as well as staff
salaries, utility costs, and similar
expenses necessary for the operation of
public works and facilities.
d. New Housing Construction. The
construction of new permanent
residential structures and any program
to subsidize or finance such new
construction is ineligible, unless carried
out by a Community-Based
Development Organization (CBDO)
pursuant to 24 CFR 1003.204(a).
e. Furnishings and Personal Property.
In general, the purchase of equipment,
fixtures, motor vehicles, furnishings, or
other personal property not an integral
structural fixture is ineligible.
Exceptions include when such
purchases are necessary for use in grant
administration (24 CFR 1003.206);
necessary and appropriate for use in a
project carried out by a CBDO (24 CFR
1003.204); used in providing a public
service (24 CFR 1003.201(e)); or used as
firefighting equipment (24 CFR
1003.201(c)(1)(ii)). However, ICDBG
funds may be used to pay depreciation
or use allowances (in accordance with
OMB Circular A–87 or A–122, as
applicable).
f. Construction Tools and Equipment.
The purchase of construction tools and
equipment is generally ineligible.
However, compensation for the use of
such tools and equipment through
leasing, depreciation, or use allowances
pursuant to OMB Circulars A–87 and
A–122, as applicable, for an otherwise
eligible activity, is eligible. Exceptions
include construction tools and
equipment purchased for use as part of
a solid waste facility (24 CFR
1003.201(c)(1)(ii)) and construction
tools only (not equipment) purchased
for use in a housing rehabilitation
project being administered by the
recipient using the force account
construction method (24 CFR
1003.202(b)(8)).
g. Income Payments. In general,
assistance shall not be used for income
payments for housing or any other
purpose. Income payments mean a
series of subsistence-type grant
payments made to an individual/family
for items such as food, clothing, housing
(rent/mortgage), or utilities, but
excludes emergency payments made
over a period of up to three months to
the provider of such items or services on
behalf of an individual/family.
Examples of ineligible income payments
include the payments for income
maintenance and housing allowances.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
2. Grant Ceilings. The authority to
establish grant ceilings is found at 24
CFR 1003.100(b)(1). Grant ceilings are
established for FY2007 funding at the
following levels:
Area ONAP
Population
Ceiling
Eastern
ALL ..............
Woodlands.
Southern
ALL ..............
Plains.
Northern
6,001+ .........
Plains.
0–6,000 .......
Southwest ... 50,001+ .......
10,501–
50,000.
7,501–
10,500.
6,001–7,500
1,501–6,000
0–1,500 .......
Northwest .... ALL ..............
Alaska ......... ALL ..............
$600,000
800,000
1,100,000
900,000
5,500,000
2,750,000
2,200,000
1,100,000
825,000
605,000
500,000
600,000
For the Southwest Area and Northern
Plains ONAP jurisdictions, the
population used to determine ceiling
amounts is the Native American
population that resides on a reservation
or rancheria.
Applicants from the Southwest or the
Northern Plains ONAP jurisdictions
should contact those offices before
submitting an application if they are
unsure of the population level to use to
determine the ceiling amount. The
Southwest or Northern Plains Area
ONAP, as appropriate, must approve
any corrections or revisions to Native
American population data before you
submit your application.
provide submission instructions
including the address where to submit
the application and number of copies to
be provided. A list identifying each
Area ONAP jurisdiction is provided at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/ih/
onap/area_onap.cfm under the ICDBG
program.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Applications must be received and
validated by Grants.gov via https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp no later than the
application deadline date and time
stated in the NOFA. Validation can take
up to 72 hours.
2. Mailing and Receipt Procedures.
Applicants granted a waiver of the
electronic submission requirement will
receive specific mailing instruction,
including the number of copies to be
submitted, with approval of the waiver.
See 24 CFR Part 5.
3. Addresses for Submitting
Applications. HUD will accept mailed
applications only if it has granted a
waiver of the electronic delivery
process. Information regarding
electronic submission and waivers from
the electronic submission requirement
is located in this program NOFA and the
General Section. If HUD grants such a
waiver, the approval notification will
V. Application Review Information
Rating factor
Rating sub-factor
Points
1 ........................
Total .................
1.a. ...................
1.b. ...................
1.c. ....................
1.d. ...................
2.a. ...................
2.b. ...................
2.c. ....................
2.d. ...................
2.e. ...................
Total .................
1 .......................
2.a. ...................
2.b. ...................
40 .....................
10 .....................
5 or 10* ............
3 or 10* ............
2 or 10* ............
4 or 0* ...............
4 or 0* ...............
4 or 0* ..............
4 or 0* ...............
4 or 0* ...............
16 .....................
4 .......................
12 .....................
12 .....................
2.c. ....................
Total .................
1 .......................
2 .......................
3 .......................
4 .......................
5.a. ...................
5.b. ...................
12 .....................
30 .....................
10 .....................
5 .......................
1 .......................
2 .......................
12 .....................
12 .....................
5.c. ....................
5.d. ...................
5.e. ...................
Total .................
Total .................
1 .......................
2 .......................
......................
12 .....................
12 .....................
12 .....................
8 .......................
6 .......................
2 .......................
4 .......................
100 ...................
2 ........................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
3 ........................
4 ........................
5 ........................
Total ..................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
11457
PO 00000
A. Criteria
1. RC/EZ/EC–II: Bonus points
described in the General Section for
projects located in RC/EZ/EC–IIs will
not be awarded under this NOFA.
2. Rating Factors to Evaluate and Rate
Applications: The factors for rating and
ranking applications and the points for
each factor are provided below. A
maximum of 100 points may be
awarded under Rating Factors 1 through
5. To be considered for funding, your
application must receive a minimum of
20 points under rating factor 1 and an
application score of at least 70 points.
The following summarizes the points
assigned to each rating factor and each
rating subfactor and lists which rating
subfactors apply to which project types.
Please use this table to ensure you are
addressing the appropriate rating
subfactor for your project.
Project type
Minimum of 20 Points Required
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
Public Facilities and Improvements and Economic Development Projects
New Housing Construction, Housing Rehabilitation, Land Acquisition to Support New
Housing, and Homeownership Assistance Projects
Microenterprise Programs
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
Public Facilities and Improvements
New Housing Construction, Housing Rehabilitation, and Homeownership Assistance
Projects
Economic Development Projects
Microenterprise Programs
Land Acquisition to Support New Housing
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
All Project Types
Minimum of 70 Points Required
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11458
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
The first number listed indicates the
maximum number of points available to
current ICDBG grantees under this
subfactor. The second number indicates
the maximum number of points
available to new applicants.
Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant (40 points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which you have the organizational
resources necessary to successfully
implement the proposed activities in
accordance with your implementation
schedule. If applicable, past
performance in administering previous
ICDBG grants will be taken into
consideration. You must address the
existence or availability of these
resources for the specific type of activity
for which you are applying. To be
eligible for funding you must receive a
minimum of 20 points under this factor
for your proposed activity. HUD will not
rate any projects further that do not
receive a minimum of 20 points under
this factor. If you are funded, the
implementation schedule and/or the
Logic Model, form HUD–96010, you
submit for this factor will be measured
against actual progress.
1. (20 points for current ICDBG
grantees) (40 points for new applicants)
Managerial, Technical, and
Administrative Capability.
Your application must include a
description demonstrating that you
possess or can obtain managerial,
technical, and/or administrative
capability necessary to carry out the
proposed project. Your application must
address who will administer the project
and how you plan to handle the
technical aspects of executing the
project in accordance with your
implementation schedule. Typical
documents that may be submitted
include, but are not limited to, written
summaries of qualifications and past
experience of proposed staff,
descriptions of staff responsibilities, and
references or letters of endorsement
from others who have worked with the
proposed staff. Do not submit job
descriptions or resumes.
a. (10 points) Managerial and
Technical Staff.
The extent to which your application
describes the roles/responsibilities and
the knowledge/experience of your
overall proposed project director and
staff, including the day-to-day program
manager, consultants, and contractors in
planning, managing, and implementing
projects in accordance with the
implementation schedule for which
funding is being requested. Experience
will be judged in terms of recent,
relevant, and successful experience of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
your staff to undertake eligible program
activities. In rating this factor, HUD will
consider experience within the last 5
years to be recent; experience pertaining
to the specific activities being proposed
or the specific roles and responsibilities
described in the application to be
relevant; and experience producing
specific accomplishments to be
successful. The more recent the
experience and the more experience
your own staff members who work on
the project have in successfully
conducting and completing similar
activities, the greater the number of
points you will receive for this rating
factor.
(10 points). The applicant adequately
describes the roles/responsibilities and
the knowledge/experience of its overall
project director and staff, including the
day-to-day program manager,
consultants, and contractors in
planning, managing, and implementing
projects for which funding is being
requested. Staff experience as described
in the application is recent (within 5
years), relevant (pertains to the specific
activities being proposed or the specific
roles and responsibilities described in
the application) and successful (has
produced specific accomplishments).
(5 points). The applicant adequately
describes the roles/responsibilities and
the knowledge/experience of its overall
project director and staff, including the
day-to-day program manager,
consultants, and contractors in
planning, managing, and implementing
projects for which funding is being
requested. However, one of the
following applies: staff experience as
described in the application is not
recent (not within 5 years), is not
relevant (does not pertain to the specific
activities being proposed or the specific
roles and responsibilities described in
the application), or is not successful
(did not produce specific
accomplishments).
(0 points). The applicant failed to
adequately describe the roles/
responsibilities and the knowledge/
experience of its overall project director
and staff, including the day-to-day
program manager, consultants, and
contractors in planning, managing, and
implementing projects for which
funding is being requested or more than
one of the following applies: staff
experience as described in the
application is not recent (not within 5
years), is not relevant (does not pertain
to the specific activity being proposed
or the specific roles and responsibilities
described in the application), or is not
successful (did not produce specific
accomplishments).
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
b. (5 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 10 points for new
applicants) Project Implementation Plan
and Program Evaluation.
The extent to which your project
implementation plan identifies the
specific tasks and timelines that you
and your partner contractors and/or subgrantees will undertake to complete
your proposed project on time and
within budget. The Project
Implementation Schedule, form HUD–
4125, may serve as this required
schedule, provided that it is sufficiently
detailed to demonstrate that you have
clearly thought out your project
implementation. The extent to which
your project identifies, measures, and
evaluates the specific benchmarks,
outputs, outcomes, and/or goals of your
project that enhance community
viability. The Logic Model, form HUD–
96010, may serve as the format to
address this information or you may
provide a different format that provides
the same information.
(5 points for current ICDBG grantees
and 10 points for new applicants) The
applicant submitted a project
implementation plan that clearly
specifies project tasks and timelines.
The applicant submitted clear project
benchmarks, outputs, outcomes, and/or
targets and identified objectively
quantifiable program measures and/or
evaluation process.
(3 points for current ICDBG grantees
and 4 points for new applicants) The
applicant submitted a project
implementation plan that specifies
project tasks and timelines. The
applicant submitted project
benchmarks, outputs, outcomes, and/or
targets for each; however, the applicant
did not clearly identify objectively
quantifiable program measures and/or
the evaluation process.
(0 points for current ICDBG grantees
or new applicants) The applicant
submitted a project implementation
schedule that does not address all
project tasks and timelines associated
with the project. Project benchmarks,
outputs, outcomes, and/or goals were
not submitted, or if submitted, they did
not address either the quantifiable
program measures and/or the evaluation
process.
c. (3 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 10 points for new
applicants) Financial Management.
This subfactor evaluates the extent to
which your application describes how
your financial management systems will
facilitate effective fiscal control over
your proposed project and meet the
requirements of 24 CFR part 85 and 24
CFR part 1003. You must also describe
how you will apply your financial
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
management systems to the specific
project for which you are applying. The
application will also be rated on the
seriousness/significance of the findings
related to your financial management
system identified in your current audit.
If you are required to have an audit but
do not have a current audit, you must
submit a letter from your Independent
Public Accountant (IPA) that is dated
within the past 12 months stating that
your financial management system
complies with all applicable regulatory
requirements. If you are not required to
have an audit, you will automatically
receive points for this portion of the
subfactor if you provide the other
information required by this subfactor.
For purposes of this subfactor, a current
audit is one which was due to be
submitted to the Federal Audit
Clearinghouse (FAC) within the 12month period prior to the application
due date. To be considered, the audit
must be submitted to the FAC prior to
the ICDBG application deadline date. Do
not submit financial management and/
or internal control policies and
procedures or your audit with the
application.
(3 points for current ICDBG grantees
and 10 points for new applicants).
The applicant clearly described how
it will apply its financial management
systems to the proposed project and
how the system meets the requirements
of 24 CFR part 85 and 24 CFR part 1003.
The applicant’s current audit does not
contain any serious or significant
findings related to its financial
management system, or if there is no
current audit, the applicant submitted a
letter from its Independent Public
Accountant stating that its financial
management system complies with all
applicable regulatory requirements.
(2 points for current ICDBG grantees
and 5 points for new applicants) The
applicant’s current audit does not
contain any serious or significant
findings related to its financial
management system, or if there is no
current audit, the applicant submitted a
letter from its Independent Public
Accountant (IPA) stating that its
financial management system complies
with all applicable regulatory
requirements. The applicant did not
describe how it would apply its
financial management systems to the
proposed project and how the system
meets the requirements of 24 CFR part
85 and 24 CFR part 1003.
(0 points for current ICDBG grantees
or new applicants) The applicant’s
current audit included serious or
significant findings related to its
financial management systems or, if
there is no current audit, the applicant
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
did not submit a letter from its IPA
stating its financial management
systems comply with all regulatory
requirements. The applicant did not
describe how it would apply its
financial management systems to the
proposed project and how the system
meets the requirements of 24 CFR part
85 and 24 CFR part 1003.
d. (2 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 10 points for new
applicants) Procurement and Contract
Management.
This subfactor evaluates the extent to
which your application describes how
your procurement and contract
management policies and procedures
will facilitate effective procurement and
contract control over your proposed
project and meet the requirements of 24
CFR part 85 and 24 CFR part 1003. You
must also describe how you will apply
your procurement and contract
management systems to the specific
project for which you are applying. The
application will also be rated on the
seriousness of the findings related to
procurement and contract management
identified in your current financial
audit. If you are required to have an
audit but do not have a current audit,
you must submit a letter from your
Independent Public Accountant stating
that your procurement and contract
management system complies with all
applicable regulatory requirements. If
you are not required to have an audit,
you will automatically receive points for
this portion of the subfactor if you
provide the other information required
by this subfactor. Do not submit
procurement and contract management
policies and procedures or your audit
with the application.
(2 points for current ICDBG grantees
and 10 points for new applicants) The
applicant clearly described how its
procurement and contract management
policies and procedures will facilitate
effective procurement and contract
control over the proposed project, and
meet the requirements of 24 CFR part 85
and 24 CFR part 1003. The applicant
described how it will apply its
procurement and management systems
to the specific project for which it is
applying. The applicant’s current audit
does not contain any serious or
significant findings related to its
procurement and contract management
system, or if there is no current audit,
the applicant submitted a letter from its
Independent Public Accountant (IPA)
stating that its procurement and contract
management system complies with all
applicable regulatory requirements.
(1 point for current ICDBG grantees
and 5 points for new applicants) The
applicant’s current audit does not
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11459
contain any serious or significant
findings related to its procurement or
contract management system, or if there
is no current audit, the applicant
submitted a letter from its Independent
Public Accountant stating that its
procurement and contract management
system complies with all applicable
regulatory requirements. The applicant
did not describe how it would apply its
procurement and contract management
systems to the proposed project and
meet the requirements of 24 CFR part 85
and 24 CFR part 1003.
(0 points for current ICDBG grantees
or new applicants) The applicant’s
current audit included serious or
significant findings related to its
procurement and contract management
systems or if there is no current audit,
the applicant did not submit a letter
from its IPA stating its procurement and
contract management systems comply
with all regulatory requirements. The
applicant did not describe how it would
apply its procurement and contract
management systems to the proposed
project and meet the requirements of 24
CFR part 85 and 24 CFR part 1003.
2. (20 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 0 points for new
applicants) Past Performance.
HUD will evaluate your experience in
producing products and reports in
accordance with regulatory timelines for
any previous grant programs undertaken
with HUD funds for the following
performance measures. HUD reserves
the right to take into account your past
performance in meeting performance
and reporting goals on any previous
HUD awards. Applicants are not
required to respond to the subfactors
related to past performance. HUD will
rely on information on file.
a. (4 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 0 points for new
applicants). You are not more than 90
days behind schedule in meeting the
time frames established in the HUDapproved Implementation Schedule for
the ICDBG program.
(1) (4 points) The applicant is not
more than 90 days behind schedule in
meeting the timeframes established in
the HUD-approved implementation
schedule.
(2) (2 points) The applicant is not
more than 120 days behind schedule in
meeting the timeframes established in
the HUD-approved implementation
schedule.
(3) (0 points) The applicant is more
than 120 days behind schedule in
meeting timeframes established in the
HUD-approved implementation
schedule.
b. (4 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 0 points for new
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11460
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
applicants). Annual Status and
Evaluation Reports (ASER) and Federal
Cash Transaction Reports are submitted
by the report submission deadlines. The
ASER is due 45 days after the end of the
federal fiscal year on November 15.
Federal Cash Transaction Reports are
due quarterly on April 21, July 21,
October 20, and January 22.
(1) (4 points) The applicant has
submitted both the ASER and Federal
Cash Transaction Reports for ICDBG
programs by the report submission
deadlines.
(2) (2 points) The applicant has
submitted either the Federal Cash
Transaction Reports or the ASERs for
ICDBG programs by the report
submission deadline.
(3) (0 points) The applicant has
submitted neither of the required
reports by the report submission
deadline.
c. (4 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 0 points for new
applicants) You have submitted closeout documents to HUD by the required
deadline. Close-out documents are
required for the ICDBG program within
90 days of the date it is determined that
the criteria for close-out at 24 CFR
1003.508 have been met.
(1) (4 points) The applicant submitted
close-out documents to HUD in
accordance with the timeframe and
criteria at § 1003.508.
(2) (0 points) The applicant has not
submitted close-out documents to HUD
as required by § 1003.508.
d. (4 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 0 points for new
applicants) You have submitted annual
audits in accordance with OMB Circular
A–133 and its compliance supplements,
or if you have received an extension of
the audit submission date, your audit
was submitted by the extended date. If
an extension was received, submit a
copy of the extension approval. Do not
submit your audit with the application.
(1) (4 points) You have submitted
annual audits in accordance with OMB
Circular A–133 and its compliance
supplements, or if you have received an
extension of the audit submission date,
your audit was submitted by the
extended date. If an extension was
received, submit a copy of the extension
approval. If the applicant has not been
required to submit an audit, it will
receive 4 points.
(2) (0 points) You have not submitted
annual audits in accordance with OMB
Circular A–133 and its compliance
supplements or if you have received an
extension of the audit submission date,
your audit was not submitted by the
extended date.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
e. (4 points for current ICDBG
grantees and 0 points for new
applicants) You have resolved ICDBG
monitoring findings and controlled
audit findings by the established target
date, or there are no findings in current
reports. Do not submit responses to
open monitoring or audit findings with
the application.
(1) (4 points) The applicant resolved
open ICDBG monitoring findings and
controlled audit findings by the
established target date. If there were no
open audit or ICDBG monitoring
findings (current grantees only), the
applicant will receive 4 points.
(2) (0 points) The applicant has not
resolved open ICDBG monitoring
findings and controlled audit findings
by the established target date.
Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (16 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need for the proposed
project to address a documented
problem among the intended
beneficiaries.
1. (Up to 4 points) Your application
includes quantitative information
demonstrating that the proposed project
meets an essential community
development need by providing
outcomes that are critical to the viability
of the community.
2. (12 points) Your project benefits the
neediest segment of the population, in
accordance with the ICDBG program’s
primary objective defined at 24 CFR
1003.2. The criteria for this sub-factor
vary according to the type of project for
which you are applying. Please note that
you may submit data that are
unpublished and not generally available
in order to meet the requirements of this
section. However, to do so, you must
submit a demographic data statement
along with supporting documentation as
described in Section IV.B. of this NOFA.
For documenting persons employed by
the project, you do not need to submit
a demographic data statement and
corresponding documentation.
However, you do need to submit
information that describes the nature of
the jobs created or retained. Such
information includes, but is not limited
to, descriptions of proposed job
responsibilities, salaries, and the
number of full-time equivalent
positions. If you believe jobs will be
retained as a result of the ICDBG project,
include information that shows clearly
and objectively that jobs will be lost
without the ICDBG project. Jobs that are
retained only for the period of the grant
will not count under this rating factor.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
a. Public Facilities and Improvements
and Economic Development Projects
The proposed activities benefit the
neediest segment of the population, as
identified below. For economic
development projects, you may consider
beneficiaries of the project as persons
served by the project and/or persons
employed by the project, and jobs
created or retained by the project.
(1) (12 points) At least 85 percent of
the beneficiaries are low- or moderateincome.
(2) (8 points) At least 75 percent but
less than 85 percent of the beneficiaries
are low- or moderate-income.
(3) (4 points) At least 55 percent but
less than 75 percent of the beneficiaries
are low- or moderate-income.
(4) (0 points) Less than 55 percent of
the beneficiaries are low-or moderateincome.
b. New Housing Construction, Housing
Rehabilitation, Land Acquisition to
Support New Housing, and
Homeownership Assistance Projects
The need for the proposed project is
determined by utilizing data from the
tribe’s 2006 IHBG formula information.
The ratio is based on the dollars
allocated to a tribe under the IHBG
program for need divided by the sum of
the number of American Indian and
Alaskan Native (AIAN) households in
the following categories:
—Annual income less than 30 percent
of median income;
—Annual income between 30 percent
and 50 percent of median income;
—Annual income between 50 percent
and 80 percent of median income;
—Overcrowded or without kitchen or
plumbing;
—Housing cost burden greater than 50
percent of annual income;
—Housing shortage (Number of lowincome AIAN households less total
number of NAHASDA and Formula
Current Assisted Stock).
This ratio is computed for each tribe
and posted in the ‘‘Factor 2 Needs
Table’’ that is available at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm under the ICDBG
program.
(1) (12 points) The dollar amount for
the Indian tribe is $316–$750 or the
tribe’s total FY2006 IHBG amount was
$100,000 or less and the Needs Table
indicates that the Indian tribe has no
AIAN households experiencing income
or housing problems.
(2) (8 points) The dollar amount for
the Indian tribe is $751–$1,250.
(3) (4 points) The dollar amount for
the Indian tribe is $1,251–$1,999.
(4) (0 points) The dollar amount for
the Indian tribe is $2,000 or higher, or
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the Needs Table indicates that the
Indian tribe has no AIAN households
experiencing income or housing
problems.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
c. Microenterprise Programs
A microenterprise is a business that
has five or fewer employees, one or
more of whom owns the enterprise. The
owner(s) of the microenterprise must be
low- or moderate-income and the
majority of the jobs created or retained
will be for low- or moderate-income
persons. To evaluate need, the nature of
the jobs created or retained will be
evaluated. The owners of the
microenterprises are low- and moderateincome and:
(1) (12 points) All employees are lowor moderate-income.
(2) (8 points) At least 75 percent but
less than 100 percent of the employees
are low- or moderate-income.
(3) (4 points) At least 50 percent but
less than 75 percent of the employees
are low- or moderate-income.
(4) (0 points) Less than 50 percent of
the employees are low- and moderateincome.
Rating Factor 3: Soundness of Approach
(30 Points)
This factor addresses the quality and
anticipated effectiveness of your
proposed project’s outcomes in
enhancing community viability and in
meeting the needs you have identified
in Rating Factor 2 and the commitment
to sustain your proposed project. The
populations that were described in
demographics that documented need
should be the same populations that
will receive the primary benefit of the
proposed project.
1. (10 points) Description of and
Rationale for Proposed Project.
a. (10 points) The proposed project is
a viable and cost effective approach to
address the needs outlined under Rating
Factor 2 of your application. The
proposed project is described in detail
and you indicate why you believe it will
be most effective in addressing the
identified need. In order for an
application to receive full credit under
this factor, the application must include
clear and sound measures of the
proposed outputs and outcomes for how
the community’s viability will be
enhanced, as presented in Rating Factor
5. The application includes a
description of the size, type, and
location of the project and a rationale
for project design. If your application is
for construction of housing or a public
facility building or rehabilitation
project, it must also include anticipated
cost savings related to project
development due to innovative program
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
design or construction methods. For
land acquisition to support new housing
projects, you must establish that there is
a reasonable ratio between the number
of net usable acres to be acquired and
the number of low- and moderateincome households to benefit from the
project.
b. (5 points) The proposed project is
a viable and cost-effective approach to
address the needs outlined under Rating
Factor 2 of the application. The project
is described in detail and indicates why
you believe the project will be most
effective in addressing the identified
need. Proposed outcomes that will
enhance the community’s viability are
included. The application includes a
description of the size, type, and
location of the project, as well as a
rationale for project design. For land
acquisition to support new housing
projects, the applicant has established
that there is a reasonable ratio between
the number of net usable acres to be
acquired and the number of low- and
moderate-income households to benefit
from this project. The application (for
construction of housing or a public
facility building or rehabilitation
projects) does not include anticipated
cost savings due to innovative program
design and/or construction methods.
c. (3 points) The proposed project is
a viable and cost-effective approach to
address the needs outlined under Rating
Factor 2 of the application. The project
is described and you indicate why you
believe the project will be most effective
in addressing the identified need.
Proposed outcomes are included but do
not describe how the project will
enhance community viability. The
application includes a description of the
size, type, and location of the project.
For land acquisition to support new
housing projects, the applicant has
established that there is a reasonable
ratio between the number of net usable
acres to be acquired and the number of
low- and moderate-income households
to benefit from the project. The
application (for construction of housing
or a public facility building or
rehabilitation activities) does not
include anticipated cost savings due to
innovative program design and/or
construction methods.
d. (0 points) The proposed project is
not a viable and cost-effective approach
to address the needs outlined under
Rating Factor 2 of the application. The
proposed project is not described in
detail with an indication of why the
applicant believes the project will be
most effective in addressing the
identified need. Proposed outcomes
describing how the project will enhance
community viability are not included.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11461
For land acquisition to support new
housing projects, the applicant has not
established that there is a reasonable
ratio between the number of net usable
acres to be acquired and the number of
low- and moderate-income households
to benefit from the project. The
application (for construction of housing
or a public facility building and
rehabilitation activities) does not
include anticipated cost savings due to
innovative program design and/or
construction methods.
2. (5 points) Budget and Cost
Estimates.
The quality, thoroughness, and
reasonableness of the proposed project
budget are documented. Cost estimates
must be broken down by line item for
each proposed activity, including
planning and administration costs, and
documented. You must provide a
description of the qualifications of the
person who prepared the cost estimate.
3. (1 point) HUD Policy Priorities.
Your application addresses the goals
for ‘‘Improving Our Nation’s
Communities,’’ or ‘‘Energy Star,’’ two of
HUD’s 2007 policy priorities, as
described in Section V. B. of the General
Section. You must describe which one
of these two policy priorities you select
and describe how your activity will
meet the applicable goals.
4. (2 points) Intent to Meet Section 3
Requirements.
Your application demonstrates how
you will apply the Section 3
requirements of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 and the
regulations in 24 CFR part 135
(Economic Opportunities for Low- and
Very Low-Income Persons) to the
proposed project. You must demonstrate
how you will incorporate Section 3
principles, with goals for expanding
opportunities for Section 3 residents
and business concerns, to your
proposed project. The purpose of
Section 3 is to ensure that employment
and other economic opportunities
generated by federal financial assistance
for housing and community
development programs shall, to the
extent feasible, be directed toward lowand very low-income persons (but not in
derogation of compliance with Section
7(b) of the Indian Self-Determination
and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C.
4503(b))).
5. (12 points) Commitment To Sustain
Activities.
Your application demonstrates your
commitment to your community’s
viability by sustaining your proposed
activities. The information provided is
sufficient to determine that the project
will proceed effectively.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11462
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
The criteria for this sub-factor vary
according to the type of project for
which you are applying.
a. Public Facilities and Improvement
Projects
(1) (12 points) If a tribe assumes
operation and maintenance
responsibilities for the public facilities
and improvements, provide a written
statement that the tribe has adopted the
operation and maintenance plan and
commits the necessary funds to provide
for these responsibilities. In addition,
describe how the operation and
maintenance plan addresses
maintenance, repairs, insurance,
security, and replacement reserves and
include a cost breakdown for annual
expenses. If an entity other than the
tribe commits to pay for operation and
maintenance for the public facilities, a
letter of commitment from the entity is
included in the application that
identifies the maintenance
responsibilities and, if applicable, the
responsibilities for operations the entity
will assume, as well as necessary funds
to provide for these responsibilities. A
description of how the operation and
maintenance plan addresses
maintenance, repairs, insurance,
security, and replacement reserves is
not required when an entity other then
the tribe assumes operation and
maintenance responsibilities. For public
facility buildings only, a commitment is
included in the application that
identifies the source of and commits the
necessary operating funds for any
recreation, social, or other services to be
provided. In addition, letters of
commitment from service providers are
included that address both operating
expenses and space needs.
(2) (8 points) If a tribe assumes
operation and maintenance
responsibilities for the public facilities
and improvements, provide a written
statement that the tribe has adopted the
operation and maintenance plan and
commits the necessary funds to provide
for these responsibilities. In addition, a
description was included that shows
that the operation and maintenance plan
addresses at least four of the following
items (maintenance, repairs, insurance,
security, and replacement reserves) but
a satisfactory cost breakdown for annual
expenses was not included. If an entity
other than the tribe commits to pay for
operation and maintenance for the
public facilities and maintenance, a
letter of commitment from the entity is
included in the application that
identifies the maintenance
responsibilities and, if applicable, the
responsibilities for operations the entity
will assume, but no information
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
committing the necessary funds to
provide for these responsibilities is
included. A description of how the
operation and maintenance plan
addresses maintenance, repairs,
insurance, security, and replacement
reserves is not required when an entity
other than the tribe assumes operation
and maintenance responsibilities. For
community buildings only, a
commitment is included in the
application that identifies the source of
and commits the necessary operating
funds for any recreation, social, or other
services to be provided. In addition,
letters of commitment from service
providers are included that address both
operating expenses and space needs.
Information provided is sufficient to
determine that the project will proceed
effectively.
(3) (4 points) If a tribe assumes
operation and maintenance
responsibilities for the public facilities
and improvements, the application
includes a written statement that the
tribe has adopted the operation and
maintenance plan and commits the
necessary funds to provide for these
responsibilities, or a description of the
operation and maintenance plan is
included that shows that the plan
addresses at least three of the following
items (maintenance, repairs, insurance,
security, and replacement reserves). If
an entity other than the tribe commits
to pay for operation and maintenance
for the public facilities and
maintenance, the maintenance provider
is identified and, if applicable, the
responsibilities for operations the entity
will assume, but no letter of
commitment is included. For public
facility buildings only, no commitment
is included in the application that
identifies the source of and commits the
necessary operating funds for any
recreation, social, or other services to be
provided. Letters of commitment to
provide services are included but they
do not address operating expenses and
space needs. Information provided is
sufficient to determine that the project
will proceed effectively.
(4) (0 points) None of the above
criteria is met.
b. New Housing Construction, Housing
Rehabilitation, and Homeownership
Assistance Projects
(1) (12 points) The ongoing
maintenance responsibilities are clearly
identified for the tribe and/or the
participants, as applicable. If the tribe or
another entity is assuming maintenance
responsibilities, then the applicant must
describe the maintenance
responsibilities and provide a
commitment to that effect.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(2) (8 points) Maintenance
responsibilities for the tribe and/or
participants are identified and
described, but lacking in detail, and the
commitment regarding maintenance
responsibilities is submitted.
(3) (4 points) Tribal maintenance
responsibilities are identified but
participant responsibilities are either
not addressed or do not exist, or there
is no commitment regarding
maintenance responsibilities.
(4) (0 points) None of the above
criteria is met.
c. Economic Development Projects
You must include information or
documentation that addresses or
provides all of the following in the
application: a description of the
organizational system and capacity of
the entity that will operate the business;
documents that show that formal
provisions exist for separation of
government functions from business
operating decisions, an operating plan
for the project, and the feasibility and
market analysis of the proposed
business activity and the financial
viability of the project.
(1) Appropriate documents to include
in the application to address these items
include:
(a) Articles of incorporation, bylaws,
resumes of key management positions,
and board members for the entity who
will operate the business.
(b) Business operating plan.
(c) A market study no more than two
years old and which has been
conducted by an independent entity.
(d) Financial analysis and feasibility
study no more than two years old which
indicates how the proposed business
will capture a fair share of the market,
and which has been conducted by an
independent entity.
(e) Detailed cost summary for the
development of the project.
(f) For the expansion of an existing
business, copies of financial statements
for the most recent three years (or the
life of the business, if less than three
years).
(2) The submitted documentation will
be evaluated to determine the project’s
financial chance for success. The
following questions must be addressed
to meet this requirement:
(a) Does the business plan seem
thorough and does the organization
structure have quality control and
responsibilities built in?
(b) Does the business plan or market
analysis indicate that a substantial
market share is likely within five years?
(c) Do the costs appear to be
reasonable given projected income and
information about inputs?
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(d) Does the business plan or cash
flow analysis indicate that cash flow
will be positive within the first year?
(e) Is the financial statement clean
with no indications of concern by the
auditor?
(12 points) All above documents
applicable to the proposed project are
included in your application and
provide evidence that the project’s
chance for financial success is excellent.
(6 points) All or most of the above
documents applicable to the proposed
project are included and provide
evidence that the project’s chance for
financial success is reasonable.
(0 points) Neither of the above criteria
is met.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
d. Microenterprise Programs
(1) You must include the following
information or documentation in the
application that addresses or provides a
description of how your microenterprise
program will operate. Appropriate
information to include in the
application to address program
operations includes:
(a) Program description. A description
of your microenterprise program
including the types of assistance offered
to microenterprise applicants and the
types of entities eligible to apply for
such assistance.
(b) Processes for selecting applicants.
A description of your processes for
analyzing microenterprise applicants’
business plans, market studies, and
financial feasibility. For credit
programs, you must describe your
process for determining the loan terms
(i.e., interest rate, maximum loan
amount, duration, loan servicing
provisions) to be offered to individual
microenterprise applicants.
(2) (12 points) All of the above
information or documentation
applicable to the proposed project are
thoroughly addressed in the application
and the chances for success are
excellent.
(3) (6 points) All or most of the above
information or documentation
applicable to the proposed project are
addressed in the application and the
chances for success are reasonable.
(4) (0 points) Neither of the above
criteria is met.
e. Land Acquisition Projects to Support
New Housing.
Submissions must include the results
of a preliminary investigation
conducted by a qualified independent
entity demonstrating that the proposed
site has suitable soil conditions for
housing and related infrastructure,
potable drinking water is accessible for
a reasonable cost, access to utilities,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
vehicular access, drainage, nearby social
and community services, and no known
environmental problems.
(1) (12 points) The submissions
include all of the above-mentioned
items and all necessary infrastructure is
in place.
(2) (6 points) The submissions
demonstrate that the proposed site(s) is/
are suitable for housing but that not all
necessary infrastructure is in place. A
detailed description of resources to be
used and a detailed implementation
schedule for development of all
necessary infrastructure demonstrates
that such infrastructure, as needed for
proposed housing development, will be
developed in time for such
development, but no later than two
years after site purchase.
(3) (0 points) Neither of the above
criteria is met.
Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources (8
points)
HUD believes that ICDBG funds can
be used more effectively to benefit a
larger number of Native American and
Alaska Native persons and communities
if projects are developed that use tribal
resources and resources from other
entities in conjunction with ICDBG
funds. To encourage this, HUD will
award points based on the percentage of
non-ICDBG resources provided relative
to project costs as follows:
Non-ICDBG resources to
project costs
Less than 4 percent ..................
At least 4 percent but less than
11 percent .............................
At least 11 percent but less
than 18 percent .....................
At least 18 percent but less
than 25 percent .....................
25 percent or more ...................
Points
0
2
4
6
8
Contributions that could be
considered as leveraged resources for
point award include, but are not limited
to: tribal trust funds, loans from
individuals or organizations, private
foundations, businesses, state or federal
loans or guarantees, other grants
including IHBG (also known as NAHBG)
funds, donated goods and services
needed for the project, land needed for
the project, and direct administrative
costs. With the exception of land
acquisition, funds that have been
expended on the project prior to the
application deadline date will not be
counted as leverage. Applicants are
reminded that environmental review
requirements under 24 CFR part 58
apply to the commitment or use of both
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11463
ICDBG and non-ICDBG funds in a
leveraged project. See Section VI.B. of
this NOFA for information related to
this requirement.
Contributions that will not be
considered include, but are not limited
to: indirect administrative costs as
identified in OMB Circular A–87,
attachment A, section F; contributions
of resources to pay for anticipated
operations and maintenance costs of the
proposed project; and, in the cases of
expansions to existing facilities, the
value of the existing facility.
To be considered for point award,
letters of firm or projected
commitments, memoranda of
understanding, or agreements to
participate from any entity, including
the tribe that will be providing a
contribution to the project, must
accompany the application. The
documentation must be received by
HUD in the paper application package
(if you have received a waiver of the
electronic submission requirement) or
for electronically submitted
applications, the documentation must
be scanned and submitted as part of the
application documents or sent by
facsimile transmittal (see the General
Section). To receive funding
consideration, all documents must be
received by the application deadline
dates and meet the timely receipt
requirements.
To demonstrate the commitment of
tribal resources, the application must
contain a written statement that
identifies and commits the tribal
resources to the project, subject to
approval of the ICDBG assistance. In the
case of IHBG funds, whether the tribe or
a TDHE administers them, an approved
Indian Housing Plan (IHP) must identify
and commit the IHBG resources to the
project. Do not submit the IHP with
your application. ONAP will rely on the
most recently approved IHP on file. If
the tribe/TDHE intends to include the
leveraged commitment in a future IHP,
the application must contain a written
statement that identifies and commits
the IHBG resources to the project subject
to the same requirements as above.
To demonstrate the commitment of a
public agency, foundation, or other
private party resources, a letter of
commitment, memorandum of
understanding, and/or agreement to
participate, including any conditions to
which the contribution may be subject,
must be submitted with the application.
All letters of commitment must include
the donor organization’s name, the
specific resource proposed, the dollar
amount of the financial or in-kind
resource and method for valuation, and
the purpose of that resource within the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11464
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
proposed project. An official of the
organization legally authorized to make
commitments on behalf of the
organization must sign the commitment.
HUD recognizes that in some cases,
firm commitments of non-tribal
resources may not be obtainable by your
tribe by the application deadline. For
such projected resources, your
application must include a statement
from the contributing entity that
describes why the firm commitment
cannot be made at the current time and
affirms that your tribe and the proposed
project meets eligibility criteria for
receiving the resource. In addition, a
date by which the funding decisions
will be made must be included. This
date cannot be more than six months
from the anticipated date of grant
approval by HUD. Should HUD not
receive notification of the firm
commitment within 6 months of the
date of grant approval, HUD will
recapture the grant funds approved and
will use them in accordance with the
requirements of 24 CFR 1003.102.
In addition to the above requirements,
for all contributions of goods, services
and land, you must demonstrate that the
donated items are necessary to the
actual development of the project and
include comparable costs that support
the donation. Land valuation must be
established using one of the following
methods and the documentation must
be contained in the application: a sitespecific appraisal no more than two
years old; an appraisal of a nearby
comparable site also no more than two
years old; a reasonable extrapolation of
land value based on current area realtor
value guides; or a reasonable
extrapolation of land value based on
recent sales of similar properties in the
same area.
Rating Factor 5: Comprehensiveness and
Coordination (6 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which your project planning and
proposed implementation reflect a
coordinated, community-based process
of identifying and addressing needs,
including assisting beneficiaries and the
program to achieve self-sufficiency/
sustainability.
The Logic Model, HUD form 96010, is
not required for Rating Factor 5 under
the ICDBG program. However,
applicants are encouraged to use this
form to address program evaluation
requirements under Rating Factor
1.(1).(b) of this NOFA, and measurable
outputs and outcomes in Section (2) of
this factor.
1. (Up to 2 points) The application
addresses the extent to which you have
coordinated your proposed ICDBG
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
activities with other organizations and/
or tribal departments that are not
providing direct financial support to
your proposed work activities, but with
which you share common goals and
objectives and are working toward
meeting these objectives in a holistic
and comprehensive manner. For
example, your project is consistent with
and, to the extent possible, identified in
the IHP (One-Year Financial Resources
Narrative; Table 2, Financial Resources,
Part I., Line 1E; and, Table 2, Financial
Resources, Part II) submitted by you or
on your behalf for the IHBG (also known
as NAHBG) program. If the IHP for the
IHBG (also known as NAHBG) program
year that coincides with the
implementation of the ICDBG proposed
project has not been submitted, you
must provide a written statement that
when submitted, the IHP will
specifically reference the proposed
project.
2. (Up to 4 points) Your proposed
project will have measurable outputs
and outcomes that will enhance
community viability.
Outputs must include, where
applicable:
• Number of houses rehabilitated;
• Number of jobs created;
• Square feet for any public facility;
• Number of education or job training
opportunities provided;
• Number of homeownership units
constructed or financed;
• Number of businesses assisted
(including number of minority/Native
American);
• Number of families proposed to be
assisted through a drug-elimination
program, or through a program to reduce
or eliminate health-related hazards.
Outcomes must include, where
appropriate:
• Reduction in the number of families
living in substandard housing;
• Increased income resulting from
employment generated by project;
• Increased quality of life due to
services provided by the public facility;
• Increased economic self-sufficiency
of program beneficiaries;
• Increase in homeownership rates;
• Reduction of drug-related crime or
health-related hazards.
HUD is providing a Master Logic
Model as a Microsoft ExcelTM file with
dropdown listings from which
applicants may select the items in each
column that reflect their activity outputs
and outcomes. The Master Logic Model
listing also identifies the unit of
measure that HUD is interested in
collecting for the output and outcome
selected. Applicants can also select the
appropriate estimated number of units
of measure to be accomplished and
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
identified for each output and outcome.
The space next to the output and
outcome is intended to capture the
anticipated units of measure. Multiple
outputs and outcomes may be selected
per project. For FY 2007, HUD is
considering a new concept for the Logic
Model. The new concept is a Return on
Investment (ROI) statement. HUD will
be publishing a separate notice on the
ROI concept. The Master Logic Model
pick is incorporated into the form
available as part of the ICDBG
Instructions download from Grants.gov.
Training on use of the dropdown form
will be provided via webcast. The
schedule for webcast training can be
found at https://www.hud.gov/offices/
adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.
B. Reviews and Selection Process
1. Application Selection Process. You
must meet all of the applicable
threshold requirements listed in Section
III.C. Your application must meet all
screening for acceptance requirements
and all identified applicant and project
specific thresholds. HUD will review
each application and assign points in
accordance with the selection factors
described in this section.
2. Threshold Compliance. The Area
ONAP will review each application that
passes the screening process to ensure
that each applicant and each proposed
project meets the applicant threshold
requirements set forth in 24 CFR
1003.301(a) and the project specific
threshold requirements set forth in 24
CFR 1003.302 and III.C. of this NOFA.
3. Past Performance. An applicant’s
past performance is evaluated under
Rating Factor 1. Applicants are
encouraged to address all performancerelated criteria prior to the application
deadline date. An applicant must score
a minimum of 20 points under Rating
Factor 1 in order to meet the minimum
point requirements outlined below in
this NOFA.
4. Rating. The Area ONAP will review
and rate each project that meets the
acceptance criteria and threshold
requirements.
After the applications are rated, a
summary review of all applications will
be conducted to ensure consistency in
the application rating. The summary
review will be performed by either the
Grants Management Director (or
designee) or by a panel composed of up
to three staff members.
The total points for all rating factors
are 100. A maximum of 100 points may
be awarded under Rating Factors 1
through 5.
5. Minimum Points. To be considered
for funding, your application must
receive a minimum of 20 points under
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Rating Factor 1 and an application score
of 70 points.
6. Ranking. All projects will be ranked
against each other according to the point
totals they receive, regardless of the type
of project or component under which
the points were awarded. Projects will
be selected for funding based on the
final ranking to the extent that funds are
available. The Area ONAP will
determine individual grant amounts in
a manner consistent with the
considerations set forth in 24 CFR
1003.100(b)(2). Specifically, the Area
ONAP may approve a grant amount less
than the amount requested. In doing so,
the Area ONAP may take into account
the size of the applicant, the level of
demand, the scale of the activity
proposed relative to need and
operational capacity, the number of
persons to be served, the amount of
funds required to achieve project
objectives, and the reasonableness of the
project costs. If the Area ONAP
determines that there are not enough
funds available to fund a project as
proposed by the applicant, it may
decline to fund that project and may
fund the next highest-ranking project or
projects for which adequate funds are
available. The Area ONAP shall select,
in rank order, additional projects for
funding if one of the higher-ranking
projects is not funded or if additional
funds become available.
7. Tiebreakers. When rating results in
a tie among projects and insufficient
resources remain to fund all tied
projects, the Area ONAP will approve
projects that can be fully funded over
those that cannot be fully funded. When
that does not resolve the tie, the Area
ONAP will use the following factors in
the order listed to resolve the tie:
(a) The applicant that has not received
an ICDBG over the longest period of
time.
(b) The applicant with the fewest
active ICDBGs.
(c) The project that would benefit the
highest percentage of low- and
moderate-income persons.
8. Technical Deficiencies and PreAward Requirements
a. Technical Deficiencies. If there are
technical deficiencies in successful
applications, you must satisfactorily
address these deficiencies before HUD
can make a grant award. See the General
Section at V.B.4. for information on
curing deficiencies.
b. Pre-award Requirements.
Successful applicants may be required
to provide supporting documentation
concerning the management,
maintenance, operation, or financing of
proposed projects before a grant
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
agreement can be executed. Such
documentation may include additional
specifications on the scope, magnitude,
timing or method of implementing the
project; or information to verify the
commitment of other resources required
to complete, operate, or maintain the
proposed project. Applicants will be
provided thirty (30) calendar days to
respond to these requirements. No
extensions will be provided. If you do
not respond within the prescribed time
period or you make an insufficient
response, the Area ONAP will
determine that you have not met the
requirements and will withdraw the
grant offer. You may not substitute new
projects for those originally proposed in
your application and any new
information will not affect your project’s
rating and ranking. The Area ONAP will
award, in accordance with the
provisions of this NOFA, grant amounts
that had been allocated for applicants
unable to meet pre-award requirements.
9. Error and Appeals. Judgments made
within the provisions of this NOFA and
the program regulations (24 CFR part
1003) are not subject to claims of error.
You may bring arithmetic errors in the
rating and ranking of applications to the
attention of the Area ONAPs within 30
days of being informed of your score.
Please see Section VI.A. of the General
Section for further information
regarding errors.
10. Performance and Compliance
Actions of Funding Recipients. HUD
will measure and address the
performance of and order compliance
actions by funding recipients in
accordance with the applicable
standards and sanctions of their
respective programs.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices. HUD expects to
announce awards by October 31, 2007.
As soon as rating and ranking are
completed, the applicant has complied
with any pre-award requirements, and
Congressional release has been
obtained, a grant award letter, a grant
agreement, and other forms and
certifications will be mailed to the
recipient for signature and return to the
Area ONAP. The grant agreement,
which is signed by HUD and the
recipient, establishes the conditions by
which both the Area ONAP and the
recipient must abide during the life of
the grant. All grants are conditioned on
the completion of all environmental
obligations and approval of release of
funds by the Area ONAP in accordance
with the requirements of 24 CFR part
58. HUD may impose other grant
conditions if additional actions or
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11465
approvals are required before the use of
funds.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements
a. Environmental Requirements. As
required by 24 CFR 1003.605, ICDBG
grantees must perform environmental
reviews of ICDBG activities in
accordance with 24 CFR part 58 (as
amended September 29, 2003). Grantees
and other participants in the
development process may not commit
or expend any ICDBG or nonfederal
funds on project activities (other than
those listed in 24 CFR 58.22(f), 58.34, or
58.35(b)) until HUD has approved a
Request for Release of Funds and the
grantee has submitted an environmental
certification. The expenditure or
commitment of ICDBG or nonfederal
funds for such activities prior to HUD
approval may result in the denial of
assistance for the project or activities
under consideration.
b. Indian Preference. HUD has
determined that the ICDBG program is
subject to Section 7(b) of the Indian
Self-Determination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450e(b)). The
provisions and requirements for
implementing this section are in 24 CFR
1003.510.
c. Anti-discrimination Provisions.
Under the authority of Section 107(e)(2)
of the CDBG statute, HUD waived the
requirement that recipients comply with
the anti-discrimination provisions in
Section 109 of the CDBG statute with
respect to race, color, and national
origin. You must comply with the other
prohibitions against discrimination in
Section 109 (HUD’s regulations for
Section 109 are in 24 CFR part 6) and
with the Indian Civil Rights Act.
d. Conflict of Interest. In addition to
the conflict-of-interest requirements
with respect to procurement
transactions found in 24 CFR 85.36 and
84.42, as applicable, the provisions of
24 CFR 1003.606 apply to such
activities as the provision of assistance
by the recipient or sub-recipients to
businesses, individuals, and other
private entities under eligible activities
that authorize such assistance.
e. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). Section 3 requirements apply to the
ICDBG program, but as stated in 24 CFR
135.3(c), the procedures and
requirements of 24 CFR part 135 apply
to the maximum extent consistent with,
but not in derogation of, compliance
with Indian Preference.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11466
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
2. OMB Circulars and Governmentwide Regulations Applicable to
Financial Assistance Programs. The
policies, guidance and requirements of
OMB Circular A–87 (Cost Principles
Applicable to Grants, Contracts, and
other Agreements with State and Local
Governments); OMB Circular A–122
(Cost Principles for Nonprofit
Organizations); OMB Circular A–133
(Audits of State and Local Governments,
and Nonprofit Organizations); and the
regulations at 24 CFR part 85
(Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to
State, Local and Federally Recognized
Indian Tribal Governments) apply to the
award, acceptance, and use of assistance
under the ICDBG program and to the
remedies for noncompliance, except
when inconsistent with the provisions
of the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007)
or the ICDBG program regulations at 24
CFR part 1003. Copies of the OMB
Circulars may be obtained from EOP
publications, Room 22000, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, telephone (202) 395–3080
(this is not a toll-free number) or (800)
877–8339 (TTY Federal Information
Relay Service). Information may also be
obtained from the OMB Web site at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
circulars/.
C. Reporting
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
1. Post-Award Reporting Requirements
a. Quarterly Financial Reports. Grant
recipients must submit to the Area
ONAP a quarterly SF–272, Federal Cash
Transaction Report. The report accounts
for funds received and disbursed by the
recipient.
b. Annual Status and Evaluation
Report. Recipients are required to
submit this report in narrative form
annually. The report is due 45 days after
the end of the federal fiscal year and at
the time of grant close-out. The report
must include:
(1) The narrative report must address
the progress made in completing
approved activities and include a list of
work remaining, along with a revised
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
implementation schedule, if necessary.
This report should include progress on
any outputs or outcomes specified in
Rating Factor 5 and incorporated into
the final award document (applicants
can use the Logic Model (HUD–96010)
to address all or some of the narrative
requirements). Further information
regarding the Return on Investment(s)
will be issued in a subsequent notice by
HUD (see section V.A.2., Rating Factor
5 of this NOFA for further information);
(2) A breakdown of funds spent on
each major project activity or category;
and
(3) If the project has been completed,
an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
project in meeting the community
development needs of the grantee, as
well as the final outputs and outcomes.
c. Minority Business Enterprise
Report. Recipients must submit this
report on contract and subcontract
activity during the first half of the fiscal
year by April 10 and, by October 10 for
the second half of the fiscal year.
d. A close-out report must be
submitted by the recipient within 90
days of completion of grant activities.
The report consists of the final Financial
Status Report (forms SF 269 or 269A),
the final Status and Evaluation Report
including outputs and outcomes agreed
upon in the final award document
relating to Rating Factor 5 and the
Close-Out Agreement.
More information regarding these
requirements may be found at 24 CFR
1003.506 and 1003.508.
VII. Agency Contact(s)
A. General Questions. You should
direct general program questions to the
Area ONAP serving your area. A list
identifying each Area ONAP is provided
at https://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/ih/
onap/area_onap.cfm. Persons with
speech or hearing impairments may call
HUD’s TTY number 202 708–0770, or
1–800–877–8339 (the Federal
Information Relay Service TTY). Other
than the ‘‘800’’ numbers, these numbers
are not toll-free. You should direct
questions concerning downloading the
electronic application, registering with
Grants.gov, or other questions regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
the electronic application to the
Grants.gov support desk at 800–518–
GRANTS. You may also send an e-mail
to Support@Grants.gov.
B. Technical Assistance. Before the
application deadline date, HUD staff
will be available to provide you with
general guidance and technical
assistance about the requirements in the
General Section and this NOFA.
However, HUD staff is not permitted to
assist in preparing your application.
Following selection of applicants, but
before awards are made, HUD staff is
available to assist in clarifying or
confirming information that is a
prerequisite to the offer of an award.
VIII. Other Information
A. NOFA Training. Training for
potential applicants on the requirements
of the General Section, this NOFA, the
Logic Model, and Grants.gov
registration, will be provided by HUD
via broadcast and webcast. Information
on the training can be found in the
General Section. The training schedule
can be found on HUD’s Web site at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
Statement. The information collection
requirements in this NOFA have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2577–0191. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 43 hours per annum for the
application and grant administration.
This includes the time for collecting,
reviewing, and reporting the data. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11467
EN13MR07.006
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11468
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities (HBCU) Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Policy Development and
Research, Office of University
Partnerships.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities (HBCU) Program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Numbers:
FR–5100-N–10; OMB Approval Number
is 2528–0235.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: The CFDA
Number for this program is 14.520.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 23, 2007. Application must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
by 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
deadline date. Please be sure to read the
General Section for electronic
application submission and receipt
requirements.
G. Additional Overview Content
Information:
1. Purpose of the Program: To assist
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities (HBCU) to expand their
role and effectiveness in addressing
community development needs in their
localities, including neighborhood
revitalization, housing and economic
development, principally for persons of
low- and moderate-income consistent
with the purposes of Title I of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974, as amended.
2. Award Information: In Fiscal Year
(FY) 2007, approximately $8.9 million
has been made available by the Revised
Continuing Appropriations Resolution,
2007 (Pub. L. 110–5; approved February
15, 2007), of which up to $1 million has
been allocated to provide technical
assistance and an additional $22,275 in
carryover funds. An applicant can
request up to $600,000 for a three-year
(36 months) grant performance period.
In order to ensure that institutions that
have never received a HUD HBCU
Program grant (First Time HBCU
applicants) receive awards in this
competition, approximately $1.8 million
will be made available to fund First
Time HBCU applicants. In addition,
approximately, $6.1 million will be
made available to fund Previously
Funded HBCU applicants. If funding
designated for First Time HBCU
applicants remains after all eligible First
Time HBCU applicants are awarded, the
remaining funds will be made available
to fund eligible Previously Funded
HBCU applicants.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
3. Eligible Applicants: Historically
Black Colleges and Universities that
meet the definition of Historically Black
Colleges and Universities as determined
by the Department of Education in 34
CFR 608.2 in accordance with that
Department’s responsibilities under
Executive Order 13256, dated February
12, 2002. Applicants must be
institutions of higher education
accredited by a national or regional
accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The purpose of the Historically Black
Colleges and Universities (HBCU)
Program is to expand their role and
effectiveness in addressing community
development needs in their localities,
including neighborhood revitalization,
housing, and economic development,
principally for persons of low- and
moderate-income, consistent with the
purpose of the Title I of Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974,
as amended.
For the purposes of this program
NOFA, the term ‘‘locality’’ includes any
city, county, township, parish, village,
or other general political subdivision of
a state, or the U.S. Virgin Islands where
the institution is located and the term
‘‘target area’’ is the area within the
locality in which the institution will
implement its proposed HBCU grant. If
an institution wants to provide services/
activities in a location other than the
target area of that institution an
applicant must provide justification for
why they want to do so.
A. Authority
HUD’s authority for making funding
available under this NOFA is the
Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5;
approved February 15, 2007). This
program is being implemented through
this NOFA and the policies governing
its operation are contained herein.
B. Modifications
Listed below are major modifications
from the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 programfunding announcement:
1. In FY 2007, there is only one
category of funding. In FY 2006, there
were two categories, one of which
exclusively funded activities related to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. No funding
is being set aside for this purpose this
year.
2. Commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements are
not required to be submitted with the
application, but the originals must be on
file at the time of application
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
submission. HUD will require
applicants chosen to proceed to the next
step in the selection process to submit
the signed commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements outlined in the application,
within seven calendar days after initial
contact from the Office of University
Partnerships (OUP). OUP will provide
specific instructions on how these
documents must be submitted at that
time. HUD will only request and
consider the resources/organizations
outlined in the application. If OUP does
not receive those documents with the
required information and within the
allotted timeframe, an applicant will not
receive points under this factor.
3. The appendix section of an
application must not exceed 15 pages in
length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and assurances). An applicant
SHOULD NOT submit resumes,
commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements, or
other back-up material. Each page must
include the institution’s name and
should be numbered. HUD will not
consider the information on any excess
pages.
4. Applicants must budget for travel
costs to attend at least one HUD
sponsored HBCU conference/workshop
every year of the three-year grant
performance period.
II. Award Information
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2007,
approximately $8.9 million is made
available for this program, of which up
to $1 million has been allocated to
provide technical assistance and an
additional $22,275 in carryover funds.
An applicant can request up to $600,000
for a three-year (36 months) grant
performance period.
In order to ensure that institutions
that have never received a HUD HBCU
Program grant (First Time HBCU
applicants) receive awards in this
competition, approximately $1.8 million
will be made available to fund First
Time HBCU applicants. In addition,
approximately $6.1 million will be
made available to fund Previously
Funded HBCU applicants. If funding
designated for First Time HBCU
applicants remains after all eligible First
Time HBCU applicants are awarded, the
remaining funds will be made available
to fund eligible Previously Funded
HBCU applicants.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities as determined by the U.S.
Department of Education in 34 CFR
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
608.2 in accordance with that
Department’s responsibilities under
Executive Order 13256, dated February
12, 2002. All applicants must be
institutions of higher education
accredited by a national or regional
accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
None Required.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Eligible
activities are listed in 24 CFR part 570,
subpart C, particularly §§ 570.201
through 570.206. Information regarding
these activities can be found at:
www.hudclips.org (click on the Code of
Federal Regulations for detailed
information). The 15 percent cap on the
total grant amount that can be used on
public service activities that benefit
low- and moderate-income persons can
be waived. Institutions seeking to
devote more than 15 percent of the grant
funds to public service activities must
include a written request in their
application addressed to Darlene F.
Williams, Assistant Secretary for Policy
Development and Research. The written
request must include the following
information: 1) the basis for the request;
2) a description of the proposed public
service activities; 3) the dollar amount
dedicated to the proposed public service
activities; and 4) a statement describing
how the proposed activities meet the
Community Development Block Grant
eligibility requirements and at least one
national objective. This letter must be
included in the application. If an
applicant devotes more than 15 percent
of their grant funds to public service
activities and the letter is not included
and/or does not include the information
requested above those activities may not
be considered fundable and this
exclusion may result in a lower score.
a. Examples of eligible activities
include, but are not limited to:
(1) Acquisition of real property;
(2) Clearance and demolition;
(3) Rehabilitation of residential
structures including lead-based paint
hazard evaluation and reduction and
making accessibility and visitabilty
modifications in accordance with the
requirements of Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
(4) Public facilities and
improvements, such as water and sewer
facilities and streets compliance with
accessibility requirements including
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, the Fair Housing Act, and the
American with Disabilities Act of 1990;
(5) Special economic development
activities described at 24 CFR 570.203
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
and assistance to facilitate economic
development by providing technical or
financial assistance for the
establishment, stabilization, and
expansion of microenterprises,
including minority enterprises;
(6) Assistance to community-based
development organizations (CBDO) to
carry out a CDBG neighborhood
revitalization, community economic
development, or energy conservation
projects, in accordance with 24 CFR
570.204. This could include activities in
support of a HUD-approved local
entitlement grantee, CDBG
Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy
(NRS) or HUD-approved State CDBG
Community Revitalization Strategy
(CRS);
(7) Public service activities such as
those general support activities that can
help to stabilize a neighborhood and
contribute to sustainable redevelopment
of the area, including but not limited to
such activities as those concerned with
employment, crime prevention, child
care, health care services, drug abuse,
education, fair housing counseling,
energy conservation, homebuyer down
payment assistance, establishment of
Neighborhood Network centers in
federally assisted or insured housing,
job training and placement, and
recreational needs;
(8) Payments of reasonable grant
administrative costs related to planning
and execution of the project (e.g.,
preparation/submission of HUD
reports). Detailed explanations of these
costs are provided in the OMB circular
(A–21 Cost Principals for Educational
Institutions) that can be accessed at the
White House Web site,
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/
index.html; and
(9) Fair housing services designed to
further the civil rights objectives of the
Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601–20) by
making all persons, without regard to
race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
familial status and/or disability aware of
the range of housing opportunities
available to them.
b. Eligible activities funded under this
program meet both the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program eligibility requirements and at
least one of the national objectives.
c. The three national objectives of the
Community Development Block Grant
program are listed in Rating Factor 3 in
Section V.A.3 of this NOFA.
Criteria for determining whether an
activity addresses one or more national
objective are provided at 24 CFR
570.208. The CDBG publication entitled
‘‘Community Development Block Grant
Program Guide to National Objectives
and Eligible Activities for Entitlement
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11469
Communities’’ describes the CDBG
regulations, and a copy can be obtained
from HUD’s NOFA Information Center
at 800–HUD–8929. Individuals with
hearing or speech impairments may
access this number via the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
2. Threshold Requirements
Applicable to all Applicants. All
applicants must comply with the
threshold requirements as defined in the
General Section and the requirements
listed below. Applications that do not
meet these requirements will be
considered ineligible for funding and
will be disqualified.
a. The applicant must meet the
eligibility requirements as defined in
Section III.A.
b. The maximum amount an applicant
can request is $600,000 for a three-year
(36 months) grant performance period.
c. An applicant must have a DUNS
number to receive HUD grant funds.
(See the General Section). Only one
application can be submitted per
institution. If multiple applications are
submitted all will be disqualified.
However, different campuses of the
same university system are eligible to
apply as long as they have separate
DUNS number, an administrative and
budgeting structure independent of the
other campuses in the system.
d. Applicants must receive a
minimum score of 75 points to be
considered for funding.
e. Electronic applications must be
received and validated by grants.gov no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on
the application deadline date.
3. Program Requirements. In addition
to the threshold requirements listed in
Section III C. of the General Section,
applicants must meet the following
program requirements:
a. All funds awarded are for a threeyear (36 months) grant performance
period.
b. Applicants must ensure that not
less than 51 percent of the aggregated
expenditures of the grant benefit lowand moderate-income persons under the
criteria specified in 24 CFR 570.208(a)
or 570.208(d)(5) or (6).
c. Site Control. Where grant funds
will be used for acquisition,
rehabilitation, or new construction an
applicant must demonstrate site control.
Funds may be recaptured or deobligated
from recipients that cannot demonstrate
control of a suitable site within one year
after the initial notification of award.
d. Environmental Requirements.
Selection for award does not constitute
approval of any proposed sites.
Following selection for award, HUD will
perform an environmental review of
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11470
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
properties proposed for assistance in
accordance with 24 CFR part 50. The
results of the environmental review may
require that proposed activities be
modified or proposed sites be rejected.
Applicants are particularly cautioned
not to undertake or commit funds for
acquisition or development of proposed
properties prior to HUD approval of
specific properties or areas. An
application constitutes an assurance
that the institution will assist HUD to
comply with part 50; will supply HUD
with all available and relevant
information to perform an
environmental review for each proposed
property; will carry out mitigating
measures required by HUD or select
alternate property; and will not acquire,
rehabilitate, convert, demolish, lease,
repair, or construct property, and not
commit or expend HUD or local funds
for these program activities with respect
to any eligible property until HUD’s
written approval of the property is
received. In supplying HUD with
environmental information, applicants
should use the same guidance as
provided in the HUD Notice CPD–05–07
entitled, ‘‘Field Environmental Review
Processing for Rural Housing and
Economic Development (RHED) Grants’’
issued August 30, 2005. Further
information and assistance on HUD’s
environmental requirements is available
at: https://www.hud.gov/utilities/
intercept.cfm?/offices/cpd/lawsregs/
notices/2005/05–07.pdf.
e. Labor Standards. Institutions and
their sub-grantees, contractors and
subcontractors must comply with the
labor standards (Davis-Bacon)
requirements referenced in 24 CFR
570.603.
f. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very-Low Income Persons (Section
3). The provisions of Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) apply to this
NOFA. One of the purposes of the
assistance is to give, to the greatest
extent feasible, and consistent with
existing federal, state, and local laws
and regulations, job training,
employment, contracting and other
economic opportunities to Section 3
residents and Section 3 business
concerns. Regulations are located at 24
CFR part 135.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Addresses To Request Application
Package
Applicants may download the
instructions to the application found on
the Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information you
may call the Grants.gov Support Desk
toll free 800–518–GRANTS or e-mail
your questions to Support@Grants.gov.
Hearing- and speech-challenged
individuals may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339. See the General Section
for information regarding the
registration process or ask for
registration information from the
Grants.gov Support Desk.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Forms. The following forms are
required for submission. Copies of these
forms are available on line at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance;
b. SF–424 Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
c. HUD–424-CB, ‘‘Grant Application
Detailed Budget’’ (‘‘HUD Detailed
Budget Form’’ on Grants.gov);
d. SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities, if applicable;
e. HUD–27300, Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov), if applicable;
f. HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
g. HUD–96010, Program Logic Model;
h. HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic
Plan, if applicable;
i. HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan,
if applicable;
j. HUD–40076, Response Sheet
Performance Narrative, Previously
Funded HBCU Applicant Only.
k. HUD–40076, Budget-By-Activity;
l. HUD–2993, Acknowledgement of
Applicant Receipt. Complete this form if
you have received a waiver to the
electronic application submission
requirement. Applicants are not
required to include this form;
m. HUD–2994–A, You Are Our Client
Grant Applicant Survey. Applicants are
not required to complete this form; and
n. HUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov). This form must be used as
the cover page to transmit third party
documents and other information.
Applicants are advised to download the
application package, complete the SF–
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
424 first and it will pre-populate the
Transmittal Cover page. The Transmittal
Cover page will contain a unique
identifier embedded in the page that
will help HUD associate your faxed
materials to your application. Please do
not use your own fax sheet. HUD will
not read any faxes that are sent without
the HUD–96011 fax transmittal cover
page.
2. Certifications and Assurances.
Please read the General Section for
detailed information on all
Certifications and Assurances. All
applications submitted through
Grants.gov constitute an
acknowledgement and agreement to all
required certifications and assurances.
Please include in your application each
item listed below. Applicants
submitting paper copy applications
should submit the application in the
following order:
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance. Please remember the
following:
(1) The full grant amount requested
from HUD (entire three-years) should be
entered, not the amount for just one
year;
(2) Include the name, title, address,
telephone number, facsimile number,
and e-mail address of the designated
contact. This is the person who will
receive all correspondence, therefore,
please ensure the accuracy of the
information;
(3) The Employer Identification/Tax
ID number;
(4) The DUNS Number;
(5) The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number for this program is
14.520;
(6) The project’s proposed start date
and completion date. For the purpose of
this application, the program start date
should be December 1, 2007; and
(7) The signature of the Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR) who
by virtue of submitting an application
via Grants.gov has been authenticated
by the credential provider to submit
applications on behalf of the Institution
and approved by the eBusiness Point of
Contact to submit an application via
Grants.gov. The AOR must be able to
make a legally binding agreement with
HUD.
b. Application Checklist. Applicants
should use the checklist to ensure that
they have all the required components
of their application. Applicants that
receive a waiver of the electronic
application submission requirement
must include a copy of the checklist in
their application submission.
Applicants submitting an electronic
application should not submit the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
checklist. The checklist can be located
in Appendix A.
c. Abstract. Applicants must include
no more than a two-page summary of
the proposed project. Please include the
following:
(1) A brief description of each
proposed project activity, where it will
take place (be located), the target
population that will be assisted, and the
impact this project is expected to have
on the community and institution;
(2) A statement that the institution is
an eligible institution because it is a
fully accredited institution, the name of
the accrediting agency and an assurance
that the accrediting agency is recognized
by the U.S. Department of Education;
(3) The designated contact person,
including phone number, facsimile
number, and e-mail address (This is the
person who will receive all
correspondence; therefore, please
ensure the accuracy of the information);
(4) The project director, if different
from the designated contact person, for
the project, including phone number,
facsimile number, and e-mail address.
d. Narrative statement addressing the
Factors. HUD will use the narrative
response to the ‘‘Rating Factors’’ to
evaluate, rate, and rank applications.
The narrative statement is the main
source of information. Applicants are
advised to review each factor carefully
for program specific requirements. The
response to each factor should be
concise and contain only information
relevant to the factor, yet detailed
enough to address each factor fully.
PLEASE DO NOT REPEAT MATERIAL
IN RESPONSE TO THE FIVE FACTORS;
INSTEAD, FOCUS ON HOW WELL THE
PROPOSAL RESPONDS TO EACH OF
THE FACTORS. Where there are
subfactors each subfactor must be
presented separately, with the short title
of the subfactor presented. Make sure to
address each subfactor and provide
sufficient information about every
element of the subfactor. The narrative
section of an application must not
exceed 50 pages in length (excluding
forms, budget narrative, assurances, and
abstract) and must be submitted on 81⁄2
by 11-inch paper, double-spaced on one
side of the paper, with one inch margins
(from the top, bottom, and left to right
side of the document) and printed in
standard Times New Roman 12-point
font. Each page of the narrative must
include the institution’s name and
should be numbered. Note that although
submitting pages in excess of the page
limit will not disqualify an applicant,
HUD will not consider the information
on any excess pages. This exclusion
may result in a lower score or failure to
meet a threshold requirement. All
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
applicants submitting electronic
applications must attach their narrative
responses to Rating Factors 1–5 as one
attachment. PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH
YOUR RESPONSE TO EACH FACTOR
SEPARATELY. Please follow the
instructions on file extension and file
names in the General Section.
e. Budget. The budget submission
must include the following:
(1) HUD–424–CB, ‘‘Grant Application
Detailed Budget.’’ This form shows the
total budget by year and by line item for
the program activities to be carried out
with the proposed HUD grant. Each year
of the program should be presented
separately. Applicants must also budget
for travel costs (airfare, lodging and per
diem) for two individuals to attend at
least one HUD sponsored HBCU
conference/workshop every year of the
three-year grant performance period. To
calculate travel expenses, applicants
located in Eastern and Central time
zones or the U.S. Virgin Islands should
use San Francisco, CA as the site of all
conferences/meetings. Applicants
located in Mountain and Pacific time
zones should use Washington, DC as the
site of all conferences/workshops.
Applicants must also submit this form
to reflect the total cost (summary) for
the entire grant performance period
(Grand Total).
(2) HUD–40076–HBCU, ‘‘Response
Sheet, Budget-By-Activity’’ The form
should include a listing of each activity
and task necessary to be performed to
implement the program, the overall
costs for each activity, and the cost from
each funding source. The budget-byactivity should clearly indicate the HUD
grant amount and identify the source
and dollar amount of the leveraged
resources, if any.
Make sure that the amounts shown on
the SF–424, HUD–424–CB, HUD–
40076–HBCU and all other required
program forms are consistent and the
budget totals are correct. Remember to
check addition in totaling the categories
on all forms so that all items are
included in the total. If there is an
inconsistency between any of the
required budget forms, the HUD–424–
CB will be used. All budget forms must
be completed fully. If an application is
selected for award, the applicant may be
required to provide greater specificity to
the budget during grant agreement
negotiations.
(3) Budget Narrative. A narrative must
be submitted that explains how the
applicant arrived at the cost estimates
for any line item over $5,000
cumulative. For example, an applicant
proposes to construct a building using
HUD funding totaling $200,000. The
following costs estimate reflects this
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11471
total. Foundation cost $75,000,
electrical work $40,000, plumbing work
$40,000, finishing work $35,000, and
landscaping $10,000. The proposed cost
estimates should be reasonable for the
work to be performed and consistent
with rates established for the level of
expertise required to perform the work
proposed in the geographical area.
When necessary, quotes from various
vendors or historical data should be
used (please make sure they are kept on
file and are available for review by HUD
at any time). When an applicant
proposes to use a consultant, the
applicant must indicate whether there is
a formal written agreement. For each
consultant, please provide the name, if
known, hourly or daily rate, and the
estimated time on the project.
Applicants must use a cost estimate
based on historical data from the
institution, and/or from a qualified firm
(e.g., Architectural or Engineering firm),
vendor, and/or qualified individual
(e.g., independent architect or
contractor) other than the institution for
projects that involve rehabilitation of
residential, commercial and/or
industrial structures, and/or acquisition,
construction, or installation of public
facilities and improvements. Such an
entity must be involved in the business
of housing rehabilitation, construction
and/or management. Equipment and
contracts cannot be presented as a total
estimated costs. For equipment,
applicants must provide a list by type
and cost for each item. Applicants using
contracts must provide an individual
description and cost estimate for each
contract. Construction costs must be
broken down to indicate how funds will
be utilized (e.g., demolition, foundation,
exterior walls, roofing, electrical work,
plumbing, finishing work, etc.).
(4) Indirect costs. Indirect costs, if
applicable, are allowable based on an
established approved indirect cost rate.
Applicants must have on file and
submit to HUD, if selected for funding,
a copy of their indirect cost rate
agreement. Applicants who are selected
for funding that do not have an
approved indirect cost rate agreement,
established by the cognizant federal
agency, will be required to establish a
rate. In such cases, HUD will issue an
award with a provisional rate and assist
applicants in having a rate established.
f. Appendix. Applicants receiving a
waiver of the electronic submission
requirements and submitting a paper
copy of the application must place all
required forms in this section. The
appendix section of an application must
not exceed 15 pages in length
(excluding forms, budget narrative and
assurances). An applicant SHOULD
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11472
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
NOT submit resumes, commitment
letters, memoranda of understanding
and/or agreements, or other back-up
materials. If this information is
included, it will not be considered
during the review process. Each page
must include the applicant’s name and
should be numbered. HUD will not
consider the information on any excess
pages. The additional items will also
slow the transmission of your
application.
708–0309. Paper applications will not
be accepted from applicants that have
not been granted a waiver. If an
applicant is granted a waiver, the Office
of University Partnerships will provide
instructions for submission. All
applicants submitting applications in
paper format must have received a
waiver to the electronic application
submission requirement and the
application must be received by HUD on
or before the application deadline date.
C. Submission Dates and Times
A complete application package must
be received and validated electronically
by the Grants.gov portal no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on or before
the applications deadline date. In an
effort to address any issues with
transmission of your application,
applicants are strongly encouraged to
submit their applications at least 48 to
72 hours prior to the application
deadline. This will allow an applicant
enough time to make the necessary
adjustments to meet the submission
deadline in the event Grants.gov rejects
the application. Please see the General
Section for further instructions.
Electronic faxes using the Facsimile
Transmittal Cover Sheet (Form HUD–
96011) contained in the electronic
application must be received no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application submission deadline date.
V. Application Review Information
D. Intergovernmental Review
This program is excluded from an
Intergovernmental Review.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
E. Funding Restrictions
Ineligible CDBG Activities are listed
at 24 CFR 570.207. Ineligible activities
include but are not limited to:
1. Curriculum development and/or
expansion of an institution’s existing
curriculum;
2. General government expenses; and
3. Political activities.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Application Submission and
Receipt Procedure. Please read the
General Section carefully and
completely for the submission and
receipt procedures for all applications
because failure to comply may
disqualify your application.
2. Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirements. Applicants should
submit their waiver requests in writing
using e-mail or fax. Waiver requests
must be submitted no later than 15 days
prior to the application deadline date
and should be submitted to: Susan
Brunson, Office of University
Partnerships, E-mail:
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov, FAX: (202)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
A. Criteria
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Experience (25
Points). This factor addresses the extent
to which the institution has the
resources necessary to successfully
implement the proposed activities in a
timely manner.
a. Knowledge and Experience For
First Time Applicants (25 Points) For
Previously Funded Applicants (10
Points). In rating this subfactor, HUD
will consider the extent to which the
applicant clearly addresses the
following:
(1) Describe the knowledge and
experience of the proposed project
director and staff, including the day-today program manager, consultants
(including technical assistance
providers), and contractors in planning
and managing the type of project for
which funding is being requested; and
(2) Clearly identify the following: key
project team members, titles (e.g.,
project manager/coordinator, etc.),
respective roles for the project staff, and
a brief description of their relevant
experience.
If key personnel have not been hired,
applicants must identify the position
title, provide a description of duties and
responsibilities, and describe the
qualifications to be considered in the
selection of personnel, including
subcontractors and consultants.
Experience will be judged in terms of
recent and relevant knowledge and
skills of the staff to undertake the
proposed eligible program activities.
HUD will consider experience within
the last five (5) years to be recent and
experience pertaining to similar
activities to be relevant.
b. Past Performance (15 points) for
Previously Funded Grant Applicants
Only. This subfactor will evaluate how
well an applicant has performed
successfully under HUD/HBCU grants.
Applicants must demonstrate this by
addressing the following information on
the HUD–40076–HBCU ‘‘Response
Sheet’’ (Performance Narrative) for all
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
previously completed and open HUD/
HBCU grants:
(1) A list of all HUD/HBCU grants
received, including the dollar amount
awarded and the amount expended as of
the date of this application. The HUD–
40076–HBCU ‘‘Response Sheet’’
(Performance Narrative) form is located
at the following Web site: https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The form should
be filled out completely;
(2) A description of the achievement
of specific tasks, measurable objectives,
and specific outcomes consistent with
the approved timeline/work plan;
(3) A comparison of the amount of
proposed leveraged funds and/or
resources to the amount that was
actually leveraged;
(4) A detailed description of
compliance with all reporting
requirements, including timeliness of
submission, whether reports were
complete and addressed all information
(both narrative and financial) as
required by the grant agreement; and
(5) A list detailing the date the
project(s) was completed, was it
completed in the original three-year
grant performance period; if not
completed why (including when it was
or will be completed);
HUD will also review an applicant’s
past performance in managing funds,
including, but not limited to: the ability
to account for funding appropriately;
timely use of funds received from HUD;
meeting performance targets for
completion of activities; timely
submission of required progress reports
and receipt of promised leveraged
resources. In evaluating past
performance, HUD reserves the right to
deduct up to five (5) points from this
rating score as a result of the
information obtained from HUD’s
records (i.e., progress and financial
reports, monitoring reports, Logic Model
submissions, and amendments).
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (15 Points). This factor
addresses the extent to which there is a
need for funding the proposed program
activities and an indication of the
importance of meeting the need(s). In
addressing this factor, applicants should
provide, at a minimum, the following
and must cite statistics and/or analyses
contained in one or more current data
sources that are sound and reliable.
(1) Describe the need(s); and
(2) Describe the importance of
meeting the proposed needs.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider only current data that is
specific to the area where the proposed
project activities will be carried out.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Sources for localized data can be found
at: www.ffiec.gov.
HUD will also consider data collected
within the last five (5) years to be
current. To the extent that the targeted
community’s Five Year Consolidated
Plan and Analysis of Impediments to
Fair Housing Choice (AI) identify the
level of the problem and the urgency in
meeting the need, applicants should
include references to these documents
in response to this factor.
Other reliable data sources include,
but are not limited to, Census reports,
HUD Continuum of Care gap analysis
and its E–MAP (to find additional
information go to HUD’s Web site:
https://www.hud.gov/emaps), law
enforcement agency crime reports,
Public Housing Agencies’
Comprehensive Plans, community
needs analyses such as provided by the
United Way, the applicant’s institution,
and other sound, reliable and
appropriate sources. Needs in terms of
fulfilling court orders or consent
decrees, settlements, conciliation
agreements, and voluntary compliance
agreements may also be addressed.
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (40 Points). This factor
addresses the quality and effectiveness
of the proposed work plan and the
commitment of the institution to sustain
the proposed project activities.
a. (33 Points) Quality of the Work
Plan. This subfactor will be evaluated
on the extent to which an applicant
provides a clear detailed description of
the proposed project activities,
anticipated accomplishments, and the
impact they will have on the target
population at the end of the project.
(1) (25 Points) Specific activities. The
work plan must describe all proposed
project activities and major tasks
required to successfully implement
them. The work plan must also identify
the anticipated accomplishments and
impact these activities will have on the
targeted population. In addressing this
subfactor, applicants must provide a
clear description of each proposed
project activity and address the
following:
(a) Describe each proposed project
activity in measurable terms (e.g., the
number of persons to be trained and
employed; houses to be rehabilitated; or
minority-owned businesses to be
started, etc.);
(b) List and describe how each
activity meets one of the following
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate-income
persons;
• Aid in the prevention or
elimination of slums or blight; or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Meet other community
development needs having a particular
urgency because existing conditions
pose a serious and immediate threat to
the health and welfare of the
community, and other financial
resources are not available to meet such
needs.
Criteria for determining whether an
activity addresses one or more
objectives are provided at 24 CFR
570.208;
(c) Describe the measurable impact
that implementing each activity (by the
end of the grant period) will have on the
target population;
(d) Identify the major tasks required
(in sequential order) to successfully
implement and complete each proposed
project activity. Include target
completion dates for each task (in 6
month intervals, up to thirty-six (36)
months); and
(e) Identify the key staff, as described
in Factor 1, who will be responsible and
accountable for completing each task.
(2) (8 Points) Describe clearly how
each proposed activity will:
(a) Expand the role of the institution
in the community;
(b) Address the needs identified in
Factor 2;
(c) Relate to and not duplicate other
activities in the target area. Duplicative
efforts will be acceptable only if an
applicant can demonstrate through
documentation that there is a
population in need that is not being
served; and
(d) Involve citizens of the target area
in the planning and implementation of
the proposed project activity (e.g.,
development of an advisory committee
that is representative of the target
community).
b. (3 Points) Involvement of the
Faculty and Students. The applicant
must describe how it proposes to
integrate the institution’s students and
faculty into proposed project activities.
c. (2 Points) HUD Policy Priorities. As
described in the General Section, to earn
points under this subfactor, HUD
requires applicants to undertake specific
activities that will assist the Department
in implementing its policy priorities
that help the Department achieve its
goals and objectives in FY2008, when
the majority of grant recipients will be
reporting programmatic results and
achievements. In addressing this
subfactor, HUD will evaluate the extent
to which a program will further and
support HUD’s priorities. The quality of
the responses provided to one or more
of HUD’s priorities will determine the
score an applicant can receive.
Applicants must describe how each
policy priority selected will be
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11473
addressed. Applicants that just list a
priority will receive no points. Please
refer to the General Section for
additional information about HUD’s
policy priorities.
The total number of points an
applicant can receive under this
subfactor is two (2). Each policy priority
addressed has a point value of one (1)
point with the exception of the policy
priority to remove regulatory barriers to
affordable housing, which has a point
value of up to two (2) points. To receive
these two (2) points, an applicant must:
(1) Complete either Part A or Part B (not
both), (2) include appropriate
documentation, (3) identify a point of
contact, (4) indicate how this priority
will be addressed and (5) submit the
completed questionnaire, (HUD–27300)
‘‘HUD’s Initiative on Removal of
Regulatory Barriers’’ found in the
General Section. It is up to the applicant
to determine which of the policy
priorities they elect to address to receive
the available two (2) points.
d. (2 Points) Economic Opportunities
for Low- and Very-Low Income Persons
(Provision of Section 3). This subfactor
will be evaluated on the extent to which
an applicant describes how it proposes
to:
(1) Provide opportunities to train and
employ Section 3 residents; and/or
(2) Award contracts to Section 3
contractors (see the regulations at 24
CFR 135). Regulations regarding the
provision of Section 3 of the Housing
and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12
U.S.C. 1701u) can be located at 24 CFR
Part 135.
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (8 Points). This factor
addresses the ability of the applicant to
secure resources and develop
partnerships that can be combined with
HUD’s grant funds to achieve the
program’s purpose.
In evaluating this factor, HUD will
consider how well the applicant has
established partnerships with other
entities to secure additional resources to
increase the effectiveness of the
proposed project activities. Resources
may include funding or in-kind
contributions, such as services or
equipment, allocated for the purpose(s)
of the proposed project activities.
Resources may be provided by
governmental entities, public or private
nonprofit organizations, for-profit
private organizations, or other entities.
Applicants may also establish
partnerships with other program
funding recipients to coordinate the use
of resources in the target area. Overhead
and other institutional costs (e.g.,
salaries, indirect costs, etc.) that the
institution has waived may be counted.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11474
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Examples of potential sources for
outside assistance include:
• Federal, state, and local
governments;
• Local or national nonprofit
organizations;
• Financial institutions and/or
private businesses;
• Foundations;
• Faith-based and other communitybased organizations.
To address this factor, an applicant
must provide an outline in the
application and have the original
written commitment letters, memoranda
of understanding and/or agreements that
show the extent and firm commitment
of all proposed leveraged resources
(including any commitment of resources
from the applicant’s own institution)
that address the following information
for each leveraged resource/fund on file
at the time of application submission:
(1) The name of the organization and
the executive officer authorizing the
funds/goods and/or services (only
applicable to the narrative section)
(2) The cash amount contributed or
dollar value of the in-kind goods and/
or services committed (if a dollar
amount and its use is not shown, the
value of the contribution will not be
scored for award);
(3) A specific description of how each
contribution is to be used toward the
proposed activities;
(4) The date the contribution will be
made available and a statement that
describes the duration of the
contribution;
(5) Any terms or conditions affecting
the commitment, other than receipt of a
HUD Grant; and
(6) The signature of the appropriate
executive officer authorized to commit
the funds and/or goods and/or services
(only applicable to the written
documentation).
DO NOT submit commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements at the time of application
submission but have the originals on file
at the time of submission. IF THIS
INFORMATION IS INCLUDED, IT WILL
NOT BE CONSIDERED DURING THE
REVIEW PROCESS. Applicants chosen
to proceed to the next step in the
selection process will be required to
submit the signed commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements outlined in the application,
within seven (7) calendar days after
initial contact from the Office of
University Partnerships (OUP). Letters,
memoranda of understanding, or
agreements must be submitted on the
provider’s letterhead and should be
addressed to Sherone Ivey, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
University Partnerships. The date of the
letter, memorandum of understanding,
or agreement from the CEO of the
provider organization must be dated no
earlier than nine months prior to this
published NOFA. OUP will provide
specific instructions on how these
documents must be submitted when
contact is made with the applicant.
HUD will only request and consider the
resources/organizations that are listed in
the outline submitted in the application.
If OUP does not receive those
documents with the required
information and within the allotted
timeframe, an applicant will not receive
points under this factor.
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (12 Points).
This factor reflects HUD’s goal to
embrace high standards of management
and accountability. It measures the
applicant’s commitment to assess their
performance to achieve the program’s
proposed objectives and goals.
Applicants are required to develop an
effective, quantifiable, outcome oriented
evaluation plan for measuring
performance and determining that
objectives and goals have been achieved
by using the Logic Model. The Logic
Model is a summary of the narrative
statements presented in Factors 1–4.
Therefore, it should be consistent with
the information contained in the
narrative statements.
‘‘Outcomes’’ are benefits accruing to
the community during or after
participation in the HBCU program.
Applicants must clearly identify the
outcomes to be measured and achieved.
Examples of outcomes include
increased employment opportunities in
the target community by a certain
percentage, increased incomes/wages or
other assets for persons trained, or
enhanced family stability through the
creation of affordable housing
opportunities (e.g., increased assets to
families and communities through the
development of affordable housing).
In addition, applicants must establish
interim benchmarks and outputs that
lead to the ultimate achievement of
outcomes. ‘‘Outputs’’ are the direct
products of the program’s activities.
Examples of outputs are the number of
new affordable housing units, the
number of homes that have been
renovated, and the number of facilities
that have been constructed or
rehabilitated. Outputs should produce
outcomes for the program. At a
minimum, an applicant must address
the following activities in the evaluation
plan:
a. Measurable outputs to be
accomplished (e.g., the number of
persons to be trained and employed;
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
houses to be built pursuant to 24 CFR
570.207 or rehabilitated; minorityowned businesses to be started);
b. Measurable outcomes the grant will
have on the community in general and
the target area or population; and
c. The impact the grant will have on
assisting the university to obtain
additional resources to continue this
type of work at the end of the grant
performance period.
The information must be placed on a
HUD–96010, Program Outcome Logic
Model form. HUD has developed a new
approach to completing this form.
Please carefully read the General
Section for instructions; training is
available. If an applicant utilizes
‘‘other’’ from the Logic Model
categories, then the applicant should
describe briefly this ‘‘other’’ category
within the Rating Factor 5 narrative. If
a narrative is provided, those pages will
be included in the page count. (Form
HUD–96010 will be excluded from the
page count.)
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Application Selection Process
Two types of reviews will be
conducted:
a. A threshold review to determine an
applicant’s basic eligibility; and
b. A technical review for all
applications that pass the threshold
review to rate and rank the application
based on the ‘‘Rating Factors’’ listed in
Section V.A. Only those applications
that pass the threshold review will
receive a technical review.
2. Rating Panels. To review and rate
applications HUD may establish panels,
which may include experts or
consultants not currently employed by
HUD to obtain certain expertise.
3. Ranking. HUD will fund
applications in rank order, until all
available program funds are awarded. In
order to be considered for funding, an
applicant must receive a minimum
score of 75 points out of a possible 100
points for Factors 1 through 5; plus up
to two bonus points that may be
awarded for activities conducted in the
RC/EZ/EC–II communities, as described
in the General Section. If two or more
applications have the same number of
points, the application with the most
points for Factor 3 shall be selected. If
there is still a tie, the application with
the most points for Factor 1 shall be
selected. If there is still a tie, the
application with the most points for
Factors 2, 4 and then 5 shall be selected
in that order until the tie is broken.
HUD reserves the right to make
selections out of rank order to provide
for geographic distribution of grantees.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
HUD also reserves the right to reduce
the amount of funding requested in
order to fund as many highly ranked
applications as possible. Additionally, if
funds remain after funding the highest
ranked applications, HUD may fund
part of the next highest-ranking
application. If an applicant turns down
an award offer, HUD will make an
award to the next highest-ranking
application. If funds remain after all
selections have been made, the
remaining funds will be carried over to
the next funding cycle’s competition.
4. Correction to Deficient
Applications. See the General Section.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Announcements of awards are
anticipated on or before September 30,
2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notice
After all selections have been made,
HUD will notify all winning
applications in writing. HUD may
require winning applicants to
participate in additional negotiations
before receiving an official award. For
further discussion on this matter, please
refer to the General Section.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Refer to the General Section.
1. Debriefing. The General Section
provides the procedures for requesting a
debriefing. All requests for debriefings
must be made in writing to: Ophelia
Wilson, Office of University
Partnerships, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 8106, Washington,
DC 20410–6000.
2. Administrative. Grants awarded
under this NOFA will be governed by
the provisions of 24 CFR part 84 (Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and Other
Non-Profit Organizations), A–21 (Cost
Principles for Educational Institutions)
and A–133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations). Applicants can access
the OMB circulars at the White House
Web site at www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
circulars/.
3. OMB Circulars and
Governmentwide Regulations
Applicable to Financial Assistance
Programs. The General Section provides
further discussion on this matter.
4. Executive Order 13202,
Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Construction Projects. See the
General Section for further discussion.
5. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. The General Section provides
further discussion on the matter.
6. Code of Conduct. See the General
Section for further discussion.
C. Reporting
All grant recipients under this NOFA
are required to submit quarterly
progress reports. The progress reports
shall consist of two components, a
narrative that must reflect the activities
undertaken during the reporting period
and a financial report that reflects costs
incurred by budget line item, as well as
a cumulative summary of costs incurred
during the reporting.
For each reporting period, as part of
the required report to HUD, grant
recipients must include a completed
Logic Model form (HUD–96010), which
identifies output and outcome
achievements.
For FY2007, HUD is considering a
new concept for the Logic Model. The
new concept is a Return on Investment
(ROI) statement. HUD will be publishing
a separate notice on the ROI concept.
VII. Agency Contacts
Applicants may contact Ophelia
Wilson at (202) 708–3061, extension
4390 or Susan Brunson at (202) 708–
3061, extension 3852. Persons with
speech or hearing impairments may call
the Federal Information Relay Service
(TTY) at (800) 877–8339. Except for the
‘‘800’’ number, these numbers are not
toll-free. mail to: Applicants may also
reach Ms. Wilson via e-mail at
Ophelia_Wilson@hud.gov, and/or Ms.
Brunson at Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this
document have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2528–
0235. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 356 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, quarterly,
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11475
semi-annual and final reports. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
Appendix A—Application Checklist—
HBCU
This checklist identifies application
submission requirements. Applicants
are requested to use this checklist when
preparing an application to ensure
submission of all required elements.
Applicants submitting an electronic
application do not have to submit the
checklist. Applicants that receive a
waiver of the electronic application
submission requirement must include a
copy of the checklist in their
application.
Check off to ensure these items have
been included in the application:
__SF–424 ‘‘Application For Federal
Assistance’’
__Application Checklist (Applicants
that submit paper applications must
include the checklist in their
applications)
__Abstract (must include no more than
a two-page summary of the proposed
project)
Indicate the page number where each
of the Factors are located:
Narrative Statement Addressing the
Rating Factors.
The narrative section of an
application must not exceed 50 pages in
length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and abstract). This information
must be submitted on 81⁄2 by 11-inch
paper, double-spaced on one side of the
paper, with one-inch margins (from the
top, bottom, left, and right sides of the
documents) and printed in standard
Times New-Roman 12-point font.
[Applicants that submit applications via
Grants.gov should review the General
Section for information about file names
and extensions. File names should not
contain spaces or special characters.]
__Factor I
__Factor II
__HUD–40076, ‘‘Response Sheet
Performance Narrative’’ (If applicable)
__Factor III
__Factor IV
__Factor V
__ HUD–96010 ‘‘Logic Model’’
Check off to ensure these items have
been included in the application:
__Appendix. The appendix section of an
application must not exceed 15 pages in
length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and assurances).
__Budget
__HUD 424–CB ‘‘Grant Application
Detailed Budget’’ (‘‘HUD Detailed
Budget Form’’ on Grants.gov)
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11476
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
__HUD–40076–HBCU ‘‘Budget-ByActivity’’
__Budget Narrative (No form provided
and must be submitted for the total
three-year grant period)
Appendix B (All Required Forms)
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
The following forms are required for
submission. All required forms are
contained in the electronic application
package.
__Application for Federal Assistance
(SF–424)
__Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants (SF–424
Supplement) (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
__Grant Application Detailed Budget
(HUD–424–CB) (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov)
__Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF–
LLL), if applicable
__Questionnaire for HUD’s Removal of
Regulatory Barriers (HUD–27300),
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov), if applicable
__Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/
Update Report (HUD–2880) (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov)
__Certification of Consistency with RC/
EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan (HUD–2990), if
applicable
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
__Certification of Consistency with the
Consolidated Plan (HUD–2991) if
applicable
__Acknowledgement of Applicant
Receipt (HUD–2993) Only applicants
that submit paper applications
__You Are Our Client Grant Applicant
Survey (HUD–2994–A)
__Response Sheet Performance
Narrative (HUD–40076) if applicable
__Budget-By-Activity (HUD–40076)
__Program Logic Model (HUD–96010)
__Third Party Documentation Facsimile
Transmittal (HUD–96011) (‘‘Facsimile
Transmittal Form’’ on Grants.gov)
required as the cover page to third party
documents transmitted by facsimile to
HUD. See the General Section.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11477
EN13MR07.007
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11478
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Hispanic-Serving Institutions Assisting
Communities (HSIAC) Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Policy Development and
Research, Office of University
Partnerships.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Hispanic-Serving Institutions Assisting
Communities (HSIAC) Program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Numbers:
FR–5100–N–13; OMB Approval Number
is 2528–0198.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: The CDFA
Number for this program is 14.514.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 23, 2007. Applications must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
by 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
deadline date. Please be sure to read the
General Section for electronic
application submission and receipt
requirements.
G. Additional Overview Content
Information:
1. Purpose of the Program: To assist
Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI)
expand their role and effectiveness in
addressing community development
needs in their localities, including
neighborhood revitalization, housing,
and economic development, principally
for persons of low- and moderateincome, consistent with the purposes of
Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended.
2. Award Information: In Fiscal Year
(FY) 2007, approximately $5.9 million
has been made available for this
program by the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5; approved February 15, 2007)
and an additional $111,226 in carryover
funds. An applicant can request up to
$600,000 for a three-year (36 months)
grant performance period.
3. Eligible Applicants: Nonprofit
Hispanic-serving institutions that meet
the definition of an HSI of higher
education established in Title V of the
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
1101), as amended. In order to meet this
definition, at least 25 percent of the fulltime undergraduate students enrolled in
an institution must be Hispanic. In
addition, all applicants must be
institutions of higher education granting
two-or four-year degrees that are fully
accredited by a national or regional
accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education.
Institutions are not required to be on the
list of eligible HSIs prepared by the U.S.
Department of Education. However, an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
institution that is not on the list is
required to provide a statement in the
application that the institution meets
the U.S. Department of Education’s
statutory definition of an HSI as cited
above. If an applicant is one of several
campuses of the same institution, the
applicant may apply separately from the
other campuses as long as the campus
has a separate DUNS number,
administrative structure and budget,
and meets the enrollment requirements
outlined above.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The purpose of the Hispanic-Serving
Institutions Assisting Communities
(HSIAC) Program is to assist HispanicServing Institutions (HSI) of higher
education expand their role and
effectiveness in addressing community
development needs in their localities,
including neighborhood revitalization,
housing and economic development,
principally for persons of low- and
moderate-income consistent with the
purpose of the Title I of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974,
as amended.
For the purpose of this program
NOFA, the term ‘‘locality’’ includes any
city, county, township, parish, village,
or other general political subdivision of
a state, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin
Islands where the institution is located.
A ‘‘target area’’ is the area within the
locality in which the institution will
implement its proposed HSIAC grant.
A. Authority
HUD’s authority for making this
funding available under this NOFA is
the Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5;
approved February 15, 2007). This
program is being implemented through
this NOFA and the policies governing
its operation are contained herein.
B. Modifications
Listed below are major modifications
from the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 programfunding announcement:
1. Commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements are
not required to be submitted with the
application, but the originals must be on
file at the time of application
submission. HUD will require
applicants chosen to proceed to the next
step in the selection process to submit
the signed commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements outlined in the application,
within seven (7) calendar days after
initial contact from the Office of
University Partnerships (OUP). OUP
will provide specific instructions on
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
how these documents must be
submitted at that time. HUD will only
request and consider the resources/
organizations outlined in the
application. If OUP does not receive
those documents with the required
information and within the allotted
timeframe, an applicant will not receive
points under this factor.
2. The appendix section of an
application must not exceed 15 pages in
length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and assurances). An applicant
SHOULD NOT submit resumes,
commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements, or
other back-up material. Each page must
include the applicant’s name and
should be numbered. HUD will not
consider the information on any excess
pages.
3. Applicants must budget for travel
costs to attend at least one HUD
sponsored HSIAC conference/workshop
every year of the three-year grant
performance period.
4. Public Law 109–242 (approved
September 30, 2006) revised the
definition of Hispanic-serving
institution found in Title V of the
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
1101). The revision removed the
requirement that not less than 50
percent of the institution’s Hispanic
students are low-income individuals.
II. Award Information
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2007,
approximately $5.9 million is made
available for this program and an
additional $111,226 in carryover funds.
An applicant can request up to $600,000
for a three-year (36 months) grant
performance period.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Nonprofit Hispanic-serving
institutions that meet the definition of
an HSI of higher education established
in Title V of the Higher Education Act
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1101), as amended.
In order to meet this definition, at least
25 percent of the full-time
undergraduate students enrolled in an
institution must be Hispanic. In
addition, all applicants must be
institutions of higher education granting
two- or four-year degrees that are fully
accredited by a national or regional
accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education.
Institutions are not required to be on the
list of eligible HSIs prepared by the U.S.
Department of Education. However, an
institution that is not on the list is
required to provide a statement in the
application that the institution meets
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the U.S. Department of Education’s
statutory definition of an HSI as cited
above. If an applicant is one of several
campuses of the same institution, the
applicant may apply separately from the
other campuses as long as the campus
has a separate DUNS number,
administrative structure and budget,
and meets the enrollment requirements
outlined above.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
None Required.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Eligible
activities are listed in 24 CFR part 570,
subpart C, particularly §§ 570.201
through 570.206. Information regarding
these activities can be found at:
www.hudclips.org (click on the Code of
Federal Regulations for detailed
information).
a. Examples of eligible activities
include, but are not limited to:
(1) Acquisition of real property;
(2) Clearance and demolition;
(3) Rehabilitation of residential
structures including lead-based paint
hazard evaluation and reduction and
making accessibility and visitabilty
modifications in accordance with the
requirements of Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
(4) Public facilities and
improvements, such as water and sewer
facilities and streets, compliance with
accessibility requirements, including
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, the Fair Housing Act, and the
American with Disabilities Act of 1990;
(5) Relocation payments and other
assistance for permanently and
temporarily relocated individuals,
families, businesses, nonprofit
organizations, and farm operations
where the assistance is:
(a) Required under the provisions of
24 CFR 570.606(b) or (c); or
(b) Determined by the grantee to be
appropriate under the provisions of 24
CFR 570.606(d);
(6) Direct homeownership assistance
to low- and moderate-income persons,
as provided in section 105(a)(25) of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974;
(7) Special economic development
activities described at 24 CFR 570.203
and assistance to facilitate economic
development by providing technical or
financial assistance for the
establishment, stabilization, and
expansion of microenterprises,
including minority enterprises;
(8) Assistance to community-based
development organizations (CBDO) to
carry out a CDBG neighborhood
revitalization, community economic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
development, or energy conservation
project, in accordance with 24 CFR
570.204. This could include activities in
support of a HUD-approved local
entitlement grantee, CDBG
Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy
(NRS) or HUD-approved State CDBG
Community Revitalization Strategy
(CRS);
(9) Public service activities such as
general support activities that can help
to stabilize a neighborhood and
contribute to sustainable redevelopment
of the area, including but not limited to
such activities as those concerned with
employment, crime prevention, child
care, health care services, drug abuse,
education, housing counseling, energy
conservation, homebuyer down
payment assistance, establishing and
maintaining Neighborhood Network
centers in federally assisted or insured
housing, job training and placement and
recreational needs;
(10) Up to 20 percent of the grant may
be used for payments of reasonable
grant administrative costs related to
planning and execution of the project
(e.g., preparation/submission of HUD
reports). Detailed explanations of these
costs are provided in OMB circular
A–21 Cost Principals for Educational
Institutions that can be accessed at the
White House Web site at:
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/
index.html;
(11) Fair housing services designed to
further civil rights objectives of the Fair
Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601–20) by
making all persons, without regard to
race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
familial status and/or disability aware of
the range of housing opportunities
available to them; and
b. Each activity proposed for funding
must meet the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) program eligibility
requirements and at least one of the
three CDBG national objectives. The
three national objectives of the CDBG
program are listed in Rating Factor 3 in
Section V.A.3 of this NOFA.
Criteria for determining whether an
activity addresses one or more national
objectives are provided at 24 CFR
570.208.
c. The CDBG publication entitled
‘‘Community Development Block Grant
Program Guide to National Objectives
and Eligible Activities for Entitlement
Communities’’ describes the CDBG
regulations, and a copy can be obtained
from HUD’s NOFA Information Center
at 800–HUD–8929. Individuals with
hearing or speech impairments may
access this number via the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11479
2. Threshold Requirements
Applicable to all Applicants. All
applicants must comply with the
threshold requirements as defined in the
General Section and the requirements
listed below. Applications that do not
meet these requirements will be
considered ineligible for funding and
will be disqualified.
a. The applicant must meet the
eligibility requirements as defined in
Section III.A.
b. The applicant may request up to
$600,000.
c. An applicant must have a DUNS
number to receive HUD grant funds (See
the General Section). Only one
application can be submitted per
campus. If multiple applications are
submitted, all will be disqualified.
However, different campuses of the
same university system are eligible to
apply as long as they have a separate
DUNS number and an administrative
and budgeting structure independent of
the other campuses in the system.
d. Institutions that received an HSIAC
grant in FY2006 are not eligible to
submit an application under this NOFA.
If an institution received an HSIAC
grant in FY2003, FY2004, or FY2005,
the institution may apply under this
NOFA as long as it proposes a different
activity (activities), which has not been
previously undertaken in their current
project location, or proposes replicating
their current project in a new location.
e. Applicants must receive a
minimum score of 75 points to be
considered for funding.
f. Electronic applications must be
received and validated by Grants.gov no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on
the application deadline date.
3. Program Requirements. In addition
to the program requirements listed in
Section III.C of the General Section,
applicants must meet the following
program requirements:
a. All funds awarded are for a threeyear (36 months) grant performance
period.
b. Applicants must ensure that not
less than 51 percent of the aggregated
expenditures of a grant award are used
to benefit low- and moderate-income
persons under the criteria specified in
24 CFR 570.208(a) or 570.208(d)(5) or
(6).
c. Site Control. Where grant funds
will be used for acquisition,
rehabilitation, or new construction, an
applicant must demonstrate site control.
Funds may be recaptured or deobligated
from recipients that cannot demonstrate
control of a suitable site within one year
after the initial notification of award.
d. Environmental Requirements.
Selection for award does not constitute
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11480
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
approval of any proposed sites.
Following selection for award, HUD will
perform an environmental review of
properties proposed for assistance in
accordance with 24 CFR Part 50. The
results of the environmental review may
require that proposed activities be
modified or proposed sites be rejected.
Applicants are particularly cautioned
not to undertake or commit funds for
acquisition or development of proposed
properties prior to HUD approval of
specific properties or areas. An
application constitutes an assurance
that the institution will assist HUD to
comply with part 50; will supply HUD
with all available and relevant
information to perform an
environmental review for each proposed
property; will carry out mitigating
measures required by HUD or select
alternate property; and will not acquire,
rehabilitate, convert, demolish, lease,
repair, or construct property, and not
commit or expend HUD or local funds
for these program activities with respect
to any eligible property until HUD’s
written approval of the property is
received. In supplying HUD with
environmental information, applicants
should use the same guidance as
provided in the HUD Notice CPD–05–07
entitled, ‘‘Field Environmental Review
Processing for Rural Housing and
Economic Development (RHED) grants’’
issued August 30, 2005. The General
Section provides further discussion of
the environmental requirements.
Further information and assistance on
HUD’s environmental requirements is
available at: https://hudstage.hud.gov/
utilities/intercept.cfm?/offices/cpd/
lawsregs/notices/2005/05-07.pdf.
e. Labor Standards. Institutions and
their sub-grantees, contractors, and
subcontractors must comply with the
labor standards (Davis-Bacon)
requirements referenced in 24 CFR
570.603.
f. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very-Low Income Persons (Section
3). The provisions of Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) apply to this
NOFA. One of the purposes of the
assistance is to give, to the greatest
extent feasible, and consistent with
existing federal, state, and local laws
and regulations, job training,
employment, contracting and other
economic opportunities to Section 3
residents and Section 3 business
concerns. Regulations are located at 24
CFR Part 135.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. Application and Submission
Information.
A. Addresses To Request Application
Package
Applicants may download the
instructions to the application found on
the Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.Grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information, you
may call the Grants.gov Support Desk
toll free at 800–518–GRANTS or e-mail
your questions to Support@Grants.gov.
See the General Section for information
regarding the registration process or ask
for registration information from the
Grants.gov Support Desk.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Forms. The following forms are
required for submission. Copies of these
forms are available on line at https://
www.Grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance;
b. SF–424, Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
c. HUD–424–CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov);
d. SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities, if applicable;
e. HUD–27300, Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov), if applicable;
f. HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
g. HUD–96010, Program Logic Model;
h. HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic
Plan, if applicable;
i. HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan,
if applicable;
j. HUD–2993, Acknowledgement of
Applicant Receipt. Complete this form
only if you have received a waiver to the
electronic application submission
requirement. Applicants submitting
electronically are not required to
include this form;
k. HUD–2994–A, You Are Our Client
Grant Applicant Survey. Applicants are
not required to complete this form.
l. HUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov). This form must be used as
the cover page to transmit third party
documents and other information.
Applicants are advised to download the
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
application package, complete the SF–
424 first and it will pre-populate the
Transmittal Cover page. The Transmittal
Cover page will contain a unique
identifier embedded in the page that
will help HUD associate your faxed
materials to your application. Please
download the cover page and then make
multiple copies to provide to any of the
entities responsible for submitting faxed
materials to HUD on your behalf. Please
do not use your own fax sheet. HUD
will not read any faxes that are sent
without the HUD–96011 fax transmittal
cover page.
2. Certifications and Assurances.
Please read the General Section for
detailed information on all
Certifications and Assurances. All
applications submitted through
Grants.gov constitute an
acknowledgement and agreement to all
required certifications and assurances.
Please include in your application each
item listed below. Applicants
submitting paper copy applications
should submit the application in the
following order:
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance. Please remember the
following:
(1) The full grant amount requested
from HUD (entire three years) should be
entered, not the amount for just one
year;
(2) Include the name, title, address,
telephone number, facsimile number,
and e-mail address of the designated
contact. This is the person who will
receive all correspondence; therefore,
please ensure the accuracy of the
information;
(3) The Employer Identification/Tax
ID;
(4) The DUNS Number;
(5) The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number for this program is
14.514;
(6) The project’s proposed start date
and completion date. For the purpose of
this application, the program start date
should be December 1, 2007; and
(7) The signature of the Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR)
who, by virtue of submitting an
application via Grants.gov, has been
authenticated by the credential provider
to submit applications on behalf of the
Institution and approved by the
eBusiness Point of Contact to submit an
application via Grants.gov. The AOR
must be able to make a binding legal
agreement with HUD.
b. Application Checklist. Applicants
should use the checklist to ensure that
they have all the required components
of their application. Applicants
submitting an electronic application
should not submit the checklist.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Applicants that receive a waiver of the
electronic application submission must
include a copy of the checklist in their
application submission. The checklist
can be located in Appendix A.
c. Abstract. Applicants must include
no more than a two-page summary of
the proposed project. Please include the
following:
(1) A clear description of each
proposed project activity, where it will
take place (be located), the target
population that will be assisted, and the
impact this project is expected to have
on the community and institution;
(2) A statement that the institution is
an eligible institution because it is a
two- or four-year fully accredited
institution, the name of the accrediting
agency and an assurance that the
accrediting agency is recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education;
(3) A statement that the institution
meets the definition of an Hispanic
Serving Institution: at least 25 percent of
the full-time undergraduate students
enrolled in an institution must be
Hispanic.
(4) The designated contact person,
including phone number, facsimile
number, and e-mail address (This is the
person who will receive all
correspondence from HUD; therefore
please ensure the accuracy of the
information);
(5) The project director, if different
from the designated contact person, for
the project, including phone number,
facsimile number, and e-mail address.
d. Narrative Statement Addressing the
Factors. HUD will use the narrative
response to the ‘‘Rating Factors’’ to
evaluate, rate, and rank applications.
The narrative statement is the main
source of information. Applicants are
advised to review each factor carefully
for program specific requirements. The
response to each factor should be
concise and contain only information
relevant to the factor, yet detailed
enough to address each factor fully.
PLEASE DO NOT REPEAT MATERIAL
IN RESPONSE TO THE FIVE FACTORS;
INSTEAD, FOCUS ON HOW WELL THE
PROPOSAL RESPONDS TO EACH OF
THE FACTORS. Where there are
subfactors, each subfactor must be
presented separately, with the short title
of the subfactor presented. Make sure to
address each subfactor and provide
sufficient information about every
element of the subfactor. The narrative
section of an application must not
exceed 50 pages in length (excluding
forms, budget narrative, assurances, and
abstract) and must be submitted on 81⁄2
by 11-inch paper, double-spaced on one
side of the paper, with one inch margins
(from the top, bottom and left to right
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
side of the document) and printed in
standard Times New Roman 12-point
font. Each page of the narrative must
include the applicant’s name and
should be numbered. Note that although
submitting pages in excess of the page
limit will not disqualify an applicant,
HUD will not consider the information
on any excess pages. This exclusion
may result in a lower score or failure to
meet a threshold requirement. All
applicants submitting electronic
applications must attach their narrative
responses to Rating Factors 1–5 as one
attachment. PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH
YOUR RESPONSE TO EACH FACTOR
SEPARATELY. Please follow the
instructions on file extension and file
names in the General Section.
e. Budget. The budget submission
must include the following:
(1) HUD–424–CB, ‘‘HUD Detailed
Budget Form.’’ This form shows the
total budget by year and by line item for
the program activities to be carried out
with the proposed HUD grant. Each year
of the program should be presented
separately. Applicants must also budget
for travel costs (airfare, lodging and per
diem) for two individuals to attend at
least one HUD sponsored HSIAC
conference/workshop every year of the
three-year grant performance period. To
calculate travel expenses, applicants
located in Eastern and Central time
zones or the U.S. Virgin Islands should
use San Francisco, CA as the site of all
conferences/workshops. Applicants
located in Mountain and Pacific time
zones or Puerto Rico should use
Washington, DC as the site of all
conferences/meetings.
Applicants must also submit this form
to reflect the total cost for the entire
grant performance period (Grand Total).
Make sure that the amounts shown on
the SF–424, the HUD–424–CB, and on
all other required program forms are
consistent and the budget totals are
correct. Remember to check addition in
totaling the categories on all forms so
that all items are included in the total.
If there is an inconsistency between any
of the required budget forms, the HUD–
424–CB will be used. All budget forms
must be fully completed. If an
application is selected for award, the
applicant may be required to provide
greater specificity to the budget during
grant agreement negotiations.
(2) Budget Narrative. A narrative must
be submitted that explains how the
applicant arrived at the cost estimates
for any line item over $5,000
cumulative. For example, an applicant
proposes to construct a building using
HUD funding totaling $200,000. The
following costs estimate reflects this
total. Foundation cost $75,000,
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11481
electrical work $40,000, plumbing work
$40,000, finishing work $35,000, and
landscaping $10,000. The proposed cost
estimates should be reasonable for the
work to be performed and consistent
with rates established for the level of
expertise required to perform the work
proposed in the geographical area.
When necessary, quotes from various
vendors or historical data should be
used (please make sure they are kept on
file and are available for review by HUD
at any time). All direct labor or salaries
must be supported with mandated city/
state pay scales, the Davis-Bacon rate, (if
applicable) or other documentation.
When an applicant proposes to use a
consultant, the applicant must indicate
whether there is a formal written
agreement. For each consultant, please
provide the name, if known, hourly or
daily rate, and the estimated time on the
project. Applicants must use cost
estimates based on historical data from
the institution and/or from a qualified
firm (e.g., Architectural or Engineering
firms), vendor, and/or qualified
individual (e.g., independent architect
or contractor) other than the institution
for projects that involve rehabilitation of
residential, commercial and/or
industrial structures, and/or acquisition,
construction, or installation of public
facilities and improvements. Such an
entity must be involved in the business
of housing rehabilitation, construction
and/or management. Equipment and
contracts cannot be presented as a total
estimated cost. For equipment,
applicants must provide a list by type
and cost for each item. Applicants using
contracts must provide an individual
description and cost estimate for each
contract. Construction costs must be
broken down to indicate how funds will
be utilized (e.g., demolition, foundation,
exterior walls, roofing, electrical work,
plumbing, finishing work, etc.).
(3) Indirect costs. Indirect costs, if
applicable, are allowable based on an
established approved indirect cost rate.
Applicants must have on file, and
submit to HUD if selected for award, a
copy of their indirect cost rate
agreement. Applicants who are selected
for funding that do not have an
approved indirect cost rate agreement,
established by the cognizant federal
agency, will be required to establish a
rate. In such cases, HUD will issue an
award with a provisional rate and assist
applicants with the process of
establishing a final rate.
f. Appendix. Applicants receiving a
waiver of the electronic submission
requirements and submitting a paper
copy of the application must place all
required forms in this section. The
appendix section of an application must
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11482
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
not exceed 15 pages in length
(excluding forms, budget narrative and
assurances). An applicant SHOULD
NOT submit resumes, commitment
letters, memoranda of understanding
and/or agreements, or other back-up
materials. If this information is
included, it will not be considered
during the review process. Each page
must include the applicant’s name and
should be numbered. HUD will not
consider the information on any excess
pages. The additional items will also
slow the transmission of your
application.
C. Submission Dates and Times
A complete application package must
be received and validated electronically
by the Grants.gov portal no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on or before
the application deadline date. In an
effort to address any issues with
transmission of your application,
applicants are strongly encouraged to
submit their applications at least 48 to
72 hours prior to the application
deadline. This will allow an applicant
enough time to make the necessary
adjustments to meet the submission
deadline in the event Grants.gov rejects
the application. Please see the General
Section for further instructions.
Electronic faxes using the Facsimile
Transmittal Cover Sheet (Form HUD–
96011) contained in the electronic
application must be received no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date.
D. Intergovernmental Review
This program is excluded from an
Intergovernmental Review.
E. Funding Restrictions
Ineligible CDBG Activities are listed
at 24 CFR 570.207. Ineligible activities
include but are not limited to:
a. Curriculum development and/or
expansion of an institution’s existing
curriculum;
b. General government expenses;
c. Political activities; and
d. Planning and administrative
activities that would result in a grantee
exceeding the 20 percent cost
limitations (e.g., preparation/submission
of HUD reports).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Application Submission and
Receipt Procedure. Please read the
General Section carefully and
completely for the submission and
receipt procedures for all applications
because failure to comply may
disqualify your application.
2. Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirements. Applicants should
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
submit their waiver requests in writing
using e-mail or fax. Waiver requests
must be submitted no later than 15 days
prior to the application deadline date
and should be submitted to: Susan
Brunson, Office of University
Partnerships, E-mail:
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov, FAX: (202)
708–0309.
Paper applications will not be
accepted from applicants that have not
been granted a waiver. If an applicant is
granted a waiver, the Office of
University Partnerships will provide
instructions for submission. All
applicants submitting applications in
paper format must have received a
waiver to the electronic application
submission requirement and the
application must be received by HUD on
or before the application deadline date.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Experience (25
Points). This factor addresses the extent
to which the applicant has the resources
necessary to successfully implement the
proposed project in a timely manner.
a. Knowledge and Experience For
First Time Applicants (25 Points); For
Previously Funded Applicants (10
Points). In rating this subfactor, HUD
will consider how well an applicant
clearly addresses the following:
(1) Describe the knowledge and
experience of the proposed project
director and staff, including the day-today program manager/coordinator,
consultants (including technical
assistance providers), and contractors in
planning and managing the type of
project for which funding is being
requested; and
(2) Clearly identify the following: key
project team members, titles (e.g.,
project manager/coordinator, etc.),
respective roles for the project staff, and
a brief description of their relevant
experience.
If key personnel have not been hired,
applicants must identify the position
title, provide a description of duties and
responsibilities, and describe the
qualifications to be considered in the
selection of personnel, including
subcontractors and consultants.
Experience will be evaluated in terms
of recent and relevant knowledge and
skills of the staff to undertake eligible
program activities. HUD will consider
experience within the last five (5) years
to be recent and experience pertaining
to similar activities to be relevant.
b. Past Performance (15 Points) For
Previously Funded Grant Applicants
Only. This subfactor will evaluate how
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
well an applicant has performed
successfully under HUD/HSIAC grants.
Applicants must demonstrate this by
addressing the following information for
all previously completed and open
HUD/HSIAC grants:
(1) A list of all HUD/HSIAC grants
received, including the dollar amount
awarded and the amount expended and
obligated as of the date of this
application;
(2) A description of the achievement
of specific tasks, measurable objectives,
and specific outcomes consistent with
the approved project management plan;
(3) A list detailing the date the
project(s) was completed, was it
completed in the original three-year
grant performance period; if not
completed, why (including when it was
or will be completed);
(4) A comparison of the amount of
proposed leveraged funds and/or
resources to the amount that was
actually leveraged; and
(5) A detailed description of
compliance with all reporting
requirements, including timeliness of
submission, whether reports were
complete and addressed all information
(both narrative and financial) as
required by the grant agreement.
HUD will also review an applicant’s
past performance in managing funds,
including, but not limited to: the ability
to account for funding appropriately;
timely use of funds received from HUD;
meeting performance targets for
completion of activities; timely
submission of required progress reports
and receipt of promised leveraged
resources. In evaluating past
performance, HUD reserves the right to
deduct up to five (5) points from this
rating score as a result of the
information obtained from HUD’s
records (i.e, progress and financial
reports, monitoring reports, Logic Model
submissions, and amendments).
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (10 Points). This factor
addresses the extent to which there is a
need for funding the proposed program
activities and an indication of the
importance of meeting the need(s) in the
target area. The need(s) described must
be relevant to the activities for which
funds are being requested. In addressing
this factor, applicants should provide, at
a minimum, the following and must cite
statistics and/or analyses contained in at
least one or more current data sources
that are sound and reliable.
(1) Describe the need(s); and
(2) Describe the importance of
meeting the proposed needs.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider only current data that is
specific to the area where the proposed
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
project activities will be carried out.
Sources for localized data can be found
at: www.ffiec.gov.
HUD will consider data collected
within the last five (5) years to be
current. To the extent that the targeted
community’s Five Year Consolidated
Plan and Analysis of Impediments to
Fair Housing Choice (AI) identify the
level of the problem and the urgency in
meeting the need, applicants should
include references to these documents
in the response to this factor.
Other reliable data sources include,
but are not limited to, Census reports,
HUD Continuum of Care gap analysis
and its E–MAP (www.hud.gov/emaps),
law enforcement agency crime reports,
Public Housing Agencies’
Comprehensive Plans, community
needs analyses such as those provided
by the United Way, the applicant’s
institution, and other sound, reliable
and appropriate sources. Needs in terms
of fulfilling court orders or consent
decrees, settlements, conciliation
agreements, and voluntary compliance
agreements may also be addressed.
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (44 Points). This factor
addresses the quality and effectiveness
of the proposed work plan and the
commitment of the institution to sustain
the proposed activities.
a. (37 Points) Quality of the Work
Plan. This subfactor will be evaluated
on the extent to which an applicant
provides a clear detailed description of
the proposed project activities,
anticipated accomplishments and the
impact they will have on the target
population at the end of the project.
(1) (32 Points) Specific Activities. The
work plan must describe all proposed
activities and major tasks required to
successfully implement them. The work
plan must also identify the anticipated
measurable accomplishments and
impact these activities will have on the
targeted population. In addressing this
subfactor, applicants must provide a
clear description of each proposed
activity and address the following:
(a) Describe each proposed project
activity in measurable terms (e.g., the
number of persons to be trained and
employed; houses to be built or
rehabilitated; or minority owned
businesses to be started, etc.);
(b) List and describe how each
activity meets one of the following
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate-income
persons;
• Aid in the prevention or
elimination of slums or blight; or
• Meet other community
development needs having a particular
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
urgency because existing conditions
pose a serious and immediate threat to
the health and welfare of the
community, and other financial
resources are not available to meet such
needs.
Criteria for determining whether an
activity addresses one or more objective
are provided at 24 CFR 570.208;
(c) Describe the measurable impact
that implementing each activity (by the
end of the grant period) will have on the
target population;
(d) Identify the major tasks required
(in sequential order) to successfully
implement and complete each proposed
project activity. Include target
completion dates for these tasks (in 6
month intervals, up to 36 months);
(e) Identify the key staff, as described
in Factor 1, who will be responsible for
completing each task; and
(f) Describe how the project director
will work with the partners and citizens
to accomplish the proposed project
activities.
(2) (5 Points) Describe clearly how
each proposed activity will:
(a) Expand the role of the institution
in the community;
(b) Address the needs identified in
Factor 2;
(c) Relate to and not duplicate other
activities in the target area. Duplicative
efforts will be acceptable only if an
applicant can demonstrate through
documentation that there is a
population in need that is not being
served; and
(d) Involve citizens of the target area
in the planning and implementation of
the proposed project activity (e.g.,
development of an advisory committee
that is representative of the target
community).
b. (3 Points) Involvement of the
Faculty and Students. The applicant
must describe how it proposes to
integrate the institution’s students and
faculty into proposed project activities.
c. (2 Points) HUD Policy Priorities. As
described in the General Section, to earn
points under this subfactor, HUD
requires applicants to undertake specific
activities that will assist the Department
in implementing its policy priorities
and that will help the Department
achieve its goals and objectives in
FY2008, when the majority of grant
recipients will be reporting
programmatic results and achievements.
In rating this subfactor, HUD will
evaluate the extent to which a program
will further and support HUD’s
priorities. The quality of the responses
provided to one or more of HUD’s
priorities will determine the score an
applicant can receive. Applicants must
describe how each policy priority
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11483
selected will be addressed. Applicants
that just list a priority will receive no
points.
The total number of points an
applicant can receive under this
subfactor is two (2). Each policy priority
addressed has a point value of one (1)
point with the exception of the policy
priority to remove regulatory barriers to
affordable housing, which has a point
value of up to two (2) points. To receive
these two (2) points, an applicant must:
(1) Complete either Part A or Part B (not
both), (2) include appropriate
documentation, (3) identify a point of
contact, (4) indicate how this priority
will be addressed and (5) submit the
completed questionnaire, (HUD–27300)
‘‘HUD’s Initiative on Removal of
Regulatory Barriers Communities
Initiative’’ found in the General Section.
It is up to the applicant to determine
which of the policy priorities they elect
to address to receive the available two
(2) points.
d. (2 Points) Economic Opportunities
for Low- and Very-Low Income Persons
(Provision of Section 3). This subfactor
will be evaluated on the extent to which
an applicant describes how it proposes
to:
(1) Provide opportunities to train and
employ Section 3 residents; and/or
(2) Award contracts to Section 3
contractors (See the regulations at 24
CFR 135.). Regulations regarding the
provision of Section 3 of the Housing
and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12
U.S.C. 1701u) can be located at 24 CFR
Part 135.
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (9 Points). This factor
addresses the ability of the applicant to
secure resources and develop
partnerships that can be combined with
HUD’s grant funds to achieve the
program’s purpose.
HUD will consider how well an
applicant has established partnerships
with other entities to secure additional
resources to increase the effectiveness of
the proposed project activities.
Resources may include funding or inkind contributions, such as services or
equipment, allocated for the purpose(s)
of the proposed project activities.
Resources may be provided by
governmental entities, public or private
nonprofit organizations, for-profit
private organizations, or other entities.
Applicants may also establish
partnerships with other program
funding recipients to coordinate the use
of resources in the target area. Overhead
and other institutional costs (e.g.,
salaries, indirect costs, etc.) that the
institution has waived may be counted.
• Examples of potential sources for
outside assistance include:
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11484
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
• Federal, state, and local
governments
• Local or national nonprofit
organizations
• Financial institutions and/or
private businesses
• Foundations
• Faith-based and other communitybased organizations.
To address this factor, an applicant
must provide an outline in the
application and have the original
written commitment letters, memoranda
of understanding and/or agreements that
show the extent and firm commitment
of all proposed leveraged resources
(including any commitment of resources
from the applicant’s own institution)
that address the following information
for each leveraged resource/fund on file
at the time of application submission:
(1) The name of the organization and
the executive officer authorizing the
funds/goods and/or services (Only
applicable to the narrative section);
(2) The cash amount contributed or
dollar value of the in-kind goods and/
or services committed (If a dollar
amount and its use are not shown, the
value of the contribution will not be
scored for award);
(3) A specific description of how each
contribution is to be used toward the
proposed activities;
(4) A description of the current and/
or past working relationship that the
institution has with the organization
contributing the resources and the
involvement it will have with this
proposed project.
(5) The date the contribution will be
made available and a statement that
describes the duration of the
contribution;
(6) Any terms or conditions affecting
the commitment, other than receipt of a
HUD Grant; and
(7) The signature of the appropriate
executive officer authorized to commit
the funds and/or goods and/or services
(Only applicable to the written
documentation).
Do not submit commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements are not required at the time
of application submission but have the
originals on file at the time of
submission. IF THIS INFORMATION IS
INCLUDED, IT WILL NOT BE
CONSIDERED DURING THE REVIEW
PROCESS. Applicants chosen to
proceed to the next step in the selection
process will be required to submit the
signed commitment letters, memoranda
of understanding and/or agreements
outlined in the application, within
seven (7) calendar days after initial
contact from the Office of University
Partnerships (OUP). Letters, memoranda
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
of understanding, or agreements must be
submitted on the provider’s letterhead
and should be addressed to Sherone
Ivey, Associate Deputy Assistant
Secretary for University Partnerships.
The date of the letter, memorandum of
understanding, or agreement from the
CEO of the provider organization must
be dated no earlier than nine months
prior to this published NOFA. OUP will
provide specific instructions on how
these documents must be submitted
when contact is made with the
applicant. HUD will only request and
consider the resources/organizations
that are listed in the outline submitted
in the application. If OUP does not
receive those documents with the
required information and within the
allotted timeframe, an applicant will not
receive points under this factor.
In scoring this factor, HUD will award
• Nine (9) points to an applicant that
provides properly documented
leveraging resources as listed in their
application that are 15 percent or more
of the amount requested under this
program;
• Seven (7) to eight (8) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least five of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 10 to 14 percent of the
amount requested under this program;
• Five (5) to six (6) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least four of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 10 to 14 percent of the
amount requested under this program;
• Three (3) to four (4) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least five of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 5 to 9 percent of the amount
requested under this program;
• One (1) to two (2) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least three of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 5 to 9 percent of the amount
requested under this program; and
• Zero (0) points to applicants that
provide documented leveraging
resources as listed above that are less
than 5 percent of the amount requested.
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (12 Points)
This factor reflects HUD’s goal to
embrace high standards of management
and accountability. It measures the
applicant’s commitment to assess their
performance to achieve the program’s
proposed objectives and goals.
Applicants are required to develop an
effective, quantifiable, outcome oriented
evaluation plan for measuring
performance and determining that
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
objectives and goals have been achieved
by using the HUD Logic Model. The
Logic Model is a summary of the
narrative statements presented in
Factors 1–4. Therefore, the information
submitted on the Logic Model should be
consistent with the information
contained in the narrative statements.
‘‘Outcomes’’ are benefits accruing to
institutions and/or communities during
or after participation in the HSIAC
program. Applicants must clearly
identify the outcomes to be measured
and achieved. Examples of outcomes
include increased employment
opportunities in the target community
by a certain percentage, or enhanced
family stability through the creation of
affordable housing opportunities.
In addition, applicants must establish
interim benchmarks and outputs that
lead to the ultimate achievement of
outcomes. ‘‘Outputs’’ are the direct
products of the program’s activities.
Examples of outputs are the number of
new affordable housing units, the
number of homes that have been
renovated, and the number of
community facilities that have been
constructed or rehabilitated. Outputs
should produce outcomes for the
program. At a minimum an applicant
must address the following activities in
the evaluation plan:
a. Measurable outputs to be
accomplished, e.g., the number of
persons to be trained and employed;
houses to be built (pursuant to 24 CFR
570.207) or rehabilitated; minorityowned businesses to be started;
b. Measurable outcomes the grant will
have on the community in general and
the target area or population; and
c. The impact the grant will have on
assisting the university to obtain
additional resources to continue this
type of work at the end of the grant
performance period.
The information must be placed on a
HUD–96010, Program Outcome Logic
Model form. HUD has developed a new
approach to completing this form.
Please carefully read the General
Section for instructions, training is
available. (Form HUD–96010 will be
excluded from the page count.) If an
applicant utilizes ‘‘other’’ from the
Logic Model categories, then the
applicant should describe briefly this
‘‘other’’ category within the Rating
Factor 5 narrative. If a narrative is
provided, those pages will be included
in the page count.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Application Selection Process
Two types of reviews will be
conducted:
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
a. A threshold review to determine an
applicant’s basic eligibility; and
b. A technical review for all
applications that pass the threshold
review to rate and rank the application
based on the ‘‘Rating Factors’’ listed in
Section V, A. Only those applications
that pass the threshold review will
receive a technical review and be rated
and ranked.
2. Rating Panels. To review and rate
applications, HUD may establish panels,
which may include experts or
consultants not currently employed by
HUD to obtain certain expertise.
3. Ranking. HUD will fund
applications in rank order, until all
available program funds are awarded. In
order to be considered for funding, an
applicant must receive a minimum
score of 75 points out of a possible 100
points; plus up to two bonus points that
may be awarded for activities conducted
in the RC/EZ/EC–II communities, as
described in the General Section. If two
or more applications have the same
number of points, the application with
the most points for Factor 3 shall be
selected. If there is still a tie, the
application with the most points for
Factor 1 shall be selected. If there is still
a tie, the application with the most
points for Factors 2, 4 and then 5 shall
be selected, in that order, until the tie
is broken. HUD reserves the right to
make selections out of rank order to
provide for geographic distribution of
grantees. HUD also reserves the right to
reduce the amount of funding requested
in order to fund as many highly ranked
applications as possible. Additionally, if
funds remain after funding the highest
ranked applications, HUD may fund
part of the next highest-ranking
application. If an applicant turns down
an award offer, HUD will make an
award to the next highest-ranking
application. If funds remain after all
selections have been made, the
remaining funds will be carried over to
the next funding cycle’s competition.
4. Correction to Deficient
Applications. See the General Section.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates. Announcements of
awards are anticipated on or before
September 30, 2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Award Notice
After all selections have been made,
HUD will notify all winning applicants
in writing. HUD may require winning
applicants to participate in additional
negotiations before receiving an official
award. For further discussion on this
matter, please refer to the General
Section.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Refer to Section in the General
Section.
1. Debriefing. The General Section
provides the procedures for requesting a
debriefing. All requests for debriefings
must be made in writing to: Madlyn
Wohlman-Rodriguez, Office of
University Partnerships, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Room 8106,
Washington, DC 20410–6000.
Applicants may also write to Ms.
Wohlman-Rodriguez via e-mail at
Madlyn_Wohlmanrodriguez@hud.gov.
2. Administrative. Grants awarded
under this NOFA will be governed by
the provisions of 24 CFR part 84 (Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and Other
Non-Profit Organizations), A–21 (Cost
Principles for Educational Institutions)
and A–133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations). Applicants can access
the OMB circulars at the White House
Web site at www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
circulars/.
3. OMB Circulars and
Governmentwide Regulations
Applicable to Financial Assistance
Programs. The General Section provides
further discussion.
4. Executive Order 13202,
Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors Labor Relations
on Federal and Federally Funded
Construction Projects. See the General
Section for further discussion.
5. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. The General Section provides
further information.
6. Executive Order 13166, Improving
Access to Services For Persons With
Limited English Proficiency (LEP). See
the General Section for further
discussion.
7. Code of Conduct. See the General
Section for further discussion.
C. Reporting
All grant recipients under this NOFA
are required to submit semi-annual
progress reports. The progress reports
shall consist of two components, a
narrative that must reflect the activities
undertaken during the reporting period
and a financial report that reflects costs
incurred by budget line items, as well as
a cumulative summary of costs incurred
during the reporting period.
For each reporting period, as part of
the required report to HUD, grant
recipients must include a completed
Logic Model (HUD–96010), which
identifies output and outcome
achievements.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11485
For FY2007, HUD is considering a
new concept for the Logic Model. The
new concept is a Return on Investment
(ROI) statement. HUD will be publishing
a separate notice on the ROI concept.
VII. Agency Contacts
Applicants may contact Madlyn
Wohlman-Rodriguez at (202) 708–3061,
extension 5939 or Susan Brunson, at
(202) 708–3061, extension 3852. Persons
with speech or hearing impairments
may call the Federal Information Relay
Service (TTY) at (800) 877–8339. Except
for the ‘‘800’’ number, these numbers
are not toll-free. mail to: Applicants may
also reach Ms. Rodriguez via e-mail at
Madlyn_Wohlmanrodriguez@hud.gov
and/or Ms. Brunson at
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this
document have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2528–
0198. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 59 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application semi-annual
and final reports. The information will
be used for grantee selection and
monitoring the administration of funds.
Response to this request for information
is required in order to receive the
benefits to be derived.
Appendix A—Application Checklist—
HSIAC
This checklist identifies application
submission requirements. Applicants
are requested to use this checklist when
preparing an application to ensure
submission of all required elements.
Applicants submitting an electronic
application do not have to submit the
checklist. Applicants that receive a
waiver of the electronic application
submission requirement must include a
copy of the checklist in their
application.
Check off to ensure these items have
been included in the application:
llSF–424 ‘‘Application For Federal
Assistance’’
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11486
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
llApplication Checklist (Applicants
that submit paper applications must
include the checklist in their
applications)
llAbstract (must include no more
than a two-page summary of the
proposed project)
Indicate the page number where each
of the Factors is located:
llNarrative Statement Addressing the
Rating Factors. The narrative section of
an application must not exceed 50 pages
in length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and abstract). This information
must be submitted on 81⁄2 by 11-inch
paper, double-spaced on one side of the
paper, with one-inch margins (from the
top, bottom, left, and right sides of the
documents) and printed in standard
Times New-Roman 12-point font.
[Applicants that submit applications via
Grants.gov should review the General
Section for information about file names
and extensions. File names should not
contain spaces or special characters.]
llFactor I
llFactor II
llFactor III
llFactor IV
llFactor V
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
llHUD–96010 ‘‘Logic Model’’
Check off to ensure these items have
been included in the application:
llAppendix. The appendix section of
an application must not exceed 15 pages
in length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and assurances).
llBudget
llGrant Application Detailed Budget
(HUD–424–CB) (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov).
llBudget Narrative (No form
provided, but must be submitted for the
total three-year grant period.
Appendix B (All Required Forms)
The following forms are required for
submission. All required forms are
contained in the electronic application
package.
llApplication for Federal Assistance
(SF–424);
llSurvey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants (SF–424
Supplement) (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
llDisclosure of Lobbying Activities
(SF–LLL), if applicable;
llGrant Application Detailed Budget
(HUD–424–CB) (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget’’
on Grants.gov);
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
llQuestionnaire for HUD’s Removal
of Regulatory Barriers (HUD–27300)
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov), if applicable;
llApplicant Recipient Disclosure
Update Report (HUD–2880) (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
llCertification of Consistency with
RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan (HUD–
2990), if applicable;
llCertification of Consistency with
the Consolidated Plan (HUD–2991), if
applicable;
llAcknowledgement of Applicant
Receipt (Only applicants who submit
paper applications (HUD–2993);
llYou Are Our Client! Grant
Applicant Survey (HUD–2994–A);
llThird Party Documentation
Facsimile Transmittal (HUD–96011)
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov), to be used as the cover page
to transmit third party documents via
facsimile, if applicable (See General
Section); and
llLogic Model (HUD–96010)
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11487
EN13MR07.008
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11488
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian
Institutions Assisting Communities
(AN/NHIAC) Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Policy Development and
Research, Office of University
Partnerships.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Alaska
Native/Native Hawaiian Institutions
Assisting Communities (AN/NHIAC)
Program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Numbers:
FR–5100–N–12; OMB Approval Number
is 2528–0206.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: The CFDA
Number for this program is 14.515.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 23, 2007. Applications must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
by 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
deadline date. Please be sure to read the
General Section for electronic
application submission and receipt
requirements.
G. Additional Overview Content
Information:
1. Purpose of the Program. To assist
Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian
Institutions (AN/NHI) of higher
education expand their role and
effectiveness in addressing community
development needs in their localities,
including neighborhood revitalization,
housing, and economic development,
principally for persons of low and
moderate income, consistent with the
purposes of Title I of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974,
as amended.
2. Award Information. In Fiscal Year
(FY) 2007, approximately $2.9 million
has been made available for this
program by the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5; approved February 15, 2007)
and an additional $36,048 in carryover
funds. An applicant can request up to
$800,000 for a three-year (36 months)
grant performance period.
3. Eligible Applicants. Nonprofit
Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian
Institutions of Higher Education that
meet the definitions of Alaska Native
and Native Hawaiian Institutions of
Higher Education established in Title
III, Part A, Section 317 of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended by
the Higher Education Amendments of
1998 (Pub. L. 105–244; enacted October
7, 1998). Institutions are not required to
be on the list of eligible AN/NHIs
prepared by the U.S. Department of
Education. However, an institution that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
is not on the list is required to provide
a statement in the application that the
institution meets the U.S. Department of
Education’s statutory definition of an
AN/NHI institution. In order to meet the
definition of an Alaska Native
Institution, at least 20 percent of the
undergraduate headcount enrollment
must be Alaska Native students. If an
applicant is a Native Hawaiian
institution, at least 10 percent of the
undergraduate headcount enrollment
must be Native Hawaiian students in
order to meet this definition. In
addition, all applicants must be a twoor four-year institution, fully accredited
by a national or regional accrediting
agency recognized by the U.S.
Department of Education. If an
applicant is one of several campuses of
the same institution, the applicant may
apply separately from the other
campuses as long as the campus has a
separate DUNS number, administrative
structure and budget, and meets the
enrollment requirements outlined
above.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The purpose of the Alaska Native/
Native Hawaiian Institutions Assisting
Communities (AN/NHIAC) Program is
to assist Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian
Institutions (AN/NHI) of higher
education expand their role and
effectiveness in addressing community
development needs in their localities,
including neighborhood revitalization,
housing, and economic development,
principally for persons of low and
moderate income, consistent with the
purposes of Title I of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974,
as amended.
A. Authority
HUD’s authority for making funding
available under this NOFA is the
Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5;
approved February 15, 2007). This
program is being implemented through
this NOFA and the policies governing
its operation are contained herein.
B. Modifications
Listed below are major modifications
from the FY2006 program-funding
announcement:
1. Commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements are
not required to be submitted with the
application but the originals must be on
file at the time of application
submission. HUD will require
applicants chosen to proceed to the next
step in the selection process to submit
the signed commitment letters,
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements outlined in the application
within seven (7) calendar days after
initial contact from the Office of
University Partnerships (OUP). OUP
will provide specific instructions on
how these documents must be
submitted at that time. HUD will only
request and consider the resources/
organizations outlined in the
application. If OUP does not receive
those documents with the required
information and within the allotted
timeframe, an applicant will not receive
points under this factor.
2. The appendix section of an
application must not exceed 15 pages in
length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and assurances). An applicant
SHOULD NOT submit resumes,
commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements, or
other back-up material. Each page must
include the applicant’s name and
should be numbered. HUD will not
consider the information on any excess
pages.
3. Applicants must budget for travel
costs to attend at least one HUD
sponsored AN/NHIAC conference/
workshop every year of the three-year
grant performance period.
II. Award Information
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2007,
approximately $2.9 million is made
available for this program with an
additional $36,048 in carryover funds.
HUD will award grants under this
program to Alaska Native Institutions
(ANI) and Native Hawaiian Institutions
(NHI). An applicant can request up to
$800,000 for a three-year (36 months)
grant performance period.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Nonprofit Alaska Native and Native
Hawaiian Institutions of Higher
Education that meet the definitions of
Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian
Institutions of Higher Education
established in Title III, Part A, Section
317 of the Higher Education Act of
1965, as amended by the Higher
Education Amendments of 1998 (Pub. L.
105–244; enacted October 7, 1998).
Institutions are not required to be on the
list of eligible AN/NHIs prepared by the
U.S. Department of Education. However,
an institution that is not on the list is
required to provide a statement in the
application that the institution meets
the U.S. Department of Education’s
statutory definition of an AN/NHI
institution. In order to meet the
definition of an Alaska Native
Institution, at least 20 percent of the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
undergraduate headcount enrollment
must be Alaska Native students. If an
applicant is a Native Hawaiian
institution, at least 10 percent of the
undergraduate headcount enrollment
must be Native Hawaiian students in
order to meet this definition. In
addition, all applicants must be a twoor four-year institution, fully accredited
by a national or regional accrediting
agency recognized by the U.S.
Department of Education. If an
applicant is one of several campuses of
the same institution, the applicant may
apply separately from the other
campuses as long as the campus has a
separate DUNS number, administrative
structure and budget, and meets the
enrollment requirements outlined
above.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
None required.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities: Eligible
activities are listed in 24 CFR Part 570,
subpart C, particularly § 570.201
through § 570.206. Information
regarding these activities can be found
at: www.hudclips.org (click on the Code
of Federal Regulations for detailed
information).
Eligible activities include, but are not
limited to:
a. Acquisition of real property;
b. Clearance and demolition;
c. Rehabilitation of residential
structures and compliance with the
accessibility requirements contained in
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973;
d. Acquisition, construction,
reconstruction, rehabilitation, or
installation of public facilities and
improvements, such as water and sewer
facilities and streets; including leadbased paint hazard evaluation and
reduction and compliance with the
accessibility requirements contained in
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 and Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990;
e. Direct homeownership assistance to
low- and moderate-income persons, as
provided in section 105(a) (25) of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974;
f. Special economic development
activities described at 24 CFR 570.203
and assistance to facilitate economic
development by providing technical or
financial assistance for the
establishment, stabilization, and
expansion of microenterprises,
including minority enterprises;
g. Assistance to community-based
development organizations (CBDO) to
carry out neighborhood revitalization,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
community economic development, or
energy conservation projects, in
accordance with 24 CFR 570.204. This
could include activities in support of a
HUD-approved local entitlement
grantee, CDBG Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy (NRS) or HUDapproved State CDBG Community
Revitalization Strategy (CRS);
h. Public service activities such as
general support activities that can help
to stabilize a neighborhood and
contribute to sustainable redevelopment
of the area, including but not limited to
such activities as those concerned with
employment, crime prevention, child
care, health care services, drug abuse,
education, housing counseling, energy
conservation, homebuyer down
payment assistance, establishing and
maintaining Neighborhood Network
centers in federally assisted or insured
housing, job training and placement and
recreational needs;
i. Fair housing services designed to
further the civil rights objectives of the
Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601–20) by
making all persons, without regard to
race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
familial status, and/or disability aware
of the range of housing opportunities
available to them;
j. Up to 20 percent of the grant may
be used for payments of reasonable
grant administrative costs related to
planning and execution of the project
(e.g., preparation/submission of HUD
reports, etc.). Detailed explanations of
these costs are provided in the OMB
circulars that can be accessed at the
White House Web site at:
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/
index.html; and
Each activity proposed for funding
must meet the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) program are listed
in Rating Factor 3 in Section V.A.3 of
this NOFA.
Criteria for determining whether an
activity addresses one or more of these
objectives are provided at 24 CFR
570.208.
The CDBG publication entitled
‘‘Community Development Block Grant
Program Guide to National Objectives
and Eligible Activities for Entitlement
Communities’’ describes the CDBG
regulations, and a copy can be obtained
online at https://www.hud.gov/offices/
cpd/communitydevelopment/library/
deskguid.cfm, or from HUD’s NOFA
Information Center at 800–HUD–8929.
Individuals with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
via the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
2. Threshold Requirements
Applicable to all Applicants. All
applicants must comply with the
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11489
threshold requirements as defined in the
General Section and the requirements
listed below. Applications that do not
meet these requirements will be
considered ineligible for funding and
will be disqualified.
a. The applicant must meet the
eligibility requirements as defined in
Section III.A
b. The applicant may request up to
$800,000.
c. An applicant must have a separate
DUNS number to receive HUD grant
funds (See the General Section). Only
one application can be submitted per
campus. If multiple applications are
submitted, all will be disqualified.
However, different campuses of the
same university system are eligible to
apply as long as they have a separate
DUNS number and an administrative
and budgeting structure independent of
the other campuses in the system.
d. Institutions that received grants in
FY2006 are not eligible to submit an
application under this NOFA.
e. Applicants must receive a
minimum score of 75 points to be
considered for funding.
f. Electronic applications must be
received and validated by Grants.gov no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on
the application deadline date.
3. Program Requirements. In addition
to the program requirements listed in
Section III.C of the General Section,
applicants must meet the following
program requirements:
a. All funds awarded are for a threeyear (36 months) grant performance
period.
b. Applicants must ensure that not
less than 51 percent of the aggregated
expenditures of a grant award are used
to benefit low- and moderate-income
persons under the criteria specified in
24 CFR 570.208(a) or 570.208(d)(5) or
(6).
c. Site Control. Where grant funds
will be used for acquisition,
rehabilitation, or new construction, an
applicant must demonstrate site control.
Funds may be recaptured or deobligated
from recipients that cannot demonstrate
control of a suitable site within one year
after the initial notification of award.
d. Environmental Requirements.
Selection for award does not constitute
approval of any proposed sites.
Following selection for award, HUD will
perform an environmental review of
properties proposed for assistance in
accordance with 24 CFR part 50. The
results of the environmental review may
require that proposed activities be
modified or proposed sites be rejected.
Applicants are particularly cautioned
not to undertake or commit funds for
acquisition or development of proposed
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11490
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
properties prior to HUD approval of
specific properties or areas. An
application constitutes an assurance
that the institution will assist HUD to
comply with part 50; will supply HUD
with all available and relevant
information to perform an
environmental review for each proposed
property; will carry out mitigating
measures required by HUD or select
alternate property; and will not acquire,
rehabilitate, convert, demolish, lease,
repair, or construct property, and not
commit or expend HUD or local funds
for these program activities with respect
to any eligible property until HUD’s
written approval of the property is
received. In supplying HUD with
environmental information, applicants
should use the same guidance as
provided in the HUD Notice CPD–05–07
entitled, ‘‘Field Environmental Review
Processing for Rural Housing and
Economic Development (RHED) grants’’
issued August 30, 2005. The General
Section provides further discussion of
the environmental requirements.
Further information and assistance on
HUD’s environmental requirements is
available at: https://hudstage.hud.gov/
utilities/intercept.cfm?/offices/cpd/
lawsregs/notices/2005/05-07.pdf.
e. Labor Standards. Institutions and
their subgrantees, contractors, and
subcontractors must comply with the
labor standards (Davis-Bacon)
requirements referenced in 24 CFR
570.603.
f. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very-Low Income Persons (Section
3). The provisions of Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) apply to this
NOFA. One of the purposes of the
assistance is to give, to the greatest
extent feasible, and consistent with
existing federal, state, and local laws
and regulations, job training,
employment, contracting and other
economic opportunities to Section 3
residents and Section 3 business
concerns. Regulations are located at 24
CFR Part 135.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Address To Request Application
Package
Applicants may download the
instructions to the application found on
the Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.Grants.gov./applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information you
may call the Grants.gov Support Desk
toll free 800–518–GRANTS or e-mail
your questions to Support@Grants.gov.
See the General Section for information
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
regarding the registration process or ask
for registration information from the
Grants.gov Support Desk.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Forms. The following forms are
required for submission. Copies of these
forms are available on line at
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grans.jsp.
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance;
b. SF–424 Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
c. HUD–424–CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov);
d. SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities, if applicable;
e. HUD–27300, Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative’’ on
Grants.gov), if applicable;
f. HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
g. HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic
Plan, if applicable;
h. HUD–96010, Program Logic Model;
i. HUD–2993, Acknowledgement of
Applicant Receipt. Complete this form
only if you have received a waiver to the
electronic application submission
requirement. Applicants submitting
electronically are not required to
include this form;
j. HUD–2994–A, You Are Our Client
Grant Applicant Survey. Applicants are
not required to complete this form.
k. HUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov). This form must be used as
the cover page to transmit third party
documents and other information.
Applicants are advised to download the
application package, complete the SF–
424 first and it will pre-populate the
Transmittal Cover page. The Transmittal
Cover page will contain a unique
identifier embedded in the page that
will help HUD associate your faxed
materials to your application. Please
download the cover page and then make
multiple copies to provide to any of the
entities responsible for submitting faxed
materials to HUD on your behalf. Please
do not use your own fax sheet. HUD
will not read any faxes that are sent
without the HUD–96011 fax transmittal
cover page; and
2. Certifications and Assurances.
Please read the General Section for
detailed information on all
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Certifications and Assurances. All
applications submitted through
Grants.gov constitute an
acknowledgement and agreement to all
required certifications and assurances.
Please include in your application each
item listed below. Applicants
submitting paper copy applications
should submit the application in the
following order:
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance. Please remember the
following:
(1) The full grant amount requested
from HUD (entire three years) should be
entered, not the amount for just one
year;
(2) Include the name, title, address,
telephone number, facsimile number,
and e-mail address of the designated
contact; this is the person who will
receive all correspondence; therefore,
please ensure the accuracy of the
information;
(3) The Employer Identification/Tax
ID number;
(4) The DUNS Number;
(5) The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number for this program is
14.515;
(6) The project’s proposed start date
and completion date. For the purpose of
this application, the program start date
should be December 1, 2007; and
(7) The signature of the Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR)
who, by virtue of submitting an
application via Grants.gov, has been
authenticated by the credential provider
to submit applications on behalf of the
Institution and approved by the
eBusiness Point of Contact to submit an
application via Grants.gov. The AOR
must be able to make a legally binding
agreement with HUD.
b. Application Checklist. Applicants
should use the checklist to ensure that
they have all the required components
of their application. Applicants
submitting an electronic application
should not submit the checklist.
Applicants that receive a waiver of the
electronic application submission
requirement must include a copy of the
checklist in their application
submission. The checklist can be
located in Appendix A.
c. Abstract. Applicants must include
no more than a two-page summary of
the proposed project. Please include the
following:
(1) A clear description of each
proposed project activity, where it will
take place (be located), the target
population that will be assisted, and the
impact this project is expected to have
on the community and institution;
(2) A statement that the institution is
an eligible institution because it is a
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
two-or four-year fully accredited
institution, the name of the accrediting
agency and an assurance that the
accrediting agency is recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education;
(3) A statement that the institution
meets the definition of an Alaska Native
Institution, or a Native Hawaiian
Institution, as appropriate;
(4) The designated contact person,
including phone number, facsimile
number, and e-mail address. (This is the
person who will receive all
correspondence; therefore, please
ensure the accuracy of the information.);
(5) The project director, if different
from the designated contact person, for
the project, including phone number,
facsimile number, and e-mail address.
d. Narrative statement addressing the
Rating Factors. HUD will use the
narrative response to the ‘‘Rating
Factors’’ to evaluate, rate, and rank
applications. The narrative statement is
the main source of information.
Applicants are advised to review each
factor carefully for program specific
requirements. The response to each
factor should be concise and contain
only information relevant to the factor,
yet detailed enough to address each
factor fully. PLEASE DO NOT REPEAT
MATERIAL IN RESPONSE TO THE
FIVE FACTORS; INSTEAD, FOCUS ON
HOW WELL THE PROPOSAL
RESPONDS TO EACH OF THE
FACTORS. Where there are subfactors,
each subfactor must be presented
separately, with the short title of the
subfactor presented. Make sure to
address each subfactor and provide
sufficient information about every
element of the subfactor. The narrative
section of an application must not
exceed 50 pages in length (excluding
forms, budget narrative, assurances, and
abstract) and must be submitted on 81⁄2
by 11-inch paper, double-spaced on one
side of the paper, with one inch margins
(from the top, bottom and left to right
side of the document) and printed in
standard Times New Roman 12-point
font. Each page of the narrative must
include the applicant’s name and
should be numbered. Note that although
submitting pages in excess of the page
limit will not disqualify an applicant,
HUD will not consider the information
on any excess pages. This exclusion
may result in a lower score or failure to
meet a threshold requirement. All
applicants submitting electronic
applications must attach their narrative
responses to Rating Factors 1–5 as one
attachment. PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH
YOUR RESPONSE TO EACH FACTOR
SEPARATELY. Please follow the
instructions on file extension and file
names in the General Section.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
e. Budget. The budget submission
must include the following:
(1) HUD–424–CB, ‘‘Grant Application
Detailed Budget.’’ This form shows the
total budget by year and by line item for
the program activities to be carried out
with the proposed HUD grant. Each year
of the program should be presented
separately. Applicants must also budget
for travel cost (airfare, lodging and per
diem) for two individuals to attend at
least one HUD sponsored AN/NHIAC
conference/workshop every year of the
three-year grant performance period. To
calculate travel expenses, applicants
should use Washington, DC as the site
of all conferences/workshops.
Applicants must also submit this form
to reflect the total cost for the entire
grant performance period (Grand Total).
Make sure that the amounts shown on
the SF–424, the HUD–424–CB and on
all other required program forms are
consistent and the budget totals are
correct. Remember to check addition in
totaling the categories on all forms so
that all items are included in the total.
If there is any inconsistency between
any of the required budget forms, the
HUD–424–CB will be used. All budget
forms must be fully completed. If an
application is selected for award, the
applicant may be required to provide
greater specificity to the budget during
grant agreement negotiations.
(2) Budget Narrative. A narrative must
be submitted that explains how the
applicant arrived at the cost estimates
for any line item over $5,000
cumulative. For example, an applicant
proposes to construct a building using
HUD funding totaling $200,000. The
following costs estimate reflects this
total. Foundation cost $75,000,
electrical work $40,000, plumbing work
$40,000, finishing work $35,000, and
landscaping $10,000. The proposed cost
estimates should be reasonable for the
work to be performed and consistent
with rates established for the level of
expertise required to perform the work
proposed in the geographical area.
When necessary, quotes from various
vendors or historical data should be
used (please make sure they are kept on
file and are available for review by HUD
at any time). When an applicant
proposes to use a consultant, the
applicant must indicate whether there is
a formal written agreement. For each
consultant, please provide the name, if
known, hourly or daily rate, and the
estimated time on the project.
Applicants must use cost estimates
based on historical data from the
institution and/or from a qualified firm
(e.g., Architectural or Engineering firm),
vendor, and/or qualified individual
(e.g., independent architect or
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11491
contractor) other than the institution for
projects that involve rehabilitation of
residential, commercial and/or
industrial structures, and/or acquisition,
construction, or installation of public
facilities, and improvements. Such an
entity must be involved in the business
of housing rehabilitation, construction,
and/or management. Equipment and
contracts cannot be presented as a total
estimated cost. For equipment,
applicants must provide a list by type
and cost for each item. Applicants using
contracts must provide an individual
description and cost estimate for each
contract. Construction costs must be
broken down to indicate how funds will
be utilized (e.g., demolition, foundation,
exterior walls, roofing, electrical work,
plumbing, finishing work, etc.)
(3) Indirect costs. Indirect costs, if
applicable, are allowable based on an
established approved indirect cost rate.
Applicants must have on file, and
submit to HUD if selected for award, a
copy of their indirect cost rate
agreement. Applicants who are selected
for funding that do not have an
approved indirect cost rate agreement,
established by the cognizant federal
agency, will be required to establish a
rate. In such cases, HUD will issue an
award with a provisional rate and assist
applicants with the process of
establishing a final rate.
f. Appendix. Applicants receiving a
waiver of the electronic submission
requirements and submitting a paper
copy of the application must place all
required forms in this section. The
appendix section of the an application
must not exceed 15 pages in length
(excluding forms, budget narrative and
assurances) An applicant SHOULD NOT
submit resumes, commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements, or other back-up materials.
If this information is included, it will
not be considered during the review
process. Each page must include the
applicant’s name and should be
numbered. HUD will not consider the
information on any excess pages. The
additional items will also slow the
transmission of your application.
C. Submission Dates and Times
A complete application package must
be received and validated electronically
by the Grants.gov portal no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on or before
the application deadline date. In an
effort to address any issues with
transmission of your applications,
applicants are strongly encouraged to
submit their applications at least 48 to
72 hours prior to the application
deadline. This will allow an applicant
enough time to make the necessary
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11492
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
adjustments to meet the submission
deadline in the event Grants.gov rejects
the application. Please see the General
Section for further instructions.
Electronic faxes using the Facsimile
Transmittal Cover Sheet (Form HUD–
96011) contained in the electronic
application must be received no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date.
D. Intergovernmental Review
This program is excluded from an
Intergovernmental Review.
E. Funding Restrictions
Ineligible CDBG Activities are listed
at 24 CFR 570.207. Ineligible activities
include but are not limited to:
1. New construction of public
housing;
2. General government expenses;
3. Political activities;
4. Planning and administrative
activities that would result in a grantee
exceeding the 20 percent cost
limitations (e.g., preparation/submission
of HUD reports);
5. Development and/or expansion of
an institution’s existing curriculum
when it is primarily to enhance the
institution rather than to achieve the
specific goals/objectives of the proposed
project; and
6. Construction, renovation,
expansion of an institution’s own
facilities.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Application Submission and
Receipt Procedure. Please read the
General Section carefully and
completely for the submission and
receipt procedures for all applications
because failure to comply may
disqualify your application.
2. Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirements. Applicants should
submit their waiver requests in writing
using e-mail or fax. Waiver requests
must be submitted no later than 15 days
prior to the application deadline date
and should be submitted to:
Susan Brunson, Office of University
Partnerships, E-mail:
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov, FAX: (202)
708–0309.
Paper applications will not be
accepted from applicants that have not
been granted a waiver. If an applicant is
granted a waiver, the Office of
University Partnerships will provide
instructions for submission. All
applicants submitting applications in
paper format must have received a
waiver to the electronic application
submission requirement and the
application must be received by HUD on
or before the application deadline date.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Experience (25
Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which the applicant has the resources
necessary to successfully implement the
proposed project in a timely manner.
a. Knowledge and Experience. For
First Time Applicants (25 Points) For
Previously Funded Applicants (13
Points). In rating this subfactor, HUD
will consider the extent to which the
applicant clearly addresses the
following:
(1) Describe the knowledge and
experience of the proposed project
director and staff, including the day-today program manager/coordinator,
consultants (including technical
assistance providers), and contractors in
planning and managing the type of
project for which funding is being
requested; and
(2) Clearly identify the following: key
project team members, titles (e.g.,
project manager/coordinator, etc.),
respective roles for the project staff, and
a brief description of their relevant
experience.
If key personnel have not been hired,
applicants must identify the position
title, provide a description of duties and
responsibilities, and describe the
qualifications to be considered in the
selection of personnel, including
subcontractors and consultants.
Experience will be judged in terms of
recent and relevant knowledge and
skills of the staff to undertake eligible
program activities. HUD will consider
experience within the last five (5) years
to be recent and experience pertaining
to similar activities to be relevant.
b. Past Performance (12 Points) For
Previously Funded Applicants Only.
This subfactor will evaluate how well
an applicant has performed successfully
under HUD/AN/NHIAC grants.
Applicants must demonstrate this by
addressing the following information for
all previously completed and open
HUD/AN/NHIAC grants:
(1) A list of all HUD/AN/NHIAC
grants received, including the dollar
amount awarded and the amount
expended and obligated as of the date of
this application;
(2) A description of the achievement
of specific tasks, measurable objectives,
and specific outcomes consistent with
the approved project management plan;
(3) A list detailing the date the
project(s) was completed, was it
completed in the original three-year
grant performance period; if not
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
completed, why (including when it was
or will be completed);
(4) A comparison of the amount of
proposed leveraged funds and/or
resources to the amount that was
actually leveraged; and
(5) A detailed description of
compliance with all reporting
requirements, including timeliness of
submission, whether reports were
complete and addressed all information
(both narrative and financial) as
required by the grant agreement.
HUD will also review an applicant’s
past performance in managing funds,
including, but not limited to: The ability
to account for funding appropriately;
timely use of funds received from HUD;
meeting performance targets for
completion of activities. In evaluating
past performance, HUD reserves the
right to deduct up to five (5) points from
this rating score as a result of the
information obtained from HUD’s
records (i.e., progress and financial
reports, monitoring reports, Logic Model
submissions, and amendments).
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (10 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need for funding the
proposed program activities and an
indication of the importance of meeting
the need(s) in the target area. The
need(s) described must be relevant to
the activities for which funds are being
requested. In addressing this factor,
applicants should provide, at a
minimum, the following and must cite
statistics and/or analyses contained in at
least one or more current data sources
that are sound and reliable.
(1) Describe the need(s); and
(2) Describe the importance of
meeting the proposed needs.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider only current data that is
specific to the area where the proposed
project activities will be carried out.
Sources for localized data can be found
at: www.ffiec.gov.
HUD will consider data collected
within the last five (5) years to be
current. To the extent that the targeted
community’s Five (5) Year Consolidated
Plan and Analysis of Impediments to
Fair Housing Choice (AI) identify the
level of the problem and the urgency in
meeting the need, applicants should
include references to these documents
in the response to this factor.
Other reliable data sources include,
but are not limited to, Census reports,
HUD Continuum of Care gap analysis
and its E-MAP (https://www.hud.gov/
emaps), law enforcement agency crime
reports, Public Housing Agencies’
Comprehensive Plans, community
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
needs analyses such as provided by the
United Way, the applicant’s institution,
and other sound, reliable and
appropriate sources. Needs in terms of
fulfilling court orders or consent
decrees, settlements, conciliation
agreements, and voluntary compliance
agreements may also be addressed.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (44 Points)
This factor addresses the quality and
effectiveness of the proposed work plan
and the commitment of the institution
to sustain the proposed project
activities.
a. (37 Points) Quality of the Work
Plan. This subfactor will be evaluated
on the extent to which an applicant
provides a clear detailed description of
the proposed project activities,
anticipated accomplishments and the
impact they will have on the target
population at the end of the project.
(1) (32 Points) Specific Activities. The
work plan must describe all proposed
project activities and major tasks
required to successfully implement
them. The work plan must also identify
the anticipated accomplishment and
impact these activities will have on the
target population. In addressing this
subfactor applicants must provide a
clear description of each proposed
activity and address the following:
(a) Describe each proposed project
activity in measurable terms (e.g., the
number of homes that will be renovated,
the number of jobs created, etc.);
(b) List and describe how each
activity meets one of the following
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate-income
person;
• Aid in the prevention or
elimination of slums or blight; or
• Meet other community
development needs having a particular
urgency because existing conditions
pose a serious and immediate threat to
the health and welfare of the
community, and other financial
resources are not available to meet such
needs.
Criteria for determining whether an
activity addresses one or more
objectives are provided at 24 CFR
570.208;
(c) Describe the measurable outcomes
that will be realized as a result of
implementing each activity (by the end
of the grant period) will have or expect
to have on the target population;
(d) Identify the major tasks required
(in sequential order) to successfully
implement and complete each proposed
project activity. Include the target
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
completion dates for these tasks (in 6
month intervals, up to 36 months);
(e) Identify key staff, as described in
Factor 1, who will be responsible and
accountable for completing each task;
and
(f) Describe how the project director
will work with partners and citizens to
accomplish the proposed project
activities.
(2) (5 Points) Describe clearly how
each proposed activity will:
(a) Expands the role of the institution
in the community;
(b) Address the needs identified in
Factor 2;
(c) Relate to and not duplicate other
activities in the target area. Duplicative
efforts will be acceptable only if an
applicant can demonstrate through
documentation that there is a
population in need that is not being
served; and
(d) Involve citizens of the target area
in the planning and implementation of
the proposed project activity (e.g.,
development of an advisory committee
that is representative of the target
community).
b. (3 Points) Involvement of the
faculty and students. The applicant
must describe how it proposes to
integrate the institution’s students and
faculty into the proposed project
activities.
c. (2 Points) HUD Policy Priorities. As
described in the General Section, to earn
points under this subfactor, HUD
requires applicants to undertake specific
activities that will assist the Department
in implementing its policy priorities
and that help the Department achieve its
goals and objectives in FY2008, when
the majority of grant recipients will be
reporting programmatic results and
achievements. In rating this subfactor,
HUD will evaluate the extent to which
a program will further and support
HUD’s priorities. The quality of the
responses provided to one or more of
HUD’s priorities will determine the
score an applicant can receive.
Applicants must describe how each
policy priority selected will be
addressed. Applicants that just list a
priority will receive no points.
The total number of points an
applicant can receive under this
subfactor is two (2). Each policy priority
addressed has a point value of one (1)
point with the exception of the policy
priority to remove regulatory barriers to
affordable housing, which has a point
value of up to two (2) points. To receive
these two (2) points, an applicant must:
(1) complete either Part A or Part B (not
both), (2) include appropriate
documentation, (3) identify a point of
contact, (4) indicate how this priority
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11493
will be addressed and (5) submit the
completed questionnaire, (HUD–27300)
‘‘HUD’s Initiative on Removal of
Regulatory Barriers’’ found in the
General Section along with required
documentation. It is up to the applicant
to determine which of the policy
priorities they elect to address to receive
the available two (2) points.
d. (2 Points) Economic Opportunities
for Low- and Very-Low Income Persons
(Provision of Section 3). This subfactor
will be evaluated on the extent to which
an applicant describes how it proposes
to:
(1) Provide opportunities to train and
employ Section 3 residents; and/or
(2) Award contracts to Section 3
contractors (See the regulations at 24
CFR).
Regulations regarding the provision of
Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C.
1701u) can be located at 24 CFR Part
135.
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(9 Points)
This factor addresses the ability of the
applicant to secure resources and
develop partnerships that can be
combined with HUD’s grant funds to
achieve the program’s purpose.
HUD will consider the extent to
which the applicant established
partnerships with other entities to
secure additional resources to increase
the effectiveness of the proposed project
activities. Resources may include
funding or in-kind contributions, such
as services or equipment, allocated for
the purpose(s) of the project activities.
Resources may be provided by
governmental entities, public or private
nonprofit organizations, for-profit
private organizations, or other entities.
Applicants may also establish
partnerships with other program
funding recipients to coordinate the use
of resources in the target area. Overhead
and other institutional costs (e.g.,
salaries, indirect costs, etc.) that the
institution has waived may be counted.
Examples of potential sources for
outside assistance include:
• Federal, state, and local
governments
• Public Housing Agencies
• Local or national nonprofit
organizations
• Financial institutions and/or
private businesses
• Foundations
• Faith-based and other communitybased organizations.
To address this factor, an applicant
must provide an outline in the
application and have the original
commitment letters, memoranda of
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11494
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
understanding and/or agreements that
show the extent and firm commitment
of all proposed leveraged resources
(including any commitment of resources
from the applicant’s own institution)
that address the following information
for each leveraged resource/fund on file
at the time of application submission:
(1) The name of the organization and
the executive officer authorizing the
funds/goods and/or services (only
applicable to the narrative section);
(2) The cash amount contributed or
dollar value of the in-kind goods and/
or services committed (If a dollar
amount and its use is not shown, the
value of the contribution will not be
scored for award);
(3) A specific description of how each
contribution is to be used toward the
proposed activities;
(4) A description of the current and/
or past working relationship that the
institution has with the organization
contributing the resources and the
involvement they will have with this
proposed project.
(5) The date the contribution will be
made available and a statement that
describes the duration of the
contribution;
(6) Any terms or conditions affecting
the commitment, other than receipt of a
HUD Grant; and
(7) The signature of the appropriate
executive officer authorized to commit
the funds and/or goods and/or services.
(Only applicable to the written
documentation) Please remember that
only items eligible for funding under
this program can be counted.
Do not submit commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements at the time of application
submission but have the originals on file
at the time of submission. IF THIS
INFORMATION IS INCLUDED, IT WILL
NOT BE CONSIDERED DURING THE
REVIEW PROCESS. Applicants chosen
to proceed to the next step in the
selection process for award will be
required to submit the signed
commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements
outlined in the application, within
seven (7) calendar days after initial
contact from the Office of University
Partnerships (OUP). Letters, memoranda
of understanding, or agreements must be
submitted on the provider’s letterhead
and should be addressed to Sherone
Ivey, Associate Deputy Assistant
Secretary for University Partnerships.
The date of the letter, memorandum of
understanding, or agreement from the
CEO of the provider organization must
be dated no earlier than nine months
prior to this published NOFA. OUP will
provide specific instructions on how
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
these documents must be submitted
when contact is made with the
applicant. HUD will only request and
consider the resources/organizations
that are listed in the outline submitted
in the application. If OUP does not
receive those documents with the
required information and within the
allotted timeframe, an applicant will not
receive points under this factor.
In scoring this factor, HUD will
award:
• Nine (9) points to an applicant that
provides properly documented
leveraging resources as listed in their
application that are 15 percent or more
of the amount requested under this
program;
• Seven (7) to eight (8) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least five of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 10 to 14 percent of the
amount requested under this program;
• Five (5) to six (6) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least four of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 10 to 14 percent of the
amount requested under this program;
• Three (3) to four (4) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least five of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 5 to 9 percent of the amount
requested under this program;
• One (1) to two (2) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least three of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 5 to 9 percent of the amount
requested under this program; and
• Zero (0) points to applicants that
provide documentation of leveraging
resources as listed above that are less
than 5 percent of the amount requested.
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (12 Points)
This factor reflects HUD’s goal to
embrace high standards of management
and accountability. It measures the
applicant’s commitment to assess their
performance to achieve the program’s
proposed objectives and goals.
Applicants are required to develop an
effective, quantifiable, outcome oriented
evaluation plan for measuring
performance and determining that
objectives and goals have been achieved
by using the Logic Model. The Logic
Model is a summary of the narrative
statements presented in Factors 1–4.
Therefore, the information submitted on
the Logic Model should be consistent
with the information contained in the
narrative statements.
‘‘Outcomes’’ are benefits accruing to
institutions of higher education and/or
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
communities during or after
participation in the AN/NHIAC
program. Applicants must clearly
identify the outcomes to be measured
and achieved. Examples of outcomes
include increased community
development in the target community
by a certain percentage, increased
employment opportunities in the target
community by a certain percentage,
increased incomes/wages or other assets
for persons trained, and or enhanced
family stability through the creation of
affordable housing opportunities.
In addition, applicants must establish
interim benchmarks and outputs that
lead to the ultimate achievement of
outcomes. ‘‘Outputs’’ are the direct
products of the program’s activities.
Examples of outputs are the number of
new affordable housing units, the
number of homes that have been
renovated, and the number of facilities
that have been constructed or
rehabilitated. Outputs should produce
outcomes for the program. At a
minimum, an applicant must address
the following activities in the evaluation
plan:
a. Measurable outputs to be
accomplished (e.g., the number of
persons to be trained and employed;
houses to be built pursuant to 24 CFR
570.207 or rehabilitated; minorityowned businesses to be started);
b. Measurable outcomes the grant will
have on the community in general and
the target area or population; and
c. The impact the grant will have on
assisting the university to obtain
additional resources to continue this
type of work at the end of the grant
performance period.
The information must be placed on a
HUD–96010, Program Logic Model
form. HUD has developed a new
approach to completing this form.
Please carefully read the General
Section for instructions, training is
available. (Form HUD–96010 will be
excluded from the page count.) If an
applicant utilizes ‘‘other’’ from the
Logic Model categories, then the
applicant should describe briefly this
‘‘other’’ category within the Rating
Factor 5 narrative. If a narrative is
provided, those pages will be included
in the page count.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Application Selection Process
Two types of reviews will be
conducted:
a. A threshold review to determine an
applicant’s basic eligibility; and
b. A technical review for all
applications that pass the threshold
review to rate and rank the application
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
based on the ‘‘Rating Factors’’ listed in
Section V.A.
Only those applications that pass the
threshold review will receive a
technical review and be rated and
ranked.
2. Rating Panels
To review and rate applications, HUD
may establish panels, which may
include experts or consultants not
currently employed by HUD to obtain
certain expertise.
3. Ranking
HUD will fund applications in rank
order, until all available program funds
are awarded. In order to be considered
for funding, an applicant must receive a
minimum score of 75 points out of a
possible 100 points for Factors 1
through 5, plus up to two bonus points
that may be awarded for activities
conducted in the RC/EZ/EC–II
communities, as described in the
General Section. If two or more
applications have the same number of
points, the application with the most
points for Factor 3 shall be selected. If
there is still a tie, the application with
the most points for Factor 1 shall be
selected. If there is still a tie, the
application with the most points for
Factors 2, 4 and then 5 shall be selected,
in that order, until the tie is broken.
HUD reserves the right to make
selections out of rank order to provide
for geographic distribution of grantees.
HUD also reserves the right to reduce
the amount of funding requested in
order to fund as many highly ranked
applications as possible. Additionally, if
funds remain after funding the highest
ranked applications, HUD may fund
part of the next highest-ranking
application. If an applicant turns down
an award offer, HUD will make an
award to the next highest-ranking
application. If funds remain after all
selections have been made, the
remaining funds will be carried over to
the next funding cycle’s competition.
4. Correction to Deficient Applications
See the General Section.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Announcements of awards are
anticipated on or before September 30,
2007.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
After all selections have been made,
HUD will notify all winning applicants
in writing. HUD may require winning
applicants to participate in additional
negotiations before receiving an official
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
award. For further discussion on this
matter, please refer to the General
Section.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Refer to the General Section.
1. Debriefing. The General Section
provides the procedures for requesting a
debriefing. All requests for debriefings
must be made in writing to: Sherone
Ivey, Office of University Partnerships,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development; 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Room 8106; Washington, DC 20410–
6000. Applicants may also write to Ms.
Ivey via e-mail at
Sherone_E._Ivey@hud.gov.
2. Administrative. Grants awarded
under this NOFA will be governed by
the provisions of 24 CFR part 84 (Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and Other
Non-Profit Organizations), A–21 (Cost
Principles for Educational Institutions)
and A–133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations). Applicants can access
the OMB circulars at the White House
Web site at: www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
circulars/.
3. OMB Circulars and Governmentwide Regulations Applicable to
Financial Assistance Programs. The
General Section provides further
discussion.
4. Executive Order 13202,
Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors Labor Relations
on Federal and Federally Funded
Construction Projects. See the General
Section for further discussion.
5. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See Section the General
Section for further discussion.
6. Executive Order 13166, Improving
Access to Services For Persons With
Limited English Proficiency (LEP). See
the General Section for further
discussion.
7. Code of Conduct. See the General
Section for further discussion.
C. Reporting
All grant recipients under this NOFA
are required to submit quarterly
progress reports.
The progress reports shall consist of
two components, a narrative that must
reflect the activities undertaken during
the reporting period and a financial
report that reflects costs incurred by
budget line item, as well as a
cumulative summary of cost incurred
during the reporting period.
For each reporting period, as part of
the required report to HUD, grant
recipients must include a completed
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11495
Logic Model form (HUD–96010), which
identifies output and outcome
achievements.
For FY2007, HUD is considering a
new concept for the Logic Model. The
new concept is a Return on Investment
(ROI) statement. HUD will be publishing
a separate notice on the ROI concept.
VII. Agency Contacts
Applicants may contact Sherone Ivey
at (202) 708–3061, extension 4200 or
Susan Brunson at (202) 708–3061,
extension 3852. Persons with speech or
hearing impairments may call the
Federal Information Relay Service TTY
at (800) 877–8339. Except for the ‘‘800’’
number, these numbers are not toll-free.
Applicants may also reach Ms. Ivey via
e-mail at Sherone_E._Ivey@hud.gov,
and/or Ms. Brunson at
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov.
VIII. Other Information: Paperwork
Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this
document have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2528–
0206. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 59 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, quarterly,
and final reports. The information will
be used for grantee selection and
monitoring the administration of funds.
Response to this request for information
is required in order to receive the
benefits to be derived.
Appendix A—Application Checklist—
AN/NHIAC
This checklist identifies application
submission requirements. Applicants
are requested to use this checklist when
preparing an application to ensure
submission of all required elements.
Applicants submitting an electronic
application do not have to submit the
checklist. Applicants that receive a
waiver of the electronic application
submission requirement should include
a copy of the checklist in their
application.
Check off to ensure these items have
been included in the application:
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11496
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
llSF–424 ‘‘Application for Federal
Assistance’’
llApplication Checklist (Applicants
that submit paper applications must
include the checklist in their
applications)
llAbstract (must include no more
than a two-page summary of the
proposed project)
Indicate the page number where each
of the llFactors is located:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
llNarrative Statement Addressing the
Rating Factors. The narrative section of
an application must not exceed 50 pages
in length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and abstract). This information
must be submitted on 81⁄2 by 11-inch
paper, double-spaced on one side of the
paper, with one-inch margins (from the
top, bottom, left, and right sides of the
documents) and printed in standard
Times New-Roman 12-point font.
[Applicants that submit applications via
Grants.gov should review the General
Section for information about file names
and extensions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
File names should not contain spaces
or special characters.
llFactor I
llFactor II
llFactor III
llFactor IV
llFactor V
ll HUD–96010 ‘‘Logic Model’’
Check off to ensure these items have
been included in the application:
llAppendix. The appendix section of
an application must not exceed 15 pages
in length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and assurances).
llBudget
llHUD–424–CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov)
llBudget Narrative (No form
provided, but must be submitted for the
total three-year grant period)
Appendix B (All Required Forms)
The following forms are required for
submission. All required forms are
contained in the electronic application
package.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
llApplication for Federal Assistance
(SF–424)
llSupplement, Survey on Ensuring
Equal Opportunities for Applicants (SF–
424 Supplement) (‘‘Faith Based EEO
Survey (SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov)
llDisclosure of Lobbying Activities
(SF–LLL)
llQuestionnaire for HUD’s Removal
of Regulatory Barriers (HUD–27300)
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov), if applicable
llApplicant/Recipient Disclosure
Update Report (HUD–2880) (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov)
llAcknowledgement of Applicant
Receipt (Only applicants who submit
paper applications (HUD–2993)
llYou Are Our Client Grant Applicant
Survey (HUD–2994–A)
llThird Party Documentation
Facsimile Transmittal (HUD–96011)
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov), if applicable
llLogic Model (HUD–96010)
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11497
EN13MR07.009
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11498
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Tribal Colleges and Universities
Program
structure and budget, and meets the
definition of a TCU outlined above.
every year of the three-year grant
performance period.
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Policy Development and
Research, Office of University
Partnerships.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Tribal
Colleges and Universities Program
(TCUP).
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Numbers:
FR–5100–N–11; OMB Approval
Number: 2528–0215.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: The CFDA
Number for this program is 14.519.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 23, 2007. Applications must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
by 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
deadline date. Please be sure to read the
General Section for electronic
application submission and receipt
requirements.
G. Additional Overview Content
Information:
1. Purpose of the Program. To assist
Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCU)
to build, expand, renovate, and equip
their own facilities, and to expand the
role of the TCUs into the community
through the provision of needed
services such as health programs, job
training, and economic development
activities.
2. Award Information: In Fiscal Year
(FY) 2007, approximately $2.5 million
has been made available for this
program by the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5; approved February 15, 2007),
and approximately $217,190 in
carryover funds has been made
available. An applicant can request up
to $600,000 for a three-year (36 months)
grant performance period.
3. Eligible Applicants: Tribal Colleges
and Universities that meet the definition
of a TCU established in Title III of the
1998 Amendments to the Higher
Education Act of 1965 (Pub. L. 105–244,
approved October 7, 1998). Applicants
must be a two- or four-year, fully
accredited institution or provide a
statement in the abstract of the
application that states the institution is
a candidate for accreditation by a
regional institutional accrediting
association recognized by the U.S.
Department of Education. If an
applicant is one of several campuses of
the same institution, the applicant may
apply separately from the other
campuses as long as the campus has a
separate DUNS number, administrative
Full Text of Announcement
II. Award Information
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The purpose of this program is to
assist Tribal Colleges and Universities
(TCU) to build, expand, renovate, and
equip their own facilities, and to expand
the role of the TCUs into the community
through the provision of needed
services such as health programs, job
training, and economic development
activities.
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2007,
approximately $2.5 million is made
available by the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5; approved February 15, 2007)
with approximately $217,190 in
additional carryover funds. An
applicant can request up to $600,000 for
a three-year (36 months) grant
performance period.
A. Authority
III. Eligibility Information
HUD’s authority for making funding
available under this NOFA is the
Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5;
approved February 15, 2007). This
program is being implemented through
this NOFA and the policies governing
its operation are contained herein.
A. Eligible Applicants
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
B. Modifications
Listed below are major modifications
from the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 programfunding announcement.
1. Commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements are
not required to be submitted with the
application, but the originals must be on
file at the time of application
submission. HUD will require
applicants chosen to proceed to the next
step in the selection process to submit
the signed commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements outlined in the application,
within seven (7) calendar days after
initial contact from the Office of
University Partnerships (OUP). OUP
will provide specific instructions on
how these documents must be
submitted at that time. HUD will only
request and consider the resources/
organizations outlined in the
application. If OUP does not receive
those documents with the required
information and within the allotted
timeframe, an applicant will not receive
points under this factor.
2. The appendix section of an
application must not exceed 15 pages in
length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and assurances). An applicant
SHOULD NOT submit resumes,
commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements, or
other back-up material. Each page must
include the applicant’s name and
should be numbered. HUD will not
consider the information on any excess
page.
3. Applicants must budget for travel
costs to attend at least one HUD
sponsored TCUP conference/workshop
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Tribal Colleges and Universities that
meet the definition of a TCU established
in Title III of the 1998 Amendments to
the Higher Education Act of 1965 (Pub.
L. 105–244, enacted October 7, 1998).
Applicants must be two- or four-year,
fully accredited, or provide a statement
in their application that verifies the
institution is a candidate for
accreditation, by a regional institutional
accrediting association recognized by
the U.S. Department of Education. If an
applicant is one of several campuses of
the same institution, the applicant may
apply separately from the other
campuses as long as the campus has a
separate DUNS number, administrative
structure and budget, and meets the
definition of a TCU outlined above.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
None Required.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Eligible
activities include building, expanding,
renovating, and equipping facilities
owned by the institution (a long-term
lease for five years or more in duration
is considered an acceptable form of
ownership under this program).
Buildings for which TCUP funding is
used that also serve the community are
eligible; however, the facilities must be
predominantly (at least 51 percent of the
time) for the use of the institution (e.g.,
students, faculty, and staff). In addition,
public services and program delivery
activities for the community such as
health programs, job training and
economic development are eligible
activities. Examples of eligible activities
include, but are not limited to:
a. Building a new facility (e.g.,
classrooms, administrative offices,
health and cultural centers, gymnasium,
technology centers, etc.);
b. Renovating an existing or acquired
facility;
c. Expanding an existing or acquired
facility;
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
d. Equipping university facilities (e.g.,
lab equipment, library books, furniture,
etc.);
e. Property acquisition;
f. Health screening;
g. Homeownership counseling/
training;
h. Technical assistance to establish,
expand or stabilize micro-enterprises;
i. Crime, alcohol and/or drug-abuse
prevention activities;
j. Youth leadership development
programs/activities;
k. Tutoring/mentoring programs;
l. Child care/development programs;
m. Cultural activities/programs; and
n. Up to 20 percent of the grant may
be used for payments of reasonable
grant administrative costs related to
planning and execution of the project
(e.g., preparation/submission of HUD
reports, etc.). A detailed explanation of
these costs is provided in the OMB
circulars that can be accessed at the
White House Web site at: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/
index.html.
Each activity proposed for funding
must meet at least one of the
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program national objectives as
described in Rating Factor 3 in Section
V.A.3 of this NOFA.
Criteria for determining whether an
activity addresses one or more
objectives are provided at 24 CFR
570.208. The CDBG publication entitled
‘‘Community Development Block Grant
Program Guide to National Objectives
and Eligible Activities for Entitlement
Communities’’ describes the CDBG
regulations, and a copy can be obtained
from HUD’s NOFA Information Center
at 800–HUD–8929. Individuals with
hearing or speech impairments may
access this number via the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
2. Threshold Requirements
Applicable to All Applicants. All
applicants must comply with the
threshold requirements as defined in the
General Section and the requirements
listed below. Applications that do not
meet these requirements will be
considered ineligible for funding and
will be disqualified.
a. The applicant must meet the
eligibility requirements as defined in
Section III.A.
b. The applicant may request up to
$600,000.
c. An applicant must have a separate
DUNS number to receive HUD grant
funds (See General Section). Only one
application can be submitted per
campus. If multiple applications are
submitted, all will be disqualified.
However, different campuses of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
same university system are eligible to
apply as long as they have a separate
DUNS number and an administrative
and budgeting structure independent of
the other campuses in the system.
d. Institutions that received grants in
FY2006 are not eligible to apply under
this NOFA.
e. Applicants must receive a
minimum score of 75 points to be
considered for funding.
f. Electronic applications must be
received and validated by Grants.gov no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on
the application deadline date.
3. Program Requirements. In addition
to the standard requirements listed in
Section III.C. of the General Section,
applicants must meet the following
program requirements:
a. All funds awarded are for a threeyear (36 months) grant performance
period.
b. While community-wide use of a
facility (that is purchased, equipped,
leased, renovated or built) is permissible
under this program, the facility must be
predominantly for the use of the
institution (i.e., it must be used by the
staff, faculty, and/or students at least 51
percent of the time).
c. If a TCU is a part or instrumentality
of a federally recognized tribe, the
applicant must comply with the Indian
Civil Rights Act (25 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.)
and all other applicable civil rights
statutes and authorities as set forth in 24
CFR 1000.12. If the TCU is not a part or
instrumentality of a federally recognized
tribe the applicant must comply with
the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601–
19) and implementing regulations at 24
CFR part 100 et seq., Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d–
2000d–4) (Nondiscrimination in
Federally Assisted Programs) and
implementing regulations at 24 CFR part
1, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794) and
implementing regulation at 24 CFR Part
8, and Section 109 of Title One of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974 (HCDA), as amended, with
respect to nondiscrimination on the
basis of age, sex, religion, or disability
and implementing regulations at 24 CFR
part 6.
d. Labor Standards. Institutions and
their subgrantees, contractors and
subcontractors must comply with the
labor standards (Davis-Bacon)
requirements referenced in 24 CFR
570.603. However, in accordance with
HCDA section 107(e)(2), the Secretary
waives the provisions of HCDA section
110 with respect to the TCUP program
for grants to a TCU that is part of a tribe,
i.e., a TCU that is legally a department
or other part of a tribal government, but
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11499
not a TCU that is established under
tribal law as an entity separate from the
tribal government. If a TCU is not part
of a tribe, the labor standards of HCDA
section 110, as referenced in 24 CFR
570.603, apply to activities under the
grant to the TCU.
e. Environmental Requirements.
Selection for award does not constitute
approval of any proposed sites.
Following selection for award, HUD will
perform an environmental review of
activities proposed for assistance in
accordance with 24 CFR part 50. The
results of the environmental review may
require that proposed activities be
modified or proposed sites be rejected.
Applicants are particularly cautioned
not to undertake or commit funds for
acquisition or development of proposed
properties prior to HUD approval of
specific properties or areas. An
application constitutes an assurance
that the institution will assist HUD to
comply with part 50; will supply HUD
with all available and relevant
information to perform an
environmental review for each proposed
property; will carry out mitigating
measures required by HUD or select
alternate property; and will not acquire,
rehabilitate, convert, demolish, lease,
repair, or construct property and not
commit or expend HUD or local funds
for these program activities with respect
to any eligible property until HUD’s
written approval of the property is
received. In supplying HUD with
environmental information, applicants
should use the same guidance as
provided in the HUD Notice CPD–05–07
entitled, ‘‘Field Environmental Review
Processing for Rural Housing and
Economic Development (RHED) grants’’
issued August 30, 2005. The General
Section provides further discussion of
the environmental requirements.
Further information and assistance on
HUD’s environmental requirements is
available at: https://www.hud.gov/
offices/cpd/environment/index.cfm.
f. Site Control. Where grant funds will
be used for acquisition, rehabilitation,
or new construction, an applicant must
demonstrate site control. Funds may be
recaptured or deobligated from
recipients that cannot demonstrate
control of a suitable site within one year
after the initial notification of award.
g. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very-Low Income Persons (Section
3). The provisions of Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) apply to this
NOFA. One of the purposes of the
assistance is to give, to the greatest
extent feasible, and consistent with
existing federal, state, and local laws
and regulations, job training,
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11500
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
employment, contracting and other
economic opportunities to Section 3
residents and Section 3 business
concerns. Regulations are located at 24
CFR part 135.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Address To Request Application
Package
Applicants may download the
instructions to the application found on
the Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.Grants.gov./applicants/apply_
for_grants.jsp. If you have difficulty
accessing the information you may call
the Grants.gov Support Desk toll free
800–518–GRANTS or e-mail your
questions to Support@Grants.gov. See
the General Section for information
regarding the registration process or ask
for registration information from the
Grants.gov Support Desk.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Forms. The following forms are
required for submission. Copies of these
forms are available on line at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance.
b. SF–424 Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
c. HUD–424–CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov);
d. SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities, if applicable;
e. HUD–27300, Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov), if applicable;
f. HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
g. HUD–2993, Acknowledgement of
Applicant Receipt. Complete this form
only if you have received a waiver to the
electronic application submission
requirement. Applicants submitting
electronically are not required to
include this form;
h. HUD–2994–A, You Are Our Client
Survey (Optional);
i. HUD–96010, Program Logic Model;
j. HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic
Plan, if applicable;
k. HUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov). This form must be used as
the cover page to transmit third party
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
documents and other information.
Applicants are advised to download the
application package, complete the SF–
424 first and it will pre-populate the
Transmittal Cover page. The Transmittal
Cover page will contain a unique
identifier embedded in the page that
will help HUD associate your faxed
materials to your application. Please
download the cover page and then make
multiple copies to provide to any of the
entities responsible for submitting faxed
materials to HUD on your behalf. Please
do not use your own fax cover sheet.
HUD will not read any faxes that are
sent without the HUD–96011 fax
transmittal cover page; and
2. Certifications and Assurances.
Please read the General Section for
detailed information on all the
Certifications and Assurances. All
applications submitted through
Grants.gov constitute an
acknowledgement and agreement to all
required certifications and assurances.
Please include in your application each
item listed below. Applicants
submitting paper copy applications
should submit the application in the
following order:
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance. Please remember the
following:
(1) The full grant amount requested
from HUD (entire three-years) should be
entered, not the amount for just one
year;
(2) Include the name, title, address,
telephone number, facsimile number,
and e-mail address of the designated
contact. This person will receive all
correspondence from HUD; therefore,
please ensure the accuracy of the
information;
(3) The Employer Identification/Tax
ID number;
(4) The DUNS Number;
(5) The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number for this program is
14.519;
(6) The project’s proposed start and
completion dates. For the purpose of
this application the program start date
should be December 1, 2007; and
(7) The signature of the Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR)
who, by virtue of submitting an
application via Grants.gov, has been
authenticated by the credential provider
to submit applications on behalf of the
Institution and approved by the
eBusiness Point of Contact to submit an
application via Grants.gov. The AOR
must be able to make a legally binding
agreement with HUD.
b. Application Checklist. Applicants
should use the checklist to ensure that
they have all the required components
of their application. Applicants
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
submitting an electronic application
should not submit the checklist in their
application. Applicants receiving a
waiver of the electronic application
submission requirement should include
a copy of the checklist in their
application submission. The checklist is
located in Appendix A.
c. Abstract. Applicants must include
no more than a two-page summary of
the proposed project. Please include the
following:
(1) A clear description of each
proposed project activity, where it will
take place (be located), the target
population that will be assisted, and the
impact this project is expected to have
on the institution;
(2) A statement that the institution is
an eligible institution because it is a
two- or four-year fully accredited
institution, the name of the accrediting
agency and an assurance that the
accrediting agency is recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education; or the
applicant is a candidate for
accreditation by a regional instructional
accrediting association recognized by
the U.S. Department of Education,
including the name of the accrediting
agency;
(3) The designated contact person,
including phone number, facsimile
number, and e-mail address (This is the
person who will receive all
correspondence from HUD; therefore,
please ensure the accuracy of the
information);
(4) The project director, if different
from the designated contact person for
the project, including phone number,
facsimile number, and e-mail address.
d. Narrative statement addressing the
Rating Factors. HUD will use the
narrative response to the ‘‘Rating
Factors’’ to evaluate, rate, and rank
applications. The narrative statement is
the main source of information.
Applicants are advised to review each
factor carefully for program specific
requirements. The response to each
factor should be concise and contain
only information relevant to the factor,
yet detailed enough to address the factor
fully. PLEASE DO NOT REPEAT
MATERIAL IN RESPONSE TO THE
FIVE FACTORS; INSTEAD, FOCUS ON
HOW WELL THE PROPOSAL
RESPONDS TO EACH OF THE
FACTORS. Where there are subfactors,
each subfactor must be presented
separately, with the short title of the
subfactor presented. Make sure to
address each subfactor and provide
sufficient information about every
element of the subfactor. The narrative
section of an application must not
exceed 50 pages in length (excluding
forms, budget narrative, assurances, and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
abstract) and must be submitted on 81⁄2
by 11-inch paper, double-spaced on one
side of the paper, with one inch margins
(from the top, bottom and left to right
side of the document) and printed in
standard Times New Roman 12-point
font. Each page of the narrative must
include the institution’s name and
should be numbered. Note that although
submitting pages in excess of the page
limit will not disqualify an applicant,
HUD will not consider the information
on any excess pages. This exclusion
may result in a lower score or failure to
meet a threshold requirement. All
applicants submitting electronic
applications must attach their narrative
responses to Rating Factors 1–5 as one
attachment. PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH
YOUR RESPONSE TO EACH FACTOR
SEPARATELY. Please follow the
instructions on file extension and file
names in the General Section.
e. Budget. The budget submission
must include the following:
(1) HUD–424–CB, ‘‘HUD Detailed
Budget.’’ This form shows the total
budget by year and by line item for the
program activities to be carried out with
the proposed HUD grant. Each year of
the program should be presented
separately. Applicants must also budget
for travel cost (airfare, lodging and per
diem) for two individuals to attend at
least one HUD sponsored TCUP
conference/workshop every year of the
three-year grant performance period. To
calculate travel expenses, applicants
should use Washington, DC as the site
of all conference/workshop. Applicants
must also submit this form to reflect the
total cost for the entire grant
performance period (Grand Total).
Make sure that the amounts shown on
the SF–424, HUD–424–CB, and all other
required program forms are consistent
and the budget totals are correct.
Remember to check the addition in
totaling the categories on all forms so
that all items are included in the total.
If there is any inconsistency between
any of the required budget forms, the
HUD–424–CB will be used. All budget
forms must be fully completed. If an
application is selected for award, the
applicant may be required to provide
greater specificity to the budget during
grant agreement negotiations.
(2) Budget Narrative. Applicants must
submit a narrative that explains how the
applicant arrived at the cost estimates
for any line item over $5,000
cumulative. For example, an applicant
proposes to construct an addition to an
existing building, which will cost
approximately $200,000. The following
cost estimate reflects this total:
Foundation cost $75,000, electrical
work $40,000, plumbing work $40,000,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
interior finishing work $35,000 and
landscaping $10,000. The proposed cost
estimates should be reasonable for the
work to be performed and consistent
with rates established for the level of
expertise required to perform the work
proposed in the geographical area.
When necessary, quotes from various
vendors or historical data should be
used (please make sure they are kept on
file and are available for review by HUD
at any time). All direct labor or salaries
must be supported with mandated city/
state pay scales, Davis-Bacon wage
rates/tribally designated wage rate (as
appropriate) or other documentation.
When an applicant proposes to use a
consultant, the applicant must indicate
whether there is a formal written
agreement. For each consultant, please
provide the name, if known, hourly or
daily fee, and the estimated time on the
project. Applicants must use cost
estimates based on historical data from
the institution and/or from a qualified
firm (e.g., Architectural or Engineering
firm), vendor and/or qualified
individual (e.g., independent architect
or contractor) other than the institution
for projects that involve rehabilitation of
residential, commercial and/or
industrial structures, and/or acquisition,
construction, or installation of public
facilities and improvements. Such an
entity must be involved in the business
of rehabilitation, construction, and/or
management. Equipment and contracts
cannot be presented as a total estimated
figure. For equipment, applicants must
provide a list by type and cost for each
item. Applicants using contracts must
provide an individual description and
cost estimate for each contract.
Construction costs must be broken
down to indicate how funds will be
utilized (e.g., demolition, foundation,
exterior walls, roofing, electrical work,
plumbing, finishing work, etc.).
(3) Indirect costs. Indirect costs, if
applicable, are allowable based on an
established approved indirect cost rate.
Applicants must have on file, and
submit to HUD if selected for award, a
copy of their indirect cost rate
agreement. Applicants who are selected
for funding that do not have an
approved indirect cost rate agreement,
established by the cognizant federal
agency, will be required to establish a
rate. In such cases, HUD will issue an
award with a provisional rate and assist
applicants with the process of
establishing a final rate.
f. Appendix. Applicants receiving a
waiver of the electronic submission
requirements and submitting a paper
copy of the application must place all
required forms in this section. The
appendix section of an application must
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11501
not exceed 15 pages in length
(excluding forms, budget narrative and
assurances). An applicant SHOULD
NOT submit resumes, commitment
letters, memoranda of understanding
and/or agreements, or other back-up
materials. If this information is
included, it will not be considered
during the review process. Each page
must include the applicant’s name and
should be numbered. HUD will not
consider the information on any excess
pages. The additional items will also
slow the transmission of your
application.
C. Submission Dates and Times
A complete application package must
be received and validated electronically
by the Grants.gov portal no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on or before
the application deadline date. In an
effort to address any issues with
transmission of your application,
applicants are strongly encouraged to
submit their applications at least 48 to
72 hours prior to the application
deadline. This will allow an applicant
enough time to make the necessary
adjustments to meet the submission
deadline in the event Grants.gov rejects
the application. Please see the General
Section for further instructions.
Electronic faxes using the Facsimile
Transmittal Cover Sheet (Form HUD–
96011) contained in the electronic
application must be received no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date.
D. Intergovernmental Review
This program is excluded for an
Intergovernmental Review.
E. Funding Restrictions
Ineligible activities for funding under
this program include, but are not
limited to the following:
1. Renovation of a facility in which
the facility is not used at least 51
percent of the time by the institution;
2. Rental space to another entity that
operates a small business assistance
center;
3. Building of a new facility, where
the activities are for non-students or the
activities are run primarily by an
outside entity;
4. Planning and administrative
activities that would result in an
applicant exceeding the 20 percent cost
limitations (e.g., preparation/submission
of HUD reports); and
5. Curriculum development and/or
expansion on an institution’s existing
curriculum.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11502
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Application Submission and
Receipt Procedure. Please read the
General Section carefully and
completely for the electronic
submission and receipt procedures for
all applications because failure to
comply may disqualify your
application.
2. Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirements. Applicants should
submit their waiver requests in writing
using e-mail or fax. Waiver requests
must be submitted no later than 15 days
prior to the application deadline date
and should be submitted to:
Susan Brunson, Office of University
Partnerships. E-mail:
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov. FAX: (202)
708–0309.
Paper applications will not be
accepted from applicants that have not
been granted a waiver. If an applicant is
granted a waiver, the Office of
University Partnerships will provide
instructions for submission. All
applicants submitting applications in
paper format must have received a
waiver to the electronic application
submission requirement and the
application must be received by HUD on
or before the application deadline date.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Experience (25
points). This factor addresses the extent
to which the applicant has the resources
necessary to successfully implement the
proposed activities in a timely manner.
a. Knowledge and Experience. For
First Time Applicants (25 points), For
Previously Funded Applicants (15
points). In rating this subfactor, HUD
will consider the extent to which the
applicant clearly addresses the
following:
(1) Describe the knowledge and
experience of the proposed project
director and staff, including the day-today program manager/coordinator,
consultants (including technical
assistance providers), and contractors in
planning and managing the type of
project for which funding is being
requested; and
(2) Clearly identify the following: key
project team members, titles (e.g.,
project manager/coordinator, etc.),
respective roles for the project staff, and
a brief description of their relevant
experience.
If key personnel have not been hired,
applicants must identify the position
title, provide a description of duties and
responsibilities, and describe the
qualifications to be considered in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
selection of personnel, including
subcontractors and consultants.
Experience will be judged in terms of
recent and relevant knowledge and
skills of the staff to undertake eligible
program activities. HUD will consider
experience within the last five (5) years
to be recent and experience pertaining
to similar activities to be relevant.
b. Past Performance (10 points) For
Previously Funded Grant Applicants
Only. This subfactor will evaluate how
well an applicant has performed
successfully under HUD/TCUP grants.
Applicants must demonstrate this by
addressing the following information for
all previously completed and open
HUD/TCUP grants:
(1) A list of all HUD/TCUP grants
received, including the dollar amount
awarded and the amount expended and
obligated as of the date of this
application;
(2) A description of the achievement
of specific tasks, measurable objectives,
and specific outcomes consistent with
the approved project management plan;
(3) A list detailing the date the
project(s) was completed, was it
completed in the original three-year
grant performance period; if not
completed, why (including when it was
or will be completed);
(4) A comparison of the amount of
proposed leveraged funds and/or
resources to the amount that was
actually leveraged; and
(5) A detailed description of
compliance with all reporting
requirements, including timeliness of
submission, whether reports were
complete and addressed all information
(both narrative and financial) as
required by the grant agreement.
HUD will also review an applicant’s
past performance in managing funds,
including, but not limited to: the ability
to account for funding appropriately;
timely use of funds received from HUD;
meeting performance targets for
completion of activities. In evaluating
past performance, HUD reserves the
right to deduct up to five (5) points from
this rating score as a result of the
information obtained from HUD’s
records (i.e., progress and financial
reports, monitoring reports, Logic Model
submission, and amendments).
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (10 points). This factor
addresses the extent to which there is a
need for funding the proposed project
activities and an indication of the
importance of meeting the need(s). The
need(s) described must be relevant to
activities for which funds are being
requested. In addressing this factor,
applicants should provide, at a
minimum, the following and must cite
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
statistics and/or analyses contained in at
least one or more current data sources
that are sound and reliable.
(1) Describe the need(s); and
(2) Describe the importance of
meeting the proposed needs.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider only current data that is
specific to the area where the proposed
project activities will be carried out.
Reliable sources of data may include
information that describes the need,
such as a need to have a building
renovated because it is 50 years old and
is deteriorating; a new computer lab has
been built, but the computers are
obsolete; a library has been expanded,
but the books are outdated, local/Tribal
crime statistics, Indian Housing Plans,
etc. When presenting data, include the
source and date of the information.
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (44 points). This factor
addresses the quality and effectiveness
of the proposed work plan and the
commitment of the institution to sustain
the proposed project activities.
a. (40 Points) Quality of Work Plan.
HUD will evaluate this subfactor based
on the extent to which an applicant
provides a clear detailed description of
the proposed project activities,
anticipated accomplishments and the
impact they will have on the target
population at the end of the project.
(1) (35 points) Specific Activities. The
work plan must describe all proposed
project activities and major tasks
required to successfully implement
them. The work plan must also identify
the anticipated accomplishments and
impact these activities will have on the
targeted population. In addressing this
subfactor, applicants must provide a
clear description of each proposed
project activity and address the
following:
(a) Describe each proposed project
activity in measurable terms (e.g., fifty
or more students will be receiving
computer literacy training, the number
of new classes that will be taught as a
result of building a new structure);
(b) Identify the major tasks in
sequential order necessary to
successfully implement and complete
each proposed project activity. Include
the target completion dates for the tasks
(6 month intervals, up to 36 months);
(c) List and describe how each activity
meets one of the following Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate-income
persons;
• Aid in the prevention or
elimination of slums or blight; or
• Meet other community
development needs having a particular
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
urgency because existing conditions
pose a serious and immediate threat to
the health and welfare of the
community, and other financial
resources are not available to meet such
needs.
Criteria for determining whether an
activity addresses one or more objective
are provided at 24 CFR 570.208;
(d) Describe the measurable
objectives/outcomes that will be
realized as a result of implementing the
proposed project; and
(e) Identify the key staff, as described
in Factor 1, who will be responsible for
completing each task.
(2) (5 points) Describe clearly how
each proposed project activity will:
(a) Address the needs identified in
Factor 2; and
(b) Relate to and not duplicate other
activities in the target area.
b. (2 points) Involvement of the
Faculty and Students. The applicant
must describe how it proposes to
integrate the institution’s students and
faculty into the proposed project
activities.
c. (2 points) HUD Policy Priorities. As
described in the General Section, to earn
points under this subfactor, HUD
requires applicants to undertake specific
activities that will assist the Department
in implementing its policy priorities
and that help the Department achieve its
goals and objectives in FY 2008, when
the majority of grant recipients will be
reporting programmatic results and
achievement. In addressing this
subfactor, HUD will evaluate the extent
to which a program will further and
support HUD priorities. The quality of
the responses provided to one or more
of HUD’s priorities will determine the
score an applicant can receive.
Applicants must describe how each
policy priority is addressed. Applicants
that just list a priority will receive no
points.
The total number of points an
applicant can receive under this
subfactor is two . Each policy priority
addressed has a point value of one
point, with the exception of the policy
priority related to removal of regulatory
barriers to affordable housing, which
has a value of up to two points. To
receive these two (2) points, an
applicant must: (1) Complete either Part
A or Part B (not both), (2) include
appropriate documentation, (3) identify
a point of contact, (4) indicate how this
priority will be addressed, and (5)
submit the completed questionnaire,
(HUD–27300) ‘‘HUD’s Initiative on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers’’ found
in the General Section along with
required documentation. It is up to the
applicant to determine which of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
policy priorities they elect to address to
receive the available two (2) points.
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (9 points). This factor
addresses the ability of the applicant to
secure resources that can be combined
with HUD’s grant funds to achieve the
program’s purpose.
HUD will consider the extent to
which the applicant established
partnerships with other entities to
secure additional resources to increase
the effectiveness of the proposed
program activities. Resources may
include funding or in-kind
contributions, such as services or
equipment, allocated for the purpose(s)
of the proposed project. Resources can
be provided by governmental entities
(e.g., Tribal, federal, and/or state
governments), public or private
nonprofit organizations, for-profit
private organizations, or other entities.
Overhead and other institutional costs
(e.g., salaries, indirect costs) that the
institution has waived can be counted.
Examples of potential sources for
outside assistance include:
• Tribal, federal, state, and local
governments
• Tribally Designated Housing
Entities
• Local or national nonprofit
organizations
• Banks and/or private businesses
• Foundations
• Faith-based and other communitybased organizations.
To address this factor, an applicant
must provide an outline in the
application and have the original
written commitment letters, memoranda
of understanding and/or agreements that
show the extent and firm commitment
of all proposed leveraged resources
(including any commitment of resources
from the applicant’s own institution)
that address the following information
for each leveraged resource/fund on file
at the time of application submission:
(1) The name of the organization and
the executive officer authorizing the
funds/goods and/or services (Only
applicable to the narrative section)
(2) The cash amount contributed or
dollar value of the in-kind goods and/
or services committed (If a dollar
amount and its use is not shown, the
value of the contribution will not be
scored for award);
(3) A specific description of how each
contribution is to be used toward the
proposed activities;
(4) A description of the current and/
or past working relationship that the
institution has with the organization
contributing the resources and the
involvement it will have with this
proposed project.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11503
(5) The date the contribution will be
made available and a statement that
describes the duration of the
contribution;
(6) Any terms or conditions affecting
the commitment, other than receipt of a
HUD Grant; and
(7) The signature of the appropriate
executive officer authorized to commit
the funds and/or goods and/or services.
(Only applicable to the written
documentation) Please remember that
only items eligible for funding under
this program can be counted.
DO NOT submit commitment letters,
memoranda of understanding and/or
agreements are not required at the time
of application submission but have the
originals on file at the time of
submission. IF THIS INFORMATION IS
INCLUDED, IT WILL NOT BE
CONSIDERED DURING THE REVIEW
PROCESS. Applicants chosen to
proceed to the next step in the selection
process will be required to submit the
signed commitment letters, memoranda
of understanding and/or agreements
outlined in the application, within
seven (7) calendar days after initial
contact from the Office of University
Partnerships (OUP). OUP will provide
specific instructions on how these
documents must be submitted at that
time. Letters, memoranda of
understanding, or agreements must be
submitted on the provider’s letterhead
and should be addressed to Sherone
Ivey, Associate Deputy Assistant
Secretary for University Partnerships.
The date of the letter, memorandum of
understanding, or agreement from the
CEO of the provider organization must
be dated no earlier than nine months
prior to this published NOFA. OUP will
provide specific instructions on how
these documents must be submitted
when contact is made with the
applicant. HUD will only request and
consider the resources/organizations
outlined in the application. If OUP does
not receive those documents with the
required information and within the
allotted timeframe, an applicant will not
receive points under this factor.
In scoring this factor, HUD will
award:
• Nine (9) points to an applicant that
provides properly documented
leveraging resources as listed in their
application that are 10 percent or more
of the amount requested under this
program;
• Seven (7) to eight (8) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least five of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 7 to 9 percent of the amount
requested under this program;
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11504
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
• Five (5) to six (6) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least four of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 7 to 9 percent of the amount
requested under this program;
• Three (3) to four (4) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least five of the seven
required items outlined above and that
represents 4 to 6 percent of the amount
requested under this program;
• One (1) to two (2) points to
applicants that provide documentation
that includes at least three of the
required seven items outlined above and
that represents 4 to 6 percent of the
amount requested under this program;
and
• Zero (0) points to applicants that
provide document leveraging resources
as listed above that are less than 4
percent of the amount requested.
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (12 points).
This factor reflects HUD’s goal to
embrace high standards of management
and accountability. It measures the
applicant’s commitment to assess their
performance to achieve the program’s
proposed objectives and goals.
Applicants are required to develop an
effective, quantifiable, outcome oriented
evaluation plan for measuring
performance and determining that
objectives and goals have been achieved
by using the Logic Model. The Logic
Model is a summary of the narrative
statements presented in Factors 1–4.
Therefore, the information submitted on
the Logic Model should be consistent
with the information contained in the
narrative statements.
‘‘Outcomes’’ are benefits accruing to
institutions of higher education during
or after participation in the TCUP
program. Applicants must clearly
identify the outcomes to be measured
and achieved. Examples of outcomes
include an increased number of campus
facilities (e.g., newly built or renovated),
an increased number of classroom
spaces available, or an increased student
enrollment and graduation rate.
In addition, applicants must establish
interim benchmarks and outputs that
lead to the ultimate achievement of
outcomes. ‘‘Outputs’’ are the direct
products of the project ’s activities.
Examples of outputs are the number of
new facilities renovated, or the number
of new dormitories built. Outputs
should produce outcomes for the
project. At a minimum, an applicant
must address the following activities in
the evaluation plan:
a. Short- and long-term objectives to
be achieved;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
b. Measurable outcomes the grant will
have on the university or the target
population;
This information must be included
under this section on a HUD–96010,
Program Logic Model form. HUD has
developed a new approach to
completing this form. Please carefully
read the General Section for
instructions, training is available. (Form
HUD–96010 will be excluded from the
page count.) If an applicant utilizes
‘‘other’’ from the Logic Model
categories, then the applicant should
describe briefly this ‘‘other’’ category
within the Rating Factor 5 narrative. If
a narrative is provided, those pages will
be included in the page count.
application. If an applicant turns down
the award offer, HUD will make an
award to the next highest-ranking
application. If funds remain after all
selections have been made, the
remaining funds will be carried over to
the next funding cycle’s competition.
4. Corrections to Deficient
Applications. See the General Section.
B. Review and Selection Process
After all selections have been made,
HUD will notify all winning applicants
in writing. HUD may require winning
applicants to participate in additional
negotiations before receiving an official
award. For further discussion on this
matter, please refer to the General
Section.
1. Application Selection Process
Two types of reviews will be
conducted:
a. A threshold review to determine an
applicant’s basic eligibility; and
b. A technical review for all
applications that pass the threshold
review to rate and rank the application
based on the ‘‘Rating Factors ‘‘ listed in
Section V.A. above.
Only those applications that pass the
threshold review will receive a
technical review and be rated and
ranked.
2. Rating Panels. To review and rate
applications, HUD may establish panels
that may include experts or consultants
not currently employed by HUD to
obtain certain expertise.
3. Ranking. HUD will fund
applications in rank order, until all
available program funds are awarded. In
order to be considered for funding, an
applicant must receive a minimum
score of 75 points out of a possible 100
points; plus up to two bonus points that
may be awarded for activities conducted
in the RC/EZ/EC–II communities, as
described in the General Section. If two
or more applications have the same
number of points, the application with
the most points for Factor 3 shall be
selected. If there is still a tie, the
application with the most points for
Factor 1shall be selected. If there is still
a tie, the application with the most
points for Factor 2, 4, and then 5 shall
be selected in that order, until the tie is
broken. HUD reserves the right to select
out of rank order to provide for
geographic distribution of grantees.
HUD also reserves the right to reduce
the amount of funding requested in
order to fund as many highly ranked
applications as possible. Additionally, if
funds remain after funding the highest
ranked applications, HUD may fund
part of the next highest-ranking
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates.
Announcements of awards are
anticipated on or before September 30,
2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notice
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Refer to the General Section.
1. Debriefing. The General Section
provides the procedures for requesting a
debriefing. All requests for debriefings
must be made in writing to: Sherone
Ivey, Office of University Partnerships,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW,
Room 8106; Washington, DC 20410–
6000. Applicants may also write to Ms.
Ivey via e-mail at
Sherone_E._Ivey@hud.gov.
2. Administrative. Grants awarded
under this NOFA will be governed by
the provisions of 24 CFR part 84 (Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and Other
Non-Profit Organizations), A–21 (Cost
Principles for Educational Institutions)
and A–133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations). Applicants can access
the OMB circulars at the White House
Web site at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/circulars/.
3. OMB Circulars and
Governmentwide Regulations
Applicable to Financial Assistance
Programs. The General Section provides
discussion of OMB circulars and
governmentwide regulations.
4. Code of Conduct. See the General
Section for further discussion.
5. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See the General Section for
further discussion.
6. Executive Order 13202,
Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Toward
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Construction Projects. See the
General Section for further discussion if
applicable.
7. Executive Order 13166, Improving
Access to Services For Persons With
Limited English Proficiency (LEP). See
the General Section for further
discussion.
C. Reporting
All grant recipients under this NOFA
are required to submit quarterly
progress reports. The progress reports
shall consist of two components, a
narrative that must reflect the activities
undertaken during the reporting period
and a financial report that reflects costs
incurred by budget line item, as well as
a cumulative summary report during the
reporting period.
For each reporting period, as part of
the required report to HUD, grant
recipients must include a completed
Logic Model (HUD–96010), which
identifies output and outcome
achievements.
For FY2007, HUD is considering a
new concept for the Logic Model. The
new concept is a Return on Investment
(ROI) statement. HUD will be publishing
a separate notice on the ROI concept.
VII. Agency Contacts
Applicants may contact Sherone Ivey
at (202) 708–3061, extension 4200, or
Susan Brunson at (202) 708–3061,
extension 3852. Persons with speech or
hearing impairments may call the
Federal Information Relay Service TTY
at (800) 877–8339. Except for the ‘‘800’’
number, these numbers are not toll-free.
Applicants may also reach Ms. Ivey via
e-mail at Sherone_E._Ivey@hud.gov, and
Ms. Brunson at
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov.
VIII. Other
Paperwork Reduction Act
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
The information collection
requirements contained in this
document have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2528–
0215. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 68 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, quarterly
and final report. The information will be
used for grantee selection and
monitoring the administration of funds.
Response to this request for information
is required in order to receive the
benefits to be derived.
Appendix A—Application Checklist—
TCUP
This checklist identifies application
submission requirements. Applicants
are requested to use this checklist when
preparing an application to ensure
submission of all required elements.
Applicants submitting an electronic
application do not have to submit the
checklist. Applicants that receive a
waiver of the electronic application
submission requirement should include
a copy of the checklist in their
application.
Check off to ensure these items have
been included in the application:
llSF–424 ‘‘Application For Federal
Assistance’’
llApplication Checklist (Applicants
that submit paper applications must
include the checklist in their
applications)
llAbstract (must include no more
than a two-page summary of the
proposed project)
Indicate the page number where each
of the Factors is located:
Narrative Statement Addressing the
Rating Factors. The narrative section of
an application must not exceed 50 pages
in length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and abstract). This information
must be submitted on 81⁄2 by 11-inch
paper, double-spaced on one side of the
paper, with one-inch margins (from the
top, bottom, and left and right sides of
the documents) and printed in standard
Times New-Roman 12-point font.
Applicants that submit applications via
Grants.gov should review the General
Section for information about file names
and extensions. File names should not
contain spaces or special characters.
llFactor–I
llFactor–II
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11505
llFactor–III
llFactor–IV
llFactor–V
llHUD–96010 Logic Model
Check off to ensure these items have
been included in the application:
llAppendix. The appendix section of
an application must not exceed 15 pages
in length (excluding forms, budget
narrative and assurances).
llBudget
llHUD 424–CB ‘‘Grant Application
Detailed Budget’’ (‘‘HUD Detailed
Budget Form’’ on Grants.gov).
llBudget Narrative (No form
provided, but must be submitted for the
total three-year grant period.
Appendix B—All Required Forms
The following forms are required for
submission. All required forms are
contained in the electronic application
package.
llApplication for Federal Assistance
(SF–424);
llSurvey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants (SF–424
Supplement); (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov).
llDisclosure of Lobbying Activities
(SF–LLL); if applicable
llQuestionnaire for HUD’s Removal
of Regulatory Barriers (HUD–27300)
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov), if applicable;
llApplicant/Recipient Disclosure
Update Report (HUD–2880) (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
llCertification of Consistency with
RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan (HUD–
2990), if applicable;
llAcknowledgement of Applicant
Receipt (Only applicants who submit
paper applications (HUD–2993);
llClient Comments and Suggestions
(HUD–2994);
llYou Are Our Client Survey (HUD–
2994–A); and
llLogic Model (HUD–96010).
llThird Party Documentation
Facsimile Transmittal (HUD–96011)
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov) required as the cover page to
third party documents transmitted by
facsimile to HUD.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.010
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11506
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Fair Housing Initiatives Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Fair
Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP)
C. Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement
D. Funding Opportunity Number: The
OMB Approval Number is 2529–0033.
The Federal Register number for this
NOFA is FR–5100–N–24.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): Private
Enforcement Initiative (PEI); Education
and Outreach Initiative (EOI) 14.408.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date shall be on or before May 3, 2007.
Applications must be received and
validated by Grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 pm on the application deadline
date. Please see the General Section of
the SuperNOFA (the General Section)
for information on electronic deadline
and timeliness requirements.
G. Optional, Additional Overview
Content Information:
1. Funding Breakdown. This year
there are two initiatives, Private
Enforcement and Education and
Outreach Initiatives. The following is a
breakdown of each Initiative:
a. Private Enforcement Initiative (PEI)
(1) General Component, and
(2) Performance Based Funding
Component
b. Education and Outreach Initiative
(EOI)
(1) Regional/Local/Community-Based
(a) General Component
(b) Clinical Law School Component.
This Component is being established to
train and develop legal practitioners in
the fair housing arena. Applicants are
Minority Serving Institution agencies (as
determined by the Department of
Education’s Web site) with an
accredited American Bar Association
law school and is geared to the
development and implementation of a
legal curriculum as it relates to fair
housing.
(2) National-Based Media Campaign
Component.
2. Electronic Applications. For
FY2007, FHIP electronic applications
will be available on https://
www.Grants.gov//
Fand_grant_opportunities.jsp and
https://www.grants.gov//
Apply_for_grants.jsp. For further
instructions on electronic application
submission requirements using
Grants.gov, please read the General
Section.
3. Fair Housing Initiatives Program
(FHIP) Funding. FHIP funds are used to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
increase compliance with the Fair
Housing Act (the Act) and with
substantially equivalent State and local
fair housing laws. Approximately $18.1
million in FY 2007 funds and any
potential recapture is allocated to two
(2) initiatives as follows:
a. Private Enforcement Initiative (PEI)
$14 million;
b. Education and Outreach Initiative
(EOI) $4.1 million.
4. Award Agreements. HUD expects to
award a cost reimbursable cooperative
agreement or grant agreement to each
applicant selected for award. Upon
completion of negotiations, HUD
reserves the right to use the funding
instrument it determines is most
appropriate.
5. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants are Qualified Fair Housing
Enforcement Organizations (QFHOs)
and Fair Housing Enforcement
Organizations (FHOs), see 24 CFR
125.103; public or private, for-profit or
not-for-profit organizations or
institutions and other public or private
entities that are formulating or carrying
out programs to prevent or eliminate
discriminatory housing practices
(including entities that will be
established as a result of receiving an
award under this FHIP NOFA); agencies
of State or local governments; and
agencies that participate in the Fair
Housing Assistance Program (FHAP).
6. Private Enforcement Initiative—
Performance-Based Funding
Component. Applicants awarded
funding under the PEI–(PBFC) for FY
2007 will not be eligible to submit
applications for additional FHIP
funding for FY2008 and FY 2009.
Applicants awarded funding under this
component will be eligible to apply for
additional PEI funding in FY2010.
Applicants awarded PBFC funding in
FY 2005 and 2006 are not eligible to
submit applications for additional PEI
funding for a three-year period. Should
the grantee’s performance for FY2007 be
assessed by your HUD Government
Technical Representative (GTR) as
anything less than an ‘‘Excellent’’ then
the grantee will be ineligible to receive
PBFC funding in the second year
(FY2008). The same applies if the
grantee receives less than an
‘‘Excellent’’ performance assessment in
FY2008 then they will be ineligible to
receive PBFC funding in the third year
(FY2009), but may apply for FHIP funds
under another component as
appropriate.
7. Start Date. For planning purposes,
assume a start date no later than October
19, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11507
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority. Section 561 of the Housing
and Community Development Act of
1987, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 3616)
established the FHIP. The implementing
regulations are found at 24 CFR Part
125. If you are interested in applying for
funding under the FHIP, please review
carefully the General Section of the
SuperNOFA (hereafter, the General
Section), the FHIP Authorizing Statute
(Sec. 561 of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1987,
as amended), and the FHIP Regulations
(24 CFR 125.103–501).
A. FHIP Initiatives and Components
The FHIP assists fair housing
activities that increase compliance with
the Act and with substantially
equivalent fair housing laws
administered by State and local
government agencies under the Fair
Housing Assistance Program (FHAP).
1. Private Enforcement Initiative (PEI).
This Initiative assists private, taxexempt fair housing enforcement
organizations in the investigation and
enforcement of alleged violations of the
Act and substantially equivalent State
and local fair housing laws. Under this
Initiative, there are two Components,
the General Component and the
Performance-Based Funding
Component.
2. Education and Outreach Initiative
(EOI). This Initiative assists
organizations that inform the public
about their rights and obligations under
the Act and substantially equivalent
State and local fair housing laws.
Applications are solicited for this
Initiative under the EOI-Regional/Local/
Community-Based Program (R/L/C–B)
and the EOI—National-Based Program
in which activities are conducted on a
nationwide basis.
Applicants who apply under EOI
R/L/C–B may apply under one or more
of the following Components, as
follows: EOI General Component and
the EOI Clinical Law School
Component. Applicants who apply
under EOI–National-Based Program may
apply under the Media Campaign
Component.
All applications submitted under EOI
are required to describe a referral
process that will result in referrals of
fair housing complaints to HUD or Fair
Housing Assistance Program (FHAP)
substantially equivalent agencies. If
funded, you will be required to develop
your complaint referral process.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11508
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
B. Other
1. Program Definitions. The
definitions that apply to this FHIP
section of the NOFA are as follows:
a. Broad-based proposals are those
that address more than one type of
housing transaction covered under the
Act. Examples of covered housing
transactions include the: rental, sales, or
financing of housing. (See also Full
Service Projects below).
b. Complainant means the person,
including the Assistant Secretary for
Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity at
HUD, who files a complaint under
Section 810 of the Fair Housing Act.
c. Disability Advocacy Groups means
organizations that traditionally have
provided for the civil rights of persons
with disabilities. This would include
organizations such as Independent
Living Centers and cross-disability legal
services groups. Such organizations
must be experienced in providing
services to persons with a broad range
of disabilities, including physical,
cognitive, and psychiatric/mental
disabilities. Such organizations must
demonstrate actual involvement of
persons with disabilities throughout
their activities, including on staff and
board levels.
d. Enforcement proposals are
potential complaints under the Act that
are timely, jurisdictional, and welldeveloped, that could reasonably be
expected to become enforcement actions
if an impartial investigation found
evidence supporting the allegations and
the case proceeded to a resolution with
HUD or FHAP agency involvement.
e. Fair Housing Act means Title VIII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 as
amended by the Fair Housing
Amendments Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C.
3600–3620).
f. Fair Housing Assistance Program
(FHAP) agencies mean State and local
fair housing enforcement government
agencies that receive FHAP funds
because they administer laws deemed
substantially equivalent to the Act, as
described in 24 CFR 115.
g. Fair Housing Enforcement
Organization (FHO) means an
organization engaged in fair housing
activities as defined in 24 CFR 125.103.
h. Full-service projects must include
the following enforcement-related
activities in the project application:
interviewing potential victims of
discrimination; taking complaints;
testing; evaluating testing results;
conducting preliminary investigations;
conducting mediation; enforcing
meritorious claims through litigation or
referral to administrative enforcement
agencies; and disseminating information
about fair housing laws.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
i. Grassroots organizations (See
General Section).
j. Jurisdiction means that the
complaint must be timely filed; the
complainant must have standing; the
respondent and the dwelling involved
(where the complaint involves a
provision or denial of a dwelling) must
be covered by the Act; and the subject
matter and the basis of the alleged
discrimination, must constitute illegal
practices as defined by the Act.
k. Meritorious claims means
enforcement activities by an
organization that resulted in lawsuits,
consent decrees, legal settlements, HUD
or substantially equivalent agency
(under 25 CFR 115.6) conciliations and
organization initiated settlements with
the outcome of monetary awards for
compensatory and/or punitive damages
to plaintiffs or complaining parties, or
other affirmative relief, including the
provision of housing (24 CFR 125.103).
l. Mortgages with unacceptable terms
or conditions or resulting from
unacceptable practices means a
mortgage or a group or category of
mortgages with one or more of the terms
and conditions as specified under 24
CFR Part 81.2.
m. Operating budget means an
organization’s total planned budget
expenditures from all sources, including
the value of in-kind and monetary
contributions, in the period for which
funding is requested.
n. Qualified Fair Housing
Enforcement Organization (QFHO)
means an organization engaged in fair
housing activities as defined in 24 CFR
125.103.
o. Regional/Local/Community-Based
Activities are defined at 24 CFR
125.301(a) and (d).
p. Rural Areas means the following:
(1) A non-urban place having fewer
than 2,500 inhabitants (within or
outside of the metropolitan areas).
(2) A county or parish with an urban
population of 20,000 inhabitants or less.
(3) Any place with a population not
in excess of 20,000 and not located in
a Metropolitan Statistical Area.
q. Traditional Civil Rights
Organizations mean non-profit
organizations or institutions and/or
private entities with a history and
primary mission of securing Federal
civil rights protection for groups and
individuals protected under the Act or
substantially equivalent State or local
laws and that are engaged in programs
to reduce discriminatory housing
practices.
r. Underserved Areas mean
jurisdictions where there are no Fair
Housing Initiatives Program or Fair
Housing Assistance Program agencies
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
and where either no public or private
fair housing enforcement organizations
exist or the jurisdiction is not
sufficiently served by one or more
public or private enforcement fair
housing organizations and there is a
need for service.
s. Underserved Populations mean
groups of individuals who fall within
one or more of the categories protected
under the Act and who are:
(1) of an immigrant population
(especially racial and ethnic minorities
who are not English-speaking or limited
English proficient);
(2) in rural populations,
(3) the homeless,
(4) persons with disabilities (i.e.,
physical) who can be historically
documented to have been subject to
discriminatory practices not having
been the focus of Federal, State or local
fair housing enforcement efforts, or
(5) areas that are heavily impacted
with minorities and there is inadequate
protection and ability to provide service
from the State or local government or
private fair housing organizations.
II. Award Information
For Fiscal Year 2007, $20 million is
appropriated for the Fair Housing
Initiatives Program (FHIP). This
appropriated amount may be
supplemented by recaptured funds. Of
this amount, approximately $18.1
million is being made available on a
competitive basis to eligible
organizations responding to this FHIP
NOFA. See the chart in Section III.A. for
a breakdown by Initiative/Component.
A. Award Instrument. The type of
funding instrument HUD may offer a
successful applicant which sets forth
the relationship between HUD and the
grantee will be a grant or cooperative
agreement, where the principal purpose
is the transfer of funds, property,
services, or anything of value to the
applicant to accomplish a public
purpose. The agreement will identify
the eligible activities to be undertaken,
financial controls, and special
conditions, including sanctions for
violations of the agreement. HUD will
determine the type of instrument under
which the award will be made and
monitor progress to ensure that the
grantee has achieved the objectives set
out in the agreement. Failure to meet
such objectives may be the basis for
HUD determining the agreement to be in
default and exercising available
sanctions, including suspension,
termination, and/or the recapture of
funds. Also, HUD may refer violations
or suspected violations to enforcement
offices within HUD, the Department of
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Justice, or other enforcement
authorities.
If funds are awarded as a Cooperative
Agreement, HUD will also exercise the
right to have substantial involvement
by: conducting quarterly reviews and
approval of all proposed deliverables
documented in the applicant’s Work
Plan or Statement of Work (SOW), and
determining whether the agency meets
all certification and assurance
requirements. HUD will conduct this
Initiative/component
performance assessment, in part, by
using the Logic Model (HUD–96010)
submitted by the applicant and
approved by HUD in the award
agreement (rating Factor 5). If upon
completion of this assessment by the
Government Technical Representative
(GTR) a determination is made that the
quarterly requirements have not been
met, the grantee will be obligated to
provide additional information or make
modifications to its work plan and
Allocation
amount
available
Applicant eligibility
Project period
activities, as necessary, in a timeframe
to be established by the GTR.
B. Project Starting Period. For
planning purposes, assume a start date
no later than October 19, 2007.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants and Activities
The following chart details each FHIP
Initiative/Component and the
approximate Funding Available along
with Eligible Applicants and Activities:
Award caps
Applicant eligible activities
Eligible activities include: (1)
Complaint intake of allegations of housing discrimination, testing evaluating testing results, or providing
other investigative and complaint support for administrative and judicial enforcement of fair housing laws:
(2) Investigation of individual complaints and systemic housing discrimination
for further enforcement
processing by HUD through
testing and other investigative methods; (3) Mediation
or other voluntary resolution
of allegations of fair housing
discrimination after a complaint has been filed; and
(4) litigating fair housing
cases including procuring
expert witnesses.
See PEI above.
$1,000,000
Fair Housing Enforcement Organizations (FHOs) with at
least one year of experience in complaint intake,
complaint investigation, testing for fair housing violations, and meritorious
claims in the two years prior
to the filing of the application (24 CFR 125.401(b)(2)
and Qualified Fair Housing
Enforcement Organizations
(QFHOs) with at least two
years of enforcement related experience as noted
above, and meritorious
claims in the three years
prior to filing this application
(24 CFR 125.103).
12–18
months.
$275,000 ......
Private Enforcement Initiative
(PEI) Performance Based
Funding Component Assists
private, tax-exempt fair housing enforcement organizations in the investigation and
enforcement of alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act
and substantially equivalent
State and local fair housing
laws.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Private Enforcement Initiative
(PEI) General Component:
Assists private, tax-exempt
fair housing enforcement organizations in the investigation and enforcement of alleged violations of the Fair
Housing Act and substantially
equivalent State and local
fair housing laws.
$13,000,000
QFHOs and FHOs (with at
least one year of enforcement related experience)
who have received excellent
performance reviews for
FHIP PEI awards made in
any two FY’s (FY pertains
to the year for which the
funding was appropriated)
beginning with FY 2003
through FY 2005; and have
received a minimum score
of 95 on the most recent of
the 2 performance reviews
from their Government
Technical Representative.
36 months ....
$275,000 per
year for a
three-year
duration,
based upon
appropriations.
Eligible PBFC
applicants
must receive a
minimum
score of 95
from the
FY ’07
Technical
Evaluation
Panel
(TEP) to be
considered
for funding.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11509
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11510
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Initiative/component
Allocation
amount
available
$2,600,000
EOI—National-Based Program—Media Campaign
Component. Applicants who
submit applications under the
EOI National-Based Media
Campaign must provide a
centralized coordination effort
for the development, implementation, and distribution of
a fair housing media campaign designed for the 40th
Anniversary of the signing of
the Fair Housing Act as part
of FY2008’s Fair Housing
Month Activities.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
EOI General Component Open
to applicants for all other fair
housing education and outreach activities. In addition to
all other education and outreach activities, applicants
may also address the fair
housing needs of persons
with disabilities, the education of consumers about
fair housing, financial literacy,
credit management, and how
to avoid high cost loans and
abusive lending practices
that violate the Fair Housing
Act.
EOI—Clinical Law School Component Applications are solicited for this component to organize and operate a fair
housing legal-clinical education program that will benefit the public by producing
well-trained clinicians and
lawyers who are capable of
educating and informing the
public on fair housing rights
and obligations.
1,000,000
$500,000
Eligibility of Successor Organizations
for PEI. HUD recognizes that QFHOs
and FHOs may merge with each other or
other organizations. The merger of a
QFHO or an FHO with a new
organization, that has a separate
Employer Identification Number (EIN),
does not confer QFHO or FHO status
upon the successor. To determine
whether the successor organization
meets the eligibility requirements for
this Initiative, HUD will look at the
enforcement-related experience of the
successor organization (based upon the
successor organization’s EIN). The
successor organization is not eligible to
apply under this Initiative unless it
establishes in its application that it is a
private, tax-exempt organization with
the requisite two years of enforcement
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Applicant eligibility
Project period
Award caps
Applicant eligible activities
QFHOs, FHOs, public or pri12–18
vate for profit or not for
months.
profit organizations or institutions, or other public or
private entities that carry
out programs to prevent or
eliminate discriminatory
housing practices. This includes agencies of State or
local governments and
agencies that participate in
the Fair Housing Assistance
Program (FHAP). See FHIP
NOFA–Eligibility Information.
100,000 ........
For a list of Eligible Activities
See EOI above.
Same as EOI above. In addition, applicant must: (1) Be
recognized by the American
Bar Association as having
an accredited law school;
(2) Be legally authorized by
the State in which it is located to provide a bachelor’s degree program and
a law degree program; and
(3) Be designated by the
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education as a
Minority Serving Institution
College or University.
Same as EOI above. In addition, applicants must have
five years of experience as
an advertisement/media organization, and must include in its proposal a subcontract with an established
fair housing organization.
12–18
months.
500,000 ........
See above.
12 months ....
$1,000,000 ...
See above.
related experience for a QFHO or one
year experience for an FHO.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. No
matching funds are required for the
Education and Outreach or Private
Enforcement Initiatives.
C. Other
1. Threshold Requirements
Program Requirements for All
Initiatives. In addition to the civil rights
and other threshold requirements found
in the General Section, FHIP program
applications must also meet the
following requirements:
a. Protected Classes. All FHIP-funded
projects must address housing
discrimination based upon race, color,
religion, sex, disability, familial status,
or national origin. All services and
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
activities must be available to the
protected class members.
b. Tax Exempt Status. Applicants for
the PEI Initiative are ineligible for
funding if they are not a 501(c)(3) taxexempt organization as determined by
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) prior
to the application deadline date.
c. Name Check Review. See the
General Section.
d. Poor Performance. All applicants
are ineligible for funding if they are a
previous FHIP grantee that has received
a ‘‘Poor’’ performance rating for its most
recent performance rating from its
Government Technical Representative
(GTR). HUD will assess performance
ratings for applicants who have received
FHIP funding in FY 2003 through FY
2005. If the applicant has received a
‘‘poor’’ performance rating for its most
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
recent performance rating from its GTR,
its application is ineligible for the FY
2007 competition. An applicant that
does not agree with its determination of
ineligibility for the FY 2007 competition
because of ‘‘poor’’ performance must
address to HUD’s satisfaction the factors
resulting in the ‘‘poor’’ performance
rating before the FHIP application
deadline date. If the ‘‘poor’’
performance rating is not resolved to the
Department’s satisfaction before the
application deadline date, the
application is ineligible for the FY 2007
FHIP NOFA competition. HUD is
interested in improving the performance
level of all grantees; therefore,
applicants who are deemed ineligible
because of a ‘‘poor’’ performance rating
have the right and are encouraged to
seek technical assistance from HUD to
correct their performance in order to be
eligible for future NOFA competition.
Applicants who have received a ‘‘poor’’
performance prior to FY 2004 must
provide written documentation that
they have implemented remedies to
address those issues and concerns that
contributed to a ‘‘poor’’ performance
rating. This written documentation
should be an addendum to the abstract.
e. Suits Against the United States. An
application is ineligible for funding if,
as a current or past recipient of FHIP
funds, the organization used any funds
provided by HUD for the payment of
expenses in connection with litigation
against the United States (24 CFR
125.104(f)).
f. Other Litigation. An application is
ineligible for funding if the organization
used funds provided by HUD under this
Program to settle a claim, satisfy a
judgment, or fulfill a court order in any
defensive litigation (24 CFR 125.104).
g. Maximum award. Applicants are
ineligible for funding if they request
funding in excess of the maximum
allowed under the Initiative or
Component for which they are applying.
In addition, inconsistencies in the
amount requested and/or
miscalculations that result in amounts
over the maximum award will be
considered excessive; therefore the
application will be considered
ineligible.
h. Dun and Bradstreet Numbering
System (DUNS) Numbering
Requirement. Refer to General Section
for information regarding the DUNS
requirement. You will need a DUNS
number to complete your electronic
application as it is a mandatory field on
the electronic application. The
Grants.gov registration also requires use
of the DUNS number.
i. Majority of Eligible Activities.
Greater than 50 percent of the activities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
and costs within the Statement of Work
(SOW) and budget are fair housing
related activities.
j. Fair Housing Assistance Program
(FHAP). FHAP agencies who are under
a suspension based on agency
performance, as designated under 24
CFR Part 115.211(b) at time of
application are ineligible for funding.
k. Minimum Technical Evaluation
Panel (TEP) Score. Applicants must
receive a minimum TEP score of 75 to
be considered for funding.
l. Application Preference. Applicants
may submit multiple applications to the
FHIP. For those applicants who submit
multiple applications the following
applies: EOI applicants may receive an
EOI General, and a EOI Clinical Law
School Component, or EOI NationalBased Program Media Campaign
Component award.
m. Independence of Awards. The
application submitted must be
independent and capable of being
implemented without reliance on the
selection of other applications.
n. Training funds. The proposed
budget must set aside funds to
participate in HUD mandatory
sponsored or approved training in the
amount of $7,000 for EOI and PEI
components; and $7,000 annually for a
36-month duration for PBFC.
Do not include amounts over the
$7,000 (as appropriate) for the training
set-aside in this category. If applicants
do not include these funds in the budget
and are selected for an award, HUD will
modify the budget, reallocating the
appropriate amount for training.
o. Accessibility Requirements. All
activities, facilities, and materials
funded by this program must be
accessible and visitable to persons with
disabilities (24 CFR 8.2, 8.4, 8.6, and
8.54).
p. Fair Housing Act. HUD expects
applicants to address housing
discrimination covered under the Act.
HUD has determined there is a need to
ensure equal opportunity and access to
housing in communities across the
nation.
q. Research Activities. Applicants are
ineligible for funding if between 90–
100% of their project is aimed at
research.
r. Limited English Proficient (LEP).
Applicants obtaining an award from
HUD must provide access to program
benefits and information to LEP
individuals through translation and
interpretive services in accordance with
HUD’s published LEP Guidance.
s. OMB Circular. For-profit awardees
are not allowed to earn a profit and
must adhere to OMB Circular A–133.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11511
t. Single Audit Requirement. All
applicants who have expended
$500,000 or more in Federal financial
assistance within a fiscal year single
year (this can be a program or fiscal
year) must be audited in accordance
with the OMB–A133 requirements as
established in 24 CFR 84 and 85.
u. Reimbursement Requirement. All
PEI grantees are required to reimburse
the Federal government for the amount
of the grant from all settlements,
conciliations, and agreements obtained
as a result of the use of FHIP funds. As
an alternative to returning these funds
to HUD, grantees may choose to use the
funds as program income to further fair
housing activities. However, the use of
funds for this purpose must be preapproved in writing by the Government
Technical Representative assigned to
the grant.
v. Clinical Law School Component. To
qualify as an applicant under this
Component, an institution must:
(1) Be recognized by the American Bar
Association as having an accredited law
school;
(2) Be legally authorized by the State
in which it is located to provide a
bachelor’s degree program and a law
degree program;
(3) Be designated by the Secretary of
the U.S. Department of Education as a
Minority Serving Institution College or
University, and
(4) Have a high enrollment of needy
students defined by 34 C.F.R 607.3.
Applicants must submit documentation
from the U.S. Department of Education
establishing eligibility (except for item
(1) above).
w. National Based Program—Media
Campaign Component Applications.
Applicants who submit applications
under the Media Campaign Component
must have as their primary
responsibility advertisement and media
and have at least five years of
experience as an advertisement/media
or public relations organization. In
addition, applicants must include as
part of its proposal a subcontract with
an established fair housing organization.
Applicants that fail to meet this
requirement or include such subcontract
arrangements in their proposals will be
ineligible for funding.
2. Other Program Requirements by
Initiative. Under the PBFC, applicants
must receive a minimum FY 2007 TEP
score of 95 to be considered for funding.
3. Performance Measures and
Products. For all Initiatives and
Components. Applicants must submit a
Logic Model (Form HUD 96010), which
provides outputs and outcomes in their
application. Applicants are also to
identify the tools they will use to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11512
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
identify program progress against their
proposed outputs and outcomes. See
reporting requirements for reporting
using the Logic Model and the
frequency of the reporting. The form is
located in the Instruction Download at
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply__ for_grants.jsp for the FHIP
program. An example of a completed
Logic Model is included within this
NOFA. The eLogic Model form is a
Microsoft Excel TM form, which provides
a drop down list from which you select
the responses that best fit your proposed
program of activities/outputs and
outcomes. The form, in HTML fillable
format and a text Logic Model Master
file, is available on the Web site at
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp for applicants that
do not have access to Microsoft ExcelTM.
Training will be provided by satellite
broadcast and webcast. The training
materials and schedule will be available
at the above HUD Web site. Applicants
should check the site for dates and
times for HUD training on the Logic
Model. For FY2007, HUD is considering
a new concept for the Logic Model. The
new concept is a Return on Investment
(ROI) statement. HUD will be publishing
a separate notice on the Return on
Investment (ROI) concept.
4. Testing Requirements for PEI
applicants. All applicants that propose
testing must review the FHIP Regulation
at 24 CFR Part 125.
a. Review and Approval of Testing
Methodology. If your application
proposes testing, other than rental
housing testing, HUD may require
copies of the following documents to be
reviewed and approved by HUD prior to
your carrying out the testing activities.
(1) The testing methodology to be
used;
(2) The training materials to be
provided for testing; and
(3) Other forms, protocols, cover
letters, etc., used in the conduct of
testing and reporting of results.
If HUD has approved your testing
methodology for FY 2005 and FY 2006,
there is no need to submit your testing
methodology, unless you are revising
the methodology that was approved by
HUD. If changes are being made, or you
have not had your testing methodology
previously approved by HUD, you must
submit information in your application.
b. Retainer Fees. FHIP recipients are
under specific restrictions regarding
establishment of retainer agreements
and recovery of legal fees from HUD
funded cases. Data on fees settlements
and verdicts are public record and must
be provided to HUD on an annual basis.
Either the grantee or the individual(s)
on whose behalf any action is filed
cannot waive these provisions. For
additional information on these
provisions, please see https://
www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/library/
index.cfm.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Requesting an Application Package
This section describes how you may
obtain application forms and additional
information about the FHIP program.
Copies of the published General
Section, FHIP NOFA and application
forms may be downloaded from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov or if you have difficulty
accessing the information you may
receive customer support from
Grants.gov by calling their help line at
(800) 518–GRANTS or sending an email to support@grants.gov. If you do
not have internet access and you need
to obtain a copy of the NOFA you can
contact HUD’s NOFA Information
Center toll-free at (800) HUD–8929.
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access the Information
Center by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
All applicants must read and adhere
to Initiative-specific information.
Applicants are encouraged to review the
chart titled ‘‘Summary of Initiatives/
Components.’’ To submit documents
using the facsimile method, see the
General Section for specific procedures
governing facsimile submission.
1. For All Applicants. The maximum
narrative page requirement is ten (10)
pages per factor. The narrative pages
must be double-spaced. This includes
all narrative text, titles and headings.
(However, you may single-space
footnotes, quotations, references,
captions, charts, forms, tables, figures
and graphs). You are required to use 12point type size. You must respond fully
to each factor to obtain maximum
points. Failure to provide narrative
responses to all factors other than factor
five or omitting requested information
will result in less than the maximum
points available for the given rating
factor or sub-factor. Failure to provide
double-spaced, 12-point type size
narrative responses will result in five
points being deducted from your overall
score (one point per factor).
2. The chart below gives a brief
description of all items to be included
within the application:
Required content
Required form or format
Application for Federal Assistance .....................
Survey for Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants.
Budget information .............................................
(per required form) ...........................................
(per required form) ...........................................
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities ........................
Applicant-Recipient Disclosure Update Report ..
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Complete application package contains
(per required form) ...........................................
(per required form) ...........................................
Certification of Consistency with RC/EZ/EC–IIs
Strategic Plan.
Acknowledgement of applicant receipt (required
only if you are granted waiver to the electronic application requirement).
You are our client grant application survey (optional).
Program Outcome Logic Model .........................
Third Party Documentation Facsimile Transmittal.
Facsimile Transmittal Form ................................
Race and Ethnic Data Reporting Form ..............
(per required form) ...........................................
Form SF–424.
SF–424 Supplement (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey (SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov).
Form SF–424CB and SF–424CBW) (‘‘HUD
Detailed Budget Form and Worksheet’’ on
Grants.gov).
SF–LLL, if applicable.
HUD–2880 (‘‘HUD Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’ on Grants.gov).
HUD–2990.
(per required form) ...........................................
HUD–2993.
(per required form) ...........................................
HUD–2994–A).
(per required form) ...........................................
(per required form) ...........................................
HUD–96010.
HUD–96010 (‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov).
HUD–96011.
HUD–27061.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(per required form) ...........................................
(per required form) ...........................................
(per required form) ...........................................
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11513
Complete application package contains
Required content
Required form or format
America’s Affordable Communities Initiative ......
(per required form) ...........................................
Narrative .............................................................
Described in Section IV.B. of this announcement.
Third parties’ affirmations of amounts of their
commitments.
Written documentation that performance
issues and concerns have been cured.
Short summary of project activities, areas of
concentration and persons to be served.
Preference for funding.
HUD–27300 (‘‘HUD Communities Initiative
Form’’ on Grants.gov).
Format described in Section IV.B of this announcement.
No specific form or format.
Letters from third parties contributing to cost
sharing.
Addendum to Abstract—Correction of Poor Performance (as appropriate).
Project Abstract ..................................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
C. Submission Dates and Times.
Applications must be received and
validated by https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date of May 3,
2007, to be considered timely filed.
Validation may take up to 72 hours to
complete. Grants.gov will reject
applications that do not meet the
deadline requirement. See the General
Section for further details.
D. Intergovernmental Review.
Intergovernmental Review is not
applicable to this program.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. PEI Limitations for Education &
Outreach—There is a 10% limit on the
amount of education and outreach
related activities that can be funded in
an enforcement award. If you exceed the
limit, points will be deducted in the
rating process and if awarded, funds
will be adjusted to maintain the
required limitation.
2. Administrative Costs. Eligible
administrative costs include leases for
office space, under the following
conditions:
(1) The lease must be for existing
facilities not requiring rehabilitation or
construction;
(2) No repairs or renovations of the
property may be undertaken with
Federal funds; and
(3) Properties in the Coastal Barrier
Resource System designated under the
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C.
3501) cannot be leased with Federal
funds.
F. Other Submission Requirements.
Electronic delivery via https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp is HUD’s required
method for application submission.
Applicants interested in applying for
FHIP funding must submit their
applications electronically or request a
waiver from the Assistant Secretary of
FHEO. The request must state the basis
for the waiver request. HUD’s regulation
on waivers, found in 24 CFR part 5,
states that waivers can be granted for
cause. Applicants must submit their
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
waiver requests, in writing at least 15
days prior to the application deadline,
to Ms. Kim Kendrick, Assistant
Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity, 451 7th Street, SW., Room
5100, Washington, DC 20410. A copy of
all waiver requests must simultaneously
be submitted to Myron P. Newry,
Director, FHEO–FHIP Support Division,
(same address as above), Room 5226, or
by e-mail to Myron_P._Newry@HUD.gov.
If granted a waiver, the notification will
provide instructions on where to submit
the application and how many copies
are required. HUD will not accept a
paper application without a waiver
being granted. If you receive a waiver of
the electronic application submission
requirement, your application must be
received by HUD no later than 11:59:59
p.m. on the application deadline date.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria for Regional/Local
Community Based Applications
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (25 Points). You must
describe staff expertise and your
organization’s ability to complete the
proposed activities within the grant
period.
In General. You must describe your
staffing plan and the extent to which
you plan to add staff (employees) or
contractors. If your application proposes
using subcontractors and these
subcontractor activities amount to more
than 10 percent of your total activities,
you must submit a separate budget for
each subcontractor. Failure to include a
separate budget will result in lower
points being assessed to your
application.
a. Number and expertise of staff (this
includes subcontractors and
consultants). (5) Points for current FHIP
grantees; (10) Points for New
Applicants. You must complete a
summary of staff expertise that will
show sufficient, qualified staff who will
be available to complete the proposed
activities. This summary should
include: Names of staff person(s), time
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
No specific form or format.
No specific form or format.
each will spend on project, years of fair
housing/civil rights experience for each
person, titles of staff persons, and a brief
paragraph on each staff member which
outlines his or her experience. Do not
include resumes or other documents.
Those that submit resumes or other
lengthy documents on staff experience
will have points deducted from their
application based on exceeding the tenpage submission requirement.
To receive maximum points, your
day-to-day program manager must
devote a minimum of 75% of his/her
time to the project. This individual must
be stationed in the metropolitan area
where the project will be carried out.
This information must be included in
the response to this factor. For day-today managers who do not have at least
75% of their time devoted to the project,
no points will be awarded under this
sub-factor. For example, if the Executive
Director is responsible for managing the
overall program administrative
activities, the application should reflect
the Executive Director’s time as 75%.
You may not designate more than one
person to fit this 75% criterion. Your
application must also clearly identify
those persons that are on staff at the
time this application is submitted and
those persons who will be assigned at a
later date and indicate whether the staff
person is assigned to work full-time or
part-time (if part-time, indicate the
percentage of time each person is
assigned to the project).
If you are applying for the EOIClinical Law School Component, you
must:
(1) Show that you will have sufficient,
qualified staff or faculty who will be
available to
(2) Have experience in recruitment of
law students (submit a projection of the
number of students expected to
participate in and complete the
program), marketing (submit a plan to
promote the fair housing curriculum
and clinical law program), and fair
housing.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11514
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(3) Implement the curriculum design
at a MSI (Minority Serving Institution)
with an ABA-accredited law school.
(a) You must also identify all of the
administrators of the clinical program
and describe their function,
qualifications, and experience;
(b) Identify persons who will
constitute the faculty for the program
and describe their functions,
qualifications, and experience; and
(c) Identify and describe the functions
and qualifications of any other program
staff.
(4) You must describe the knowledge
and experience of the proposed overall
Faculty Administrator and day-to-day
program manager (whose duties and
responsibilities include managing all
program and administrative activities as
outlined in the SOW and ensuring that
all timelines are met), in planning and
managing a fair housing legal-clinical
program. Indicate the percentage of time
that key personnel will devote to your
project.
b. Organizational experience. (10)
Points for current FHIP grantees; (15)
Points for new applicants. In responding
to this sub-factor, you, the applicant,
must show that your organization has:
(1) conducted a past project or
projects similar in scope and complexity
to the project proposed in this
application (whether FHIP-funded or
not), or
(2) engaged in activities that, although
not similar, are readily transferable to
the proposed project. You must provide
a listing of all affiliate and/or subsidiary
organizations, and identify which of
these organizations will assist you in the
development and/or implementation of
any portion of your proposed FY2007
FHIP funded project. If you do not have
any affiliates or subsidiaries, you should
state this in your application.
(3) If you are an existing FHIP grantee,
you must provide details about the
progress and outcomes of your previous
grant.
(a) EOI applicants must show that
they have engaged in projects that are
Regional/Local/Community based.
Experience will be judged in terms of
recent, relevant and successful
experience of your staff to undertake
eligible activities. In rating this factor,
HUD will consider experience within
the last three years to be recent,
experience pertaining to the specific
activities to be relevant, and experience
producing measurable accomplishments
to be successful. The more recent the
experience and the more experience
your own staff members who work on
the project have in successfully
conducting and completing similar
activities, the greater the number of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
points you will receive for this rating
factor.
(b) If you are applying for funding
under PEI, you must provide the
following information when responding
to this sub-factor:
(i) If you propose to conduct testing
(other than rental or accessibility
testing), provide a brief narrative that
documents that you have conducted
successful testing in those areas.
(ii) Discuss your compliance with the
requirement to either reimburse the
Federal government for compensation
received from FHIP-funded enforcement
activities or use the compensation as
program income to further fair housing
activities. If you have not reimbursed
the Federal government or used the
funds as program income to further fair
housing activities, explain why you
have not. Also, state whether you
reported to HUD any likely
compensation that may result in such
reimbursement or use for furthering fair
housing. Two (2) points will be
deducted for this sub-factor if you have
not complied with the requirement.
(c) If you are submitting an
application under the EOI—Clinical
Law School Component, you are
responsible for the development of a
comprehensive concept and design of
an Action Plan for the Clinical Law
School. The Action Plan must include a
design concept and academic structural
approach that will be used in assessing
your capacity to develop and operate a
Fair Housing Legal-Clinical Program.
In order to assess your capacity to
design and implement a fair housing
course curriculum, please provide
documented information that your
organization has conducted a past
clinical project or projects similar in
scope and complexity to the clinical
project being proposed. You must
describe the knowledge and experience
of the proposed overall faculty and staff
and indicate whether this staff has had
prior knowledge and experience in
establishing and implementing a
clinical law project similar to the one
being proposed. Further, you must show
that faculty and staff have expertise in
implementing a newly designed clinical
curriculum at a MSI with an ABAaccredited law school.
c. Performance on past project(s). (10)
Points for current FHIP grantees; (0)
Points for new applicants. HUD will
assess your organization’s past
performance in conducting activities
relevant to your application. For current
FHIPs, past performance will be
assessed based on your most recent
performance assessment received from
your HUD Government Technical
Representative (GTR) for the past two
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(2) complete fiscal years (FY 2004
through FY2005).
This information will be provided to
the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) by
HUD staff. Based on past performance,
the following points will be deducted
from your score under this rating subfactor:
(1) 10 points out of 10 possible points
will be deducted if you received a ‘‘fair
performance’’ assessment;
(2) 5 points out of 10 possible points
will be deducted if you received a ‘‘good
performance’’ assessment; and
(3) 0 points will be deducted if you
received an ‘‘excellent performance’’
assessment.
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Distress/
Extent of the Problem (20 Points).
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need for funding the
proposed activities to address
documented fair housing problems in
target area(s). You will be evaluated on
the information that you submit that
describes the fair housing need in the
geographic area you propose to serve, its
urgency and how your project is
responsive to that need. Applicants
should document and use any relevant
information from HUD’s Housing
Discrimination Study 2000 (HDS2000)
to respond to this factor.
a. Documentation of Need. To justify
the need for your project, PEI and EOI
applicants must describe the following:
(1) The fair housing need, including:
(a) Geographic area to be served and
your proximity and experience within
the area;
(b) Populations that will be served—
your project may focus on a specific
population and/or protected class;
however, you must state that your
project will serve all persons protected
by the Act; and
(c) The presence of housing
discrimination, high segregation indices
or other evidence of discrimination
prohibited by the Act within the project
area.
(2) The urgency of the identified need.
For example:
(a) The potential consequences to
persons if your application is not
selected for funding;
(b) The extent to which other
organizations provide the services
identified in your application;
(c) Other sources that support the
need and urgency for this project. (Do
not include these sources within your
application.) Please provide Web site
information where these sources may be
found. Applicants that provide detailed
studies, including detailed consolidated
plans for their referenced project area
will have points deducted from this
factor based upon the ten-page
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
submission requirement. For example,
make reference to reports, statistics, or
other data sources that you used that are
sound and reliable, including but not
limited to, HUD or other Federal, State
or local government reports analyses,
relevant economic and/or demographic
data including those that show
segregation, foundation reports and
studies, news articles, and other
information that relate to the identified
need. Provide the Web site where these
reports may be found for reference.
Chapter V of the Fair Housing Planning
Guide, Vol. 1, has other suggestions for
supporting documentation. You may
access the Guide from the HUD Web site
at https://www.hud.gov./offices/adm/
grants/fundsavail.cfm.
For all applicants: You must use
sound data sources to identify the level
of need and the urgency in meeting the
need and provide Web site addresses for
each data source (ex. Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
(AI), fair housing studies, etc.) For you
to receive maximum points for this
factor, there must be a direct
relationship between your proposed
activities, the outcomes to be
accomplished, and the community or
communities’ fair housing needs,
including your knowledge of and your
proximity to the targeted area, and the
purpose of the program funding.
To the extent possible, the data you
use should be specific to the area where
the proposed activity will be carried
out. For example, if you propose to test
in areas impacted by Hurricane Katrina
in the states of Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama or Texas you should document
the number of displaced persons
relocated to those areas and the impact
of the numbers of displaced persons
upon existing fair housing services. You
should document needs as they apply to
the specific area(s) where activities will
be targeted and your proximity to the
target area, rather than the entire
locality or State. If the data presented
does not specifically represent your
target area, you should discuss why the
target area was proposed.
(3) The link between the need and
your proposed activities:
(a) How the proposed activities
augment or improve upon on-going
efforts by public and private agencies,
grass-roots faith-based and other
community-based organizations and
other organizations and institutions in
the target area, and/or
(b) Why, in light of other on-going
efforts, the additional funding you are
requesting is necessary.
b. In addition, with respect to
Documentation of Need, the following
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
apply to specific FHIP Initiatives or
Components:
EOI-Clinical Law School Component.
Your project must show that you have
data, statistics, and community support
to establish a clinical law project or
projects similar in scope and complexity
to the clinical project proposed in this
NOFA.
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (35 Points)
You must describe your project in
detail and how it will support the goals
and policy priorities outlined in the
General Section. For each goal and
policy priority that your project
addresses, you must propose
performance measures/outcomes in
support of these goals, and establish
numerical baselines and targets for
those measures. Attach a Statement of
Work (SOW) and budget.
a. Support of Policy Priorities (8
Points). HUD encourages applicants to
undertake specific activities that will
assist the Department in implementing
its policy priorities and which will help
the Department achieve its goals and
objectives in FY 2007. Describe how
your proposed project will further and
support HUD’s policy priorities for FY
2007. The quality of the responses
provided and the extent to which a
program will further and support one or
more of HUD’s priorities will determine
the score an applicant can receive.
Applicants must describe how each
policy priority selected will be
addressed.
Applicants that just list a priority will
receive no points. It is up to the
applicant to determine which of the
policy priorities to address to receive
the available 8 points. Each policy
priority addressed must discuss the
geographic area to be served in relation
to the project’s purpose, the persons to
be served and the methodology for
carrying out these activities. Each policy
priority has a point value of one point,
with the exception of the policy priority
to remove regulatory barriers to
affordable housing which has a point
value of up to 2 points; and, for EOI
applicants only, promoting participation
by grassroots faith-based and other
community-based organizations, or
partnering with an organization
promoting participation in grassroots
faith-based and other community-based
organizations, which has a point value
of up to 4 points. To secure the possible
2 points for efforts to remove regulatory
barriers to affordable housing, an
applicant must submit the completed
questionnaire (HUD 27300), and provide
the required documentation and contact
information. Please see the General
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11515
Section for further information on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing. The questionnaire
is part of the electronic application
package. For the full list of each policy
priority, please refer to the General
Section.
b. Proposed Statement of Work (SOW)
and Information Requirements (17
Points). The SOW and budget are
attachments that will not count toward
the ten (10)-page limit on the narrative
response to this factor. However, points
will be assigned based on the relevance
of proposed activities to needs stated in
Factor 2, the attention given to
implementation steps, the consistency
of proposed activities with
organizational expertise and capacity,
and the accuracy of the SOW and
budget.
Statement of Work—Submit a
proposed SOW that comprehensively
outlines in chronological order the
administrative and program activities
and tasks to be performed during the
grant period. Your outline should
identify all activities and tasks to be
performed and by whom (e.g., you, a
subcontractor, or partner), and the
products that will be provided to HUD
and when. You should also include a
schedule of your activities and products
(with interim implementation steps),
staff allocation over the term of the
project; staff acquisition and training;
and activities of partners and/or
subcontractors. Applicants should
provide numbers on the projected
clients to be served. Do not provide
ranges or percentages, but a specific
number of clients. These numbers
should represent individuals to be
served entirely with HUD FHIP funding.
For the EOI General Component, HUD
anticipates that products will be
available in at least seven languages,
including English. The languages will
include French, Korean, Laotian,
Vietnamese, Chinese, Arabic, and
Spanish. Deliverables may include
brochures, Public Service
Announcements (PSAs) for radio in
both majority and minority markets and
posters and other graphic materials.
Graphic materials may include but are
not limited to enlarged reproductions of
existing HUD printed PSAs and HUD
materials. Provide information on media
markets coverage with specific
protected class focus, as well as those
with Limited English Proficiency and a
method for distribution of the finished
product.
c. The Budget Form and the Budget
Information (10 Points). HUD will also
assess the soundness of your approach
by evaluating the quality, thoroughness,
and reasonableness of the budget and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11516
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
financial controls of your organization,
including information on your proposed
program cost categories. As part of your
response, you must prepare a budget
that is:
(1) Reasonable in achieving the goals
identified in your proposed SOW;
(2) Relate tasks in the SOW to the
proposed budget costs;
(3) Cost-effective, and includes a brief
discussion of the extent to which your
proposed program is cost effective in
achieving the anticipated results of the
proposed activities in the targeted area.
Applicants seeking funding to conduct
activities in an area other than the
applicant’s State or locality must
discuss the cost effectiveness of where
the activities will be conducted in
relation to the location of the
organization. HUD will look at the cost
effectiveness of your travel to and from
your location to the targeted area(s),
personnel expenses for out-stationed
personnel, contracts and sub-grantees,
and other direct costs, which may
include relocation expenses, and
telecommunications expenses and make
a final determination of cost
effectiveness based on the above listed
items. Also, indicate how the proposed
project is:
(4) Quantifiable based on the need
identified in Factor 2, and
(5) justifiable for all cost categories in
accordance with the cost categories
indicated in the HUD–424 CB. If you are
awarded a grant or cooperative
agreement under FHIP, staff will request
that you include your approved indirect
cost rate as part of your negotiations
with HUD. If you do not have a
Federally approved indirect cost rate
and HUD is the cognizant agency, HUD
will submit a request within 30 days
after award to establish a rate. For
information on indirect cost rates, you
can review HUD’s training on https://
www.hud.gov./offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
(6) Financial Management Capacity.
Describe your organization’s financial
management system and your Board’s
contribution to the organization. In
addition, discuss your capabilities in
handling financial resources,
dissemination payments to
subcontractors, and maintaining
adequate accounting and internal
control procedures.
(7) Grant Application Detailed Budget
Worksheet (HUD–424–CBW). The HUD–
424–CBW must show the total cost of
the project and indicate other sources of
funds that will be used for the project.
While the costs are based only on
estimates, the budget narrative work
plan may include information obtained
from various vendors, or you may rely
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
on historical data. Applicants must
round all budget items to the nearest
dollar.
A written budget narrative work plan
must accompany the proposed budget
explaining each budget category listed
and must explain each cost category.
Failure to provide a written budget
narrative work plan will result in 2
points being deducted from your
application. It must explain each cost
category you list. Where there are travel
costs for subcontractors/consultants,
you must show that the combined travel
costs (per diem rates) are consistent
with Federal Travel Regulations (41 CFR
301.11) and travel costs for the
applicant’s subcontractors and/or
consultants do not exceed the rates and
fees charged by local subcontractors and
consultants. The narrative (which does
not count toward the ten page limit)
must address the Grant Application
Detailed Budget.
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(5 Points)
This factor addresses your ability to
secure additional resources to support
your project. Points will be awarded on
the basis of the percentage of non-FHIP
resources you have received at
application submission, in the form of
firm commitments, or planned
collaborative efforts you have with Fair
Housing Assistance Program agencies.
a. Firm Commitment of Leveraging or
Collaboration. HUD requires you to
secure resources from sources other
than what is requested under this FHIP
NOFA. Leveraging of community
resources may include funding or inkind contributions, such as workspace
or services or equipment, allocated to
the purpose(s) of your proposal.
Contributions from affiliates,
subsidiaries, divisions, or employees of
the applicant do not qualify as in-kind
contributions. Funds from an
applicant’s previously established
investment account(s) may qualify as inkind resources; however,
documentation must be provided.
Resources may be provided by
governmental entities (including other
HUD programs if such costs are allowed
by statute), public or private non-profit
organizations, faith-based organizations,
for-profit or civic private organizations,
or other entities planning to work with
you. In order to secure points you must
establish leveraging of resources by
identifying sources of contributors who
have already provided to you letters of
firm commitment from the organizations
and/or individuals who will support
your project. Collaboration will consist
of activities you have or plan to have
with Fair Housing Assistance Program
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
agencies. You must provide a letter of
firm commitment from that organization
and/or individual, on their letterhead,
stating their intent to work with you on
your project. For PEI–PB applicants
only, each letter must state the total
dollar amount of in-kind funds and/or
resources to be donated to the fair
housing project, and specify the amount
to be used each of the three years of this
project. For all applicants, each letter of
firm commitment must:
(1) Identify the organization and/or
individual committing resources to the
project and state the timeline for use of
these funds in relation to the project.
Further, the letter must identify any
affiliation with the applicant,
(2) Identify the sources and amounts
of the leveraged resources (the total
FHIP and non-FHIP amounts must
match those in your proposed budget
submitted under Factor 3), and
(3) Describe how these resources will
be used under your SOW. The letter
must be dated and signed by the
individual or organization official
legally able to make commitments for
the organization. If the resources are inkind or donated goods, the commitment
letter must indicate the fair market
value of those resources and describe
how this fair market value was
determined. (Do not include indirect
costs within your in-kind resources). Inkind matching and leveraging
contributions, as well as Program
Income must comply with 24 CFR 84.23
and 84.24 requirements. FHIP funds
cannot be used for in-kind or donated
services (for example, a current staff
person on a FHIP-funded project).
No points will be awarded for general
letters of support endorsing the project
from organizations, including elected
officials on the local, State, or national
levels, and/or individuals in your
community. See General Section for
instructions on how third party
documents are to be submitted to HUD
via the electronic submission process.
For PEI and EOI, if your project will not
be supported by non-FHIP resources,
then you will not receive any points
under this factor. Points will be
assigned for each Initiative based on the
following scale:
One point will be awarded if less than
5% of the projects total costs come from
non-FHIP resources.
Two points will be awarded if
between 5% and 10% of the project’s
total costs are from non-FHIP resources.
Three points will be awarded if
between 11% and 20% of the project’s
total costs are from non-FHIP resources.
Four points will be awarded if
between 21% and 30% of the project’s
total costs are from non-FHIP resources.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Five points will be awarded if at least
31% of the project’s total costs are from
non-FHIP resources.
Five points will be awarded if your
application contains a firm letter of
commitment from a Fair Housing
Assistance Program agency stating their
firm commitment to work with you on
your project. Should the letter lack any
of the required information listed in (1)
through (3) above, ‘no’ points will be
awarded under this factor.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (15 Points)
a. In evaluating this factor, HUD will
assess the extent to which you
demonstrate how you will measure the
results of the work of your organization
as set out in your budget. Applicants
must select from the list of activities and
outcomes detailed in the Logic Model
for the Initiative applied for and should
determine from these selections, their
specific methods and measures to assess
progress, evaluate program
effectiveness, and identify program
changes necessary to improve
performance. This will ensure that
performance measures are met and that
grantees are establishing achievable
realistic goals. Applicants who have
identified outputs and outcome
measurements and methods for
assessing those against commitments
made in the application, will receive
higher points than those that do not. To
meet this Factor requirement, you must
submit HUD’s Logic Model (HUD–
96010).
Instructions and a Microsoft ExcelTM
form are provided in the forms
appended to the Instruction Download
on https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Applicants that do
not have access to Microsoft ExcelTM
may obtain a copy of the form in HTML
fillable format along with a text format
of the Master Logic Model listing, from
HUD’s Web site at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.
A narrative response is not required
for this factor as all applicants must use
the Logic Model Form to respond to this
factor. Applicants that submit narrative
responses rather than use the Logic
Model Form will receive no points
under this subfactor. Applicants should
also review the Logic Model training
which can be found at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
training/training.cfm.
b. In evaluating this factor:
(1) HUD will review the activities/
outputs and outcomes units of
measurement you selected and in
relation to the needs of your intended
audience or target populations;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(2) Output. The direct products of the
applicant’s activities that lead to the
ultimate achievement of outcomes.
Examples of activities and outputs for
PEI and EOI applicants can be found at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm. Applicants must select
one or more activities from the listing of
‘‘Fair Housing Services Provided’’ that
will be undertaken by your
organization. Applicants who do not
select from the list ‘‘Fair Housing
Services Provided’’ or those who do not
add additional services to the list will
not receive any points under this factor.
(3) Outcome. The Logic Model has a
prepared list of activities, outcomes and
indicators associated with Fair Housing.
Applicants must choose from this list of
‘‘Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3’’ outcomes
that are provided as part of the FHIP
NOFA or applicants may choose others
and provide a brief statement to
describe other activities or outcomes.
Applicants who do not select from the
list ‘‘Outcomes and Indicators’’ or do
not select others with a brief description
will not receive any points under this
factor. You should assess progress and
track performance in meeting the goals
and objectives outlined in the work
plan.
Accountability can be achieved using
specific measurement tools to assess the
impact of your activities. Examples
include:
• Intake Instrument;
• Pre/Post Tests;
• Customer/Client Satisfaction
Survey;
• Follow-up Survey;
• Observational Survey;
• Functioning scale; or
• Self-sufficiency scale.
Applicants must also reference policy
priorities, as stated in your response to
Factor 3, and relate them to your
project’s goals, as appropriate.
B. Criteria for National Based Program
Applications
Factors for Award Used to Evaluate
and Rate Applications for the National
Education and Outreach Initiative
Program. The factors for rating and
ranking applicants and the maximum
points for each factor, are provided
below. The maximum number of points
awarded any application is 100. Bonus
points are not available for this category
of funding.
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (25 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which the applicant has the
organizational resources necessary to
successfully implement the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11517
activities in a timely manner, and the
applicant’s ability to develop and
implement large information campaign
projects as appropriate, on a national
scale. The rating of the ‘‘applicant’’ or
the ‘‘applicant’s organization and staff’’
for technical merit or threshold
compliance, unless otherwise specified,
will include any subcontractors,
consultants, and sub-recipients that are
firmly committed to the project.
You must describe staff expertise and
your organization’s ability to complete
the proposed activities within the grant
period.
In General. HUD recognizes that, in
carrying out the proposed activities, you
may have persons already on staff, plan
to hire additional staff, or rely on
subcontractors or consultants to perform
specific tasks. You must describe your
staffing plan and the extent to which
you plan to add staff (employees) or
contractors. If your application proposes
using subcontractors and these
subcontractor activities amount to more
than 10 percent of your total activities,
you must submit a separate budget for
each subcontractor. Failure to include a
separate budget will result in lower
points being assessed to your
application.
(5) Points current FHIP grantees
(10) Points for new applicants
a. Number and expertise of staff (this
includes subcontractors and
consultants). You must show that you
will have sufficient, qualified staff that
will be available to complete the
proposed activities. Provide the
following information for all staff
assigned to or hired for this project, not
just key personnel (those persons
identified in attachments to Rating
Factor 3: Soundness of Approach):
Identify by name and/or title and
hours, all persons that will be assigned
to the project. You must describe the
knowledge and experience of the
proposed overall project director or dayto-day program manager (whose duties
and responsibilities include managing
all program and administrative activities
as outlined in the SOW and ensuring
that all timelines are met), in planning
and managing national projects similar
in scope and complex interdisciplinary
programs. To receive maximum points,
your day-to-day program manager must
devote a minimum of 75% of his/her
time to the project. For day-to-day
managers who do not have at least 75%
(based on full-time) of their time
devoted to the project, no points will be
awarded under this sub-factor. For
example, if the Executive Director is
responsible for managing the overall
program administrative activities, the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11518
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
application should reflect the Executive
Director’s time as 75%. However, if a
staff person will be assigned this
responsibility, the 75% time should be
reflected as such. You may demonstrate
capacity by thoroughly describing your
prior experience in conducting national
and/or regional/local media campaigns.
You should indicate how this prior
experience will be used in carrying out
your proposed activities. Your
application must clearly identify those
persons that are on staff at the time this
application is filed, and those persons
who will be assigned at a later date;
describe each person’s duties and
responsibilities and their expertise
(including years of experience) to
perform project tasks; indicate whether
the staff person is assigned to work fulltime or part-time (if part-time, indicate
the percentage of time each person is
assigned to the project).
If the applicant has experienced staff
or if the applicant proposes to use a
contractor sub-grantee, the extent to
which the applicant provides a rationale
for how it will utilize its staff or a
contractor or sub-grantee to incorporate
its proposed activities, methods, and
how these media techniques will most
effectively deal with the national need
described by the applicant in response
to the need described in Rating Factor
2. To the extent possible, applicants
should demonstrate effectiveness in
terms of scope and cost.
(10) Points for current FHIP grantees
(15) Points for new applicants
b. Organizational experience. In
responding to this subfactor, you must
show that your organization has the
ability to effectively develop,
implement, and manage a media
campaign on a national scale.
(Applicants must be an established
media/advertisement organization and
include as part of their proposal a
subcontract with an established fair
housing organization.) Applicants for
FHIP program funding must specifically
describe their experience in developing
or carrying out programs to prevent or
eliminate discriminatory housing
practices. Applicants must discuss their
ability to implement a coordinated
national marketing awareness campaign,
especially in the areas of fair housing,
discrimination, public health, and
housing. In responding to this subfactor,
the applicant must describe the extent
to which its past activities have resulted
in successful national media campaigns
as appropriate, especially with respect
to developing and implementing
innovative strategies resulting in
positive public response. Experience
will be judged in terms of recent,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
relevant and successful experience of
your staff to undertake eligible
activities.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider experience within the last 3
years to be recent, experience pertaining
to the specific activities to be relevant,
and experience producing measurable
accomplishments to be successful. The
more recent the experience and the
more experience your own staff
members who work on the project have
in successfully conducting and
completing similar activities, the greater
the number of points you will receive
for this rating factor.
(10) Points for current FHIP grantees
(0) Points for new applicants
c. Performance on past project(s).
HUD will assess your organization’s
past performance in conducting
activities relevant to your application.
For current FHIPs, past performance
will be assessed based on your most
recent performance assessment received
from your HUD Government Technical
Representative (GTR) for the past two
(2) complete fiscal years (FY 2004 and
FY 2005).
This information will be provided to
the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) by
HUD staff. Based on past performance,
the following points will be deducted
from your score under this rating subfactor:
(1) 10 points out of 10 possible points
will be deducted if you received a ‘‘fair
performance’’ assessment;
(2) 5 points out of 10 possible points
will be deducted if you received a ‘‘good
performance’’ assessment; and
(3) 0 points will be deducted if you
received an ‘‘excellent performance’’
assessment.
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Approach to
the Problem (10 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which the applicant documents and
defines the national need that its
proposed activities and methods are
intended to address, and how its
proposal offers the most effective
approach for dealing with that national
need. In responding to this factor, an
applicant will be evaluated on the
extent to which the applicant defines,
describes, and documents the national
need the application intends to address,
which demonstrates a grasp of the
elements of the problem, its
pervasiveness at the national level, and
an understanding of the necessary mass
media vehicles. The applicant’s
description of the national need will be
used to evaluate the depth of the
applicant’s understanding of the
problem as an indication of ability to
address the problem.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (45 Points)
This factor addresses the quality and
cost-effectiveness of the applicant’s
proposed Statement of Work (SOW).
You must describe your project in
detail, and how it will support the goals
and policy priorities outlined in the
General Section. For each goal and
policy priority that your project
addresses, you must propose
performance measures/outcomes in
support of these goals, and establish
numerical baselines and targets for
those measures. The SOW must address
the strategy, quality and time frames
needed to carry out the project and all
activities as proposed.
a. (8 Points) Support of HUD Goals.
HUD encourages applicants to
undertake specific activities that will
assist the Department in implementing
its policy priorities and which will help
the Department achieve its goals and
objectives in FY 2007. Describe how
your proposed project will further and
support HUD’s policy priorities for FY
2007. The quality of the responses
provided and the extent to which a
program will further and support one or
more of HUD’s priorities will determine
the score an applicant can receive.
Applicants must describe how each
policy priority selected will be
addressed.
Applicants that just list a priority will
receive no points. Each policy priority
addressed if applicable, must discuss
the national need in relation to the
project’s purpose, the persons to be
served and the methodology for carrying
out these activities. Each policy priority
has a point value of one point, with the
exception of the policy priority to
remove regulatory barriers to affordable
housing which has a point value of up
to 2 points; and, promoting
participation by grassroots faith-based
and other community-based
organizations, or partnering with an
organization promoting participation in
grassroots faith-based and other
community-based organizations, which
has a point value of up to 4 points. It
is up to the applicant to determine
which of the policy priorities to address
to receive the available 8 points. To
secure the possible 2 points for efforts
to remove regulatory barriers to
affordable housing, an applicant must
submit the completed questionnaire
(HUD 27300), and provide the required
documentation and contact information.
Please see the General Section for
further information on Removal of
Regulatory Barriers to Affordable
Housing. The questionnaire is part of
the electronic application package. For
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the full list of each policy priority,
please refer to the General Section.
b. (22 Points) Statement of Work.
Submit a proposed SOW that
comprehensively outlines in
chronological order the administrative
and program activities and tasks to be
performed during the grant period. Your
outline should also include a schedule
of proposed activities and products
(with interim implementation steps),
staff allocation over the term of the
project, staff acquisitions and training,
and activities of partners and
subcontractors. However, points will be
assigned based on the relevance of
proposed activities to national needs
stated in Factor 2, the attention given to
implementation steps, the consistency
of proposed activities with
organizational expertise and capacity,
and the accuracy of the SOW and
budget.
For this Component, HUD anticipates
that products will be available in at least
3 languages, including English.
Deliverables may include Public Service
Announcements (PSAs) for radio and
television in both majority and minority
markets, and posters and other graphic
materials. Graphic materials may
include, but are not limited to, enlarged
reproductions of several print PSAs,
separately produced and printed posters
for national public dissemination, and
the development of ad slicks to market
in newspapers and magazines
nationwide. The applicant should plan
on using a clipping service or other
appropriate means to collect
information on frequency and scope of
the placement of ads.
Applicant’s SOW should:
(1) Clearly describe the specific
activities and tasks to be performed, the
sequence in which the tasks are to be
performed, noting areas of work which
must be performed simultaneously,
estimated completion dates, and the
work and program deliverables to be
completed within the grant period,
including specific numbers of
quantifiable end products and program
improvements the applicant aims to
deliver by the end of the award
agreement period as a result of the work
performed;
(2) Provide national media market
coverage, specific protected class focus,
as well as focus on the 40th Anniversary
of the signing of the Fair Housing Act,
and
(3) Describe their methods for
distribution of finished materials.
Applicants must describe the methods
they will use to distribute and gauge the
effectiveness of their national marketing
strategies. In addition, applicant must
be prepared to present the Media
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Campaign in time for beginning of Fair
Housing Month activities in April of
2008.
c. (15 Points) Budget Form and
Budget Information. A written budget
narrative must accompany the proposed
budget. HUD will also assess the
soundness of your approach by
evaluating the quality, thoroughness,
and reasonableness of the budget and
financial controls of your organization,
including information on your proposed
program cost categories. As part of your
response, you must prepare a budget
that is:
(1) Reasonable in achieving the goals
identified in your proposed SOW;
(2) Relate tasks in the SOW to the
proposed budget costs;
(3) Cost-effective, and includes a brief
discussion of the extent to which your
proposed program is cost effective in
achieving the anticipated results of the
proposed activities in the targeted area.
Also, indicate how the proposed project
is quantifiable based on the needs
identified in Rating Factor 2. Also
indicate whether your proposed project
is justifiable for all cost categories in
accordance with the cost categories
indicated in the HUD–424 CB. If you are
awarded a grant or cooperative
agreement under FHIP, staff will request
that you include your approved indirect
cost rate as part of your negotiations
with HUD. If you do not have a
Federally approved indirect cost rate
and HUD is the cognizant agency, HUD
will submit a request within 30 days
after award to establish a rate. For
information on indirect cost rates, you
can review HUD’s training on https://
www.hud.gov./offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
(4) In addition, the proposed activities
will be conducted in a manner (e.g.,
languages, formats, locations,
distribution, use of majority and
minority media) that will reach and
benefit all members of the public,
especially members of target groups
identified in Factor 2;
(5) How proposed activities will yield
long-term results and innovative
strategies or ‘‘best practices’’ that can be
readily disseminated to other
organizations and State and local
governments; and
(6) The proposed Media Campaign
Component will make available
activities, training and meeting sites,
and information services and materials
in places and formats that are accessible
to all persons including persons with
disabilities.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11519
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(5 Points Maximum)
This factor addresses your ability to
secure additional resources to support
your project. Points will be awarded on
the basis of the percentage of non-FHIP
resources you have received at
application submission, in the form of
firm commitments, or planned
collaborative efforts you have with Fair
Housing Assistance Program agencies.
a. Firm Commitment of Leveraging or
Collaboration. HUD requires you to
secure resources from sources other
than what is requested under this FHIP
NOFA. Leveraging of community
resources may include funding or inkind contributions, such as workspace
or services or equipment, allocated to
the purpose(s) of your proposal.
Contributions from affiliates,
subsidiaries, divisions, or employees of
the applicant do not qualify as in-kind
contributions. These resources may be
provided by governmental entities
(including other HUD programs if such
costs are allowed by statute), public or
private non-profit organizations, faithbased organizations, for-profit or civic
private organizations, or other entities
willing to work with you. Applicants
may also leverage resources from their
organization’s previously established
savings and/or investment accounts;
however, evidence of these resources
must be provided. If leveraging
community resources, in order to secure
points you must establish leveraging of
resources by identifying sources of
contributors who have already provided
to you letters of firm commitment from
the organizations and/or individuals
who will support your project.
Leveraging through collaboration will
require that you provide a list of
activities you have or plan to have with
Fair Housing Assistance Program
(FHAP) agencies nationwide.
Whether leveraging community or
through collaboration, you must provide
a letter of firm commitment from that
agency, organization and/or individual
on their letterhead stating their intent to
work with you on your project. Each
letter of firm commitment must:
(1) Identify the agency, organization
and/or individual committing resources
to the project, the timeframes and
timelines for use of the funds, state that
the funds will be used for fair housing
to support the applicant should they be
awarded, and identify any affiliation
with the applicant,
(2) Identify the sources and amounts
of the leveraged resources (the total
FHIP and non-FHIP amounts must
match those in your proposed budget
submitted under Factor 3), and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11520
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
(3) Describe how these resources will
be used under your SOW. The letter
must be dated and signed by the agency,
individual and/or organization official
legally able to make commitments for
the organization. It must also be
provided on the letterhead of the
agency, organization and/or individual.
If the resources are in-kind or donated
goods, the commitment letter must
indicate the fair market value of those
resources and describe how this fair
market value was determined. (Do not
include indirect costs within your inkind resources). In-kind matching and
leveraging contributions, as well as
Program Income must comply with 24
CFR 84.23 and 84.24 requirements.
FHIP funds cannot be used for in-kind
or donated services (for example, a
current staff person on a FHIP-funded
project). No points will be awarded for
general letters of support endorsing the
project from the agency or
organizations, including elected officials
on the local, State, or national levels,
and/or individuals in your community.
See General Section for instructions on
how third party documents are to be
submitted to HUD via the electronic
submission process. If your project will
not be supported by non-FHIP
resources, then you will not receive any
points under this factor. Points under
the factor will be assigned based on the
following scale:
One point will be awarded if less than
5% of the projects total costs come from
non-FHIP resources.
Two points will be awarded if
between 5% and 10% of the project’s
total costs are from non-FHIP resources.
Three points will be awarded if
between 11% and 20% of the project’s
total costs are from non-FHIP resources.
Four points will be awarded if
between 21% and 30% of the project’s
total costs are from non-FHIP resources.
Five points will be awarded if at least
31% of the project’s total costs are from
non-FHIP resources.
Five points will be awarded if your
application contains a firm letter of
commitment from a Fair Housing
Assistance Program agency stating their
firm commitment to work with you on
your project. Should the letter lack any
of the required information listed in (1)
through (3) above, ‘no’ points will be
awarded under this factor.
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (15 Points)
a. In evaluating this factor, HUD will
assess the extent to which you
demonstrate how you will measure the
results of the work of your organization
as set out in your budget and Statement
of Work. Applicants must select from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the list of activities and outcomes
detailed in the Logic Model and should
determine from these selections, their
specific methods and measures to assess
progress, evaluate program
effectiveness, and identify program
changes necessary to improve
performance. This will ensure that
performance measures are met and that
grantees are establishing achievable
realistic goals. Applicants who have
identified outputs and outcome
measurements and methods for
assessing those measurements against
commitments made in the application,
will receive higher points than those
that do not. To meet this Factor
requirement, you must submit a
completed HUD’s Logic Model (HUD–
96010).
Instructions and a Microsoft ExcelTM
form are provided in the forms
appended to the Instruction Download
on www.Grants.gov/APPLY. Applicants
that do not have access to Microsoft
ExcelTM may obtain a copy of the form
in HTML fillable format along with a
text format of the Master Logic Model
listing, from HUD’s Web site at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
A narrative response is not required
for this factor as all applicants must use
the Logic Model Form to respond to this
Factor. Applicants that submit narrative
responses rather than use the Logic
Model Form will receive no points
under this subfactor. Applicants should
also review the Logic Model training
which can be found at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
training/training.cfm.
b. In evaluating this Factor:
(1) HUD will review the activities/
outputs and outcomes units of
measurement you selected and in
relation to the needs of your intended
audience or target populations;
(2) Output. The direct products of the
applicant’s activities that lead to the
ultimate achievement of outcomes.
Examples of activities and outputs for
EOI applicants can be found at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm. Applicants must select
one or more activities from the listing of
‘‘Fair Housing Services Provided’’ that
will be undertaken by your
organization. Applicants who do not
select from the list ‘‘Fair Housing
Services Provided’’ or who do not add
additional services to the list will not
receive any points under this Factor.
(3) Outcome. The Logic Model has a
prepared list of activities, outcomes and
indicators associated with Fair Housing.
Applicants must choose from this list of
‘‘Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3’’ outcomes
that are provided as part of the FHIP
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
NOFA or applicants may choose others
and provide a brief statement to
describe other activities or outcomes.
Applicants who do not select from the
list ‘‘Outcomes and Indicators’’ or do
not select ‘‘Other’’ with a brief
description will not receive any points
under this Factor. You should assess
progress and track performance in
meeting the goals and objectives
outlined in the work plan.
Accountability can be achieved using
specific measurement tools to assess the
impact of your activities. Examples
include:
• Intake Instrument;
• Pre/Post Tests;
• Customer/Client Satisfaction
Survey;
• Follow-up Survey;
• Observational Survey;
• Functioning scale; or
• Self-sufficiency scale.
Applicants must also reference policy
priorities, as stated in your response to
Factor 3, and relate them to your
project’s goals, as appropriate.
C. Reviews and Selection Process
1. Rating and Ranking. Although all
rating factors are organized the same
way for all FHIP initiatives, there are
differences in application requirements
and rating criteria, which are indicated
throughout the Rating Factor
instructions. Your application for
funding will be evaluated competitively
against all other applications submitted
under one of the following Initiatives or
Components:
a. Private Enforcement Initiative
(PEI)—
(1) General Component (PEI–GC);
(2) Performance Based Funding
Component (PBFC);
b. Education and Outreach Initiative
(EOI)—
(1) Regional/Local/Community Based
Program
(a) General Component (EOI–GC);
(b) Clinical Law School Component
(EOI–CLS)
(2) National Based Program
(a) Media Campaign Component
c. For all initiatives, all eligible
applications will be reviewed and
points awarded based upon:
(1) Narrative responses to the Factors
for Award and accompanying materials,
and
(2) RC/EC/EZ–IIs bonus points, as
applicable. Ineligible applications will
not be ranked. The maximum number of
points to be awarded for the Rating
Factors is 100. See the General Section
for information on Bonus Points.
Only applications with a score of
seventy-five (75) points or more will be
considered of sufficient quality for
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
funding. Generally, applications of
sufficient quality for funding will be
selected in rank order under each
Initiative or Component.
PBFC applicants will be evaluated
competitively against other PBFC
applicants who apply and have received
two years of excellent performance
reviews for FHIP PEI awards made in
any two consecutive years from FY 2003
through FY 2005, as well as scoring a 95
on their most current performance
review. These applicants will then be
rated by the Technical Evaluation Panel
and ranked by score. Only those
applicants who receive a minimum final
score of 95 or above from the TEP will
be considered for funding under this
Component.
2. Tie Breaking. When two or more
applications have the same total overall
score, the application with the higher
score under Rating Factor 3 will be
ranked higher. If applications still have
the same score, the following factors
will be selected sequentially until one
applicant can be determined: higher
score under Rating Factor 1, the higher
score under Rating Factor 2, the lower
amount of FHIP funding requested.
3. Achieving Geographic Diversity of
Awards.
a. PEI and EOI: HUD reserves the right
to apply geographic diversity, to ensure
that, to the extent possible, applications
from more States for each Initiative or
Component are selected for funding. If
the Selecting Official exercises this
discretion, there will be two
determinants used: (1) geography and
(2) score. Geographic diversity shall be
applied to all qualified applications
(applications of sufficient quality for
funding—applications that received a
score of 75 or more points) in each
Initiative or Component in which the
Selecting Official applies geographic
diversity. The geographic diversity
provision will be applied as follows:
when there are two or more applications
of sufficient quality from the same State,
the application(s) with the lower
score(s) will be moved to the end of the
qualified queue. The applications
moved to the end of the qualified queue
will retain their geographic rank order.
If sufficient funds remain, it is possible
that applications moved to the end of
the queue may be selected for award.
For the Clinical Law Program
Component, and the Media Campaign
Component, the geographic diversity
provision does not apply.
4. Adjustments to Funding. As
provided in the General Section, HUD
may approve an application for an
amount lower than the amount
requested, fund only portions of the
application, withhold funds after
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
approval, reallocate funds among
activities and/or require that special
conditions be added to the grant
agreement, in accordance with 24 CFR
84.14, the requirements of the General
Section, or where:
a. HUD determines the amount
requested for one or more eligible
activities is unreasonable or
unnecessary;
b. An ineligible activity is proposed in
an otherwise eligible project;
c. Insufficient amounts remain to fund
the full amount requested in the
application, and HUD determines that
partial funding is a viable option;
d. The past record of key personnel
warrants special conditions; or
e. Training funds are not reserved for
FHIP training.
5. Reallocation of Funds. If after all
applications within funding range have
been selected or obligations are
completed in an Initiative and funds
remain available, the Selecting Official
or designee will have the discretion to
reallocate leftover funds in rank order
among Initiatives as follows:
a. For EOI, any remaining funds from
any component will be reallocated first
within the Initiative; if after reallocating
funds within the Initiative left over
funds remain, they shall be reallocated
to PEI;
b. For PEI, any remaining funds from
any component will be reallocated first
within the Initiative, if after reallocating
funds within the Initiative left over
funds remain, they shall be reallocated
to EOI.
D. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates. For planning purposes,
anticipate an announcement date of
September 23, 2007 and an award date
of September 29, 2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Applicant Notification and Award
Procedures.
a. Notification. No information about
the review and award process will be
available during the period of HUD
evaluation, which begins on the
application deadline date under this
NOFA and lasts approximately 90 days
thereafter. However, you will be
advised, in writing or by telephone, if
HUD determines that your application is
ineligible or has technical deficiencies
which may be corrected as described in
the General Section. HUD will
communicate only with persons
specifically identified in the application
on the SF–424. HUD will not provide
information about the application to
third parties such as subcontractors.
b. Negotiations. If you are selected,
HUD will require you to participate in
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11521
negotiations to determine the specific
terms of your cooperative or grant
agreement. HUD will follow the
negotiation procedures described in the
General Section. The selection is
conditional and does not become final
until the negotiations between the
applicant and the Department are
successfully concluded and the grant or
cooperative agreement is signed and
executed. HUD will negotiate only with
the person identified in the application
as the Director of the organization or if
specifically identified in the application
as the Project Director. HUD will not
negotiate with any third party (i.e., a
subcontractor, etc.). The Grant Officer
and Government Technical
Representative will determine on a caseby-case basis if technical assistance or
special conditions are required.
Performance Based Funding
Component-Applicants selected for
funding under the PBFC will be
required to submit a SOW and a
separate budget for each year that
projects the agency’s activities for a
period of three years commensurate
with the level of funding.
c. Applicant Debriefing. After awards
are announced, applicants may receive
a debriefing on their application as
described in the General Section.
Materials provided during the
debriefing will be the applicant’s final
scores for each rating factor and final
evaluator comments for each rating
factor. Applicants requesting a
debriefing must send a written request
to Annette Corley, Grant Officer, U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, FHIP/Support Division,
451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 5224,
Washington, DC 20410. HUD will not
release the names of applicants or their
scores to third parties.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Accessibility Requirements. All
activities, facilities, and materials
funded by this Program must be
accessible to persons with disabilities
(24 CFR 8.2, 8.4, 8.6, and 8.54).
2. Protected Classes. All FHIP-funded
projects must address housing
discrimination based upon race, color,
religion, sex, disability, familial status,
or national origin.
3. Environmental Requirements. In
accordance with 24 CFR 50.19(b)(3), (4),
(9), (12), and (13) of HUD regulations,
activities assisted under this program
are categorically excluded from the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act and are not
subject to environmental review under
related laws and authorities.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11522
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
4. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. State agencies (FHAP
agencies) and agencies of a political
subdivision of a State that are using
assistance under a HUD program NOFA
for procurement, and any person
contracting with such an agency with
respect to work performed under an
assisted contract, must comply with the
requirements of Section 6002 of the
Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended
by the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act. See General Section for
details.
5. Product Information. Press releases
and any other product intended to be
disseminated to the public must be
submitted to the Government Technical
Representative (GTR) two weeks before
release for approval and acceptance.
6. Ensuring the Participation of Small
Businesses, Small Disadvantaged
Businesses, and Women Owned
Businesses. (See General Section).
7. Payment Contingent on
Completion. Payment of FHIP funds is
made on a reimbursement basis.
Payments are contingent on the
satisfactory and timely completion of
your project activities and products as
reflected in your grant or cooperative
agreement. Requests for funds must be
accompanied by financial and progress
reports.
8. Copyright Materials. You may
copyright any work that is eligible for
copyright protection subject to HUD’s
right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise
use your work for Federal purposes, and
to authorize others to do so as required
in 24 CFR 84.36.
9. Complaints Against Awardees.
Each FHIP award is overseen by a HUD
Grant Officer (See www.hud.gov for list
of Grant Officers per region).
Complaints from the public against
FHIP grantees should be forwarded to
the Grant Officer. The Grant Officer’s
name and contact information is
provided in the grant agreement. If, after
notice and consideration of relevant
information, the Grant Officer concludes
that there has been inappropriate
conduct, such as a violation of FHIP
program requirements, terms or
conditions of the grant, or any other
applicable statute, regulation or other
requirement, HUD will take appropriate
action in accordance with 24 CFR 84.62.
Such action may include: written
reprimand; consideration of past
performance in awarding future FHIP
applications; repayment to HUD of
funds received under the grant; or
temporary or permanent denial of
participation in the FHIP in accordance
with 24 CFR part 24.
10. Double Payments. If you are
awarded funds under this NOFA, you
(and any subcontractor or consultant)
may not charge or claim credit for the
activities performed under this project
under any other Federally assisted
project.
11. Performance Sanctions. A grantee
or subcontractor failing to comply with
the requirements set forth in its grant
agreement will be liable for such
sanctions as may be authorized by law,
including repayment of improperly used
funds, termination of further
participation in the FHIP, and denial of
further participation in programs of
HUD or any Federal agency.
C. Reporting
1. HUD requires that funded
recipients collect racial and ethnic
beneficiary data. It has adopted the
Office of Management and Budget’s
Standards for the Collection of Racial
and Ethnic Data. In view of these
requirements, you should use Form
HUD–27061, Racial and Ethnic Data
Reporting Form (and instructions for its
use), found on www.HUDclips.org, a
comparable program form, or a
comparable electronic data system for
this purpose. Quarterly and as your
project ends, you must report
meaningful data derived from client
feedback on how they benefited from
your project’s activities.
2. Listed below is a sample-reporting
document of activities and tasks to be
performed by a FHIP Grantee.
Administrative activities
Tasks
Submitted by
Submitted to
Activities
1. Complete HUD–22081 Race and Ethnic
Data Reporting Form.
2. Complete HUD–28807 Disclosure Statements.
3. Complete SF–269A Financial Status Report
and Written Quarterly Status Reports on All
Activities.
4. Voucher for Payment ...................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
5. Complete Listing of Current or Pending
Grants/Contracts/Other Financial Agreements.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
45 Days ...........................................................
GTR/GTM..
Submit Disclosure Statement. If no changes
occur, submit statement of no change with
final report.
Submit SF–269A and Copy of Written Report
When changes occur
GTR/GTM.
Quarterly .....................
GTR/GTM.
Submit payment request to LOCCS ...............
Per Payment Schedule.
45 Days and at end of
Grant.
GTR/GTM.
Submit listing for recipient and any contractors.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
GTR/GTM.
11523
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Administrative activities
Tasks
Submitted by
Submitted to
Submit Draft of Report. Report your eLogic
Model Reporting your short- and intermediate-term outputs and outcomes as
contained in the eLogic Model submitted
and approved in your grant agreement.
Your report and eLogic Model should identify results and benefits to date of the work
accomplished under the FHIP award. In
addition, the eLogic Model should include
an attachment that addresses the management questions applicable to your work
program. Complaint and testing activities
should provide data on complaints received
and tests conducted by basis, issues, and
outcomes. This should include number of
credible, legitimate complaints filed with
HUD, a State or local Fair Housing Agency, Department of Justice or private litigator; and types of relief/results.
Submit a copy of the Final Report, including
a final Logic Model with all outputs and
outcomes identified, and management
questions responded to. Submit all Final
Products not previously submitted to GTR
and GTM.
Submit detailed description of items submitted to GTR and GTM.
One month before end
of grant term.
GTR/GTM.
Within 90 days after
end of grant term.
GTR/GTM.
Within 90 days after
end of grant term.
GTR/GTM.
Activities
6. Prepare and Submit Draft of Final Report,
including HUD 96010.
7. Complete Final Report and Provide Copies
of All Final Products Not Previously Submitted.
8. Submit 2 copies of Final Report and all final
program products produced under the Grant
(with diskette, where feasible) to HUD.
VII. Agency Contacts
You may contact Myron P. Newry or
Denise L. Brooks, of the Office of Fair
Housing and Equal Opportunity’s FHIP
Support Division, at 202–708–0800, ext.
7095 or 7050, respectively (this is not a
toll-free number). Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may contact the
Division by calling 1–800–290–1617
(this is a toll-free number).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VIII. Other Information
1. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
approval number 2529–0033. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burdens for the
collection of information is estimated to
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
approximate 105 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, semi-annual
reports and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.011
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11524
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Housing Counseling Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Single Family Housing.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Housing Counseling Program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–09; OMB Approval number is:
2502–0261.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 14.169
Housing Counseling Assistance
Program.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 17, 2007. Applications
submitted through https://
www.grants.gov must be received and
validated by grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date. See Section
IV of the General Section, regarding
application submission procedures and
timely filing requirements.
G. Available Funds: Approximately
$41.08 million is made available for
eligible applicants under this program
NOFA.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Description. This program
supports the delivery of a wide variety
of housing counseling services to
homebuyers, homeowners, low- to
moderate-income renters, and the
homeless. The primary objectives of the
program are to expand homeownership
opportunities, improve access to
affordable housing and preserve
homeownership. Counselors provide
guidance and advice to help families
and individuals improve their housing
conditions and meet the responsibilities
of tenancy and homeownership.
Counselors also help borrowers avoid
inflated appraisals, unreasonably high
interest rates, unaffordable repayment
terms, and other conditions that can
result in a loss of equity, increased debt,
default, and eventually foreclosure.
Applicants funded through this program
may also provide Home Equity
Conversion Mortgage (HECM)
counseling to elderly homeowners who
seek to convert equity in their homes
into income that can be used to pay for
home improvements, medical costs,
living expenses, or other expenses.
B. Grant Applicant Categories. HUD
will award a single comprehensive grant
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
to qualified applicants through one of
three categories:
(1) Local Housing Counseling
Agencies (LHCAs);
(2) National and Regional
Intermediaries (Intermediaries); and
(3) State Housing Finance Agencies
(SHFAs).
Supplemental funding is available to
qualified intermediaries for counseling
and educational activities in
conjunction with HUD’s Home Equity
Conversion Mortgage (HECM) Program.
C. Authority. HUD’s Housing
Counseling Program is authorized by
section 106 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C.
1701x).
The Home Equity Conversion
Mortgage (HECM) Program is authorized
by section 255 of the National Housing
Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z–20).
D. Definitions.
1. Affiliate. An affiliate is a separately
incorporated or organized housing
counseling agency connected with an
intermediary or SHFA for the purposes
of its housing counseling program. To
be eligible for a sub-grant an affiliate
must be: (1) Duly organized and existing
as a nonprofit, (2) in good standing
under the laws of the state of its
organization, and (3) authorized to do
business in the states where it proposes
to provide housing counseling services.
2. Applicant. ‘‘Applicant’’ refers to a
HUD-approved housing counseling
agency or SHFA applying for a Housing
Counseling grant from HUD through this
NOFA. The term ‘‘Applicant’’ includes
the agency’s branch or branch offices
identified in its application.
3. Branch. ‘‘Branch’’ or ‘‘Branch
Office’’ refers to an organizational and
subordinate unit of an LHCA or
Intermediary not separately
incorporated or organized. A Branch or
Branch Office must be in good standing
under the laws of the state where it is
authorized to do business and where it
proposes to provide housing counseling
services. A Branch or Branch Office
cannot be an applicant, affiliate or subgrantee.
4. Grantee. ‘‘Grantee’’ refers to the
HUD-approved housing counseling
agencies or SHFAs that receive housing
counseling funds from HUD through
this NOFA. The term ‘‘Grantee’’
includes the agency’s branch or branch
offices identified in its application.
5. HUD HECM Network Counselor. A
‘‘HUD HECM Network Counselor’’ is a
housing counselor that has passed the
HECM exam administered by HUD and/
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11525
or its agent, and is approved by HUD to
provide HECM counseling nationally by
telephone.
6. Intermediary. ‘‘Intermediary’’ refers
to a HUD-approved national or regional
organization that provides housing
counseling services through its branches
or affiliates.
7. Local Housing Counseling Agency
(LHCA). ‘‘LHCA’’ refers to a HUDapproved Local Housing Counseling
Agency. LHCAs must be approved by
one of HUD’s four HOCs. Affiliates of
HUD-approved Housing Counseling
intermediaries are not HUD-approved
LHCAs by virtue of their affiliation with
the intermediary. They are, however,
eligible to individually apply for HUD
approval as an LHCA.
8. State Housing Finance Agency
(SHFA). For the purpose of this NOFA,
a ‘‘SHFA’’ is the unique public body,
agency, or instrumentality created by a
specific act of a state legislature and
empowered to finance activities
designed to provide housing and related
facilities and services, for example
through land acquisition, construction
or rehabilitation, throughout a state. The
term state includes the fifty states,
Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia,
Guam, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, American
Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
9. Sub-grantee. ‘‘Sub-grantee’’ refers to
an organization to which the grantee
awards a sub-grant, and which is
accountable to the grantee for the use of
the funds provided. A Sub-grantee may
be separately incorporated or organized,
but connected with an intermediary or
SHFA for purposes of this NOFA.
All Sub-grantees must be identified in
the grantee’s application. Under certain
conditions, grantees may amend their
Sub-grantee list after awards are made.
II. Award Information
A. Amount Allocated. Of the
approximately $41.5 million
appropriated for housing counseling in
FY2007 under the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007),
approximately $41.08 million is
available for eligible applicants under
this NOFA. Approximately $38.08
million is available for comprehensive
counseling. Approximately $3.0 million
is available for HECM counseling.
B. Specific Allocations.
Comprehensive counseling funding is
distributed over three applicant
categories, as shown below.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11526
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Total amount
available
Applicant categories
Who is eligible
Category 1—LHCAs ...................................................................
Category 2—Intermediaries ........................................................
Category 3—SHFAs ...................................................................
HUD-approved Local Housing Counseling Agencies ................
HUD-approved National and Regional Intermediaries ...............
State Housing Finance Agencies ...............................................
1. Category 1—Local Housing
Counseling Agencies (LHCAs). For the
grant period October 1, 2007 through
September 30, 2008, approximately
$14,748,800 is available from HUD to
directly fund HUD-approved LHCAs. A
LHCA can only request funding for its
main office and branches located in the
same state as the main office and/or
located in one other contiguous state.
2. Category 2—Intermediaries. For the
grant period October 1, 2007 through
September 30, 2008, approximately
$24,054,720 is available from HUD to
directly fund HUD-approved
Intermediaries, including $21,054,720
for comprehensive counseling and $3.0
million for HECM counseling.
3. Category 3—State Housing Finance
Agencies (SHFAs). For the grant period
October 1, 2007 through September 30,
2008, approximately $2,276,480 is
available to fund SHFAs that provide
housing counseling services directly or
serve as intermediaries to Affiliates who
offer housing counseling services.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
C. Individual Awards
1. Category 1. No individual LHCA
may be awarded more than $150,000.
HUD anticipates that the average total
award for LHCAs will be approximately
$36,000.
2. Category 2. Awards for individual
HUD-approved intermediaries may not
exceed $5.5 million, which includes any
HECM supplemental funding. The limit
for Comprehensive Counseling is $2.5
million and the limit for HECM
counseling is $3.0 million. HUD
anticipates that the average total award
for Intermediaries will be $1.2 million.
3. Category 3. No individual SHFA
may be awarded more than $450,000.
HUD anticipates that the average total
award for SHFAs will be approximately
$135,000.
D. Grant Period. Funds awarded shall
be available for a period of 12 calendar
months.
E. Award Instrument. HUD will use a
Grant Agreement. All Housing
Counseling Program awards will be
made on a cost reimbursement basis.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants include: HUD-approved
Local Housing Counseling Agencies
(LHCAs); HUD-approved national and
regional intermediaries (Intermediaries);
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
and State Housing Finance Agencies
(SHFAs).
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. No
specific ratio is required. However, in
order to receive points under Rating
Factor 4, applicants are required to
demonstrate the commitment of other
private and public sources of funding to
supplement HUD funding for the
applicant’s counseling program. HUD
does not intend for its Housing
Counseling grant to cover all costs
incurred by an applicant.
C. Other. 1. Eligible Activities for
Awards Under All Applicant Categories.
Grantees and sub-grantees will only be
reimbursed for the applicable activities
outlined in this Section.
a. Individual counseling or group
education/classes regarding the
following topics:
(1) Pre-Purchase/Homebuying. This
includes: evaluating mortgagor
readiness; search assistance/mobility;
fair housing, including whether or not
the beneficiary belongs to a protected
class, and how to recognize
discrimination; budgeting for mortgage
payments; money management (does
not include administration of debt
management plans whereby an
organization pays bills on behalf of a
client); selecting a real estate agent; and
home inspection. This also may include
guidance on: alternative sources of
mortgage credit; how to apply for
special programs available to potential
homebuyers; how to identify and avoid
predatory lending practices; locating
housing that provides universal design
and visitability; locating sources and
methods to help pay for accessibility
modifications; how to purchase a home
using the Section 8 Homeownership
Voucher Program; and referrals to
community services and regulatory
agencies. Applicants that provide
homebuyer education must also offer
individual counseling that complements
the group sessions.
(2) Resolving or Preventing Mortgage
Delinquency or Default. This includes:
restructuring debt, obtaining recertification for mortgage subsidy,
establishing reinstatement plans,
seeking loan forbearance, and managing
household finances. This can also
include helping clients affected by
predatory lending, homeownership
preservation and foreclosure prevention
strategies, explaining the foreclosure
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
$14,748,800
21,054,720
2,276,480
process, providing referrals to other
sources, and assisting clients with
locating alternative housing, or pursuing
loss mitigation strategies.
(3) Non-Delinquency Post-Purchase,
Including Improving Mortgage Terms
and Home Improvement. This includes
information and advice on finding
favorable mortgage loan terms, personal
money management, and relations with
lenders. It also includes: home
improvement and rehabilitation;
property maintenance; loan and grant
options; the loan or grant application
processes; what housing codes and
housing enforcement procedures apply
for the intended activity; accessibility
codes and how to design features to
provide accessibility for persons with
disabilities; non-discriminatory lending
and funding for persons who modify
their dwellings to accommodate
disabilities; visitability and universal
design; how to specify and bid
construction work; how to enter into
construction contracts; and how to
manage construction contracts,
including actions to address the nonperformance of contractors. Agencies
that provide post-purchase education
classes must also offer individual
counseling to complement group
sessions.
(4) Locating, Securing, or Maintaining
Residence in Rental Housing. This refers
to renter-related topics, including:
helping clients obtain and utilize rent
subsidies; pre-rental search assistance/
mobility counseling; budgeting for rent
payments; educating clients on
landlords’ and renters’ rights;
explaining the eviction process;
ensuring clients understand their rights
when faced with displacement;
explaining the responsibility of the
entity causing displacement; and
providing assistance with locating
alternate housing.
(5) Shelter or Services for the
Homeless. Includes referrals to social,
community, and homeless services such
as emergency shelter or transitional
housing.
b. HECM Counseling. This includes
providing the statutorily-required
counseling to individuals/families that
may be eligible for, or are interested in
obtaining, an FHA-insured Home Equity
Conversion Mortgage (HECM). This
counseling assists elderly homeowners
who seek to convert equity in their
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
homes into income that can be used to
pay for home improvements, medical
costs, living expenses, or other
expenses.
c. Marketing and Outreach Initiatives.
This includes providing general
information and materials about
housing opportunities and issues,
conducting informational campaigns,
advocating with lenders for nontraditional lending standards, and
raising awareness about critical housing
topics, such as predatory lending or fair
housing issues. (Note: affirmative fair
housing outreach should be directed at
those populations least likely to seek
counseling services, including those of
racial, religious or national groups not
normally served by the sponsoring
agency. To do so, it may be necessary
to broaden the target areas or provide
translation and interpretive services in
languages other than English in order to
reach a greater variety of racial and
ethnic minorities. It may also require
providing outreach and services in
alternative formats for persons with
disabilities).
d. Training. Training to increase the
capacity of housing counselors and
program managers.
e. Computer equipment/systems.
Computer equipment/systems with the
objective of improving the quality of
counseling and education services
available.
f. Administrative Costs. For
intermediaries and SHFAs,
administrative costs associated with
managing a network of housing
counseling agencies and providing
technical assistance.
2. Threshold Requirements.
Applications that do not meet all of the
following Threshold Requirements are
not eligible to receive an award from
HUD.
a. Applicants, and subgrantees, must
meet the Threshold Requirements in the
General Section.
b. Minimum grant request.
Applications must contain a request for
comprehensive funds of not less than
$20,000 from LHCAs, not less than
$50,000 from SHFAs and not less than
$200,000 from Intermediaries.
Applications for lesser amounts will not
be considered. Intermediaries must
request a minimum of $500,000 for
HECM supplemental funding. HUD will
consider the amount of the
comprehensive counseling grant being
requested to be the value entered into
box 18a on form SF–424. For
intermediaries also requesting HECM
supplemental funding, box 18a of form
SF–424 should reflect the total of the
comprehensive request and the HECM
supplemental request. For these
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
intermediaries requesting both, the
narrative response to Factor 3 must
make clear the exact comprehensive and
supplemental amounts being requested.
c. Only HUD-approved Housing
Counseling Agencies and SHFAs may
apply. Applicants must be currently
approved by HUD as an LHCA or as a
housing counseling intermediary, and
have secured HUD approval as a
housing counseling agency by the
publication date of this Housing
Counseling Program NOFA. SHFAs are
not required to be HUD-approved, but
must meet the eligibility requirements
listed in this NOFA.
d. Applicants Requesting
Supplemental HECM Funding. No
separate application is needed to apply
for supplemental funding. However,
applicants requesting supplemental
HECM funding must meet the following
requirements:
(1) Request the supplemental funding
by identifying in box 18a of form SF–
424 the total of the comprehensive
request and the HECM supplemental
request, and making clear in the
narrative response to Factor 3 the exact
comprehensive and supplemental
amounts being requested;
(2) Identify HECM-related needs in
the target community in its response to
Rating Factor 2;
(3) Respond to all HECM-related
requests for information throughout the
NOFA;
(4) Include counseling and other
related activities targeted at HECM
clients over and above the proposed
comprehensive counseling activities
listed in response to the Rating Factors;
and
(5) Indicate in the Rating Factors how
many individuals will be served
specifically with the requested
supplemental funding for HECM
counseling in addition to those served
under the comprehensive counseling
award. Be sure to clearly identify the
total number projected to be served, the
activities to be provided, and the output
and outcome goals to be achieved with
the supplemental funding.
3. Other Program Requirements
a. To receive a grant or subgrant under
this Housing Counseling NOFA, all
applicants and subgrantees (except
SHFAs) must be:
(1) In good standing under the laws of
the state of their organization; and
(2) Authorized to do business in the
states where they propose to provide
housing counseling services.
(3) All grantees and sub-grantees must
make counseling offices and services
accessible to persons with a wide range
of disabilities and help persons locate
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11527
suitable housing in locations throughout
the applicant’s community, target area,
or metropolitan area, as defined by the
applicant.
b. Limits on Applications
1. HUD-approved LHCAs. HUDapproved LHCAs may apply for and
receive: one grant under Applicant
Category 1; or one sub-grant from an
intermediary or SHFA under Applicant
Category 2 or 3, but not both. The only
exceptions to this rule are: (a) HUDapproved LHCAs with one or more HUD
HECM Network Counselors may receive
a sub-grant or be reimbursed exclusively
for HECM counseling activities from a
HUD-approved intermediary
administering the HECM supplemental
funds made available through this
NOFA or by another entity designated
by HUD; and/or (b) HUD-approved
LHCAs may also receive a sub-grant or
be reimbursed for default counseling
activities by a HUD-approved
intermediary that is dedicated to
foreclosure prevention exclusively.
Funded LHCAs may not make subgrants to other HUD-approved LHCAs or
non-HUD-approved entities.
2. HUD-approved Intermediaries.
HUD approved intermediaries may only
apply for a grant under Applicant
Category 2. HUD-approved
intermediaries are also eligible for
supplemental funding for HECM
counseling.
3. SHFAs. SHFAs may only apply for
grants under Applicant Category 3 for
comprehensive counseling funds.
c. Sub-Grantees of Intermediaries and
SHFAs
(1) Sub-grantees of intermediaries and
SHFAs are not required to be HUDapproved, although HUD-approved
LHCAs may apply to an intermediary or
SHFA as a sub-grantee.
(2) Intermediaries and SHFAs that
award sub-grants to counseling agencies
that are not HUD-approved must assure
that the sub-grantee organizations meet
or exceed HUD’s approval standards.
(3) Sub-grantees must also be in
compliance with all civil rights
threshold requirements. Intermediaries
that do not ensure their sub-grantee’s
compliance with HUD standards may be
prohibited from participating in the
Housing Counseling Program. HUD will
monitor sub-grantees.
(4) To be eligible for funding under
Categories 2 or 3, proposed sub-grantees
or branches must not have directly
applied for or received a grant under
Category 1 of this NOFA, or applied for
or received a sub-grant or funding from
another intermediary or SHFA under
Category 2 or 3 of this NOFA. Sub-
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11528
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
grantees or branches may apply for and
receive funding from only one
intermediary or SHFA under Category 2
or 3, but not both. The only exceptions
to this rule are: (a) Sub-grantees or
branches that have one or more HUD
HECM Network Counselors that receive
a sub-grant or funding from an
intermediary or SHFA under Category 2
or 3 may also receive a sub-grant or
funding or be reimbursed exclusively
for HECM counseling activities, from a
HUD-approved intermediary
administering the HECM supplemental
funds made available through this
NOFA or by another entity designated
by HUD; and/or (b) sub-grantees or
branches may also receive a sub-grant or
be reimbursed for default counseling
activities by an intermediary that is
dedicated to foreclosure prevention.
(5) Intermediaries and SHFAs that
make sub-grants must execute sub-grant
agreements with sub-grantees that
clearly delineate the mutual
responsibilities for program
management, including appropriate
time frames for reporting results to
HUD. Intermediaries and SHFAs have
wide discretion to decide how to
allocate their HUD Housing Counseling
funding among sub-grantees, with the
understanding that a written record
must be kept documenting and
justifying funding decisions. This record
must be made available to sub-grantees
and to HUD.
d. List of HUD-approved Housing
Counseling Agencies. Pursuant to
section 106 (c)(5)(D) of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968, HUD
maintains a list of all HUD-approved
and HUD-funded counseling agencies,
including contact information that
interested persons can access. All HUDapproved LHCAs and their branches,
and all sub-grantees and branches that
receive funding under Applicant
Categories 2 and 3 of this NOFA may be
placed on this list and must accept
subsequent referrals, or when they do
not provide the services sought, make a
reasonable effort to refer the person to
another organization in the area that can
provide the services.
e. Non-Discrimination Requirement
(1) Grant recipients and sub-grantees
are prohibited from discriminating on
behalf of or against any segment of the
population in the provision of services
or in outreach.
(2) Organizations funded under this
program may not engage in inherently
religious activities, such as worship,
religious instruction, or proselytization,
as part of the programs or services
funded under this program. If an
organization conducts such activities,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
these activities must be offered
separately, in time or location, from the
programs or services funded under this
part, and participation must be
voluntary and not a condition of the
HUD-funded programs or services.
f. Indirect Cost Rate. Grantees that
plan to use grant funds to cover direct
costs only are not required to provide an
indirect cost rate. However, Grantees
that plan to use grant funds to cover any
indirect costs must submit their
approved indirect cost rate established
by the cognizant federal agency. If the
grantee does not have an established
indirect cost rate, it will be required to
develop and submit an indirect cost
proposal to HUD, or the cognizant
federal agency as applicable, for
determination of an indirect cost rate
that will govern the award. Applicants
that do not have a previously
established indirect cost rate with a
federal agency shall submit an initial
indirect cost rate proposal immediately
after the applicant is advised that it will
be offered a grant and, in no event, later
than three months after the start date of
the grant. OMB Circular A–122
established the requirements to
determine allowable direct and indirect
costs and the preparation of indirect
cost proposals, and can be found at
www.whitehouse.gov/omb. Applicants
can review Indirect Cost Training on
www.hud.gov at: https://www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/training/
training.cfm.
g. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). Section 3 does not apply to Housing
Counseling Grants.
h. Ensuring the Participation of Small
Businesses, Small Disadvantaged
Businesses, and Woman-Owned
Businesses. See the General Section for
information on this topic.
i. Subcontracting. Grantees and subgrantees must deliver all of the
counseling activities set forth in the
applicant’s work plan provided in
Factor 3 of this NOFA. Subcontracting
with other entities is permitted only in
geographical areas where no HUDapproved housing counseling agency
exists; however, the subcontractor must
meet or exceed the standards for a HUD
approved agency.
j. Conflicts of Interest. See the General
Section. In addition, a grantee or subgrantee that is using grant funds to pay
a subcontractor for housing counseling
services pursuant to a housing
counseling sub-agreement is prohibited
from having a controlling interest in that
subcontractor or vice versa. In other
words, a grantee or sub-grantee cannot
use grant funds to pay for housing
counseling services by a subcontractor,
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
if the subcontractor is partially or fullycontrolled by the grantee or sub-grantee,
or affiliate or vice versa.
k. Accessible Technology. See the
General Section.
l. Participation in HUD Sponsored
Program Evaluation. See the General
Section.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Receiving an Application Package.
Applicants may download the
instructions to the application found on
the Grants.gov Web site at
www.Grants.gov. The instructions
contain the General Section and
Program Section of the published NOFA
as well as forms that you must complete
and attach as a zip file to your
application submission. If you have
difficulty accessing the information you
may call the Grants.gov Support desk
toll free 800–518–GRANTS or e-mail
your questions to Support@Grants.gov.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission. Please be sure to read the
General Section for application deadline
and timely receipt requirements as HUD
is using electronic application
submission via www.Grants.gov. In
addition to the instructions in the
General Section follow the instructions
below:
1. Size Limitations and Format for
Narrative Statements. Applicants must
be as specific and direct as possible. For
LHCAs, the narrative portion (responses
to all factors) must be limited to 50
double-spaced, 12-point font, singlesided pages. Intermediaries and SHFAs
are limited to a total of 100 doublespaced, 12-point font, single-sided pages
for the narrative portion. Pages in excess
of the size limit will not be read.
Number the pages of the narrative
statements and include a header that
includes the applicant’s name and the
Rating Factor number and title. Within
each narrative, clearly identify each subfactor immediately above the response
for that sub-factor.
2. Application Checklist. The
Application Checklist indicates forms,
information, certifications and
assurances that apply to this NOFA.
Housing Counseling NOFA Application
Checklist
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance
b. SF–424 Supplement—Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov)
(optional)
c. HUD 424 CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov);
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
d. SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities (if applicable)
e. HUD–27300, Questionnaire for
HUD’s Initiative on Removal of
Regulatory Barriers (‘‘HUD
Communities Initiative’’ on Grants.gov)
(optional regarding eligibility, but
mandatory to receive credit in Factor 2
for the Regulatory Barriers policy
priority)
f. HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov)
g. HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC–II
Strategic Plan (LHCAs only, if
applicable)
h. HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan
(optional)
i. HUD–2994, You Are Our Client
Grant Applicant Survey (optional)
j. HUD–96010, Program Outcome
Logic Model
k. HUD–96011 Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov) (to be used to transmit third
party documents as part of your
electronic application)
l. HUD–9902, Housing Counseling
Agency Fiscal Year Activity Report For
the Period October 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2006 (only required for
Applicants who did not electronically
submit to HUD a form HUD–9902 for
the period October 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2006, for example,
applicants that received approval as a
HUD housing counseling agency after
September 30, 2006.) HUD will utilize
the 9902 data in HUD’s Housing
Counseling System. However, HUD will
consider a revised 9902 submitted with
this application if it is accompanied by
an acceptable explanation regarding
why the data was revised.
m. SHFA Statutory Authority. SHFAs
must submit evidence of their statutory
authority to operate as a SHFA, as
defined in this NOFA, and must submit
evidence of their authority to apply for
funds and subsequently use any funds
awarded. Applicants should verify that
their agency profile information is
accurately represented in HUD’s
Housing Counseling System (HCS) and
validate the information prior to
submitting the grant application.
n. Organization Description.
Applicants must provide a brief
description, no more than 225 words, of
their organizational history and
proposed grant activities, as they would
like them to appear in the press release
issued by HUD in the event that the
applicant is funded through this NOFA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
o. Narrative statements as required in
this NOFA.
C. Submission Dates and Times. A
complete application package must be
received and validated electronically by
the Grants.gov portal no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on or before
the applications deadline date.
Applicants are advised to submit their
applications at least 48 to 72 hours in
advance of the deadline date and when
the Grants.gov help desk is open so that
any issues can be addressed prior to the
deadline date and time. Please note that
validation may take up to 72 hours.
Please be sure to read the General
Section for timely submission and
receipt. Failure to follow the submission
requirements and procedures may affect
your ability to receive an award.
D. Intergovernmental Review. The
Housing Counseling Program is not
subject to Intergovernmental Review.
E. Funding Restrictions. 1. Funding is
limited to the eligible activities
described in Section III.C.1 of this
NOFA.
2. Pre-award Costs. Grantees may
incur pre-award costs not more than 90
calendar days prior to the effective date
of the grant agreement and only with
prior approval from HUD. All pre-award
costs are incurred at the applicant’s risk
and HUD has no obligation to reimburse
such costs if the award is inadequate to
cover such costs or the award offer is
withdrawn because of the applicant’s
failure to satisfy the requirements of this
NOFA, the grant agreement or program
requirements.
F. Other Submission Requirements.
Applications must be submitted via the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp by no later than the
established deadline date and time. See
the General Section for further
information. Applicants interested in
applying for funding under this NOFA
must submit their applications
electronically or request a waiver from
the electronic submission requirement.
Applicants must submit their waiver
requests in writing using e-mail. Waiver
requests must be submitted no later than
15 days prior to the application
deadline date and should be submitted
to Miriam_Torres@hud.gov. If granted a
waiver the notification will provide
instructions on where to submit the
application and how many copies are
required. Paper copy applications must
be received by the deadline date. HUD
will not accept a paper application
without a waiver being granted. See the
General Section for detailed submission
and timely receipt instructions.
A. Criteria. The Factors for Award,
and maximum points for each factor, are
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11529
outlined below. These factors will be
used to evaluate all applications. The
maximum number of points for each
applicant is 102 for LHCAs and 100 for
all other applicants.
1. Bonus Points—‘‘RC/EZ/EC–II.’’
ONLY LHCAs are eligible for 2 bonus
points. See the General Section for
information regarding ‘‘RC/EZ/EC–II’’
bonus points. Form HUD–2990 must be
signed by the organization head of the
RC/EZ/EC7–II not the representative of
the jurisdiction in which the RC/EZ/EC–
II exists.
2. Additional Information. HUD may
rely on information from performance
reports, financial status information,
monitoring reports, audit reports, and
other information available to HUD to
make score determinations to any
relevant Rating Factor.
3. Responses to Factors for Award.
Responses to the following rating factors
should provide HUD with detailed
quantitative and qualitative information
and relevant examples regarding the
housing counseling work of the
organization. The Rating Factors contain
requests for additional information from
applicants interested in supplemental
HECM funding.
In responses to the various factors and
sub-factors, intermediaries and SHFAs
should not submit a separate response
for each proposed sub-grantee and
branch, but should provide a brief
profile of each and summary response
for their entire network, highlighting
individual activities, partnerships,
needs and/or results when appropriate.
a. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (30 Points). HUD uses responses to
this Rating Factor to evaluate the
readiness and ability of an applicant
and proposed sub-grantee and branch
staff, to immediately begin, and
successfully implement, the proposed
work plan detailed in Rating Factor 3.
HUD will also evaluate how effectively
the applicant managed work plan
adjustments that may have been
required if performance targets were not
met within established timeframes and
how often work plan adjustments were
required.
(1) Applicants must provide the
following information to support
evaluation of this Rating Factor.
Information must be provided in a chart
or table.
(a) Number of full-time (35 hours +
per week) housing counselors working
for the applicant and, if applicable,
proposed sub-grantees or branches;
(b) Number of part-time housing
counselors working for the applicant
and, if applicable, proposed subgrantees or branches;
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11530
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(c) Number of bilingual housing
counselors working for the applicant
and, if applicable, proposed subgrantees or branches;
(d) Average years of housing
counseling experience for housing
counselors working for the applicant
and, if applicable, proposed subgrantees or branches;
(e) Average years of housing
counseling program management
experience for the project director(s) for
the applicant and, if applicable,
proposed sub-grantees or branches;
(f) Average years of related
experience, such as experience in
mortgage lending, for counselors and
project managers;
(g) Proposed average hourly labor-rate
for housing counselors and project
managers, including benefits.
(2) Knowledge and Experience (11
points). Using the information provided
above, demonstrate that the applicant,
including proposed sub-grantees and
branches, has sufficient personnel with
the relevant knowledge and experience
to implement the proposed activities in
a timely and effective manner, and
bilingual language skills, if appropriate.
Specifically, for LHCAs, scoring will
be based on the number of years of
recent and relevant experience of
Housing Counseling Program project
directors and recent housing counseling
and relevant experience of housing
counselors.
For intermediaries and SHFAs,
scoring will be based on:
• The number of years of recent and
relevant experience of project directors
of proposed sub-grantees and branches;
• The number of years of recent
housing counseling and relevant
experience of counselors in proposed
sub-grantees and branches;
• The number of years, for key
intermediary or SHFA personnel, of
recent experience administering a
housing counseling program consisting
of a network of multiple housing
counseling agencies. HUD will award
higher scores to applicants with more
experienced staff and management;
• Related experience, such as
experience in mortgage lending, will
also be considered, but will not be
weighted as heavily in the scoring as
direct housing counseling or housing
counseling program management
experience;
• HUD will also factor in other
information that demonstrates the
capacity of the applicant, such as
relevant staff trainings and
certifications.
In scoring this section, HUD will
evaluate whether the applicant has
experience providing the proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
services. HUD will award higher scores
to applicants with staff and management
that have the greatest combination of
experience, training and demonstrated
competency.
(a) LHCAs may provide individual
descriptions of staff limited to one page.
These descriptions do not count toward
narrative page limitations.
Intermediaries and SHFAs acting as
intermediaries should summarize in a
single chart, for each applicable
employee, subcontractor, and consultant
of proposed sub-grantees or branches,
the number of years of direct counseling
or counseling program management
experience, and the number of years of
relevant experience. Total each column.
Do not submit individual resumes for
sub-grantee staff. HUD staff will verify
experience information submitted
during monitoring reviews. The
following must be included in each
person’s description:
• The names and titles of employees,
including subcontractors and
consultants who will perform the
activities proposed in the applicant’s
work plan in Rating Factor 3. Clerical
staff should not be listed.
• Individual current housing
counseling duties and responsibilities;
• Experience in providing one-on-one
and group counseling (describe each
separately);
• Relevant professional background
and experience, and;
• Bilingual language skills, if
applicable.
• Experience is relevant if it
corresponds directly to projects of a
similar scale and purpose. Provide the
number of years of experience for each
position listed and indicate:
• Where and when each position was
held;
• Whether the position was full-time
or part-time;
• In the case of part-time positions,
the number of hours per week.
Applicants for HECM supplemental
funding must specify the HECM
experience of project directors, HUD
HECM Network Counselors and the
organization. They must also indicate
the number of HUD HECM Network
Counselors that are in the applicant’s
network at the time of application, and
that the applicant proposes to fund with
the requested award;
(b) Also indicate in the chart for all
housing counselors and project directors
the specialized trainings received
within the last two years relevant to the
proposed activities, including specific
trainings regarding FHA programs.
Include when the training was received
and who provided it. Do not include onthe-job training. Applicants that seek
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
supplemental funds for HECM
counseling must indicate what relevant
training counselors received to prepare
them as HECM counselors.
(c) Indicate which housing counselors
are certified housing or financial
counselors. Describe what type of
certification is held, who provided it,
when the certification was received, and
if applicable, the date certification
expires.
(d) Identify the Client Management
System utilized by the applicant,
affiliates, and branches, if applicable,
during the grant period October 1, 2005,
to September 30, 2006. Applicants that
used a system during this period that
interfaces or will interface with HUD’s
database will be awarded more points
than applicants that did not utilize a
web-based system.
If the applicant does not currently use
an on-line or web-based system but
plans to in the coming grant period,
October 1, 2007 through September 30,
2008, indicate which system will be
used, and how its use will be
implemented in terms of training
employees to use it and its ability to
improve client services and generate
reports.
(3) Grant and Program Requirement
Compliance (14 points).
In scoring this Section, HUD will
evaluate how well the applicant met the
Program requirements, including
reporting and grant document
execution, if applicable, for the period
October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006,
and its ability to spend all grant funds
allotted.
If the applicant did not receive an
FY2005 HUD grant, it must provide a
response, with sufficient detail for HUD
to evaluate compliance, based on
activities and requirements under other
sources of funding, such as other
federal, state, or local grant awards.
Identify the source(s) and amount(s) of
funds used for housing counseling.
Provide relevant contact information for
the agencies or organizations
administering these programs so HUD
can verify that the information you
report is accurate.
(a) Grantee Requirements. HUD will
evaluate the applicant’s performance
with regard to the timeliness and
completeness with which the applicant
satisfied grant requirements, including
grant document execution, grant
reporting requirements including
quarterly (if applicable), mid-term and
final reports.
(b) Form HUD–9902. HUD will deduct
points if the applicant was required to
submit a form HUD–9902 for the period
October 1, 2005 through September 30,
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
2006, but failed to do so in a timely
manner.
(c) Expending Grant Funds. If grant
awards were not fully expended during
the grant period October 1, 2005, to
September 30, 2006, provide an
explanation as to the reason why and
the steps the applicant has taken to
ensure that future funding will be
expended according to the terms of the
grant agreement.
(d) Performance Reviews. Significant
findings on performance reviews
conducted by HUD staff will be taken
into consideration when scoring this
section. Significant findings may be
findings that suggest an applicant has
operated its agency in a manner
inconsistent with the Housing
Counseling program.
(e) Housing Counseling System (HCS).
HUD will evaluate applicant’s
timeliness and effectiveness in
validating and updating agency
information in HCS. Intermediaries and
SHFAs must describe procedures and
quality control measures used to verify
sub-grantee, and if applicable branch or
affiliate, information is validated in HCS
on a regular basis.
(4) Management—Goals and Results
(5 points). In scoring this section, HUD
will compare applicant output and
outcome goals and actual results for the
period October 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2006, and evaluate
subsequent changes in approach
resulting from any differences, if
applicable. HUD’s primary concern is
how the applicant managed change,
when needed, within the organization
as well as a clear and reasonable
explanation as to why goals were not
met, or why they were exceeded, and
what steps were taken organizationally
to accommodate either scenario.
For applicants that received a FY2005
housing counseling grant covering the
period October 1, 2005 to September 30,
2006, HUD will compare the projections
made in the Program Outcome and
Output Logic Model, Form HUD–96010
submitted with the FY2005 Housing
Counseling NOFA, including any
adjustments based on actual award
amounts, to the corresponding actual
results for that period reported by the
applicant on the Form HUD–9902
submitted to HUD.
Applicants who did not receive a
FY2005 Housing Counseling Grant and
therefore did not finalize outcome and
output projections, or who are recently
approved, or who were a sub-grantee of
an intermediary or SHFA for the period
of October 1, 2005 through September
30, 2006, and are now applying for
funding under the LHCA category must
indicate the detailed, quantifiable goals
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the organization set for itself for the
period covering October 1, 2005 to
September 30, 2006, or for the 12 month
period ending December 31, 2006 if
more appropriate to the applicant’s or
other grant-requiring reporting
schedule. Also provide the actual
results corresponding to these goals and
explain any differences in goals versus
actual results and indicate what
measurement reporting tools were used
as well as describe the evaluation
process. The Logic Model Instructions,
which is tab 1 of Form HUD–96010,
provides information regarding
measurement reporting tools and the
evaluation process. If describing goals
corresponding to other grant programs
or sources of funding, provide relevant
contact information for the agencies or
organizations administering those
programs so HUD can verify that the
goals and corresponding achievements
you report are accurate.
b. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (12 Points).
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need for funding the
proposed activities described in the
applicant’s work plan, and the degree to
which the applicant’s work plan
substantively addresses departmental
policy priorities.
(1) Needs Data (6 points). Provide
current or recent economic and
demographic data, and any other
evidence that demonstrates housing
counseling need relevant to the target
area. All proposed activities in Factor 3
must have corresponding need-related
data. Sources for all data provided must
be clearly cited. Do not submit copies of
reports or tables.
To the extent that the community the
applicant serves has documented need
in its Consolidated Plan, Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
(AI), or other planning documents,
provide these in the response. Economic
and demographic data must include
persons with disabilities located in the
target area. The U.S. Census Bureau, for
example, maintains disability data by
state, county, and metropolitan
statistical area (MSA) at the following
Web site: https://www.census.gov/hhes/
www/disability/disability.html.
Additionally, the HUD USER Research
Information Service and Clearinghouse,
available at https://www.huduser.org/,
allows users to search over 800 HUD
publications by subjects and keywords.
In scoring this Section, HUD will
evaluate the degree to which the
applicant provides current or recent
economic and demographic data, and
any other evidence that demonstrates
housing counseling need relevant to the
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11531
target area and the activities proposed in
projected work plan activities detailed
in Rating Factor 3. Applicants that fail
to identify current or recent objective
data will not receive full points for this
factor.
(2) Departmental Policy Priorities (6
points). The Departmental policy
priorities are described in detail in the
General Section. Of those listed, the
following five apply to the Housing
Counseling Program for the purpose of
this NOFA. Indicate if and describe how
the applicant’s work plan substantively
addresses each of these departmental
policy priorities. Applicants are advised
to review the policy priorities in the
General Section, to assure they fully
understand the meaning of each, prior
to responding to this sub-factor.
In scoring this section, the applicant
will receive one point for each of the
departmental policy priorities (a)—(d)
that the projected work plan in Factor
3 substantively addresses. Up to 2
points are available for priority (e). The
General Section and HUD’s Notices
identify how policy priority points will
be awarded. Copies of HUD’s notices
published on this issue, can be found on
HUD’s Web site at https://www.hud.gov/
grants/index.cfm.
(a) Providing Increased
Homeownership and Rental
Opportunities for Low- and ModerateIncome Persons, Persons with
Disabilities, the Elderly, Minorities, and
Families with Limited English
Proficiency.
(b) Providing Full and Equal Access to
Grassroots, Faith-Based and Other
Community-Based Organizations in
HUD Program Implementation.
(c) Participation of Minority-Serving
Institutions in HUD Programs. Identify
partnerships with minority-serving
institutions of higher learning such as
colleges and trade schools.
(d) Participation in Energy Star.
Applicants must provide information on
how they promote or plan to promote
Energy Star materials and practices and
buildings constructed to Energy Star
standards to homebuyers, renters and
other applicable counseling clients.
Describe any outreach activities
previously conducted and/or planned to
promote Energy Star products.
(e) Removal of Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing. Under this policy
priority, higher rating points are
available to (1) governmental applicants
that are able to demonstrate successful
efforts in removing regulatory barriers to
affordable housing and (2)
nongovernmental applicants that are
associated with jurisdictions that have
undertaken successful efforts in
removing barriers. To obtain the policy
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11532
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
priority points for efforts to successfully
remove regulatory barriers, applicants
must complete form HUD–27300,
‘‘Questionnaire for HUD’s Initiative on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers.’’ A
limited number of questions on form
HUD–27300 expressly request the
applicant to provide brief
documentation with its response. Other
questions require that, for each
affirmative statement made, the
applicant supply a reference, URL or
brief statement indicating where the
back-up information may be found, and
a point of contact, including a telephone
number or e-mail address. Applicants
that do not provide the required URL
references, points of contact (POC) or
other back-up documentation will not
be eligible for the points associated with
this policy priority. When addressing
this policy priority, Intermediaries and
SHFAs should complete a HUD–27300
that identifies the jurisdiction in which
the preponderance of services will be
performed if an award is made.
c. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach/Scope of Housing Counseling
Services (35 Points). This factor
addresses the quality and effectiveness
of the applicant’s historical and
proposed housing counseling activities.
(1) Historical Performance-Quality
and Complexity of Services (8 Points).
In scoring this section, HUD will
evaluate the quality of, the variety of,
and the level of effort and time
associated with all the housing
counseling services provided by the
applicant from all funding sources
during the period October 1, 2005
through September 30, 2006. Responses
should contain ‘‘Historical
Performance’’ as part of the heading for
the response. Applicants must provide
the following information:
(a) Average hours of housing
counseling per client, for the period
October 1, 2005, through September 30,
2006, for each of the following service
types, including follow-up, the
applicant organization provides. Do not
provide a range of hours.
(i) Pre-purchase Counseling
(ii) Homebuyer Education
(iii) Delinquency/Default Counseling
(iv) Non-Delinquency Post-Purchase
Counseling
(v) Home Equity Conversion Mortgage
(HECM) Counseling
(vi) Post-Purchase Education
(vii) Rental Counseling
(viii) Homeless/Displacement
Counseling
(ix) Predatory Lending Counseling
(x) Homeownership Voucher
Counseling and Education
(xi) Fair Housing Issues.
(xii) Other (describe)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Describe the level of effort and time
required to provide the housing
counseling services described and to
meet the needs of clients. Explain the
average counseling time per client
figures above. Scoring will be based on
the degree to which the applicant
demonstrates, as compared to other
applicants, that sufficient time and
resources were devoted to ensure that
clients received quality counseling.
(b) Types of Counseling and Services
Offered: HUD will retrieve this
information from the HUD–9902, ‘‘All
Counseling Activities’’ column, through
the Housing Counseling System (HCS).
Verify that the information from this
source is accurate. Scoring of the variety
of housing counseling services offered is
weighted to provide the most points for
HECM and Post Purchase Default/Loss
Mitigation counseling.
(c) Group Education and One-On-One
Counseling. For the period October 1,
2005, through September 30, 2006, HUD
will retrieve from Section 6a-b of form
HUD–9902, ‘‘All Counseling Activities’’
column, the number of clients that
participated in Homebuyer Education
Workshops or other types of classes
offered as group sessions and will
retrieve from Section 7a–e, the number
of clients that participated in one-onone counseling. Applicants should
explain the figures provided in Form
HUD–9902, ‘‘All Counseling Activities’’
column, regarding group session
participation and one-on-one
counseling. Describe how clients come
to participate in one or the other, the
relationship between the two, and the
role that each plays in the applicant’s
overall service provision. Estimate the
percentage of clients participating in
both group education sessions and oneon-one counseling. Scorers will evaluate
the extent to which an agency
encouraged and provided one-on-one
counseling, which HUD considers the
most effective form of housing
counseling, instead of over-relying on
homebuyer education workshops and
other forms of group sessions.
(d) For intermediaries and SHFAs,
HUD will evaluate the number and
location of sub-grantees and branches
that received funding from the applicant
through a FY2005 HUD housing
counseling grant(s), if applicable,
covering the period October 1, 2005September 30, 2006.
(2) Historical Performance—Impact/
Outcomes (9 points). To score this
Section, HUD will evaluate the
applicant’s performance for the period
October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006
as reported on the HUD 9902, ‘‘All
Counseling Activities’’ column. The
quantity of clients the applicant served
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
will be compared to similar applicants
providing similar services. Clients
served numbers will also be analyzed in
the context of the applicant’s total
housing counseling budget for the same
period, FY2005. HUD will also consider
the degree to which the services
provided were time and resource
intensive. Additionally, for
intermediaries and SHFAs, HUD will
evaluate the geographic coverage and
scope of the applicant’s activities for the
period October 1, 2005, through
September 30, 2006, including the
number of states served by affiliates or
branches, if applicable, and the overall
size of the housing counseling network
during that period.
(a) Cost per client. Clients served
figures will be obtained from the Form
HUD–9902, ‘‘All Counseling Activities’’
column, for the period October 1, 2005
through September 30, 2006, submitted
to HUD by the applicant, which reflects
activities funded both with HUD
housing counseling grant funds, if
applicable, and with other leveraged
resources. Applicants that were not
required to submit Form HUD–9902 for
the period October 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2006 must complete one
as part of this application. In addition,
the applicant must provide the
following information.
(i) Total housing counseling budget
for the period October 1, 2005–
September 30, 2006, including HUD
housing counseling grant(s) or subgrants, if applicable, as well as other
resources leveraged specifically for
housing counseling. Do not include
funds for down payment or closing cost
assistance, Individual Development
Accounts, emergency services, or other
resources not used for the direct
provision of housing counseling.
(ii) If projections for outputs and/or
outcomes were not met, indicate how
location, type of counseling, client type,
and expenses may have affected client
volume. Justify expenses and explain
why they were reasonable, strategic, and
appropriate.
(b) Percentage of Grant Funding
Passed Through: Intermediaries and
SHFAs that received one or more
FY2005 HUD housing counseling grant,
for the grant period October 1, 2005, to
September 30, 2006, must also indicate
what percentage of their grant(s) was
passed through directly to sub-grantees
or branches, and explain how funds not
passed through were spent.
LHCAs applying under Applicant
Category 1 that received one or more
FY2005 HUD housing counseling grants
for the grant period October 1, 2005, to
September 30, 2006, must indicate what
percentage of their grant(s) was spent on
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the salaries and benefits of housing
counselors and project directors.
Explain how other funds were spent.
All Applicants must indicate the
sources and amounts spent on formal
staff training during the grant period
October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006.
Do not include on-the-job training.
Applicants that did not receive a
FY2005 HUD housing counseling grant
must characterize their performance
through other housing counseling
funding sources, for example other
federal, state or local government grants,
providing as much detail, similar to that
requested above, as possible.
(c) Geographic Coverage:
Intermediaries and SHFAs must identify
the sub-grantees, affiliates and branches,
and corresponding states, to which the
applicant provided housing counseling
funding, for the period October 1, 2005,
through September 30, 2006, through:
(i) FY2005 HUD housing counseling
grant funds, if applicable.
(ii) All housing counseling resources.
(3) Projected Performance/Work
Plan—Quality and Complexity of
Services (9 points). This section
involves information on the housing
counseling services and other activities
to be conducted during the period
October 1, 2007, through September 30,
2008. In scoring this Section, HUD will
consider the types and variety of
housing counseling and education
services being offered, and other
activities occurring in support of the
applicant’s housing counseling program.
HUD will also evaluate the quality of
the applicant’s proposed housing
counseling services, and level of effort
and time associated with providing the
proposed counseling services to the
number of clients it estimates it will
serve. Scoring will be based on the
degree to which the applicant
demonstrates, as compared to other
applicants, that for each type of
counseling service delivered, average,
greater than average or less than average
time and resources will be devoted to
ensure that clients receive quality
counseling.
Applicants must provide the
following information, which will be
used in conjunction with responses in
Rating Factor 5, as a basis to support the
scoring of the sub-factors below. There
must be consistency between Rating
Factor 3 and the projected outputs and
outcomes in Rating Factor 5. Responses
must contain ‘‘Projected Performance’’
as part of the heading for the response.
(a) Describe the various types of
housing counseling and education
services, and if applicable intermediary
activities, the applicant proposes to
undertake, and identify the geographic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
area the services will cover. Also,
describe planned follow-up activities, if
applicable. Proposed services and
activities must relate to the needs
identified in Rating Factor 2. Scoring of
the variety of housing counseling
services offered is weighted to provide
the most points for one-on-one
counseling regarding HECM and Post
Purchase Default/Loss Mitigation. To be
eligible for the full points available for
these service types, applicants
proposing to provide HECM and/or
Default/Loss Mitigation counseling must
have prior HUD approval to provide
these services.
Intermediaries and SHFAs acting as
intermediaries should describe in detail
their plans to train proposed subgrantees and branches, provide
technical assistance, and evaluate
compliance with program requirements,
for example through site visits.
(b) Average hours of housing
counseling time the applicant estimates
per client, for each of the activities
listed in part (a), including follow-up.
Do not provide a range of hours. If the
projected average times are the same as
those listed for the period covering
October 1, 2005–September 30, 2006,
the applicant may simply state so in lieu
of listing them again here.
(c) Indicate the names and titles of
employees, including subcontractors
and consultants, allocated to each
proposed activity, as well as the
corresponding staff hours for each task,
and demonstrate that the applicant has
the human resources to accomplish the
proposed activities and serve the
number of individuals the applicant
proposes to serve. The staff information
should include who from Rating Factor
1 will be involved and any new staff,
subcontractors or consultants that will
be hired for the October 1, 2007–
September 30, 2008 grant period.
(d) Indicate proposed amount to be
spent on formal staff training during the
grant period October 1, 2007, to
September 30, 2008 from all sources. Do
not include on-the-job training.
(e) Describe plans to effectively serve
and/or communicate with persons with
limited English proficiency (LEP) and
persons with disabilities who require
alternative formats, for example
materials that are available in languages
other than English.
(f) Intermediaries and SHFAs must
also:
(i) Describe the housing counseling
and education activities to be provided
by proposed sub-grantees and branches,
explicitly stating the types of services to
be offered, preferably in a chart.
(ii) Describe the applicant’s legal
relationship with sub-grantees (i.e.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11533
membership organization, field, or
branch office, subsidiary organization,
etc.)
(iii) Explain the process that will be
used to determine sub-grantee funding
levels and distribute funds. If
applicable, indicate how sub-grantee
funding levels are adjusted on an ongoing basis based on performance.
(4) Projected Performance/Work
Plan—Coordination (5 points). HUD
will consider the extent to which, as
compared to similar applicants, the
applicant can demonstrate it will
coordinate proposed activities with
other organizations, and if applicable,
with other services and products offered
by the applicant’s organization in a
manner that benefits their clients.
Scoring will also be based on the degree
to which the applicant takes steps to
avoid conflicts of interest, and discloses
to clients that they have a choice in
matters such as the loan product they
choose and the house that they
purchase.
(a) Identify and describe partnerships
and efforts to coordinate proposed
activities with other organizations,
including, but not limited to, emergency
and social services providers, lending
organizations, homeowner insurance
providers, down payment and closing
cost assistance programs, nonprofit
housing providers, and local or state
government. For example, describe
agreements with lenders regarding nontraditional lending standards or
participation in the Consolidated
Planning process or the Analysis of
Impediments. Any written agreements
or memoranda of understanding in
place should be described. These
agreements and memoranda of
understanding will be reviewed by HUD
staff as a part of the biennial reviews
and on-site monitoring visits.
Applicants should also highlight
internal products and functions, if
applicable, such as loan products
available to clients, down payment and
closing cost assistance programs, as well
as internal affordable housing programs
that can be a resource for clients.
Applicants requesting HECM
supplemental funding should highlight
the partnerships or internal products
that are relevant to HECM activities.
(b) Describe plans to avoid conflicts of
interest, such as methods for disclosing
to participants that they are free to
choose lenders, loan products, and
homes, regardless of the
recommendations made by counselors.
To receive full credit in this Section, the
applicant must submit the disclosure
forms and materials used by the
applicant to communicate to clients
that, while affordable homes, lending
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11534
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
products and other forms of assistance
might be available through the
applicant, and partnerships in which
the applicant has entered, the client is
under no obligation to utilize these
services. These plans and disclosures
will also be reviewed by HUD staff as a
part of the biennial reviews and on-site
monitoring visits.
(5) Projected Performance/Work
Plan—Coverage/Efficient Use of
Resources (4 points). In scoring this
Section, HUD will evaluate the
geographic coverage of the applicant’s
proposed activities, and spending
decisions.
(a) Percentage of Grant Funding To Be
Passed Through: Intermediaries and
SHFAs must indicate what percentage
of their proposed award will be passed
through directly to sub-grantees and
branches, and explain how funds not
passed through will be spent. LHCAs
that apply under Applicant Category 1
must indicate what percentage of their
proposed award will be spent on the
salaries and benefits of housing
counselors and project directors.
Explain in detail how other proposed
funds will be spent.
(b) Geographic Coverage:
Intermediaries and SHFAs must identify
the sub-grantees and branches, and
corresponding states, the applicant
proposes will receive funding through
this grant award. Indicate which, if any
proposed sub-grantees and branches,
serve Colonias. In the event that an
intermediary is also applying for HECM
supplemental funding, indicate the
agencies and corresponding states in
which the HUD HECM Network
counselors you propose to fund are
located. Applicants unable to precisely
identify proposed sub-grantees and
branches to receive funding through the
proposed grant must identify the most
likely sub-grantees and branches, based
on past experience, and explain what
process will be used to select actual subgrantees and branches. Pursuant to the
applicable regulations at 24 CFR
84.82(d)(3)(iii) and 85.30(d)(4), grantees
must receive HUD’s prior written
approval for sub-grants.
d. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (10 Points). HUD housing
counseling grants are not intended to
fully fund an applicant’s housing
counseling program, or that of its subgrantees. All organizations that use
housing counseling grant funds are
expected to seek other private and
public sources of funding for housing
counseling to supplement HUD funding.
Any agency that does not have other
resources available will receive no
points for this factor. Applicants will be
evaluated based on their ability to show
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
that they have obtained additional
resources for their housing counseling
activities, for the period October 1,
2007—September 30, 2008, including:
direct financial assistance; in-kind
contributions, such as services,
equipment, office space, labor; etc.
Resources may be provided by
governmental entities, public or private
nonprofit organizations, for-profit
private organizations, or other entities
committed to providing assistance.
Grantees will be required to maintain
evidence that leveraged funds were
actually provided to the agency. These
files will be reviewed by HUD staff as
a part of the biennial reviews and onsite monitoring visits.
(1) All Applicants must provide a
comprehensive list of all leveraged
funds and in-kind contributions being
claimed. Include the amount and the
source, and total it. Intermediaries and
SHFAs must itemize the list of
leveraged resources by each proposed
sub-grantee and/or funded branch
office. All leveraged resources claimed
by an applicant, including cash and
third party in-kind, must meet all of the
criteria set forth in 24 CFR 84.23 and
must be accounted for in the budget
form 424CBW.
(2) Additionally, for Category 1—
Local Housing Counseling Agencies
(LHCAs), in order to obtain points under
this factor, the Applicant must
demonstrate leveraging by providing
letters and, if applicable, copies of
relevant grant agreements, from entities
or individuals, or both, committing
resources to the project, that include:
(a) The identity of the entity or
individual committing resources to the
project.
(b) Dollar value of the resources to be
committed. For in-kind resources with
no clear total dollar value indicated,
Applicants should estimate their value
and describe in detail how the estimate
was determined. Values for recipient
contributions of services and property
shall be established in accordance with
the applicable cost principles.
(c) The type of resources to be
committed.
(d) An indication that the resources
will be available during the grant period
pertaining to this NOFA, October 1,
2007–September 30, 2008.
(e) An indication that the award, or a
specific portion of it, is intended for
housing counseling.
(f) The signature of an official of the
entity legally able to make commitments
on behalf of the entity.
(g) No conditions that would nullify
the commitment. (It is, however,
acceptable for the commitment to be
conditional on HUD funding.)
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(3) Additionally, resources provided
by the applicant may count as leveraged
resources. These amounts must include
only funds that will directly result in
the provision of housing counseling
services, but not resources for activities
such as down payment and closing cost
assistance, IDA programs, and
emergency services.
(4) Intermediaries and SHFAs should
include information on leveraged
resources for only anticipated subgrantees and branches that will be
funded through this application.
(5) Points for this factor will be
awarded based on the amount of
leveraging that meets the criteria in this
section and the percentage of the
applicant’s total housing counseling
budget that the requested HUD housing
counseling funds would represent. The
amount of grant funds requested will
impact the ratio used to score this
factor, as this factor evaluates the
proposed HUD grant as a percentage of
the total counseling budget. For
example, a LHCA requesting the
maximum comprehensive grant amount
of $150,000 with leveraged funds
equaling that grant will only receive 7
points. If that same LHCA requests only
$100,000 with the same leveraged funds
of $150,000, the score will be 9.
Depending on organization type, the
following scales will be used to
determine scores for this factor:
LHCAs and SHFAs
1–25%—10 points
26–40%—9 points
41–48%—8 points
49–55%—7 points
56–65%—6 points
66–75%—5 points
76–85%—4 points
86–91%—3 points
92–95%—2 points
96–99%—1 point
Intermediaries
1–15%—10 points
16–20%—9 points
21–26%—8 points
27–32%—7 points
33–41%—6 points
42–47%—5 points
48–53%—4 points
54–59%—3 points
60–65%—2 points
66–99%—1 point
e. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (13 points).
This factor emphasizes HUD’s
determination to ensure that applicants
meet commitments made in their
applications and grant agreements and
assess their performance in achieving
agreed upon performance goals. This
reflects HUD’s Strategic goal to embrace
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
high standards of ethics, management
and accountability.
The purpose of this factor is for the
applicant to identify projected outputs
and outcomes corresponding to the
proposed workplan in Factor 3. The
developed logic model submitted with
the application will serve as a reporting
tool for applicants selected to receive an
award, allowing HUD to compare
proposed program outputs and
outcomes with actual results. In scoring
this Factor, HUD will consider the
appropriateness of the goals given the
award the applicant is applying for and
evaluate the proposed outputs and
outcomes for their effectiveness and
efficiency in delivering housing
counseling services to the population to
be serviced. Additionally, scorers will
evaluate the extent to which an
applicant’s proposal includes one-onone counseling or encourages affiliates
to undertake one-on-one counseling.
HUD considers one-on-one counseling
the most effective form of housing
counseling, as compared to homebuyer
education workshops and other forms of
group sessions.
(1) Program Outcome Logic Model (2
points). Applicants must select
appropriate outputs and outcomes from
a series of ‘‘pick lists’’ for the Housing
Counseling Program. The pick list can
be found in the form HUD–96010 in the
Grants.gov Housing Counseling Program
Instructions Download. Using the pick
list, for each column of the logic model,
applicants can select and insert their
outputs and outcomes in the
appropriate columns of the Logic
Model.
The pick lists also provide for an
associate unit of measure for each
output and outcome, and applicants
must utilize the measure provided that
is associated to the activity. Applicants
must identify projected output and
outcome values that correspond to the
unit of measure. For example, insert
whole numbers, not percentages, when
the unit of measure is ‘Households’.
These amounts should represent
results to be achieved entirely as a result
of the HUD housing counseling funding.
If, in reality, various funding sources
will contribute to the services provided
each individual, the applicant must
prorate their response to reflect a figure
representing services provided with
only funding from the proposed grant.
Applicants should use the same
methodology to complete the logic
model as they do for form HUD–9902.
For example, the logic model is not
designed to record the exact number of
clients projected or served, but rather
the number of unique counseling or
education services provided. So an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
individual or household that receives
multiple, distinct types of counseling or
education in a reporting period is
recorded on the logic model multiple
times. For example, if an individual
comes in for one type of counseling (e.g.
pre-purchase), they are recorded. If,
later in the reporting period, the same
individual comes in for another type of
counseling, for example default
counseling, record this new activity. By
contrast, if multiple topics are covered
in one counseling session, it is only
recorded as one activity. Moreover, the
form is designed to capture
participation in each complete course
on a unique education topic. For
example: whether or not the course is
completed in one 8-hour session, or four
2-hour classes, it is counted as one
course.
In addition, HUD has provided a
series of management questions, which
awardees will be expected to respond to
in reporting back to HUD. The
management questions place a
framework around the data you will be
reporting to HUD. The management
questions are included in the Logic
Model and applicants should use them
as a guide to understanding what HUD
is interested in learning about the major
element of your program. HUD will
provide training on the Logic Model
through webcasts and detailed step-bystep instructions for using the new form
and format. The schedule for the
webcasts and instructions can be found
at https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/
grants/fundsavail. For FY2007, HUD is
considering a new concept for the Logic
Model. The new concept is a Return on
Investment (ROI) statement. HUD will
be publishing a separate notice on the
ROI concept.
Applicants must complete and submit
Form HUD–96010 reflecting projected
outputs and outcomes under the
proposed HUD Housing Counseling
grant. The Form HUD–96010 must
identify:
(a) Outputs. Outputs are the direct
products of the applicant’s activities
that lead to the ultimate achievement of
outcomes. Based on the proposed work
plan in Factor 3 and the amount being
requested through this NOFA,
applicants should select the appropriate
outputs and their associated units of
measure from the choices provided in
the pick list, and provide the
corresponding number to be achieved
for each proposed output.
If requesting supplemental funding,
indicate the specific number of
households the applicant projects it, or
if applicable, sub-grantees and branches,
will serve under the comprehensive
counseling portion of the requested
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11535
award and with requested HECM
supplemental funding.
(b) Outcomes. Outcomes are benefits
accruing to the households as a result of
participation in the program. Outcomes
are performance indicators the applicant
expects to achieve or goals it hopes to
meet over the term of the proposed
grant. Using the pick lists provided,
applicants should select each
appropriate outcome and associated
unit of measure related to the proposed
work plan, and provide the
corresponding number to be achieved
for each proposed outcome. Projected
outcomes should reflect the number you
expect to report in the HUD Housing
Counseling Grant Activities column on
the Form HUD–9902.
The proposed outcomes the applicant
provides will be compared to actual
results in the measurement of grant
performance and future grant
application evaluations.
(2) Projected Performance/Work
Plan—Impact (6 points). In scoring this
Section, HUD will evaluate the
proposed outputs from the logic model,
specifically the number of clients that
the applicant estimates will be served
under the proposed HUD grant, by the
applicant and sub-grantees, if
applicable, for the grant period October
1, 2007, to September 30, 2008. Scoring
will be based on the cost per client,
compared to historical averages for
similar services and similar applicants.
Proposed clients served numbers will
also be analyzed in the context of
budget, costs, spending decisions, the
types of services provided, level of effort
expended, etc.
(a) Provide a context for, or qualify
the number of clients the applicant
projects to serve with the proposed HUD
grant. Indicate how location, counseling
and client types, and expenses may
affect client volume, and whether the
impact will be short-term or long-term.
Justify proposed expenses and explain
why they are reasonable, strategic, and
appropriate for the counseling activities
identified above.
(3) Projected Performance—Group
Education and One-On-One Counseling.
(3 points). HUD will utilize logic model
output projections to evaluate what
percentage of total clients the applicant
estimates will participate in group
education, what percentage will
participate in one-on-one counseling,
and what percentage will participate in
both group sessions and one-on-one
counseling. Applicants must complete
each of these output projections.
Describe how clients are selected for
one or the other, the relationship
between the two, and the role that each
will play in the overall service
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11536
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
provision. Scorers will evaluate the
extent to which an agency plans to
encourage and provide one-on-one
counseling, which HUD considers the
most effective form of housing
counseling, instead of over-relying on
homebuyer education workshops and
other forms of group sessions.
(4) Evaluation Plan. (2 points).
Applicants must also submit an
evaluation plan for how they are going
to track actual accomplishments against
anticipated achievements and ensure
that the program can provide the
services projected to be delivered and
outcomes projected to be achieved.
(a) Information Collection. Describe
the applicant’s procedures for
measuring outputs and outcomes.
Describe follow-up activities with
clients to collect outcome information.
(b) Data Analysis and Work Plan
Adjustments. Indicate how the
information will be evaluated, and the
steps the applicant has in place to make
adjustments to the work plan if
performance targets are not met within
established timeframes. National and
regional intermediaries and SHFAs
should indicate if and how the
performance of sub-grantees and branch
offices affects current and future subgrants and allocations.
B. Review and Selection Process. Two
types of reviews will be conducted.
1. Technical Review. First, each
application will be reviewed for
technical sufficiency, in other words,
whether the application meets the
threshold requirements set out in this
NOFA and the General Section and
whether all required forms have been
submitted. The General Section
provides the procedures for corrections
to deficient applications.
2. General Review. The second review
considers the responses to the rating
factors outlined above and other
relevant information. Applications will
be evaluated competitively, and ranked
against all other applicants that applied
in the same funding category.
3. Rating Panels. Detailed information
on the rating review panels appears in
the General Section.
4. Minimum Score for Fundable
Applications. The minimum score for
fundable applications is 75 points.
5. Funding Methodology.
a. Comprehensive Counseling. Only
applicants who receive a score of 75
points or above will be considered
eligible for funding. All eligible
applicants will then be funded in
proportion to the score they receive.
Regarding the comprehensive
counseling portion of an award, all
grantees will receive the lower of either
the comprehensive award amount
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
determined with the formula, or the
amount actually requested by the
applicant. HUD will consider the
amount of the comprehensive
counseling grant being requested to be
the value entered into box 18a on form
SF–424. For intermediaries also
requesting HECM supplemental
funding, box 18a of Form SF–424
should reflect the total of the
comprehensive request and the HECM
supplemental request. For those
intermediaries requesting both, the
narrative response to Factor 3 must
make clear the exact comprehensive and
supplemental amounts being requested.
The minimum award is $20,000 for
LHCAs; $50,000 for SHFAs; and
$200,000 for intermediaries.
b. Supplemental Funding. The same
methodology described above in section
a will be used to distribute the available
HECM supplemental funds. Regarding
supplemental funding, all grantees will
receive the lower of either the
supplemental award amount
determined with the formula, or the
specific amount of supplemental
funding actually requested by the
applicant. Each applicant will only
submit one application and receive a
score based on the application for the
comprehensive counseling grant.
Comprehensive counseling funds will
be allocated based on this score.
Subsequently, for HECM supplemental
funding, responses to each rating factor
will be evaluated on a yes/no, adequate/
inadequate basis. An adequate response
will result in a score for the
supplemental funding identical to the
comprehensive score on each respective
rating factor. An inadequate
supplemental response will result in a
1-point deduction from the
comprehensive score. After all five
rating factors have been evaluated, the
adjusted ratings will result in a distinct
score for the HECM supplemental funds.
This method will result in scores for
supplemental funding that may be equal
to the comprehensive score, or up to
five points less than the comprehensive
score. In no case can an applicant
receive a higher score on an application
for supplemental funding than it
received on its comprehensive
application. An applicant will receive a
separate score for its application for
comprehensive counseling, and for
HECM supplemental funding. The base
award for the HECM supplemental
funding will be $40,000 for
intermediaries. Only applicants scoring
75 points or above are eligible for
supplemental funding. HUD may award
one or more HECM supplemental grants
to intermediaries. HECM supplemental
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
grant funds are awarded based upon
scores beginning with the highest until
the funds are expended. Applications
that receive 75 points or more will not
necessarily receive supplemental
funding.
6. Reallocation of Unspent Funds. If
funds designated for a specific grant
Category, HOC, or for supplemental
funding remain unspent after the
formulas have been run and award
recommendations are determined, HUD
may, at its discretion, reallocate those
funds to any other funding Category or
supplemental funding area under this
NOFA. Additionally, HUD may
reallocate unspent funds to any HOC
jurisdiction or to HUD Headquarters for
awards under this NOFA. HUD may also
reallocate unspent funds for housing
counseling support activities. Any
reallocation will be based on demand
and unmet need.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices: Following
selection, applicants will receive
notification from HUD regarding their
application.
1. Publication of Recipients of HUD
Funding. HUD’s regulations at 24 CFR
part 4 provide that HUD will publish a
notice in the Federal Register to notify
the public of all decisions made by the
Department. Please see the General
Section for more information on this
topic.
2. Debriefing. Applicants may receive
a debriefing on their application
submission. Please see the General
Section for a further discussion of the
time frame in which the debriefing
request may be submitted.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Requirements. In
accordance with 24 CFR 50.19(b)(9) and
(12) of the HUD regulations, activities
assisted under this program are
categorically excluded from the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act and are not
subject to environmental review under
the related laws and authorities.
2. Audit Requirements. Grantees that
expend $500,000 or more in federal
financial assistance in a single year (this
can be program year or fiscal year) must
be audited in accordance with the OMB
requirements as established in 24 CFR
part 84. Additional information
regarding this requirement can be
accessed at the following Web site:
https://harvester.census.gov/sac.
3. Other Matters.
a. Relocation. See the General Section.
b. OMB Circulars and Governmentwide Regulations Applicable to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Financial Assistance Programs. See the
General Section.
c. Prohibition Against Lobbying
Activities. See the General Section.
d. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See the General Section.
f. Executive Order 13279 Equal
Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based
and Community Organizations. See the
General Section.
g. Salary Limitation for Consultants.
See the General Section.
h. Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
See the General Section.
C. Reporting
1. Fiscal Year Activity Report.
Grantees are required to submit Form
HUD–9902, Housing Counseling
Activity Report, quarterly via HUD’s
web-based Housing Counseling System
(HCS). The information compiled from
this report provides HUD with its
primary means of measuring program
performance.
2. Program Outcome Logic Model. If
the actual award amount differs from
the proposed award, Grantees are
required to submit an updated Form
HUD–96010, Program Outcome Logic
Model, and a corresponding budget,
before the grant agreement will be
executed. Additionally, Grantees will be
required to submit an updated Form
HUD–96010, Program Outcome Logic
Model, reflecting actual achievements,
with each quarterly, midterm and final
report, in accordance with the reporting
requirements of the grant agreement.
The information in this form provides
the primary means through which HUD
will monitor the ongoing performance of
the grantee.
VII. Agency Contact(s)
A. Technical Assistance. For technical
assistance in downloading or submitting
an application package using
www.Grants.gov, contact the Grants.gov
support desk at 800–518–Grants or by
sending an e-mail to
support@grants.gov.
B. Programmatic Information. For
program related information, LHCAs
and SHFAs should contact the HOC
serving their area, as indicated below.
Intermediaries should contact HUD
Headquarters, Program Support Division
at (202) 708–0317 (this is not a toll-free
number).
Hearing and speech challenged
persons may access the telephone
numbers listed below by calling the
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
Homeownership center
States
Philadelphia Homeownership Center:
Ms. Brenda Bellisario, Director, Program Support Division,
Wannamaker Building, 100 Penn Square East, 12th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107–3389. For programmatic information contact:
Robert Wright, Robert_Wright@hud.gov, (215) 656–0527 x3406.
Atlanta Homeownership Center:
Ms. Gayle Knowlson, Director, Program Support Division, 40 Marietta Street, 8th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303–2806. For programmatic
information
contact:
E.
Carolyn
Hogans,
E._Carolyn_Hogans@hud.gov, (404) 331–5001, x2129.
Denver Homeownership Center:
Ms. Irma Devich, Director, Program Support Division, 1670 Broadway, Denver, CO 80202–4801. For programmatic information
contact: Vic Karels, 303–675–1640, Victor_E._Karels@hud.gov.
Santa Ana Homeownership Center:
Mr. Jerrold Mayer, Director, Program Support Division, Santa Ana
Federal Building, 34 Civic Center Plaza, Room 7015, Santa Ana,
CA 92701–4003. For programmatic information contact: Rhonda
J. Rivera, rhonda_j._rivera@hud.gov, 1–888–827–5605 x3210.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VIII. Other Information
A. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
an informational broadcast via satellite
for potential applicants to learn more
about the program, the FY2007 Logic
Model requirements, and the
application. For more information about
the date and time of the broadcast,
consult the HUD Web site at: https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
11537
Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia.
Alabama, Puerto Rico, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee.
Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri,
Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South
Dakota, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming.
Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, Washington.
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2502–0261. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
average 68 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, semi-annual
reports and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
BILLING CODE 4210–01–P
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.012
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11538
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant
Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and
Operation Lead Elimination Action
Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: LeadBased Paint Hazard Control Program,
Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration
Program, and Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program).
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–20; OMB Approval Number
2539–0015.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): 14.900
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control in
Privately Owned Housing and 14.905
Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration
Program, and 14.903 Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program.
F. Dates: Applications must be
received and validated by Grants.gov no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on
May 18, 2007 for the Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Control and Operation Lead
Elimination Action Programs, and the
application deadline date for the Lead
Hazard Reduction Demonstration is May
30, 2007. See the General Section for
specific instructions regarding
application submission.
G. Additional Overview Content
Information:
1. Purpose of the Program.
a. The purpose of the Lead-Based
Paint Hazard Control Program is to
assist states, Native American Tribes,
and local governments in undertaking
comprehensive programs to identify and
control lead-based paint hazards in
eligible privately owned housing for
rental or owner-occupants.
b. The purpose of the Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration Grant
Program is the same as the Lead-Based
Paint Hazard Control, but the Lead
Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant
Program is targeted for urban
jurisdictions with the highest lead-based
paint hazard control needs.
c. The purpose of the Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program is to
provide grants to private sector and nonprofit organizations to leverage funds for
addressing lead hazards in privately
owned housing units and eliminating
lead poisoning as a major public health
threat to young children.
2. Available Funds. Approximately
$148.4 million (Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Control Program, Lead Hazard
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Reduction Demonstration Program and
Lead Elimination Action Program).
3. Eligible Applicants.
a. To be eligible to apply for funding
under the Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Control (LBPHC) Grant Program, the
applicant must be a state, Native
American Tribe, city, county, or other
unit of local government. Multiple units
of a local government (or multiple local
governments) may apply as a
consortium; however, you must identify
a lead applicant that will be responsible
for ensuring compliance with all
requirements specified in this NOFA.
State government and Native American
tribal applicants must have an
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
authorized lead-based paint training and
certification program.
b. To be eligible to apply for the Lead
Hazard Reduction Demonstration
(LHRD) Grant Program, the applicant
must be a city, county, Native American
Tribe, or other unit of local government.
The applicant must have at least 3,500
pre-1940 occupied rental housing units,
as listed at the 2000 Census Web site
identified in Form HUD 96013, Need/
Extent of the Problem. In addition, a
State may apply on behalf of one or
more of the eligible local jurisdictions if
it has an EPA-authorized lead-based
paint training and certification program.
A list of eligible applicants can be
downloaded with the application from
www.grants.gov/Applicants/
Apply_for_grants.jsp in Appendix A.
c. To be eligible to apply for funding
under the Operation Lead Elimination
Action Program (LEAP), the applicant
must be a non-profit or for-profit entity
or firm. For-profit institutions are not
allowed to earn a fee. Colleges and
Universities are also eligible to apply.
National and local groups are
encouraged to apply. States, cities,
counties and units of local government
and their departments are not eligible.
4. Match. See NOFA Criteria by Grant
Program Chart in Section III, Eligibility
Information.
5. Information on application. The
applications for this NOFA can be found
at https://www.grants.gov. The General
Section contains information about
Grants.gov registration, submission
requirements, and submission
procedures.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Description. The LeadBased Paint Hazard Control Program
(LBPHC), the Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program (LHRD)
and the Operation Lead Elimination
Action Program (LEAP) are authorized
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11539
by Section 1011 of the Residential LeadBased Paint Hazard Reduction Act of
1992 (Title X of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1992,
Pub. L. 102–550). HUD’s authority for
making funding available under this
NOFA for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Control Program, the Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program and the
Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration
Program is the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007).
The Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control
Grant Program assists states, Native
American Tribes and local governments,
and the Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Program assists urban
jurisdictions with the highest lead-based
paint hazard control needs, in
undertaking programs for the
identification and control of lead-based
paint hazards in eligible privately
owned rental and owner-occupied
housing units. Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program (LEAP)
provides grants to private sector and
non-profit organizations to leverage
funds for addressing lead hazards in
privately owned housing units and
eliminating lead poisoning as a major
public health threat to young children.
HUD is interested in promoting lead
hazard control approaches that result in
the reduction of elevated blood lead
levels in children for the maximum
number of low-income families with
children under six years of age, for the
longest period of time, and that
demonstrate techniques which are costeffective, efficient, and replicable
elsewhere. Refer to the HUD Web site
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/regs/
leadtitlex.pdf to obtain information on
Title X. HUD’s Lead Safe Housing
Regulation is available at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/lead/leadsaferule/
LSHRFinal21June04.rtf, and the
companion interpretive guidance
publication at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/lead/leadsaferule/
LSHRGuidance21June04.rtf. If you
cannot access the information you can
call the NOFA Information Center at
800–HUD–8929. If you are a hearing- or
speech-impaired person, you may
request the information by telephone
TTY by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at 800–877–
8339.
Because lead-based paint is a national
problem, these funds will be awarded to
programs that will fulfill the following
objectives:
1. Maximize the combination of
children less than six years of age
protected from lead poisoning and
housing units where lead-hazards are
controlled;
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11540
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
2. Target the reduction of elevated
blood lead levels in children for the
maximum number of low-income
families with children less than six
years of age, for the longest period of
time;
3. Stimulate lower-cost and costeffective methods and approaches to
lead hazard control work that can be
replicated;
4. Build local capacity to safely and
effectively address lead hazards during
lead hazard control, renovation,
remodeling, and maintenance activities
by integrating lead safe work practices
into housing maintenance, repair,
weatherization, rehabilitation, and other
programs that will continue beyond the
grant period;
5. Affirmatively further fair housing
and environmental justice;
6. Develop a comprehensive
community approach to address lead
hazards in housing by mobilizing public
and private resources, involving
cooperation among all levels of
government, the private sector, and
grassroots community-based non-profit
organizations, including faith-based
organizations, to develop cost-effective
methods for identifying and controlling
lead-based paint hazards;
7. Establish a public registry (listing)
of lead-safe housing or inclusion of the
lead-safe status of properties in a
publicly accessible address-based
property information system to be
affirmatively marketed to families with
young children; and
8. To the greatest extent feasible,
promote job training, employment, and
other economic opportunities for lowincome and minority residents and
businesses that are owned by and/or
employ minorities and low-income
persons as defined in 24 CFR 135.5 (see
59 FR 33881, published June 30, 1994).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Changes in the FY 2007 NOFA
1. A total of 150 pages for the entire
application including narrative
responses, attachments, tables,
appendices, and other required forms.
2. All contributions above the
statutory match requirement should be
reported as leveraged contributions.
3. The Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program has a 10
percent match requirement and an 80
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
percent direct Lead Hazard Control cost
requirement.
II. Award Information
A. Funding Available. From current
and past years’ funding, approximately
$76.4 million will be available for the
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control
Program, approximately $54.7 million
will be available for the Lead-Based
Paint Hazard Reduction Grant Program,
and approximately $17.3 million will be
available for Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program.
1. Approximately 26 to 40 grants will
be awarded to applicants for the LeadBased Paint Hazard Control Program.
Approximately 14 to 22 grants will be
awarded to applicants for the Lead
Hazard Reduction Demonstration
Program, and approximately 9 to 12
grants will be awarded to applicants for
Operation Lead Elimination Action
Program. Grant award amounts for the
entire period of performance for LeadBased Paint Hazard Control Program
grants shall be from approximately $1
million up to a maximum of $3 million
per grant, for the Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration Program
grants, from approximately $1 million
up to a maximum of $4 million per
grant, and for Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program (LEAP)
grants a maximum of $2 million per
grant. Applications for amounts larger
than the applicable maximum amount
for a program will be deemed ineligible
and will not be reviewed.
2. The start date for grants is expected
to be no later than October 1, 2007. The
period of performance shall not exceed
36 months. Period of performance
extensions for delays due to conditions
beyond the grantee’s control will be
considered by HUD in accordance with
24 CFR 84.25(e)(2) or 85.30(d)(2), as
applicable, and the OHHLHC Program
Guide. Such extensions, when granted,
are one time only, and for no longer
than a period of one year from the
original period of performance end date.
B. Contracts or Other Formal
Arrangements.
1. If selected for funding, grantees are
required to maintain a contract
administration system to ensure subgrantee and contractor conformance
with the terms, conditions, and
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
specifications of contracts. Grantees
must enter into written contracts or
agreements with sub-grantees and
contractors, which identify specific
services to be provided such as:
• Staffing requirements,
• Time periods for the performance of
work,
• Project budget, and total amount of
compensation to be provided,
• Methods and documentation
requirements for obtaining
reimbursement of expenses,
• Record keeping and reporting
requirements,
• Requirements placed upon the subgrantee or contractor to comply with
applicable federal laws, regulations,
circulars, and Executive Orders,
• Provisions for the grantee with
access to financial and other documents
and files for the purpose of monitoring
sub-grantee or contractor performance
and compliance with the local contract
or agreement, and applicable Federal
laws, regulations, circulars and
Executive orders.
2. All applicants are encouraged to
enter into formal arrangements with
grassroots community-based non-profit
organizations, including faith-based
organizations, or other communitybased organizations, particularly if such
organizations will be reimbursed for
eligible activities under this NOFA.
(This does not apply to Native American
Tribes.) These formal arrangements
could be a contract, a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU), a Memorandum
of Agreement (MOA), or a letter of
commitment. Such relationships should
be established prior to the actual
execution of an award or within 120
days of the effective start date of the
grant agreement.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
See the General Section for additional
eligibility requirements applicable to
HUD Programs. See chart below that
describes eligible applicants, match
percentage requirement, minimum
percentage of federal funds for direct
lead hazard control activities, and
maximum administrative cost.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11541
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
MATCH REQUIREMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS BY GRANT PROGRAMS
Percent of HUD award
Programs
Eligible applicants
Match
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Lead-Based Paint Hazard
State, Native American Tribe, city, county, or other unit
Control Program (LBPHC).
of local government. Multiple units of a local government (or multiple local governments) may apply as a
consortium; however, you must identify a lead applicant that will be responsible for ensuring compliance
with all requirements specified in this NOFA. State
government and Native American tribal applicants
must have an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
authorized lead-based paint training and certification
program.
Lead hazard Reduction
City, county, Native American Tribe, or other unit of local
Demonstration (LHRD).
government. The applicant must have at least 3,500
pre-1940 occupied rental housing units, as listed at
the 2000 Census Web site identified in Form HUD
96013, Need/Extent of the Problem. In addition, a
State may apply on behalf of one or more of the eligible local jurisdictions if it has an EPA-authorized leadbased paint training and certification program. A list of
eligible applicants can be downloaded with the application from www.grants.gov, in Appendix A.
Operation Lead Elimination
For-profit and non-profit entities; colleges and univerAction Program (LEAP).
sities; and national and local groups. For profit institutions are not allowed to earn a fee.
B. Cost Sharing and Match
This section applies to all three grant
programs. See Chart above for statutory
match requirements. Match and
Leverage Guidance in Appendix B can
be downloaded with the application
from https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If an applicant
does not meet the minimum
requirements of 10 percent match for
LBPHC it will be considered ineligible
for an award.
Under Rating Factor 4, Leveraging,
HUD provides rating points to
applicants that documenting additional
resources to increase the scope or
effectiveness of the proposed program
activities. For the LBPHC and LHRD
that have a required match, HUD will
award points to applicants that provide
additional resources over required
match amount. For LEAP applicants,
which has no matching requirement,
HUD will award points based upon the
amount of resources that are leveraged
by the applicant. The larger the amount
of funds or in-kind services that are
secured by the applicant, the higher the
number of points that will be awarded
under Rating Factor 4. For all programs,
match and/or leverage contributions
may be in the form of cash including
private sector funding, or in-kind (noncash) contributions or a combination of
these sources. With the exception of
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds, or other programs that
allow their funds to be considered local
funds and therefore eligible to be used
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Direct lead hazard control costs
Administrative
cost
10% ..................
Minimum 65% ...
Maximum 10%.
10% ..................
Minimum 80% ...
Maximum 10%.
None .................
Minimum 65% ...
Maximum 10%.
as matching funds, federal funds may
not be used to satisfy any statutorily
required matching requirement, as
applicable. Both CDBG and other local
funds must be used for otherwise
eligible grant-related lead hazard control
activities to be eligible as match or
leverage funds. For cash and in kind
match and leveraged contributions, the
applicant must submit a letter of
commitment, signed by an official of the
organization legally able to make
commitments on behalf of the
organization. The letter must indicate
the amount and source, and detail how
the contribution will support the
proposed grant program. The signature
of the authorized official on the Form
SF–424 is deemed as official
documentation of commitment of match
or other contributed resources of the
applicant organization. A separate letter
from the applicant organization is not
required. For LEAP applicants, a
leveraged resource only from the private
sector is considered eligible. All
matching and leveraged contributions
shall be used for the same purposes as
allowed for by the federal funds.
C. Other
1. Eligible Costs and Activities. This
section applies to all three grant
programs unless otherwise specified.
All lead hazard control activities
funded under the LBPHC, LHRD and
LEAP must be conducted in compliance
with the applicable requirements of
HUD’s Lead-Safe Housing Regulation,
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
24 CFR part 35, and the companion
Interpretive Guidance publication.
Activities must also comply with any
additional requirements in effect under
a state or Tribal Lead-Based Paint
Training and Certification Program that
has been authorized by the EPA
pursuant to 40 CFR 745.320.
There are, in general, four categories
of eligible costs under each competitive
grant program included in this NOFA:
(1) Direct costs for lead-based paint
hazard identification and control
activities, (2) other direct costs, (3)
indirect costs, and (4) administrative
costs.
a. Definition of Direct Costs and
Description of Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Identification and Control Activities.
Direct costs are defined as the
allocable portion of allowable costs
incurred directly for the purposes of the
grant. Direct costs for lead hazard
control activities consist of lead dust,
soil and paint-chip testing and
associated laboratory costs, the purchase
or lease of a maximum of two X-ray
fluorescence analyzers (if not otherwise
available), and XRF maintenance, lead
paint inspection and risk assessments,
interim controls, abatement of leadbased paint or lead-based paint hazards
(see section C.1(a)(4)(b) for abatement
limitations), occupant protection and
temporary relocation of occupants when
lead hazard control work supported by
this program is conducted in a unit, and
clearance examinations. Direct costs for
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11542
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
lead-based paint hazard identification
and control activities do not include
universal blood lead testing, housing
rehabilitation beyond what is
specifically required to carry out
effective lead hazard control, training,
community education and outreach,
applied research and purchase of
supplies or equipment and
administrative costs. Eligible activities
to meet the minimum 65% (LBPHC and
LEAP) or 80% (LHRD) direct lead
hazard control costs, as applicable, are
as follows:
(1) Performing lead dust, soil and
paint-chip testing, lead-based paint
inspections, risk assessments, clearance
examination, and engineering and
architectural activities that are required
for, and in direct support of, interim
control and lead hazard abatement
work, of eligible housing units
constructed prior to 1978 to determine
the presence of lead-based paint and/or
lead hazards from paint, dust, or soil
through the use of acceptable testing
procedures.
(2) All laboratory analysis in support
of required testing and evaluation under
this NOFA must be conducted by a
laboratory recognized for the analysis by
the EPA National Lead Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NLLAP).
(3) All lead-based paint testing
results, summaries of lead-based paint
hazard control treatments, and
clearances must be provided to the
owner of the unit, together with a notice
describing the owner’s legal duty to
disclose the results to tenants and
buyers. Grantee files must contain
verifiable evidence of providing lead
hazard control reports, such as a signed
and dated receipt. Refer to 24 CFR
35.125 of the Lead Safe Housing
Regulation.
(4) All lead-based paint hazards
identified in housing units and in
common areas of multifamily housing
enrolled in this grant program must be
controlled or eliminated by either of the
following strategies or a combination of
the two;
(a) Interim Controls. According to the
HUD Guidelines, interim controls of
lead-based paint hazards including leadcontaminated dust and soil in housing
must include specialized cleaning
techniques to address lead dust.
(b) Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Abatement. Abatement of all lead-based
paint or lead-based paint hazards is
generally authorized only in states or
localities that require complete
abatement by law. HUD does not
consider abatement of all lead-based
paint to be cost effective in most
circumstances; therefore, a grantee must
make a special request in writing prior
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
to conducting complete abatement of
lead-based paint or lead-based paint
hazards. Abatement of leadcontaminated soil should be limited to
areas with bare soil in the immediate
vicinity of the structure (i.e., the drip
line or foundation of the unit being
treated, and children’s play areas).
(5) Undertaking minimal housing
rehabilitation activities that are
specifically required to carry out
effective hazard control, and without
which the hazard control could not be
completed and maintained. These grant
funds may be used for lead hazard
control work done in conjunction with
other housing rehabilitation programs,
to the extent practicable. HUD
encourages integration of this grant
program with housing rehabilitation,
maintenance, weatherization, and other
energy conservation activities.
(6) Carrying out temporary relocation
of families and individuals while the
remediation is conducted and until the
time the affected unit receives clearance
for re-occupancy. See Section III.C.4.e,
Real Property Acquisition and
Relocation of the General Section and
Section VI.B.4 of this NOFA for
discussion of regulations that apply
when relocating families.
b. Description of Eligible Other Direct
Costs.
(1) Purchasing or leasing equipment
having a per-unit cost under $5,000
(except for the purchase or lease of up
to two X-ray florescence analyzers used
by the grant program).
(2) Performing blood lead testing and
air sampling to protect the health of the
hazard control workers, supervisors,
and contractors.
(3) Conducting pre-hazard control
blood lead testing of children under six
years of age residing in or frequently
visiting units undergoing lead hazard
control work.
(4) Conducting targeted outreach,
affirmative marketing, education or
outreach programs on lead hazard
control and lead poisoning prevention
designed to increase the ability of the
program to deliver lead hazard control
services including educating owners of
rental properties, tenants, and others on
the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Reduction Act, Lead-Safe Housing Rule,
and applicable provisions of the Fair
Housing Act especially as it pertains to
familial status (e.g., families with
children) and disability discrimination,
offering educational materials in
languages that are common in the
community other than English,
consistent with HUD’s published
Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Recipient Guidance, 68 FR 70968, and
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
providing training on lead-safe
maintenance and renovation practices
and management. Upon request, this
also would include making all materials
available in alternative formats to
persons with disabilities (e.g., Braille,
audio, and large type).
(5) Supporting data collection,
analysis, and evaluation of grant
program activities. This includes
compiling and delivering such data as
may be required by HUD.
(6) Preparing a final report at the
conclusion of grant activities.
(7) Providing resources to build
capacity for lead-safe housing and lead
hazard control, including free delivery
of HUD-approved lead-safe work
practices training courses for housing
rehabilitation contractors, rehabilitation
workers, homeowners, renters, painters,
remodelers, maintenance staff, and
others conducting renovation,
rehabilitation, maintenance or other
work in private housing; free delivery of
lead sampling technician training, leadbased paint worker or contractor
certification training; and subsidies for
licensing or certification fees to lowincome persons seeking credentials as
lead-based paint workers or contractors
or lead sampling technicians.
(8) Conducting planning,
coordination, and training activities to
comply with HUD’s Lead-Safe Housing
Regulation (24 CFR part 35, subparts B–
R). These activities should support the
expansion of a workforce properly
trained in lead-safe work practices that
is available to conduct interim controls
on HUD-assisted housing covered by
these regulations.
(9) Conducting outreach and related
activities that will result in increased
lead hazard control activities in lowincome privately owned or owneroccupied housing with lead-based paint
hazards. For LEAP grants, outreach and/
or related activities, must be tied to a
leveraging strategy.
(10) Participating in applied research,
studies, or developing information
systems to enhance the delivery,
analysis, or conduct of lead hazard
control activities, or to facilitate
targeting and consolidating resources to
further childhood lead poisoning
prevention efforts.
c. For reference to the Administrative
Cost requirements, please see Appendix
D, which can be downloaded with the
application from https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
d. For reference to the Indirect Cost
requirements see Appendix C, which
can be downloaded with the application
from https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
2. Eligibility of HUD-Assisted
Housing. The Table 10, ‘‘Eligibility of
HUD Assisted Housing,’’ that lists the
housing units that may participate
under each of the three competitive
programs detailed in this NOFA can be
downloaded with the application from
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
3. Threshold Requirements. To be an
eligible applicant, you must meet all of
the threshold requirements in Section
III.C of the General Section as well as
any specific threshold requirements
listed in this subsection. Applications
will not be funded if they do not meet
the threshold requirements.
a. Applicants under the Lead-Based
Paint Hazard Control and Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration Programs are
required to match 10 percent of the
funds requested with other funds or
resources. There is no match
requirement for LEAP.
b. Applicants under the Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration Program must
be a city, county, Native American
Tribe, or other unit of local government.
The applicant must have at least 3,500
pre-1940 occupied rental housing units,
as listed at the 2000 Census Web site
identified in Form HUD 96013, Need/
Extent of the Problem. A list of eligible
applicants can be downloaded with the
application from https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. In
addition, a State may apply on behalf of
one or more of the eligible local
jurisdictions if it has an EPA-authorized
lead-based paint training and
certification program. There is no
minimum threshold requirement for the
number of pre-1940 occupied units for
LBPHC or LEAP.
c. All applicants under the Lead
Hazard Reduction Demonstration
Program must provide the actual
number of children with documented
elevated blood levels residing within
the jurisdiction(s) where the lead hazard
control work will be conducted for the
most recent twelve-month period
available since January 1, 2003 and
identify the source of the data. Failure
to provide these data will result in the
application not being rated or ranked.
d. EPA Authorization. If you are a
state government or Native American
Tribal government, you must have an
EPA-authorized Lead-Based Paint
Training and Certification Program in
effect, on the application deadline date,
to be eligible to apply for Lead Based
Paint Hazard Control and Lead Hazard
Control Reduction Demonstration Grant
funds. The approval date in the Federal
Register notice published by the EPA
will be used in determining the Training
and Certification status of the applicant
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
state or Native American Tribal
government. If you do not have an EPA
authorized program on the application
submission date, the application will
not be rated or ranked. Further, if you
do not have an EPA authorized program
on the grant award date, you will not be
awarded a grant under this NOFA.
e. Consolidated Plans. (This
requirement does not apply to Native
American Tribes.) You must submit, as
an appendix, the current lead-based
paint element from the approved
Consolidated Plan of the jurisdiction(s)
where the lead-based paint hazard
control will be conducted. In lieu of
submitting a hard copy of the lead-based
paint element from the current
consolidated plan(s), you may substitute
a Web site address. The Web site must
contain the lead-based paint element of
the current Consolidated Plan(s). If the
jurisdiction does not have a currently
approved Consolidated Plan, but is
otherwise eligible for LBPHC and LHRD
grant programs, you must include the
jurisdiction’s abbreviated Consolidated
Plan, which includes a lead-based paint
hazard control strategy developed in
accordance with 24 CFR 91.235. You
should include the discussion of any
lead-based paint issues in your
jurisdiction’s Analysis of Impediments,
particularly as it addresses your target
areas.
f. An applicant requesting a grant
amount greater than the maximum grant
award amount will be deemed ineligible
and not reviewed or rated.
g. Applications that do not have either
a narrative response to the rating factors
or form HUD–424 CBW Budget
worksheet will not be reviewed or rated.
h. Fiscal Year 2006 awardees of
LBPHC, LHRD, reopened LHRD, or
LEAP grants, are not eligible to apply for
any of these three programs during this
competitive NOFA cycle.
i. Applicants may submit up to one
application for each of the competitive
programs covered by this NOFA for
which they are eligible.
4. Environmental Requirements
a. Recipients of Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Control Grants and Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration grants must
comply with 24 CFR part 58,
Environmental Review Procedures for
Entities Assuming HUD Environmental
Responsibilities, and must carry out
environmental review responsibilities as
a responsible entity under part 58.
b. Work on properties assisted with
LEAP funds under this NOFA is covered
by the provisions of section 305(c) of the
Multifamily Housing Property
Disposition Reform Act of 1994, which
are implemented by HUD regulations at
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11543
24 CFR part 50. Under part 50, a
responsible entity, usually a local
government unit, must assume the
environmental review responsibilities
for activities funded under LEAP. Under
24 CFR 50.3(h), if a responsible entity or
the recipient objects to the responsible
entity performing the environmental
review for LEAP activities, HUD may
designate another responsible entity to
perform the review or may perform the
environmental review itself under the
provisions of 24 CFR part 50.
c. For all grants under this NOFA,
recipients and other participants in the
project are prohibited from undertaking,
or committing or expending HUD or
non-HUD funds (including leveraged or
match funds) on a project or activities
under this NOFA (on activities other
than listed in 24 CFR 58.34, 58.35(b) or
58.22(f)) until the responsible entity
completes an environmental review and
the applicant submits and HUD
approves a Request for the Release of
Funds and the responsible entity’s
environmental certification (both on
form HUD 7015.15). In the case of LEAP
grants, the grantee must await HUD’s
completing the review and notifying the
grantee of the approval of the
environmental review before initiating
work. The results of the environmental
review may require that proposed
activities be modified or proposed sites
may be rejected. The results of the
environmental reviews may require that
proposed activities be modified or
proposed sites rejected. For part 58
procedures, see https://www.hud.gov/
offices/cpd/energyenviron/environment/
index.cfm. For assistance, contact
Edward Thomas, the Office of Healthy
Homes and Lead Hazard Control
Environmental Officer at (215) 861–
7670 (this is not a toll-free number) or
the HUD Environmental Review Officer
in the HUD Field Office serving your
area. If you are a hearing- or speechimpaired person, you may reach the
telephone number via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339. Recipients
of a grant under these funded programs
will be given additional guidance in
these environmental responsibilities.
5. Administrative and Other
Requirements. If awarded a grant, you
must comply with the requirements and
maintain appropriate documentation to
demonstrate compliance with the
requirements specified below. The
requirements apply to all grant
programs unless otherwise specified.
a. Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction
Act of 1992 (Title X of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1992),
Section 1011. Section 217 of Public Law
104–134 (the Omnibus Consolidated
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11544
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Rescissions and Appropriations Act of
1996, 110 Stat. 1321, approved April 26,
1996) amended Section 1011(a) of the
Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) to read
as follows:
‘‘Section 1011. Grants for Lead-Based
Paint Hazard Reduction in Target
Housing
‘‘(a) General Authority. The Secretary
is authorized to provide grants to
eligible applicants to evaluate and
reduce lead-based paint hazards in
housing that is not federally assisted
housing, federally owned housing, or
public housing, in accordance with the
provisions of this section. Grants shall
only be made under this section to
provide assistance for housing that
meets the following criteria—
‘‘(1) for grants made to assist rental
housing, at least 50 percent of the units
must be occupied by or made available
to families with incomes at or below 50
percent of the area median income level
and the remaining units shall be
occupied or made available to families
with incomes at or below 80 percent of
the area median income level, and in all
cases the landlord shall give priority in
renting units assisted under this section,
for not less than 3 years following the
completion of lead abatement activities,
to families with a child under the age of
six years, except that buildings with five
or more units may have 20 percent of
the units occupied by families with
incomes above 80 percent of area
median income level;
‘‘(2) for grants made to assist housing
owned by owner-occupants, all units
assisted with grants under this section
shall be the principal residence of
families with income at or below 80
percent of the area median income level,
and not less than 90 percent of the units
assisted with grants under this section
shall be occupied by a child under the
age of six years or shall be units where
a child under the age of six years spends
a significant amount of time visiting.’’
(1) Trained and Certified
Professionals. Funded activities must be
conducted by persons qualified for the
activities according to 24 CFR part 35,
subparts B–R (possessing certification as
abatement contractors, risk assessors,
inspectors, abatement workers, or
sampling technicians, or others having
been trained in a HUD-approved course
in lead-safe work practices).
(2) Lead hazard evaluation and
control work must be conducted in
compliance with HUD’s Lead Safe
Housing Rule, 24 CFR part 35, the HUD
Guidelines, and applicable federal, state
and local regulations and guidance.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(3) You must document the income
and family composition of occupants of
units assisted to meet Title X
requirements. Identify the key staff who
will certify as to the eligibility of each
unit assisted under the grant based on
the determination of income, and when
required, the presence of a child under
six years of age.
6. Prohibited Practices. You must not
engage in the following prohibited
practices:
a. Open flame burning or torching;
b. Machine sanding or grinding
without a high-efficiency particulate air
(HEPA) exhaust control;
c. Uncontained hydroblasting or highpressure wash;
d. Abrasive blasting or sandblasting
without HEPA exhaust control;
e. Heat guns operating above 1,100
degrees Fahrenheit;
f. Chemical paint strippers containing
methylene chloride or other volatile
hazardous chemicals in a poorly
ventilated space; and
g. Dry scraping or dry sanding, except
scraping in conjunction with heat guns
or around electrical outlets or when
treating no more than two square feet in
any one interior room or space, or
totaling no more than 20 square feet on
exterior surfaces.
7. Written Policies and Procedures.
You must have clearly established,
written policies and procedures for
eligibility, program marketing, unit
selection, expediting work on homes
occupied by children with elevated
blood lead levels, and all phases of lead
hazard control, including risk
assessment, inspection, development of
specifications, pre-hazard control blood
lead testing, financing, temporary
relocation and clearance examination.
Grantees, subcontractors, sub-grantees,
sub-recipients, and their contractors
must adhere to these policies and
procedures.
8. Continued Availability of Lead-Safe
Housing to Low-Income Families. Units
in which lead hazards have been
controlled under this program shall be
occupied by or continue to be available
to low-income residents as required by
Title X (Section 1011). You must
maintain a publicly available registry
(listing) of units in which lead hazards
have been controlled and ensure that
these units are affirmatively marketed to
agencies and families as suitable
housing for families with children less
than six years of age. The grantee must
also provide the owner with the lead
hazard evaluation and control
information generated by activities
under this grant, so that the owner can
comply with his/her disclosure
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
requirements under 24 CFR part 35,
Subpart A.
9. Testing. In developing your
application budget, include costs for
lead paint inspection, risk assessment,
and clearance examination for each
dwelling that will receive lead hazard
control, as follows:
a. General. All testing and sampling
shall comply with the Lead Safe
Housing Rule and conform to the
current HUD Guidelines, the EPA lead
hazard standards at 40 CFR part 745,
and federal, state, or tribal regulations
developed as part of the appropriate
contractor certification program,
whichever is most stringent.
b. Lead-Based Paint and Lead-Based
Paint Hazard Identification. A leadbased paint inspection and risk
assessment is required.
c. Clearance Testing. If rehabilitation
is conducted in conjunction with lead
hazard control, clearance may be
conducted either after the lead hazard
control work is completed, and again
after any subsequent rehabilitation work
is completed, or after all of the lead
hazard control and rehabilitation work
is completed. Clearance shall be
successfully completed before reoccupancy.
10. Blood lead testing. Each child
under six years of age should be tested
for lead poisoning within the six
months preceding the lead hazard
control work. Any child with an
elevated blood lead level must be
referred for appropriate medical followup. The standards for such testing are
described in the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC)
publications Preventing Lead Poisoning
in Young Children (1991), and
Screening Young Children for Lead
Poisoning: Guidance for State and Local
Public Health Officials (1997).
11. Cooperation With Related
Research and Evaluation. You shall
cooperate fully with any research or
evaluation sponsored by HUD, CDC,
EPA or another government agency
associated with this grant program,
including preservation of project data
and records and compiling requested
information in formats provided by the
researchers, evaluators or HUD. This
also may include the compiling of
certain relevant local demographic,
dwelling unit, and participant data not
contemplated in your original proposal.
Participant data shall be subject to the
Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA). HIPAA and the Privacy
Rule can be found at www.hhs.gov/ocr/
hipaa.
12. Data Collection. You shall collect,
maintain, and provide to HUD the data
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
necessary to document and evaluate
grant program outputs and outcomes.
13. Financial Control. Financial
control systems shall be established
including methods and procedures to
ensure that only grant eligible expenses
are charged to the grant as reimbursable
expenses or project match; that
appropriate documentation of time
worked on and charged to the grant is
maintained; that no more than 10
percent of grant funds are used for
administrative costs and that indirect
cost allocation plans are updated
annually.
14. Section 3 Employment
Opportunities. Please refer to Section
III.C of the General Section. The
requirements of Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) are applicable to
this program. This sub-factor will be
evaluated on the extent to which an
applicant describes how it proposes to:
a. Provide opportunities to train and
employ Section 3 residents; and
b. Award contracts to Section 3
contractors, as each of those terms is
defined in the regulations, 24 CFR Part
135. Applicants that demonstrate their
responsiveness to the section 3
requirements may receive up to 2 points
(see Rating Factor 3). Annual
submission of Form HUD–60002 is
required. Regulations regarding the
provision of Section 3 of the Housing
and Urban Development Act of 1968 can
be located at 24 CFR Part 135.
15. Replacing Existing Resources.
Funds received under the grant
programs covered under this NOFA
shall not be used to replace existing
community resources dedicated to any
ongoing project.
16. Certifications and Assurances. By
signing the SF–424, you are agreeing to
the certifications and assurances listed
in the General Section and this NOFA.
17. Code of Conduct. If awarded
assistance, you will be required, prior to
entering into a grant agreement with
HUD, to submit a copy of your Code of
Conduct and describe the methods you
will use to ensure that all officers,
employees, and agents of your
organization are aware of your Code of
Conduct. An applicant who submitted
an application during FY2005 or
FY2006 and included a copy of its code
of conduct will not be required to
submit another copy if the applicant is
listed on HUD’s Web site https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
codeofconduct/cconduct.cfm. An
applicant must also include a copy of its
code of conduct if the information listed
on the above Web site has changed (e.g.,
the person who submitted the previous
application is no longer your authorized
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
organization representative, the
organization has changed its legal name
or merged with another organization, or
the address of the organization has
changed, etc.). Refer to the General
Section for further information about
the Code of Conduct requirements.
18. Lead-Safe Work Practice Training
Activities. Under the Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Control Grant Program, you are
encouraged to provide resources to
promote the expansion of a workforce
that is:
—Properly trained in lead-safe work
practices;
—Available to conduct interim controls
and/or lead hazard abatement;
—Able to follow lead-safe work
practices while performing work on
HUD assisted housing units; and
—Able to safely repair, rehabilitate, and
maintain other privately owned
residential property.
19. Coordination among Critical
Agencies.
a. Under the Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Control or Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration programs, you shall
participate in the state-wide or
jurisdiction-wide strategic plan to
eliminate childhood lead poisoning as a
major public health problem by 2010, or
assist in the development of a plan in
states or localities that do not have such
a plan. The CDC strategic elimination
plans for state and local childhood lead
poisoning prevention programs can be
downloaded from https://www.cdc.gov/
nceh/lead/StrategicElimPlans/
strategicplans.htm. Additionally, if
awarded lead hazard control or lead
hazard demonstration funds, you shall
enter into or extend existing
collaborative arrangements with
childhood lead poisoning prevention
programs among health agencies,
housing agencies, community
development agencies, and code
enforcement agencies (or equivalent) for
their target area(s), local jurisdiction(s),
and, for state or tribal applicants, with
their state or tribal health agencies,
housing agencies, development
agencies, and code enforcement
agencies (or equivalent). Arrangements
must describe how the health
department and the housing and/or
development agency have or will
consider enrolling housing units (or
multifamily buildings) in which one or
more children under age 6 years have
elevated blood lead levels, with priority
to housing where repeated and/or severe
cases of childhood lead poisoning have
occurred. HUD encourages LEAP
applicants to enter into such
agreements.
20. Work Plan. Upon award, you shall
develop a work plan including
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11545
measurable quarterly performance goals
and specific time-phased objectives for
each of the major activities and tasks
required to execute the project. These
major activities and tasks are outlined in
the Quarterly Progress Reporting System
(Form HUD–96006) and include:
Program Management and Capacity
Building including data collection and
program evaluation; Community
Education, Outreach and Training; and
Lead Hazard Activities including
testing, interventions, and temporary
relocation.
a. Describe how lead hazard units,
especially those known to house
elevated blood lead level children under
six years of age, will be identified,
selected, prioritized, and considered for
treatment under this grant and/or other
programs of the grantee or grantee’s
team members. An elevated blood lead
level is defined as an excessive
absorption of lead that is a confirmed
concentration of ten (10) micrograms of
lead per deciliter of whole blood.
You must demonstrate how you
consider housing units identified by
local health and child welfare agencies
where incidences of childhood lead
poisoning have occurred, particularly
those where multiple poisonings have
been reported, for enrollment into lead
hazard control treatment programs, as
well as demonstrate the use of other
sources of information on high priority
housing;
b. Your work plan should address
your jurisdiction’s Consolidated Plan
goals for pursuing community planning
and development and housing programs
relative to lead and other housingrelated issues that affect the health of
residents. The work plan must include
a detailed strategy to:
(1) Obtain data from state or local
health departments or from families
themselves (either directly, for example,
through service organizations that
families distribute their information) on
the addresses of housing units in which
children have been identified as lead
poisoned, as required by 24 CFR
91.100(a)(2).
(2) Continue or enter into
collaborative agreements or
arrangements with applicable state or
local health and child welfare agencies,
community development organizations,
and housing agencies and/or other
housing organizations to team with
HUD Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control,
Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration,
and LEAP grantees to identify and
address childhood lead poisoning in the
jurisdiction collaboratively, and
describe the methods for coordinating
among these agencies.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11546
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(3) Demonstrate specific steps and/or
actions that will be taken to ensure that
other resources in the community are
utilized to increase funding, provide
training, and to link with other local
programs engaged in lead hazard control
activities.
(4) Describe how the project will be
managed, and the timeline for staffing
the program, establishing a lead-based
paint contractor pool, and obtaining
HUD approval for the Request for the
Release of Funds (HUD Form 7015.15).
(5) Describe how assistance and
funding will flow from you to the actual
performers of the hazard reduction
work.
(6) Describe the selection process for
sub-grantees, sub-contractors, or subrecipients.
(7) Describe the financing mechanism
used to support lead hazard control
work in units (name of administering
agency, eligibility requirements, type of
financing, etc.), any owner matching
requirement, and the terms, conditions,
and amounts of assistance available,
include affordability terms and
provisions for forgiveness and recapture
of funds.
(8) Perform combined lead-based
paint inspection and risk assessment
procedures using the HUD Guidelines,
applicable sections of the Lead Safe
Housing Rule and use EPA standards to
identify lead hazards and to conduct
clearance testing.
(9) Describe the process for
developing work specifications and bids
on properties selected for lead hazard
control work.
(10) The specific intervention
methods and clearance procedures to be
conducted for units enrolled and
treated.
(11) The number of rental-occupied,
vacant, and owner-occupied units,
including the number of single-family
and multifamily units, proposed for
interim controls and hazard abatement.
(12) The occupant protection and
relocation plan for residents required to
be out of their homes during hazard
control activities. The relocation should
be in accordance with Section III.C.4.e.
(13) The outputs and overall
outcomes for community education,
outreach, and training activities,
including the nature and number of
events and the number of individuals to
receive education, outreach, and
training.
(14) The blood lead testing and other
measures to be undertaken to protect
children under six years of age and
other occupants of units undergoing
lead hazard control work.
(15) The evaluation process used to
measure program performance, with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
particular attention given to program
performance in the five key areas
evaluated by OHHLHC on a quarterly
basis (NOFA Rating Factor 5 response):
number of units inspected and risk
assessed; number of units cleared of
lead hazards; the amount of grant funds
disbursed through HUD’s Line of Credit
Control System (LOCCS); the number of
persons reached through outreach and
education efforts; and the number of
persons trained in lead hazard control
courses. For LEAP only, the quarterly
assessment will include one additional
performance measure, which is the
amount of leverage.
(16) The grantee’s accounting,
finance, and internal audit procedures;
(a) Procedures for tracking funds
obtained through government resources
(including HUD, other federal agencies,
and state and local governments), match
and leverage; and
(b) Procedures for the procurement
process and the reimbursement process
of vendors, contractors, and subgrantees.
(17) Quarterly performance
benchmarks. The benchmarks identified
in the work plan for a 36-month period
of performance are on the Work Plan
Development Worksheet with Minimum
Benchmark Standards for 36 Months—
Form HUD–96008. (You can download
Form HUD–96008 from https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp, in the application
instructions download section.) All
applicants are required to complete the
Factor 3 Table—Soundness of
Approach, and the Work Plan
Development Worksheet with Minimum
Benchmark Standards for 36 Months—
Form HUD–96008 for the purposes of
developing your work plan. Applicants
selected for award may be asked to
modify the work plan to reflect agreed
upon benchmarks determined during
pre-award negotiations.
21. Detailed Budget. Submit a detailed
budget that identifies the total budget
(federal share and matching and/or
leverage contribution) on Form HUD–
424 CBW and budget and cost
justification narrative for all budget
categories of your grant request. You
must provide a separate estimate for the
overall grant management element
(Administrative Costs), which is more
fully defined in Section IV.E of this
NOFA. All applicants must provide a
detailed budget for any subcontractors,
sub-grantees, or sub-recipients receiving
greater than 10 percent of the federal
budget request. In the event of a
discrepancy between grant amounts
requested in various sections of the
application, the amount you indicate on
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
the Form SF–424 will govern as the
correct value.
22. Institutional Review Board (IRB).
Indicate if your program includes
conducting research involving human
subjects in a manner which requires IRB
approval and periodic monitoring under
24 CFR part 60, which incorporates the
Department of Health and Human
Service’s regulations, at 45 CFR part 46.
For additional information on what
constitutes human subjects’ research or
how to obtain an institutional
assurance, see the Department of Health
and Human Services, Office of Human
Research Protection (OHRP) Web site at
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/.
IV. Application and Submission
Procedures
A. Address to Request Application
Package
See the General Section for specific
procedures concerning the electronic
application submission requirements.
The application and Instructions are
available at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. If you
have difficulty accessing the
information, you may call the help desk
help line at (800) 518–GRANTS or emailing support@grants.gov.
Guidebook and Further Information:
HUD provides a Desktop User Guide to
Find, Register and Apply for Grant
Opportunities using Grants.gov. The
Desktop User Guide is available on
HUD’s Web site at https://www.hud.gov/
utilities/intercept.cfm?/offices/adm/
grants/deskuserguide.pdf. If you have
difficulty accessing the information, you
may call HUD’s NOFA Information
Center at (800–HUD 8929. If you are a
hearing-or speech-impaired person, you
may request the information by
telephone TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
Applicants eligible to apply under
this NOFA are to follow the submission
requirements described below:
1. Applicant Information
a. Application Format.
(1) Application including narrative
responses, attachments, tables,
appendices, and other required forms
should be limited to a total of 150 pages.
Number all pages of the application
sequentially from page 1 to the end of
the application, including charts,
figures, tables and appendices. If the
application exceeds the 150-page limit
and has no page numbers, HUD will
consider only the first 150 pages it
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
prints for review (forms will be counted
first).
(2) The application narrative response
to the Rating Factors is limited to a
maximum of 20 pages (excluding
appendices and worksheets) of size 81⁄2″
x 11″ using a 12-point (minimum) font
with not less than 1″ margins on all
sides.
(3) Materials provided in the
appendices should directly refer to the
specific rating factor narrative.
Applicants are strongly urged to not
submit information that is not required
and/or requested in the NOFA or
relevant to a specific narrative response.
The narrative rating responses should be
submitted as a single Microsoft Word
document file. All attachments must
identify the related factor in the footer
by providing the rating factor and the
page number (e.g., Factor 1 Attachment,
pg. 1), and should be submitted as a
single zip file attachment to the
electronic application.
b. Information contained in the
abstract will not be considered in the
evaluation and scoring of your
application.
c. Application Checklist (Voluntary).
Your application must contain all of the
required information requested in this
NOFA and the General Section. These
items include the standard forms, and
the certifications and assurances listed
in the General Section that are
applicable to this NOFA. The forms
required for application submission and
instructions can be found in the
application at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. The
‘‘Checklist and Submission Table of
Contents’’ below includes a list of the
required items needed for submitting a
complete application and receiving
consideration for funding.
Checklist and Submission Table of
Contents (Counts Towards the 150 Page
Limit)
• Application Checklist (paper copy
applications only)
• Applicant Abstract (limited to a
maximum of 2 pages)
• Rating Factors Response (limited to
a maximum of 20 narrative pages plus
the following forms):
1. Capacity of the Applicant and
Relevant Organizational Experience—
Form HUD–96012;
2. Needs/Extent of the Problem—
Form HUD–96013;
3. Soundness of Approach (Work
Plan/Budget)—Form HUD–96014;
4. Leveraging and Matching
Resources—Form HUD–96015; and
5. Achieving Results and Program
Evaluation—Logic Model—Form HUD–
96010.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Other Materials in Support of Rating
Factors
Application for Federal Assistance—
Form SF–424;
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity
for Applicants—Form SF–424
Supplement (Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP) on Grants.gov);
Grant Application Detailed Budget
(HUD Detailed Budget Form on
Grants.gov) and Worksheet HUD–424
CBW, Total Budget (Federal Share
and Matching) and Budget
Justification Narrative;
Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/Update
Report—Form HUD–2880 (HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure
Report on Grants.gov);
Certification of Consistency with the
RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan—Form
HUD–2990;
Certification of Consistency with the
Consolidated Plan—Form HUD–2991;
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (if
applicable)—Form SF–LLL;
Development Worksheet with Minimum
Benchmark Standards (36 Months)
Form HUD–96008;
Match and Leverage Documentation;
Third Party Documentation Facsimile
Transmittal (Facsimile Transmittal
Form on Grants.gov)(for electronic
applications)—Form HUD–96011;
Questionnaire for HUD’s Removal of
Regulatory Barriers (HUD
Communities Initiative Form on
Grants.gov)—Form HUD-27300,
including required documentation or
URL references;
You Are Our Client Survey—Form
HUD–2994–A (optional); and
Threshold Requirements (Refer to
Section III.C of the General Section,
and Section III.C.3, Threshold
Requirements, of this NOFA).
C. Submission Dates and Times. The
application must be received and
validated by Grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
deadline date. Please note that the
validation process may take up to 72
hours. Refer to the General Section for
timely submission requirements.
D. Intergovernmental Review: Not
required.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Administrative Costs. There is a 10
percent maximum allowance for
administrative costs. Additional
information about allowable
administrative costs is provided in
Appendix D of this NOFA at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
2. Ineligible Activities. You may not
use grant funds for any of the following
activities:
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11547
a. Purchase of real property.
b. Purchase or lease of equipment
having a per-unit cost in excess of
$5,000, except for the purchase and
lease of up to two X-ray fluorescence
analyzers used by the grant program.
c. Chelation or other medical
treatment costs related to children with
Elevated Blood Lead levels (EBLs). Nonfederal funds used to cover these costs
may be counted as part of the required
matching contribution.
d. Lead hazard evaluation or control
activities in publicly-owned housing, or
project-based Section 8 housing (this
housing stock is not eligible under
Section 1011 of the Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Reduction Act).
e. Lead hazard evaluation or control
activities in housing covered by a
settlement agreement, consent decree,
court order or other similar action by
HUD or EPA regarding the Lead
Disclosure Rule (24 CFR part 35,
Subpart A, or the equivalent 40 CFR
part 745, subpart F), or by HUD
regarding its Lead Safe Housing Rule (24
CFR part 35, subparts B–R).
f. Presumption of the presence of
lead-based paint or lead-based paint
hazards. A lead-based paint inspection
and risk assessment are required.
g. Activities that do not comply with
the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16
U.S.C. 3501).
h. Lead-hazard control or
rehabilitation of a building or
manufactured home that is located in an
area identified by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) under the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001–
4128) as having special flood hazards
unless:
(1) The community in which the area
is situated is participating in the
National Flood Insurance Program in
accordance with the applicable
regulations (44 CFR parts 59–79), or less
than a year has passed since FEMA
notification regarding these hazards;
and
(2) Where the community is
participating in the National Flood
Insurance Program, flood insurance on
the property is obtained in accordance
with section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act (42 U.S.C. 4012a(a)). You
are responsible for assuring that flood
insurance is obtained and maintained
for the appropriate amount and term.
F. Other Submission Requirements:
Applicants are required to submit
applications electronically via the Web
site https://www.grants.gov. See the
General Section for additional
information on the electronic process
and how to request a waiver from the
requirement, if necessary. Applicants
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11548
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
should submit their waiver requests in
writing by e-mail. Waiver requests must
be submitted no later than 15 days prior
to the application deadline date and
should be submitted to Jonnette
Hawkins, Director, Program
Management and Assurance Division,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control,
Jonnette_G._Hawkins@hud.gov. If you
are granted a waiver of the electronic
application submission requirement, the
application must be received by HUD no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. on the
application deadline date. The waiver
approval notification will provide
further information on where to send
the application and the number of
copies to be provided.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria: The following section
applies to all applicants unless
otherwise specified.
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (20 points maximum for all
applicants)
All applicants.
a. Capacity of the Applicant (10
points). This rating factor addresses
your capacity to successfully implement
the proposed activities. The applicant
must demonstrate that it has sufficient
personnel or will actively retain
qualified experts or professionals, and is
prepared to perform lead-based paint
hazard evaluation, lead-based paint
hazard control intervention work, and
other proposed activities within 120
days of the effective date of the grant
award. HUD reserves the right to
terminate the grant if sufficient
personnel or qualified experts are not
retained to actively perform these
program activities within this 120-day
period. All applicants must respond to
this Rating Factor, including completing
the Factor 1 Table. The ‘‘applicant’’
includes the applicant organization as a
whole, and the applicant staff, including
key personnel responsible for
implementing the program.
Applicants are to list by name and/or
position title all key personnel, whether
currently vacant or contingent upon an
award, including the percentage of time
to be dedicated to the proposed
program. Key personnel should include,
at a minimum, one Project Director and
one Program Manager. The applicant
must describe the relevant knowledge
and experience of the Project Director
and Program Manager, and any
additional key personnel, who will
carry out program activities, including
the time commitment of each to the
proposed program. The day-to-day
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Program Manager must be experienced
in the management of housing
rehabilitation or lead hazard control,
childhood lead poisoning prevention, or
similar work involving project
management, and must be dedicated to
the proposed program for a minimum of
75 percent of the time. The applicant
must describe the roles and
responsibilities of each key personnel,
including any/all relevant current or
previous experience in the planning and
management of large, complex and
interdisciplinary programs involving
housing rehabilitation, lead hazard
control, childhood lead poisoning
prevention, or similar work. Resumes
(maximum three pages each for up to
three key personnel) or position
descriptions for those key personnel to
be hired, and organizational charts for
the grant program must be submitted as
an appendix. Similarly, applicants must
list and describe sub-grantees, subcontractor organizations, sub-recipients
and consultants that will provide
services and carry out critical activities
for the proposed grant program. Provide
the capacity of the above entities as
demonstrated by experience in initiating
and implementing related
environmental, health, or housing
projects. List key personnel from each
sub-grantee or sub-contractor
organization who will provide services,
their respective roles and
responsibilities on the proposed
program and the time commitment to
the proposed program.
b. Relevant Organization Experience
(10 points).
(1) New Applicants. Your
organizational capacity should be
demonstrated by describing prior
experience in initiating and
implementing lead hazard control or
related environmental, health or
housing programs. Include a table that
lists the relevant and most recent
experience in initiating and
implementing lead hazard control
efforts and or related environmental,
health or housing programs and/or
grants awarded (which may also include
philanthropic/foundation awards for
LEAP applicants). Provide examples of
relevant programs that you currently
manage or have previously managed
within the past three years (e.g., Lead
Hazard Control, CDBG Housing
Rehabilitation, Childhood Lead
Poisoning Prevention Program, Healthy
Homes Demonstration, Weatherization,
LEAP, etc). Include the following details
for each project:
• Title of the project
• Start and end date of the project
• Funding Agency
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
• Name of the Project Director and
Program Manager
• Dollar amount of the project
• Project goals and deliverables
• Whether or not the project was
completed on time and all goals
achieved
• Discussion of significant obstacles
and how they were resolved
• If grant’s performance was rated,
the final rating received HUD’s
evaluation process will consider an
applicant’s past performance record as
reported to HUD in effectively
organizing and managing its grant
operations, in meeting performance and
work plan benchmarks and goals, and in
managing funds, including its ability to
account for funds appropriately, the
timely use of funds received either from
HUD or other federal, state or local
programs, and meeting performance
milestones. HUD may also use other
information relating to these items from
sources at hand, including public
sources such as newspapers, Inspector
General or Government Accountability
Office Reports or Findings, hotline
complaints, or other sources of
information that possess merit.
(2) Current or previous grantees under
any of this NOFA’s programs: HUD will
evaluate the applicant’s quarterly
performance reports for the most recent
four (4) quarters, and award a maximum
of 10 points based on the performance
ratings.
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (20 points maximum for LeadBased Paint Hazard Control and Lead
Hazard Reduction Demonstration
Programs, and 10 points maximum for
LEAP).
This factor refers to whether or not
the community where eligible lead
hazard control activities will be
conducted has significant lead-based
paint hazards to be addressed and an
urgent need exists for HUD funding to
address the problem in the identified
target area(s). A target area is the area in
which you will be performing lead
hazard control activities; the area may
be a whole jurisdiction, or, if a portion
of a jurisdiction is being targeted, a
specific set of Census tracts. Each
applicant will be evaluated and scored
in this rating factor based on
documented need as evidenced by
thorough, credible, and applicable data
and information. For you to receive
maximum points for this rating factor
there must be a direct and substantial
relationship between your proposed
lead hazard control activities, the
Consolidated Plan’s lead element, and
the documented community needs.
Since an objective of the program is to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
prevent at-risk children from being
poisoned, specific attention must be
paid to documenting the identified need
as it applies to any selected targeted
area(s). The applicant shall complete the
Factor 2 Table—Need/Extent of the
Problem.
Multiple tables (one per target area)
are permissible. Provide the number of
children less than 6 years of age in the
target area(s). You must identify the
Census 2000 tract numbers for each
target area that is smaller than your
jurisdiction. The data submitted to HUD
may be verified using data available
from the Census https://
factfinder.census.gov, HUDuser https://
www.huduser.org/datasets/il/fmr99rev/
hud99revmd.txt, and other sources
available to HUD. Points will be
awarded in this rating factor based on
the information documenting the
number of children with an elevated
blood lead level, the number of pre-1940
housing units, the number and
percentage of families with incomes at
or below 80% of the Area Medium
Income as determined by HUD within
your jurisdiction and/or target areas,
and other socioeconomic or
environmental factors in the applicants
target area(s).
a. Points will be awarded based on the
documented number of children with an
EBL entered in the Rating Factor 2 table.
Documented Number of Children with
an Elevated Blood Lead (EBL) (5 Points
Maximum for LBPHC and LHRD
Programs, and 3 Points Maximum for
LEAP). See Rating Factor 2—Table 1
(LBPHC), Table 2 (LHRD) and Table 3
(LEAP) for ‘‘Points Awarded for the
Number of Children Under 6 Years of
Age with an Elevated Blood Lead Level
in the Applicant’s Target Area(s),’’ that
can be downloaded for each grant
program from https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
Provide the Census tract numbers for
each target area that is smaller than your
jurisdiction area(s). Provide the actual
number of children documented as
having an elevated blood lead (EBL)
residing within the target area and
within the jurisdiction where the lead
hazard control work will be conducted
for the most recent complete calendar
year and identify the source of the data.
HUD will accept data for the most
recent 12-month period available since
January 1, 2003. States must report the
number in each target area and each
city, county, or other area where funds
will actually be used. (Data are needed
just in the application, and are not
required during or after grant
completion.) Consortia of local
governments must report the number in
the cities or counties making up the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
consortium. For the purposes of this
application, the ‘‘documented number
of children’’ with an EBL is based on the
CDC level of concern. Failure to provide
this number in the application means
that no points will be awarded for this
sub-factor.
b. Points will be awarded based on
other socioeconomic or environmental
factors in the applicants target area(s).
(Maximum 5 points for Lead-Based
Paint Hazard Control and Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration Programs,
and 3 Points Maximum for LEAP).
Describe the need and extent of the lead
poisoning problem in children under six
years of age in terms of other
socioeconomic or environmental factors
that demonstrate the need to establish or
continue lead hazard control work in
the jurisdiction and target area(s).
c. Points will be awarded based on the
documented housing market data
relevant to the specified target area(s)
entered in the Rating Factor 2 table. (5
Points maximum for LBPHC and LHRD
Programs, and 2 Points Maximum for
LEAP). Points will be awarded under
the LBPHC and LEAP Programs for the
number of pre-1978 occupied housing
units in the applicant’s target area(s),
see Rating Factor 2—Table 4 (LBPHC)
and Table 5 (LEAP) for ‘‘Points
Awarded for Number of Pre-1978
Occupied Housing Units in Target
Area(s),’’ that can be downloaded as
part of the program instructions from
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Points will be
awarded under the LHRD program for
the number of pre-1940 occupied rental
housing units in the applicant’s target
area(s), see Table 6 (LHRD) for ‘‘Points
Awarded for Number of Pre-1940
Occupied Rental Housing Units in
Target Area,’’ that can be downloaded as
part of the program instructions from
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
d. Points will be awarded based on
the documented percentage of very-low
income (less than 50 percent of the area
median) and low-income (less than 80
percent of the area median income)
families, as determined by HUD and
entered in the Rating Factor 2 table (5
Points Maximum for LBPHC and LHRD
Grant Programs and 2 Points Maximum
for LEAP). https:/// See Rating Factor 2—
Table 7 (LBPHC), Table 8 (LHRD) and
Table 9 (LEAP) for ‘‘Points Awarded for
Number of Very Low and Low-Income
Percentages of Families in Target
Area(s),’’ that can be downloaded from
www.grants.gov, for each grant program.
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11549
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (40 points maximum for all
applicants)
Applicants shall complete the Rating
Factor 3 Table Soundness of Approach.
(All Applicants: Based on analysis of
internal historical data, lead hazard
control costs average approximately
$8,000 per unit. It is, therefore,
anticipated that average per unit cost for
all programs under this NOFA will be
no more than this value. If your per-unit
cost estimate exceeds the above dollar
figure, you should justify the cost
overrun).
The work plan should include
specific, measurable, and time-phased
objectives for each major program
activity and should reflect benchmark
performance standards for unit
evaluation, unit production, match/
leverage funds, community outreach
and education, skills training, and other
activities. Examples of benchmarks
include number of units to be made
lead-safe, number of children living in
units to be made lead-safe, number of
persons to be trained to perform lead
hazard control activities, number of
educational programs to be presented
and/or the number of persons to be
served by such programs. The
benchmark form (Form HUD—96008)
and policy guidance on developing
work plans are available at the HUD
Web site: https://www.hud.gov/offices/
lead/lhc/pgi/index.cfm.
a. Lead Hazard Control Work Plan
Strategy (10 Points all Applicants):
Describe the overall work plan goals and
time-phased strategy to complete work
within the 36-month period of
performance (Form HUD—96008).
Describe the methods, including
schedule and milestones, that will be
used to identify and control lead-based
paint hazards and how the desired
project benchmarks will be achieved.
Include information about the estimated
numbers of families to be contacted,
units enrolled, units to receive risk
assessments and inspections, units to
receive lead hazard control work,
individuals/groups to be reached
through education and/or outreach
activities and trained.
Additionally, provide responses to the
following:
(1) Program Administration and
Financial Management. Describe the
approach and method to successfully
administer the proposed program.
(a) Include details about staff and
project oversight/monitoring, contract
administration (routine monitoring of
all sub-grantees and contractors to
ensure conformity to the terms,
conditions and specifications of
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11550
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
contracts or other formal agreements),
and how funding will flow from the
grantee to those who will perform work
under the proposed program.
(b) Discuss the lead hazard control
financing strategy, including
verification of financing eligibility
requirements, terms, conditions, dollar
limits, amounts available for lead
hazard control work in the various
categories of housing (e.g., single-family,
multi-family, vacant, owner or tenantoccupied), and who is responsible for
establishing, administering and
overseeing this aspect of the program.
Describe how recapture of grants or loan
funds to owners of assisted units will
occur when recipients fail to comply
with any terms and conditions of the
financing arrangement (e.g., failure to
comply with affordability, affirmatively
marketing and providing priority to
renting units to families with children
under six years of age, sale of property,
etc.). Explain the type of assistance (e.g.
grants, deferred/forgivable loans and the
basis and schedule for forgiveness), and
the role of other resources such as
private sector financing and matching, if
any, from rental property owners.
(c) Describe your involvement in
coordination among critical agencies,
including participation in the CDC statewide or jurisdiction-wide strategic plan
to eliminate childhood lead poisoning
by 2010.
(2) Program Start-Up. Describe
program start-up activities during the
first 120 days of the grant (hiring/
training staff, establishing qualified
contractor pool, outreach/education and
unit enrollment activities).
Provide information about internal
and external capacity-building steps
necessary to ensure a smooth and timely
start-up phase. Provide detailed
information about other organizations
that provide the knowledge and skills
required to address lead hazard control,
including establishment of a qualified
contractor pool, and other lead
poisoning prevention actions that are
essential for successfully implementing
your program (e.g., education, testing,
housing interventions).
(a) Describe the proposed
involvement of grassroots communitybased nonprofit organizations, including
faith-based organizations, in the
program activities. These activities may
include outreach, community
education, marketing, inspection, and
housing evaluations and interventions.
(b) Explain how you will implement
the environmental review and Request
for Release of Funds process, and who
is responsible to obtain the required
HUD approval for intended lead hazard
control work on eligible, enrolled units.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Include a description of the steps to be
taken, and who will be responsible, to
comply with applicable environmental
reviews for individual projects.
(3) Outreach, Recruitment and Unit
Enrollment. Describe the methods and
strategies, including the individuals
and/or sub-grantees, sub-recipients or
contractors responsible for marketing
and outreach to intended target area(s)
and/or residents, including recruitment
and enrollment activities to supply the
program with sufficient numbers of
eligible units within an established
timeframe.
(a) Describe how you will identify,
select, prioritize and enroll eligible
housing units in which you will
undertake lead hazard control
interventions, especially those known to
house EBL children. Include the number
of eligible privately-owned housing
units, including the number of owneroccupied, rental, vacant, single and/or
multi-family units to be enrolled.
(b) Describe your planned approach to
control lead hazards in vacant and/or
occupied units before children are
poisoned.
(c) Describe measures you will take to
sustain recruitment. Identify the staff
responsible for both monitoring
recruitment status and implementing
the measures identified to sustain
recruitment.
(d) Explain how you will obtain data
from state/local health departments,
Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention
Programs (CLPPP) and other health care
and housing agencies on the addresses
of housing units in which children have
been identified as lead poisoned, for
purposes of recruiting and enrolling
housing units.
(e) Discuss how referrals from the
Section 8, Housing Choice Voucher
program and other agencies that provide
housing assistance to low-income
households with children, including
CDBG, HOME Investment Partnerships
Program-funded housing programs,
weatherization or other sources, will be
received and processed.
(f) Describe how you will obtain
information in order to document the
occupants of units assisted and meet the
Title X income and family composition
requirements by identifying key staff
who will certify as to the eligibility of
each unit assisted, based on the
determination of income, and when
required, the presence of a child or
children under six years of age.
b. Technical Approach/Lead Hazard
Control Intervention (10 Points for all
Applicants). Describe the technical
approach and associated costs for
testing enrolled units, blood-lead testing
of children in enrolled units, lead
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
hazard control methods and strategies,
occupant protection and temporary
relocation.
Describe the lead hazard control
methods, and strategies, including the
most cost-effective hazard control
methods you will undertake and the
number of single and multi-family units
that you will treat based on the method
selected (e.g., interim controls and/or
hazard abatement). Explain your
strategy to ensure that the units are
maintained lead safe after treatment.
If you maintain that approaches other
than interim controls are necessary, a
justification is necessary. For example,
abatement might be justified in an area
where significant amounts of lowincome housing stock are highly
distressed or where lead hazard control
work is being combined with
rehabilitation over $25,000 per housing
unit. Where highly distressed housing
stock exists, applicants should explain
why options for households to move to
lead-safe housing are not viable.
Complete abatement of lead-based
painted surfaces in units is generally not
a cost effective strategy. In cases where
only a few surfaces have identified leadbased paint hazards and if abatement is
cost-effective, the applicant must
provide a detailed rationale for selecting
complete abatement as a strategy.
(a) Management. Indicate the
individual or entity responsible for, and
describe the process for developing the
work specifications and the lead hazard
control contractor bid and selection
process (i.e., the contracting) on
properties selected for lead hazard
control work. Explain the management
process to ensure the cost-effectiveness
of intended lead hazard control
methods.
(b) Coordination.
(1) Explain the coordination of
relevant activities among lead hazard
control, rehabilitation, weatherization,
and other contractors performing work
other than lead hazard control.
(2) Describe your testing methods,
schedule, and costs for lead-based paint
inspections and risk assessments and
clearance examinations. If you propose
to use a more restrictive standard than
the HUD/EPA thresholds, provide the
standard(s) that will be used. All testing
shall be performed in accordance with
applicable regulations.
(3) Describe how you will ensure that
contractors, property owners and
maintenance personnel performing
interim controls and lead hazard
abatement work are properly trained
and/or certified, and how work will be
monitored and supervised to ensure that
contractors perform work of reasonable
quality in compliance with work
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
specifications and applicable federal/
state/local regulations.
(4) Provide a realistic schedule for
completing key program activities and
outputs, by quarter, so that all activities
and outputs can be completed before or
within the grant period of performance.
Key production activities include unit
enrollment, lead-based paint inspection
and risk assessments, hazard control
and clearance of units. Describe the
estimated timeframe for treating a
typical unit from referral and intake to
hazard control and clearance. Explain
how the program will accommodate
emergency referrals (e.g., units occupied
by a child under six years of age with
an EBL).
(5) Provide guidelines and/or
flowcharts that demonstrate the agency
and team member responsibilities for
each step in the unit production process
(from intake and enrollment to
completion and clearance of units).
Describe how coordination and handoffs from individuals or agencies to and
from each step in the unit production
process will be carried out. Discuss how
the actual production status of units,
from intake and enrollment to
completion and clearance, will be
monitored, and how and when
impediments to production will be
identified and remedied.
(6) Relocation:
(a) Describe your plan for the
relocation of occupants of units selected
for remediation, if temporary relocation
is necessary (see Section VI B.4, below).
If temporary relocation is necessary,
address the use of safe houses and other
housing arrangements, storage of
household goods, stipends, incentives,
etc., and the source of funding for
relocation.
(b) If relocation is necessary for
occupants of rental units, describe your
plan for ensuring right of return and/or
first referral for occupants of units
selected for remediation who have had
to move for the remediations to be
performed. Describe your plan and the
individual(s) responsible for occupant
protection and the temporary relocation
of occupants of units selected to receive
lead hazard control work. Describe
strategies to avoid overnight relocation
in small-scale projects consistent with
applicable subsections of HUD’s Lead
Safe Housing Regulations.
(7) Describe the methods, measures
and cost for performing blood lead
testing in children less than six years of
age.
(a) Describe strategies to increase
blood lead testing of children within the
target area(s).
(b) Explain who will be responsible
for ensuring and how you will ensure
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
that all children less than six years of
age who occupy units to be assisted
with lead hazard control work receive
blood lead testing within six months of
commencement of work on the unit.
(c) Identify the individual responsible
to ensure that children identified with
an elevated blood-lead level are referred
to appropriate medical care and how
patient confidentiality, privacy and the
security of medical information is
protected as required by the Health
Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996.
c. Economic Opportunity (7 points for
all applicants).
(1) Section 3 Requirement (2 of 7
points). Explain how you will provide
appropriate economic opportunities to
Section 3 residents and Section 3
businesses of the target area, in
compliance with Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) and HUD’s
implementing rules at 24 CFR Part 135.
Describe how you will accomplish
Section 3 requirements by identifying
the number of individuals to receive
such training per discipline, the
schedule for delivering said training for
low and very low-income persons living
within the applicant’s jurisdiction, and
how trained individuals will be linked
to employment opportunities with
Section 3 businesses owned by and/or
employ low and very low-income
persons living within the grantee’s
jurisdiction.
(2) Lead Hazard Control Outreach (5
of 7 points).
(a) Describe your involvement in
collaborative agreements or
arrangements with childhood lead
poisoning prevention programs,
housing, community development, and
code enforcement agencies (or
equivalent) for the target area(s), as
applicable. If these collaborative
agreements or arrangements are not yet
made, address plans to develop these
agreements.
(b) Discuss the opportunity-to-learn
approaches to educate children, parents,
workers, business people, and other
community members about lead
poisoning prevention and lead hazard
control. Include how the proposed
educational program will continue to
meet the needs of those children already
living in units to receive lead hazard
control work.
(c) Community and Private Sector
Involvement:
(i) Describe the role of grassroots,
community-based nonprofit
organizations, including faith-based
organizations, in specific program
activities (e.g., hazard evaluation and
control, monitoring, awareness,
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11551
education and outreach within the
community).
(ii) Explain how the intended
education program(s) will be culturally
sensitive, targeted, and linguistically
appropriate. Identify the means
available to supply the educational
materials in other languages (identify all
that apply) common to the community.
(iii) Include the estimated number of
individuals to receive the intended
education and the estimated number of
events to be delivered.
(d) Affirmatively Furthering Fair
Housing:
(i) Describe strategies and
methodologies that affirmatively further
fair housing and increase access to leadsafe housing for all segments of the
population: homeowners, owners of
rental properties, and tenants.
(ii) Identify who will ensure and how
the applicant will ensure that the
program will continue to affirmatively
market and match treated units with
low-income families with children less
than six years of age in the future.
(iii) Explain how this outreach
strategy will avoid housing
discrimination against families with
young children, and how families will
have adequate, lead-safe housing
choices in the future. The strategy could
also include affirmatively marketing
your services to those populations least
likely to apply and who may not be
served by any of the organizations
working with you or the grantee team.
d. HUD’s Departmental Policy
Priorities and Consolidated Plan (6
points for all applicants; each policy
priority is 1 point, except the policy
priority addressing Removal of
Regulatory Barriers (#4, which is 2
points). Please note that HUD Form
27300 requires the submission of
documentation and contact information
to receive policy priority points.
Indicate if, and describe how, you will
address any of HUD’s departmental
policy priorities (see General Section for
more detailed explanation of HUD’s
policy priorities). Applicants shall also
provide evidence of the priority that the
community’s Consolidated Plan and
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice has placed on
addressing the needs described.
The policy priorities that are
applicable to this NOFA, and which the
applicant should address, are: (1)
Improving our Nation’s Communities
(focus on distressed communities); (2)
Providing Full and Equal Access to
Grassroots Community-based Non-profit
Organizations, including Faith-based
Organizations in HUD Program
Implementation; (3) Participation of
Minority-Serving Institutions in HUD
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11552
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Programs; (4) Removal of Regulatory
Barriers to Affordable Housing; and (5)
Promoting Energy Efficiency and Energy
Star. HUD expects the applicants to
implement Energy Star building
techniques and utilize Energy Star
appliances whenever activities of the
grant afford the opportunity. (For
information on Energy Star Programs
and Appliances, see https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/athome.htm and
HUD’s scheduled webcast.)
Describe how the proposed program
would contribute to satisfying the stated
needs in the Consolidated Plan or
Indian Housing Plan, and eliminate
impediments identified in the Analysis
of Impediments (AI).
e. Data Collection and other Program
Support Activities (2 Points for all
Applicants).
(1) Identify and discuss the specific
methods you will use (in addition to
HUD reporting requirements) to
document activities, progress, and
program effectiveness. Explain how you
will make necessary changes to improve
program performance.
(2) Describe how databases, including
web sites, computer, paper or other
formats, will incorporate the provisions
of the Privacy Act of 1974, such that the
addresses of enrolled, treated and/or
cleared housing units shall not include
personal information that could identify
any child affected.
f. Budget Proposal (5 points).
(a) Your budget proposal should
thoroughly estimate all applicable costs
(administrative, direct, indirect, and
other direct costs), and be presented in
a clear and coherent format in
accordance with the requirements listed
in the General Section. HUD is not
required to approve or fund all
proposed activities. You must
thoroughly document and justify all
budget categories and costs (Form HUD–
424–CBW) and all major tasks, for
yourself, sub-recipients, major
subcontractors, joint venture
participants, or others contributing
resources to the project. A separate
budget must be provided for partners
who are proposed to receive more than
10 percent of the federal budget request.
Your application will be evaluated on
the extent to which your resources are
appropriate for the scope of your
proposed project.
(b) Your narrative justification
associated with these budgeted costs
should be submitted as part of the Total
Budget (Federal Share, Matching and
Leveraging), but is not included in the
20-page limit for this submission.
Separate narrative justifications should
be submitted for partners that are
submitting separate budgets. Your
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
proposed budget should clearly identify
the funding or cash equivalent amounts
being provided as matching funds and
as leveraged funds. These funds should
reflect the numbers and contributions
provided in response to Rating Factor 4,
Leverage.
(c) The application will not be rated
on the proposed cost; however, cost will
be considered in addition to the rated
factors to determine whether the
proposal is most advantageous to the
Federal Government. Cost will be the
deciding factor when proposals ranked
under the listed factors are considered
acceptable and are substantially equal.
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (10 points maximum for
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control and
Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration
Program, and 20 points maximum for
LEAP). This rating factor applies to all
programs unless otherwise specified.
LBPHC and LHRD applicants will be
given higher points for leveraged
contributions that the applicant
commits over and above the 10 percent
or 25 percent statutory match
requirement. For LEAP applicants,
leveraged contributions at or above 100
percent of the federal requested amount
are eligible to receive higher points. See
Section III.B, Cost Sharing and Match,
regarding letters of commitment from
organizations other than the applicant
required for the leveraging to be eligible
for points. Based on the documented
match/leverage funding, points will be
awarded in accordance with the charts
below.
Lead-based paint hazard control and lead
hazard reduction demonstration
Documented leveraged contributions of the requested
HUD amount:
at least (percent)
10 ............................................
15 ............................................
20 ............................................
30 ............................................
40 ............................................
50 ............................................
60 ............................................
70 ............................................
80 ............................................
90 ............................................
100 ..........................................
Points
awarded
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LEAP
0 ..............................................
100 ..........................................
110 ..........................................
120 ..........................................
130 ..........................................
140 ..........................................
150 ..........................................
160 ..........................................
170 ..........................................
180 ..........................................
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
0
1.00
2.25
3.50
4.75
6.00
7.25
8.50
9.75
11.00
Lead-based paint hazard control and lead
hazard reduction demonstration
Documented leveraged contributions of the requested
HUD amount:
at least (percent)
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
..........................................
..........................................
..........................................
..........................................
..........................................
..........................................
..........................................
Points
awarded
12.25
13.50
14.75
16.00
17.25
18.50
20.00
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (10 Points
maximum for all applicants). This rating
factor reflects HUD’s goal to embrace
high standards of ethics, management,
and accountability.
a. Description of program activities,
outputs and short-term, intermediateterm and long-term outcomes (5 points).
(1) State clearly the project goals
(‘‘benchmarks’’) and activities to
achieve these goals.
(2) Describe how you will measure the
results.
(3) Explain how you will document
and track your goals, program activities,
and schedules.
(4) Identify the procedures you will
follow to make adjustments to your
work plan to improve performance if
benchmarks are not met within
established timeframes.
b. Logic Model (5 points).
(1) Submit Form HUD–96010.
HUD is using an electronic Logic
Model with dropdown menus from
which you can select needs, activities,
and outcomes appropriate to your
program. See the General Section for
detailed information on the use of the
Logic Model. HUD is requiring grantees
to use program-specific questions to
self-evaluate the management and
performance of their program. Training
on HUD’s logic model and the reporting
requirements for addressing the
Management questions will be provided
via satellite broadcast.
In evaluating Rating Factor 5, HUD
will consider how you have described
the benefits and outcome measures of
your program. HUD will also consider
the evaluation plan, to ensure the
project is on schedule and within
budget.
(2) Performance indicators should be
objectively quantifiable and should
measure actual achievements against
anticipated achievements. Step 1. The
planning component of the logic model
should identify the problem or need and
develop a plan. Step 2. The intervention
component of the logic model should
identify the kinds of services, activities,
and outputs projected. Step 3. The
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11553
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
impact component of the logic model
should identify the projected outcomes.
Step 4. The accountability (phase one)
component of the logic model should
include data sources, measurement, and
reporting tools. Step 5. The
accountability (phase two) component
of the logic model should include the
evaluation methodology or the
evaluation process. As a planning tool,
the logic model can provide the
statement of need and also provide the
rationale for the proposed service or
activity. For goals or benchmarks, the
logic model can provide a set of
quantifiable goals including timeframes.
These goals allow you, the applicant,
and HUD to monitor and assess your
progress in achieving your program
work plan. The process for the
achievement of outcome goals should
include identifying the expected
outcome and the estimated number
needed to achieve the goal or the
expected outcome in terms of the
community impact or changes in
economic and social status. Some
examples of measurement-reporting
tools are survey instruments; attendance
logs; case report; pre-post tests; or
waiting lists. Describe where/how data
are maintained, for example, central
databases; individual case records;
specialized access databases, tax
assessor databases; and local precinct.
Also, identify the location where the
database is maintained, updated, etc.,
for example, on-site, subcontractor, or
specify (e.g., identify what the other is).
6. Bonus Points (2 Points for All
Programs)
Applicants are eligible for two bonus
points for projects that the applicant
proposes to conduct in federally
designated Empowerment Zones (EZs),
Renewal Communities (RCs), or
Enterprise Communities designated by
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) in round II (EC–IIs) and that are
certified to be consistent with the area’s
strategic plan or RC Tax Incentive
Utilization Plan (TIUP). Applicants
must submit a completed Certification
of Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC–II
Strategic Plan—Form HUD–2990 signed
by the appropriate official of the RC/EZ/
EC II and also meet the requirements
listed in the General Section for a
possible award of two bonus points.
Discuss whether any of the proposed
activities will occur in any of these
areas and how they will benefit the
residents of those zones or
communities.
B. Reviews and Selection Process
1. Rating and Ranking. Please refer to
the General Section.
a. Applicants that meet all of the
threshold requirements will be eligible
to be scored and ranked, based on the
total number of points allocated for each
of the rating factors described in Section
V.A of this NOFA.
b. Remaining Funds. Refer to the
General Section for HUD’s procedures if
funds remain after all selections have
been made within a category.
c. The scoring criteria to be used to
award the maximum points for this
NOFA are based on how fully and
thoroughly the applicant answers each
item listed in each rating factor.
2. Factors for Award Used to Rate and
Rank Applications.
a. Implementing HUD’s Strategic
Framework and Demonstrating Results.
HUD is committed to ensuring that
programs result in the achievement of
HUD’s strategic mission. To support this
effort, grant applications submitted for
HUD programs will be rated on how
well they tie proposed outcomes to
HUD’s policy priorities and Annual
Goals and Objectives, and the quality of
proposed Evaluation and Monitoring
Plans.
b. The maximum number of points to
be awarded is 100 plus two bonus
points as described in the General
Section and above.
c. The factors for rating and ranking
eligible applicants under all categories,
and the maximum points for each factor
are stated below:
Maximum points
Rating factors
LBPHC
&
LHRD
LEAP
1. Capacity of the Applicant and Relevant Organizational Experience ..........................................................................................
2. Need/Extent of the Problem ........................................................................................................................................................
3. Soundness of Approach ..............................................................................................................................................................
4. Matching and Leveraging Resources ..........................................................................................................................................
5. Achieving Results and Program Evaluation ................................................................................................................................
Empowerment Zone, Renewal Zones and Enterprise Community (II) Bonus Points .....................................................................
20
20
40
10
10
2
20
10
40
20
10
2
Total ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
102
102
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Applicants Selected for Award.
a. Successful applicants will receive a
letter from the Office of Healthy Homes
and Lead Hazard Control Grant Officer
providing details regarding the effective
start date of the grant agreement and any
additional data and information to be
submitted to execute the grant. This
letter is not an authorization to begin
work or incur costs under the grant.
b. HUD may require that a selected
applicant participate in negotiations to
determine the specific terms of the grant
agreement, budget, and Logic Model.
Should HUD not be able to successfully
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
conclude negotiations with a selected
applicant, an award will not be made.
Applicants should note that, if they are
selected for multiple awards, they must
ensure that they have sufficient
resources to provide the promised
match and/or leveraging for the multiple
awards. During negotiations, such
applicants would be required to provide
alternative match and/or leveraged
resources, if necessary, before the grant
can be awarded in order to avoid
committing duplicate match and/or
leveraged resources to more than one
OHHLHC grant. If the applicant accepts
the terms and conditions of the grant
agreement, a signed grant agreement
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
must be returned by the date specified.
Instructions on how to have the grant
agreement account entered into HUD’s
Line of Credit Control System (LOCCS)
payment system will be provided. Other
forms and program requirements will be
provided. In accordance with OMB
Circular A–133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments and Nonprofit
Organizations), if an awardee expends
$500,000 in federal funds in a single
year, they follow the requirements of the
Single Audit Act and must submit their
completed audit-reporting package
along with the Data Collection Form
(SF–SAC) to the Single Audit
Clearinghouse. The address can be
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11554
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
obtained from their Web site. The SF–
SAC can be downloaded at: https://
harvester.census.gov/sac/.
2. Debriefing. The General Section
provides the procedures for applicants
to request a debriefing.
3. Negotiation. Refer to the General
Section for additional details.
4. Adjustments to Funding. Refer to
the General Section for additional
details.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: Refer to the General
Section for additional details regarding
the Administrative and National Policy
Requirements applicable to HUD
Programs.
1. National Historic Preservation Act.
The National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470) and the
regulations at 36 CFR part 800 apply to
the lead-hazard control or rehabilitation
activities that are undertaken pursuant
to this NOFA.
2. Waste Disposal. You must handle
waste disposal according to the
requirements of the appropriate local,
state, and federal regulatory agencies.
You must handle disposal of wastes
from hazard control activities that
contain lead-based paint, but are not
classified as hazardous in accordance
with state or local law or the HUD
Guidelines for the Evaluation and
Control of Lead-Based Hazards in
Housing (HUD Guidelines). The
Guidelines are available from the HUD
Web site at: https://www.hud.gov/offices/
lead/guidelines/hudguidelines/
index.cfm.
3. Worker Protection Procedures. You
must observe the procedures for worker
protection established in the HUD
Guidelines, as well as the requirements
of the Occupational Health and Safety
Administration (OSHA) (29 CFR
1926.62, Lead Exposure in
Construction), or the state or local
occupational safety and health
regulations, whichever are most
protective. If other applicable
requirements contain more stringent
requirements than the HUD Guidelines,
the more rigorous standards shall be
followed.
4. Relocation. The relocation
requirements of the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URA),
as amended, and the implementing
government-wide regulation at 49 CFR
part 24, that cover any person
(including individuals, businesses, and
farms) displaced as a direct result of the
acquisition, rehabilitation, or
demolition of real property, apply to
this grant program. If such persons are
required to temporarily relocate for a
project, the requirements of the URA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
regulations at 49 CFR 24.2(a)(9) must be
met. HUD recommends you review
these regulations when preparing your
proposal. (They can be downloaded
from the Government Printing Office
Web site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
cfr/ by entering the
regulatory citation in quotes without
any spaces (e.g., ‘‘49CFR24.2’’) in the
Quick Search box.). See Section III.C.4.e
of the General Section for additional
information about relocation.
5. Davis-Bacon wage rates. The DavisBacon wage rates are not applicable to
these programs. However, if you use
grant funds in conjunction with other
federal programs, Davis-Bacon
requirements will apply to the extent
required under the other federal
programs.
6. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See the General Section for
information concerning this
requirement.
7. Executive Order 13202.
‘‘Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and FederallyFunded Construction Projects.’’ See
General Section for information
concerning this requirement.
C. Reporting: Reports shall comply
with section VI.C. of the General
Section. In addition, successful
applicants will be required to submit
quarterly, annual and final program and
financial reports according the
requirements of the Office of Healthy
Homes and Lead Hazard Control.
Specific guidance and additional details
will be provided to successful
applicants. The following items are a
part of OHHLHC reporting
requirements.
1. Final Work Plan and Budget are
due within sixty days of signing the
grant agreement.
2. Progress reports are due on a
quarterly basis. In quarterly reports,
grantees provide information about
accomplishments in the areas of
program management; assessment and
intervention activities; community
education, outreach, training and
capacity building; data collection and
analysis; as well as a listing of
completed units and financial report.
Project benchmarks and milestones will
be tracked using a benchmark
spreadsheet that uses the benchmarks
and milestones identified in the Logic
Model form (HUD–96010) approved and
incorporated into your award
agreement. For specific reporting
requirements, see policy guidance at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead. For FY
2007, HUD is considering a new concept
for the Logic Model. The new concept
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
is a Return on Investment (ROI)
statement. HUD will be publishing a
separate notice on the ROI concept.
3. Annual report shall be submitted at
the end of each fiscal year. A final
report is due at the end of the project
period, which includes final project
benchmarks and milestones achieved
against the proposed benchmarks and
milestones in the Logic Model (HUD–
96010) approved and incorporated into
your award agreement. Specific
information on all reporting
requirements will be provided to
successful applicants.
4. Racial and Ethnic Beneficiary Data.
HUD does not require LBPHC, LHRD
and LEAP awardees to report ethnic and
racial beneficiary data as part of their
initial application package. However,
such data must be reported on an
annual basis, at a minimum, during the
implementation of your grant
agreement. You must report the data as
described in the General Section and
use the Office of Management and
Budget’s Standards for the Collection of
Racial and Ethnic Data, using Form
HUD–27061, Race and Ethnic Data
Reporting Form, if applicable (HUD
Race Ethnic Form on Grants.gov), found
on HUD’s Web site at https://
www.hudclips.org/cgi/index.cgi.
Grantees can also use an online system
to meet this requirement, provided the
data elements and reports derived from
the system are equivalent to the data
collection in the form HUD–27061.
5. All grant recipients must comply
with reporting requirements of subpart
E (Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968, 12 U.S.C.
1701u (Economic Opportunities for
Low- and Very Low-Income Persons in
Connection with Assisted Projects) and
the HUD regulations at 24 CFR part
135).
VII. Agency Contact(s)
For questions related to the
application process, you may contact
the Grants.gov help line at 800–518GRANTS. For programmatic questions,
you may contact: Ms. Jonnette G.
Hawkins, Director, Program
Management and Assurance Division,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control: Department of Housing
and Urban Development; 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 8236, Washington,
DC 20410–3000; telephone (202) 755–
1785, extension 7593 (this is not a tollfree number); facsimile (202) 755–1000;
e-mail: Jonnette_G._Hawkins@hud.gov.
For administrative questions, you may
contact Curtissa L. Coleman, Grants
Officer, at the address above or by
telephone at: (202) 755–1785, extension
7580 (this is not a toll-free number); e-
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
mail at: Curtissa_L._Coleman@hud.gov.
If you are a hearing- or speech-impaired
person, you may reach the above
telephone numbers via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. General. For additional general,
technical, and grant program
information pertaining to the Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control, visit: https://www.hud.gov/
offices/lead.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2539–0015. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 80 hours to prepare the
application, 16 hours to finalize the
grant agreement, and 32 hours per
annum for grant administration
(progress reporting) per respondent.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11555
This includes the time for collecting,
reviewing, and reporting the data for the
application, quarterly reports, and final
report. The information will be used for
awardee selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
C. Appendices. Appendices A, B, C, D
and E of this NOFA are available for
downloading with the application at
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/apply
for grants.jsp. Appendix E lists HUD’s
comments on selected issues related to
the Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.013
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11556
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Lead Technical Studies and Healthy
Homes Technical Studies Programs
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Lead
Technical Studies and Healthy Homes
Technical Studies.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–25, OMB Paperwork Approval
number is 2539–0015.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Numbers: 14.902,
Lead Technical Studies Grant Program,
and 14.906, Healthy Homes Technical
Studies Grant Program.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 18, 2007. Applications must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
no later than 11:59:59 pm eastern time
on the application deadline date. See
Section IV of the General Section,
regarding application submission
procedures and timely filing
requirements.
G. Additional Information:
1. Purpose: To fund technical studies
to improve existing methods for
detecting and controlling lead-based
paint and other housing-related health
and safety hazards, to develop new
methods to detect and control these
hazards, and to improve our knowledge
of lead-based paint and other housingrelated health and safety hazards.
2. Available funding: HUD anticipates
that approximately $5.6 million will be
available. Of this, approximately $3.6
million is for Lead Technical Studies
and approximately $2.0 million is for
Healthy Homes Technical Studies.
3. Anticipated awards: Approximately
4 to approximately 10 awards will be
made for the Lead Technical Studies
Program, ranging from approximately
$200,000 to a maximum of $1 million
each for the entire period of
performance. The anticipated amounts
and number of individual awards for the
Healthy Homes Technical Studies
Program will be approximately 2 to
approximately 6 awards, ranging from
approximately $200,000 to a maximum
of $1million each for the entire period
of performance.
4. Type of awards: Cooperative
agreements, with substantial
involvement of the government, will be
awarded (see Paragraph II.C for a
description of substantial involvement).
5. Eligible applicants: Academic, notfor-profit and for-profit institutions
located in the U.S., state and units of
general local government, and federally
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
recognized Native American tribes are
eligible to apply. For-profit firms are not
allowed to earn a fee (i.e., make a profit
from the project).
6. Cost sharing or ‘‘matching’’ is not
required; however, applicant
‘‘leveraging’’ contributions are
encouraged (see Section V.A.3.d).
7. There is no limit on the number of
applications that each applicant may
submit.
8. The applications for this NOFA can
be found at www.grants.gov.: The
General Section contains information on
submission requirements and
procedures. Please carefully review the
General Section before reading the
program section so that you understand
the Grants.gov electronic application
process.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Purpose of the Programs
The overall goal of both the Lead and
the Healthy Homes Technical Studies
programs is to gain knowledge to
improve the efficacy and costeffectiveness of methods for evaluation
and control of lead-based paint and
other housing related health and safety
hazards. This also supports HUD’s
Strategic Goal to Strengthen
Communities and the associated policy
priority to Improve Our Nation’s
Communities by improving the
environmental health and safety of
families living in public and privately
owned housing.
B. Program Description
HUD is funding studies to improve
HUD’s and the public’s knowledge of
lead-based paint hazards and other
housing-related health and safety
hazards, and to improve or develop new
hazard assessment and control methods,
with a focus on the key residential
health and safety hazards. Key hazards
are discussed in Appendix A of this
NOFA. A list of references that serves as
the basis for the information provided in
this NOFA is provided as Appendix B
to this NOFA. Both Appendix A and
Appendix B of this NOFA can be found
on HUD’s Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
1. General Goals
a. Lead Technical Studies
The overall goal of the Lead Technical
Studies grant program is to gain
knowledge to improve the efficacy and
cost-effectiveness of methods for
evaluation and control of residential
lead-based paint hazards.
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11557
Through the Lead Technical Studies
Program, HUD is working to fulfill the
requirements of sections 1051 and 1052
of the Residential Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X)
(42 U.S.C. 4854 and 4854a) which
directs HUD to conduct research on
topics which include the development
of ‘‘improved methods for evaluating
[and] reducing lead-based paint hazards
in housing,’’ among others.
Brief descriptions of active and
previously funded lead technical
studies projects can be found on HUD’s
Web site at https://www.hud.gov/offices/
lead/techstudies/index.cfm. Where
appropriate, you are strongly
encouraged to build your proposed
study upon HUD-sponsored work that
has been previously completed, in
addition to other relevant research (i.e.,
that contained in government reports
and in the published literature).
The results of the technical studies
will be used in part to update HUD’s
Guidelines for the Evaluation and
Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in
Housing (Guidelines). For supporting
references, including where to find the
Guidelines, see Appendix B on HUD’s
Web site at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
b. Healthy Homes Technical Studies
The overall goals and objectives of the
Healthy Home Initiative (HHI), which
includes the Healthy Homes Technical
Studies Program and the Healthy Homes
Demonstration Grant Program (see the
Healthy Homes Demonstration Grant
Program NOFA published in this
SuperNOFA), are to:
(1) Mobilize public and private
resources, involving cooperation among
all levels of government, the private
sector, grassroots community-based
organizations, including faith-based
organizations, and other non-profit
organizations, to develop the most
promising, cost-effective methods for
identifying and controlling housingrelated hazards; and
(2) Build local capacity to operate
sustainable programs that will continue
to prevent, minimize, and control
housing-related hazards in low- and
very low-income residences when HUD
funding is exhausted.
The HHI departs from the more
traditional approach of attempting to
correct one hazard at a time. HUD is
interested in promoting approaches that
are cost-effective and efficient and result
in the reduction of health threats for the
maximum number of residents and, in
particular, low-income children.
In April 1999, HUD submitted a
preliminary plan that described the HHI
to Congress. The submission (Summary
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11558
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
and Full Report), and a description of
the HHI are available on the HUD Web
site at https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/
hhi/index.cfm.
In addition to deficiencies in basic
housing facilities that may impact
health, changes in the U.S. housing
stock and more sophisticated
epidemiological methods and
biomedical research have led to the
identification of new and often more
subtle health hazards in the residential
environment (e.g., asthma triggers).
While such hazards will tend to be
found disproportionately in housing
that is substandard (e.g., structural
problems, lack of adequate heat, poor
maintenance, etc.), such housing-related
environmental hazards may also exist in
housing that is otherwise of good
quality. Appendix A of this NOFA
briefly describes the key housingassociated health and injury hazards
HUD considers targets for intervention.
HUD has also developed resource
papers on a number of topics of
importance under the HHI, including
mold, environmental aspects of asthma,
carbon monoxide, and unintentional
injuries. These resource papers can be
downloaded at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/lead/hhi/hhiresources.cfm.
Brief descriptions of current and
recently completed Healthy Homes
Technical Studies projects and grantee
contact information can be found on the
HUD Web site at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/lead/hhi/hhigranteeinfo.cfm.
2. Community Participation
HUD believes that it is important for
researchers to incorporate some aspect
of meaningful community participation
in the development and implementation
of studies that are conducted in
communities and/or involve significant
interaction with community residents.
Community participation can improve
study effectiveness in various ways,
including the development of more
appropriate research objectives,
improving recruitment and retention of
study participants, improving
participants’ involvement in and
understanding of a study, improving
ongoing communication between
researchers and the affected community,
and more effectively disseminating
study findings. HUD encourages
applicants to consider using a
‘‘community based participatory
research (CBPR)’’ approach, where
applicable, in study design and
implementation. (See, e.g., the report
published by the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences titled
‘‘Successful Models of CommunityBased Participatory Research’’ at:
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/translat/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
C. Authority
The Lead Technical Studies program
is authorized under sections 1011(g)(1),
1011(o), and 1051–1053 of the
Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1992, 42 U.S.C. 4851 et seq.). The
Healthy Homes Technical Studies
program is authorized under sections
501 and 502 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1970 (12 U.S.C.
1701z–1 and 1701z–2). Fiscal Year 2007
funds for both programs are authorized
under the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007).
in the past. Period of performance
extensions for delays due to exceptional
conditions beyond the grantee’s control
will be considered for approval by HUD
in accordance with 24 CFR 84.25(e)(2)
or 85.30(d)(2), as applicable, and the
OHHLHC Program Guide. If approved,
grantees will be eligible to receive a
single extension of up to 12 months in
length. Applicants are encouraged to
plan studies with shorter performance
periods than 36 months; however, when
developing your schedule, you should
consider the possibility that issues may
arise that could cause delays.
C. Type of Award Instrument
pubs.htm). CBPR is characterized by
substantial community input in all
phases of a study (i.e., design,
implementation, data interpretation,
conclusions, and communication of
results).
II. Award Information
A. Funding Available
Approximately $3.6 million in fiscal
year 2007 funds are available for Lead
Technical Studies. Approximately $2.0
million is available for Healthy Homes
Technical Studies. Cooperative
agreements will be awarded on a
competitive basis following evaluation
of all eligible proposals according to the
rating factors described in Section V.A.3
of this NOFA. HUD anticipates that
approximately 4 to 10 awards will be
made for the Lead Technical Studies
Program, and that approximately 2 to 6
awards will be made for the Healthy
Homes Technical Studies Program with
awards ranging from approximately
$200,000 to no more than $1 million per
award for each program. Applications
for additional work related to existing
HUD-funded technical studies (i.e., for
work outside of the scope of the original
agreement) are eligible to compete with
applications for awards on new subjects.
These applications will be evaluated in
the same manner as new applicants.
B. Anticipated Start Date and Period of
Performance for New Grants
The start date for new awards is
expected to be not later than October 1,
2007. The period of performance cannot
exceed 36 months from the time of
award. The proposed performance
period should include adequate time for
such project components as the
Institutional Review Board process, if
required, the recruitment of new staff
and/or study participants, and the
development of new instrumentation or
methods (e.g., analytical methods), all of
which have been found to delay projects
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Awards will be made as cooperative
agreements. Anticipated substantial
involvement by HUD staff for
cooperative agreements may include,
but will not be limited to:
1. Review and suggestion of
amendments to the study design,
including: study objectives; field
sampling plan; data collection methods;
sample handling and preparation; and
sample and data analysis.
2. Review and provision of technical
recommendations in response to
quarterly progress reports (e.g.,
amendments to study design based on
preliminary results).
3. Review and provision of technical
recommendations on the journal
article(s) and final study report.
4. Requirements for peer review of
scientific data in accordance with the
Office of Management and Budget
Information Quality Guidelines. All
HUD-sponsored research is subject to
the OMB Final Information Quality
Bulletin for Peer Review (70 FR 2664–
2677, January 14, 2005) prior to its
public dissemination. In accordance
with paragraph II.2 of the Bulletin, HUD
will not need further peer review
conducted on information that has
already been subjected to adequate peer
review. Therefore grantees must provide
enough information on their peer review
process for HUD to determine whether
additional review is needed.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Academic and non-profit institutions
located in the United States, state and
units of general local government, and
federally recognized Native American
tribes are eligible under all existing
authorizations. For-profit firms also are
eligible; however, they are not allowed
to earn a profit from the project.
Applications to supplement existing
projects are eligible to compete with
applications for new awards. Federal
agencies are not eligible to submit
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
applications. The General Section
identifies threshold requirements that
must be met for an organization to
receive an award.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing or matching is not
required. In rating your application,
however, you will receive a higher score
under Rating Factor 4 if you provide
evidence of significant resource
leveraging.
C. Other
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
1. Eligible Activities
a. Lead Technical Studies.
HUD is particularly interested in the
following topics:
(1) Development of alternative or
improved clearance methods. The
clearance of a dwelling following lead
hazard control activities is achieved by
collecting dust-wipe samples following
a standard protocol, with subsequent
analysis of the samples by a laboratory
recognized under the National Lead
Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NLLAP). Lead hazard control costs
could be reduced if immediate clearance
results could be obtained in the field.
Existing techniques that can be used to
analyze dust samples in the field
include the use of portable X-ray
fluorescence (XRF) analyzers and
anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV)
instruments. It is theoretically possible
to also employ colorimetric methods to
analyze clearance samples. These
techniques can be used in a screening
context in which a ‘‘failure’’ would
indicate the need for additional cleaning
before definitive clearance wipe
samples are collected for analysis by an
appropriate laboratory. It is possible for
an organization using a field-based
technology to achieve recognition as a
portable laboratory under NLLAP;
however, it is HUD’s understanding
that, to date, this has not been done.
HUD is interested in funding research
that improves the performance of
portable analytical technologies for lead
dust-wipe analysis with the ultimate
goal of improving the feasibility for such
technologies to be used to conduct
definitive analyses in the field.
HUD has funded research for the onsite use of X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) for
dust wipe lead analysis and does not
intend to fund additional work on this
topic through this NOFA.
(2) Reducing exterior soil as a cause
of dust-lead hazards. Studies have
shown that lead in exterior dust and soil
can be an important source of lead
exposure to young children, both
through direct contact and indirectly
when tracked or blown into the home.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
HUD has funded several studies that
have assessed approaches to reducing
the risk posed by this large
environmental lead reservoir. These
previous studies have focused on the
following topics: reducing the
bioavailability (as determined using in
vitro testing) of lead in soil through the
addition of composted biosolids or other
additives; reducing soil hazards in
urban yards through targeted
landscaping (e.g., raised beds,
improving ground cover); reducing
exterior dust-lead levels through
exterior building treatments and street
and sidewalk cleaning; development of
new sampling method for surface soils,
and reducing surface soil-lead hazards
by overlaying with clean soil and grass
cover (see, e.g.: Binns et al., 2004, and
Farfel et al., 2005, in Appendix B).
Additional study is needed to assess
the long-term effectiveness of interim
controls to reduce soil and exterior dustlead hazards. Research is also needed to
develop interim controls and strategies
for exterior dust and soil that are
reasonable in cost, feasible to
implement, and which do not require
frequent maintenance to retain their
effectiveness. Also, the relationship
between control of soil lead hazards and
interior dust lead levels has not been
adequately described.
(3) Effectiveness of Ongoing
Maintenance Activities in Controlling
Lead-Based Paint Hazards. There are
few studies directly assessing the
effectiveness of ongoing lead-based
paint maintenance programs. HUD is
interested in evaluating the
effectiveness and feasibility of ongoing
lead-based paint maintenance programs,
identifying program components for
which particular implementation
difficulties exist, and evaluating
proposed measures for overcoming
those difficulties. Such an evaluation of
program components could address
whether and how technically-acceptable
and cost-effective work practices are
selected and implemented, how
effectively supervisors monitor work
activities to ensure that lead-based paint
hazards are controlled and that dust and
debris are contained and cleaned up
during and after work, and how well
clearance procedures (including
necessary re-cleaning) are integrated
into the maintenance program, among
other factors.
(4) Use of Available Databases to
Evaluate the Efficacy of Lead Hazard
Control Activities. Public databases can
be used to help target and assess the
effectiveness of lead hazard control
activities. Examples of this include the
use of census data to identify
neighborhoods that are at high risk for
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11559
lead poisoning (e.g., age and value of
housing used in combination with
indicators of socioeconomic status) and
the use of blood-lead screening data to
target dwellings that have been
associated with repeated identification
of resident children with elevated
blood-lead levels. Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) have also
been successfully used as a tool to help
target high-risk housing. At a broader
level, serial blood-lead screening data
could be used to assess the effectiveness
of lead hazard control activities or laws
that require lead hazard control
treatments in high risk housing (e.g., by
comparing community screening results
before and after laws were enacted
while accounting for the overall
downward trend in blood lead levels
and the performance of Lead Hazard
Control grantees and other activities).
HUD is interested in studies that assess
effective and creative uses of public
databases to improve the efficacy of lead
hazard control programs (e.g., targeting
neighborhoods), assess the effectiveness
of enforcement and lead hazard control
activities and regulations, and other
uses of these data that further the goal
of improving methods for the
identification and control of residential
lead-based paint hazards. Applicants
proposing projects under this topic area
should focus primarily on the use of
existing data as opposed to the
collection of new data through field
activities. An applicant must
demonstrate why the collection of any
new data is important in the context of
a proposed study (e.g., to validate a
model developed using publicly
available data) and that there is a
limited amount of new data being
collected.
(5) Other Focus Areas that are
Consistent with the Overall Goals of
HUD’s Lead Technical Studies Program.
HUD will consider funding applications
for technical studies on other topics that
are consistent with the overall goals and
objectives of the Lead Technical Studies
program, as described above. In such
instances, for an applicant to receive an
award, it is necessary that the applicant
describe in sufficient detail how the
proposed study is consistent with the
overall lead technical studies program
goals and objectives.
Note: A limited amount of lead hazard
control activities, which involve construction
rather than research, may be conducted as
part of a project (see Section IV.E.9 of this
NOFA).
b. Healthy Homes Technical Studies
(1) HUD expects to advance the
recognition and control of residential
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11560
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
health and safety hazards and more
closely examine the link between
housing and health. The overall
objectives of the Healthy Homes
Technical Studies projects to be funded
through this NOFA include, but are not
limited to:
(a) Development and evaluation of
low-cost test methods and protocols for
identification and assessment of
housing-related hazards;
(b) Development and assessment of
cost-effective methods for reducing or
eliminating housing-related hazards;
(c) Evaluation of the effectiveness of
housing interventions and public
education campaigns, and barriers and
incentives affecting future use of the
most cost-effective strategies;
(d) Investigation of the epidemiology
of housing-related hazards and illness
and injuries associated with these
hazards, with an emphasis on children’s
health;
(e) Evaluation of residential health
and safety hazard assessment and
control methodologies and approaches
(including both existing methods and
the evaluation of novel approaches);
(f) Analysis of existing data or
generation of limited new data to
improve knowledge regarding the
prevalence and severity of specific
hazards in various classes of housing,
with a focus on low-income housing.
Specific examples include:
(i) The prevalence of carbon
monoxide and other indoor air quality
hazards;
(ii) The prevalence and patterns of
moisture problems and biological
contaminants associated with excess
moisture (e.g., fungi, mold, bacteria,
dust mites);
(iii) The prevalence of specific
childhood injury hazards in housing;
and
(iv) Improved understanding of the
relationship between a residential
exposure and childhood illness or
injury.
Applicants that propose this type of
study should discuss how the
knowledge that is gained from the study
could be used in a program to reduce
these hazards in target communities.
(g) Low-cost analytical techniques and
instruments for the rapid, on- and offsite determination of environmental
contaminants of concern (e.g.,
bioaerosols, pesticides, allergens).
HUD’s primary interest is in the
improvement of existing instruments or
methods, and not in the development of
new technologies or instruments. The
OHHLHC has noted that these types of
studies pose a high risk of experiencing
significant delays. Applicants seeking to
develop new technologies/instruments
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
should discuss why, if funded, their
proposed project would be unlikely to
experience significant delays in its
completion.
(2) HUD is particularly interested in
the following topics:
(a) Improving or assessing the efficacy
of current methods for residential
Integrated Pest Management (IPM). IPM
approaches focus on the use of
economical means for managing pests,
which incorporate information on the
life cycles of pests and their interaction
with the environment, while
minimizing hazards to people, property,
and the environment. HUD is
particularly interested in IPM methods
for reducing cockroach and/or rodent
populations in multifamily housing,
with an emphasis on low-income
housing.
(b) Controlling excess moisture by
reducing migration through the building
envelope and condensation of water
vapor on interior surfaces, with an
emphasis on low-cost interventions for
low-income housing;
(c) Improving indoor air quality, such
as through cost-effective approaches to
upgrading residential ventilation or
improving control/management of
combustion appliances. Applicants
should discuss how proposed
approaches might affect residential
energy costs (e.g., increasing air
exchange rates resulting in an increase
in heating costs);
(d) Dust control measures (e.g.,
preventing track-in of exterior dust and
soil, improved methods for interior dust
cleaning) have been identified as key
areas in the HHI Preliminary Plan;
(e) Evaluating the effectiveness of
education and outreach methods
designed to provide at-risk families with
the knowledge to adopt self-protective
behaviors with respect to housingrelated health hazards. If you propose a
study in this focus area you should cite
and discuss the theoretical basis for the
education/outreach approach that you
are proposing.
(f) Other Focus Areas that are
Consistent with the Overall Goals of
HUD’s Healthy Homes Technical
Studies Program. HUD will consider
funding applications for technical
studies on other topics that are
consistent with the overall goals and
objectives of the Healthy Homes
Technical Studies program, as described
above. In such instances, for an
applicant to receive an award, it is
necessary that the applicant describe in
sufficient detail how the proposed study
is consistent with the overall program
goals and objectives.
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(3) General Information. In proposing
to conduct a study on a particular topic,
applicants should consider:
(a) The ‘‘fit’’ of the proposed hazard
assessment and/or control methods
within the overall goal of addressing
‘‘priority’’ health and safety hazards in
a cost-effective manner;
(b) The efficacy of the proposed
methods for hazard control and risk
reduction (e.g., how long is effective
hazard reduction maintained);
(c) Where and how these methods
would be applied and tested, and/or
perform demonstration activities; and
(d) The degree to which the study will
help develop practical, widely
applicable methods and protocols or
improve our understanding of a
residential health hazard.
Applications for a study for which the
sole or primary focus is on lead-based
paint hazards are ineligible for funding
under the Healthy Homes Technical
Studies program. Such studies should
be submitted for funding under the Lead
Technical Studies Program.
Applicants should consider the
efficiencies that might be gained by
working cooperatively with one or more
recipients of HUD’s Healthy Homes
Demonstration and/or Lead Hazard
Control grants, which are widely
distributed throughout the United
States. Information on current grantees
is available at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/lead.
You may address one or more than
one of the above technical studies topic
areas within your proposal, or submit
separate applications for different topic
areas.
Note: A limited amount of hazard control
activities, which involve construction rather
than research, may be conducted as part of
a Healthy Homes Technical Studies project
(see Section IV.E.9 of this NOFA).
2. Threshold Requirements
Applicable to all Applicants.
To receive an award of funds from
HUD, you must meet all the threshold
requirements in the General Section.
3. Program Requirements.
The following requirements are
applicable to both the Healthy Homes
Technical Studies and Lead Technical
Studies Programs:
a. Program Performance. Grantees
shall take all reasonable steps to
accomplish all activities within the
approved period of performance. HUD
reserves the right to terminate the
cooperative agreement prior to the
expiration of the period of performance
if the grantee fails to make reasonable
progress in implementing the approved
program of activities or fails to comply
with the terms of the cooperative
agreement.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
b. Regulatory Compliance. Grantees
must comply with all relevant federal,
state, and local regulations regarding
exposure to and proper disposal of
hazardous materials.
c. Blood Lead Testing. Any blood lead
testing, blood lead level test results,
medical referral, or follow-up for
children under 6 years of age will be
conducted according to the
recommendations of the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young
Children (see Appendix B of this
NOFA).
d. Restricted Use of Funds. HUD
technical studies grant funds will not
replace existing resources dedicated to
any ongoing project.
e. Laboratory Analysis for Lead.
Laboratory analysis covered by the
NLLAP will be conducted by a
laboratory recognized under the
program.
f. Laboratory Analysis for Mold.
Samples to be analyzed for mold (fungi)
must be submitted to a laboratory
accredited through the Environmental
Microbiological Laboratory
Accreditation Program (EMLAP),
administered by the American
Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA).
g. Human Research. Human research
subjects will be protected from research
risks in conformance with Federal
Policy for the Protection of Human
Subjects, required by HUD at 24 CFR
60.101, which incorporates the
Department of Health and Human
Services (DHHS) Protection of Human
Subjects regulation at 45 CFR part 46.
h. OSHA Compliance. The
requirements of the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA)
(e.g., 29 CFR part 1910 and/or 1926, as
applicable) or the state or local
occupational safety and health
regulations, whichever are most
stringent, will be met.
i. Civil Rights. The institution
administering the grant must meet the
civil rights threshold set forth in the
General Section.
j. Disclosure. All test results and other
information in pre-1978 housing related
to lead-based paint or lead-based paint
hazards must be provided to the owner
of the unit, together with a statement
describing the owner’s legal duty to
disclose the knowledge of lead-based
paint and its hazards to tenants (before
initial leasing, or before lease renewal
with changes) and buyers (before sale)
(24 CFR Part 35, subpart A). Disclosure
of other identified housing-related
health or safety hazards to the owner of
the unit, for purposes of remediation, is
encouraged but not required.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
k. Privacy. Submission of any
information on the properties to
databases (whether Web site, computer,
paper, or other format) of addresses of
identified, treated or cleared housing
units is subject to the protections of the
Privacy Act of 1974, and shall not
include any personal information that
could identify any child affected. You
should also check to ensure you meet
state privacy regulations.
l. Applicants must incorporate
meaningful community involvement
into any study that requires a significant
level of interaction with a community
during implementation (e.g., projects
being conducted within occupied
dwellings or which involve surveys of
community residents). The term
community refers to a variety of
populations comprised of persons who
have commonalities that can be
identified (e.g., based on geographic
location, ethnicity, health condition,
common interests). Applicants should
identify the community that is most
relevant to their particular project.
There are many different approaches to
involving the community in the
conception, design, and implementation
of a study and the subsequent
dissemination of findings. Examples
include but are not limited to:
Establishing a structured approach to
obtain community input and feedback
(e.g., through a community advisory
board); including one or more
community-based organizations as
study partners; employing community
residents to recruit study participants
and collect data; and enlisting the
community in the dissemination of
findings and translation of results into
improved policies and/or practices. A
discussion of community involvement
in research involving housing-related
health hazards can be found in Chapter
5 of the Institute of Medicine
publication titled ‘‘Ethical
Considerations for Research on
Housing-Related Health Hazards
Involving Children’’ (see Appendix B
for more information on this report).
m. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). This program is subject to the
requirements of section 3 of the Housing
and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12
U.S.C. 1701u). Section 3 requires
recipients to ensure that, to the greatest
extent feasible, training, employment,
and other economic opportunities will
be directed to low- and very low-income
persons, particularly those who are
recipients of government assistance for
housing, and to businesses which
provide economic opportunities to lowand very low-income persons. The
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11561
regulations may be found at 24 CFR part
135.
n. Standardized Dust Sampling
Protocol and Quality Control
Requirements. Grantees collecting
samples of settled dust from participant
homes for environmental allergen
analyses (e.g., cockroach, dust mite) will
be required to use a standard dust
sampling protocol, unless there is a
strong justification to use an alternate
protocol (e.g., the study involves the
development of an alternative sampling
method). The HUD protocol can be
found on the OHHLHC Web site at:
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/hhi/
hhiresources.cfm. Grantees conducting
these analyses will also be required to
include quality control dust samples,
provided by OHHLHC at no cost to the
grantee, with the samples that are
submitted for laboratory analyses. For
the purpose of budgeting laboratory
costs, you should assume that 5 percent
of your total allergen dust samples will
consist of Quality Control samples.
4. DUNS Requirement.
Refer to the General Section for
information regarding the DUNS
requirement. A DUNS number must be
provided for the institution that is
submitting an application. Your DUNS
number must be included in your
electronic application submission. Be
sure to use the DUNS number that you
have registered as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR) with
Grants.gov and that your eBusiness
Point of Contact has authorized you to
submit an application on behalf of the
applicant organization (see the General
Section for details about the Grants.gov
registration process).
IV. Application and Submission
Information
If you are interested in applying for
funding under this program, please
review carefully the General Section
and the following additional
information.
A. Addresses to Request Application
Package
All applications must be submitted
electronically. The information required
to submit an application is contained in
the program section of this NOFA and
the General Section. Applications can
be downloaded from the web at: https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information you
may call the Grants.gov help line tollfree at (800) 518–GRANTS (4726) from
Monday to Friday from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m.
eastern time, or send an e-mail to
Support@grants.gov.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11562
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Applicant Data. Your application
must contain the items listed in this
section. These items include the
standard forms contained in the General
Section that are applicable to this
funding announcement (collectively
referred to as the ‘‘standard forms’’).
Copies of these forms are available on
line at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. The
required items are:
a. Application Abstract. An abstract
with the project title, the names and
affiliations of all investigators, and a
summary of the objectives, expected
results, and study design (two-page
maximum) must be included in the
proposal. Information contained in the
abstract will not be considered in the
evaluation and scoring of your
application. Any information you wish
to be considered should be provided
under the appropriate rating factor
response.
b. All forms as required by the
General Section. However, forms HUD–
2991 (Certification of Consistency with
the Consolidated Plan) and HUD–27061
(Race and Ethnicity Data) are not
required with the application for these
programs.
c. Materials Submitted. A project
description/narrative statement
addressing the rating factors for award
under the program (Lead Technical
Studies or Healthy Homes Technical
Studies) for which you are applying.
The narrative statement must be
identified in accordance with each
factor for award (Rating Factors 1
through 5). Number the pages of your
narrative statement. The project
description or narrative must be
included in the responses to the rating
factors. The response to the rating
factors should not exceed a total of 25
pages, single-sided, with a minimum 12point font and a minimum margin width
of 1-inch. Any pages in excess of this
limit will not be read. The points you
receive for each rating factor will be
based on the portion of your narrative
statement that you submit in response to
that particular factor, supplemented by
any appendices that are referenced in
your narrative response to the rating
factor. Supporting materials that are not
referenced or discussed in your
responses to the individual rating
factors will not be considered.
Additional materials (e.g., appendices)
must be submitted with your
application according to the directions
in the General Section. The footer on the
pages of these materials should identify
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the rating factor that they are
supporting.
d. Supporting Materials. Include the
resumes of the principal investigator
and other key personnel and other
materials that are needed in your
response to the rating factors (e.g.,
organizational chart, letters of
commitment, a list of references cited in
your responses to the rating factors).
Each resume shall not exceed three
pages, and is limited to information that
is relevant in assessing the
qualifications and experience of key
personnel to conduct and/or manage the
proposed technical studies. This
information will not be counted towards
the Rating Factors narrative 25-page
limit.
e. Additional Information. Submit
other optional information provided in
support of your application following
the directions in the General Section.
These additional optional materials
must not exceed 20 pages. Any pages in
excess of this limit will not be read. Do
not include additional narrative
information that is an extension of or
expands upon any of your rating factor
responses. Such narrative will not be
considered.
f. Budget. Include a total budget with
supporting cost justification up to four
pages, which will cover all budget
categories of the federal grant request.
This information will not be counted
towards the Rating Factors narrative 25page limit. Use the budget format
discussed in Rating Factor 3, Section
V.A.3.c, below. In completing the
budget forms and justification, you
should address the following elements:
(1) Direct Labor costs, including all
full- and part-time staff required for the
planning and implementation phases of
the project. These costs should be based
on full time equivalent (FTE) or hours
per year (hours/year) (i.e., one FTE
equals 2,080 hours/year);
(2) Allowance for one trip to HUD
Headquarters in Washington, DC, for
each year of your grant, planning each
trip for two people. The first trip will
occur shortly after grant award for a stay
of two or three days, depending on your
location, and the remaining trips will
have a stay of one or two days,
depending on your location;
(3) A separate budget proposal for
each subrecipient receiving more than
10 percent of the total federal budget
request;
(4) Supporting documentation for
salaries and prices of materials and
equipment, upon request; and
(5) Indirect Cost Rates. Organizations
that have a federally negotiated indirect
cost rate should use that rate and the
appropriate base. The documentation
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
will be verified during award
negotiations. Organizations that do not
have a federally negotiated rate
schedule must obtain a rate from their
cognizant federal agency, otherwise the
organization will be required to obtain
a negotiated rate through HUD.
g. Checklist for Technical Studies
Program Applicants.
(1) Applicant Abstract (limited to 2
pages).
(2) Rating Factor Responses (Total
narrative response limited to 25 pages.)
(a) Capacity of the Applicant and
Relevant Organizational Experience (21
points).
(b) Need/Extent of the Problem (15
points).
(c) Soundness of Approach (50
points).
(d) Leveraging Resources (6 points).
(e) Achieving Results and Program
Evaluation (8 points).
(f) Bonus Points (RC/EZ/EC–II) (2
points).
(3) Required materials in response to
rating factors (does not count towards
25-page limit).
(a) Resumes of Key Personnel (limited
to 3 pages per resume).
(b) Organizational Chart.
(c) Letters of Commitment (if
applicable)—Letters of commitment
should include language defining the
activities to be performed, the
contributions to be made, and the
monetary value of each.
Note: HUD recommends against including
letters of support that do not commit
services, materials, or funds; they will not
add to the consideration of your application.
(4) Optional material in support of the
Rating Factors (20 page limit).
(5) Required Forms and Budget
Material.
(a) Form SF 424 (Application for
Federal Assistance).
(b) Form HUD–424–CBW (Budget
Worksheet).
(c) Form HUD–96010 (Logic Model
Form).
(d) Form SF–424 Supplement,
‘‘Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunities for Applicants’’ (‘‘Faith
Based EEO Survey (SF–424 SUPP)’’ on
Grants.gov) (to be completed by private
nonprofit organizations only).
(e) Form SF LLL (Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities, if applicable).
(f) Form HUD–2880, ‘‘Applicant/
Recipient Disclosure/Update Report’’
(‘‘HUD Applicant Recipient Disclosure
Report’’ on Grants.gov).
(g) Form HUD–2990 (Certification of
Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC–II
Strategic Plan, required only for
applicants who are seeking these 2
bonus points).
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(h) Form HUD–2994–A (You Are Our
Client Grant Applicant Survey,
Optional).
(i) Form HUD–27300, ‘‘Questionnaire
for HUD’s Removal of Regulatory
Barriers’’ (‘‘HUD Communities Initiative
Form’’ on Grants.gov) including the
required information, if applicable.
(j) Form HUD–96011, ‘‘Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal’’
(‘‘ Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov) (Used as the cover page to
transmit third party documents and
other information designed for each
specific application for tracking
purposes. HUD will not read faxes that
do not use the HUD–96011 as the cover
page to the fax).
C. Submission Dates and Times
Electronic applications must be
received and validated by Grants.gov on
or before 11:59:59 PM eastern time on
the application deadline date. Refer to
the General Section for submission
requirements.
D. Intergovernmental Review
This NOFA is excluded from the
requirement of an Intergovernmental
Review.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Administrative Costs. There is a 10
percent maximum allowance for
administrative costs. Additional
information about allowable
administrative costs is provided in
Appendix C of this NOFA, which can be
downloaded from Grants.gov.
2. Indirect Costs. Please see https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm for reference to the
Indirect Cost requirements.
3. Purchase of Real Property. The
purchase of real property is not an
allowable cost under this program.
4. Purchase or Lease of Equipment.
The purchase or lease of equipment
having a per unit cost in excess of
$5,000 is not an allowable cost, unless
prior written approval is obtained from
HUD.
5. Medical Treatment. Medical
treatment costs are not allowable under
this program.
6. Profit. For profit institutions are not
allowed to earn a profit.
7. You must comply with the Coastal
Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3501).
8. You may not conduct lead-based
paint or healthy home hazard control
activities or related work that
constitutes construction, reconstruction,
repair or improvement (as referenced in
Section 3(a)(4) of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001–
4128)) of a building or mobile home
which is located in an area identified by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) as having special flood
hazards unless:
a. The community in which the area
is situated is participating in the
National Flood Insurance Program in
accordance with the applicable
regulations (44 CFR parts 59–79), or less
than a year has passed since FEMA
notification regarding these hazards;
and
b. Where the community is
participating in the National Flood
Insurance Program, flood insurance on
the property is obtained in accordance
with section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act (42 U.S.C. 4012a(a)). You
are responsible for assuring that flood
insurance is obtained and maintained
for the appropriate amount and term.
9. Construction Activities. The
amount of HUD Lead Technical Studies
grant funds used for lead-based paint
hazard control activities may not exceed
20% of the total HUD funds awarded.
The amount of HUD Healthy Homes
Technical Studies grant funds used for
construction activities may not exceed
40% of the total HUD funds awarded.
Furthermore, the majority of any funds
dedicated to Healthy Homes
construction activities shall be spent for
interventions not intended for lead
hazard control.
F. Other Submission Requirements
Applicants are required to submit
applications electronically via the Web
site https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. See sections IV.B
and F of the General Section for
additional information on the electronic
process and how to request a waiver
from the requirement if necessary.
Applicants should submit their waiver
requests in writing using e-mail. Waiver
requests must be submitted no later than
15 days prior to the application
deadline date and should be submitted
to Ms. Jonnette Hawkins at:
Jonnette_G._Hawkins@hud.gov.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Threshold Requirements.
Applications that meet all of the
threshold requirements will be eligible
to be scored and ranked, based on the
total number of points allocated for each
of the rating factors described in Section
V.A.3 of this NOFA. Your application
must receive a total score of at least 75
points to be considered for funding.
2. Award Factors. Each of the five
factors is weighted as indicated by the
number of points that are assigned to it.
The maximum score that can be attained
is 100 points plus a possible 2 bonus
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11563
points. Applicants should be certain
that each of these factors is adequately
addressed in the project description and
accompanying materials.
3. Rating Factors.
a. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (21 Points). This factor
addresses the extent to which you have
the ability and organizational resources
necessary to successfully implement
your proposed activities in a timely
manner. The rating of your application
will include any sub-grantees,
consultants, sub-recipients, and
members of consortia that are firmly
committed to the project (generally,
‘‘subordinate organizations’’). In rating
this factor, HUD will consider the extent
to which your application demonstrates:
(1) The capability and qualifications
of key and supporting personnel (14
points). HUD will assess the
qualifications of key personnel to carry
out the proposed study as evidenced by
relevant academic background,
publications, and recent (within the past
10 years) research experience.
Publications and/or research experience
are considered relevant if they required
the acquisition and use of knowledge
and skills that can be applied in the
planning and execution of the technical
study that is proposed under this
NOFA. HUD will also evaluate the
qualifications of supporting personnel
such as statisticians and research
assistants. Partner organizations will
also be evaluated with respect to their
qualifications and capabilities to
successfully implement their proposed
project roles.
(2) Past performance of the study
team in managing similar projects (7
points). HUD will evaluate your
demonstrated ability to successfully
manage various aspects (e.g., personnel
management, data management, quality
control, reporting) of a complex
technical study, as well as your overall
success in completing projects on time
and within budget. If applicable,
provide the number and title of current
and past OHHLHC grants as well as past
performance of the organization
(applicant and/or partners) on other
grant(s) or project(s) related to
residential environmental health and
safety research, or other relevant
experience. Provide details about the
nature of the project, the funding
agency, and your performance (e.g.,
timely completion, achievement of
desired outcomes). You should also
discuss the degree to which the results
from past research have been used to
develop new or improved methods or
tools for residential hazard assessment
or control. If your organization has an
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11564
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
active OHHLHC grant or cooperative
agreement, provide a description of the
progress and outcomes achieved under
that award.
If you completed one or more HUDfunded Technical Studies grants, your
performance will be evaluated in terms
of achievements made under the
previous grant(s). If you have completed
a previous HUD-funded Technical
Studies grant but you have not
published the study results in a peerreviewed scientific journal, you should
explain why the results have not been
published.
b. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (15 Points). This factor
addresses the extent to which there is a
need for your proposed technical study.
In responding to this factor, you should
document in detail how your project
will make a significant contribution
towards achieving some or all of HUD’s
stated goals and objectives for one or
more of the topic areas described in
Section I.B.1.a (Lead Technical Studies)
or I.B.1.b (Healthy Homes Technical
Studies), as appropriate for the program
to which you are applying. For example,
you should demonstrate how your
proposed study addresses a need with
respect to the development of improved
methods for the assessment and control
of residential lead-based paint hazards
or addresses a need associated with an
important housing-related health
hazard, with an emphasis on children’s
health. This is especially important for
applicants that are proposing to study a
lead or healthy homes topic that is not
highlighted as a priority area by HUD in
section III.C of this NOFA; such
applicants that do not provide
supporting language to demonstrate this
will not receive points under this rating
factor. Specific topics to be addressed
for this factor include (five points for
each item):
(1) A concise review of the research
need that is addressed in your study and
why it is high priority with respect to
the program. For Healthy Homes
Technical Studies applicants, include
available documented rates of illness or
injury associated with the hazard or
hazards that you are addressing,
including local, regional, and national
data, as applicable.
(2) A discussion of how your
proposed project would significantly
advance the current state of knowledge
for your focus area, especially with
respect to the development of practical,
cost-effective solutions.
(3) A discussion on how you
anticipate your study findings will be
used to improve current methods for
assessing or mitigating the hazards
under study. Indicate why the method/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
protocol that would be improved
through your study would likely be
widely adopted (e.g., low cost, easily
replicated, lack of other options).
c. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (50 Points). This factor
addresses the quality of your proposed
technical study plan. Specific
components include:
(1) Soundness of the study design (26
points). Clearly and thoroughly describe
the design of your proposed study and
identify the major objectives. If possible,
your study should be designed to
address testable hypotheses that are
clearly stated. The study should be
presented as a logical sequence of steps
or phases with individual tasks
described for each phase. Your narrative
should reflect the relevant scientific
literature, which should be thoroughly
cited in your application. Describe the
statistical basis for your study design
and demonstrate that you would have
adequate statistical power to test your
stated hypotheses and achieve your
study objectives. You should identify
any important ‘‘decision points’’ in your
study plan and you should discuss your
plans for data management, analysis and
archiving. You should demonstrate that
it is clearly feasible to complete the
study within the proposed period of
performance and successfully achieve
your objectives. HUD has observed that
studies can miss targeted performance
timelines because of delays in the IRB
approval process or unexpected
difficulties with recruiting study
participants, and delays in developing
new laboratory methods or instruments.
If applicable, describe actions that you
will take to minimize the possibility
that your study would experience
delays in these areas (e.g.,
understanding likely IRB requirements
in advance, planning on additional
avenues for recruitment of participants,
initiating the development of new
methods/instruments).
If you are proposing to conduct a
study that includes a significant level of
community interaction (e.g., studies
involving participant recruitment,
survey research, environmental
sampling on private property), describe
your plan for meaningful involvement
of the affected community in your
proposed study. You should define the
community of interest with respect to
your proposed study and discuss why
and how your proposed approach to
community involvement will make a
meaningful contribution to your study
and to the community.
(2) Policy Priorities (5 points). Indicate
if your proposed study will address any
of the FY 2007 policy priorities that are
applicable to this NOFA (see the
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
General Section for additional details
regarding these policy priorities). You
will receive one point under Rating
Factor 3(2) for each of the applicable FY
2007 policy priorities that are found in
the General Section and applicable to
the Technical Studies NOFA that are
adequately addressed in your
application, with the exception of
‘‘Removal of Barriers to Affordable
Housing,’’ for which you can receive up
to two points (see the General Section).
Policy priorities that are applicable to
the Technical Studies NOFA are: (1)
Improving our Nation’s Communities
(focus on distressed communities); (2)
Providing Full and Equal Access to
Grass-Roots Faith-based and other
Community-based Organizations in
HUD Program Implementation; (3)
Participation of Minority-Serving
Institutions in HUD Programs, and (4)
Removal of Barriers to Affordable
Housing.
Each policy priority is worth one
point, except for policy priority (4),
Removal of Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing, which is worth up
to 2 points provided the applicant
includes a narrative response and
submits the required documentation as
described in Form HUD 27300 to this
policy priority. Applicants may also
provide a Web site address where the
documentation can be readily found.
(3) Quality assurance mechanisms (8
points). You must describe the quality
assurance mechanisms that will be
integrated into your project design to
ensure the validity and quality of the
results. Applicants that receive awards
will be required to submit a Quality
Assurance Plan to HUD. You should
plan for this and include Quality
Assurance activities in your study work
plan. The Office of Management and
Budget paperwork approval for the
Quality Assurance Plan template for this
program is currently pending.
(a) Discuss the major quality
assurance mechanisms that are relevant
for your proposed study. Examples of
quality assurance mechanisms include,
but are not limited to: procedures for
selection of samples/sample sites,
sample handling, use of quality control
samples, validating the accuracy of
instrumentation, measures to ensure
accuracy during data management, staff
training, and final validation of your
dataset. Documents (e.g., government
reports, peer-reviewed academic
literature) that provide the basis for your
quality assurance mechanisms should
be cited. Also, identify members of the
study team who will have primary
responsibility for drafting and ensuring
compliance with the Quality Assurance
Plan. Your application will be rated on
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the thoroughness, clarity, and validity of
your proposed quality assurance
activities, and their appropriateness for
ensuring the validity and quality of the
data.
(b) For the collection of data using
instruments, such as surveys and visual
assessment tools, describe the
procedures that you will follow to
ensure accurate data capture and
transfer (e.g., transfer of data from the
field to a database). Also, describe any
research done (or planned) to validate
the instrument.
(c) Institutional Review Boards. In
conformance with the Common Rule
(Federal Policy for the Protection of
Human Subjects, codified by HUD at 24
CFR 60.101, which incorporates the
DHHS regulation at 45 CFR part 46), if
your research involves human subjects,
your organization must provide proof
(e.g., a letter signed by an appropriate
official) that the research has been
reviewed and approved by an
Institutional Review Board (IRB) before
you can initiate activities that require
IRB approval. Before initiating such
activities you must also provide the
number for your organization’s
assurance (i.e., an ‘‘institutional
assurance’’) that has been approved by
the DHHS’s Office for Human Research
Protections (OHRP).
You do not have to provide proof of
IRB approval with your application. If
you do not have IRB approval yet, you
should address how you will obtain
such approval. Describe how you will
obtain informed consent (e.g., from the
subjects, their parents or their
guardians, as applicable) and discuss
the steps you will take to help ensure
participants’ understanding of the
elements of informed consent, such as
the purposes, benefits and risks of the
research. Describe how this information
will be provided and how the consent
will be collected. For example, describe
your use of ‘‘plain language’’ forms,
flyers and verbal scripts, and how you
plan to work with families with limited
English proficiency or primary
languages other than English, and with
families including persons with
disabilities. For additional information
on what constitutes human subject
research or how to obtain an
institutional assurance see the OHRP
Web site at https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/.
(4) Project management plan (5
points). The proposal should include a
management plan that provides a
schedule for the clear and expeditious
completion of major tasks, with
associated benchmarks and major study
milestones, and major deliverables. If
your application includes multiple
organizations, you should identify the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
organization/person that has primary
responsibility for completion of each of
the major study tasks. The major tasks
and benchmarks/deliverables identified
in the management plan should be
consistent with those identified in the
Logic Model (see description under
Rating Factor 5). You should include
plans for preparation of one or more
articles for publication in peer-reviewed
academic journals and submission of
the draft(s) to the journal(s) after HUD
acceptance. The final deliverable can be
submitted to HUD during the agreed
upon period of performance or during
the 90-day closeout period following
award expiration.
(5) Budget Proposal (6 points).
(a) Your budget proposal should
thoroughly estimate all applicable direct
and indirect costs, and be presented in
a clear and coherent format in
accordance with the requirements listed
in the General Section. HUD is not
required to approve or fund all
proposed activities. You must
thoroughly document and justify all
budget categories and costs (Form HUD–
424–CBW) and all major tasks, for
yourself, sub-recipients, major
subcontractors, joint venture
participants, or others contributing
resources to the project. A separate
budget must be provided for partners
who are proposed to receive more than
10 percent of the federal budget request.
Your application will be evaluated on
the extent to which your resources are
appropriate for the scope of your
proposed study.
(b) Your narrative justification
associated with these budgeted costs
should be submitted as part of the Total
Budget (Federal Share and Matching),
but is not included in the 25-page limit
for this submission. Separate narrative
justifications should be submitted for
partners that are submitting separate
budgets.
(c) The application will not be rated
on the proposed cost; however, cost will
be considered in addition to the rated
factors to determine the proposal most
advantageous to the Federal
Government. Cost will be the deciding
factor when proposals ranked under the
listed factors are considered acceptable
and are substantially equal.
d. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (6 Points). Your proposal
should demonstrate that the
effectiveness of HUD’s Technical
Studies grant funds is being increased
by securing other public and/or private
resources or by structuring the project in
a cost-effective manner, such as
integrating the project into an existing
study (either funded by HUD or another
source) that will be concurrent with
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11565
your proposed study. Resources may
include funding or in-kind
contributions (such as services, facilities
or equipment) allocated to the
purpose(s) of your project. Staff and inkind contributions should be assigned a
monetary value.
You should provide evidence of
leveraging/partnerships by submitting:
letters of firm commitment, memoranda
of understanding, and/or agreements to
participate from those entities identified
as partners in the project efforts. Each
document must include the
organization’s name, proposed level of
commitment (with monetary value) and
responsibilities as they relate to specific
activities or tasks of your proposed
program. The commitment must also be
signed by an official of the organization
legally able to make commitments on
behalf of the organization. Simple letters
that only indicate support of the
proposed study are not sufficient.
Leveraging is discussed in Appendix D,
‘‘Matching and Leveraging Contribution
Guidance,’’ of this NOFA.
e. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (8 Points). This
factor emphasizes HUD’s commitment
to ensuring that applicants keep
promises made in their applications and
assess their performance to ensure
performance goals are met. Achieving
results means you, the applicant, have
clearly identified the benefits or
outcomes of your program. Outcomes
are ultimate goals. Benchmarks or
outputs are interim activities or
products that lead to the ultimate
achievement of your goals.
Program evaluation requires that you,
the applicant, identify program
outcomes, interim products or
benchmarks, and indicators that will
allow you to measure your performance.
Performance indicators should be
objectively quantifiable and measure
actual achievements against anticipated
goals. Your evaluation plan should
identify what you are going to measure,
how you are going to measure it, and the
steps you have in place to make
adjustments to your work plan if
performance targets are not met within
established timeframes.
This rating factor reflects HUD’s goal
to embrace high standards of ethics,
management and accountability. In
evaluating this factor, HUD will
consider how you have described the
procedures you will follow to have
reliable outcome measures and
performance, so that the project will be
recognized as being of high quality that
provides benefits to the community.
In your response to this Rating Factor,
discuss the performance goals for your
project and identify specific outcome
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11566
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
measures. Describe how the outcome
information will be obtained,
documented, and reported. You must
complete and return the eLogic
ModelTM Form HUD–96010 included in
the download instructions found as part
of the application at https://
www.grants.gov. You must show your
proposed project short-term,
intermediate, long-term and final
results. Instructions on the Logic model
are contained in the General Section
and are also contained in Tab 1 of the
electronic form. The form features drop
down menus from which to select and
construct the Logic Model response
relevant to your proposal. The
electronic logic model with dropdown
menus is in the instruction download at
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp under the program
NOFA.
Also, in responding to this factor, you
should:
(1) Identify benchmarks that you will
use to track the progress of your study;
(2) Identify important study
milestones (e.g., the end of specific
phases in a multiphase study,
recruitment of study participants,
developing a new analytical protocol),
which should also be clearly indicated
in your study timeline. Also identify
potential obstacles in meeting these
objectives, and discuss how you would
respond to these obstacles;
f. Bonus Points (2 points). Applicants
are eligible to receive up to two bonus
points for projects located within
federally designated Renewable
Communities (RCs), Empowerment
Zones (EZs), or Enterprise Communities
(ECs) designated by USDA in round II
(EC–IIs) (collectively referred to as RC/
EZ/EC–IIs), and which will serve the
residents of these communities (see the
General Section). In order to be eligible
for these bonus points, applicants must
meet the requirements of the General
Section and submit a completed form
HUD–2990, with descriptive language in
the budget discussion describing the
actual work that is to be done in these
communities.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Corrections To Deficient
Applications. The General Section
provides the procedures for correcting
deficient applications.
2. Rating and Ranking. Awards will
be made in rank order for each type of
Technical Studies Program applications
(Lead or Healthy Homes), within the
limits of funding availability for the
program.
a. Partial Funding. In the selection
process, HUD reserves the right to offer
partial funding to any or all applicants.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
If you are offered a reduced grant
amount, you will have a maximum of 14
calendar days to accept such a reduced
award. If you fail to respond within the
14-day limit, you shall be considered to
have declined the award.
b. Remaining Funds. See the General
Section for HUD’s procedures if funds
remain after all selections have been
made within either type of Technical
Studies Program.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Notice of Award. Applicants who
have been selected for award will be
notified by letter from the Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control Grant Officer. The letter will
state the program for which the
application has been selected, the
amount the applicant is eligible to
receive, and the name of the
Government Technical Representative
(GTR). This letter is not an authorization
to begin work or incur costs under the
award. An executed cooperative
agreement is the authorizing document.
HUD may require that all the selected
applicants participate in negotiations to
determine the specific terms of the
cooperative agreement, budget, and
Logic Model. If you accept the terms
and conditions of the cooperative
agreement, you must return your signed
cooperative agreement by the date
specified during negotiation. In cases
where HUD cannot successfully
conclude negotiations with a selected
applicant or a selected applicant fails to
provide HUD with requested
information, an award will not be made
to that applicant. In this instance, HUD
may offer an award, and proceed with
negotiations with the next highestranking applicant. Applicants should
note that, if they are selected for
multiple OHHLHC awards, they must
ensure that they have sufficient
resources to provide the promised
match and/or leveraging for the multiple
awards. During negotiations, applicants
selected for multiple awards will be
required to provide alternative match
and/or leveraged resources, if necessary,
before the grant can be awarded. This is
required in order to avoid committing
duplicate match and/or leveraged
resources to more than one OHHLHC
grant.
Awardees will receive additional
instructions on how to have the grant
account entered into HUD’s Line of
Credit Control System (LOCCS)
payment system or its successor will be
provided. Other forms and program
requirements will also be provided.
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
In accordance with OMB Circular A–
133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments and Non-Profit
Organizations), grantees expending
$500,000 in Federal funds within a
program or fiscal year must submit their
completed audit-reporting package
along with the Data Collection Form
(SF–SAC) to the Single Audit
Clearinghouse, the address can be
obtained from their Web site. The SF–
SAC can be downloaded at https://
harvester.census.gov/sac/.
2. Debriefing. The General Section
provides the procedures applicants
should follow for requesting a
debriefing.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Requirements.
a. Eligible Construction and
Rehabilitation Activities.
(1) A Technical Studies award does
not constitute approval of specific sites
where activities that are subject to
environmental review may be carried
out. Recipients conducting eligible
construction and rehabilitation
activities must comply with 24 CFR part
58, ‘‘Environmental Review Procedures
for Entities Assuming HUD
Environmental Responsibilities’’.
Recipients that are States, units of
general local government or Indian
tribes must carry out environmental
review responsibilities as a responsible
entity under part 58. Where the
recipient is not a State, unit of general
local government or Indian tribe, a
responsible entity, usually the unit of
general local government or Indian
tribe, must assume the environmental
review responsibilities for construction
or rehabilitation activities funded under
this NOFA. Under 24 CFR 58.11, where
the recipient is not a State, unit of
general local government or Indian
tribe, if a responsible entity objects to
performing the environmental review,
or the recipient objects to the
responsible entity performing the
environmental review, HUD may
designate another responsible entity to
perform the review or may perform the
environmental review itself under the
provisions of 24 CFR part 50. In such
cases, following grant award execution,
HUD will be responsible for ensuring
that any necessary environmental
reviews are completed. See paragraph
(2) below for additional assistance.
(2) For all grants under this NOFA,
recipients and other participants in the
project are prohibited from undertaking,
or committing or expending HUD or
non-HUD funds (including HUD
leveraged or match funds) on, a project
or activities under this NOFA (other
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
than activities listed in 24 CFR 58.34,
58.35(b) or 58.22(f)) until the
responsible entity completes an
environmental review and the applicant
submits and HUD approves a Request
for the Release of Funds and the
responsible entity’s environmental
certification (both on form HUD
7015.15) or, in the case where the
recipient is not a State, unit of general
local government or Indian tribe and
HUD has determined to perform the
environmental review under part 50,
HUD has completed the review and
notified the grantee of its approval. The
results of the environmental reviews
may require that proposed activities be
modified or proposed sites rejected. For
Part 58 procedures, see https://
www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/environment/
index.cfm. For assistance, contact
Edward Thomas, the Office of Healthy
Homes and Lead Hazard Control
Environmental Officer at (215) 861–
7670 (this is not a toll free-number) or
the HUD Environmental Review Officer
in the HUD Field Office serving your
area. If you are a hearing- or speechimpaired person, you may reach the
telephone number via TTY by calling 1–
800–877–8339. Recipients of a grant
under these funded programs will be
given additional guidance in these
environmental responsibilities.
b. All other activities not related to
construction and rehabilitation
activities are categorically excluded
under 24 CFR 50.19(b)(1), (3), and (9)
from the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321) and are not subject to
environmental review under the related
laws and authorities.
2. Conducting Business in Accordance
with HUD Core Values and Ethical
Standards. If awarded assistance under
this NOFA, prior to entering into a
cooperative agreement with HUD, you
will be required to submit a copy of
your code of conduct and describe the
methods you will use to ensure that all
officers, employees, and agents of your
organization are aware of your code of
conduct. See the General Section for
information about conducting business
in accordance with HUD’s core values
and ethical standards.
3. Participation in HUD-Sponsored
Program Evaluation. See the General
Section.
4. Removal of Barriers to Affordable
Housing. See the General Section.
5. HUD Reform Act of 1989. The
provisions of the HUD Reform Act of
1989 that apply to this NOFA are
explained in the General Section.
6. Executive Order 13202. Compliance
with HUD regulations at 24 CFR 5.108
that implement Executive Order 13202,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
‘‘Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and FederallyFunded Construction Projects’’, is a
condition of receipt of assistance under
this NOFA.
Note: This Order only applies to
construction work.
7. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See the General Section for
information concerning this
requirement.
8. Davis-Bacon Wage Rates. The
Davis-Bacon prevailing wage rates do
not apply to this program. However, if
program funds are used in conjunction
with other federal programs in which
Davis-Bacon prevailing wage rates
apply, then Davis-Bacon provisions
would apply to the extent required
under the other federal programs.
C. Reporting
1. Post Award Reporting
Requirements. Final budget and work
plans are due 60 days after the start
date.
2. Progress Reporting. Progress
reporting is required on a quarterly
basis. Project benchmarks and
milestones will be tracked using a
benchmark spreadsheet that uses the
benchmarks and milestones identified
in the Logic Model form (HUD–96010)
approved and incorporated into your
award agreement. For specific reporting
requirements, see policy guidance at:
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead. For FY
2007, HUD is considering a new concept
for the Logic Model. The new concept
is a Return on Investment (ROI)
statement. HUD will be publishing a
separate notice on the ROI concept.
3. Racial and Ethnic Beneficiary Data.
HUD does not require grantees to collect
racial and ethnic beneficiary data for
this program. Grantees conducting
studies that do not involve people, such
as those confined to the laboratory or
certain types of environmental
sampling, will not be required to submit
Form-27061 to HUD. If, however, racial
and ethnic data are collected and
reported as part of a study funded under
this program NOFA, you must use the
Office of Management and Budget’s
Standards for the Collection of Racial
and Ethnic Data as presented on Form
HUD–27061, Racial and Ethnic Data
Reporting Form (and instructions for its
use), found on https://www.hudclips.org/
sub_nonhud/html/forms.htm.
4. Final Report. The cooperative
agreement will specify the requirements
for final reporting (e.g., final technical
report and final project benchmarks and
milestones achieved against the
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11567
proposed benchmarks and milestones in
the Logic Model which was approved
and incorporated into your cooperative
agreement).
5. Draft Scientific Manuscript(s).
Grantees will be required to complete a
minimum of one draft manuscript for
publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
VII. Agency Contact(s)
For technical help in downloading an
application from Grants.gov or
submitting an application via
Grants.gov, call the Grants.gov help
desk at 800–518–GRANTS. For
programmatic questions on the Lead
Technical Studies program, you may
contact Dr. Robert Weisberg, Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control, at (202) 755–1785, extension
7687 (this is not a toll-free number) or
via e-mail at
Robert_F._Weisberg@hud.gov. For
programmatic questions on the Healthy
Homes Technical Studies program, you
may contact Dr. Peter Ashley, Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control, at (202) 755–1785, extension
7595 (this is not a toll-free number) or
via e-mail at Peter_J._Ashley@hud.gov.
For grants administrative questions, you
may contact Ms. Curtissa L. Coleman,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control, at telephone (202) 755–
1785, extension 7580 (this is not a tollfree number) or via e-mail at
Curtissa_L._Coleman@hud.gov. If you
are a hearing- or speech-impaired
person, you may reach the above
telephone numbers through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
A. Other Office of Healthy Homes and
Lead Hazard Control Information. For
additional general, technical, and grant
program information pertaining to the
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control, visit https://
www.hud.gov/offices/lead.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2539–0015. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 80 hours per respondent for the
application and 16 hours to finalize the
cooperative agreement. This includes
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
the time for collecting, reviewing, and
reporting the data for the application.
This information will be used for
grantee selection. The reporting burden
for completion of the Quality Assurance
Plan by applicants who are awarded a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
grant is estimated at 24 hours per
grantee (OMB approval is pending).
Response to this request for information
is required in order to receive the
benefits to be derived.
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
C. Appendices. Appendices A, B, C
and D to this NOFA are available for
downloading with the application at
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.014
11568
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Lead Outreach Grant Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control (OHHLHC).
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Lead
Outreach Grant Program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: The
Federal Register number is: FR–5100–
N–26. The OMB approval number is
2539–0015.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): 14.904,
Lead Outreach Grant Program.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 18, 2007. Applications must
be received and validated by grants.gov
no later than 11:59:59 pm eastern time
on the application deadline date. See
Section IV of the General Section,
regarding application submission
procedures and timely filing
requirements.
G. Additional Important Information:
1. Overall Purpose. This funding
opportunity is to provide funding for
information dissemination about lead
poisoning prevention through outreach.
2. Available Funds. Approximately $2
million is available under this program.
3. Number of Awards. Approximately
5 to 8 cooperative agreements will be
awarded.
4. Type of Awards. The awards will be
made as cooperative agreements.
5. Eligible Applicants. Academic and
non-profit institutions located in the
U.S., state and local governments, and
federally recognized Native American
tribes are eligible under all existing
authorizations. For-profit firms are also
eligible; however, they are not allowed
to earn a fee (i.e., no profit can be made
from the project).
6. Matching Requirements and
Leveraging. Ten percent match or cost
sharing from applicant and partners is
required. All contributions, regardless of
source, above the 10 percent match are
considered leverage. Leveraging is
encouraged. Applications will receive a
higher score under Rating Factor 4 if
you provide evidence of significant cost
sharing and leveraging. Leveraging
means increasing the amount or number
of eligible activities that can be
performed under this award through
cash or in-kind contributions of
resources. Applicants must provide
evidence that proposed matching
resources are not from Federal funds,
and provide a statement of commitment
that proposed matching or leveraging
resources are not previously committed
as match or leverage to support other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
applications or existing awards. Match
and leveraged resources may be used
only for eligible activities. See Section
III.B and Section V, Rating Factor 4.
7. Limitations on Applications. Each
applicant, partner, sub-contractor and
sub-recipient may participate in only
one application to the Lead Outreach
program. Outreach applicants are not
prohibited from receiving other
OHHLHC grant awards if those grant
programs’ selecting official selects them
for such awards.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description.
Background information about lead,
lead-based paint hazards and other
information applicable to this NOFA
can be found at: https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
A. Purpose of the Program. The
purpose of this program is to raise
public awareness and deliver HUDapproved training about lead-based
paint as a source of lead poisoning,
childhood lead poisoning prevention,
and proper lead hazard identification,
control and lead safe rehabilitation and
maintenance methods for at-risk
communities and children, primarily to
underserved populations. Only entities,
states or local governments that are not
current Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Control, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration, or Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program (LEAP)
grantees, or sub-grantees, contractors or
sub-contractors receiving 10 percent or
greater of the award may apply to this
program. If an applicant has received
previous OHHLHC funding, the
application must clearly explain why
there remains a need for lead outreach
in that jurisdiction.
B. Authority. The authority for this
program is Sections 1011(e)(8) and (g)(1)
of the Residential Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X
of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1992), and the
Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5,
approved February 15, 2007).
C. Changes in the FY 2007
Competitive NOFA. Listed below are
major changes from the FY 2006 Lead
Outreach NOFA:
1. The outreach and education
categories have been merged and the
technical assistance category of activity
has been eliminated.
2. Eligible outreach and educational
activities are clearly identified and
described.
3. For this round of funding, higher
points will be awarded to communities
having confirmed elevated blood level
(EBL) rates for children under 6 years of
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11569
age equal to or greater than 2.5 percent
and that track and report lead poisoning
data.
II. Terms of Award
A. Available Funding
Approximately $2 million from fiscal
year 2007 and prior year funds is
available under this program. HUD
anticipates that approximately five to
approximately eight cooperative
agreements will be awarded, for a
minimum of $200,000 and a maximum
of $400,000 each for the entire period of
performance.
B. Type of Award and Period of
Performance
1. Awards will be made as
cooperative agreements.
2. The anticipated start dates for new
awards is expected to be no later than
October 1, 2007. The period of
performance for awards will be 24
months from the date of award.
3. Period of performance extensions
for delays due to exceptional conditions
beyond the grantee’s control will be
considered for approval by HUD in
accordance with 24 CFR 84.25(e)(2) or
85.30(d)(2), as applicable, and the
OHHLHC Program Guide. If approved,
grantees will be eligible to receive a
single extension of up to 12 months in
length. Although applicants are
encouraged to plan projects with shorter
performance periods than 24 months,
you should consider the possibility that
issues may arise that could cause delays
when developing your schedule.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
1. Academic, not-for-profit and forprofit institutions located in the United
States, states and units of general local
government, and federally recognized
Native American tribes are eligible to
apply. For-profit firms are not allowed
to earn a fee (i.e., make a profit from the
project).
2. Current Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Control, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration, or Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program (LEAP)
grantees, sub-grantees, entities, states or
local governments receiving 10 percent
or greater of the grant award are not
eligible to apply to this program as
applicants, sub-grantees, team members,
contractors or sub-contractors in any
capacity receiving 10 percent or greater
of grant funds. Conversely, an entity
may not apply under this NOFA or be
a sub-grantee, sub-contractor,
participant, or partner receiving 10
percent or greater of grant funds. An
entity that is an existing grantee, sub-
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11570
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
grantee, sub-contractor or partner
receiving 10 percent or greater of grant
funds on another application or grant
may not apply under this program in
any role. Organizations that are ‘‘doing
business as’’ a different organization are
considered to be the same entity.
Organizations may not qualify for
eligibility by applying under a different
name.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Requirements. A 10 percent match is
required. Leveraging is encouraged.
Applicants must provide a matching
contribution of at least 10 percent of the
requested cooperative agreement sum. If
an applicant does not include proper
documentation of the minimum 10
percent match requirements in the
application, it will be considered
ineligible for an award and will not be
reviewed. Matching contributions may
be in the form of cash or in-kind (noncash) contributions or a combination of
these sources. Matched resources must
be used only for eligible activities. With
the exception of Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds, or other programs that only allow
their funds to be considered local funds
and therefore eligible to be used as
matching funds, federal funds may not
be used to satisfy any statutorily
required matching requirement, as
applicable. Federal funds may be used,
however, for contributions above the 10
percent match requirement, provided
that these funds are used only for
eligible activities under the Lead
Outreach program. The applicant must
submit a letter of commitment for the
match or leverage from each
organization other than itself that is
providing match or leverage, whether
cash and/or in-kind. The letter must
indicate the amount and source of the
match, and detail how the matching
funds will be specifically dedicated to
and integrated into supporting the
proposed cooperative agreement
program. The signature of the
authorized official on the Form SF–424
commits proposed matching or other
contributed resources of the applicant
organization. A separate letter from the
applicant organization is not required.
C. Other
1. Threshold Requirements.
Applicants must also meet the threshold
requirements of the General Section,
including the Civil Rights threshold.
2. Policies applicable to all activities
in this NOFA.
a. Each awardee will be assigned a
GTR (Government Technical
Representative) who will provide
oversight and approve grantees’
activities and deliverables.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
b. Awardees must use existing
outreach, training and technical
assistance documents unless they can
adequately justify in their application
that a great need exists in their
community to substantively modify
existing documents or create new ones.
Before creating a new product (such as
a brochure, curriculum or technical
document), grantees must investigate if
a similar item already exists and can be
used or revised with a level of effort
lower than would be spent creating a
new equivalent product. Applicants
must ensure that materials are
appropriate for the target populations,
including persons with Limited English
Proficiency (LEP), and for visually
impaired or other disabled persons (see
Eligible Activities, below). All new
products and adaptations/translations
must be submitted to HUD as
deliverables, in electronic format
suitable for web posting.
c. For use under this program, all
documents in languages other than
English must be culturally neutral
(understandable by speakers of all
dialects of the target language). For a
new translation to be acceptable,
grantees must provide evidence that
translators are certified by the American
Translators Association. Awardees are
responsible for first determining if a
translation already exists. Quality
reviews are required for all translations.
Reimbursements will not be allowed for
translations of federal documents that
have previously been translated into the
target language.
d. HUD has noted that during prior
funding rounds, some applicants to this
program have not met all requirements
for application content and submission.
HUD recommends that applicants use
and follow the application checklist in
this NOFA to help them identify any
missing elements and complete the
application before it is submitted. No
information may be submitted after the
deadline date except under the
threshold review process. Although
applications with curable deficiencies
are offered an opportunity at threshold
review to submit certain information to
cure these deficiencies, non-curable
deficiencies are not correctable and may
disqualify an application. (See General
Section.)
3. Eligible Activities. Consideration
will only be given to proposed activities
that are specifically listed as eligible in
this NOFA. Other work activities are
ineligible. All activities must address
childhood lead poisoning prevention
(primarily from lead-based paint in
housing) and/or control at the national,
regional, and/or local levels. If an
activity or training curriculum is not
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
specifically listed below, it may not be
used. The following section lists
specific eligible activities.
a. Door-to-door canvasses, smallgroup meetings, community meeting
visits, health fairs, conducting
presentations or speaking engagements
to inform the public and owners of
housing, including owners receiving
rehabilitation or other tax credits, about
programs that can assist in control of the
identified lead hazards, and other
activities to publicize or conduct events
that highlight lead hazards in the home
environment;
b. Earned media (no-cost public
service announcements), news stories in
radio, print, or TV to raise public
awareness and promote name
recognition for treatment programs;
c. Advertising (paid ads on buses,
billboards, etc.);
d. Use of collateral materials and
campaign props and incentives. These
materials include outreach brochures
and printed materials, visual
presentations, giveaways with outreach
providers’ phone numbers/contact
information, mascots, cleaning kits,
meals not to exceed $10 in value per
meal per person, etc. The use of
appropriate training materials is also
eligible, but training materials are not
considered to be collateral materials,
props or incentives. (See paragraph
III.C.3.o., Eligible Activities, below.)
Outreach materials and props can
support general lead outreach and
education efforts. However, the budget
must include details of the items
including cost per item. All
expenditures made by a grantee must be
linked to specific outreach activities and
listed in the approved budget;
e. Development and maintenance of
infrastructure and support such as
telephone hotlines and Web sites;
f. Entering into working arrangements
with regional/local non-profit
organizations, including grassroots
community-based organizations, faithbased organizations; chambers of
commerce; public and private social
service agencies; corporations, retailers,
construction organizations, or unions
for the purpose of coordinating or
conducting joint outreach activities;
g. Other outreach activities designed
to disseminate information to targeted
populations identified as being at-risk of
lead poisoning;
h. Making materials available in
alternative formats for persons with
disabilities (e.g., Braille, audio, large
type) upon request, and providing
materials in languages other than
English that are common in the
community, consistent with HUD’s
published Limited English Proficiency
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(LEP) Recipient Guidance, 68 FR 70968
(see above);
i. Program administration in
accordance with the guidelines
established under funding restrictions;
j. Program evaluation and assessment
activities to improve the effectiveness of
present and future outreach efforts and
to measure whether efforts have
successfully been targeted to at risk
populations;
k. Innovative use of funds to outreach
and education to regional/local
community groups, residents, and other
appropriate community stakeholders to
resolve regional/local lead poisoning
problems, as approved by the GTR;
l. Delivery of HUD-approved (or stateapproved, as applicable) Lead Safe
Work Practices (Interim Controls), EPAor state-approved lead training, Lead
Awareness training curricula, or visual
assessment training, for the target
audience(s);
m. Training regional/local residents
and businesses, including retail paint
sales associates and managers, on
identifying and preventing lead-based
paint hazards, and lead safe
maintenance and renovation work
practices, etc.;
n. Educating tenants, owners, housing
inspectors, and others about HUD’s lead
safety regulations, including the Lead
Disclosure Rule and Lead Safe Housing
Rule (24 CFR part 35), regional/local
building codes, and HUD’s Housing
Quality Standards (HQS) and Uniform
Physical Condition Standards (UPCS),
as applicable;
o. Training curriculum design,
development, maintenance and
evaluation; preparing, distributing
appropriate training materials,
including photographs, other graphics
and visual presentations (compliance
with copyright and trademark laws is
the responsibility of the grantee);
p. Applying for or maintaining EPA,
State or HUD approval of training
program (as applicable);
q. Promoting or marketing training
courses directly or through partnerships
with organizations conducting outreach;
r. Delivery of formal or one-on-one or
group educational or training sessions
in classrooms, homes or other locations;
s. Delivery of informal one-on-one or
group educational sessions, workshops
or demonstrations in homes or other
locations (cleaning techniques, etc.);
t. Participation in training-related
partnerships and task forces; and,
u. Auditing course delivery, training,
mentoring and evaluating trainers to
increase lead safety training capacity.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Address to Request Application
Package. All the information required to
submit an application can be
downloaded from the web at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Consult the
General Section for more information. If
you have difficulty accessing the
information, you may call the
Grants.gov helpline toll-free at (800)
518-GRANTS or e-mail Support@grants.
gov.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Application Format. Because of the
electronic submission process,
proposals must conform to the
formatting requirements below to be
eligible. All material submitted must be
required or be in support of the
narrative response to the rating factors.
Any material, whether required or
supplemental, that is not properly
located in the application, and
referenced and discussed within the
narrative statement as described below,
will not be rated. The narrative response
to all rating factors (see below) must be
submitted within a single electronic file
within the zip file attached to the
application. The narrative response to
the five rating factors may not exceed 25
pages (excluding required additional
materials and worksheets, see below)
equivalent to one-side only on 81⁄2 x 11
inch paper using a standard 12-point
font with not less than 3⁄4-inch margins
on all sides. Each attachment or
appendix must be an individual
electronic file. All pages must be
numbered in order starting with the
cover page and continuing through the
appendices. HUD is not responsible for
electronic transmission errors or
omissions. Applicants are responsible
for verifying the successful transmission
of all documents submitted with their
applications.
2. Prohibition on Materials Not
Required. Submission of materials other
than those specified as allowable by this
NOFA are prohibited. Reviewers will
not consider resumes (other than those
called for in response to the rating
factors), reports, charts, letters, or any
other documents attached to the
application.
3. Required Application Contents.
Applications must contain all of the
information required by this NOFA,
including the following items:
a. Application Abstract. An abstract is
required. It may not exceed 2 pages of
81⁄2 x 11 inch paper using a standard 12point font with not less than 3⁄4inch
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11571
margins on all sides in length, and must
summarize the proposed project,
including the objectives, proposed
activities and expected results, the
dollar amount requested, and contact
information for the applicant and
project partners. Information contained
in the abstract will not be considered in
the evaluation and scoring of your
application. Any information you wish
considered should be provided under
the appropriate rating factor. The 2-page
abstract will not be included in the 25page limit of the application.
The abstract will be used for
developing the news release to the
public if the application is funded.
b. Narrative Response. A narrative
statement with supporting required
forms and other documents addressing
the five rating factors for award is
required. This portion of the application
consists of a narrative response to each
of the five rating factors (total 25-page
limit), specific HUD-required forms
documents (which do not count toward
the page limit), and optional
supplemental material (20-page limit).
Pages in excess of these limits will not
be read. Each of Rating Factors 1–5 has
an associated required form (HUD–
96012, HUD–96013, HUD–96014, HUD–
96015, and HUD–96010, respectively)
that does not count toward the page
limits, and must be located immediately
after the response to that rating factor
(see list of forms, below). You are
advised to review each factor carefully
for program specific requirements. The
response to each factor should be
concise and contain only information
relevant to the factor, but detailed
enough to address each factor fully.
Please do not repeat material in
response to the five factors; instead,
focus on how well the proposal
responds to each of the factors. In
factors where there are sub-factors, each
sub-factor must be presented separately.
All information relative to a given
rating factor MUST be contained in the
narrative for that rating factor. If it is
found in a different rating factor, IT
WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. In
addition, supplemental material that is
not referenced and discussed within
that portion of the narrative will not be
considered.
c. In addition to the abstract and
narrative response described above, the
following materials (which do not count
toward the page limits) must be
included in the locations specified:
resumes, process flow diagram for the
project (not the employer’s
organizational chart), budget, and other
required forms. The standard forms can
be found in the application package on
Grants.gov.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11572
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(1) Resumes and a process flow
diagram for your project must be placed
immediately following the narrative
response to Rating Factor 1. Resumes for
project director, day-to-day program
manager and up to 3 key personnel
(limited to 3 pages per resume) are
required. (See Rating Factor 1.)
(2) Include a detailed budget for any
sub-contractors, sub-grantees, or subrecipients receiving greater than 10
percent of the federal budget request.
Use the budget format discussed in
Rating Factor 3.
(3) Form HUD–96010, Logic Model
(See Rating Factor 5).
(4) General letters of support will not
be considered and are discouraged.
d. Applicants are encouraged to use
the following checklist to ensure that all
required materials have been prepared
and submitted. Do not submit the
checklist (see below) with the
application.
Checklist for Applicants
Abstract (Limited to 2 Pages)
Required Information Supporting Rating
Factors
1. Capacity of the Applicant and
Relevant Organizational Experience,
plus Form HUD–96012; Resumes of
Proposed Project Director, Day-to-day
Program Manager and up to 3 Key
Personnel; Project Organization Chart.
2. Need/Extent of the Problem, plus
Form HUD–96013.
3. Soundness of Approach, plus Form
HUD–96014; budget forms and narrative
budget justification.
4. Matching and Leveraging Resources
plus Form HUD–96015, Leveraging
Resources, Letters of Commitment
attached immediately after Rating Factor
4.
5. Achieving Results and Program
Evaluation plus Form HUD–96010 Logic
Model.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Additional Material Supporting the
Rating Factors (attachments,
appendices, etc.: 20-page limit)
Complete Checklist of Required Forms
and Budget Material
1. Form SF–424 (Application for
Federal Assistance).
2. Form HUD–CBW (Detailed Budget
Worksheet).
3. Form SF–424 SUPP (Faith Based
EEO Survey) (to be completed by private
nonprofit organizations only).
4. Form SF–LLL (if applicable)
(Disclosure of Lobbying Activities).
5. Form HUD–2880 (Applicant
Recipient Disclosure Report).
6. Form-2990 Certification of
Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC/II
Strategic Plan (required only for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
applicants who are seeking these bonus
points).
7. Form HUD–2994A You Are Our
Client Grant Applicant Survey
(Optional).
8. Form HUD–27300 HUD
Communities Initiative (if applicable)
(up to 2 points can be awarded).
9. Form HUD–96011 Facsimile
Transmittal, for electronic applications
(used as the cover page to transmit
third-party documents and other
documentation designed for each
specific application for tracking
purposes. HUD will not read faxes that
do not use the HUD–96011 as the cover
page to the fax).
C. Submission Dates and Times
Application Submission Dates:
Applications must be received and
validated by Grants.gov by 11:59:59
p.m. eastern time on the deadline date.
Refer to the General Section for
additional requirements including
registration requirements, deadline
dates, Grants.gov validation, proof of
delivery, and other information
regarding electronic application
submission via https://www.grants.gov.
D. Intergovernmental Review. Not
applicable to this program. See 24 CFR
Part 52.
E. Funding Restrictions.
1. Administrative Costs. There is a 10
percent maximum allowance for
administrative costs. Additional
information about allowable
administrative costs is provided in
Appendix A and can be downloaded
with this application from https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Eligible
administrative costs include leases for
office space, under the following
conditions:
a. The lease must be for existing
facilities not requiring rehabilitation or
construction;
b. No repairs or renovations of the
property may be undertaken with
federal funds:
c. Properties in the Coastal Barrier
Resources System designated under the
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C.
3501) cannot be leased with federal
funds.
2. Indirect Costs. You must comply
with Indirect Cost requirements.
Guidelines for indirect cost
requirements are provided in Appendix
B and may be downloaded as part of
your application package from https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
3. HUD will not fund the following
ineligible activities:
a. Purchase of real property.
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
b. Purchase or lease of equipment
having a per-unit cost in excess of
$5,000, unless prior written approval is
obtained from HUD.
c. Identification of lead-based paint or
lead-based paint hazards, hazard
reduction (including, interim controls or
abatement), rehabilitation, remodeling,
maintenance, repair, or any other
construction work, blood lead testing of
adults or children, laboratory analysis,
medical treatment, clearance
examinations and visual assessment.
d. Renovations or construction work
on office space leased for the program.
e. Activities required in order to fulfill
court orders or consent decrees,
settlements, conciliation agreements, or
other compliance agreements.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Applications are required to be
received and validated electronically via
the Web site https://www.grants.gov. See
Section IV of the General Section for
additional information on the electronic
process. Waivers may only be granted
for cause. See General Section for
further discussion.
2. Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirements. Applicants should
submit their waiver requests in writing
by e-mail. Waiver requests must be
submitted no later than 15 days prior to
the application deadline date and
should be submitted to Jonnette
Hawkins, Director, Program
Management and Assurance Division,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control,
Jonnette_G._Hawkins@hud.gov.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Threshold Requirements.
Applications that meet all of the
threshold requirements will be eligible
to be scored and ranked, based on the
total number of points allocated for each
of the rating factors described in Section
V.A.3 of this NOFA. Your application
must receive a total score of at least 75
points to be considered for funding.
2. Award Factors. Each of the five
factors is weighted as indicated by the
number of points that are assigned to it.
The maximum score that can be attained
is 100 plus 2 possible bonus points.
Applicants should be certain that each
of these factors is adequately addressed
in the project description and
accompanying materials.
3. Rating Factors for All Categories.
a. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (20 points). This factor
includes information about the
organization, its individual employees
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
and partners, and past performance.
Higher points will be given for more
recent, relevant experience of high
quality. The following areas will be
evaluated: organizational capacity,
experience and past performance,
individual staff and participants’
qualifications including education and
experience, and specific qualifications
related to the categories of activities
under this NOFA. Applicants should
not explain their work plans in this
rating factor response, but should
demonstrate the ability and
commitment of its organization as a
whole and the individuals proposed to
serve on this project.
(1) Organizational Experience. This
sub-factor addresses the extent to which
the applicant’s organization has the
organizational experience necessary to
successfully implement the proposed
activities in a timely manner. HUD will
evaluate the organization’s experience
in initiating, implementing, and
evaluating related outreach, health
education and training and recruitment
projects, or solving community
problems directly related to this
program. In rating this sub-factor, HUD
will consider the extent to which the
proposal demonstrates organizational
experience that is recent and relevant.
HUD will consider organizational
experience within the last 5 years to be
recent and experience pertaining to
activities of similar scope to be relevant.
(a) Describe whether you have
sufficient personnel, or will be able to
quickly hire qualified experts or
professionals to begin your proposed
project within 30 days of award, if
funded.
(b) Describe how the principal
components of your project organization
will participate in, or support, your
project, and how you propose to
coordinate with your partners. Include a
project-specific organizational chart
indicating the organizational capacities
of and interrelationships among the
various entities involved in the project.
Do not provide an organization chart of
your employer unless it meets the
project-specific criteria described above.
(c) Past performance in previous
projects with an emphasis on health
education, outreach and recruitment,
training and education, or technical
assistance. This sub-factor evaluates the
extent to which an applicant has
performed previous work successfully.
Provide details about the nature of
projects performed through grants or
contracts. Applicants failing to disclose
previous grants or contracts with
OHHLHC or HUD may be deemed
ineligible for award. To receive
maximum points for this factor,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
applicants must provide the following
specific information:
(i) A detailed list outlining the period
of performance, achievement of specific
tasks, measurable objectives
(benchmarks) and outcomes consistent
with the approved timeline/work plan
and budget;
(ii) If any applicant, proposed partner,
contractor, sub-contractor or subrecipient intending to receive 10 percent
or greater of the award funding has had
previous OHHLHC grant funding, the
application must provide details about
the level of performance on that grant,
clear justification as to why additional
funds are requested at this time and
explanation regarding the local lead
poisoning surveillance and a tracking
system. If the jurisdiction has no local
system for tracking and reporting blood
lead data, do not enter any EBL data on
HUD-Form 96013 (see Rating Factor 2,
Need/Extent of the Problem).
(iii) Comparison of previous awards’
proposed match or leveraged resources
compared to what was actually
matched; and,
(iv) A detailed list outlining the
timeliness and completeness of
complying with all reporting
requirements. In addressing timeliness,
compare when reports were due with
when they were actually submitted.
(2) Individual Qualifications:
(a) Project Director and Day-to-Day
Project Manager. OHHLHC considers
these to be among the most important
individuals working on its grants.
Programs that do not experience
vacancies or high turnover in these
important positions typically have
levels of performance and success that
are higher than those of programs
having vacancies or high turnover.
Identify by name the individuals
proposed to serve as the overall project
director and day-to-day project manager.
The terms ‘‘Project Director’’ and ‘‘Dayto-Day Project Manager’’ must be used
consistently in the application to earn
points for individuals having these
responsibilities, regardless of their
current employer-assigned position
titles. Describe their individual
qualifications that will enable them to
function effectively in their assigned
roles, including knowledge, work
experience, management experience,
education, training, and publications.
Include specific projects they have
performed involving planning and
managing large and complex
interdisciplinary outreach or
educational programs, especially those
involving housing, public health, or
environmental initiatives.
(b) Other Key Personnel. Identify by
name and position up to three
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11573
additional key personnel. In this rating
factor response, provide the individual
qualifications, experience, percentage
commitment to the project, salary costs
to be paid by funds from this program,
and role in the proposed project for each
key personnel. You must provide
resumes (or position descriptions and
copies of job announcements including
salary range, for vacant positions) for
the project director, day-to-day project
manager, and up to three additional key
personnel to receive maximum points
for this rating sub-factor.
(c) Sub-recipients (sub-grantees, subcontractors and consultants). Include
descriptions of their experience and
qualifications. Detail their grant and
financial management experience. You
may find it useful to include a table
indicating the name, position and
percentage contribution of participating
individuals, specifying organizational
affiliation. Describe who is responsible
for quality control of processes and
materials produced by sub-recipients.
(3) In addition to other eligibility
criteria and knowledge of OHHLHC’s
grant programs, applicants must also
demonstrate specific capacity as
follows:
(a) Outreach Providers: Specific
capacity to provide outreach services,
such as holding community meetings,
health fairs, adapting printed materials,
writing public service announcements,
etc. Applications that include
development and distribution of media
products in languages other than
English must include a discussion of the
applicant’s (or sub-grantee’s/
contractor’s) expertise in those
languages and in meeting the
informational needs of non-Englishspeaking, underserved populations.
Outreach grantees involving face-to-face
interaction with the community should
have staff that are well-trained,
motivated, committed to the program,
and reflect the characteristics of the
target community.
b. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (10 Points). This factor
addresses the extent to which there is a
need for funding the proposed program
activities and an indication of the
importance of meeting the need(s) in the
target area. In this round of funding,
HUD is targeting those communities
with significant numbers of lead
poisoned children. All applicants are
encouraged to target minority
populations and utilize minority media
in an effort to achieve diversity in
outreach and educational efforts. The
proposal will be evaluated on the extent
to which the level of need for the
proposed activities and the importance
of meeting the need(s) are documented.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11574
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
To earn any points for this factor, the
data used must be specific to the area
where the proposed activities will be
carried out (for projects with specific
regional/local target areas, do not apply
the data to the entire regional/locality or
state). To receive maximum points for
this factor, proposals must demonstrate
that the target area(s) has a rate of
elevated blood lead levels in children
up to age six of 2.5 percent or greater.
Lead poisoned children are children up
to age 6 (72 months) who are tested and
have confirmed blood lead levels of at
least 10 micrograms per deciliter (µg/
dL). For this program, the confirmed
EBL rate is the total number of
confirmed cases expressed as a
percentage of the total number of
children tested.
In order to receive maximum points,
proposals addressing one or a few
communities must explain how the
targeted community’s(ies’) Five Year
Consolidated Plan(s) and Analysis(es) of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
(AI) identify the level of the problem
and the urgency in meeting the need.
Only communities whose Consolidated
Plans identify lead-based paint hazards
in housing as a serious problem and
have a clear implementation strategy for
meeting this need will receive
maximum points for this rating factor.
Communities having Consolidated Plans
that indicate the most serious needs and
present the clearest strategies will
receive higher points for this rating
factor.
To demonstrate these needs,
applicants must use surveys or other
analyses contained in at least one or
more current and reliable data sources.
In rating this factor, HUD will consider
data collected within the last five (5)
years and published by government
agencies or peer-reviewed journals to be
current and reliable. Sources for
regional/localized data can be found at:
https://www.ffiec.gov. Other reliable
sources of data include, but are not
limited to, Census reports, HUD
Continuum of Care gap analysis and its
E-Map (to find additional information,
go to HUD’s Web site: https://
www.hud.gov/emaps), Comprehensive
Plans, community needs analyses such
as provided by the United Way, and
other sound, reliable, and appropriate
sources.
c. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (40 Points). This factor
contains three sub-factors:
(1) your goals and objectives;
(2) the quality and cost-effectiveness
of your proposed work plan; and,
(3) proposed budget.
Before developing a work plan,
applicants should review the activities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
that are not eligible under this program,
as described in Section IV.E.3, above.
No points will be awarded for ineligible
activities. Higher points will be given to
applications that contain approaches
with clearly articulated goals, activities
and sub-activities, and demonstrate a
logical progression of implementation
steps.
(1) Project Goals (10 Points). Describe:
(a) The goals and objectives for your
project based on the need described
under Rating Factor 2, and
(b) How proposed activities would
address your goals and HUD’s policy
priorities.
See the General Section for
information on HUD’s policy priorities.
The policy priorities that are applicable
to the Lead Outreach NOFA and that are
eligible for one point each are: (1)
Improving our Nation’s Communities
(focus on distressed communities); and
(2) Providing full and equal access to
grass-roots, faith-based and other
community-based organizations in HUD
program implementation. Removal of
regulatory barriers to affordable housing
is eligible for up to 2 points provided
the required documentation, as
specified in form HUD 27300 (HUD
Communities Initiative), is part of the
application submission to HUD.
Applicants may also provide a Point of
Contact Name and phone or email
address and the required documentation
as noted in the form HUD 27300. You
may provide a URL for a Web site where
the required documentation is readily
accessible for use.
(2) Work Plan (20 Points). HUD will
award maximum points for this subfactor to applications that demonstrate a
high probability of success of the
program, convey the significance of the
tasks identified, and propose realistic
time frames. This portion of the
response will be evaluated based on the
extent to which the proposed work plan
demonstrates the following:
(a) The general approach and overall
strategy;
(b) Specific, measurable and timephased objectives for each major
program activity, accompanied by a
complementary schedule indicating
proposed date(s) of completion (in
three-month intervals);
(c) Specific services and/or activities.
The work plan must identify all major
tasks and list all proposed activities in
sequential order. For maximum points,
the activities must correlate to the needs
explained in the narrative response to
Rating Factor 2. All activities under this
program must assist the regional/local
area to develop or implement a strategy
to eliminate lead poisoning, target atrisk populations or areas, and
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
implement programs to meet those
populations’ information needs. In
addition, grantees’ regular, routine
activities must provide information to
owners and low-income occupants
about regional/local resources for
housing rehabilitation and lead hazard
control programs.
Describe in detail how you will
identify and serve participants receiving
services, especially participants in highrisk groups and communities,
vulnerable populations and persons
traditionally underserved. Include a
brief, concise outreach strategy or
marketing plan, as applicable, in the
work plan and list on the Logic Model
(submitted under Rating Factor 5). To
receive maximum points, you must:
(i) Identify your approaches to
overcoming poor response, attendance
or participation difficulties and explain
how you will ensure that proposed
activities do not duplicate activities by
others for the target area previously
completed or currently underway;
(ii) Identify the personnel responsible
for major tasks;
(iii) Describe your products or outputs
and expected outcomes or impacts;
(iv) Describe your proposed methods
to research existing materials or develop
new ones, and print and disseminate
materials for outreach or training. (Note:
All products to be distributed to the
public, whether in hard copy or
electronic format, must be submitted to
HUD for review and in final form as
deliverables in electronic format
suitable for web posting.)
(v) Describe how you will ensure that
materials will be of consistently high
quality and technically sound;
(vi) Describe the plan to manage the
project. Include details about the
management and financial systems, and
how you will track and ensure the costeffectiveness of expenditures and will
link them to specific activities;
(vii) Describe how you propose to
coordinate with HUD field offices and
HUD program personnel, as applicable,
in your application; and
(viii) Describe how you will make
materials available in alternative
formats for persons with disabilities
(e.g., Braille, audio, large type) upon
request, and provide materials in
languages other than English that are
common in the community, consistent
with HUD’s published Limited English
Proficiency (LEP) Recipient Guidance,
68 FR 70968.
(d) Outreach providers must follow
these specific program requirements:
(i) Increase lead awareness among the
general public;
(ii) Provide information to owners and
low-income occupants about regional/
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
local resources for housing
rehabilitation and lead hazard control
programs; and
(iii) Create a detailed outreach
strategy as part of their work plan.
(e) Training providers must follow
these specific program requirements:
(i) Meet a documented regional/local
need to develop a sustainable capacity
of lead safety trained workers and/or
EPA-or state-certified lead professionals;
(ii) Have underserved and minority
populations as the primary target
audience;
(iii) Provide information to owners
and low-income occupants about
regional/local resources for housing
rehabilitation and lead hazard control
programs;
(iv) Perform structured education of
other groups about lead poisoning
prevention and control;
(v) Target a specific, appropriate
audience;
(vi) Use a HUD-approved curriculum
for all interim controls training and
specify in the application all training
materials to be used;
(vii) Provide plans for sustainability
including train-the-trainer programs;
(viii) Design the course materials as
’’step-in’’ packages so that HUD or other
training providers may independently
conduct the course on their own;
(ix) Make the course materials
available to the GTR in sufficient time
for review (minimum of three weeks),
for you to provide revision, and for the
GTR to provide concurrence on the
content and quality prior to delivery;
(x) Provide all course materials in an
electronic format that will permit wide
distribution among field offices, and
HUD grantees (see the General Section
for information on formats acceptable to
HUD);
(xi) Arrange for delivery of the
training with HUD participation when
requested by the GTR;
(xii) Establish minimum enrollments
for deliveries of training courses;
implement and disseminate fair course
cancellation policies;
(xiii) Deliver HUD-approved training
courses that have been designed and
developed by others on a ’’step-in’’ basis
when requested; and
(xiv) For Interim Controls (Lead Safe
Work Practices), training providers must
comply with HUD’s Interim Criteria to
Evaluate Training Courses in Lead Safe
Work Practices (https://www.hud.gov/
offices/lead). The costs associated with
attending these required sessions are
eligible under the grant.
(f) Institutionalization (applies to all
applicants). All applicants must provide
a detailed description of how the
applicant plans to mainstream or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
continue integrating lead poisoning
prevention into its regular, permanent
programs. To evaluate
institutionalization, HUD will evaluate
the extent to which the applicant (and
partners) demonstrate:
(i) Other lead poisoning prevention
projects that are locally funded;
(ii) Specific examples of and the
degree of implementation of the Lead
Safe Housing Rule in the jurisdiction’s
publicly-funded housing programs, as
applicable;
(iii) Commitment to undertake project
activities in the future;
(iv) Support and involvement of the
applicant’s organizational leadership;
and
(v) Commitment to include leadrelated work in decisions affecting
policy and program development.
(3) Budget Justification (10 Points).
HUD is not required to approve or fund
all proposed activities. Your budget will
be evaluated for its reasonableness, clear
justification, and consistency with the
work plan. Submit a narrative
justification associated with the budget
that explains all budget categories and
costs for each major task of the work
plan and that does not simply repeat the
budget numbers in the narrative.
Identify the source of funds as HUD,
applicant match, or third-party (partner)
leverage. Each budget page should
identify the entity and project year to
which it applies. Higher points will be
awarded for greater percentages of subcontracting and substantive work
performed by bona fide and legitimate
grassroots organizations, including
faith-based and other community-based
non-profit organizations, Fair Housing
Organizations, advocates for various
minority and ethnic groups, and persons
with disabilities. Applicants should
note that national-level organizations
are not considered by HUD to be
grassroots organizations, which are
generally small, local groups with social
services budgets less than $300,000. In
completing the budget forms and
justification, you should address the
following specific elements:
(a) Direct Labor. Direct Labor costs
should include all full- and part-time
staff required for the planning and
implementation phases of the project.
These costs should be based on full-time
equivalent (FTE) or hours per year
(hours/year) (i.e., one FTE equals 2,080
hours/year);
(b) Travel to HUD Meetings. You
should budget for one trip annually to
HUD Headquarters in Washington, DC,
planning each trip for two people for 2
or 3 days, depending on your location;
(c) Sub-grantee and Sub-recipient
Budgets. Without exception, a separate
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11575
budget proposal must be provided for
any sub-recipient(s) receiving greater
than 10 percent of the total federal
budget request;
(d) Provide supporting documentation
for salaries and cost of materials and
equipment; and
(e) Federally Negotiated Indirect Cost
Rate, without exception. Organizations
that have a federally negotiated indirect
cost rate should provide documentation
of that rate. Organizations not having a
federally negotiated rate schedule must
obtain a rate from their cognizant
federal agency. Applicant and subgrantee budgets should reference only
their own indirect cost rates.
d. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (15 points). This factor
evaluates the ability to:
(1) Contribute allowable resources
from your organization; (2) leverage
(secure) other allowable public and/or
private sector resources (such as
financing, supplies, or services) that can
be added to HUD’s funds to perform
eligible activities; and, (3) sustain your
proposed project from sources other
than HUD at the end of the period of
performance. This program has a 10
percent match requirement. Higher
points will be awarded for percentages
of leveraged resources, compared to the
amount of HUD funds requested. To
receive points for leveraged resources
above the 10 percent required match, all
contributions committed for the period
of performance, whether cash or inkind, must be expressed in dollar values
and documented in a commitment letter
(or memorandum of understanding, or
agreement to participate) on official
letterhead submitted with the
application signed and dated by a
responsible official legally able to make
commitments on behalf of the
organization, from each contributing
organization (except that leveraging
from the applicant’s own resources does
not require a letter of commitment). The
letter must describe the contributed
resource(s) that will be used in your
project, and roles and responsibilities as
they relate to the proposed project.
Letters must be submitted with your
application.
For more information on matching
and leveraging resources, see Appendix
C, which can be downloaded from
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
e. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (15 points).
This rating factor reflects HUD’s goal to
embrace high standards of ethics,
management, and accountability.
Describe in detail your Year 1, Year 2
and Total goals. State clearly the project
activities including specific goals
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11576
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(outputs) of each activity and how you
will achieve those goals. Describe how
you will measure the results. Provide
your goals, activities (outputs),
outcomes and projected performance
results (goals) for the entire grant
period. In the narrative, explain how
you will document and track your goals,
program activities, and schedules.
Identify the procedures you will follow
to make adjustments to your work plan
to improve performance if projected
outputs and outcomes are not met
within established timeframes. To
receive maximum points for this rating
factor, you must explain your plan to
actively manage, not solely implement,
the proposed program. All awardees
will be required to use HUD’s Logic
Model to report results. Grantees may
also use a project management tool, to
manage and evaluate the programs’
effectiveness and modify strategies as
needed to achieve the greatest return on
HUD’s investment. HUD has found that
modest additional actions to gather
information about results would enable
grantees to better measure the impact of
their outreach and education efforts.
Outcomes that are vague or not
measurable will not receive points.
Applicants must complete and return
the Logic Model Form HUD–90610.
HUD is using a standardized ‘‘Master’’
Logic Model from which you can select
needs, activities (outputs), and
outcomes appropriate to your program.
See the General Section for detailed
information on use of the ‘‘Master’’
Logic Model. HUD is requiring grantees
to use program-specific questions to
self-evaluate the management and
performance of their program. Training
on HUD’s Logic Model and reporting
requirements will be provided via
satellite broadcast. In evaluating Rating
Factor 5, HUD will consider how you
have described the management and
evaluation mechanisms, benefits, and
outcome measures of your program.
HUD will also consider the proposed
objectives and performance objectives
relative to cost and achieving the
purpose of the program, as well as
evaluation plan, to ensure the project is
on schedule and within budget.
Instructions for completing the Logic
model are found in Tab 1 of the form
HUD 96010. Training on the Logic
Model is available via satellite broadcast
and webcast. The training schedule can
be found on https://www.hud.gov/
offices/admin/grants/fundsavail.cfm.
f. Bonus Points for Federally
Designated Zones and Communities (2
points). HUD will award two bonus
points to each application that includes
a valid Form HUD–2990 certifying that
the proposed activities/projects in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
application are consistent with the
strategic plan for an empowerment zone
(EZ) designated by HUD or the United
States Department of Agriculture
(USDA), the tax incentive utilization
plan for an urban or rural renewal
community designated by HUD (RC), or
the strategic plan for an enterprise
community designated in round II by
USDA (EC–II) and that the proposed
activities/projects will be located within
the RC/EZ/EC–II identified above and
are intended to serve the residents. A
listing of the RC/EZ/EC–IIs is available
on the Internet at https://www.hud.gov/
cr.
B. Reviews and Selection Process.
1. The review and selection process is
provided in the General Section. The
General Section also provides the
procedures for correcting deficient
applications.
2. Partial Funding. In the selection
process, HUD reserves the right to offer
partial funding to any or all applicants.
If you are offered a reduced grant
amount, you will have a maximum of 14
calendar days to accept such a reduced
award. If you fail to respond within the
14-day limit, you shall be considered to
have declined the award. Please see the
General Section for a discussion of
adjustments to funding that may be
made by HUD during the selection
process.
3. Remaining Funds. See the General
Section for HUD’s procedures if funds
remain after all selections have been
made.
4. Minimum Points for Award. Your
application must receive a total score of
at least 75 points to be considered for
funding.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates. HUD anticipates
announcing awards under this program
no later than October 1, 2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Notice of Award. Applicants that
have been selected for award will be
notified by letter from the Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control Grant Officer. The letter will
state the program for which the
application has been selected, the
amount the grantee is eligible to receive,
and the name of the Government
Technical Representative (GTR). This
letter is not an authorization to begin
work or incur costs under the
cooperative agreement.
2. Negotiations. HUD may require that
selected applicants participate in
negotiations to determine the specific
terms of the cooperative agreement,
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
budget, and Logic Model. In cases where
HUD cannot successfully conclude
negotiations with a selected applicant or
a selected applicant fails to provide
HUD with requested information, an
award will not be made to that
applicant. In this instance, HUD may
offer an award, and proceed with
negotiations with the next highestranking applicant. If you accept the
terms and conditions of the cooperative
agreement, you must return your signed
cooperative agreement by the date
specified during negotiation.
3. Award Adjustments. If funds
remain after all selections have been
made, the remaining funds may be
redistributed or made available for other
competitions.
4. LOCCS Payment System. After
receiving the letter, additional
instructions on how to have the grant
account entered into HUD’s Line of
Credit Control System (LOCCS)
payment system will be provided. Other
forms and program requirements will
also be provided.
5. Start of Work. All awardees are
expected to commence activity
immediately upon completion of
negotiations, and execution of the
cooperative agreement.
6. Applicant Debriefing. See the
General Section for information
regarding unsuccessful applicant
debriefing.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Review. In
accordance with 24 CFR 50.19(b)(2),
(b)(3) and (b)(9), activities assisted
under this program are categorically
excluded from the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and are not
subject to environmental review under
the related laws and authorities.
2. HUD Reform Act of 1989.
Applicants must comply with the
requirements for funding competitions
established by the HUD Reform Act of
1989 (42 U.S.C. 3531 et seq.) as defined
in the General Section.
3. Audit Requirements. Any grant
recipient that expends $500,000 or more
in federal financial assistance in a single
year must meet the audit requirements
established in 24 CFR Parts 84 and 85
in accordance with OMB Circular A–
133. In accordance with OMB Circular
A–133 (Audits of States, Regional/local
Governments and Non-Profit
Organizations), grantees will have to
submit their completed audit-reporting
package along with the Data Collection
Form (SF–SAC) to the Single Audit
Clearinghouse, at the address obtained
from their Web site. The SF–SAC can be
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
downloaded at: https://
harvester.census.gov/sac/.
4. Timely Hiring of Staff. HUD
reserves the right to terminate awards
made to recipients that fail to timely
hire (within 30 days of award) staff to
fill key positions identified in the
applicant’s proposal as vacant.
5. Executive Order 13202. Compliance
with HUD regulations at 24 CFR 5.108
that implement Executive Order 13202,
‘‘Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Construction Projects’’, is a
condition of receipt of assistance under
this NOFA.
6. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See the General Section for
further information.
7. Conducting Business in Accordance
with HUD Core Values and Ethical
Standards. Refer to the General Section
for information about conducting
business in accordance with HUD’s core
values and ethical standards.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
C. Reporting
The following items are Post-Award
Reporting Requirements:
1. Final Budget and Work Plan. Final
budget and work plans are due 60 days
after the effective date of the cooperative
agreement.
2. Racial and Ethnic Data. HUD does
not require Lead Outreach applicants to
report ethnic and racial beneficiary data
as part of their initial application
package. However, such data must be
reported on an annual basis, at a
minimum, during the implementation of
your grant agreement. You must report
the data as described in the General
Section and use the Office of
Management and Budget’s Standards for
the Collection of Racial and Ethnic Data,
using Form HUD–27061, Racial and
Ethnic Data Reporting Form, found on
https://www.hudclips.org/sub_nonhud/
html/forms.htm along with instructions
for its use.
3. Progress reporting. Progress
reporting is done on a quarterly and
annual basis. For specific reporting
requirements, see policy guidance at:
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead.
OHHLHC awardees will submit
quarterly reports via an on-line
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
reporting system and will use the their
Logic Model approved as part of the
grant agreement to measure and report
performance for each quarter. The
quarterly report must reflect all
benchmarks (output goals) and
proposed outcomes (results) that are
indicated on the Logic Model with an
associated cost estimate. For FY 2007,
HUD is considering a new concept for
the Logic Model. The new concept is a
Return on Investment (ROI) statement.
HUD will be publishing a separate
notice on the ROI concept. Deviations
from projected outputs and outcomes,
either positive or negative, should be
reported in the Logic Model under the
reporting Tab. The completed Logic
Model showing output and outcome
status must be submitted as part of the
quarterly progress report.
4. Final Report. An overall final
cooperative agreement report, due at the
completion of the cooperative
agreement, will detail activities (e.g., the
number of low-income housing units
enrolled in lead hazard treatment
programs as a result of activities
performed under the cooperative
agreement, number and type of
materials produced, activities
conducted, evaluation of the various
outreach and educational methods used,
findings, and recommended future
actions at the conclusion of cooperative
agreement activities). The final report
shall include cumulative achievements,
final project outputs, outcomes and
results reported against the project’s
Logic Model (Form HUD–96010) as
approved and incorporated into your
award agreement, including
explanations of any deviations from
projected levels of performance.
VII. Agency Contacts
For programmatic questions, you may
contact Jonnette Hawkins, Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control; telephone (202) 755–1785,
extension 7593 (this is not a toll-free
number) or via e-mail at
Jonnette_G._Hawkins@hud.gov. For
grants administrative questions, you
may contact Mr. Royal Rucker, Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control; telephone (202) 755–1785
extension 7584 (this is not a toll-free
number) or via e-mail at Royal_A._
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11577
Rucker@hud.gov. If neither of these
individuals is available, you may
contact the Office’s general Lead
Regulations hotline, at (202) 755–1785,
extension 7698. Your call will be
forwarded in one business day for
subsequent response by the appropriate
staff. Hearing- or speech-challenged
individuals may access these numbers
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
A. For additional information about
this NOFA, program, or for general,
technical, and grant program
information pertaining to the Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control, visit: https://www.hud.gov/
offices/lead.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this
document have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2539–
0015. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 80 hours to prepare the
application, 16 hours to finalize the
cooperative agreement, and 32 hours per
annum for grant administration
(progress reporting) per respondent.
This includes the time for collecting,
reviewing, and reporting the data for the
application, semi-annual reports, and
final report. The information will be
used for grantee selection and
monitoring the administration of funds.
Response to this request for information
is required in order to receive the
benefits to be derived.
C. Appendices
Appendices A, B, and C of this NOFA
are available for downloading with the
application at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.015
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11578
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Healthy Homes Demonstration Program
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Overview Informattion
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control (OHHLHC).
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Healthy Homes Demonstration Program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–19, OMB Paperwork approval
number 2539–0015.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): 14.901,
Healthy Homes Demonstration Program.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 18, 2007. Applications must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
no later than 11:59:59 pm eastern time
on the application deadline date. See
the General Section IV, regarding
application submission procedures and
timely filing requirements.
G. Additional Information
1. Purpose of the Program. The
purpose of the Healthy Homes
Demonstration Program is to develop,
demonstrate, and promote cost-effective,
preventive measures to correct multiple
safety and health hazards in the home
environment that produce serious
diseases and injuries in children in lowand very low-income families. The
Healthy Homes Demonstration program
is committed to supporting the
Departmental Strategic Goal of
strengthening communities by
addressing housing conditions that
threaten health. As a part of this
commitment, the Healthy Homes
Initiative strives to reduce allergen
levels in 5,000 units by 2011, and
correspondingly, reduce asthmatic
episodes for 3,000 children living in
those units.
2. Available Funds. HUD anticipates
that approximately $5,000,000 in fiscal
year 2007 and prior year funds will be
available.
3. Anticipated Awards.
Approximately five to seven cooperative
agreements will be awarded for a
maximum of $1,000,000 each for the
entire period of performance.
4. Eligible Applicants. Not-for-profit
institutions and for-profit firms state
and local governments, federally
recognized Indian Tribes, and colleges
and universities located in the United
States. For-profit firms are not allowed
to make a profit from the project.
5. Type of award. Cooperative
Agreements, with substantial
involvement of the Government, will be
awarded (see Paragraph II.C for a
description of substantial involvement).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
6. Match. None required, but
leveraging strongly encouraged.
7. Limitations. There are no
limitations on the number of
applications that each applicant may
submit.
8. Information on application. The
applications for this NOFA can be found
at https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The General
Section contains information about
Grants.gov registration, submission
requirements, and submission
procedures.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Background
The Healthy Homes Demonstration
Program is a part of HUD’s Healthy
Homes Initiative (HHI). In April 1999,
HUD submitted to Congress a Healthy
Homes Initiative: Preliminary Plan
containing a full description of the HHI.
This description (Summary and Full
Report) is available on the HUD Web
site at: https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/
hhi/index.cfm. This site also contains
additional information on the HHI.
HUD believes that it is important for
grantees to incorporate meaningful
community participation, to the greatest
extent possible, in the development and
implementation of programs that are
conducted in communities and/or
involve significant interaction with
community residents. Community
participation can improve program
effectiveness in various ways, including
the development of more salient
program objectives, recruitment and
retention of study participants,
participants’ understanding of the
program, ongoing communication, and
more effectively disseminating study
findings.
HUD encourages applicants to
consider using a ‘‘community-based
participatory research (CBPR)’’
approach, where applicable, in study
design and implementation. For
example, see the report published by the
National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences titled ‘‘Successful
Models of Community-Based
Participatory Research’’ at: https://
www.niehs.nih.gov/translat/pubs.htm.
CBPR is characterized by substantial
community input in all phases of a
study, including the design,
implementation, data interpretation,
conclusions, and communication of
results. The HHI seeks proposals that
provide a coordinated approach to
address multiple hazards caused by a
limited number of building deficiencies.
The HHI approach is anticipated to
reduce labor and travel costs and
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11579
provide substantial savings, since
separate visits to a home by an
inspector, public health nurse, or
outreach worker can add significant
costs to project activities. OHHLHC is in
the process of evaluating the
effectiveness of the Healthy Homes
Initiative, and, as a result of this
evaluation, will be examining the
efficiencies (as measured by per-unit
costs and benefits) of a coordinated
approach to assess and remediate
multiple housing-related hazards.
In addition to deficiencies in basic
housing facilities that may impact
health and safety, changes in the U.S.
housing stock and more sophisticated
epidemiological methods and
biomedical research have led to the
identification of new, and often more
subtle, health and safety hazards in the
residential environment. While such
health hazards will tend to be found
disproportionately in housing that is
substandard, these environmental
health and safety hazards also exist in
housing that is otherwise of good
quality. ‘‘Housing-Related Health and
Injury Hazards,’’ Appendix A, a brief
description of the housing-associated
health and injury hazards HUD
considers key targets for remediation,
can be downloaded with your
application package at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The Web site
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/hhi/
index.cfm also lists some of the
references that serve as the basis for
information provided in the Healthy
Homes Demonstration Program NOFA.
HUD’s authority for making funding
available under this NOFA is the
Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5,
approved February 15, 2007).
B. Healthy Homes Initiative Goals
1. Develop and implement
demonstration projects that address
multiple housing-related problems
affecting the health of children;
2. Achieve the Healthy Homes
Initiative’s Departmental Strategic Goal
objective of reducing allergen levels in
5,000 units by 2011, and
correspondingly, reducing asthmatic
episodes for 3,000 children living in
those units;
3. Mobilize public and private
resources, involving cooperation among
all levels of government, the private
sector, and grassroots community-based,
nonprofit organizations, including faithbased organizations, to develop the most
promising, cost-effective methods for
identifying and controlling housingrelated environmental health and safety
hazards;
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11580
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
4. Build local capacity to operate
sustainable programs that will prevent
and control housing-related
environmental health and safety hazards
in low- and very low-income residences
when HUD funding is exhausted; and
5. Affirmatively further fair housing
and environmental justice.
HUD also encourages applicants to
undertake specific activities that will
assist the Department in implementing
its Policy Priorities. HUD’s fiscal year
2007 Policy Priorities are discussed in
the General Section.
C. Healthy Homes Demonstration
Program Objectives
The objectives of the Healthy Homes
Demonstration Program include direct
remediations, including assessment of
housing-related hazards, education and
outreach and capacity building. HUD
recognizes that, in many cases, activities
may meet multiple objectives. Because
the development and evaluation of
effective methods for assessing and
remediating housing-related hazards is
the principal focus of the Healthy
Homes Demonstration Program,
awardees must expend at least 65
percent of grant funds on direct
remediations in the home. Additional
expenditures may include capacity
building (training) and information
dissemination.
1. Direct remediations in homes of
children where environmental triggers
may contribute to a child’s illness,
including the following kinds of
activities:
a. Development of cost-effective
protocols for identifying homes that are
candidates for remediations, identifying
environmental health and safety hazards
in these homes, and screening out
homes where structural or other factors,
including cost issues, make
remediations impractical;
b. Development of appropriately
scaled, flexible, cost-effective and
efficient assessment and intervention
strategies that take into account the
range of unhealthy conditions
encountered in housing, that maximize
the number of housing units that receive
remediations and the number of positive
or negative health outcomes as a result.
HUD believes health outcomes,
particularly the reduction in asthmatic
episodes or injuries, are an important
component of this NOFA and wants to
assess how Healthy Homes remediations
affect the health of the population being
served relative to the population at
large. Therefore, any health outcome
should be documented.
c. Development of methodologies for
evaluating the effectiveness of
remediations and assessing the effect of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the remediation on the health of the
resident or program participant.
2. Education and outreach that
furthers the goal of protecting children
from environmentally induced illnesses,
including:
a. Targeting, through education and
outreach, specific high-risk
communities and other identified
audiences such as homeowners,
landlords, health care providers,
pregnant women, children, residential
construction contractors, maintenance
personnel, housing inspectors, real
estate professionals, home buyers, and
low- or very low-income minority
families;
b. Developing and delivering public
outreach programs that provide
information about effective methods for
preventing housing-related childhood
diseases and injuries, and promoting the
use of these methods, especially in lowand very low-income residences; and
c. Increasing public awareness of
housing-related environmental health
and safety hazards that threaten the
health of children, through the use of
media strategies using print, radio and
television, including the use of minority
media and provision of materials in
alternative formats and materials for
populations with Limited English
Proficiency (LEP).
3. Building capacity in the target
community to assure that Healthy
Homes programs are sustained beyond
the life of the award period, including
the development of local capacity in
target areas for target groups to operate
sustainable programs to prevent and
control housing-related environmental
health and safety hazards.
II. Award Information
A. Funding Available
Approximately $5,000,000 in fiscal
year 2007 and prior year funds are
available for Healthy Homes
Demonstration cooperative agreements.
HUD anticipates that approximately five
to seven cooperative agreements will be
awarded, for a maximum of $1,000,000
each for the entire period of
performance.
Applicants may wish to review
currently funded grants on the Healthy
Homes Web site at: https://www.hud.gov/
offices/lead/hhi/index.cfm.
B. Anticipated Start Date and Period of
Performance for New Cooperative
Agreements
1. The start date for new cooperative
agreements is expected to be no later
than October 1, 2007, with a period of
performance not to exceed 36 months.
For planning purposes, applicants need
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
to include adequate time for start up
activities such as the Institutional
Review Board approval process,
recruitment of study participants,
fulfillment of environmental
requirements, and development of new
methods (e.g., survey forms, database,
etc.) within this period of performance.
2. Period of performance extensions
for delays due to exceptional conditions
beyond the grantee’s control will be
considered for approval by HUD in
accordance with 24 CFR 85.24(e)(2) or
85.30(d)(2), as applicable, and the
OHHLHC Program Guide. Because
delays have been associated with
recruitment and Institutional Review
Board approval issues, HUD encourages
applicants to involve all partners in preplanning processes. If approved,
grantees will be eligible to receive a
single extension of up to 12 months in
length. Although applicants are
encouraged to plan projects with shorter
performance periods than 36 months,
you should consider the possibility that
issues may arise that could cause delays
when developing your schedule.
C. Type of Award Instrument
Awards will be made as cooperative
agreements. Anticipated substantial
involvement by HUD staff for
cooperative agreements may include,
but will not be limited to:
1. Review and suggestion of
amendments to the study design,
including: study objectives; field
sampling plan; data collection methods;
sample handling and preparation; and
sample and data analysis.
2. Review and provision of technical
recommendations in response to
quarterly progress reports (e.g.,
amendments to study design based on
preliminary results).
3. Review and provision of technical
recommendations on journal article(s)
and the final report for the project.
4. Collaboration on peer review of
scientific data in accord with the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
Information Quality Guidelines. All
HUD-sponsored research is subject to
the OMB Final Information Quality
Bulletin for Peer Review (70 FR 2664–
2677, published on January 14, 2005)
prior to its public dissemination. In
accordance with paragraph II.2 of the
Bulletin, HUD will not need further peer
review conducted on information that
has already been subjected to adequate
peer review. Therefore, grantees must
provide enough information on their
peer review process for HUD to
determine whether additional review is
needed.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Eligible applicants include not-forprofit institutions and for-profit firms,
state and local governments, federally
recognized Indian Tribes, and colleges
and universities located in the United
States. For-profit firms are not allowed
to make a profit from the project.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing or matching is not
required. In rating your application,
however, HUD will award a higher score
under Rating Factor 4 if you provide
documentation of commitments for
significant leveraging.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
C. Other
1. Threshold Requirements
Applicable to all Applicants Under the
SuperNOFA. As an applicant, you must
meet all the threshold requirements
described in the General Section.
Applications that do not address the
threshold items will not be funded.
Cooperative agreements will be awarded
on a competitive basis following
evaluation of all proposals according to
the rating factors described in this
NOFA. A minimum score of 75 points
is required for consideration for award.
The maximum score that can be attained
is 100 points for the narrative responses
and an additional 2 bonus points for
activities proposed to be located in RC/
EZ/EC-II communities.
2. Eligible Activities
The following activities and support
tasks are eligible under the Healthy
Homes Demonstration Program. a.
Assessing (evaluating) housing to
determine the presence of
environmental health and safety hazards
(e.g., moisture intrusion, mold growth,
pests and allergens, unvented
appliances, exposed steam pipes or
radiators, deteriorated lead-based paint)
through the use of accepted assessment
procedures.
b. Remediating existing housing-based
environmental health and safety hazards
and addressing conditions that could
recur.
c. Undertaking rehabilitation
activities to effectively control housing
deficiencies that are required for
remediating environmental health and
safety hazards in the unit. Funds under
this program may only be used to
address lead-based hazards at the de
minimis level (see 24 CFR 35.1350(d)).
These lead hazard evaluation and/or
control activities may not be a principal
focus of the cooperative agreement.
(Lead hazard evaluation and control
activities are carried out under HUD’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant
Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and
Operation Lead Elimination Action
Program.) For information about
conducting remediation of de minimis
amounts of lead-based paint hazards,
refer to the HUD Guidelines for the
Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based
Paint Hazards in Housing (HUD
Guidelines). The HUD Guidelines and/
or applicable regulations may be
downloaded from HUD’s Web site at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead/
guidelines/index.cfm.
d. Carrying out temporary relocation
of families and individuals while the
remediation is conducted and until the
time the affected unit receives clearance
for re-occupancy. See III.C.4.e, Real
Property Acquisition and Relocation, of
the General Section, and Section VI.B.4
of this NOFA for a discussion of
regulations that apply when relocating
families.
e. Environmental sampling and
medical testing to protect the health of
the remediation workers, supervisors,
and contractors, unless reimbursable
from another source.
f. Conducting testing, analysis, and
mitigation for lead, mold, carbon
monoxide and/or other housing-related
environmental health and safety hazards
as appropriate, following generally
accepted standards or criteria. A
laboratory recognized by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA’s) National Lead Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NLLAP) must
analyze paint, soil or dust samples
related to lead-based paint. Samples to
be analyzed for fungi should be
submitted to a laboratory accredited in
the Environmental Microbiological
Laboratory Accreditation Program
(EMLAP), administered by the
American Industrial Hygiene
Association (AIHA).
g. Carrying out necessary
architectural, engineering and work
specification development and other
construction management services.
h. Providing training on Healthy
Homes practices to homeowners,
renters, landlords, painters, remodelers,
and housing maintenance staff working
in low- or very low-income housing.
i. Providing cleaning supplies for
hazard remediation to grassroots
community-based nonprofit
organizations, including faith-based
organizations, for use by homeowners
and tenants in low-income housing, or
providing these supplies to homeowners
and tenants directly. (See the General
Section for more information about
grassroots community-based nonprofit
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11581
organizations, including faith-based
organizations.)
j. Providing incentives (financial or
other incentives, including coupons for
a video rental, coupons for groceries,
stipends for completion of surveys,
child care, cleaning kits, etc.) with a
value up to $10 for recruitment, through
up to $250 for the most significant or
lengthy participation. These incentives
are subject to approval by HUD. Their
purpose is to encourage recruitment and
retention in the healthy homes program,
and participation in educational and
training activities and other programrelated functions.
k. Conducting community education
programs on housing-related
environmental health and safety
hazards. Materials should be available
in alternative formats for persons with
disabilities including Braille, audio,
large type), upon request, and in
languages other than English that are
common in the community, consistent
with HUD’s published ‘‘Limited English
Proficiency (LEP) Recipient Guidance’’
(see https://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/
library/lepFRguidance.html).
l. Securing liability insurance for
housing-related environmental health
and safety hazard evaluation and
control activities. This is not considered
an administrative cost.
m. Supporting data collection,
analysis, and evaluation of project
activities. (As a condition of the receipt
of financial assistance under this NOFA,
all successful applicants will be
required to cooperate with HUD staff
and contractors who are performing
HUD-funded research and evaluation
studies.)
3. Program Requirements. In addition
to the program requirements in the
General Section, applicants must also
meet the following program
requirements.
a. Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Approval. In conformance with the
Common Rule (Federal Policy for the
Protection of Human Subjects, 45 CFR
46, codified by HUD at 24 CFR 60.101),
if your grant activities include research
involving human subjects, your
organization must provide an assurance
(e.g., a letter signed by an appropriate
official) that the research has been
reviewed and approved by an IRB before
you can initiate activities that require
IRB approval. You must also provide the
number for your organization’s
assurance (institutional assurance) that
has been approved by the Department of
Health and Human Service’s Office of
Human Research Protections (OHRP).
For additional information on elements
of human subject research or obtaining
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11582
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
an institutional assurance, see the OHRP
Web site at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp.
b. HIPAA Authorization. The Privacy
Rule of the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act of 1996 requires
covered entities that transmit health
information electronically (health care
providers, health plans, etc.) to protect
that information. This may be
accomplished by obtaining
authorization from the patient or parent,
obtaining a waiver of authorization from
an IRB or HIPAA Privacy Board or deidentifying data. You should identify
whether your proposal is subject to
requirements of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
and, if so, how you plan to address
these requirements. Additional
information on HIPAA and the Privacy
Rule can be found at https://
www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa and https://
privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/
authorization.asp.
c. Community Involvement.
Applicants must incorporate meaningful
community involvement in any
programmatic study that requires a
significant level of interaction with a
community (including, projects being
conducted within occupied dwellings or
which involve surveys of community
residents). A community is made up of
various groups of persons who have
commonalities that can be identified on
the basis of geographic location,
ethnicity, health condition, and
common interests. Applicants should
identify the community that is most
relevant to their particular project.
There are many different approaches for
involving the community in the
conception, design, and implementation
of a project and the subsequent
dissemination of findings. Examples
include, but are not limited to:
establishing a structured approach to
obtain community input and feedback
(such as involving a community
advisory board); including one or more
community-based organizations as
study partners; employing community
residents to recruit study participants
and collect data; and enlisting the
community in the dissemination of
findings and translation of results into
improved policies and/or practices. A
discussion of community involvement
in research involving housing-related
health hazards can be found in Chapter
5 of the Institute of Medicine
publication titled ‘‘Ethical
Considerations for Research on
Housing-Related Health Hazards
Involving Children,’’ at https://
www.iom.edu/cms/12552/26004/
29871.aspx.
d. Program Performance. Awardees
shall take all reasonable steps to
accomplish all healthy homes activities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
within the approved period of
performance. HUD will closely monitor
the awardee’s performance with
particular attention to completion of
specified activities, deliverables and
milestones, and number of units
proposed to be assessed or to receive
remediation. Any previous requests for
no-cost extensions will be considered in
the evaluation of the capacity of the
applicant under Rating Factor 1.
e. Lead Hazard Control Activities. All
lead hazard control activities must be
conducted in compliance with HUD’s
Lead-Safe Housing Rule, 24 CFR Part 35.
Grantees must also comply with any
additional requirements in effect under
a state or Native American Tribal LeadBased Paint Training and Certification
Program that has been authorized by the
EPA pursuant to 40 CFR 745.320. See
Section III.C.2.c regarding lead activity
limitations.
f. Compliance with Lead Disclosure
Rule. All lead-based paint and leadbased paint hazard test and hazard
reduction results must be provided to
the owner of the unit, with a statement
describing the owner’s legal duty to
disclose the results to tenants (before
initial leasing, or before lease renewal
with changes) and buyers (before sale) if
the housing was constructed before
1978 (24 CFR Part 35, subpart A). This
information may only be used for
purposes of remediation of hazards in
the unit and not for retribution/eviction.
Disclosure of other identified housingrelated environmental health and safety
hazards to the owner of the unit, for
purposes of remediation, is encouraged
but not required unless disclosure is
required by Federal, state or local
regulations.
g. Integrated Pest Management. All
pest control activities shall incorporate
the principles and methods of integrated
pest management (IPM). In technical
terms, IPM is the coordinated use of
pest and environmental information
with available pest control methods to
prevent unacceptable levels of pest
damage by the most economical means
and with the least possible hazard to
people, property, and the environment.
The IPM approach emphasizes a
targeted use of pesticides that limits the
possibility of human exposure (e.g., as
opposed to wide-spread applications)
and includes interventions based on the
behavior of the target pest (e.g.,
preventing access to food or water). One
source for information on IPM is
Environmental Health Watch; you can
download information from its Web site:
https://www.ehw.org/Asthma/
ASTH_Cockroach_Control.htm.
h. Dust Sampling Protocol. Collection
of settled dust samples for
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
environmental allergen analysis (e.g.,
cockroach, dust mite) must follow a
standard dust sampling protocol, such
as the protocol posted on the OHHLHC
website, https://www.hud.gov/offices/
lead/hhi/hhiresources.cfm. If an
applicant chooses to use a different
protocol, such as a protocol from the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
or the American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM), the applicant must
provide a justification to HUD. The
awardee is also required to submit
quality control (QC) samples of
allergens in household dust, provided at
no cost, as blind samples in the train of
samples submitted for laboratory
analysis. For the purpose of budgeting
laboratory costs, assume that 5 percent
of your total allergen dust samples will
consist of HUD-provided QC samples.
i. Hazardous Waste Disposal.
Awardees must follow procedures for
hazardous waste disposal as required by
the EPA (e.g., 40 CFR parts 61, 260–282,
300–374, and/or 700–799, as
applicable), the Department of
Transportation (e.g., 49 CFR parts 171–
177), and/or appropriate state or local
regulatory agencies.
j. Worker Protection Procedures.
Awardees must comply with the
procedures for worker protection
established in the HUD Guidelines as
well as the requirements of OHSA, e.g.,
29 CFR part 1910 and/or 1926, as
applicable, or the state or local
occupational safety and health
regulations, whichever are more
stringent.
k. Written Policies and Procedures.
You must have written policies and
procedures for all phases of
interventions, including recruitment,
enrollment, participant prioritization,
unit assessment, development of
specifications, remediations, training,
financing, occupant relocation,
independent project inspection, and
clearance testing (e.g., for mold, lead,
carbon monoxide or other hazards, as
applicable). You and all your
subcontractors, sub-recipients, and their
contractors must comply with these
policies and procedures.
l. Data Collection and Provision. You
must collect, maintain, and provide to
HUD the data necessary to document
the various approaches used to evaluate
and control housing-related
environmental health and safety
hazards, including evaluation and
remediation methods, building
conditions, medical and familial
information (with confidentiality of
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
individually-identifiable information
ensured) in order to determine the
effectiveness and relative cost of these
methods.
m. Section 3 Employment
Opportunities. Recipients of assistance
in the Healthy Homes Demonstration
Program must comply with Section 3 of
the Housing and Urban Development
Act of 1968, 12 U.S.C. 1701u (Economic
Opportunities for Low- and Very-LowIncome Persons in Connection with
Assisted Projects) and the HUD
regulations at 24 CFR part 135,
including the reporting requirements of
subpart E. See Section V, Rating Factor
3, for recommendations for
implementing Section 3 Employment
Opportunities.
n. Conducting Business in
Accordance with HUD Core Values and
Ethical Standards. If selected for an
award under the Healthy Homes
Demonstration Program NOFA, you will
be required to submit a copy of your
Code of Conduct and describe the
methods you will use to ensure that all
officers, employees, and agents of your
organization are aware of your Code of
Conduct. If you previously submitted
your Code of Conduct to HUD and it
appears in the listing on HUD’s Web site
at https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/
grants/codeofconduct/cconduct.cfm,
you do not have to resubmit the
information unless there has been a
change in the legal name, address or
authorizing official for your
organization. See the General Section
for information about conducting
business in accordance with HUD’s core
values and ethical standards.
4. DUNS Requirement. Refer to the
General Section for information
regarding the DUNS requirement.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Web Address To Access an
Application Package
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Copies of this published NOFA and
application forms for this program may
be downloaded from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. If you
have difficulty accessing the
information you may call the Grants.gov
helpline toll-free at (800) 518-GRANTS
or e-mail Support@grants.gov. Helpline
customer representatives will assist you
in accessing the information.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
The following section provides
instructions on the items to be
submitted as part of the application. See
the General Section for instructions for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
submitting third party documents and
electronic files.
1. An abstract describing the goals
and objectives of your proposed
program (2 page limit, single-spaced, 12
point standard font, at least 3⁄4-inch
margins) must be included in the
proposal. The abstract should include
the title of your proposed project,
amount of funding requested from HUD,
amount of funding leveraged or
matched, period of performance, a short
summary of the proposed project and
the name, mailing address, e-mail
address and telephone number of the
principal contact person for the primary
entity. Information contained in the
abstract will not be considered in the
evaluation and scoring of your
application. Any information you wish
considered should be provided under
the appropriate rating factor. The 2-page
abstract will not be included in the 25
page limit of the application.
2. A narrative statement addressing
the rating factors for award. Number the
pages of your narrative statement and
include a header and a footer that
provides the name of the applicant and
the name of the program to which you
are applying. Narrative statements
provided as part of the application
should be individually labeled to
identify the rating factor to which the
narrative is responding (for example,
Factor 1, Capacity of the Applicant,
etc.). You are strongly advised to use the
format of the NOFA as an outline for
discussion of your rating factors. The
overall response to the rating factors
must not exceed a total of 25 pages
including all rating factors (single-sided,
single-spaced, 12 point standard font, at
least 3⁄4-inch margins). Any pages in
excess of this limit will not be read.
Application packages without narrative
statements addressing the rating factors
will not be reviewed or considered for
funding. Applicants should carefully
review each narrative attached to the
electronic application to make sure that
you have attached the correct file and
not an incomplete one, as this is not a
curable deficiency.
3. The score for each rating factor will
be based on the content of the narrative
submitted for each rating factor,
supplemented by materials referenced
and discussed in that portion of your
narrative statement. Information relative
to a given rating factor must be
contained in the narrative for that rating
factor. If it is found in another rating
factor, it will not be considered. In
addition, supplemental material that is
not referenced and discussed within the
narrative statements will not be rated.
4. The position descriptions and
resumes, if available, of your project
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11583
director and project manager and up to
three additional key personnel (in
accordance with Rating Factor 1), not to
exceed 2 pages each (single-spaced, 12point font, with at least 3⁄4 inch
margins). This information will not be
counted toward the page limit.
5. Any attachments, materials,
references, or other relevant information
that directly support the narrative must
not exceed 20 pages for your entire
application. Any pages in excess of this
limit will not be read. See the General
Section for instructions for submitting
third party documents or material not
readily available in electronic format.
6. A detailed budget narrative
(maximum 4 pages) with supporting
justification for all budget categories of
your funding request, in accordance
with Rating Factor 3, Section V.A.2.c(3).
This budget narrative will not be
counted towards the 25-page limit of the
application. In completing the budget
forms and justification, you should
address the following elements:
a. Direct Labor costs should include
all full- and part-time staff required for
the planning and implementation
phases of the project. These costs
should be based on full-time equivalent
(FTE) or hours per year (hours/year).
(One FTE equals 2,080 hours/year.)
b. You should budget for one trip
annually for two people for meetings at
HUD Headquarters in Washington, DC,
assuming a 2–3 day stay per trip
depending upon your location.
c. A separate budget proposal should
be provided for any sub-recipients
receiving more than 10 percent of the
total federal budget request.
d. You should be prepared to provide
supporting documentation for salaries
and prices of materials and equipment,
upon request.
e. Organizations that have a federally
negotiated indirect cost rate should use
that rate and the appropriate base. Other
organizations should submit their
proposal with their suggested indirect
rate. If they are funded and HUD is the
cognizant agency, it will set a rate;
otherwise HUD will request the
cognizant federal agency to set the rate.
f. You should submit a copy of the
negotiated rate agreements for fringe
benefits and indirect costs, if applicable,
as an attachment to the budget sheets.
7. Applicants are encouraged to use
the following checklist to ensure that all
required materials have been prepared
and submitted. You are not required to
submit this checklist with your
application.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11584
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Checklist for Healthy Homes
Demonstration Program Applicants
Applicant Abstract (Limited to 2 Pages)
• Rating Factor Responses (Total
narrative response limited to 25 pages.
Rating Factor tables (Forms HUD–
96012, 96016, 96015 and 96010) do not
count toward the 25-page limit.)
1. Capacity of the Applicant and
Relevant Organizational Experience—
Form HUD 96012.
2. Need/Extent of the Problem—Form
HUD–96016.
3. Soundness of Approach.
4. Leveraging Resources—Form HUD–
96015.
5. Achieving Results and Program
Evaluation—Form HUD–96010 (Logic
Model).
• Required materials in response to
rating factors (does not count towards
25-page limit)
Form SF 424, Application for Federal
Assistance.
Form HUD–424–CB, ‘‘Grant
Application Detailed Budget’’ (HUD
Detailed Budget Form on Grants.gov).
Form SF–424 Supplement, ‘‘Survey
on Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants’’ (Faith-Based EEO Survey
on Grants.gov).
Faith-Based EEO Survey (to be
completed by private nonprofit
organizations only).
Form SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities
Form HUD–2880, ‘‘Applicant/
Recipient Disclosure/Update Report’’
(HUD Applicant Recipient Disclosure
Report on Grants.gov).
Form HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC–II
Strategic Plan (if applicable).
Form HUD–27300, ‘‘Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers’’
(HUD Communities Initiative Form on
Grants.gov).
Form HUD–96011, ‘‘Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal’’
(Facsimile Transmittal Form on
Grants.gov). This is to be used as the
cover page for faxing third party
information for electronic applications
only. See the General Section.
Resumes of Project Director, Project
Manager and up to 3 Key Personnel
(limited to 2 pages per resume).
Position Descriptions for Key
Personnel to be hired (limited to 2 pages
per description).
Organizational Chart.
Letters of Commitment (if applicable).
Form HUD–2994A—You are Our
Client! Grant Applicant Survey
(Optional).
• Optional material in support of the
Rating Factors (20-page limit)
C. Submission Dates and Times.
Electronic applications must be received
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
and validated by Grants.gov on or before
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application submission date. Refer to
the General Section for submission
requirements. Materials associated to
your electronic application submitted
by facsimile transmission must also be
received by 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time
on the application submission date. See
sections IV.B and IV.F of the General
Section for additional information on
the electronic process and how to
request a waiver from this requirement,
if necessary.
D. Intergovernmental Review. Not
required for this submission.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Administrative Costs. There is a 10
percent maximum allowance for
administrative costs. Additional
information about allowable
administrative costs is provided in
Appendix B and can be downloaded
with this application at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
2. Indirect Costs. You must comply
with Indirect Cost requirements.
Guidelines for indirect cost
requirements, presented in Appendix C,
may be downloaded as part of your
application package at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
3. Purchase of Real Property is not
permitted.
4. Purchase or lease of equipment
having a per-unit cost in excess of
$5,000 is not permitted, unless prior
written approval is obtained from HUD.
5. Medical costs are not permitted
(except for medical testing to protect the
health of the intervention workers,
supervisors, and contractors, unless
reimbursable from another source).
6. For-profit organizations cannot
receive a fee or profit.
7. Applicants must comply with the
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C.
3501).
8. You may not use grant funds for
hazard control of a building or
manufactured home that is located in an
area identified by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) under the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001–
4128) as having special flood hazards
unless:
a. The community in which the area
is situated is participating in the
National Flood Insurance Program in
accordance with the applicable
regulations (44 CFR parts 59–79), or less
than a year has passed since FEMA
notification regarding these hazards;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
b. Where the community is
participating in the National Flood
Insurance Program, flood insurance on
the property is obtained in accordance
with section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act (42 U.S.C. 4012a(a)). You
are responsible for assuring that flood
insurance is obtained and maintained
for the appropriate amount and term.
F. Other Submission Requirements.
HUD requires applicants to submit
applications electronically through
https://www.grants.gov unless you
request and are granted a waiver to the
electronic submission requirements. See
the General Section. Applicants should
submit their waiver requests in writing
by e-mail. Waiver requests must be
submitted no later than 15 days prior to
the application deadline date and
should be submitted to Jonnette
Hawkins, Director, Program
Management and Assurance Division,
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control,
Jonnette_G._Hawkins@hud.gov.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Rating and Ranking. Applications
that meet all of the threshold
requirements will be eligible to be
scored and ranked, based on the total
number of points allocated for each of
the rating factors described in Section
V.A.2 of this NOFA. Your application
must receive a total score of at least 75
points to be considered for funding.
Each of the five factors is weighted as
indicated by the number of points that
are assigned to it. The maximum score
that can be attained is 100 points for the
narrative responses, and 2 bonus points
for activities carried out in a RC/EZ/EC–
II. Applicants should be certain that
each of these factors is clearly and
comprehensively addressed in the
project description and accompanying
materials.
HUD will not review any applications
with a request for federal funding that
exceeds the maximum amount specified
in this NOFA.
2. Rating Factors. The factors for
rating and ranking applicants, and
maximum points for each factor, are
provided below. Applicants should be
certain that these factors are adequately
addressed in the narrative relevant to
the rating factors and the accompanying
materials.
a. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (15 Points)
This factor addresses your
organizational capacity (including the
capacity of your own organization, as
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
well as partner organizations) necessary
to successfully implement your
proposed activities in a timely manner.
The rating of your program includes any
grassroots community-based nonprofit
organizations firmly committed to your
project, including faith-based
organizations, sub-contractors,
consultants, sub-recipients, and
members of consortia. HUD strongly
encourages the formation and
development of consortia in
implementing your project goals.
Applicants are encouraged to partner,
fund, or sub-contract with grassroots,
community-based nonprofit
organizations, including faith-based
organizations to carry out program
activities. If these partnerships are
proposed, applicants will receive higher
rating points as specified in the General
Section. Applicants should note in their
Rating Factor 1 narrative whether they
are submitting multiple applications to
OHHLHC, and, if so, the percentage
commitment of staff for each
application.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider the three items listed below.
(1) Capacity and Qualifications of
Principal Investigator and Key
Personnel. (6 points). Describe your
recent, relevant, and successful
demonstrated experience in undertaking
eligible program activities. Describe the
knowledge and experience of the
proposed overall project director and
day-to-day project manager in planning
and managing large and complex
interdisciplinary programs, especially
those involving housing, public health,
or environmental programs. Include
information on your project staff, their
experience with housing and health
programs, percentage commitment to
the project, and position titles. Project
directors should commit at least 20
percent and the project manager’s time
commitment should be at least 50
percent. Resumes of up to 2 pages each
for up to three key personnel, in
addition to the project director and
project manager, and a clearly
delineated organizational chart for the
Healthy Homes project (including all
partner organizations) , must be
included in your application
submission. Position descriptions or job
announcements (including salary range,
percent of time commitment, percentage
of time covered by cooperative
agreement funds) for unfilled positions
should be included for any key
positions that are currently vacant or
contingent upon an award.
Document that you have sufficient
personnel, or will be able to quickly
retain qualified personnel to begin your
project immediately, and to perform
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
activities in a timely and effective
fashion. Successful applicants must hire
all key staff positions identified in the
proposal as vacant or required in the
award agreement within 120 days of
award. Describe how principal
components of your organization will
participate in, or support, your project.
(2) Qualifications of Applicant and
Partner Organizations (4 points).
Include names, descriptions of the
experience and qualifications of
subcontractors. Document how you
propose to coordinate with and monitor
sub-contractors, including frequency of
meetings, on-site inspections and
submission of formal monthly or
quarterly reports. Discuss your
communication and coordination with
partners, including partner
responsibilities, meeting frequency, etc.
If partners are community-based
grassroots, non-profit organizations,
including faith-based organizations,
include documentation demonstrating
their community-based grassroots
status, such as organizational profile,
501(c)(3) status or Social Services
budget. (Lengthy documents are not
required; face pages or extracted
relevant text is adequate.)
(3) Past Performance of the
Organization (5 points). This section
refers to applicants who have any prior
experience in another Healthy Homes or
Lead Hazard Control grant, another
grant related to environmental health
and safety issues, or other experience in
a similar program. Provide details about
the nature of the project, the funding
agency, and your performance, relative
to performance measures and the
achievement of desired housing- and
health-related outcomes. If your
organization is an existing Healthy
Homes grantee, provide a description of
the progress and outcomes achieved in
that grant. Current grantees that are on,
or ahead of their benchmarks, may earn
one point based on their demonstrated
ability to date. If you received previous
Healthy Homes Demonstration Program
funding, you will be evaluated in terms
of your performance and timeliness
under the previous grant.
You must complete and submit the
Factor 1, Table 1, Form HUD–96012,
which can be downloaded with your
application at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp to
support narrative information.
b. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (15 Points)
This factor addresses the extent for
your proposed activities to document
housing-related environmental health
and safety hazards (including, but not
limited to, mold, allergens, lead-based
PO 00000
Frm 00153
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11585
paint hazards, carbon monoxide,
pesticides, home safety hazards) in your
target area(s) that impact your targeted
group(s).
(1) Target Area for Proposed Activities
(5 points). Specifically identify a target
area for your proposed activities.
Document the critical level of need for
your proposed activities in this target
area by providing data documenting
targeted groups that are traditionally
underserved or have special needs. For
a maximum score, data provided should
represent the target area, rather than
general statistics or information
pertinent to a larger geographic area. If
specific statistics are not available,
discuss why this is the case.
(2) Link to Housing-related Health
and Safety Hazards (10 points). Your
documentation should summarize
available data linking housing-based
environmental health and safety hazards
to disease or injuries to children,
especially in low- and very low-income
families, in your target area. Examples
of data that might be used to
demonstrate need include:
(a) Economic and demographic data (3
points), including poverty and
unemployment rates and the number
and percentage of low- and very-lowincome families with incomes less than
50 percent and 80 percent of the median
income, respectively, as determined by
HUD, for the area. Statistics that
describe low- and very-low-income
families are available at https://
factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/
main.html?_lang=en. Applicants should
also consult local data sources, such as
city government Web sites, for target
area data.
(b) Statistics for your target area that
present rates of childhood illnesses (4
points) (including asthma, elevated
blood lead levels) or injuries (falls,
burns) among children residing in your
target areas that could be caused or
exacerbated by exposure to conditions
in the home environment; and
(c) The age and condition of housing
(3 points). In responding, provide data
available in your jurisdiction’s currently
approved Consolidated Plan and the
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice (AI) or Indian Housing
Plan or derived from current census
data or from other sources of
comparable quality.
You must complete and submit the
Factor 2 Table, Form HUD–96016,
posted at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
c. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (50 Points)
(1) Approach for Implementing the
Project (36 points). HUD is interested in
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11586
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
comparability among the Healthy
Homes Demonstration Programs, in
order to further standardize outcomes
and performance measures. Therefore,
applicants are encouraged to be explicit
in describing proposed project activities
and provide details about designing and
implementing their work plan.
(a) Project Approach (5 points)
Describe your approach to implement
your proposed project. In particular
describe the methods, schedule and
milestones that will be used to identify
and control housing-related
environmental health and safety hazards
and to achieve the desired
improvements in the health of the
families you serve. Include summary
information about the estimated
numbers of clients to be contacted,
clients enrolled, units to be assessed,
units to receive remediations,
individuals to be trained, and
individuals or groups that will be
reached through education or outreach
activities. You are expected to
document environmental outputs
(reduction in allergen levels) and health
outcome measures, such as reduction in
asthmatic episodes, pediatric asthma
hospitalizations, emergency room visits
for asthma, falls, burns, etc. These
outputs and outcomes are critical to
achieving the Healthy Homes Initiative
Departmental Goal of reducing allergen
levels in 5,000 units, and
correspondingly reducing asthmatic
episodes for 3,000 children living in
these units by 2011. The use of tables
to describe schedule, milestones and
summary data is encouraged.
(b) Start up (3 Points)
(i) Institutional Review Boards. In
conformance with the Common Rule
(Federal Policy for the Protection of
Human Subjects, codified by HUD at 24
CFR 60.101, which incorporates the
DHHS regulation at 45 CFR part 46), if
your research involves human subjects,
your organization must provide proof
(e.g., a letter signed by an appropriate
official) that the research has been
reviewed and approved by an
Institutional Review Board (IRB) before
you can initiate activities that require
IRB approval. Before initiating such
activities you must also provide the
number for your organization’s
assurance (i.e., an ‘‘institutional
assurance’’) that has been approved by
the Department of Health and Human
Service’s Office for Human Research
Protections (OHRP).
Although you do not have to provide
proof of IRB approval with your
application, you should address how
you will obtain such approval. Describe
how you will obtain informed consent
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(e.g., from the subjects, their parents or
their guardians, as applicable) and
discuss the steps you will take to help
ensure participants’ understanding of
the elements of informed consent, such
as the purposes, benefits and risks of the
research. Describe how this information
will be provided and how the consent
will be collected. For example, describe
your use of ‘‘plain language’’ forms,
flyers and verbal scripts, and how you
plan to work with families with limited
English proficiency or primary
languages other than English, and with
families including persons with
disabilities. For additional information
on what constitutes human subject
research or how to obtain an
institutional assurance see the OHRP
Web site at https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/.
(ii) Staff and Partner Training and
Capacity Building. Provide detailed
information regarding how program staff
and, where applicable, partnering
organizations will be trained in the
disciplines needed to successfully
implement your project (e.g., resident
education, assessments and
remediations). Include an outline of
training curricula, a description of
qualifications of trainers, and describe
how individuals or groups to be trained
will be selected.
(iii) Quality Assurance (QA)
Activities. Successful Healthy Homes
Demonstration Program applicants that
are collecting housing, demographic,
medical or environmental data must
ensure the quality and integrity of the
data. Describe the elements of your
project that will integrate QA activities
into the project design and applicable
activities such as visual assessments,
environmental assessments and
questionnaires. Elements you may want
to describe include the use of quality
control samples, validated
questionnaires and assessment tools,
data collection, data management,
statistical analysis, staff training and
monitoring. Your description will be
evaluated relative to its thoroughness,
level of detail, and appropriateness for
ensuring the validity and quality of the
data. If awarded, you will be asked to
develop a Quality Assurance Plan that
describes these elements.
(iv) If you are proposing to conduct a
project that includes a significant level
of community interaction (e.g., resident
recruitment, home-based remediations,
data collection, environmental sampling
in residences) describe your plan for
meaningful involvement of the affected
community in your proposed project.
You should define the community of
interest with respect to your proposed
project and discuss why your proposed
approach to community involvement
PO 00000
Frm 00154
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
will make a meaningful contribution to
your project and to the community.
(v) Describe any proposed
involvement of grassroots communitybased, nonprofit organizations,
including faith-based organizations, in
the proposed activities including the
development of consortia. These
activities may include outreach,
community education, marketing,
inspection, and housing evaluations and
remediations.
(c) Recruitment and Enrollment (6
Points)
(i) Describe how you will identify,
select, prioritize, and enroll units of
housing in which you will undertake
housing-based health hazard and safety
remediations, targeting low- and very
low-income families with young
children under the age of six (72
months) to the extent feasible.
(ii) Discuss possible recruitment
problems, and the probability of
dropouts, and describe measures you
will perform to sustain recruitment and
enrollment, including over-recruitment
and incentives for sustainability of
participants throughout the period of
performance of the cooperative
agreement.
(iii) Describe how you will monitor
enrollment and recruitment status and
implement measures identified to
sustain enrollment and recruitment.
(iv) Discuss how you will comply
with the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act (HIPAA). See
Section III.C.3 for more information
about HIPAA requirements.
(v) Along with HIPAA compliance,
describe how you will provide
appropriate program information and
gain informed consent from the subjects,
their parents and guardians, as
applicable. Describe how you will
ensure that participants understand and
consent to the elements of the program
such as the purposes, benefits and risks
of the research activities.
(vi) Describe your proposed methods
to reach high-risk groups and
communities, vulnerable populations
and traditionally underserved
populations.
(vii) Describe how you will
affirmatively further fair housing, which
would include, but not be limited to: (1)
Affirmative marketing of the program to
those least likely to apply based on race,
color, sex, familial status, national
origin, religion, or disability (especially
when persons in these demographic
groups are generally not served by the
grassroots community-based, nonprofit
organizations, including faith-based
organizations or other partner
organizations); (2) providing materials
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
in alternative formats for persons with
disabilities; providing materials in
languages other than English for
individuals with limited English
proficiency and their families; (3)
assuring long-term residency by families
currently living in the community; and
(4) assuring that priority for treated
units go to those who need the features
(treatment) of the unit.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
(d) Unit Assessments, Occupant Surveys
and Medical Referrals (3 Points)
(i) Describe the assessment tools your
project will employ to establish baseline
data for unit condition, knowledge of
program participant and/or the health of
the occupant(s). These tools include
questionnaires, visual assessment
protocols and environmental sampling
and analysis.
(ii) Describe your process for
evaluating units of housing in which
you will undertake housing-related
environmental health and safety hazard
remediations. Provide an estimate of the
total number of owner-occupied and/or
rental units in which you will perform
assessments and conduct remediations.
(iii) Describe the process to be
followed for referring children for
medical case management, if applicable.
Describe the organizations that will be
involved in this process and their prior
experience providing case management
to the target population(s).
(e) Remediations (7 Points)
(i) Describe your process for the
development of work specifications for
the selected physical remediations and
identify individuals (or organizations)
who will develop the work
specifications. Include specifics about
the individual’s position or the
organizational role in your project.
(ii) Discuss your process to select and
obtain contractors for conducting
remediations in selected units and
provide details about the competitive
bidding process.
(iii) Discuss efforts to incorporate
cost-effective methods to address
multiple housing-related environmental
health and safety hazards, and describe
the specific remediations you will
employ to control these hazards before
children are affected; and/or to control
these hazards in units where children
have already been treated for illnesses
or injuries associated with these hazards
(e.g., burns, lead poisoning, asthma).
Although program partners have shown
that low-cost housing remediations can
be effective in reducing illness and
hazardous conditions, HUD is interested
in data that evaluate the costeffectiveness over time of carrying out
assessments and remediations for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
multiple hazards compared to the
conventional approach of identifying
and remediating one hazard at a time.
The data should be stratified by the
type, size and other housing
characteristics, and the type and extent
of assessment and remediation, in order
to provide meaningful and comparable
unit costs. Therefore, in your budget
submission, provide an estimate of the
cost of each remediation (material costs
and labor costs associated with
installation) and an estimate of costs
projected per unit. Describe how you
will track the costs of remediations and
provide information about the efficiency
of these remediations. For example,
provide information about the costeffectiveness, technical effectiveness
and sustainability of the remediations.
Include any remediation plans to
achieve the Healthy Homes Initiative’s
Departmental Strategic Goal of reducing
allergen levels in 5,000 units by 2011,
and correspondingly, reducing
asthmatic episodes in 3,000 children.
(iv) Discuss how you will assure that
the contractor will comply with all
applicable Federal, state and local
regulations.
(v) Describe the financing strategy,
including eligibility requirements,
terms, conditions, and amounts
available, to be employed for
conducting housing remediations. You
must discuss the way funds will be
administered (e.g., use of grants,
deferred loans, forgivable loans, other
resources, private sector financing, etc.)
as well as the agency that will
administer the process.
(vi) Describe your plan for the
relocation of occupants of units selected
for remediation, if temporary relocation
is necessary (see Section VI B.4, below).
If temporary relocation is necessary,
address the use of safe houses and other
housing arrangements, storage of
household goods, stipends, incentives,
etc., and the source of funding for
relocation.
(vii) If relocation is necessary for
occupants of rental units, describe your
plan for ensuring right of return and/or
first referral for occupants of units
selected for remediation who have had
to move for the remediations to be
performed. (see Section VI B.4, below).
(f) Community Education, Outreach
and Capacity Building/Training (3
Points)
(i) Describe your proposed methods
for community and/or targeted
education and training. These should
include community awareness,
education, training, and outreach
programs that support your work plan
and are culturally sensitive and targeted
appropriately. Provide information
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11587
about specific educational/outreach
activities with quantitative data
(number of individuals to be reached,
etc.) and a description of the intended
audience (include plans for both
program participants and the
community at large).
(ii) Discuss whether Healthy Homes
training programs will be expanded to
include non sub-grantee organizations,
such as public housing agencies,
Tribally Designated Housing Entities,
grassroots community-based or
nonprofit organizations, including faithbased organizations. If so, describe your
plan for doing this.
(g) HUD’s Departmental Policy
Priorities (6 Points). Indicate if, and
describe how, you will address any of
HUD’s Departmental policy priorities
(see General Section). You will receive
points for each of the applicable FY
2007 policy priorities that are
adequately addressed in your
application and incorporated into work
plan activities showing outputs and
outcomes to a maximum of six points.
Policy priorities that are applicable to
the Healthy Homes Demonstration
NOFA are: (1) Improving our Nation’s
Communities (focus on distressed
communities); (2) Providing Full and
Equal Access to Grassroots Communitybased, Nonprofit Organizations,
including Faith-based Organizations in
HUD Program Implementation; (3)
Participation of Minority-Serving
Institutions in HUD Programs; (4)
Removal of Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing; and (5) Promoting
Energy Efficiency and Energy Star. HUD
expects the applicant to implement
Energy Star building techniques and
utilize Energy Star appliances whenever
activities of the grant afford the
opportunity. For information on Energy
Star programs and appliances, see
https://www.energystar.gov.
Each policy priority is worth one
point, except for policy priority (4),
Removal of Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing, which is worth up
to 2 points, provided the applicant
includes an appropriate narrative
response demonstrating what they have
accomplished to date and submits the
required documentation as described in
Form HUD 27300. Applicants may
instead provide a Web site address
where the documentation can be readily
found.
(h) Economic Opportunity (3 points).
To the greatest extent feasible, your
project should promote job training,
employment, and other economic
opportunities for low-income and
minority residents and businesses that
are owned by, and/or employ, lowincome and minority residents as
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11588
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
defined in 24 CFR 135.5. Describe how
you or your partners will comply with
Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C.
1701u) and HUD’s implementing rules
at 24 CFR part 135 by:
• Providing training and employment
opportunities for low- and very lowincome persons living within the
awardee’s jurisdiction;
• Purchasing goods and supplies, or
contracting for services from businesses
that are owned by, and/or employ, lowand very low-income persons living
within the targeted jurisdiction;
information about Section 3
requirements is available at: https://
www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/section3/
section3.cfm; and
• Describing how your proposed
project will provide opportunities for
self-sufficiency, particularly for persons
enrolled in welfare-to-work programs, or
provide educational and job training
opportunities.
(2) Approach for Managing the Project
(9 points). Considering your project
goals and objectives, describe how you
will manage the project. Provide
information on the general management
approach including a management plan
that:
(a) Incorporates appropriate project
objectives, major tasks/activities,
responsible entities, performance goals,
and the process that you will utilize to
assign, track and monitor the
performance of major tasks and
activities. All specific activities
necessary to complete the proposed
project, such as recruitment, enrollment,
training, education and outreach, unit
identification, assessment and
remediation, must be included.
(b) Provides a schedule of milestones
and deliverables for the completion of
major tasks and activities, and the
delivery of interim and final products.
(c) Discusses coordination with subrecipients, partners and staff.
(d) Describes quality assurance
activities, including the collection of
data (questionnaires and environmental
sampling and analysis), case
management, data entry and report
preparation, and associated corrective
actions.
(3) Budget Justification (5 points).
Your proposed budget will be evaluated
for the extent to which it is reasonable,
clearly justified, and consistent with the
project management plan and intended
use of program funds. HUD is not
required to approve or fund all
proposed activities. Your detailed
budget should be submitted using Form
HUD–424–CBW. An electronic copy is
available at: https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. You
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
must thoroughly document and justify
all budget categories and costs and all
major tasks for yourself, sub-recipients,
partners, major subcontractors, joint
venture participants, or others
contributing resources to the project.
Include a 4-page (maximum) narrative
that describes clearly and in detail your
budgeted costs for each required
program element (major task) included
in your overall plan (at least 65 percent
of the budget must be expended for
direct remediation). Include a separate,
detailed budget for any sub-grantee
proposed to receive more than 10
percent of the total federal budget
request.
d. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (5 Points)
This factor addresses your ability to
secure other community resources (e.g.,
financing, supplies, and/or services)
that can be combined with HUD’s
resources to achieve project purposes.
These community resources may be
contributions from organizations such
as the applicant, partners, or other
organizations not directly involved in
the project. Resources may also be
provided by state and local
governmental entities. While cost
sharing or matching is not required,
HUD will award a higher score under
this rating factor if you provide
documentation of commitments for
significant leveraging. HUD’s Matching
and Leveraging Contribution Guidance,
Appendix D, may be downloaded with
your application at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Applicants should
note that, if they are submitting multiple
proposals to OHHLHC and are selected
for multiple awards, they may not use
the same resources for match and/or
leveraging. During cooperative
agreement negotiations, awardees will
be required to provide alternative match
and/or leveraged resources than were
proposed in the original applications. In
other words, awardees may not commit
duplicate matching and/or leveraged
resources to multiple OHHLHC
programs.
(1) HUD will consider the extent to
which you have developed partnerships
or consortia to secure additional
resources to increase the effectiveness of
your proposed project. Describe how
other organizations will participate in or
support your project. Resources may
include funding or in-kind
contributions (e.g., labor, fringe benefits,
services, supplies, or equipment)
budgeted for your proposed project.
Include in the narrative the details of
the commitment, the amount being
leveraged, or if the commitment is inkind, the specific names, percent of
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
time, supplies and other resources, and
value of each commitment.
(2) The signature of the authorized
official on the Form SF–424 commits
matching or other contributed resources
of the applicant organization. The
applicant must obtain a letter of
commitment from each organization
(other than itself) that is providing a
match, whether cash or in-kind. The
letter must describe the contributed
resource(s) that will be used in your
project and the dollar value of each
contribution. Staff and in-kind
contributions should be given a marketbased monetary value. Each letter of
commitment, memorandum of
understanding, or agreement to
participate shall include the
organization’s name and the proposed
level of commitment and roles and
responsibilities as they relate to the
proposed project. The commitment
must be on official letterhead and
signed by an official legally able to make
commitments on behalf of the
organization and dated. Letters must be
submitted with your application.
(3) Include information to address the
following elements.
(i) The extent to which you have
coordinated your activities with other
known organizations that are not
directly participating in your proposed
work activities (organizations other than
sub-grantees and program partners), but
with which you share common goals
and objectives.
(A) Describe your plan for integrating
and coordinating housing-related
environmental health and safety hazard
remediations with other housing-related
activities (e.g., rehabilitation,
weatherization, correction of code
violations, and other similar work).
(B) Describe your plans to generate
and use public subsidies or other
resources, such as loan funds, to finance
future remediations to prevent and
control housing-related environmental
health and safety hazards, particularly
in low-or very low-income families with
children under the age of six years.
(ii) The extent to which your project
exhibits the potential to be financially
self-sustaining by decreasing
dependence on federal funding and
relying more on state, local and private
funding to continue healthy homes
activities after the funding period is
completed.
Applicants are to complete the Factor
4 table, Form HUD–96015, Leveraging
Resources that is posted at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
e. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (15 points)
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
This rating factor reflects HUD’s goal
to embrace high standards of ethics,
management and accountability. HUD is
committed to ensuring that applicants
keep promises made in their
applications and assess their
performance to ensure that performance
goals are met. In your response to this
rating factor, you are to discuss the
performance goals for your project and
specific outcome measure results.
Discuss the specific methods you will
use to measure progress towards your
goals, track and report results of
assessments and remediations, and
evaluate the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of remediations [see
requirements discussed in
V.A.2.c(1)(e)(iii)]; identify important
project milestones (e.g., the end of
specific phases in a multi-phased
project) and deliverables specific to
your project timeline; identify
milestones that are critical to achieving
project objectives (e.g., developing
questionnaires or protocols, hiring staff,
recruitment of participants, and IRB
approval and/or HIPAA Authorization,
if applicable); and identify benchmarks
such as number of units that received
intervention, percent of remediations
that occurred in high-risk communities,
etc., that you will use to track the
progress of your project.
Identify how your project will be held
accountable for meeting project goals,
objectives, and the actions undertaken
in implementing the program. Provide
assurances that work plans and
performance measures developed for
your project will be achieved in a timely
and cost-effective manner.
Your project should focus particular
attention on identifying specific
resident, or program participant, health
outcomes and describe how these
outcomes will be measured. Resident
health outcomes do not necessarily
require medical testing, such as
spirometry or documenting blood lead
levels, and may be assessed using
questionnaires or other tools. Careful
attention should be given to the
relationship between the program’s
remediations (e.g., physical changes in
the environment, changes to cleaning
protocols, in-home training or provision
of educational materials) and the effect
on resident health, particularly the
reduction in asthmatic episodes for
children. As part of your health
outcomes, include a discussion of how
your program will support the Healthy
Homes Initiative’s Departmental
Strategic Goal of reducing allergen
levels in 5,000 units by 2011, and
correspondingly, reducing asthmatic
episodes in 3,000 children living in
these units.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
In addition, you should describe how
you will evaluate the benefits of your
proposed remediations relative to their
costs or alternative approaches to
achieving these same outcomes. For
example, you could compare the costs
and benefits of the healthy homes
approach in which multiple housingrelated environmental health and safety
hazards are assessed and remediated by
a comprehensive method, to costs and
benefits associated with adopting a
‘‘single hazard’’ model in which
separate assessments and remediations
are carried out by several different
programs. You could also estimate the
monetary benefits of remediations that
prevent illness (e.g., reducing asthma
symptoms) or reducing injuries.
In evaluating Rating Factor 5, HUD
will consider how you have described
the benefits and outcome measures of
your program. HUD will also consider
the proposed objectives and
performance measures relative to cost
and achieving the purpose of the
program, as well as the evaluation plan,
to ensure the project is on schedule and
within budget.
You must submit Form HUD–96010.
HUD is using an electronic Logic Model
with drop down menus from which you
can select needs, activities, and
outcomes appropriate to your program.
See the General Section for detailed
information on use of the Logic Model.
HUD is requiring grantees to use
program-specific questions to selfevaluate the management and
performance of their program. For FY
2007, HUD is considering a new concept
for the Logic Model. The new concept
is a Return on Investment statement.
HUD will be publishing a separate
notice on the ROI concept. Training on
HUD’s logic model will be provided via
satellite broadcast.
f. Bonus Points: RC/EZ/EC–II (2
points)
Applicants are eligible to receive 2
bonus points for projects located within
federally designated Renewable
Communities (RCs), Empowerment
Zones (EZs), or Enterprise Communities
(ECs) designated by USDA in round II
(EC–IIs) (collectively referred to as RC/
EZ/EC–IIs), and which will serve the
residents of these communities (see the
General Section). In order to be eligible
for the bonus points, applicants must
submit a completed Form HUD–2990
signed by the appropriate official of the
RC/EZ/EC–II.
B. Reviews and Selection Process. The
review and selection process is
provided in the General Section. The
General Section also provides the
procedures for correcting deficient
applications.
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11589
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Applicants Selected for Award.
(a) Successful applicants will receive
a letter from the Office of Healthy
Homes and Lead Hazard Control Grant
Officer providing details regarding the
effective start date of the cooperative
agreement and any additional data and
information to be submitted to execute
a cooperative agreement. This letter is
not an authorization to begin work or
incur costs under the cooperative
agreement or grant.
(b) HUD may require that a selected
applicant participate in negotiations to
determine the specific terms of the
cooperative agreement and budget.
Should HUD not be able to successfully
conclude negotiations with a selected
applicant, an award will not be made.
If the applicant accepts the terms and
conditions of the cooperative agreement,
a signed cooperative agreement must be
returned by the date specified.
Instructions on how to have the
cooperative agreement account entered
into HUD’s Line of Credit Control
System (LOCCS) payment system will
be provided. Other forms and program
requirements will be provided. In
accordance with OMB Circular A–133
(Audits of States, Local Governments
and Nonprofit Organizations), awardees
will have to submit their completed
audit-reporting package along with the
Data Collection Form (SF–SAC) to the
Single Audit Clearinghouse. The
address can be obtained from their Web
site. The SF–SAC can be downloaded at:
https://harvester.census.gov/sac/.
2. Debriefing. The General Section
provides the procedures for applicants
to request a debriefing.
3. Negotiation. Refer to the General
Section for additional details.
4. Adjustments to Funding. Refer to
the General Section for additional
details.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Requirements.
Under the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007),
the provisions of section 305(c) of the
Multifamily Housing Property
Disposition Reform Act of 1994,
implemented by HUD regulations at 24
CFR part 58, ‘‘Environmental Review
Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD
Environmental Responsibilities,’’ are
applicable to properties assisted with
Healthy Homes Demonstration funds. In
accordance with part 58, applicants
under this NOFA that are States, units
of general local government or Indian
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11590
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Tribes must act as the responsible entity
and assume the environmental review
responsibilities for activities funded
under this NOFA. Other applicants
must arrange for the unit of general local
government or Indian Tribe to act as the
responsible entity. Under 24 CFR 58.11,
if a non-recipient responsible entity
objects to performing the environmental
review, or if a recipient that is not a
responsible entity objects to the local or
tribal government performing the
environmental review, HUD may
designate another responsible entity to
perform the review or may perform the
environmental review itself under the
provisions of 24 CFR part 50. Healthy
Homes Demonstration Program
applicants and other participants in
activities under this NOFA may not
undertake, or commit or expend federal
or non-federal funds (including HUDleveraged or match funds) for housing
interventions, related rehabilitation or
other physical activities until the
responsible entity completes an
environmental review and the applicant
submits and obtains HUD approval of a
request for release of funds and the
responsible entity’s environmental
certification in accordance with part 58
(or until HUD has completed an
environmental review under part 50).
The results of environmental reviews on
individual projects may require that
proposed activities be modified or
proposed sites rejected. For assistance,
contact Edward Thomas, the Office of
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control Environmental Officer at (215)
861–7670 (this is not a toll-free number)
or the HUD Environmental Review
Officer in the HUD Field Office serving
your area. If you are a hearing-or
speech-impaired person, you may reach
the telephone number via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339.
Recipients of a cooperative agreement
under this NOFA will be given guidance
in these responsibilities.
2. Executive Order 13202.
‘‘Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and FederallyFunded Construction Projects.’’ See
General Section for information
concerning this requirement. https://
www.hud.gov/.
3. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See the General Section for
information concerning this
requirement.
4. Relocation. The relocation
requirements of the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URA),
as amended, and the implementing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
government wide regulation at 49 CFR
part 24, that cover any person
(including individuals, businesses, and
farms) displaced as a direct result of the
acquisition, rehabilitation, or
demolition of real property apply to this
grant program. If such persons are
required to temporarily relocate for a
project, the requirements of the URA
regulations at 49 CFR 24.2(a)(9) must be
met. HUD recommends you review
these regulations when preparing your
proposal. (They can be downloaded
from the Government Printing Office
website at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
cfr/ by entering the
regulatory citation in quotes without
any spaces (e.g., ‘‘49CFR24.2’’) in the
Quick Search box.). See Section III.C.4.e
of the General Section for additional
information about relocation.
5. Davis-Bacon Wage Rates. The
Davis-Bacon wage rates are not
applicable to this program. However, if
you use grant funds in conjunction with
other federal programs, Davis-Bacon
requirements will apply to the extent
required under the other federal
programs.
6. Audit Requirements. Any grant
recipient that spends $500,000 or more
in federal financial assistance in a single
year must meet the audit requirements
established in 24 CFR part 84 or 85, as
applicable, in accordance with OMB
Circular A–133.
C. Reporting
Successful applicants will be required
to submit quarterly and final program
and financial reports according the
requirements of the Office of Healthy
Homes and Lead Hazard Control.
Specific guidance and additional details
will be provided to successful
applicants. The following items are a
part of OHHLHC reporting
requirements.
1. Final Work Plan and Budget are
due prior to the effective start of the
cooperative agreement.
2. Progress reports are due on a
quarterly basis. In quarterly reports,
grantees provide information about
accomplishments in the areas of
program management and capacity
building; assessment and intervention
activities; community education,
outreach, training and capacity
building; data collection and analysis;
as well as a listing of completed units
and financial report. Project benchmarks
and milestones will be tracked using a
benchmark spreadsheet that uses the
benchmarks and milestones identified
in the Logic Model form (HUD–96010)
approved and incorporated into your
award agreement. For specific reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
requirements, see policy guidance at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead.
3. A final report is due at the end of
the project period, which includes final
project benchmarks and milestones
achieved against the proposed
benchmarks and milestones in the Logic
Model (HUD–96010) approved and
incorporated into your award
agreement. The final report shall also
respond to the management questions
found in the Logic Model and approved
for your program. Specific information
on all reporting requirements will be
provided to successful applicants.
4. Racial and Ethnic Beneficiary Data.
HUD does not require Healthy Homes
Demonstration Program awardees to
report ethnic and racial beneficiary data
as part of their initial application
package. However, such data must be
reported on an annual basis, at a
minimum, during the implementation of
your cooperative agreement. You must
use the Office of Management and
Budget’s Standards for the Collection of
Racial and Ethnic Data to report these
data, using Form HUD–27061, ‘‘Race
and Ethnic Data Reporting Form,’’ if
applicable (HUD Race Ethnic Form on
Grants.gov) found on https://
www.hudclips.org/sub_nonhud/html/
forms.htm, along with instructions for
its use.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions related to the
application download submission
process, you may contact the Grants.gov
helpline at 800–518–GRANTS. For
programmatic questions, you may
contact by writing: Emily E. Williams,
Director; Healthy Homes Division;
Department of Housing and Urban
Development; Office of Healthy Homes
and Lead Hazard Control; 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 8236; Washington,
DC 20410–3000; or by telephone at (336)
547–4002, extension 2067 (this is not a
toll-free number); or via e-mail at:
Emily_E._Williams@hud.gov. For
administrative questions, you may
contact Curtissa L. Coleman, Grants
Officer, at the address above or by
telephone at: (202) 402–7580 (this is not
a toll-free number) or via e-mail at:
Curtissa_L._Coleman@hud.gov. If you
are hearing- or speech-impaired, you
may reach the above telephone numbers
via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at 800–877–
8339.
VIII. Other Information
A. General. For additional general,
technical, and program information
pertaining to the Office of Healthy
Homes and Lead Hazard Control, visit:
https://www.hud.gov/offices/lead.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2539–0015. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 80 hours to prepare the
application and 16 hours to finalize the
cooperative agreement. This includes
the time for collecting, reviewing, and
reporting the data for the application.
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11591
This information will be used for
grantee selection. The reporting burden
for completion of the Quality Assurance
Plan by applicants who are awarded a
grant is estimated at 24 hours per
grantee (OMB approval is pending).
Response to this request for information
is required in order to receive the
benefits to be derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.016
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11592
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency Program Coordinators
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Public and Indian Housing,
Office of Public Housing and Voucher
Programs.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Family
Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program
Coordinators.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–15, the OMB Approval Number
is 2577–0178.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): 14.871,
Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 18, 2007. Please see the
General Section for timely receipt
requirements.
G. Additional Information: The
purpose of the HCV FSS program is to
promote the development of local
strategies to coordinate the use of
assistance under the HCV program with
public and private resources to enable
participating families to increase earned
income, reduce or eliminate the need for
welfare assistance, and make progress
toward economic independence and
self-sufficiency. The FSS program and
this FSS NOFA support the
Department’s strategic goal of helping
HUD-assisted renters make progress
toward self-sufficiency. The FSS
program provides critical tools that can
be used by communities to support
welfare reform and help families
develop new skills that will lead to
economic self-sufficiency. As a result of
their participation in the FSS program,
many families have achieved stable,
well-paid employment. An FSS program
coordinator assures that program
participants are linked to the supportive
services they need to achieve selfsufficiency.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Authority and Program
Description. The Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007)
allows funding for program coordinators
under the HCV FSS program under
Section 23 of the United States Housing
Act of 1937. Through annual NOFAs,
HUD has provided funding to public
housing agencies (PHAs) that are
operating HCV FSS programs to enable
those PHAs to employ program
coordinators to support their HCV FSS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
programs. In the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007
HCV FSS Program Coordinator NOFA,
HUD is again making funding available
to PHAs to employ FSS program
coordinators and FSS homeownership
program coordinators for one year.
Funding priority under this NOFA will
be provided to applicants with Public
Housing Information Center (PIC) data
confirming that their FSS families have
purchased homes and to applicants
whose PIC data demonstrate program
accomplishments, such as increased
HCV FSS program size, increased
earned income of program participants,
and families successfully completing
their FSS contracts. HUD will accept
applications from both new and renewal
PHAs that have HUD approval to
administer an HCV FSS program. PHAs
funded under the HCV FSS NOFA in FY
2005 or FY 2006 are considered
‘‘renewal’’ PHAs in this NOFA. These
renewal PHAs are invited to apply for
funds to continue previously funded
HCV FSS program coordinator and FSS
homeownership coordinator positions
that they have filled.
Because of the importance of the FSS
program in helping families increase
earned income and develop assets, HUD
will also accept applications from
‘‘new’’ PHAs (PHAs that do not qualify
as renewal PHAs as defined under this
FSS NOFA). The maximum number of
positions that a new applicant PHA,
including new PHA joint applicants,
may receive is one full-time FSS
program coordinator.
To support the Department’s
initiatives on Colonias, a selection
preference is again included for ‘‘new’’
applicant PHAs that provide services
and support to rural under-served
communities in the Southwest Border
regions of Arizona, California, New
Mexico, and Texas. See Section III.C.3.c.
of this NOFA for requirements that must
be met to qualify for the Colonias
preference.
PHAs are encouraged to reach out to
persons with disabilities who are HCV
program participants and might be
interested in participating in the FSS
program. PHAs are also encouraged to
include agencies on their FSS Program
Coordinating Committee (PCC) that
work with and provide services to
families with disabilities.
Applicants must administer the FSS
program in accordance with HUD
regulations and requirements in 24 CFR
part 984, which govern the HCV FSS
Program, and must comply with existing
HCV program requirements, notices,
and guidebooks.
B. Number of Positions for Which
Eligible PHAs May Apply. Eligible
PHAs may apply for funding for HCV
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11593
FSS program coordinator positions
under this NOFA as follows:
1. Renewal PHA Applicants. PHAs
that qualify as eligible renewal PHA
applicants under this NOFA may apply
for continuation of each FSS
coordinator position, including
homeownership coordinator positions,
awarded under the HCV FSS NOFA in
FY 2005 or FY 2006 that has been filled
by the PHA.
2. New PHA Applicants. New PHA
applicants may apply for HCV FSS
program coordinator positions as
follows: a) up to one full-time HCV FSS
coordinator position for a PHA
applicant with HUD approval to
administer a HCV FSS program of 25 or
more FSS slots and b) up to one fulltime HCV FSS coordinator position per
application for joint PHA applicants
that together have HUD approval to
administer a total of at least 25 HCV FSS
slots.
C. Definitions. The following
definitions apply to the funding
available under this NOFA.
1. Renewal PHA Applicant. A PHA or
PHAs that received funding under the
HCV FSS NOFA in FY 2005 or FY 2006.
2. New PHA Applicant. PHAs that did
not receive funding under the HCV FSS
NOFA in FY 2005 or FY 2006 that have
HUD approval to administer a HCV FSS
program of at least 25 slots or that fulfill
the 25 slot minimum by applying jointly
with one or more other PHAs.
3. FSS Program Size. The total
number of HCV FSS program slots
identified in the PHA’s HUD-approved
FSS Action Plan, or if requested by
Moving to Work (MTW) PHA
applicants, the number of slots in the
applicant’s MTW agreement. The total
may include both voluntary and
mandatory HCV FSS program slots. This
number is used in determining the
eligibility of new applicant PHAs under
this NOFA.
4. Qualifying FSS Homeownership
Program. Qualifying homeownership
programs include the HCV
Homeownership Program and other
programs administered by the PHA or
other entities that prepare HCV program
FSS participants for making the
transition from renting to
homeownership.
5. The Number of HCV FSS Program
Participants. The total number of
families shown in HUD’s PIC data
system or applicable MTW report, as
enrolled in the applicant’s HCV FSS
program at the end of a calendar year,
plus those families that successfully
completed their FSS contracts during
that calendar year.
6. Percentage of Families with
Positive FSS Escrow Balances. A
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11594
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
percentage that will be computed by
HUD and used to determine funding
order of priority 2 applicants under this
NOFA. It is the sum of the number of
HCV FSS families with positive escrow
balances and the number of families that
successfully completed their FSS
contracts as a percentage of HCV FSS
families with FSS progress reports. This
calculation will be made using data for
the period from December 31, 2005
through December 31, 2006 that has
been submitted to HUD on the Form
HUD–50058. For MTW applicants, a
comparable reporting source may be
used.
7. HCV Program Size. The number of
HCVs in a PHA’s program as determined
by HUD using Voucher Management
System (VMS) data.
8. HCV FSS Program Size Increase
Percentage. A percentage calculated for
renewal PHA applicants whose number
of HCV FSS participants in Calendar
Year 2006 is higher than their Calendar
Year 2005 number of participants.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
II. Award Information
Available Funds. This NOFA
announces the availability of
approximately $47,000,000 in FY 2007
to employ FSS program and FSS
homeownership coordinators for the
HCV FSS program. If additional funding
becomes available during FY 2007, HUD
may increase the amount available for
coordinators under this NOFA. A
maximum of $65,500 is available for
each full-time coordinator position
funded. Salaries are to be based on local
comparables. The funding will be
provided as a one-year HCV funding
increment under the PHA’s Annual
Contributions Contract (ACC). HUD
reserves the right to adjust funding for
renewal positions in order to ensure a
fair and reasonable distribution of
funding.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. PHAs eligible
to apply for funding under this NOFA
are:
1. Renewal PHA Applicants. Those
PHAs that received funding under the
HCV FSS NOFA in FY 2005 or FY 2006.
To continue to qualify as renewal PHAs,
the FY 2007 application of joint
applicants must include at least one
PHA applicant that meets this standard.
Joint applicants can change the lead
PHA in their FY 2007 application. A
PHA that was originally funded as part
of a joint application that wishes to now
apply separately would continue to be
considered a renewal PHA applicant for
funding purposes, but must be able to
meet the FSS minimum program size
requirement of a HUD-approved HCV
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
FSS program of at least 25 slots that
applies to new applicant PHAs.
2. New PHA Applicants. PHAs that
were not funded under the HCV FSS
NOFA in FY 2005 or FY 2006. The new
applicant PHA must be authorized
through its HUD-approved FSS Action
Plan to administer an HCV FSS program
of at least 25 slots, or be a PHA with
HUD approval to administer an HCV
FSS program of fewer than 25 slots that
applies jointly with one or more other
PHAs so that together they have HUD
approval to administer at least 25 HCV
FSS slots. Joint applicants must specify
a lead co-applicant that will receive and
administer the FSS program coordinator
funding.
3. MTW PHAs. New and renewal
PHAs that are under MTW agreements
with HUD may qualify for funding
under this NOFA if the PHA
administers an FSS program. When
determining the size of a new applicant
MTW PHA’s HUD-approved FSS
program, the PHA may request that the
number of FSS slots reflected in the
PHA’s MTW agreement be used instead
of the number in the PHA’s FSS Action
Plan.
4. Troubled PHAs
a. A PHA that has been designated by
HUD as a troubled PHA under the
Section Eight Management Assessment
Program (SEMAP), or that has serious
program management findings from
Inspector General audits or serious
outstanding HUD management review
or Independent Public Accountant (IPA)
audit findings for the PHA’s HCV or
Moderate Rehabilitation programs that
are resolved prior to this NOFA’s
application due date is eligible to apply
under this NOFA. Serious program
management findings are those that
would cast doubt on the capacity of the
PHA to administer its HCV FSS program
in accordance with applicable HUD
regulatory and statutory requirements.
b. A PHA whose SEMAP troubled
designation has not been removed by
HUD or whose major program
management findings or other
significant program compliance
problems have not been resolved by the
application due date may apply if the
PHA meets the requirements stated in
Section III.C.3.e. of this NOFA.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. None
required.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Funds awarded
to PHAs under this FSS NOFA may only
be used to pay salaries and fringe
benefits of HCV FSS program staff.
Funding may be used to employ or
otherwise retain for one year the
services of HCV FSS program
coordinators and HCV FSS
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
homeownership coordinators. FSS
coordinator support positions funded
under previous FSS NOFAs that made
funding available for such FSS positions
may be continued. A part-time program
coordinator may be retained where
appropriate.
2. Threshold Requirements
a. All Applicants
(1) Each applicant must qualify as an
eligible PHA under Section III.A. of this
NOFA and must have submitted their
FSS application by the application due
date and in the format required in
Section IV. of this NOFA.
(2) All applications must include a
Dun and Bradstreet Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number.
(See the General Section for further
information about the DUNS number
requirement.)
(3) Compliance with Fair Housing and
Civil Rights Laws. The General Section
of the SuperNOFA applies.
(4) Additional nondiscrimination and
other requirements. The General Section
of the SuperNOFA applies. The
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
requirements of the General Section also
apply. Section 3 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968 does
not apply to this program.
(5) The PHA must have a financial
management system that meets federal
standards. See the General Section
regarding those applicants that may be
subject to HUD’s arranging for a preaward survey of an applicant’s financial
management system.
(6) Applicants must comply with the
requirements for funding competitions
established by the HUD Reform Act of
1989 (42 U.S.C. 3531 et seq.) and other
requirements as defined in the General
Section.
b. Renewal Applicants. Continued
funding for existing coordinator
positions. In addition to meeting the
requirements of Section III.A. of this
FSS NOFA, renewal PHA applicants
must continue to operate an HCV FSS
program, have filled eligible FSS
program coordinator positions for which
they are seeking renewal funding,
executed FSS contracts of participation
with HCV FSS program families, and
submitted reports on participant
families to HUD via the form HUD–
50058, or a similar report for MTW PHA
applicants.
c. New Applicants. New applicants
must meet the requirements of Section
III.A. and Section III. C.2.a of this FSS
NOFA.
3. Program Requirements.
a. Salary Comparables. For all
positions requested under this NOFA,
evidence of salary comparability to
similar positions in the local
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
jurisdiction must be kept on file in the
PHA office.
b. FSS Action Plan. The requirements
for the FSS Action Plan are stated in 24
CFR 984.201. For a new PHA applicant
to qualify for funding under this NOFA,
the PHA’s initial FSS Action Plan or
amendment to change the number of
HCV FSS slots in the PHA’s previously
HUD-approved FSS Action Plan must be
submitted to and approved by the PHA’s
local HUD field office prior to the
application due date of this FSS NOFA.
An FSS Action Plan can be updated by
means of a simple one-page addendum
that reflects the total number of HCV
FSS slots (voluntary and/or mandatory
slots) the PHA intends to fill. New PHA
applicants with previously approved
HCV FSS Action Plans may wish to
confirm the number of HUD-approved
slots their local HUD field office has on
record for the PHA. A new applicant
MTW PHA may request that the number
of FSS slots in its MTW agreement be
used instead of the number of slots in
the PHA’s FSS Action Plan.
c. Colonias Preference. New applicant
PHAs claiming the Colonias preference
must meet the requirements of Sections
III.A., III.C.2.a. and III.C.2.c. of this FSS
NOFA and must operate in a Southwest
border area that contains Colonia
communities and administer programs
that include outreach to members of
those Colonia communities. Attachment
A of this NOFA provides a listing of
PHAs in Arizona, California, New
Mexico, and Texas that HUD has
identified as operating in areas
containing Colonia communities. PHAs
not listed in Attachment A that are
claiming the Colonias preference will be
required to submit a written request that
HUD determine their eligibility for the
preference. The request must be
submitted prior to the application
deadline date and must be sent to
Lorenzo ‘‘Larry’’ Reyes, Coordinator,
SW Border Colonias and Migrant
Farmworker Initiative, Office of
Departmental Operations and
Coordination, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 3120, Washington,
DC 20410. Any PHA that fails to submit
its request by the application deadline
will be ineligible for the Colonias
preference.
d. Homeownership Preferences. See
priority funding categories in Section
V.B.2. of this FSS NOFA. Reported HCV
FSS home purchase numbers will be
subject to post audit.
e. Troubled PHAs. A PHA whose
SEMAP troubled designation has not
been removed by HUD or that has major
program management findings or other
significant program compliance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
problems that have not been resolved by
the application due date, may apply if
the PHA submits an application that
designates another organization or
entity that is acceptable to HUD and
that:
(1) Includes an agreement by the other
organization or entity to administer the
FSS program on behalf of the PHA; and
(2) In the instance of a PHA with
unresolved major program management
findings, includes a statement that
outlines the steps the PHA is taking to
resolve the program findings.
Immediately after the publication of
this NOFA, the Office of Public Housing
in the local HUD field office will notify,
in writing, those PHAs that have been
designated by HUD as troubled under
SEMAP, and those PHAs with
unresolved major program management
findings or other significant program
compliance problems that are not
eligible to apply without such an
agreement. Concurrently, the local HUD
field office will provide a copy of each
such written notification to the Director
of the Grants Management Center. If an
applicant that is required to have an
agreement under this section fails to
submit the required agreement, this will
be treated as a technical deficiency. See
General Section for more information on
Corrections to Deficient Applications.
f. Conducting Business in Accordance
with Core Values and Ethical Standards.
To reflect core values, all PHAs shall
develop and maintain a written code of
conduct in the PHA administrative plan
that:
(1) Requires compliance with the
conflict-of-interest requirements of the
HCV program at 24 CFR 982.161; and
(2) Prohibits the solicitation or
acceptance of gifts or gratuities, in
excess of a nominal value, by any officer
or employee of the PHA, or any
contractor, subcontractor, or agent of the
PHA. The PHA’s administrative plan
shall state PHA policies concerning
PHA administrative and disciplinary
remedies for violation of the PHA code
of conduct. The PHA shall inform all
officers, employees, and agents of its
organization of the PHA’s code of
conduct. See the General Section for
additional information on the Code of
Conduct requirement.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Addresses To Request Application
Package
1. Web site. A copy of this funding
announcement for the HCV FSS
program may be downloaded from the
following Web site: https://
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11595
www.Grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
2. Further Information. When
requesting information, please refer to
the name of the program you are
interested in. The NOFA Information
Center opens for business
simultaneously with the publication of
the SuperNOFA. You can also obtain
information on this NOFA when you
download the instructions from the
www.Grants.gov Web site identified
above.
3. Technical Assistance. See Section
VII. of this FSS funding announcement.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Content of Application. Each new
and renewal PHA must complete form
SF–424; the SF–LLL, if appropriate; the
form HUD–52651, the HCV FSS
application form; HUD–2880,
‘‘Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/
Update Report’’ (HUD Applicant
Recipient Disclosure Report on
Grants.gov); HUD–2994–A, You are our
Client Grant Applicant Survey; HUD–
2991, Certification of Consistency with
the Consolidated Plan; and an
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
statement in accordance with the
General Section. In addition, the
application must include a completed
Logic Model (form HUD–96010)
showing proposed performance
measures applicable to the one-year
term of the funding requested under this
NOFA. See the General Section for
information on the Logic Model. A copy
of form HUD–52651, the HCV FSS
application form, and the HUD–96010,
Logic Model form, are part of the
INSTRUCTIONS download. Applicants
choosing the Outputs/Outcomes
category of ‘‘Other’’ must include a brief
narrative explanation of the category in
their application package. In completing
the SF–424, renewal PHAs should select
the continuation box on question 2, type
of application. The Federal Identifier
requested in 5a. is the PHA number of
each applicant PHA (e.g., MD035 or
AK002). The Federal Award Identifier is
the PHA number including the
increment number for the last award
(e.g., MD035V012 or AK002V005). Both
new and renewal PHA applicants
should enter the proposed Annual
Contributions Contract (ACC)
amendment effective and ending dates
for the FSS coordinator funding in
Section 17 of the SF–424. In Section 18
of SF–424 (Estimated Funding),
complete only 18.a., which will be the
amount requested from HUD in the FY
2007 FSS application, and 18.g., Total.
The dollar amounts entered in 18.a. and
18.g. must be the total requested under
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11596
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
this NOFA. Those totals should include
amounts for fringe benefits, if
applicable, and the percentage increase
for renewal PHA applicants. In
completing Part IV. A. of form HUD–
52651, enter the salary requested per
position under the NOFA with the
percentage increase included.
C. Submission Date and Time. Your
completed application must be received
and validated by Grants.gov no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date. Please note
that validation may take up to 72 hours.
Applicants should carefully read the
section titled ‘‘APPLICATION and
SUBMISSION INFORMATION’’ in the
General Section.
D. Intergovernmental Review. This
NOFA is not subject to Executive Order
(EO) 12372, Intergovernmental Review
of Federal Programs.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Salary Cap. Awards under this
NOFA are subject to a cap of $65,500
per year per full-time coordinator
position funded. Under this NOFA, if
PHAs apply jointly, the $65,500
maximum amount that may be
requested per position applies to up to
one full-time coordinator position for
the application as a whole, not to each
PHA separately.
2. Limitation on Renewal Funding
Increases. For renewal coordinator
positions, PHAs will be limited to a one
percent increase above the amount of
the most recent award for the position
unless a higher increase is approved by
the local HUD field office after review
of the PHA’s written justification and at
least three comparables that must be
submitted to the field office by the
application due date. Examples of
acceptable reasons for increases above
one percent would be a need for a
coordinator with higher level of skills or
to increase the hours of a part-time
coordinator to full time. Total positions
funded cannot exceed the maximum
number of positions for which the PHA
is eligible under this NOFA.
3. Ineligible Activities
a. Funds under this NOFA may not be
used to pay the salary of an FSS
coordinator for a public housing FSS
program. An HCV FSS program
coordinator may only serve HCV
families while the public housing FSS
program serves only public housing
residents. In FY 2007, funding for
public housing FSS program
coordinators is being made available
through the Public Housing Resident
Opportunities and Self-Sufficiency
(ROSS) NOFA for Public Housing FSS
Program Coordinators that is included
in the FY 2007 SuperNOFA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
b. Funds under this FSS NOFA may
not be used to pay for services for FSS
program participants.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Application Submission and
Receipt Procedures. See the General
Section. Electronic application
submission is mandatory unless an
applicant requests, and is granted, a
waiver to the requirement. Applicants
should submit their waiver requests in
writing using e-mail. Waiver requests
must be submitted no later than 15 days
prior to the application deadline date
and should be submitted to
Alfred_C._Jurison@hud.gov and to
Kathryn_L._Greenspan@hud.gov. The
subject line of the email message should
be FY’07 HCV FSS NOFA Waiver
Request. If an applicant is granted a
waiver, then the approval will provide
instructions for submitting paper copies
to the appropriate HUD office(s). All
paper applications must be received by
the application deadline date to meet
the requirements for timely submission.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria. The funds available under
this NOFA are being awarded based on
demonstrated performance.
Applications are reviewed by the local
HUD field office and Grants
Management Center (GMC) to determine
whether or not they are technically
adequate based on the NOFA
requirements. Field offices will provide
to the GMC in a timely manner, as
requested, information needed by the
GMC to make its determination, such as
the HUD-approved HCV FSS program
size of new PHA applicants and
information on the administrative
capabilities of PHAs. Categories of
applications that will not be funded are
stated in Section V.B.6. of this FSS
NOFA.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Technically Acceptable
Applications. All technically adequate
applications will be funded to the extent
funds are available.
2. Funding Priority Categories. If HUD
receives applications for funding greater
than the amount made available under
this NOFA, HUD will divide eligible
applications into priority categories as
follows:
Funding Category 1—Applications
from eligible renewal PHAs with
qualifying homeownership programs
with a minimum of fifteen (15) HCV
FSS program participants or graduates
that purchased homes between October
1, 2000, and the publication date of this
FSS NOFA and an increase of at least
ten (10) percent in the number of
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
participants in the applicant’s HCV FSS
program from Calendar Year 2005 to
Calendar Year 2006. Both the number of
home purchases and the percentage
increase in the number the HCV FSS
program participants will be determined
by HUD using PIC data from form HUD–
50058 or as otherwise reported for MTW
PHAs.
Funding Category 2—Eligible renewal
PHA applicants with programs that have
families with positive escrow balances
and/or families that successfully
completed their FSS contracts between
December 31, 2005, and December 31,
2006.
Funding Category 3—Eligible renewal
PHA applicants with qualifying
homeownership programs and an
increase in the number of HCV FSS
program participants of at least ten (10)
percent from Calendar Year 2005 to
Calendar Year 2006.
Funding Category 4—New PHA
applicants with HUD approval to
implement an FSS program of at least 25
slots.
3. Order of Funding. Starting with
Funding Category 1, HUD will first
determine whether there are sufficient
monies to fund all eligible positions
requested in the funding category. If
available funding is not sufficient to
fund all positions requested in the
category, HUD will fund applications in
the following order:
a. Funding Category 1. HUD will
calculate the Percentage Increase of
HCV FSS Program Participants for each
eligible applicant and will use this
percentage in making funding decisions.
HUD will fund eligible applicants in
order starting with those that have the
highest Percentage Increase of HCV FSS
Program Participants. If funding is not
sufficient to fund all applicants with the
same Percentage Increase of HCV FSS
Program Participants, HUD will select
among eligible applicants by HCV
program size starting with eligible
applicants with the smallest HCV
program size.
b. Funding Category 2. If funds
remain, HUD will process requests of
eligible Funding Category 2 applicant
PHAs. HUD will first calculate the
Percentage of Families with Positive
FSS escrow balances for all eligible
Funding Category 2 applicants. If there
are not sufficient monies to fund all
eligible funding category 2 applicants,
HUD will fund eligible applications
starting with those with the highest
positive escrow percentage. If there are
not sufficient monies to fund all
applications with the same positive
escrow percentage, HUD will select
eligible applicants in order by HCV
program size starting with eligible
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
applicants with the smallest HCV
program size.
c. Funding Category 3. If funds
remain, HUD will process eligible
Funding Category 3 applications. If
there is not enough funding for all
applicants, HUD will use the Percentage
Increase of HCV FSS Participants to
determine selection order, starting with
applicants with the highest Percentage
Increase of HCV FSS Participants. If
funds are not sufficient for all
applicants with the same Percentage
Increase of HCV FSS Participants, HUD
will fund eligible applicants by HCV
program size starting with eligible
applicants with the smallest HCV
program size.
d. Funding Category 4. If funds
remain after all Category 1 through 3
applicants have been funded, HUD will
process applications from eligible
Category 4 new PHA applicants. If there
are not sufficient monies to fund all
eligible Category 4 PHA applicants,
HUD will first fund eligible applications
from those PHAs qualifying for the
Colonias preference. If there are not
sufficient monies to fund all eligible
Colonias PHA applicants, HUD will
fund them starting with the smallest
HCV program size first. If funding
remains after funding all eligible
Category 4 Colonias PHA applicants,
HUD will then begin funding eligible
non-Colonias applicants by HCV
program size, starting with eligible
applicants with the smallest HCV
program size first.
4. Based on the number of
applications submitted, the GMC may
elect not to process applications for a
funding priority category where it is
apparent that there are insufficient
funds available to fund any applications
within the priority category.
5. Corrections to Deficient
Applications. The General Section
provides the procedures for corrections
to deficient applications.
6. Unacceptable Applications. After
the technical deficiency correction
period (as provided in the General
Section), the GMC will disapprove PHA
applications that it determines are not
acceptable for processing. Applications
from PHAs that fall into any of the
following categories are ineligible for
funding under this NOFA and will not
be processed:
a. An application submitted by an
entity that is not an eligible PHA as
defined under Section III.A. and Section
III.C. of this FSS NOFA or an
application that does not comply with
the requirements of Section IV.B., IV.C.,
and IV.F. of this FSS NOFA.
b. An application from a PHA that
does not meet the fair housing and civil
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
rights compliance requirements of the
General Section.
c. An application from a PHA that
does not comply with the prohibition
against lobbying activities of the General
Section.
d. An application from a PHA that as
of the application due date has not
made progress satisfactory to HUD in
resolving serious outstanding Inspector
General audit findings, or serious
outstanding HUD management review
or Independent Public Accountant audit
findings for the HCV program and/or
Moderate Rehabilitation program or has
a ‘‘troubled’’ rating under SEMAP, and
has not designated another organization
acceptable to HUD to administer the
FSS program on behalf of the PHA as
required in Section III.C.3.e. of this FSS
NOFA.
e. An application from a PHA that has
been debarred or otherwise disqualified
from providing assistance under the
program.
f. An application that did not meet the
application due date and timely receipt
requirements as specified in this NOFA
and the General Section.
g. Applications will not be funded
that do not meet the Threshold
requirements identified in this NOFA
and the General Section.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates. It is anticipated that
award announcements will take place
during either the month of July or
August 2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices. Successful
applicants will receive an award letter
from HUD. Funding will be provided to
successful applicants as an amendment
to the ACC of the applicant PHA. In the
case of awards to joint applicants, the
funding will be provided as an
amendment to the ACC of the lead PHA
that was identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive a
notification of rejection letter from the
GMC that will state the basis for the
decision. The applicant may request an
applicant debriefing. Beginning not less
than 30 days after the awards for
assistance are publicly announced in
the Federal Register and for at least 120
days after awards for assistance are
announced publicly, HUD will, upon
receiving a written request, provide a
debriefing to the requesting applicant.
(See the General Section for additional
information regarding a debriefing.)
Applicants requesting to be debriefed
must send a written request to: Iredia
Hutchinson, Director, Grants
Management Center, U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 501
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11597
School Street, SW., Suite 800,
Washington, DC 20024.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Impact. Under 24
CFR 50.19(b)(4) and (12), no
environmental review is required in
connection with activities conducted
under this NOFA, because the NOFA
provides funds for employing a
coordinator to provide only public and
supportive services, which are
categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and not subject to
the related environmental authorities.
2. HUD’s Strategic Goals. HUD is
committed to ensuring that programs
result in the achievement of HUD’s
strategic mission. The FSS program and
this FSS NOFA support the
Department’s strategic goals of
increasing homeownership activities
and helping HUD-assisted renters make
progress toward self-sufficiency by
giving funding preference to PHAs
whose FSS programs show success in
moving families to self-sufficiency and
homeownership. You can find out about
HUD’s Strategic Framework and Annual
Performance Plan at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/cfo/reports/
cforept.cfm.
3. HUD Policy Priorities. This NOFA
supports HUD’s policy priorities of
providing increased homeownership
opportunities and increased selfsufficiency of low-income families
through employment. Consequently,
funding priority in this NOFA will be
given to those PHA applicants that
demonstrate that a minimum of 15 of
their FSS families have become
homeowners that have increased their
FSS program size by at least 10 percent
in calendar year 2006 and to applicants
with program participants who have
increased their earned income since
enrolling in FSS and/or have families
that completed their FSS contracts in
the last calendar year. See the General
Section for a full discussion of HUD’s
policy priorities.
C. Reporting. Successful applicants
must report activities of their FSS
enrollment, progress and exit activities
of their FSS program participants
through required submissions of the
Form HUD–50058. HUD’s assessment of
the accomplishments of the FSS
programs of PHAs funded under this
NOFA will be based primarily on PIC
system data obtained from form HUD–
50058. MTW PHAs that do not report to
HUD on form HUD–50058 will be asked
to submit an annual report to HUD with
the same information on FSS program
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11598
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
activities that is provided to HUD by
non-MTW PHAs via form HUD–50058.
Each recipient is also required to submit
a completed Logic Model showing
accomplishments against proposed
outputs and outcomes as part of their
annual reporting requirement to HUD.
Recipients shall use quantifiable data to
measure performance against goals and
objectives outlined in their Logic Model.
An annual Performance Report
consisting of the updated Logic Model
and answers to the Program
Management and Evaluations Questions
must be submitted to the Public
Housing Director in the recipient’s local
HUD field office no later than 30 days
after the ending date of the one-year
funding increment provided to the
recipient under this NOFA. For FY
2007, HUD is considering a new concept
for the Logic Model. The new concept
is a Return on Investment (ROI)
statement. HUD plans to issue a Federal
Register notice soliciting comment on
the ROI concept. In addition, HUD
requires that funded recipients collect
racial and ethnic beneficiary data. It has
adopted the Office of Management and
Budget’s Standards for the Collection of
Racial and Ethnic Data. In view of these
requirements, funded recipients should
use Form HUD–27061, Racial and
Ethnic Data Reporting Form (HUD Race
Ethnic Form on Grants.gov), or a
comparable form. Form HUD–50058,
which provides racial and ethnic data to
HUD’s PIC data system, is a comparable
program form.
VII. Agency Contacts
A. For Technical Assistance. For
answers to your questions, you may
contact the Public and Indian Housing
Resource Center at 800–955–2232.
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
via TTY (text telephone) by calling the
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339. (These are toll-free
numbers). Prior to the application
deadline, staff at the numbers given
above will be available to provide
general guidance, but not guidance in
actually preparing the application.
Following selection, but prior to award,
HUD staff will be available to assist in
clarifying or confirming information
that is a prerequisite to the offer of an
award by HUD.
B. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
an information broadcast via satellite for
potential applicants to learn more about
the HCV FSS program and preparation
of an application. For more information
about the date and time of this
broadcast, you should consult the HUD
website at www.hud.gov.
VIII. Other Information
A. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2577–0178. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average one hour per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application and other
required reporting. The information will
be used for grantee selection and
monitoring the administration of funds.
Response to this request for information
is required in order to receive the
benefits to be derived.
B. Public Access, Documentation, and
Disclosure. See Section VIII. G. of the
General Section.
ATTACHMENT A—PHAS THAT OPERATE IN AREAS CONTAINING COLONIA COMMUNITIES
Arizona PHAs
City of Douglas Housing Authority ...........................................................
City of Eloy Housing Authority .................................................................
Cochise County Housing Authority ..........................................................
City of Nogales Housing Authority.
City of Yuma Housing Authority.
Yuma County Housing Authority.
Pinal County Housing Authority ...............................................................
Section 8 Housing for Graham County, Arizona Department of Housing.
California PHAs
City of Calexico Housing Authority ...........................................................
Imperial Valley Housing Authority.
Housing Authority of the County of Riverside.
New Mexico PHAs
City of Alamogordo Housing Authority .....................................................
City of Truth or Consequences Housing Authority ..................................
Eddy County—Region VI .........................................................................
Lordsburg Housing Authority ....................................................................
Silver City Housing Authority—Region V .................................................
Town of Baynard Housing Authority.
City of Las Cruces/Dona Ana County Housing Authority.
City of Socorro Housing Authority.
Housing Authority of the Village of Santa Clara.
Otero County—Region VI.
Sunland Park Housing Authority.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Texas PHAs
Alamo Housing Authority ..........................................................................
Bracketville Housing Authority ..................................................................
Cameron County Housing Authority .........................................................
Del Rio Housing Authority ........................................................................
Eagle Pass Housing Authority ..................................................................
Edinburg Housing Authority ......................................................................
Harlingen Housing Authority .....................................................................
Laredo Housing Authority .........................................................................
Los Fresnos Housing Authority ................................................................
Mercedes Housing Authority ....................................................................
Pharr Housing Authority ...........................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00166
Fmt 4701
Asherton Housing Authority.
Brownsville Housing Authority.
Carrizo Housing Authority.
Dona Housing Authority.
Ed Couch Housing Authority.
Elsa Housing Authority.
Hidalgo County Housing Authority.
La Joya Housing Authority.
McAllen Housing Authority.
Mission Housing Authority.
Port Isabel Housing Authority.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
ATTACHMENT A—PHAS THAT OPERATE IN AREAS CONTAINING COLONIA COMMUNITIES—Continued
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
San Benito Housing Authority ..................................................................
Starr County Housing Authority ................................................................
Willacy County Housing Authority ............................................................
Zapata County Housing Authority.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 4701
San Juan Housing Authority.
Weslaco Housing Authority.
Uvalde Housing Authority.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11599
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00168
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.017
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11600
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Rural Housing and Economic
Development Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Community Planning and Development,
Office of Rural Housing and Economic
Development.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Rural
Housing and Economic Development
(RHED) program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–02, OMB Approval Number
2506–0169.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Numbers: 14.250,
Rural Housing and Economic
Development.
F. Application Date: The application
deadline date is May 23, 2007.
Applications submitted through https://
www.grants.gov must be received and
validated by grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 Eastern time on the application
deadline date. The validation process
may take up to 72 hours.
G. Optional, Additional Overview
Information
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Rural Housing and Economic
Development program is to provide
support for innovative housing and
economic development activities in
rural areas. The funds made available
under this program will be awarded
competitively through a selection
process conducted by HUD in
accordance with the HUD Reform Act.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Background
There has been a growing national
recognition of the need to provide
support for local rural nonprofit
organizations, community development
corporations, federally recognized
Indian tribes, state housing finance
agencies (HFAs), and state economic
development and community
development agencies to expand the
supply of affordable housing and to
engage in economic development
activities in rural areas. A number of
resources are available from the federal
government to address these problems,
including programs of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA), the
Economic Development Administration
(EDA), the Appalachian Regional
Commission (ARC), the Department of
Interior (for Indian tribes), and HUD.
The Rural Housing and Economic
Development program was developed to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
supplement these resources and to focus
specifically on promoting innovative
approaches to housing and economic
development in rural areas. In
administering these funds, HUD
encourages you to coordinate your
activities with those supported by any
of the agencies listed above.
B. Definitions
1. Appalachia’s Distressed Counties
means those counties in Appalachia that
the Appalachian Regional Commission
(ARC) has determined to have
unemployment and poverty rates that
are 150 percent of the respective U.S.
rates and a per capita income that is less
than 67 percent of the U.S. per capita
income, and have counties with 200
percent of the U.S. poverty rate and one
other indicator, such as the percentage
of overcrowded housing. Refer to
www.arc.gov for a list of ARC-distressed
counties and more information.
2. Colonia means any identifiable,
rural community that: a. Is located in
the state of Arizona, California, New
Mexico, or Texas; b. Is within 150 miles
of the border between the United States
and Mexico; and c. Is determined to be
a colonia on the basis of objective need
criteria, including a lack of potable
water supply, lack of adequate sewage
systems, and lack of decent, safe,
sanitary, and accessible housing.
3. Farm Worker means a farm
employee of an owner, tenant, labor
contractor, or other operator raising or
harvesting agricultural or aquacultural
commodities, or a worker who, in the
employment of a farm operator, engages
in handling, planting, drying, packing,
grading, storing, delivering to storage or
market, or carrying to market
agricultural or aquacultural
commodities produced by the operator.
Seasonal farm workers are those farm
employees who typically do not have a
constant year-round salary.
4. Firm Commitment means a letter of
commitment from a partner by which an
applicant’s partner agrees to perform an
activity specified in the application,
demonstrates the financial capacity to
deliver the resources necessary to carry
out the activity, and commits the
resources to the activity, either in cash
or through in-kind contributions. It is
irrevocable, subject only to approval
and receipt of a fiscal year (FY) 2007
Rural Housing and Economic
Development grant. Each letter of
commitment must include the
organization’s name and applicant’s
name, reference the Rural Housing and
Economic Development program, and
describe the proposed total level of
commitment and responsibilities,
expressed in dollar value for cash or in-
PO 00000
Frm 00169
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11601
kind contributions, as they relate to the
proposed program. The commitment
must be written on the letterhead of the
participating organization, must be
signed by an official of the organization
legally able to make commitments on
behalf of the organization, and must be
dated no earlier than the date of
publication of this NOFA. In
documenting a firm commitment, the
applicant’s partner must:
a. Specify the authority by which the
commitment is made, the amount of the
commitment, the proposed use of funds,
and the relationship of the commitment
to the proposed investment. If the
committed activity is to be selffinanced, the applicant’s partner must
demonstrate its financial capability
through a corporate or personal
financial statement or other appropriate
means. If any portion of the activity is
to be financed through a lending
institution, the participant must provide
evidence of the institution’s
commitment to fund the loan; and
b. Affirm that the firm commitment is
contingent only upon the receipt of
FY2007 Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds and state a
willingness on the part of the signatory
to sign a legally binding agreement
(conditioned upon HUD’s
environmental review and approval of a
property, where applicable) upon award
of the grant.
5. Federally Recognized Indian tribe
means any tribal entity eligible to apply
for funding and services from the
Bureau of Indian Affairs by virtue of its
status as an Indian tribe. The list of
federally recognized tribes can be found
in the notice published by the
Department of the Interior on November
25, 2005 (70 FR 71194) and is also
available from HUD.
6. Innovative Housing Activities
means projects, techniques, methods,
combinations of assistance, construction
materials, energy efficiency
improvements, or financing institutions
or sources new to the eligible area or to
its population. The innovative activities
can also build upon and enhance a
model that already exists.
7. Local Rural Nonprofit Organization
or Community Development
Corporation means either of the
following:
a. Any private entity with tax-exempt
status recognized by the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) that serves the
eligible rural area identified in the
application (including a local affiliate of
a national organization that provides
technical assistance in rural areas); or
b. Any public nonprofit entity such as
a Council of Governments that will
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11602
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
serve specific local nonprofit
organizations in the eligible area.
8. Lower Mississippi Delta Region
means the eight-state, 240-county/parish
region defined by Congress in the Lower
Mississippi Delta Development Act,
Public Law 100–460. Refer to
www.dra.gov for more information.
9. Eligible Rural Area means one of
the following:
a. A non-urban place having fewer
than 2,500 inhabitants (within or
outside of metropolitan areas).
b. A county or parish with an urban
population of 20,000 inhabitants or less.
c. Territory, including its persons and
housing units, in the rural portions of
‘‘extended cities.’’ The U.S. Census
Bureau identifies the rural portions of
extended cities.
d. Open country that is not part of or
associated with an urban area. The
USDA describes ‘‘open country’’ as a
site separated by open space from any
adjacent, densely populated urban area.
Open space includes undeveloped land,
agricultural land, or sparsely settled
areas, but does not include physical
barriers (such as rivers and canals),
public parks, commercial and industrial
developments, small areas reserved for
recreational purposes, or open space set
aside for future development.
e. Any place with a population of
20,000 or less and not located in a
Metropolitan Statistical Area.
10. State Community and/or
Economic Development Agency means
any state agency whose primary purpose
is promotion of economic development
statewide or in a local community.
11. State Housing Finance Agency
means any state agency created to assist
local communities and housing
providers with financing assistance for
development of housing in rural areas,
particularly for low- and moderateincome people.
II. Award Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Amount Allocated
1. Available Funds. Approximately
$16,830,000 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2007
funding (plus any additional funds
available through recapture) are being
made available through this NOFA.
2. Funding Award Amount. HUD will
award up to approximately $16,830,000
on a competitive basis for Support for
Innovative Housing and Economic
Development Activities to federally
recognized Indian tribes, state housing
finance agencies (HFAs), state
community and/or economic
development agencies, local rural
nonprofit organizations, and community
development corporations to support
innovative housing and economic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
development activities in rural areas.
The maximum amount awarded to a
successful applicant will be $300,000.
B. Grant Amount
In the event, you, the applicant, are
awarded a grant that has been reduced
(e.g., the application contained some
activities that were ineligible or budget
information did not support the
request), you will be required to modify
your project plans and application to
conform to the terms of HUD’s approval
before execution of the grant agreement.
HUD reserves the right to reduce or
de-obligate the award if suitable
modifications to the proposed project
are not submitted by the awardee within
90 days of the request. Any
modifications must be within the scope
of the original application. HUD
reserves the right to not make awards
under this NOFA.
C. Grant Period
Recipients will have 36 months from
the date of the executed grant agreement
to complete all project activities.
D. Notification of Approval or
Disapproval
HUD will notify you whether or not
you have been selected for an award. If
you are selected, HUD’s notice to you
concerning the amount of the grant
award (based on the approved
application) will constitute HUD’s
conditional approval, subject to
negotiation and execution of a grant
agreement by HUD.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants for the Rural Housing and
Economic Development program are
local rural nonprofit organizations,
community development corporations,
federally recognized Indian tribes, state
housing finance agencies, and state
community and/or economic
development agencies. Also, you must
meet all of the applicable eligibility
requirements described in section III.C
of the General Section.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. There is
no match required under the Rural
Housing and Economic Development
program. Applicants that submit
evidence of leveraging dollars under
Rating Factor 4 will receive points
according to the scale under that factor.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. The following
are examples of eligible activities under
the Rural Housing and Economic
Development program.
Permissible activities may include,
but are not limited to the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00170
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
a. The cost of using new or innovative
construction, energy efficiency, or other
techniques that will result in the design
or construction of innovative housing
and economic development projects;
b. Preparation of plans or of
architectural or engineering drawings;
c. Preparation of legal documents,
government paperwork, and
applications necessary for construction
of housing and economic development
activities to occur in the jurisdiction;
d. Acquisition of land and buildings;
e. Demolition of property to permit
construction or rehabilitation activities
to occur;
f. Purchase of construction materials;
g. Homeownership counseling,
including on the subjects of fair housing
counseling, credit counseling,
budgeting, access to credit, and other
federal assistance available, including
features for persons with disabilities,
such as full accessibility, visitability,
and universal design;
h. Conducting conferences or
meetings with other federal or state
agencies, tribes, tribally designated
housing entities (TDHE), or national or
regional housing organizations, to
inform residents of programs, rights,
and responsibilities associated with
homebuying opportunities (all meetings
and conferences should be provided in
alternative formats for persons with a
variety of disabilities, as appropriate,
and in applicable languages common in
the community for limited English
proficient (LEP) families);
i. Establishing Community
Development Financial Institutions
(CDFIs), lines of credit, revolving loan
funds, microenterprises, and small
business incubators; and
j. Provision of direct financial
assistance to homeowners/businesses/
developers, etc. This can be in the form
of default reserves, pooling/
securitization mechanisms, loans,
grants, the funding of existing
individual development accounts, or
similar activities.
2. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements. To be eligible for funding
under HUD NOFAs issued during FY
2007, you, the applicant, must meet all
statutory and regulatory requirements
applicable to this NOFA as described in
the General Section. HUD may also
eliminate ineligible activities from
funding consideration and reduce
funding amounts accordingly.
3. General HUD Threshold
Requirements. You must meet all
threshold requirements described in the
General Section.
a. Ineligible Applicants. HUD will not
consider an application from an
ineligible applicant.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
b. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). Recipients of assistance under this
NOFA must comply with section 3 of
the Housing and Urban Development
Act of 1968, 12 U.S.C. 1701u (Economic
Opportunities for Low- and Very LowIncome Persons in Connection with
Assisted Projects) and the HUD
regulations at 24 CFR part 135,
including the reporting requirements at
subpart E. Section 3 requires recipients
to ensure that, to the greatest extent
feasible, training, employment, and
other economic opportunities will be
directed to low- and very-low income
persons, particularly those who are
recipients of government assistance for
housing, and to businesses that provide
economic opportunities to low- and
very low-income persons.
4. Program-Specific Threshold
Requirements.
a. The application must receive a
minimum rating score of 75 points to be
considered for funding.
b. HUD will only fund eligible
applicants as defined in this NOFA
under section III.A.
c. Applicants must serve an eligible
rural area as defined in section I. of this
NOFA.
d. Proposed activities must meet the
objectives of the Rural Housing and
Economic Development program.
e. Applicants must demonstrate that
their activities will continue to serve
populations that are in need and that
beneficiaries will have a choice of
innovative housing and economic
development opportunities as a result of
the activities.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Address To Request Application
Package
This section describes how you may
obtain application forms. Copies of the
published Rural Housing and Economic
Development NOFA and application
forms may be downloaded from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/Apply. You may call
the Grants.gov support desk at 800–518–
GRANTS, or e-mail the support desk at
Support@Grants.gov for assistance in
downloading the application.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Application Submission
Requirements. Be sure to read and
follow the application submission
requirements carefully.
a. Page Numbering. All pages of the
application must be numbered
sequentially if you are submitting a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
paper copy application. For electronic
application submission, you should
follow the directions in the General
Section.
b. Application Items. Your
application must contain the items
listed below.
(1) An abstract with the dollar amount
requested, the category under which
you qualify for demographics of distress
special factor under Rating Factor 2
(Need and Extent of the Problem),
which of the five definitions of the term
‘‘rural area’’ set forth in section I B.9 of
this NOFA applies to the proposed
service area, and accompanying
documentation as indicated on the form.
(2) Table of Contents.
(3) A signed Application for Federal
Assistance (SF–424) (application form).
(4) SF–424 Supplement Survey on
Equal Opportunity for Applicants
(optional submission).
(5) Facsimile Transmittal (HUD–
96011). (This must be used as the cover
page to transmit third-party documents
as part of your electronic application).
(6) Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
(SF–LLL).
(7) Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/
Update Report (HUD–2880).
(8) You Are Our Client Grant
Applicant Survey (HUD 2994–A)
(Optional).
(9) Program Outcome Logic Model
(HUD–96010).
(10) A budget for all funds (federal
and non-federal including the Detailed
Budget Form (HUD–424–CB) and the
Grant Application Detailed Budge
Worksheet (HUD 424–CBW).
(11) Certification of Consistency with
RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan (HUD–
2990), if applicable.
(12) Certification of Consistency with
the Consolidated Plan (HUD–2991), if
applicable.
(13) Documentation of funds pledged
in support of Rating Factor 4—
‘‘Leveraging Resources.’’ This
documentation, which will not be
counted in the 15-page limitation, must
be in the form of a ‘‘firm commitment’’
as defined in section I.B.4 of this NOFA.
(14) If you are a private nonprofit
organization, a copy of your
organization’s IRS ruling providing taxexempt status under section 501 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
(15) Narrative response to Factors for
Award. The total narrative response to
all factors should not exceed 15 pages
and should be submitted on 8.5-x-11inch single-sided paper, with 12-point
font and double lined spacing. Please
note that although submitting pages in
excess of the page limit will not
disqualify your application, HUD will
PO 00000
Frm 00171
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11603
not consider or review the information
on any excess pages, and if you place
key information on those pages, you
may fail to meet a threshold
requirement. In addition, applicants
should be aware that additional pages
increase the size of the application and
the length of time it will take to
electronically submit the document and
have it electronically received by
Grants.gov.
(16) Questionnaire for HUD’s
Initiative on Removal of Regulatory
Barriers (Form HUD–27300). To get the
points for this policy priority, you must
include the documentation or references
to website links where the information
can be found.
All applicants are required to use the
following format in their 15-page
narrative responses to the rating factors
included in the program NOFA:
Factor 1—Relevant Organizational
Experience;
Factor 2—Need and Extent of the
Problem;
Factor 3—Soundness of Approach;
Factor 4—Leveraging Resources; and
Factor 5—Achieving Results and
Program Evaluation.
See section V. of this NOFA for
further details.
C. Submission Dates and Times
1. Electronic Application Submission.
Applications for the Rural Housing and
Economic Development program must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
no later than 11:59:59 p.m. Eastern Time
on the application deadline date.
Applicants are advised to submit their
applications at least 48 to 72 hours in
advance of the deadline date and when
the Grants.gov help desk is open so that
any issues can be addressed prior to the
deadline date and time. Please note that
validation may take up to 72 hours. You
will receive an acknowledgement of
receipt from Grants.gov when your
application has been successfully
received, and later that it has been
validated or rejected. Please see the
General Section for more detailed
information. If you do not receive the
validation or rejection notice within 24
to 48 hours, contact the Grants.gov help
desk.
2. Applicants are advised to carefully
read their application submission and
timely receipt requirements in the
General Section since they have
changed from previous years.
3. Only one application will be
accepted from any given organization. If
more than one application is submitted
electronically, the application submitted
closest in time before the due date will
be the one reviewed by HUD. HUD will
not accept application addendums after
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11604
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the deadline unless HUD has
specifically asked the applicant for a
correction to a technical deficiency in
the application. Responses to technical
deficiencies must be received by HUD
within the time allocated to cure the
deficiency. Corrections to technical
deficiencies are submitted directly to
HUD in accordance with the
information contained in the program
office’s cure notification.
D. Intergovernmental Agency Review
Intergovernmental agency review is
not required for this program.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Administrative Costs.
Administrative costs for assistance
under the Rural Housing and Economic
Development program may not exceed
15 percent of the total HUD Rural
Housing and Economic Development
grant award.
2. Ineligible Activities. RHED funds
cannot be used for the following
activities:
a. Income payments to subsidize
individuals or families;
b. Political activities;
c. General governmental expenses
other than expenses related to the
administrative cost of the grant; or
d. Projects or activities intended for
personal gain or private use.
HUD reserves the right to reduce or
deobligate the award if suitable
modifications to the proposed project
are not submitted by the awardee within
90 days of the request. Any modification
must be within the scope of the original
application. HUD reserves the right not
to make awards under this NOFA.
F. Other Submission Requirements.
Carefully review the procedures
presented in section IV of the General
Section FY 2007, because HUD will
only accept electronic applications
submitted through www.grants.gov.
Applicants may request a waiver of
the electronic submission requirement.
Paper applications will not be accepted
unless the applicant has received a
waiver to the electronic submission
requirement. Applicants should submit
their waiver requests in writing in the
form of a letter of request. Waiver
requests must be submitted no later than
15 days prior to the application
deadline date and should be submitted
to the Office of Rural Housing and
Economic Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 7137, Washington,
DC 20410. Instructions regarding the
number of copies to submit and to what
address will be contained in the
approval to the waiver request. Paper
submissions must be received at the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
appropriate HUD office(s) no later than
the deadline date.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria. Carefully review all the
Application Review procedures in
section V of the General Section. In
addition, the following Rating Factors
will be used to rate your application.
1. Rating Factor 1—Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (25 points). This rating
factor addresses the extent to which you
have the organizational resources
necessary to successfully implement
your proposed workplan, as further
described in Rating Factor 3, within the
36-month award period.
a. Team members, composition, and
experience (10 points). HUD will
evaluate the experience (including for
recentness and relevancy) of your
project director, core staff, and any
outside consultant, contractor,
subrecipient, or project partner as it
relates to innovative housing and
economic development and to the
implementation of the activities in your
work plan. HUD also will assess the
services that consultants or other parties
will provide to fill gaps in your staffing
structure to enable you to carry out the
proposed work plan; the experience of
your project director in managing
projects of similar size, scope, and
dollar amount; the lines of authority and
procedures that you have in place for
ensuring that work plan goals and
objectives are being met, that
consultants and other project partners
are performing as planned, and that
beneficiaries are being adequately
served. In judging your response to this
factor, HUD will only consider work
experience gained within the last 7
years. When responding, please be sure
to provide the dates, job titles, and
relevancy of the past experience to the
work to be undertaken by the employee
or contractor under your proposed Rural
Housing and Economic Development
award. The more recent, relevant, and
successful the experience of your team
members is in relationship to the work
plan activities, the greater the number of
points you will receive.
b. Organizational structure and
management capacity (5 points). HUD
will evaluate the extent to which you
can demonstrate your organization’s
ability to manage a workforce composed
of full-time or part-time staff, as well as
any consultant staff, and your ability to
work with community-based groups or
organizations in resolving issues related
to affordable housing and economic
development. In evaluating this
subfactor, HUD will take into account
your experience in working with
PO 00000
Frm 00172
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
community-based organizations to
design and implement programs that
address the identified housing and
economic development issues. The
more recent, relevant, and successful
the experience of your organization and
any participating entity, the greater the
number of points you will receive.
c. Experience with performance based
funding requirements (10 points). HUD
will evaluate your performance in any
previous grant program undertaken with
HUD funds or other federal, state, local,
or nonprofit or for-profit organization
funds. In assessing points for this subfactor, HUD reserves the right to take
into account your past performance in
meeting performance and reporting
goals for any previous HUD award, in
particular whether the program
achieved its outcomes. HUD will deduct
one point for each of the following
activities related to previous HUD grant
programs for which unsatisfactory
performance has been verified: (1)
Mismanagement of funds, including the
inability to account for funds
appropriately; (2) untimely use of funds
received either from HUD or other
federal, state, or local programs; and (3)
significant and consistent failure to
measure performance outcomes. Among
the specific outcomes to be measured
are the increases in program
accomplishments as a result of capacity
building assistance and the increase in
organizational resources as a result of
assistance.
d. Past Rural Housing and Economic
Development program performance. The
past performance of previously awarded
Rural Housing and Economic
Development grantees will be taken into
consideration when evaluating Rating
Factor 1 (Capacity of the Applicant and
Relevant Organizational Experience).
Applicants who have been awarded
Rural Housing and Economic
Development program funds prior to FY
2007 should indicate the fiscal year and
funding amount. HUD field offices may
be consulted to verify information
submitted by the applicant as a part of
the review of applications.
2. Rating Factor 2—Need and Extent of
the Problem (20 points)
The Rural Housing and Economic
Development program is designed to
address the problems of rural poverty,
inadequate housing, and lack of
economic opportunity. This factor
addresses the extent to which there is a
need for funding the proposed activities
based on levels of distress, and the
urgency of meeting the need/distress in
the applicant’s target area. In
responding to this factor, applications
will be evaluated on the extent to which
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
the level of need for the proposed
activity and the urgency in meeting the
need are documented and compared to
target area and national data.
a. In applying this factor, HUD will
compare the current levels of need in
the area (i.e., Census Tract(s) or Block
Group(s) immediately surrounding the
project site or the target area to be
served by the proposed project to
national levels of need. This means that
an application that provides data that
show levels of need in the project area
at a percent greater than the national
average will be rated higher under this
factor. Applicants should provide data
that address indicators of need as
follows:
(1) Poverty Rate (5 points)—Data
should be provided in both absolute and
percentage form (i.e., whole numbers
and percents) for the target area(s). An
application that compares the local
poverty rate in the following manner to
the national average at the time of
submission will receive points under
this section as follows:
(a) Less than the national average = 0
points;
(b) Equal to but less than twice the
national average = 1 point;
(c) Twice but less than three times the
national average = 3 points;
(d) Three or more times the national
average = 5 points.
(2) Unemployment (5 points)—for the
target area:
(a) Less than the national average = 0
points;
(b) Equal to but less than twice the
national average = 1 point;
(c) Twice but less than three times the
national average = 2 points;
(d) Three but less than four times the
national average = 3 points;
(e) Four but less than five times the
national average = 4 points;
(f) Five or more times the national
average = 5 points.
(3) Other indicators of social or
economic decline that best capture the
applicant’s local situation (5 points).
(a) Data that could be provided under
this section are information on the
community’s stagnant or falling tax
base, including recent commercial or
industrial closings; housing conditions,
such as the number and percentage of
substandard or overcrowded units; rent
burden (defined as average housing cost
divided by average income) for the
target area; and local crime statistics,
falling property values, etc. To the
extent that the applicant’s statewide or
local Consolidated Plan, its Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
(AI), its Indian housing plan, or its antipoverty strategy identify the level of
distress in the community and the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
neighborhood in which the project is to
be carried out, references to such
documents should be included in
preparing the response to this factor.
(b) In rating applications under this
factor, HUD reserves the right to
consider sources of available objective
data other than or in addition to those
provided by applicants, and to compare
such data to those provided by
applicants for the project site. These
may include U.S. Census data.
(c) HUD requires use of sound,
verifiable, and reliable data (e.g., U.S.
Census data, state statistical reports,
university studies/reports, or Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act or Community
Reinvestment Act databases) to support
distress levels cited in each application.
See https://www.ffiec.gov/ or https://
www.ffiec.gov/webcensus/
ffieccensus.htm for census data. A
source for all information along with the
publication or origination date must
also be provided.
(d) Updated Census data are available
for the following indicators:
(i) Unemployment rate—estimated
monthly for counties, with a 2-month
lag;
(ii) Population—estimated for
incorporated places and counties,
through 2000;
(iii) Poverty rate—through 2000.
(4) Demographics of Distress—Special
Factors (5 points). Because HUD is
concerned with meeting the needs of
certain underserved areas, you will be
awarded a total of five points if you are
located in or propose to serve one or
more of the following populations, or if
your application demonstrates that 100
percent of the beneficiaries supported
by Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds are in one or more
of the following populations. You must
also specifically identify how each
population will be served and that the
proposed service area meet the
definition of ‘‘eligible rural area’’ in
section I of this NOFA:
(a) Areas with very small populations
in non-urban areas (2,500 population or
less);
(b) Seasonal farm workers;
(c) Federally recognized Indian tribes;
(d) Colonias;
(e) Appalachia’s Distressed Counties;
or
(f) The Lower Mississippi Delta
Region (eight states and 240 counties/
parishes).
For these underserved areas, you
should ensure that the populations that
you serve and the documentation that
you provide are consistent with the
information described in the above
paragraph under this rating factor.
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11605
3. Rating Factor 3—Soundness of
Approach (21 points). This factor
addresses the overall quality of your
proposed work plan, taking into account
the project and the activities proposed
to be undertaken; the cost-effectiveness
of your proposed program; and the
linkages between identified needs, the
purposes of this program, and your
proposed activities and tasks. In
addition, this factor addresses your
ability to ensure that a clear linkage
exists between innovative rural housing
and economic development. In
assessing cost-effectiveness, HUD will
take into account your staffing levels,
beneficiaries to be served, and your
timetable for the achievement of
program outcomes, the delivery of
products and reports, and any
anticipated outcome or product. You
will receive a greater number of points
if your work plan is consistent with the
purpose of the Rural Housing and
Economic Development program, your
program goals, and the resources
provided.
a. Management Plan (13 points). A
clearly defined management plan
should be submitted that: identifies
each of the projects and activities you
will carry out to further the objectives
of this program; describes the linkage
between rural housing and economic
development activities; and addresses
the needs identified in Factor 2,
including needs that previously were
identified in a statewide or local
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice (AI) or Consolidated
Plan. The populations that were
described in Rating Factor 2 for the
purpose of documenting need should be
the same populations that will receive
the primary benefit of the activities,
both immediately and over the long
term. The benefits should be
affirmatively marketed to those
populations least likely to apply for and
receive these benefits without such
marketing. Your timetable should
address the measurable short-term and
long-term goals and objectives to be
achieved through the proposed
activities based on annual benchmarks;
the method you will use for evaluating
and monitoring program progress with
respect to those activities; and the
method you will use to ensure that the
activities will be completed on time and
within your proposed budget estimates.
Your management plan should also
include the budget for your program,
broken out by line item. Documented
projected cost estimates from outside
sources are also required. Applicants
should submit their work plan on a
spreadsheet showing each project to be
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11606
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
undertaken and the tasks (to the extent
necessary or appropriate) in your work
plan to implement the project with your
associated budget estimate for each
activity/task. Your work plan should
provide the rationale for your proposed
activities and assumptions used in
determining your project timeline and
budget estimates. Failure to provide
your rationale may result in your
application receiving fewer points for
lack of clarity in the proposed
management plan.
This subfactor should include
information that indicates the extent to
which you have coordinated your
activities with other known
organizations (e.g., through letters of
participation or coordination) that are
not directly participating in your
proposed work activities, but with
which you share common goals and
objectives and that are working toward
meeting these objectives in a holistic
and comprehensive manner. The goal of
this coordination is to ensure that
programs do not operate in isolation.
Additionally, your application should
demonstrate the extent to which your
program has the potential to be
financially self-sustaining by decreasing
dependence on Rural Housing and
Economic Development funding and
relying more on state, local, and private
funding. The goal of sustainability is to
ensure that the activities proposed in
your application can be continued after
your grant award is complete.
b. Policy Priorities (8 Points). Policy
priorities are outlined in detail in the
General Section. You should document
the extent to which HUD’s policy
priorities are advanced by the proposed
activities. Applicants that include
activities that can result in the
achievement of the following
departmental policy priorities will
receive higher rating points in
evaluating their application for funding.
Seven departmental policy priorities are
listed below. When you include policy
priorities, describe in brief detail how
those activities will be carried out and
if selecting item (6), Removal of Barriers
to Affordable Housing, be sure to
include the required Points of Contact
information and documentation or
references to the documentation to
receive points.
The point values for policy priorities
are as follows:
(1) Providing increased
homeownership and rental
opportunities for low- and moderateincome persons, persons with
disabilities, the elderly, minorities, and
families with limited English
proficiency = 1 point;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(2) Improving our nation’s
communities = 1 point;
(3) Encouraging accessible design
features = 1 point;
(4) Providing full and equal access to
grassroots faith-based and other
community-based organizations in HUD
program implementation = 1 point;
(5) Ending chronic homelessness
within 10 years = 1 point
(6) Removal of barriers to affordable
housing = 2 points; and
(7) Promoting Energy Efficiency and
Adopting Energy Star = 1 point.
4. Rating Factor 4—Leveraging
Resources (10 points). This factor
addresses the extent to which applicants
have obtained firm commitments of
financial or in-kind resources from other
federal, state, local, and private sources.
For every Rural Housing and Economic
Development program dollar
anticipated, you should provide the
specific amount of dollars leveraged. In
assigning points for this criterion, HUD
will consider the level of outside
resources obtained in the form of cash
or in-kind goods or services that support
activities proposed in your application.
HUD will award a greater number of
points based on a comparison of the
extent of leveraged funds with the
requested Rural Housing and Economic
Development award. The level of
outside resources for which
commitments are obtained will be
evaluated based on their importance to
the total program. Your application
must provide evidence of leveraging in
the form of letters of firm commitment
from any entity, including your own
organization, that will be providing the
leveraging funds to the project. Each
commitment described in the narrative
of this factor must be in accordance
with the definition of ‘‘firm
commitment,’’ as defined in this NOFA.
The commitment letter must be on
letterhead of the participating
organization, must be signed by an
official of the organization legally able
to make commitments on behalf of the
organization, and must not be dated
earlier than the date this NOFA is
published.
Points for this factor will be awarded
based on the satisfactory provisions of
evidence of leveraging and financial
sustainability, as described above, and
the ratio of leveraged funds to requested
HUD Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds as follows:
a. 50 percent or more of requested
HUD Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds = 10 points;
b. 49–40 percent of requested HUD
Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds = 8 points;
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
c. 39–30 percent of requested HUD
Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds = 6 points;
d. 29–20 percent of requested HUD
Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds = 4 points;
e. 19–9 percent of requested HUD
Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds = 2 points;
f. Less than 9 percent of HUD
requested Rural Housing and Economic
Development funds = 0 points.
See the General Section for
instructions for submitting third-party
letters and other documents with your
electronic application.
5. Rating Factor 5—Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (24 points)
This factor emphasizes HUD’s
commitment to ensure that applicants
keep promises made in their
application. This factor assesses their
performance to ensure that rigorous and
useful performance measures are used
and goals are met. Achieving results
means you, the applicant, have clearly
identified the benefits or outcomes of
your program. Outcomes are ultimate
project end goals. Benchmarks or
outputs are interim activities or
products that lead to the ultimate
achievement of your goals. Program
evaluation requires that you, the
applicant, identify program outcomes,
interim products or benchmarks, and
performance indicators that will allow
you to measure your performance.
Performance indicators should be
objectively quantifiable and measure
actual achievements against anticipated
achievements. Your evaluation plan
should identify what you are going to
measure, how you are going to measure
it, and the steps you have in place to
make adjustments to your work plan if
performance targets are not met within
established time frames.
Applicants must also complete the
‘‘Logic Model’’ HUD Form (HUD–96010)
included in the application instructions
at www.Grants.gov and submit the
completed form with their application.
HUD has provided an electronic Logic
Model that will enable applicants to
select from lists the appropriate needs
statement(s), activities/outputs, and
outcomes that the applicant is
proposing in the application
submission. The listing of the activities
is referred to as the Master Logic Model
List and each list is unique to the
program funding opportunity. The
application instructions found on
www.Grants.gov/Apply include the
eLogic ModelTM that you can complete
and attach to your electronic application
submission. Applicants who do not
have Microsoft Excel software should
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
contact the SuperNOFA Information
Center at 800–HUD–8929. Persons with
speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 800–877–8339. Applicants
may select items from each column of
the list that reflect their activity outputs
and outcomes and copy and paste them
into the appropriate column in the Logic
Model form. In completing the Logic
Model, applicants are expected to select
from the lists of appropriate outputs and
outcomes for their proposed work plan.
The eLogic ModelTM and Master Logic
Model listing also identify the unit of
measure that HUD is interested in
collecting for the outputs and outcomes
selected. In making the selections for
each output and outcome, applicants are
to complete the appropriate proposed
number of units of measure to be
accomplished. The space next to the
output and outcome is to capture the
anticipated units of measure. Multiple
outputs and outcomes may be selected
per project.
Under this rating factor, applicants
will receive a maximum of 24 points
based on how they propose to
effectively address program goals and
performance measures. HUD will
evaluate and analyze how well an
applicant implemented the required
Rural Housing and Economic
Development output and outcome goals
and identified other stated benefits or
outcomes of the applicant’s program. In
order to receive the highest number of
points, applicants should present a clear
plan to address the RHED output and
outcome measures.
1. Output Measures are quantifiable.
RHED outputs include: number of
housing units constructed; number of
housing units rehabilitated; number of
jobs created; number of participants
trained; number of new businesses
created; and number of existing
businesses assisted.
2. Outcomes Measures are benefits
accruing to the program participants
and/or communities during or after
participation in the RHED program.
RHED outcomes include: the number of
housing units rehabilitated that will be
made available to low-to-moderateincome participants; the percentage
change in earnings as a result of
employment for those participants; the
percent of participants trained who find
a job; annual estimated savings for lowincome families as a result of energy
efficiency improvements; and the
increase in organizational resources as a
result of assistance (e.g., dollars
leveraged).
You must clearly identify the
outcomes to be achieved and measured.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Proposed program benefits should
include program activities, benchmarks,
and interim activities or performance
indicators with timelines. Applications
should include an evaluation plan that
will effectively measure actual
achievements against anticipated
achievements.
3. Logic Model. HUD requires RHED
applicants to develop an effective,
quantifiable, outcome-oriented
evaluation plan for measuring
performance and determining whether
goals have been met using the Master
Logic Model for RHED. The model can
be found in the download instructions
portion of the application at
www.Grants.gov. In preparing your
Logic Model, first open the Form HUD–
96010 and go to the instruction tab and
follow the directions in the tab. Your
application must include the form to
receive any points under this factor.
This rating factor reflects HUD’s goal
to embrace high standards of ethics,
management, and accountability. HUD
will hold a training broadcast via
satellite for potential applicants to learn
more about Rating Factor 5. For more
information about the date and time of
the broadcast, consult the HUD Web site
at www.hud.gov/grants/index.cfm.
Although the following list is not allinclusive, program outcomes for the
Rural Housing and Economic
Development program must include,
where applicable:
a. Total number of housing units
constructed;
b. Total number of housing units
rehabilitated;
c. Number of Housing units
rehabilitated that will be made available
to low-to moderate-income participants;
d. Number of Housing units
constructed that will be made available
to low-to moderate-income participants;
e. Number of jobs created;
f. Percentage change in earnings as a
result of employment for those
participants;
g. Number of participants trained;
h. Percent of participants trained who
find a job;
i. Number of new businesses created;
j. Number of existing businesses
assisted; and
k. Annual estimated savings for lowincome families as a result of energy
efficiency improvements.
l. Increase in program
accomplishments as a result of capacity
building assistance (e.g. the number of
employees hired or retained, or the
efficiency or effectiveness of services
provided); and
m. Increase in organizational
resources as a result of assistance (e.g.,
dollars leveraged). If you receive an
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11607
award of funds, you will be required to
use the Logic Model to report progress
against the proposed outcomes in your
approved application and award
agreement.
The applicant’s proposed budget must
reflect a breakdown of estimated dollar
amount of the Rural Housing and
Economic Development grant to be
expended on each of the activities/
outputs and the anticipated results
included on the Form HUD–96010 and
under the Rating Factor 5 section of
your application.
6. RC/EZ/EC–II bonus points (2 points)
HUD will award two bonus points to
all applications that include
documentation stating that the proposed
eligible activities/projects will be
located in and serve federally
designated renewal community (RCs),
empowerment zone (EZs), or enterprise
communities (ECs) designated by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
in round II RC/EZ/EC. A listing of
federally designated RC/EZ/EC–II is
available on the Internet at https://
www.hud.gov/crlocator.
This notice contains a certification
(Form HUD–2990) that must be
completed for the applicant to be
considered for Rural EZ/Round II EC
bonus points.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Application Selection Process.
a. Rating and Ranking.
(1) General. To review and rate
applications, HUD may establish panels
that may include outside experts or
consultants to obtain certain expertise
and outside points of view, including
views from other Federal agencies.
(2) Rating. All applicants for funding
will be evaluated against applicable
criteria. In evaluating applications for
funding, HUD will take into account an
applicant’s past performance in
managing funds, including the ability to
account for funds appropriately; it’s the
applicant’s timely use of funds received
either from HUD or other federal, state,
or local programs; its success in meeting
performance targets for completion of
activities; and the number of persons to
be served or targeted for assistance.
HUD may use information relating to
these items based on information at
hand or available from public sources
such as newspapers, HUD Inspector
General or Government Accountability
Office reports or findings, or hotline
complaints that have been found to have
merit, or other such sources of
information. In evaluating past
performance, HUD will deduct points
from rating scores as specified under
Rating Factor 1.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11608
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(3) Ranking. Applicants will be
selected for funding in accordance with
their rank order. An application must
receive a minimum score of 75 points to
be eligible for funding. If two or more
applications are rated fundable and
have the same score, but there are
insufficient funds to fund all of them,
the application(s) with the highest score
for Rating Factor 2 will be selected. If
applications still have the same score,
the highest score in the following factors
will be selected sequentially until one
highest score can be determined: Rating
Factor 3, Rating Factor 1, Rating Factor
5, and Rating Factor 4.
a. Initial screening. During the period
immediately following the application
deadline, HUD will screen each
application to determine eligibility.
Applications will be rejected if they:
(1) Are submitted by ineligible
applicants;
(2) Do not serve an eligible rural area
as defined in section III of this NOFA;
(3) Do not meet the objectives of the
Rural Housing and Economic
Development program; or
(4) Propose a project for which the
majority of the activities are ineligible.
b. Rating Factors for Award Used to
Evaluate and Rate Applications. The
factors for rating and ranking applicants
and the maximum points for each factor
are provided above. The maximum
number of points for this program is
102. This includes 100 points for all five
rating factors and two RC/EZ/EC–II
bonus points, as described above.
c. Environmental Review. Each
application constitutes an assurance
that the applicant agrees to assist HUD
in complying with the provisions set
forth in 24 CFR part 50. Selection for
award does not constitute approval of
any proposed site. Following selection
for award, HUD will perform an
environmental review of activities
proposed for assistance under this part,
in accordance with 24 CFR part 50. The
results of the environmental review may
require that proposed activities be
modified or that proposed sites be
rejected. Applicants are particularly
cautioned not to undertake or commit
HUD funds for acquisition or
development of proposed properties
(including establishing lines of credit
that permit financing of such activities
or making commitments for loans that
would finance such activities from a
revolving loan fund capitalized by funds
under this NOFA) prior to HUD
approval of specific properties or areas.
Each application constitutes an
assurance that you, the applicant, will
assist HUD in complying with part 50;
will supply HUD with all available
relevant information to perform an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
environmental review for each proposed
property; will carry out mitigating
measures required by HUD or select
alternate property; and will not acquire,
rehabilitate, convert, demolish, lease,
repair, or construct property, or commit
or expend HUD or local funds for these
program activities with respect to any
eligible property until HUD approval of
the property is received. In supplying
HUD with environmental information,
grantees must use the guidance
provided in Notice CPD 05–07, entitled
‘‘Field Environmental Review
Processing for Rural Housing and
Economic Development (RHED)
Grants,’’ issued August 30, 2005, which
can be found at www.hud.gov/offices/
cpd/energyenviron/environment/
lawsandregs/notices.cfm. HUD’s
funding commitment is contingent on
HUD’s site approval following an
environmental review.
d. Adjustments to Funding.
(1) HUD will not fund any portion of
your application that is ineligible for
funding and does not meet the
requirements of this NOFA, or is
duplicative of other funded programs or
activities from prior year awards or
other selected applicants. Only the
eligible non-duplicative portions of your
application will be funded.
(2) HUD reserves the right to utilize
this year’s funding to fund previous
years’ errors prior to rating and ranking
this year’s applications.
(3) If a balance remains, HUD reserves
the right to utilize those funds toward
the following year’s awards.
(4) Please see the section VI.A.2 and
3 of the General Section for more
information about funding.
(5) Performance and Compliance
Actions of Funding Recipients. HUD
will measure and address the
performance and compliance actions of
funding recipients in accordance with
the applicable standards and sanctions
of the Rural Housing and Economic
Development program.
e. Corrections to Deficient
Applications. After the application due
date, HUD may not, consistent with its
regulations in 24 CFR part 4, subpart B,
consider any unsolicited information
that you, the applicant, may want to
provide. HUD may contact you to clarify
an item in your application or to correct
technical deficiencies. See section
V.B.4. of the General Section for more
detailed information on this topic.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notice. Successful Rural
Housing and Economic Development
program applicants will be notified of
grant award and will receive post-award
instructions by mail.
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements. In addition to the
requirements listed below, please
review all requirements in section III of
the General Section.
1. Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control.
All property assisted under the Rural
Housing and Economic Development
program is covered by the Lead-Based
Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42
U.S.C. 4821–4846) and HUD’s
implementing regulations at 24 CFR part
35.
2. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See the General Section for
further information.
3. Executive Order 13202,
‘‘Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Construction Projects.’’ (See the
General Section for further information.)
4. Audit Requirements. Any grantee
that expends $500,000 or more in
federal financial assistance in a single
year (this can be program year or fiscal
year) must meet the audit requirements
established in 24 CFR parts 84 and 85
in accordance with OMB A–133.
5. Accounting System Requirements.
The Rural Housing and Economic
Development program requires that
successful applicants have in place an
accounting system that meets the
policies, guidance, and requirements
described in the following applicable
OMB Circulars and Code of Federal
Regulations:
a. OMB Circular A–87 (Cost
Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments);
b. OMB Circular A–122 (Cost
Principles for Non-Profit Organizations);
c. OMB Circular A–133 (Audits of
States, Local Governments, and NonProfit Organizations);
d. 24 CFR part 84 (Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and Other NonProfit Organizations); and
e. 24 CFR part 85 (Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State, Local,
and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal
Governments).
C. Reporting.
1. Reporting Requirements. Reporting
documents apply to the award,
acceptance and use of assistance under
the Rural Housing and Economic
Development program and to the
remedies for noncompliance, except
when inconsistent with HUD’s
Appropriation Act, or other Federal
statutes or the provisions of this NOFA.
For each reporting period, as part of
your required report to HUD, grantees
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
must include a completed Logic Model
(Form HUD 96010), which identifies
output and outcome achievements. For
FY2007, HUD is considering a new
concept for the Logic Model. The new
concept is a Return on Investment
statement. HUD will be publishing a
separate notice on the ROI concept. If
you are reporting race and ethnic data,
you must use Form HUD–27061, Race
and Ethnic Data Reporting Form.
2. Racial and Ethnic Data. HUD
requires that funded recipients collect
racial and ethnic beneficiary data. It has
adopted the Office of Management and
Budget’s Standards for the Collection of
Racial and Ethnic Data. In view of these
requirements, you should use Form
HUD–27061, Racial and Ethnic Data
Reporting Form (instructions for its
use), found on www.HUDclips.org, a
comparable program form, or a
comparable electronic data system for
this purpose.
D. Debriefing. See the General Section
for information on how to obtain a
debriefing on your application review
and evaluation.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VII. Agency Contact(s)
Further Information and Technical
Assistance. For information concerning
the HUD Rural Housing and Economic
Development program, contact Ms.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Linda Streets, Community Planning and
Development Specialist, Ms. Monica
Wallace, Community Planning and
Development Specialist, Mr. James
Hedrick, Presidential Management
Fellow, or Ms. Nikki Bowser,
Community Planning and Development
Specialist, Office of Rural Housing and
Economic Development, Office of
Community Planning and Development,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Room 7137, Washington, DC 20410–
7000; telephone 202–708–2290 (this is
not a toll-free number) or 1–877–787–
2526 (this is a toll-free number). Persons
with speech or hearing impairments
may access this number via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
Prior to the application deadline, staff
will be available at the above number to
provide general guidance and
clarification of the NOFA, but not
guidance in actually preparing your
application. Following selection, but
prior to award, HUD staff will be
available to assist in clarifying or
confirming information that is a
prerequisite to the offer of an award by
HUD.
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11609
VIII. Other Information
A. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
an information webcast via satellite for
potential applicants to learn more about
the program and preparation of an
application. For more information about
the date and time of this webcast,
consult the HUD Web site at https://
www.hud.gov.
B. The Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2506–0169. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor and a person is
not required to respond to a collection
of information, unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 100 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, semi-annual
reports, and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00178
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.018
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11610
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency (ROSS)—Elderly/Persons
With Disabilities Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Public and Indian Housing.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency (ROSS)—Elderly/Persons
With Disabilities Program (formerly
known as Resident Services Delivery
Model—Elderly/Persons With
Disabilities).
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–17; OMB Approval Number is
2577–0229.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): 14.876,
Resident Opportunity and Self
Sufficiency.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is July 19, 2007. Applications
submitted through https://
www.grants.gov must be received and
validated by grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 eastern time on the application
deadline date. Please note that
validation may take up to 72 hours.
Grant program
ROSS—Elderly/Persons
With Disabilities.
G. Additional Information
1. Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the ROSS—Elderly/Persons With
Disabilities Program is to provide grants
to public housing agencies (PHAs),
tribes/tribally designated housing
entities (TDHEs), Resident Associations
(RAs), and nonprofit organizations
(including grassroots, faith-based, and
other community-based organizations),
for the delivery and coordination of
supportive services and other activities
designed to help improve the living
conditions of public and Indian housing
residents who are elderly and/or
disabled. Applicants should be aware
that receipt of grant funds in no way
guarantees further funding beyond the
3-year grant term and should be sure
that services commenced pursuant to
this grant will be sustained
independently in the future or that the
cessation of these activities will not
negatively impact residents. This is
especially important for any meal
programs to meet residents’ nutritional
needs.
2. Funding Available. HUD expects to
award a total of approximately
$20,000,000 in ROSS—Elderly/Persons
With Disabilities grants in FY 2007.
Total funding
PHAs/Tribe/TDHE .............
Resident Associations .......
Nonprofit entities ...............
The applicant may use up to $68,000
maximum per year and in accordance
with local wage standards (see Funding
Restrictions) for the salary and fringe
benefits of a Project Coordinator.
Additionally, the applicant may use
funds for delivery of services.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Purpose. The purpose of the
ROSS—Elderly/Persons with
Disabilities Program is to provide grants
to public housing agencies (PHAs),
Tribes/Tribally Designated Housing
Entities (TDHEs), Resident Associations
(RAs), and nonprofit organizations
(including grassroots, faith-based and
other community-based organizations)
for the delivery and coordination of
supportive services and other activities
designed to help improve the living
conditions of public and Indian housing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
$250,000 for PHAs/Tribes/TDHEs with 1–217 units.
$350,000 for PHAs/Tribes/TDHEs with 218–1,155
units.
$450,000 for PHAs/Tribes/TDHEs with 1,156 or more
units.
$125,000.
$125,000 per RA; up to $375,000.
residents who are elderly and/or
disabled. Please note that no elderly
individual or person with a disability
may be required to take services.
B. Definition of Terms
1. City-Wide Resident Organization
consists of members from Resident
Councils, Resident Management
Corporations, and Resident
Organizations who reside in public
housing developments that are owned
and operated by the same PHA within
a city.
2. Community Facility means a nondwelling structure that provides space
for multiple supportive services for the
benefit of public and/or Indian housing
residents eligible for the services
provided.
3. Contract Administrator (CA) means
an overall grant administrator and/or a
financial management agent that
oversees the implementation of the
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
This amount includes $10,000,000
appropriated in FY 2007 and
$10,000,000 in rollover funds.
3. Award Amounts. Awards,
depending on the grant category, unit
count, and type of grantee will range
from $125,000 to $450,000. Please see
the funding breakdown chart below.
4. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants are PHAs; tribes/TDHEs;
nonprofit organizations (including
grassroots, faith-based and other
community-based organizations that
have resident support or the support of
PHAs or tribes/TDHEs); and RAs. The
term ‘‘resident association’’ or ‘‘RA’’
will be used to refer to all types of
eligible resident organizations. Please
see the section on ‘‘Definition of Terms’’
for a complete definition of each type of
eligible resident organization.
5. Cost Sharing/Match Requirement.
At least 25 percent of the requested
grant amount is required as a match.
The match may be in cash and/or inkind donations. The match is a
threshold requirement.
6. Grant term. The grant term is 3
years from the execution date of the
grant agreement.
Maximum grant amount (units refers to the number of
units occupied by elderly/disabled, as indicated on
ROSS Fact Sheet (HUD–52751))
Eligible applicants
Approximately $20 million
11611
grant and/or the financial aspects of the
grant. (See the ‘‘Threshold
Requirements’’ and ‘‘Program
Requirements’’ sections for more
information.) All nonprofit applicants,
all RAs, and PHAs that are troubled at
time of application must have a CA and
are required, per the Threshold Section,
to submit a signed Contract
Administrator Partnership Agreement.
The agreement must be for the entire
grant term. The CA must assure that the
financial management system and
procurement procedures that will be in
place during the grant term will fully
comply with either 24 CFR part 84 or
85, as appropriate. CAs are expressly
forbidden from accessing HUD’s Line of
Credit Control System (LOCCS) and
submitting vouchers on behalf of
grantees. CAs must also assist PHAs to
meet HUD’s reporting requirements.
CAs may be: local housing agencies;
community-based organizations such as
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11612
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
community development corporations
(CDCs), churches, temples, synagogues,
and mosques; nonprofit organizations;
state/regional associations and
organizations. Troubled PHAs are not
eligible to be contract administrators.
Grant writers who assist applicants in
preparing their ROSS applications are
also ineligible to be contract
administrators. Organizations that the
applicant proposes to use as the CA
must not violate or be in violation of
other conflicts of interest as defined in
24 CFR part 84 and 24 CFR part 85.
4. Elderly person means a person who
is at least 62 years of age.
5. Jurisdiction-Wide Resident
Organization means an incorporated
nonprofit organization or association
that meets the following requirements:
a. Most of its activities are conducted
within the jurisdiction of a single
housing authority;
b. There are no incorporated resident
councils or resident management
corporations within the jurisdiction of
the single housing authority;
c. It has experience in providing startup and capacity-building training to
residents and resident organizations;
and
d. Public housing residents
representing unincorporated resident
councils within the jurisdiction of the
single housing authority must comprise
a majority of the board of directors.
6. Tribally Designated Housing Entity
(TDHE) is an entity authorized or
established by one or more Indian tribes
to act on behalf of each such tribe
authorizing or establishing the housing
entity as defined by Section 4(21) of
Native American Housing Assistance
and Self-Determination Act
(NAHASDA).
7. Indian Tribe means any tribe, band,
nation, or other organized group of a
community of Indians, including any
Alaska native village, regional, or village
corporation as defined in or established
pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act, and that is recognized
as eligible for the special programs and
services provided by the United States
to Indians because of their status as
Indians pursuant to the Indian Self
Determination and Education Act of
1975 or any state-recognized tribe
eligible for assistance under section
4(12)(C) of NAHASDA.
8. Intermediary Resident
Organizations means jurisdiction-wide
resident organizations, citywide
resident organizations, statewide
resident organizations, regional resident
organizations, and national resident
organizations.
9. NAHASDA-assisted resident means
a resident of tribal housing (as defined
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
above) who has been assisted by the
Native American Housing Assistance
and Self-Determination Act
(NAHASDA) of 1996.
10. National Resident Organization
(NRO) is an incorporated nonprofit
organization or association for public
housing that meets each of the following
requirements:
a. It is national in that it conducts
activities or provides services in at least
two HUD areas or two states;
b. It has the capacity to provide startup and capacity-building training to
residents and resident organizations;
and
c. Public housing residents
representing different geographical
locations in the country are members of
the board of directors.
11. Nonprofit organization is an
organization that is exempt from federal
taxation. A nonprofit organization can
be organized for the following purposes:
charitable, religious, educational,
scientific, or other similar purposes in
the public interest. In order to qualify,
an organization must be a corporation,
community chest, fund, or foundation.
An individual or partnership will not
qualify. To obtain nonprofit status,
qualified organizations must file an
application with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) and receive designation as
such by the IRS. For more information,
go to www.irs.gov. Applicants who are
in the process of applying for nonprofit
status, but have not yet received
nonprofit designation from the IRS, will
not be considered nonprofit
organizations. All nonprofit applicants
must submit their IRS determination
letter to prove their nonprofit (e.g.,
501(c)(3)) status with their funding
application. Please see the section on
‘‘Threshold Requirements’’ for more
information. Nonprofit applicants must
also provide letters of support as
described in the ‘‘Threshold
Requirements’’ section.
12. National nonprofit organizations
work on a national basis and have the
capacity to mobilize resources on both
a national and local level. All nonprofit
applicants must submit their IRS
determination letter to prove their
nonprofit (e.g., 501(c)(3)) status.
National nonprofit applicants must also
provide letters of support as outlined in
the ‘‘Threshold Requirements’’ section.
13. Past Performance is a threshold
requirement. Using Rating Factor 1,
HUD’s field offices will evaluate
applicants for past performance to
determine whether an applicant has the
capacity to manage the grant for which
the applicant is applying. The area
Office of Native American Programs
(ONAP) will review past performance
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
for tribal/TDHE submissions. Field
offices will evaluate the past
performance of contract administrators
for applicants required to have one.
14. Person with disabilities: This
NOFA uses the definition of person
with disabilities found at 24 CFR 5.403.
15. Project Coordinator is responsible
for coordinating the grantee’s approved
activities to ensure that grant goals and
objectives are met. A qualified Project
Coordinator is someone with experience
managing projects and who preferably
has experience working with supportive
services. Project Coordinators and
grantees are responsible for ensuring
that all federal requirements are
followed.
16. Resident Association (RA) means
any or all of the forms of resident
organizations as they are defined
elsewhere in this Definitions section
and includes Resident Councils (RCs),
Resident Management Corporations
(RMCs), City-Wide Resident
Organizations, Regional Resident
Organizations (RROs), Statewide
Resident Organizations (SROs),
Jurisdiction-Wide Resident
Organizations, and National Resident
Organizations (NROs), Resident
Organization (RO) for tribal entities,
Site-Based Resident Associations, and
Tribal/TDHE Resident Groups. The
NOFA will use ‘‘Resident Association’’
or ‘‘RA’’ to refer to all eligible types of
resident organizations. See 24 CFR Part
964.115 for more information.
17. Regional Resident Organization
(RRO) means an incorporated nonprofit
organization or association for public
housing that meets each of the following
requirements:
a. The RRO is regional; i.e., it is not
limited to HUD-defined regions;
b. The RRO has experience in
providing start-up and capacity-building
training to residents and resident
organizations; and
c. Public housing residents
representing different geographical
locations in the region must comprise
the majority of the board of directors.
18. Resident Management
Corporation (RMC) means an entity that
proposes to enter into, or enters into a
contract to conduct one or more
management activities of a PHA and
meets the requirements of 24 CFR
964.120.
19. Resident Organization (RO) for
tribal entities means an incorporated or
unincorporated nonprofit tribal
organization or association that meets
each of the following criteria:
a. Consists of residents only, and only
residents may vote;
b. If it represents residents in more
than one development or in all of the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
developments of the tribal/TDHE
community, it shall fairly represent
residents from each development that it
represents;
c. Adopts written procedures
providing for the election of specific
officers on a regular basis; and
d. Has an elected governing board.
20. Secretary means the Secretary of
Housing and Urban Development.
21. Site-Based Resident Associations
means resident councils or resident
management corporations representing a
specific public housing development.
22. Supportive Services means
activities including, but not limited to:
a. Meal services adequate to meet
nutritional need;
b. Wellness programs;
c. Job training;
d. Coordination of volunteer
activities;
e. ESL or other educational classes;
and
f. Congregate services.
23. Statewide Resident Organization
(SRO) is an incorporated nonprofit
organization or association for public
housing that meets the following
requirements:
a. The SRO is statewide;
b. The SRO has experience in
providing start-up and capacity-building
training to residents and resident
organizations; and
c. Public housing residents
representing different geographical
locations in the state must comprise the
majority of the SRO’s board of directors.
24. Tribal/TDHE Resident Group
means tribal/TDHE resident groups that
are democratically elected groups such
as IHA-wide resident groups, area-wide
resident groups, single development
groups, or resident management
corporations (RMCs).
C. Regulations Governing the ROSS
Grant
ROSS—Elderly/Persons with
Disabilities is governed by 24 CFR part
964.
II. Award Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Performance Period and Award Type
1. Grant Period. Three years. The
grant period shall begin the day the
grant agreement and the form HUD–
1044, ‘‘Assistance Award/Amendment,’’
are signed by both the grantee and HUD.
2. Grant Extensions. Requests to
extend the grant term beyond the grant
term must be submitted in writing to the
local HUD field office or area ONAP at
least 90 days prior to the expiration of
the grant term. Requests must explain
why the extension is necessary, what
work remains to be completed, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
what work and progress has been
accomplished to date. Extensions may
be granted only once by the field office
or area ONAP for a period not to exceed
6 months and may be granted for a
further 6 months by the Headquarters
Program Office at the request of the
Field Office or Area ONAP.
3. Type of Award. Grant agreement.
4. Subcontracting. Subcontracting is
permitted. Grantees must follow federal
procurement regulations found in HUD
regulations at 24 CFR part 84.40–84.48
and 24 CFR part 85.36.
B. Funding Amounts
1. Total Funding. HUD expects to
award approximately $20,000,000 under
this funding category of ROSS. This
amount includes $10,000,000
appropriated in FY 2007 and
$10,000,000 in rollover funds.
Awards will be made as follows:
a. PHAs must use the number of
conventional public housing units
occupied by elderly and disabled
residents as of September 30, 2006, per
their budget to determine the maximum
grant amount they are eligible for in
accordance with the categories in the
chart above. On the Fact Sheet, PHAs
should clearly indicate the number of
conventional public housing units
occupied by elderly and disabled
residents under their Annual
Contributions Contract.
b. The maximum grant award is
$125,000 for each RA.
c. Nonprofits are eligible applicants if
they are representing or acting at the
behest of an RA. Accordingly, nonprofit
applicants must show support from that
RA. Nonprofits that have support from
an RA are limited to $125,000 for each
RA. A nonprofit organization may not
receive more than $375,000 in FY 2007
ROSS-Elderly/Disabled grant funding,
but may propose to serve more than 3
RAs. In cases where nonprofit
applicants are not able to obtain support
from RAs, they must obtain letters of
support from PHAs or tribes/TDHEs.
Note: All nonprofit applicants that do not
include a letter of support from an RA must
include a letter of support from a PHA or
tribes/TDHE. Please see the Threshold
Requirements section for more information.
Support letters must indicate the
developments to be served by the nonprofit
organization. Funding for nonprofit
applicants that do not receive letters of
support from RAs will be determined as
follows. Support letters must indicate the
developments to be served by the nonprofit
organization as well as the number of
conventional public housing units occupied
by elderly and persons with disabilities.
PO 00000
Frm 00181
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11613
Number of conventional units occupied by elderly/disabled residents
Maximum
Funding
1–217 units ...................................
218–1,155 units ............................
1,156 or more units ......................
$125,000
250,000
375,000
Applicants should see the General
Section of the SuperNOFA for
instructions on submitting support
letters and other documentation with
their electronic application.
d. Tribes/TDHEs should use the
number of units occupied by elderly
and persons with disabilities counted as
Formula Current Assisted Stock for FY
2006, as defined in 24 CFR part
1000.316. Tribes that have not
previously received funds from the
Department under the 1937 Housing Act
should count housing units under
management that are owned and
operated by the Tribe, identified in their
housing inventory as of September 30,
2006, and occupied by elderly/disabled
residents. Tribes should clearly indicate
the number of units under management
occupied by elderly/disabled residents
on the Fact Sheet.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. PHAs, tribes/
TDHEs, RAs, and nonprofit
organizations (supported by resident
organizations or PHAs/tribes/TDHEs ).
PHAs that are recipients of the Elderly/
Disabled Renewal Service Coordinator
funding through Operating Subsidy are
not eligible to apply for this ROSS
funding category. If you are unsure if
your organization falls into this
category, please contact the Public and
Indian Housing Information and
Resource Center at 800–955–2232.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Information for All Applicants: Match
is a threshold requirement. Applicants
who do not demonstrate that they have
a match of 25 percent of the total
requested grant amount will fail the
threshold requirement and will not
receive further consideration for
funding.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Applicants
should propose implementing
comprehensive programs within the 3year grant term, which will result in
improved living conditions for the
elderly/persons with disabilities
population. Improved living conditions
may mean, but is not limited to, agingin-place or assistance to live
independently. Proposals should
involve partnerships with organizations
that will help grantees provide
enhanced services to the elderly/
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11614
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
persons with disabilities they will serve.
All applicants must complete a
descriptive narrative and work plan and
a Logic Model covering the 3-year grant
term. Proposed grant activities should
build on the foundation created by
previous ROSS grants or other federal,
state, and local efforts to assist these
populations. Eligible activities include,
but are not limited to the following:
a. Hiring of a qualified Project
Coordinator to run the grant program. A
qualified Project Coordinator should
have at least 2 years of experience
managing programs and have
experience working with supportive
services. The Project Coordinator is
responsible for:
(1) Assessing participating residents’
needs for supportive services (e.g.,
Medicaid, Medicare, physician care,
food stamps, rehabilitation services,
veterans disability, state-funded
programs such as nurse case
management, housekeeping, Meals-onWheels, transportation, etc.);
(2) Designing, coordinating, referring
to and delivering, as relevant, grant
activities based on residents’ needs,
such as those activities listed below;
(3) Monitoring the progress of
program participants and evaluating the
overall success of the program. A
portion of grant funds may be reserved
to ensure that evaluations can be
completed for all participants who
received assistance through the
program. This may include software for
tracking and evaluation to meet HUD’s
reporting requirements. Project
Coordinators and grantees are
responsible for ensuring that all federal
requirements are followed.
b. Coordination, referral to, and
delivery of meal services adequate to
meet nutritional needs (i.e., not related
to entertainment activities);
c. Coordination, referral to, and
delivery of transportation services
including purchase, rental, or lease of a
vehicle for the grantee and limited in
use for program purposes and fuel for
program activities;
d. Coordination, set-up, and referral to
assistance with daily activities (ADLs);
e. Coordination, set-up, and referral to
housekeeping assistance;
f. Coordination, referral to, and
delivery of wellness programs
including, but not limited to, health and
nutrition programs, preventive health
education, referral to rehabilitation
services, structured programs to build
social support, services for the disabled,
and other community resources;
g. Coordination, set-up, and referral to
personal emergency response;
h. Coordination, referral to, and
delivery of congregate services. This
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
includes supportive services provided
in a congregate setting at a conventional
public housing development; and
i. Coordination, referral to, and
delivery of case management;
j. Coordination and referral to health
services (e.g., medical and dental checkups);
k. Coordination, referral, and delivery
of job training opportunities under
Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968;
l. Coordination and referral of
residents to employment opportunities
under Section 3 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968;
m. Salary and fringe benefits of staff;
n. Lease or rental of space for program
activities, but only under the following
conditions:
(1) The lease must be for existing
facilities not requiring rehabilitation or
construction;
(2) No repairs or renovations of the
property may be undertaken with
Federal funds; and
(3) Properties in the Coastal Barrier
Resources System designated under the
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C.
3501) cannot be leased or rented with
Federal Funds.
o. Administrative Costs, for all
applicants, may include, but are not
limited to, purchase of furniture, office
equipment and supplies, local travel,
utilities, printing, postage,
administrative salaries, and lease or
rental of space for program activities
(subject to the lease restrictions in the
preceding paragraph). To the maximum
extent practicable, when leasing space
or purchasing equipment or supplies,
business opportunities should be
provided to businesses under Section 3
of the Housing and Urban Development
Act of 1968. Administrative costs must
not exceed 10 percent of the total grant
costs. All administrative costs should be
delineated and allocated as direct
costs—an indirect cost rate will not be
accepted;
p. Other supportive services;
q. Staff training;
r. Long-distance travel (subject to
funding restrictions); and
s. Evaluation costs for the grant
program, including tracking or
evaluation software to meet HUD’s
reporting requirements.
2. Threshold Requirements. The
criteria below apply to all applicants
unless otherwise indicated. Additional
information about threshold
requirements may also be found in the
General Section. Applicants must
respond to each threshold requirement
clearly and thoroughly by following the
instructions below. If the application
fails any threshold requirement, it will
PO 00000
Frm 00182
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
be considered a failed application and
will not receive consideration for
funding.
a. Match. All applicants are required
to have in place firm match
commitments, either in cash or in-kind,
for 25 percent of the requested grant
amount, as defined in this NOFA. Joint
applicants must together have at least a
25 percent match of the requested grant
amount. Applicants who do not
demonstrate the minimum 25 percent
match of the requested grant amount
will fail this threshold requirement and
will not receive further consideration
for funding. If you are applying for more
than one category of ROSS grant (i.e.,
ROSS—Family & Homeownership), you
must use different sources of match
donations for each grant application.
Additionally, you must indicate which
other ROSS grant(s) you are applying for
by attaching a page to your application
stating the sources and amounts of each
of your match contributions for this
application as well as any other HUD
programs to which you are applying.
Match donations must be firmly
committed, which means that the
amount of match resources and their
dedication to ROSS-funded activities
must be explicit, in writing, and signed
by a person authorized to make the
commitment. Letters of commitment,
memoranda of understanding (MOUs),
or tribal resolutions must be on
organization letterhead, and signed by a
person authorized to make the stated
commitment, whether it be in cash or
in-kind services. The letters of
commitment/MOUs/tribal resolutions
must indicate the total dollar value of
the commitment and be dated between
the publication date of this NOFA and
the application deadline published in
this NOFA, or the amended deadline
and indicate how the commitment will
relate to the proposed program. The
commitment must be available at the
time of award. A match that is proposed
for ineligible activities will not be
accepted. Although ineligible as a use of
grant funds for applicants, the direct
delivery of ADLs, housekeeping, and
personal emergency response will be
accepted as match if provided by a
partner. Applicants proposing to use
their own non-ROSS grant funds to meet
the match requirement in whole or in
part, must also include a letter of
commitment indicating the type of
match (cash or in-kind) and how the
match will be used. Please see the
General Section for instructions for
submitting the required letters with
your electronic application.
Committed amounts in excess of the
25 percent of the requested grant
amount may be considered as leveraged
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
funds for higher points under Rating
Factor 4.
(1) The value of volunteer time and
services shall be computed by using the
normal professional rate for the local
area or the national minimum wage rate
of $5.15 per hour (NOTE: PHA applicants
may not count their staff time toward
the match);
(2) In order for HUD to determine the
value of any donated material,
equipment, staff time, building, or lease,
your application must provide a letter
from the organization making the
donation stating the value of the
contribution.
(3) Other resources/services that can
be committed include: in-kind services
provided to the applicant; funds from
federal sources (not including ROSS
funds), as allowed by statute, including,
for example, Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds or Indian
Housing Block Grant (IHBG) funds;
funds from any state or local
government sources; and funds from
private contributions. Applicants may
also partner with other program funding
recipients to coordinate the use of
resources in the target area.
b. Past Performance. HUD’s field
offices will evaluate data provided by
applicants under Rating Factor 1, as
well as applicants’ past performance, to
determine whether applicants have the
capacity to manage the grant for which
they are applying. The area Offices of
Native American Programs (ONAPs)
will review past performance for tribal
and TDHE submissions. Field offices
will evaluate the contract
administrators’ past performance for
applicants required to have a contract
administrator. In evaluating past
performance, HUD will look at the
applicant’s record of completing grant
activities on time, within budget, and
the results achieved. Using Rating
Factor 1, the field office/area ONAP will
evaluate applicants’ past performance.
Applicants should carefully review and
respond to Rating Factor 1 to ensure
their applications address each of the
criteria. If applicants fail to address
what is requested in Rating Factor 1,
their applications will fail this threshold
and will not receive further
consideration.
c. Contract Administrator Partnership
Agreement. All nonprofit applicants, all
RAs, and troubled PHAs (troubled as of
the application deadline) are required to
submit a signed Contract Administrator
Partnership Agreement. The agreement
must be for the entire grant term. If an
applicant that is required to have a
Contract Administrator Partnership
Agreement fails to submit one, or if it
is incomplete, incorrect or insufficient,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
this will be treated as a technical
deficiency. See the General Section for
more information on Corrections to
Deficient Applications. Troubled PHAs
are ineligible to be contract
administrators. Grant writers who assist
applicants in preparing their ROSS
applications are also ineligible to be
contract administrators.
d. Letters of Support for Nonprofit
Applicants.
(1) All nonprofit applicants must
include one or more letters of support
from RAs. If the RAs are inactive, then
a nonprofit applicant must submit an
accompanying letter of support from the
PHA or tribe/TDHE that is indicating
support for the application. All letters of
support must be signed by an
authorized representative of the
supporting organization and be dated
between the publication date of this
NOFA and the application deadline
published in this NOFA, or the
amended deadline.
(2) Nonprofit applicants that do
receive support from RAs must also
submit form HUD–52754 (‘‘List of
Resident Associations Supporting
Nonprofit Applicants.’’) Submitting this
form is not applicable where RAs are
inactive or where applicants do not
submit letters of support from RAs.
(3) In cases where nonprofit
organizations are applying to serve
tribes/TDHEs, nonprofit applicants must
submit letters of support from tribes/
TDHEs. Nonprofit organizations must
also use form HUD–52754 to list which
tribes/TDHEs support their application.
(4) Letters of support must describe to
what extent they are familiar with the
nonprofit applicant and indicate their
support and understanding of the
nonprofit organization’s application.
Letters must include contact
information and the name and title of
the person authorized to sign for the
organization and should be on
letterhead. If RA letterhead is not
available, the letter may be submitted on
PHA letterhead.
(5) All nonprofit applicants that do
not provide letters of support from RAs
must provide letters of support from
PHAs or tribes/TDHEs with jurisdiction
over the developments the applicant
proposes to serve. Letters from PHAs or
tribes/TDHEs must describe the extent
to which the nonprofit applicant is
familiar with the needs of the
community to be served, which
programs the nonprofit applicant has
operated or managed in the community
that are similar to the applicant’s
proposal, and whether the nonprofit
organization has the capacity to
implement its proposed program.
Letters from PHAs or tribes/TDHEs must
PO 00000
Frm 00183
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11615
also list the names of the developments
to be served, certify the number of
conventional units occupied by elderly/
persons with disabilities in those
developments, and identify the ROSS
funding category to which the nonprofit
organization is applying. PHA or tribe/
TDHE letters of support must be signed
by the Executive Director, tribal leader,
or authorized designee and must be on
PHA or tribe/TDHE letterhead. Please
see the General Section of the
SuperNOFA for instructions for
submitting the required letters with
your electronic application.
(6) Applications from nonprofit
organizations that do not submit the
information requested in this section
will fail this threshold requirement and
will not be considered for funding.
e. Nonprofit status. All nonprofit
applicants must submit their IRS
determination letter to prove their
nonprofit (e.g., 501(c)(3)) status.
Applicants that fail to submit this letter
will fail this threshold requirement and
will not be considered for funding.
Please see the General Section of the
SuperNOFA for instructions on
submitting the required documentation
with your electronic application.
f. Minimum Score for All Fundable
Applications. Applications that pass all
threshold requirements and go through
the ranking and rating process must
receive a minimum score of 75 in order
to be considered for funding.
g. General Section Thresholds. All
applicants will be subject to all
Thresholds requirements listed in the
General Section.
h. The Dun and Bradstreet Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) Number
Requirement. Refer to the General
Section for information regarding the
DUNS requirement. You will need to
obtain a DUNS number to receive an
award from HUD. See the General
Section for a discussion of the
Grants.gov registration process.
3. Program Requirements
a. Contract Administrator. The
contract administrator must assure that
the financial management system and
procurement procedures that will be in
place during the grant term will fully
comply with either 24 CFR part 84 or
85, as appropriate. CAs are expressly
forbidden from accessing HUD’s Line of
Credit Control System (LOCCS) and
submitting vouchers on behalf of
grantees. Contract administrators must
also assist grantees to meet HUD’s
reporting requirements. Contract
administrators may be: local housing
agencies; community-based
organizations such as community
development corporations (CDCs),
churches, temples, synagogues, or
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11616
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
mosques; nonprofit organizations; and
state/regional associations and
organizations. Troubled PHAs are not
eligible to be contract administrators.
Grant writers who assist applicants to
prepare their applications are also
ineligible to be contract administrators.
Organizations that the applicant
proposes to use as the contract
administrator must not violate or be in
violation of other conflicts of interest as
defined in 24 CFR part 84 and 24 CFR
part 85.
b. Requirements for All Applicants.
All applicants, lead and non-lead,
should refer to ‘‘Other Requirements
and Procedures Applicable to All
Programs’’ of the General Section for
requirements pertaining specifically to
procurement of recovered materials and
for information regarding other
requirements to which they may be
subject.
4. Number of Applications Permitted.
Applicants may desire to provide a
broad range of services supported by
grants from a number of ROSS funding
categories. Applicants may submit more
than one application only based on the
criteria below:
a. General. Applicants may submit up
to one application for each ROSS
funding category (i.e., one application
for ROSS–Elderly/Persons with
Disabilities, one application for ROSS–
Family, etc.), except for nonprofits.
Nonprofit organizations may submit
more than one application per ROSS
funding category provided they will be
serving residents of distinct PHAs or
Tribes/TDHEs.
b. More than one application per
development. Only one application per
funding category will be funded for a
particular development. For example, if
multiple applicants apply for ROSS–
Elderly/Persons with Disabilities for the
same development, only the highest
scoring application will be considered
for award. If multiple applicants are
interested in providing services to a
development and the services are
funded under the same ROSS funding
category, it is suggested the applicants
work together to submit one application
on behalf of the development.
c. Joint applications. Two or more
applicants may join together to submit
a joint application for proposed grant
activities. Joint applications must
designate a lead applicant. The lead
applicant must be registered with
Grants.gov and submit the application
using the Grants.gov portal. Lead
applicants are subject to all threshold
requirements. Non-lead applicants are
subject to the following threshold
requirements as applicable:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(1) Letters of support for nonprofit
applicants,
(2) Evidence of nonprofit status, as
outlined under the section covering
threshold requirements; and
(3) Threshold requirements as
outlined in Section III.C. of the General
Section. Joint applications may include
PHAs, RAs, Tribes/TDHEs, and
nonprofit organizations on behalf of
resident organizations. Joint
applications involving nonprofit
organizations must also provide
evidence of resident support (the RA)
or, if the RA is inactive, the RAB. (If the
support letter is from the RAB, the
applicant must also provide a support
letter from the PHAs or tribes/TDHEs.)
The PHA, tribe/TDHE, or RA that is part
of a joint application may not also
submit separate applications as sole
applicants under this NOFA.
Note: Joint applicants may combine their
eligible units to determine the maximum
funding amount the applicants are eligible to
receive. Please enter the total number of
eligible units on the ROSS Fact Sheet.
5. Eligible Participants. All ROSS—
Elderly/Persons with Disabilities
program participants must be residents
of conventional public housing or
NAHASDA-assisted housing and must
be elderly or disabled. See the
Definitions Section for more
information.
6. Eligible Developments. Only
conventional public and Indian housing
developments or NAHASDA-assisted
housing may be served by ROSS grant
funds. Other housing/developments,
including but not limited to private
housing, federally insured housing,
federally subsidized or assisted (e.g.,
assisted under Section 8, Section 202,
Section 811, or Section 236), and others
are not eligible to participate in ROSS.
7. Energy Star. HUD has adopted a
wide-ranging energy action plan for
improving energy efficiency in all
program areas. As a first step toward
implementing the energy plan, HUD, the
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), and the Department of Energy
(DoE) have signed a joint partnership to
promote energy efficiency in HUD’s
affordable housing efforts and programs.
The purpose of the Energy Star
partnership is to promote energy
efficiency in the affordable housing
stock, and also to help protect the
environment. Applicants providing
housing assistance or counseling
services are encouraged to promote
Energy Star materials and practices, as
well as buildings constructed to Energy
Star standards, to both homebuyers and
renters. Program activities can include
developing Energy Star promotional and
PO 00000
Frm 00184
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
information materials, outreach to lowand moderate-income renters and
buyers on the benefits and savings when
using Energy Star products and
appliances, and promoting the
designation of community buildings and
homes as Energy Star compliant. For
further information about Energy Star,
see https://www.energystar.gov or call
888–STAR7–YES (888–782–7937).The
hearing-impaired may call 888–588–
9920 (TTY).
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Application Components. Copies
of the published NOFAs and application
forms for HUD programs announced
through NOFA may be downloaded
from the grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp; if you have
difficulty accessing the information, you
may receive customer support from
Grants.gov by calling their Support Desk
at (800) 518–GRANTS, or by sending an
e-mail to support@grants.gov. You may
request general information from the
NOFA Information Center (800–HUD–
8929) between the hours of 10 a.m. and
6:30 p.m. (Eastern Time) Monday
through Friday, except on federal
holidays. When requesting information,
please refer to the name of the program
you are interested in. The NOFA
Information Center opens for business
simultaneously with the publication of
the SuperNOFA. Applicants should
make sure to include all requested
information, according to the
instructions found in this NOFA and
where applicable, in the General
Section. This will help ensure a fair and
accurate review of your application.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Application Format Information for
All Applicants. Before preparing an
application for any ROSS funding,
applicants should carefully review the
program description, ineligible
activities, program and threshold
requirements, and the General Section.
Applicants should also review each
rating factor found in the ‘‘Application
Review Information’’ section before
writing a narrative response.
Applicants’ narratives should be as
descriptive as possible, to ensure that
every requested item is addressed.
Applicants should make sure to include
all requested information, according to
the instructions found in this NOFA
and, where applicable, in the General
Section. This will help ensure fair and
accurate review of your application.
2. Content and Format for Submission
a. Content of Application
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Applicants must write narrative
responses to each of the rating factors,
that follow this section. Under some
sections, applicants are also asked to
complete and include provided forms.
Applicants will be evaluated on
whether their responses contained in
the narratives and on the forms
demonstrate that they have the
necessary capacity to successfully
manage the proposed program.
Applicants should ensure that their
narratives are written clearly and
concisely so that reviewers, who may
not be HUD staff, may fully understand
their proposal. Also, if information
provided on one of the grant forms is
not self-explanatory, narrative should be
provided to clarify.
b. Format of Application
(1) Applications may not exceed 40
narrative pages. Narrative pages must be
typed in Times New Roman font style,
double-spaced, numbered, with a font
size 12, and with one-inch margins all
around. Supporting documentation,
required forms, and certifications will
not be counted toward the 40-page
narrative page limit. However,
applicants should make every effort to
submit only what is necessary in terms
of supporting documentation. Please see
the General Section for instructions on
how to submit supporting
documentation with your electronic
application.
(2) A checklist is provided here to
help applicants ensure that they submit
all required forms and information.
(Note: Applicants who receive a waiver
to submit paper applications must
submit their applications in a three-ring
binder, with TABS dividing the sections
as indicated below. When submitting
electronically, you do not need to
submit these in TABS. Be sure to name
each attachment clearly following the
instructions in the General Section.)
Copies of the forms may be downloaded
with the application package and
instructions from https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. You must use the
forms that are included with the 2007
application so as to avoid using
outdated forms that may be on
HUDCLIPS or found from another
source. Please include a header in your
narrative pages and any other additional
pages that includes the applicant name
and the requirement being responded to.
TAB 1: Required Forms from the
General Section and other ROSS forms:
1. Acknowledgement of Application
Receipt (HUD–2993), for paper
application submissions only (you must
have an approved waiver to submit a
paper application.)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
2. Application for Federal Financial
Assistance (SF–424);
3. SF–424 Supplement, ‘‘Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants’’ (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424–SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
4. HUD–27300, ‘‘Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers’’
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov);
5. ROSS Fact Sheet (HUD–52751);
6. HUD–4247–CB, ‘‘Grant Application
Detailed Budget’’ (‘‘HUD Detailed
Budget Form’’ on Grants.gov);
7. Grant Application Detailed Budget
Worksheet (HUD–424–CBW)—please
remember to include a separate HUD–
424–CBW for any sub-contract of 10%
or more of federal funds;
8. HUD–2880, ‘‘Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report’’ (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
9. Certification of Consistency with
RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan (HUD–
2990), if applicable;
10. Certification of Consistency with
the Consolidated Plan (HUD–2991), (for
all applicants except for tribes/TDHEs
and non-profits serving tribes/TDHEs);
11. Certification of Consistency with
the Indian Housing Plan if applicable
(HUD–52752) (for tribes/TDHEs and
non-profits serving tribes/TDHEs);
12. Certification of Resident Council
Board of Election (HUD–52753) (for RA
applicants and non-profit applicants
being supported by one or more RAs);
13. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
(SF–LLL), if applicable;
14. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Continuation Sheet (SF–LLL–A), if
applicable;
15. You Are Our Client Grant
Applicant Survey (HUD–2994–A)
(optional)
16. HUD–96011, ‘‘Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal’’
(‘‘HUD Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov). (For use with electronic
applications as the cover page to
provide third-party documentation.)
17. Code of Conduct per General
Section instructions;
18. Statement on Affirmatively
Further Fair Housing per General
Section instructions.
TAB 2: Threshold Requirements:
1. Letters from partners attesting to
match;
2. Letter from applicant’s organization
attesting to match (if applicant is
contributing to match);
3. Letters of support from RAs/PHAs/
tribes/TDHEs (Threshold requirement
for all nonprofit applicants);
4. List of Resident Organizations
Supporting Nonprofit Applicants
(required only for nonprofit applicants)
(HUD–52754);
PO 00000
Frm 00185
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11617
5. IRS nonprofit determination letter
proving 501(c)(3) status (this is a
threshold requirement for all nonprofit
applicants); and
6. Contract Administrator Partnership
Agreement (required for all nonprofit
organizations, RAs, and PHAs troubled
at the time of application submission)
(HUD–52755).
TAB 3: Narrative for Rating Factor 1
and ROSS Program Forms
1. Narrative for Rating Factor 1;
2. Chart A: Program Staffing (HUD–
52756);
3. Chart B: Applicant/Contract
Administrator Track Record (HUD–
52757);
4. Resumes/Position Descriptions.
TAB 4: Narrative for Rating Factor 2.
TAB 5: Narrative and work plan for
Rating Factor 3. See Sample ROSS Work
Plan (HUD–52764).
TAB 6: Narrative for Rating Factor 4.
TAB 7: Narrative for Rating Factor 5
and ROSS Program Forms
1. Narrative;
2. Logic Model (HUD–96010);
C. Submission Dates and Times
1. Deadline Dates.
a. The application must be received
and validated by Grants.gov no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date. Please note
the validation process may take up to 72
hours. If you submit a waiver request
and it is approved, the notification of
approval of the waiver request will
provide instructions on where to submit
the paper application. See the General
Section and Section F. below for
instructions regarding waivers to the
electronic application submission
requirement. If you receive a waiver of
the electronic application submission,
your application must be received by
the application deadline date. See the
General Section and Section F. below
for waiver and mailing requirements.
D. Intergovernmental Review: Not
applicable.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Reimbursement for Grant
Application Costs. Grantees are
prohibited from using ROSS grant funds
to reimburse any costs incurred in
conjunction with preparation of their
ROSS grant application.
2. Covered Salaries. Applicable to all
applicants:
a. Types of Salaries. ROSS–Elderly/
Persons with Disabilities funds may
only be used for the types of salaries
described in this section according to
the restrictions described herein.
b. Project Coordinator. All applicants
may propose to hire a qualified Project
Coordinator to run the grant program.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11618
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
The ROSS–Elderly/Persons with
Disabilities program will fund up to
$68,000 in combined annual salary and
fringe benefits for a full-time Project
Coordinator. Applicants may propose a
part-time Project Coordinator at a lesser
salary. For audit purposes, applicants
must have documentation on file
demonstrating that the salary and fringe
benefits of the Project Coordinator are
comparable to similar professions in
their local area.
c. Non-administrative ROSS funds
may only be used to pay for salaries of
staff that provide direct services to
residents. Direct services staff, for
purposes of this NOFA, are defined as
applicant personnel or subcontractors
who, as their primary responsibility,
provide services directly to residents
that participate in the activities
described in this application (e.g., case
managers, and wellness program staff,
among other positions.) Clerical, legal,
finance, supervisory, executive and all
other non-direct services staff may be
paid for activities related to the grant,
but subject to the 10% total
administrative costs limit.
3. Administrative Costs.
Administrative costs may include, but
are not limited to, purchase of furniture,
office equipment and supplies, local
travel, utilities, printing, postage,
administrative salaries, and lease or
rental of space for program activities
(subject to lease restrictions—See
Eligible Activities section of this
NOFA). Administrative costs, including
administrative salaries, must not exceed
10 percent of the total grant amount
requested from HUD. Administrative
costs must adhere to OMB Circular A–
87 or A–122 as appropriate. Please use
HUD–424–CBW to itemize your
administrative costs. All administrative
costs should be delineated and allocated
as direct costs—an indirect cost rate will
not be accepted.
4. Funding Requests in Excess of
Maximum Grant Amount. Applicants
that request funding in excess of the
maximum grant amount which they are
eligible to receive will be given
consideration only for the maximum
grant for which they are eligible. If
awarded a grant, the grantee will work
with the Field Office to re-apportion the
grant funds for eligible activities
proposed in the original application.
5. Ineligible Activities/Costs. Grant
funds may not be used for ineligible
activities. Match will not be counted if
it is proposed to be used for ineligible
activities. The following are ineligible
activities/costs:
a. Payment of wages and/or salaries to
participants for receiving supportive
services and/or training programs;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
b. Purchase, lease, or rental of land;
c. Purchase of space;
d. New construction, costs for
construction materials;
e. Rehabilitation or physical
improvements;
f. Entertainment costs;
g. Payment of wages and/or salaries to
doctors, nurses or other staff (including
health aids or companions) in relation
to medical services provided to
residents;
h. Purchase of non-prescription or
prescription medications;
i. Costs, which exceed limits,
identified in the NOFA for the
following: Project Coordinator,
administrative expenses, and longdistance travel;
j. Cost of application preparation;
k. Vehicle insurance and/or
maintenance;
6. ROSS funds cannot be used to hire
or pay for the services (salary, fringe
benefits, etc.) of a Contract
Administrator.
7. Other Budgetary Restrictions. Some
long-distance travel may be necessary
during the term of the grant in order for
professional grant staff to attend training
conferences related to program purposes
or activities. Long distance travel costs
for grant program staff may not exceed
$5,000 for the life of the grant and must
receive prior approval from the grantee’s
local HUD field office or area ONAP.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. All applicants are required to
submit their applications electronically
via Grants.gov, unless they request and
are approved by HUD for a waiver of
that requirement. Please refer to the
General Section for information on how
to submit your application and all
attachments electronically via
Grants.gov.
2. Proof of Timely Submission. Please
see the General Section for this
information. Applicants that fail to meet
the deadline for application receipt will
not receive funding consideration.
3. For Waiver Recipients Only.
Applicants should submit their waiver
requests in writing using mail. Waiver
requests must be postmarked no later
than 15 days prior to the application
deadline date and should be sent to
Anice Schervish, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 3236, Washington, DC
20410. Applicants who have received
waivers to submit paper applications
(see the General Section for more
information), must submit their
applications to: HUD Grants
Management Center, Mail Stop: ROSS–
Elderly/Persons with Disabilities, 501
School Street, SW., 8th floor,
Washington, DC 20024. The waiver
PO 00000
Frm 00186
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
approval will provide detailed
instructions.
4. Number of Copies. When the
waiver request is approved the
applicant will be provided information
on how many copies are needed and
where to submit the copies. Only
applicants receiving a waiver to the
electronic submission requirement may
submit a paper copy application. Any
paper applications submitted without
an approved waiver will be considered
ineligible.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Factors for Award Used to Evaluate
and Rate Applications to the ROSS
program. The factors for rating and
ranking applications and maximum
points for each factor are provided
below. The maximum number of points
available for this program is 102. This
includes two RC/EZ/EC–II bonus points.
The SuperNOFA contains a certification
that must be completed in order for the
applicant to be considered for the RC/
EZ/EC–II bonus points. A listing of
federally designated RCs, EZs, and EC–
IIs is available at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The
agency certifying to RC/EZ/EC–II status
must be contained in the listing of RC/
EZ/EC–II organizations on HUD’s Web
site listed above.
Note: Applicants should carefully review
each rating factor before writing a response
and completing forms. Applicants’ narratives
and forms should be as descriptive as
possible, to ensure that every requested item
is addressed. Applicants should make sure
their narratives and forms thoroughly address
the Rating Factors below. Applicants should
include all requested information according
to the instructions found in this NOFA. This
will help ensure fair and accurate application
review.
a. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (25 Points).
This factor addresses whether the
applicant has the organizational
resources necessary to successfully
implement the proposed activities
within the grant period. In rating this
factor, HUD will consider the extent to
which the proposal demonstrates that
the applicant will have qualified and
experienced staff dedicated to
administering the program.
(1) Proposed Program Staffing (up to
7 Points).
(a) Staff Experience (up to 4 Points).
The knowledge and experience of the
proposed Project Coordinator, staff, and
partners in planning and managing
programs for which funding is being
requested. Experience will be judged in
terms of recent, relevant, and successful
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
experience of proposed staff to
undertake eligible program activities. In
rating this factor, HUD will consider
experience within the last 5 years to be
recent; experience pertaining to the
specific activities being proposed to be
relevant; and experience producing
specific accomplishments to be
successful. The more recent the
experience and the more experience
proposed staff members who work on
the project have in successfully
conducting and completing similar
activities, the greater the number of
points applicants will receive for this
rating factor. The following information
should be provided in order to provide
HUD an understanding of proposed
staff’s experience and capacity:
(i) The number of staff years (one staff
year = 2,080 hours) to be allocated to the
proposed program by each employee or
expert as well as each of their roles in
the program;
(ii) The staff’s relevant educational
background and/or work experience;
and
(iii) Relevant and successful
experience running programs whose
activities are similar to the eligible
program activities described in the grant
application.
An applicant will receive up to 4
points if the applicant provided the
requested materials in sufficient detail
to demonstrate an experienced and
well-coordinated proposed staff.
Documentation indicates that the
project coordinator and proposed staff
have recent (experience within the last
5 years), relevant (pertaining to the
specific or similar activities being
proposed), and successful (experience
producing specific results) experience
in conducting and completing similar
activities.
(b) Organizational Capacity (up to 3
Points). Applicants will be evaluated
based on whether they or their partners
have sufficient qualified personnel to
deliver the proposed activities in a
timely and effective fashion. In order to
enhance or supplement capacity,
applicants should provide evidence of
partnerships with nonprofit
organizations or other organizations that
have experience providing supportive
services to typically underserved
populations. Provide resumes and
position descriptions (where staff is not
yet hired) for all key personnel. (NOTE:
Resumes/position descriptions and
other HUD forms do not count toward
the page limit.)
An applicant will receive up to 3
points if the applicant shows its ability
(in-house or with partners) to
implement the proposed program and
attaches resumes and position
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
descriptions (where staff is not yet
hired) for all key personnel. Reviewers
may also consult HUD–52756.
(2) Past Performance of Applicant/
Contract Administrator (up to 8 Points).
(a) Applicants’ past experience may
include, but is not limited to, running
and managing programs aimed at
improving living conditions for the
targeted elderly/persons with
disabilities population.
(b) Applications must indicate past
grants they received and managed, the
grant amounts, and grant terms (years)
of the grants, which they are counting
toward past experience.
(c) Applicants’ narrative must
describe how they (or their Contract
Administrator) successfully
implemented past grant programs
designed to assist elderly/persons with
disabilities meet their daily living needs
and enhance their access to needed
services so they can continue to reside
comfortably and productively in their
current living environment.
(d) Applicants will be evaluated
according to the following criteria:
(i) Achievement of specific
measurable outcomes and objectives in
terms of benefits gained by participating
residents. Applicants should describe
results their programs have obtained,
such as impact on emergency care,
improved living or health conditions of
assisted population, and access to
greater number of social services.
Improved living conditions may mean,
but is not limited to, aging-in-place or
assistance to live independently.
(ii) Description of success in attracting
and keeping residents involved in past
grant-funded training programs. HUD
wants to see that applicants’ grantfunded programs benefited significant
numbers of residents;
(iii) Description of timely expenditure
of program funding throughout the term
of past grants. Timely means
drawdowns made commensurate with
the level of activities completed and per
the approved application. Timely
expenditure also refers to fully
expending all grant funds by the end of
the grant term;
(iv) Description of Past Leveraging.
Applicants must describe how they
have created leveraging partnerships for
funding or in-kind services for previous
projects, the extent of the leveraging
partnerships, and how the leveraging
and partnerships benefited participants.
The applicant will receive up to 8
points if the following is shown:
• Achievement of specific measurable
outcomes and objectives;
• A description of success in
attracting and keeping residents
involved in past grant-funded training
PO 00000
Frm 00187
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11619
programs and documentation that
shows that the grant activities benefited
a significant number of residents;
• A description of timely expenditure
of program funding throughout the term
of past grants. Timely means regular
draw-downs throughout the life of the
grant, i.e., quarterly draw-downs, with
all funds expended by the end of the
grant term;
• A description of how the applicant
has leveraged funding or in-kind
services beyond amounts that were
originally proposed for past projects.
An applicant will receive up to 6
points if the applicant fully addressed at
least 3 of the 4 items of review criteria
listed above. An applicant will receive
up to 4 points if the applicant fully
addressed at least 2 of the 4 items of
review criteria listed above. An
applicant will receive 2 points if the
applicant fully addressed 1 of the 4
items above. An applicant will receive
0 points if the applicant failed to
address all of items 1 through 4.
(3) Program Administration and
Fiscal Management (up to 10 Points).
Applicants should describe how they
will manage the program; how HUD can
be sure that there is program
accountability; and provide a
description of proposed staff’s roles and
responsibilities. Applicants should also
describe how grant staff and partners
will report to the Project Coordinator
and other senior staff. Applicants
should also include:
(a) A complete description of an
applicant’s fiscal management structure,
including fiscal controls currently in
place, including those of a contract
administrator for applicants required to
have a contract administrator (i.e.,
PHAS troubled PHAs, resident
associations, and nonprofit applicants);
and
(b) any of an applicant’s audit
findings or material weaknesses in the
past five years (HUD Inspector General,
management review, fiscal, etc.), and
what has been done to address them.
An applicant will receive up to 10
points if the applicant provides a
comprehensive narrative description of
(i) the project management structure and
program accountability, including the
use of a contract administrator, if
applicable; the narrative (ii) describes
staff’s roles and responsibilities, and
(iii) details how staff and partners will
report to the project coordinator and
other senior staff, as well as (iv) the
lines of accountability among all
components of the proposed program,
and (v) if applicable, a list of any audit
findings in the past 5 years (HUD IG,
management review, fiscal, etc.),
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11620
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
material weaknesses and what the
applicant has done to address them.
An applicant will receive up to 8
points if the applicant has fully
addressed three of (i)–(iv). An applicant
will receive up to 6 points the applicant
has fully addressed two of (i)–(iv). An
applicant will receive up to 4 points if
the applicant has adequately fully
addressed one of (i)–(iv). If an applicant
provides audit findings or material
weaknesses but does not provide what
the applicant has done to address them,
the applicant will lose two points. An
applicant will receive 0 points if all of
(i)–(v) are missing or inadequate.
b. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (up to 20 Points).
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need for funding the
proposed program. In responding to this
factor, applicants will be evaluated on
the extent to which they describe and
document the level of need for their
proposed activities and the urgency for
meeting the need.
(1) Socioeconomic Profile (up to 5
points). A thorough socioeconomic
profile of the eligible residents to be
served by the program, including
education levels, income levels, health
statistics, economic statistics for the
local area, etc. Applicants may either
provide data for the local area and show
that the residents reflect the local area
or may provide resident-specific data.
An applicant will receive up to 5
points if the applicant provided a
thorough socioeconomic profile of the
eligible residents to be served by the
program, including education levels,
income levels, health statistics and
economic statistics that show a need for
services. An applicant will receive up to
3 points if the applicant provided a
basic socioeconomic profile of the area,
but did not show that the residents to
be served reflect that profile. An
applicant will receive 0 Points if the
applicant failed to provide the
socioeconomic data on the community
and/or profiles of the eligible residents.
(2) Demonstrated Link Between
Proposed Activities and Local Need (up
to 15 points). Applicant’s narratives
must demonstrate a clear relationship
between proposed activities, community
needs and the purpose of the program
funding in order for points to be
awarded for this factor. The applicant
must, in the narrative for this rating
factor, describe the service needs of the
targeted residents, show which service
needs are already being met by local
resources and which service needs the
applicant is unable to meet using
existing resources, and demonstrate that
these services are of a high-priority for
the targeted elderly/disabled residents.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
The applicant may also indicate a need
for a Project Coordinator, which it may
pay up to the $68,000 maximum per
year from grant funds for salary and
fringe benefits in accordance with local
wage standards (see Funding
Restrictions).
An applicant will receive up to 15
points if the applicant narrative
demonstrates a direct, clear relationship
between the proposed activities,
community needs and the purpose of
the program funding. The applicant has
described the service needs of the
targeted residents, shown which service
needs are already being met by local
resources and which service needs the
applicant is unable to meet using
existing resources, and demonstrated
that these services are of a high priority
for the targeted elderly/disabled. An
applicant will receive up to 10 points if
the applicant’s narrative demonstrates a
strong relationship between the
proposed activities, community needs
and the purpose of funding, but does
not show which services are already
being met by existing local resources.
An applicant will receive up to 5 points
if the applicant’s narrative shows a
tenuous relationship between the need
and proposed activities and does not
show existing local resources or lack
thereof. An applicant will receive 0
Points if the applicant failed to
demonstrate a clear relationship among
the proposed activities, community
needs and the purpose of the program
funding.
c. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (up to 30 points)
This subfactor addresses both the
quality and cost-effectiveness of an
applicant’s proposed program and/or
work plan. The narrative and work plan
must indicate a clear relationship
between proposed activities, the
targeted population’s needs, and the
purpose of the program funding.
Applicant’s proposed program must
address HUD’s policy priorities outlined
in this Rating Factor.
In rating this factor HUD will
consider:
(1) Quality of the Work Plan (up to 20
points). This factor evaluates both the
applicant’s proposed program and/or
work plan and budget which will be
evaluated based on the following
criteria:
(a) Specific Services and/or Activities
(up to 10 points). Applicants’ narrative
must describe the proposed program
(i.e., specific services, course
curriculum, and activities) they plan to
offer and who will be responsible for
each. In addition to the narrative,
applicants may also provide a work
plan, which should list the specific
PO 00000
Frm 00188
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
services, activities, and outcomes they
expect. The proposed program narrative
and work plan must show a logical
order of activities and must tie to the
outcomes and outputs applicants
identify in the Logic Model (see Rating
Factor 5). Applicants’ narrative must
explain how their proposed activities
will:
(i) Involve community partners in the
delivery of services (up to 5 points).
An applicant will receive up to 5
points if the applicant’s narrative
describes the involvement of partner
organizations to deliver or support its
proposed programs. An applicant will
receive up to 3 points if the applicant
narrative describes the existence of
other community-based organizations in
the area, but does not describe firm
connections between program activities
and the delivery or support of the
proposed program. An applicant will
receive 0 points if the applicant does
not intend to involve any community
partners in the delivery or support of its
proposed program.
(ii) Offer comprehensive services
(versus a small range of services) geared
toward achieving the enhancement of
the residents’ quality of life. If the
proposed program activities are part of
a more comprehensive plan funded
through other resources, please provide
a description of the comprehensive
program clearly delineating those
proposed activities to be funded by the
ROSS-Elderly/Persons with Disabilities
grant category. (up to 5 points).
An applicant will receive up to 5
points if the applicant narrative
describes the specific services and
activities they plan to offer through their
whole program (HUD-funded and not)
and who will be responsible for each
and the narrative shows how the
applicant will provide a range of
services and activities that are intended
to enhance the residents’ quality of life.
An applicant will receive 3 points if the
applicant fully describes the proposed
program, but the program does not
address a spectrum of activities that will
be provided by the applicant. An
applicant will receive 0 points if the
applicant failed to provide sufficient
information to determine if the
proposed program will contain a range
of services and no outcomes are
identified.
(b) Feasibility and Demonstrable
Benefits (up to 5 points). This subfactor
examines whether an applicant’s work
plan is logical, feasible, and likely to
achieve its stated purpose during the
term of the grant. HUD seeks to fund
applications that will quickly produce
demonstrable results and advance the
purposes of the ROSS program. The
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
applicant’s work plan should
demonstrate that their project is ready to
be implemented shortly after the grant
award, but not to exceed three months
following the execution of the grant
agreement. The work plan must indicate
time frames and deadlines for
accomplishing major activities and
show the ability to complete all
activities within the period of
performance for the proposed budget.
An applicant will receive up to 5
points if the work plan and supporting
narrative are logical and feasible, and
demonstrates that the proposed project
is ready for implementation within
three months of execution of the grant
agreement. The work plan also indicates
timeframes and deadlines for
accomplishing major activities within
the period of performance and how well
the proposed activities address the
needs described in Rating Factor 2. The
applicant will receive up to 3 points if
the work plan and supporting narrative
are logical and feasible, but do not
demonstrate that the project is ready for
implementation within 3 months of
grant agreement execution and can be
completed within the period of
performance. An applicant will receive
0 points if the applicant failed to
provide sufficient information to
determine that the project is logical and
feasible or whether the project would be
ready for implementation within three
months of execution of the grant
agreement, or can be completed within
the period of performance.
(c) Budget Appropriateness/Efficient
Use of Grant (up to 5 Points). The score
in this sub-factor will be based on the
following:
(i) Justification of expenses.
Applicants will be evaluated on
whether their expenses are reasonable
and thoroughly explained and support
the objectives of their proposal.
(ii) Budget Efficiency. Applicants will
be evaluated based on whether their
application requests funds
commensurate with the level of effort
necessary to accomplish their goals and
anticipated results.
(iii) Please note that the budget form
HUD–424CBW requires that a separate
424–CBW form be submitted for each
sub-contract of 10 percent or more of the
requested grant amount. If an
application proposes to sub-contract 10
percent or more of the requested grant
amount and does not include a separate
424–CBW for each 10 percent or more
sub-contract, all points for Budget
Appropriateness/Efficient Use of Grant
will be lost (5 points). If 424–CBWs for
sub-contracts for 50 percent or more of
the requested grant amount are not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
included, the application will lose 10
points.
An applicant will receive up to 5
points if expenses are reasonable,
thoroughly explained, support the
objectives of the proposal and are
commensurate with the level of effort
necessary to accomplish the goal. An
applicant will receive up to 3 points if
the expenses somewhat support the
objectives of the proposal or are only
somewhat commensurate with the level
of effort necessary to accomplish the
goals. An applicant will receive 0 points
if expenses are not reasonable and/or
the requested funds are not
commensurate with the goals and
anticipated results of the proposed
program.
(d) Ineligible Activities. Two points
will be deducted for each ineligible
activity proposed in the application, as
identified in Section IV.E. For example,
you will lose 2 points if you propose
costs that exceed the limits identified in
the NOFA for a Project Coordinator.
(2) Addressing HUD’s Policy Priorities
(up to 8 points). HUD wants to improve
the quality of life for those living in
distressed communities. HUD’s grant
programs are a vehicle through which
long-term, positive change can be
achieved at the community level.
Applicants’ narrative and work plan
will be evaluated based on how well
they meet HUD’s policy priorities listed
below.
(a) Improving the Quality of Life in
Our Nation’s Communities (2 points).
The applicant’s narrative and work plan
must indicate the types of activities,
service, and programs applicants will
offer which can help residents to
continue to live independently.
An applicant will receive up to 2
points if the work plan and supporting
narrative indicate the types of activities,
services and programs that will be
offered to help residents successfully
continue to live independently. An
applicant will receive 0 points if the
application did not provide sufficient
information to determine whether the
types of activities, services and training
programs that will be offered will help
residents continue to live
independently.
(b) Providing Full and Equal Access to
Grassroots Faith-Based and Other
Community-Based Organizations in
HUD Program Implementation (up to 4
points). HUD encourages applicants to
partner with grassroots organizations,
e.g., civic organizations, grassroots faithbased and other community-based
organizations that are not usually
effectively utilized. These grassroots
organizations have a strong history of
providing vital community services and
PO 00000
Frm 00189
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11621
other supportive services. In order to
receive points under this subfactor,
applicants’ narrative and work plan
must describe how applicants will work
with these organizations and what types
of services they will provide. An
applicant will receive up to 4 points if
the applicant’s narrative and work plan
clearly name the grassroots
organizations with whom they will be
working, describes what types of
services will be provided by those
organizations, and describes how these
partnerships will contribute to the
achievement of the goals and proposed
outcomes for the program. An applicant
will receive up to 2 points if the
applicant indicates that it will work
with grassroots organizations, but does
not indicate the types of services that
will be provided by these organizations.
An applicant will receive 0 points if
neither the work plan or narrative
provide a description of how the
applicant will work with grassroots
organizations (civic organizations, faithbased and/or other community-based
organizations) and the types of services
that will be provided.
(c) Policy Priority for Increasing the
Supply of Affordable Housing Through
the Removal of Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing (up to 2 points).
Under this policy priority, higher
rating points are available to: (1)
Governmental applicants that are able to
demonstrate successful efforts in
removing regulatory barriers to
affordable housing, and (2)
nongovernmental applicants that are
associated with jurisdictions that have
undertaken successful efforts in
removing barriers. For applicants to
obtain the policy priority points for
efforts to successfully remove regulatory
barriers, applicants must complete form
HUD–27300 (‘‘Questionnaire for HUD’s
Initiative on Removal of Regulatory
Barriers’’). A copy of HUD’s Notice
titled ‘‘America’s Affordable
Communities Initiative, HUD’s Initiative
on Removal of Regulatory Barriers:
Announcement of Incentive Criteria on
Barrier Removal in HUD’s 2004
Competitive Funding Allocations’’ can
be found on HUD’s Web site at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
frregbarrier.pdf. The information and
requirements contained in HUD’s
regulatory barriers policy priority apply
to this FY 2007 NOFA. A description of
the policy priority and a copy of form
HUD–27300 can be found in the
application package posted on https://
www.Grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Applicants are
encouraged to read the Notice as well as
the General Section to obtain an
understanding of this policy priority
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11622
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
and how it can impact their score. A
limited number of questions expressly
request the applicant to provide brief
documentation with their response.
Other questions require that for each
affirmative statement made, the
applicant must supply a reference, Web
site address, or a brief statement
indicating where the back-up
information may be found, and a point
of contact, including a telephone
number and/or email address.
Applicants can attach the required
documentation, URL references, and
contact information using the
attachment capability at the bottom of
the electronic form. Reference material/
documentation can be scanned and
attached to the form HUD–27300 and
submitted with the application or faxed
to HUD following the facsimile
submission instructions. When
providing documents in support of your
responses to the questions on the form,
please provide the applicant name and
project name and whether you were
responding under column A or B, then
identify the number of the question and
the URL or document name and attach
using the attachment function at the end
of the electronic form.
(3) Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3) (2 Points).
You will receive 2 points if your
application demonstrates that you will
implement Section 3 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968 (12
U.S.C. 1701u) (Economic Opportunities
for Low- and Very Low-Income Persons
in Connection with Assisted Projects)
and its implementing regulations at 24
CFR part 135 in connection with this
grant, if awarded. Information about
Section 3 can be found at HUD’s Section
3 Web site at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/fheo/section3/
section3brochure.cfm. Your application
must describe how you will implement
Section 3 through the proposed grant
activities. You must state that you will,
to the greatest extent feasible, direct
training, employment, and other
economic opportunities to:
(a) Low- and very low-income
persons, particularly those who are
recipients of government assistance for
housing, and
(b) Business concerns which provide
economic opportunities to low- and
very low-income persons.
An applicant will receive 2 points if
the applicant describes how it will
implement Section 3 through the
proposed grant activities and states that
it will, to the greatest extent feasible,
direct training, employment, and other
economic opportunities to Section 3
interests (low- and very low-income
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
persons, particularly those who are
recipients of government assistance for
housing and business concerns which
provide economic opportunities to lowand very low-income persons). An
applicant will receive 0 points if the
applicant does not describe
implementing Section 3 through
proposed grant activities and does not
state that it will direct training,
employment and other economic
opportunities to Section 3 interests.
d. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (up to 10 Points).
This factor addresses the applicant’s
ability to secure community resources
that can be combined with HUD’s grant
resources to achieve program purposes.
Applicants are required to create
partnerships with organizations that can
help achieve their program’s goals.
PHAs are required by section 12(d)(7) of
the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (entitled
‘‘Cooperation Agreements for Economic
Self-Sufficiency Activities’’) to make
best efforts to enter into such
agreements with relevant state or local
agencies. Additionally, applicants must
have at least a 25 percent cash or inkind match. The match is a threshold
requirement. Joint applicants must
together have at least a 25 percent
match. Leveraging in excess of 25
percent of the grant amount will receive
a higher point value. In evaluating this
factor, HUD will consider the extent to
which applicants have partnered with
other entities to secure additional
resources, which will increase the
effectiveness of the proposed program
activities. The additional resources and
services must be firmly committed,
must support the proposed grant
activities and must, in combined
amount (including in-kind contributions
of personnel, space and/or equipment,
and monetary contributions) equal at
least 25 percent of the grant amount
requested in this application. A match
will not be accepted if it is proposed to
be used for ineligible activities. Please
see the section on Threshold
Requirements in this NOFA for more
information.
Points for this factor will be awarded
based on the documented evidence of
partnerships and firm commitments and
the ratio of requested ROSS funds to the
total proposed grant budget.
Points will be assigned based on the
following scale:
Percentage of Match Points Awarded
25—4 points (with partnerships) 2
points (without partnerships);
26–50—6 points (with partnerships) 4
points (without partnerships);
51–75—8 points (with partnerships) 6
points (without partnerships);
PO 00000
Frm 00190
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
76 or above—10 points (with
partnerships) 8 points (without
partnerships).
e. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (up to 15
Points)
(1) An important element in this
year’s NOFA is the development and
reporting of performance measures and
outcomes. This factor emphasizes
HUD’s determination to ensure that
applicants meet commitments made in
their applications and grant agreements
and that they assess their performance
so that they realize performance goals.
Applicants must demonstrate how they
propose to measure their success and
outcomes as they relate to the
Department’s Strategic Plan.
(2) HUD requires ROSS applicants to
develop an effective, quantifiable,
outcome-oriented plan for measuring
performance and determining that goals
have been met. Applicants must use the
Logic Model (form HUD–96010) for this
purpose.
(3) Applicants must establish interim
benchmarks, or outputs, for their
proposed program that lead to the
ultimate achievement of outcomes.
‘‘Outputs’’ are the direct products of a
program’s activities. Outputs should
produce outcomes for your program.
Examples of outputs are the number of
elderly persons referred to for social or
health care services, the number of
persons equipped with emergency
response resources, etc. ‘‘Outcomes’’ are
benefits accruing to the residents,
families, and/or communities during or
after their participation in the ROSS
program. Applicants must clearly
identify the outcomes to be achieved
and measured. Outcomes are not the
development or delivery of services or
program activities but the results of the
services delivered or program
activities—the ultimate results of the
program. Examples of outcomes are: the
number of persons able to live
independently and have avoided longterm care placement, the number of
persons that have had improved living
conditions or quality of life as a result
of receiving increased social services,
etc.
(4) This rating factor requires that
applicants identify program outputs,
outcomes, and performance indicators
that will allow applicants to measure
their performance. Performance
indicators should be objectively
quantifiable and measure actual
achievements against anticipated
achievements. Applicants’ narrative,
work plan, and Logic Model should
identify what applicants are going to
measure, how they are going to measure
it, and the steps they have in place to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
make adjustments to their work plan
and management practices if
performance targets begin to fall short of
established benchmarks and time
frames. Applicants’ proposal must also
show how they will measure the
performance of partners and affiliates.
Applicants must include the standards,
data sources, and measurement methods
they will use to measure performance.
Applicants will be evaluated based on
how comprehensively they propose to
measure their program’s outcomes. The
applicant will receive up to 15 points if
the applicant provided a work plan,
narrative and Logic Model that (a)
describes the goals, objectives,
outcomes, and performance
measurements to be achieved over the
term of the program; (b) includes short,
intermediate and long term goals; (c)
indicates what will be measured and (d)
how it will be measured and (e) shows
steps to be taken if performance targets
are not met within the established
timeframes. An applicant will receive
up to 12 points if the applicant has fully
addressed at least 4 of the 5 items of
review criteria (a–e). The applicant will
receive up to 9 points if the applicant
has fully addressed at least 3 of the 5
items of review criteria (a–e). The
applicant will receive up to 6 points if
the applicant has fully addressed at
least 2 of the 5 items of review criteria
(a–e). The applicant will receive up to
3 points if the applicant has fully
addressed at least 1 of the 5 items of
review criteria (a–e). An applicant will
receive 0 points if the applicant did not
provide the Logic Model or enough
information to determine the program
goals, outcomes and/or performance
measurements.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Review Process. Four types of
reviews will be conducted: a screening
to determine if you are eligible to apply
for funding under the ROSS-Elderly/
Persons with Disabilities grant; a review
of whether your application submission
is complete, on time, and meets
threshold; a review by the field office
(or area ONAP office) to evaluate past
performance; and a technical review to
rate your application based on the five
rating factors provided in this NOFA.
2. Selection Process for All Grant
Categories and All Applicants. Twentyfive percent (25%) of funds will be set
aside for Resident Associations and all
qualifying Resident Association
applications will be funded first, up to
25 percent of the funding amount. The
selection process is designed to achieve
geographic diversity of grant awards
throughout the country. For each grant
category, HUD will first select the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
highest-ranked application from each of
the ten federal regions and ONAP for
funding. After this ‘‘round,’’ HUD will
select the second-highest-ranked
application in each of the ten federal
regions and ONAP for funding (the
second round). HUD will continue this
process with the third, fourth, and so
on, highest-ranked applications in each
federal region and ONAP until the last
complete round is selected for funding.
If available funds exist to fund some but
not all eligible applications in the next
round, HUD will make awards to those
remaining applications in ranked order
(by score), regardless of region and
ONAP and will fully fund as many as
possible with remaining funds. If
remaining funds in one program are too
small to make an award, they may be
transferred to another ROSS program.
3. Tie Scores. In the event of a tie
score between two applications in the
ROSS-Elderly/Persons with Disabilities
funding category that target the same
developments, HUD will select the
application that was received first.
4. Deficiency Period. Applicants will
have 14 calendar days in which to
provide missing information requested
from HUD. For other information on
correcting deficient applications, please
see the General Section.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices.
1. HUD will make announcements of
grant awards after the rating and ranking
process is completed. Grantees will be
notified by letter and will receive
instructions on what steps they must
take in order to access funding and
begin implementing grant activities.
Applicants who are not funded will also
receive letters via U.S. postal mail.
2. Debriefings. All applicants may
request a debriefing. Applicants
requesting to be debriefed must send a
written request to: Iredia Hutchinson,
Director, Grants Management Center,
501 School Street, SW., Suite 800,
Washington, DC 20024. See the General
Section for more information on
debriefings.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Impact. In
accordance with 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3) or
(a)(9), 58.35(b)(2), (b)(4) or (b)(5),
50.19(b)(3), (b)(9), (b)(12), (b)(14), or
(b)(15), activities under this ROSS
program are categorically excluded from
the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and
are not subject to environmental review
under related laws and authorities.
2. Applicable Requirements. Unless
specifically enumerated in this NOFA,
PO 00000
Frm 00191
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11623
all lead and non-lead applicants are
subject to the requirements specified in
Section III.C. of the General Section.
Grantees are subject to regulations and
other requirements found in:
a. 24 CFR Part 84 (‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Nonprofit Organizations’’);
b. 24 CFR Part 85 (‘‘Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State, Local,
and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal
Governments’’);
c. 24 CFR Part 964 (‘‘Tenant
Participation and Tenant Opportunities
in Public Housing’’);
d. OMB Circular A–87 (‘‘Cost
Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments’’);
e. OMB Circular A–110, (‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Other Agreements with Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals and
Other Non-Profit Organizations’’);
f. OMB Circular A–122, (‘‘Cost
Principles for Non-Profit
Organizations’’); and
g. OMB Circular A–133, (‘‘Audits of
States, Local Governments, and NonProfit Organizations’’).
3. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). Applicants and grantees must also
comply with Section 3 of the Housing
and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12
U.S.C. 1701u), and ensure that training,
employment, and other economic
opportunities shall, to the greatest
extent feasible, be directed toward lowand very low-income persons,
particularly those who are recipients of
government assistance for housing, and
to business concerns that provide
economic opportunities to low- and
very low-income persons.
4. Fair Housing and Civil Rights Laws.
Applicants and their subrecipients must
comply with all fair housing and civil
rights laws, statutes, regulations, and
Executive Orders as enumerated in 24
CFR 5.105(a), as applicable. Please see
the General Section for more
information.
C. Reporting
1. Semi-Annual Performance Reports.
Grantees must submit semi-annual
performance reports to the field office or
area ONAP. These progress reports must
include financial reports (SF–269A) and
a Logic Model (HUD–96010) showing
achievements to date against outputs
and outcomes proposed in the
application and approved by HUD. Each
quarterly report must identify any
deviations (positive or negative) from
outputs and outcomes proposed and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11624
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
approved by HUD, by providing the
information in the reporting TAB of the
approved Logic Model. Grantees must
use quantifiable data to measure
performance against goals and
objectives outlined in their program
and/or work plan. Performance reports
are due to the field office or Area ONAP
on July 30 and January 31 of each year.
If reports are not received by the due
date, grant funds will be suspended
until reports are received. For FY 2007,
HUD is considering a new concept for
the Logic Model. The new concept is a
Return on Investment (ROI) statement.
HUD will be publishing a separate
notice on the ROI concept.
2. Final Report. All grantees must
submit a final report to their local field
office or area ONAP that will include a
financial report (SF–269A), a final Logic
Model, and a narrative evaluating
overall results achieved against their
program and/or work plan. Grantees
must use quantifiable data to measure
performance against goals and
objectives outlined in their program
and/or work plan. The final report must
also include responses to the
management questions found in the
Logic Model and approved for your
program. The financial report must
contain a summary of all expenditures
made from the beginning of the grant
agreement to the end of the grant
agreement and must include any
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
unexpended balances. The final
narrative, Logic Model, and financial
report are due to the field office 90 days
after the termination of the grant
agreement.
3. Final Audit. Grantees that expend
$500,000 in federal funds in a given
program or fiscal year are required to
obtain a complete final close-out audit
of the grant’s financial statements by a
Certified Public Accountant (CPA), in
accordance with generally accepted
government audit standards. A written
report of the audit must be forwarded to
HUD within 60 days of issuance.
4. Racial and Ethnic Data. HUD
requires that funded recipients collect
racial and ethnic beneficiary data. HUD
has adopted the Office of Management
and Budget’s Standards for the
Collection of Racial and Ethnic Data. In
view of these requirements, funded
recipients should use form HUD–27061
(Racial and Ethnic Data Reporting
Form).
VII. Agency Contact(s)
For questions and technical
assistance, you may call the Public and
Indian Housing Information and
Resource Center at 800–955–2232. For
persons with hearing or speech
impairments, please call the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
PO 00000
Frm 00192
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
VIII. Other Information
A. Code of Conduct. Please see the
General Section for more information.
B. Transfer of Funds. If transfer of
funds from any of the ROSS programs
does become necessary, HUD will
consider the amount of unfunded
qualified applications in deciding to
which program it will transfer the extra
funds.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2577–0229. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 49.5 hours per respondent for
the application. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00193
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11625
EN13MR07.019
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11626
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency (ROSS) Family and
Homeownership Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Public and Indian Housing.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: ROSS
Family and Homeownership, under the
Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency (ROSS) program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number:
5100–N–18; OMB Approval Number
2577–0229.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): Resident
Opportunity and Self Sufficiency,
14.870.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is June 27, 2007. Applications
submitted through https://
www.grants.gov must be received and
validated by grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 Eastern time on the application
deadline date. The validation process
may take up to 72 hours.
G. Additional Overview Content
Information:
Grant program
1. Purpose of Program. The purpose of
the Public and Indian Housing Resident
Opportunity and Self Sufficiency
(ROSS) program is to provide grants to
public housing agencies (PHAs), tribes/
tribally designated housing entities
(TDHEs), Resident Associations (RAs),
and nonprofit organizations (including
grassroots, faith-based and other
community-based organizations) for the
delivery and coordination of supportive
services and other activities designed to
help public and Indian housing
residents attain economic and housing
self-sufficiency.
2. Funding Available. HUD expects to
award a total of approximately
$30,000,000 in ROSS—Family and
Homeownership grants in FY 2007. This
amount includes $18,000,000
appropriated in FY 2007 and
$12,000,000 in rollover funds.
3. Award Amounts. Awards,
depending on the unit count and type
of grantee, will range from $125,000 to
$1,000,000. Please see the program
description for more specific
information about funding amounts.
4. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants are PHAs; tribes/TDHEs;
nonprofit organizations including
grassroots faith-based and other
community-based organizations that
have resident support or the support of
tribes; RAs; resident councils (RCs);
resident organizations (ROs); City-Wide
Resident Organizations (CWROs);
Intermediary Resident Organizations
(IROs); Jurisdiction-Wide Resident
Organizations; Regional Resident
Organizations; Resident Management
Corporations (RMCs); Site-Based
Resident Organizations; Statewide
Resident Organizations (SROs); and
Tribal/TDHE resident groups. The term
‘‘resident association’’ or ‘‘RA’’ will be
used to refer to all types of eligible
resident organizations. Please see the
section on ‘‘Definition of Terms’’ for a
complete definition of each type of
eligible resident organization.
5. Cost Sharing/Match Requirement.
At least 25 percent of the requested
grant amount is required as a match.
The match may be in cash and/or inkind donations. The match is a
threshold requirement.
6. Grant term. The grant term for each
funding category is 3 years from the
execution date of the grant agreement.
Maximum grant amount (units refers to the number of
family-occupied units as indicated on ROSS Fact
Sheet (HUD–52751)
Eligible applicants
$30 million .........................
PHAs/Tribes/TDHEs ..........
$250,000 for 1–780 units.
Resident Associations .......
Nonprofit entities ...............
ROSS—Family and Homeownership.
Total funding
$350,000 for 781–2,500 units.
$500,000 for 2,501–7,300 units.
$1,000,000 for 7,301 or more units.
$125,000.
$125,000 per RA; Maximum award is $375,000.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. ROSS Family and Homeownership.
The purpose is to provide funding to
assist PHAs, tribes/TDHEs, RAs,
nonprofit organizations (including
grassroots community based
organizations such as faith-based
organizations), to create programs that
will help residents achieve economic
self-sufficiency. Applicants must submit
proposals that will link residents with
services such as job training and
educational opportunities that facilitate
economic and housing self-sufficiency.
The Homeownership component
provides funds to recipients to deliver
homeownership training, counseling,
and supportive services for residents of
public and Indian housing who are
participating or have participated in
self-sufficiency programs such as ROSS;
Public Housing Family Self-Sufficiency
(FSS); or other federal, state, or local
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
self-sufficiency programs. ROSSElderly/Persons with Disabilities
funding is being offered under a
separate notice in the 2007 SuperNOFA.
B. Definition of Terms
1. City-Wide Resident Organization
consists of members of Resident
Councils, Resident Management
Corporations, and Resident
Organizations who reside in public
housing developments that are owned
and operated by the same PHA within
a city.
2. Community Facility means a nondwelling structure that provides space
for multiple supportive services for the
benefit of public or Indian housing
residents and others eligible for the
services provided. Supportive services
may include but are not limited to:
a. Job-training;
b. After-school activities for youth;
PO 00000
Frm 00194
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
c. Neighborhood Networks (formerly
Twenty Education Communities (TECs),
Campus of Learners activities);
d. English as a Second Language (ESL)
classes; and
e. Child care.
3. Contract Administrator means an
overall grant administrator or a financial
management agent (or both) that
oversees the implementation of the
grant and/or the financial aspects of the
grant.
4. Elderly person means a person who
is at least 62 years of age.
5. Jurisdiction-Wide Resident
Organization means an incorporated
nonprofit organization or association
that meets the following requirements:
a. Most of its activities are conducted
within the jurisdiction of a single
housing authority;
b. There are no incorporated resident
councils or resident management
corporations within the jurisdiction of
the single housing authority;
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
c. It has experience in providing startup and capacity-building training to
residents and resident organizations;
and
d. Public housing residents
representing unincorporated resident
councils within the jurisdiction of the
single housing authority must comprise
a majority of the board of directors.
6. Tribally Designated Housing Entity
(TDHE) is an entity authorized or
established by one or more Indian tribes
to act on behalf of each such tribe
authorizing or establishing the housing
entity as defined by Section 4(21) of
NAHASDA.
7. Indian Tribe means any tribe, band,
nation, or other organized group of a
community of Indians, including any
Alaska Native village, regional, or
village corporation as defined in or
established pursuant to the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act, and that
is recognized as eligible for the special
programs and services provided by the
United States to Indians because of their
status as Indians pursuant to the Indian
Self Determination and Education Act of
1975 or any state-recognized tribe
eligible for assistance under section
4(12)(C) of the Native American
Housing Assistance and SelfDetermination Act of 1996 (NAHASDA).
8. Intermediary Resident
Organizations means jurisdiction-wide
resident organizations, citywide
resident organizations, statewide
resident organizations, regional resident
organizations, and national resident
organizations.
9. NAHASDA-assisted resident means
a member of a tribe (as defined above)
who has been assisted by NAHASDA.
10. National Resident Organization
(NRO) is an incorporated nonprofit
organization or association for public
housing that meets each of the following
requirements:
a. It is national (i.e., conducts
activities or provides services in at least
two HUD areas or two states);
b. It has the capacity to provide startup and capacity-building training to
residents and resident organizations;
and
c. Public housing residents
representing different geographical
locations in the country are members of
the board of directors.
11. Nonprofit organization is an
organization that is exempt from federal
taxation. A nonprofit organization can
be organized for the following purposes:
charitable, religious, educational,
scientific, or other similar purposes in
the public interest. In order to qualify,
an organization must be a corporation,
community chest, fund, or foundation.
An individual or partnership cannot
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
qualify. To obtain nonprofit status,
qualified organizations must file an
application with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) and receive designation as
such by the IRS. For more information,
go to www.irs.gov. Applicants who are
in the process of applying for nonprofit
status, but have not yet received
nonprofit designation from the IRS, will
not be considered nonprofit
organizations. All nonprofit applicants
must submit their IRS determination
letter to prove their nonprofit (e.g.
501(c)(3)) status with their funding
application. Please see the section on
Threshold Requirements for more
information. Nonprofit applicants must
also provide letters of support as
described in the Threshold
Requirements section.
12. National nonprofit organizations
work on a national basis and have the
capacity to mobilize resources on both
a national and local level. All nonprofit
applicants must submit their IRS
determination letter to prove their
nonprofit (e.g. 501(c)(3)) status. National
nonprofit applicants must also provide
letters of support as outlined in the
‘‘Threshold Requirements’’ section.
13. Past Performance is a threshold
requirement. Using Rating Factor 1
(described in the Application Review
Information section of this NOFA),
HUD’s field offices will evaluate
applicants for past performance to
determine whether an applicant has the
capacity to manage the grant for which
it is applying. The area Office of Native
American Programs (ONAP) will review
past performance for tribal/TDHE
submissions. Field offices will also
evaluate the past performance of
contract administrators for applicants
required to have a contract
administrator.
14. Person with disabilities means a
person who:
a. Has a condition defined as a
disability in section 223 of the Social
Security Act; or
b. Has a developmental disability as
defined in section 102 of the
Developmental Disabilities Assistance
Bill of Rights Act.
The term ‘‘person with disabilities’’
does not exclude persons who have
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
(HIV/AIDS) or any conditions arising
from the etiologic agent for AIDS. In
addition, no individual shall be
considered a person with disabilities,
for purposes of eligibility for lowincome housing, solely on the basis of
any drug or alcohol dependence.
The definition of a person with
disabilities contained in section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and its
implementing regulations must be used
PO 00000
Frm 00195
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11627
for purposes of reasonable
accommodations and program
accessibility. Please see 24 CFR 5.403.
15. Project Coordinator is responsible
for coordinating the grantee’s approved
activities to ensure that grant goals and
objectives are met. A qualified project
coordinator is someone with experience
managing projects and preferably has
experience working with supportive
services. The project coordinator and
grantees are responsible for ensuring
that all federal requirements are
followed.
16. Resident Association (RA) means
any or all of the forms of resident
organizations as they are defined
elsewhere in this Definitions section
and includes Resident Councils (RC),
Resident Management Corporations
(RMC), Regional Resident Organizations
(RRO), Statewide Resident
Organizations (SRO), Jurisdiction-Wide
Resident Organizations, and National
Resident Organizations (NRO). The
NOFA will use ‘‘Resident Association’’
or ‘‘RA’’ to refer to all eligible types of
resident organizations. See 24 CFR
964.115 for more information.
17. Regional Resident Organization
(RRO) means an incorporated nonprofit
organization or association for public
housing that meets each of the following
requirements:
a. The RRO is regional (i.e., not
limited by HUD Areas);
b. The RRO has experience in
providing start-up and capacity-building
training to residents and resident
organizations; and
c. Public housing residents
representing different geographical
locations in the region must comprise
the majority of the Board of Directors.
18. Resident Management
Corporation (RMC) means an entity that
proposes to enter into, or enters into a
contract to conduct one or more
management activities of a PHA and
meets the requirements of 24 CFR
964.120.
19. Resident Organization (RO) for
tribal entities means an incorporated or
unincorporated nonprofit tribal
organization or association that meets
each of the following criteria:
a. It shall consist of residents only,
and only residents may vote;
b. If it represents residents in more
than one development or in all of the
developments of the tribal/TDHE
community, it shall fairly represent
residents from each development that it
represents;
c. It shall adopt written procedures
providing for the election of specific
officers on a regular basis; and
d. It shall have an elected governing
board.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11628
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
20. Secretary means the Secretary of
the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
21. Site-Based Resident Associations
means resident councils or resident
management corporations representing a
specific public housing development.
22. Statewide Resident Organization
(SRO) is an incorporated nonprofit
organization or association for public
housing that meets the following
requirements:
a. The SRO has statewide jurisdiction;
b. The SRO has experience in
providing start-up and capacity-building
training to residents and resident
organizations; and
c. Public housing residents
representing different geographical
locations in the state must comprise the
majority of the Board of Directors.
23. Tribal/TDHE Resident Group
means tribal/TDHE resident groups that
are democratically elected groups such
as IHA-wide resident groups, area-wide
resident groups, single development
groups, or resident management
corporations (RMCs).
C. Regulations Governing the ROSS
Program
ROSS Family and Homeownership is
governed by 24 CFR Part 964.
II. Award Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Performance Period and Award Type
1. Grant Period. Three years. The
grant period shall begin the day the
grant agreement and the form HUD–
1044 (Assistance Award/Amendment)
are signed by both the grantee and HUD.
2. Grant Extensions. Requests to
extend the grant term beyond the grant
term must be submitted in writing to the
local HUD field office or area ONAP at
least 90 days prior to the expiration of
the grant term. Requests must explain
why the extension is necessary, what
work remains to be completed, and
what work and progress was
accomplished to date. Extensions may
be granted only once by the field office
or area ONAP for a period not to exceed
6 months and may be granted for a
further 6 months by the HUD
Headquarters program office at the
request of the Field Office or area
ONAP.
3. Type of Award. Grant agreement.
4. Subcontracting. Subcontracting is
permitted. Grantees must follow federal
procurement regulations found in HUD
regulations at 24 CFR 84.40–84.48 and
24 CFR 85.36.
5. Total Funding. HUD expects to
award a total of approximately
$30,000,000 in ROSS—Elderly/Persons
with Disabilities grants in FY 2007. This
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
amount includes $18,000,000
appropriated in FY 2007 and
$12,000,000 in rollover funds. Awards
will be made as follows:
a. PHAs must use the number of
occupied conventional family public
housing units as of September 30, 2006,
per their budget to determine the
maximum grant amount they are eligible
for in accordance with the chart above.
(Use form HUD–51751, ROSS Fact
Sheet). Applicants should clearly
indicate on the fact sheet the number of
eligible units under their Annual
Contributions Contract.
b. The maximum grant award is
$125,000 for each RA.
c. Nonprofits are eligible applicants if
they are representing or acting at the
behest of an RA. Accordingly, nonprofit
applicants must show support from that
RA. Nonprofit organizations that have
support from an RA are limited to
$125,000 for each RA. A nonprofit
organization may not receive more than
$375,000 in FY 2007 ROSS-Family &
Homeownership grant funding, but may
propose to serve more than 3 RAs. In
cases where nonprofit applicants are not
able to obtain support from RAs, they
must obtain letters of support from
PHAs and/or tribes/TDHEs.
number of units under management on
the Fact Sheet.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants are PHAs, tribes/TDHEs,
RAs, and nonprofit organizations
(including those nonprofit organizations
supported by resident organizations,
PHAs, or tribes/TDHEs).
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. The
required match is 25 percent of
requested funds and the match is a
threshold requirement. Therefore,
applicants who do not demonstrate the
minimum 25 percent match will fail the
threshold requirement and will not
receive further consideration for
funding. Please see the section below on
threshold requirements for more
information on what is required for the
match.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities.
a. Eligible Program Activities
Applicants should propose
implementing comprehensive programs
within the 3-year grant term which will
result in improved housing and
economic self-sufficiency for Public and
Indian Housing residents. Proposals
should involve partnerships with
Note: All nonprofit applicants that do not
include a letter of support from an RA must
organizations that will enhance
include a letter of support from a PHA or
grantees’ ability to provide educational
tribe/TDHE. Please see Threshold
programs, housing counseling, fair
Requirements for more information. Support
housing counseling, job training and
letters must indicate the developments to be
other supportive services for residents.
served by the nonprofit organization.
All applicants must complete a work
Funding for nonprofit applicants that do not
plan covering the 3-year grant term.
receive letters of support from RAs will be
The eligible activities are listed in the
determined as follows. Support letters must
indicate the developments to be served by
following five categories, from basic to
the nonprofit organization as well as the
advanced: (1) Life-Skills Training; (2)
number of family occupied conventional
Job Training, Job Search, and Placement
public housing units in those developments.
Assistance; (3) Post-Employment
Follow-up; (4) Activities to Support
Number of family occupied conMaximum
Career Advancement and Long-Term
ventional units
funding
Economic Self-Sufficiency; and (5)
Homeownership. Applicants are not
1–780 units ...............................
$125,000
781–2,500 units ........................
250,000 limited to choosing one category of
2,501 or more units ..................
375,000 activity, but rather should design their
programs to address the specific needs
of the population they are targeting.
Applicants should see the General
Only applicants proposing activities in
Section for instructions on submitting
support letters and other documentation Category 5 (Homeownership), and able
to show existing linkages to an existing
with their electronic application.
d. Tribes/TDHEs should use the
homeownership program such as, for
number of units counted as Formula
PHAs, Housing Choice VoucherCurrent Assisted Stock for FY 2006 as
Homeownership, Section 32, or
defined in 24 CFR 1000.316. Tribes that homeownership programs and resources
have not previously received funds from offered by other organizations or state or
the Department under the U.S. Housing
local homeownership programs and for
Act of 1937 should count housing units
Tribes/TDHEs, programs such as the
under management that are owned and
Mutual Help Homeownership
operated by the Tribe and that are
Opportunity Program, the Section 184
identified in their housing inventory as
Program, and homeownership programs
of September 30, 2006, for family units.
developed under the Indian Housing
Tribes should clearly indicate the
Block Grant Program such as mortgage
PO 00000
Frm 00196
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
assistance, will be eligible for 2 points
in Rating Factor 3, Soundness of
Approach, under ‘‘Addressing HUD’s
Policy Priorities—Providing Increased
Homeownership and Rental
Opportunities for Low- and ModerateIncome Persons * * *’’ Funds may be
used for, but are not limited to, the
activities described below.
(Category 1) Life-Skills Training (for
Youth and Adults). An applicant’s
proposals can cover, but are not limited
to, the following types of activities:
(a) Credit. The importance of having
good credit and how to maintain good
credit.
(b) Banking and Money Management.
How to open a bank account, balance a
checkbook, create a weekly spending
budget, and establish contingency plans
for child care and transportation, etc.
(c) Real Life Issues. Information on tax
forms, voter registration, leases, car
insurance, health insurance, long-term
care insurance, etc.
(d) Literacy training and GED
preparation.
(e) College preparatory courses and
information.
(f) Goal setting.
(g) Mentoring.
(h) Hiring residents to help with the
implementation of this program.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Note: Stipends and salaries serve different
purposes. Resident salaries can only be used
to hire residents to help program staff with
the implementation of grant activities.
(Category 2) Job Training, Job Search,
and Placement Assistance. Eligible
activities include but are not limited to:
(a) Skills assessment of participating
residents.
(b) Applying for a job. How to
complete employment forms;
highlighting skills employers are
looking for, researching job
opportunities in the area, and
calculating net wages.
(c) Soft skills training including
problem-solving and other cognitive
skills, oral and written communication
skills, workplace norms (appropriate
dress, punctuality, respectful
communication, etc.), work ethic, and
interpersonal and teamwork skills.
(d) Creating job training and
placement programs.
(e) Resume writing.
(f) Interviewing techniques.
(g) Employer linkage and job
placement. Working with local
employers and job placement providers
to design and offer training that
addresses local employers’ needs, and to
create a job placement program that
refers trained residents to participating
employers and other local area
employers.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(h) Professional clothing or uniforms
related to new employment.
(i) Career advancement and planning
programs. Such programs should be
designed to:
(i) Set career goals;
(ii) Provide strategies such as finding
a strong professional mentor within an
organization for which residents may be
working, and focusing on the
organization’s priorities.
(iii) Reinforce welfare-to-work
programs and focus efforts on increasing
residents’ earning capacity. Activities
can include job counseling, helping
residents secure better paying jobs or
jobs in better work environments,
preparing for work in a new job
category, obtaining additional job skills,
and other job-related or educational
training.
(iv) Working with local employers to
create opportunities that combine
education and skills training with jobs.
Strategies that promote work-based
learning can offer the most effective
method for giving new workers the tools
they need to move onto a career ladder
and achieve upward mobility.
(Category 3) Post-employment followup. After placing residents in jobs,
providing follow-up and ongoing
support to newly hired residents can
have a significant positive impact on
long-term job retention.
(Category 4) Activities to Support
Career Advancement and Long-Term
Economic Self-Sufficiency.
(a) Individual Savings Accounts
(ISAs). Applicants may create programs
that encourage residents to save and
contribute to match savings accounts
such as Individual Development
Accounts (IDAs). The programs should
include financial counseling and
education activities. ISAs may only be
used for three purposes: (1) To purchase
a first home that is existing or under
construction when the purchase
contract is signed; (2) to receive
postsecondary education or training; or
(3) to start a local business (other than
acquiring, leasing, constructing, or
rehabilitating real property in
connection with the business).
Applicants are encouraged to leverage
funds by working with local financial
organizations, which can also contribute
to residents’ ISAs. FSS escrow accounts
may not be used as a match for ROSS
FamilyHomeownership-funded ISAs.
Grantees shall consult the Internal
Revenue Service regarding possible tax
consequences of the ISAs on
participating residents.
(b) Housing Counseling to increase
homeownership opportunities. This can
include information to help residents
move to market-rate rental housing and/
PO 00000
Frm 00197
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11629
or ‘‘pre-purchase’’ homeownership
counseling and training. This may
include training on such subjects as
credit and financial management, credit
repair, housing search, how to finance
the purchase of a home, fair housing,
Individual Savings Accounts, the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act
(RESPA), and home maintenance.
(Category 5) Homeownership.
Applicants should be able to show
existing linkages with HUD
homeownership programs such as the
Housing Choice Voucher
Homeownership Program, the PHA
Homeownership Program also known as
Section 32 (formerly the Section 5(h)
Homeownership Program), or
homeownership programs and resources
offered by other organizations or state or
local homeownership programs.
Tribes/TDHEs should be able to show
existing linkages with programs such as
the Mutual Help Homeownership
Opportunity Program, the Section 184
Program, and homeownership programs
developed under the Indian Housing
Block Grant Program such as mortgage
assistance. Proposals should involve
partnerships with organizations that
will enhance the services grantees will
offer. Applicants are strongly
encouraged to partner with HUDapproved housing counseling agencies.
For a list of HUD-approved housing
counseling agencies, go to: https://
www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/hcc/
hccprof14.cfm.
Eligible activities include, but are not
limited to:
(1) Training to include:
(a) Asset building;
(b) Credit counseling and credit
scoring;
(c) Financial literacy and
management;
(d) Selecting a real estate broker;
(e) Choosing a lender;
(f) Appraisals;
(g) Home inspections;
(h) Avoiding delinquency and
predatory lending;
(i) Foreclosure prevention;
(j) Home maintenance and financial
management for first-time homeowners;
(k) RESPA; and
(l) Fair Housing Counseling.
(2) ISAs. You may create programs
that encourage residents to save and
contribute to match savings accounts
such as Individual Development
Accounts (IDAs). ISAs are to be used
solely for (a) escrow accounts, (b) down
payment assistance and (c) closing
costs, to assist the resident to purchase
an existing dwelling unit or a dwelling
unit under construction.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11630
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
b. Eligible Other Activities
(1) Hiring of a qualified project
coordinator to run the grant program. A
qualified project coordinator must have
at least 2 years of experience in
managing programs and should have
experience working on supportive
services programs. If Category 5
activities are being proposed, a qualified
grant coordinator must have experience
working on homeownership programs
designed for typically underserved
populations. The project coordinator
should be hired for the entire 3-year
term of the grant. The project
coordinator is responsible for:
(a) Marketing the program to
residents;
(b) Assessing participating residents’
skills and job readiness;
(c) Assessing participating residents’
needs for supportive services, e.g., child
care, transportation costs, etc.
(d) Assisting a tribe or TDHE to create
a resident group to promote selfsufficiency efforts in the Indian area;
(e) Designing, coordinating, and
providing grant activities based on
residents’ needs and the local labor
market; and
(f) Monitoring the progress of program
participants and evaluating the overall
success of the program. A portion of
grant funds may be reserved to ensure
that evaluations can be completed for all
participants who received training
through this program. This may include
software for tracking and evaluation to
meet HUD’s reporting requirements. For
more information on how to measure
performance, please see Rating Factor 5
in the ‘‘Application Review
Information’’ section of this NOFA.
(2) Staff training.
(3) Long distance travel subject to
funding restrictions.
(4) Lease or rental of space for
program activities, but only under the
following conditions:
(i) The lease must be for existing
facilities not requiring rehabilitation or
construction except for minimal
alterations to make the facilities
accessible for a person with disabilities;
(ii) No repairs or renovations of the
property may be undertaken with
federal funds; and
(iii) Properties in the Coastal Barrier
Resources System designated under the
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C.
3501) cannot be leased or rented with
federal funds.
(5) Stipends. Stipends are an eligible
use of grant funds, and stipends may be
used for reasonable out-of-pocket costs.
Stipends may also be used to reimburse
such things as local transportation to
and from job training and job
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
interviews, supplemental educational
materials, and child care expenses.
Stipends must be tied to residents’
successful performance and regular
attendance.
(6) Hiring of Residents. Grant funds
may also be used to hire a resident(s) as
program staff.
(7) Supportive Services.
(a) After-school programs for schoolage children to include tutoring,
remedial training, and educational
programming using computers.
(b) Provision of information on the
Earned Income Tax Credit Program,
Food Stamps, Child Tax Credit Program,
Medicaid, the State Child Health
Insurance Program (S–CHIP), Student
Loan Interest Deduction, tribal welfare
programs, and other benefit programs
that can help individuals and families
make a successful transition from
welfare to work.
(c) Transportation costs as necessary
to enable participating families to
receive services or commute to training
or employment including purchase,
rental, or lease of a vehicle for the
grantee and limited in use for program
purposes and fuel for program activities.
(d) Childcare while residents are
participating in program-related
activities.
(e) Parenting courses.
(f) Nutrition courses.
(g) Health care information and
services including referrals to mental
health providers and alcohol and other
drug abuse treatment programs.
(h) English as a second language (ESL)
classes.
(i) Housekeeping courses.
(j) Creating and maintaining linkages
to local social service agencies such as
employment agencies, health
departments, transportation agencies,
economic/community development
agencies, community colleges,
recreational and cultural services, and
other community organizations such as
Boys & Girls Clubs, 4H Clubs, Boy
Scouts, Girl Scouts, etc.
(8) Hiring or otherwise retaining other
staff as necessary for program activities.
(9) Evaluation.
(10) Administrative Costs.
Administrative costs may include, but
are not limited to, purchase of office
furniture, or office equipment and
supplies, program outreach, printing
and postage, local travel, utilities,
administrative salaries, and lease or
rental of space for program activities
(subject to lease restrictions above). To
the maximum extent practicable, when
leasing space or purchasing equipment
or supplies, business opportunities
should be provided to businesses under
Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
PO 00000
Frm 00198
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Development Act of 1968.
Administrative costs, including
administrative salaries, must not exceed
10 percent of the total grant amount
requested from HUD. All administrative
costs should be delineated and allocated
as direct costs an indirect cost rate will
not be accepted;
2. Threshold Requirements.
Applicants must respond to each
threshold requirement clearly and
thoroughly by following the instructions
below. If your application fails one
threshold requirement (regardless of the
type of threshold) it will be considered
a failed application and will not receive
consideration for funding.
a. Match. All applicants are required
to have in place a firmly committed 25
percent match in cash or in-kind
donations as defined in this NOFA.
Joint applicants must together have at
least a 25 percent match. Applicants
who do not demonstrate the minimum
25 percent match will fail this threshold
requirement and will not receive further
consideration for funding. If you are
applying for more than one ROSS grant
(i.e., ROSS-Elderly), you must use
different sources of match donations for
each grant application and you must
indicate which additional ROSS grant(s)
you are applying for by attaching an
additional page to your application
stating the sources and amounts of each
of your match contributions for this
application as well as any other HUD
programs to which you are applying.
Match to be used for ineligible activities
will not be accepted. Match donations
must be firmly committed, which means
that the amount of match resources and
their dedication to ROSS-funded
activities must be explicit, in writing,
and signed by a person authorized to
make the commitment. Letters of
commitment, memoranda of
understanding (MOU), or tribal
resolution must be on organization
letterhead, and signed by a person
authorized to make the stated
commitment, whether it be in cash or
in-kind services. The letters of
commitment/MOUs/tribal resolutions
must indicate the total dollar value of
the commitment and be dated between
the publication date of this NOFA and
the application deadline published in
this NOFA, or amended deadline, and
indicate how the commitment will
relate to the proposed program. If the
commitment is in-kind, the letters
should explain exactly what services or
material will be provided. The
commitment must be available at time
of award. Applicants proposing to use
their own, non-ROSS grant funds to
meet the match requirement, in whole
or in part, must also include a letter of
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
commitment indicating the type of
match (cash or in-kind) and how the
match will be used. Please see the
General Section for instructions for
submitting the required letters with
your electronic application.
Committed amounts in excess of the
25 percent of the requested grant
amount may be considered as leveraged
funds for higher points under Rating
Factor 4 (described in the ‘‘Application
Review Information’’ section of this
NOFA).
(1) The value of volunteer time and
services shall be computed by using the
normal professional rate for the local
area or the national minimum wage rate
of $5.15 per hour (Note: PHA applicants
may not count their staff time toward
the match);
(2) In order for HUD to determine the
value of any donated material,
equipment, staff time, building, or lease,
your application must provide a letter
from the organization making the
donation stating the value of the
contribution.
(3) Other resources/services that can
be committed include: in-kind services
provided to the applicant; funds from
federal sources (not including ROSS
funds) as allowed by statute, including,
for example, Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds; Indian
Housing Block Grant (IHBG) funds;
funds from any state or local
government sources; and funds from
private contributions. Applicants may
also partner with other program funding
recipients to coordinate the use of
resources in the target area.
b. Past Performance. HUD’s field
offices will evaluate data provided by
applicants as well as applicants’ past
performance to determine whether
applicants have the capacity to manage
the grant for which they are applying.
The area ONAP will review past
performance for tribal and TDHE
submissions. Field offices will evaluate
the contract administrators’ past
performance for applicants required to
have a contract administrator. In
evaluating past performance HUD will
look at the applicant’s record of
completing grant activities on time,
within budget, and the results achieved.
Using Rating Factor 1, the field office/
area ONAP will evaluate applicants’
past performance. Applicants should
carefully review Rating Factor 1 to
ensure their application addresses each
of the criteria requested therein. If
applicants fail to address what is
requested in Rating Factor 1, their
application will fail this threshold and
will not receive further consideration.
c. Contract Administrator Partnership
Agreement. All nonprofit applicants, all
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
RAs, and PHAS troubled PHAs (as of
the application publication date) are
required to submit a signed Contract
Administrator Partnership Agreement.
The agreement must be for the entire
grant term. If an applicant that is
required to have a Contract
Administrator Partnership Agreement
and fails to submit one or it is
incomplete, incorrect or insufficient,
this will be treated as a technical
deficiency. See the General Section for
more information on Corrections to
Deficient Applications. Troubled PHAs
are not eligible to be contract
administrators. Grant writers who assist
applicants with preparing their ROSS
applications are also ineligible to be
contract administrators. For more
information on contract administrators,
see the section ‘‘Program
Requirements.’’
d. Letters of Support for Nonprofit
Applicants.
(1) All nonprofit applicants must
include one or more letters of support
from resident associations (RAs). In the
event that RAs are inactive, nonprofit
applicants must submit letters from
PHAs or tribes/TDHEs indicating
support for their application. All letters
of support must be signed by an
authorized representative of the
supporting organization and be dated
between the publication date of this
NOFA and the application deadline
published in this NOFA, or the
amended deadline.
(2) Nonprofit applicants that do
receive support from resident
associations must submit form HUD–
52754 (‘‘List of Resident Associations
Supporting Nonprofit Applicants’’).
Submitting this form is not applicable
where RAs are inactive or where
applicants do not submit letters of
support from RAs.
(3) In cases where nonprofit
organizations are applying to serve
tribes/TDHEs, nonprofit applicants must
submit letters of support from tribes/
TDHEs. Nonprofit organizations must
also use form HUD–52754 to list which
tribes/TDHEs support their application.
(4) Letters of support must describe to
what extent they are familiar with the
nonprofit applicant and indicate their
support and understanding of the
nonprofit organization’s application.
Letters must include contact
information and the name and title of
the person authorized to sign for the
organization and should, whenever
possible, be on letterhead. If RA
letterhead is not available, the letter
may be submitted on PHA letterhead.
(5) All nonprofit applicants that do
not provide letters of support from
resident associations must provide a
PO 00000
Frm 00199
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11631
letter(s) of support from PHAs or tribes/
TDHEs with jurisdiction over the
developments the applicant proposes to
serve. Letters from PHAs or tribes/
TDHEs must describe the extent to
which the nonprofit applicant is
familiar with the needs of the
community to be served, which
programs the nonprofit applicant has
operated or managed in the community
that are similar to the applicant’s
proposal, and whether the nonprofit
organization has the capacity to
implement its proposed program.
Letters from PHAs or tribes/TDHEs must
also list the names of the developments
to be served, the number of occupied
conventional family or elderly/disabled
public housing units (depending on the
grant category) in those developments,
certify that the units are conventional
public housing, and identify the ROSS
grant category to which the nonprofit
organization is applying. PHA or tribe/
TDHE letters of support must be signed
by the Executive Director, tribal leader,
or authorized designee and must be on
PHA or tribe/TDHE letterhead. Please
see the General Section for instructions
for submitting the required letters with
your electronic application.
(6) Applications from nonprofit
organizations, which do not submit the
information requested in this section
will fail this threshold requirement and
will not be considered for funding.
e. Nonprofit status. All nonprofit
applicants must submit their IRS
determination letter to prove their
nonprofit (e.g., 501(c)(3)) status.
Applicants that fail to submit this letter
will fail this threshold requirement and
will not be considered for funding.
Please see the General Section for
instructions for submitting the required
documentation with your electronic
application.
f. Minimum Score for All Fundable
Applications. Applications that pass all
threshold requirements and go through
the ranking and rating process must
receive a minimum score of 75 in order
to be considered for funding.
g. General Section Thresholds. All
applicants will be subject to all
Threshold requirements listed in the
General Section.
h. The Dun and Bradstreet Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) Number
Requirement. Refer to the General
Section for information regarding the
DUNS requirement. You will need to
obtain a DUNS number to receive an
award from HUD.
3. Program Requirements
a. Contract Administrator. The
contract administrator must assure that
the financial management system and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11632
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
procurement procedures that will be in
place during the grant term will fully
comply with either 24 CFR part 84 or
85, as appropriate. Contract
administrators are expressly forbidden
from accessing HUD’s Line of Credit
Control System (LOCCS) and submitting
vouchers on behalf of grantees. Contract
administrators must also assist grantees
to meet HUD’s reporting requirements.
Contract administrators may be: local
housing agencies; community-based
organizations such as community
development corporations (CDCs),
churches, temples, synagogues,
mosques; nonprofit organizations; state/
regional associations and organizations.
Troubled PHAs are not eligible to be
contract administrators. Grant writers
who assist applicants prepare their
applications are also ineligible to be
contract administrators. Organizations
that the applicant proposes to use as the
contract administrator must not violate
or be in violation of other conflicts of
interest as defined in 24 CFR part 84
and 24 CFR part 85.
b. Requirements Applicable to All
Applicants. All applicants, lead and
non-lead, should refer to ‘‘Other
Requirements and Procedures
Applicable to All Programs’’ of the
General Section for requirements
pertaining specifically to procurement
of recovered materials and for
information regarding other
requirements to which they may be
subject.
4. Number of Applications Permitted.
Applicants may desire to provide a
broad range of services supported by
grants from a number of ROSS funding
categories. Applicants may submit more
than one application only based on the
criteria below:
a. General. Applicants may submit up
to one application for each ROSS
funding category (i.e., one application
for ROSS–Elderly/Persons with
Disabilities, one application for ROSSFamily-Homeownership, etc.), except in
the case of nonprofits. Nonprofit
organizations may submit more than
one application per ROSS funding
category provided they will be serving
residents of distinct PHAs or Tribes/
TDHEs.
b. More than one application per
development. Only one application per
funding category will be funded for a
particular development. For example, if
multiple applicants apply for ROSSFamily-Homeownership for the same
development, only the highest scoring
application will be considered for
award. If multiple applicants are
interested in providing services to a
development and the services are
funded under the same ROSS funding
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
category, the applicants should work
together to submit one application on
behalf of the development.
c. Joint applications. Two or more
applicants may join together to submit
a joint application for proposed grant
activities. However, joint applications
must designate a lead applicant. In
addition, the lead applicant must be
registered with Grants.gov and submit
the application using the Grants.gov
portal. Lead applicants are subject to all
threshold requirements. Non-lead
applicants are subject to the following
threshold requirements as applicable:
(1) Letter(s) of support for nonprofit
applicants;
(2) Evidence of nonprofit status as
outlined under the section covering
threshold requirements; and
(3) Threshold requirements outlined
in Section III.C. of the General Section.
Joint applications may include PHAs,
RAs, Tribes/TDHEs, and nonprofit
organizations on behalf of resident
organizations. Joint applications
involving nonprofit organizations must
also provide evidence of resident
support or support from local civic
organizations or from units of local
government. PHAs, tribes/TDHEs, and
resident organizations that are part of a
joint application may not also submit
separate applications as sole applicants
under this NOFA.
Note: Joint applicants may combine their
eligible units to determine the maximum
funding amount the applicants are eligible to
receive. Please enter the total number of
eligible units on the ROSS fact sheet.
5. Eligible Participants. All ROSS
Family and Homeownership program
participants must be residents of
conventional public housing or
NAHASDA-assisted housing.
Participants in the Public Housing
Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) program
(non-Housing Choice Voucher FSS
Program) are also eligible to participate
in activities funded under ROSS.
6. Eligible Developments. Only
conventional Public and Indian housing
developments and NAHASDA-assisted
developments may be served by ROSS
grant funds. Other housing/
developments, including, but not
limited to private housing, federally
insured housing, federally subsidized,
or assisted (i.e., assisted under Section
8, Section 202, Section 811, Section
236), and others are not eligible to
participate in ROSS.
7. Energy Star. HUD has adopted a
wide-ranging energy action plan for
improving energy efficiency in all
program areas. As a first step toward
implementing the energy plan, HUD, the
Environmental Protection Agency
PO 00000
Frm 00200
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(EPA), and the Department of Energy
(DoE) have signed a joint partnership to
promote energy efficiency in HUD’s
affordable housing efforts and programs.
The purpose of the Energy Star
partnership is to promote energy
efficiency of the affordable housing
stock and to help protect the
environment. Applicants providing
housing assistance or counseling
services are encouraged to promote
Energy Star materials and practices, as
well as buildings constructed to Energy
Star standards, to both homebuyers and
renters. Program activities can include
developing Energy Star promotional and
information materials, outreach to lowand moderate-income renters and
buyers on the benefits and savings when
using Energy Star products and
appliances, and promoting the
designation of community buildings and
homes as Energy Star compliant. For
further information about Energy Star,
see https://www.energystar.gov or call
888–STAR–YES (888–782–7937) or, for
the hearing-impaired, 888–588–9920
(TTY).
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Address to Request an Application
Package. Copies of the published
NOFAs and application forms for HUD
programs announced through NOFAs
may be downloaded from the grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp; if you
have difficulty accessing the
information, you may receive customer
support from Grants.gov by calling its
Support Desk at (800) 518-GRANTS, or
by sending an e-mail to
support@grants.gov. You may request
general information from the NOFA
Information Center (800–HUD–8929)
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 6:30
p.m. (Eastern Time) Monday through
Friday, except on federal holidays.
When requesting information, please
refer to the name of the program you are
interested in. The NOFA Information
Center opens for business
simultaneously with the publication of
the SuperNOFA.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Application Format Information for
All Applicants. Applicants should make
sure to include all requested
information, according to the
instructions found in this NOFA and,
where applicable, in the General
Section. This will help ensure a fair and
accurate review of your application.
2. Content and Format for
Submission.
a. Content of Application.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Applicants must write narrative
responses to each of the rating factors,
that appear after this section. Applicants
will be evaluated on whether their
responses demonstrate that they have
the necessary capacity to successfully
manage the proposed program.
Applicants should ensure that their
narratives are written clearly and
concisely so that HUD reviewers, who
may not be familiar with the ROSS
program, may fully understand their
proposal.
b. Format of Application
(1) Applications may not exceed 40
narrative pages. Narrative pages must be
typed, double-spaced, numbered, be in
Times New Roman, 12-point font, and
have one-inch margins and font size 12.
Supporting documentation, required
forms, and certifications will not be
counted toward the 40 narrative page
limit. However, applicants should make
every effort to submit only what is
necessary in terms of supporting
documentation. Please see the General
Section for instructions on how to
submit supporting documentation with
your electronic application.
(2) A checklist is provided here to
ensure applicants submit all required
forms and information. (Note:
Applicants who receive a waiver to
submit paper applications must submit
their applications in a three-ring binder,
with TABS dividing the sections as
indicated below. When submitting
electronically, you do not need to
submit these in TABS. Be sure to name
each attachment clearly.) Copies of the
forms may be downloaded with the
application package and instructions
from https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. You must use the
forms that are included with the 2007
application so as to avoid using
outdated forms that may be on
HUDCLIPS or found from another
source. Please include a header in your
narrative pages and any other additional
pages that includes the applicant names
and the requirement being responded to.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
TAB 1: Required Forms From the
General Section and Other ROSS Forms:
1. Acknowledgement of Application
Receipt (HUD–2993), for paper
application submissions only (you must
have an approved waiver to submit a
paper application);
2. Application for Federal Financial
Assistance (SF–424);
3. SF–424 Supplement, ‘‘Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants’’ (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
4. Questionnaire for HUD’s Initiative
on Removal of Regulatory Barriers
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(HUD–27300) (‘‘HUD Communities
Initiative Form’’ on Grants.gov);
5. ROSS Fact Sheet (HUD–52751);
6. HUD–424–CB, ‘‘Grant Application
Detailed Budget’’ (‘‘HUD Detailed
Budget Form’’ on Grants.gov);
7. Grant Application Detailed Budget
Worksheet (HUD–424–CBW)—please
remember to include a separate HUD–
424–CBW for any sub-contract of 10%
or more of federal funds;
8. HUD–2880, ‘‘Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report’’ (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
9. Certification of Consistency with
RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan (HUD–2990)
if applicable;
10. Certification of Consistency with
the Consolidated Plan (HUD–2991) (for
all applicants except for tribes/TDHEs
and non-profits serving tribes/TDHEs);
11. Certification of Consistency with
the Indian Housing Plan (HUD–52752)
(for tribes/TDHEs and non-profits
serving tribes/TDHEs);
12. Certification of Resident Council
Board of Election (HUD–52753) (for RA
applicants and non-profit applicants
being supported by one or more RAs);
13. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
(SF–LLL), if applicable;
14. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Continuation Sheet (SF–LLL–A), if
applicable;
15. You Are Our Client Grant
Applicant Survey (HUD–2994–A)
(Optional);
16. HUD–96011, ‘‘Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal’’
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov) (For use with electronic
applications as the cover sheet to
provide third party documentation);
17. Code of Conduct per General
Section Instructions; and
18. Statement on Affirmatively
Furthering Fair Housing per General
Section Instructions.
11633
organizations, resident associations, and
PHAS-troubled PHAs) (HUD–52755).
TAB 3: Narrative for Rating Factor 1 and
ROSS Program Forms
1. Narrative;
2. Chart A: Program Staffing (HUD–
52756);
3. Chart B: Applicant/Administrator
Track Record (HUD–52757);
4. Resumes/Position Descriptions;
5. Statement attesting to Housing
Choice Voucher Homeownership
program, Section 32 or other program, if
proposing activities in Category 5.
TAB 4: Narrative for Rating Factor 2
TAB 5: Rating Factor 3
1. Narrative;
2. Work plan (see relevant sample
ROSS work plan HUD 52764).
TAB 6: Narrative for Rating Factor 4
TAB 7: Rating Factor 5
1. Narrative;
2. Logic Model (HUD–96010).
C. Submission Dates and Times
1. Deadline Dates. The application
must be received and validated by
Grants.gov no later than 11:59:59 p.m.
eastern time on the deadline date.
Please note that the validation process
may take up to 72 hours. If you submit
a waiver request and it is approved, the
notification of approval of the waiver
request will provide instructions on
where to submit the paper application.
See the General Section and Section F.
below for instructions regarding waivers
to the electronic application submission
requirement. If an applicant receives a
waiver to the electronic application
submission requirement, the application
must be received by the application
deadline date.
D. Intergovernmental Review: Not
applicable.
TAB 2: Threshold Requirements:
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Letters from Partners attesting to
match;
2. Letter from Applicant’s
organization attesting to match (if
applicant is contributing to match);
3. Letter(s) of Support from Resident
Associations/PHAs/tribes/TDHEs
(Threshold requirement for all nonprofit
applicants);
4. Chart of Resident Associations
Participating (required only for
nonprofit applicants) (HUD–52754);
5. IRS nonprofit determination letter
proving 501(c)(3) status (Threshold
requirement for all nonprofit
applicants); and
6. Contract Administrator Partnership
Agreement (required for all nonprofit
1. Reimbursement for Grant
Application Costs. Grantees are
prohibited from using ROSS grant funds
to reimburse any costs incurred in
conjunction with preparation of their
ROSS application.
2. Covered Salaries.
a. Project Coordinator. All applicants
may propose to hire a qualified project
coordinator to run the program. The
ROSS Family and Homeownership
program will fund up to $68,000 in
combined annual salary and fringe
benefits for a full-time project
coordinator. Applicants may propose a
part-time coordinator at a lesser salary.
For audit purposes, applicants must
have documentation on file
PO 00000
Frm 00201
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11634
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
demonstrating that the salary and fringe
benefits of the project coordinator are
comparable to similar professions in
their local area.
b. Resident Salaries. No more than 5
percent of ROSS Family and
Homeownership funds may be used to
pay for resident salaries. This does not
apply to contracting with residentowned businesses.
c. Types of Salaries. ROSS Family and
Homeownership funds may only be
used for the types of salaries described
in this section according to the
restrictions described. Nonadministrative ROSS funds may only be
used to pay for salaries of staff that
provide direct services to residents.
Direct services staff, for purposes of this
NOFA, are defined as applicant
personnel or subcontractors who, as
their primary responsibility, provide
services directly to residents that
participate in the activities described in
this application e.g., housing and credit
counselors, case managers, job trainers,
and childcare providers, among other
positions. Clerical, legal, finance,
supervisory, executive and all other
non-direct services staff may be paid for
activities related to the grant, but subject
to the 10 percent total administrative
costs limit.
3. Administrative Costs. For all
applicants, administrative costs may
include, but are not limited to, purchase
of furniture, office equipment and
supplies, program outreach, printing
and postage, local travel, utilities,
administrative salaries, and lease or
rental of space for program activities
(subject to restrictions on leasing; see
Eligible Activities section of this
NOFA). Administrative costs, including
administrative salaries, must not exceed
10 percent of the total grant amount
requested from HUD. Administrative
costs must adhere to OMB Circular A–
87 or A–122, as appropriate. Please use
HUD–424–CBW to itemize your
administrative costs. All administrative
costs should be delineated and allocated
as direct costs—an indirect cost rate will
not be accepted;
4. Individual Savings Accounts
(ISAs). ROSS Family and
Homeownership funds can be used as
matching funds for ISAs, but no more
than 20 percent of total grant funds may
be used for this purpose.
5. Stipends. No more than $200 of the
grant award may be used per participant
per month for stipends for active
trainees and program participants.
Stipends may only be used to reimburse
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
related to participation in training and
other program-related activities.
Receipts for such expenses must be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
provided by the resident in order to
obtain reimbursement. Stipends are not
considered an administrative expense
and therefore are not subject to the 10
percent limitation on administrative
costs.
6. Funding Requests in Excess of
Maximum Grant Amount. Applicants
that request funding in excess of the
maximum grant amount that they are
eligible to receive will be given
consideration only for the maximum
grant for which they are eligible. If a
grant is awarded, the grantee will work
with the field office or area ONAP to reapportion the grant funds for eligible
activities proposed in the original
application.
7. Ineligible Activities/Costs. Grant
funds may not be used for ineligible
activities. The following are ineligible
activities/costs:
a. Payment of wages and/or salaries to
participants for receiving supportive
services and/or training programs (this
does not include stipends);
b. Purchase, lease, or rental of land;
c. New construction, costs for
construction materials;
d. Rehabilitation or physical
improvements except for minimal
alterations to make the facilities
accessible for a person with disabilities;
e. Vehicle insurance and/or
maintenance;
f. Entertainment costs;
g. Purchasing food;
h. Payment of wages and/or salaries to
doctors, nurses or other staff (including
health aids or companions) in relation
to medical services provided to
residents;
i. Purchase of non-prescription or
prescription medications;
j. Down payment assistance (NOTE:
Participants may use their ISAs for this
purpose);
k. Revolving loan funds;
l. Costs that exceed limits identified
in the NOFA, for the following: Project
Coordinator, resident salaries, ISAs,
stipends, administrative expenses, and
long distance travel;
m. Cost of application preparation;
n. Scholarships for degree programs;
o. purchase of space
8. ROSS funds cannot be used to hire
or pay for the services of a Contract
Administrator.
9. Other Budgetary Restrictions. Some
long-distance travel may be necessary
during the term of the grant in order for
professional grant staff to attend training
conferences related to program purposes
or activities. Long distance travel costs
for grant program staff may not exceed
$5,000 for the life of the grant and must
receive prior approval from the grantee’s
local HUD field office or area ONAP.
PO 00000
Frm 00202
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. All applicants are required to
submit their applications electronically
via Grants.gov unless they request and
are approved by HUD for a waiver of
that requirement. Please refer to the
General Section for information on how
to submit your application and all
attachments electronically via
Grants.gov.
2. Proof of Timely Submission. Please
see the General Section for this
information. Applicants that fail to meet
the deadline for application receipt will
not receive funding consideration.
3. For Waiver Recipients Only.
Applicants should submit their waiver
requests in writing using mail. Waiver
requests must be postmarked no later
than 15 days prior to the application
deadline date and should be sent to
Anice Schervish, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 3236, Washington, DC
20410. Applicants who have received
waivers to submit paper applications
(see the General Section for more
information) must submit their
applications to: HUD Grants
Management Center, Mail Stop: ROSS
Family and Homeownership, 501
School Street, SW., 8th floor,
Washington DC 20024.
4. Number of Copies. Only applicants
receiving a waiver to the electronic
submission requirement may submit a
paper copy application. When the
waiver request is approved, the
applicant will be provided information
on how many copies are needed and
where to submit the copies. All paper
applications must be received by the
deadline date. Any paper applications
submitted without an approved waiver
will be considered ineligible.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Factors for Award Used to Evaluate
and Rate Applications to the ROSS
program. The factors for rating and
ranking applicants and maximum points
for each factor are provided below. The
maximum number of points available
for this program is 102. This includes
two RC/EZ/EC–II bonus points. The
SuperNOFA contains a certification that
must be completed in order for the
applicant to be considered for the RC/
EZ/EC–II bonus points. A listing of
federally designated RCs, EZs, and EC–
IIs is available at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The
agency certifying to RC/EZ/EC–II status
must be contained in the listing of RC/
EZ/EC–II organizations on HUD’s Web
site.
Note: Applicants should carefully review
each rating factor before writing a response.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Applicants’ narratives should be as
descriptive as possible, ensuring that every
requested item is addressed. Applicants
should make sure their narratives thoroughly
address the Rating Factors below. Applicants
should include all requested information,
according to the instructions found in this
NOFA. This will help ensure a fair and
accurate application review.
a. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (up to 25 Points).
This factor addresses whether the
applicant has the organizational
capacity and resources necessary to
successfully implement the proposed
activities within the grant period. In
rating this factor, HUD will consider the
extent to which the proposal
demonstrates that the applicant will
have qualified and experienced staff
dedicated to administering the program.
(1) Proposed Program Staffing (up to
7 Points).
(a) Staff Experience (up to 4 Points).
The knowledge and experience of the
proposed project coordinator, staff, and
partners in planning and managing
programs for which funding is being
requested. Experience will be judged in
terms of recent, relevant, and successful
experience of proposed staff to
undertake eligible program activities. In
rating this factor, HUD will consider
experience within the last 5 years to be
recent, experience pertaining to the
specific activities being proposed to be
relevant, and experience producing
specific accomplishments to be
successful. The more recent the
experience and the more experience
proposed staff members who work on
the project have in successfully
conducting and completing similar
activities, the greater the number of
points applicants will receive for this
rating factor. The following information
should be provided in order to provide
HUD with an understanding of your
proposed staff’s experience and
capacity:
(i) The number of staff years (one staff
year = 2080 hours) to be allocated to the
proposed program by each employee or
expert as well as each of their roles in
the program;
(ii) The staff’s relevant educational
background and/or work experience;
and
(iii) Relevant and successful
experience running programs whose
activities are similar to the eligible
program activities described in the grant
application.
An applicant will receive up to 4
points if the applicant provided the
requested materials in sufficient detail
to demonstrate an experienced and
well-coordinated proposed staff.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Documentation indicates that the
project coordinator and proposed staff
have recent (experience within the last
5 years), relevant (pertaining to the
specific or similar activities being
proposed), and successful (experience
producing specific results) experience
in conducting and completing similar
activities.
(b) Organizational Capacity (up to 3
Points). Applicants will be evaluated
based on whether they or their partners
have sufficient qualified personnel to
deliver the proposed activities in a
timely and effective fashion. In order to
enhance or supplement capacity,
applicants should provide evidence of
partnerships with nonprofit
organizations or other organizations that
have experience providing supportive
services to typically underserved
populations. Provide resumes and
position descriptions (where staff is not
yet hired) for all key personnel.
(Resumes/position descriptions and
other HUD forms do not count toward
the page limit.) An applicant will
receive up to 3 points if the applicant
provided a description of its ability (inhouse or with partners) to implement
the proposed program and attached
resumes and position descriptions
(where staff is not yet hired) for all key
personnel. Reviewers may also consult
HUD–52756.
(2) Past Performance of Applicant/
Contract Administrator (up to 6 Points).
(a) Applicants’ past experience may
include, but is not limited to, running
and managing programs aimed at
assisting residents of low-income
housing to achieve housing and
economic self-sufficiency.
(b) Applicants must indicate past
grants they received and managed, the
grant amounts, and grant terms (years)
of the grants, which are counted toward
past experience.
(c) Applicants’ narratives must
describe how they (or their Contract
Administrator) successfully
implemented past grant programs
designed to promote resident selfsufficiency, moving from welfare to
work, and/or helping residents move to
market-rate rental housing or
homeownership.
(d) Applicants will be evaluated
according to the following criteria:
(i) Achievement of specific
measurable outcomes and objectives in
terms of benefits gained by participating
residents. Applicants should describe
results their programs have obtained,
such as reduced welfare dependency,
higher incomes, higher rates of
employment, increased savings, moving
from subsidized housing to market rate
rental housing; and for Category 5, the
PO 00000
Frm 00203
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11635
number of families in homeownership
counseling pipeline, and the rates of
homeownership achieved through
training programs;
(ii) Description of success in attracting
and keeping residents involved in past
grant-funded training programs. HUD
wants to see that applicants’ grantfunded programs benefited a significant
numbers of residents;
(iii) Description of timely and
accurate expenditure of program
funding throughout the term of past
grants. This means regular (i.e.,
quarterly) and accurate drawdowns
throughout the life of the grant, with all
funds expended by the end of the grant
term;
(iv) Description of past leveraging.
Applicants must describe how they
have created leveraging partnerships for
funding or in-kind services for previous
projects, the extent of the leveraging
partnership, and how leveraging and
partnerships benefited program
participants.
Past experience may include, but is
not limited to, running and managing
programs aimed at assisting residents of
low-income housing to achieve
economic self-sufficiency. Reviewers
may consult the narrative and/or the
HUD–52757. The applicant will receive
up to 6 points if the following is shown:
• achievement of specific measurable
outcomes and objectives in terms of
benefits gained by participating
residents;
• a description of success in
attracting and keeping residents
involved in past grant-funded training
programs, and documentation that
shows that the grant activities benefited
a significant number of residents;
• a description of timely expenditure
of program funding throughout the term
of past grants. Timely means regular
draw-downs throughout the life of the
grant, i.e., quarterly draw-downs, with
all funds expended by the end of the
grant term;
• a description of how the applicant
has leveraged funding or in-kind
services beyond amounts that were
originally proposed for past projects. In
addition to addressing items 1–4 above,
the application must also: indicate past
grants received, the grant amounts, and
grant terms (years) of the grants, which
are being counting toward past
experience; AND
• describe how the applicant (or their
Contract Coordinator Administrator, if
applicable) successfully implemented
past grant programs designed to
promote self-sufficiency, moving from
welfare to work, and/or helping
residents move to market rate rental
housing.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11636
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
An applicant will receive up to 4
points if the applicant sufficiently
addressed at least 3 of the 4 items of
review criteria listed above. An
applicant will receive up to 2 points if
the applicant sufficiently addressed at
least 2 of the 4 items of review criteria
listed above. An applicant will receive
0 points if the applicant only addressed
one or did not address any of items 1
through 4.
(3) Program Administration and
Fiscal Management (up to 12 Points).
Applicants should describe how they
will manage the program; how HUD can
be sure that there is program
accountability; and provide a
description of proposed staff’s roles and
responsibilities. Applicants should also
describe how grant staff and partners
will report to the project coordinator
and other senior staff. Applicants
should also include the following:
(a) A complete description of their
fiscal management structure, including
fiscal controls currently in place
including those of a Contract
Administrator for applicants required to
have a Contract Administrator (i.e.,
PHAS troubled PHAs, resident
associations, and nonprofit applicants);
(b) Applicants must list any audit
findings or material weaknesses in the
past five years (HUD Inspector General,
management review, fiscal, etc.), and
what has been done to address them;
An applicant will receive up to 12
Points if the applicant provided a
comprehensive narrative description of
(i) the project management structure and
program accountability, including the
use of a contract administrator, if
applicable; the narrative (ii) describes
staff’s roles and responsibilities and (iii)
details how staff and partners will
report to the project coordinator and
other senior staff, as well as (iv) the
lines of accountability among all
components of the proposed program;
and (v) if applicable, a list of any audit
findings in the past 5 years (HUD IG,
management review, fiscal, etc.),
material weaknesses and what the
applicant has done to address them. An
applicant will receive up to 9 points if
the applicant has fully addressed three
of (i) through (iv). An applicant will
receive up to 6 points if the applicant
has fully addressed two of (i) through
(iv). An applicant will receive up to 3
points if the applicant has fully
addressed one of (i) through (iv). If an
applicant provides audit findings or
material weaknesses but does not
provide what the applicant has done to
address them, the applicant will lose
two points. An applicant will receive 0
points if all of (i) through (v) are not
addressed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
b. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (up to 14 Points).
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need for funding the
proposed program. In responding to this
factor, applicants will be evaluated on
the extent to which they describe and
document the level of need for their
proposed activities and the urgency for
meeting the need.
In responding to this factor,
applicants must include:
(1) Socioeconomic Profile (up to 6
points). A thorough socioeconomic
profile of the eligible residents to be
served by the program, including
education levels, income levels, and
other socio-economic statistics for the
local area pertinent to the proposed
program, etc. Applicants may either
provide data for the local area and show
that the residents reflect the local area
or may provide resident-specific data.
An applicant will receive up to 6
points if the applicant provided a
thorough socioeconomic profile of the
eligible residents to be served by the
program, including education levels,
income levels, and other pertinent
socio-economic data for the local area.
An applicant will receive up to 3 points
if the applicant provided a basic
socioeconomic profile of the area, but
did not show that the residents to be
served reflect that profile. An applicant
will receive 0 Points if the applicant
failed to provide the socioeconomic data
on the community and/or profiles of the
eligible residents.
(2) Demonstrated Link Between
Proposed Activities and Local Need (up
to 8 points). Applicants’ narratives must
demonstrate a clear relationship
between proposed activities, community
needs, and the purpose of the program
funding in order for points to be
awarded for this factor.
An applicant will receive up to 8
points if the applicant narrative
demonstrates a strong, clear relationship
between the proposed activities,
community needs and the purpose of
the program funding. An applicant will
receive up to 4 points if the applicant
narrative demonstrates a tenuous
relationship between the proposed
activities, needs, and the purpose of
program funding. An applicant will
receive 0 points if the applicant failed
to demonstrate a clear relationship
between the proposed activities,
community needs and the purpose of
the program funding.
c. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (up to 34 Points).
This factor addresses both the quality
and cost-effectiveness of applicants’
proposed work plan. The narrative and
work plan must indicate a clear
PO 00000
Frm 00204
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
relationship between proposed activities
and intended outcomes, the targeted
population’s needs, and the purpose of
the program funding. Applicants’
proposed activities must address HUD’s
policy priorities outlined in this Rating
Factor.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider:
(1) Quality of the Work Plan (up to 22
points). This factor evaluates both the
applicant’s work plan and budget,
which will be evaluated based on the
following criteria:
(a) Specific Services and/or Activities
(up to 12 points). Applicants’ narratives
must describe the specific services,
course curricula, and activities they
plan to offer and who will be
responsible for each. In addition to the
narrative, applicants must also provide
a work plan, which must list the
specific services, activities, and
outcomes they expect. The proposed
program narrative and work plan must
show a logical order of activities and
progress and must tie to the outcomes
and outputs applicants identify in the
Logic Model (see Rating Factor 5).
Please see a sample work plan in the
Appendix. Applicants’ narratives must
explain how their proposed activities
will:
(i) Involve community partners in the
delivery of services (4 points);
An applicant will receive up to 4
points if the applicant narrative
describes the involvement of partner
organizations to deliver or support their
proposed programs. An applicant will
receive up to 2 points if the applicant
narrative describes the existence of
other community-based organizations in
the area, but does not describe firm
connections between program activities
and the delivery or support of the
proposed program. An applicant will
receive 0 points if the applicant does
not intend to involve any community
partners in the delivery or support of
their proposed program.
(ii) Offer comprehensive services
(versus a small range of services) geared
toward achieving the following (6
points):
—Enhancing economic opportunities for
residents leading to economic selfsufficiency and homeownership or
other housing self-sufficiency;
An applicant will receive up to 6
points if the applicant narrative
describes the specific services, course
curricula, and activities they plan to
offer and who will be responsible for
each; the narrative shows that the
proposed program involves a
comprehensive range of services and
activities that are intended to move
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
participants along a continuum towards
economic self-sufficiency; and the
narrative shows a logical order and
progress and outcomes are identified.
An applicant will receive up to 3 points
if the applicant fully describes the
proposed program, but the program does
not address a spectrum of activities. An
applicant will receive 0 points if the
applicant failed to provide sufficient
information to determine if the
proposed program will contain a
continuum of services, no logical order
is described and no outcomes are
identified.
(b) Feasibility and Demonstrable
Benefits (up to 5 points). This factor
examines whether applicants’ work
plans are logical, feasible and likely to
achieve its stated purpose during the
term of the grant. HUD’s intention is to
fund applications that will quickly
produce demonstrable results and
advance the purposes of the ROSS
program.
The work plan should demonstrate
that their projects are ready to be
implemented shortly after the grant
award, but not to exceed three months
following the execution of the grant
agreement. The work plan must indicate
time frames and deadlines for
accomplishing major activities.
An applicant will receive up to 5
points if the work plan and supporting
narrative are logical, feasible, and
demonstrate that the proposed project is
ready for implementation within three
months of execution of the grant
agreement. The work plan also indicates
timeframes and deadlines for
accomplishing major activities and how
well the proposed activities address the
needs described in Rating Factor 2. The
applicant will receive up to 3 points if
the work plan and supporting narrative
are logical and feasible, but do not
demonstrate that the project is ready for
implementation within 3 months of
grant agreement execution. An applicant
will receive 0 points if the applicant
failed to provide the information to
determine that the project is logical and
feasible or whether the project would be
ready for implementation within three
months of execution of the grant
agreement.
(c) Budget Appropriateness/Efficient
Use of Grant (up to 5 Points). The score
in this factor will be based on the
following:
(i) Justification of expenses.
Applicants will be evaluated based on
whether their expenses are reasonable
and thoroughly explained, and support
the objectives of their proposal.
(ii) Budget Efficiency. Applicants will
be evaluated based on whether their
application requests funds
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
commensurate with the level of effort
necessary to accomplish their goals and
anticipated results.
(iii) Please note that the budget form
HUD–424 CBW requires that a separate
424–CBW form be submitted for each
sub-contract of 10% or more of the
requested grant amount. If an
application proposes to sub-contract
10% or more of the requested grant
amount and does not include a separate
424–CBW for each 10 percent or more
sub-contract, all points for Budget
Appropriateness/Efficient Use of Grant
will be lost (5 points). If 424–CBWs for
sub-contracts for 50 percent or more of
the requested grant amount are not
included, the application will lose 10
points.
An applicant will receive up to 5
Points if expenses are reasonable,
thoroughly explained, support the
objectives of the proposal and are
commensurate with the level of effort
necessary to accomplish the goal. An
applicant will receive up to 3 points if
the expenses somewhat support the
objectives of the proposal or only
somewhat commensurate with the level
of effort necessary to accomplish the
goals. An applicant will receive 0 points
if expenses are not reasonable and/or
the requested funds are not
commensurate with the goals and
anticipated results of the proposed
program.
(d) Ineligible Activities. Two points
will be deducted for each type of
ineligible activity proposed in the
application, as identified in Section
IV(E). For example, you will lose 2
points if you propose costs that exceed
the limits identified in the NOFA for a
Project Coordinator.
(2) Addressing HUD’s Policy Priorities
(up to 10 points). HUD wants to
improve the quality of life for those
living in distressed communities. HUD’s
grant programs are a vehicle through
which long-term, positive change can be
achieved at the community level.
Applicants’ narratives and work plans
will be evaluated based on how well
they meet the following HUD policy
priorities:
(i) Improving the Quality of Life in
Our Nation’s Communities (up to 2
points). In order to receive points in this
category, applicants’ narrative and/or
work plan must indicate the types of
activities, service, and training programs
applicants will offer which can help
residents successfully transition from
welfare to work and earn higher wages.
An applicant will receive up to 4
points if the work plan and supporting
narrative indicate the types of activities,
services and training programs that will
be offered to help residents successfully
PO 00000
Frm 00205
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11637
move along the spectrum of selfsufficiency. An applicant will receive 0
points if the application did not provide
sufficient information to determine
whether the types of activities, services
and training programs that will be
offered will help residents successfully
transition from welfare to work and earn
higher wages.
(ii) Providing Increased
Homeownership and Rental
Opportunities for Low- and ModerateIncome Persons, Persons with
Disabilities, the Elderly, Minorities, and
Families with Limited English
Proficiency (NOTE: Only applicants
proposing Category 5-Homeownership
activities are eligible for these points.)
(up to 2 points). In order to receive
points in this category, applicants’
narratives and/or work plans must
indicate the types of activities and
training programs they will offer which
can help residents successfully
transition to homeownership.
Applicants that indicate that they have
existing linkages to an existing
homeownership program (such as, for
PHAs, Housing Choice VoucherHomeownership, Section 32, or
homeownership programs and resources
offered by other organizations or state or
local homeownership programs or for
Tribes/TDHEs, programs such as the
Mutual Help Homeownership
Opportunity Program, the Section 184
Program, and homeownership programs
developed under the Indian Housing
Block Grant Program such as mortgage
assistance, must provide a specific
statement attesting to these linkages and
indicating the minimum number of
homeownership opportunities (e.g,. the
number of HCV-Homeownership
vouchers or number of homes in the
Section 32 program that will be
dedicated to ROSS participants) that
will be provided annually to residents
successfully completing the
requirements of the programs funded by
this NOFA.
An applicant will receive 2 points if
the application indicates the applicant
has existing linkages to an existing
homeownership program such as HCVHomeownership, Section 32, Mutual
Help Homeownership Opportunity
Program, SHOP, Section 184, IHBG or
other state or local homeownership (not
just homeownership training) programs
AND provides a specific statement
indicating the minimum number of
homeownership opportunities that will
be provided annually. An applicant will
receive 0 points if the applicant does
not provide a specific statement
indicating the minimum number of
homeownership opportunities that will
be provided annually OR does not
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11638
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
describe its existing linkages to existing
homeownership programs.
(iii) Providing Full and Equal Access
to Grassroots Faith-Based and Other
Community-Based Organizations in
HUD Program Implementation (up to 4
points). HUD encourages applicants to
partner with grassroots organizations,
e.g., civic organizations, grassroots faithbased and other community-based
organizations that are not usually
effectively utilized. These grassroots
organizations have a strong history of
providing vital community services
such as developing first-time
homeownership programs, creating
economic development programs, and
providing job training and other
supportive services. In order to receive
points under this factor, applicants’
narratives and/or work plans must
describe how applicants will work with
these organizations and what types of
services they will provide.
An applicant will receive up to 4
points if the applicant’s narrative and
work plan clearly name the grassroots
organizations with whom they will be
working, describe what types of services
will be provided by those organizations,
and describe how these partnerships
will contribute to the achievement of
the goals and proposed outcomes for the
program. An applicant will receive up
to 2 points if the applicant indicates that
it will work with grassroots
organizations, but does not indicate the
types of services that will be provided
by these organizations. An applicant
will receive 0 points if neither the work
plan or narrative provide a description
of how the applicant will work with
grassroots organizations (civic
organizations, faith-based and/or other
community-based organizations), and
the types of services that will be
provided.
(iv) Policy Priority for Increasing the
Supply of Affordable Housing Through
the Removal of Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing (up to 2 points).
Under this policy priority, higher
rating points are available to: (1)
Governmental applicants that are able to
demonstrate successful efforts in
removing regulatory barriers to
affordable housing, and (2)
nongovernmental applicants that are
associated with jurisdictions that have
undertaken successful efforts in
removing barriers. For applicants to
obtain the policy priority points for
efforts to successfully remove regulatory
barriers, applicants would have to
complete form HUD 27300,
‘‘Questionnaire for HUD’s Initiative on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers.’’ A copy
of HUD’s Notice entitled America’s
Affordable Communities Initiative,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
HUD’s Initiative on Removal of
Regulatory Barriers: Announcement of
Incentive Criteria on Barrier Removal in
HUD’s 2004 Competitive Funding
Allocations’’ can be found on HUD’s
Web site at https://www.hud.gov/offices/
adm/grants/frregbarrier.pdf. The
information and requirements contained
in HUD’s regulatory barriers policy
priority apply to this FY2006 NOFA. A
description of the policy priority and a
copy of form HUD–27300 can be found
in the application package posted on
www.Grants.gov. Applicants are
encouraged to read the Notice as well as
the General Section to obtain an
understanding of this policy priority
and how it can impact their score. A
limited number of questions expressly
request the applicant to provide brief
documentation with their response.
Other questions require that for each
affirmative statement made, the
applicant must supply a reference, Web
site link, or a brief statement indicating
where the back-up information may be
found, and a point of contact, including
a telephone number and/or email
address. The electronic copy of the HUD
27300 has space to attach required
documentation or identify a URL or
reference. Reference material/
documentation can be scanned and
attached to the form HUD–27300 and
submitted with the application or faxed
to HUD following the facsimile
submission instructions. When
providing documents in support of your
responses to the questions on the form,
please provide the applicant name and
project name and whether you are
responding under column A or B, then
identify the number of the question and
the URL or document name and attach
using the attachment function at the end
of the electronic form.
(3) Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3) (up to 2 Points).
You will receive 2 points if your
application demonstrates that you will
implement Section 3 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968 (12
U.S.C. 1701u) (Economic Opportunities
for Low- and Very Low-Income Persons
in Connection with Assisted Projects)
and its implementing regulations at 24
CFR part 135 in connection with this
grant, if awarded. Information about
Section 3 can be found at HUD’s Section
3 website at https://www.hud.gov/offices/
fheo/section3/section3brochure.cfm.
Your application must describe how
you will implement Section 3 through
the proposed grant activities. You must
state that you will, to the greatest extent
feasible, direct training, employment,
and other economic opportunities to:
PO 00000
Frm 00206
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(a) Low- and very low-income
persons, particularly those who are
recipients of government assistance for
housing, and
(b) Business concerns which provide
economic opportunities to low- and
very low-income persons.
An applicant will receive 2 points if
the applicant describes how it will
implement Section 3 through the
proposed grant activities and states it
they will, to the greatest extent feasible,
direct training, employment, and other
economic opportunities to Section 3
interests (low- and very low-income
persons, particularly those who are
recipients of government assistance for
housing and business concerns which
provide economic opportunities to lowand very low-income persons.) An
applicant will receive 0 points if the
applicant does not describe
implementing Section 3 through
proposed grant activities and does not
state that they will direct training,
employment and other economic
opportunities to Section 3 interests.
d. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging
Resources (up to 10 Points).
This factor addresses the applicant’s
ability to secure community resources
that can be combined with HUD’s grant
resources to achieve program purposes.
Applicants are required to create
partnerships with organizations that can
help achieve their program’s goals.
PHAs are required by section 12(d)(7) of
the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 entitled
‘‘Cooperation Agreements for Economic
Self-Sufficiency Activities’’ to make best
efforts to enter into such agreements
with relevant state or local agencies. In
rating this factor, HUD will look at the
extent to which applicants partner,
coordinate, and leverage their services
with other organizations serving the
same or similar populations.
Applicants must have at least a 25
percent cash or in-kind match. The
match is a threshold requirement. Joint
applicants must together have at least a
25 percent match. Applicants who do
not demonstrate the minimum 25
percent match will fail the threshold
requirement and will not receive further
consideration for funding. Leveraging in
excess of the 25 percent of the grant
amount will receive a higher point
value. In evaluating this factor, HUD
will consider the extent to which
applicants have partnered with other
entities to secure additional resources,
which will increase the effectiveness of
the proposed program activities. Match
proposed to be used for ineligible
activities will not be accepted. The
additional resources and services must
be firmly committed, must support the
proposed grant activities and must, in
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
combined amount (including in-kind
contributions of personnel, space and/or
equipment, and monetary contributions)
equal at least 25 percent of the grant
amount requested in the application.
‘‘Firmly committed’’ means that the
amount of resources and their
dedication to ROSS-funded activities
must be explicit, in writing and signed
by a person authorized to make the
commitment. Please see the section on
Threshold Requirements for more
information.
Points for this factor will be awarded
based on the documented evidence of
partnerships and firm commitments and
the ratio of requested ROSS funds to the
total proposed grant budget.
Points will be assigned based on the
following scale:
Percentage of Match Points Awarded
25 4 points (with partnerships), 2
points (without partnerships);
26–50 6 points (with partnerships),
4 points (without partnerships);
51–75 8 points (with partnerships),
6 points (without partnerships);
76 or above 10 points (with
partnerships), 8 points (without
partnerships).
e. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (up to 17
Points).
(1) An important element in any
supportive service program is the
development and reporting of
performance measures and outcomes.
This factor emphasizes HUD’s
determination to ensure that applicants
develop performance and outcome
measures that are focused on residents’
achieving economic and housing selfsufficiency—reducing and eliminating
dependency on any type of subsidized
housing or welfare assistance.
Additionally, achieving outcomes and
accurate evaluation will assist HUD in
meeting its commitment to federal
requirements for accountability.
Applicants must demonstrate how they
propose to measure their success and
outcomes as they relate to the
Department’s Strategic Plan.
(2) HUD requires ROSS applicants to
develop an effective, quantifiable,
outcome-oriented plan for measuring
performance and determining that goals
have been met. Applicants must use the
Logic Model form HUD–96010 for this
purpose. The narrative describes how
the measurement tools are used to
collect and verify reported data and to
modify the program if goals are not
being met.
(3) Applicants must establish interim
benchmarks, or outputs, for their
proposed program that lead to the
ultimate achievement of outcomes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
‘‘Outputs’’ are the direct products of a
program’s activities. Examples of
outputs are: the number of eligible
families that participate in supportive
services, the number of new services
provided, the number of residents
receiving counseling, or the number of
households using a technology center.
Outputs should produce outcomes for
your program. ‘‘Outcomes’’ are benefits
accruing to the residents, families, and/
or communities during or after
participation in the ROSS program.
Outcomes are not the development or
delivery of services or program activities
but the results of the services delivered
or program activities—the ultimate
results of the program. Applicants must
clearly identify the outcomes to be
achieved and measured. Examples of
outcomes are: increasing
homeownership rates, increasing
residents’ financial stability (e.g.,
increasing assets of a household through
savings), or increasing employment
stability (e.g., whether persons assisted
obtain or retain employment for one or
two years after job training completion).
(4) This rating factor requires that
applicants identify program outputs,
outcomes, and performance indicators
that will allow applicants to measure
their performance. Performance
indicators should be objectively
quantifiable and measure actual
achievements against anticipated
achievements. Applicants’ narratives,
work plans, and Logic Models should
identify what applicants are going to
measure, how they are going to measure
it, and the steps they have in place to
make adjustments to their work plan
and management practices if
performance targets begin to fall short of
established benchmarks and time
frames. Applicants’ proposals must also
show how they will measure the
performance of partners and affiliates.
Applicants must include the standards,
data sources, and measurement methods
they will use to measure performance.
(Applicants will be evaluated based
on how comprehensively they propose
to measure their program’s outcomes.)
Applicant will receive up to 17 points
if the applicant provided a work plan,
narrative and Logic Model that (a)
describes the goals, objectives,
outcomes, and performance
measurements to be achieved over the
term of the program; (b) includes short,
intermediate, and long-term goals; (c)
indicates what will be measured; (d)
indicates how it will be measured; and
(e) shows steps to be taken if
performance targets are not met within
the established timeframes. An
applicant will receive up to 14 points if
the applicant fully addresses four of the
PO 00000
Frm 00207
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11639
five items of review criteria. An
applicant will receive up to 11 points if
the applicant fully addresses three of
the five items of review criteria. An
applicant will receive up to 7 points if
the applicant fully addresses two of the
five items of review criteria. An
applicant will receive up to 4 points if
the applicant fully addresses one of the
five items of review criteria. An
applicant will receive 0 points if the
applicant did not provide the Logic
Model or enough information to
determine the program goals, outcomes
and/or performance measurements.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Review Process. Four types of
reviews will be conducted: a screening
to determine if you are eligible to apply
for funding under the ROSS Family and
Homeownership grant program; whether
your application submission is
complete, on time and meets the
threshold; a review by the field office
(or area ONAP office) to evaluate past
performance; and a technical review to
rate your application based on the five
rating factors provided in this NOFA.
2. Selection Process for All Grant
Categories and All Applicants. Twentyfive percent (25%) of funds will be set
aside for Resident Associations and all
qualifying Resident Association
applications will be funded first, up to
25 percent of the funding amount.
HUD’s selection process is designed to
achieve geographic diversity of grant
awards throughout the country. For
each grant category, HUD will first
select the highest ranked application
from each of the ten federal regions and
ONAP for funding. After this ‘‘round,’’
HUD will select the second highestranked application in each of the 10
federal regions and ONAP for funding
(the second round). HUD will continue
this process with the third, fourth, and
so on, highest ranked applications in
each federal region and ONAP until the
last complete round is selected for
funding. If available funds exist to fund
some but not all eligible applications in
the next round, HUD will make awards
to those remaining applications in rank
order (by score) regardless of region and
ONAP and will fully fund as many as
possible with remaining funds. If
remaining funds in one grant category
are too small to make an award, they
may be transferred to another ROSS
program. If there are remaining funds in
any ROSS program after all qualifying
applications have been awarded, those
funds may be transferred to another
ROSS program.
3. Tie Scores. In the event of a tie
score between two applications that
target the same developments, HUD will
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11640
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
select the application that was received
first.
4. Deficiency Period. Applicants will
have 14 calendar days in which to
provide missing information requested
from HUD. For other information on
correcting deficient applications, please
see the General Section.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. HUD will make announcements of
grant awards after the rating and ranking
process is completed. Grantees will be
notified by letter and will receive
instructions on what steps they must
take in order to access funding and
begin implementing grant activities.
Applicants who are not funded will also
receive letters via U.S. postal mail.
2. Debriefings. All applicants may
request a debriefing. Applicants
requesting to be debriefed must send a
written request to Iredia Hutchinson,
Director, Grants Management Center,
501 School Street, SW., Suite 800,
Washington, DC 20024.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Impact. In
accordance with 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3) or
(a)(9), 58.35(b)(2), (b)(4) or (b)(5),
50.19(b)(3), (b)(9), (b)(12), (b)(14), or
(b)(15), activities under this ROSS
program are categorically excluded from
the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and
are not subject to environmental review
under related laws and authorities.
2. Applicable Requirements. Unless
specifically enumerated in this NOFA,
all applicants (lead and non-lead) are
subject to the requirements specified in
Section III.C. of the General Section.
Grantees are subject to regulations and
other requirements found in:
a. 24 CFR 84 (‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Nonprofit Organizations’’);
b. 24 CFR 85 (‘‘Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State, Local,
and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal
Governments’’);
c. 24 CFR 964 (‘‘Tenant Participation
and Tenant Opportunities in Public
Housing’’);
d. OMB Circular A–87 (‘‘Cost
Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments’’);
e. OMB Circular A–110 (‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Other Agreements with Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals and
Other Non-Profit Organizations’’);
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
f. OMB Circular A–122 (‘‘Cost
Principles for Non-Profit
Organizations’’); and
g. OMB Circular A–133 (‘‘Audits of
States, Local Governments, and NonProfit Organizations’’).
3. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). Applicants and grantees must also
comply with Section 3 of the Housing
and Urban Development Act of 1968, 12
U.S.C. 1701u and ensure that training,
employment, and other economic
opportunities shall, to the greatest
extent feasible, be directed toward lowand very low-income persons,
particularly those who are recipients of
government assistance for housing and
to business concerns that provide
economic opportunities to low- and
very low-income persons.
4. Fair Housing and Civil Rights Laws.
Applicants and their sub-recipients
must comply with all Fair Housing and
Civil Rights laws, statutes, regulations,
and Executive Orders as enumerated in
24 CFR 5.105(a), as applicable. Please
see the General Section for more
information.
C. Reporting
1. Semi-Annual Performance Reports.
Grantees must submit semi-annual
performance reports to the field office or
area ONAP. These progress reports must
include financial reports (SF–269A) and
a Logic Model (HUD–96010) showing
achievements to date against outputs
and outcomes proposed in the
application and approved by HUD. Each
quarterly report must identify any
deviations (positive or negative) from
outputs and outcomes proposed and
approved by HUD, by providing the
information in the reporting TAB of the
approved Logic Model. HUD anticipates
that some of the reporting of financial
status and grant performance will be
through electronic or Internet-based
submissions. Grantees must use
quantifiable data to measure
performance against goals and
objectives outlined in their work plan.
Performance reports are due to the field
office on July 30 and January 31 of each
year. If reports are not received by the
due date, grant funds will be suspended
until reports are received. For FY 2007,
HUD is considering a new concept for
the Logic Model. The new concept is a
Return on Investment (ROI) statement.
HUD will be publishing a separate
notice on the ROI concept.
2. Final Report. All grantees must
submit a final report to their local field
office or area ONAP that will include a
financial report (SF–269A), a final Logic
Model, and a narrative evaluating
overall results achieved against their
PO 00000
Frm 00208
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
work plan. Grantees must use
quantifiable data to measure
performance against goals and
objectives outlined in their work plan.
The final report must also include
responses to the management questions
found in the Logic Model and approved
for your program. The financial report
must contain a summary of all
expenditures made from the beginning
of the grant agreement to the end of the
grant agreement and must include any
unexpended balances. The final Logic
Model and financial report are due to
the field office 90 days after the
termination of the grant agreement.
3. Final Audit. Grantees that expend
$500,000 in federal funds in a given
program or fiscal year are required to
obtain a complete final close-out audit
of the grant’s financial statements by a
Certified Public Accountant (CPA), in
accordance with generally accepted
government audit standards. A written
report of the audit must be forwarded to
HUD within 60 days of issuance. Grant
recipients must comply with the
requirements of 24 CFR 84 or 24 CFR
85, as stated in OMB Circulars A–87, A–
110, and A–122, as applicable.
4. Racial and Ethnic Data. HUD
requires that funded recipients collect
racial and ethnic beneficiary data. HUD
has adopted the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Standards for the
Collection of Racial and Ethnic Data. In
view of these requirements, funded
recipients should use form HUD–27061,
Racial and Ethnic Data Reporting Form.
VII. Agency Contact(s)
For questions and technical
assistance, you may call the Public and
Indian Housing Information and
Resource Center at 800–955–2232. For
persons with hearing or speech
impairments, please call the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
A. Code of Conduct. Please see the
General Section for more information.
B. Transfer of Funds. If transfer of
funds from any of the ROSS programs
does become necessary, HUD will
consider the amount of unfunded
qualified applications in deciding to
which program the extra funds will be
transferred.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2577–0229. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
average 49.5 hours per respondent for
the application. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
PO 00000
Frm 00209
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11641
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00210
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.020
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11642
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Public and Indian Housing Family SelfSufficiency Program Coordinators
Under Resident Opportunities and SelfSufficiency (ROSS) Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Public and Indian Housing,
Office of Public Housing Investments.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Public
and Indian Housing Family SelfSufficiency (PH FSS) Program
Coordinators.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR
5100–N–16; OMB Approval Number is
2577–0229.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 14.877.
F. Application Deadline: The
application deadline date is June 6,
2007. Please see the General Section for
application submission, delivery, and
timely receipt requirements.
G. Additional Overview Content
Information:
1. Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Public Housing FSS (PH FSS)
program is to promote the development
of local strategies to coordinate the use
of assistance under the Public Housing
program with public and private
resources, enable participating families
to increase earned income, reduce or
eliminate the need for welfare
assistance, and make progress toward
achieving economic independence and
housing self-sufficiency. The FSS
program and this FSS NOFA support
the Department’s strategic goals of
helping HUD-assisted renters make
progress toward housing selfsufficiency. The FSS program provides
critical tools that can be used by
communities to support welfare reform
and help families develop new skills
that will lead to economic selfsufficiency. As a result of their
participation in the FSS program, many
families have achieved stable, well-paid
employment, which has made it
possible for them to become
homeowners or move to other nonassisted housing. An FSS program
coordinator assures that program
participants are linked to the supportive
services they need to achieve selfsufficiency.
2. Funding Available: HUD expects to
award a total of approximately
$12,000,000 in FY 2007. This amount
includes $10,000,000 appropriated in
FY 2007 and $2,000,000 in rollover
funds.
3. Award Amounts: Awards will pay
only for the annual salary and fringe
benefits of PH FSS Coordinators. Award
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
amounts will be based on locality pay
rates for similar professions. Each new
or renewal position amount will not
exceed $65,500.
4. Eligible Applicants: Eligible
applicants are Public Housing
Authorities (PHAs) and tribes/Tribally
Designated Housing Entities (TDHEs)
that administer PH FSS programs. All
applicants must have an approved PH
FSS Action Plan on file with their local
HUD field office or Area Office of Native
American Programs (ONAP) prior to this
NOFA’s application deadline. Nonprofit organizations and resident
associations are not eligible to apply for
funding under this program.
5. Cost Sharing/Match Requirement:
There is no match requirement under
this funding program.
6. Grant Term: The grant term is one
year from the execution date of the grant
agreement.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Authority and Program
Description. The Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007)
allows funding for program coordinators
under the Resident Opportunity & SelfSufficiency program. Through annual
NOFAs, HUD has provided funding to
public housing agencies (PHAs) or
tribes/TDHEs that are operating PH FSS
programs to enable those applicants to
employ program coordinators to support
their PH FSS programs. In FY 2007 PH
FSS Program Coordinator NOFA, HUD
is again making funding available to
PHAs/Tribes/TDHEs to employ PH FSS
program coordinators for one year. HUD
will accept applications from both new
and renewal applicants that have HUD
approval to administer a PH FSS
program. PHA/Tribe/TDHEs funded
under the ROSS PH FSS NOFA in FY
2005 or 2006 are considered ‘‘renewal’’
applicants in this NOFA. These renewal
applicants are invited to apply for funds
to continue previously funded PH FSS
program coordinator positions. Funding
priority will be given to renewals for
applicants that have achieved a ‘‘High
Performer’’ status on their most recent
Public Housing Assessment System
(PHAS) review and tribes/THDEs that
have been determined eligible as a
renewal applicant (PHAS score
requirement is not applicable to tribes/
THDEs). Second priority will be given to
standard performer renewal applicants.
Third priority will be given to troubled
performer renewal applicants and fourth
priority will be given to new applicants.
There will be no funding for expanding
PO 00000
Frm 00211
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11643
the number of coordinator positions in
an existing program.
The maximum number of positions
that a new applicant, including new
joint applicants, may receive is one fulltime FSS program coordinator.
Applicants must administer the FSS
program in accordance with HUD
regulations and requirements in 24 CFR
Part 984, which govern the PH FSS
program and must comply with the
existing Public Housing program
requirements, notices, and guidebooks.
This includes using a Program
Coordinating Committee (PCC) to secure
the necessary resources to implement
the FSS Program. See 24 CFR 984.202
for more information.
B. Number of Positions for Which
Eligible Applicants May Apply. Eligible
applicants may apply for funding for PH
FSS program coordinator positions
under this NOFA as follows:
1. Renewal Applicants. Applicants
that qualify as eligible renewal
applicants under this NOFA may apply
for the continuation of each PH FSS
coordinator position awarded under the
ROSS PH FSS NOFA in FY 2005 or
2006.
2. New Applicants. An applicant that
meets the requirements for a new
applicant under this FSS NOFA may
apply for PH FSS program coordinator
positions as follows:
a. Up to one full-time PH FSS
coordinator position for an applicant
with HUD approval to administer a PH
FSS program of 25 or more FSS slots; or
b. Up to one full-time PH FSS
coordinator position per application for
joint applicants that together have HUD
approval to administer a total of at least
25 PH FSS slots.
C. Definitions. The following
definitions apply to the funding
available under this NOFA.
1. Renewal Applicant. Applicants that
received funding under the ROSS PH
FSS NOFA in FY 2005 or 2006.
2. New Applicant. Applicants that did
not receive funding under the ROSS PH
FSS NOFA in FY 2005 or FY 2006 that
have HUD approval to administer a PH
FSS program of at least 25 slots or that
fulfill the 25 slot minimum by applying
jointly with one or more other
applicants who together have approval
to administer at least 25 PH FSS slots.
3. Tribally Designated Housing Entity
(TDHE) is an entity authorized or
established by one or more Indian tribes
to act on behalf of each such tribe
authorizing or establishing the housing
entity as defined by Section 4(21) of
NAHASDA.
4. Indian Tribe means any tribe, band,
nation, or other organized group or a
community of Indians, including any
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11644
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Alaska Native village, regional, or
village corporation as defined in or
established pursuant to the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act, and that
is recognized as eligible for the special
programs and services provided by the
United States to Indians because of their
status as Indians pursuant to the Indian
Self Determination and Education Act of
1975, or any state-recognized tribe
eligible for assistance under section 4
(12)(C) of NAHASDA.
5. MTW PHAs. New and renewal
PHAs that are under MTW agreements
with HUD may qualify for funding
under this NOFA if the PHA
administers an FSS program. When
determining the size of a new applicant,
MTW PHA’s HUD-approved FSS
program, the PHA may request the
number of FSS slots reflected in the
PHA’s MTW agreement be used instead
of the number in the PHA’s FSS Action
Plan. However, this number must be at
least 25 in order to qualify as a new
applicant.
6. FSS Program Size. The total
number of PH FSS program slots
identified in the applicant’s HUDapproved PH FSS Action Plan, or, if
requested by MTW PHA applicants, the
number of slots in the applicant’s MTW
agreement. The total may include both
voluntary and mandatory PH FSS
program slots.
7. Action Plan. Describes the policies
and procedures of the PHA or tribe/
TDHE for operation of a local FSS
program. For a full description of the
minimum amount of information that
the Action Plan must contain, please see
24 CFR 984.201.
8. Positive Graduation Percentage.
The percent of public housing FSS
families that have successfully
graduated from the program between
October 1, 2000, and the publication
date of this NOFA as shown in FSS exit
reports submitted to HUD on Form
HUD–50058 or as otherwise reported to
HUD by MTW PHAs. The data source is
Form HUD–52767 as well as HUD’s PIC
data system records of Form HUD–
50058 PH FSS program exit reports that
were effective between October 1, 2000,
and the publication date of this NOFA.
9. The Number of PH FSS Program
Participants. The total number of
families formerly or currently enrolled
in the applicant’s PH FSS program
between October 1, 2000 and the
publication date of this NOFA. For
renewal applicants funded for the first
time under the 2006 NOFA, please use
the enrollments anticipated by the due
date of this NOFA. The data source is
Form HUD–52767 as well as HUD’s PIC
data system records of Form HUD–
50058 reports that were effective
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
between October 1, 2000, and the
publication date of this NOFA.
10. Percentage of Families with
Positive FSS Escrow Balances. The
number of current or former PH FSS
families with positive escrow balances
as a percentage of total number of PH
FSS program participants. The data
source is Form HUD–52767 as well as
HUD’s PIC data system records of Form
HUD–50058 PH FSS program progress
reports that were effective between
October 1, 2000, and the publication
date of this NOFA, or as otherwise
reported to HUD by MTW PHAs.
11. PH FSS Program Coordinator. A
person responsible for linking FSS
program participants to supportive
services. Program Coordinators will
work with the Program Coordinating
Committee and local service providers
to ensure that the necessary services and
linkages to community resources are
being made, such as ensuring that the
services included in participants’
contracts of participation are provided
on a regular, ongoing, and satisfactory
basis; making sure that participants are
fulfilling their responsibilities under the
contracts, and ensuring that FSS escrow
accounts are established and properly
maintained for eligible families. FSS
Coordinators may also perform job
development functions for the FSS
program.
II. Award Information
A. Available Funds. This NOFA
announces the availability of
approximately $12,000,000 in FY 2007
to employ FSS program coordinators for
the PH FSS program. This amount
includes $10,000,000 appropriated in
FY 2007 and $2,000,000 in rollover
funds. If additional funding becomes
available during FY 2007, HUD may
increase the amount available for PH
FSS program coordinators under this
NOFA. A maximum of $65,500 is
available for each full-time coordinator
position funded. Salaries are to be based
on local comparables. The funding will
be provided as a one-year grant.
Funding amounts for individual
grantees will be contingent upon HUD
field office approval.
B. Grant Term. The grant term is one
year from the execution date of the grant
agreement.
C. Grant Extensions. Requests to
extend the grant term beyond the grant
term must be submitted in writing to the
local HUD field office or area ONAP at
least 90 days prior to the expiration of
the grant term. Requests must explain
why the extension is necessary, what
work remains to be completed, and
what work and progress was
accomplished to date. Extensions may
PO 00000
Frm 00212
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
be granted only once by the field office
or area ONAP for a period not to exceed
6months and may be granted for longer
by the HUD Headquarters Program
Office at the request of the Field Office
or Area ONAP.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants are PHAs and tribes/TDHEs
that administer low-rent public housing
programs. New and renewal applicants
must have an approved PH FSS Action
Plan on file with their local HUD field
office or Area ONAP prior to this
NOFA’s application deadline. PHAs/
tribes/TDHEs eligible to apply for
funding under this NOFA are:
1. Renewal Applicants. Those PHAs
or Tribes/TDHEs that received funding
under the PH FSS NOFA in FY 2005 or
2006. To continue to qualify as renewal
applicants, the FY 2007 application of
joint applicants must include at least
one applicant that meets this standard.
Joint applicants can change the lead
applicant in their FY2007 application. A
grantee that was originally funded as
part of a joint application, that wishes
to now apply separately will continue to
be considered a renewal applicant for
funding purposes, but must be able to
meet the FSS minimum program size
requirement of a HUD-approved PH FSS
program of at least 25 slots that applies
to new applicants.
2. New Applicants. Applicants that
were not funded under the PH FSS
NOFA in FY 2005 or FY 2006. The new
applicant PHA or Tribe/TDHE must be
authorized through its HUD-approved
FSS Action Plan to administer a PH FSS
program of at least 25 slots, or be an
applicant with HUD approval to
administer PH FSS programs of fewer
than 25 slots that applies jointly with
one or more other applicants so that
together they have HUD approval to
administer at least 25 PH FSS slots.
Joint applicants must specify a lead coapplicant that will receive and
administer the FSS program coordinator
funding.
3. Moving to Work (MTW) PHAs. New
and renewal PHAs that are under the
MTW demonstration may qualify for
funding under this NOFA if the PHA
administers a PH FSS program. When
determining the size of a MTW PHA’s
HUD-approved PH FSS program, the
PHA may request that the number of PH
FSS slots reflected in the PHA’s MTW
agreement be used instead of the
number in the PHA’s PH FSS Action
Plan. However, this number must be at
least 25 in order to qualify as a new
applicant.
4. Troubled Applicants
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
a. An applicant that has been
designated by HUD as troubled under
the Public Housing Assessment System
(PHAS), or that has serious program
management findings from Inspector
General audits or serious outstanding
HUD management review or
Independent Public Accountant (IPA)
audit findings for the applicant’s Low
Rent Public Housing program that are
resolved prior to the application due
date is eligible to apply under this
NOFA. Serious program management
findings are those that would cast doubt
on the capacity of the applicant to
administer its PH FSS program in
accordance with applicable HUD
regulatory and statutory requirements.
b. The requirements that apply to an
applicant whose PHAS troubled
designation has not been removed by
HUD or whose major program
management findings or other
significant program compliance
problems that have not been resolved by
the deadline date are stated in the
Program Requirements section of this
NOFA.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. None
required.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Funds awarded
to applicants under this FSS NOFA may
only be used to pay salaries and fringe
benefits of PH FSS program staff.
Funding may be used to employ or
otherwise retain for one year the
services of PH FSS program
coordinators. PH FSS coordinator
support positions funded under
previous FSS NOFAs that made funding
available for such FSS positions may be
continued. A part-time program
coordinator may be retained where
appropriate. Please note that even with
a part-time program coordinator, the 25slot minimum must be retained.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
2. Theshold Requirements
a. All Applicants
(1) Each applicant must qualify as an
eligible applicant under this NOFA and
must have submitted an FSS application
in the format required by this NOFA
that was received and validated by
Grants.gov by the application deadline
date. Validation may take up to 72
hours.
(2) All applications must include a
Dun and Bradstreet Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number.
(See the General Section for further
information about the DUNS number
requirement.)
(3) Civil Rights Thresholds, Nondiscrimination, Affirmatively Furthering
Fair Housing. All applicants must
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
comply with these requirements. Please
see the General Section for details.
(4) The applicant must have a
financial management system that meets
federal standards. See the General
Section regarding those applicants that
may be subject to HUD’s arranging for
a pre-award survey of an applicant’s
financial management system.
(5) Applicants must comply with the
requirements for funding competitions
established by the HUD Reform Act of
1989 (42 U.S.C. 3531 et seq.) and other
requirements as defined in the General
Section.
b. Renewal Applicants. Continued
funding for existing coordinator
positions. In addition to meeting the
other requirements of this FSS NOFA,
renewal applicants must continue to
operate a PH FSS program and have
executed FSS contract(s) of
participation with PH FSS program
families.
c. New Applicants. New applicants
must meet the all requirements of this
FSS NOFA including those in Section
III.A above regarding eligibility.
d. Troubled Applicants. Contract
Administrator Partnership Agreement.
Applicants that are troubled at the time
of application are required to submit a
signed Contract Administrator
Partnership Agreement. The agreement
must be for the entire grant term. The
grant award shall be contingent on
having a signed Partnership Agreement
included in the application. If an
applicant that is required to have a
Contract Administrator Partnership
Agreement fails to submit one or if it is
incomplete, incorrect, or insufficient,
this will be treated as a technical
deficiency. See General Section for more
information on Corrections to Deficient
Applications. The Contract
Administrator must ensure that the
financial management system and
procurement procedures that will be in
place during the grant term will fully
comply with 24 CFR Part 85. Troubled
applicants are not eligible to be contract
administrators. Grant writers who assist
applicants to prepare their FSS
applications are ineligible to be Contract
Administrators.
3. Program Requirements
a. Hiring a PH FSS Program
Coordinator. Funds awarded under this
NOFA may only be used to employ or
retain the services of a PH FSS Program
Coordinator for the one-year grant term.
A PH FSS Program Coordinator must:
(1) Work with the Program
Coordinating Committee and with local
service providers to ensure that PH FSS
program participants are linked to the
PO 00000
Frm 00213
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11645
supportive services they need to achieve
self-sufficiency.
(2) Ensure that the services included
in participants’ contracts of
participation are provided on a regular,
ongoing, and satisfactory basis; that
participants are fulfilling their
responsibilities under the contracts; and
that FSS escrow accounts are
established and properly maintained for
eligible families. All of these tasks
should be accomplished through case
management. FSS coordinators may also
perform job development functions for
the FSS program.
(3) Monitor the progress of program
participants and evaluate the overall
success of the program.
b. Salary Comparables. For all
positions requested under this NOFA,
evidence of salary comparability to
similar positions in the local
jurisdiction must be kept on file in the
PHA/Tribe/TDHE office.
c. FSS Action Plan. The requirements
for the PH FSS Action Plan are stated in
24 CFR 984.201. For a new applicant to
qualify for funding under this NOFA,
the PHA/Tribe/TDHE’s initial PH FSS
Action Plan or amendment to change
the number of PH FSS slots in the PHA/
Tribe/TDHE’s previously HUDapproved PH FSS Action Plan, must be
submitted to and approved by the local
HUD field office or Area ONAP prior to
the application due date of this PH FSS
NOFA. An FSS Action Plan can be
updated by means of a simple one-page
addendum that reflects the total number
of PH FSS slots (voluntary and/or
mandatory slots) the applicant intends
to fill. New applicants with previously
approved PH FSS Action Plans may
wish to confirm the number of HUDapproved slots their local HUD field
office has on record. An MTW PHA may
request that the number of PH FSS slots
reflected in its MTW agreement be used
instead of the number of slots in the
PHA’s PH FSS Action Plan.
d. Eligible families. Current residents
of public/Indian housing are eligible.
Eligible families that are currently
enrolled or participating in local public/
Indian housing self-sufficiency
programs are also eligible.
e. Contract of participation. Each
family that is selected to participate in
an FSS program must enter into a
contract of participation with the PHA
or tribe/TDHE that operates the FSS
program. The contract shall be signed by
the head of the FSS family and be
individually designed to benefit the
subject family.
f. Contract term. The contract with
participating families shall be for 5
years. During this time, each family will
be required to fulfill its contractual
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11646
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
obligations. PHAs or tribes/TDHEs may
extend contracts for no more than 2
years for any family that requests an
extension of its contract, provided the
PHA or tribe/TDHE finds good cause
exists to provide an extension. This
extension request must be in writing.
See 24 CFR 984.303 for more
information on contracts of
participation.
g. Escrow accounts for very low or
low-income participating families. Such
accounts shall be computed using the
guidelines set forth in 24 CFR 984.305.
NOTE: FSS families that are not lowincome are not entitled to an escrow/
credit.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Addresses to Request Application
Package. Applications are available from
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The Download
Instructions and the Application
Download provide the information and
forms that you need to apply for funding
under this NOFA. If you have difficulty
accessing the information you may
receive customer support from
Grants.gov by calling their Support Desk
at (800) 518–GRANTS, or sending an email to support@grants.gov. You may
request general information, from the
NOFA Information Center (800–HUD–
8929) between the hours of 10 a.m. and
6:30 p.m. (eastern time) Monday
through Friday, except on federal
holidays. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number via TTY (text telephone) by
calling the Federal Information Relay
Service at 800–877–8339. (These are
toll-free numbers.) When requesting
information, please refer to the name of
the program you are interested in. The
NOFA Information Center opens for
business simultaneously with the
publication of the SuperNOFA.
B. Content and Format of Application
Submission
1. Content of Application. In addition
to any information required in the
General Section, each new and renewal
applicant must complete the forms on
the list below. Copies of the forms may
be downloaded with the application
package and instructions from https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. You must use the
forms that are included with the 2007
application so as to avoid using
outdated forms that may be on
HUDCLIPS or found from another
source.
a. SF–424 Application for Federal
Assistance—In completing the SF–424,
renewal applicants should select the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
continuation box on question 2, type of
application. In section 18 of the SF–424,
estimated funding, complete only 18.a.,
which will be the amount requested
from HUD in the FY 2007 FSS
application, and 18.g., Total.
b. SF–424 Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov)
c. SF–LLL Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities (if applicable)
d. HUD–2880—Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov)
e. HUD–2991—Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan
( for PHA applicants)
f. HUD–52752—Certification of
Consistency with Indian Housing Plan
(for Tribes/TDHE applicants)
g. Contract Administrator Partnership
Agreement, required for troubled PHA
applicants (see HUD–52755)
h. HUD–96011 Facsimile Transmittal,
even if not transmitting any faxes
(‘‘HUD Facsimile Transmittal’’ on
Grants.gov)
i. HUD–52767 Family Self-Sufficiency
Funding Request Form.
j. The HUD–2994–A—‘‘You Are Our
Client Applicant Survey’’ is optional.
k. In addition, the application must
include a completed Logic Model (form
HUD 96010) showing proposed
performance measures. See the General
Section for information on the Logic
Model.
l. Code of Conduct per General
Section instructions
m. Statement on Affirmatively
Furthering Fair Housing per General
Section instructions.
2. Budget Forms. There are no budget
forms required for this application.
C. Submission Date and Time. Your
completed application must be received
and validated by Grants.gov no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date. Please note
that validation may take up to 72 hours.
Applicants should carefully read section
IV titled ‘‘APPLICATION and
SUBMISSION INFORMATION’’ in the
General Section regarding HUD’s
procedures pertinent to the submission
of your application.
D. Intergovernmental Review.
Intergovernmental Review is not
applicable to this program.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Salary Cap. Awards under this
NOFA are subject to a cap of $65,500
per year per full-time coordinator
position funded. Under this NOFA, if
applicants apply jointly, the $65,500
maximum amount that may be
PO 00000
Frm 00214
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
requested per position applies to up to
one full time coordinator position for
the application as a whole, not to each
applicant separately.
2. Limitation on Renewal Funding
Increases. For renewal coordinator
positions, applicants will be limited to
a three percent increase above the
amount of the most recent award for the
position unless a higher increase is
approved by the local HUD field office
after review of the applicant’s written
justification and at least three
comparables that must be submitted to
the field office by the applicant at the
time they submit their FY2007 PH FSS
Program Coordinator application to
HUD. Examples of acceptable reasons
for increases above 3 percent would be
the need for a coordinator with higher
level of skills or to increase the hours of
a part-time coordinator to full-time.
Total positions funded cannot exceed
the maximum number of positions for
which the applicant is eligible under
this NOFA. If the funding increase is not
approved by the local field office or area
ONAP, the applicant will be eligible for
renewal at the level of the most recent
award.
3. Ineligible Activities
a. Funds under this NOFA may not be
used to pay the salary of an FSS
coordinator for a Housing Choice
Voucher (HCV) FSS program. A PH FSS
program coordinator may only serve
Low-Rent Public Housing families while
the HCV FSS program serves only HCV
families. The funding for HCV FSS
program coordinators is being made
available through a separate NOFA
included in the FY 2007 Super NOFA.
b. Funds under this FSS NOFA may
not be used to pay for services for FSS
program participants.
c. Funds under this FSS NOFA may
not be used to pay for administrative
activities.
F. Other Submission Requirements.
Electronic application submission is
mandatory unless an applicant requests,
and is granted, a waiver to the
requirement. Applicants should submit
waiver requests in writing using mail.
Waiver requests must be postmarked no
later than 15 days prior to the
application deadline date and should be
sent to Anice Schervish, 451 7th Street,
SW., Room 3236 Washington, DC 20410.
If HUD grants a waiver, the applicant
will be notified of the application
submission requirements for paper copy
applications. Paper copy applications
must be received by the appropriate
HUD office no later than the application
deadline date to meet the deadline
submission requirements.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria. The funds available under
this NOFA are being awarded based on
demonstrated performance.
Applications are reviewed by the local
HUD field office or area ONAP office
and the Grants Management Center to
determine whether or not they are
technically adequate based on the
NOFA requirements. Field offices or
area ONAPs will provide to the Grants
Management Center (GMC) in a timely
manner, as requested, information
needed by the GMC to make its
determination, such as the HUDapproved PH FSS program size of new
applicants and information on the
administrative capabilities of
applicants.
B. Reviews and Selection Process
1. Funding Priority Categories. If HUD
receives applications for funding greater
than the amount made available under
this NOFA, HUD will divide eligible
applications into priority categories as
follows:
a. Funding Category 1—Applications
from eligible renewal applicants
designated ‘‘high performer’’ in their
most recent PHAS review and tribes/
THDEs that have been determined
eligible as a renewal applicant (PHAS
score requirement is not applicable to
tribes/THDEs) will be funded for
continuation of previously funded
eligible positions.
b. Funding Category 2—Eligible
renewal applicants designated standard
performers on the most recent PHAS
review will be funded for continuation
of previously funded eligible positions.
c. Funding Category 3—Eligible
renewal applicants designated troubled
performers on the most recent PHAS
review will be funded for continuation
of previously funded eligible positions.
d. Funding Category 4—Applications
from eligible new applicants agreeing to
implement an FSS program of at least 25
slots.
2. Order of Funding.
a. Funding Category 1.—Starting with
Funding Category 1, HUD will first
determine whether there are sufficient
monies to fund all eligible positions
requested in the funding category. If
available funding is not sufficient to
fund all positions requested in the
category, HUD will calculate, for each
eligible applicant, the applicant’s
Positive Escrow Percentage and
Graduation Percentage and will use
these percentages in making funding
decisions. Definitions of the FSS
Positive Escrow Percentage and
Graduation Percentage are included in
the Definitions Section (Section I.C.) of
this NOFA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
HUD will begin funding eligible
Funding Category 1 applicants starting
with the applicants with the highest
Positive Escrow Percentage first. If
monies are not sufficient to fund all
applicants with the same Positive
Escrow Percentage, HUD will fund
eligible applicants in order starting with
those that have the highest Graduation
Percentage first. If funding is not
sufficient to fund all applicants with the
same FSS Positive Escrow Percentage
and/or Graduation Percentage, HUD will
select among eligible applicants by PH
FSS program size (number of approved
slots) starting with eligible applicants
with the largest PH FSS program size
first.
b. Funding Category 2.—If funding
remains after funding all Funding
Category 1 applications, HUD will then
process eligible Funding Category 2
applications. If there are not enough
funds to fund all of Funding Category 2,
HUD will use same criteria as above for
Funding Category 1.
c. Funding Category 3.—If funding
remains after funding all Funding
Category 2 applications, HUD will then
process eligible Funding Category 3
applications. If there are not enough
funds to fund all of Funding Category 2,
HUD will use the same criteria as above
for Funding Category.
d. Funding Category 4.—If funding
remains after funding all Funding
Category 1, 2, and 3 applications, HUD
will then process requests of eligible
Funding Category 4 applicants. If there
are not sufficient monies to fund all
eligible positions requested, HUD will
begin funding positions starting with
applicants with the largest PH FSS
program size (number of approved slots)
first.
3. Based on the number of
applications submitted, the GMC may
elect not to process applications for a
funding priority category where it is
apparent that there are insufficient
funds available to fund any applications
within the priority category.
4. Corrections to Deficient
Applications. The General Section of
the SuperNOFA provides the
procedures for corrections to deficient
applications.
5. Unacceptable Applications. After
the technical deficiency correction
period (as provided in the General
Section), the GMC will disapprove
applications that it determines are not
acceptable for processing. Applications
from applicants that fall into any of the
following categories are ineligible for
funding under this NOFA and will not
be processed:
a. An application submitted by an
entity that is not an eligible applicant as
PO 00000
Frm 00215
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11647
defined under this PH FSS NOFA or an
application that does not comply with
the requirements of Section IV.B., IV.C.
and IV.F. of this NOFA.
b. An application from an applicant
that does not meet the fair housing and
civil rights threshold requirements of
the General Section of the SuperNOFA.
c. An application from an applicant
that does not comply with the
prohibition against lobbying activities of
this NOFA.
d. An application from an applicant
that has been debarred or otherwise
disqualified from providing assistance
under the program.
e. An application that did not meet
the application deadline date and timely
receipt requirements as specified in this
NOFA and the General Section.
f. Applications will not be funded that
do not meet the threshold requirements
identified in this NOFA and the General
Section.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices. Successful
applicants will receive an award letter
from HUD. Successful applicants will be
notified by letter and will receive
instructions for the steps they must take
to access funding and begin
implementing grant activities.
Applicants who are not funded will also
receive letters via U.S. postal mail.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Impact. Under 24
CFR 50.19(b)(4) and (12), activities
under this NOFA are categorically
excluded from environmental review
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and
not subject to compliance actions for
related environmental authorities.
2. Applicable Requirements. Grantees
are subject to regulations and other
requirements found in:
a. OMB Circular A–87 ‘‘Cost
principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments’’;
b. OMB Circular A–133 ‘‘Audits of
States, Local Governments, and NonProfit Organizations’’;
c. HUD Regulations 24 CFR Part 984
‘‘Section 8 and Public Housing Family
Self-Sufficiency Program’’; and
d. HUD Regulations 24 CFR Part 85
‘‘Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to
State, Local, and Federally Recognized
Indian Tribal Governments’’.
3. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). Section 3 requirements do not apply
to this program.
4. Fair Housing and Civil Rights Laws.
Please see the General Section for more
information.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11648
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
5. Provision of Services to Individuals
with Limited English Proficiency (LEP).
Successful applicants and grantees must
seek to provide access to program
benefits and information to LEP
individuals through translation and
interpretive services, in accordance with
HUD’s Draft LEP Recipient Guidance
(68 FR 70968).
6. Communications. Successful
applicants should ensure that notices of
and communications during all training
sessions and meetings shall be provided
in a manner that is effective for persons
with hearing, visual, and other
communication-related disabilities
consistent with Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. See 24 CFR
Section 8.6.
7. HUD’s Strategic Goals. HUD is
committed to ensuring that programs
result in the achievement of HUD’s
strategic mission. The FSS program and
this FSS NOFA support the
Department’s strategic goals of helping
HUD-assisted renters make progress
toward self-sufficiency by giving
funding preference to PHA/Tribes/
TDHEs whose FSS programs show
success in moving families to economic
self-sufficiency. You can find out about
HUD’s Strategic Framework and Annual
Performance Plan at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/cfo/reports/
cforept.cfm3.
8. HUD Policy Priorities. This NOFA
supports the HUD policy priority of
helping HUD-assisted renters make
progress toward self-sufficiency. In this
NOFA, funding priority is given to those
applicants that demonstrate that their
FSS families have increased their
earned income since enrolling in FSS.
See Section V.B. of the General Section
for a full discussion of HUD’s policy
priorities.
C. Reporting. Successful applicants
must report activities of their FSS
enrollment, progress and exit activities
of their FSS program participants
through required submissions of the
Form HUD–50058 or as otherwise
agreed for MTW PHAs. HUD’s
assessment of the accomplishments of
the FSS programs of grantees funded
under this NOFA may be based in part
on Public Housing Information Center
(PIC) system data obtained from the
Form HUD–50058. MTW PHAs that do
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
not report to HUD on Form HUD–50058
will be asked to submit an annual report
to HUD with the same information on
FSS program activities that is provided
to HUD by non-MTW PHAs via Form
HUD–50058. A grantee is also required
to submit a completed Logic Model
(HUD–96010) showing
accomplishments against proposed
outputs and outcomes as part of their
annual reporting requirement to HUD.
Grantees shall use quantifiable data to
measure performance against goals and
objectives outlined in their Logic Model.
Semi-annual Performance Reports
consisting of the updated Logic Model
are due in the field office on July 30 and
January 31 of each year. For FY 2007,
HUD is considering a new concept for
the Logic Model. The new concept is a
Return on Investment statement. HUD
will be publishing a separate notice on
the ROI concept. In addition, HUD
requires that funded recipients collect
racial and ethnic beneficiary data. It has
adopted the Office of Management and
Budget’s Standards for the Collection of
Racial and Ethnic Data. In view of these
requirements, funded recipients should
use Form HUD–27061, Racial and
Ethnic Data Reporting Form. Form
50058 used in concurrence with the PIC
Data system is a comparable form.
Applicants that receive awards from
HUD should be prepared to report on
additional measures that HUD may
designate at the time of award.
D. Debriefings. The applicant may
request an applicant debriefing.
Beginning not less than 30 days after the
awards for assistance are publicly
announced in the Federal Register and
for at least 120 days after that
announcement, HUD will, upon
receiving a written request, provide a
debriefing to the requesting applicant.
(See Section VI.A. of the General
Section for additional information
regarding a debriefing.) Applicants
requesting to be debriefed must send a
written request to: Iredia Hutchinson,
Director; Grants Management Center,
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 501 School Street, SW.,
Suite 800; Washington, DC 20024.
VII. Agency Contacts
A. For Technical Assistance. For
answers to your questions, you may
PO 00000
Frm 00216
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
contact the Public and Indian Housing
Resource Center at 800–955–2232. Prior
to the application deadline, staff at the
number given above will be available to
provide general guidance, but not
guidance with actually preparing the
application. Following selection, but
prior to award, HUD staff will be
available to assist in clarifying or
confirming information that is a
prerequisite to the offer of an award by
HUD. Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may use the Grants.gov
helpdesk e-mail.
B. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
an information broadcast via satellite for
potential applicants to learn more about
the PH FSS program and preparation of
an application. For more information
about the date and time of this
broadcast, you should consult the HUD
Web site at https://www.hud.gov.
VIII. Other Information
A. Code of Conduct. Please see the
General Section for more information.
B. Transfer of Funds. If transfer of
funds from any of the ROSS programs
does become necessary, HUD will
consider the amount of un-funded
qualified applications in deciding to
which program the extra funds will be
transferred.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2577–0229. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 40 hours per respondent for the
application. This includes the time for
collecting, reviewing, and reporting the
data for the application. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00217
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11649
EN13MR07.021
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11650
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity
Program (SHOP)
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Community Planning and
Development.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: SelfHelp Homeownership Opportunity
Program (SHOP).
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–06; OMB Approval Number
2506–0157.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: Self-Help
Homeownership Opportunity Program.
The CFDA number is 14.247.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date for electronic submission and
validation in Grants.gov is June 13,
2007. Applications submitted through
https://www.grants.gov must be received
and validated by grants.gov no later
than 11:59:59 Eastern time on the
application deadline date. The
validation process may take up to 72
hours.
G. Optional, Additional Overview
Information:
SHOP funds are awarded to national
and regional nonprofit organizations
and consortia demonstrating experience
in administering self-help housing
programs in which the homebuyers
contribute a significant amount of
sweat-equity toward construction or
rehabilitation of the dwelling. The
amount available for SHOP in Fiscal
Year (FY) 2007 is approximately
$19,800,000.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Description
SHOP funds are to be used to
facilitate and encourage innovative
homeownership opportunities on a
national geographically diverse basis
through self-help housing programs that
require significant sweat-equity by the
homebuyer toward the construction or
rehabilitation of the dwelling.
SHOP programs are administered by
national and regional nonprofit
organizations and consortia. Units
developed with SHOP funds must be
decent, safe, and sanitary non-luxury
dwellings and must be made available
to eligible homebuyers at prices below
the prevailing market prices. Eligible
homebuyers are low-income individuals
and families (i.e., those whose annual
incomes do not exceed 80 percent of the
median income for the area, as
established by HUD) who would
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
otherwise be unable to purchase a
dwelling but for the provision of sweat
equity. Housing assisted under this
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)
must involve labor contributed by
homebuyers and volunteers in the
construction of dwellings and other
activities that involve the community in
the project.
B. Authority
Funding made available under SHOP
is authorized by Section 11 of the
Housing Opportunity Program
Extension Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 12805
note) (the ‘‘Extension Act’’).
II. Award Information
Approximately $19,800,000 will be
available for this program in FY2007.
Any unobligated funds from previous
competitions or additional funds that
may become available due to
deobligation or recapture from previous
awards or budget transfers may be
added to the FY2007 appropriation to
fund applications submitted in response
to this NOFA. Awards will be made to
successful applicants in the form of a
grant. Grant funds must be expended
within 24 months of the date that they
are first made available for draw-down
in a line of credit established by HUD
for the grantee, except that grant funds
provided to affiliates that develop five
or more units must be expended within
36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
You must be a national or regional
nonprofit public or private organization
or consortium that has the capacity and
experience to provide or facilitate selfhelp housing homeownership
opportunities. Your organization or
consortium must undertake eligible
SHOP activities directly and/or provide
funding assistance to your local
affiliates to carry out SHOP activities.
You must propose in your application to
use a significant amount of SHOP funds
in at least two states. Affiliates must be
located within the regional
organization’s or consortium’s service
area.
A national organization is defined as
an organization that carries out self-help
housing activities or funds affiliates that
carry out self-help housing activities on
a national scale. A regional organization
is defined as an organization that carries
out self-help housing activities or funds
affiliates that carry out self-help housing
activities on a regional scale. A regional
area is a geographic area, such as the
Southwest or Northeast that includes at
least two states. The states in the region
PO 00000
Frm 00218
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
need not be contiguous, and the service
area of the organization need not
precisely conform to state boundaries.
A consortium is defined as two or
more nonprofit organizations located in
at least two states that individually have
the capacity and experience to carry out
self-help housing activities or fund
affiliates that carry out self-help housing
activities on a national or regional scale
and enter into an agreement to submit
a single application for SHOP funding
on a national or regional basis. The
consortium must propose to use a
significant amount of SHOP funds in
each state represented in the
consortium. All consortium members
must receive SHOP funds and one
organization must be designated as the
lead entity. The lead entity must submit
the application and, if selected for
funding, execute the SHOP Grant
Agreement with HUD and assume
responsibility for the grant on behalf of
the consortium in compliance with all
program requirements.
A consortium agreement, executed
and dated by all consortium members
for the purpose of applying for and
using FY2007 SHOP funds, must be
submitted with your application. A
consortium’s application must be a
single integrated document that
demonstrates the consortium’s
comprehensive approach to self-help
housing. All consortium members must
be identified in your application. The
integrated application must reflect all
consortium members’ programs as a
single program and may only briefly
summarize the individual consortium
members’ past experiences in factor 1.
All other components of the application
must reflect an overall consortium
program design. Individual program
designs for consortium members or
affiliates within the integrated
document will not be considered by
HUD in scoring an application. Upon
being funded, the lead entity must enter
into a separate agreement with each
consortium member. The agreement
must include the requirements of the
FY2007 SHOP Grant Agreement
between HUD and the consortium and
set forth the individual consortium
member’s responsibilities for
compliance with HUD’s 2007 SHOP
program.
An affiliate is defined as:
(1) a local public or private nonprofit
self-help housing organization that is a
subordinate organization (i.e., chapter,
local, post, or unit) of a central
organization and covered by the group
exemption letter issued to the central
organization under Section 501(c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code; or
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(2) a local public or private nonprofit
self-help housing organization with
which the applicant has an existing
relationship (e.g., the applicant has
provided technical assistance or funding
to the local self-help housing
organization); or
(3) a local public or private nonprofit
self-help housing organization with
which the applicant does not have an
existing relationship, but to which the
applicant will provide necessary
technical assistance and mentoring as
part of funding under the application.
You must carry out eligible activities
or you must enter into an agreement to
fund affiliates to carry out eligible
activities. If you are a consortium, each
of your affiliates must receive funds and
be linked to an individual consortium
member.
Your application may not propose to
fund any affiliate or consortium member
that is also included in another SHOP
application. You must ensure that any
affiliate or consortium member under
your FY2007 application is not also
seeking FY2007 SHOP funding from
another SHOP applicant. If an affiliate
applies for funds through more than one
applicant, it may be disqualified for any
funding.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Applicants are required to leverage
resources for the construction of selfhelp housing assisted with SHOP.
Failure to provide documentation of
leveraged resources that meet the
submission requirements for firm
commitments as stated in factor 4 will
result in a lower application score.
C. Other
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
1. Eligible Activities
The costs of eligible activities may be
incurred by the applicant (and by
affiliates, if permitted by the applicant)
after the publication date of the NOFA
and charged to the SHOP grant,
provided that the applicant and
affiliates comply with the requirements
of this NOFA (including relocation and
environmental review requirements)
and provided that these costs are
included in the application. Applicants
and affiliates incur costs at their own
risk, because applicants that do not
receive a SHOP grant cannot be
reimbursed or reimburse affiliates.
Eligible activities are:
a. Land acquisition, including
financing and closing costs, which may
include reimbursing an organization,
consortium, or affiliate, upon approval
of any required environmental review,
for non-grant amounts expended by the
organization, consortium, or affiliate to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
acquire land before completion of the
review;
b. Infrastructure improvements,
including installing, extending,
constructing, rehabilitating, or
otherwise improving utilities and other
infrastructure, including removal of
environmental hazards; and
c. Administration, planning, and
management development, including
the costs of general management,
oversight, and coordination of the SHOP
grant; staff and overhead costs of the
SHOP grant; costs of providing
information to the public about the
SHOP grant; costs of providing civil
rights and fair housing training to local
affiliates as well as any expenses
involved in affirmatively furthering fair
housing; and indirect costs (such as rent
and utilities) of the grantee or affiliate
in carrying out the SHOP activities.
2. Threshold Requirements
HUD will not consider an application
from an ineligible applicant. An
applicant must meet all of the
applicable threshold requirements listed
in the General Section published on
January 18, 2007, and the SHOP
threshold requirements described
below:
a. Organization and Eligibility. You
must be eligible to apply under SHOP
(see Section III.A.).
b. Nonprofit Status. You must
describe how you qualify as an eligible
applicant and provide evidence of your
public or private nonprofit status, such
as a current Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) ruling that your organization is
exempt from taxation under Section
501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986. If you are a
consortium, each consortium member
must submit evidence of its nonprofit
status to the lead entity for inclusion in
the consortium’s application package.
c. Consortium Agreement. If you are
a consortium, each consortium member
must enter into and sign a consortium
agreement for the purpose of applying
for SHOP funds and carrying out SHOP
activities. Your consortium agreement
must be submitted as an appendix to
your application.
d. Amount. The amount of SHOP
funds you request must be sufficient to
complete a minimum of 30 self-help
housing units and may not exceed an
average investment of $15,000 per unit.
e. Homebuyer Eligibility. Eligible
homebuyers are low-income individuals
and families (i.e., those whose incomes
do not exceed 80 percent of the median
income for the area, as established by
HUD). You must specify the definition
of ‘‘annual income’’ to be used in your
proposed program. You may use one of
PO 00000
Frm 00219
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11651
the following three definitions of
‘‘annual income’’ to determine whether
a homebuyer is income-eligible under
SHOP:
(1) ‘‘Annual income’’ as defined at 24
CFR 5.609; or
(2) ‘‘Annual income’’ as reported
under the Census long-form for the most
recent available decennial Census; or
(3) ‘‘Adjusted gross income’’ as
defined for purposes of reporting under
the IRS Form 1040 series for individual
federal annual income tax purposes.
You may also adopt or develop your
own definition of annual income for use
in determining income eligibility under
SHOP subject to review and approval by
HUD. You must include your definition
of ‘‘annual income’’ in your Program
Summary.
f. Experience. You must demonstrate
successful completion of at least 30 selfhelp homeownership units in a national
or regional area within the 24-month
period immediately preceding the
publication of this NOFA. For dwellings
to qualify as self-help homeownership
units, the homebuyers must have
contributed a significant amount of
sweat-equity toward the construction as
set forth in this section.
g. Sweat Equity. Your program must
require homebuyers to contribute a
minimum of 100 hours of sweat equity
toward the construction or
rehabilitation of their own homes and/
or the homes of other homebuyers
participating in the self-help housing
program. In the case of a household
with only one adult, the requirement is
50 hours of sweat equity toward the
construction of these homes. Sweat
equity includes training for construction
on the dwelling units, but excludes
homebuyer counseling and home
maintenance training. All homebuyers,
including homebuyers with disabilities,
must meet these minimum hourly sweat
equity requirements; however, grantees
must permit reasonable
accommodations for persons with
disabilities in order for them to meet the
hourly requirements. For example,
homebuyers with disabilities may work
on less physical tasks or administrative
tasks to meet this requirement, or a
volunteer(s) may enter into an
agreement to substitute for the disabled
person. No exception to meeting these
hourly sweat equity requirements may
be made.
h. Community Participation. Your
program must involve community
participation in which volunteers assist
in the construction or rehabilitation of
dwellings. Volunteer labor is work
performed by an individual without
promise, expectation, or compensation
for the work rendered. For mutual self-
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11652
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
help housing programs that are assisted
by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
Rural Housing Services/Rural
Development under Section 523 of the
Housing Act of 1949 (7 CFR part 1944,
subpart I) or which have a program
design similar to the Section 523
program, the work by each participating
family on other participating families’
homes may count as volunteer labor. A
mutual self-help housing program
generally involves four to ten
participating families organized in a
group to use their own labor to reduce
the total construction cost of their
homes and complete construction work
on their homes by an exchange of labor
with one another.
i. Eligible Activities. You must use the
SHOP funds for eligible activities (see
Sections III.C.1 and IV.E.) and carry out
the activities yourself or fund affiliates
to carry out the activities.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
3. Threshold Submission Requirements.
In order for your application to be
rated and ranked, all threshold
requirements must be met. Threshold
requirements 2(d) through (i) above do
not require separate submissions, but
must be addressed in the program
summary and/or in the submission
requirements for the rating factors listed
below in Section V, Application Review
Information Criteria.
4. Other Requirements.
Other requirements applicable to the
SHOP program are set forth in Section
III.C.4, ‘‘Additional Nondiscrimination
and Other Requirements’’ of the General
Section. The following requirements
also apply to SHOP:
a. Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). SHOP recipients must comply with
Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 (Section 3), 12
U.S.C. 170lu (Economic Opportunities
for Low- and Very Low-Income Persons
in Connection with Assisted Projects),
and the HUD regulations at 24 CFR part
135, including the reporting
requirement of subpart E. Section 3
requires recipients to ensure that to the
greatest extent feasible, training,
employment, and other economic
opportunities will be directed to lowand very-low income persons,
particularly those who are recipients of
government assistance for housing, and
to business concerns that provide
economic opportunities to low- and
very-low income persons.
b. Real Property Acquisition and
Relocation. SHOP projects are subject to
the Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970, as amended (Uniform Act or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
URA) (42 U.S.C. 4601), and the
government-wide implementing
regulations issued by the U.S.
Department of Transportation at 49 CFR
Part 24. The URA is a federal law that
establishes minimum standards for
federally-funded programs and projects
that require the acquisition of real
property (real estate) or displace persons
from their homes, businesses, or farms.
The URA’s protections and assistance
apply to the acquisition, rehabilitation,
or demolition of real property for federal
or federally funded projects.
SHOP grantees and affiliates must
comply with all applicable URA
requirements in order to receive SHOP
funds for their programs and projects;
non-compliance could jeopardize SHOP
funding. Real property acquisitions for a
SHOP-assisted program or project
conducted before completion of an
environmental review and HUD’s
approval of a request for release of funds
and environmental certification are also
subject to the URA. SHOP grantees and
affiliates must ensure that all such real
property acquisitions comply with
applicable URA requirements.
Generally, real property acquisitions
conducted without the threat or use of
eminent domain, commonly referred to
as ‘‘voluntary acquisitions,’’ must satisfy
the applicable requirements and criteria
of 49 CFR 24.101(b)(1) through (5).
Evidence of compliance with these
requirements must be maintained by the
affiliate and submitted to and
maintained by the SHOP grantee. It is
also important to note that tenants who
occupy property that may be acquired
through voluntary means must be fully
informed of their eligibility for
relocation assistance. This includes
notifying such tenants of their potential
eligibility when negotiations are
initiated, notifying them if they become
fully eligible, and, in the event the
purchase of the property will not occur,
notifying them that they are no longer
eligible for relocation benefits. Evidence
of compliance with these requirements
must be maintained by the affiliate and
submitted to and maintained by the
SHOP grantee.
Additional information and resources
pertaining to real property acquisition
and relocation for HUD-funded
programs and projects are available on
HUD’s Real Estate Acquisition and
Relocation Web site at https://
www.hud.gov/relocation. You will find
applicable laws and regulations, policy
and guidance, publications, training
resources, and a listing of HUD contacts
if you have questions or need assistance.
c. Environmental Requirements. The
environmental review requirements for
SHOP supersede the environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00220
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
requirements in the General Section. All
SHOP assistance is subject to the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 and related federal environmental
authorities and regulations at 24 CFR
part 58. SHOP grant applicants are
cautioned that no activity or project may
be undertaken, or federal or non-federal
funds or assistance committed, if the
project or activity would limit
reasonable choices or could produce an
adverse environmental impact, until all
required environmental reviews and
notifications have been completed by a
unit of general local government, tribe,
or State, and until HUD approves a
recipient’s request for release of funds
under the environmental provisions
contained in 24 CFR part 58.
Notwithstanding the preceding
sentence, in accordance with section
11(d)(2)(A) of the Housing Opportunity
Extension Act of l996 and HUD Notice
CPD–01–09, an organization,
consortium, or affiliate may advance
non-grant funds to acquire land before
completion of an environmental review
and HUD’s approval of a request for
release of funds and environmental
certification. Any advances to acquire
land prior to such approval are made at
the risk of the organization, consortium,
or affiliate, and reimbursement from
SHOP funds for such advances will
depend on the result of the
environmental review.
d. Statutory and Program
Requirements. SHOP is governed by
Section 11 of the Housing Opportunity
Program Extension Act of 1996 (42
U.S.C. 12805 note) (the Extension Act),
and this NOFA. There are no program
regulations. You must comply with all
statutory requirements applicable to
SHOP as cited in Section I, Funding
Opportunity Description, and the
program requirements cited in this
NOFA. Pursuant to these requirements,
you must:
(1) Develop, through significant
amounts of sweat-equity by each
homebuyer and volunteer labor, at least
30 dwelling units at an average cost of
no more than $15,000 per unit of SHOP
funds for land acquisition and
infrastructure improvements;
(2) Use your grant to leverage other
sources of funding, including private or
other public funds, to complete
construction or rehabilitation of the
housing units;
(3) Develop quality dwellings that
comply with local building and safety
codes and standards that will be made
available to homebuyers at prices below
the prevailing market price;
(4) Schedule SHOP activities to
expend all grant funds awarded and
substantially fulfill your obligations
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
under your grant agreement, including
timely development of the appropriate
number of dwelling units. Grant funds
must be expended within 24 months of
the date that they are first made
available for draw-down in a line of
credit established by HUD for the
grantee, except that grant funds
provided to affiliates that develop five
or more units must be expended within
36 months; and
(5) Not require a homebuyer to make
an up-front financial contribution to a
housing unit other than cash
contributed for down payment or
closing costs at the time of acquisition.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Address To Request Application
Package
This NOFA contains all the
information necessary for national and
regional nonprofit organizations and
consortia to submit an application for
SHOP funding. This section describes
how you may obtain application forms
and additional information about the
SHOP program NOFA. Copies of the
published SHOP NOFA and related
application forms for this NOFA may be
downloaded from the grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. If you
have difficulty accessing the
information, you may receive customer
support from Grants.gov by calling its
help desk at (800) 518–GRANTS or by
sending an e-mail to
support@grants.gov. If you do not have
Internet access and you need to obtain
a copy of this NOFA, you may contact
HUD’s NOFA Information Center tollfree at (800) HUD–8929. Individuals
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number via the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
1. Application Kit. There is no
application kit for this program. All the
information you need to apply is
contained in this NOFA and is available
at https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The NOFA forms
are available to be downloaded from
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Pay attention to
the submission requirements and format
for submission specified for this NOFA
to ensure that you have submitted all
required elements of your application.
The published Federal Register
document is the official document that
HUD uses to solicit applications.
Therefore, if there is a discrepancy
between any materials published by
HUD in its Federal Register
publications and other information
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
provided in paper copy, electronic copy,
or at www.grants.gov, the Federal
Register publication prevails. Be sure to
review your application submission
against the requirements in the Federal
Register for this NOFA.
2. Guidebook and Further
Information. See the General Section.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
You must meet all application and
submission requirements described in
the General Section. Your application
should consist of the items listed in the
section below called Assembly Format
and Content. HUD’s standard forms can
be found in the application located on
Grants.gov.
1. Page Limits. There are page limits
for responses to the five rating factors.
A national or regional organization is
limited to 40 pages of narrative to
respond to the five rating factors. A
consortium is permitted up to 5
additional pages to address the past
experiences of its individual consortium
members. Required appendices, forms,
certifications, statements, and
assurances are not subject to the page
limitations. All pages must be numbered
sequentially 1 through 40 or 45, for
factors 1 through 5. Your application
may contain only the items listed in the
Assembly Format and Content checklist
below. In responding to the five factors,
information must be included in your
narrative response to each factor, unless
this NOFA states that it should be
included as an appendix. If you are
submitting material using the fax
method described in the General
Section, the narrative should refer to the
documents being faxed as part of your
narrative response to the factor. Any
supplemental information not required
in the program summary, narratives or
appendices requested by HUD that
further explains information required in
the five factors will not be reviewed for
consideration in the scoring of the
application.
2. Assembly Format and Content.
Your FY2007 application will be
composed of an Application Overview,
Narrative Statements (rating factors),
Forms, and Appendices. In order to
receive full consideration for funding,
you should use the following checklist
to ensure that all requirements are
addressed and submitted with your
electronic application.
a. Application Overview (Not subject
to the page limitations)
lllSF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance (signed by the Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR) who
is legally authorized to submit the
application on behalf of the applicant
PO 00000
Frm 00221
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11653
and has been approved by the eBusiness
Point of Contact to submit the
application via Grants.gov. (See the
General Section.)
lllSF–424 Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424–SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov).
lllSelf-Help Housing Organization
Qualification—Narrative describing
qualification as an eligible applicant
and Evidence of Nonprofit Tax Exempt
Status (in accordance with Section III.C.
of this NOFA).
lllConsortium Agreement, if
applicable.
lllProgram Summary (including
definition of ‘‘annual income’’).
b. Narrative Statements Addressing:
(Subject to the page limitations
described above.)
lllFactor 1—Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (including organizational chart).
lllFactor 2—Need/Extent of the
Problem (limited to five pages).
lllFactor 3—Soundness of
Approach.
lllFactor 4—Leveraging Resources.
lllFactor 5—Achieving Results and
Program Evaluation.
c. Forms, Certifications, and
Assurances: (Not subject to the page
limitations.)
lllHUD–424–CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov).
lllHUD–424–CBW, Grant
Application Detailed Budget Worksheet.
lllSF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities, as applicable.
lllHUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report. (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov).
lllHUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC–II
Strategic Plan.
lllHUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov) required for electronic
submissions of third party documents.
lllHUD–2994–A, You Are Our
Client Grant Applicant Survey
(optional)
lllHUD–96010, Program Outcome
Logic Model.
d. Appendices (Not subject to the
page limitations.)
lllA copy of your code of conduct
(see the General Section).
lllLeveraging documentation—firm
commitment letters (see factor 4).
lllSurvey of potential affiliates, if
applicable (see factor 2).
lllDemonstration of past
performance for new applicants (see
factor 5).
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11654
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
lllHUD–27300, Questionnaire for
HUD’s Initiative on Removal of
Regulatory Barriers (‘‘HUD
Communities Initiative Form’’ on
Grants.gov), if applicable. (See factor 3.)
lllEvaluative criteria for Removal of
Regulatory Barriers to Affordable
Housing in affiliate selection process, if
applicable (see factor 3).
Other information should not be
submitted and will not be considered in
scoring the application.
e. Certifications and Assurances.
Applicants are placed on notice that by
signing the SF–424 cover page noted
above in 2.a., Application Overview, the
applicant is certifying to all information
described in Section IV.F of the General
Section.
C. Submission Date and Time
The electronic application must be
received and validated no later than
11:59:59 p.m. Eastern time by
Grants.gov on the application deadline
date, which is June 13, 2007. The
validation process may take up to 72
hours. If an applicant is granted a
waiver to the electronic application
submission requirement, the application
must be received at HUD Headquarters
by the application deadline date, which
is June 13, 2007 (see General Section).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
D. Intergovernmental Review
Executive Order 12372 review does
not apply to SHOP.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Administrative costs.
Administrative costs may not exceed 20
percent of any SHOP grant. Indirect
costs may only be charged to the SHOP
grant under a cost allocation plan
prepared in accordance with OMB
Circular A–122.
2. Pre-agreement costs. After the
publication date of the NOFA, but
before the effective date of the SHOP
Grant Agreement, an applicant and
affiliates, if permitted by the applicant,
may incur costs that may be charged to
their SHOP grant, provided the costs are
eligible (see Section III.C.1.) and in
compliance with the requirements of
this NOFA (including relocation and
environmental review requirements)
and the application. Applicants and
affiliates incur costs at their own risk,
because applicants that do not receive a
SHOP grant cannot be reimbursed or
reimburse affiliates. To be eligible for
reimbursement with SHOP funds, preagreement costs must be identified in
the application.
3. Ineligible Costs. Costs associated
with the rehabilitation, improvement, or
construction of dwellings and any other
costs not identified in Section III.C.1.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
are not eligible uses of SHOP funds.
Acquiring land for land banking
purposes (i.e., holding land for an
indefinite period) is an ineligible use of
program funds. Acquisition undertaken
by the applicant or its affiliate before the
publication date of the NOFA is not an
eligible cost. SHOP funds may not be
expended on a property unless its
acquisition by the grantee, (includes
individual consortium members), or its
affiliates complies with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URA).
SHOP funds may not be used for
lobbying activities. These requirements
also apply to the reimbursement of preagreement costs (see Section IV.E.2).
F. Other Submission Requirements
You must meet all submission
requirements described in the General
Section. Refer to the General Section for
detailed submission instructions,
including methods and deadlines for
submission.
1. No Facsimiles or Videos. HUD will
not accept an entire application sent by
facsimile (fax). However, third-party
documents or other materials sent by
facsimile in compliance with the
submission requirements and received
by the application submission date will
be accepted. Facsimile corrections to
technical deficiencies will not be
accepted. Videos submitted as part of an
application will not be viewed.
2. Applications must be received and
validated by Grants.gov by the
application deadline date.
3. Waivers to the Electronic
Submission Process: Applicants may
request a waiver of the electronic
submission process for good cause (see
the General Section for more
information). Applicants may submit
waiver requests by facsimile or by email no later than 15 days prior to the
June 13, 2007, application due date.
Applicants may e-mail their requests to
Louise_D._Thompson@hud.gov or send
a facsimile to Lou Thompson at (202)
708–1744. Requests should include a
subject line titled ‘‘SHOP—Electronic
Application Waiver Request.’’
Applicants who are granted a waiver
based on a HUD-approved justification
must submit their applications in
accordance with the requirements stated
in the approval to the waiver request.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
Rating Factor l: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (25 Points)
This factor examines the extent to
which you, as a single applicant or
PO 00000
Frm 00222
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
consortium (including individual
consortium members), have the
experience and organizational resources
necessary to carry out the proposed
activities effectively and in a timely
manner. Any applicant that does not
receive at least 15 points under this
factor will not be eligible for funding.
In evaluating this factor, HUD will
consider your recent (last five years) and
relevant experience in carrying out the
activities you propose (including
experience in developing accessible/
visitable housing), and your
administrative and fiscal management
capability to administer the grant,
including the ability to account for
funds appropriately. All applicants,
including individual consortium
members, must have capacity and
experience in administering or
facilitating self-help housing. If you are
sponsoring affiliate organizations that
do not have experience in developing
self-help housing, HUD will assess your
organization’s experience in providing
technical assistance and the ability to
mentor new affiliates.
Submission Requirements for Rating
Factor 1
a. Past Experience (10 points). You
must describe the past experience (most
recent five years) of your organization in
carrying out self-help housing activities
(specify the time frame during which
these activities occurred) that are the
same as, or similar to, the activities you
propose for funding, and demonstrate
that you have had reasonable success in
carrying out and completing those
activities. You must include the average
number of sweat equity hours provided
per homebuyer family, and the average
number of volunteer labor hours
provided per unit. You may
demonstrate reasonable success by
showing that your previous activities
were carried out as proposed, consistent
with the time frame you proposed for
completion of all work.
b. Management Structure (12 points).
You must provide a description of your
organization’s or consortium’s
management structure, including an
organizational chart that identifies all
key management positions and the
names and positions of staff managing
SHOP. You must also describe your key
staff and their specific roles and
responsibilities for the day-to-day
management of your proposed program
to be funded from FY2007 SHOP funds.
You must indicate if you will or will not
be working with organizations that are
inexperienced in carrying out self-help
housing and describe the technical
assistance you will provide them and
how you will mentor these
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
organizations to develop capacity either
directly or indirectly resulting in
development of FY2007 SHOP-assisted
units.
c. Experience Developing Accessible
Housing (3 points). You must
demonstrate your experience in and
ability to construct and alter self-help
housing by describing the kinds of
features you have used to design homes
in accordance with universal design and
visitability standards, or to otherwise
make homes physically accessible. You
must provide yearly data for the last five
years on the number of accessible units
completed.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (10 Points)
This factor examines the extent to
which you demonstrate an urgent need
for SHOP funds in your proposed target
areas based on the need for affordable
housing, using quality data identified by
sources to substantiate that need.
The purpose of this factor is to make
sure that funding is provided where a
need for funding exists. You must
identify the community need or needs
that your proposed SHOP activities are
designed to address. If you plan to select
some or all affiliates after application
submission, you must demonstrate how
the selection of affiliates will help to
address the needs identified in the
proposed target areas.
Submission Requirements for Rating
Factor 2 (Five Page Limit)
Extent of Need for Affordable Housing
(10 points). You must establish the need
for affordable housing and the specific
need for SHOP funds in the
communities or areas in which your
proposed activities will be carried out.
You must specifically address the need
for acquisition and/or infrastructure
assistance for self-help housing
activities in these identified areas and
how your proposed SHOP activities
meet these needs. Also, to the extent
information is available, you must
address the need for accessible homes in
the target area(s); evidence of housing
discrimination in the target area(s); and
any need for housing shown in the local
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice, if appropriate. This
information must be tied to the
examples of housing problems that are
noted in b. below. Applicants that select
affiliates after application submission
must submit a list of affiliates they
surveyed and upon which they are
basing their need for SHOP funding, and
the specific criteria to be used to select
communities or projects based on need.
In reviewing applications, HUD will
consider the extent, quality, and validity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
of the information and data submitted
that addresses the need for affordable
housing in the target area and how
recent the data sources are. ‘‘Recent’’
means the most recent updated U.S.
Census data, as appropriate, and other
information and data issued within the
last five years of this NOFA that address
indicators of social or economic decline
that best capture the applicant’s
situation. Such information must
include:
a. Housing market data in the
proposed target areas including, but not
limited to: low-income, minority, and
disability populations; number of home
sales and median sales price; and
homeownership, rental, and vacancy
rates. This information can be obtained
from state or regional housing plans, the
American Housing Survey, the United
States Census, Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act data or other local data
sources, such as Consolidated Plans,
comprehensive plans, local tax assessor
databases, or relevant realtor
information. Data included in your
application must be recent and specific
to your proposed target areas; and
b. Housing problems in the proposed
target areas such as overcrowding, cost
burden, housing age or deterioration,
low homeownership rate (especially
among minority families, families with
children, and families with members
with disabilities), and lack of adequate
infrastructure or utilities.
Rating Factor 3: Soundness of Approach
(45 Points)
This factor examines the quality and
soundness of your plan to carry out a
self-help housing program. In evaluating
this factor, HUD will consider the areas
described below:
a. Your proposed use of SHOP funds,
including the number of units and the
type(s) of housing to be constructed, and
the use of sweat equity and volunteer
labor; your schedule for expending
funds and completing construction,
including interim milestones; the
proposed budget and cost effectiveness
of your program; your plan to reach all
potentially eligible homebuyers,
including those with disabilities and
others least likely to apply; and your
procedures for meeting section 3
requirements.
b. How your planned activities further
five of eight HUD policy priorities
described in the General Section. The
five policy priorities that apply
specifically to SHOP in FY2007 are:
(1) Providing increased
homeownership opportunities for lowand moderate-income persons, persons
with disabilities, the elderly, minorities,
PO 00000
Frm 00223
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11655
and families with limited English
proficiency;
(2) Encouraging accessible design
features: visitability in new construction
and substantial rehabilitation and
universal design;
(3) Providing full and equal access to
grassroots, faith-based, and other
community-based organizations in HUD
program implementation;
(4) Participation in Energy Star; and
(5) Removal of regulatory barriers to
affordable housing.
c. How you plan to meet section 3
requirements for jobs and training and
contracting opportunities for SHOPfunded infrastructure improvements.
Submission Requirements for Rating
Factor 3
Activities. Describe the types of
activities that you propose to fund with
SHOP and the proposed number of units
to be assisted with SHOP funding, the
housing type(s) (single family or
multifamily, or both) to be assisted and
the form of ownership (fee simple,
condominium, cooperative, etc.) you
propose to use.
a. Sweat Equity and Volunteer Labor
(7 points). Describe your program’s
requirements for sweat equity and
volunteer labor (i.e., types of tasks and
numbers of hours required for both
sweat equity and volunteer labor) and
how you will provide reasonable
accommodations for persons with
disabilities by identifying sweat equity
assignments that can be performed by
the homebuyer regardless of the
disability, such as providing
administrative, clerical, organizational,
or other office work or minor tasks onsite. Reasonable accommodation can
include sweat equity by the homebuyer
that can be performed regardless of the
disability or substitution of a nonhomebuyer designee(s) to perform the
sweat equity assignments on behalf of
the homebuyer. Volunteers substituting
for disabled homebuyers must enter into
an agreement to complete the work on
behalf of the homebuyers. Include the
dollar values of both the sweat equity
and volunteer labor contributions.
b. Funds Expenditure, Construction,
and Completion Schedules (7 points).
Submit a construction and completion
schedule that expends SHOP funds and
substantially fulfills your obligations if
you are funded. You must provide a
definition of ‘‘substantially fulfills’’ and
specifically state the percentage or
number of properties that you propose
to be completed and conveyed to
homebuyers at the time all grant funds
are expended. Your construction
schedule must include the number of
dwelling units to be completed within
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11656
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
24 months or, in the case of affiliates
that develop five or more units, within
36 months, and a time frame for
completing any unfinished units.
Your schedule must also include
interim milestones or benchmarks
against which HUD can measure your
progress in: (1) Selecting local affiliates
if they are not specifically identified in
the application, (2) expending funds,
and (3) completing acquisition,
infrastructure, and housing construction
activities, and occupancy by
homebuyers within these schedules.
These milestones or benchmarks should
be established at reasonable intervals
(e.g., monthly, quarterly).
c. Budget (7 points). Provide a
detailed budget including a breakdown
for each proposed task and each budget
category (acquisition, infrastructure
improvements, and administration)
funded by SHOP in the HUD–424–CB
and 424–CBW. You must include a line
item for the cost of monitoring
consortium members and affiliates at
least once during the grant period. Your
detailed budget must also include
leveraged funding to cover costs of
completing construction of the proposed
number of units. Budget amounts on the
HUD–424–CB and 424–CBW must agree
with amounts stated elsewhere in the
application.
d. Cost Effective (6 points).
Demonstrate the extent to which after
the investment of SHOP funds, the
contribution of sweat equity and
volunteer labor, donations (e.g. land or
building materials, etc.), in-kind
contributions, and financing subsidies,
reduces the average sales price to the
homebuyer below the appraised value of
the house or market value of comparable
housing in the neighborhood.
Applicants showing a larger reduction
of the sales price to the homebuyer from
the appraised value as a result of the
homebuyer’s sweat equity, volunteer
labor, and other contributions will
receive a higher score.
e. Policy Priorities (6 points). Describe
how each of the five HUD policy
priorities identified specifically for
SHOP is furthered by your proposed
activities. You will receive up to one
point for each of the first four policy
priorities based on how well your
proposed work activities address the
specific policy. You can receive up to
two points based on how well you
address policy priority 5, removal of
regulatory barriers to affordable
housing, for which you must submit
form HUD–27300 (America’s Affordable
Communities Initiative, Questionnaire
for HUD’s Initiative on Removal of
Regulatory Barriers) and where
required, provide the documentation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
and point of contact information.
Applicants are encouraged to read
HUD’s notices published in the Federal
Register on March 22 (69 FR 13450) and
April 21 (69 FR 21663), 2004, to obtain
an understanding of this policy priority
and how it can impact your score. There
are exceptions as provided below.
Applicants that identify affiliate
organizations and jurisdictions to be
served in their application to HUD
should address the questions in Part A
or Part B, but not both, of form HUD–
27300 for the jurisdiction in which the
majority or plurality of services will be
performed.
Applicants that do not identify
affiliates and communities to be served
in their application to HUD, but select
affiliates competitively or through
another method after application
submission to HUD, may address this
policy priority by including it as an
evaluative criterion in their affiliate
selection process. Such applicants may
receive up to 2 points by requiring
affiliate applicants for the awarded
SHOP funds to complete the questions
in either Part A or B, as appropriate. In
order to receive points, applicants that
identify affiliates after application
submission must include their
evaluative criterion as an appendix,
and, if awarded SHOP funds in FY2006,
must demonstrate how the evaluative
criteria that were included in your
FY2006 application were implemented.
You must also describe how the
evaluative criteria in your FY2006
SHOP program affected or will affect the
selection and funding of affiliates for
FY2007, to the extent this has been
completed. The narrative for your
evaluative criteria does not count
against the page limits described in
Section IV.B.1., Page Limits.
Applicants applying for funds for
projects located in local jurisdictions
and counties/parishes are invited to
answer the 20 questions under Part A.
An applicant that scores at least five
points in column 2 will receive 1 point
in the NOFA evaluation. An applicant
that scores 10 points or more in column
2 will receive 2 points in the NOFA
evaluation. The community(ies) must be
identified on the form HUD–27300.
Applicants applying for funds for
projects located in unincorporated areas
or areas otherwise not covered in Part A
are invited to answer the 15 questions
in Part B. Under Part B, an applicant
that scores at least 4 points in Column
2 will receive 1 point in the NOFA
evaluation. An applicant that scores 8
points or greater will receive a total of
2 points in the evaluation. The
community(ies) must be identified on
the form HUD–27300.
PO 00000
Frm 00224
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
A limited number of questions on
form HUD–27300 expressly request the
applicant to provide brief
documentation with its response. Other
questions require that, for each
affirmative statement made, the
applicant supply a reference, Web site
address, or brief statement indicating
where the back-up information may be
found, and a point of contact including
a telephone number or email address.
To receive points for this priority,
applicants must provide this additional
information, including separate contact
information if the contacts are different
for the individual questions. If the
contact is the same, please note that is
the case.
f. Program Outreach (5 points).
Describe materials or services that will
be used to reach potential homebuyers,
including persons least likely to apply.
For example, what alternative formats
will be used to reach persons with a
variety of disabilities and what language
accommodations will be made for
persons with limited English
proficiency.
g. Performance and Monitoring (5
points). Describe your plan for
overseeing the performance of
consortium members and affiliates,
including a plan for monitoring each
consortium member and affiliate for
program compliance at least once
during the term of the grant. Your plan
should address when and how you will
shift funds among consortium members
and affiliates to ensure timely and
effective use of SHOP funds within the
schedule submitted for item b. above.
h. Section 3 Procedures (2 points).
Under section 3 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968, to the
greatest extent feasible, opportunities
for job training and employment arising
in connection with housing
rehabilitation, housing construction, or
other public construction projects must
be given to low- and very low-income
persons in the metropolitan area (or
non-metropolitan county) in which the
project is located. In addition, to the
greatest extent feasible, contracts for
work to be performed in connection
with housing rehabilitation, housing
construction, or other public
construction projects are given to
business concerns that provide
economic opportunities for low- and
very low-income persons in the
metropolitan area (or non-metropolitan
county) in which the project is located.
The regulations implementing section 3
are found at 24 CFR Part 135. Because
SHOP funds may only be used for
acquisition and infrastructure
improvements, section 3 requirements
apply only to SHOP projects for which
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
the amount of SHOP funds for the
infrastructure improvements (together
with any other covered section 3
housing and community development
assistance for infrastructure) meets the
threshold amount of $200,000. Based on
the SHOP maximum average investment
of $15,000 per unit, section 3 would
generally only apply to a SHOP project
with at least 14 units where the entire
SHOP amount (if no other covered
section 3 housing and community
development assistance is provided to
the grantee or affiliate for infrastructure)
is $200,000 or more.
Regardless of whether the Section 3
threshold is met, all applicants are
required to describe procedures they
have in place for section 3 compliance
in the event that they meet the section
3 threshold in carrying out their
proposed FY2007 SHOP activities. You
must clearly explain your procedures
for complying with these requirements
(1) for projects you will undertake
directly, and (2) for projects to be
undertaken by affiliates. In the case of
projects undertaken by affiliates, your
procedures must state how you will
inform affiliates of their responsibilities
under section 3 and how you will
monitor compliance. One point will be
awarded for addressing job training and
employment opportunities. One point
will be awarded for addressing
contracting opportunities.
Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(10 Points)
This factor addresses your ability to
secure other resources that can be
combined with HUD’s program
resources to fully fund your proposed
program. When combined with the
SHOP grant funds, homebuyer sweat
equity, and volunteer labor, your
leveraged resources must be sufficient to
develop the number of units proposed
in your application. HUD will consider
only those leveraging contributions for
which current firm commitments as
described in this factor are submitted. A
firm commitment means a written
agreement under which the applicant, a
partner, or an entity agrees to perform
services or provide resources for an
activity specified in your application.
Firm commitments in the form of cash
funding (e.g., grants or loans), in-kind
contributions, donated land and
construction materials, and donated
services will count as leverage.
Leveraging does not include the dollar
value of sweat equity and volunteer
labor for your proposed activities.
Leveraging does not include financing
provided to homebuyers. However,
financing provided through the U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s Section 502
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
11657
Submission Requirements for Rating
Factor 4
To receive full credit for leveraging,
an applicant’s leveraging resources must
be clearly identified for its FY2007
SHOP application and must total at least
50 percent of the amount shown on
forms HUD–424–CB needed to complete
all properties, minus the proposed
SHOP grant amount, homebuyer sweat
equity, and volunteer labor.
Firm Commitments of Resources (10
points). Provide firm commitments
(letters, agreements, pledges, etc.) of
leveraged resources or services from the
source of the commitment. In order to
be considered, leveraged resources or
services must be committed in writing
and include your organization’s name,
the contributing organization’s name
(including designation as a federal,
state, local, or private source), the
proposed type of commitment, and the
dollar value of the commitment as it
relates to your proposed FY2007 SHOPfunded activities. Each letter of
commitment must be signed by an
official of the organization legally able
to make the commitment on behalf of
the organization. See Other Submission
Requirements, of the General Section
regarding the procedures for submitting
third-party documentation. Each letter
of commitment must specifically
support your FY2007 SHOP application
or specific projects in your FY2007
application. If your organization
depends upon fundraising and
donations from unknown sources/
providers, you must submit a separate
letter committing a specific amount of
dollars in fundraising to your proposed
FY2007 SHOP program. Applicants
must ensure that duplicate letters for
fundraising amounts are not submitted
by both the applicant and its affiliates.
Also, if you have received funds from
organizations and agencies from
previous years that are not committed to
another activity and you have the sole
discretion to commit these funds to your
FY2007 SHOP program, you must
submit a separate letter committing
these dollars to your FY2007 SHOP
program. In all instances, the dollar
amount must be stated in the letters.
Letters of commitment may be
contingent upon your receiving a grant
award. Letters of commitment must be
included as an appendix to your
application, and do not count toward
the page limitation noted in Section
IV.B.1. Unsigned, undated, or outdated
letters, letters only expressing support
of your organization or its proposal, or
those not specifically stating the dollar
amount or linking the resources to your
FY2007 SHOP application or specific
projects in your FY2007 application do
not count as firm commitments.
Rating Factor 5. Achieving Results and
Program Evaluation (10 Points)
This factor assesses an applicant’s
past performance and emphasizes
HUD’s determination to track whether
applicants meet commitments made in
their applications.
a. Past Performance. For applicants
that previously received SHOP grants,
HUD will assess your organization’s
past performance based upon
performance reports that demonstrate
your organization’s completion of
eligible SHOP activities, the number of
families provided housing, financial
status information focusing on timely
use of funds, and other program
outcomes. HUD will consider whether
you had funds deobligated for failure to
meet your drawdown and construction
schedules or funds were returned
because of monitoring findings or other
program deficiencies. HUD may also use
monitoring reports, audit reports, logic
models, and other information available
to HUD in making its determination
under this factor. For applicants that
received SHOP grants in previous years,
HUD will assess your success in
meeting benchmarks in the most recent
3 full years of participation in the
program. If you are not a current SHOP
grantee, HUD will assess your
performance in undertaking similar
activities and identifying and meeting
outcomes during the past three years.
You must supplement your narrative
with internal or external performance
reports or other information that will
assist HUD in making its determination
under this factor. Supplemental
information and reports from applicants
that have not received SHOP grants do
not count against the page limitations.
b. Logic Model form HUD–96010.
HUD requires SHOP applicants to
develop an effective, quantifiable,
outcome-oriented evaluation plan for
measuring performance and
determining whether goals have been
met using the Master Logic Model for
SHOP, which can be found in the
download instructions portion at
www.grants.gov. In preparing your Logic
Model, you must first open the form
HUD–96010 and go to the instruction
tab and follow the directions in the tab.
‘‘Outcomes’’ are benefits accruing to the
families and/or communities during or
direct loans to homebuyers, for
construction of their dwellings counts
as leveraging for mutual self-help
housing programs. Firm commitments
must be substantiated by the
documentation described below.
PO 00000
Frm 00225
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11658
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
after participation in SHOP. The selfhelp housing units developed are
outputs as described under this factor,
not outcomes. Applicants must clearly
identify the outcomes to be achieved
and measured. Examples of outcomes
for SHOP include increasing the
homeownership rate in a neighborhood
or among low-income families by a
certain percentage, increasing financial
stability (e.g., increasing assets of the
low-income homebuyer households
through home equity accumulation or
reducing total housing costs compared
to rents that SHOP participants
previously paid) or increasing housing
stability during and beyond the
grantee’s period for reporting on
property completions. See Reporting in
Section VI.C. Outcomes must be
quantifiable.
In addition, applicants must establish
interim benchmarks for which outputs
lead to the ultimate achievement of
outcomes. ‘‘Outputs’’ are the direct
products of the applicant’s program
activities. Examples of outputs for
SHOP include the number of houses
constructed, number of sweat equity
hours, or number of homes
rehabilitated. Outputs should produce
outcomes for your program and outputs
must be quantifiable.
‘‘Interim benchmarks’’ are steps or
stages in your activities that, if reached
or completed successfully, will result in
outputs for your program. Examples of
interim benchmarks for SHOP include
income-qualifying homebuyers,
obtaining building permits, or securing
construction materials and equipment.
Program evaluation requires that you
identify program outcomes, outputs,
benchmarks, and performance
indicators that will allow you to
measure your performance. Performance
indicators must be objectively
quantifiable and measure actual
achievements against anticipated
achievements. Your evaluation plan
must identify what you are going to
measure, how you are going to measure
it, and the steps you have in place to
make adjustments to your work plan if
performance targets are not met within
established time frames. This factor
reflects HUD’s goal to embrace high
standards of ethics, management, and
accountability. Successful applicants
will be required to periodically report
on their progress in achieving the
proposed outcomes identified in the
application. Applicants should refer to
the General Section for more
information on the Master Logic Model.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Submission Requirements for Rating
Factor 5
a. Past Performance (7 points). For
applicants that received SHOP grants in
previous years, you must summarize
your past performance, including any
delays you encountered and the
mitigating actions taken to overcome
them to successfully complete your
program. HUD will measure your past
performance using tools such as
monitoring reports, audit reports,
quarterly and annual reports,
disbursement data, prior years’ logic
models demonstrating success in
meeting outputs and outcomes, and
other information currently in-house
against what you stated you would do
in your previous applications and your
summary. New applicants must provide
a summary of your performance in
carrying out self-help housing,
including any delays you encountered
and the mitigating actions taken to
overcome them to successfully complete
your program. Your narrative summary
must be supported by existing internal
or external performance reports or other
information that will assist HUD in
measuring your performance for
carrying out self-help housing and
demonstrating outcomes beyond the
provision of housing units. The
supplemental reports and information
must be included as an appendix and
will not count against the page
limitations.
b. Program Evaluation Plan (3 Points).
The FY2007 application provides an
eLogicModelTM that allows the
applicant to select from drop down
menus the elements of their program to
be captured in the Logic Model.
Instructions for the eLogic ModelTM are
found in Tab 1 of the form HUD–96011
found in the instructions download to
your electronic application. The Master
Logic Model listing also identifies the
unit of measure that HUD will collect
for the output and outcome selected.
Applicants must identify a unit of
measure and establish a goal for each
output and outcome. HUD expects
applicants to identify more than one
output and outcome. You must
summarize your program evaluation
plan that measures your own program
performance. Your plan must measure
the performance of individual
consortium members and affiliates,
including the standards and
measurement methods, and the steps
you have in place or how you plan to
make adjustments if you begin to fall
short of established benchmarks and
timeframes. Applicants who identify
two or more outputs and outcomes that
reflect their proposed activities and
PO 00000
Frm 00226
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
work plan and prepare an evaluation
plan that meets these criteria will
receive a higher score. For FY2007,
HUD is considering a new concept for
the Logic Model. The new concept is a
Return on Investment (ROI) statement.
HUD will be publishing a separate
notice on the ROI concept.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Factors for Award Used to Evaluate
Applications. HUD will evaluate all
SHOP applications that successfully
complete technical processing and meet
threshold and submission requirements
for Factors 1 through 5. The maximum
number of points awarded for the rating
factors is 100 plus the possibility of an
additional 2 bonus points for RC/EZ/
EC–II.
2. RC/EZ/EC–II Bonus Points.
Applicants may receive up to 2 bonus
points for eligible activities that the
applicant proposes to locate in federally
designated Empowerment Zones (EZs),
renewal communities (RCs), or
enterprise communities (ECs)
designated by the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) in
Round II (EC–IIs) that are intended to
serve the residents of these areas and
that are certified to be consistent with
the area’s strategic plan or RC Tax
Incentive Utilization Plan for an urban
or rural renewal community designated
by HUD (RC) on the strategic plan for an
enterprise community designed in
round II by USDA (EC–II). For ease of
reference in this notice, all of the
federally designated areas are
collectively referred to as ‘‘RC/EZ/EC–
IIs’’ and the residents of these federally
designated areas as ‘‘RC/EZ/EC–II
residents.’’ The RC/EZ/EC–II
certification, a valid HUD–2990 form,
must be completed for an applicant to
be considered for RC/EZ/EC–II bonus
points. A list of RC/EZ/EC–IIs can be
obtained from HUD’s grants Web site at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm. Applicants can
determine if their program or project
activities are located in one of these
designated areas by using the locator on
HUD’s Web site at https://www.hud.gov/
crlocator. Copies of the certification can
be found in the electronic application.
The certification must be completed and
signed by the appropriate official in the
RC/EZ/EC–II for an applicant to be
considered for RC/EZ/EC–II bonus
points. In addition to the RC/EZ/EC–II
certification, applicants must provide
the location of the EC/EZ/EC–II (name
of town, city, state, or other locale) if not
otherwise identified on the certification,
and the number of units to be developed
within the RC/EZ/EC–II in order to
receive credit.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
RC/EZ/EC–II bonus points will be
awarded as follows: 2 points to an
applicant with over 25 percent of its
proposed units in RC/EZ/EC–II; 1 point
for 10 to 25 percent of units in RC/EZ/
EC–IIs; and 0 points below 10 percent
of units in RC/EZ/EC–II zones.
3. Rating. Applications that meet all
threshold requirements listed in Section
III.C will be rated against the criteria in
Factors 1 through 5 and assigned a
score. Applications that do not meet all
threshold factors will be rejected and
not rated.
4. Ranking and Selection Procedures.
Applications that receive a total of 75
points or more (without the addition of
RC/EZ/EC–II bonus points) will be
eligible for selection. After adding any
bonus points for RC/EZ/EC–IIs HUD
will place applications in ranked order.
HUD will consider ranked order, funds
availability, and past performance in the
selection and funding of applications.
5. Technical Deficiencies. After the
application submission date and
consistent with regulations in 24 CFR
part 4, subpart B, HUD may not consider
any unsolicited information you may
want to provide. However, HUD may
contact you to clarify an item in your
application or to correct technical
deficiencies. In order not to
unreasonably exclude applications from
being rated and ranked, HUD may
contact applicants to ensure proper
completion of the application and will
do so on a uniform basis for all
applicants. However, HUD may not seek
clarification of items or responses that
improve the substantive quality of your
response to any rating factor.
Examples of curable (correctible)
technical deficiencies include
inconsistencies in the funding request, a
failure to submit certifications. In each
case, HUD will notify you in writing by
describing the clarification or technical
deficiency. See the General Section for
additional information.
6. HUD’s Strategic Goals to Implement
HUD’s Strategic Frameworks and
Demonstrate Results. See the General
Section for HUD’s Strategic Goals.
7. Policy Priorities. Refer to the
General Section for information
regarding application criteria addressing
HUD’s policy priorities.
Note: From all applications that receive
SHOP funds, HUD intends to add relevant
data obtained from the ‘‘Removal of
Regulatory Barriers’’ policy priority factor to
the database on state and local regulatory
reform actions maintained at the Regulatory
Barrier Clearinghouse Web site at https://
www.huduser.org.rbc/ used by states,
localities, and housing providers to identify
regulatory barriers and learn of exemplary
local efforts at regulatory reform.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. HUD reserves the right to:
a. fund less than the amount
requested by any applicant based on the
application’s rank, the applicant’s past
performance, and the amount of funds
requested relative to the total amount of
available funds; and/or
b. fund less than the full amount
requested by any applicant to ensure a
fair distribution of the funds and the
development of housing on a national,
geographically diverse basis as required
by the statute.
HUD will not fund any portion of an
application that is ineligible for funding
under program threshold requirements
in Section III.C or which does not meet
other threshold and pre-award
requirements in Section III.C. The
minimum grant award shall be the
amount necessary to complete at least
30 units at an average investment of not
more than $15,000 per unit or a lesser
amount if lower costs are reflected in
the application. If any funds remain
after all selections have been made,
these funds may be available for
subsequent competitions.
2. Debriefing. For a period of at least
120 days, beginning 30 days after the
awards for assistance are publicly
announced, HUD will provide to a
requesting applicant a debriefing related
to its application. A debriefing request
must be made in writing or by e-mail by
its authorized official whose signature
appears on the SF–424, or his or her
successor in the office and submitted to
Ms. Lou Thompson, Office of Affordable
Housing Programs, U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Room 7164,
Washington, DC 20410–7000.
Information provided during a
debriefing will include, at a minimum,
the final score you received for each
rating factor, final evaluation comments
for each rating factor, and the final
assessment indicating the basis upon
which assistance was provided or
denied.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Grantees are required to comply
with the following administrative and
financial requirements: A–122 Cost
Principles for Non-Profit Organizations;
A–133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations); and the regulations at 24
CFR part 84 (Grants and Agreements
with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Non-Profit
Organizations).
PO 00000
Frm 00227
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11659
2. Copies of the OMB Circulars may
be obtained from EOP Publications,
New Executive Office Building, Room
2200, Washington, DC 20503, telephone
(202) 395–3080 (this is not a toll-free
number) or (800) 877–8339 (toll-free
TTY Federal Information Relay Service)
or from the Web site at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/
index.html.
3. Refer to all award administration
information requirements described in
Section VI (‘‘Award Administration
Information’’) of the General Section.
C. Reporting. Grantees are required to
submit quarterly and annual
(consortium members/affiliates) reports
providing data on the construction
status, unit characteristics, and income
and racial and ethnic composition of
homeowners in SHOP-funded
properties. For each reporting period, as
part of the required quarterly report to
HUD, grant recipients must include a
completed Logic Model (form HUD–
96010), which updates the output and
outcome achievements identified in
your application with which HUD can
evaluate the effectiveness of the SHOP
funding. Applicants are also required to
report annually their response to the
management questions contained in the
eLogic ModelTM for the SHOP program.
VII. Agency Contact
Further Information and Technical
Assistance. Before the application due
date, HUD staff may provide general
guidance and technical assistance about
this NOFA. However, staff is not
permitted to assist in preparing your
application. Also, following selection of
applicants, but before awards are
announced, staff may assist in clarifying
or confirming information that is a
prerequisite to the offer of an award.
You may contact Ms. Lou Thompson,
SHOP Program Manager, Office of
Affordable Housing Programs,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Room 7164, Washington, DC 20410–
7000, telephone (202) 708–2684 (this is
not a toll-free number). This number can
be accessed via TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service
Operator at (800) 877–8339. For
technical support for downloading an
application or electronically submitting
an application, please call Grants.gov
help desk at 800–518–GRANTS (this is
a toll-free number) or send an e-mail to
support@grants.gov.
VIII. Other Information
A. Review Sections VIII.A., B., E., F.,
and G. (‘‘Other Information’’) of the
General Section, and note that these
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11660
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
subsections are incorporated by
reference into this NOFA.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document were
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2506–0157. In accordance with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 60 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
PO 00000
Frm 00228
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, quarterly
and annual reports, and final report.
The information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00229
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11661
EN13MR07.022
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11662
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Housing Opportunities for Persons With
AIDS (HOPWA)
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Community Planning and
Development (CPD), Office of HIV/AIDS
Housing.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Housing Opportunities for Persons With
AIDS (HOPWA).
C. Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–04; OMB Approval Number
2506–0133.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 14.241
Housing Opportunities for Persons With
AIDS Program.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 31, 2007. Applications
submitted through https://
www.grants.gov must be received and
validated by grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 Eastern time on the application
deadline date. The validation process
may take up to 72 hours. Refer to the
General Section for application
submission and timely receipt
requirements.
G. Additional Information
1. Purpose of the Program: To provide
states and localities with the resources
and incentives to devise long-term
comprehensive strategies for meeting
the housing needs of low-income
persons with Human Immunodeficiency
Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency
Syndrome (HIV/AIDS). Grant recipients
will measure client outcomes to assess
how housing assistance results in
creating or maintaining stable housing,
reduces risks of homelessness, and
improves access to health care and other
needed support. States, units of general
local government, and nonprofit
organizations interested in applying for
funding under this grant program
should carefully review the General
Section and detailed information listed
in this NOFA.
2. Available Funds. Approximately
$28,463,000 in FY2007 funding is made
available under the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5, approved February 15, 2007).
Funds for the renewal of expiring
HOPWA competitive grants that have
successfully undertaken permanent
supportive housing projects will be
distributed under a separate, simplified
process, described in a separate notice
from this NOFA. Funds under this
NOFA will be made available after those
awards with the remaining funds. This
notice makes available funding for two
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
types of HOPWA competitive grants for
new projects: (1) Long-term project
awards for housing activities to be
conducted by eligible states and units of
general local government in areas that
are not eligible for formula allocations
or in the balance of the state areas
outside of eligible metropolitan
statistical areas by a governmental
agency that is not eligible to receive
formula grants; and (2) awards for
Special Projects of National Significance
(SPNS) projects that will undertake
housing service delivery models to
provide HOPWA clients with improved
stable housing arrangements by a
governmental agency or an eligible
nonprofit organization.
As initiated in FY2006, the
Department will again advise existing
grantees that provide permanent
supportive housing of the procedure for
qualifying for additional funds as a
renewal of an expiring HOPWA grant.
Such grantees will not be required to
submit an application under this
competition for a renewal grant.
3. Eligible Applicants. States, units of
general local government, and nonprofit
organizations are eligible to apply.
4. Match. None.
5. Authorities. HOPWA program
regulations at 24 CFR Part 574 and the
AIDS Housing Opportunity Act (42
U.S.C. 12901–12912), govern the
program.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Description
1. Long-Term Projects in Non-formula
Areas. HUD will award funding for
short-term, transitional and/or
permanent supportive housing
activities. These projects should
improve stable housing arrangements
for eligible persons who reside in areas
that do not qualify for Fiscal Year (FY)
2007 HOPWA formula allocations.
Applications should be submitted by
state or the unit of general local
government undertaking activities in the
balance of state areas outside of eligible
metropolitan statistical areas.
2. Special Projects of National
Significance (SPNS). SPNS projects will
provide assistance that stabilizes
housing for eligible persons through
model and/or innovative service
delivery models. Consistent with the
selection considerations established at
42 U.S.C. 12903(c)(3)(C), SPNS projects
will demonstrate potential replicability
in the larger HOPWA program.
3. Definitions for all HOPWA grants.
a. Chronically Homeless Person. An
unaccompanied homeless individual
with a disabling condition who has
PO 00000
Frm 00230
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
either been continuously homeless for a
year or more OR has had at least 4
episodes of homelessness in the past 3
years. For this program, a disabling
condition is defined as a diagnosable
substance abuse disorder, serious
mental illness, developmental
disability, or chronic physical illness or
disability, including AIDS or a disabling
condition due to HIV, including the cooccurrence of two or more of these
conditions.
b. Lease or Occupancy Agreement. In
establishing that an eligible person has
obtained permanent supportive housing
and a legal right to remain in that
housing unit, the lease or occupancy
agreement must be for a term of at least
one year. The lease or occupancy
agreement must also be automatically
renewable upon expiration, except on
reasonable and timely prior notice by
either the tenant or the landlord. A
short-term lease or lease in the name of
the provider may be used to undertake
transitional housing activities.
c. Nonprofit Organization. Nonprofit
organizations include those that: (1) Are
state or locally chartered; (2) Are
organized under state or local laws; (3)
Have no part of earnings inuring to the
benefit of any member, founder,
contributor or individual; (4) Have a
functioning accounting system that is
operated in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, or has
designated an entity that will maintain
such an accounting system; and (5)
Have among its purposes significant
activities related to providing services
or housing to persons with acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome or related
diseases, as clarified to include
infection with the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
d. Permanent Supportive Housing.
Housing in which the eligible person
has a continuous legal right to remain in
the unit and which provides the eligible
person with ongoing supportive services
through qualified providers.
e. Transitional Housing. Housing that
will help facilitate the movement of
eligible person(s) to permanent housing
within 24 months.
B. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements
For more information on the HOPWA
program, including eligible uses of
funds, see the HOPWA program
regulations at 24 CFR Part 574 and the
AIDS Housing Opportunity Act (42
U.S.C. 12901–12912), which govern the
program.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
C. Availability of Other HOPWA
Resources
1. Formula Allocations and Renewal
Funds. Applicants are advised to also
consider seeking funds from the formula
component of the HOPWA program and
from other resources. Ninety percent of
the HOPWA program is allocated by
formula to eligible states and qualifying
cities.
In FY2007, HUD distributed
$256,162,000 in HOPWA funds by
formula to the qualifying cities for 83
eligible metropolitan statistical areas
(EMSAs) and to 39 eligible states for
areas outside of EMSAs. In addition,
expiring projects that provided
permanent supportive housing under a
competitive award in a prior year may
qualify for renewal funds, as authorized
by statute. In 2006, HUD provided
$16,488,302 to 16 renewal projects that
were eligible, consistent with CPD
Notice 06–06, Standards for Fiscal Year
2006 HOPWA Permanent Supportive
Housing Renewal Grant Applications,
issued on May 15, 2006 (the notice is
available at https://www.hudclips.org/
sub_nonhud/cgi/pdfforms/0606CPD.doc).
2. National HOPWA Technical
Assistance. To apply for funding to
serve as a provider of HOPWA technical
assistance, you must submit an
application for funds under the
Community Development Technical
Assistance (CDTA) section of the
SuperNOFA. The CDTA notice makes
HOPWA funds available to
organizations qualified to provide
technical assistance support to HOPWA
grantees and project sponsors.
Organizations seeking help in managing
their current HOPWA project, such as
advice or other help needed in
planning, operating, reporting to HUD
and evaluating HOPWA programs, can
request technical assistance by
contacting their state or area CPD office.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
II. Award Information
A. Total. The total available HOPWA
competitive funding in FY2007 is
approximately $28,463,000. After first
awarding funds to renew existing
HOPWA permanent housing projects in
FY2007, HUD estimates that
approximately $10 million will be
available for new projects.
B. Announcement of Awards. HUD
anticipates that projects awarded under
this notice will be announced by August
31, 2007. HUD expects that selected
projects will undertake program
activities under a grant agreement for a
3-year operating period.
C. Minimum and Maximum Grant
Award. In order to fairly distribute
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
11663
available funding, the conditions on
grant size for award that you may
receive is:
1. For program activities (e.g.,
activities that directly benefit eligible
persons): at least $500,000 and up to
$1.3 million;
2. For grant administrative costs of the
grantee: 3 percent of the awarded grant
amount (e.g., an additional $39,000 if
the maximum grant is awarded);
3. For grant administrative costs for
project sponsors: 7 percent of the
amounts received by the project sponsor
under the grant (e.g., an additional
$91,000 if the maximum grant is
awarded). A grantee cannot also receive
project sponsor administrative costs
even when the grantee carries out the
program activities directly;
4. Total maximum grant amount for
all categories of grant awards under this
NOFA is $1.43 million.
D. Average Grant Award. Based on the
results of the 2006 HOPWA
competition, the average grant award for
the 10 grants selected was $1,099,589.
projects or for additional funding to
existing projects that do not qualify as
permanent supportive housing renewal
grants.
States and units of general local
government may apply under the
‘‘Long-term’’ category, if the project
entails housing activities in areas that
did not receive or are not designated to
receive HOPWA formula allocations in
FY2007 or the government agency is not
eligible to receive formula funds will
serve a balance of state area outside of
any EMSA. Nonprofit organizations are
not eligible to apply directly for Longterm grants, but may serve as a project
sponsor for an eligible state or local
government applicant.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Threshold Requirements for All
Applications. Applicants must meet the
threshold requirement identified in the
General Section. HUD will also review
your application to determine that you
are eligible for funding, as follows:
a. Eligible Applicant.
(1) Your application is consistent with
the requirements of Section III.A of this
NOFA for eligibility based on applicant
requirements, project sponsor
requirements, and the lack of any
unresolved management issues for
applicants who currently administer
HOPWA grants; and
(2) Your application complies with
the Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS). More
information on the requirement of the
DUNS can be found in the General
Section.
b. Eligible Project Sponsors. Your
application is consistent with the
requirements for eligibility of project
sponsors, as follows:
If the project sponsor is a nonprofit
organization, it must also satisfy the
nonprofit requirements established in
the definition of an eligible nonprofit
organization found in 24 CFR 574.3 and
in the definition section of this NOFA.
A. Eligible Applicants
1. Eligibility for Funding to Nonprofit
Organizations. If you are a nonprofit
organization, you must also satisfy the
nonprofit requirements established in
the definition for eligible nonprofit
organization found in 24 CFR 574.3 and
in the definitions section of this
Program NOFA.
2. General Eligibility for Expiring
Grant Projects. To be eligible for a new
grant for an existing HOPWA project, a
project that does not qualify for renewal
as a permanent supportive housing
project, or significantly changes an
existing project, the project must meet
all program requirements. Existing
HOPWA projects that show poor
performance or unresolved grants
management issues up to the date of the
public announcement of awards under
this NOFA will not be funded.
Unresolved problems may include: (1)
HUD knowledge that planned activities
remain significantly delayed in their
implementation; (2) A significant
number of planned housing units are
vacant; (3) Required annual progress
reports are not timely filed with HUD;
(4) Unresolved actions pending under a
HUD notice of default on your current
grant or significant citizen complaints
are unresolved or not responded to with
justified reasons.
3. General Eligibility for Applicants
and Sponsors. States, units of general
local government, and nonprofit
organizations may apply under the
SPNS grants category to propose new
PO 00000
Frm 00231
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
There are no cost sharing or matching
requirements for applications under this
program NOFA. However, leveraging is
encouraged and addressed in Rating
Factor 4 Leveraging.
C. Other
2. Program Requirements
All grant recipients must also meet
the following program requirements,
including performance goals and
operational benchmarks, and conduct
project activities in a consistent and
ongoing manner over the approved grant
operating period. If a selected project
does not meet the appropriate
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11664
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
requirement, HUD reserves the right to
cancel and/or withdraw the grant funds.
a. General Provisions. The provisions
outlined within the General Section
apply to the HOPWA program unless
otherwise stated within this NOFA.
Specifically, you are encouraged to
review Section III.C, Other
Requirements and Procedures
Applicable to All Programs.
b. Environmental Requirements. All
HOPWA assistance is subject to the
National Environmental Policy Act and
applicable related federal environmental
authorities. While some eligible
activities, such as tenant-based rental
assistance, supportive services,
operating costs, and administrative
costs, are excluded from environmental
review because of the lack of
environmental impact, other activities
require environmental review. All new
facility-based projects must undergo an
environmental review. In accordance
with Section 856(h) of the AIDS
Housing Opportunity Act and the
HOPWA regulations at 24 CFR 574.510,
environmental reviews for HOPWA
activities are to be completed by
responsible entities in accordance with
24 CFR Part 58. Applicants or grantees
that are not a responsible entity must
request the unit of general local
government to perform the
environmental review. HOPWA grantees
and project sponsors may not commit or
expend any grant or non-federal funds
on project activities (other than those
listed in 24 CFR 58.22(f), 58.34 or
58.35(b)) for which the responsible
entity documents its findings of
exemption or exclusion for the
environmental review record (24 CFR
58.34(b) or 24 CFR 58.35(d)) until HUD
has approved a ‘‘Request for Release of
Funds and Certification’’ (RROF), form
HUD–7015.15, on compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act and
implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part
58 (Environmental Review Procedures
for Entities Assuming HUD
Environmental Responsibilities). The
recipient, its project sponsors and their
contractors may not acquire,
rehabilitate, convert, lease, repair,
dispose of, demolish, or construct
property for a project, or commit or
expend HUD or local funds for such
eligible activities, until the responsible
entity (as defined in 24 CFR 58.2) has
completed the environmental review
procedures required by 24 CFR part 58
and the environmental certification and
the RROF have been approved. HUD
will not release grant funds if the
recipient or any other party commits
grant funds (i.e., incurs any costs or
expenditures to be paid or reimbursed
with such funds) before the recipient
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
submits and HUD approves its RROF
(where such submission is required).
The recipient shall supply all available,
relevant information necessary for the
responsible entity to perform, for each
property, any environmental review
required.
c. Required HOPWA Performance
Goals. Grant recipients must conduct
activities consistent with their planned
annual housing assistance performance
output goals, objectively measure actual
achievements against anticipated
achievements, and report on their actual
performance housing outputs and client
outcomes. Applicants are required to
use the HOPWA Budget Form (form
HUD–40110–B) found in the
instructions to the published NOFA on
Grants.gov/Apply in this NOFA for
recording the funding for housing
assistance activities that are associated
with these performance outputs,
including any funding request for
HOPWA funds and/or commitment to
use other funds for this purpose. This
form is consistent with the new Annual
Progress Report that grantees will be
required to complete. In establishing
and reporting on performance goals,
applicants are required to use the Logic
Model (Form HUD–96010) as described
under paragraph (e). Applicants must
establish a reasonable client outcome
goal on achieving housing stability,
reducing risks of homelessness and
improving access to care to be
quantified after each year of operation to
demonstrate client outcomes. HUD
expects that each HOPWA grantee will
show that at least half of the
beneficiaries achieve stable housing,
have reduced risks of homeless or
improved access to care in their
program during the operating year, as
shown by an assessment of the housing
status for the household at the end of
each operating year. The grantee will
assist in establishing a baseline on
annual performance to help measure
how future efforts lead to the
achievement of higher levels of housing
stability. On a national basis, HUD has
established the goal that more than 80
percent of clients will be in stable
housing situations by 2008. The
following performance measures must
be used in your project plan and your
logic model under paragraph (e):
(1) Required Output refers to the
number of units of housing/households
assisted during the year, as measured by
the annual use of HOPWA funds. For
HOPWA, the application must specify
one-year goals for the number of
households to be provided housing
through the use of HOPWA activities
for: (a) Short-term rent, mortgage, and
utility assistance payments to prevent
PO 00000
Frm 00232
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
homelessness of the individual or
family; (b) tenant-based rental
assistance; and (c) units provided in
housing facilities that are being
developed, leased, or operated with
HOPWA funds. You should also include
the projected numbers of low-income
eligible households who are expected to
benefit from the other types of HOPWA
assistance to be provided through your
project during each operating year, such
as the number receiving permanent
housing placement support, or
supportive services.
(2) Required Outcomes refer to the
number of eligible households who have
been provided housing assistance (as
noted above for outputs) and thereby
maintain a stable living environment in
housing that is safe, decent, and
sanitary. The program will measure
these results in annual assessments on
the housing status of beneficiaries along
with other outcome measures on the
reduced risks of homelessness and
improved access to HIV treatment and
other health care and support. On a
nationwide basis, the program is
expected to demonstrate stable housing,
reduced risks of homelessness and
improved access to care results for
beneficiaries through the use of annual
resources with a national goal that this
status be achieved by 80 percent of all
HOPWA beneficiaries by 2008.
d. Optional Program Performance
Goals. In addition to required
performance measures described in the
paragraph above, you may include other
measures or annual indicators in your
project plan and in your logic model
under paragraph (e).
e. HUD Logic Model. You must use
the Logic Model (Form HUD–96010) in
this NOFA to illustrate the planning for
the use of resources, project activities,
required outputs and outcomes, and
other grantee-identified goals, and for
reporting on annual accomplishments.
Applicants must make use of the
required elements in paragraph (a) in
this form. If you are awarded a grant
under this notice, please note that the
Logic Model form will also be used as
part of your Annual Progress Report to
document results obtained under your
approved plans during each operating
year. HUD intends to propose a Return
on Investment Statement (ROI) for each
of its competitive grant programs. HUD
will publish a proposed ROI Statement
for public comment prior to
implementation. HUD intends to
publish the first ROI Statements for
public comment and input during
FY2007. HUD expects grantees to
respond to the Management Evaluation
Questions, however in their final
reports. Training on the logic model will
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
be conducted via satellite broadcast and
archived on HUD’s Web site and the
satellite broadcast and webcast date will
be published on HUD’s Web site. See
Section VI.C, ‘‘Reporting’’ for additional
information on Logic Model reporting
requirements.
f. HOPWA Facility Use Period
Requirement. Any building or structure
assisted with amounts under this part
will be maintained as a facility to
provide assistance for eligible persons:
(1) For not less than 10 years in the case
of assistance involving new
construction, substantial rehabilitation
or acquisition of a building or structure;
and (2) for not less than 3 years in cases
involving non-substantial rehabilitation
or repair of a building structure.
g. Execution of Grant Agreement and
Obligation of Awards. HOPWA grants
are obligated upon execution of the
grant agreement by both parties (i.e., the
recipient and HUD). Applicants selected
to receive FY2007 funding must execute
grant agreements as soon as practicable,
but no later than 6 months after the
notice of selection.
h. Disbursement of Funds. Grant
recipients must fully expend their grant
funding no later than three years
following the effective date or the
operation start date in the grant
agreement, unless HUD has approved a
one-time extension for an additional 12
months or less. A time limit on grant
expenditures that is established in the
National Defense Authorization Act for
FY1991 requires the expenditure of all
HOPWA funds awarded under this
NOFA by September 30, 2013. After
September 30, 2013, any unexpended
funds shall be canceled and, thereafter,
shall not be available for obligation or
expenditure for any purpose.
i. Site Control of Housing Facilities
through Acquisition or Lease. If you
propose to acquire a site or structure or
lease a structure to serve as a housing
facility in your project, you are required
to gain site control within one year from
the date of your notice of selection by
HUD.
j. Rehabilitation or New Construction.
If you propose to use HOPWA funds for
rehabilitation or new construction
activities for housing projects, you must
agree to begin the rehabilitation or
construction within 18 months
(including any time taken in the
facility’s acquisition or lease under
paragraph (i)), and all rehabilitation or
construction work must be completed
within the terms of your grant
agreement with HUD. Such activities
will trigger certain accessibility
requirements of Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and/or the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Design and Construction requirements
of the Fair Housing Act of 1988.
k. Project Operations. If funds are
used for operating costs of existing
housing facilities, you must agree to
begin to use these funds within 6
months, consistent with the terms of
your grant agreement with HUD. If
funds are to be used for operating costs,
in connection with the new
construction or substantial
rehabilitation of housing facilities, the
amount of funds designated for
operating costs must be limited to the
amount to be used during the portion of
the planned three-year period for your
grant agreement for which the facility
will be operational and assisting
eligible. Delays in the project’s
development activities, such as the
planned completion of the construction
or rehabilitation activities, could result
in the loss of funds designated for
operating costs, if such funds remain in
excess after the authorized use period
for this award. For example, if you
expect to take two years to complete the
rehabilitation of the facility, any
operating costs could only be requested
for use in the remaining one-year of the
planned 3-year operating period for this
award.
l. Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968. The applicant
will comply with Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1701(u),
and regulations pursuant thereto (24
CFR part 135), which require that to the
greatest extent feasible opportunities for
training and employment be given to
lower-income residents of the project
service area and that contracts for work
in connection with the project be
awarded in substantial part to persons
residing in the service area of the
project.
3. Eligible Activities
a. Proposed Project Activities. In your
application, you must specify the
activities and budget amounts for which
HOPWA funds are being requested,
consistent with the eligible activities
found in the HOPWA regulations at 24
CFR 574.300. Your activities must
address housing needs of eligible
members of the community and specify
whether the project will be undertaking
permanent, transitional, short-term and/
or emergency housing assistance. A
copy of the regulations may be
downloaded from www.hud.gov/offices/
cpd/aidshousing/lawsregs/index.cfm.
You are encouraged to review the
HOPWA regulations before seeking
funding, and other program guidance,
such as CPD Notice 06–07, HOPWA
Short-term Rent, Mortgage and Utility
PO 00000
Frm 00233
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11665
Payments (STRMU) and Connections to
Permanent Housing, issued August 3,
2006. HOPWA documents can be found
on the program webpage noted above.
HUD will not approve proposals that
depend on a prospective determination
as to how program funds will be used.
For example, a proposal to establish a
local request-for-proposal process to
select either activities, or to select
project sponsors, that would have the
effect of delaying the obligation of funds
due to the unplanned use of HOPWA
funds, will not be approved.
b. Additional Guidance on Use of
Program Funds.
(1) Housing Assistance. HOPWA
projects must demonstrate that housing
assistance is the main focus of program
activities. Please indicate if you propose
to use HOPWA funds to provide
permanent supportive housing (as
defined in Section I.A.). If you are
proposing emergency or transitional
housing assistance, your plan must
include linkages to permanent
supportive housing. See 24 CFR
574.300(b)(8) for descriptions of
appropriate operating costs for a
housing project.
(2) Supportive Services. Many of the
eligible persons who will be served by
HOPWA may need other support in
addition to housing. It is important that
you design programs that enhance
access to those existing mainstream
resources through communitywide
strategies to coordinate assistance to
eligible persons. These mainstream
programs include: The Ryan White
CARE Act; Medicaid; the Children’s
Health Insurance Program; Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families; Food
Stamps; Mental Health Block Grant;
Substance Abuse Block Grant;
Workforce Investment Act; the Welfareto-Work grant program; as well as other
state, local and private sources. No more
than 35 percent of the proposed budget
for program activities undertaken by
project recipients can be designated for
supportive services costs. In addition,
HUD will not award funds for the
acquisition, lease, rehabilitation, or new
construction of a supportive servicesonly facility. Additional restrictions and
limitations that apply to supportive
services such as limitations addressing
only uncompensated health care costs,
can be found at 24 CFR 574.300. HUD
will not provide funds for medications
or other health care costs, as these are
reasonably available from other sources.
Costs for staff engaged in delivering the
supportive service is part of the
supportive service activity cost, and
should not be listed as operating costs
or ‘‘other’’ costs in the application’s
proposed HOPWA budget.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11666
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(3) Permanent Housing Placement
Assistance. Permanent housing
placement at 24 CFR 574.300(b)(7) may
also be used in connection with the
provision of housing support provided
under these awards and is not
considered a supportive service under
limitations stated in paragraph (2).
Permanent housing placement costs
may involve costs associated with
helping eligible persons establish a new
residence where ongoing occupancy is
expected to continue, including rental
application fees, related credit checks,
and reasonable security deposits
necessary to move persons to permanent
housing, provided such deposits do not
exceed 2 months of rent. Leveraged
resources may involve other forms of
move-in support, such as essential
housing supplies, smoke alarms,
standard furnishings, minor repairs to
the unit associated with move-in, and
other incidental costs for occupancy of
the housing unit. While these items are
not eligible as permanent housing
placement costs, grantees may make use
of other leveraged funds for these costs.
(4) Other HUD-Approved Activities.
You may propose other activities not
already authorized at 24 CFR
574.300(b), subject to HUD’s approval.
Your proposal should address the
expected beneficial impact of this
alternative activity in addressing
housing needs of eligible persons by
describing the project impact and the
identified performance output and
client outcome measures for this
activity.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Addresses to Request Application
Package
Copies of the published NOFAs and
application forms for HUD programs
announced through NOFA are available
at the Grants.gov Web site, https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information,
customer support is available from
Grants.gov by calling its Support Desk at
(800) 518–4726 between 7 a.m. and 9
p.m. eastern time or by sending an email to support@grants.gov. If you do
not have Internet access and need to
obtain a copy of the NOFA, you can
contact HUD’s NOFA Information
Center toll-free at (800) HUD–8929.
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
via the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
By signing the SF–424, applicants are
agreeing to the assurances found in the
General Section. If conditionally
selected for funding, the following
certifications as noted must be provided
prior to the signing of a grant agreement.
Standard certifications and forms are
listed in the General Section and the
HOPWA budget and certification (form
HUD–40110–B), is identified in this
NOFA.
1. Forms: Applicants are requested to
submit the following information:
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance (Required)
b. SF–424 Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov)
(Optional).
c. HUD–96010, Program Outcome
Logic Model (Required).
d. HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan
(Required).
e. HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC–II
Plan—if applicable to the service area of
your project (Optional).
f. HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov) (Required).
g. SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities, if applicable (Required).
h. HUD–40110–B, HOPWA
Application Budget Summary,
including HOPWA Applicant
Certifications (Required).
i. HUD–27300, Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov) (Optional).
j. HUD–2993, Acknowledgement of
Application Receipt, if applicable due to
an approved waiver of the electronic
submission requirement (Optional).
k. HUD 2994–A, You Are Our Client!
Grant Applicant Survey (Optional).
l. HUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov) (for electronic applications).
2. Additional HOPWA Guidance on
Forms.
a. HOPWA Application Budget
Summary (form HUD–40110–B). Do not
complete the standard budget form
contained in the General Section.
Applicants must use this programspecific budget form (HUD–40110–B,
HOPWA Budget Application Summary)
that demonstrates how funds will be
used for eligible activities. The HOPWA
HUD–40110–B will provide a summary
PO 00000
Frm 00234
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
of the total budget for your project, the
annual HOPWA amounts to be used in
each of the three years of operation and
description budget by project sponsor of
the HOPWA funds to be used by each
sponsor. On this form, you must provide
a short narrative which outlines each of
your requested budget line items and
how the funds will be used, including
the amount of requested funding, by
line item for you and your project
sponsors.
b. Certification of Consistency with
the Consolidated Plan (HUD–2991).
Except as stated below, you must obtain
a Consolidated Plan certification signed
by the applicable state or local
government official for submitting the
appropriate plan for the areas in which
activities are targeted. This form must
be submitted to HUD prior to the
signing of a grant agreement. The
authorizing official from the state or
local government must sign this
certification. If your project will be
carried out on a national basis or will
be located on an Indian reservation or
in one of the U.S. Territories of Guam,
the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, or
the Northern Mariana Islands, you are
not required to include a Consolidated
Plan certification from these areas with
your application.
3. Application Content for Long-term
and Special Projects of National
Significance (SPNS) Project
Applications. The review criteria for
long-term, and SPNS applications can
be found in Section V.A. of this NOFA.
For your narrative responses, number
the pages and include a header or a
footer that provides the name of the
applicant or the project.
a. Executive Summary. On no more
than two double-spaced pages, provide
an Executive Summary of the proposed
project. The summary should provide
an overview of the main components of
your planned HOPWA project, any
special service delivery method or
project purposes and the projected
annual housing output for the first year
of operation. In the executive summary,
provide the name of the grantee and any
project sponsors, along with contact
names, phone numbers, and e-mail
addresses.
For projects involving sites, (e.g., a
structure where HOPWA funds will be
used for the housing activities,
involving construction, acquisition,
rehabilitation, leasing, operating costs,
and/or project-based rental assistance)
provide the address of the proposed site
of this structure and describe what other
resources will be used to complete the
development of this housing facility.
Please identify if the site is a
Confidential Site or a Public Site. (HUD
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
will not release the address of
confidential sites).
b. Proof of Nonprofit Status and AIDS
Purpose. Excluding situations where
nonprofit documentation was submitted
to HUD under prior HOPWA awards
and there has been no change in this
status for the project sponsor(s), all
conditionally selected applicants must
provide a copy of the nonprofit
documentation for each sponsor that is
a nonprofit organization consistent with
the standards under paragraph (1) below
prior to the signing of a grant agreement.
Conditionally selected applicants must
also provide documentation consistent
with paragraph (2) below prior to the
signing of a grant agreement to
demonstrate that each sponsor’s
organizational documents include a
purpose of significant activities related
to providing housing or services to
persons with HIV/AIDS. For submission
of the documentation in paragraphs (1)
and (2) on paper forms, you should
follow the directions in the General
Section, with the exception of the
budget forms.
(1) HUD will accept as evidence of
your nonprofit status:
(a) A copy of the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) ruling providing taxexempt status under Section 501(c)(3),
(4), (6), (7), (9) or (19) of the IRS code;
(b) A ruling from the Treasury
Department of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico granting income tax
exemption under section 101 of the
Income Tax Act of 1954, as amended (13
LPRA 3101);
(c) Documentation that the applicant
is a certified United Way agency;
(d) Copy of your most recent
completed tax statement, Form IRS–990
or Form 990–EZ;
(e) All of these:
(i) a certification by the appropriate
official of the jurisdiction where the
nonprofit was organized that your
organization was organized as a
nonprofit organization and is in good
standing;
(ii) A certification from a designated
official of the organization that no part
of the net earnings of the organization
inures to the benefit of any member,
founder, contributor, or individual; that
the organization has a voluntary board;
and that the organization practices
nondiscrimination in the provision of
assistance in accordance with
applicable program requirements; and
(iii) an opinion letter from an
independent public accounting firm that
the nonprofit entity has a functioning
accounting system that provides for
each of the following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(A) Accurate, current, and complete
disclosure of the financial results of
each federally funded project;
(B) Records that identify adequately
the source and application of funds for
federally funded activities;
(C) Effective control over and
accountability for all funds, property
and other assets;
(D) Comparison of outlays with
budget amounts;
(E) Written procedures to minimize
the time elapsing between the transfer of
funds to the recipient from the U.S.
Treasury and the use of funds for
program purposes;
(F) Written procedures for
determining reasonableness, allocable,
and allowable costs; and
(G) Accounting records including cost
accounting records that are supported
by source documentation.
(2) HUD will also accept, as evidence
of your organization’s HIV/AIDS-related
purpose, a copy of the organization’s
articles of incorporation and bylaws,
mission statement, program
management plan, or other
organizational policy document that
evidences the organization’s activities or
objectives related to providing services
or housing to persons with HIV/AIDS.
c. Capacity of Applicant and Project
Sponsors and Relevant Organizational
Experience Narrative. On no more than
five double-spaced typed pages or
similar chart or table for the Applicant,
and no more than two double-spaced
pages or similar chart or table per
additional sponsor, demonstrate the
extent to which you and any project
sponsor(s) have the organizational
resources necessary to successfully
implement your proposed activities in a
timely manner.
d. Need/Extent of the Problem
Narrative. On no more than five doublespaced typed pages or similar chart or
table define your planned service area
and demonstrate the need for funding
eligible activities in the area to be
served.
e. Soundness of Approach: Model
Qualities and Responsiveness/
Coordination Narrative. On no more
than ten double-spaced, typed pages or
a similar chart or table, address the
method by which your plan meets your
identified needs. Demonstrate how your
project will provide its planned
activities through HOPWA and other
resources, and how it will serve as a
model with exemplary qualities to
address the ongoing housing and
supportive service needs of eligible
persons within a replicable operational
framework.
f. Documentation of Leveraged
Resources. As described in paragraph 4
PO 00000
Frm 00235
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11667
of this section, to receive a leverage
score for your project, provide a detailed
chart of commitments that you have
obtained and have on file that provides
evidence of your ability to secure
community resources for operating and
sustaining your housing project. On no
more than two double-spaced typed
pages or similar chart or table, address
the method by which your plan
addresses sustainability of the effort.
g. Achieving Results and Program
Evaluation Narrative. To complement
the use of the Logic Model form, in no
more than three double-spaced, typed
pages or a similar chart or table, provide
a supplemental optional narrative that
may detail or further demonstrate your
commitment to ensuring that the goals
that you set forth and your performance
will be assessed in a clear and effective
manner. Address how you will
implement the HOPWA Program goals
and identify the benefits or outcomes of
your program, including details on your
activities, benchmarks, and interim
activities or performance indicators
shown in the Logic Model. Provide
comments as may be needed on details
for an evaluation plan that will
objectively measure actual
achievements against anticipated
achievements.
4. Application Content on Leveraging
for All Types of Applications
To receive consideration for leveraged
resources, all types of applications must
include information on the
commitments from other state, local,
federal, or private entities to provide
additional resources in operating and
sustaining your planned activities to
support project beneficiaries. Other
HOPWA funds, such as formula
allocations, may not be used for this
purpose in determining leveraging. To
receive a score for leveraging, any
project must provide a list in a chart
with information on the nature of the
secured leveraged commitments that
you have in hand at the time of your
application submission to HUD. You
may also describe a plan for how the
project will continue to operate in
future years, with a decreased reliance
on these federal resources.
As a change from prior year
competitions, you should not submit an
electronic copy or facsimile transmittal
of these letters of commitment with
your HOPWA application, but should
use these letters or documents to report
on the information requested below.
The applicant must retain in its files all
of the leveraging letters or documents,
and a conditionally selected applicant
may be required to provide HUD with
a copy or other evidence of these letters
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11668
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
or documents as part of the conditions
for receiving HOPWA funds.
In the application, provide
information only for contributions for
which you have a written commitment
in hand at the time of application. A
written commitment could include
signed letters, memoranda of agreement,
and other documented evidence of a
firm commitment for resources to be
available during the operating period of
your project, if selected for award. This
does not include resources that are in
use prior to the new grant operating
period. Leveraging items may include
any written commitments that will be
used towards your leveraging of the
project, as well as any written
commitments for buildings, equipment,
materials, services and volunteer time.
The value of commitments of land,
buildings and equipment are one-time
only and cannot be claimed by more
than one selected project (e.g., the value
of donated land, buildings or equipment
claimed in 2006 and prior years for a
project that was selected for funding
cannot be claimed as leveraging by that
project in subsequent competitions).
The written commitments must be
documented on letterhead stationery,
signed by an authorized representative,
dated and in your possession prior to
the deadline for submitting your
application.
The Department will periodically
monitor the use of your commitments
by requiring the collection of
information in annual progress reports
to establish that the leveraged resources
are being used, as committed, in
undertaking the project. Failure to
provide evidence of these commitments
or the related use of these additional
resources in operating your project
could result in a notice of default and
affect the project’s continued access to
federal funds awarded under this
NOFA.
C. Submission Dates
Application Deadline Date. Your
completed application must be received
and validated electronically by
Grants.gov no later than 11:59:59 p.m.
eastern time on the deadline date for
HOPWA. The validation process may
take up to 72 hours. Failure to have the
application validated by Grants.gov
prior to the deadline will result in a late
application making the application
ineligible for funding under this NOFA.
Please follow the application
submission and timely receipt
requirements that are established in the
General Section.
All parts of an electronic application
must be submitted via the Grants.gov
portal with additional documentation as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
called for in this NOFA provided via
electronic facsimile transmittal in
accordance with the requirements stated
in the General Section. For electronic
applications, HUD will not accept parts
of an application submitted through the
mail or entire applications by facsimile.
For applications receiving a waiver of
the electronic application submission
requirements, the entire application
must be submitted in hard paper copy
format with the required number of
copies.
D. Intergovernmental Review
The HOPWA program is not subject to
Executive Order (EO) 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Limitations on Maximum Grant
Amounts. Your request for funding must
be consistent with the following
limitations on minimum and maximum
grant amounts:
a. For program activities (e.g.,
activities that directly benefit eligible
persons): At least $500,000 and a
maximum of $1.3 million, subject to the
limitations in this section;
b. For grant administrative costs of the
grantee: A maximum of no more than an
additional $39,000, subject to the limit
on administrative costs of 3 percent of
the amount requested for project
activities in your application for
grantees.
c. For grant administrative costs for
project sponsors: A maximum of no
more than an additional $91,000,
subject to the limit on administrative
costs of 7 percent of the amount
requested for project activities to be
conducted by project sponsors in your
application. (Note: An applicant that
will serve as a grantee, but carry out
activities directly without a third-party
project sponsor, cannot add amounts
from this paragraph to its eligible
amount under paragraph (b) above.)
d. Total for maximum grant amount:
$1.43 million, as subject to applicable
limitations in this section and if funds
are requested for a term of less than
three years, HUD reserves the right to
reduce these amounts in a proportionate
manner.
2. Limitation on Supportive Services.
Your request for the supportive services
line item in program activities must be
consistent with the program limits of
not more than 35 percent of the
proposed budget for program activities
undertaken by project recipients.
3. Limitation on Prospective
Determinations. HUD will not approve
proposals that depend on a prospective
determination as to how program funds
PO 00000
Frm 00236
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
will be used, except as needed in
securing housing units for participants.
More specifically, proposals to establish
a local request-for-proposal process to
select either activities or project
sponsors, and other similar proposals
that have the effect of delaying the
obligation of funds due to the
unplanned use of HOPWA funds, will
not be approved.
4. Limitation on Ineligible Activities.
HUD will not provide additional funds
under this notice for the purposes of
conducting resource identification
activities to establish, coordinate, and
develop housing assistance resources,
and/or technical assistance for
community residence activities, because
these types of activities are funded
through the national HOPWA technical
assistance funds being made available
under the Community Development
Technical Assistance (CDTA) NOFA or
available for resource identification
activities under formula allocations.
HUD will not provide additional funds
for data collection on project outcomes;
because such activities in collecting
performance data and reporting to HUD
are required as a central grants
management function, is already
covered under administrative costs. In
addition, eligible HOPWA costs cannot
involve costs for personal items, such as
grooming, clothing, pets, financial
assistance, consumer credit payments,
entertainment activities, personal
vehicle maintenance and repairs,
property taxes, condominium fees, and
other non-housing-related costs. Eligible
costs are also subject to additional
HOPWA standards at 24 CFR Part 574.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Electronic Delivery. HUD requires
applicants to electronically submit via
www.grants.gov. See Sections IV.B. and
F. of the General Section for instructions
for submitting leveraging
documentation, certifications, and other
required forms.
2. Waivers to the Electronic
Submission Process: Applicants may
request a waiver of the electronic
submission process (see the General
Section for more information).
Applicants should submit waiver
requests in writing, by e-mail, fax, or to
the address listed below. Waiver
requests must be submitted no later than
15 days prior to the application
deadline date to: David Vos, Director of
HIV/AIDS Housing, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW, Suite 7212,
Washington, DC 20410–7000.
E-mail: David_Vos@hud.gov, facsimile
(fax) 202–708–9313.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Applicants who are granted a waiver
based on a HUD-approved justification
must submit their applications in
accordance with the requirements stated
in the approval to the waiver request.
Paper applications must be received by
HUD at the proper location by the
deadline date.
V. Application Review Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Criteria
1. Criteria for Project Applications
a. Departmental Policy Priorities. As
outlined in the General Section, HUD
has identified policy priorities that
project applicants are encouraged to
address through their proposed project
plans. HUD has identified five
Departmental policy priorities as being
applicable for new HOPWA projects.
Applications for HOPWA funding will
receive rating points for each applicable
Departmental policy priority initiative
addressed through the proposed
program activities and performance
goals and objectives. Applicants must
demonstrate how these priorities will be
addressed through the Soundness of
Approach of the application as outlined
under Rating Factor 3. Under the points
available for Rating Factor 3, one or two
Rating Points, as specified below, will
be awarded for each of the following
addressed priorities:
(1) In accordance with the General
Section, for applicants seeking HOPWA
funds for capital development activities,
including rehabilitation or new
construction, or identifying leveraged
commitments of other funds for these
activities in assisting HOPWA
beneficiaries, for one rating point under
project soundness of approach, you are
encouraged to institute visitability and
universal design standards in these
activities undertaken with HOPWA
funds. Visitability standards allow a
person with mobility impairments
access into the home, but do not require
that all features be made accessible; and
such standards incorporate universal
design in the construction or
rehabilitation of housing undertaken
with HOPWA funds. Universal design
provides housing that is usable by all
without the need for adaptation or
specialized design.
(2) For one rating point under project
soundness of approach, you are
encouraged to propose projects in which
the grantee, or the project sponsor(s),
fulfills the policy priority for being a
nonprofit, grassroots community-based
organization, including faith-based
organizations, as defined in the General
Section.
(3) For one rating point under project
soundness of approach, you are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
encouraged to propose applications in
which the grantee, or project sponsor(s),
commits to follow the Energy Star
standard in any new construction, or
rehabilitation activity, or in maintaining
housing or community facilities to be
undertaken in the proposed project with
HOPWA or other funds. This would also
apply to undertaking program activities
that include developing energy star
promotional and information materials,
providing outreach to low- and
moderate-income renters and buyers on
the benefits and savings when using
Energy Star products. The Energy Star
standard is as defined in the General
Section.
(4) For up to two rating points under
project soundness of approach, you are
encouraged to propose an application in
which the grantee, or project sponsor(s),
if it is a state or local government
agency, as defined in the General
Section, completes the regulatory
barriers policy questionnaire,
‘‘Questionnaire for HUD’s Initiative on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers’’ (Form
HUD–27300) and provides the required
documentation, contact information
and/or a Web site link where the
information can be readily found.
b. Program Policies—Target
Population. Prior to the award of other
projects, HUD reserves the right to select
the two highest rated applications (but
not any that are rated at less than 75
points) that demonstrate that the
planned HOPWA activities and
activities supported by leveraged funds
will serve the special population of
HOPWA eligible persons who are
chronically homeless persons with HIV/
AIDS. Persons who are infected with
HIV are more likely to be able to follow
complex treatment regimens if they
have a reliable address where they can
be reached by care providers, a safe
place to keep medications, refrigeration
for drugs that require it, and other
necessities that many of us take for
granted. HUD is encouraging
applications that strive to create
additional models for permanent
housing for eligible persons living with
HIV/AIDS that are experiencing chronic
homelessness. Applicants must work
collaboratively with the local
Continuum of Care Plans to create these
models for persons living with HIV/
AIDS and their families and
demonstrate a plan for the integration of
HOPWA activities with those systems
such as the use of HMIS. HMIS
participation is required for all
recipients of award funding under this
NOFA whose projects intentionally
target HOPWA eligible persons who are
homeless or chronically homeless. In a
number of Continuum of Care
PO 00000
Frm 00237
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11669
communities, HOPWA projects are
directly involved in providing outreach,
assessment, housing and supportive
services to HOPWA eligible persons
who are homeless at the time they enter
into program support. HMIS activities or
the use of related information
technology systems may already be
operating to support the delivery of
housing information services to these
HOPWA clients.
c. Economic opportunities for lowand very low-income persons—Section
3. For up to two rating points under
project soundness of approach, you are
encouraged to propose an application in
which the grantee or project sponsor(s)
demonstrate in their application how
they will incorporate Section 3
principles into their project with goals
for expanding opportunities in their
service area for Section 3 residents and
businesses. As defined in Section V of
the General Section, the purpose of
Section 3 is to ensure that employment
and other economic opportunities
generated by F ederal financial
assistance for housing and community
development programs, shall, to the
greatest extent feasible, be directed
toward low- and very-low income
persons.
d. Application Selection Process for
Projects.
Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Project Sponsors and
Relevant Organizational Experience (20
points) (Minimum for Funding
Eligibility—14 Points)
Address the following factor by using
not more than five double-spaced, typed
pages or a similar chart or table. For
each project sponsor, you may add two
additional pages. This factor addresses
the extent to which you and any project
sponsor have the organizational
resources necessary to successfully
implement your proposed activities in a
timely manner. If you will be using
project sponsor(s) in your project, you
must identify each project sponsor in
your application. HUD will award up to
20 points based on your and any project
sponsor’s ability to develop and operate
your proposed program in relation to
which entity is carrying out an activity.
(1) With regard to both you and your
project sponsor(s), you should
demonstrate:
(a) Past experience and knowledge in
serving persons with HIV/AIDS and
their families;
(b) Past experience and knowledge in
programs similar to those proposed in
your application, including HOPWA
formula funding;
(c) Experience and knowledge in
monitoring and evaluating program
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11670
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
performance and disseminating
information on project housing outputs
and client outcomes; and
(d) Past experience as measured by
expenditures and measurable progress
in achieving the purpose for which
funds were provided.
(2) In reviewing the elements of the
paragraph above, HUD will consider:
(a) The knowledge and experience of
the proposed project director and staff,
including the day-to-day program
manager, consultants, and contractors in
planning and managing the proposed
activities. You and any project sponsor
will be judged in terms of recent,
relevant, and successful experience of
staff in undertaking eligible program
activities.
(b) Your and/or the project sponsor’s
experience in managing complex
interdisciplinary programs, especially
those involving housing and community
development programs directly relevant
to the work activities proposed and
carrying out grant management
responsibilities.
(c) If you and/or the project sponsor
received funding in previous years in
the program area for which you seek
funding, those past experiences will be
evaluated in terms of the ability to attain
demonstrated measurable progress in
the implementation of your grant
awards. Measurable progress is defined
as:
(i) Meeting applicable performance
benchmarks in program development
and operation;
(ii) Meeting project goals and
objectives, such as the HOPWA output
for the number of homeless persons
assisted in comparison to the number
that was planned at the time of the
application;
(iii) Submitting timely performance
reports and other results, such as client
outcomes in maintaining stable housing,
reducing risks of homelessness and
improving access to care; and
(iv) Expending prior funding as
outlined in the existing HOPWA grant
agreement with HUD, with no
outstanding audit or monitoring issues.
Applicants must receive a minimum
of 14 points in Rating Factor 1 to be
eligible for funding under this NOFA.
An application that plans to use project
sponsors but fails to provide
information on their capacity could not
receive the minimum score.
Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (15 Points)
Address the following factor using not
more than five double-spaced typed
pages or similar chart or table. Up to 15
points will be awarded for this factor.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
a. AIDS Cases (5 points). You must
define your planned service area. HUD
will obtain AIDS surveillance
information pertinent to that area from
the Director of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. Up to five
points will then be awarded based on
the relative numbers of AIDS cases and
per capita AIDS incidence within your
service area, in metropolitan areas of
over 500,000 population and in areas of
a state outside of these metropolitan
areas, in the state for proposals
involving state-wide activities, and in
the nation for proposals involving
nationwide activities.
b. Description of Unmet Housing
Need (10 points). Up to ten points will
be awarded based on demonstration of
need for funding eligible housing
activities in the area to be served. To
receive the maximum points,
demonstrate that substantial housing
and related service needs of eligible
persons and/or the target population, as
outlined in Section V.A.1.b., are not
being met in the project area and that
reliable statistics and data sources (e.g.,
Census, health department statistics,
research, scientific studies, and Needs
Analysis of Consolidated Plan and/or
Continuum of Care documentation)
show this unmet need. To receive the
maximum points, show that specific
elements of your jurisdiction’s
Consolidated Plan and Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice,
Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance
plans (if homeless persons are to be
served), and comprehensive HIV/AIDS
housing plans are applicable to your
project, and identify the level of the
problem and the urgency of the need. A
Consolidated Plan certification alone is
not sufficient to demonstrate need for
the project as established under this
criterion.
(1) If you apply for a SPNS grant, you
must describe a housing need that is not
currently addressed by other projects or
programs in the area, including
reference to the area’s existing HOPWA
programs. You must further describe
how the planned activity will
complement these in a manner that is
consistent with the community’s plan
for a comprehensive and coordinated
approach to housing needs of persons
living with HIV/AIDS that establishes
stable housing for clients and helps
foster greater self sufficiency and
independence. Also, describe any
unresolved or emerging issues and the
need to provide new or alternative
forms of assistance that, if provided,
would enhance your area’s programs for
housing and related care for persons
living with HIV/AIDS and their families.
You must also describe how your
PO 00000
Frm 00238
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
project will enhance the community’s
Consolidated Plan strategies for
providing affordable housing and access
to related mainstream services to
HOPWA-eligible persons; or
(2) If you apply as a long-term project
that will operate in a non-formula area
or balance-of-state area, you must
describe the housing need that is not
currently addressed by other projects or
programs in the area including any
HOPWA competitive grants or other
HIV/AIDS housing projects and how the
planned activity will complement these
in a manner that is consistent with the
community’s plan for a comprehensive
and coordinated approach to housing
needs of persons living with HIV/AIDS.
You must also describe any unresolved
or emerging issues and/or the need to
provide forms of assistance that
enhances the community’s strategy for
providing housing and related services
to eligible persons.
HUD will evaluate your presentation
of statistics and data sources based on
soundness, reliability, and the
specificity of information to the target
population and the area to be served. If
you propose to serve a subpopulation of
eligible persons on the basis that these
persons have been traditionally and are
currently underserved (e.g., HOPWA
eligible persons who are chronically
homeless), your application must
demonstrate the need for this targeted
effort through statistics and data sources
that support the need of this population
in your service area. Programs may
serve a qualified subpopulation of
persons with AIDS based on the
presence of another disability or group
of disabilities, only if doing so is
necessary to provide this subpopulation
with housing, benefits, aid, or services
as effective as that provided to others.
See 24 CFR 8.4(b)(1)(iv).
Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach: Responsiveness,
Coordination and Public Policy
Priorities, and Model Qualities (45
Points)
Address this factor on not more than
ten (10) double-spaced, typed pages or
similar chart or table. Include the
HOPWA Budget forms identified in this
NOFA. This factor addresses the method
by which your plan meets your
identified needs. HUD will award up to
45 points (15 for responsiveness, 5 for
coordination, 7 for public policy
priorities, and 18 for model qualities)
based on the extent to which your plan
evidences a sound approach for
conducting the HOPWA activities in a
manner that is responsive to the needs
of eligible persons and that your plan
for project coordination will offer model
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
qualities in providing supportive
housing opportunities for eligible
persons with access to mainstream
health and human welfare services,
when compared to other applications
and projects funded under previous
HOPWA competitions.
a. Responsiveness, Coordination, and
Public Policy Priorities (27 points). HUD
will award up to 27 points
(Responsiveness—15 points and
Coordination—5 points and Public
Policy Priorities—7 points) based on
how well your project plans respond to
the unmet needs in housing and related
supportive services for the eligible
population, including target populations
outlined under Section V.A.1.b. You
should demonstrate the extent to which
you have coordinated your activities
and the activities of your project
sponsors with other organizations that
are not directly participating in your
proposed work activities. This involves
organizations with which you share
common goals and objectives in
assisting eligible persons. In order to
ensure that resources are used to their
maximum effect within the community,
it is important that you demonstrate
collaboration and leveraging of other
resources from state, local, and private
funding resources.
(1) Responsiveness (15 points). To
receive the highest rating in this
element, your application must address:
• The projected number of persons to
be served through each activity for each
year of your program;
• The projected number of housing
units, by type, to be provided through
your project, by year, over a 3-year
period; and
• The specific organizations, either
through an agreement with your
organization or through funding from
your project, that will provide housing,
and agreements with organizations that
will provide mainstream supportive
services, or other activities. Include a
description of the roles and
responsibilities of your project sponsors
and/or other organizations within your
project plan and how these will be
coordinated in conducting eligible
activities. To receive the maximum
points for your project plan, you must
explain and describe the eligible
housing activities you or your project
sponsor intend to conduct, where these
activities will take place (either on-site
or at another location), and how those
activities will benefit eligible persons.
Please describe:
(a) Housing Activities. You must
demonstrate how the emergency,
transitional, or permanent housing
needs of eligible persons will be
addressed through one or more of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
HOPWA eligible activities and through
any other resources and how such
activities are coordinated with other
available housing assistance. Your plan
for housing assistance must include:
(i) Access to permanent supportive
housing for applicants. In proposing a
housing project, you must describe how
eligible persons will access permanent
housing and/or use emergency, shortterm and transitional housing support
through your project and through any
specific commitments with other
community housing providers. If your
project involves some initial emergency
or transitional assistance for clients,
please describe your plans to facilitate
the movement of eligible persons
receiving this emergency or transitional
housing support to permanent housing
or independent living arrangements
within 24 months.
(ii) Permanent housing placement. If
you use funds to help beneficiaries
secure new housing units, please
describe your plans to use funds and the
related housing outputs for these
permanent housing placement services
(under that budget line item) such as
costs for first month’s rent and security
deposits;
(iii) Description of Housing Site. You
must describe any appropriate site
features including use of universal
design, accessibility, visitability, and
access to other community amenities
associated with your project.
(iv) Development and Operations
Plan. You must describe a development
and/or operations plan for the
emergency, transitional, or permanent
housing assistance you are proposing to
provide. For rental assistance programs,
this will include your plan for providing
rental assistance, proposed housing sites
if project-based, and length of stay if
less than ongoing permanent supportive
housing. If you are proposing to use
HOPWA funds for the acquisition,
rehabilitation, or new construction of a
housing facility, your plan must also
document that you have secured other
funding sources, including plans for
coordinating the use of other resources
that are committed to undertaking the
development activities. Please identify
the planned site or structure and
describe any progress on securing the
identified project site(s) or structure(s),
to demonstrate that the development
activities will be undertaken consistent
with the related benchmarks for those
activities. The project must be costeffective, including costs not deviating
substantially from the norm in that
locale for the type of structure or kind
of activity. The highest rated projects
involving development costs will
demonstrate that HOPWA funds will
PO 00000
Frm 00239
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11671
not be used as the initial or sole funding
source for capital development housing
projects and significant progress has
been made to identify and secure the
proposed project site or structure.
(v) Operational Procedures. Describe
your outreach, intake, engagement and
assessment procedures, as well as how
eligible persons will receive housing
support with access to medical care and
other supportive services provided by
other organizations. Describe the use of
housing being funded from other
sources, and how your project provides
for ongoing assessments of the housing
service benefits received by eligible
persons. Include a description of how a
client moves through the housing
program from outreach, intake, client
assessment, the delivery of housing
services, the use of emergency,
transitional, or permanent housing, and
when appropriate, the outplacement to
more self-sufficient independent
housing. If persons who are homeless
are to be assisted, including persons
who are chronically homeless, describe
the housing activities and necessary
support to identify, prioritize and
respond to their supportive housing
needs in coordination with other area
assistance for persons who are
homeless. Also address the number of
permanent housing beds for the
chronically homeless that would
become available for occupancy during
each of your project operating years.
(b) Supportive Service Activities. You
must describe how you will address the
supportive service needs of eligible
persons with HOPWA assistance
(subject to applicable limitations) and
the use of any additional leveraged
resources by describing the type of
supportive services that will be offered
directly by the program and/or how
agreements and project plans will assure
that services will be accessed and
coordinated from other mainstream
health and human welfare sources.
Explain the connection of these services
in helping eligible persons obtain and/
or maintain stable housing. Supportive
service costs may represent no more
than 35 percent of your proposed budget
for program activities. In describing
your supportive services delivery plan
explain:
(i) How agreements provide that
eligible persons will have access to
mainstream programs that offer health
care and other supportive services;
(ii) How project plans ensure that
eligible persons will participate in
decision-making in the project
operations and management; and
(iii) Your plan for delivering
supportive services through a
comprehensive plan that shows how
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11672
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
agreements provide that eligible persons
access medical care and other
mainstream supportive services to
address their needs.
(c) Additional HOPWA Activities. You
must describe your plan for utilizing
other requested HOPWA funds
(described at 24 CFR 574.300(b)).
Explain how these activities will be
integrated into your overall plan in the
provision of housing and related
supportive services to eligible persons.
(d) Other Approvable Activities. As
authorized by statute, HUD may
approve other activities that are in
addition to the activities at 24 CFR
574.300(b). You may propose other
activities in your application, which can
be undertaken only if approved by HUD
due to their relevance in addressing the
housing needs of eligible persons. You
must describe the reason for the need to
request authorization for ‘‘other
activities’’ and the benefits likely to
occur if the activities are authorized.
Also, address how the project would
operate, or not, if such request were not
approved.
(2) Coordination (5 points). You
should demonstrate the extent to which
you have coordinated your planned
application activities and the activities
of your project sponsors with other
organizations that are not directly
participating in your proposed work
activities. This involves organizations
for which you share common goals and
objectives. You may provide
information on your primary decisionmaking group in providing leadership to
your efforts as well as other
organizations participating in planning
activities, such as committees,
workgroups, public meetings, forums
etc. and the frequency of meetings. You
will be rated on the extent to which you
demonstrate you have:
(a) Coordinated your proposed
application activities with those of other
groups or organizations within the
community or region prior to
submission, to best complement,
support, and coordinate all housing and
supportive service activities including
specific reference to how the proposal is
coordinated with existing HOPWA
programs in that area (formula and
competitive) and how the planned
efforts complement the existing
programs;
(b) Developed your project through
consultation with other stakeholders,
such as organizations, groups, or
consumers involved with area HIV/
AIDS housing and service planning,
including planning under the Ryan
White CARE Act and other federal
planning. The highest rated applications
will demonstrate that the project is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
closely and fully integrated with HUD’s
planning processes, such as the
jurisdiction’s Consolidated Planning
process or the community’s Continuum
of Care Homeless Assistance planning
process (if homeless persons are to be
served by proposed activities and
related use of Homeless Management
Information Systems (HMIS) to
coordinate benefits for clients);
(c) Coordinated with other HUDfunded programs outside of the
Consolidated Planning process; for
example, accessing additional housing
resources through a local public housing
authority; and
(d) Coordinated with mainstream
resources including private, other
public, and mainstream services and
housing programs. To achieve the
maximum points, applicants must
evidence explicit agency strategies to
coordinate client assistance with
mainstream health, social service, and
employment programs for which
eligible persons may benefit.
(3) Public Policy Priorities (7 points).
Applications for HOPWA funding will
receive rating point(s) for each
applicable Department policy priority
initiative addressed through the
proposed program activities and
performance goals and objectives.
Applicants must make a specific
statement on their commitment to
address each priority or to otherwise
demonstrate how these priorities will be
addressed:
(a) In accordance with the General
Section, for applicants seeking HOPWA
funds or uses related leveraged funds for
capital development activities,
including rehabilitation or new
construction, for one rating point under
project soundness of approach, your
application describes the use of
universal design and visitability
standards in development activities
undertaken with HOPWA or leveraged
funds and incorporate universal design
in the construction or rehabilitation of
housing undertaken with HOPWA
funds. Visitability standards allow a
person with mobility impairments
access into the home, but do not require
that all features be made accessible.
Universal design provides housing that
is usable by all without the need for
adaptation or specialized design.
(b) For one rating point under project
soundness of approach, your
application involves participation as the
grantee, or as a project sponsor(s), by a
nonprofit grassroots community-based
organization, including faith-based
organizations, as defined in the General
Section.
(c) For one rating point under project
soundness of approach, the grantee, or
PO 00000
Frm 00240
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
project sponsor(s), commits to promote
energy efficiency by adopting or
following the Energy Star standard in
any new construction or rehabilitation
activity or in maintaining housing or
community facilities to be undertaken
in the proposed project with HOPWA or
other funds. This would also apply to
undertaking program activities that
include developing Energy Star
promotional and information materials,
providing outreach to low- and
moderate-income renters and buyers on
the benefits and savings when using
Energy Star products. The Energy Star
standard is as defined in the General
Section.
(d) For two rating points under project
soundness of approach, your
application involves a state or local
government agency as the grantee, or as
a project sponsor(s), and that agency
completes the regulatory barriers policy
questionnaire, including providing the
required documentation, as defined in
the General Section.
(4) Economic Opportunities for Lowand Very-Low Income Persons—Section
3. For up to two rating points under
project soundness of approach, your
application demonstrates how you are
incorporating Section 3 principles into
your project with goals for expanding
employment and other opportunities in
your service area for Section 3 residents
who are low and very-low income
persons, and related business concerns,
as defined in Section III.C.4 of the
General Section,
b. Model Qualities (18 points). HUD
will award up to 18 points based on
your service delivery plan and how well
it will serve as a model for a housing
project during the operating period.
HUD expects the proposed project to
show exemplary and/or innovative
qualities that address the ongoing
housing needs of eligible persons by
establishing or maintaining stable
housing arrangements by project
activities that will be undertaken within
a replicable operational framework. To
receive the maximum points, you must
offer a housing plan that describes the
following:
(1) Policy Priorities. If applicable to
your application, describe how you will
meet the Departmental policy priorities
for assisting the special population of
HOPWA-eligible persons who are
chronically homeless persons with HIV/
AIDS. HUD is encouraging applications
that strive to create additional models
for permanent housing for persons
living with HIV/AIDS that are
experiencing chronic homelessness.
Applicants addressing this population
must work collaboratively with the local
Continuum of Care plans to create this
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
permanent housing for persons living
with HIV/AIDS and their families.
(2) Project Management and
Oversight. Describe your method for
managing and overseeing activities,
including those of your organization,
your project sponsor, and any other
organization. Identify staff members
who are responsible for management
and oversight of the project and activity
implementation and sustainability
plans.
(3) Evaluation Plan. In addition to
required HOPWA outputs and outcomes
your evaluation plan should identify
what you are going to measure, how you
are going to measure it, the steps you
have in place to make adjustments to
your work plan if performance targets
are not met within established
timeframes, and how you plan to share
successes and lessons learned in
undertaking your activities with other
communities.
(4) Model Features. Describe how the
planned efforts for the type of proposed
project, Long-term or SPNS, will
represent model or exemplary qualities
in service delivery, management, or
other features in connection with other
HOPWA-funded projects in your
community including any local
assessment of these features. For a Longterm project, the features must involve
housing activities to be undertaken in a
non-formula area. A SPNS project must
involve a plan and commitments to
establish or maintain stable housing
arrangements by showing exemplary
and/or innovative qualities. If you
propose a new program, or an
alternative method of meeting the needs
of your eligible population, describe
how the innovative qualities of your
activities will result in knowledge
gained or lessons learned for achieving
greater housing opportunities and
supportive services for persons living
with HIV/AIDS. HUD will rate your
application higher if you provide strong
evidence that your methods will yield
qualities that will benefit or expand
knowledge in serving eligible persons,
when compared to other applications
and HOPWA projects. To learn about
qualities of previously funded and
ongoing HOPWA projects, you may
review the HOPWA Executive
Summaries for HOPWA grantees at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/
aidshousing.
(5) Model Descriptive Budget. HUD
will review your budget under the
HOPWA budget form (HUD–40110–B)
in describing:
(a) How each amount of requested
funding for you and your project
sponsors will be used and the related
use of leveraged resources;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(b) How each line item will relate to
your description of planned eligible
HOPWA activities; and
(c) The clarity and completeness of
your summary statement of the planned
activities for your project by budget line
item and the use of any leveraged funds
or other resources by the grantee and
sponsor(s).
You must complete the HOPWA
Project Budget Form as described above.
Rating Factor 4: Leverage and
Sustainability (10 Points) (Minimum for
Funding Eligibility 1 Point)
This factor addresses your ability to
secure community resources that can be
combined with HUD’s funds to achieve
program purposes and to ensure
sustainability of the housing efforts.
HUD will award up to 10 points based
on the extent to which resources from
other state, local, federal, or private
resources are listed with the required
elements to demonstrate that these
funds are committed at the time of
application to support and sustain your
project. To receive the highest
leveraging points based on the amount
of commitments, up to 8 points, you
must provide information on the
commitment of other resources that at
least equal the amount of the HOPWA
request for program activities (not
including administrative costs) as part
of your plan to operate this project over
the next 3 year period. Applications
must receive a minimum of 1 point in
this Rating Factor to demonstrate the
commitment of other resources to be
eligible for funding under this NOFA
with the standards described in Section
IV (B)4 on Leveraging. Applicants will
be awarded points based on the content
of a list or chart for the commitments
with the following information: the
name and address of the organization(s)
providing the commitment(s) (note if
the organization will serve as a project
sponsor); the type of commitment
(applicant or third party cash resources,
non-cash resources, volunteer time,
contribution of a building, contribution
of lease hold interest); the dollar value
of the commitment; the date of the
commitment letter or other document;
the source of the funding, such as
federal, state, local, private or in-kind
contributions; and the organization’s
authorized representative’s name, title,
and contact information who has made
this commitment. For up to two
additional points, the application must
address the project’s sustainability as
shown in a plan for obtaining and
coordinating identified resources to be
more financially self-sustaining. The
highest rated plan will show how the
project will decrease dependency on
PO 00000
Frm 00241
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11673
federal funding at the end of the
operating period and rely more on state,
local, and private funding to continue
support for beneficiaries.
Factor 5: Achieving Results and
Program Evaluation (Maximum 10
points)
Address this factor in your Logic
Model (and optionally in a
supplemental related narrative if
performance elements are added to
those available on this form) on not
more than three additional doublespaced, typed pages or similar chart or
table. Under this factor, HUD will award
10 points based on how well your
application demonstrates a commitment
to ensuring that the goals that you set
forth and your performance will be
assessed in a clear and effective manner.
HUD will analyze how well you have
clearly implemented the required
HOPWA program output and outcome
goals and identified other stated benefits
or outcomes of your program including
your activities, benchmarks, and interim
activities or performance indicators
with timelines. HUD will award the
highest points to applications that
demonstrate an evaluation plan that will
objectively measure actual
achievements against anticipated
achievements.
The highest-rated applications will
have a clear plan to address the HOPWA
client outcome goals increase the
amount of housing assistance provided
to eligible persons, to establish or
maintain housing stability, reduce the
risks of homelessness for eligible
persons, and improve access to health
care and other support. The application
may also optionally address other
related indicators of relevant outcomes.
The highest rated applications will
also have a clear plan to use the
HOPWA housing output measures—the
projected number of households to be
assisted in HOPWA-supported housing
units by type (tenant-based rental
assistance, STRMU payments and
assistance in housing facilities) to be
provided to eligible households through
your project during each projectoperating year. The application may
also optionally address other related
outputs. Your application must include
the Logic Model form (HUD–96010) to
receive any points under this factor.
B. Reviews and Selection Process
1. HOPWA Project Applications
a. Threshold Reviews. HUD will
review your HOPWA application to
ensure that it meets the threshold
requirements found in the General
Section and Section III.C of this NOFA
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11674
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
pertaining to a request for a Long-term
project or an SPNS project.
b. HUD Reviews. HUD staff will
conduct this review, including HUD
staff from Community Planning and
Development (CPD) at Headquarters and
HUD’s state and area field offices.
c. Procedures for the Rating and
Selection of Applications. HUD will rate
all HOPWA applications based on the
factors listed above. The points awarded
for the factors total 100. In addition,
HUD will award two bonus points to
each application that includes a valid
form HUD–2990 certifying that the
proposed activities/projects in the
application are consistent with the
strategic plan for an empowerment zone
(EZ) designated by HUD or the United
States Department of Agriculture
(USDA), the tax incentive utilization
plan for an urban or rural renewal
community designated by HUD (RC), or
the strategic plan for an enterprise
community designated in Round II by
USDA (EC–II) and that the proposed
activities/projects will be located within
the RC/EZ/EC–II identified above and
are intended to serve the residents. A
listing of the RC/EZ/EC–IIs is available
on the Internet at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/cpd/economicdevelopment/
programs/rc/tour/roundnumber.cfm.
This notice contains the certification
form HUD–2990 that must be completed
for the applicant to be considered for
RC/EZ/EC–II bonus points. Whether
your HOPWA application is
conditionally selected will depend on
your overall ranking compared to other
applications within each of the two
categories of assistance, long-term
projects or SPNS projects, and the
amount of funds that are available to be
awarded by this competition. Funds
made available from federal Fiscal Year
2007 must first be used to fund the
priority selection of expiring
competitive projects that undertake
permanent supportive housing activities
(as a change from prior years, renewal
applicants are not part of this NOFA
process and will be conducted by HUD
by a separate action). If any such funds
remain after renewal actions are funded,
then the funds will be used under this
NOFA competition to fund additional
projects. HUD will select applications in
rank order in each category of assistance
(Long-term and SPNS) to the extent that
funds are available, except as outlined
in this Program NOFA, where HUD
reserves the right to select two projects
addressing the housing needs of persons
who are chronically homeless as the
target population established under
program policies. In allocating amounts
to the categories of assistance, HUD
reserves the right to ensure that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
sufficient funds are available for the
selection of at least one application with
the highest ranking under each category
of assistance. HUD will not select an
application that is rated below 75
points, nor will an application be
funded if it receives a Rating Factor 1—
Capacity score lower than 14 points or
Rating Factor 4—Leveraging score lower
than 1 point.
In the event of a tie between
applications in a category of assistance,
HUD reserves the right to break the tie
by selecting the proposal that was
scored higher on a rating criterion in the
following order: Rating Factor 3; Rating
Factor 5; Rating Factor 1; Rating Factor
2; and Rating Factor 4.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
The anticipated announcement of the
projects selected under this notice is no
later than August 31, 2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Applicant Notification. HUD will
notify the eligible applicants of their
conditional selection or rejection for
awards by e-mail or by a letter to be
mailed to the applicant’s authorized
official at the address or e-mail address
provided in your application. For
conditionally selected applicants, the
CPD Division of HUD’s state or area
office will provide a second letter with
a copy of a proposed grant agreement
along with instructions on any
adjustments to the grant amount
requested and other conditions
identified during the review for
conducting planned activities and on
the close out of the current grant.
2. Award Modifications. After
reviewing each application, HUD
reserves the right to take each of the
following actions:
a. HUD reserves the right to make
award adjustments as outlined in
Section VI.A.2, Adjustments to Funding,
of the General Section.
b. In the event that a conditionally
selected applicant is unable to meet any
conditions for funding within the
specified time, HUD reserves the right
not to make an award to that applicant.
In the event that a conditionally
selected applicant is continuing to
operate under the prior grant, and has
sufficient funds to continue current
operations for at least six months
following the date of notification of
selection, HUD may take any of the
following actions: (i) Follow procedures
to terminate the prior grant and
recapture remaining funds after this
date, consistent with the terms of the
PO 00000
Frm 00242
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
applicable grant agreement and 24 CFR
574.500(c); or (ii) adjust the amount of
the new award by the amount of funds
remaining after this date in the prior
grant.
c. In making an award to the final
selected project (by order of ranking),
HUD may offer less than the full amount
requested by an applicant that had
received sufficient points to be selected,
but for which there are insufficient
funds remaining to provide the full
funding request. HUD may also use
funds from an award reduced under
item b, above, to restore amounts to a
funding request that had been reduced
in this competition due to the
application’s lower rating status;
d. If an applicant turns down an
award, an award is not made, or if there
are sufficient award adjustments to
make additional awards feasible, HUD
reserves the right to: (a) offer an award
to the next highest rated application(s)
in this competition in their ranked
order; (b) add remaining or recaptured
amounts to the funds that become
available for a future competition; or (c)
restore amounts to a funding request
that had been reduced in this
competition.
3. Applicant Debriefing. Applicants
requesting to be debriefed must send a
written request to: Department of
Housing and Urban Development;
Attention: Office of HIV/AIDS Housing;
451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7212;
Washington, DC 20401–7000.
Telephone number is (202) 708–1934.
Persons with hearing or speech
challenges may access the above
number via TTY (text telephone) by
calling the Federal Information Relay
Service at 800–877–8339 (this is a tollfree number). Additional information
regarding debriefing can be found in the
General Section.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Executive Order 13202,
Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Toward
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Contract Projects. See the
General Section for the information on
how to meet this requirement.
2. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. See the General Section for
the information on how to meet this
requirement.
C. Reporting
1. Six-Month Report. For any new
project (i.e., a conditionally selected
applicant that has not previously
received a HOPWA competitive grant),
you must provide an initial report to the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
field office and HUD Headquarters on
the startup of the planned activities
within six months of your selection.
Your report must outline your
accomplishments and identify any
barriers or issues for which the
Department may provide assistance on
the start-up on your new award.
2. Measuring Performance. You must
report after each year of operation on
the annual accomplishments of your
projects under the HOPWA annual
progress report (form HUD–40110–B),
comparing your results to proposed
plans, including reporting under the
required HOPWA Performance Goals
including reporting on annual housing
outputs and client outcomes in
achieving housing stability, reduced
risks of homelessness, and improved
access to health care and other needed
support. For each reporting period, you
must provide a completed Logic Model
showing progress to date against
projected outputs and outcomes
contained in your approved grant
agreement. In addition, on an annual
basis, you must respond to the
management questions in the Program
Logic Model found as an appendix to
this program Section. HUD will use
these reports and information obtained
from HUD financial systems, along with
any remote or on-site monitoring, to
measure your progress and
achievements in evaluating your
performance on your HOPWA grant.
3. Beneficiary Information. HUD
requires that funded recipients collect
racial and ethnic beneficiary data. It has
adopted the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) Standards for the
collection of Racial and Ethnic Data. In
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
view of these requirements, you should
use one of the following:
• HUD–27061, Racial and Ethnic Data
Reporting Form (instructions for its use)
found on www.HUDclips.org;
• A comparable program form
(HOPWA—Annual Progress Report
(APR) form HUD–40110–C); or
• A comparable electronic data
system for this purpose.
VII. Agency Contacts
A. For Further Information and
Technical Assistance (TA). For
technical assistance in downloading an
application package from Grants.gov/
Apply, contact the Grant.gov help desk
at 800–518–Grants or send an e-mail to
support@grants.gov. For programmatic
information, you may contact the HUD
field office serving your area. You can
find the telephone number for the State
or Area Office of Community Planning
and Development on HUD’s Web site at:
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm. HUD staff can assist
with program questions, but may not
assist in preparing your application.
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access the above
number via TTY (text telephone) by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
B. Seeking Technical Assistance (TA)
in Developing a HOPWA Application.
HOPWA TA providers may not provide
technical assistance in the drafting of
responses to HUD’s NOFA due to the
unfair advantage such assistance gives
to one organization over another. If HUD
determines that HOPWA technical
assistance has been used to draft a
HOPWA application, HUD reserves that
right to reject the application for
PO 00000
Frm 00243
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11675
funding. If, after your application has
been selected for an award, HUD
determines that HOPWA technical
assistance was used to draft your
application, the award will be
withdrawn and you may be liable to
return to HUD any funds already spent.
C. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
information broadcasts via satellite for
potential applicants to learn more about
the program and preparation of the
application. For more information about
the date and time of the broadcast, you
should consult the HUD Web site at
www.hud.gov/grants.
VIII. Other Information
Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2506–0133. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 413 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
collecting, reviewing, and reporting the
data for the application, semi-annual
reports, and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00244
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.023
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11676
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Assisted Living Conversion Program
(ALCP) for Eligible Multifamily Housing
Projects
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: The
Assisted Living Conversion Program for
Eligible Multifamily Projects.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: The
OMB Approval Number is: 2502–0542.
The Federal Register number for this
NOFA is FR–5100–N–28.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: The
Assisted Living Conversion Program for
Eligible Multifamily Housing Projects is
14.314.
F. Dates: Applications must be
received and validated by Grants.gov no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
June 7, 2007. See the General Section for
specific instructions regarding
application submission.
G. Optional, Additional Overview
Content Information: The purpose of
this program is to provide grants for the
conversion of some or all of the
dwelling units in an eligible project into
assisted living facilities (ALFs) for frail
elderly persons. Private nonprofit
owners of eligible developments
interested in applying for funding under
this grant program should carefully
review the General Section and the
detailed information listed in this
NOFA. Funding will only be provided
for those items related to the
conversion.
The ALCP will fund those
applications that may impact federal
problem solving and policymaking and
that are relevant to HUD’s policy
priorities and annual goals and
objectives. Refer to the General Section
for discussion of these priorities and
annual goals and objectives.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Description. Assisted
living facilities (ALFs) are designed to
accommodate frail elderly persons and
people with disabilities who need
certain support services (e.g., assistance
with eating, bathing, grooming,
dressing, and home management
activities). ALFs must provide support
services such as personal care,
transportation, meals, housekeeping,
and laundry. Frail elderly person means
an individual 62 years of age or older
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
11677
who is unable to perform at least three
activities of daily living (ADLs) as
defined by the regulations for HUD’s
Section 202 Program (Supportive
Housing for the Elderly) at 24 CFR
891.205. Assisted living is defined in
section 232(b)(6) of the National
Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715w).
The ALCP provides funding for the
physical costs of converting some or all
of the units of an eligible multifamily
development into an ALF, including
unit configuration and related common
and services space and any necessary
remodeling, consistent with HUD or the
state’s statute/regulations (whichever is
more stringent). Typical funding will
cover basic physical conversion of
existing project units, as well as related
common and services space. There must
be sufficient community space to
accommodate a central kitchen or
dining facility, lounges, recreation, and
other multiple-areas available to all
residents of the project, and/or office/
staff spaces in the ALF. When food is
prepared at an off-site location, the
preparation area of the facility must be
of sufficient size to allow for the
installation of a full kitchen, if
necessary. You must provide supportive
services for the residents either directly
or through a third party. Your
application must include a firm
commitment for the supportive services
to be offered within the ALF. You may
charge assisted living residents for
meals and/or service fees. Residents
may contract with third party agencies
directly for nursing, therapy, or other
services not offered by the ALF.
B. Authority. The Assisted Living
Conversion Program is authorized by
Section 202b of the Housing Act of 1959
(12 U.S.C. 1701q–2) and the Revised
Continuing Appropriations Resolution,
2007 (Pub. L. 110–5, approved February
15, 2007) which provides $24.8 for the
conversion of eligible projects to
assisted-living or related use and for
emergency repairs, and the governmentwide rescissions pursuant to the
Department of Defense Appropriations
Act.
quality. The four geographical areas and
the lead Hub under the ALCP for each
are:
The lead Hub for the East Geographic
Area is Buffalo (the other Hubs which
feed into Buffalo for the ALCP are
Boston, New York, Philadelphia and
Baltimore).
The lead Hub for the South
Geographic Area is Fort Worth (the
other Hubs which feed into Fort Worth
for the ALCP are Greensboro,
Jacksonville, and Atlanta).
The lead Hub for the Central
Geographic Area is Kansas City (the
other Hubs which feed into Kansas City
for the ALCP are Chicago, Columbus,
Detroit, and Minneapolis).
The lead Hub for the West Geographic
Area is San Francisco (the other Hubs
which feed into San Francisco for the
ALCP are Seattle, Los Angeles, and
Denver).
The allocation formula used to fair
share the $30 million for the ALCP
reflects demographic characteristics of
age and incidence of frailty that would
be expected for program participants.
The FY2007 formula consists of one
data element from the 2000 decennial
census: The number of non-institutional
elderly population aged 75 years or
older with a disability. A fair share
factor for each state was developed by
taking the sum of the persons aged 75
or older with a disability within each
state as a percentage of the sum of the
same number of persons for the total
United States. The resulting percentage
for each state was then adjusted to
reflect the relative difference in the cost
of providing housing among the states.
The total of the grant funds available
was multiplied by the adjusted fair
share percentage for each state, and the
resulting funds for each state were
totaled for each Hub.
The ALCP grant funds fair share
allocations, based on the formula above,
for the four geographical areas are as
shown on the following chart:
II. Award Information
A. Available Funds. This NOFA
makes available approximately $30
million including carryover funds. The
funds will be used for the physical
conversion of eligible multifamily
assisted housing projects or portions of
projects to ALFs.
Under the ALCP, the 18 HUD
Multifamily Hubs are grouped into four
geographical areas so that the amount of
fair-shared grant funds will be sufficient
to enable reasonable competition, and
insure projects of feasible size and
FY 2007 ALLOCATION FOR THE ASSISTED LIVING CONVERSION PROGRAM (ALCP) OF ELIGIBLE ASSISTED MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS
PO 00000
Frm 00245
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
B. FY 2007 Allocation
Area
Grant
authority
East ...........................................
South ........................................
Central ......................................
West ..........................................
$7,530,990
9,504,338
7,043,100
5,921,572
Total ...................................
30,000,000
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11678
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
The ALCP Grant Agreement, when
fully executed, obligates the HUD funds.
This Agreement establishes the legal
relationship between HUD and the
ALCP award recipient. The period of
performance will be based on the scope
of work but shall not exceed 18 months.
e. Projects subsidized with Section
221(d)(3) below-market interest
mortgage,
f. Projects assisted under Section 236
of the National Housing Act.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. No
matching required.
III. Eligibility Information
C. Eligibility Requirements
A. Eligible Applicants. Only private
nonprofit owners of eligible multifamily
assisted housing developments
specified in section 683(2)(B), (C), (D),
(E), (F), and (G) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1992
(Pub. L. 102–550, approved October 28,
1992) may apply for an ALCP grant.
1. Eligible conversion activities are:
a. Retrofitting to meet Section 504
accessibility requirements, minimum
property standards for accessibility and/
or building codes and health and safety
standards for ALFs in that jurisdiction.
Examples are items such as addition of:
(1) Upgrading to accessible units for
the ALF with moveable cabinetry,
accessible appliances, sinks, bathroom
and kitchen fixtures, closets, hardware
and grab bars, widening of doors, etc.;
(2) An elevator or upgrades thereto;
(3) Lighting upgrades;
(4) Major physical or mechanical
systems of projects necessary to meet
local code or assisted living
requirements;
(5) Sprinkler systems;
(6) Upgrades to safety and emergency
alert systems;
(7) Addition of hallway railings; and
(8) Medication storage and
workstations.
b. Retrofitting to add, modify and/or
outfit common space, office or related
space for ALF staff including a service
coordinator and file security, and/or a
central kitchen/dining facility to
support the ALF function (e.g., outfit
lounge/common space/dining furniture,
kitchen equipment for cooking/serving
and dishware).
c. Retrofitting to upgrade a regular
unit to an accessible unit for a person/
family with disabilities who is being
displaced from an accessible unit in the
portion of the project that is being
converted to the ALF, where another
accessible unit is not available.
d. Temporary relocation.
e. Consultant, architectural, and legal
fees.
f. Vacancy payments limited to 30
days after conversion to an ALF.
g. Any excess Residual Receipts (over
$500/unit) and Reserve for Replacement
funds (over $1000/unit) in Project
Accounts that are not approved for
another use at the time of application to
HUD under this NOFA are considered
available funds and must be applied
toward the cost of conversion activities.
Before making this determination,
however, HUD staff will consider the
extent of repair/replacement needs
indicated in the most recent Real Estate
Assessment Center (REAC) physical
inspection and not yet approved and
any ongoing commitments such as non-
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Note: If your eligibility status changes
during the course of the grant term, making
you ineligible to receive the grant (e.g.,
prepayment of mortgage, sale/TPA of
property, opting out of a Section 8 Housing
Assistance Payment (HAP) contract, or the
transfer of the grant to a single asset entity),
HUD retains the right to terminate the grant
and recover funds made available through
this NOFA.
1. Ineligible Applicants. Ineligible
applicants are:
a. Owners of developments designed
specifically for people with disabilities.
b. Owners of Section 232
developments.
c. Property management companies
and agents of property management
companies.
d. Limited dividend partnerships.
e. Nonprofit Public Agencies.
f. Owners of hospitals or other healthrelated facility which are considered to
be eleemosynary institutions.
g. Owner of an existing insured or
privately owned Assisted Living
Facility.
h. Owners of commercial structures.
2. Eligible Developments. Eligible
projects must be owned by a private,
nonprofit entity and designated
primarily for occupancy by elderly
persons. Projects must have been in
occupancy for at least five years from
the date the form HUD–92485,
Permission to Occupy Project Mortgage,
was approved by HUD and have
completed final closing. Eligible
projects may only receive one grant
award. Additionally, eligible projects
must meet one of the following criteria:
a. Section 202 direct loan projects
with or without Section 8 rental
assistance,
b. Section 202 capital advance
projects receiving rental assistance
under their Project Rental Assistance
Contract (PRAC),
c. Section 515 rural housing projects
receiving Section 8 rental assistance,
d. Other projects receiving Section 8
project-based rental assistance,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00246
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
grant-based service coordinator or other
funding, where existing, deduct the
estimated costs of such items from the
reserve for replacement and residual
receipts balances to determine the
extent of available residual receipts and
reserve for replacement funds for the
ALCP.
2. Threshold Requirements. In
addition to the threshold criteria
outlined in the General Section,
applicants must meet the following
requirements to receive funding for this
program.
a. Be an eligible applicant.
b. DUNS Requirement. All ALCP
applicants must have a DUN and
Bradstreet Universal Data Numbering
Systems (DUNS) number. The DUNS
number must be included in the data
entry field labeled ‘‘organizational
DUNS’’ on the form SF–424.
Instructions for obtaining a DUNS
number can be found at either
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
duns.cfm or https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/request_duns_number.jsp.
c. You cannot request more funds
than allocated for your geographical
area. (See the allocation chart above in
Section II.B.)
d. You must provide commitment and
funding support letters from the
appropriate funding organizations and
the appropriate licensing agency(ies).
HUD will reject your application if the
commitment and support letter(s) from
the appropriate funding organizations
and the appropriate licensing
agency(ies):
(1) Are not submitted by the
application submission date as part of
your application for financial assistance;
(2) Indicate that the ALF units,
facilities, meals and supportive services
to be provided are not designed to meet
the special needs of the residents who
will reside in the ALF as defined in this
NOFA,
(3) Do not show commitment for
funding the meals and supportive
services proposed; or
(4) Indicate that the project as
proposed will not meet the licensing
requirements of the appropriate state/
local agency(ies).
e. You must comply with all
applicable statutory requirements
specified in Section 202b and statutory
requirements under Section 232(b)(6).
f. Minimum Size Limits for an ALF.
An ALF must be economically feasible.
Consistent with HUD Handbook 4600.1,
CHG–1, the minimum size for an ALF
is five units.
g. You must submit the required
number of copies of your completed
ALCP application by the deadline date,
if you requested and received a waiver
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
of the electronic submission
requirement. The notification granting
your waiver request will specify
requirements for paper application
submission, including the required
number of copies and where to submit
the application.
h. If you submit a substantially
deficient application, that is, an
application missing six or more
exhibits, the application will be
considered non-responsive to the
NOFA, thus leaving your application
ineligible for review. Refer to Section
IV.B, Content and Form of Application
Submission for further information.
3. Program Requirements
a. You must have a residual receipts
account separate from the Reserve for
Replacement account, or agree to
establish this account as a condition for
getting an award(s).
b. You must be in compliance with
your Loan Agreement, Capital Advance
Agreement, Regulatory Agreement,
Housing Assistance Payment contract,
Project Rental Assistance Contract, Rent
Supplement or Loan Management SetAside (LMSA) contract, or any other
HUD grant or contract document.
c. If selected, you must file a form
HUD–2530 for all construction
contractors, architects, consultants, and
service provider organizations under
direct contract with you that will be
engaged under this NOFA within 30
days of execution of the grant award.
d. Your project must meet HUD’s
Uniform Physical Conditions Standards
at 24 CFR part 5, subpart G. Meeting
these standards, based on the most
recent REAC physical inspection report
and responses thereto, means that the
project, must have a ‘‘satisfactory’’
rating as evidenced by a score of 60 or
better or a HUD-approved and on
schedule repair plan for developments
scoring less than 60. Additionally, the
project must have no uncorrected and
outstanding Exigent Health and Safety
violations. Finally, the project must not
have a management review with a rating
of ‘‘minimally satisfactory’’ or
‘‘unsatisfactory’’ with open and
unresolved findings.
e. You must submit, with your
application, an agreement to pursue
appropriate ALF licensing in a timely
manner.
f. Meals and Supportive Services. You
must develop and submit a Supportive
Services Plan (SSP) for the services and
coordination of the supportive services,
which will be offered in the ALF to the
appropriate state or local
organization(s), which are expected to
fund those supportive services. (See
Section IV.B. below for information,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
which must be in the SSP.) You must
submit one copy of your SSP to each
appropriate state or local service
funding organizations well in advance
of the application deadline, for
appropriate review. The state or local
funding organization(s) must return the
SSP to you with appropriate comments
and an indication of the funding
commitment, which you will then
include with the application you submit
to HUD.
g. Licensing Requirements. You must
ALSO submit the SSP to the appropriate
organization(s), which license(s) ALFs
in your jurisdiction. The licensing
agency(ies) must approve your plan, and
must also certify that the ALF and the
proposed supportive services identified
in your SSP, are consistent with local
statute and regulations and well
designed to serve the needs of the frail
elderly and people with disabilities who
will reside in the ALF portion of your
project.
h. Your ALF must be licensed and
regulated by the state (or if there is no
state law providing such licensing and
regulation, by the municipality or other
subdivision in which the facility is
located). Each assisted living unit must
include its own kitchen, bathroom,
bedroom, living/dining area (1 bedroom
unit) or kitchen, bathroom, bedroom/
living/dining area (efficiency unit) and
must meet the state and/or local
licensing, building, zoning, and other
requirements for an ALF.
i. Your ALF must be available to
qualified elderly persons and persons
with disabilities, consistent with the
rules and payment plans of the state,
who need and want the supportive
services in order to remain independent
and avoid premature
institutionalization.
j. Your ALF’s residents must be
tenants or residents of the multifamily
project and must comply with the
requirements applicable to the project.
Thus, you cannot charge additional rent
over what is charged to residents in the
non-ALF portion of the project. All
admissions to the ALF must be through
the applicable project admissions office.
However, persons accepted into the ALF
also must sign an ALF admissions
agreement, which shall be an addendum
to the applicable project lease.
k. At a minimum, your ALF must
provide room, board, and continuous
protective oversight (CPO). CPO
involves a range of activities and
services that may include such things as
awareness by management and staff of
the occupant’s condition and location as
well as an ability to intervene in a crisis
for ALF occupants on a 24-hour basis.
The two occupant groups in an ALF are:
PO 00000
Frm 00247
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11679
(1) Independent Occupants.
Awareness by management and staff of
the occupant’s condition and
whereabouts as well as the availability
of assistance for the occupants as
needed.
(2) Dependent occupants. Supervision
of nutrition, assistance with medication
and continuous responsibility for the
occupants’ welfare.
l. Anyone moving into an ALF unit
must agree to accept as a condition of
occupancy the board and services
required for the purpose of complying
with state and local law and regulation.
m. Your ALF must provide three
meals per day.
(1) Residents whose apartments have
kitchens must take at least the number
of meals a day provided by the facility,
per their mandatory meals requirement,
or as required by state or local rules, if
more stringent. If the facility does not
have a mandatory meals plan, then state
and local rules govern.
(2) Residents in projects which were
originally constructed without kitchens
in their units must take such meals as
required by their mandatory meals
agreement, if applicable, or by the
state’s mandated requirements if more
stringent (e.g., two meals, two snacks
daily).
In either case, ALF management must
coordinate meal requirements with the
needs of residents who are out part of
the day (e.g., in day care). The meal
program may not be operated at a profit
by the project owner.
n. Priority admissions for ALF units
are as follows:
(1) Current residents desiring an ALF
unit and meeting the program
requirements (no resident can be
required to accept an ALF unit).
(2) Qualified individuals or families
needing ALF services who are already
on the project’s waiting list;
(3) Qualified individuals or families
in the community needing ALF services
wanting to be added to the project’s
waiting list.
(4) Qualified disabled non-elderly
persons needing assisted living services
are eligible to occupy these units on the
same basis as elderly persons, except for
section 202 project rental assistance
contracts (PRAC) projects.
o. The management of the project
must set up a separate waiting list for
ALF units. ALF units must be for
eligible residents who meet the
admissions/discharge requirements as
established for assisted living by state
and local licensing, or HUD frailty
requirements under 24 CFR 891.205 if
more stringent.
p. Upon receipt of a grant under this
program, all project owners
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11680
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
participating in the ALCP must provide
a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
(DRC), which will be recorded with the
land, to retain the low income character
of the housing, and to maintain the
project (including the ALF), as a
moderate-, low-, or very low-income
facility (as appropriate) for at least 20
years beyond the current 40- to 50-year
term of the mortgage loan or capital
advance.
q. The ALCP requires service
coordination for linking the ALF to
available services in the community for
low-income persons. All projects
funded under this NOFA must have
sufficient service coordination in place,
or request additional funds, if
appropriate, to ensure that services
meeting licensing requirements are
available to ALF residents on an
ongoing basis. Service coordination
must be described in the application
(see Section IV.B. of this NOFA). If you
need to enhance an existing service
coordination program or add one where
it does not exist, you may apply for
funding through the Service Coordinator
NOFA, published elsewhere in the
SuperNOFA. If a funds request for
service coordination for the ALF and/or
the whole project is included as part of
this application, the Form SF–424 under
Exhibit 11, must indicate the dollars
requested. Do NOT attach the whole
service coordinator application. You
may also show evidence that funding for
the enhanced service coordination is
provided by other sources by indicating
such funding on the form SF–424. If you
are funded under this NOFA and
requested new or enhanced service
coordination you will be funded first
under the service coordinator NOFA.
(1) The ALF must be staffed either
directly or through coordination with
local agencies, depending on state
regulations or local requirements. These
may also serve non-ALF residents of the
project on a time available and
appropriate fee basis.
(2) If you are a Section 202 PRAC
project owner, you are NOT eligible to
request funding under the service
coordinator NOFA. Section 202 PRAC
owners can pay for the service
coordinator out of PRAC funds.
(3) The ALF may cater to the special
needs of residents depending on their
condition or diagnosis, such as
Alzheimer’s disease. If it does so, the
design/environment of such facilities
must accommodate those needs, e.g.,
dementia special care unit. However,
the ALF cannot provide a service it is
not licensed by the state or locality to
provide.
(4) Owners of Section 202/PRAC
projects are reminded that they may
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
include a PRAC payment of up to $15/
unit/month not to exceed 15 percent of
the total program cost, consistent with
24 CFR 891.225(b)(2) to cover part of the
cost of meals and/or supportive services
for frail elderly residents, including
residents of the ALF.
(5) Training for ALF staff is an eligible
project cost under existing operating
procedures. For further information on
ALFs, please refer to Handbook 4600.1,
CHG–1, ‘‘Mortgage Insurance for
Residential Care Facilities,’’ Chapter 13.
This Handbook and recent ALF program
Notices are accessible through
HUDCLIPS on HUD’s Web site at
https://www.hudclips.org/cgi/index.cgi.
These notices are in the Handbooks and
Notices—Housing Notices database.
Enter only the number without the letter
prefix (e.g., 99–16) in the ‘‘Document
number’’ to retrieve the program notice.
For further guidance on service
coordinators, please refer to Handbook
4381.5 REV–2, CHANGE–2, Chapter 8,
‘‘The Management Agent’s Handbook,’’
which is also available through the
HUDCLIPS database.
r. Your ALF’s operation must be part
of the project owner’s management
organization. Some or all of its functions
may be contracted out. The ALF must
predicate its budget on a two-tiered
structure under which board and
supportive service income and expenses
must be maintained separately and
independently from the regular income
and expenses of the applicable project.
The two components of ALF costs are:
(1) Charges/payment for board, (not
including rent for the unit) which may
be on a sliding scale or any other
equitable fee system; and
(2) Charges/payment for necessary
supportive services, which may include
a combination of resident fees, Medicaid
and/or other third party payments.
s. Prohibition Against Lobbying
Activities. The Byrd Amendment
prohibits ALCP recipients of federal
contracts, grants, or loans from using
appropriated funds for lobbying
activities. (Refer to Section III.C. of the
General Section for further instructions
regarding this requirement.)
t. Economic Opportunities for Low
and Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). You must comply with Section 3 of
the Housing and Urban Development
Act of 1968, 12 U.S.C. 1701u (Economic
Opportunities for Low and Very LowIncome Persons), and implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 135. You
must ensure that training, employment,
and other economic opportunities shall,
to the greatest extent feasible, be
directed toward low- and very lowincome persons, particularly those who
are recipients of government assistance
PO 00000
Frm 00248
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
for housing and to business concerns
which provide economic opportunities
to low- and very low-income persons
and including people with disabilities.
4. Additional Non-discrimination and
Other Requirements. Comply with the
requirements of the Fair Housing Act,
Executive Order 11063, Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975, the affirmative fair housing
marketing requirements of 24 CFR part
200, subpart M, and the implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 108, which
requires that the project be marketed to
those least likely to apply, including
those who are not generally served by
the agency administering the program,
and other applicable federal, state, and
local laws prohibiting discrimination
and promoting equal opportunity,
including affirmatively furthering fair
housing, and other certifications listed
in the application. (Refer to Section
III.C. of the General Section for
additional requirements and
information.)
a. Comply with section 232 of the
National Housing Act, as applicable; the
Uniform Federal Accessibility
Standards (24 CFR 40.7); section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and
HUD’s implementing regulations at 24
CFR part 8; and the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 for all portions
of the development physically affected
by this proposal.
b. Comply with the Davis-Bacon
requirements and the Contract Work
Hours and Safety Standards Act as
applied to this program. While it has
been determined that Davis-Bacon does
not apply statutorily to the ALCP, the
Department has administratively
determined that Davis-Bacon standards
and overtime rates in accordance with
the Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act will be adhered to in any
ALCP conversion grant in which the
total cost of the physical conversion to
an ALF (and including any additional
renovation work undertaken at the same
time) is $500,000 or more (this includes
ALCP grant funds, owner funds, or any
third party funds loaned or granted in
support of the conversion or other
renovation for the project associated
with this grant), AND in which the ALF
portion of the project is 12 units or
more.
c. Ensuring the Participation of Small
Business, Small Disadvantaged
Businesses, and Woman-Owned
Businesses. HUD is committed to
ensuring that small businesses, small
disadvantage businesses, and womanowned businesses participate fully in
HUD’s direct contracting and in
contracting opportunities generated by
HUD’s financial assistance. (Refer to the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
General Section for further instructions
regarding this requirement.)
d. Executive Order 13166, Improving
Access to Persons with Limited English
Proficiency (LEP). ALCP applicants
must seek to improve access to persons
with limited English proficiency by
providing materials and information in
languages other than English. Make
applications and other materials
available in languages other than
English that are common in the
community, if speakers of these
languages are found in significant
numbers and come into frequent contact
with the program. For further guidance
on serving persons with Limited English
Proficiency (LEP) in HUD assisted
programs, see HUD’s LEP guidance,
‘‘Notice of Guidance to Federal
Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI
Prohibition Against National Origin
Discrimination Affecting Limited
English Proficient Persons,’’ 72 FR 2732
(January 22, 2007) or see the following
web site, https://www.lep.gov/recip.html.
e. Executive Order 13279, Equal
Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based
and Community Organizations. HUD
has undertaken a review of all policies
and regulations that have implications
for faith-based and community
organizations, and has established a
policy priority to provide full and equal
access to grassroots faith-based and
other community-based organizations.
(Refer to the General Section for specific
instructions regarding this requirement.)
f. Accessible Technology. The
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998
apply to all electronic information
technology (EIT) used by an ALCP
recipient for transmitting, receiving,
using, or storing information to carry
out the responsibilities of the ALCP
awards. (Refer to Section III.C. of the
General Section for specific instructions
regarding this requirement.)
g. Participation in HUD-Sponsored
Program Evaluation. As a condition of
the receipt of ALCP funds, successful
applicants are required to cooperate
with all HUD staff or contractors
performing HUD-funded research and
evaluation studies.
h. Comply with Executive Order
13202, Preservation of Open
Competition and Government Neutrality
toward Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Construction Projects. (Refer to
the General Section for additional
information on this requirement).
i. OMB Circulars and Governmentwide Regulations Applicable to
Financial Assistance. ALCP applicants
are subject to the Administrative
Requirements of OMB Circular A–133,
Audits of States, Local Governments
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
and Non-Profit Organizations; OMB
Circular A–122, Cost Principles for NonProfit Institutions; the administrative
requirements of 24 CFR Part 84; and the
procurement requirements of 24 CFR
84.44. (Refer to the General Section for
additional information on this
requirement).
j. Environmental Requirements. Your
ALCP application is subject to the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 and applicable related federal
environmental authorities. (See 24 CFR
part 50, as applicable.) An
environmental review will be completed
by HUD before awarding any grant
under this program. ALCP projects are
‘critical actions’ for purposes of 24 CFR
part 55 and must comply with
requirements applicable to ‘critical
actions,’ including floodplain
management review requirements, if
proposed to be carried out in the 500year floodplain.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Addresses to Request Application
Package. All information for requesting
an application is included in this NOFA
and Section IV.A. of the General
Section. The application for the ALCP is
available on the Internet from the
grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information, you
can receive customer support from
Grants.gov by calling the help line at
(800) 518–Grants or by sending an email to support@grants.gov. If you do
not have access, you may obtain an
ALCP application by calling the NOFA
Information Center at (voice) 800–HUD–
8929 (800–483–8929). Persons with a
hearing or speech impairment access
this number via TTY by calling the
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339. Please be sure to provide
your name, address (including zip
code), and telephone number (including
area code).
1. Multiple Applications. Owners may
not submit multiple applications for the
same elderly housing development.
HUD will only accept one ALCP
application per project.
2. For Technical Assistance. Before
the ALCP application deadline date,
HUD staff will be available to provide
you with general guidance and technical
assistance. However, HUD staff is not
permitted to assist in preparing your
application. For technical support for
downloading the ALCP application or
submitting the application, call the toll
free Grants.gov Customer Support line
at 1–800–518-Grants or send an e-mail
message to support@grants.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00249
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11681
3. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will
provide a satellite broadcast for
potential applicants. For more
information about the date and time of
the broadcast, you should contact your
local HUD Office or go to HUD’s Web
site at: www.hud.gov/webcasts/
index.cfm.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission. There are eleven required
exhibits under the ALCP, including
prescribed forms and certifications. In
cases where your articles of
incorporation and by-laws have NOT
changed since the project was originally
approved by HUD, your signature on the
SF–424 signifies that you are selfcertifying to that effect—that the
documents on file with HUD are
current—is sufficient. Exhibits for
which self-certification of currency is
possible are Exhibits 2(a) and (b).
In addition to the relief of paperwork
burden, you will not have to submit
certain information and exhibits you
have previously prepared. See
individual item descriptions below to
identify such items. An example of such
an item may be the FY2007 Annual
Financial Statement. Your application
must include all of the information,
materials, forms, and exhibits listed
below (Please see the General Section
for instructions on how to submit third
party and other documents such as
Articles of Incorporation; by-laws;
copies of original plans; evidence of
financial commitment; letter(s) from
zoning officials; etc.):
1. Application Summary for the
Assisted Living Conversion Program,
Form HUD–92045.
2. Evidence that you are a private
nonprofit organization or nonprofit
consumer cooperative and have the
legal ability to operate an ALF program,
per the following:
a. Articles of Incorporation,
constitution, or other organizational
documents, or self-certification of these
documents if there has been no change
in the Articles since they were
originally filed with HUD and
b. By-laws, or self-certification of bylaws, if there has been no change in the
by-laws since they were originally filed
with HUD.
3. A description of your community
support:
a. A description of your links to the
community at large and to the minority
and elderly communities in particular;
and
b. A description of your efforts to
involve elderly persons, including
minority elderly persons and persons
with disabilities in:
(1) The development of the
application;
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11682
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(2) The development of the ALF
operating philosophy;
(3) Review of the application prior to
submission to HUD; and
(4) Your intent whether or not to
involve eligible ALF residents in the
operation of the project.
c. A description of your involvement
in your community’s Consolidated
Planning and Analysis of Impediments
to Fair Housing (AI) processes
including:
(1) An identification of the lead/
facilitating agency(ies) that organizes
and/or administers the process;
(2) A listing of the Consolidated Plan/
AI issue areas in which you participate;
and
(3) The level of your participation in
the process, including active
involvement with any neighborhoodbased organizations, associations, or any
committees that support programs and
activities that enhance projects or the
lives of residents of the projects, such as
the one proposed in your application.
If you are not currently active,
describe the specific steps you will take
to become active in the Consolidated
Planning and AI processes. (Consult the
local HUD office for the identification of
the Consolidated Plan community
process for the appropriate area.)
d. A description of how the assisted
living facility will implement practical
solutions that will result in assisting
residents in achieving independent
living and improved living
environment.
e. A description of how you have
supported state and local efforts to
streamline processes and procedures in
the removal of regulatory barriers to
affordable housing. To obtain up to 2
points for this policy priority you must
complete the Form HUD–27300,
Questionnaire for HUD’s Initiative on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers,
complete Part A or Part B (not both),
provide the required documentation,
where requested, and include a point of
contact. See Rating Factor 3 in Section
V.A. of this NOFA for more details.
4. Evidence of your project being
occupied for at least five years prior to
the date of application to HUD.
5. A market analysis of the need for
the proposed ALF units, including
information from both the project and
the housing market, containing:
a. Evidence of need for the ALF by
current project residents:
(1) A description of the demographic
characteristics of the elderly residents
currently living in the project, including
the current number of residents,
distribution of residents by age, race,
and sex, an estimate of the number of
residents with frailties/limitations in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
activities of daily living, and an estimate
of the number of residents in need of
assisted living services.
(2) A description of the services
currently available to the residents and/
or provided on or off-site and what
services are lacking;
b. Evidence of the need for ALF units
by very low-income elderly and
disabled households in the market area;
a description of the trend in elderly and
disabled population and household
change; data on the demographic
characteristics of the very low-income
elderly in need of assisted living
services (age, race, sex, household size,
and tenure) and extent of residents with
frailty/limitations in existing federally
assisted housing for the elderly (HUD
and Rural Housing Service); and an
estimate of the very low-income elderly
and disabled in need of assisted living
taking into consideration any available
state or local data.
c. A description of the extent, types,
and availability and cost of alternate
care and services locally, such as home
health care; adult day care;
housekeeping services; meals programs;
visiting nurses; on-call transportation
services; health care; and providers of
supportive services who address the
needs of the local low income
population.
d. A description of how information
in the community’s Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
was used in documenting the need for
the ALF (covering items in c. above).
6. A description of the physical
construction aspects of the ALF
conversion, including the following:
a. How you propose to carry out the
physical conversion (including a
timetable and relocation planning).
Completion of the Logic Model will
assist in completing your response to
this Exhibit.
b. A short narrative stating the
number of units, special design features,
community and office space/storage,
dining and kitchen facility and staff
space, and the physical relationship to
the rest of the project. Also, you must
describe how this design will facilitate
the delivery of services in an
economical fashion in the most
integrated setting appropriate to the
needs of the participating residents with
disabilities and accommodate the
changing needs of the residents over at
least the next 10 years.
c. A description on how the project
will promote energy efficiency,
including any plans to incorporate
energy efficiency features in the design
and operation of the ALF through the
use of Energy Star labeled products and
appliances. Applicants that meet this
PO 00000
Frm 00250
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
policy priority will receive two points
under Rating Factor 3 in Section V.A. of
this NOFA. Refer to the General Section
for further information on this
requirement or for further information
about Energy Star see https://
www.energystar.gov.
d. A copy of the original plans for all
units and other areas of the
development, which will be included in
the conversion.
e. A description of the conversion
must clearly address how the units will
conform to the accessibility
requirements described in the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS).
(For example, all door openings must
have a minimum clear opening of 32
inches; and, all bathrooms and kitchens
must be accessible to and functional for
persons in wheelchairs.)
f. Architectural sketches of the
conversion to a scale of 1⁄4 inch to one
foot that indicate the following:
(1) All doors being widened;
(2) Typical kitchen and bathroom
reconfiguration: show all wheelchair
clearances, wall reinforcing, grab bars,
and elevations of counters and work
surfaces;
(3) Bedroom/living/dining area
modification, if needed;
(4) Any reconfigured common space;
(5) Added/reconfigured office and
storage space;
(6) Monitoring stations, and
(7) The kitchen and dining facility.
All architectural modifications must
meet section 504 and ADA requirements
as appropriate.
g. A budget showing estimated costs
for materials, supplies, fixtures, and
labor for each of the items listed in
Section IV.B.6.f, items (1) through (7),
above.
h. Include firm financial commitment
letters with specific dollar amounts
from appropriate organization(s) for
conversion needs (within the scope of
the ALF conversion NOFA) which will
be supported by non-HUD funding.
i. A description of any relocation of
current tenants including a statement
that:
(1) Indicates the estimated cost of
temporary relocation payments and
other related services;
(2) Identifies the staff organization
that will carry out the relocation
activities; and
(3) Identifies all tenants that will have
to be temporarily moved to another unit
within the development OR from the
development during the period that the
physical conversion of the project is
under way.
(4) Temporary relocation should not
extend beyond one year before the
person is returned to his or her previous
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
unit or location. The grantee must
contact any residential tenant who has
been temporarily relocated for a period
beyond one year and offer all permanent
relocation assistance. This assistance
would be in addition to any assistance
the person has already received for
temporary relocation, and may be
reduced by the amount of any
temporary relocation assistance.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Note: If any of the relocation costs will be
funded from sources other than the ALCP
grant, you must provide evidence of a firm
financial commitment of these funds. When
evaluating applications, HUD will consider
the total cost of proposals (i.e., cost of
conversion, temporary relocation, service
coordinator, and other project costs).
j. Address how training, employment,
and economic opportunities will be
directed to low- and very low-income
persons that receive government
assistance for housing and to business
concerns which provide economic
opportunities to low- and very-lowincome persons and people with
disabilities.
7. A description of any retrofit or
renovation that will be done at the
project (with third party funds) that is
separate and distinct from the ALF
conversion. With such description,
include as part of your application
submission firm commitment letters
from third party organizations in
specific dollar amounts that will cover
the cost of any work outside the scope
of this NOFA.
8. A letter from the local zoning
official indicating evidence of
permissive zoning. Also, showing that
the modifications to include the ALF
into the project as proposed are
permissible under applicable zoning
ordinances or regulations.
9. A supportive services plan (SSP), a
copy of which must be submitted to the
appropriate state and/or local agency as
instructed in Section III.C. above. For
those applicants needing to contact state
Medicaid offices, a list is provided on
the Internet at www.cms.hhs.gov/
medicaid. The SSP must include:
a. A description of the supportive
services needed for the frail elderly the
ALF is expected to serve. This must
include at least (1) meals and such other
supportive services required locally or
by the state, and (2) such optional
services or care to be offered on an ‘‘as
needed’’ basis.
Examples of both mandatory and
optional services (which will vary from
state to state) are: two meals and two
snacks or three meals daily; 24-hour
protective oversight; personal care;
housekeeping services; personal
counseling, and transportation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
b. A description of how you will
provide the supportive services to those
who are frail and have disabilities (i.e.,
on or off-site or combination of on or
off-site), including an explanation of
how the service coordination role will
facilitate the adequate provision of such
services to ALF residents, and how the
services will meet the identified needs
of the residents. Also indicate how you
intend to fund the service coordinator
role.
c. A description of how the operation
of your ALF will work. Address: (1)
general operating procedures; (2) ALF
philosophy and how it will promote the
autonomy and independence of the frail
elderly and persons with disabilities; (3)
what will the service coordination
function do and the extent to which this
function already exists, or will be
augmented or new; (4) ALF staff training
plans; and (5) the degree to which and
how the ALF will relate to the day-today operations of the rest of the project.
d. The monthly individual rate for
board and supportive services for the
ALF listing the total fee and
components of the total fee for the items
required by state or local licensing, and
list the appropriate rate for any optional
services you plan to offer to the ALF
residents. Provide an estimate of the
total annual costs of the required board
and supportive services you expect to
provide and an estimate of the amount
of optional services you expect to
provide.
e. List who will pay for the board and
supportive services and the amount. For
example, include such items as:
(1) Meals by sponsors—$20
(2) Housekeeping services by the City
government—$30
(3) Personal care by State Department
of Health—$60
(4) Service paid for by state program—
$40
(5) Fees paid by tenants—$83
The amounts and commitments from
both tenants and/or providers must
equal the estimated amounts necessary
to cover the monthly rates for the
number of people expected to be served.
If you include tenant fees in the
proposal, list and show any proposed
scaling mechanism. All amounts
committed/collected must equal the
annualized cost of the monthly rates
calculated by the expected percentage of
units filled.
f. A support/commitment letter from
EACH listed proposed funding source
per paragraph e. above, for the planned
meals and supportive services listed in
the application. The letter must cover
the total planned annual commitment
(and multiyear amount total, if
different), length of time for the
PO 00000
Frm 00251
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11683
commitment, and the amounts payable
for each service covered by the
provider/paying organization. There
must be a letter from EACH
participating organization listed in
paragraph e, above.
g. A support letter from EACH
governmental agency that provides
licensing for ALFs in that jurisdiction.
h. A description of your relevant
experience in arranging for and/or
delivering supportive services to frail
residents. The description should
include any supportive services
facilities owned/operated; your past or
current involvement in any projectbased programs that demonstrates your
management capabilities. The
description should include data on the
facilities and specific meals and/or
supportive services provided on a
regular basis, the racial/ethnic
composition of the populations served,
if available, and information and
testimonials from residents or
community leaders on the quality of the
services.
10. A description of your project’s
resources:
a. A copy of the most recent project
Reserve and Replacement account
statement, and a Reserve for
Replacement analysis showing plans for
its use over the next five years, and any
approvals received from the HUD field
office to date.
b. A copy of the most recent Residual
Receipts Account statement. Indicate
any approvals for the use of such
receipts from the field office for over
$500/unit.
c. Annual Financial Statement (AFS).
If your FY2007 AFS was due to REAC
more than 120 days BEFORE the
deadline date for this application, in the
interest of reducing work burden, only
include the date that it was sent to
REAC. If the AFS was due to REAC 120
days or less from the deadline date of
this application, you MUST include a
paper copy of your AFS in the
application. See Section IV.F.5. of this
NOFA for information on addresses to
submit paper applications.
11. Forms and Certifications. The
electronic version of the NOFA contains
all forms required for submitting the
ALCP application. The following
exhibits, forms, certifications, and
assurances are required.
a. Form HUD–92045, Multifamily
Housing Assisted Living Conversion
Program Application Summary Sheet.
b. Form SF–424, Application for
Federal Assistance, and compliance
with Executive Order 12372 (a
certification that you have submitted a
copy of your application, if required, to
the state agency (Single Point of
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11684
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Contact) for state review in accordance
with Executive Order 12372 (refer to the
General Section for instructions in
submitting this form).
c. SF–424 Supplement, Survey for
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO survey
(SF–424SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
d. Form HUD–424–CB, Grant
Applications Detailed Budget (HUD
Detailed Budget Form’’ on Grants.gov);
e. Form HUD–424–CBW, Grant
Application Detailed Budget worksheet;
f. Form HUD–2880, Applicant/
Recipient Disclosure/Update Report
(‘‘HUD Applicant Recipient Disclosure
Report’’ on Grants.gov), including Social
Security and Employment Identification
numbers. A disclosure of assistance
from other government sources received
in connection with the project.
g. Form HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan
for the jurisdiction in which the
proposed ALF will be located. The
certification must be made by the unit
of general local government if it is
required to have, or has, a complete
Plan. Otherwise, the certification may
be made by the state, or by the unit of
general local government if the project
will be located within the jurisdiction of
the unit of general local government
authorized to use an abbreviated
strategy, and if it is willing to prepare
such a Plan.
All certifications must be made by the
public official responsible for
submitting the plan to HUD. The
certifications must be submitted by the
application submission deadline date
set forth herein. The Plan regulations
are published in 24 CFR part 91.
h. Form HUD 2994–A, You Are Our
Client Grant Application Survey,
optional.
i. Standard Form–LLL, Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities, if applicable.
j. Form HUD–96010, Program
Outcome Logic Model.
k. Form HUD–27300, America’s
Affordable Communities Initiative/
Removal of Regulatory Barriers (and
supporting documentation) (‘‘HUD
Communities Initiative Form’’ on
Grants.gov).
l. Certification of Consistency with
RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan (HUD–
2990), if applicable.
m. HUD–96011, ‘‘Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal’’
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov). This form must be used as
the cover page to transmit third party
documents and other information as
described in the General Section as part
of your electronic application submittal
(if applicable).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
C. Submission Date and Time
Application Submission Date. Unless
you received a waiver to the electronic
application submission requirements,
your completed ALCP application must
be submitted via https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/applyfor_grants.jsp and must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
no later than 11:59:59 eastern time on
the application deadline date (June 7,
2007). (Refer to Section IV. of the
General Section for further instructions
on the delivery and receipt of
applications.
D. Intergovernmental Review
1. Executive Order 12372. ALCP
applicants are subject to the Executive
Order 12372 process. Refer to Section
IV.D. of the General Section for
instructions on the intergovernmental
review process.)
2. You must submit a Supportive
Services Plan (SSP) for the services and
coordination of the supportive services
that will be offered in the assisted living
facility (ALF) to the appropriate state or
local organization(s), which are
expected to fund those supportive
services. You must submit one copy of
your SSP to each appropriate state or
local service funding organizations well
in advance of the application deadline,
for appropriate review. The state or
local funding organization(s) must
return the SSP to you with appropriate
comments and an indication of the
funding commitment, which you will
then include with the application you
submit to HUD.
You must ALSO submit the SSP to the
appropriate organization(s) that license
ALFs in your jurisdiction. The licensing
agency(ies) must approve your plan, and
must also certify that the ALF and the
proposed supportive services identified
in your SSP, are consistent with local
statute and regulations and well
designed to serve the needs of the frail
elderly and people with disabilities who
will reside in the ALF portion of your
project.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. This program does NOT cover the
cost of meals and supportive services.
These items must be paid for through
other sources (e.g., a mix of resident fees
and/or third party providers). Evidence
of third party commitment(s) must be
included as part of the application. The
assisted living supportive services
program must promote independence
and provide personal care assistance
based on individual needs in a homelike environment. In accordance with
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 and HUD’s regulations at 24 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00252
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
8.4(d), the project must deliver services
in the most integrated setting
appropriate to the needs of qualified
individuals with disabilities.
2. This program does NOT allow
permanent displacement of any resident
living in the project at the time the
application was submitted to HUD.
(HUD will only provide temporary
relocation costs for current tenants if
they must vacate their unit while
conversion work is underway (normal
temporary relocation costs include
increases in rent, reconnection of
telephones, moving costs, and
appropriate out-of-pocket expenses).
3. Applicants will not be awarded
multiple grant funds for the same
elderly housing development.
4. Ineligible Activities. You may not
use funds available through this NOFA
to:
a. Add additional dwelling units to
the existing project
b. Pay the costs of any of the
necessary direct supportive services
needed to operate the ALF;
c. Purchase or lease additional land;
d. Rehabilitate (see definition at 24
CFR 891.105) the project for needs
unrelated directly to the conversion of
units and common space for assisted
living.
e. Use the ALCP to reduce the number
of accessible units in the project that are
not part of the ALF
f. Permanently displace any resident
out of the project (permanent relocation
is prohibited under this program)
g. Increase the management fee.
h. Cover the cost of activities not
directly related to the conversion of the
units and common space. (i.e., if an
applicant is applying to convert 24 units
on 2 floors of a 5-story elderly housing
development and the inspection by the
Fire Marshal reveals that sprinklers
must be installed in the entire building,
ALCP funds will be used only to install
sprinklers for the 24 units on the 2
floors requested in the application. The
cost to install sprinklers in the
remaining units must be paid for out of
other resources.
F. Other Submission Requirements
Application Submission and Receipt
Procedures. Refer to Section IV.F. of the
General Section for additional
information on application submission
requirements.
1. Electronic Delivery
a. The Grants.gov Web site offers a
simple, unified application process.
There are several registration steps
applicants need to complete. Further
information is contained in the General
Section published on January 18, 2007
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(72 FR 2396). ALCP applicants should
also read HUD’s Federal Register Notice
on Early Registration published in the
Federal Register on October 31, 2006
(71 FR 64070).
b. Electronic signature. ALCP
applications submitted through
Grants.gov constitute submission as an
electronically signed application.
2. Instructions on how to submit
electronically are outlined in HUD’s
‘‘Desktop User’s Guide’’ located on
HUD’s Grants Web site at: https://
www.hud.gov/grants/index.cfm.
3. Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirement. Applicants interested in
applying for funding under this NOFA
must submit their applications
electronically or request a waiver of the
electronic submission process. Waiver
requests must be submitted by mail or
by fax. For this program NOFA, e-mail
requests will not be considered. Waiver
requests submitted by mail or fax
should be submitted on the applicant’s
letterhead and signed by an official with
the legal authority to request a waiver
from the Department. Waiver requests
must be submitted no later than 15 days
prior to the application deadline date
and should be sent to Brian D.
Montgomery, Assistant Secretary for
Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 9100, Washington,
DC 20410–8000. Waiver requests
submitted by fax must be sent to (202)
708–3104. If you are granted a waiver to
the electronic submission process, your
application must be received by HUD no
later than 11:59:59 PM eastern time on
the application deadline date. See the
General Section for additional
information.
4. Proof of Timely Submission. ALCP
applicants must submit their
applications via grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp) in time for receipt
and validation by 11:59:59 p.m. eastern
time on the application deadline date of
June 7, 2007. Validation can take up to
72 hours so applicants should submit
with ample time for the process to be
completed. Applicants are also advised
to submit with sufficient time to correct
any deficiencies that would prevent the
acceptance of your application by
Grants.gov. (Refer to the General Section
for specific procedures regarding proof
of timely submission of applications.)
5. Hubs and Field Offices addresses.
If you are granted a waiver to the
electronic application submission
requirement, your waiver approval will
provide the information on the number
of copies of the application you are
required to submit and where to submit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the application. If you send your
application to the wrong Hub Office, it
will be rejected. Therefore, upon
receiving your waiver approval, if you
are uncertain as to which lead HUD
Multifamily Hub to submit your
application, you are encouraged to
contact the local HUD Office that is
closest to your project’s location to
ascertain the lead HUD Multifamily Hub
to ensure that you submit your
application to the correct local lead
HUD Multifamily Hub Office. Paper
applications must be received in the
appropriate lead HUD Multifamily Hub
by the application deadline date.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria. HUD will rate ALCP
applications that successfully complete
technical processing using the Rating
Factors set forth below and in
accordance with the application
submission requirements identified in
Section IV.B. above. The maximum
number of points an application may
receive under this program is 100 plus
2 bonus points as described in the
General Section and Section V.A. below.
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (20 Points)
This factor addresses your capacity to
carry out the conversion in a timely,
cost-conscious and effective manner. It
also addresses your experience at
providing the proposed supportive
services you intend to make available at
the ALF for elderly residents, especially
in such areas as meals, 24-hour staffing,
and on-site health care. Submit
information responding to this factor in
accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Sections
IV.B.6.a. and b. and 9.a. through c and
h. of this NOFA.
In rating this factor, HUD will
consider the extent to which your
application demonstrates your ability to
carry out a successful conversion of the
project and to implement the plan to
deliver the supportive services on a
long-term basis, considering the
following:
a. (9 points). The time frame planned
for carrying out the physical conversion
of the development to the ALF.
Examples are: Timeframe for
completion of the project in 9 months or
less (9 points); completion in 13 months
(5 points); completion in 13–18 months
(3 points); completion in more than 18
months (0 points).
b. (10 points). Describe your past
experience in providing or arranging for
supportive services either on or off site
for those who are frail. Examples are:
Meals delivered to apartment of resident
PO 00000
Frm 00253
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11685
or in a congregate setting (2 points),
arranging for or providing personal care
(3 points), providing 24-hour staffing (1
point), providing or making available
on-site preventive health care (2 points)
and other support services (2 points).
c. (1 point). The Department will
provide 1 point to those applicants who
currently or propose to partner, fund, or
subcontract with grassroots
organizations. HUD will consider an
organization a ‘‘grassroots organization’’
if the organization is headquartered in
the local community and has a social
services budget of $300,000 or less; or
has six or fewer full-time equivalent
employees. (Refer to the General Section
for further information on policy
priority points for activities related to
grassroots organizations.)
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (20 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which the conversion is needed by the
categories of elderly persons and
persons with disabilities that the ALF is
intended to serve. The application must
include evidence of current needs
among project residents and needs of
potential residents in the housing
market area for such persons including
economic and demographic information
on very low-income, frail, elderly, and
persons with disabilities and
information on current assisted living
resources in the market area.
The factor also addresses your
inability to fund the repairs or
conversion activities from existing
financial resources. In making this
determination, HUD will consider the
project’s financial information. Submit
information responding to this factor in
accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Sections
IV.B.3.c., 5. a. through d., and 10. a.
through c. of this NOFA. In evaluating
this factor, HUD will consider:
a. (7 points). The need for assisted
living among the elderly and disabled
residents of the project taking into
consideration those currently in need
and the depth of future needs given
aging in place.
b. (3 points). The need for assisted
living among very low-income elderly
persons and persons with disabilities in
the housing market area.
c. (9 points). Insufficient funding for
any needed conversion work, as
evidenced by the project’s financial
statements and specifically the lack of
excess Reserve for Replacement dollars
and residual receipts. If the available
Reserve for Replacement and residual
receipts are less than 10 percent of the
total funds needed = 9 points; if the
available Reserve for Replacement and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11686
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
residual receipts are 10–50 percent of
need = 5 points; and, if the available
Reserve for Replacement and residual
receipts are 51 percent or more of the
total funds needed = 0 points).
d. (1 point). The Department will
provide one point to those applications
which establish a connection between
the proposed ALF and the community’s
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice (AI) or other planning
document that analyzes fair housing
issues and is prepared by a local
planning or similar organization.
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (40 Points)
This factor addresses the quality and
effectiveness of your proposal in
addressing the proposed conversion,
effectiveness of service coordination
and management planning and the
meals and supportive services which
the ALF intends to provide, whether the
jurisdiction in which the ALF is located
has taken successful efforts to remove
regulatory barriers to affordable
housing, whether you will incorporate
energy efficiency in the design and
operation of the assisted living facility,
provide training, employment, and
economic opportunities to low- and
very low-income persons, and the extent
to which you have evidenced general
support for conversion by participating
in your community’s Consolidated
Planning Process, involving the
residents in the planning process.
Submit information responding to this
factor in accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Sections
IV.B.3.a. through c. and e., IV. B.5.e.,
IV.B.6.b. through e., IV. B.9.a. through
e., g., and h. of this NOFA. In evaluating
this factor, HUD will consider the
following:
a. (10 points). The extent to which the
proposed ALF design will meet the
special physical needs of frail elderly
persons or persons with disabilities
(ALF design: meets needs = 10 points;
ALF design partially meets needs = 5
points; and ALF design does not meet
needs = 0 points).
b. (10 points). The extent to which the
ALF’s proposed management and
operational plan ensures that the
provision of both meals and supportive
services planned will be accomplished
upon completion of the conversion and
receipt of license for the operation of the
facility. (Consider ALF design/
management plan: meets needs of
management operations = 10 points;
ALF design/management plan partially
meets needs of management operations
= 5 points; and ALF design/management
plan does not meet needs of
management operations = 0 points.)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
c. (7 points). The extent to which the
proposed supportive services meet the
anticipated needs of the frail elderly and
disabled residents (does meet = 7
points; partially meets needs = 4 points;
and, does not meet needs = 0 points);
and
d. (7 points). The extent to which the
service coordination function is
addressed and explained as augmented
or new, and addresses the ongoing
procurement of needed services for the
residents of the ALF (does meet = 7
points, partially meets = 4 points, does
not meet = 0 points).
e. (2 points). The steps you have in
support of State and local efforts in
streamlining processes and procedures
that eliminate redundant requirements,
statutes, regulations and codes which
impede the availability of affordable
housing. To receive points for removal
of regulatory barriers, applicants must
complete Part A or B (not both), include
some form of documentation, where
requested, and include a point of
contact in their response using the
completed Questionnaire HUD Form
27300. (Refer to the General Section for
further information.)
f. (2 points). Describe how you plan
to incorporate energy efficiency
activities in the design or the operation
of the assisted living facility through the
use of Energy Star labeled products and
appliances. (Refer to the General Section
for further information.)
g. (2 points). To the greatest extent
feasible, describe how you propose to
provide opportunities to train and
employ low- and very low-income
persons in the project area; and how you
plan to award contracts to business
concerns which provide economic
opportunities to low- and very lowincome persons and people with
disabilities in the project area.
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(10 Points)
This factor addresses your ability to
secure other community resources that
can be combined with HUD’s grant
funds to achieve program purposes. For
the ALCP to succeed, you must generate
local funding for the necessary
supportive services to operate the ALF.
HUD also encourages local funding for
some of the necessary conversion work,
or other work needed in the project (e.g.,
general modernization) which is NOT
specifically linked to the ALF).
Submit information responding to this
factor in accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Section
IV.B.6.h. and i., B.7., and B.9.e. through
g. of this NOFA.
a. (5 points). The extent to which
there are commitments for the funding
PO 00000
Frm 00254
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
needed for the meals and the supportive
services planned for the ALF and that
the total cost of the estimated budget of
the ALF is covered. Consider 90 percent
or more commitment of the total budget
with no more than 10 percent for meals
and services = 5 points; 80–89.9 percent
with no more than 20 percent for meals
and services = 4 points; 65–79.9 percent
with no more than 35 percent for meals
and services = 3 points; 40–64.9 percent
with no more than 60 percent for meals
and services = 2 points; less than 40
percent commitment of the total budget
with no more than 60 percent support
for meals and services = 0 points.
b. (3 points). The extent of local
organizations’ support, which is firmly
committed to providing at least 50
percent of the total cost of ALF
conversion (consider 50% or more = 3
points, 20–49.9 percent = 2 points, and
under 20 percent = 0 points).
c. (2 points). The extent of local
organizational support which is firmly
committed to providing funds for
additional repair or retrofit necessary for
the project NOT specifically directed to
activities eligible under this NOFA
(funds firmly committed = 2 points,
funds not committed = 0 points).
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (10 Points)
This factor reflects HUD’s goal to
embrace high standards of ethics,
management and accountability. This
factor emphasizes HUD’s commitment
to ensure that promises you make in the
application are kept; and to ensure
performance goals with outcomes are
established and are met (refer to Section
V.B. of the General Section for more
detail). Outcomes may include the
extent to which your project will
implement practical solutions that will
result in assisting residents in achieving
independent living and an improved
living environment, as well as the extent
to which the project will be viable
absent HUD funds but rely more on
state, local, and private funds. Submit
information responding to this factor in
accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Section
IV.B.3.d., 6.a. through g., and 9.a.
through e. of this NOFA. Applicants
must complete Form HUD–96010,
Program Outcome Logic Model in
responding to this Rating Factor.
a. (4 points). Describe the extent to
which your conversion time frame
reflects the length of time it will take to
convert the units describing how
residents will benefit from the
conversion of the units; and how the
converted units will result in ALF
residents being able to age in place;
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
b. (2 points). Describe the extent to
which your assisted living facility will
implement practical solutions that will
result in assisting residents in achieving
independent living and improved living
environment.
c. (2 points). Demonstrate how the
project will be viable absent HUD funds
while relying more on state, local, and
private funds.
d. (2 points). Describe the extent to
which the ALFs operating philosophy
promotes the autonomy and
independence of the frail elderly
persons it is intended to serve (is fully
addressed = 2 points, ‘‘no’’ or not
addressed = 0 points).
6. Bonus Points (2 bonus points). The
project to be converted is located in an
RC/EZ/EC-II area, as described in the
General Section.
B. Reviews and Selection Process
1. The ALCP will fund those
applications that may impact federal
problem solving and policymaking and
that are relevant to HUD’s policy
priorities and annual goals and
objectives. (Refer to the General Section
for discussion of these priorities and
annual goals and objectives).
2. Review for Curable Deficiencies.
You should ensure that your application
is complete before submitting it to HUD
electronically via grants.gov. If you
received a waiver of the electronic
submission requirement, you must
submit an original and four copies to the
appropriate lead HUD Multifamily Hub
Office. Submitting fewer than the
original and four copies of the
application is not a curable deficiency
and will cause your application to be
considered non-responsive to the NOFA
and returned to you.
HUD will screen all applications
received by the deadline for curable
deficiencies. With respect to correction
of deficient applications, HUD may not,
after the application deadline date and
consistent with HUD’s regulations in 24
CFR part 4, subpart B, consider any
unsolicited information an applicant
may want to provide. HUD may contact
an applicant to clarify an item in the
application or to correct curable
deficiencies. Please note, however, that
HUD may not seek clarification of items
or responses that improve the
substantive quality of a response to any
rating factors. In order not to
unreasonably exclude applications from
being rated and ranked, HUD may
contact applicants to ensure proper
completion of the application and will
do so on a uniform basis for all
applicants. A curable deficiency is a
missing Exhibit or portion of an Exhibit
that will not affect the rating of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
application. In each case, under this
NOFA, the appropriate lead HUD
Multifamily Hub office will notify you
in writing by describing the clarification
or curable deficiency. You must submit
clarifications or responses to curable
deficiencies in accordance with the
information provided by the Hub office
within 14 calendar days of the date of
HUD notification. (If the due date falls
on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal
holiday, your correction must be
received by HUD on the next day that
is not a Saturday, Sunday, or federal
holiday.) If the deficiency is not
corrected within this time period, HUD
will reject the application as
incomplete, and it will not be
considered for funding. The following is
a list of the deficiencies that will be
considered curable in ALCP
applications:
Exhibits/Forms
• *Application Summary
• *Articles of Incorporation, or
certification of Articles of Incorporation
• *By-laws, or certification of by-laws
• Evidence of occupancy for at least
five years
• Original project plans
• Relocation Plan
• Evidence of Permissive Zoning
• Form SF–424 Supplement, Survey
for Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
• Form HUD–424–CB, Grant
Applications Detailed Budget ‘‘HUD
Detailed Budget Form’’ on Grants.gov);
• Form HUD–424–CBW, Grant
Application Detailed Budget worksheet
• Form HUD–2880, Applicant/
Recipient Disclosure/Update Report
(‘‘HUD Applicant Recipient Disclosure
Report’’ on Grants.gov);
• Form HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan
• Form HUD–2994–A, You Are Our
Client Grant Applicant Survey, optional;
• Standard Form–LLL, Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities, if applicable
• HUD–96011, ‘‘Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal’’
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form on
Grants.gov) (For use with electronic
applications as the cover sheet to
provide third party documentation.)
The appropriate Hub office will notify
you in writing if your application is
missing any of the exhibits listed above
and you will be given 14 days from the
date of the HUD notification to submit
the information required to cure the
noted deficiencies. The exhibits
identified by an asterisk (*) must be
dated on or before the application
deadline date. If not so dated the
application will be rejected.
PO 00000
Frm 00255
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11687
After the completeness review, HUD
staff will review your application to
determine whether the application
meets the threshold requirements.
3. Threshold Review. Only those
ALCP applications that meet all
threshold requirements will be eligible
to receive an award. Applications that
do not pass threshold will be rejected.
(See Section III.C 2. above for threshold
requirements).
4. Appeal Process. Upon rejection of
an ALCP application, HUD must send a
letter to the Owner outlining all reasons
for rejection. The Owner has 14
calendar days from the date of the letter
to appeal the rejection. If the Owner
submits an appeal, which causes the
rejection to be overturned, the
application will be rated, ranked, and
submitted to the selection panel for
consideration. If the Owner does not
appeal or does appeal but the rejection
is not overturned, the application will
remain rejected.
5. Review Panels. The Office of
Housing’s Multifamily Hubs will
establish panels to review all eligible
applications that have passed threshold.
6. Rating of Applications. HUD staff
teams will review and rate ALCP
applications in accordance with the
Ranking and Selection procedures
outlined below. All applications will be
either rated or technically rejected at the
end of technical review. If your
application meets all program eligibility
requirements after completion of
technical review, it will be rated
according to the rating selection factors
in Section V.A. above of this NOFA.
HUD reserves the right to reduce the
amount requested in the application if
any proposed components are ineligible
or if the cost of items is not deemed
reasonable. HUD will NOT reject an
ALCP application based on technical
review without notifying you of that
rejection with all the reasons for the
rejection, and providing you an
opportunity to appeal. You will have 14
calendar days from the date of HUD’s
written notice to appeal a technical
rejection to the Multifamily Hub where
the applications were sent originally.
HUD staff will make a determination on
an appeal before finalizing selection
recommendations.
7. Ranking and Selection Procedures.
Applications submitted in response to
this NOFA that are eligible, pass
threshold and have a total score of 75
points (or more) are eligible for ranking
and selection.
a. Hub staff teams will be established
for ALCP review in each geographical
area to do the application ratings. After
the team’s ratings are finalized, the team
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11688
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
will place all rated applications within
that geographical area in rank order.
b. From within rank order, Hub staff
teams in each of the four geographical
areas will select the highest ranked
applications from within that
geographical area in rank order, without
regard to which Hub the application
was submitted which can be funded
from within the dollars available.
c. After making the initial selections,
however, HUD may use any residual
funds in each geographical area to select
the next rank-ordered application by
reducing the dollars requested by no
more than 10 percent and reducing the
number of units proposed, but in no
case reducing the number of units below
the financial threshold feasibility of five
ALF units.
d. Funds remaining after these
processes are completed will be
returned to HUD Headquarters. HUD
Headquarters will use these funds to
restore units to any project reduced as
a result of using the residual grant funds
in a geographical area. Finally, HUD
will use these funds for selecting one or
more additional applications based on
the field staff rating and rankings,
beginning with the highest rated
application nationwide. Only one
application will be selected per
geographical area from the national
residual amount. If there are no
approvable applications in other
geographical areas, the process will
begin again with the selection of the
next highest rated application
nationwide. This process will continue
until all approvable applications are
selected using the available remaining
funds. If there is a tie score between two
or more applications, and there are
insufficient residual funds to cover all
tied applications, HUD Headquarters
staff will choose the winning
application(s) by lottery and/or
reduction of grant requests consistent
with the instructions above.
as the authorizing award documents.
Unsuccessful applicants will be
notified, by mail, within 30 days of the
announcement of the awards.
2. Adjustments to Funding. HUD will
not fund any portion of your application
that is not eligible for funding under
specific program statutory or regulatory
requirements; does not meet the
requirements of this notice; or may be
duplicative of other funded programs or
activities. Only the eligible portion of
your application will be funded.
3. Applicant Debriefing. All requests
for debriefing must be made in writing
and submitted to the lead HUD
Multifamily Hub in which you applied
for assistance. Materials provided to you
during your debriefing will include the
final scores you received for each rating
factor, final evaluator comments for
each rating factor, and the final
assessment indicating the basis upon
which assistance was provided or
denied. Information regarding this
procedure may be found in the General
Section.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements. See Section III.C. of this
NOFA and the General Section.
A. Award Notices
1. The Grant Agreement, and the
Form HUD–1044, signed by both the
Recipient and Grant Officer, shall serve
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VI. Award Administration Information
C. Reporting
Recipients of funding under this
program NOFA shall submit a progress
report every six months after the
effective date of the Grant Agreement.
Every six months owners must report
their progress in attaining the goals and
objectives they proposed in their ALCP
Logic Model that was included in their
application. Each semi-annual report
must identify any deviations (positive or
negative) from outputs and outcomes
proposed and approved by HUD, by
providing the information in the
reporting TAB of the approved Logic
Model. For FY 2007, HUD is
considering a new concept for the Logic
Model. The new concept is a Return on
Investment statement. HUD will be
publishing a separate notice on the ROI
concept.
VII. Agency Contacts
A. For Further Information and
Technical Assistance. You should
contact the HUD Multifamily Hub in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00256
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
your geographical area. For a list of
HUD Multifamily Hub Offices, see
HUD’s Web site at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.
You also may contact Faye Norman,
Housing Project Manager at (202) 708–
3000, extension 2482 or Aretha
Williams, Director, Grant Policy and
Management Division, Room 6138 at
(202) 708–3000, extension 2480 for
questions regarding the ALF grant
award process. These are not toll-free
numbers. Ms. Norman can be reached
by e-mail at Faye_ L._ Norman@hud.gov
and Ms. Williams at
Aretha_M._Williams@hud.gov. If you
have a hearing or speech impairment,
you may access the telephone number
via TTY by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service at 800–877–
8339.
VIII. Other Information
A. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (4 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2502–0542. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 2,550 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
data for the application, semi-annual
reports, and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
B. Appendix. Appendix 1 provides a
list of HUD Multifamily Hub Offices.
Appendix 1 may be found at HUD’s
Web site at https://www.hud.gov/offices/
adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00257
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11689
EN13MR07.024
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11690
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Service Coordinators In Multifamily
Housing; Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Service
Coordinators In Multifamily Housing.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: The
Federal Register number is FR–5100–
N–03. The OMB approval number is
2502–0447.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 14.191,
Multifamily Housing Service
Coordinators.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is June 8, 2007. (All applications
must be received and validated by
www.grants.gov no later than 11:59:59
p.m. Eastern Time on the application
deadline date. See submission details in
the General Section.)
G. Optional, Additional Overview
Information
1. Available Funds. Approximately
$51.6 million in fiscal year 2007 funds
are available for the Service Coordinator
program. Of these funds, approximately
$3.5 million are available in this NOFA
for funding new Service Coordinator
programs.
2. Purpose of the program. The
Service Coordinator program allows
multifamily housing owners to assist
elderly individuals and nonelderly
people with disabilities living in HUDassisted housing and in the surrounding
area to obtain needed supportive
services from the community, to enable
them to continue living as
independently as possible in their
homes.
3. Eligible Applicants. Only owners of
eligible multifamily assisted
developments may apply.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. The Service Coordinator Program.
The Service Coordinator Program
provides funding for the employment
and support of Service Coordinators in
insured and assisted housing
developments that were designed for the
elderly or nonelderly persons with
disabilities and continue to operate as
such. Service Coordinators help
residents obtain supportive services
from the community that are needed to
enable independent living and aging in
place.
A Service Coordinator is a social
service staff person hired or contracted
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
by the development’s owner or
management company. The Service
Coordinator is responsible for assuring
that elderly residents, especially those
who are frail or at risk, and those nonelderly residents with disabilities are
linked to the supportive services they
need to continue living independently
in their current homes. All services
should meet the specific desires and
needs of the residents themselves. The
Service Coordinator may not require any
elderly individual or person with a
disability to accept any specific
supportive service(s).
You may want to review the
Management Agent Handbook 4381.5
REVISION–2, CHANGE–2, Chapter 8 for
further guidance on service
coordinators. This Handbook is
accessible through HUDCLIPS on HUD’s
Web site at https://www.hudclips.org.
The Handbook is in the Handbooks and
Notices—Housing Notices database.
Enter the Handbook number in the
‘‘Document Number’’ field to retrieve
the Handbook.
B. Authority. Section 808 of the
Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable
Housing Act (Pub. L. 101–625, approved
November 28, 1990), as amended by
sections 671, 674, 676, and 677 of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102–550, approved
October 28, 1992), and section 851 of
the American Homeownership and
Economic Opportunity Act of 2000
(Pub. L. 106–569, approved December
27, 2000).
C. Definition of Terms Used in This
Program NOFA
1. ‘‘Activities of daily living (ADLs)’’
means eating, dressing, bathing,
grooming, and household management
activities, as further described below:
a. Eating—May need assistance with
cooking, preparing, or serving food, but
must be able to feed self;
b. Bathing—May need assistance in
getting in and out of the shower or tub,
but must be able to wash self;
c. Grooming—May need assistance in
washing hair, but must be able to take
care of personal appearance;
d. Dressing—Must be able to dress
self, but may need occasional assistance;
and
e. Home management activities—May
need assistance in doing housework,
grocery shopping, laundry, or getting to
and from activities such as going to the
doctor and shopping, but must be
mobile. The mobility requirement does
not exclude persons in wheelchairs or
those requiring mobility devices.
2. ‘‘At-risk elderly person’’ is an
individual 62 years of age or older who
PO 00000
Frm 00258
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
is unable to perform one or two ADLs,
as defined in the above paragraph.
3. ‘‘Frail elderly person’’ means an
individual 62 years of age or older who
is unable to perform at least three ADLs
as defined in the above paragraph.
4. ‘‘People with disabilities’’ means
those individuals who:
a. Have a disability as defined in
Section 223 of the Social Security Act;
b. Have a physical, mental, or
emotional impairment expected to be of
long, continued, and indefinite duration
that substantially impedes the
individual’s ability to live
independently; or
c. Have a developmental disability as
defined in Section 102 of the
Developmental Disabilities Assistance
and Bill of Rights Act of 2000, (42
U.S.C. Section 15002).
5. ‘‘Reasonable costs’’ mean that costs
are consistent with salaries and
administrative costs of similar programs
in your Field office’s jurisdiction.
D. Basic Qualifications of Service
Coordinators and Aides
1. Service Coordinator qualifications
include the following:
a. A Bachelor of Social Work or
degree in Gerontology, Psychology or
Counseling is preferable; a college
degree is fully acceptable. You may also
consider individuals who do not have a
college degree, but who have
appropriate work experience.
b. Knowledge of the aging process,
elder services, disability services,
eligibility for and procedures of federal
and applicable state entitlement
programs, legal liability issues relating
to providing Service Coordination, drug
and alcohol use and abuse by the
elderly, and mental health issues.
c. Two to three years experience in
social service delivery with senior
citizens and/or people with disabilities.
Some supervisory or management
experience may be desirable if the
Service Coordinator will work with
aides.
d. Demonstrated working knowledge
of supportive services and other
resources for senior citizens and/or nonelderly people with disabilities
available in the local area.
e. Demonstrated ability to advocate,
organize, problem-solve, and provide
results for the elderly and people with
disabilities.
2. Aides working with a Service
Coordinator should have appropriate
education or experience in working
with the elderly and/or people with
disabilities. An example of an aide
position could be an internship or workstudy program with local colleges and
universities to assist in carrying out
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
some of the Service Coordinator’s
functions.
II. Award Information
A. Available Funding. The Revised
Continuing Appropriations Resolution,
2007 (Pub. L. 110–5, approved February
15, 2007) provides approximately $51.6
million to fund Service Coordinators
and the continuation of existing
Congregate Housing Services Program
(CHSP) grants. Approximately $3.5
million of the available $51.6 million
will be used to fund new Service
Coordinator programs. The remaining
amount of $48.1 million will be used to
fund one-year extensions to expiring
Service Coordinator and CHSP grants.
B. Maximum Grant Award. There is
no maximum grant amount. The grant
amount you request will be based on the
Service Coordinator’s salary and the
number of hours worked each week by
that Service Coordinator (and/or aide).
You should base your determination of
the appropriate number of weekly work
hours on the number of people in the
development who are frail or at-risk
elderly or non-elderly people with
disabilities. Under normal
circumstances, a full-time Service
Coordinator should be able to serve
about 50–60 frail or at-risk elderly or
non-elderly people with disabilities on
a continuing basis. Your proposed
salary must also be supported by
evidence of comparable salaries in your
area. Gather data from programs near
you to compare your estimates with the
salaries and administrative costs of
currently operating programs. HUD
Field staff can provide you with
contacts at local program sites.
C. HUD provides funding in the form
of three-year grants. HUD may renew
grants subject to the availability of funds
and the grantee’s acceptable
performance and compliance with
program requirements. HUD will
determine performance based on the
information given in the grantee’s semiannual performance reports, financial
status reports, and Logic Model forms.
III. Eligibility Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Eligible Applicants
1. You must meet all of the applicable
threshold requirements of Section III.C
of the General Section.
2. You must be an owner of a
development assisted under one of the
following programs:
a. Section 202 Direct Loan;
b. Project-based Section 8 (including
Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation), or
c. Section 221(d)(3) below-market
interest rate, and 236 developments that
are insured or assisted.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
3. Additionally, developments listed
in paragraph III.A.2, above, are eligible
only if they meet the following criteria:
a. Have frail or at-risk elderly
residents and/or non-elderly residents
with disabilities who together total at
least 25 percent of the building’s
residents. (For example, in a 52-unit
development, at least 13 residents must
be frail, at-risk, or non-elderly people
with disabilities.)
b. Were designed for the elderly or
persons with disabilities and continue
to operate as such. This includes any
building within a mixed-use
development that was designed for
occupancy by elderly persons or
persons with disabilities at its inception
and continues to operate as such, or
consistent with title VI, subtitle D of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102–550). If not so
designed, a development in which the
owner gives preferences in tenant
selection (with HUD approval) to
eligible elderly persons or nonelderly
persons with disabilities, for all units in
that development.
c. If FHA insured or financed with a
Section 202 Direct Loan, are current in
mortgage payments or are current under
a workout agreement.
d. Meet HUD’s Uniform Physical
Conditions Standards (codified in 24
CFR part 5, subpart G), based on the
most recent physical inspection report
and responses thereto, as evidenced by
a score of 60 or better on the last
physical inspection or by an approved
plan for developments scoring less than
60.
e. Are in compliance with their
regulatory agreement, Housing
Assistance Payment (HAP) Contract,
and any other outstanding HUD grant or
contract document.
f. Have no available project funds (i.e.,
Section 8 operating funds, residual
receipts, or excess income) that could
pay for a Service Coordinator program.
(‘‘Available funds’’ are those that
require HUD approval for their use and
are not needed to meet critical project
needs.) Field office staff will make this
determination based on financial
records maintained by the Department
and information provided by the
applicant in the grant application.
g. You may use funds to continue a
Service Coordinator program that has
previously been funded through other
sources. To be deemed eligible, you
must provide evidence that these
resources have already ended or will
discontinue within six months
following the application deadline date
and that no other funding mechanism is
available to continue the program. (This
applies only to funding sources other
PO 00000
Frm 00259
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11691
than the subsidy awards and grants
provided by the Department through
program Notices beginning in FY 1992.
HUD currently provides one-year
extensions to these subsidy awards and
grants through a separate funding
action.)
4. If your eligibility status changes
during the course of the grant term,
making you ineligible to receive a grant
(e.g., due to prepayment of mortgage,
sale of property, or opting out of a
Section 8 HAP contract), HUD has the
right to terminate your grant.
5. Ineligible Applicants and
Developments
a. Property management companies,
area agencies on aging, and other like
organizations are not eligible applicants
for Service Coordinator funds.
b. Developments not designed for the
elderly, nonelderly people with
disabilities, or those no longer operating
as such;
c. Section 221(d)(4) and Section 515
developments without project-based
Section 8 assistance;
d. Section 202 and 811 developments
with a Project Rental Assistance
Contract (PRAC). Owners of Section 202
PRAC developments may obtain
funding by requesting an increase in
their PRAC payment consistent with
Handbook 4381.5 REVISION–2,
CHANGE–2, Chapter 8;
e. Conventional public housing, as
such term is defined in section 3(b) of
the United States Housing Act of 1937),
and units assisted by project-based
Housing Choice Vouchers, as set forth in
24 CFR Part 983.
f. Renewals of existing Section 8
Service Coordinator subsidy awards or
grants. HUD currently provides one-year
extensions to these subsidy awards and
grants through a separate funding
action.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Requirement. None required.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. The functions of
a Service Coordinator position are
considered the program’s eligible
activities. The major functions of the
Service Coordinator include the
following:
a. Refer and link the residents of the
development to supportive services
provided by the general community.
Such services may include case
management, personal assistance,
homemaker, meals-on-wheels,
transportation, counseling, occasional
visiting nurse, preventive health
screening/wellness, and legal advocacy.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11692
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
b. Educate residents on service
availability, application procedures,
client rights, etc.
c. Establish linkages with agencies
and service providers in the community.
Shop around to determine/develop the
best ‘‘deals’’ in service pricing, to assure
individualized, flexible, and creative
services for the involved resident.
Provide advocacy as appropriate.
d. Provide case management when
such service is not available through the
general community. This might include
evaluation of health, psychological and
social needs, development of an
individually tailored case plan for
services, and periodic reassessment of
the resident’s situation and needs.
Service Coordinators can also set up a
Professional Assessment Committee
(PAC) to assist in performing initial
resident assessments. (See the guidance
in the Congregate Housing Services
Program (CHSP) regulations at 24 CFR
700.135 (or 7 CFR 1944.258 for Rural
Housing developments)).
e. Monitor the ongoing provision of
services from community agencies and
keep the case management and provider
agency current with the progress of the
individual. Manage the provision of
supportive services where appropriate.
f. Help the residents build informal
support networks with other residents,
family and friends.
g. Work and consult with tenant
organizations and resident management
corporations. Provide training to the
development’s residents in the
obligations of tenancy or coordinate
such training.
h. Create a directory of providers for
use by both development staff and
residents.
i. Educate other staff of the
management team on issues related to
aging in place and Service Coordination,
to help them to better work with and
assist the residents.
j. Provide service coordination to lowincome elderly individuals or
nonelderly people with disabilities
living in the vicinity of an eligible
development. Community residents
should come to your housing
development to meet with and receive
service from the Service Coordinator,
but you must make reasonable
accommodations for those individuals
unable to travel to the housing site.
2. Eligible Program Costs
a. Service Coordinator Program grant
funds may be used to pay for the salary,
fringe benefits, and related support costs
of employing a service coordinator.
Support costs may include quality
assurance, training, travel, creation of
office space, purchase of office
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
furniture, equipment, and supplies,
computer hardware, software, and
Internet service, and indirect
administrative costs.
b. You may use grant funds to pay for
Quality Assurance (QA) in an amount
that does not exceed ten percent of the
Service Coordinator’s salary. Eligible
QA activities are those that evaluate
your program to assure that the position
and program are effectively
implemented. A qualified, objective
third party must perform the program
evaluation work and must have work
experience and education in social or
health care services. Your QA activities
must identify short- and long-term
program outcomes and performance
indicators that will help you measure
your performance. On-site housing
management staff cannot perform QA
and you may not augment current
salaries of in-house staff for this
purpose.
c. You may propose reasonable costs
associated with setting up a confidential
office space for the Service Coordinator.
Such expenses must be one-time only
start-up costs. Such costs may involve
acquisition, leasing, rehabilitation, or
conversion of space. The office space
must be accessible to people with
disabilities and meet the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS)
requirements of accessibility. HUD field
office staff must approve both the
proposed costs and activity and must
perform an environmental assessment
on such proposed work prior to grant
award.
d. Only ALCP applicants may use
funds to augment a current Service
Coordinator program, by increasing the
hours of a currently employed Service
Coordinator, or hiring an additional
Service Coordinator or aide on a part- or
full-time basis. The additional hours
and/or staff must work only with ALCP
residents.
3. Threshold Requirements
a. At the time of submission, grant
applications must contain the materials
in Section IV.B.2.a and c of this NOFA
in order to be considered for funding. If
any of these items are missing, HUD
will immediately reject your
application.
b. In cases where field office staff
request information in response to
technical deficiencies in applications,
applicants must submit the response by
the designated deadline date. If
requested responses are not received by
this date, HUD will reject the
application.
c. DUNS Number Requirement. Refer
to the General Section for information
regarding the DUNS requirement. You
PO 00000
Frm 00260
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
will need to obtain a DUNS number to
receive an award from HUD.
4. Program Requirements. In
managing your Service Coordinator
grant, you must meet the requirements
of this Section. These requirements
apply to all activities, programs, and
functions used to plan, budget, and
evaluate the work funded under your
program.
a. You must make sufficient separate
and private office space available for the
Service Coordinator and/or aides to
meet with residents, without adversely
affecting normal activities.
b. The Service Coordinator must
maintain resident files in a secured
location. Files must be accessible ONLY
to the Service Coordinator, unless
residents provide signed consent
otherwise. These policies must be
consistent with maintaining
confidentiality of information related to
any individual per the Privacy Act of
1974.
c. Grantees must ensure that the
Service Coordinator receives
appropriate supervision, training, and
ongoing continuing education,
consistent with statutory and HUD
administrative requirements. This
includes 36 hours of training in agerelated and disability issues during the
first year of employment, if the Service
Coordinator has not received recent
training in these areas, and 12 hours of
continuing education each year
thereafter.
d. Grantees are responsible for any
budget shortfalls during the three-year
grant term.
e. As a condition of receiving a grant,
Section 202 developments without a
dedicated residual receipts account
must amend their regulatory agreement
and open such an account, separate
from their Reserve for Replacement
account.
f. Subgrants and Subcontracts. You
may directly hire a Service Coordinator
or you may contract with a qualified
third party to provide this service.
g. Environmental Requirements. It is
anticipated that most activities under
this program are categorically excluded
from the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) and related environmental
authorities under 24 CFR 50.19(b)(3),
(4), (12), or (13). If grant funds will be
used to cover the cost of any activities
which are not exempt from
environmental review requirements—
such as acquisition, leasing,
construction, or building rehabilitation,
HUD must perform an environmental
review to the extent required by 24 CFR
part 50, prior to grant award. HUD Field
office staff will determine the need for
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
an environmental assessment, based on
the proposed program activities.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Obtaining Grant Application
Packages. Applicants may download the
Instructions to the application found on
the grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The instructions
contain the General Section and
Program Section of the published NOFA
as well as forms that you must complete
and attach as a zip file to your
application submission. If you have
difficulty accessing the information, you
may call the Grants.gov Support desk
toll free at 800–518–GRANTS or e-mail
your questions to Support@Grants.gov.
The Support Desk staff will assist you
in accessing the information. Persons
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number via TTY by
calling the Federal Information Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission. Your application must
contain the items listed in paragraphs 1
and 2, below. These items include the
standard forms listed in Section
IV.B.2.b(4) of the General Section that
are applicable to this funding Notice
(collectively referred to as the ‘‘standard
forms’’). The standard forms and other
required forms are part of the electronic
application found at https://
www.grants.gov/apply_for_grants.jsp.
The items are as follows:
1. Standard Forms
a. Application for Federal Assistance
(SF–424)
b. Faith Based EEO Survey (SF–424
SUPP).
c. If engaged in lobbying, the
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Form
(SF–LLL)
d. Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/
Update Report (HUD–2880)
e. Logic Model, (HUD–96010). The
Logic Model for the Service Coordinator
NOFA is contained in the application
instructions download. Applicants may
select the items from the download
menu in each column that reflect their
anticipated activity outputs and
outcomes and select the activities and
outcomes that reflect your program into
the appropriate column in the Logic
Model form. You must enter the
appropriate outcomes in the outcome
column related to the output list
provided. The Master Logic Model
listing also identifies the unit of
measure that HUD is interested in
collecting for the outputs and outcomes
selected. In making the selections, you
must identify the appropriate predicted
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
number of units of measure to be
accomplished for each out put and
outcome. Use the space next to the
output and outcome to identify the
anticipated units of measure. You may
select multiple outputs and outcomes.
f. Acknowledgment of Application
Receipt (HUD–2993), for applicants
submitting paper applications only.
g. You Are Our Client Grant
Applicant Survey (HUD 2994–A),
optional.
h. Facsimile Transmittal (HUD–
96011). This form must be used as part
of the electronic application to transmit
third party documents and other
information as described in the General
Section.
2. Other Application Items. All
applications for funding under the
Service Coordinator Program must
include the following documents and
information:
a. Service Coordinator First-Time
Funding Request, form HUD–91186.
b. Evidence of comparable salaries in
your local area.
c. Narrative Statements Describing
Your Program.
(1) Explain your method of estimating
how many residents of your
development are frail or at-risk elderly
or non-elderly people with disabilities.
Please document that individuals
meeting these criteria make up at least
25 percent of your resident population.
(Do not include elderly individuals or
people with disabilities who do not live
in the eligible developments included in
your application.)
(2) Explain how you will provide onsite private office space for the Service
Coordinator, to allow for confidential
meetings with residents. If construction
is planned, also include a plan and a
cost-estimate.
(3) Describe your quality assurance
program evaluation activities and
itemized list of estimated expenses for
this activity if included in your request
for funding. Indicate the type of
professional or entity that will perform
the work if known at this time or the
criteria you will use to select the
provider.
(4) Describe your plan to address
community resident needs, if applicable
to your program.
(5) If you are applying for an ALCP
grant in conjunction with your Service
Coordinator application, describe how
the new or additional Service
Coordinator hours will support your
proposed assisted living program.
Indicate if you want your Service
Coordinator application entered into the
lottery if your ALCP application is not
selected to receive an award. In this
instance, your SC application will be
PO 00000
Frm 00261
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11693
eligible only if the concerned housing
development currently has no SC
program.
d. Evidence that no project funds are
available to fund a Service Coordinator
program. You must include a copy of
your development’s most recent bank
statement (or the equivalent thereof),
showing the project’s current residual
receipts or excess income balance (if
any). It is incumbent upon the applicant
to demonstrate that no such project
funds are available.
e. If applicable, provide evidence that
prior funding sources for your
development’s Service Coordinator
program are no longer available or will
expire within six months following the
application deadline date.
f. Agents may prepare applications
and sign application documents if they
provide authorization from the owner
corporation as part of the application. In
such cases, the owner corporation must
be indicated on all forms and
documents as the funding recipient.
(1) If an agent is preparing an
electronic application for an owner, the
owner must authorize the agent as the
Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR) in the Grants.gov Registration
process. HUD will recognize this
authority if the DUNS number included
in the application belongs to the owner
corporation and the name of the agent
is listed as the AOR. Refer to Section
IV.B. of the General Section for more
detailed registration information.
(2) If you are applying in paper copy
format, you must provide a letter from
the owner authorizing the submission
by the agent on their behalf.
3. Single and Joint Applications
a. Single Applications.
(1) You may submit one application
that contains one or more developments
that your corporation owns. Submitting
one application for each project you
own will increase your chances of
selection in the lottery. You may also
submit one application that contains
multiple projects you own, to reduce
preparation time and resources. Each
application must propose a stand-alone
program at separate developments. The
developments must all be located in the
same field office jurisdiction.
(2) If you wish to apply on behalf of
developments located in different field
office jurisdictions, you must submit a
separate application to each field office.
b. Joint Applications. You may join
with one or more other eligible owners
to share a Service Coordinator and
submit a joint application. Small
developments often join together to hire
and share a part or full-time Service
Coordinator and submit a joint
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11694
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
application. If more than one owner is
proposing to share a Service
Coordinator, one agency must designate
itself the ‘‘lead’’. When the legal
signatory for the owner corporation
signs the application, the owner agrees
to administer grant funds for all the
housing developments listed in the
application.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
4. Application Submission
Requirements for ALCP Applicants
a. If you are an ALCP applicant and
you request new or additional Service
Coordinator funds specifically for your
proposed Assisted Living Program, you
must submit an application containing
all required documents listed in Section
IV.B of this NOFA. You may include a
copy of all standard forms submitted as
part of your ALCP application.
b. If you currently do not have a
Service Coordinator working at the
development proposed in your ALCP
application and your ALCP application
is selected to receive an award, HUD
will fund a Service Coordinator to serve
either ALCP residents only or all
residents of the development dependent
upon your request. If your development
currently has a Service Coordinator, you
may request additional hours for the
Service Coordinator to serve the
Assisted Living residents only. If you
request additional hours, you must
specify the number of additional hours
per week and provide an explanation
based on the anticipated needs of the
Assisted Living residents. If you request
Service Coordinator funding to serve all
residents of your development, indicate
whether or not your request should be
entered into the national lottery if your
ALCP application is not selected to
receive an award. Provide this
information in your related narrative,
pursuant to paragraph IV.B.2.c(5) of this
NOFA.
C. Submission Dates and Times. The
application deadline date is June 8,
2007. (All applications must be received
and validated by www.grants.gov no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on
the application deadline date. See
submission details in the General
Section.)
D. Intergovernmental Review. Not
applicable to this program.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Alternative Funding for Service
Coordinators. If your development has
available Section 8 operating funds,
residual receipts, or excess income (i.e.
‘‘project funds’’), not needed for critical
project expenses, you must use these
project funds prior to receiving grant
monies. Owners may submit requests to
use Section 8 operating funds, residual
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
receipts, or excess income pursuant to
instructions in Housing’s Management
Agent Handbook 4381.5, REVISION–2,
CHANGE–2, Chapter 8 and Housing
Notice H 02–14. HUD field staff may
approve use of these project funds at
any time, consistent with current policy.
You should discuss the use of project
funds with your field office staff prior
to submitting a grant application.
2. Ineligible Activities and Program
Costs
a. You may not use funds available
through this NOFA to replace currently
available funding from other sources for
a Service Coordinator or for some other
staff person who performs service
coordinator functions.
b. Owners with existing service
coordinator subsidy awards or grants
may not apply for renewal or extension
of those programs under this NOFA.
HUD will provide extension funds
through a separate funding process.
c. Non-ALCP applicants may not use
funds to augment a current Service
Coordinator program, by increasing the
hours of a currently employed Service
Coordinator, or hiring an additional
Service Coordinator or aide on a part-or
full-time basis. HUD will award grants
only to eligible projects that do not
currently have (or are served by) an SC
program, regardless of the funding
source used to operate that program.
d. Grant recipients may not use grant
funds to pay for supervision performed
by property management staff.
(Management fees already pay for such
supervision.)
e. Cost overruns associated with
creating private office space and usual
audit and legal fees are not eligible uses
of grant funds.
f. The cost of application preparation
is not eligible for reimbursement.
g. Grant funds cannot be used to
increase a project’s management fee.
h. Grant funds may not cover the cost
of Service Coordinator-related training
courses for members of a development’s
management staff who do not directly
provide Service Coordination. Owners
must use their management fees to pay
this expense.
i. Owners/managers cannot use
Reserve for Replacement funds to pay
costs associated with a Service
Coordinator program.
j. CHSP grantees may not use these
funds to meet statutory program match
requirements and may not use these
funds to replace current CHSP program
funds to continue the employment of a
service coordinator.
k. Grantees cannot use grant funds to
pay PAC members for their services.
PO 00000
Frm 00262
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
l. The grant amount allowed for QA
may not exceed ten percent of the
Service Coordinator’s salary.
3. Prohibited Service Coordinator
Functions. Service Coordinators may
not perform the following activities: a.
Act as a recreational or activities
director;
b. Provide supportive services
directly;
c. Act as a Neighborhood Networks
program director or coordinator; and
d. Perform property management
work, regardless of the funding source
used to pay for these activities.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Application Submission and
Receipt Procedures. Carefully review
the procedures presented in Section
IV.B and F of the General Section. All
applicants submitting Service
Coordinator applications must submit
applications electronically.
2. Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirement. Applicants that are unable
to submit their application
electronically must seek a waiver of the
electronic grant submission
requirement. Requests for waivers must
be submitted to HUD no later than 15
days before the application deadline
date. Waiver requests must be submitted
by mail or by fax. For this program
NOFA, e-mail requests will not be
considered. Waiver requests submitted
by mail or fax should be submitted on
the applicant’s letterhead and signed by
an official with the legal authority to
request a waiver from the Department.
The request must be addressed to the
Assistant Secretary for Housing at the
following address: Brian D.
Montgomery, Assistant Secretary for
Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 9100, Washington,
DC 20410–8000. Waiver requests
submitted by fax must be sent to (202)
708–3104. If a waiver is granted, you
will receive notification that provides
specific instructions on how and where
to submit the paper application. You
must submit the required number of
copies of your application (an original
and two copies) by no later than the
local HUD office’s close of business on
the application deadline date.
3. Application Copies. Applicants
submitting electronic applications must
submit just one application to https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Applicants who
receive a waiver for electronic
submission will receive submission
instructions in the waiver approval
notification as to where the application
should be submitted and the number of
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
copies to be provided. If you do not
follow the instructions provided in your
waiver approval, your application will
be rejected. Therefore, if you are
uncertain to which local office to submit
your application, you should contact the
local HUD office representative listed in
the notification as a local contact for
clarification. Paper applications
received without a waiver will not be
considered.
4. Field Office Addresses. For a list of
field office addresses, see HUD’s Web
site at https://www.hud.gov/
localoffices.cfm.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. HUD will not award Service
Coordinator Program grant funds
through a rating and ranking process.
Instead, the Department will hold one
national lottery for all applications
determined to be eligible by Multifamily
Hub and Multifamily Program Center
staffs.
2. Threshold Eligibility Review. HUD
Multifamily field office staff will review
applications for completeness and
compliance with the eligibility criteria
set forth in Section III of this NOFA.
Field office staff will deem an
application eligible if the electronic
application was received and validated
by www.grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 PM on June 8, 2007. Paper
applications are eligible if received by
the field office on or before the deadline
date. Paper applications not received by
the deadline date will not be
considered. To be eligible for the lottery,
in addition to meeting the timely
submission requirements, an applicant
must meet all eligibility criteria;
propose reasonable costs for eligible
activities, and, if technical corrections
are requested during the review process,
provide the technical correction(s) by
the timeframe stated in the request.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Funding Priorities
a. Prior to the lottery, HUD will fund
Service Coordinator applications
submitted by FY2007 ALCP applicants,
whose ALCP applications are selected
for funding under that program’s NOFA.
HUD estimates that approximately
$500,000 will be used to fund ALCP
Service Coordinator applications. Any
funds not used by the ALCP program to
fund service coordinators will be added
to the funds available for the National
Lottery.
b. After setting aside funds for ALCP
applicants, and prior to the lottery, HUD
will next fund all applications
submitted by owners who are applying
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
for grant funds to continue a currently
operating program previously funded
through project funds. As stated in
paragraph III.A.3.f of this NOFA, such
applications are eligible only if project
funds are no longer available to
continue the program.
2. Selection Process
a. HUD will use remaining funds to
make grant awards through the use of a
national lottery. A computer program
performs the lottery by randomly
selecting eligible applications.
b. HUD will fully fund as many
applications as possible with the given
amount of funds available. After all
fully fundable applications have been
selected by lottery, HUD may make an
offer to partially fund the next
application on the lottery’s list, in order
to use the entire amount of funds
allocated. If the applicant selected for
partial funding turns down the offer,
HUD will make an offer to partially fund
the next application on the lottery list.
HUD will continue this process until an
applicant accepts the partial funding
offer.
3. Reduction in Requested Grant
Amount. HUD may make an award in an
amount less than requested, if:
a. HUD determines that some
elements of your proposed program are
ineligible for funding;
b. There are insufficient funds
available to make an offer to fully fund
the application;
c. HUD determines that reduced grant
amount would prevent duplicative
federal funding.
4. Corrections to Deficient
Applications. Section V.B. of the
General Section provides the procedures
for corrections to deficient applications.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices. HUD field staff
will send, by postal or overnight mail,
selection letters and grant agreements to
the award recipient organization. The
grant agreement is the obligating
document and funds are obligated once
the HUD grant officer signs the
agreement. Field staff will send nonselection letters during this same period
of time. If your application is rejected,
field staff may notify you by letter any
time during the application review
process.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements. None.
C. Reporting. All award recipients
must submit the following reports each
year of their period of performance:
1. Two Semi-Annual Financial Status
Reports (SF–269–A), for each half-year
period of the federal fiscal year;
PO 00000
Frm 00263
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11695
2. Two Semi-Annual Service
Coordinator Performance Reports,
(HUD–92456), for each half-year period
of the federal fiscal year;
3. Two completed Logic Model forms,
HUD–96010, submitted as an
attachment to each Semi-Annual
Performance Report. The Logic Model
must present performance information
corresponding to each six-month
reporting period, annually, and results
for the entire grant term. The reports
should reflect achievements related to
program outputs and outcomes as
specified in your approved Logic Model
incorporated into your grant agreement.
The objectives of the Service
Coordinator program are to enhance a
resident’s quality of life and ability to
live independently and to age in place.
The data that HUD collects on the
performance report and Logic Model
measure, in a quantitative form, the
grantee’s success in meeting these
intended program outcomes. HUD is
also considering a new concept for the
Logic Model, the Return on Investment
(ROI) Statement. HUD will be
publishing a separate notice on the ROI
concept.
4. Periodic reimbursement requests
(i.e., Payment Voucher, form HUD–
50080–SCMF), providing program
expenses for the associated time period,
and submitted in accordance with the
due dates stated in the grant agreement.
Grantees must request grant payments
directly following the end of each
agreed-upon time period and the funds
must reimburse those program costs
already incurred.
5. If your grant includes Quality
Assurance activities, you must provide
a copy of at least one annual report that
your QA provider submits to you each
year. You must submit this copy along
with the semi-annual reports that are
due on October 30 of each year. The QA
provider’s report that you submit to
HUD must include the following
information: who performed the QA
work, when the review(s) was
conducted, and the results of the
evaluation. The results should include
such information as how many residents
were served, the types of services they
receive, the training sessions attended
by the Service Coordinator, and the
extent of resident satisfaction with the
program. HUD will use this report, in
tandem with other reports and
performance data, to determine a
grantee’s acceptable program
performance.
VII. Agency Contacts
You may contact your local HUD field
office staff for questions you have
regarding this NOFA and your
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11696
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
application. Please contact the
Multifamily Housing Service
Coordinator contact person in your local
office. If you are an owner of a Section
515 development, contact the HUD field
office that monitors your Section 8
contract. If you have a question that the
field staff is unable to answer, please
call Carissa Janis, Housing Project
Manager; Office of Housing Assistance
and Grants Administration; Department
of Housing and Urban Development;
451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 6146;
Washington, DC 20410–8000; (202) 402–
2487 (this is not a toll-free number). If
you are hearing-or speech-impaired, you
may access this number via TTY by
calling the Federal Information Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
VIII. Other Information
A. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
an information program for potential
applicants via satellite broadcast to
learn more about the program and
preparation of the application. For more
information about the date and time of
the broadcast, you should contact your
local field office staff or consult the
HUD Web site at https://www.hud.gov.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2502–0477. In accordance with
PO 00000
Frm 00264
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 50.25 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, semi-annual
reports and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00265
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11697
EN13MR07.025
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
11698
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Section 202 Supportive Housing for the
Elderly Program (Section 202 Program)
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Housing.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Section
202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–07; OMB Approval Number is
2502–0267.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): 14.157,
Section 202 Supportive Housing for the
Elderly.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is on or before May 25, 2007.
Applications must be received and
validated by Grants.gov by 11:59:59
p.m. eastern time on the deadline date.
Please be sure to read the General
Section for electronic application
submission and receipt requirements.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
G. Optional, Additional Overview
Content Information
1. Purpose of the Program. This
program provides funding for the
development and operation of
supportive housing for very low-income
persons 62 years of age or older.
2. Available Funds. Approximately
$431.5 million in capital advance funds,
plus associated project rental assistance
contract (PRAC) funds and any
carryover funds available.
3. Types of Funds. Capital advance
funds will cover the cost of developing
the housing. PRAC funds will cover the
difference between the HUD-approved
operating costs of the project and the
tenants’ contributions toward rent (30
percent of their adjusted monthly
income).
4. Eligible Applicants. Private
nonprofit organizations and nonprofit
consumer cooperatives. (See Section
III.C.3.k of this NOFA for further details
and information regarding the formation
of the Owner corporation).
5. Eligible Activities. New
construction, rehabilitation, or
acquisition (with or without
rehabilitation) of housing. See Section
III.C.1 below of this NOFA for further
information.
6. Match Requirements. None
required.
7. Local HUD Offices. The local HUD
office structure, for the purpose of
implementing the Section 202 program,
consists of 18 Multifamily Hub Offices.
Within the Multifamily Hubs, there are
Multifamily Program Centers with the
exception of the New York Hub, the
Buffalo Hub, the Denver Hub and the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Los Angeles Hub. All future references
shall use the term ‘‘local HUD office’’
unless a more detailed description is
necessary as in Limitations on
Applications and Ranking and Selection
Procedures, below.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Description. HUD
provides capital advances and contracts
for project rental assistance in
accordance with 24 CFR part 891.
Capital advances may be used for the
construction or rehabilitation of a
structure, or acquisition of a structure
with or without rehabilitation. Capital
advance funds bear no interest and are
based on development cost limits in
Section IV.E.3. Repayment of the capital
advance is not required as long as the
housing remains available for
occupancy by very low-income elderly
persons for at least 40 years.
PRAC funds are used to cover the
difference between the tenants’
contributions toward rent (30 percent of
adjusted income) and the HUDapproved cost to operate the project.
PRAC funds may also be used to
provide supportive services and to hire
a service coordinator in those projects
serving frail elderly residents. The
supportive services must be appropriate
to the category or categories of frail
elderly residents to be served.
B. Authority. The Section 202
Supportive Housing for the Elderly
Program is authorized by section 202 of
the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C.
1701q), as amended by section 801 of
the Cranston-Gonzalez National
Affordable Housing Act (Pub. L. 101–
625; approved November 28, 1990); the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102–550; approved
October 28, 1992); the Rescissions Act
(Pub. L. 104–19; enacted on July 27,
1995); the American Homeownership
and Economic Opportunity Act of 2000
(Pub. L. 106–569; approved December
27, 2000); and the Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5; approved February 15, 2007).
C. Calculation of Fund Reservation. If
selected, you will receive a fund
reservation that will consist of both a
reservation of capital advance funds and
a reservation of three years for project
rental assistance.
1. Capital Advance Funds. The
reservation of capital advance funds is
based on a formula which takes the
development cost limit for the
appropriate building type (elevator,
non-elevator) and unit size(s) and
multiplies it by the number of units of
each size (including a unit for a resident
PO 00000
Frm 00266
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
manager, if applicable) and then
multiplies the result by the high cost
factor for the area. The development
cost limits can be found in Section
IV.E.3. of this NOFA.
2. PRAC Funds. The initial PRAC
award covers three years. The amount
awarded is determined by multiplying
the number of revenue units for elderly
persons by the appropriate operating
cost standard times 3. The operating
cost standards will be published by
Notice.
II. Award Information
A. Available Funds. For FY2007,
approximately $431.5 million is
available for capital advances for the
Section 202 Supportive Housing for the
Elderly Program. The Revised
Continuing Appropriations Resolution,
2007 (Pub. L. 110–5; approved February
15, 2007) provides approximately $742
million for capital advances, including
amendments to capital advance
contracts, for supportive housing for the
elderly as authorized by Section 202 of
the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C.
1701q), as amended by section 801 of
the Cranston-Gonzalez National
Affordable Housing Act (Pub. L. 101–
625, approved November 28, 1990), for
project rental assistance, amendments to
contracts for project rental assistance,
and the renewal of expiring contracts for
such assistance for up to a one-year
term, for supportive housing for the
elderly under section 202(c)(2) of the
Housing Act of 1959 as well as the
amount of $400,000 to be transferred to
the Working Capital Fund. Additionally,
of the amount appropriated,
approximately $51,600,000 is provided
for Service Coordinators and the
continuation of Congregate Services
grants, up to $24,800,000 is provided for
Assisted Living Conversion grants and
Emergency Capital Repairs, and
approximately $20,000,000 is provided
for a Section 202 Demonstration PreDevelopment Grant Program.
The announcement of the availability
of the funds for the Service Coordinators
and the continuation of Congregate
Services as well as the Assisted Living
Conversion program is covered
elsewhere in this NOFA.
The announcement of the availability
of funds for Emergency Capital Repairs
will be addressed in a separate Federal
Register publication.
In accordance with the waiver
authority provided in the Department of
Housing and Urban Development
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Pub. L. 109–
115; approved November 30, 2005), the
Secretary is waiving the following
statutory and regulatory provision: The
term of the project rental assistance
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11699
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
contract is reduced from 20 years to 3
years. HUD anticipates that at the end
of the contract terms, renewals will be
approved subject to the availability of
funds. In addition to this provision,
HUD will reserve project rental
assistance contract funds based on 75
percent rather than on 100 percent of
the current operating cost standards for
approved units in order to take into
account the average tenant contribution
toward rent.
The allocation formula used for
Section 202 reflects the ‘‘relevant
characteristics of prospective program
participants,’’ as specified in 24 CFR
791.402(a). The FY2007 formula
consists of one data element from the
2000 Census: number of one-person
elderly renter households (householder
age 62 and older) with incomes at or
below the applicable Section 8 very
low-income limit, and with housing
conditions. Housing conditions are
defined as paying more than 30 percent
of income for gross rent, or occupying
a unit lacking some or all kitchen or
plumbing facilities, or occupying an
overcrowded unit (1.01 persons per
room or more).
Under Section 202, 85 percent of the
total capital advance amount is
allocated to metropolitan areas and 15
percent to nonmetropolitan areas. In
addition, each local HUD office
jurisdiction receives sufficient capital
advance funds for a minimum of 20
units in metropolitan areas and 5 units
in nonmetropolitan areas. The total
amount of capital advance funds to
support these minimum set-asides are
subtracted from the respective
(metropolitan or nonmetropolitan) total
capital advance amounts available. The
remainder is fair shared to each local
HUD office jurisdiction whose fair share
exceeds the minimum set-aside based
on the allocation formula fair share
factors described below.
Note: The allocations for metropolitan and
nonmetropolitan portions of the local HUD
office jurisdictions reflect the definitions of
metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas as of
the June 2003 definitions by the Office of
Management and Budget.
A fair share factor is developed for
each metropolitan and nonmetropolitan
portion of each local HUD office
jurisdiction by dividing the number of
elderly renter households in the
respective metropolitan and
nonmetropolitan portion of the
jurisdiction by the total number of
elderly rental households in the
metropolitan and nonmetropolitan
portions of the United States. The
resulting percentage for each local HUD
office jurisdiction is then adjusted to
reflect the relative cost of providing
housing among the local HUD office
jurisdictions. The adjusted needs
percentage for the applicable
metropolitan or nonmetropolitan
portion of each jurisdiction is then
multiplied by the respective total
remaining capital advance funds
available nationwide. Based on the
allocation formula, HUD has allocated
the available capital advance funds as
shown on the following chart:
FY 2007 SECTION 202 ALLOCATION BY FIELD OFFICE
Metropolitan
Offices
Capital
advance
Units
Non-Metropolitan
Totals
Units
Capital
advance
5
5
19
........................
29
$688,957
713,661
2,044,752
........................
3,447,370
112
61
55
36
264
$15,466,111
8,683,982
6,050,601
4,988,499
35,189,193
5
713,661
257
36,617,887
20
2,475,872
93
11,385,392
15
10
........................
12
37
1,963,717
1,024,03
........................
1,376,023
4,363,773
120
30
120
67
337
16,061,630
3,154,037
17,044,604
7,558,057
43,818,328
5
12
........................
17
551,715
1,260,724
........................
1,812,439
59
62
52
173
6,532,685
6,392,750
6,403,632
19,329,067
24
11
35
3,081,337
1,188,664
4,270,001
79
49
128
10,246,034
5,327,349
15,573,383
Units
Capital
advance
BOSTON HUB
BOSTON ..........................................................................
HARTFORD .....................................................................
MANCHESTER ................................................................
PROVIDENCE .................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
107
56
36
36
235
$14,777,154
7,970,321
4,005,849
4,988,499
31,741,823
NEW YORK HUB
NEW YORK .....................................................................
252
35,904,226
BUFFALO HUB
BUFFALO .........................................................................
73
8,909,520
PHILADELPHIA HUB
PHILADELPHIA ...............................................................
CHARLESTON .................................................................
NEWARK .........................................................................
PITTSBURGH ..................................................................
TOTAL ............................................................
105
20
120
55
300
14,097,914
2,130,004
17,044,604
6,182,034
39,454,555
BALTIMORE HUB
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
BALTIMORE ....................................................................
RICHMOND .....................................................................
WASHINGTON ................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
54
50
52
156
5,980,970
5,132,026
6,403,632
17,516,628
GREENSBORO HUB
GREENSBORO ...............................................................
COLUMBIA ......................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00267
55
38
93
Fmt 4701
7,164,697
4,138,685
11,303,382
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11700
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
FY 2007 SECTION 202 ALLOCATION BY FIELD OFFICE—Continued
Metropolitan
Offices
Non-Metropolitan
Capital
advance
Units
Capital
advance
Units
Totals
Units
Capital
advance
JACKSONVILLE HUB
JACKSONVILLE ..............................................................
BIRMINGHAM ..................................................................
JACKSON ........................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
149
42
20
211
14,433,608
3,924,098
1,833,560
20,191,266
10
14
15
39
983,871
1,321,771
1,354,360
3,660,002
159
56
35
250
15,417,479
5,245,869
3,187,920
23,851,268
17
17
8
12
5
59
1,639,350
1,744,670
778,828
1,201,262
609,357
5,973,467
74
54
28
50
25
231
7,183,951
5,582,214
2,722,182
4,966,469
3,046,784
23,501,600
19
15
34
2,552,786
1,604,961
4,157,747
143
74
217
19,204,631
7,701,242
26,905,873
13
5
12
30
1,297,567
510,542
1,358,297
3,166,406
49
50
80
179
4,955,322
5,101,385
9,058,330
19,115,037
9
12
21
1,024,695
1,079,547
2,104,242
81
52
133
9,550,728
4,551,068
14,101,796
19
19
38
2,308,510
2,345,943
4,654,453
73
81
154
8,942,514
9,931,551
18,874,065
20
8
14
12
9
63
1,815,184
753,322
1,230,048
1,114,371
799,046
5,711,971
99
61
34
56
54
304
9,008,045
5,466,685
2,997,731
5,225,479
4,781,017
27,478,957
17
14
17
12
12
72
1,802,135
1,262,681
1,520,159
1,194,837
1,448,490
7,228,302
64
49
37
32
52
234
6,838,052
4,431,891
3,353,719
3,247,985
6,227,554
24,099,201
25
2,280,793
90
9,194,870
9
5
8
8
30
1,145,500
988,146
813,731
1,121,909
4,069,286
131
25
57
51
264
17,789,630
4,940,730
5,514,289
7,066,160
35,310,809
ATLANTA HUB
ATLANTA .........................................................................
LOUISVILLE .....................................................................
KNOXVILLE .....................................................................
NASHVILLE .....................................................................
SAN JUAN .......................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
57
37
20
38
20
172
5,544,601
3,837,544
1,943,354
3,765,207
2,437,427
17,528,133
CHICAGO HUB
CHICAGO ........................................................................
INDIANAPOLIS ................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
124
59
183
16,651,845
6,096,281
22,748,126
COLUMBUS HUB
COLUMBUS .....................................................................
CINCINNATI .....................................................................
CLEVELAND ....................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
36
45
68
149
3,657,755
4,590,843
7,700,033
15,948,631
DETROIT HUB
DETROIT .........................................................................
GRAND RAPIDS ..............................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
72
40
112
8,526,033
3,471,521
11,997,554
MINNEAPOLIS HUB
MINNEAPOLIS .................................................................
MILWAUKEE ....................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
54
62
116
6,634,004
7,585,608
14,219,612
FT WORTH HUB
FT WORTH ......................................................................
HOUSTON .......................................................................
LITTLE ROCK ..................................................................
NEW ORLEANS ..............................................................
SAN ANTONIO ................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
79
53
20
44
45
241
7,192,861
4,713,363
1,767,683
4,111,108
3,981,971
21,766,986
KANSAS CITY HUB
KANSAS CITY .................................................................
OKLAHOMA CITY ...........................................................
DES MOINES ..................................................................
OMAHA ............................................................................
ST LOUIS .........................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
47
35
20
20
40
162
5,035,917
3,169,210
1,833,560
2,053,148
4,779,064
16,870,899
DENVER HUB
DENVER ..........................................................................
65
6,914,077
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
SAN FRANCISCO HUB
SAN FRANCISCO ...........................................................
HONOLULU .....................................................................
PHOENIX .........................................................................
SACRAMENTO ................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
122
20
49
43
234
Frm 00268
Fmt 4701
16,644,130
3,952,584
4,700,558
5,944,251
31,241,523
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11701
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
FY 2007 SECTION 202 ALLOCATION BY FIELD OFFICE—Continued
Metropolitan
Offices
Units
Capital
advance
Non-Metropolitan
Capital
advance
Units
Totals
Units
Capital
advance
LOS ANGELES HUB
LOS ANGELES ................................................................
191
25,334,365
5
661,509
196
25,995,874
SEATTLE HUB
SEATTLE .........................................................................
ANCHORAGE ..................................................................
PORTLAND ......................................................................
TOTAL ......................................................................
64
20
48
132
8,048,338
3,952,584
5,214,272
17,215,194
11
5
15
31
1,388,476
988,146
1,602,644
3,979,266
75
25
63
163
9,436,814
4,940,730
6,816,916
21,194,460
NATIONAL TOTAL ........................................
3,077
$366,806,500
590
$64,730,560
3,667
$431,537,060
B. Type of Award. Capital Advance
and Project Rental Assistance Contract
Funds for new Section 202 applications.
C. Type of Assistance Instrument. The
Agreement Letter stipulates the terms
and conditions for the Section 202 fund
reservation award as well as the
submission requirements following the
fund reservation award. The duration of
the fund reservation award for the
capital advance is 18 months from the
date of issuance of the fund reservation.
D. Anticipated Start and Completion
Date. Immediately upon your
acceptance of the Agreement Letter, you
are expected to begin work toward the
submission of a Firm Commitment
Application, which is the next
application submission stage. You are
required to submit a Firm Commitment
Application to the local HUD office
within 180 days from the date of the
Agreement Letter. Initial closing of the
capital advance and start of construction
of the project are expected to be
accomplished within the duration of the
fund reservation award period as
indicated in the above paragraph
regarding the Type of Assistance
Instrument. Final closing of this capital
advance is expected to occur no later
than six months after completion of
project construction.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. Private
nonprofit organizations and nonprofit
consumer cooperatives that meet the
threshold requirements contained in the
General Section and Section III.C.2. of
this NOFA are the only eligible
applicants under this Section 202
program. Neither a public body nor an
instrumentality of a public body is
eligible to participate in the program.
Applicant eligibility for purposes of
applying for a Section 202 fund
reservation under this NOFA has not
changed; i.e., all Section 202 Sponsors
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
and Co-Sponsors must be private
nonprofit organizations and nonprofit
consumer cooperatives. However, the
Owner corporation, when later formed
by the Sponsor, may be (1) a singlepurpose private nonprofit organization
that has tax-exempt status under Section
501(c)(3) or Section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, (2)
nonprofit consumer cooperative, or (3)
for purposes of developing a mixedfinance project pursuant to the statutory
provision under Title VIII of the
American Homeownership and
Economic Opportunity Act of 2000, a
for-profit limited partnership with a
private nonprofit organization as the
sole general partner.
See Section III.C.3.b. regarding limits
on the total number of units and
projects for which you may apply for
funding.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. No cost
sharing or match is required; however,
you are required to make a commitment
to cover the estimated start-up expenses,
the minimum capital investment of onehalf of one percent of the HUDapproved capital advance, not to exceed
$10,000 or for a national Sponsor not to
exceed $25,000, and any funds required
in excess of the capital advance,
including the estimated cost of any
amenities or features (and operating
costs related thereto) which are not
covered by the capital advance. You
make such a commitment by signing the
Form HUD–92042, Sponsor’s Resolution
for Commitment to Project in Exhibit
8(g) of the application found in Section
IV.B.
C. Other.
1. Eligible Activities. Section 202
capital advance funds must be used to
finance the development of housing
through new construction,
rehabilitation, or acquisition with or
without rehabilitation. Capital advance
funds may also be used in combination
PO 00000
Frm 00269
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
with other non-Section 202 funding
sources leveraged by a for-profit limited
partnership (of which a single-purpose
private nonprofit organization is the
sole general partner) to develop a
mixed-finance project, including a
mixed-finance project for additional
units for the elderly over and above the
Section 202 units. The development of
a mixed-use project in which the
Section 202 units are mortgaged
separately from the other uses of the
structure is not considered a mixedfinance project. Project rental assistance
funds are provided to cover the
difference between the HUD-approved
operating costs and the amount the
residents pay (each resident pays 30
percent of adjusted income) as well as
to provide supportive services to frail
elderly residents.
Note: For purposes of approving Section
202 capital advances, HUD will consider
proposals involving mixed-financing for
additional units over and above the Section
202 units. However, you must obtain funds
to assist the additional units with other than
PRAC funds. HUD will not provide PRAC
funds for non-Section 202 units.
A portion of the PRAC funds (not to
exceed $15 per unit/per month) may be
used to cover some of the cost of any
supportive services for those frail
elderly or those elderly determined to
be at-risk of being institutionalized. The
balance of the cost for services must be
paid for from sources other than the
capital advance or PRAC funds. Also,
the cost of employing a service
coordinator for those projects serving
principally the frail elderly (when at
least 25 percent of the residents will be
frail or determined to be at-risk of being
institutionalized) is an eligible use of
PRAC funds. Section 202 projects
receiving Congregate Housing Services
assistance under Section 802 of the
National Affordable Housing Act are not
eligible to use capital advance or PRAC
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11702
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
funds for supportive services or the cost
of a service coordinator.
2. Threshold Requirements for
Funding Consideration. In addition to
the threshold criteria outlined in the
General Section, the following threshold
requirements must be met:
a. Non-Responsive Application. Your
application will be considered nonresponsive to the NOFA and will not be
accepted for processing if you:
(1) requested and received approval to
submit a paper application and you
submit less than the required number of
paper copies. Applicants receiving
waiver approval to submit a paper
application must follow the instructions
in the approval notification regarding
where to submit the application and the
number of copies required. All paper
applications granted a waiver to the
electronic application submission
requirement must be received by HUD
at the proper location no later than the
deadline date.
(2) submit paper copies of the
application if you have not received
approval from HUD for a waiver of the
electronic submission requirements;
(3) submit a substantially deficient
application (i.e., a majority of the
required exhibits are not submitted with
your application, particularly, but not
limited to, those exhibits which are not
curable). HUD reserves the right to
determine whether your application is
substantially deficient for purposes of
determining whether the application is
non-responsive to the NOFA. Refer to
Section IV.B., Content of Form of
Application Submission, for
information on the required exhibits for
submission with your application to
ensure that your application is complete
at time of submission;
(4) request more units than were
allocated in either the metropolitan or
nonmetropolitan allocation category to
the local HUD office that will be
reviewing your application or 125 units,
whichever is less (see the allocation
chart in Section II.A. above);
(5) request less than the minimum
number of 5 units per site;
(6) request assistance for an ineligible
activity as defined in Section IV.E.,
Funding Restrictions, of this program
NOFA; or
(7) are an ineligible applicant (see
Section III.A, Eligible Applicants of this
program NOFA).
b. Other Criteria
(1) You, or a co-Sponsor, must have
experience in providing housing or
services to elderly persons.
(2) You and any co-Sponsor must be
eligible private nonprofit organizations
or nonprofit consumer cooperatives
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
with tax exempt status under Internal
Revenue Service code.
(3) Your application must contain
acceptable evidence of the following:
(a) Evidence of Site Control. You must
provide evidence of site control as
described in this section and Exhibit
4(d)(i) of Section IV.B. of this NOFA).
(b) Historic Preservation. You are
required to send a letter to the State/
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO/THPO) that attempts to initiate
consultation with their office and
requests their review of your
determinations and findings with
respect to the historical significance of
your proposed project. A sample letter
to the SHPO/THPO that you may adapt
for your use, if you so choose, is
available on HUD’s Web site at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm. You must include a
copy of your letter to the SHPO/THPO
in your application and a statement that
you have not received a response
letter(s) from the SHPO/THPO or a copy
of the response letter(s) received from
the SHPO/THPO.
(c) Contamination. HUD must
determine if a proposed site contains
contamination, such as hazardous
waste, petroleum, or petroleum
products, and, if so, HUD must be
satisfied that it is eliminated to the
extent necessary to meet non sitespecific federal, state or local health
standards. You must assist HUD by
doing the following:
(i) Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA). You must undertake
and submit a Phase I ESA, prepared in
accordance with the ASTM Standard E
1527–05, as amended, using the table of
contents and report format specified at
Appendix X4 thereto, completed or
updated as specified at Section 4.6
thereto no earlier than 180 days prior to
the application deadline date. The
Phase I ESA must be completed and
submitted with the application.
Therefore, it is important that you start
the Phase I ESA process as soon after
publication of the SuperNOFA as
possible.
Note: A Phase I ESA that is not properly
updated, does not use the report format
specified at Appendix X4 of ASTM Standard
E 1527–05, or that is prepared in accordance
with an older version of ASTM E 1527 will
result in a technical rejection of your
application.
To help you choose an
environmentally safe site, HUD invites
you to review the documents ‘‘Choosing
an Environmentally Safe Site’’ and
‘‘Supplemental Guidance,
Environmental Information’’, which are
available on the HUD Web site at
PO 00000
Frm 00270
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
(ii) Phase II ESA. If the Phase I ESA
indicates the possible presence of
contamination and/or hazards, you must
decide whether to continue with this
site or choose another site. Should you
choose another site, the same Phase I
ESA process identified above must be
followed for the new site. However, if
you choose to continue with the original
site on which the Phase I ESA indicated
contamination or hazards, you must
undertake a detailed Phase II ESA by an
appropriate professional. In order for
your application to be considered for
review under this FY2007 funding
competition, the Phase II must be
received by the local HUD office on or
before June 25, 2007.
(iii) Clean-up—If the Phase II ESA
reveals site contamination, the extent of
the contamination and a plan for cleanup of the site must be submitted to the
local HUD office. The plan for clean-up
must include a contract for remediation
of the problem(s) and an approval letter
from the applicable federal, state, and/
or local agency with jurisdiction over
the site. In order for your application to
be considered for review under this
FY2007 funding competition, this
information must be received by the
local HUD office on or before June 25,
2007. If the above information is not
received by the local HUD office by that
date, the application will be rejected.
Note: Clean-up could be an expensive
undertaking. You must pay for the cost of any
clean-up and/or remediation with sources
other than the capital advance funds. If the
application is approved, clean-up must be
completed prior to initial closing.
Completion of clean-up means that HUD
must be satisfied that the contamination has
been eliminated to the extent necessary to
meet non site-specific federal, state or local
health standards, with no active or passive
remediation still taking place, no capping
over of any contamination, and no
monitoring wells. However, it is acceptable if
contamination remains solely in groundwater
that is at least 25 feet below the surface.
(d) Asbestos. Asbestos is a hazardous
substance commonly used in building
products until the late 1970s. Therefore,
you must submit one of the following
with your application:
(i) If there are no pre-1978 structures
on the site or if there are pre-1978
structures, that most recently consisted
of solely four or fewer units of singlefamily housing including appurtenant
structures thereto, a statement to this
effect, or
(ii) If there are pre-1978 structures on
the site, other than for a site that most
recently consisted of solely four or
fewer units of single-family housing
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
including appurtenant structures
thereto, a comprehensive building
asbestos survey that is based on a
thorough inspection to identify the
location and condition of asbestos
throughout any structures. In those
cases where suspect asbestos is found,
it would either be assumed to be
asbestos or would require confirmatory
testing. If the asbestos survey indicates
the presence of asbestos or the presence
of asbestos is assumed, and if the
application is approved, HUD will
condition the approval on an
appropriate mix of asbestos abatement
and an asbestos Operations and
Maintenance Plan.
(4) There must be a market need for
the number of units proposed in the
area of the project location.
(5) You are required to include a
Supportive Services Plan that describes
the supportive services proposed to be
provided to the anticipated occupants,
including a description of the public or
private funds that are expected to fund
the proposed services and the manner in
which the services will be provided to
the proposed residents (see Exhibit 5 in
Section IV.B. of this NOFA). You must
not require residents to accept any
supportive services as a condition of
occupancy or admission.
(6) Delinquent Federal Debt. Refer to
the General Section for information
regarding delinquent federal debt.
3. Program Requirements. By signing
Form HUD–92015–CA, Supportive
Housing for the Elderly Section 202,
Application for Capital Advance
Summary Information, you are
certifying that you will comply with all
program requirements listed in the
General Section as well as the following
requirements:
a. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements. In addition to the
statutory, regulatory, threshold and
public policy requirements listed in the
General Section, you must comply with
all statutory and regulatory
requirements listed in this NOFA.
b. Application/Project Size Limits.
(1) Application Limits Applicable to
Sponsors or Co-Sponsors. A Sponsor or
Co-Sponsor may not apply for more
than 200 units of housing for the elderly
in a single Hub or more than 10 percent
of the total units allocated to all HUD
offices. Affiliated entities (organizations
that are branches or offshoots of a parent
organization) that submit separate
applications are considered a single
entity for the purpose of this limit.
(2) Maximum Project Size. No single
application may propose the
development of a project for more than
the number of units allocated to a local
HUD office (in either the metropolitan
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
or nonmetropolitan allocation category,
depending on the location of your
proposed project) or 125 units,
whichever is less. For example, the local
HUD office, which has jurisdiction over
the area of your proposed project, was
allocated 80 units (metropolitan) and 20
units (nonmetropolitan) for a total of
100 units. You cannot apply for more
than 80 units if your proposed project
is in a metropolitan area and no more
than 20 units if the project is in a
nonmetropolitan area. The maximum
project size includes a resident
manager’s unit, if proposed.
(3) Minimum Project Size. The
minimum number of units that can be
applied for in one application is five
units. If the proposed project will be a
scattered-site development, the five-unit
minimum requirement will apply to
each site.
c. Minimum Capital Investment. If
selected, you must provide a minimum
capital investment of one-half of one
percent of the HUD-approved capital
advance amount, not to exceed $10,000
in accordance with 24 CFR 891.145,
with the following exception: If you, as
Sponsor or Co-Sponsor, have one or
more Section 202 or one or more
Section 811 project(s) under reservation,
construction, or management in two or
more different HUD geographical
regions (Hubs), the minimum capital
investment shall be one-half of one
percent of the HUD-approved capital
advance amount, not to exceed $25,000.
d. Accessibility. Your project must
meet accessibility requirements
published at 24 CFR 891.120, 24 CFR
891.210, and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and its
implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part
8, and, if new construction, the design
and construction requirements of the
Fair Housing Act and HUD’s
implementing regulations at 24 CFR part
100. In addition, 24 CFR 8.4(b)(5)
prohibits the selection of a site or
location which has the purpose or effect
of excluding persons with disabilities
from the federally assisted program or
activity. Refer to Section V.A. below and
the General Section for information
regarding the policy priority of
encouraging accessible design.
e. Conducting Business in Accordance
with HUD Core Values and Ethical
Standards. You are not subject to the
requirements of 24 CFR parts 84 and 85
as outlined in the General Section,
except that the disposition of real
property may be subject to 24 CFR part
84. However, you are still subject to the
core values and ethical standards as
they relate to the conflict of interest
provisions in 24 CFR 891.130. To ensure
compliance with the program’s conflict
PO 00000
Frm 00271
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11703
of interest provisions, you are required
to sign a Conflict of Interest Resolution
and include it in your Section 202
application. Further, if awarded a
Section 202 fund reservation, the
officers, directors, board members,
trustees, stockholders and authorized
agents of the Section 202 Sponsor and
Owner entities will be required to
submit to HUD individual certifications
regarding compliance with HUD’s
conflict of interest requirements.
f. National Environmental Policy Act.
You must comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321) and applicable
related environmental authorities at 24
CFR 50.4, HUD’s programmatic
implementing regulations at 24 CFR part
50 and 24 CFR 891.155(b), especially,
but not limited to, the provision of
information to HUD at 24 CFR 50.31(b),
and you must comply with any
environmental ‘‘conditions and
safeguards’’ at 24 CFR 50.3(c).
Under 24 CFR Part 50, HUD has the
responsibility for conducting the
environmental reviews. HUD will
commence the environmental review of
your project upon receipt of your
completed application. However, HUD
cannot approve any site unless it first
completes the environmental review
and finds that the site meets its
environmental requirements. In rare
cases where HUD is not able to
complete the environmental review, it is
due to a complex environmental issue
that could not be resolved during the
time period allocated for application
processing. Thus, HUD requires you to
attempt to obtain comments from the
State/Tribal Historic Preservation
Officer (see Exhibit 4(d)(ix) of Section
IV.B. below) to help HUD complete the
environmental review on time. It is also
why HUD may contact you for
additional environmental information.
So that you can review the type of
information that HUD needs for its
preparation of the environmental
review, the type of information requests
that HUD may make to you, and the
criteria that HUD uses to determine the
environmental acceptability of a site,
you are invited to go to the following
Web site to view the HUD form 4128,
including the Sample Field Notes
Checklist, which HUD uses to record the
environmental review: www.hud.gov/
utilities/intercept.cfm?/offices/cpd/
energyenviron/environment/
compliance/forms/4128.pdf.
g. Executive Order 13202,
Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11704
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Funded Construction Projects. Refer to
the General Section.
h. Fair Housing Requirements. Refer
to the General Section for information
regarding fair housing requirements.
i. Economic Opportunities for Low
and Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). You must comply with Section 3 of
the Housing and Urban Development
Act of 1968, 12 U.S.C. 1701u (Economic
Opportunities for Low and Very LowIncome Persons) and its implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 135. You
must ensure that training, employment
and other economic opportunities shall,
to the greatest extent feasible, be
directed toward low and very lowincome persons, particularly those who
are recipients of government assistance
for housing and to business concerns
which provide economic opportunities
to low and very low-income persons in
the area in which the proposed project
will be located. To comply with Section
3 requirements you are hereby certifying
that you will strongly encourage your
general contractor and subcontractors to
participate in local apprenticeship
programs or training programs
registered or certified by the Department
of Labor’s Office of Apprenticeship,
Training, Employer and Labor Services
or recognized State Apprenticeship
Agency. Although not a NOFA
requirement, you are encouraged to
submit with your application a
description on how you plan to
incorporate the Section 3 requirements
into your proposed project with goals
for expanding training and employment
opportunities for low and very lowincome (Section 3) residents as well as
business concerns. You will receive up
to two (2) points if you provide a
description of your plans for doing so
under Exhibit 3(k) of this program
NOFA.
j. Design and Cost Standards. You
must comply with HUD’s Section 202
design and cost standards (24 CFR
891.120 and 891.210), the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Standards (24 CFR
40.7), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 and HUD’s implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 8, and for
covered multifamily dwellings designed
and constructed for first occupancy after
March 13, 1991, the design and
construction requirements of the Fair
Housing Act and HUD’s implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 100, and,
where applicable, the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990.
k. Formation of Owner Corporation.
You must form an Owner entity (in
accordance with 24 CFR 891.205) after
issuance of the capital advance fund
reservation and must cause the Owner
entity to file a request for determination
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
of eligibility and a request for capital
advance, and must provide sufficient
resources to the Owner entity to ensure
the development and long-term
operation of the project, including
capitalizing the Owner entity at firm
commitment processing in an amount
sufficient to meet its obligations in
connection with the project over and
above the capital advance amount.
l. Davis-Bacon. You must comply
with the Davis-Bacon requirements (12
U.S.C. 1701q(j)(5)) and the Contract
Work Hours and Safety Standards Act in
accordance with 24 CFR 891.155(d).
4. Energy Efficiency. HUD has
adopted a wide-ranging energy action
plan for improving energy efficiency in
all program areas. As a first step in
implementing the energy plan, HUD, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the Department of Energy (DoE)
have signed a joint partnership to
promote energy efficiency in HUD’s
affordable housing efforts and programs.
The purpose of the Energy Star
partnership is not only to promote
energy efficiency of the affordable
housing stock, but also to help protect
the environment.
Although it is not a requirement, you
are encouraged to promote energy
efficiency in design and operation of
your proposed project and your
application will receive one (1) point if
you describe your plans for doing so in
the proposed project. You are urged
especially to purchase and use Energy
Star-labeled products. For further
information about Energy Star, see
https://www.energystar.gov or call 1–
888–STAR–YES (1–888–782–7937) or
for the hearing-impaired, 1–888–588–
9920 TTY.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Applicants are required to submit an
electronic application unless they
receive a waiver of the requirement in
accordance with the procedures in
Section IV.C. of this NOFA. See the
General Section for information on
electronic application submission and
timely submission and receipt
requirements.
A. Address to Request Application
Package. All information required to
complete and return a valid application
is included in the General Section and
this NOFA, including other related
documents. Applicants may download
the application and instructions from
the Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information you
may call the Grants.gov Support Desk
toll free 800–518–GRANTS or e-mail
PO 00000
Frm 00272
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
your questions to Support@Grants.gov.
See the General Section for information
regarding the registration process or ask
for registration information from the
Grants.gov Support Desk.
You may request general information,
copies of the General Section and NOFA
(including related documents), from the
NOFA Information Center (800–HUD–
8929) Monday through Friday, except
on federal holidays. Persons with
hearing and speech impairments may
access the above number via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay
Service at 800–877–8339. When
requesting information, please refer to
the name of the program in which you
are interested.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission. The exhibits to be included
in your application are contained in the
body of this NOFA. Before preparing
your application, you should carefully
review the requirements of the
regulations (24 CFR Part 891) and
general program instructions in
Handbook 4571.3 REV–1, Section 202
Capital Advance Program for Housing
the Elderly. Note: Section 1001 of Title
18 of the United States Code (Criminal
Code and Criminal Procedure, 72 Stat.
967) applies to all information supplied
in the application submission. (18
U.S.C. 1001, among other things,
provides that whoever knowingly and
willfully makes or uses a document or
writing containing any false, fictitious,
fraudulent statement or entry, in any
matter within the jurisdiction of any
department or agency of the United
States, shall be fined not more than
$10,000 or imprisoned for not more than
five years, or both.)
The Application for a Section 202
Capital Advance consists of four parts
with a total of eight Exhibits. Included
with the eight Exhibits are prescribed
forms, certifications and resolutions.
The components of the Application are:
• Part 1—Application Form for
Section 202 Supportive Housing—
Capital Advance (Exhibit 1).
• Part 2—Your Ability to Develop and
Operate the Proposed Project (Exhibits 2
and 3).
• Part 3—The Need for Supportive
Housing for the Target Population in the
Area to be Served, Site Control and
Suitability of Site, Adequacy of the
Provision of Supportive Services and of
the Proposed Project (Exhibits 4 and 5).
• Part 4—General Application
Requirements, Certifications and
Resolutions (Exhibits 6 through 8).
The following additional information,
which may assist you in preparing your
application, is available on HUD’s Web
site at https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/
grants/fundsavail.cfm:
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
• Listing of Local HUD Offices.
• Letter Requesting SHPO/THPO
Review.
• Choosing an Environmentally Safe
Site.
• Supplemental to Choosing an
Environmentally Safe Site.
Your application must include all of
the information, materials, forms, and
exhibits listed below (unless you were
selected for a Section 202 fund
reservation within the last three funding
cycles). If you qualify for this exception,
you are not required to submit the
information described in Exhibits 2(a),
(b), and (c), which are the articles of
incorporation, (or other organizational
documents), by-laws, and the IRS tax
exemption, respectively. If there has
been a change in any of these
documents since your previous HUD
approval, you must submit the updated
information in your application. The
local HUD office will verify your
previous HUD approval by checking the
project number and approval status with
the appropriate local HUD office based
on the information submitted.
In addition to this relief of paperwork
burden in preparing applications, you
will be able to use information and
exhibits previously prepared for prior
applications under Section 202, Section
811, or other funding programs.
Examples of exhibits that may be readily
adapted or amended to decrease the
burden of application preparation
include, among others, those on
previous participation in the Section
202 or Section 811 programs, your
experience in the provision of housing
and services, supportive services plans,
community ties, and experience serving
minorities.
For programmatic information, you
MUST contact the appropriate local
HUD office about the submission of
applications within the jurisdiction of
that Office. A listing of the local HUD
offices is available on HUD’s Web site
at https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/
grants/fundsavail.cfm.
Please submit your application using
the following format provided in this
NOFA. For applications to be submitted
electronically, in which you have
created files to be attached to the
electronic application, you should
number the pages of the attached file
and include a header that identifies the
exhibit that it relates to. Please be sure
to follow the file labeling and file format
instructions in the General Section.
For applicants that have received a
waiver of the electronic application
submission, you must number the pages
of each file, narratives and other
attached files. Include the name of your
organization, your DUNS number, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
the exhibit number that you are
responding to on the header of each
document.
1. Table of Contents
a. Part I—Application Form.
(1) Exhibit 1: Form HUD–92015–CA
Application for Capital Advance
Summary Information.
b. Part II—Ability to Develop/Operate
Project.
(1) Exhibit 2: Legal Status.
(a) Organizational Documents.
(b) By-Laws.
(c) IRS Tax Exemption Ruling.
(3) Exhibit 3: Purpose/Community Ties/
Experience.
(a) Purpose(s), current activities, etc.
(b) Community ties, description of area.
(c) Other Funding Sources.
(d) Letters of support.
(e) Housing/Services experience.
(f) Involvement of target population.
(g) Practical solutions.
(h) Project Development Timeline.
(i) How project will remain viable:
(i) If services are depleted;
(ii) If State-funded services changes;
(iii) If need for project changes.
(j) Form HUD–27300, America’s Affordable
Communities Initiative/Removal of
Regulatory Barriers (HUD Communities
Initiative Form on Grants.gov), with
supporting documentation.
(k) Section 3 requirements.
c. Part III—Need for Housing, Site
Requirements, Proposed Services.
(1) Exhibit 4: Project Information.
(a) Evidence of need for project.
(b) Benefit to population/community.
(c) Narrative project description:
(i) Building design;
(ii) Energy efficiency features;
(iii) Mixed-financing for additional units.
(d) Site control and zoning:
(i) Site control documents;
(ii) Freedom of site from restrictions;
(iii) Zoning requirements;
(iv) URA site notification requirements;
(v) Topographical/demographical
description of site/area and
opportunities for minorities;
(vi) Racial composition/map of site;
(vii) Phase I ESA;
(viii) Asbestos Statement/Survey;
(ix) SHPO/THPO requirements.
(2) Exhibit 5: Supportive Services Plan.
(a) Description of services.
(b) Other funding sources.
(c) How services will be provided.
d. Part IV—Requirements/Certifications/
Resolutions.
(1) Exhibit 6: Other Applications.
(a) FY07 Sections 202/811 applications to
other Offices.
(b) Information on FY06 and prior years’
Sections 202/811 applications
(2) Exhibit 7: Required information on:
(a) All property occupants;
(b) Relocation costs/services;
(c) Staff to carry out relocation;
(d) Occupant move-outs within past 12
months.
(3) Exhibit 8: Forms/Certifications/
Resolutions.
PO 00000
Frm 00273
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11705
(a) SF–424 Application for Federal
Assistance
(b) SF–424 Supplement ‘‘Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants’’ (Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP) on Grants.gov).
(c) SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities.
(d) HUD–2880 ‘‘Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report’’ (HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report
on Grants.gov).
(e) HUD–2991 Certification of Consistency
with the Consolidated Plan.
(f) HUD–92041 Sponsor’s Conflict of
Interest Resolution.
(g) HUD–92042 Sponsor’s Resolution for
Commit to Project.
(h) HUD–2990 Certification of Consistency
with the RC/EZ/EC–II Strategic Plan (if
applicable).
(i) HUD–96010 Program Outcome Logic
Model.
(j) HUD–96011 ‘‘Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal’’
(Facsimile Transmittal Form on
Grants.gov). This is to be used as the
cover page for faxing third party
information for electronic applications
only. See the General Section.
(k) HUD–2994–A Form HUD–2994A—You
are Our Client! Grant Applicant Survey
(Optional).
2. Programmatic Applications
Requirements
a. Part I—Application Form for Section
202 Supportive Housing—Capital
Advance
(1) EXHIBIT 1—Form HUD–92015–
CA, Supportive Housing for the Elderly
Section 202, Application for Capital
Advance Summary Information. A copy
of the form is available in the
instructions download at https://www/
grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
b. Part II—Your Ability To Develop and
Operate the Proposed Project
(1) EXHIBIT 2—Evidence of your legal
status (i.e., evidence of your status as a
private nonprofit organization or
nonprofit consumer cooperative). If
another organization(s) is co-sponsoring
the application with you, each cosponsor must also submit the following:
(a) Articles of Incorporation,
constitution, or other organizational
documents;
(b) By-laws;
(c) IRS tax exemption ruling (this
must be submitted by all Sponsors,
including churches).
Note: Based on a HUD review of your
articles of incorporation, constitution, or
other organizational documents, HUD must
determine, among other things, that (1) you
are an eligible private nonprofit entity and
are not a public body or an instrumentality
of a public body, (2) your corporate purposes
are sufficiently broad to provide you the legal
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11706
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
authority to sponsor the proposed project for
the elderly, to assist the Owner, and to apply
for a capital advance, (3) no part of the
Sponsor’s net earnings inures to the benefit
of any private party, and (4) that you are not
controlled by or under the direction of
persons seeking to derive profit or gain
therefrom.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
[Exception: If you received a section
202 fund reservation within the last
three funding cycles, you are not
required to submit the documents
described in (a), (b), and (c) above.
Instead, submit the project number of
the latest application and the local HUD
office to which it was submitted. If there
have been any modifications or
additions to the subject documents,
indicate such, and submit the new
material.]
(2) EXHIBIT 3—Your purpose,
community ties and experience
(a) A description of your purpose(s),
current activities, including your ability
to enlist volunteers and raise private
and local funds, and how long you have
been in existence.
(b) A description of your ties to the
community in which your project will
be located and to the minority and
elderly communities in particular,
including a description of the specific
geographic area(s) in which you have
served.
(c) A description of other funding
sources for the project (including
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.).
(d) Letters of support for your
organization and for the proposed
project from organizations familiar with
the housing and supportive services
needs of the target population that you
expect to serve in the proposed project.
(e) A description of your housing and/
or supportive services experience. The
description should include any rental
housing projects and/or supportive
services facilities that you sponsored,
own and/or operate, your past or current
involvement in any programs other than
housing that demonstrates your
management capabilities (including
financial management) and experience,
your experience in serving the target
population (the elderly and/or families
and minorities); and the reasons for
receiving any increases in fund
reservations for developing and/or
operating previously funded Section
202 or Section 811 projects. The
description should include data on the
facilities and services provided, the
racial/ethnic composition of the
populations served, if available, and
information and testimonials from
residents or community leaders on the
quality of the activities. Examples of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
activities that could be described
include housing counseling, nutrition
and food services, special housing
referral, screening and information
projects.
(f) A description of your efforts to
involve members of the target
population (elderly persons, including
minority elderly persons) in the
development of the application as well
as your intent to involve the target
population in the development and
operation of the project.
(g) A description of the practical
solutions you will implement which
will enable residents of your project to
achieve independent living. In addition,
describe the educational opportunities
you will provide for the residents and
how you will provide them. This
description should include any
activities that will enhance the quality
of life for the residents. And, finally,
describe how your proposed project will
be an improved living environment for
the residents when compared to their
previous place of residence.
(h) Describe your plan for completing
the proposed project. Include a project
development timeline which lists the
major development stages for the project
with associated dates that must be met
in order to get the project to initial
closing and start of construction within
the 18-month fund reservation period as
well as the full completion of the
project, including final closing.
Completion of Exhibit 8(i), Program
Outcome Logic Model, will assist you in
completing your response to this
Exhibit.
(i) Describe how you will ensure that
your proposed project will remain
viable as housing with the availability of
supportive services for the target
population for the 40-year capital
advance period. This description should
address the measures you would take
should any of the following occur:
(i) funding for any of the needed
supportive services becomes depleted;
(ii) if, for any state-funded services for
your project, the state changes its policy
regarding the provision of supportive
services to projects such as the one you
propose; or
(iii) if the need for housing for the
population you will be serving wanes
over time, causing vacancies in your
project.
(j) A description of the successful
efforts the jurisdiction in which your
project will be located has taken in
removing regulatory barriers to
affordable housing. To obtain up to 2
points for this policy priority, you must
complete the optional Form HUD–
27300, ‘‘Questionnaire for HUD’s
Initiative on Removal of Regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00274
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Barriers’’ AND provide the necessary
URL references or submit the
documentary evidence. This exhibit is
optional, but to obtain up to 2 points for
this policy priority, you must submit
this information using Form HUD–
27300 and include the necessary URL
references or other documentary
evidence and contact information.
When providing documents in support
of your responses to the questions on
the form, please provide the applicant
name and project name and whether
you were responding under column A
or B, then identify the number of the
question and the URL or document
name and attach using the attachment
function at the end of the electronic
form. This exhibit will be used to rate
your application under Rating Factor
3(j).
(k) A description on how you plan to
incorporate the Section 3 requirements
into your proposed project with goals
for expanding training and employment
opportunities for low- and very lowincome (Section 3) persons as well as
business concerns in the area in which
the proposed project will be located.
This exhibit is optional, but to obtain up
to 2 points for this policy priority, you
must submit this exhibit and adequately
address your plans to provide
opportunities to train and employ lowand very low-income residents of the
project area and award substantial
contracts to persons residing in the
project area.
c. Part III—The Need for Supportive
Housing for the Target Population, Site
Control and Suitability of Site,
Adequacy of the Provision Of
Supportive Services and of the
Proposed Project
(1) EXHIBIT 4—Need and Project
Information
(a) Evidence of need for supportive
housing. Include a description of the
category or categories of elderly persons
the housing is intended to serve and
evidence demonstrating sustained
effective demand for supportive housing
for that population in the market area to
be served, taking into consideration the
occupancy and vacancy conditions in
existing federally assisted housing for
the elderly (HUD and the Rural Housing
Service (RHS)) e.g., public housing, state
or local data on the limitations in
activities of daily living among the
elderly in the area; aging in place in
existing assisted rentals; trends in
demographic changes in elderly
population and households; the
numbers of income eligible elderly
households by size, tenure and housing
condition; the types of supportive
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
services arrangements currently
available in the area; and the use of such
services as evidenced by data from local
social service agencies or agencies on
aging. Also, a description of how
information in the community’s or
(where applicable) the state’s
Consolidated Plan, Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
(AI) or other planning document that
analyzes fair housing issues was used in
documenting the need for the project.
(b) A description of how the proposed
project will benefit the target population
and the community in which it will be
located.
(c) Description of the project.
(i) Narrative description of the
building design including a description
of the number of units with bedroom
distribution, any special design features,
including any features that incorporate
visitability standards and universal
design, amenities, and/or commercial
and community spaces, and how this
design will facilitate the delivery of
services in an economical fashion and
accommodate the changing needs of the
residents over the next 10–20 years.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Note: If the community spaces, amenities,
or features do not comply with the project
design and cost standards of 24 CFR
891.120(a) and (c), the special standards of 24
CFR 891.210, and the limitation on bedroom
unit sizes as required by paragraph 1–11.B.4.
of HUD Handbook 4571.3 REV–1, you must
demonstrate your ability and willingness to
contribute both the incremental development
cost and continuing operating cost associated
with the community spaces, amenities, or
features;
(ii) Describe whether and how the
project will promote energy efficiency
(in accordance with the requirements
set forth in Section III.C.4.of this
NOFA), including any plans to
incorporate energy efficiency features in
the operation of the project through the
use of Energy Star labeled products and
appliances and, if applicable, innovative
construction or rehabilitation methods
or technologies to be used that will
promote efficient construction.
(iii) If you are proposing to develop a
mixed-finance project by developing
additional units for the elderly (i.e., in
addition to the 202 units), a description
of any plans and actions you have taken
to create such a mixed-finance project
with the use of Section 202 capital
advance funds, in combination with
other funding sources. Provide the
number of non-Section 202 units to be
included in the mixed-finance project
(also provide the number of additional
units in the appropriate space on Form
HUD–92015-CA). Also, provide copies
of any letters you have sent seeking
outside funding for the non-Section 202
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
units and any responses thereto. You
also must demonstrate your ability to
proceed with the development of a
Section 202 project that will not involve
mixed-financing, as proposed in your
application, in the event you are later
unable to obtain the necessary outside
funding or HUD disapproves your
proposal for a mixed-finance project for
additional non-Section 202 units for the
elderly.
Notes: (1) A proposal to develop a mixedfinance project for additional units must
occur at the application for fund reservation
stage. You cannot decide after selection that
you want to do a mixed-finance project for
additional units. (2) Section 202 capital
advance amendment money will not be
approved for projects proposing mixedfinancing. (3) If approved for a reservation of
capital advance funds, you will be required
to submit, with your Firm Commitment
Application, the additional documents
required by HUD for mixed-finance
proposals. (4) A mixed-finance project does
not include the development of a mixed-use
project in which the Section 202 units are
mortgaged separately from the other uses of
the structure.
(d) Evidence of site control and
permissive zoning.
(i) Acceptable evidence of site control
is limited to any one of the following:
(A) Deed or long-term leasehold
which evidences that you have title to
or a leasehold interest in the site. If a
leasehold, the term of the lease must be
at least 50 years with renewable
provisions for 25 years, except for sites
on Indian trust land, in which case, the
term of the lease must be at least 50
years with no requirement for
extensions;
(B) Contract of sale for the site that is
free of any limitations affecting the
ability of the seller to deliver ownership
to you after you receive and accept a
notice of Section 202 capital advance.
(The only condition for closing on the
sale can be your receipt and acceptance
of the capital advance.) The contract of
sale cannot require closing earlier than
the Section 202 closing;
(C) Option to purchase or for a longterm leasehold, which must remain in
effect for six months from the date on
which the applications are due, must
state a firm price binding on the seller,
and be renewable at the end of the sixmonth period. The only condition on
which the option may be terminated is
if you are not awarded a fund
reservation;
(D) If the site is covered by a mortgage
under a HUD program, (e.g., a
previously funded Section 202 or
Section 811 project or an FHA-insured
mortgage) you must submit evidence of
site control as described above AND
evidence that consent to release the site
PO 00000
Frm 00275
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11707
from the mortgage has been obtained or
has been requested from HUD (all
required information in order for a
decision on the request for a partial
release of security must have been
submitted to the local HUD office) and
from the mortgagee, if other than HUD.
Approval to release the site from the
mortgage must be done before the local
HUD office makes its selection
recommendations to HUD Headquarters.
Refer to Chapter 16 of HUD Handbook
4350.1 REV–1, Multifamily Asset
Management and Project Servicing, for
instructions on submitting requests to
the local HUD office for partial release
of security from a mortgage under a
HUD program; or
(E) For sites to be acquired from a
public body, evidence is needed that the
public body possesses clear title to the
site and has entered into a legally
binding agreement to lease or convey
the site to you after you receive and
accept a notice of Section 202 capital
advance. Where HUD determines that
time constraints of the funding round
will not permit you to obtain all of the
required official actions (e.g., approval
of Community Planning Boards) that are
necessary to convey publicly-owned
sites, you may include in your
application a letter from the mayor or
director of the appropriate local agency
indicating that conveyance or leasing of
the site is acceptable without imposition
of additional covenants or restrictions,
and only contingent on the necessary
approval action. Such a letter of
commitment will be considered
sufficient evidence of site control.
(ii) Whether you have title to the site,
a contract of sale, an option to purchase,
or are acquiring a site from a public
body, you must provide evidence (a
current title policy or other acceptable
evidence) that the site is free of any
limitations, restrictions, or reverters
which could adversely affect the use of
the site for the proposed project for the
40-year capital advance period under
HUD’s regulations and requirements
(e.g., reversion to seller if title is
transferred). If the title evidence
contains restrictions or covenants,
copies of the restrictions or covenants
must be submitted with the application.
If the site is subject to any such
limitations, restrictions, or reverters, the
application will be rejected. Purchase
money mortgages that will be satisfied
from capital advance funds are not
considered to be limitations or
restrictions that would adversely affect
the use of the site. If the contract of sale
or option agreement contains provisions
that allow a Sponsor not to purchase the
property for reasons such as
environmental problems, failure of the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11708
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
site to pass inspection, or the appraisal
is less than the purchase price, then
such provisions are not objectionable
and a Sponsor is allowed to terminate
the contract of sale or the option
agreement.
Note: A proposed project site may not be
acquired or optioned from a general
contractor (or its affiliate) that will construct
the Section 202 project or from any other
development team member.
(iii) Evidence that the project, as
proposed, is permissible under
applicable zoning ordinances or
regulations or a statement of the
proposed action required to make the
proposed project permissible AND the
basis for the belief that the proposed
action will be completed successfully
before the submission of the firm
commitment application (e.g., a
summary of the results of any requests
for rezoning and/or the procedures for
obtaining special or conditional use
permits on land in similar zoning
classifications and the time required for
such rezoning, or preliminary
indications of acceptability from zoning
bodies, etc.).
(iv) Evidence of compliance with the
URA requirement that the seller has
been provided, in writing, with the
required information regarding a
voluntary, arm’s length purchase
transaction (i.e., (1) applicant does not
have the power of eminent domain and,
therefore, will not acquire the property
if negotiations fail to result in an
amicable agreement, and (2) of the
estimate of the fair market value of the
property).
Note: A certification for this requirement is
not sufficient. Evidence must be submitted to
meet this requirement. This information
should have been provided before making the
purchase offer. However, in those cases
where there is an existing option or contract,
the seller must be provided the opportunity
to withdraw from the agreement or
transaction, without penalty, after this
information is provided.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
(v) Narrative describing topographical
and demographic aspects of the site, the
suitability of the site and area (as well
as a description of the characteristics of
the neighborhood), how use of the site
will promote greater housing
opportunities for minority elderly and
elderly persons with disabilities (if
applicable), and how use of the site will
affirmatively further fair housing.
Note: You can best demonstrate your
commitment to affirmatively furthering fair
housing by describing how your proposed
activities will assist the jurisdiction in
overcoming impediments to fair housing
choice identified in the applicable
jurisdiction’s Analysis of Impediments (AI)
to Fair Housing Choice, which is a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
component of the jurisdiction’s Consolidated
Plan or any other planning document that
addresses fair housing issues. The applicable
Consolidated Plan and AI may be the
community’s, the county’s, or the state’s, to
which input should have been provided by
local community organizations, agencies in
the community and residents of the
community. Alternatively, a document that
addresses fair housing issues and remedies to
barriers to fair housing in the community that
was previously prepared by a local planning,
or similar organization, may be used.
Applicable impediments could include the
need for improved housing quality and
services for elderly minority families, lack of
affirmative marketing and outreach to
minority elderly persons, and the need for
quality eldercare services within areas of
minority concentration when compared with
the type and quality of similar services and
housing in nonminority areas.
(vi) A map showing the location of the
site, the racial composition of the
neighborhood, and any areas of racial
concentration.
Note: For this competition, when
determining the racial and ethnic
composition of the neighborhood
surrounding the proposed site, use data from
the 2000 Census of Population. Data from the
2000 Census may be found at:
www.factfinder.census.gov/servlet/
BasicFactsServlet.
(vii) A Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA), in accordance with
the ASTM Standard E 1527–05, as
amended, using the table of contents
and report format specified at Appendix
X4 thereto and completed or updated as
specified at Section 4.6 thereto, must be
undertaken and completed by you and
submitted with the application. In order
for the Phase I ESA to be acceptable, it
must have been completed or updated
no earlier than 180 days prior to the
application deadline date. Therefore, it
is important to start the site assessment
process as soon after the publication of
the NOFA as possible.
Note: A Phase I ESA that is not properly
updated, does not use the report format
specified at Appendix X4 of ASTM Standard
E 1527–05, or that is prepared in accordance
with an older version of ASTM E 1527 will
result in a technical rejection of your
application.
If the Phase I ESA indicates possible
presence of contamination and/or
hazards, you must decide whether to
continue with this site or choose
another site. Should you choose another
site, the same Phase I ESA process
identified above must be followed for
the new site. If you choose to continue
with the original site on which the
Phase I ESA indicated contamination or
hazards, you must undertake a detailed
Phase II ESA by an appropriate
professional. If the Phase II Assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00276
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
reveals site contamination, you must
submit the extent of the contamination
and a plan for clean-up of the site
including a contract for remediation of
the problem(s) and an approval letter
from the applicable federal, state, and/
or local agency with jurisdiction over
the site to the local HUD office. The
Phase II ESA and any necessary plans
for clean-up do not have to be submitted
with the application but must be
received by the local HUD office by June
25, 2007. If it is not received by that
date, the application will be rejected.
Note: You must pay for the cost of any
clean-up or remediation which can be very
expensive. See Note at Section
III.C.2.b.(3)(c)(iii).
(viii) You must submit one of the
following:
(A) If there is no pre-1978 structures
on the site or if there are pre-1978
structures, that most recently consisted
of solely four or fewer units of singlefamily housing including appurtenant
structures thereto, a statement to this
effect, or
(B) If there are pre-1978 structures on
the site, other than for a site that most
recently consisted of solely four or
fewer units of single-family housing
including appurtenant structures
thereto, a comprehensive building
asbestos survey that is based on a
thorough inspection to identify the
location and condition of asbestos
throughout any structures.
Note: In those cases where suspect asbestos
is found, it would either be assumed to be
asbestos or would require confirmatory
testing. If the asbestos survey indicates the
presence of asbestos, or the presence of
asbestos is assumed, and if the application is
approved, HUD will condition the approval
on an appropriate mix of asbestos abatement
and an asbestos Operations and Maintenance
Plan.
(ix) Letter to State/Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO/THPO) and
a statement that SHPO/THPO failed to
respond to you OR a copy of the
response letter received from SHPO/
THPO.
(2) EXHIBIT 5—Supportive Services
Plan
(a) A detailed description of the
supportive services proposed to be
provided to the anticipated occupancy.
(b) A description of public or private
sources of assistance that reasonably
could be expected to fund the proposed
services.
(c) The manner in which such
services will be provided to such
persons (i.e., on or off-site), including
whether a service coordinator will
facilitate the adequate provision of such
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
services, and how the services will meet
the identified needs of the residents.
Note: You may not require residents, as a
condition of admission or occupancy, to
accept any supportive services.
d. Part IV—General Application
Requirements, Certifications and
Resolutions
(1) EXHIBIT 6: Other Applications
(a) A list of the applications, if any,
you are submitting to any other local
HUD office in response to the FY2007
Section 202 or Section 811 NOFA.
Indicate by local HUD office, the
proposed location by city and state and
the number of units requested in each
application.
(b) Include a list of all FY2006 and
prior years approved Section 202 and
Section 811 capital advance projects to
which you are a party. Identify each by
project number and local HUD office
and include the following information:
(i) Whether the project has initially
closed and, if so, when;
(ii) If the project was older than 24
months when it initially closed (specify
how old) or if older than 24 months now
(specify how old) and has not initially
closed, provide the reasons for the delay
in closing;
(iii) Whether amendment money was
or will be needed for any project in (ii)
above, including the amount of the
amendment money; and,
(iv) Those projects that have not been
finally closed.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
(2) EXHIBIT 7: A Statement That
(a) Identifies all persons (families,
individuals, businesses and nonprofit
organizations) by race/minority group,
and status as owners or tenants
occupying the property on the date of
submission of the application for a
capital advance.
(b) Indicates the estimated cost of
relocation payments and other services.
(c) Identifies the staff organization
that will carry out the relocation
activities.
(d) Identifies all persons that have
moved from the site within the past 12
months and the reason for such a move.
(e) Indicates that all persons
occupying the site have been issued the
appropriate required General
Information Notice and advisory
services information receipt required,
either at the time the option to acquire
the property is executed, or at the time
the application is submitted.
Note: If any of the relocation costs will be
funded from sources other than the section
202 capital advance, you must provide
evidence of a firm commitment of these
funds. When evaluating applications, HUD
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
will consider the total cost of proposals (i.e.,
cost of site acquisition, relocation,
construction and other project costs).
Exhibit 7 Is Required for All Section 202
Applications
(3) EXHIBIT 8: Standard Forms,
Certifications and Resolutions. You are
required to submit completed copies of
the following forms, which are available
in the instructions download at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp.
(a) Standard Form 424—Application
for Federal Assistance, including a
DUNS number, an indication of whether
you are delinquent on any federal debt,
and compliance with Executive Order
12372 (a certification that you have
submitted a copy of your application, if
required, to the State agency (Single
Point of Contact/(SPOC)) for state
review in accordance with Executive
Order 12372). If the SPOC requires a
review of your application, you must
include in your Section 202 application,
a copy of the cover letter sent to the
SPOC. Refer to Section IV.D. of this
NOFA for additional information on
compliance with Executive Order
12372.
Note: For Section 202 program purposes, in
Item 12, Areas Affected by Project, of SF–
424, provide the names of the City, County
and State where the project will be located
(not the largest political entities as indicated
on the instructions page of SF–424).
(b) Standard Form 424 Supplement,
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity
for Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO
Survey (SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov).
Although the information on this form
will not be considered in making
funding decisions, it will assist the
federal government in ensuring that all
qualified applicants have an equal
opportunity to compete for federal
funding.
(c) Standard Form LLL—Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities (if applicable). A
disclosure of activities conducted that
may influence any federal transactions.
(d) Form HUD–2880, Applicant/
Recipient Disclosure/Update Report
(‘‘HUD Applicant Recipient Disclosure
Report’’ on Grants.gov), including Social
Security and Employee Identification
Numbers. A disclosure of assistance
from other government sources received
in connection with the project.
(e) Form HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan
(Plan) for the jurisdiction in which the
proposed project will be located. The
certification must be made by the unit
of general local government if it is
required to have, or has, a complete
Plan. Otherwise, the certification may
PO 00000
Frm 00277
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11709
be made by the state or by the unit of
general local government if the project
will be located within the jurisdiction of
the unit of general local government
authorized to use an abbreviated
strategy, and if it is willing to prepare
such a Plan. All certifications must be
made by a public official responsible for
submitting the Plan to HUD. The
certifications must be submitted as part
of the application by the application
submission deadline date set forth in
the NOFA. The Plan regulations are
published in 24 CFR part 91.
(f) Form HUD–92041, Sponsor’s
Conflict of Interest Resolution. A
certified Board Resolution that no
officer or director of the Sponsor or
Owner has or will have any financial
interest in any contract with the Owner
or in any firm or corporation that has or
will have a contract with the Owner,
including a current listing of all duly
qualified and sitting officers and
directors by title and the beginning and
ending dates of each person’s term.
(g) Form HUD–92042, Sponsor’s
Resolution for Commitment to Project.
A certified Board Resolution
acknowledging responsibilities of
sponsorship, long-term support of the
project(s), your willingness to assist the
Owner to develop, own, manage and
provide appropriate services in
connection with the proposed project,
and that it reflects the will of your
membership. Also, it shall indicate your
willingness to fund the estimated startup expenses, the Minimum Capital
Investment (one-half of one-percent of
the HUD-approved capital advance, not
to exceed $10,000 or for national
Sponsors, not to exceed $25,000), and
the estimated cost of any amenities or
features (and operating costs related
thereto) that would not be covered by
the approved capital advance.
(h) Form HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC–II
Strategic Plan. A certification that the
project is consistent with the RC/EZ/
EC–IIs strategic plan, is located within
the RC/EZ/EC–II, and serves RC/EZ/EC–
II residents. (This certification is not
required if the project site(s) will not be
located in a RC/EZ/EC–II.) .
(i) Form HUD–96010, Program
Outcome Logic Model. In addition to
the Project Development Timeline to be
submitted in Exhibit 3(h) above, the
information provided in the Logic
Model will be used in rating your
application for Rating Factor 5,
Achieving Results and Program
Evaluation.
(j) Form HUD–96011, Facsimile
Transmittal (‘‘Facsimile Transmittal
Form’’ on Grants.gov), is only required
if you are using the facsimile method to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11710
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
fax third party letters and other
documents for your electronic
application in accordance with the
instructions in the General Section.
Note: HUD will not accept entire
applications by fax. If you submit the
application entirely by fax, it will be
disqualified.
(k) Form HUD–2994–A, You Are Our
Client Grant Applicant Survey. This is
an optional form, which may be used to
provide suggestions and comments to
the Department regarding your
application submission experience.
C. Submission Dates and Time. Your
application must be received and
validated electronically by Grants.gov
no later than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time
on the application deadline date, unless
a waiver of the electronic delivery
process has been approved by HUD in
accordance with the following
procedures. Applicants that are unable
to submit their application
electronically must seek a waiver of the
electronic grant submission
requirement. Waiver requests must be
submitted no later than 15 days before
the application deadline date. Waiver
requests must be submitted by mail or
by fax. For this program NOFA, e-mail
requests will not be considered. Waiver
requests submitted by mail or fax
should be submitted on the applicant’s
letterhead and signed by an official with
the legal authority to request a waiver
from the Department. The request must
be addressed to the Assistant Secretary
for Housing at the following address:
Brian D. Montgomery, Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 9100, Washington,
DC 20410–8000. Waiver requests
submitted by fax must be sent to (202)
708–3104.
If a waiver is granted, you must
submit the required number of copies of
your application to the Director of the
appropriate local HUD office, and the
application must be received no later
than that HUD office’s close of business
on the application deadline date. The
waiver approval notification will
identify the appropriate HUD office
where the application should be
submitted and the required number of
copies that must be submitted.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
D. Intergovernmental Review
1. State Review. This funding
opportunity is subject to Executive
Order (EO) 12372, ‘‘Intergovernmental
Review of Federal Programs.’’ You must
contact your State’s Single Point of
Contact (SPOC) to find out about and
comply with the state’s process under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
EO 12372. The names and addresses of
the SPOCs are listed in the Office of
Management and Budget’s home page at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
spoc.html. If required by the state, the
submission to the state needs to occur
before the Section 202 application
deadline date, but in no event later than
the application deadline date. It is
recommended that you provide the state
with sufficient time to review the
application. Therefore, it is important
that you consult with the SPOC for State
review timeframes and take that into
account when submitting the
application. If the SPOC requires a
review of your application, you must
include a copy of the cover letter you
sent to the SPOC in Exhibit 8(a) of your
Section 202 application.
2. HUD/RHS Agreement. HUD and the
Rural Housing Service (RHS) have an
agreement to coordinate the
administration of the agencies’
respective rental assistance programs.
As a result, HUD is required to notify
RHS of applications for housing
assistance it receives. This notification
gives RHS the opportunity to comment
if it has concerns about the demand for
additional assisted housing and possible
harm to existing projects in the same
housing market area. HUD will consider
RHS’ comments in its review and
application selection process.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Ineligible Activities. Section 202
funds may not be used for:
a. Nursing homes;
b. Infirmaries;
c. Medical facilities;
d. Mobile homes;
e. Community centers;
f. Headquarters for organizations for
the elderly;
g. Nonhousekeeping accommodations
(e.g., central dining, but without private
kitchens and/or bathrooms in the
residential units);
h. Refinancing of sponsor-owned
facilities without rehabilitation;
i. Housing that you currently own or
lease that is occupied by elderly
persons; and
j. Projects licensed or to be licensed
as assisted living facilities.
Note: You may propose to rehabilitate an
existing currently-owned or leased structure
that does not already serve elderly persons,
except that the refinancing of any federallyfunded or assisted project or project insured
or guaranteed by a federal agency is not
permissible under this Section 202 NOFA.
HUD does not consider it appropriate to
utilize scarce program resources to refinance
projects that have already received some
form of assistance under a federal program.
(For example, Section 202 or Section 202/8
direct loan projects cannot be refinanced
PO 00000
Frm 00278
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
with capital advances and project rental
assistance.)
2. Application Limits (Units/Projects).
Refer to Section III.C. of this NOFA for
information applicable to the limitations
on the number of units you may apply
for in a single application and the
project sizes.
3. Development Cost Limits.
a. The following development cost
limits, adjusted by locality as described
in Section IV.E.3.b. below must be used
to determine the capital advance
amount to be reserved for projects for
the elderly.
Note: The capital advance funds awarded
for this project are to be considered the total
amount of funds that the Department will
provide for the development of this project.
Amendment funds will only be provided in
exceptional circumstances (e.g., to cover
increased costs for construction delays due to
litigation or unforeseen environmental issues
resulting in a change of sites) that are clearly
beyond your control. Otherwise, you are
responsible for any costs over and above the
capital advance amount provided by the
Department as well as any costs associated
with any excess amenities and design
features.
(1) The capital advance amount for
the project attributable to dwelling use
(less the incremental development cost
and the capitalized operating costs
associated with any excess amenities
and design features and other costs you
must pay for) may not exceed:
Non-elevator structures:
$45,507 per family unit without a
bedroom;
$52,470 per family unit with one
bedroom;
$63,279 per family unit with two
bedrooms.
For elevator structures:
$47,890 per family unit without a
bedroom;
$54,897 per family unit with one
bedroom;
$66,755 per family unit with two
bedrooms
(2) These cost limits reflect those
costs reasonable and necessary to
develop a project of modest design that
complies with HUD minimum property
standards; the accessibility
requirements of § 891.120(b); and the
project design and cost standards of
§ 891.120 and § 891.210.
b. Increased development cost limits.
(1) HUD may increase the
development cost limits set forth above,
by up to 140 percent in any geographic
area where the cost levels require, and
may increase the development cost
limits by up to 160 percent on a projectby-project basis. This increase may
include covering additional costs to
make dwelling units accessible through
rehabilitation.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Note: In applying the applicable high cost
percentage, the local HUD Office may use a
percentage that is higher or lower than that
which is assigned to the local HUD Office if
it is needed to provide a capital advance
amount that is comparable to what it
typically costs to develop a Section 202
project in that area.
including any remaining balance on
PRAC contracts, will be cancelled as of
October 1, 2015. Amounts needed to
maintain PRAC payments for any
remaining term on the affected contracts
beyond that date will have to be funded
from other current appropriations.
(2) If HUD finds that high
construction costs in Alaska, Guam, the
Virgin Islands, or Hawaii make it
infeasible to construct dwellings,
without the sacrifice of sound standards
of construction, design, and livability,
within the development cost limits
provided in sections IV.E.3.a.(1) and
IV.E.3.b.(1) above, the amount of the
capital advances may be increased to
compensate for such costs. The increase
may not exceed the limits established
under this section (including any high
cost area adjustment) by more than 50
percent.
4. Commercial Facilities. A
commercial facility for the benefit of the
residents may be located and operated
in the Section 202 project. However, the
commercial facility cannot be funded
with the use of Section 202 capital
advance or PRAC funds. The maximum
amount of space permitted for a
commercial facility cannot exceed 10
percent of the total project floor space.
An exception to this 10 percent
limitation is if the project involves
acquisition or rehabilitation and the
additional space was incorporated in
the existing structure at the time the
proposal was submitted to HUD.
Commercial facilities are considered
public accommodations under Title III
of the Americans with Disabilities Act
of 1990 (ADA), and thus must comply
with all the accessibility requirements
of the ADA.
5. Expiration of Section 202 Funds.
The Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5;
approved February 15, 2007), requires
HUD to obligate all Section 202 funds
appropriated for FY 2007 by September
30, 2010. Under 31 U.S.C. Section 1551,
no funds can be disbursed from this
account after September 30, 2015.
Under Section 202, obligation of funds
occurs for both capital advances and
project rental assistance upon fund
reservation and acceptance. If all funds
are not disbursed by HUD and expended
by the project Owner by September 30,
2015, the funds, even though obligated,
will expire and no further
disbursements can be made from this
account. In submitting an application
you need to carefully consider whether
your proposed project can be completed
through final capital advance closing no
later than September 30, 2015.
Furthermore, all unexpended balances,
F. Other Submission Requirements:
1. Address for Submitting
Applications. Applications must be
submitted electronically through the
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp Web site, unless
the applicant receives a waiver from the
electronic application submission
requirement. See the General Section,
Application Submission and Receipt
Procedures and Section IV.C. of this
NOFA for additional information. Refer
to HUD’s Web site at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm for a listing of local HUD
offices. All applications submitted
electronically via https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp will be
downloaded and forwarded to the
appropriate local HUD office.
2. Special Instructions for Section 202
Applications That Will Have More Than
One Applicant, i.e., Co-Sponsors. The
applicants must designate a single
individual to act as the authorized
representative for all co-Sponsors of the
application. The designated authorized
representative of the organization
submitting the application must be
registered with Grants.gov, the Federal
Central Contractor Registry and with the
credential provider for EAuthentication. Information on the
Grants.gov registration process is found
in Section IV.B. of the General Section.
When the application is submitted
through Grants.gov, the name of the
designated authorized representative
will be inserted into the signature line
of the application. Please note that the
designated authorized representative
must be able to make legally binding
commitments for each co-Sponsor to the
application.
Each co-Sponsor must complete the
documents required of all co-sponsoring
organizations to permit HUD to make a
determination on the eligibility of the
co-Sponsor(s) and the acceptability of
the application based on the assistance
and commitments the co-Sponsor(s) has
pledged to the project. Therefore, each
co-Sponsor must submit the following
information using the scanning and/or
faxing method described in Section IV.
of the General Section: Standard Form–
424, Application for Federal Assistance;
Standard Form–424 Supplement,
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity
for Applicants; Standard Form LLL,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00279
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11711
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (if
applicable); Form HUD–92015–CA,
Section 202 Application for Capital
Advance, Summary Information; Form
HUD–92041, Sponsor’s Conflict of
Interest Resolution; and Form HUD–
92042, Sponsor’s Resolution for
Commitment to Project. The forms
identified above are discussed in the
Program instructions package and can
be downloaded from Grants.gov under
the program application download at
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The downloaded
and completed forms should be saved as
separate electronic files and attached to
the electronic application submission
following the requirements of Section
IV.
As stated in the General Section,
Section IV, scanning documents to
create electronic files increases the size
of the file. Therefore, applicants may
not submit scanned files unless using
the facsimile method as stated in the
General Section will not work due to the
nature of the document. If the facsimile
method does not work, forms and other
documents from co-Sponsors may be
scanned to create an electronic file and
submitted as an attachment to the
application. These documents should be
labeled and numbered so the HUD
reviewer can identify the file and its
contents. If the applicant is creating an
electronic file, the file should contain a
header that identifies the name of the
Sponsor submitting the electronic
application, that Sponsor’s DUNS
number, and the unique ID that is found
at the top of the Facsimile Transmission
form found in the electronic application
package. The naming convention for
each electronic file should correspond
to the labeling convention used in the
application Table of Contents found in
Section IV.B.1. of this program NOFA
and the General Section. For example,
the organizational documents of a coSponsor would be included under Part
II, Exhibit 2(a) of the Section 202
application.
The signed documents and other
information required to be submitted
with the electronic application should
be transmitted via fax using Form HUD–
96011, Facsimile Transmittal found in
the electronic application package. CoSponsors should use the form HUD–
96011 provided by the Sponsor that is
submitting the electronic application.
The submitting Sponsor should fill in
the SF–424 form prior to giving the
Form HUD–96011 to the co-Sponsors.
By following these directions, the Form
HUD–96011 will be pre-populated with
the submitting Sponsor’s organizational
information exactly as the submitting
Sponsor has provided it on the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11712
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
electronic application. In addition, HUD
will be using the unique identifier
associated to the downloaded
application package as a means of
matching the faxes submitted with the
applications received via Grants.gov.
The Facsimile Transmittal form also has
space to provide the number of pages
being faxed and information on the type
of document. Co-Sponsors or the
submitting applicant can insert the
document name in the space labeled
Program Component.
Note: Do not insert any additional or other
cover pages as it will cause problems in
electronically matching the pieces of the
application. See the General Section for
further instructions.
V. Application Review Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Criteria
Policy Priorities. HUD encourages
applicants to undertake specific
activities that will assist the Department
in implementing its policy priorities
and which help the Department achieve
its strategic goals for FY2007. Refer to
the General Section for information
regarding HUD’s Strategic Goals and
Policy Priorities. For the Section 202
program, applicants who include work
activities that specifically address the
policy priorities of encouraging
accessible design features by
incorporating visitability standards and
universal design, removing barriers to
affordable housing, promoting energy
efficiency in design and operations, and
expanding training and employment
opportunities for low- and very lowincome persons and business concerns
(Section 3 requirements), will receive
additional points. A Notice pertaining to
the removal of barriers to affordable
housing was published in the Federal
Register and may be downloaded from
the HUD web site at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
Rating Factors. HUD will rate
applications that successfully complete
technical processing using the Rating
Factors set forth below and in
accordance with the application
submission requirements in this NOFA.
The maximum number of points an
application may receive under this
program is 102. This includes two (2)
RC/EZ/EC–II bonus points, as described
in the General Section and Section
V.A.6. below.
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (23 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which you have the organizational
resources to successfully implement the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
proposed activities in a timely manner.
Submit information responding to this
factor in accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
3(a), 3(b), 3(e), 5 and 6 of Section IV.B.
of this NOFA. In rating this factor, HUD
will consider the extent to which your
application demonstrates your ability to
develop and operate the proposed
housing on a long-term basis,
considering the following:
a. (13 points). The scope, extent, and
quality of your experience in providing
housing or related services to those
proposed to be served by the project and
the scope of the proposed project (i.e.,
number of units, services, relocation
costs, development, and operation) in
relationship to your demonstrated
development and management capacity
as well as your financial management
capability.
b. (10 points) The scope, extent and
quality of your experience in providing
housing or related services to minority
persons or minority families and your
ties to the community at large and to the
minority and elderly communities in
particular.
(1) (5 points). The scope, extent, and
quality of your experience in providing
housing or related services to minority
persons or minority families.
(2) (5 points). The scope, extent, and
quality of your ties to the community at
large and to the minority and elderly
communities in particular.
To earn the maximum number of
points under sub-criteria (b)(1) above,
you must describe significant previous
experience in providing housing and/or
supportive services to minorities
generally and to minority elderly in
particular. For the purpose of this
competition, ‘‘significant previous
experience’’ means that the previous
housing assistance or related services to
minorities (i.e., the percentage of
minorities being provided housing or
related services in your current
developments) was equal to or greater
than the percentage of minorities in the
housing market area where the previous
housing or services occurred. To earn
the maximum number of points under
sub-criteria (b)(2) above, you should
submit materials that demonstrate your
efforts to make housing available to the
community at large and the minority
and elderly communities in particular
and your relationships over time with
the minority and elderly communities.
Examples of documents that may be
submitted to earn the maximum number
of points under sub-criteria (b)(2)
include letters of support from
community leaders (including minority
community leaders) that give
information about the applicant’s
PO 00000
Frm 00280
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
relationship over time with the
community (including the minority
community). You may also submit
copies of your affirmative marketing
plan and the advertising/outreach
materials you utilize to attract minority
communities (including limited English
proficient communities), elderly
communities, and the community at
large. Regarding your advertising/
outreach materials, you should identify
when advertising/outreach materials are
circulated, to whom they are circulated,
where they are circulated and how they
are circulated. Descriptions of other
advertising/outreach efforts to the
minority (including limited English
proficient communities) and elderly
communities and the dates and places
of such advertising/outreach efforts
should also be included.
c. (–3 to –5 points). HUD will deduct
(except if the delay was beyond your
control) 3 points if a fund reservation
you received under either the Section
202 Program of Supportive Housing for
the Elderly or the Section 811 Program
of Supportive Housing for Persons with
Disabilities in FY2002 or later has been
extended beyond 24 months, 4 points if
beyond 36 months, or 5 points if beyond
48 months. Examples of such delays
beyond your control include, but are not
limited to, initial closing delays that are:
(1) directly attributable to HUD, (2)
directly attributable to third party
opposition, including litigation, and (3)
due to a disaster, as declared by the
President of the United States.
d. (–3 to –5 points). HUD will deduct
from 3 points to 5 points if HUD
amendment money was required in
connection with a fund reservation you
received under either the Section 202
Program of Supportive Housing for the
Elderly or the Section 811 Program of
Supportive Housing for Persons with
Disabilities in FY2002 or later based on
the following.
(1) (–3 points). The amount of the
amendment money required was 25
percent or less of the original capital
advance amount approved by HUD.
(2) (–4 points). The amount of the
amendment money required was
between 26 percent and 50 percent of
the original capital advance amount
approved by HUD.
(3) (–5 points). The amount of the
amendment money required was over
50 percent of the original capital
advance amount approved by HUD.
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (13 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need for funding the
proposed activities to address a
documented problem in the target area.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Submit information responding to this
factor in accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
4(a) and 4(b) of Section IV.B. of this
NOFA. HUD will take into
consideration the following in
evaluating this factor:
The extent of the need for the project
in the area based on a determination by
the local HUD Office. In making this
determination, HUD will consider your
evidence of need in the area, as well as
other economic, demographic, and
housing market data available to the
local HUD office. The data should
include but is not limited to:
• a general assessment of the current
conditions in the market for the type of
housing proposed,
• an estimate of the demand for
additional housing of the type proposed
in the applicable housing market area,
• information on the numbers and
types of existing comparable Federally
assisted housing units for the elderly
(HUD and RHS) and current occupancy
in such housing and recent market
experience,
• comparable assisted housing for the
elderly under construction or for which
fund reservations have been issued, and
• in accordance with an agreement
between HUD and RHS, comments from
RHS on the demand for additional
comparable subsidized housing and the
possible harm to existing projects in the
same housing market areas.
The Department will also review more
favorably those applications that
establish a connection between the
proposed project and the community’s
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice (AI) or other planning
document that analyzes fair housing
issues and is prepared by a local
planning or similar organization. You
must show how your proposed project
will address an impediment to fair
housing choice described in the AI or
meet a need identified in the other type
of planning document.
For all Section 202 projects that are
determined to have sufficient demand,
HUD will rate your application based on
the ratio of the number of units in the
proposed project to the estimate of
unmet need for housing assistance by
the income eligible elderly households
with selected housing conditions.
Unmet need is defined as the number of
very low-income elderly one-person
renter households age 75 and older with
housing conditions problems, as of the
2000 Census, minus the number of
project-based subsidized rental housing
units (HUD, RHS, or LIHTC) that are
affordable to very low-income elderly
provided in the area since 1999. Units
to be occupied by resident managers are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
not counted. After HUD determines the
estimate of unmet need and whether a
connection has been made between the
project and community’s Consolidated
Plan, Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice, or other planning
document, HUD will rate your
application as follows:
a. (10 points). The area of the project
has an unmet needs ratio of 15 percent
or less; OR (5 points). The area of the
project has an unmet needs ratio of
greater than 15 percent; OR (0 points).
The area of the proposed project has no
unmet needs for housing assistance.
b. (3 points). The extent that a
connection has been established
between the project and the
community’s Consolidated Plan,
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice (AI) or other planning
document that analyzes fair housing
issues and is prepared by a local
planning or similar organization.
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (47 Points)
This factor addresses the quality and
effectiveness of your proposal and the
extent to which you involved elderly
persons, including elderly minority
persons, in the development of the
application and will involve them in the
development and operation of the
project, whether the jurisdiction in
which your project will be located has
undertaken successful efforts to remove
regulatory barriers to affordable
housing, whether you will promote
energy efficiency in the design and
operation of the proposed housing, and
your plans to expand economic
opportunities for low- and very lowincome persons as well as certain
business concerns (Section 3
requirements). There must be a clear
relationship between your proposed
design, proposed activities, the
community’s needs and purposes of the
program funding for your application to
receive points for this factor. Submit
information responding to this factor in
accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
3(f), 3(j), 3(k), 4(c)(i), 4(c)(ii), 4(d)(iii),
4(d)(v), 4(d)(vi), and 5 of Section IV.B.
of this NOFA. In evaluating this factor,
HUD will consider the following:
a. (20 points). The proximity or
accessibility of the site to shopping,
medical facilities, transportation, places
of worship, recreational facilities, places
of employment, and other necessary
services to the intended occupants;
adequacy of utilities and streets;
freedom of the site from adverse
environmental conditions; compliance
with site and neighborhood standards
(24 CFR 891.125(a), (d) and (e)).
PO 00000
Frm 00281
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11713
b. (¥1 point). The site(s) is not
permissively zoned for the intended
use.
c. (10 points). The suitability of the
site from the standpoint of promoting a
greater choice of housing opportunities
for minority elderly persons/families
and affirmatively furthering fair
housing. In reviewing this criterion,
HUD will assess whether the site meets
the site and neighborhood standards at
24 CFR 891.125(b) and (c) by examining
relevant data in your application or in
the local HUD Office. Where
appropriate, HUD may visit the site.
(1) The site will be deemed acceptable
if it increases housing choice and
opportunity by expanding housing
opportunities in non-minority
neighborhoods (if located in such a
neighborhood). The term ‘‘nonminority
area’’ is defined as one in which the
minority population is lower than 10
percent. If the site will be in a minority
neighborhood, the site will be deemed
acceptable if it contributes to the
revitalization of and reinvestment in the
minority neighborhood, including
improvement of the level, quality and
affordability of services furnished to
minority elderly. You should refer to the
Site and Neighborhood Standards
provisions of the regulations governing
the Section 202 Supportive Housing for
the Elderly program (24 CFR 891.125(b)
and (c)) when considering sites for your
project.
(2) For the purpose of this
competition, the term ‘‘minority
neighborhood (area of minority
concentration)’’ is defined as one where
any one of the following statistical
conditions exists:
(a) The percentage of persons of a
particular racial or ethnic minority is at
least 20 points higher than the
percentage of that minority’s or a
combination of minorities’ in the
housing market area as a whole;
(b) The neighborhood’s total
percentage of minority persons is at
least 20 points higher than the total
percentage of minorities for the housing
market as a whole; or,
(c) In the case of a metropolitan area,
the neighborhood’s total percentage of
minority persons exceeds 50 percent of
its population.
d. (2 points). The extent to which
your proposed design will meet the
special physical needs of elderly
persons.
e. (2 points). The extent to which the
proposed size and unit mix of the
housing will enable you to manage and
operate the housing efficiently and
ensure that the provision of supportive
services will be accomplished in an
economical fashion.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11714
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
f. (2 points). The extent to which the
proposed design of the housing will
accommodate the provision of
supportive services that are expected to
be needed, initially and over the useful
life of the housing, by the category or
categories of elderly persons the
housing is intended to serve.
g. (3 points). The extent to which the
proposed supportive services meet the
identified needs of the anticipated
residents and that the identified
supportive services will be provided on
a consistent, long-term basis.
h. (1 point). The extent to which the
proposed design incorporates
visitability standards and/or universal
design in the construction or
rehabilitation of the project. Refer to the
General Section for further information.
i. (2 points). Your involvement of
elderly persons, particularly minority
elderly persons, in the development of
the application and your intent to
involve elderly persons, particularly
minority elderly persons, in the
development and operation of the
project.
j. (2 points). The extent to which the
jurisdiction in which your project will
be located has undertaken successful
efforts to remove regulatory barriers to
affordable housing. (Note: This is an
optional requirement, but to receive up
to 2 points, the applicant must have
submitted the Form HUD–27300,
Questionnaire for HUD’s Initiative on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers, AND
provided some form of documentation
where requested, including point of
contact and URL references or
submitted the required documentary
evidence.) Refer to the General Section
for further information.
k. (1 point) The extent to which you
will promote energy efficiency in the
design and operation of the proposed
housing. Refer to Section III.C.4. of this
NOFA.
l. (2 points). The extent to which you
have described your plans for
expanding economic opportunities for
low- and very-low income persons
(provisions of Section 3). (Note: This is
an optional requirement, but to receive
up to 2 points, the applicant must have
adequately addressed the following in
Exhibit 3(k) of the application.) Refer to
the General Section for further
information.
(1) (1 point) Provide opportunities to
train and employ low- and very lowincome residents of the project area.
(2) (1 point). Award substantial
contracts to persons residing in the
project area.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(5 Points)
This factor addresses your ability to
secure other funding sources and
community resources that can be
combined with HUD’s program
resources to achieve program purposes.
Submit information responding to this
factor in accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
3(a), 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), 3(e), and 5(b) of
Section IV.B. of this NOFA.
a. (0 point). The application contains
general support and/or written evidence
of firm commitments towards the
development and operation of the
proposed project (including, financial
assistance, donation of land, provision
of services, etc.) from other funding
sources (e.g., private, local community,
and government sources) where the
dollar value totals 5 percent or less of
the capital advance amount as
determined by HUD.
b. (1 point). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private, local
community, and government sources)
where the dollar value totals between 6
percent and 10 percent of the capital
advance amount as determined by HUD.
c. (2 points). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private, local
community, and government sources)
where the dollar value totals between 11
percent and 15 percent of the capital
advance amount as determined by HUD.
d. (3 points). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private, local
community, and government sources)
where the dollar value totals between 16
percent and 20 percent of the capital
advance amount as determined by HUD.
e. (4 points). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private, local
community, and government sources)
where the dollar value totals between 21
percent and 25 percent of the capital
advance amount as determined by HUD.
PO 00000
Frm 00282
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
f. (5 points). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private, local
community, and government sources)
where the dollar value totals over 25
percent of the capital advance amount
as determined by HUD.
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (12 Points)
This factor reflects HUD’s goal to
embrace high standards of ethics,
management and accountability and, as
such, emphasizes HUD’s commitment to
ensuring that you keep the promises
made in your application. This factor
requires that you clearly identify the
benefits or outcomes of your project and
develop an evaluation plan to measure
performance, which includes what you
are going to measure, how you are going
to measure it, and the steps you will
have in place to make adjustments to
your project development timeline
should you not be able to achieve any
of the major milestones. Completion of
Exhibit 8(i), Project Outcome Logic
Model (HUD–96010), will assist you in
completing your response to this rating
factor. This rating factor also addresses
the extent to which your project will
implement practical solutions that
result in residents achieving
independent living, educational
opportunities, and improved living
environments. Finally, this factor
addresses the extent to which the longterm viability of your project will be
sustained for the duration of the 40-year
capital advance period. Submit
information responding to this factor in
accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
3(e), 3(g), 3(h), 3(i), 6(b) and 8(i) of
Section IV.B.
a. (5 points). The extent to which your
project development timeline is
indicative of your full understanding of
the development process and will,
therefore, result in the timely
development of your project.
b. (2 points). The extent to which your
past performance evidences that the
proposed project will result in the
timely development of the project.
Evidence of your past performance
could include the development of
previous construction projects,
including but not limited to Section 202
and Section 811 projects.
c. (2 points). The extent to which your
project will implement practical
solutions that will result in assisting
residents in achieving independent
living, educational opportunities,
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
more (without the addition of RC/EZ/
EC–II bonus points) and meet all of the
applicable threshold requirements of the
(d) ......... Form HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipi- General Section and this NOFA will be
ent Disclosure/Update Report
eligible for selection, and HUD will
(e) ......... Form HUD–2991, Certification of
place them in rank order per
Consistency with Consolidated
metropolitan or nonmetropolitan
Plan
(f) .......... Form HUD–92041, Sponsor’s Con- allocation. These applications, after
adding any bonus points for RC/EZ/EC–
flict of Interest Resolution
(g) ......... Form HUD–92042, Sponsor’s Res- II, will be selected based on rank order,
olution for Commitment to up to and including the last application
Project*
that can be funded out of each HUD
(j) .......... Form
HUD–96011
Facsimile Multifamily Program Center’s
Transmittal (Required Only for metropolitan or nonmetropolitan
Transmittal of Faxes)*
allocation. HUD Multifamily Program
(k) ......... Form HUD–2994–A, You are Our
Centers will not skip over any
Client! Grant Applicant Survey
applications in order to select one based
(optional)
B. Reviews and Selection Process
on the funds remaining. After making
1. Review for Curable Deficiencies.
the initial selections in each allocation
The local HUD office will notify you
Upon receipt of the application by HUD
in writing if your application is missing area, however, HUD Multifamily
staff, HUD will screen all applications to
Program Centers may use remaining
any of the above exhibits or portions of
determine if there are any curable
available funds to select the next highest
exhibits and will provide you with a
deficiencies. For applicants receiving a
rank-ordered application by reducing
specified deadline to submit the
waiver to submit a paper application,
the number of units by no more than 10
information required to cure the noted
submitting fewer than the required
percent, rounded to the nearest whole
deficiencies. The items identified by an
original and four copies of the
number, provided the reduction will not
asterisk (*) must be dated on or before
application is not a curable deficiency
render the project infeasible. For this
the application submission date. If an
and will cause your application to be
purpose, however, HUD will not reduce
Exhibit or portion of an Exhibit listed
considered non-responsive to the NOFA
the number of units in projects of five
above as curable is not discovered as
and returned to you. A curable
units or less.
missing until technical processing, HUD
Once this process has been
deficiency is a missing Exhibit or
will provide you with a deadline to cure completed, HUD Multifamily Program
portion of an Exhibit that will not affect
the deficiency.
Centers may combine their unused
the rating of the application. Refer to the
2. Rating. HUD will review and rate
metropolitan and nonmetropolitan
General Section for additional
your application in accordance with the funds in order to select the next highest
information regarding procedures for
Reviews and Selection Process in the
ranked application in either category,
corrections to deficient applications.
General Section except as described in
using the unit reduction policy
The following is a list of the only
‘‘3. Appeal Process’’ found below. Your
described above, if necessary.
deficiencies that will be considered
application will be either rated or
After the HUD Multifamily Program
curable in a Section 202 application:
technically rejected at the end of
Centers have funded all possible
technical review. If your application
projects based on the process above,
Curable
Description
meets all program eligibility
exhibit
combined metropolitan and
requirements after completion of
nonmetropolitan residual funds from all
1 ........... Form
92015–CA
(Application technical review, it will be rated
HUD Multifamily Program Centers
Form)*
according to the rating factors in Section within each Multifamily Hub will be
2(a) ....... Articles of Incorporation*
V.A. above.
combined. First, these funds will be
(b) ......... By-laws*
3. Appeal Process. HUD will not reject used to restore units to projects reduced
(c) ......... IRS tax exemption ruling*
by HUD Multifamily Program Centers
4(c)(iii) .. Description of mixed-financing your application based on technical
based on the above instructions.
plans for additional units, if ap- review without notifying you of the
rejection with all the reasons for
plicable
Second, additional applications within
rejection and providing you an
4(d)(i) ... Evidence of site control
each Multifamily Hub will be selected
(d)(ii) ..... Evidence site is free of limitations, opportunity to appeal. You will have 14 in Hub-wide rank order with only one
restrictions or reverters
calendar days from the date of HUD’s
application selected per HUD
(d)(iv) .... Evidence of compliance with URA written notice to appeal a technical
Multifamily Program Center. More than
site notification requirement
rejection to the local HUD office. In
one application may be selected per
(d)(vii) ... Phase I ESA
HUD’s review of any appeal, it should
HUD Multifamily Program Center if
(d)(viii) .. Asbestos Statement or Survey
there are no approvable applications in
(d)(ix) .... Letter to the State/Tribal Historic be noted that in conformance with its
other HUD Multifamily Program Centers
Preservation Officer (SHPO/ regulations at 24 CFR part 4, subpart B,
THPO) and a statement that the HUD will not consider any unsolicited
within the Multifamily Hub. This
SHPO/THPO failed to respond information that you, the applicant, may process will continue until there are no
OR the Letter from the SHPO/ want to provide. The local HUD office
more approvable applications within
THPO
will make a determination on any
the Multifamily Hub that can be
7 ........... Relocation
appeals before making its selection
selected with the remaining funds.
8(a) ....... Letter sent to the State Point of recommendations.
Applications may not be skipped over to
Contact (SPOC)*
4. Ranking and Selection Procedures.
select one based on funds remaining.
(b) ......... Standard Form 424 Supplement,
However, the Multifamily Hub may use
Survey on Ensuring Equal Op- Applications submitted in response to
the advertised metropolitan allocations
any remaining residual funds to select
portunity for Applicants
the next highest rated application by
(c) ......... Standard Form LLL, Disclosure of or nonmetropolitan allocations that
have a total base score of 75 points or
Lobbying Activities, if applicable
reducing the number of units by no
outreach regarding telemarketing fraud,
and improved living environments.
d. (3 points). The extent to which you
demonstrated that your project will
remain viable as housing with the
availability of supportive services for
very low-income elderly persons for the
40-year capital advance period.
6. Bonus Points (2 bonus points).
Location of proposed site in an RC/EZ/
EC–II area, as described in the General
Section. Submit the information
responding to the bonus points in
accordance with the Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibit
8(h) of Section IV.B. of this NOFA.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11715
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Curable
exhibit
PO 00000
Frm 00283
Description
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11716
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
more than 10 percent rounded to the
nearest whole number, provided the
reduction will not render the project
infeasible or result in the project being
less than five units.
Funds remaining after the Multifamily
Hub selection process is completed will
be returned to Headquarters. HUD
Headquarters will use these residual
funds first to restore units to projects
reduced by HUD Multifamily Program
Centers or Multifamily Hubs as a result
of the instructions for using their
residual funds. Second, HUD
Headquarters will use these funds for
selecting applications based on HUD
Multifamily Program Centers’ rankings,
beginning with the highest rated
application nationwide. However, after
restoring units to projects where
necessary, priority will be given to those
applications for projects in nonmetropolitan areas, if necessary to meet
the statutory requirement of Section 202
of the Housing Act of 1959 pertaining to
Section 202 funding in nonmetropolitan
areas. Only one application will be
selected per HUD Multifamily Program
Center from the national residual
amount. If there are no approvable
applications in other HUD Multifamily
Program Centers, the process will begin
again with the selection of the next
highest rated application nationwide.
This process will continue until all
approvable applications are selected
using the available remaining funds.
HUD Headquarters may skip over a
higher-rated application in order to use
as much of the available remaining
funds as possible.
5. HUD Error. In the event HUD
commits an error that, when corrected,
would have resulted in the selection of
an otherwise eligible applicant during
the funding round of this NOFA, HUD
may select that applicant when
sufficient funds become available.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Agreement Letter. If you are
selected to receive a Section 202 fund
reservation, you will receive an
Agreement Letter that stipulates the
terms and conditions for the Section 202
fund reservation award as well as the
submission requirements following the
fund reservation award. The duration of
the fund reservation award for the
capital advance is 18 months from the
date of issuance of the fund reservation.
Immediately upon your acceptance of
the Agreement Letter, you are expected
to begin work towards the submission of
a Firm Commitment Application, which
is the next application submission stage.
You are required to submit a Firm
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Commitment Application to the local
HUD office within 180 days from the
date of the Agreement Letter. Initial
closing of the capital advance and start
of construction of the project are
expected to be accomplished within the
duration of the fund reservation award.
Final closing of the capital advance is
expected to occur no later than six
months after completion of project
construction.
2. Non-Selection Letter. If your
application is approvable but unfunded
due to insufficient funds or receives a
rating that is below the minimum
threshold score established for funding
eligibility, you will receive a letter to
this effect.
3. Debriefing. Refer to the General
Section for further information
regarding debriefings, except that the
request for a debriefing must be made to
the Director of Multifamily Housing in
the appropriate local HUD office.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Ensuring the Participation of Small
Businesses, Small Disadvantaged
Businesses, and Women-Owned
Businesses. Although the Section 202
program is not subject to the provisions
of 24 CFR 85.36(e) as described in the
corresponding paragraph in the General
Section, you are required to comply
with Executive Order 12432, Minority
Business Enterprise Development and
Executive Order 11625, Prescribing
Additional Arrangements for
Developing and Coordinating a National
Program for Minority Business
Enterprise as they relate to the
encouragement of HUD grantees to
utilize minority business enterprises.
2. Acquisition and Relocation. You
must comply with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as
amended (49 CFR part 24, and 24 CFR
891.155(e)) (URA), which covers the
acquisition of sites, with or without
existing structures, and with 24 CFR
8.4(b)(5) of the Section 504 regulations
which prohibits discrimination based
on disability in determining the site or
location of a federally-assisted facility.
However, you are exempt from
complying with the site acquisition
requirements of the URA if you do not
have the power of eminent domain and
prior to entering into a contract of sale,
option to purchase or any other method
of obtaining site control, you inform the
seller of the land in writing (1) that you
do not have the power of eminent
domain and, therefore, you will not
acquire the property if negotiations fail
to result in an amicable agreement, and
(2) of the estimate of the fair market
PO 00000
Frm 00284
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
value of the property. An appraisal is
not required to meet this requirement,
however, your files must include an
explanation (with reasonable evidence)
of the basis for the estimate. Evidence of
compliance with this advance notice
requirement must be included in Exhibit
4(d)(iv) of your application.
3. Flood Disaster Protection Act of
1973 and Coastal Barrier Resources Act.
You must comply with the requirements
under the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001–4128) and the
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C.
3601).
C. Reporting
1. The Program Outcome Logic Model
(Form HUD–96010) must be completed
indicating the results achieved against
the proposed output goal(s) and
proposed outcome(s) which you stated
in your approved application and
agreed upon by HUD. Based on the
information you provided in the
Program Outcome Logic Model, you also
are required to submit to HUD a
statement reporting the Return on
Investment as a result of HUD’s Section
202 funding award to you to develop
and operate a Section 202 housing
project with supportive services for the
very low-income elderly. HUD is
considering a new concept for the Logic
Model. The new concept is a Return on
Investment (ROI) statement. HUD will
be publishing a separate notice on the
ROI concept.
These reporting requirements are to
be submitted to HUD as follows:
Program Outcome Logic Model. You,
as the Sponsor, and the Owner, when
formed, are required to report annually,
beginning from the date of the
Agreement Letter, on the results
achieved against the output goal(s) and
outcome(s), which you proposed in the
Program Outcome Logic Model that was
submitted in your application.
2. The Regulatory Agreement (Form
HUD–92466–CA) requires the Owner of
the Section 202 project to submit an
annual financial statement for the
project. This financial statement must
be audited by an Independent Public
Accountant who is a Certified Public
Accountant or other person accepted by
HUD and filed electronically with
HUD’s Real Estate Assessment Center
(REAC) through the Financial
Assessment Subsystem for Multifamily
Housing (MF–FASS). The submission of
annual financial statements is required
throughout the 40-year term of the
mortgage.
VII. Agency Contact(s)
For Technical Assistance. For
technical assistance in downloading an
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
application package from
www.Grants.gov, contact the Grants.gov
help desk at 800–518–Grants or by
sending an e-mail to
support@grants.gov. For programmatic
information, you may contact the
appropriate local HUD office, or Alicia
Anderson at HUD Headquarters at (202)
708–3000 (this is not a toll-free
number), or access the Internet at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm. Persons with hearing
and speech impairments may access the
above number via TTY by calling the
Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339
(this is a toll-free number).
VIII. Other Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Field Office Workshop. HUD
encourages minority organizations and
grassroots organizations (e.g., civic
organizations, faith-communities and
grassroots faith-based and other
community-based organizations) to
participate in this program and strongly
recommends that prospective applicants
attend the local HUD office workshop.
At the workshops, HUD will explain
application procedures and
requirements, as well as address
concerns such as local market
conditions, building codes and
accessibility requirements,
contamination identification and
remediation, historic preservation,
floodplain management, other
environmental requirements,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
displacement and relocation, zoning,
and housing costs. If you are interested
in attending the workshop, make sure
that your name, address and telephone
number are on the appropriate local
HUD office’s mailing list so that you
will be informed of the date, time and
place of the workshop. Persons with
disabilities should call the appropriate
local HUD Office to assure that any
necessary arrangements can be made to
enable their attendance and
participation in the workshop.
If you cannot attend the workshop,
call the appropriate local HUD office if
you have any questions concerning the
submission of applications to that
particular office and to request any
materials distributed at the workshop.
B. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
an information broadcast via satellite for
potential applicants to learn more about
the program and preparation of the
application. It is strongly recommended
that potential applicants, especially
those who may be applying for Section
202 funding for the first time, tune in to
this broadcast, if at all possible. Copies
of the broadcast tapes are also available
from the NOFA Information Center. For
more information about the date and
time of the broadcast, you should
consult the HUD Web site at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
C. Related Programs. Funding for a
related program, Section 202
PO 00000
Frm 00285
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11717
Demonstration Pre-Development Grant
Program, is available to provide
predevelopment grants to private
nonprofit organizations and consumer
cooperatives in connection with the
development of housing under the
Section 202 program. The
announcement of the availability of
funding under this program will be
addressed in a separate NOFA.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this
document have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2502–
0267. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 37.42 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00286
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.026
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11718
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Section 811 Program of Supportive
Housing for Persons With Disabilities
(Section 811 Program)
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Housing.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Section
811 Supportive Housing for Persons
with Disabilities.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–05; OMB Approval Number is
2502–0462.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 14.181,
Section 811 Supportive Housing for
Persons with Disabilities.
F. Dates: Application deadline date:
May 24, 2007. Application must be
received and validated by Grants.gov by
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
deadline date. Refer to Section IV.
below and the General Section for
information on application submission
requirements.
G. Optional, Additional Overview
Content Information:
1. Purpose of the Program. This
program provides funding for the
development and operation of
supportive housing for very low-income
persons with disabilities who are at
least 18 years old. If you receive funding
through this program, you must assure
that supportive services are identified
and available.
2. Available Funds. Approximately
$88.3 million in capital advance funds
plus associated project rental assistance
contract (PRAC) funds and any
carryover funds available.
3. Types of Funds. Capital advance
funds will cover the cost of developing
the housing. PRAC funds will cover the
difference between the HUD-approved
operating costs of the project and the
tenants’ contributions toward rent (30
percent of their adjusted monthly
income).
4. Eligible Applicants. Nonprofit
organizations that have a section
501(c)(3) tax exemption from the
Internal Revenue Service. (See Section
III.C.3.m. below of this NOFA for further
details and information regarding the
formation of the Owner corporation.)
5. Eligible Activities. New
construction, rehabilitation, or
acquisition (with or without
rehabilitation) of housing. (See Section
III.C.1. below of this NOFA for further
information.)
6. Match Requirements. None
required.
7. Local HUD Offices. The local HUD
office structure, for the purpose of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
implementing the Section 811 program,
consists of 18 Multifamily Hub Offices.
Within the Multifamily Hubs, there are
Multifamily Program Centers with the
exception of the New York Hub, the
Buffalo Hub, the Denver Hub and the
Los Angeles Hub. All future references
shall use the term ‘‘local HUD office’’
unless a more detailed description is
necessary as in Limitations on
Applications and Ranking and Selection
Procedures, below.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Description. HUD
provides capital advances and contracts
for project rental assistance in
accordance with 24 CFR part 891.
Capital advances may be used for the
construction or rehabilitation of a
structure or acquisition of a structure
with or without rehabilitation, to be
developed into a variety of housing
options described in Section III.C.
Capital advance funds bear no interest
and are based on development cost
limits in Section IV.E.3. Repayment of
the capital advance is not required as
long as the housing remains available
for occupancy by very low-income
persons with disabilities for at least 40
years. PRAC funds are used to cover the
difference between the tenants’
contributions toward rent (30 percent of
adjusted income) and the HUDapproved cost to operate the project.
B. Authority. 42 U.S.C. 8013 (Section
811 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National
Affordable Housing Act (Pub. L. 101–
625, approved November 28, 1990)
(NAHA), as amended by the Housing
and Community Development Act of
1992) (Pub. L. 102–550, approved
October 28, 1992) (HCD Act of 1992);
the Rescissions Act (Pub. L. 104–19,
approved July 27, 1995); the American
Homeownership and Economic
Opportunity Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
569, approved December 27, 2000) and
the Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5;
approved February 15, 2007) authorized
a new supportive housing program for
persons with disabilities, and replaced
assistance for persons with disabilities
previously covered by section 202 of the
Housing Act of 1959 (section 202
continues, as amended by section 801 of
the NAHA, and the HCD Act of 1992, to
authorize supportive housing for the
elderly).
C. Eligible Occupancy. You may
propose a Section 811 project to serve
persons with physical disabilities,
developmental disabilities, chronic
mental illness, or any combination of
the three as defined in 24 CFR 891.305.
PO 00000
Frm 00287
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11719
In addition, you may request HUD
approval to restrict occupancy to a
subcategory of one of these three
defined categories (e.g., HIV/AIDS is a
subcategory of physical disability). If
restricted occupancy is approved,
however, you cannot deny occupancy to
any otherwise qualified person that
meets the definition of the overall
category of disability under which the
subcategory falls.
D. Calculation of Fund Reservation. If
selected, you will receive a fund
reservation that will consist of both a
reservation of capital advance funds and
a reservation of three years for project
rental assistance.
1. Capital advance funds. The
reservation of capital advance funds is
based on a formula which, for an
independent living project (including
condominiums), takes the development
cost limit for the appropriate building
type (elevator, non-elevator) and unit
size(s) and multiplies it by the number
of units of each size (including a unit for
a resident manager, if applicable) and
then multiplies the result by the high
cost factor for the area. For a group
home, the formula is based on the
number of persons with disabilities in
the appropriate disability category
(excluding any unit for a resident
manager since such a unit is already
incorporated in the development cost
limit) multiplied by the high cost factor
for the area. The development cost
limits can be found in Section IV.E.3. of
this NOFA.
2. PRAC funds. The initial PRAC
award covers three years. The amount
awarded is determined by multiplying
the number of units for residents with
disabilities in an independent living
project or the number of residents with
disabilities in a group home by the
appropriate operating cost standard
times three (3). The operating cost
standards will be published by Notice.
II. Award Information
A. Available Funds. For FY2007,
$88.3 million is available for capital
advances for the Section 811 Program of
Supportive Housing for Persons with
Disabilities. The Revised Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub.
L. 110–5; approved February 15, 2007)
provides $239,000,000 for capital
advances, including amendments to
capital advance contracts, for supportive
housing for persons with disabilities as
authorized by section 811 of the
National Affordable Housing Act of
1990 (NAHA); for project rental
assistance for supportive housing for
persons with disabilities under section
811 of the NAHA, including
amendments to contracts for such
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11720
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
assistance and renewal of expiring
contracts for such assistance for up to a
one-year term and for tenant-based
rental assistance contracts and renewal
of expiring contracts for such assistance
entered into pursuant to section 811 of
the NAHA, and $400,000 to be
transferred to the Working Capital Fund.
Approximately $5,000,000 will be
provided for tenant-based rental
assistance for persons with disabilities
administered through public housing
agencies (PHAs) and nonprofit
organizations under the Mainstream
Housing Opportunities for Persons with
Disabilities Program and $78,300,000
will be provided for one-year renewal
costs of Section 811 rental assistance.
In accordance with the waiver
authority provided in the Department of
Housing and Urban Development
Appropriations Act, 2007, the Secretary
is waiving the following statutory and
regulatory provision: The term of the
project rental assistance contract is
reduced from 20 years to 3 years. HUD
anticipates that at the end of the
contract terms, renewals will be
approved subject to the availability of
funds. In addition to this provision,
HUD will reserve project rental
assistance contract funds based on 75
percent rather than on 100 percent of
the current operating cost standards for
approved units in order to take into
account the average tenant contribution
toward rent.
The allocation formula used for
Section 811 reflects the ‘‘relevant
characteristics of prospective program
participants,’’ as specified in 24 CFR
791.402(a). The FY2007 formula
consists of the following data element
from the 2000 Census: the number of
non-institutionalized persons age 16 to
64 with a disability. The data on
disability status were derived from
answers to a two-part question that
asked about the existence of the
following long-lasting conditions: (a)
blindness, deafness, or a severe vision
or hearing impairment (sensory
disability) and (b) a condition that
substantially limits one or more basic
physical activities, such as walking,
climbing stairs, reaching, lifting, or
carrying (physical disability); and a
four-part question that asked if the
individual had a physical, mental, or
emotional condition lasting 6 months or
more that made it difficult to perform
certain activities. The four activity
categories were: (a) learning,
remembering, or concentrating (mental
disability); (b) dressing, bathing, or
getting around inside the home (selfcare disability); (c) going outside the
home alone to shop or visit a doctor’s
office (going outside the home
disability); and (d) working at a job or
business (employment disability).
Under the Section 811 Program, each
local HUD office jurisdiction receives
sufficient capital advance funds for a
minimum of 10 units. The total amount
of capital advance funds to support this
minimum set-aside is then subtracted
from the total capital advance available.
The remainder is fair shared to each
local HUD office jurisdiction whose fair
share would exceed the set-aside based
on the allocation formula fair share
factors described below.
The fair share factors were developed
by taking the number of persons with
disabilities in the data element for each
state, or state portion, of each local HUD
office jurisdiction as a percent of the
data element from the 2000 Census,
described above, for the total United
States. The resulting percentage for each
local HUD office is then adjusted to
reflect the relative cost of providing
housing among the local HUD office
jurisdictions. The adjusted needs
percentage for each local HUD office is
then multiplied by the total amount of
capital advance funds available
nationwide.
The Section 811 capital advance
funds have been allocated, based on the
formula above, to 51 local HUD offices
as shown on the following chart:
FY 2007 SECTION 811 ALLOCATIONS FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
Offices
Capital
advance
Units
BOSTON HUB
BOSTON ..................................................................................................................................................................
HARTFORD .............................................................................................................................................................
MANCHESTER ........................................................................................................................................................
PROVIDENCE .........................................................................................................................................................
17
10
10
10
$2,296,605
1,364,220
1,075,415
1,342,183
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
47
6,078,423
28
3,812,372
17
1,961,062
CHARLESTON ........................................................................................................................................................
NEWARK .................................................................................................................................................................
PHILADELPHIA .......................................................................................................................................................
PITTSBURGH ..........................................................................................................................................................
10
19
20
10
1,034,708
2,576,996
2,576,410
1,081,931
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
59
7,270,045
10
16
10
1,073,536
1,595,661
1,201,563
NEW YORK HUB
NEW YORK .............................................................................................................................................................
BUFFALO HUB
BUFFALO ................................................................................................................................................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
PHILADELPHIA HUB
BALTIMORE HUB
BALTIMORE ............................................................................................................................................................
RICHMOND .............................................................................................................................................................
WASHINGTON ........................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00288
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11721
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
FY 2007 SECTION 811 ALLOCATIONS FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES—Continued
Offices
Capital
advance
Units
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
36
3,870,760
COLUMBIA ..............................................................................................................................................................
GREENSBORO .......................................................................................................................................................
16
20
1,645,470
2,584,393
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
36
4,229,863
ATLANTA .................................................................................................................................................................
KNOXVILLE .............................................................................................................................................................
LOUISVILLE ............................................................................................................................................................
NASHVILLE .............................................................................................................................................................
SAN JUAN ...............................................................................................................................................................
20
10
16
15
16
1,908,196
947,608
1,592,146
1,388,636
1,944,381
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
77
7,780,967
BIRMINGHAM ..........................................................................................................................................................
JACKSON ................................................................................................................................................................
JACKSONVILLE ......................................................................................................................................................
16
10
31
1,485,461
890,941
2,894,379
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
57
5,270,781
CHICAGO ................................................................................................................................................................
INDIANAPOLIS ........................................................................................................................................................
23
17
3,018,814
1,698,474
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
40
4,717,288
CINCINNATI ............................................................................................................................................................
CLEVELAND ............................................................................................................................................................
COLUMBUS .............................................................................................................................................................
10
16
10
994,831
1,739,750
982,238
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
36
3,716,819
DETROIT .................................................................................................................................................................
GRAND RAPIDS .....................................................................................................................................................
17
10
1,986,025
846,866
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
27
2,832,891
MINNEAPOLIS ........................................................................................................................................................
MILWAUKEE ...........................................................................................................................................................
14
15
1,710,717
1,768,524
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
29
3,479,241
FT. WORTH .............................................................................................................................................................
HOUSTON ...............................................................................................................................................................
LITTLE ROCK ..........................................................................................................................................................
NEW ORLEANS ......................................................................................................................................................
SAN ANTONIO ........................................................................................................................................................
25
17
10
16
17
2,105,842
1,513,059
859,459
1,441,667
1,436,753
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
85
7,356,780
10
15
14
10
890,941
1,610,158
1,283,491
1,000,078
GREENSBORO HUB
ATLANTA HUB
JACKSONVILLE HUB
CHICAGO HUB
COLUMBUS HUB
DETROIT HUB
MINNEAPOLIS HUB
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
FT. WORTH HUB
KANSAS CITY HUB
DES MOINES ..........................................................................................................................................................
KANSAS CITY .........................................................................................................................................................
OKLAHOMA CITY ...................................................................................................................................................
OMAHA ....................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00289
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11722
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
FY 2007 SECTION 811 ALLOCATIONS FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES—Continued
Offices
Capital
advance
Units
ST. LOUIS ...............................................................................................................................................................
10
1,162,735
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
59
5,947,403
19
1,937,395
SAN FRANCISCO ...................................................................................................................................................
HONOLULU .............................................................................................................................................................
PHOENIX .................................................................................................................................................................
SACRAMENTO ........................................................................................................................................................
24
10
16
10
3,170,932
1,888,920
1,499,753
1,329,590
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
60
7,889,195
36
4,608,427
SEATTLE .................................................................................................................................................................
ANCHORAGE ..........................................................................................................................................................
PORTLAND .............................................................................................................................................................
17
10
15
2,034,377
1,888,920
1,580,209
TOTAL ..............................................................................................................................................................
42
5,503,506
NATIONAL TOTAL ...........................................................................................................................................
790
88,263,218
DENVER HUB
DENVER ..................................................................................................................................................................
SAN FRANCISCO HUB
LOS ANGELES HUB
LOS ANGELES ........................................................................................................................................................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
SEATTLE HUB
B. Type of Award. Capital Advance
and Project Rental Assistance Contract
Funds for new Section 811 applications.
C. Type of Assistance Instrument. The
Agreement Letter stipulates the terms
and conditions for the Section 811 fund
reservation award as well as the
submission requirements following the
fund reservation award. The duration of
the fund reservation award for the
capital advance is 18 months from the
date of issuance of the fund reservation.
D. Anticipated Start and Completion
Date. Immediately upon your
acceptance of the Agreement Letter, you
are expected to begin work toward the
submission of a Firm Commitment
Application, which is the next
application submission stage. You are
required to submit a Firm Commitment
Application to the local HUD office
within 180 days from the date of the
Agreement Letter. Initial closing of the
capital advance and start of construction
of the project are expected to be
accomplished within the duration of the
fund reservation award as indicated in
the above paragraph regarding the Type
of Assistance Instrument. Final closing
of this capital advance is expected to
occur no later than six months after
completion of project construction.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants: Nonprofit
organizations with a section 501(c)(3)
tax exemption from the Internal
Revenue Service and who meet the
threshold requirements contained in the
General Section NOFA and Section
III.C.2 below are the only eligible
applicants for this program.
Applicant eligibility for purposes of
applying for a Section 811 fund
reservation under this NOFA has not
changed; i.e., all Section 811 Sponsors
and Co-Sponsors must be nonprofit
organizations. However, the Owner
corporation, when later formed by the
Sponsor, may be (1) a single-purpose
nonprofit organization that has taxexempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code (IRS) of 1986,
OR (2) for purposes of developing a
mixed-finance project pursuant to the
statutory provision under Title VIII of
the American Homeownership and
Economic Opportunity Act of 2000, a
for-profit limited partnership with a
nonprofit organization that has tax
exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of
the IRS code as the sole general partner.
See Section IV.E.2 below regarding
limits on the total number of units and
projects for which you may apply for
funding.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching: No cost
sharing or match is required; however,
PO 00000
Frm 00290
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
you are required to make a commitment
to cover the estimated start-up expenses,
the minimum capital investment of one
half of one percent of the HUDapproved capital advance, not to exceed
$10,000, and any funds required in
excess of the capital advance, including
the estimated cost of any amenities or
features (and operating costs related
thereto) which are not covered by the
capital advance. You must make such a
commitment by signing the form HUD–
92042, Sponsor’s Resolution for
Commitment to Project, in Exhibit 8(g)
of the application found in Section IV.B.
below.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Section 811
capital advance funds must be used to
finance the development of housing
through new construction,
rehabilitation, or acquisition with or
without rehabilitation. Capital advance
funds may also be used in combination
with other non-Section 811 funding
sources leveraged by a for-profit limited
partnership (of which a single-purpose
nonprofit organization with a 501(c)(3)
tax exemption is the sole general
partner) to develop a mixed-finance
project, including a mixed-finance
project for additional units over and
above the Section 811 units. The
development of a mixed-use project in
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
which the Section 811 units are
mortgaged separately from the other
uses of the structure is not considered
a mixed-finance project. Project rental
assistance funds are provided to cover
the difference between the HUDapproved operating costs and the
amount the residents pay (each resident
pays 30 percent of adjusted income).
The types of housing that can be
developed with Section 811 capital
advance funds include independent
living projects, dwelling units in
multifamily housing developments,
condominium and cooperative housing
and small group homes.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Note: For purposes of approving Section
811 capital advances, HUD will consider
proposals involving mixed-financing for
additional units over and above the Section
811 units if you have legal control of an
approvable site and the additional units do
not cause the project, as a whole, to exceed
the project size limits if the additional units
will also house persons with disabilities
(unless your project will be an independent
living project and you request and receive
HUD approval to exceed the project size
limits (See IV.B.2.c.(1)(d)(xi)). However, you
must obtain funds to assist the additional
units with other than PRAC funds. HUD will
not provide PRAC funds for non-Section 811
units.
2. Threshold Criteria for Funding
Consideration. In addition to the
threshold criteria outlined in the
General Section of the SuperNOFA, the
following threshold requirements must
be met:
a. Non-Responsive Application. Your
application will be considered nonresponsive to the NOFA and will not be
accepted for processing if you:
(1) submit less than the required
number of copies if you requested and
received approval for a waiver of the
electronic submission requirement.
Applicants receiving waiver approval to
submit a paper application must follow
the instructions in the approval
notification regarding where to submit
the application and the number of
copies required. All paper applications
granted a waiver to the electronic
application submission requirement
must be received by HUD at the proper
location no later than the deadline date.
(2) submit paper copies of the
application if you have not received
approval from HUD for a waiver of the
electronic submission requirements;
(3) submit a substantially deficient
application (i.e., a majority of the
required exhibits are not submitted with
your application, particularly, but not
limited to, those exhibits which are not
curable). HUD reserves the right to
determine whether your application is
substantially deficient for purposes of
determining whether the application is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
non-responsive to the NOFA. Refer to
Section IV.B., Content and Form of
Application Submission, for
information on the required exhibits for
submission with your application to
ensure that your application is complete
at time of submission;
(4) request more units than were
allocated to the local HUD office that
will be reviewing your application (See
the allocation chart in Section II.A.
above);
(5) request less than the minimum
number of units for persons with
disabilities in an independent living
project (5 units) or a group home (2
units);
(6) request more than the maximum
number of units for a group home (6
units); or
(7) request assistance for housing that
you currently own or lease that has been
occupied by people with disabilities for
longer than one year prior to the
application deadline date;
(8) request assistance for an ineligible
activity as defined in Section IV.E.,
Funding Restrictions, of this program
NOFA;
(9) are an ineligible applicant (see
Section III.A., Eligible Applicants of this
program NOFA).
b. Other Criteria.
(1) You, or a Co-Sponsor, must have
experience in providing housing or
services to persons with disabilities.
(2) You and any Co-Sponsor must be
eligible nonprofit organizations with
tax-exempt status under Section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Service code.
(3) Your application must contain
evidence of site control or the
identification of a site. Section 811(d)(3)
of the National Affordable Housing Act
requires you to provide either evidence
of site control or a reasonable assurance
that you will have control of a site
within six months of the date of the
Agreement Letter notifying you that you
have been selected to receive a Section
811 fund reservation. Accordingly, you
must include in your application the
required information specified below for
evidence of site control, or the required
information specified below under site
identification as a reasonable assurance
that site control will be obtained within
six months of the date of the Agreement
Letter. If you submit the required
information for an identified site(s), you
must include a specific street address
for each identified site or the
application will be rejected.
(a) Evidence of Site Control—If you
have control of a site at the time you
submit your application, you must
provide the information in Exhibit 4(d)
PO 00000
Frm 00291
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11723
in IV.B. of this NOFA relative to site
control.
OR
(b) Site Identification—If you do not
have site control of one or more of your
sites, you must provide the information
required in Exhibit 4(e) in IV.B. of this
NOFA under ‘‘Identification of a Site’’
for any site not under control as a
reasonable assurance that site control
will be obtained within six months of
fund reservation notification.
If your application contains evidence
of site control where either the evidence
or the site is not approvable, your
application will not be rejected
provided you indicate in your
application that you are willing to seek
an alternate site and provide an
assurance that site control will be
obtained within six months of fund
reservation notification. During the
selection process, all applications with
acceptable evidence of site control for
all proposed sites and all proposed sites
that have been found approvable will be
grouped in Category A. All applications
that are submitted as ‘‘site identified’’ as
well as those that are submitted with
site control but the evidence of control
and/or site(s) are not approvable (if the
Sponsor indicates that it is willing to
seek a different site if the proposed site
is not approvable) will be grouped in
Category B. All applications in Category
A will be selected before any
applications are selected from Category
B. See Section V.B.4. for further
information on the selection process.
(c) Historic Preservation. If you
submit an application with evidence of
site control, you are required to send a
letter to the State/Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO/THPO) that
attempts to initiate consultation with
their office and requests their review of
your determinations and findings with
respect to the historical significance of
your proposed project. A HUD’s Web
site at
https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm contains a sample letter
to the SHPO/THPO that you may adapt
for your use, if you so choose. You must
include a copy of your letter to the
SHPO/THPO in your application. You
must then also include in your
application either:
(i) The response letter(s) from the
SHPO/THPO, or
(ii) A statement from you that you
have not received a response letter(s)
from the SHPO/THPO.
(d) Contamination. HUD must
determine if a proposed site contains
contamination such as hazardous waste,
petroleum, or petroleum products, and,
if so, HUD must be satisfied that it is
eliminated to the extent necessary to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11724
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
meet non site-specific Federal, State or
local health standards. If you submit an
application with evidence of site
control, you must assist HUD by doing
the following:
(i) Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA)—You must undertake
and submit a Phase I ESA, prepared in
accordance with the ASTM Standard E
1527–05, using the table of contents and
report format specified at Appendix X4,
completed or updated as specified at
Section 4.6 no earlier than 180 days
prior to the application deadline date in
order for the application to be
considered as an application with site
control. The Phase I ESA must be
completed and included in your
application. Therefore, it is important
that you start the Phase I ESA process
as soon after publication of the
SuperNOFA as possible. To help you
choose an environmentally safe site,
HUD invites you to review the
document ‘‘Choosing An
Environmentally Safe Site’’ and
‘‘Supplemental Guidance,
Environmental Information’’, which are
available on HUD’s Web site at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Note: An application with a phase I That
is not properly updated, does not use the
format specified at appendix X4 of ASTM
Standard E 1527–05 or that is prepared in
accordance with an older version of ASTM
E 1527 will result in being a technical reject.
(ii) Phase II ESA—If the Phase I ESA
indicates the possible presence of
contamination and/or hazards, you must
decide whether to continue with this
site or choose another site. Should you
choose another site, the same Phase I
ESA process identified above must be
followed for the new site. However, if
you choose to continue with the original
site on which the Phase I ESA indicated
contamination or hazards, you must
undertake a detailed Phase II ESA by an
appropriate professional. In order for
your application to be considered as an
application with site control, the Phase
II must be received in the local HUD
office on or before June 25, 2007.
(iii) Clean-up—If the Phase II ESA
reveals site contamination, the extent of
the contamination and a plan for cleanup of the site must be submitted to the
local HUD office. The plan for clean-up
must include a contract for remediation
of the problem(s) and an approval letter
from the applicable federal, state, and/
or local agency with jurisdiction over
the site. In order for your application to
be considered as an application with
site control, this information must be
received by the appropriate local HUD
office on or before June 25, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Note: Clean-up could be an expensive
undertaking. You must pay for the cost of any
clean-up and/or remediation with sources
other than the capital advance funds. If the
application is approved, clean-up must be
completed prior to initial closing.
Completion of clean-up means that HUD
Must be satisfied that the contamination has
been eliminated to the extent necessary to
meet non site-specific federal, state or local
health standards, with no active or passive
remediation still taking place, no capping
over of any contamination, and no
monitoring wells. However, it is acceptable if
contamination remains solely in groundwater
that is at least 25 feet below the surface.
(e) Asbestos. Asbestos is a hazardous
substance commonly used in building
products until the late 1970s. Therefore,
if you submit an application with
evidence of site control, you must
submit one of the following with your
application:
(i) If there are no pre-1978 structures
on the site or if there are pre-1978
structures that most recently consisted
of solely four or fewer units of singlefamily housing including appurtenant
structures thereto, a statement to this
effect, or
(ii) If there are pre-1978 structures on
the site, other than for a site that most
recently consisted of solely four or
fewer units of single-family housing
including appurtenant structures
thereto, a comprehensive building
asbestos survey that is based on a
thorough inspection to identify the
location and condition of asbestos
throughout any structures. In those
cases where suspect asbestos is found,
it would either be assumed to be
asbestos or would require confirmatory
testing. If the asbestos survey indicates
the presence of asbestos or the presence
of asbestos is assumed, and if the
application is approved, HUD will
condition the approval on an
appropriate mix of asbestos abatement
and an asbestos Operations and
Maintenance Plan.
(4) There must be a market need for
the number of units proposed in the
area of the project location.
(5) Your application must contain a
Supportive Services Plan and a
Certification from the appropriate state
or local agency that the Supportive
Services Plan is well designed to
address the individual health, mental
health and other needs of persons with
disabilities who will live in your
proposed project. Exhibit 5 in Section
IV.B. below outlines the information
that must be in the Supportive Services
Plan. You must submit one copy of your
Supportive Services Plan to the
appropriate State or local agency well in
advance of the application submission
deadline date for the state or local
PO 00000
Frm 00292
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
agency to review your Supportive
Services Plan and complete the
Supportive Services Certification and
return it to you so that you can include
it in the application you submit to HUD.
(a) HUD will reject your application if
the Supportive Services Certification:
(i) Is not submitted with your
application and is not submitted to
HUD within the 14-day cure period; or
(ii) Indicates that the provision of
supportive services is not well designed
to address the individual health, mental
health and other needs of persons with
disabilities who will live in your
project; or
(iii) Indicates that the provision of
supportive services will not enhance
independent living success or promote
the dignity of the persons with
disabilities who will live in your
proposed project.
(b) In addition, if the agency
completing the certification will be a
major funding or referral source for your
proposed project or be responsible for
licensing the project, HUD will reject
your application if either the agency’s
Supportive Services Certification
indicates—or, where the agency fails to
complete item 3 or 4 of the certification,
HUD determines that:
(i) You failed to demonstrate that
supportive services will be available on
a consistent, long-term basis; and/or
(ii) The proposed housing is not
consistent with state or local agency
plans/policies addressing the housing
needs of people with disabilities.
Any prospective resident of a Section
811 project who believes he/she needs
supportive services must be given the
choice to be responsible for acquiring
his/her own services or to take part in
your Supportive Services Plan which
must be designed to meet the individual
needs of each resident.
You must not require residents to
accept any supportive services as a
condition of occupancy or admission.
(6) Delinquent Federal Debt. Refer to
the General Section for information
regarding delinquent federal debt.
3. Program Requirements. By signing
Form HUD–92016–CA, Supportive
Housing for Persons with Disabilities
Section 811, Application for Capital
Advance Summary Information, you are
certifying that you will comply with the
program requirements listed in the
General Section as well as the following
requirements:
a. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements. In addition to the
statutory, regulatory, threshold and
public policy requirements listed in the
General Section, you must comply with
all statutory and regulatory
requirements listed in this NOFA.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
b. Project Size Limits.
(1) Independent living project. The
minimum number of units for persons
with disabilities that can be applied for
in one application is five units for
persons with disabilities. All of the
units are not required to be in one
structure and they may be on scattered
sites. The maximum number of persons
with disabilities that can be housed in
an independent living project on one or
adjacent sites is 14 plus one additional
one-or two-bedroom unit for a resident
manager, if necessary. If the proposed
independent living project will be
located on a site already containing
housing for persons with disabilities or
on an adjacent site containing such
housing, the total number of persons
with disabilities housed in both the
existing and the proposed project
cannot exceed 14.
(2) Exception to project size limit for
an independent living project. If you are
submitting an application for an
independent living project with site
control, you may request an exception
to the above project size limit by
providing the information required in
Exhibit 4(d)(xi) of Section IV.B. below
NOFA.
(3) Group home. The minimum
number of persons with disabilities that
can reside in a group home is two, and
the maximum number is six. There are
no exceptions to the maximum project
size limit for a group home. An
additional one-bedroom unit can be
provided for a resident manager. Only
one person per bedroom is allowed,
unless two residents choose to share one
bedroom or a resident determines he/
she needs another person to share his/
her bedroom. If you are applying for
more than one group home, they cannot
be located on the same or adjacent sites.
(4) Condominium Units.
Condominium units are treated the
same as units in an independent living
project except that you cannot request
an additional condominium unit for a
resident manager.
c. Minimum Capital Investment. If
selected, you must provide a minimum
capital investment of one-half of one
percent of the HUD-approved capital
advance amount, not to exceed a
maximum of $10,000 in accordance
with 24 CFR 891.145.
d. Accessibility. Your project must
meet accessibility requirements
published at 24 CFR 891.120, 24 CFR
891.310 and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and, if new
construction, the design and
construction requirements of the Fair
Housing Act and HUD’s implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 100. In
addition, 24 CFR 8.4(b)(5) prohibits the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
selection of a site or location which has
the purpose or effect of excluding
persons with disabilities from the
Federally assisted program or activity.
Refer to Section V.A. below and the
General Section for information
regarding the policy priority of
encouraging accessible design.
e. Conducting Business in Accordance
With Core Values and Ethical
Standards. You are not subject to the
requirements of 24 CFR parts 84 and 85
as outlined in the General Section
except for the disposition of real
property, which may be subject to 24
CFR Part 84. However, you are still
subject to the core values and ethical
standards as they relate to the conflict
of interest provisions in 24 CFR
891.130. To ensure compliance with the
program’s conflict of interest provisions,
you are required to sign a Conflict of
Interest Resolution and include it in
your Section 811 application. Further, if
awarded a Section 811 fund reservation,
the officers, directors, board members,
trustees, stockholders and authorized
agents of the Section 811 Sponsor and
Owner entities will be required to
submit to HUD individual certifications
regarding compliance with HUD’s
conflict of interest requirements.
f. National Environmental Policy Act.
You must comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321) and applicable
related environmental authorities at 24
CFR 50.4, HUD’s programmatic
implementing regulations at 24 CFR part
50 and 24 CFR 891.155(b), especially,
but not limited to, the provision of
information to HUD at 24 CFR 50.31(b),
and you must comply with any
environmental ‘‘conditions and
safeguards’’ at 24 CFR 50.3(c).
Under 24 CFR Part 50, HUD has the
responsibility for conducting the
environmental reviews. HUD will
commence the environmental review of
your project upon receipt of your
completed application. However, HUD
cannot approve any site for which you
have site control unless it first
completes the environmental review
and finds that the site(s) meets its
environmental requirements. In rare
cases where HUD is not able to
complete the environmental review, it is
due to a complex environmental issue
that could not be resolved during the
time period allocated for application
processing. Thus, if you submit an
application with evidence of site
control, HUD requires you to attempt to
obtain comments from the State/Tribal
Historic Preservation Officer (see
Exhibit 4(d)(ix) of Section IV.B. below)
to help HUD complete the
environmental review on time. It is also
PO 00000
Frm 00293
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11725
why HUD may contact you for
additional environmental information.
So that you can review the type of
information that HUD needs for its
preparation of the environmental
review, the type of information requests
that HUD may make to you, and the
criteria that HUD uses to determine the
environmental acceptability of a site,
you are invited to go to the following
Web site to view the HUD form 4128,
including the Sample Field Notes
Checklist, which HUD uses to record the
environmental review: www.hud.gov/
utilities/intercept.cfm?/offices/cpd/
energyenviron/environment/
compliance/forms/4128.pdf.
g. Lead-Based Paint. You must
comply with the requirements of the
Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention
Act (42 U.S.C. 4821–4846) and
implementing regulations at 24 CFR part
35.
h. Executive Order 13202,
Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Construction Projects. Refer to
the General Section.
i. Fair Housing Requirements. Refer to
the General Section.
j. Economic Opportunities for Low
and Very Low-Income Persons (Section
3). You must comply with Section 3 of
the Housing and Urban Development
Act of 1968, U.S.C. 1701u (Economic
Opportunities for Low and Very LowIncome Persons) and its implementation
regulations at 24 CFR part 135. You
must ensure that training, employment
and other economic opportunities shall,
to the greatest extent feasible, be
directed toward low and very lowincome persons, particularly those who
are recipients of government assistance
for housing and to business concerns
which provide economic opportunities
to low and very-low income persons in
the area in which the proposed project
will be located. To comply with Section
3 requirements you are hereby certifying
that you will strongly encourage your
general contractor and subcontractors to
participate in local apprenticeship
programs or training programs
registered or certified by the Department
of Labor’s Office of Apprenticeship,
Training, Employer and Labor Services
or recognized State Apprenticeship
Agency. Although not a NOFA
requirement, you are nonetheless
encouraged to submit with your
application a description on how you
plan to incorporate the Section 3
requirements into your proposed project
with goals for expanding training and
employment opportunities for low and
very low-income (Section 3) residents as
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11726
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
well as business concerns. You will
receive up to two (2) points if you
provide a description of your plans for
doing so under Exhibit 3(m) of this
program NOFA
k. Design and Cost Standards. You
must comply with HUD’s Section 811
project design and cost standards (24
CFR 891.120 and 891.310), the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Standards (24 CFR
40.7), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 and HUD’s implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 8, and for
covered multifamily dwellings designed
and constructed for first occupancy after
March 13, 1991, the design and
construction requirements of the Fair
Housing Act and HUD’s implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 100, and,
where applicable, the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990.
l. Energy Efficiency. HUD has adopted
a wide-ranging energy action plan for
improving energy efficiency in all
program areas. As a first step in
implementing the energy plan, HUD, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the Department of Energy (DOE)
have signed a joint partnership to
promote energy efficiency in HUD’s
affordable housing efforts and programs.
The purpose of the Energy Star
partnership is not only to promote
energy efficiency of the affordable
housing stock, but also to help protect
the environment. Although it is not a
requirement, you are nonetheless
encouraged to promote energy efficiency
in design and operations and your
application will receive one (1) point if
you describe your plans for doing so in
the proposed project. You are especially
urged to purchase and use Energy Starlabeled products. For further
information about Energy Star, see
https://www.energystar.gov or call 888–
STAR–YES (1–888–782–7937) or for the
hearing-impaired, 888–588–9920 TTY.
m. Formation of Owner Corporation.
You must form an ‘‘Owner’’ entity (in
accordance with 24 CFR 891.305) after
issuance of the capital advance fund
reservation and must cause the Owner
entity to file a request for determination
of eligibility and a request for capital
advance, and must provide sufficient
resources to the Owner entity to ensure
the development and long-term
operation of the project, including
capitalizing the Owner entity at firm
commitment processing in an amount
sufficient to meet its obligations in
connection with the project over and
above the capital advance amount. n.
Davis-Bacon. You must comply with the
Davis-Bacon Requirements (42 U.S.C.
8013(j)(6)) and the Contract Work Hours
and Safety Standards Act in accordance
with 24 CFR 891.155(d).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Address to Request Application
Package. Applicants are required to
submit an electronic application unless
they receive a waiver of the requirement
in accordance with the procedures in
Section IV.C. of this NOFA. See the
General Section for information on
electronic application submission and
timely submission and receipt
requirements. Copies of the General
Section, this NOFA, the required forms,
and other related documents are
available and may be downloaded from
the Grants.gov Web site at http:/
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. Search for the
program using the CFDA Number,
Competition ID OR Funding
Opportunity Number. If you have
difficulty accessing the information, you
may call the Grants.gov Support Desk
toll free @ 800–518–GRANTS or e-mail
your questions to Support@Grants.gov.
See the General Section for information
regarding the registration process or ask
for registration information from the
Grants.gov Support Desk.
You may request general information,
copies of the General Section and this
NOFA (including related documents),
and required forms from the NOFA
Information Center (800–HUD–8929)
Monday through Friday, except on
federal holidays. Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this
number via TTY by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339. When requesting information,
please refer to the name of the program
you are interested in.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission. The exhibits to be included
in your application are contained in the
body of this NOFA below. Before
preparing your application, you should
carefully review the requirements of the
regulations (24 CFR Part 891) and
general program instructions in
Handbook 4571.2, Section 811 Capital
Advance Program for Housing Persons
with Disabilities. Note: Section 1001 of
Title 18 of the United States Code
(Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure,
72 Stat. 967) applies to all information
supplied in the application submission.
(18 U.S.C. 1001, among other things,
provides that whoever knowingly and
willfully makes or uses a document or
writing containing any false, fictitious,
fraudulent statement or entry, in any
matter within the jurisdiction of any
department or agency of the United
States, shall be fined not more than
$10,000 or imprisoned for not more than
five years, or both.)
PO 00000
Frm 00294
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
The Application for a Section 811
Capital Advance consists of four parts
with a total of eight Exhibits. Included
with the eight Exhibits are prescribed
forms, certifications and resolutions.
The components of the Application are:
• Part 1—Application Form for
Section 811 Supportive Housing—
Capital Advance (Exhibit 1).
• Part 2—Your Ability to Develop and
Operate the Proposed Project (Exhibits 2
and 3).
• Part 3—The Need for Supportive
Housing for the Target Population in the
Area to be Served, Site Control and/or
Identification of Site, Suitability of Site,
Adequacy of the Provision of
Supportive Services and of the Proposed
Project (Exhibits 4 and 5).
• Part 4—General Application
Requirements, Certifications and
Resolutions (Exhibits 6 through 8).
The following additional information,
which may assist you in preparing your
application, is available on HUD’s Web
site at https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/
grants/fundsavail.cfm:
• Listing of Local HUD Offices
• Letter Requesting SHPO/THPO
Review
• Choosing an Environmentally Safe
Site
• Supplemental to Choosing an
Environmentally Safe Site
Your application must include all of
the information, materials, forms, and
exhibits listed below (unless you were
selected for a Section 811 fund
reservation within the last three funding
cycles). If you qualify for this exception,
you are not required to submit the
information described in Exhibit 2(a),
(b), and (c), which are the articles of
incorporation (or other organizational
documents), by-laws, and the IRS tax
exemption, respectively. If there has
been a change in any of these
documents since your previous HUD
approval, you must submit the updated
information in your application. The
local HUD office will verify your
previous HUD approval by checking the
project number and approval status with
the appropriate local HUD office based
on information submitted.
In addition to this relief of paperwork
burden in preparing applications, you
are able to use information and exhibits
previously prepared for prior
applications under Section 811, Section
202, or other funding programs.
Examples of exhibits that may be readily
adapted or amended to decrease the
burden of application preparation
include, among others, those on
previous participation in the Section
202 or Section 811 programs, your
experience in the provision of housing
and services, supportive services plans,
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
community ties, and experience serving
minorities.
For programmatic information, you
MUST contact the appropriate local
HUD office about the submission of
applications within the jurisdiction of
that office. A listing of the local HUD
offices is available on HUD’s Web site
at https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/
grants/fundsavail.cfm.
Please submit your application using
the following format provided in this
NOFA. For applications to be submitted
electronically in which you have
created files to be attached to the
electronic application, you should
number the pages of the attached file
and include a header that identifies the
exhibit that it relates to. Please be sure
to follow the file labeling and file format
instructions in the General Section.
For applicants that received a waiver
of the electronic application submission
requirement, you must number the
pages of each file, narratives and other
attached files. Include the name of your
organization and your DUNS number,
and the exhibit number that you are
responding to on the header of each
document.
1. Table of Contents
a. Part I—Application Form
(1) Exhibit 1: Form HUD–92016-CA
Application for Capital Advance Summary
Information.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
b. Part II—Ability to Develop/Operate Project
(1) Exhibit 2: Legal Status.
(a) Organizational Documents.
(b) By-Laws.
(c) IRS Tax Exemption Ruling.
(d) Number of board members.
(2) Exhibit 3: Purpose/Community Ties/
Experience.
(a) Purpose(s), current activities, etc.
(b) Community ties, description of area.
(c) Other Funding Sources.
(d) Letters of support.
(e) Housing/Services experience.
(f) Involvement of target population.
(g) Practical solutions.
(h) Project Development Timeline.
(i) How project will remain viable:
(i) If services are depleted;
(ii) If State-funded services change; and
(iii) If need for project changes.
(j) Coordination with other organizations.
(k) Consultation with Continuum of Care
organizations.
(l) Form HUD–27300, America’s Affordable
Communities Initiative/Removal of
Regulatory Barriers (HUD Communities
Initiative Form on Grants.gov), with
supporting documentation.
(m) Section 3 requirements.
c. Part III—Need for Housing, Site
Requirements, Proposed Services
(1) Exhibit 4: Project Information.
(a) Evidence of need for project.
(b) Benefit to population/community.
(c) Narrative project description:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(i) Building design;
(ii) Energy efficiency features; and
(iii) Mixed-financing for additional units.
(d) Site control and zoning;
(i) Site control documents;
(ii) Freedom of site from restrictions;
(iii) Zoning requirements;
(iv) URA site notification requirements;
(v) Topographical/demographical
description of site/area and opportunities for
minorities;
(vi) Racial composition/map of site;
(vii) Phase I ESA;
(viii) Asbestos Statement/Survey;
(ix) SHPO/THPO requirements;
(x) Willingness to seek alternate site; and
(xi) Exception to project size limit:
(A) Preference/acceptance of people with
disabilities to live in proposed housing;
(B) Increase number of people;
(C) Compatibility of project;
(D) Increased number will not prohibit
integration in community;
(E) Project marketability;
(F) Consistency of project size with State/
local policies; and
(G) Willingness to accept project size limit.
(e) Site identification:
(i) Site location;
(ii) Steps to identify site/activities to obtain
site control;
(iii) Whether site is properly zoned;
(iv) Status of sale of site; and
(v) Whether site involves relocation.
(2) Exhibit 5: Supportive Services Plan.
(a) Description of occupancy.
(b) Request to limit occupancy:
(i) Population to which occupancy will be
limited;
(ii) Why necessary to limit occupancy:
(A) Achievement of Section 811 goals;
(B) Why unable to meet housing/services
needs in an integrated setting;
(iii) Housing/Services experience;
(iv) Assurance of integrating occupants in
neighborhood/community.
(c) Services needs of proposed population.
(d) Community services providers with
letters of intent.
(e) Service providers’ capabilities/
experience.
(f) State/local agency involvement in
project.
(g) Your commitment to make services
available or coordinate their availability.
(h) Employment opportunities for
residents.
(i) Whether a manager’s unit will be
included.
(j) Statement that occupancy will not be
conditioned on resident’s acceptance of
supportive services.
d. Part IV—Requirements/Certifications/
Resolutions
(1) Exhibit 6: Other Applications.
(a) FY07 Sections 202/811 applications to
other Offices.
(b) Information on FY06 and prior years’
Sections 202/811 applications.
(2) Exhibit 7: Required information on:
(a) All property occupants;
(b) Relocation costs/services;
(c) Staff to carry out relocation;
(d) Occupant move-outs within past 12
months.
PO 00000
Frm 00295
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11727
(3) Exhibit 8: Forms/Certifications/
Resolutions.
(a) SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance.
(b) SF–424 Supplement, ‘‘Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants’’ (Faith Based EEO Survey (SF–
424 SUPP) on Grants.gov).
(c) SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities.
(d) HUD–2880, ‘‘Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report’’ (HUD Applicant/
Recipient Disclosure Report on Grants.gov).
(e) HUD–2991, Certification of Consistency
with the Consolidated Plan.
(f) HUD–92041, Sponsor’s Conflict of
Interest Resolution.
(g) HUD–92042, Sponsor’s Resolution for
Commit to Project.
(h) HUD–2990, Certification of Consistency
with the RC/EZ/EC-II Strategic Plan (if
applicable).
(i) HUD–92043, Certification for Provision
of Supportive Services.
(j) HUD–96010, Program Outcome Logic
Model.
(k) HUD–96011, ‘‘Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal’’
(Facsimile Transmittal Form on Grants.gov).
This is to be used as the cover page for faxing
third party information for electronic
applications only. See the General Section.
(l) HUD–2994–A, You are Our Client!
Grant Applicant Survey.
2. Programmatic Applications
Requirements
a. Part I—Application Form for Section
811 Supportive Housing—Capital
Advance
Exhibit 1—Form HUD–92016–CA,
Supportive Housing for Persons with
Disabilities Section 811 Application for
Capital Advance Summary Information.
A copy of this form is available in the
instructions download at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/apply_for_
grants.jsp.
b. Part II—Your Ability To Develop and
Operate the Proposed Project
(1) Exhibit 2—Evidence of your legal
status (i.e., evidence of your status as a
nonprofit organization with 501(c)(3)
IRS tax exemption). If another
organization(s) is co-sponsoring the
application with you, each Co-Sponsor
must also submit the following:
(a) Articles of incorporation,
constitution, or other organizational
documents
(b) By-laws
(c) IRS tax exemption ruling (this
must be submitted by all Sponsors,
including churches)
Note: Based on a HUD review of your
articles of incorporation, constitution, or
other organizational documents, HUD must
determine, among other things, that (1) you
are an eligible nonprofit entity with a
501(c)(3) IRS tax exemption status, (2) your
corporate purposes are sufficiently broad to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11728
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
provide you the legal authority to sponsor the
proposed project for the disabled, to assist
the Owner, and to apply for a capital
advance, (3) no part of the Sponsor’s net
earnings inures to the benefit of any private
party, and (4) that you are not controlled by
or under the direction of persons seeking to
derive profit or gain therefrom. [Exception: If
you received a Section 811 fund reservation
within the last three funding cycles, you are
not required to submit the documents
described in (a), (b), and (c) above. Instead,
submit the project number of the latest
application and the local HUD office to
which it was submitted. If there have been
any modifications or additions to the subject
documents, indicate such, and submit the
new material.]
racial/ethnic composition of the
populations served, if available, and
information and testimonials from
residents or community leaders on the
quality of the activities. Examples of
activities that could be described
include housing counseling, nutrition
and food services, special housing
referral, screening and information
projects.
(f) A description of your efforts to
involve members of the target
population (persons with disabilities
including minority persons with
disabilities and persons with disabilities
similar to those of the prospective
residents) in the development of the
(d) The number of people on your
application as well as your intent to
board and the number of board members
involve the target population in the
who have disabilities.
development and operation of the
(2) Exhibit 3—Your purpose, community project.
ties, and experience
(g) A description of the practical
solutions you will implement which
(a) A description of your purpose(s),
current activities, including your ability will enable residents of your project to
achieve independent living and
to enlist volunteers and raise private
and local funds, and how long you have economic empowerment. In addition,
describe the educational opportunities
been in existence.
you will provide for the residents and
(b) A description of your ties to the
how you will provide them. This
community in which your project will
description should include the activities
be located and to the minority and
you will undertake to improve computer
disability communities in particular,
access, literacy and employment
including a description of the specific
opportunities (e.g., provide programs
geographic area(s) in which you have
that can teach residents how to use
served.
computers to become educated as well
(c) A description of other funding
as achieve economic self-sufficiency
sources for the project (including
through job training and placement).
financial assistance, donation of land,
And, finally, describe how your
provision of services, etc.).
proposed project will be an improved
(d) Letters of support for your
living environment for the residents
organization and for the proposed
project from organizations familiar with when compared to their previous place
of residence.
the housing and supportive services
(h) Describe your plan for completing
needs of the target population (e.g., the
the proposed project. Include a project
local center for independent living, the
development timeline which lists the
Statewide Independent Living Council)
that you expect to serve in the proposed major development stages for the project
with associated dates that must be met
project.
(e) A description of your housing and/ in order to get the project to initial
closing and start of construction within
or supportive services experience. The
the 18-month fund reservation period as
description should include any rental
well as the full completion of the
housing projects (including any
project, including final closing.
integrated housing developments) and/
or supportive services facilities that you Completion of Exhibit 8(j), Logic Model,
will assist you in completing your
sponsored, own and/or operate, your
response to this Exhibit.
past or current involvement in any
(i) Describe how you will ensure that
programs other than housing that
your proposed project will remain
demonstrates your management
viable as housing with the availability of
capabilities (including financial
supportive services for the target
management) and experience, your
population for the 40-year capital
experience in serving the target
advance period. This description should
population (persons with disabilities
address the measures you would take
and minorities); and the reasons for
should any of the following occur:
receiving any increases in fund
(i) funding for any of the needed
reservations for developing and/or
supportive services becomes depleted;
operating previously funded Section
(ii) if, for any state-funded services for
202 or Section 811 projects. The
your project, the state changes its policy
description should include data on the
regarding the provision of supportive
facilities and services provided, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00296
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
services to projects such as the one you
propose; or
(iii) if the need for housing for the
population you will be serving wanes
over time, causing vacancies in your
project.
(j) A description of the steps you took
to coordinate your application with
other organizations (e.g., the local center
for independent living) that will not be
directly involved in your project but
with which you share common goals
and objectives, to complement and/or
support the proposed project so that the
project will provide a comprehensive
and holistic solution to the needs of
persons with disabilities.
(k) A description of your efforts to
consult with Continuum of Care
organizations in the community where
the project will be located about the
ways you can assist persons with
disabilities who are chronically
homeless as defined in the General
Section.
(l) A description of the successful
efforts the jurisdiction in which your
project will be located has taken in
removing regulatory barriers to
affordable housing. To obtain up to 2
points for this policy priority, you must
complete the optional Form HUD–
27300, ‘‘Questionnaire for HUD’s
Initiative on Removal of Regulatory
Barriers’’ AND provide the necessary
URL references or submit the
documentary evidence. This exhibit is
optional, but to obtain up to 2 points for
this policy priority, you must submit
this information using Form HUD–
27300 and contact information. When
providing documents in support of your
responses to the questions on the form,
please provide the applicant name and
project name and whether you were
responding under column A or B, then
identify the number of the question and
the URL or document name and attach
using the attachment function at the end
of the electronic form. This exhibit will
be used to rate your application under
Rating Factor 3(j).
(m) A description on how you plan to
incorporate the Section 3 requirements
into your proposed project with goals
for expanding training and employment
opportunities for low and very lowincome (Section 3) persons as well as
business concerns in the area in which
the proposed project will be located.
This exhibit is optional, but to obtain up
to 2 points for this policy priority, you
must submit this exhibit and adequately
address your plans to provide
opportunities to train and employ low
and very low-income residents of the
project area and award substantial
contracts to persons residing in the
project area.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
c. Part III—The Need for Supportive
Housing for the Target Population, Site
Control and/or Identification of Site
and Suitability of Site, Adequacy of
The Provision of Supportive Services
and of The Proposed Project
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
(1) EXHIBIT 4—Need and Project
Information
(a) Evidence of need for supportive
housing. Include a description of the
proposed population and evidence
demonstrating sustained effective
demand for supportive housing for the
proposed population in the market area
to be served, taking into consideration
the occupancy and vacancy conditions
in existing comparable subsidized
housing for persons with disabilities,
state or local needs assessments of
persons with disabilities in the area, the
types of supportive services
arrangements currently available in the
area, and the use of such services as
evidenced by data from local social
service agencies. Also, a description of
how information in the community’s or
(where applicable) the State’s
Consolidated Plan, Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
(AI) or other planning document that
analyzes fair housing issues was used in
documenting the need for the project.
(b) A description of how the proposed
project will benefit the target population
and the community in which it will be
located.
(c) Description of the project.
(i) Narrative description of the
building(s) including the number and
type of structure(s), number of units
with bedroom distribution if
independent living units including
dwelling units in multifamily housing
developments, condominiums and
cooperatives, number of bedrooms if
group home, number of residents with
disabilities, and any resident manager
per structure; identification of all
commercial and community spaces,
amenities or features planned for the
housing and a description of how the
spaces, amenities, or features will be
used, and the extent to which they are
necessary to accommodate the needs of
the proposed residents. A narrative
description of the building design (both
interior and exterior), including any
special design features, as well as any
features that incorporate visitability
standards and universal design. Also
include a description of how the design
of the proposed project will facilitate
the integration of the residents into the
surrounding community and promote
the ability of the residents to live as
independently as possible.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Note: If the community spaces, amenities,
or features do not comply with the project
design and cost standards of 24 CFR 891.120
(a) and (c), the special project standards of 24
CFR 891.310 (a), and the limitations on
bedroom sizes as required by paragraph 1–
11.E.2.a of HUD Handbook 4571.2 REV–1,
you must demonstrate your ability and
willingness to contribute both the
incremental development cost and
continuing operating cost associated with the
community spaces, amenities, or features.
(ii) Describe whether and how the
project will promote energy efficiency
(in accordance with the requirements
set forth in Section III.C.3.l. of this
NOFA), including any plans to
incorporate energy efficiency features in
the operation of the project through the
use of Energy Star labeled products and
appliances and, if applicable, innovative
construction or rehabilitation methods
or technologies to be used that will
promote efficient construction.
(iii) For site control applications, if
you are proposing to develop a mixedfinance project by developing additional
units (i.e., in addition to the 811 units),
a description of any plans and actions
you have taken to create such a mixedfinance project with the use of Section
811 capital advance funds, in
combination with other funding
sources. Provide the number of nonSection 811 units to be included in the
mixed-finance project (also provide the
number of additional units in the
appropriate space on Form HUD–
92016–CA). Also, provide copies of any
letters you have sent seeking outside
funding for the non-Section 811 units
and any responses thereto. You must
also demonstrate your ability to proceed
with the development of a Section 811
project that will not involve mixedfinancing, as proposed in your
application, in the event you are later
unable to obtain the necessary outside
funding or HUD disapproves your
proposal for a mixed-finance project for
additional non-Section 811 units for
persons with disabilities.
Notes: (1) A proposal to develop a mixedfinance project for additional units must
occur at the application for fund reservation
stage. You cannot decide after selection that
you want to do a mixed-finance project for
additional units. (2) Section 811 capital
advance amendment money will not be
approved for projects proposing mixedfinancing. (3) If approved for a reservation of
capital advance funds, you will be required
to submit with your Firm Commitment
Application, the additional documents
required by HUD for mixed-finance
proposals. (4) A mixed-finance project does
not include the development of a mixed-use
project in which the Section 811 units are
mortgaged separately from the other uses of
the structure. (5) For a Section 811 mixedfinance project, the additional units cannot
PO 00000
Frm 00297
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11729
cause the project to exceed the project size
limit for the type of project proposed, unless
you request and receive HUD approval to
exceed the project size limit if the project
will be an independent living project (See
IV.B.2.c.(1)(d)(xi)) or the additional units will
house people who do not have a disability.
(d) Evidence of site control and
permissive zoning.
Note: If you are applying for Section 811
funding without control of any or all of your
proposed sites, you must provide the
information under (e), Identification of a Site,
below for any site you are submitting without
evidence of control of that site.
(i) Acceptable evidence of site control
is limited to any one of the following:
(A) Deed or long-term leasehold
which evidences that you have title to
or a leasehold interest in the site. If a
leasehold, the term of the lease must be
50 years with renewable provisions for
25 years except for sites on Indian trust
land, in which case, the term of the
lease must be at least 50 years with no
requirements for extensions;
(B) Contract of sale for the site that is
free of any limitations affecting the
ability of the seller to deliver ownership
to you after you receive and accept a
notice of Section 811 capital advance.
(The only condition for closing on the
sale can be your receipt and acceptance
of the capital advance.) The contract of
sale cannot require closing earlier than
the Section 811 closing;
(C) Option to purchase or for a longterm leasehold, which must remain in
effect for six months from the date on
which the applications are due, must
state a firm price binding on the seller,
and be renewable at the end of the sixmonth period. The only condition on
which the option may be terminated is
if you are not awarded a fund
reservation;
(D) If the site is covered by a mortgage
under a HUD program, (e.g., a
previously funded Section 202 or
Section 811 project or an FHA-insured
mortgage) you must submit evidence of
site control as described above AND
evidence that consent to release the site
from the mortgage has been obtained or
has been requested from HUD (all
required information in order for a
decision on the request for a partial
release of security must have been
submitted to the local HUD office) and
from the mortgagee, if other than HUD.
Approval to release the site from the
mortgage must be done before the local
HUD office makes its selection
recommendations to HUD Headquarters.
Refer to Chapter 16 of HUD Handbook
4350.1 Rev–1, Multifamily Asset
Management and Project Servicing, for
instructions on submitting requests to
the local HUD Office for partial release
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11730
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
of security from a mortgage under a
HUD program; or
(E) For sites to be acquired from a
public body, evidence is needed that the
public body possesses clear title to the
site and has entered into a legally
binding agreement to lease or convey
the site to you after you receive and
accept a notice of Section 811 capital
advance. Where HUD determines that
time constraints of the funding round
will not permit you to obtain all of the
required official actions (e.g., approval
of Community of Planning Boards) that
are necessary to convey publicly-owned
sites, you may include in your
application a letter from the mayor or
director of the appropriate local agency
indicating that conveyance or leasing of
the site is acceptable without imposition
of additional covenants or restrictions,
and only contingent on the necessary
approval action. Such a letter of
commitment will be considered
sufficient evidence of site control.
(ii) Whether you have title to the site,
a contract of sale, an option to purchase,
or are acquiring a site from a public
body, you must provide evidence (a
current title policy or other acceptable
evidence) that the site is free of any
limitations, restrictions, or reverters
which could adversely affect the use of
the site for the proposed project for the
40-year capital advance period under
HUD’s regulations and requirements
(e.g., reversion to seller if title is
transferred). If the title evidence
contains restrictions or covenants,
copies of the restrictions or covenants
must be submitted with the application.
If the site is subject to any such
limitations, restrictions, or reverters, the
site will be rejected and the application
will be considered a ‘‘site identified’’
application. Purchase money mortgages
that will be satisfied from capital
advance funds are not considered to be
limitations or restrictions that would
adversely affect the use of the site. If the
contract of sale or option agreement
contains provisions that allow a
Sponsor not to purchase the property for
reasons such as environmental
problems, failure of the site to pass
inspection, or the appraisal is less than
the purchase price, then such provisions
are not objectionable and a Sponsor is
allowed to terminate the contract of sale
or the option agreement.
Note: A proposed project site may not be
acquired or optioned from a general
contractor (or its affiliate) that will construct
the Section 811 project or from any other
development team member.
(iii) Evidence that the project, as
proposed, is permissible under
applicable zoning ordinances or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
regulations, or a statement of the
proposed action required to make the
proposed project permissible AND the
basis for the belief that the proposed
action will be completed successfully
before the submission of the firm
commitment application (e.g., a
summary of the results of any requests
for rezoning and/or the procedures for
obtaining special or conditional use
permits on land in similar zoning
classifications and the time required for
such rezoning, or preliminary
indications of acceptability from zoning
bodies, etc.).
Note: You should be aware that under
certain circumstances the Fair Housing Act
requires localities to make reasonable
accommodations to their zoning ordinances
or regulations to offer persons with
disabilities an opportunity to live in an area
of their choice. If you are relying upon a
theory of reasonable accommodation to
satisfy the zoning requirement, then you
must clearly articulate the basis for your
reasonable accommodation theory.
(iv) Evidence of compliance with the
URA requirement that the seller has
been provided, in writing, with the
required information regarding a
voluntary, arm’s length purchase
transaction (i.e., (1) applicant does not
have the power of eminent domain and,
therefore, will not acquire the property
if negotiations fail to result in an
amicable agreement, and (2) of the
estimate of the fair market value of the
property).
Note: A certification for this requirement is
not sufficient. Evidence must be submitted to
meet this requirement. This information
should have been provided before making the
purchase offer. However, in those cases
where there is an existing option or contract,
the seller must be provided the opportunity
to withdraw from the agreement or
transaction, without penalty, after this
information is provided.
(v) Narrative describing topographical
and demographic aspects of the site, the
suitability of the site and area (as well
as a description of the characteristics of
the neighborhood), how use of the site
will promote greater housing
opportunities for minority persons with
disabilities, and how use of the site will
affirmatively further fair housing.
Note: You can best demonstrate your
commitment to affirmatively furthering fair
housing by describing how your proposed
activities will assist the jurisdiction in
overcoming impediments to fair housing
choice identified in the applicable
jurisdiction’s Analysis of Impediments (AI)
to Fair Housing Choice, which is a
component of the jurisdiction’s Consolidated
Plan or any other planning document that
addresses fair housing issues. The applicable
Consolidated Plan and AI may be the
community’s, the county’s, or the state’s, to
PO 00000
Frm 00298
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
which input should have been provided by
local community organizations, agencies in
the community and residents of the
community. Alternatively, a document that
addresses fair housing issues and remedies to
barriers to fair housing in the community that
was previously prepared by a local planning,
or similar organization, may be used.
Applicable impediments could include a lack
of units that are accessible to persons with
disabilities, a lack of transportation services
or other assistance that would serve persons
with disabilities, or the need for improved
quality and services for all persons with
disabilities.
(vi) A map showing the location of the
site, the racial composition of the
neighborhood, and any areas of racial
concentration.
Note: For this competition, when
determining the racial and ethnic
composition of the neighborhood
surrounding the proposed site, use data from
the 2000 Census of Population. Data from the
2000 Census may be found at
www.factfinder.census.gov/servlet/
BasicFactsServlet.
(vii) A Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA), in accordance with
the ASTM Standard E 1527–05, as
amended, using the table of contents
and report format specified at Appendix
X4 thereto and completed or updated as
specified at Section 4.6 thereto, must be
completed and submitted with the
application. In order for the Phase I ESA
to be acceptable, it must have been
completed or updated no earlier than
180 days prior to the application
deadline date. Therefore, it is important
to start the site assessment process as
soon after the publication of the NOFA
as possible.
Note: A Phase I ESA that is not properly
updated, does not use the format specified at
Appendix X4 of ASTM Standard E 1527–05,
or that is prepared in accordance with an
older version of ASTM E 1527 will result in
a technical rejection of your application.
If the Phase I ESA indicates possible
presence of contamination and/or
hazards, you must decide whether to
continue with this site or choose
another site. Should you choose another
site, the same Phase I ESA process
identified above must be followed for
the new site. If you choose to continue
with the original site on which the
Phase I ESA indicated contamination or
hazards, you must undertake a detailed
Phase II ESA by an appropriate
professional. If the Phase II Assessment
reveals site contamination, you must
submit the extent of the contamination
and a plan for clean-up of the site
including a contract for remediation of
the problem(s) and an approval letter
from the applicable federal, state and/or
local agency with jurisdiction over the
site to the local HUD office. The Phase
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
II ESA and any necessary plans for
clean-up do not have to be submitted
with the application but must be
received in the local HUD office by June
25, 2007. If it is not received by that
date, the site will be rejected and the
application will be placed in Category B
for selection purposes.
Note: You must pay for the cost of any
clean-up or remediation which can be very
expensive. [See Note at Section
III.C.2.b.(3)(d)(iii)]
(viii) If you submit an application
with evidence of site control, you must
submit one of the following:
(A) If there are no pre-1978 structures
on the site or if there are pre-1978
structures that most recently consisted
of solely four or fewer units of singlefamily housing including appurtenant
structures thereto, a statement to this
effect, or
(B) If there are pre-1978 structures on
the site other than for a site that most
recently consisted of solely four or
fewer units of single-family housing
including appurtenant structures
thereto, a comprehensive building
asbestos survey that is based on a
thorough inspection to identify the
location and condition of asbestos
throughout any structures.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Note: In those cases where suspect asbestos
is found, it would either be assumed to be
asbestos or would require confirmatory
testing. If the asbestos report indicates the
presence of asbestos, or the presence of
asbestos is assumed, and if the application is
approved, HUD will condition the approval
on an appropriate mix of asbestos abatement
and an asbestos Operations and Maintenance
Plan.
(ix) Letter to State/Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO/THPO) and
a statement that SHPO/THPO failed to
respond to you OR a copy of the
response letter received from SHPO/
THPO.
(x) A statement that you are willing to
seek a different site if the preferred site
is not approvable and that site control
will be obtained within six months of
notification of fund reservation.
(xi) If an exception to the project size
limits is being requested, describe why
the site was selected and demonstrate
the following: (Only for applications for
independent living projects and
condominium units [not group homes]
with site control)
(A) People with disabilities have
indicated their acceptance or preference
to live in housing with as many units/
people as proposed for the project.
(B) The increased number of units/
people is warranted by the market
conditions in the area in which the
project will be located.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(C) Your project is compatible with
other residential development and the
population density of the area in which
the project is to be located.
(D) The increased number of people
will not prohibit their successful
integration into the community.
(E) The project is marketable in the
community.
(F) The size of the project is
consistent with state and/or local
policies governing similar housing for
the proposed population.
(G) A statement that you are willing
to have your application processed at
the project size limit should HUD not
approve the exception.
(e) Identification of a Site. If you have
identified a site, but do not have it
under control, you must submit the
following information:
Note: If an application is submitted
without evidence of site control and does not
provide a specific street address for the
identified site(s) (e.g., only an indication that
the project will be developed in a particular
part of town but a site(s) has not been
chosen) the application will be rejected.
(i) A description of the location of the
site, including its street address or block
and lot number(s), its unit number (if
condominium), neighborhood/
community characteristics (to include
racial and ethnic data), amenities,
adjacent housing and/or facilities, how
the site will promote greater housing
opportunities for minority persons with
disabilities and affirmatively further fair
housing. You can best demonstrate your
commitment to affirmatively furthering
fair housing by describing how your
proposed activities will assist the
jurisdiction in overcoming impediments
to fair housing choice identified in the
community’s AI or any other planning
document that addresses fair housing
issues. Examples of the applicable
impediments include the need for
improved housing quality and services
for minority persons with disabilities
and the need for quality services for
persons with disabilities within the type
and quality of similar services and
housing in minority areas.
(ii) A description of the activities
undertaken to identify the site, as well
as what actions must be taken to obtain
control of the site, if approved for
funding.
(iii) An indication as to whether the
site is properly zoned. If it is not, an
indication of the actions necessary for
proper zoning and whether these can be
accomplished within six months of fund
reservation award, if approved for
funding.
(iv) A status of the sale of the site.
(v) An indication as to whether the
site would involve relocation.
PO 00000
Frm 00299
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11731
(2) EXHIBIT 5—Supportive Services
Plan
Note: Your supportive services plan and
the Supportive Services Certification (Exhibit
8(i)) must be sent to the appropriate state or
local agency (identified by the local HUD
office) far enough in advance of the
application deadline date so that the agency
can review the plan, complete the
certification and return both to you for
inclusion in your application to HUD.
(a) A detailed description of whether
the housing is expected to serve persons
with physical disabilities,
developmental disabilities, or chronic
mental illness or any combination of the
three. Include how and from whom/
where persons will be referred and
admitted for occupancy in the project.
You may, with the approval of the
Secretary, restrict occupancy within
housing developed under this NOFA to
a subcategory of one of the three main
categories of disability noted above (e.g.,
AIDS is a subcategory of physical
disability). However, the Owner must
permit occupancy by any qualified
person with a disability that qualifies
under the applicable main category of
disability.
(b) If requesting approval to restrict
occupancy, also submit the following:
(i) A description of the population of
persons with disabilities to which
occupancy will be limited.
(ii) An explanation of why it is
necessary to restrict occupancy of the
proposed project(s) to the population
described in (i) above, including the
following:
(A) An explanation of how restricting
occupancy to a subcategory of persons
with disabilities promotes the goals of
the Section 811 program.
(B) An explanation of why the
housing and/or service needs of this
population cannot be met in a more
integrated setting.
(iii) A description of your experience
in providing housing and/or supportive
services to proposed occupants.
(iv) A description of how you will
ensure that occupants of the proposed
project will be integrated into the
neighborhood and community.
(c) A detailed description of the
supportive service needs of the persons
with disabilities that the housing is
expected to serve.
(d) A list of community service
providers, (including consumercontrolled providers), including letters
of intent to provide services to proposed
residents from as many potential
providers as possible.
(e) The evidence of each service
provider’s capability and experience in
providing such supportive services
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11732
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(even if you will be the service
provider).
(f) Identification of the extent of state
and/or local agency involvement in the
project (i.e., funding for the provision of
supportive services, referral of residents,
or licensing the project). If there will be
any state or local agency involvement, a
description of the state/local agency’s
philosophy/policy concerning housing
for the population to be served and a
demonstration that your application is
consistent with state and/or local
agency plans and policies governing the
development and operation of housing
for persons with disabilities.
(g) If you will be making any
supportive services available to the
residents or will be coordinating the
availability of any supportive services, a
letter providing:
(i) A description of the supportive
services that you will make available to
the residents or, if you will be
coordinating the availability of any
supportive services, a description of the
supportive service(s) and how the
coordination will be implemented;
(ii) An assurance that any supportive
services that you will make available to
the residents will be based on their
individual needs; and
(iii) A commitment to make the
supportive services available or
coordinate their availability for the life
of the project.
(h) A description of how the residents
will be afforded opportunities for
employment.
(i) An indication as to whether the
project will include a unit for a resident
manager.
(j) A statement that you will not
condition admission or occupancy on
the resident’s acceptance of any
supportive services.
d. Part IV–General Application
Requirements, Certifications and
Resolutions
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
(1) EXHIBIT 6: Other Applications
(a) A list of the applications, if any,
you are submitting to any other local
HUD office in response to the FY 2007
Section 202 or Section 811 NOFA.
Indicate by local HUD office, the
proposed location by city and state and
the number of units requested for each
application.
(b) Include a list of all FY2006 and
prior years Section 202 and Section 811
capital advance projects to which you
are a party. Identify each by project
number and local HUD office and
include the following information:
(i) Whether the project has initially
closed and, if so, when;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(ii) If the project was older than 24
months when it initially closed (specify
how old) or if older than 24 months now
(specify how old) and has not initially
closed, provide the reasons for the delay
in closing;
(iii) Whether amendment money was
or will be needed for any project in (ii)
above; including the amount of the
amendment money and,
(iv) Those projects which have not
been finally closed.
(2) EXHIBIT 7: A statement that:
(applicable to applications with site
control only)
Note: For site identified projects, exhibit 7
must be submitted once site control is
obtained.
(a) Identifies all persons (families,
individuals, businesses and nonprofit
organizations) by race/minority group,
and status as owners or tenants
occupying the property on the date of
submission of the application for a
capital advance.
(b) Indicates the estimated cost of
relocation payments and other services.
(c) Identifies the staff organization
that will carry out the relocation
activities.
(d) Identifies all persons who were
required to move from the site within
the past 12 months.
Note: If any of the relocation costs will be
funded from sources other than the section
811 capital advance, you must provide
evidence of a firm commitment of these
funds. When evaluating applications, hud
will consider the total cost of proposals (i.e.,
cost of site acquisition, relocation,
construction and other project costs).
(3) EXHIBIT 8: Certifications and
Resolutions
You are required to submit completed
copies of the following forms which are
included either in the General Section
or with this NOFA and copies of the
forms are available in the instructions
download at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
(a) Standard Form 424—Application
for Federal Assistance, including a
DUNS number, an indication of whether
you are delinquent on any federal debt,
and compliance with Executive Order
12372 (a certification that you have
submitted a copy of your application, if
required, to the State agency (Single
Point of Contact) for state review in
accordance with Executive Order
12372). If required by the State’s Single
Point of Contact (SPOC), a copy of your
application needs to be submitted to the
SPOC before the application deadline
date, but in no event later than the
application deadline date. Refer to the
PO 00000
Frm 00300
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
General Section and Section IV.D. of
this program NOFA to find out if your
State has a SPOC and additional
information on compliance with
Executive Order 12372.
Note: For Section 811 program purposes,
item 12, Areas Affected by Project, of SF–
424, provide the names of the City, County
and State where the project will be located
(not the largest political entities as indicated
on the instructions page of SF–424).
(b) Standard Form 424 Supplement,
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity
for Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO
Survey (SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov).
Although the information on this form
will not be considered in making
funding decisions, it will assist the
federal government in ensuring that all
qualified applicants have an equal
opportunity to compete for federal
funding.
(c) Standard Form LLL—Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities (if applicable). A
disclosure of activities conducted to
influence any federal transactions.
(d) Form HUD–2880, Applicant/
Recipient Disclosure/Update Report
(‘‘HUD Applicant Recipient Disclosure
Report’’ on Grants.gov), including Social
Security and Employee Identification
Numbers. A disclosure of assistance
from other government sources received
in connection with the project.
(e) Form HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan
(Plan), for the jurisdiction in which the
proposed project will be located. The
certification must be made by the unit
of general local government if it is
required to have, or has, a complete
Plan. Otherwise, the certification may
be made by the state, or by the unit of
general local government if the project
will be located within the jurisdiction of
the unit of general local government
authorized to use an abbreviated
strategy, and if it is willing to prepare
such a Plan. All certifications must be
made by a public official responsible for
submitting the Plan to HUD. The
certifications must be submitted as part
of the application by the application
submission deadline date set forth in
this NOFA. The Plan regulations are
published in 24 CFR part 91.
(f) Form HUD–92041, Sponsor’s
Conflict of Interest Resolution. A
certified Board Resolution that no
officer or director of the Sponsor or
Owner has or will have any financial
interest in any contract with the Owner
or in any firm or corporation that has or
will have a contract with the Owner,
including a current listing of all duly
qualified and sitting officers and
directors by title and the beginning and
ending dates of each person’s term.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(g) Form HUD–92042, Sponsor’s
Resolution for Commitment to Project.
A certified Board Resolution
acknowledging responsibilities of
sponsorship, long-term support of the
project(s), your willingness to assist the
Owner to develop, own, manage and
provide appropriate services in
connection with the proposed project,
and that it reflects the will of your
membership. Also, it shall indicate your
willingness to fund the estimated startup expenses, the Minimum Capital
Investment (one-half of one-percent of
the HUD-approved capital advance, not
to exceed $10,000), and the estimated
cost of any amenities or features (and
operating costs related thereto) that
would not be covered by the approved
capital advance.
(h) Form HUD–2990, Certification of
Consistency with the RC/EZ/EC
Strategic Plan. A certification that the
project is consistent with the RC/EZ/
EC–IIs strategic plan, is located within
the RC/EZ/EC–II, and serves RC/EZ/EC–
II residents. (This certification is not
required if the project site(s) will not be
located in an RC/EZ/EC–II.) A copy of
the RC/EZ/EC–II Certification form is
contained in the online application; and
(i) Form HUD–92043, Certification for
Provision of Supportive Services. A
certification from the appropriate state
or local agency (identified in the
application or obtained from the local
HUD office), indicating whether the:
(i) Provision of supportive services is
well designed to serve the needs of
persons with disabilities the housing is
expected to serve;
(ii) The provision of supportive
services will enhance independent
living success and promote the dignity
of those who will access your proposed
project;
(iii) Supportive services will be
available on a consistent, long-term
basis; and
(iv) Proposed housing is consistent
with state or local plans and policies
addressing the housing needs of people
with disabilities if the state or local
agency will provide funding for the
provision of supportive services, refer
residents to the project or license the
project. (The name, address, and
telephone number of the appropriate
agency can also be obtained from the
appropriate local HUD Office.)
(j) Form HUD–96010, Program
Outcome Logic Model. In addition to
the Project Development Timeline to be
submitted in Exhibit 3(h) above, the
information provided in the Logic
Model will be used in rating your
application for Rating Factor 5,
Achieving Results and Program
Evaluation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(k) Form HUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov) to be used for faxing third
party letters and other documents for
your electronic applications in
accordance with the instructions in the
General Section.
Note: HUD will not accept entire
applications by fax. If you submit the
application entirely by fax, it will be
disqualified.
(l) Form HUD–2994–A, You Are Our
Client Grant Applicant Survey. This is
an optional form that may be used to
provide suggestions and comments to
the Department regarding your
application submission experience.
C. Submission Dates and Time. Your
application must be received and
validated electronically by Grants.gov
no later than 11:59:59 PM eastern time
on the application deadline date, unless
a waiver of the electronic delivery
process has been approved by HUD in
accordance with the following
procedures. Applicants that are unable
to submit their application
electronically must seek a waiver of the
electronic grant submission
requirement. Waiver requests must be
submitted by mail or by fax. For this
program NOFA, e-mail requests will not
be considered. Waiver requests
submitted by mail or fax should be
submitted on the applicant’s letterhead
and signed by an official with the legal
authority to request a waiver from the
Department. The request must be
addressed to the Assistant Secretary for
Housing at the following address: Brian
D. Montgomery, Assistant Secretary for
Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 9100, Washington,
DC 20410–8000. Waiver requests
submitted by fax must be sent to (202)
708–3104. Applicants that are granted a
waiver of the electronic submission
requirement will not be afforded
additional time to submit their
applications. Therefore, submit your
waiver requests to the above address no
later than 15 days before the application
deadline date. If a waiver is granted, you
must submit the required number of
copies and the application must be
received by the application deadline
date. Your approval of the waiver
request will provide instructions on the
number of copies and where to submit
the application.
D. Intergovernmental Review
1. State Review. This funding
opportunity is subject to Executive
Order (EO) 12372, ‘‘Intergovernmental
PO 00000
Frm 00301
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11733
Review of Federal Programs.’’ You must
contact your State’s Single Point of
Contact (SPOC) to find out about and
comply with the state’s process under
EO 12372. The names and addresses of
the SPOCs are listed in the Office of
Management and Budget’s Web site at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
spoc.html. If required by the state, the
submission to the state needs to occur
before the Section 811 application
deadline date, but in no event later than
the application deadline date. It is
recommended that you provide the state
with sufficient time to review the
application. Therefore, it is important
that you consult with the SPOC for state
review time frames and take that into
account when submitting the
application. If the SPOC requires a
review of your application, you must
include a copy of the cover letter you
sent to the SPOC in Exhibit 8(a) of your
Section 811 application.
2. HUD/RHS Agreement. HUD and the
Rural Housing Service (RHS) have an
agreement to coordinate the
administration of the agencies’
respective rental assistance programs.
As a result, HUD is required to notify
RHS of applications for housing
assistance it receives. This notification
gives RHS the opportunity to comment
if it has concerns about the demand for
additional assisted housing and possible
harm to existing projects in the same
housing market area. HUD will consider
RHS comments in its review and
application selection process.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Ineligible Activities. Section 811
funds may not be used for any of the
following:
a. Supportive Services
b. Housing that you currently own or
lease that has been occupied by people
with disabilities for longer than one year
prior to the application deadline date;
c. Nursing homes, infirmaries and
medical facilities;
d. Transitional housing;
e. Mobile homes;
f. Intermediate care facilities;
g. Assisted living facilities;
h. Community centers, with or
without special components for use by
persons with disabilities;
i. Sheltered workshops and centers for
persons with disabilities;
j. Headquarters for organizations for
persons with disabilities; and
k. Refinancing of Sponsor-owned
facilities without rehabilitation.
Note: You may propose to rehabilitate an
existing currently-owned or leased structure
(if the structure already serves persons with
disabilities, it cannot have operated as
housing for persons with disabilities for
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11734
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
longer than one year prior to the application
deadline date); however, the refinancing of
any federally funded or assisted project or
project insured or guaranteed by a federal
agency is not permissible under this Section
811 NOFA. HUD does not consider it
appropriate to utilize scarce program
resources to refinance projects that have
already received some form of assistance
under a federal program or that have been
operating as housing for persons with
disabilities for longer than one year prior to
the application deadline date. (For example,
Section 202, Section 202/8 or Section 202/
PAC direct loan projects cannot be
refinanced with capital advances and project
rental assistance.)
2. Application Limits (Units/Projects).
A Sponsor or Co-Sponsor may not apply
for more than 70 units of housing or 4
projects (whichever is less) for persons
with disabilities in a single Hub or more
than 10 percent of the total units
allocated to all local HUD offices.
Affiliated entities (organizations that are
branches or offshoots of a parent
organization) that submit separate
applications are considered a single
entity for the purpose of these limits. In
addition, no single application may
propose more units in a given local
HUD office than allocated for the
Section 811 program in that local HUD
office. If the proposed project will be an
independent living project, your
application must request at least five
units for persons with disabilities, not
necessarily in one structure. If your
proposed project will be a group home,
you must request at least two units for
persons with disabilities per group
home. If your proposed project will be
a combination of an independent living
project and a group home, your
application must request at least the
minimum number of units for each
project type (i.e., 5 units for an
independent living project and 2 units
for a group home).
3. Development Cost Limits
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
a. The following development cost
limits, adjusted by locality as described
in Section IV.E.3.b. below must be used
to determine the capital advance
amount reserved for projects for persons
with disabilities.
Note: The capital advance funds awarded
for this project are to be considered the total
amount of funds that the Department will
provide for the development of this project.
Amendment funds will only be provided in
exceptional circumstances (e.g., to cover
increased costs for construction delays due to
litigation or unforeseen environmental issues
resulting in a change of sites) that are clearly
beyond your control. If amendment funds are
not approved, you are responsible for any
costs over and above the capital advance
amount provided by the Department as well
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
as any costs associated with any excess
amenities and design features.
(1) For independent living projects
and dwelling units in multifamily
housing developments, condominium
and cooperative housing: The capital
advance amount for the project
attributable to dwelling use (less the
incremental development cost and the
capitalized operating costs associated
with any excess amenities and design
features and other costs you must pay
for) may not exceed:
Non-elevator structures:
$45,507 per family unit without a
bedroom
$52,470 per family unit with one
bedroom
$63,279 per family unit with two
bedrooms
$80,998 per family unit with three
bedrooms
$90,235 per family unit with four
bedrooms
For elevator structures:
$47,890 per family unit without a
bedroom
$54,897 per family unit with one
bedroom
$66,755 per family unit with two
bedrooms
$86,358 per family unit with three
bedrooms
$94,795 per family unit with four
bedrooms
(2) For group homes only (the
development cost limits are capped by
type of occupancy and number of
person with disabilities):
TYPE OF DISABILITY
Residents
2
3
4
5
6
................
................
................
................
................
Physical/developmental
Chronic mental illness
$172,303
185,287
198,273
211,257
224,228
$166,325
178,860
189,995
201,130
212,265
(3) These cost limits reflect those
costs reasonable and necessary to
develop a project of modest design that
complies with HUD minimum property
standards; the minimum group home
requirements of 24 CFR 891.310(a) (if
applicable); the accessibility
requirements of 24 CFR 891.120(b) and
891.310(b); and the project design and
cost standards of 24 CFR 891.120.
b. Increased development cost limits.
(1) HUD may increase the
development cost limits set forth above,
by up to 140 percent in any geographic
area where the cost levels require, and
may increase the development cost
limits by up to 160 percent on a projectby-project basis. This increase may
PO 00000
Frm 00302
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
include covering additional costs to
make dwelling units accessible through
rehabilitation.
Note: In applying the applicable high cost
percentage, the local HUD office may use a
percentage that is higher or lower than that
which is assigned to the local HUD office if
it is needed to provide a capital advance
amount that is comparable to what it
typically costs to develop a Section 811
project in that area.
(2) If HUD finds that high
construction costs in Alaska, Guam, the
Virgin Islands or Hawaii make it
unfeasible to construct dwellings,
without the sacrifice of sound standards
of construction, design, and livability,
within the development cost limits
provided in Section IV.E.3.a.(1) and
IV.E.3.b.(1) above, the amount of capital
advances may be increased to
compensate for such costs. The increase
may not exceed the limits established
under this section (including any high
cost area adjustment) by more than 50
percent.
(3) For group homes only, local HUD
offices may approve increases in the
development cost limits in Section
IV.E.3.a.(2), above, in areas where you
can provide sufficient documentation
that high land costs limit or prohibit
project feasibility. An example of
acceptable documentation is evidence of
at least three land sales that have
actually taken place (listed prices for
land are not acceptable) within the last
two years in the area where your project
is to be built. The average cost of the
documented sales must exceed ten
percent of the development cost limit
for your project in order for an increase
to be considered.
4. Commercial Facilities. A
commercial facility for the benefit of the
residents may be located and operated
in the Section 811 project. However, the
commercial facility cannot be funded
with the use of Section 811 capital
advance or PRAC funds. The maximum
amount of space permitted for a
commercial facility cannot exceed 10
percent of the total project cost. An
exception to this 10 percent limitation
is if the project involves acquisition or
rehabilitation and the additional space
was incorporated in the existing
structure at the time the proposal was
submitted to HUD. Commercial facilities
are considered public accommodations
under Title III of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and thus
must comply with all the accessibility
requirements of the ADA.
5. Expiration of Section 811 Funds.
The Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5;
approved February 15, 2007), requires
HUD to obligate all Section 811 funds
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
appropriated for FY2007 by September
30, 2010. Under 31 U.S.C. 1551, no
funds can be disbursed from this
account after September 30, 2015.
Under Section 811, obligation of funds
occurs for both capital advances and
project rental assistance upon fund
reservation and acceptance. If all funds
are not disbursed by HUD and expended
by the project Owner by September 30,
2015, the funds, even though obligated,
will expire and no further
disbursements can be made from this
account. In submitting an application,
you need to carefully consider whether
your proposed project can be completed
through final capital advance closing no
later than September 30, 2015.
Furthermore, all unexpended balances,
including any remaining balance on
PRAC contracts, will be cancelled as of
October 1, 2015. Amounts needed to
maintain PRAC payments for any
remaining term on the affected contracts
beyond that date will have to be funded
from other current appropriations.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Address for Submitting
Applications. Applications must be
submitted electronically through the
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp Web site, unless
the applicant receives a waiver from the
electronic submission requirement. See
the General Section, Application
Submission and Receipt Procedures and
Section IV.C. of this NOFA for
additional information. Refer to HUD’s
Web site at https://www.hud.gov/offices/
adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm for a listing
of local HUD offices. All applications
submitted electronically via https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp will be
downloaded and forwarded to the
appropriate local HUD office.
2. For Section 811 applications that
have more than one applicant, i.e. CoSponsors. The applicants must
designate a single individual to act as
the authorized representative for all CoSponsors of the application. The
designated authorized representative of
the organization submitting the
application must be registered with
Grants.gov, the Federal Central
Contractor Registry and with the
credential provider for EAuthentication. Information on the
Grants.gov registration process is found
in Section IV.B. of the General Section.
When the application is submitted
through Grants.gov, the name of the
designated authorized representative
will be inserted into the signature line
of the application. Please note that the
designated authorized representative
must be able to make legally binding
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
commitments for each Co-Sponsor to
the application.
Each Co-Sponsor must complete the
documents required of all co-sponsoring
organizations to permit HUD to make a
determination on the eligibility of the
Co-Sponsor(s) has pledged to the
project. Therefore, each Co-Sponsor
must submit the following information
using the scanning and/or faxing
method described in Section IV. of the
General Section: Standard Form 424,
Application for Federal Assistance;
Standard Form 424 Supplement, Survey
for Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants; Standard Form LLL,
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (if
applicable); Form HUD–92016–CA,
Section 811 Application for Capital
Advance, Summary Information; Form
HUD–92041, Sponsor’s Conflict of
Interest Resolution; Form HUD–92042,
and Sponsor’s Resolution for
Commitment to Project. The forms
identified above are discussed in the
Program instructions package and can
be downloaded from https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The downloaded
and completed forms should be saved as
separate electronic files and attached to
the electronic application submission
following the requirements of Section
IV.
As stated in Section IV of the General
Section, scanning documents to create
electronic files increases the size of the
file. Therefore, applicants may not
submit scanned files unless using the
facsimile method as stated in the
General Section. If the facsimile method
does not work, forms and other
documents from Co-Sponsors may be
scanned to create an electronic file and
submitted as an attachment to the
application. These documents should be
labeled and numbered so the HUD
reviewer can identify the file and its
contents. If the applicant is creating an
electronic file, the file should contain a
header that identifies the name of the
Sponsor submitting the electronic
application, that Sponsor’s DUNS
Number, and the unique ID that is found
at the top of the Facsimile Transmission
form found in the electronic application
package. The naming convention for
each electronic file should correspond
to the labeling convention used in the
application Table of Contents found in
Section IV.B.1. of this NOFA. For
example, the organizational documents
of a Co-Sponsor would be included
under Part II, Exhibit 2(a) of the Section
811 application.
The signed documents and other
information required to be submitted
with the electronic application should
be transmitted via fax, using Form
PO 00000
Frm 00303
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11735
HUD–96011, Facsimile Transmittal as
the cover page to the facsimile. The
Form HUD–96011 is found in the
electronic application package. CoSponsors should use the Form HUD–
96011 provided by the Sponsor that is
submitting the electronic application.
The submitting Sponsor should fill in
the SF 424 form prior to giving the Form
96011 to the Co-Sponsors. By following
these directions, the Form HUD–96011
will be pre-populated with the
submitting Sponsor’s organizational
information exactly as the submitting
Sponsor has provided it on the
electronic application. In addition, HUD
will be using the unique identifier
associated to the downloaded
application package as a means of
matching the faxes submitted with
applications received via Grants.gov.
The Facsimile Transmittal form also has
space to provide the number of pages
being faxed and information on the type
of document. Co-Sponsors or the
submitting applicant can insert the
document name in the space provided
labeled Program Component and should
ensure that the form that is used is the
cover sheet to the facsimile transmittal.
Do not insert any additional or other
cover pages as it will cause problems in
electronically matching the pieces of the
application.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
Policy Priorities. HUD encourages
applicants to undertake specific
activities that will assist the Department
in implementing its policy priorities
and which help the Department achieve
its strategic goals for FY2007. Refer to
the General Section for information
regarding HUD’s Strategic Goals and
Policy Priorities. For the Section 811
program, applicants who include work
activities that specifically address the
policy priorities of encouraging
accessible design features by
incorporating visitability standards and
universal design, ending chronic
homelessness, removing barriers to
affordable housing, promoting energy
efficiency in design and operations, and
expanding training and employment
opportunities for low and very lowincome persons and business concerns
(Section 3 requirements) will receive
additional points. A Notice pertaining to
the removal of barriers to affordable
housing was published in the Federal
Register and may be downloaded from
the HUD Web site at https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
Rating Factors. HUD will rate
applications that successfully complete
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11736
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
technical processing using the Rating
Factors set forth below and in
accordance with the application
submission requirements in this NOFA.
The maximum number of points an
application may receive under this
program is 100 plus 2 bonus points.
This includes two (2) RC/EZ/EC–II
bonus points, as described in the
General Section of the SuperNOFA and
Section V.A.6 below.
1. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (30 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which you have the organizational
resources to successfully implement the
proposed activities in a timely manner.
Submit information responding to this
factor in accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
3(a), 3(b), 3(e), 5 and 6 of Section IV.B.
of this NOFA. In rating this factor, HUD
will consider the extent to which your
application demonstrates your ability to
develop and operate the proposed
housing on a long-term basis,
considering the following:
a. (15 points) The scope, extent, and
quality of your experience in providing
housing or related services to those
proposed to be served by the project and
the scope of the proposed project (i.e.,
number of units, services, relocation
costs, development, and operation) in
relationship to your demonstrated
development and management capacity
as well as your financial management
capability.
b. (10 points) The scope, extent, and
quality of your experience in providing
housing or related services to minority
persons or minority families and your
ties to the community at large and to the
minority and disability communities in
particular.
(1) (5 points) The scope, extent, and
quality of your experience in providing
housing or related services to minority
persons or families.
(2) (5 points) The scope, extent, and
quality of your ties to the community at
large and to the minority and disability
communities in particular.
To earn the maximum number of
points under subcriteria (b)(1) above,
you must describe significant previous
experience in providing housing and/or
supportive services to minorities
generally and to minority persons with
disabilities, in particular. For the
purpose of this competition, ‘‘significant
previous experience’’ means that the
previous housing assistance or related
services to minorities, i.e., the
percentage of minorities being provided
housing or related services in your
current developments, was equal to or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
greater than the percentage of minorities
in the housing market area where the
previous housing or services occurred.
To earn the maximum number of points
under subcriteria (b)(2) above, you
should submit materials that
demonstrate your efforts to make
housing available to the community at
large and the minority and disability
communities in particular and your
relationships over time with the
community, including the minority and
disability communities. Examples of
documents that may be submitted to
earn the maximum number of points
under subcriteria (b)(2), include letters
of support from community leaders
(including minority and disability
community leaders) that give
information about applicant’s
relationship over time with the
community (including the minority and
disability community). You may also
submit copies of your affirmative
marketing plan and the advertising/
outreach materials you utilize to attract
minority communities (including
limited English proficient
communities), disabled community and
the community at large. Regarding your
advertising/outreach materials, you
should identify when advertising/
outreach materials are circulated, whom
they are circulated to, where they are
circulated, and how they are circulated.
Descriptions of other advertising/
outreach efforts to the minority
(including limited English proficient
communities) and disabled
communities and the dates and places
of such advertising/outreach efforts
should also be included.
c. (¥3 to ¥5 points) HUD will deduct
(except if the delay was beyond your
control) 3 points if a fund reservation
you received under either the Section
811 program of Supportive Housing for
Persons with Disabilities or the Section
202 program of Supportive Housing for
the Elderly in FY2002 or later has been
extended beyond 24 months, 4 points if
beyond 36 months, and 5 points if
beyond 48 months. Examples of delays
beyond your control include, but are not
limited to, initial closing delays that are:
(1) directly attributable to HUD, (2)
directly attributable to third party
opposition, including litigation, and (3)
due to a disaster, as declared by the
President of the United States.
d. (¥3 to ¥5 points). HUD will
deduct from 3 points to 5 points if HUD
amendment money was required in
connection with a fund reservation you
received under either the Section 202
Program of Supportive Housing for the
Elderly or the Section 811 Program of
Supportive Housing for Persons with
PO 00000
Frm 00304
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Disabilities in FY 2002 or later based on
the following.
(1) (¥3 points). The amount of the
amendment money required was 25
percent or less of the original capital
advance amount approved by HUD.
(2) (¥4 points). The amount of the
amendment money required was
between 26 percent and 50 percent of
the original capital advance amount
approved by HUD.
(3) (¥5 points). The amount of the
amendment money required was over
50 percent of the original capital
advance amount approved by HUD.
e. (5 points) You have experience in
developing integrated housing and/or
the proposed project will be an
integrated housing model (applies to
condominium units scattered within
one or more buildings or noncontiguous independent living units on
scattered sites only).
2. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (13 Points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need for funding the
proposed activities to address a
documented problem in the target area.
Submit information responding to this
factor in accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
4(a) and 4(b) of Section IV.B. of this
NOFA. HUD will consider the following
in evaluating this factor:
The extent of the need for the project
in the area based on a determination by
the local HUD office. In making this
determination, HUD will consider your
evidence of need in the area, as well as
other economic, demographic, and
housing market data available to the
local HUD office. The data should
include but is not limited to:
• a general assessment of the current
conditions in the market for the type of
housing proposed,
• an estimate of the demand for
additional housing of the type proposed
in the applicable housing market area,
• information on the numbers and
types of existing comparable Federally
assisted housing units for persons with
disabilities (HUD and RHS) and current
occupancy in such housing and recent
market experience,
• comparable assisted housing for
persons with disabilities under
construction or for which fund
reservations have been issued and,
• In accordance with an agreement
between HUD and RHS, comments from
RHS on the demand for additional
comparable subsidized housing and the
possible harm to existing projects in the
same housing market areas.
The Department also will review more
favorably those applications which
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
establish a connection between the
proposed project and the community’s
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice (AI) or other planning
document that analyzes fair housing
issues and is prepared by a local
planning or similar organization. You
must show how the proposed project
will address an impediment to fair
housing choice described in the AI or
meet a need identified in the other type
of planning document.
In evaluating this factor, HUD will
rate your application as follows:
a. (10 points) If a determination has
been made that there is sufficient
sustainable long-term demand for
additional supportive housing for
persons with disabilities in the area to
be served, the project is to be awarded
10 points. If not, the project is to be
awarded 0 points. No other point values
are allowed under this subsection
V.A.2.a.
b. (3 points) The extent that a
connection has been established
between the project and the
community’s Consolidated Plan,
Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice (AI) or other planning
document that analyzes fair housing
issues and is prepared by a local
planning or similar organization.
3. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach (40 Points)
This factor addresses the quality and
effectiveness of your proposal, the
extent to which you involved persons
with disabilities, including minority
persons with disabilities, in the
development of the application and will
involve them in the development and
operation of the project, the extent to
which you coordinated your application
with other organizations, including
local independent living centers, with
which you share common goals and
objectives and are working toward
meeting these objectives in a holistic
and comprehensive manner, whether
you consulted with Continuum of Care
organizations to address efforts to assist
persons with disabilities who are
chronically homeless as defined in the
General Section, whether the
jurisdiction in which your project will
be located has undertaken successful
efforts to remove regulatory barriers to
affordable housing, whether you will
promote energy efficiency in the design
and operation of the proposed housing,
and your plans to expand economic
opportunities for low and very lowincome persons as well as certain
business concerns (Section 3). There
must be a clear relationship between the
proposed design, the proposed
activities, the community’s needs and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
purposes of the program funding for
your application to receive points for
this factor. Submit information
responding to this factor in accordance
with Application Submission
Requirements in Exhibits 2(d), 3(f), 3(j),
3(k), 3(l), 3(m), 4(c)(i), 4(c)(ii), 4(d)(iii),
4(d)(v), 4(d)(vi), 4(e)(i), and 5 of Section
IV.B. of this NOFA. In evaluating this
factor, HUD will consider the following:
a. (14 points) Site approvability—The
proximity or accessibility of the site to
shopping, medical facilities,
transportation, places of worship,
recreational facilities, places of
employment, and other necessary
services to the intended occupants;
adequacy of utilities and streets, and
freedom of the site from adverse
environmental conditions (based on site
visit for site control projects only); and
compliance with site and neighborhood
standards in 24 CFR 891.125(a), (d), and
(e) and 24 CFR 891.320. Sites where
amenities are accessible other than by
project residence or private vehicle will
be rated more favorably;
b. (¥1 point) One or more of your
proposed sites is not permissively zoned
for the intended use.
c. (8 points) The suitability of the site
from the standpoint of promoting a
greater choice of housing opportunities
for minorities and persons with
disabilities and affirmatively furthering
fair housing. In reviewing this criterion,
HUD will assess whether the site meets
the site and neighborhood standards at
24 CFR 891.125(b) and (c) by examining
relevant data in your application or in
the local HUD office. If appropriate,
HUD may visit the site.
(1) The site will be deemed acceptable
if it increases housing choice and
opportunity by expanding housing
opportunities in non-minority
neighborhoods (if located in such a
neighborhood). The term ‘‘non-minority
area’’ is defined as one in which the
minority population is lower than 10
percent. If the site will be in a minority
neighborhood, the site will be deemed
acceptable if it contributes to the
revitalization of and reinvestment in the
minority neighborhood, including
improvement of the level, quality and
affordability of services furnished to
minority persons with disabilities. You
should refer to the Site and
Neighborhood Standards provisions of
the regulations governing the Section
811 Supportive Housing Program (24
CFR 891.125(b) and (c)) when
considering sites for your projects.
(2) For the purpose of this
competition, the term ‘‘minority
neighborhood (area of minority
concentration)’’ is defined as one where
PO 00000
Frm 00305
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11737
any one of the following statistical
conditions exists:
(a) The neighborhood’s percentage of
persons of a particular racial or ethnic
minority is at least 20 percentage points
higher than the percentage of that
particular racial or ethnic minority in
the housing market area;
(b) The neighborhood’s total
percentage of minority persons is at
least 20 percentage points higher than
the total percentage of minorities for the
housing market area; or
(c) In the case of a metropolitan area,
the neighborhood’s total percentage of
minority persons exceeds 50 percent of
its population.
d. (2 points) Site and Neighborhood
Standards and Persons with Disabilities:
The extent to which the proposed
design of the project (exterior and
interior) and its placement in the
neighborhood will meet the individual
needs of the residents and will facilitate
their integration into the surrounding
community and promote their ability to
live as independently as possible.
e. (1 point) The extent to which the
proposed design incorporates
visitability standards and universal
design in the construction or
rehabilitation of the project. Refer to the
General Section for further information.
f. (4 points) Your board is comprised
of persons with disabilities.
g. (3 points) You involved persons
with disabilities (including minority
persons with disabilities) in the
development of the application, and
will involve persons with disabilities
(including minority persons with
disabilities) in the development and
operation of the project.
h. (2 points) The extent to which you
coordinated your application with other
organizations (including local
independent living centers; a list of
such can be obtained from the local
HUD office) that will not be directly
participating in your project, but with
which you share common goals and
objectives and are working toward
meeting these goals and objectives in a
holistic and comprehensive manner.
i. (1 point) You consulted with the
Continuum of Care organizations in the
community in which your proposed
project will be located and have
developed ways in which the proposed
project will assist persons with
disabilities who have been experiencing
chronic homelessness become more
productive members of society. Refer to
the General Section for further
information.
j. (2 points) The extent to which the
jurisdiction in which your project will
be located has undertaken successful
efforts to remove regulatory barriers to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11738
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
affordable housing. (Note: This is an
optional requirement, but to receive up
to 2 points, the applicant must have
submitted the Form HUD–27300,
Questionnaire for HUD’s Initiative on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers, AND
provided some form of documentation
where requested, including point of
contact and URL references or
submitted the required documentary
evidence.) Refer to the General Section
for further information.
k. (1 point) The extent to which you
will promote energy efficiency in the
design and operation of the proposed
housing. (Note: Optional, but to receive
the 1 point, the applicant must have
adequately addressed their plans to
promote energy efficiency in the design
and operation of the proposed project.)
Refer to Section III.C.4 of this NOFA.
l. (2 points). The extent to which you
have described your plans for
expanding economic opportunities for
low and very low-income persons
(provisions of Section 3). Note: This is
an optional requirement, but to receive
up to 2 points, the applicant must have
adequately addressed the following in
Exhibit 3(m) of the application. Refer to
the General Section for further
information.
(1) (1 point). Provide opportunities to
train and employ low and very lowincome residents of the project area.
(2) (1 point). Award substantial
contracts to persons residing in the
project area.
4. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(5 Points)
This factor addresses your ability to
secure other funding sources and
community resources that can be
combined with HUD’s program
resources to achieve program purposes.
Submit information responding to this
factor in accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
3(a), 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), 3(e), and 5(f) of
Section IV.B. of this NOFA.
a. (0 point). The application contains
general support and/or written evidence
of firm commitments towards the
development and operation of the
proposed project (including, financial
assistance, donation of land, provision
of services, etc.) from other funding
sources (e.g., private, local community,
and government sources) where the
dollar value totals 5% or less of the
capital advance amount as determined
by HUD.
b. (1 point). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
funding sources (e.g., private local
community and government sources)
where the dollar value totals between
6% and 10% of the capital advance
amount as determined by HUD.
c. (2 points). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private local
community and government sources)
where the dollar value totals between
11% and 15% of the capital advance
amount as determined by HUD.
d. (3 points). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private, local
community, and government sources)
where the dollar value totals between
16% and 20% of the capital advance
amount as determined by HUD.
e. (4 points). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private, local
community, and government sources)
where the dollar value totals between
21% and 25% of the capital advance
amount as determined by HUD.
f. (5 points). The application contains
written evidence of firm commitments
towards the development and operation
of the proposed project (including,
financial assistance, donation of land,
provision of services, etc.) from other
funding sources (e.g., private, local
community, and government sources)
where the dollar value totals over 25%
of the capital advance amount as
determined by HUD.
5. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (12 Points)
This factor reflects HUD’s goal to
embrace high standards of ethics,
management and accountability and, as
such, emphasizes HUD’s commitment to
ensuring that you keep the promises
made in your application. This factor
requires that you clearly identify the
benefits or outcomes of your project and
develop an evaluation plan to measure
performance, which includes what you
are going to measure, how you are going
to measure it, and the steps you will
have in place to make adjustments to
your project development timeline
should you not be able to achieve any
of the major milestones. Completion of
Exhibit 8(j), Program Outcome Logic
PO 00000
Frm 00306
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Model (HUD–96010), will assist you in
completing your response to this rating
factor. This rating factor also addresses
the extent to which your project will
implement practical solutions that
result in residents achieving
independent living, economic
empowerment, educational
opportunities and improved living
environments. Finally, this factor
addresses the extent to which the longterm viability of your project will be
sustained for the duration of the 40-year
capital advance period. Submit
information responding to this factor in
accordance with Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibits
3(e), 3(g), 3(h), 3(i), 6(b), and 8(j) of
Section IV.B. of this NOFA.
a. (5 points) The extent to which your
project development timeline is
indicative of your full understanding of
the development process and will,
therefore, result in the timely
development of your project.
b. (2 points) The extent to which your
past performance evidences that the
proposed project will result in the
timely development of the project.
Evidence of your past performances
could include the development of
previous construction projects,
including but not limited to Section 202
or Section 811 projects.
c. (2 points) The extent to which your
project will implement practical
solutions that will result in assisting
residents in achieving independent
living, economic empowerment,
educational opportunities, and
improved living environments (e.g.,
activities that will improve computer
access, literacy and employment
opportunities).
d. (3 points) The extent to which you
demonstrated that your project will
remain viable as housing with the
availability of supportive services for
very low income persons with
disabilities for the 40-year capital
advance period.
6. Bonus Points (2 bonus points)
Location of proposed site in an RC/EZ/
EC–II area, as described in the General
Section. Submit the information
responding to the bonus points in
accordance with the Application
Submission Requirements in Exhibit
8(h) of Section IV.B. of this NOFA.
B. Reviews and Selection Process
1. Review for Curable Deficiencies.
Upon receipt of the application by HUD
staff, HUD will screen all applications to
determine if there are any curable
deficiencies. For applicants receiving a
waiver to submit a paper application,
submitting fewer than the required
original and four copies of the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
application is not a curable deficiency
and will cause your application to be
considered non-responsive to the NOFA
and returned to you. A curable
deficiency is a missing Exhibit or
portion of an Exhibit that will not affect
the rating of the application. Refer to the
General Section for additional
information regarding procedures for
corrections to deficient applications.
The following is a list of the only
deficiencies that will be considered
curable in a Section 811 application:
Exhibit
Description
1 ...........
Form
92016–CA
(Application
Form)*
Articles of Incorporation*
By-laws*
IRS tax exemption ruling*
Description of mixed-financing
plans for additional units, if applicable
Evidence of site control
Evidence site is free of limitations,
restrictions or reverters
Evidence of compliance with URA
site notification requirement
Phase I ESA
Asbestos Statement or Survey
Letter to the State/Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO/
THPO) and a statement that the
SHPO/THPO failed to respond
OR the letter from the SHPO/
THPO
Willingness to seek an alternate
site
Exception to project size limit
Steps undertaken to identify site
Status of the sale of the site
Whether the site would involve relocation
Supportive Services Plan
Relocation
Letter sent to the State Point of
Contact (SPOC).*
Standard Form 424 Supplement,
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants.
Standard Form LLL, Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities (if applicable).
Form HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/Update Report.
Form HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with Consolidated
Plan.
Form HUD–92041, Sponsor’s Conflict of Interest Resolution.
Form HUD–92042, Sponsor’s Resolution for Commitment to
Project.*
Form HUD–92043, Supportive
Services Certification.
Form
HUD–96011
Facsimile
Transmittal (Required Only for
Transmittal of Faxes).*
Form HUD–2994–A, You Are Our
Client Grant Applicant Survey
(optional).
2(a) .......
2(b) .......
2(c) .......
4(c)(iii) ..
4(d)(i) ...
4(d)(ii) ...
4(d)(iv) ..
4(d)(vii)
4(d)(viii)
4(d)(ix) ..
4(d)(x) ..
4(d)(xi) ..
4(e)(ii) ...
4(e)(iv) ..
4(e)(v) ..
5 ...........
7 ...........
8(a) .......
8(b) .......
8(c) .......
8(d) .......
8(e) .......
8(f) ........
8(g) .......
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
8(i) ........
8(k) .......
8(l) ........
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
The local HUD office will notify you
in writing if your application is missing
any of the above exhibits or portions of
exhibits and will provide you with a
specified deadline to submit the
information required to cure the noted
deficiencies. The items identified by an
asterisk (*) must be dated on or before
the application submission date. If an
Exhibit or portion of an Exhibit listed
above as curable is not discovered as
missing until technical processing, HUD
will provide you with a deadline to cure
the deficiency.
2. Rating. HUD will review and rate
your application in accordance with the
Reviews and Selection Process in the
General Section except as described in
‘‘3 Appeal Process’’ found below. Your
application will be either rated or
technically rejected at the end of
technical review. If your application
meets all program eligibility
requirements after completion of
technical review, it will be rated
according to the rating factors in Section
V.A. above.
3. Appeal Process. HUD will not reject
your application based on technical
review without notifying you of the
rejection with all the reasons for
rejection and providing you an
opportunity to appeal. You will have 14
calendar days from the date of HUD’s
written notice to appeal a technical
rejection to the local HUD office. In
HUD’s review of any appeal, it should
be noted that in conformance with its
regulations at 24 CFR part 4, subpart B,
HUD will not consider any unsolicited
information that you, the applicant, may
want to provide. The local HUD office
will make a determination on any
appeals before making its selection
recommendations.
4. Ranking and Selection Procedures.
Applications that have a total base score
of 75 points or more (without the
addition of RC/EZ/EC–II bonus points)
and meet all of the applicable threshold
requirements in the General Section and
this NOFA will be eligible for selection
and will be placed in rank order in two
categories; Category A and Category B.
Category A will consist of approvable
applications that contain acceptable
evidence of control of all proposed sites
and all proposed sites have been found
approvable. Category B will consist of
the following approvable applications:
(a) those that were submitted with
identified sites;
(b) those that were submitted with
evidence of site control where the
evidence and/or any of the proposed
sites were found not approvable
provided you indicate your willingness
to locate another site(s) should the
PO 00000
Frm 00307
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11739
proposed site(s) be found not
approvable; and
(c) those that were submitted with a
combination of sites under control and
identified sites. Each HUD Multifamily
Program Center will select applications,
after adding any bonus points for RC/
EZ/EC–II, based on rank order, from
Category A first that most closely
approximates the capital advance
authority available in its allocation. If
capital advance authority remains after
selecting all approvable applications
from Category A, each HUD Multifamily
Program Center shall then select
applications, in rank order, from
Category B that most closely
approximates the capital advance
authority remaining in its allocation.
HUD Multifamily Program Centers will
not skip over any applications in order
to select one based on the funds
remaining. After making the initial
selections from the applicable category,
however, HUD Multifamily Program
Centers may use remaining available
funds to select the next highest rankordered application in that category by
reducing the number of units by no
more than 10 percent, rounded to the
nearest whole number, provided the
reduction will not render the project
unfeasible. For this purpose, however,
HUD will not reduce the number of
units in projects of five units or less.
After the HUD Multifamily Program
Centers have funded all possible
projects based on the process above,
residual funds from all HUD
Multifamily Program Centers within
each Multifamily Hub will be combined.
First, these funds will be used to restore
units to projects reduced by HUD
Multifamily Program Centers based on
the above instructions. Second,
additional approvable applications
within each Multifamily Hub will be
selected in Hub-wide rank order, first
from Category A, and if sufficient funds
remain, from Category B, with only one
application selected per HUD
Multifamily Program Center. More than
one application may be selected per
HUD Multifamily Program Center if
there are no approvable applications in
other HUD Multifamily Program Centers
within the Multifamily Hub. This
process will continue until there are no
more approvable applications within
the Multifamily Hub that can be
selected with the remaining funds.
Applications may not be skipped over to
select one based on funds remaining.
However, the Multifamily Hub may use
any remaining residual funds to select
the next rank-ordered application in the
applicable category by reducing the
number of units by no more than 10
percent rounded to the nearest whole
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11740
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
number, provided the reduction will not
render the project infeasible or result in
the project being less than 5 units.
Funds remaining after the Multifamily
HUB selection process is completed will
be returned to Headquarters. HUD
Headquarters will use the residual funds
first to restore units to projects reduced
by HUD Multifamily Program Center or
Multifamily Hub as a result of the
instructions for using their residual
funds. Second, HUD Headquarters will
use these funds for selecting additional
applications based on HUD Program
Centers’ rankings, beginning with the
highest rated application nationwide in
Category A. Only one application will
be selected per HUD Multifamily
Program Center in Category A from the
national residual amount. Headquarters
may skip over a higher rated Category A
application to ensure that only one
application is selected from each HUD
Multifamily Program Center. This
process will continue until the
remaining available funds are used to
select Category A applications, to the
maximum extent possible. If all
Category A applications are selected,
Category B applications will then
become eligible for selection in rank
order, beginning with the highest rated
application. Only one Category B
application per HUD Multifamily
Program Center will be selected from
the remaining national residual amount.
Headquarters may skip over a higher
rated Category B application in order to
ensure that only one application is
selected from each HUD Multifamily
Program Center. This process will
continue until the remaining available
funds are used to select approvable
applications. If there are no approvable
applications in Category A in other HUD
Multifamily Program Centers, then the
next highest rated application in
Category B in another HUD Multifamily
Program Center will be selected.
5. HUD Error. In the event HUD
commits an error that, when corrected,
would have resulted in the selection of
an otherwise eligible applicant during
the funding round of this NOFA, HUD
may select that applicant when
sufficient funds become available.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Agreement Letter. If you are
selected to receive a Section 811 fund
reservation, you will receive an
Agreement Letter that stipulates the
terms and conditions for the Section 811
fund reservation award as well as the
submission requirements following the
fund reservation award. The duration of
the fund reservation award for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
capital advance is 18 months from the
date of issuance of the fund reservation.
Immediately upon your acceptance of
the Agreement Letter, you are expected
to begin work towards the submission of
a Firm Commitment Application, which
is the next application submission stage.
You are required to submit a Firm
Commitment Application to the local
HUD office within 180 days from the
date of the Agreement Letter. Initial
closing of the capital advance and start
of construction of the project are
expected to be accomplished within the
duration of the fund reservation award.
Final closing of the capital advance is
expected to occur no later than six
months after completion of project
construction.
2. Non-selection Letter. If your
application is approvable but unfunded
due to insufficient funds or receives a
rating that is below the minimum
threshold score established for funding
eligibility, you will receive a letter to
this effect.
3. Debriefing. Refer to the General
Section for further information
regarding debriefings except that the
request must be made to the Director of
Multifamily Housing in the appropriate
local HUD office.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Ensuring the Participation of Small
Businesses, Small Disadvantaged
Businesses, and Women-Owned
Businesses. Although the Section 811
program is not subject to the provisions
of 24 CFR 85.36(e) as described in the
corresponding paragraph in the General
Section you are required to comply with
Executive Order 12432, Minority
Business Enterprise Development and
Executive Order 11625, Prescribing
Additional Arrangements for
Developing and Coordinating a National
Program for Minority Business
Enterprise as they relate to the
encouragement of HUD grantees to
utilize minority business enterprises.
2. Acquisition and Relocation. You
must comply with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as
amended (49 CFR part 24 and 24 CFR
part 891.155(e)) (URA), which covers
the acquisition of sites, with or without
existing structures, and with 24 CFR
8.4(b)(5) of the Section 504 regulations
which prohibits discrimination based
on disability in determining the site or
location of a federally-assisted facility.
However, you are exempt from
complying with the site acquisition
requirements of the URA if you do not
have the power of eminent domain and
prior to entering into a contract of sale,
PO 00000
Frm 00308
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
option to purchase or any other method
of obtaining site control, you inform the
seller of the land in writing: (1) that you
do not have the power of eminent
domain and, therefore, you will not
acquire the property if negotiations fail
to result in an amicable agreement, and
(2) of the estimate of the fair market
value of the property. An appraisal is
not required to meet this requirement;
however, your files must include an
explanation, (with reasonable evidence)
of the basis for the estimate. Evidence of
compliance with this advance notice
requirement must be included in Exhibit
4(d)(iv) of your application.
If you had site control as an applicant,
you must be able to identify all persons
who were required to move from the site
within the past 12 months and the
reason for such a move. You will also
have to be able to demonstrate that all
persons occupying the site have been
issued the appropriate required General
Information Notice and advisory
services information receipt required,
either at the time of the execution of the
option to acquire the property or at the
time of application submission.
3. Flood Disaster Protection Act of
1973 and Coastal Barriers Resources
Act. You must comply with the
requirements under the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001–
4128) and the Coastal Barrier Resources
Act (16 U.S.C. 3601).
C. Reporting
1. The Program Outcome Logic Model
(Form HUD–96010) must be completed
indicating the results achieved against
the proposed output goal(s) and
proposed outcome(s) which you stated
in your approved application and
agreed upon by HUD. Based on the
information you provided in the
Program Outcome Logic Model. These
reporting requirements are to be
submitted to HUD as follows:
Program Outcome Logic Model. You,
as the Sponsor, and the Owner, when
formed, are required to report annually,
beginning from the date of the
Agreement Letter, on the results
achieved against the output goal(s) and
outcome(s), which you proposed in the
Program Outcome Logic Model that was
submitted in your application. HUD is
considering a new concept for the Logic
Model. The new concept is a Return on
Investment (ROI) statement. HUD will
be publishing a separate notice on the
ROI concept.
2. The Regulatory Agreement (Form
HUD–92466–CA) requires the Owner of
the Section 811 project to submit an
annual financial statement for the
project. This financial statement must
be audited by an Independent Public
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Accountant who is a Certified Public
Accountant or other person accepted by
HUD and filed electronically with
HUD’s Real Estate Assessment Center
(REAC) through the Financial
Assessment Subsystem for Multifamily
Housing (MF–FASS). The submission of
annual financial statements is required
throughout the 40-year term of the
mortgage.
VII. Agency Contact(s)
Technical Assistance. For technical
assistance in downloading an
application package from
www.grants.gov/Apply, contact the
Grants.gov help desk at 800–518–Grants
or by sending an e-mail to
support@grants.gov.
Programmatic Information. For
programmatic information, you may
contact the appropriate local HUD
office, or Frank Tolliver at HUD
Headquarters at (202) 708–3000 (this is
not a toll-free number), or access the
Internet at: https://www.hud.gov/offices/
adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. Persons
with hearing and speech impairments
may access the above number via TTY
by calling the toll-free Federal Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VIII. Other Information
A. Field Office Workshop. HUD
encourages minority organizations and
grassroots organizations (e.g., civic
organizations, faith-communities and
grassroots faith-based and other
community-based organizations) to
participate in this program and strongly
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
recommends prospective applicants
attend the local HUD office workshop.
At the workshops, HUD will explain
application procedures and
requirements, as well as address
concerns such as local market
conditions, building codes and
accessibility requirements,
contamination identification and
remediation, historic preservation,
floodplain management, other
environmental requirements,
displacement and relocation, zoning,
and housing costs. If you are interested
in attending the workshop, make sure
that your name, address and telephone
number are on the appropriate local
HUD office’s mailing list so that you
will be informed of the date, time and
place of the workshop. Persons with
disabilities should call the appropriate
local HUD office to assure that any
necessary arrangements can be made to
enable their attendance and
participation in the workshop.
If you cannot attend the workshop,
call the appropriate local HUD office if
you have any questions regarding the
submission of applications to that
particular office and to request any
materials distributed at the workshop.
B. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
an information broadcast via satellite for
potential applicants to learn more about
the program and preparation of the
application. It is strongly recommended
that potential applicants, especially
those who may be applying for Section
811 funding for the first time, tune in to
this broadcast, if at all possible. Copies
PO 00000
Frm 00309
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11741
of the broadcast tapes are also available
from the NOFA Information Center. For
more information about the date and
time of the broadcast, you should
consult the HUD Web site at: https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
C. Related Programs. Section 811
funding for tenant-based assistance is
administered by public housing
agencies and nonprofit organizations
through the Mainstream Housing
Opportunities for Persons with
Disabilities Program.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2502–0462. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB number.
Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 35.92 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits derived.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00310
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.027
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11742
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
BILLING CODE 4210–01–C
Continuum of Care (COC) Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Community Planning and
Development.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Funding Availability for Continuum of
Care (CoC) Homeless Assistance
Programs.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: The
Federal Register number is FR–5100–
N–14. The OMB Approval number is
2506–0112.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Numbers:
1. 14.235, Supportive Housing
Program (SHP)
2. 14.238, Shelter Plus Care (S+C) and
3. 14.249, Section 8 Moderate
Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy
(SRO).
F. Dates: Applications should be
submitted no later than June 8, 2007.
Please see Section IV of this NOFA for
application submission and timely
receipt requirements.
G. Additional Overview Content
Information
1. Purpose of the Programs: The
purpose of the CoC Homeless Assistance
Programs is to assist homeless persons
to move to self-sufficiency and
permanent housing.
2. Available Funds: Approximately
$1.25 billion is available for funding.
3. Eligible Applicants: The program
summary chart in Section III.A.3
identifies the eligible applicants for
each of the three programs under the
CoC Homeless Assistance Programs.
4. Match: Matching funds are required
from local, state, federal or private
resources.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Description
1. Overview. The purpose of the CoC
Homeless Assistance Programs is to
reduce the incidence of homelessness in
CoC communities by assisting homeless
individuals and families to move to selfsufficiency and permanent housing.
CoCs and their projects that sustain
current successful interventions and
advance the goals of ending chronic
homelessness will be scored higher.
2. The authorizing legislation and
implementing regulations for all
programs covered by this NOFA are
outlined on the chart in Section III.A.3.
3. Changes for 2007. This list includes
all major changes to the CoC NOFA:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
a. As in past years, CoCs who would
like to create new permanent housing
units may use the ‘‘hold harmless
reallocation process’’ to do so. With this
process, eligible CoCs can replace or
reduce renewal projects with a new
permanent housing project using the
same funds. In the past, a CoC risked
losing the funds that it had
‘‘reallocated’’ in this way if the CoC did
not score above the full funding line.
New this year, CoCs who are in ‘‘hold
harmless status’’ who seek to use the
reallocation process to create new
permanent housing units may do so
without risk of losing the reallocated
amount. If a CoC reallocates a portion of
its pro rata need to an eligible new
permanent housing project, the project
will be funded, even if it is a lowerrated eligible project as long as it is in
a CoC receiving at least 65 points. HUD
is making this change to make it easier
for CoCs to choose to fund new
permanent housing units. For more
information on hold harmless status and
the process for reallocating pro rata
need, see section I.A.8.h of this NOFA
(the glossary) or the Questions and
Answers Supplement at: www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.
b. The ‘‘Questions and Answers
Supplement’’ contains additional
information and should be thoroughly
reviewed. It is now available on the web
at www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
4. Developing and Coordinating CoC
Systems. Developing a CoC system
should be an inclusive process that
brings together participants from the
state, local, private and nonprofit
sectors to reduce homelessness. This
NOFA emphasizes HUD’s determination
to integrate and align plans, including
jurisdictional state and city ten-year
plans (jurisdictional ten-year plans)
encouraged by the U.S. Interagency
Council on Homelessness and
Consolidated Plans, into the CoC plans.
These plans serve as the vehicle for a
community to comprehensively identify
each of its needs and to coordinate a
plan of action for addressing them. For
a community to successfully address the
complex and interrelated problems
related to homelessness, the community
must marshal its varied resources—
community and economic development
resources, social service resources,
business, health care, philanthropy, law
enforcement, and housing and homeless
assistance resources—and use them in a
coordinated and effective manner.
5. CoC Components. A CoC system
consists of five basic components, as
follows:
a. A system of outreach, engagement,
and assessment for determining the
PO 00000
Frm 00311
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11743
needs and conditions of an individual
or family who is homeless, and
necessary support to identify, prioritize,
and respond to persons who are
chronically homeless;
b. Emergency shelters with
appropriate supportive services to help
ensure that homeless individuals and
families receive adequate emergency
shelter and referral to necessary service
providers or housing search counselors;
c. Transitional housing with
appropriate supportive services to help
homeless individuals and families
prepare to make the transition to
permanent housing and independent
living; and
d. Permanent housing, or permanent
supportive housing, to help meet the
long-term needs of homeless individuals
and families.
e. Prevention strategies play an
integral role in a community’s plan to
eliminate homelessness by effectively
intervening for persons in public
systems—e.g., corrections, foster care,
mental health, and other institutions—
so that they do not enter the homeless
system. By law, prevention activities are
ineligible activities in the three
programs for which funds are awarded
in this competition but are eligible for
funding under the Emergency Shelter
Grants block grant program.
6. CoC Planning Process. A CoC
system is developed through a
community-wide or region-wide process
involving nonprofit organizations
(including those representing persons
with disabilities), government agencies,
public housing agencies, community
and faith-based organizations, other
homeless providers, service providers,
housing developers, private health care
organizations, businesses and business
associations, law enforcement and
corrections agencies, school systems,
private funding providers, and homeless
or formerly homeless persons. A CoC
system should address the specific
needs of each homeless subpopulation:
those experiencing chronic
homelessness, veterans, persons with
serious mental illnesses, persons with
substance abuse issues, persons with
HIV/AIDS, persons with co-occurring
diagnoses (these may include diagnoses
of multiple physical disabilities or
multiple mental disabilities or a
combination of these two types), victims
of domestic violence, youth, and any
others. To ensure that the CoC system
addresses the needs of homeless
veterans, it is particularly important that
you involve veteran service
organizations with specific experience
in serving homeless veterans.
7. CoC Funding is provided through
the programs briefly described below.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11744
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Please refer to the CoC Homeless
Assistance Programs Chart in Section
III.A.3 for a more detailed description of
each program:
a. The Supportive Housing Program
(SHP) provides funding for the
development of transitional and
permanent supportive housing and
services that help homeless persons
transition from homelessness to living
as independently as possible. Some
services are also funded to assist in
achieving the goal of self-sufficiency.
b. The Shelter Plus Care (S+C)
Program provides funding for rental
assistance and requires grantees to
identify service dollars. This gives
applicants flexibility in devising
appropriate housing and supportive
services for homeless persons with
disabilities.
c. The Section 8 Moderate
Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy
(SRO) Program provides rental
assistance on behalf of homeless
individuals in connection with the
moderate rehabilitation of SRO
dwellings.
8. Glossary of Terms
a. Annual Renewal Amount. This is
the amount that an SHP grant receives
as a renewal each year after the initial
grant term has ended. This was formerly
referred to as the Average Yearly
Amount. It is also used to calculate a
CoC’s ‘‘hold harmless’’ amount. To
calculate the Annual Renewal Amount,
add up the amount of the renewable
items (such as operating, services, and
administration costs) for all the years of
the initial grant, and divide by the
number of years in the grant term. For
example, if a grant received a total of
$60,000 in eligible renewable costs over
a three-year period, the Annual Renewal
Amount would be $20,000, or $60,000
divided by 3.
b. Applicant. An entity that applies to
HUD for funds. See the CoC Homeless
Assistance Programs Chart in Section
III.A.3 for a list of entities that are
eligible. An applicant must submit a
SF–424 (Application for Federal
Assistance Form). If selected for
funding, the applicant becomes the
grantee and is responsible for the overall
management of the grant, including
drawing grant funds and distributing
them to project sponsors. The applicant
is also responsible for supervision of
project sponsor compliance with grant
requirements. The applicant may also be
a project sponsor.
c. Applicant Certification. The form,
required by law, in which an applicant
certifies that it will adhere to certain
statutory requirements, such as the Civil
Rights Act of 1964.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
d. Chronically Homeless Person. An
unaccompanied homeless individual
with a disabling condition who has
either been continuously homeless for a
year or more OR has had at least four
(4) episodes of homelessness in the past
three (3) years. A disabling condition is
defined as ‘‘a diagnosable substance use
disorder, serious mental illness,
developmental disability, or chronic
physical illness or disability, including
the co-occurrence of two or more of
these conditions.’’ In defining the
chronically homeless, the term
‘‘homeless’’ means ‘‘a person sleeping in
a place not meant for human habitation
(e.g., living on the streets) or in an
emergency homeless shelter.’’
e. Consolidated Plan. A long-term
housing and community development
plan developed by state and local
governments and approved by HUD.
The Consolidated Plan contains
information on homeless populations
and should be coordinated with the CoC
plan. It can be a source of information
for the Unmet Need sections of the
Housing Activities Chart. The plan
contains both narratives and maps, the
latter developed by localities using
software provided by HUD.
f. Consolidated Plan Certification. The
form, required by law, in which a state
or local official certifies that the
proposed activities or projects are
consistent with the jurisdiction’s
Consolidated Plan and, if the applicant
is a state or unit of local government,
that the jurisdiction is following its
Consolidated Plan.
g. Continuum of Care (CoC). A
collaborative funding approach that
helps communities plan for and provide
a full range of emergency, transitional,
and permanent housing and service
resources to address the various needs
of homeless persons.
h. Continuum of Care Hold Harmless
Amount. This is the total of the one-year
amount (the total of the annual renewal
amount) of all SHP projects eligible for
renewal under this NOFA. CoCs shall
receive the higher of: (1) the preliminary
pro rata need (PRN) or (2) the CoC hold
harmless amount. CoCs receiving the
CoC hold harmless amount have the
opportunity to replace or reduce
projects in their CoC and reallocate their
PRN funds in order to create new
permanent supportive housing projects.
i. Current Inventory. A complete
listing of the community’s existing beds
and supportive services.
j. Homeless Management Information
Systems (HMIS). An HMIS is a
computerized data collection
application designed to capture clientlevel information over time on the
characteristics and service needs of
PO 00000
Frm 00312
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
men, women, and children experiencing
homelessness, while also protecting
client confidentiality. It is designed to
aggregate client-level data to generate an
unduplicated count of clients served
within a community’s system of
homeless services. An HMIS may also
cover a statewide or regional area, and
include several CoCs. The HMIS can
provide data on client characteristics
and service utilization.
k. Homeless Person means a person
sleeping in a place not meant for human
habitation or in an emergency shelter;
and a person in transitional housing for
homeless persons who originally came
from the street or an emergency shelter.
For a more detailed discussion, see the
Questions and Answers Supplement
available on the Web at www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The
programs covered by this NOFA are not
for populations who are at risk of
becoming homeless.
l. NOFA. Notice of Funding
Availability, published in the Federal
Register to announce available funds
and application requirements.
m. Private Nonprofit Status. Private
nonprofit status is documented by
submitting either: (1) a copy of the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ruling
providing tax-exempt status under
Section 501(c)(3) of the IRS Code; or (2)
documentation showing that the
applicant is a certified United Way
agency; or (3) a certification from a
designated official of the organization
that no part of the net earnings of the
organization inures to the benefit of any
member, founder, contributor, or
individual; that the organization has a
voluntary board; that the organization
practices nondiscrimination in the
provision of assistance; and that the
organization has a functioning
accounting system that provides for
each of the following (mention each in
the certification):
(1) Accurate, current and complete
disclosure of the financial results of
each federally sponsored project.
(2) Records that identify adequately
the source and application of funds for
federally sponsored activities.
(3) Effective control over and
accountability for all funds, property
and other assets.
(4) Comparison of outlays with budget
amounts.
(5) Written procedures to minimize
the time elapsing between the transfer of
funds to the recipient from the U.S.
Treasury and the use of the funds for
program purposes.
(6) Written procedures for
determining the reasonableness,
allocability and allowability of costs.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
(7) Accounting records, including cost
accounting records, which are
supported by source documentation.
n. Project Sponsor. The organization
that is responsible for carrying out the
proposed project activities. A project
sponsor does not submit a SF–424
(Application for Federal Assistance),
unless it is also the applicant. To be
eligible to be a project sponsor, you
must meet the same program eligibility
standards as applicants do, as outlined
in Section III.A.3, except in the
Sponsor-based rental assistance (SRA)
component of the S+C Program. Eligible
sponsors for the SRA component are
statutorily precluded from applying for
S+C funding.
o. Public Nonprofit Status. Public
nonprofit status is documented for
community mental health centers by
including a letter or other document
from an authorized official stating that
the organization is a public nonprofit
organization.
p. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance. The application cover sheet
required to be submitted by applicants
requesting HUD Federal Assistance.
q. Safe Haven. A Safe Haven is a form
of supportive housing funded and
administered under the Supportive
Housing Program serving hard-to-reach
homeless persons with severe mental
illness and other debilitating behavioral
conditions who are on the streets and
have been unwilling or unable to
participate in supportive services. A
Safe Haven may be transitional
supportive housing, or permanent
supportive housing if it has the
characteristics of permanent housing
and requires participants to sign a lease.
r. Samaritan Housing Initiative. The
Samaritan Initiative will be integrated
into this NOFA as part of the larger CoC
process and is only for projects serving
exclusively chronically homeless
persons. It is 15 percent of a CoC’s
preliminary pro rata need amount or $6
million, whichever is less. Applicants
may use no more than 20 percent of this
bonus for case management costs to
enable program participants to remain
successfully housed. See Section
V.A.2.b(3) for additional information on
this subject.
9. Applicant Roles and
Responsibilities. An applicant will be
responsible for the overall management
and administration of a particular grant,
including drawing down the grant funds
from HUD, distributing them to the
project sponsors, overseeing project
sponsors, reporting to HUD, providing
performance data to the CoC for
community-level analysis, and
collecting information to provide the
CoC with counts of the homeless
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
through HMIS. Applicants can submit
applications for projects on behalf of
project sponsors, who will actually
carry out the proposed project activities.
Applicants can also carry out their own
projects. In these cases, the applicant is
responsible for both administering and
managing a grant (as the grantee) and
carrying out the project activities (as the
project sponsor).
II. Award Information
A. Amount Allocated. Approximately
$1.25 billion is available for this CoC
competition in FY 2007. Any
unobligated funds from previous CoC
competitions or additional funds that
may become available as a result of
deobligations or recaptures from
previous awards or budget transfers may
be used in addition to FY 2007
appropriations to fund applications
submitted in response to this NOFA.
The FY 2007 HUD Appropriations Act
requires HUD to obligate all CoC
homeless assistance funds by September
30, 2009. These funds will remain
available for expenditure for either five
(5) or ten (10) years following that date,
as provided by statute. The only
exception is that $20 million will
remain available until expended for 10year term projects.
1. Distribution of Funds: HUD will not
specify amounts for each of the three
programs. Instead, the distribution of
funds among the three programs will
depend largely on locally determined
priorities and overall demand.
a. Permanent Housing Requirement.
Local priorities notwithstanding, the FY
2007 HUD Appropriations Act requires
that not less than 30 percent of this
year’s Homeless Assistance Grants
(HAG) appropriation, excluding
amounts provided for one-year renewals
under the Shelter Plus Care Program,
must be used for permanent housing
projects for all homeless populations.
b. Chronic Homelessness
Requirement. The Administration has
established as a policy priority the goal
of ending chronic homelessness. CoCs
are strongly encouraged to use the funds
available in this NOFA to target persons
experiencing chronic homelessness in
their communities. HUD encourages
communities to select projects that will
contribute to the achievement of this
important goal. The CoC strategy to end
chronic homelessness is now referred to
as the CoC Ten-Year Plan (see Chart N
in Exhibit 1). CoCs should align and
integrate their CoC Ten-Year Plans with
other plans, including jurisdictionally
led ten-year plans and applicable
Consolidated Plans. To work towards
this goal, HUD is targeting the
Samaritan Initiative for projects that
PO 00000
Frm 00313
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11745
exclusively serve individuals who are
experiencing chronic homelessness. In
addition, at least 10 percent of the
appropriation will be awarded to new or
renewal, transitional or permanent
housing projects where at least 70
percent of the project’s clients are
expected to be chronically homeless (as
defined by HUD) immediately prior to
entry into the project. Housing projects
include: SHP transitional housing,
permanent housing and Safe Havens;
S+C; and SRO projects. Since the
housing funding allocation set-aside
requirements are expected to continue
in future competitions and may affect
project funding selections, you are
strongly encouraged to begin planning
for new housing projects, particularly
those serving individuals experiencing
chronic homelessness, and include
them as part of your submission in this
competition. See Sections V.B.3.a and
V.B.3.b of this NOFA for additional
information on the permanent housing
and chronic homeless requirements.
c. Lower-rated SHP Renewals. HUD
reserves the authority to conditionally
select for one year of funding lowerrated eligible SHP renewal projects that
are assigned 40 need points in a CoC
application receiving at least 25 points
under the CoC scoring factor that would
not otherwise receive funding for these
projects. (See Sections V.A.2.a and
V.A.2.b of this NOFA for information on
project rating and scoring.) Therefore,
the projects must receive a minimum
score of 65 points. Although these
lower-rated SHP renewal projects will
have scored below the otherwise
recognized funding line, their funding
allows homeless persons to continue to
be served and move towards selfsufficiency. Not renewing these projects
would likely result in the closure of
these projects and displacement of the
homeless people being served.
2. Prioritizing Projects for Funding.
Project priority decisions are best made
by members of the local community,
including local government and
community and faith-based
organizations, which represent the
various economic, housing and social
resources within that community. For
example, if HUD has funds available
only to award 8 of 10 proposed projects,
then it will award funding to the first 8
eligible projects listed, except as may be
necessary to achieve the 30 percent
overall permanent housing and the 10
percent chronic homelessness
requirements; see Sections V.B.3.a. and
V.B.3.b. of this NOFA for additional
information. In such cases, higher
priority non-permanent housing projects
may be de-selected to fund lower
priority permanent housing projects and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11746
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
housing projects predominantly serving
those persons experiencing chronic
homelessness.
3. Grant Term. See chart in Section
III.A.3. of this NOFA for information on
the term of assistance for each of the
three CoC programs covered in this
NOFA.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
1. Eligible applicants for each
program are those identified in the
following chart.
2. Renewal Applicants. As a project
applicant, you are eligible to apply for
renewal of a grant only if you have
executed a grant agreement for the
project directly with HUD for SHP or
S+C programs under a CoC NOFA. If
you are a project sponsor or subrecipient who has not signed such an
agreement, you are not eligible to apply
for renewal of these projects.
3. Continuum of Care Homeless
Assistance Programs
Elements
Supportive housing
Shelter plus care
Section 8 SRO
Authorizing Legislation ...................
Subtitle C of Title IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 11381.
24 CFR part 583 ...........................
Subtitle F of Title IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 11403.
24 CFR part 582 ...........................
• States ........................................
• Units of general local government.
• Special purpose units of government, e.g. PHAs.
• Private nonprofit organizations.
• Community Mental Health Centers that are public nonprofit organizations.
• Transitional housing ..................
• Permanent housing for disabled
persons only.
• Supportive services not in conjunction with supportive housing.
• Safe Havens .............................
• Innovative supportive housing.
• Homeless Mngt. Info. System
(HMIS).
• Acquisition .................................
• States ........................................
• Units of general local government.
• PHAs.
Section 441 of the McKinneyVento Homeless Assistance
Act, 42 U.S.C. 11401.
24 CFR part 882, subpart H, except that all persons receiving
rental assistance must meet the
McKinney-Vento definition of
homelessness.
• PHAs.
• Private nonprofit organizations.
Implementing Regulations .............
Eligible Applicant(s) .......................
Eligible Components ......................
Eligible Activities, See footnotes 1,
2 and 3.
Eligible Populations, See footnote
2.
Populations Given Special Consideration.
Initial Term of Assistance, See
footnote 4.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Rehabilitation.
New construction.
Leasing.
Operating costs.
Supportive services.
Homeless individuals and families.
.......................................................
• Homeless persons with disabilities.
• Homeless families with children
.......................................................
• 2 or 3 years for new SHP .........
• 1, 2 or 3 years for new HMIS ...
• 1, 2, or 3 years for new reallocated projects.
• Tenant-based housing ..............
• Sponsor-based housing.
• SRO housing.
• Project-based housing.
• SRO-based housing.
• Rental assistance ......................
• Rental assistance.
• Homeless disabled individuals ..
• Homeless individuals.
• Homeless disabled individuals
& their families.
• Homeless persons who are seriously mentally ill.
• Have chronic problems with alcohol and/or drugs.
• Have AIDS & related diseases.
• 5 years: TRA, SRA, and PRA
without rehab.
• 10 years: SRO, and PRA with
rehab.
• N/A.
• 10 years.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Footnote 1: Homeless prevention activities are statutorily ineligible under these programs.
Footnote 2: Persons at risk of homelessness are statutorily ineligible for assistance under these programs.
Footnote 3: Acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, leasing, and operating costs are statutorily ineligible for assistance under Shelter Plus Care
and Section 8 SRO.
Footnote 4: The term of a new grant with funds for acquisition, construction or rehabilitation also includes the time to acquire the property,
complete construction and begin operating the project, which may be no greater than 39 months.
B. Matching (Cost Sharing). You must
match Supportive Housing Program
funds provided for acquisition,
rehabilitation, and new construction
with an equal amount of cash from other
sources. Since SHP by statute can pay
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
no more than 75 percent of the total
operating budget for supportive
housing, you must provide at least a 25
percent cash match of the total annual
operating costs. In addition, for all SHP
funding for supportive services and
PO 00000
Frm 00314
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Homeless Management Information
Systems (HMIS) you must provide a 20
percent cash match. This means that of
the total supportive services budget line
item, no more than 80 percent may be
from SHP grant funds.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
You must match rental assistance
provided through the Shelter Plus Care
Program in the aggregate with
supportive services. Shelter Plus Care
requires a dollar for dollar match; the
recipient’s match source can be cash or
in kind.
Documentation of the match
requirement must be maintained in the
grantee’s financial records on a grantspecific basis.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Eligible activities
for the SHP, S+C, and SRO Programs are
outlined in the preceding CoC Homeless
Assistance Programs Chart at Section
III.A.3.
2. Threshold Requirements
a. Project Eligibility Threshold. HUD
will review projects to determine if they
meet the following eligibility threshold
requirements. If HUD determines that
these standards are not met by a specific
project or activity, the project or activity
will be rejected from the competition.
(1) Applicants and sponsors must
meet the eligibility requirements of the
specific program as described in
program regulations and provide
evidence of eligibility and appropriate
certifications as specified by the
attachments in Section VIII.
(2) The population to be served must
meet the eligibility requirements of the
specific program as described in the
program regulations, and the
application must clearly establish
eligibility of program participants to be
served pertaining to homelessness and
disability status.
(3) The only persons who may be
served by new and renewal permanent
housing projects are those who come
from the streets, emergency shelters, or
transitional housing who originally
came from the streets or emergency
shelter. As participants leave currently
operating projects, participants who
meet this eligibility standard must
replace them.
(4) Projects that involve rehabilitation
or new construction must meet the
accessibility requirements of Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
the design and construction
requirements of the Fair Housing Act
and the accessibility requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act, as
applicable.
(5) The project must be cost-effective,
including costs associated with
construction, operations and supportive
services with such costs not deviating
substantially from the norm in that
locale for the type of structure or kind
of activity.
(6) For those applicants applying for
the Innovative component of SHP,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
whether or not a project is considered
innovative will be determined on the
basis that the particular approach
proposed is new and can be replicated.
(7) Renewal applications should be
submitted as part of a CoC application,
and must either be listed on the priority
list or accompanied by a certification
from the CoC saying that they have
determined that the project is still
needed.
(8) Under the Sponsor-based rental
assistance S+C component, an applicant
must subcontract the funding awarded
with an eligible sponsor: a private
nonprofit organization or a community
mental health agency established as a
public nonprofit organization that owns
or leases the housing where participants
will reside.
(9) For the Section 8 SRO program,
only individuals meeting HUD’s
definition of homeless are eligible to
receive rental assistance. Therefore, any
individual occupying a unit at
commencement of the unit’s
rehabilitation will not receive rental
assistance if they return to their unit (or
any other) upon completion of its
rehabilitation.
(10) Applicants agree to participate in
a local HMIS system when it is
implemented in their community.
b. Project Quality Threshold. HUD
will review projects to determine if they
meet the following quality threshold
requirements with clear and convincing
evidence. A S+C or SHP project renewal
will be considered as having met these
requirements through its previously
approved grant application unless
information to the contrary is received.
The housing and services proposed
must be appropriate to the needs of the
program participants and the
community. HUD will assess the
following:
(1) The type, scale and general
location of the housing fit the needs of
the participants and that the housing is
readily accessible to community
amenities.
(2) That all of the proposed
participants come from the streets,
homeless shelters or transitional
housing for homeless persons.
(3) The type, scale and location of the
supportive services fit the needs of the
participants and the mode of
transportation to those services is
described.
(4) The specific plan for ensuring
clients will be individually assisted to
obtain the benefits of the mainstream
health, social service, and employment
programs for which they are eligible is
provided.
PO 00000
Frm 00315
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11747
(5) How participants are helped to
obtain and remain in permanent
housing is described.
(6) How participants are assisted to
both increase their incomes and live
independently using mainstream
housing and service programs is
described.
(7) Applicants and sponsors must
evidence satisfactory performance for
existing grant(s).
c. Project Renewal Threshold. Your
local needs analysis process must
consider the need to continue funding
for projects expiring in calendar year
2008. HUD will not fund competitive
renewals out of order on the priority list
except as may be necessary to achieve
the 30 percent overall permanent
housing requirement and the 10 percent
requirement for individuals
experiencing chronic homelessness
requirement. It is important that SHP
renewals and S+C non-competitive
renewals meet minimum project
eligibility, capacity and performance
standards identified in this NOFA or
they will be rejected from consideration
for either competitive or noncompetitive funding.
d. Civil Rights Thresholds: Applicants
and the project sponsors must be in
compliance with the threshold
requirements of the General Section.
3. Program Requirements
a. Projects funded under this NOFA
shall operate in a fashion that complies
with applicable civil rights laws and
Executive Orders, including the
requirement to Affirmatively Further
Fair Housing (AFFH), and does not
deprive any individual of any right
protected by the Fair Housing Act (42
U.S.C. 3601–19), Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C.
794), the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.),
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 U.S.C. 2000d), Section 109 of Title
I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
5309), or the Age Discrimination Act of
1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101).
b. Local Resident Employment. To the
extent that any housing assistance
(including rental assistance) funded
through this NOFA is used for housing
rehabilitation (including reduction and
abatement of lead-based paint hazards,
but excluding routine maintenance,
repair, and replacement) or housing
construction, then it is subject to section
3 of the Housing and Urban
Rehabilitation Act of 1968, and the
implementing regulations at 24 CFR part
135. Section 3, as amended, requires
that economic opportunities generated
by certain HUD financial assistance for
housing and community development
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11748
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
programs shall, to the greatest extent
feasible, be given to low- and very lowincome persons, particularly those who
are recipients of government assistance
for housing, and to businesses that
provide economic opportunities for
these persons.
c. Relocation. The SHP, S+C, and SRO
programs are subject to the requirements
of the Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970, as amended (URA). These
requirements are explained in HUD
Handbook 1378, Tenant Assistance,
Relocation and Real Property
Acquisition. Also see General Section.
d. Environmental Reviews. All CoC
assistance is subject to the National
Environmental Policy Act and
applicable related Federal
environmental authorities. Conditional
selection of projects under the CoC
Homeless Assistance competition is
subject to the environmental review
requirements of 24 CFR 582.230,
583.230 and 882.804(c), as applicable.
The recipient, its project partners and
their contractors may not acquire,
rehabilitate, convert, lease (under S+C/
TRA where participants are required to
live in a particular structure or area as
described in Section III.C.3.h(3)(a)),
repair, dispose of, demolish or construct
property for a project under this CoC
NOFA, or commit or expend HUD or
local funds for such eligible activities,
until the responsible entity has
completed the environmental review
procedures required by Part 58 and the
environmental certification and Request
for Release of Funds (RROF) have been
approved or HUD has performed an
environmental review under Part 50 and
the recipient has received HUD
approval of the property. The
expenditure or commitment of
Continuum of Care assistance or nonfederal funds for such activities prior to
this HUD approval may result in the
denial of assistance for the project under
consideration.
e. CoC Geographic Area. In deciding
what geographic area you will cover in
your CoC strategy, you should be aware
that the single most important factor in
being awarded funding under this
competition will be the strength of your
CoC strategy when measured against the
CoC rating factors described in this
NOFA. When you determine what
jurisdictions to include in your CoC
strategy area, include only those
jurisdictions that are fully involved in
the development and implementation of
the CoC strategy.
The more jurisdictions you include in
the CoC strategy area, the larger the pro
rata need share that will be allocated to
the strategy area (as described in Section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
V.B.2.b. of this NOFA). If you are a rural
county, you may wish to consider
working with larger groups of
contiguous counties to develop a regionwide or multi-county CoC strategy
covering the combined service areas of
these counties. The areas covered by
CoC strategies should not overlap.
f. Expiring/Extended Grants. If your
SHP or S+C Program grant will be
expiring in calendar year 2008, or if
your S+C Program grant has been
extended beyond its original five-year
term and is projected to run out of funds
in FY 2008, you may apply as a renewal
under this CoC NOFA to get continued
funding.
g. Participation in Energy Star. In
keeping with the Administration’s
policy priority of promoting energy
efficient housing while protecting the
environment, applicants applying for
new construction or rehabilitation
funding, who maintain housing or
community facilities or provide services
in those facilities, are encouraged to
promote energy efficiency and are
specifically encouraged to purchase and
use Energy Star-labeled products. All
applicants must complete the questions
on the Energy Star Chart (Chart CoC–
AA) in Exhibit 1. Refer to the General
Section for detailed information about
this requirement.
h. Program-Specific Requirements.
Please be advised that where an
applicant for the SHP funding is a state
or unit of general local government that
utilizes one or more nonprofit
organizations to administer the
homeless assistance project(s),
administrative funds provided as part of
the SHP grant must be passed on to the
nonprofit organization(s) in proportion
to the administrative burden borne by
them for the SHP project(s). HUD will
consider states or units of general local
government that pass on at least 50
percent of the administrative funds
made available under the grant as
having met this requirement. This
requirement does not apply to either the
SRO Program, since only PHAs
administer the SRO rental assistance, or
to the S+C Program, since paying the
costs associated with the administration
of these grants is ineligible by
regulation.
HUD will not award funds to
rehabilitate leased property. In addition,
SHP funds may not be used to lease
units or structures owned by the project
sponsor, the selectee, or their parent
organizations. This includes
organizations that are members of a
general partnership where the general
partnership owns the structure.
PO 00000
Frm 00316
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(1) SHP—New Projects
(a) Please note that applicants for new
grants can request 2 or 3 years’ worth of
funds for operating, supportive services
and leasing costs and that the grant term
will be the 2 or 3 years requested.
However, if you also request funds for
acquisition, construction or
rehabilitation, the grant term will be the
2 or 3 years, plus the time to acquire the
property, complete construction and
begin operating the project (no greater
than 39 months).
(b) HUD will require recordation of a
HUD-approved use and repayment
covenant (a form may be obtained from
your field office) for all grants of funds
for acquisition, rehabilitation or new
construction. The covenant will enforce
the use and repayment requirements
found at section 423(b)(1) and (c) of the
McKinney-Vento Act and must be
approved by HUD counsel before
execution and recordation. Proof of
recordation must be provided to HUD
counsel before funds for rehabilitation
or new construction may be drawn
down.
(c) All project sponsors must meet
applicant eligibility standards as
described in Section III.A.3. As in past
years, HUD will review sponsor
eligibility as part of the threshold
review process. Project sponsors for new
projects are required to submit evidence
of their eligibility with the application
(See Section IV.B.1.b.(3)(a) and Section
I.A.8.n).
(2) SHP—Renewal Projects
(a) For the renewal of a SHP project,
you may request funding for one (1),
two (2) or three (3) years.
(b) The total request for each
renewable project cannot exceed the
Annual Renewal Amount (formerly
referred to as the Average Yearly
Amount) received in your current grant
for that project. Within that total
request, the administrative amount must
be the exact amount awarded in the
previous grant. An exception to this rule
is grants being renewed whose original
expiring award included ‘‘hard’’
development costs (acquisition, new
construction, and rehab). In the current
competition, you must recalculate your
administrative allocation not to exceed
five percent of the Annual Renewal
Amount of the activities being renewed.
To calculate administrative amounts for
activities in all new projects and
renewal projects with these ‘‘hard’’
development costs, calculate the
subtotal of all requested amounts for
activities. Administrative costs cannot
exceed 5% of this subtotal. For example,
if a project requests $60 for supportive
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
services and $40 for operating expenses,
the maximum amount of administration
dollars the project can request is $5.
Only leasing, operating, supportive
services, and administration costs may
be renewed. Applicants proposing both
to renew an existing project and to
expand the number of units or number
of participants receiving services in that
grant must submit a new project
proposal for the expansion portion of
the project. HMIS activities being
renewed should be included on the
HMIS budget chart. For more
information on Annual Renewal
Amount, see section I.A.8.a of this
NOFA (the glossary).
(c) HUD will recapture SHP grant
funds remaining unspent at the end of
the previous grant period when it
renews a grant.
(3) S+C—New Projects
(a) A project may not include more
than one component, e.g., combining
Tenant-based Rental Assistance (TRA)
with Sponsor-based Rental Assistance
(SRA) is prohibited within the same
grant. Under the TRA component, in
order to help provide supportive
services or for the purposes of
controlling housing costs, a grantee may
require participants to live in a
particular structure for the first year of
assistance or to live in a particular area
for the entire rental assistance period.
Where this option is exercised, an
environmental review and clearance
must be performed prior to any
commitment to lease a particular
structure or unit for participant
occupancy as described in Section
III.C.3.d, Environmental Reviews.
(b) S+C/SRO Component. If you are a
state or a unit of general local
government, you must subcontract with
a public housing agency to administer
the S+C assistance. Also, no single
project may contain more than 100
units.
(c) S+C SRA Component. Project
sponsors must submit proof of their
eligibility to serve as a project sponsor.
(4) S+C Renewal Projects. HUD
encourages the consolidation of
appropriate S+C renewal grants when
the grants are under the same grantee,
same component and expire in the same
year. However, renewal requests for
expiring S+C grants that have not yet
been combined should still be listed
individually on the CoC priority list and
will be awarded as individual renewal
grants. Where the grantee wishes to
consolidate the renewal grants, this
action will be subsequently
accomplished by the field office at the
point of renewal grant agreement
execution. The field office will receive
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
instructions for this process in the S+C
Operating Procedures guidance for 2007
awards.
(a) For the renewal of a S+C project,
including S+C SROs, the grant term will
be one (1) year, as specified by
Congress. For the renewal of S+C rental
assistance that is Tenant-based (TRA),
Sponsor-based (SRA), Project-based
(PRA), or Single Room Occupancybased (SRO), you may request up to the
amount determined by multiplying the
number of units under lease at the time
of your application for renewal funding
by the applicable 2006 Fair Market
Rent(s) by 12 months. Current FMRs can
be found at www.hudclips.org. For S+C
grants having been awarded one year of
renewal funding in 2005, the number of
units requested for renewal this year
must not exceed the number of units
funded in 2005. As is the case with
SHP, HUD will recapture S+C grant
funds remaining unspent at the end of
the previous grant period when it
renews a grant. The one-year term of
non-competitively awarded S+C
renewal projects may not be extended.
(b) Under the FY 2007 HUD
Appropriations Act, eligible S+C
Program grants whose terms are
expiring in 2008 and S+C Program
grants that have been extended beyond
their original five-year terms but which
are projected to run out of funds in
2008, will be renewed for one year
provided that they are determined to be
needed by the CoC, either as evidenced
by their inclusion on the priority chart
or as accompanied by a certification
from the CoC. These projects must also
demonstrate that their applicant and
sponsor meet eligibility, capacity and
performance requirements described in
Section V.A.1 of this NOFA. Noncompetitive S+C renewals should be
submitted by the application deadline.
These S+C renewal projects will not
count against a continuum’s pro rata
need amount, but, if listed on the CoC
Priority Chart, should be numbered,
continuing the priority sequence. On the
other hand, no community hold
harmless amount will be computed for
any CoC using S+C renewal amounts
since these projects are being funded
outside of the competition.
(5) Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation
SRO Program—New Projects. As an
applicant, the following limitations
apply to the Section 8 SRO program:
(a) SRO assistance may not be
provided to more than 100 units in any
structure.
(b) Under 24 CFR 882.802, applicants
that are private nonprofit organizations
must subcontract with a public housing
agency to administer the SRO
assistance.
PO 00000
Frm 00317
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11749
(c) Under 24 CFR 882.802,
rehabilitation must involve a minimum
expenditure of $3,000 for a unit,
including its prorated share of work to
be accomplished on common areas or
systems, to upgrade conditions to
comply with HUD’s physical condition
standards in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G.
(d) Under section 441(e) of the
McKinney-Vento Act and 24 CFR
882.805(d)(1), HUD publishes the SRO
per unit rehabilitation cost limit each
year to take into account changes in
construction costs. This cost limitation
applies to eligible rehabilitation costs
that may be compensated for in the
Housing Assistance Payments (HAP)
contract rents. For purposes of Fiscal
Year 2007 funding, the cost limitation is
raised from $20,500 to $21,000 per unit
to take into account increases in
construction costs during the past 12month period.
(e) The SRO Program is subject to the
Federal standards at 24 CFR part 882,
subpart H.
(f) Individuals assisted through the
SRO Program must meet the definition
of homeless individual found at section
103 of the McKinney-Vento Act.
(g) Resources outside the program pay
for the rehabilitation, and rehabilitation
financing. The rental assistance covers
operating expenses of the SRO housing,
including debt service for rehabilitation
financing. Units may contain food
preparation or sanitary facilities or both.
(6) Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation
SRO Program—Renewals. This program
section of the NOFA is not applicable to
the renewal of funding under the
Section 8 SRO program. The renewal of
expiring Section 8 SRO projects is not
part of the competitive CoC NOFA
process. Rather, expiring Section 8
SROs will be identified at the beginning
of the applicable year by the public
housing agency and HUD field office.
One-year renewal funds for expiring
Section 8 SRO HAP contracts will be
provided by HUD under a separate, noncompetitive process. For further
guidance on Section 8 SRO renewals,
please contact your local HUD field
office.
i. Timeliness Standards. As an
applicant, you are expected to initiate
your approved projects promptly in
accordance with Section VI.A of this
NOFA. In addition, HUD will take
action if you fail to satisfy the following
timeliness standards:
(1) SHP: HUD will deselect your
award if you do not demonstrate site
control within one (1) year of the date
of your grant award letter, as required
by the McKinney-Vento Act (see 42
U.S.C. 11386(a)(3)) and implemented in
program regulations at 24 CFR
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11750
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
583.320(a). Subsequent loss of site
control beyond the 12-month statutory
limit will be cause for cancellation of
the award and recapture of funds. HUD
may deobligate SHP funds if the
following additional timeliness
standards are not met:
(a) You must begin construction
activities within eighteen (18) months of
the date of HUD’s grant award letter and
complete them within thirty-six (36)
months after that notification.
(b) For activities that cannot begin
until construction activities are
completed, such as supportive service
or operating activities that will be
conducted within the building being
rehabilitated or newly constructed, you
must begin these activities within three
(3) months after you complete
construction.
(c) You must begin all activities that
may proceed independent of
construction activities, including HMIS
and SSO, within twelve (12) months of
the date of HUD’s grant award letter.
HUD may deselect or terminate a grant
agreement if the applicant is not in
compliance with this requirement. HUD
may reduce a grant agreement term to
one (1) year where implementation
delays have reduced the amount of
funds that reasonably can be used in the
original term.
(2) S+C Except SRO Component. HUD
may deselect an award or deobligate
S+C funds if you do not meet the
following timeliness standards:
(a) For Tenant-based Rental
Assistance, for Sponsor-based Rental
Assistance, and for Project-based Rental
Assistance without rehabilitation, you
must start the rental assistance within
twelve (12) months of the date of HUD’s
grant award letter.
(b) For Project-based Rental
Assistance with rehabilitation, you must
complete the rehabilitation within
twelve (12) months of the date of HUD’s
grant award letter.
(3) Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation
SRO Program and SRO Component of
the S+C Program. For the Section 8 SRO
program and the SRO component of the
S+C program projects awarded under
this NOFA, the Annual Contributions
Contract (ACC) must be executed no
later than September 30, 2009. The
rehabilitation work must be completed
and the HAP contract executed within
twelve (12) months of execution of the
Annual Contributions Contract. HUD
may reduce the number of units or the
amount of the annual contribution
commitment if, in HUD’s determination,
the Public Housing Agency fails to
demonstrate a good faith effort to adhere
to this schedule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Application Package. A checklist of
forms needed to complete the
application is provided, as described in
Section VIII below. Exhibits 1, 2, and
the Applicant Certifications are
attachments. The Exhibits, Geographic
Codes, Preliminary Pro Rata Need
Amounts, Applicant Certifications, and
the Questions and Answers Supplement
can be accessed at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cim. An
applicant may also obtain a copy of the
General Section and this NOFA by
calling the NOFA Information Center at
1–800–HUD–8929 (voice) (this is a toll
free number). Persons with hearing and
speech impairments may access the
above number via TTY by calling the
toll-free Federal Relay Service at 800–
877–8339. Please note that all sections
of the General Section are critical and
must be carefully reviewed to ensure
your application can be considered for
funding.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission. The only option for
submitting a viable application under
this NOFA is to submit the entire
Continuum of Care application, with all
of its projects, together in a single
package mailed to HUD. Each
application will consist of one
Continuum of Care Exhibit and
submissions from one or more
applicants and project sponsors.
Although HUD will accept an
application for a project exclusive of
participation in any community-wide or
region-wide CoC development process,
projects will receive few, if any, points
under the CoC rating factors and are
very unlikely to be funded. Please note
that Exhibits 1 and 2 should only
include the actual application questions
and responses being provided and
should not include the HUD application
instructions or any blank tables and
charts. The General Section contains
certifications that the applicant will
comply with fair housing and civil
rights requirements, program
regulations, and other Federal
requirements, and (where applicable)
that the proposed activities are
consistent with the HUD-approved
Consolidated Plan of the applicable
state or unit of general local
government. Section IV of Exhibit 2 of
this NOFA contains program-specific
Applicant Certifications.
1. Application Submission
Requirements
a. A completed application will
include one Exhibit 1 (CoC) and any
number of Exhibits 2, depending on the
PO 00000
Frm 00318
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
number of projects and type of programs
proposed for funding. For example, if
your CoC were proposing five SHP
Renewal projects and one S+C New
project, then you would submit one
Exhibit 1 and six Exhibits 2, filling out
the applicable charts in Exhibit 2 for
each project. Refer to Assembly Order
below for full assembling instructions.
b. Assembly Order: Each CoC must
submit the entire CoC application, with
all of its parts, in a single package to
HUD. There are three separate sections
to a CoC submission: the CoC Exhibit 1,
all applicant documentation, and all
project documentation. The application
must be assembled in the following
order:
(1) Section I—Exhibit 1 Narrative and
Charts
(a) HUD–40090–1, Exhibit 1, the CoC
plan with all charts completed as
applicable;
(b) HUD–27300, America’s Affordable
Communities Initiative/Removal of
Regulatory Barriers, with supporting
documentation;
(c) HUD–2993, Acknowledgment of
Application Receipt; and
(d) HUD–2994–A, You Are Our
Client! Grant Applicant Survey
(optional).
(2) Section II—Applicant
Documentation
(a) SF–424 Application for Federal
Assistance. Submit one SF–424 for each
applicant in the Continuum. Attached to
each SF–424 must be a list of all the
applicant’s projects in priority number
order, with project name and requested
amount. Each SF–424 must also include
the applicant’s DUNS number. Please
see the General Section for more
information on obtaining a DUNS
number. The SF–424 Supplement,
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunities
for Applicants, is for private nonprofit
applicants only and completion/
submission of this survey is voluntary.
Additionally, each applicant must
attach the following documentation (i–
v) to its SF–424:
(i) Documentation of Applicant
Eligibility. Only applicants for new
projects must include documentation of
eligibility as defined in the chart in
Section III.A.3. Also, see Section
I.A.8.m. & o. of this NOFA for
information on the documentation
required to validate non-profit status.
(ii) SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities, where applicable.
(iii) Applicant Code of Conduct. (New
applicants and applicants awarded HUD
funding prior to 2007 who have not
previously submitted a Code of
Conduct).
(iv) HUD 40090–4, Applicant
Certifications.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
(3) Section III—Project
Documentation: Each project applying
under Exhibit 2 must be submitted in its
priority list order with all Exhibit 2
required forms, HUD–40090–2,
completed for every project. The
following documentation must be
included after each project submission:
(a) Documentation of Sponsor
Eligibility. Only sponsors for new
projects must include documentation of
eligibility as defined in the chart in
Section III.A.3. See also Section I.A.8.n.
for information on the documentation
required to validate sponsor eligibility.
(b) HUD–96010, Program Outcome
Logic Model (for Logic Model
instructions, see the General Section of
the NOFA);
(c) HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report;
(d) HUD–2991, Certification of
Consistency with the Consolidated Plan;
and
(e) SF 424-Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants (for private nonprofit
applicants only—completion of survey
is voluntary).
2. Assembly Format
a. The standard font that should be
used for narratives is Times New
Roman, size 12 (pitch). Number all
pages within each exhibit sequentially
and insert tabs marking each exhibit.
b. Please use a two-hole punch to
insert holes at the top of your
application.
c. Please do not bind your
application, since this impedes
processing.
C. Submission Dates and Times
1. Application Deadline Date. Your
completed application must be
submitted on or before June 8, 2007 to
the addresses shown below. HUD will
not accept faxed or hand delivered
applications.
a. Timeliness. Your application will
be considered filed in a timely manner
if your application is postmarked on or
before 11:59:59 p.m. on the application
deadline date, and received by HUD on
or within fifteen (15) days of the
application deadline date. Applicants
may use any type of mail service
provided by the United States Postal
Service (USPS) to have their application
package delivered to HUD in time to
meet the timely submission
requirements. Applicants using the
USPS must take their application to a
post office to get a receipt of mailing
that provides the date and time the
package was submitted to the USPS.
USPS rules now require that large
packages must be brought to a postal
facility for mailing. In many areas, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
USPS has made a practice of returning
to the sender, large packages that have
been dropped in a mail collection box.
If the USPS does not have a receipt with
a digital time stamp, HUD will accept a
receipt showing USPS Form 3817,
Certificate of Mailing with a dated
postmark. The proof of submission
receipt provided by the USPS must
show receipt no later than the
application deadline. The Certificate of
Mailing or other USPS receipt will be
your documentary evidence that your
application was timely filed. If your
application is sent by overnight delivery
or express mail, other than the United
States Postal Service, your application
will be timely filed if it is placed in
transit with the overnight/express mail
service on or before the application
submission date. Applicants should
retain a receipt from these services
showing that it was submitted for
delivery by the application deadline
date and time. Applicants whose
applications are determined to be late,
who cannot furnish HUD with a receipt
from the USPS or other mail carrier that
verifies the package was submitted prior
to the submission deadline date and
time will not receive funding
consideration.
b. Field Office Copies. The HUD Field
Office must also receive one copy of
your application, with the same due
date and timely filing requirements as
described in Section IV.C.1.a above. In
the rare event that a CoC’s entire
application is not received at HUD
Headquarters on time, HUD may
similarly request proof that the
Headquarters and Field Office copy was
filed on time and, if so, may use the
copy received by the Field Office for
review.
D. Intergovernmental Review
Not applicable.
E. Funding Restrictions
Funding Restrictions are outlined in
Sections V.B.3.a and V.B.3.b.
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Addresses for Submitting
Applications:
a. To HUD Headquarters. Once you
have downloaded the forms from the
web site and completed the application
and all documentation, submit your
original completed application (the
application with the original signed
documentation) and one additional
copy of Exhibit 1 only to: HUD
Headquarters, Robert C. Weaver
Building, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Room
7270, Washington, DC 20410, Attention:
Continuum of Care Programs.
PO 00000
Frm 00319
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11751
b. To the Appropriate CPD Field
Office. Also submit one copy of your
completed application to the
Community Planning and Development
Division of the appropriate HUD Field
Office for your jurisdiction. Please see
the following web site for Field Office
addresses: https://www.hud.gov/
localoffices.cfm.
2. Security Procedures. HUD
recommends that applications be mailed
or shipped express using the United
States Postal Service (USPS). However,
applications shipped via United Parcel
Service (UPS), FedEx, DHL, or Falcon
Carrier will also be accepted. Due to
HUD security regulations, no other
delivery service is permitted into HUD
Headquarters without escort. You must,
therefore, use one of the four carriers
listed above.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria. Your application will
receive a higher score under the CoC
scoring factors if the application
demonstrates the achievement of four
basic goals:
—One, that you have successfully
identified and developed partnerships
with nonprofit organizations
(including those representing persons
with disabilities), government
agencies, jurisdictional ten-year
planning bodies, public housing
agencies, faith-based and other
community-based organizations, other
homeless providers, housing
developers and service providers,
private businesses and business
associations, law enforcement
agencies, funding providers, and
homeless or formerly homeless
persons, and that your CoC structure
and decision-making processes are
inclusive of all of these parties. Also,
other jurisdictional ten-year plans
within your CoC’s geographic area
must be aligned and integrated with
the CoC plan;
—Two, that you have created,
maintained, and built upon a
community-wide inventory of
housing and services for homeless
families and individuals (both HUD
and non-HUD funded); identified the
full spectrum of needs of homeless
families and individuals; and
coordinated efforts to fill gaps
between the current inventory and
existing needs. This coordinated effort
must appropriately address all aspects
of the continuum, especially
permanent housing;
—Three, that you have instituted a CoCwide strategy to achieve the CoC’s
goals, especially to end chronic
homelessness. This can be
accomplished through careful
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11752
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
planning, coordination with other
state and local ten-year plans, and
through leveraging resources from
multiple sources; and
—Four, that your Continuum is working
toward the HUD/national
performance objectives (the objectives
listed in Section VI.B.1 below and on
Chart N in Exhibit 1, the CoC 10-Year
Plan, Objectives, and Action Steps
Chart), that you are reporting on
progress toward the CoC’s goals, and
that you are coordinating homeless
assistance with mainstream health,
social services, and employment
programs.
1. Applicant and sponsor eligibility,
capacity and performance. HUD will
review applications to ensure that the
applicant and project sponsor meet the
eligibility and capacity standards
outlined in this section. If HUD
determines these standards are not met,
the project will be rejected from the
competition. The eligibility, capacity
and performance standards are as
follows:
a. You must be eligible to apply for
the specific program.
b. You must demonstrate ability to
carry out the project(s). With respect to
each proposed project, this means that,
in addition to knowledge of and
experience with homelessness in
general, the organization carrying out
the project, its employees, or its
partners, must have the necessary
experience and knowledge to carry out
the specific activities proposed, such as
housing development, housing
management, and service delivery.
c. If you or the project sponsor is a
current or past recipient of assistance
under a HUD McKinney-Vento Act
program, there must have been no delay
in meeting applicable program
timeliness standards unless HUD
determines the delay in project
implementation is beyond your or the
project sponsor’s control, there are no
serious unresolved HUD monitoring
finding, and no outstanding audit
finding of a material nature regarding
the administration of the program.
2. Review, Rating and Conditional
Selection. HUD will use the same
review, rating, and conditional selection
process for all three programs (SHP, S+C
and SRO). The standard factors for
award identified in the General Section
have been modified in this NOFA as
described below. Only the factors
described in this NOFA—Continuum of
Care and Need—will be used to assign
points. Parts 2a and 2b in this section
describe selection factors. Up to 100
points will be assigned using these
factors, including rating points for
HUD’s policy priority of ending chronic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
homelessness; and the policy priority
for removing regulatory barriers to
affordable housing (see Section V.B.3.b.
and V.A.2.a.(4)g. below on both policy
priorities). There are no bonus points for
proposing projects in an RC/EZ/EC–IIs.
a. Continuum of Care. HUD will
award up to 60 points as follows:
(1) Organizational Structure: HUD
will award up to 8 points based on the
extent to which your application
demonstrates:
(a) The existence of a coordinated,
inclusive, and outcome-oriented
community process, including
organizational structure(s) and decisionmaking processes for developing and
implementing a CoC strategy;
(b) That this process includes
nonprofit organizations (such as
veterans service organizations,
organizations representing persons with
disabilities, faith-based and other
community-based organizations, and
other groups serving homeless and other
low-income persons), state and local
governmental agencies, public housing
agencies, housing developers and
service providers, school systems, law
enforcement, hospital and medical
entities, funding providers, local
businesses and business associations,
and homeless or formerly homeless
persons; and
(c) That the CoC has a process in
place to achieve fair and impartial
project review and selection, with
representation and input from diverse
parties such as those outlined under
Criteria for Application Review.
(2) CoC Housing and Service Needs:
HUD will award up to 12 points based
on the extent to which your application
demonstrates:
(a) That a well-defined and
comprehensive strategy has been
developed which addresses the
components of a CoC system (i.e.,
outreach, intake and assessment;
emergency shelter; transitional housing;
permanent supportive housing; and
prevention), and that the strategy has
been designed to serve all homeless
subpopulations in the community (e.g.,
seriously mentally ill, persons with
multiple diagnoses, veterans, persons
with HIV/AIDS), including those
persons living in emergency shelters,
supportive housing for homeless
persons, or in places not designed for,
or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping
accommodation for human beings.
Having high-quality data is important,
and your application in this section
must demonstrate the CoC’s data
collection methods.
(b) HMIS Implementation. Of these 12
points, HUD will award up to 5 points
based upon the extent to which your
PO 00000
Frm 00320
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
application demonstrates progress in the
planning, implementation and operation
of an HMIS system covering at a
minimum all street outreach, emergency
shelters and transitional housing
programs so that a reliable,
unduplicated count of homeless persons
on the street and in shelters may be
conducted.
(3) CoC Strategic Planning: HUD will
award up to 10 points based on the
extent to which your application
demonstrates:
(a) The existence of a performancebased 10-year strategy for ending
chronic homelessness that establishes
specific action steps to achieve the five
objectives listed in Chart N, the CoC 10Year Plan, Objectives, and Action Steps
Chart, with measurable achievements. It
should be integrated with other ten-year
plans in the community to eliminate
chronic homelessness (if applicable),
the local HUD Consolidated Plan, and
other state and local plans related to
homelessness;
(b) Your Continuum’s progress in
working with the appropriate local
government entity to develop and
implement a discharge policy for
persons leaving publicly funded
institutions or systems of care (such as
health care facilities, foster care or other
youth facilities, or correction programs
and institutions) in order to prevent
such discharge from immediately
resulting in persons entering the
homeless system;
(c) Proposes projects that are
consistent with identified unmet needs
and correctly completes the priority
chart (note: if you do not provide a
Project Priority Chart in Exhibit 1, all
proposed projects may lose up to 30
points of the 40-point Need total);
(d) Provides estimates of renewal
funds needed through 2012 for SHP and
S+C projects; and
(e) Demonstrates leveraging of funds
requested under this NOFA with other
resources, including private, other
public, and mainstream services and
housing programs, for proposed projects
and ongoing efforts (Leveraging
Supplemental Resources).
(4) CoC Performance: HUD will award
up to 18 points based upon the CoC’s
progress in reducing homelessness,
including chronic homelessness. Please
note that HUD reserves the right to
award at least a minimum score of half
of the full points in this section, for each
completed chart in Part IV, CoC
Performance, to continuums located in
areas affected by Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita that President Bush has declared to
be major disaster areas under Title IV of
the Robert T. Stafford Act. CoC
Performance will be measured by
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
demonstrating: That the CoC has taken
specific action steps and made progress
toward achieving its goals; That the CoC
has increased the number of permanent
housing beds for the chronically
homeless and made progress toward
eliminating chronic homelessness;
Program participants’ success in
moving to and maintaining permanent
housing as reported in the most recent
Annual Progress Report (APR);
The extent to which participants
successfully become employed and
access mainstream programs. These
measures emphasize HUD’s
determination to assess grantees’
performance in the prior program year
and to determine if they are meeting the
overall goal of the homeless assistance
grants under which they are funded.
Both housing and supportive services
only projects will be assessed, using the
data submitted in Exhibit 1, Charts W
and X;
That the CoC has no unexecuted
grants;
That projects within the CoC have
policies and practices in place to hire,
and have hired, low and very lowincome employees and subcontractors,
under Section 3 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968 (HUD
will award up to 2 points for this chart,
within the 18 points for this rating
factor); and
Removal of Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing: As provided for in
the General Section, HUD will award up
to 2 points, within the 18 points for this
rating factor, based on the extent that
the CoC’s application demonstrates a
local plan and/or existing policy to
remove regulatory barriers to the
production of affordable housing.
Applicable activities include the
support of state and local efforts to
streamline processes, eliminate
redundant requirements, statutes,
regulations, and codes that impede the
availability of affordable housing. The
response (one questionnaire per CoC)
should be submitted for consideration
as a completed HUD Form 27300,
Questionnaire for HUD’s Removal of
Regulatory Barriers. The Continuum
should submit the questionnaire for the
local jurisdiction where the majority of
its CoC assistance will be provided.
Please identify the name of the
jurisdiction reported on the top of the
first page of the returned questionnaire.
The completed questionnaire (Part A or
B, NOT both) must include some form
of documentation, where requested, and
identify a point of contact. This
questionnaire can be found in the
attachments to the General Section and
should be submitted with Exhibit 1.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(5) Emphasis on Housing Activities:
HUD will award up to 12 points based
upon the relationship between funds
requested for housing activities (i.e.,
transitional and permanent) and funds
requested for supportive service
activities among projects assigned 40
need points (including S+C renewals).
Points will be awarded on a sliding
scale with the Continuums with the
highest percentage of approvable
requests for funds for housing activities
receiving the highest points. HUD will
count as housing activity all approvable
requests for funds for rental assistance
and approvable requests for funds for
acquisition, rehabilitation, construction,
leasing and operations when used in
connection with housing. HMIS costs
and administrative costs will be
excluded from this calculation.
b. Need: HUD will award up to 40
points for need. There is a three-step
approach to determining the need scores
to be awarded to projects.
(1) Step 1—HUD’s Determination of
preliminary pro rata need: To determine
the homeless assistance need of a
particular jurisdiction, HUD will use
nationally available data, including the
following factors as used in the
Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG)
program; data on poverty, housing
overcrowding, population, age of
housing, and growth lag. Applying those
factors to a particular jurisdiction
provides an estimate of the relative need
index for that jurisdiction compared to
other jurisdictions applying for
assistance under this NOFA.
(2) Step 2—Determining CoC hold
harmless pro rata need: In CoCs where
the total amount needed to fund, for one
year, all SHP grants eligible for renewal
in this competition exceeds the
preliminary pro rata need amount for
that CoC, the CoC will receive this
higher amount, referred to as the CoC
hold harmless amount. SHP grants
eligible for renewal are those that expire
between January 1, 2008 and December
31, 2008. No adjustment will be made
for S+C renewals. To provide
communities with maximum flexibility
in addressing current needs, CoCs have
the discretion to not fund or to reduce
one or more SHP renewal project
applications and still receive the benefit
of the hold harmless amount if the CoC
proposes to use that amount of reduced
renewal funds for new permanent
supportive housing projects. As in past
years, CoCs who would like to create
new permanent housing units may use
the ‘‘hold harmless reallocation
process’’ to do so. With this process,
eligible CoCs can replace or reduce
renewal projects with a new permanent
housing project using the same funds. In
PO 00000
Frm 00321
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11753
the past, a CoC risked losing the funds
that it had ‘‘reallocated’’ in this way if
the CoC did not score above the full
funding line. New this year, if a CoC
reallocates a portion of its pro rata need
to an eligible new permanent housing
project, the project will be funded, as
long as it is in a CoC receiving at least
65 points. HUD is making this change to
make it easier for CoCs to choose to
fund new permanent housing units. For
more information on hold harmless
status and the process for reallocating
pro rata need, see section I.A.8.g of this
NOFA (the glossary) or the Questions
and Answers Supplement at
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
(3) Step 3—Samaritan Housing
Initiative: Formerly referred to as the
Permanent Housing Bonus, this special
incentive to promote permanent
supportive housing for the chronically
homeless is provided to CoC systems
that place an eligible, new permanent
supportive housing project in the
number one priority position on the
priority list. If the number one priority
project qualifies as an eligible, new
permanent housing project exclusively
serving the chronically homeless, then
the full amount of that project’s eligible
housing activities, up to a maximum 15
percent of the CoC’s preliminary pro
rata need, will be added to the pro rata
need amount for the Continuum. The
only eligible activities that will be
counted toward this bonus are housing
activities and for SHP, case
management, and administration.
Applicants may use no more than 20
percent of this bonus for case
management costs. Please note: any
amount of the proposed project that
exceeds the limitations described above
will be applied against the pro rata need
for the CoC. For the SHP program,
housing activities are acquisition, new
construction, rehabilitation, leasing of
housing and operating costs when used
in connection with housing. S+C and
SRO rental assistance are defined as
housing activities and are eligible under
the incentive as well. HMIS costs will
be excluded from this calculation.
(4) Step 4—Final Pro Rata Need: The
dollar amount determined after
application of each of these steps, as
applicable, is referred to as the ‘‘final
pro rata need amount.’’ Please be
advised that the final funding amount
awarded to Shelter Plus Care or Section
8 SRO projects may be different from
the requested amount due to changes in
the FMRs. HUD will apply FMR changes
after selection.
(5) Step 5—Awarding need points to
projects: Once HUD establishes the final
pro rata need, HUD will apply it against
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11754
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
the priority project list in the
application. Starting from the highest
priority project, HUD will proceed
down the list to award need points to
each project. Any project not falling
fully within the 40 point need range
will receive 10 need points. Thereafter,
HUD will proceed further down the
priority project list and award 10 points
for need to each project if it falls fully
within the ‘‘second level’’ of pro rata
need amount for that CoC. The ‘‘second
level’’ is the amount between the pro
rata need and twice the pro rata need for
the CoC. Remaining projects each
receive 5 points. If the projects for the
Continuum are not prioritized, then all
projects will receive 0 points for Need.
B. Reviews and Selection Process
1. Review, Rating, and Ranking. HUD
may employ rating panels to review and
rate applications. See the General
Section for more information on rating
panels. Two types of reviews will be
conducted—threshold review and
selection factor (CoC and Need) rating.
Applicant and Sponsor Eligibility and
Capacity as well as Project Eligibility
and Project Quality are threshold
reviews. Threshold reviews are
explained in Section III.C.2 of this
NOFA, which covers eligible applicants
and projects. HUD will add the score for
the CoC to the Need score to obtain a
total score for each project. The projects
will then be ranked nationally from
highest to lowest according to the total
combined score.
2. Conditional Selection and
Adjustments to Funding
a. Conditional Selection. Whether a
project is conditionally selected, as
described in Section VI.A, will depend
on its overall ranking compared to
others, except that HUD reserves the
right to select lower rated eligible
projects in order to meet the 30 percent
overall permanent housing requirement,
as well as the 10 percent chronic
homeless requirement. Projects that are
included in the 10 percent chronic
homeless requirement may also be part
of the 30 percent overall permanent
housing requirement. (See Section V.B.3
below for additional selection
considerations regarding these
requirements.)
When insufficient funds remain to
fund all projects in the competition
having the same total score, HUD will
first fund permanent housing projects if
necessary to achieve the 30 percent
overall permanent housing requirement.
HUD will then fund non-permanent
housing, safe haven-TH and transitional
housing projects that predominantly
serve individuals experiencing chronic
homelessness in order to achieve the 10
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
percent chronic homeless requirement.
HUD will then break ties among the
remaining projects with the same total
score by comparing scores received by
the projects for each of the following
scoring factors, in the order shown:
Need, Overall CoC score, CoC
Organizational Structure, CoC Housing
and Service Needs, CoC Strategic
Planning, CoC Performance, Housing
Emphasis and Performance. The final
tie-breaking factor is the priority
number of the competing projects on the
applicable CoC priority list(s).
HUD has determined that the
Congressional goal of enhancing
homeless data collection at the CoC
level is best achieved by assisting CoCs
seeking dedicated Homeless
Management Information Systems
(HMIS) to receive Supportive Housing
Program funds. To this end, HUD
reserves the right to fund for at least one
year lower rated eligible dedicated
HMIS projects receiving 40 need points
and at least 25 Continuum points.
b. Adjustments to Funding: HUD has
determined that geographic diversity is
an appropriate consideration in
selecting homeless assistance projects in
the competition. HUD believes that
geographic diversity can be achieved
best by awarding grants to as many CoCs
as possible. To this end, in instances
where any of the 50 States, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern
Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands, and
American Samoa does not have at least
one funded CoC, HUD reserves the right
to fund eligible project(s) receiving 40
Need points in the CoC with the highest
total score in that jurisdiction. To
qualify for funding, the total score for
these first-level projects on the CoC
priority list must be at least 65 points.
In the case of two or more CoCs with the
same total score, HUD will use the tiebreaking rules described above. In
addition, if the highest priority project
passing threshold requirements within a
CoC fails to meet the criteria for
receiving 40 Need points, HUD reserves
the right to reduce the total requested
amount for that project to allow it to
qualify for 40 Need points. If you do not
submit clear project priority
designations for the Continuum or if
HUD, at its sole discretion, cannot
determine the CoC’s priority
designations, then HUD will give all
such projects 0 Need points. If the CoC
requests a new permanent housing
project as the highest priority, and HUD
determines that it is not a permanent
housing project, HUD reserves the right
to not award funds to that project rather
than reclassify the component. The
intent of this provision is to preserve
PO 00000
Frm 00322
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
PRN for lower ranking projects. Finally,
if the total amount that would be
awarded for first level projects in a CoC
exceeds the final pro rata need amount
for that CoC, the lowest priority first
level project being selected for funding
will be reduced to the amount that is
wholly within the higher need level.
HUD may otherwise adjust funding of
applications in accordance with the
provisions of the General Section.
In addition, HUD reserves the right to
ensure that a project that is applying for,
and eligible for, selection under this
competition is not awarded funds that
duplicate activities. If the geography
included in your CoC strategy
substantially overlaps that of another
application, projects within the CoC
application that receive the highest CoC
score will be eligible for up to 40 Need
points. Projects in the competing CoC
application with the lower CoC score
will receive 0 need points. In no case
will the same geographical area be used
more than one time in assigning Need
points. The local HUD Field Office can
help you determine if any of the areas
proposed for inclusion by your CoC
system is also likely to be claimed under
another CoC system in this competition.
3. Additional Selection
Considerations. HUD also will apply the
limitations on funding described below
in making conditional selections.
a. Thirty Percent Permanent Housing
Requirement. In accordance with the
appropriation for homeless assistance
grants in the Fiscal Year 2007 HUD
Appropriations Act, HUD will use not
less than 30 percent of the total FY 2007
Homeless Assistance Grants
appropriation, excluding amounts
provided for renewals under the S+C
Program, to fund projects that meet the
definition of permanent housing.
Projects meeting the definition of
permanent housing for this purpose are:
(1) New and renewal projects under
the SHP that are designated as either
permanent housing for homeless
persons with disabilities or Safe Haven
projects designated as having the
characteristics of permanent housing for
homeless persons with disabilities,
including having leases with all
program participants. All such
permanent housing projects chosen for
this purpose must have received at least
10 Need points, and must be submitted
as part of a CoC application receiving at
least 25 points under the CoC scoring
factor. However, no CoC applicant may
receive more than 30 percent of its pro
rata need, up to $3 million, for ‘‘second
level’’ permanent housing projects
assigned 10 Need points that are
selected for funding under this
procedure. (See Section V.A.2.b(5) for
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
definition of ‘‘second level.’’) HUD will
award no less than 30 percent of the
total FY 2007 Homeless Assistance
Grants appropriation, excluding
amounts for S+C renewals, for
permanent housing projects unless an
insufficient number of approvable
permanent housing projects are
submitted. In order to meet this
permanent housing funding requirement
and stay within the total funding
amount available, initially selected
Supportive Service Only (SSO) and nonpermanent housing projects will be
deselected if necessary to add an
adequate number of permanent housing
projects, even if they are lower scoring
housing projects. HUD will, if
necessary, first proceed to de-select new
SSO projects initially selected, starting
with lowest scoring new projects and
proceeding to higher scoring new SSO
projects initially selected. If the funding
line is still exceeded, HUD will proceed
to de-select the lowest scoring new nonpermanent housing projects initially
selected and proceed to higher scoring
new non-permanent housing projects.
Finally, if the funding line is still
exceeded HUD will proceed to de-select
SSO and then other non-permanent
housing renewal projects until all
selected projects are within the funding
line.
(2) New S+C projects; and
(3) SRO projects.
b. Ten Percent Housing for Chronic
Homeless Requirement: HUD has
implemented a requirement that at least
10 percent of the appropriation must be
awarded for projects predominantly
serving individuals experiencing
chronic homelessness. To be considered
predominantly serving chronically
homeless people, at least 70 percent of
the persons served in this project must
meet HUD’s definition of chronic
homelessness. Permanent housing,
transitional and safe haven housing
projects, whether new or renewal, that
commit to predominantly serving
persons experiencing chronic
homelessness will be counted for this
purpose. To meet this requirement,
HUD will also include permanent
housing projects selected for the 30
percent requirement that predominantly
serve chronically homeless persons.
S+C renewals will then be screened to
count projects predominantly serving
chronically homeless persons. If the 10
percent requirement is not yet met,
permanent, transitional and safe haven
housing projects below the funding line
that predominantly serve chronically
homeless persons will also be selected
to achieve this requirement.
c. Distribution of Selections: In
accordance with section 429 of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
McKinney-Vento Act, HUD will award
Supportive Housing Program funds as
follows: not less than 25 percent for
projects that primarily serve homeless
families with children; not less than 25
percent for projects that primarily serve
homeless persons with disabilities; and
not less than 10 percent for supportive
services not provided in conjunction
with supportive housing. After projects
are rated and ranked, based on the
factors described above, HUD will
determine if the conditionally selected
projects achieve these minimum
percentages. If not, HUD will skip
higher-ranked projects in order to
achieve these minimum percentages.
In accordance with section 463(a) of
the McKinney-Vento Act, at least 10
percent of S+C funds will be awarded
for each of the four components of the
program: Tenant-based Rental
Assistance; Sponsor-based Rental
Assistance; Project-based Rental
Assistance; and Single Room
Occupancy (provided there are
sufficient numbers of approvable
projects to achieve these percentages).
After projects are rated and ranked,
based on the factors described above,
HUD will determine if the conditionally
selected projects achieve these
minimum percentages. If necessary,
HUD will skip higher-ranked projects in
order to achieve these minimum
percentages.
In accordance with section 455(b) of
the McKinney-Vento Act, no more than
10 percent of the assistance made
available for S+C in any fiscal year may
be used for programs located within any
one unit of general local government. In
accordance with section 441(c) of the
McKinney-Vento Act, no city or urban
county may have SRO Section 8 projects
receiving a total of more than 10 percent
of the assistance made available under
this program. HUD is defining the 10
percent availability this fiscal year as
$10 million for S+C and $10 million for
Section 8 SRO. However, if the amount
awarded under either of these two
programs exceeds $100 million, then the
amount awarded to any one unit of
general local government (for purposes
of the S+C Program) or city or urban
county (for the purposes of the Section
8 SRO Program) cannot exceed 10
percent of the actual total amount
awarded for that program.
Lastly, HUD reserves the right to
reduce the amount of a grant if
necessary to ensure that no more than
10 percent of assistance made available
under this NOFA will be awarded for
projects located within any one unit of
general local government or within the
geographic area covered by any one
Continuum of Care. If HUD exercises a
PO 00000
Frm 00323
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11755
right it has reserved under this NOFA,
that right will be exercised uniformly
across all applications received in
response to this NOFA.
4. Corrections to Deficient
Applications. The General Section
provides the procedures for corrections
to deficient applications.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
1. Action on Conditionally Selected
Applications. HUD will notify
conditionally selected applicants in
writing. HUD may subsequently request
them to submit additional project
information, which may include
documentation to show the project is
financially feasible; documentation of
firm commitments for cash match;
documentation showing site control;
information necessary for HUD to
perform an environmental review; a
copy of your Code of Conduct; and such
other documentation as specified by
HUD in writing to the applicant, that
confirms or clarifies information
provided in the application. HUD will
notify SHP, SRO, S+C and S+C/SRO
applicants of the deadline for
submission of such information. If an
applicant is unable to meet any
conditions for fund award within the
specified timeframe, HUD reserves the
right not to award funds to the applicant
and add them to funds available for the
next competition for the applicable
program.
2. Applicant Debriefing: See the
General Section for applicant debriefing
procedures.
3. Appeals Process: Applicants may
appeal the results of HUD’s review and
selection process if they believe a HUD
error has occurred. Appeals must be
submitted in writing to the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development and must state what HUD
error the applicant believes has
occurred.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Administrative and Other Program
Requirements
a. The Government Performance and
Results Act (GPRA) require Federal
agencies to measure the performance of
their programs. HUD captures this
information not only from monitoring
visits and APRs, but also on the data
gathered in annual competitions. For
example, the description of methods
used in determining the project priority
order submitted in Exhibit 1, CoC-Q,
Project Priorities Chart, provides
verification that projects are performing
satisfactorily and are effectively
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11756
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
addressing the needs for which they
were designed. HUD’s homeless
assistance programs are measured in
2007 by the objective to ‘‘end chronic
homelessness and to move homeless
families and individuals to permanent
housing.’’ This objective has a number
of measurable indicators, five of which
relate directly to the Continuum of Care
homeless assistance programs. These
five indicators are:
(1) Create new permanent housing
beds for chronically homeless persons.
This information is collected in Exhibit
1, Chart V, CoC Chronic Homeless
Progress Chart;
(2) At least 395 functioning CoC
communities will have a functional
Homeless Management Information
System (HMIS) by Fiscal Year 2007.
This information is collected via Exhibit
1, Chart CoC-M, HMIS Charts;
(3) The percentage of formerly
homeless individuals who remain
housed in HUD permanent housing
projects for at least 6 months will be at
least 71 percent. Stability in this
permanent housing is addressed in
Exhibit 1, Chart CoC-W, CoC Housing
Project Performance Chart;
(4) The percentage of homeless
persons who have moved from HUD
transitional housing into permanent
housing will be at least 61.5 percent.
The success of transitional housing is
addressed in Exhibit 1, Chart CoC-W,
CoC Housing Project Performance Chart;
and
(5) The employment rate of persons
exiting HUD homeless assistance
projects will be at least 18 percent.
Obtaining employment is addressed in
Exhibit 1, Chart CoC-X, CoC Mainstream
Programs and Employment Project
Performance Chart.
b. To achieve this objective and each
of these measurable indicators, HUD
needs your community’s help. The
emphasis in this year’s competition on
housing chronically homeless persons,
using HUD funds for transitional and
especially permanent housing, helping
clients access mainstream service
programs and jobs, and implementing
HMIS are all aligned with this GPRA
objective and its performance
indicators.
c. Executive Order 13202,
‘‘Preservation of Open Competition and
Government Neutrality Towards
Government Contractors’ Labor
Relations on Federal and Federally
Funded Construction Projects.’’ Please
see the General Section for further
information.
d. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. Please see the General
Section for further information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
e. Please reference the General
Section of the NOFA for other
administrative requirements.
2. Sanctions. Should HUD determine,
in its sole discretion, that sufficient
evidence exists to confirm that the
entity responsible for convening and
managing the CoC process in a
community has failed to follow locally
established or accepted procedures
governing the conduct of that process or
has failed to provide for a fair process,
including a project priority selection
process that gives equal consideration to
projects proposed by nonprofit
organizations, HUD reserves the
authority to impose sanctions up to and
including a prohibition on that entity
and the individuals comprising that
entity from participating in that capacity
in the future. In making this
determination, HUD will consider as
evidence court proceedings and
decisions, or the determinations of other
independent and impartial review
bodies. This authority cannot be
exercised until after a description of
procedural safeguards, including an
opportunity for comment and appeal,
and the specific process and procedures
for imposing a prohibition or
debarment, have been published in the
Federal Register.
C. Reporting
Once conditionally selected
applications advance to full award and
execution of a grant agreement, grantees
are required to submit an APR and a
completed Logic Model showing
outputs and outcomes achieved for the
year to both HUD Headquarters and the
respective Field Office each year.
Grantees must also respond to the
management questions contained in the
Logic Model. For FY 2006, HUD is
considering a new concept for the Logic
Model. The new concept is a Return on
Investment (ROI) statement. HUD will
be publishing a separate notice on the
ROI concept.
In addition, applicants must report
race and ethnicity data for beneficiaries
of HUD programs in conformity with
form 27061 HUD Race and Ethnic Data
Reporting Form. CoC applicants may
report this data as part of their Annual
Performance Report submission to HUD.
Also, Grantees who expend $500,000
or more in a year in Federal awards are
reminded they must have a single or
program-specific audit for that year in
accordance with the provisions of 24
CFR 45 and OMB Circular No. A–133.
VII. Agency Contacts
A. For Further Information. You may
contact the HUD Field Office serving
your area, at the telephone number
PO 00000
Frm 00324
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
shown in the General Section, or you
may contact the NOFA Information
Center at 1–800–483–8929. Individuals
who are hearing- or speech-impaired
should use the Information Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339 (these are
toll-free numbers).
B. For Technical Assistance. Before
the application deadline, HUD staff will
be available to provide you with general
guidance. HUD staff, however, cannot
provide you with guidance in actually
preparing your application. HUD Field
Office staff also will be available to help
you identify organizations in your
community that are involved in
developing the CoC system. Following
conditional selection of applications,
HUD staff will be available to assist
selected applicants in clarifying or
confirming information that is a
prerequisite to the offer of a grant
agreement or Annual Contributions
Contract by HUD. However, between the
application deadline and the
announcement of conditional selections,
HUD will accept no information that
would improve the substantive quality
of your application pertinent to HUD’s
funding decision.
C. Satellite Broadcast. HUD will hold
one or more information broadcasts via
satellite for potential applicants to learn
more about the program and preparation
of the application. Viewing of these
broadcasts, which will provide critical
information on the application process,
is highly recommended. For more
information about the date and time of
the broadcast, you should consult the
HUD web site at https://www.hud.gov/
offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.
VIII. Other Information
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this
document have been submitted for
approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and the OMB approval number is
2506–0112. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 200 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, semi-annual
reports and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
B. Attachments. This final section
lists the attachments that are critical to
the application process. Please see
Section IV.B.1.b of this NOFA for a
complete description of the forms and
certifications required and the order of
assembly. In addition to applicant and
sponsor documentation of eligibility,
please provide:
1. Forms to complete for Exhibit 1,
Continuum of Care.
Form HUD–40090–1. Exhibit 1,
Continuum of Care Application. All of
the following charts comprise this form:
A: CoC Lead Organization Chart
B: CoC Geography Chart
C: CoC Groups and Meetings Chart
D: CoC Planning Process Organizations
Chart
E: CoC Governing Structure Chart
F: CoC Project Review and Selection
Chart
G: Written Complaints Chart
H: CoC Services Inventory
I: Housing Inventory Charts
J: Housing Inventory Data Sources and
Methods Chart
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
K: CoC Point-in-Time Homeless
Population and Subpopulations Chart
L: CoC Homeless Population and
Subpopulations Data Sources and
Methods Chart
M: CoC HMIS Charts
N: CoC 10-Year Plan, Objectives, and
Action Steps Chart
O: CoC Discharge Planning Policy Chart
P: CoC Coordination Chart
Q: CoC Project Priorities Chart
R: CoC Pro Rata Need (PRN)
Reallocation Chart
S: CoC Project Leveraging Chart
T: CoC Current Funding and Renewal
Projections Chart
U: CoC Achievements Chart
V: CoC Chronic Homeless (CH) Progress
Chart
W: CoC Housing Performance Chart
X: Mainstream Programs and
Employment Project Performance
Chart
Y: Enrollment and Participation in
Mainstream Programs Chart
Z: Unexecuted Grants Awarded Prior to
the 2005 CoC Competition Chart
AA: CoC Participation in Energy Star
Chart
AB: Section 3 Employment Policy Chart
Form HUD–27300 Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers
PO 00000
Frm 00325
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11757
Form HUD–2993 Acknowledgment of
Application Receipt
Form HUD–2994–A You Are Our
Client! Grant Application Survey
2. Forms to complete for each applicant.
These include:
Form SF–424 Application for Federal
Assistance
Form HUD–40090–4 Applicant
Certifications
Form HUD–2880 Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report
Form SF–424 Supplement Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants
3. Forms to complete for each project
(Exhibit 2). These include:
Form HUD–40090–2 Exhibit 2,
Continuum of Care Project Application
Form HUD–96010
Logic Model
Form HUD–2991
Certification of Consistency with the
Consolidated Plan
Note: This year, the Questions and
Answers Supplement can be accessed at:
https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/
fundsavail.cfm.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00326
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.028
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11758
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
The Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant Program and Doctoral
Dissertation Research Grant Program
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of Policy Development and
Research, Office of University
Partnerships.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: The
Early Doctoral Student Research Grant
(EDSRG) Program and the Doctoral
Dissertation Research Grant (DDRG)
Program.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–27; OMB Approval Numbers
are:
1. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant Program is 2528–0216.
2. Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant Program is 2528–0213.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): The
CFDA Numbers for the programs in this
NOFA are as follows:
1. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant Program is 14.517
2. Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant Program is 14.516
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 2, 2007. Applications must
be received and validated by Grants.gov
by the deadline date. Please be sure to
read the General Section for electronic
submission and receipt requirements.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
G. Optional, Additional Overview
Content Information
1. Purpose of the University Partnership
Dissertation Programs
a. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant (EDSRG) Program. To enable
doctoral students enrolled at
institutions of higher education
accredited by a national or regional
accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education to
cultivate their research skills through
the preparation of research manuscripts
that focus on policy-relevant housing
and urban development issues.
b. Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant (DDRG) Program. To enable
doctoral candidates enrolled at
institutions of higher education
accredited by a national or regional
accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education to
complete their research and
dissertations on policy-relevant housing
and urban development issues.
2. Award Information. In Fiscal Year
(FY) 2007, approximately $405,000 has
been made available for the following
Office of University Partnerships (OUP)
dissertation programs.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
a. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant Program. Approximately $105,000
is available for funding. The maximum
grant performance period is 12 months.
The maximum amount that can be
requested by a doctoral student is
$15,000.
b. Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant Program. Approximately $300,000
is available for funding. The maximum
grant performance period is 24 months.
The maximum amount that can be
requested by a doctoral student is
$25,000.
If funding remains after all eligible
EDSRG doctoral students have been
selected for award, the remaining funds
will be made available to fund eligible
DDRG doctoral students. If funding
remains after all eligible DDRG doctoral
students have been selected for award,
the remaining funds will be made
available to fund eligible EDSRG
doctoral students.
3. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants are institutions of higher
education accredited by a national or
regional accrediting agency recognized
by the U.S. Department of Education
that sponsor doctoral students who meet
the following program requirements:
a. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant Program. Doctoral students
sponsored for funding under this
program must meet the following
requirements:
(1) Be a U.S. citizen or lawful
permanent resident (recipient of an
Alien Registration Recipient Card-Form
I–551, commonly referred to as a Green
Card) currently enrolled as a full-time
student in an accredited doctoral
program;
(2) Have a major or concentration
within a field related to housing and
urban development;
(3) Have not taken the preliminary/
comprehensive examinations;
(4) Completed at least two semesters
or three terms of a doctoral studies
program (depending on the course
structure of the institution); and
(5) Have an assigned faculty advisor
to supervise the research manuscript.
b. Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant Program. Doctoral students
sponsored for funding under this
program must meet the following
requirements:
(1) Be a U.S. citizen or lawful
permanent resident (recipient of an
Alien Registration Recipient Card-Form
I–551, commonly referred to as a Green
Card) currently enrolled an accredited
doctoral program;
(2) Have an approved dissertation
proposal;
(3) By the application deadline date,
the student’s dissertation proposal will
PO 00000
Frm 00327
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11759
be accepted by the full dissertation
committee;
(4) The student will have an assigned
dissertation advisor; and
(5) By September 1, 2007, the student
will have satisfactorily completed all
other written and oral doctoral degree
requirements, including all
examinations and defense of the
proposal, except the dissertation.
Full Text Of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant (EDSRG) Program
The purpose of the EDSRG program is
to enable doctoral students enrolled at
an institution of higher education
accredited by a national or regional
accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education to
cultivate their research skills through
the preparation of research manuscripts
that focus on policy-relevant housing
and urban development issues. The
FY2007 EDSRG program seeks to fund
research studies that may impact federal
problem solving and policymaking and
that are relevant to HUD’s policy
priorities and annual goals and
objectives. (See the General Section for
discussion of these priorities and annual
goals and objectives.)
B. Doctoral Dissertation Research Grant
(DDRG) Program
The purpose of the DDRG program is
to enable doctoral candidates enrolled at
institutions of higher education
accredited by a national or regional
accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Department of Education to
complete their research and
dissertations on policy-relevant housing
and urban development issues. The
FY2007 DDRG program seeks to fund
research studies that may impact federal
problem solving and policymaking and
that are relevant to HUD’s policy
priorities and annual goals and
objectives. (See the General Section for
discussion of these priorities and annual
goals and objectives.)
C. Topics
Examples of topics addressing these
issues (applicable to both the EDSRG
and DDRG programs) include but are
not limited to:
1. Increase Homeownership
Opportunities
a. Increase Minority Homeownership.
b. Simplify the Home Buying Process
(RESPA reform) and Reduce Settlement
Costs.
c. Set Appropriate Housing Goals for
the GSEs.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11760
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
E. Modifications
d. Counter Predatory Lending.
e. Help Low-Income Homeowners
Avoid Default and Foreclosure.
f. Evaluate Housing Counseling.
2. Promote Decent Affordable Housing
a. Reduce Regulatory Barriers to the
Development of Affordable Housing, as
well as All Forms of Multifamily
Housing.
b. Develop Creative Strategies for
Expanding the Availability of
Affordable Housing.
c. Strengthen the Delivery of HUDFunded Rental Assistance and
Assistance Provided Through the LowIncome Housing Tax Credit.
d. Promote Self-Sufficiency Among
Residents of Public and Assisted
Housing.
e. Meet the Housing-Related Needs of
the Elderly.
f. Meet the Housing-Related Needs of
Persons with Disabilities.
g. Improve Housing Quality and
Affordability through Technology and
Design.
3. Strengthen Communities
a. End Chronic Homelessness.
b. Prevent Homelessness.
c. Strengthen Cities.
d. Meet the Housing and Community
and Economic Development Needs of
Residents of High-Needs Areas,
including areas affected by Hurricane
Katrina, Appalachia, the Mississippi
Delta, and Indian Country.
4. Ensure Equal Opportunity in Housing
a. Reduce Housing Discrimination.
b. Improve Housing Accessibility for
Persons with Disabilities.
5. Embrace High Standards of Ethics,
Management, And Accountability
a. Reduce Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in
HUD-Funded Programs.
b. Improve the Effectiveness of HUD
Programs Through Program Evaluations
and Performance Measurement.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
6. Promote Participation of Faith-Based
and Community Organizations
a. Strengthen the Capacity of FaithBased and Community Organizations.
D. Authority
HUD’s authority for making funding
available under this NOFA is the
Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5;
approved February 15, 2007). These
programs are undertaken under HUD’s
research authority under Title V of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1970. They are being implemented
through this NOFA and the policies
governing their operation are contained
herein.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Listed below are major modifications
from the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 programfunding announcement:
1. A support letter from the doctoral
student’s assigned faculty advisor is no
longer required.
2. A support letter from the doctoral
student’s institution is no longer
required to be submitted with the
application, but must be on file at the
time of application submission. This is
a threshold requirement. HUD will
require students chosen to proceed to
the next step in the selection process to
submit the support letter from the
institution seven (7) calendar days after
initial contact from the OUP. OUP will
provide specific instructions on how the
letter must be submitted at that time.
OUP must receive the support letter
within the allotted timeframe or the
application will not be funded.
3. All applicants submitting electronic
applications must attach their narrative
response to Rating Factors 1–4 as one
attachment.
4. The appendix section of an
application must not exceed five (5)
pages in length (excluding forms, budget
narrative, and assurances). An applicant
SHOULD NOT submit resumes,
commitment letters, memoranda of
understanding and/or agreements, or
other back-up material. Each page must
include the applicant’s name and be
numbered. HUD will not consider the
information on any excess page.
II. Award Information
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2007,
approximately $405,000 has been made
available for the Office of University
Partnerships (OUP) dissertation
programs as follows:
A. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant Program. Approximately $105,000
will be made available for funding
under this program. The maximum
grant performance period is 12 months.
The maximum amount that can be
requested by a doctoral student is
$15,000.
B. Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant Program. Approximately $300,000
will be made available for funding
under this program. The maximum
grant performance period is 24 months.
The maximum amount that can be
requested by a doctoral student is
$25,000. If funding remains after all
eligible EDSRG doctoral students have
been selected for award, the remaining
funds will be made available to fund
eligible DDRG doctoral students. If
funding remains after all eligible DDRG
doctoral students have been selected for
award, the remaining funds will be
PO 00000
Frm 00328
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
made available to fund eligible EDSRG
doctoral students.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. Eligible
applicants are institutions of higher
education accredited by a national or
regional accrediting agency recognized
by the U.S. Department of Education
that sponsor doctoral students who meet
the following program requirements:
1. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant Program. Doctoral students
applying for funding under this program
must meet the following requirements:
a. Be a U.S. citizen or lawful
permanent resident (recipient of an
Alien Registration Recipient Card—
Form I–551, commonly referred to as a
Green Card) currently enrolled as a fulltime student in an accredited doctoral
program;
b. Have not taken the preliminary/
comprehensive examinations;
c. Have completed at least two
semesters or three terms of a doctoral
studies program (depending on the
course structure of the institution);
d. Have an assigned faculty advisor to
supervise the research manuscript.
2. Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant Program. Doctoral students
applying for funding under this program
must meet the following requirements:
a. Be a U.S. citizen or lawful
permanent resident (recipient of an
Alien Registration Recipient Card—
Form I–551, commonly referred to as a
Green Card) currently enrolled in an
accredited doctoral program;
b. Have an approved dissertation
proposal;
c. By the application deadline date,
the student’s dissertation proposal has
been accepted by the full dissertation
committee and the student has been
assigned a dissertation advisor; and
d. By September 1, 2007, the student
will have satisfactorily completed all
other written and oral doctoral degree
requirements, including all
examinations and defense of the
proposal, except the dissertation.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
None Required
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities. Grant funds
awarded under this NOFA must be used
to support direct costs incurred in the
timely completion of the research
product. Eligible costs include stipends,
computer software, purchase of data,
travel expenses to collect data,
transcription services, and
compensation for interviews.
2. Threshold Requirements
Applicable to All Applicants. All
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
applicants and doctoral students must
comply with the threshold requirements
as defined in the General Section and
the requirements listed below.
Applications that do not meet these
requirements will be considered
ineligible for funding and will be
disqualified.
a. The doctoral student must meet the
eligibility requirement for the program
for which they are requesting funding as
defined in Section III.A;
b. University sponsorship. The
university shall enter into a Grant
Agreement with HUD that provides for
payment of the grant by HUD to the
university and from the university to the
approved doctoral student, and that
further provides all required
certifications and assurances. The
University shall agree to provide, as the
Principal Investigator under the Grant
Agreement, a faculty advisor or
chairperson of the doctoral student’s
dissertation committee who shall
supervise the student’s work under the
Grant Agreement;
c. The student’s institution must
provide a letter agreeing to support the
student. The letter must outline the
specific type of support the institution
will provide as part of this grant. This
support may not replace support or
assistance the institution would
otherwise provide to students. A
support letter from the doctoral
student’s institution is no longer
required at the time of application
submission, but must be on file at the
time of application submission.
Students chosen to proceed to the next
step in the selection process will be
required to submit the support letter
from the institution seven (7) calendar
days after initial contact from the OUP
office. OUP will provide specific
instructions on how the letter must be
submitted at that time. If OUP does not
receive the support letter within the
allotted timeframe, the application will
not be funded and the funding will be
made available to the next eligible
applicant.
d. The applicant has requested no
more funding than the grant maximum
allocated for the program for which they
are requesting funding as outlined in
Section II;
e. Only one application package can
be submitted per doctoral student.
Students who have received funding in
the past are not eligible to receive
funding under the same program;
f. Applications must receive a
minimum score of 75 points to be
considered for funding;
g. The University (the official
applicant on behalf of the student) must
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
have a DUNS number to receive HUD
grant funds (See the General); and
h. Electronic applications must be
received and validated by Grants.gov no
later than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on
the application dateline date.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Addresses to Request Application
Package
Applicants may download the
instructions to the application found on
the Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information you
may call the Grants.gov Support Desk
toll free 800–518–GRANTS or e-mail
your questions to Support@Grants.gov.
Applicants must be registered to submit
an application via Grants.gov. See the
General Section for information
regarding the registration process or ask
for registration information from the
Grants.gov Support Desk.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Forms. The following forms are
required for submission, except where
otherwise noted.
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance;
b. SF–424 Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunities for
Applicants (‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey
(SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov);
c. HUD–424–CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov);
d. SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities;
e. HUD–27300, Questionnaire for
HUD’s Removal of Regulatory Barriers
(‘‘HUD Communities Initiative Form’’
on Grants.gov), if applicable;
f. HUD–2880, Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov);
g. HUD–96010, Program Outcome
Logic Model;
h. HUD–2994–A, You Are Our Client!
Grant Applicant Survey (Optional)
i. HUD–2993, Acknowledgement of
Applicant Receipt. Complete this form
only if you have received a waiver to the
electronic application submission
requirement. Applicants submitting
electronically are not required to
include this form; and
j. HUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov). This form must be used as
the cover page to transmit third party
documents and other information.
PO 00000
Frm 00329
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11761
Applicants are advised to download the
application package, complete the SF–
424 first and it will pre-populate the
Transmittal Cover page. The Transmittal
Cover page will contain a unique
identifier embedded in the page that
will help HUD associate your faxed
materials to your application. Please
download the cover page and then make
multiple copies to provide to any of the
entities responsible for submitting faxed
materials to HUD on your behalf. Please
do not use your own fax cover sheet.
HUD will not read any faxes that are
sent without the HUD–96011 fax
transmittal cover page.
2. Certifications and Assurances.
Please read the General Section for
detailed information on all
Certifications and Assurances. All
applications submitted through
Grants.gov constitute an
acknowledgement and agreement to all
required certifications and assurances.
Please include in your application
each item listed below. Applicants
submitting paper copy applications
should submit the applications in the
following order:
a. SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance. Please remember the
following:
(1) The name of the applicant for
these programs is the University. Please
make sure that the University’s address
is listed on this form (not the student’s
information);
(2) Include the name, title, address,
telephone number, facsimile number,
and e-mail address of the designated
contact person. This is the University
contact that will receive all information
pertinent to this grant including
notification for the support letter from
the University if required; therefore
please ensure the accuracy of the
information;
(3) The total grant amount requested
for the total performance period of the
grant;
(4) The University’s Employer
Identification/Tax ID;
(5) The DUNS Number;
(6) The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number for the program
from which you are requesting funding;
(a) Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant Program is 14.517
(b) Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant Program is 14.516.
(7) The signature of the Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR) who
by virtue of submitting an application
via Grants.gov has been authenticated
by the credential provider to submit
applications on behalf of the Institution
and approved by the eBusiness Point of
Contact to submit an application via
Grants.gov. The AOR must be able to
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11762
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
make a legally binding agreement with
HUD. See the General Section for
further information.
b. Table of Contents.
c. Application Checklist. Doctoral
students should use the checklist to
ensure that they have all the required
components of the application. Students
submitting an electronic application do
not have to submit the checklist.
Students who receive a waiver of the
electronic application submission
requirement must include a copy of the
checklist in their application. The
checklist can be located in Appendix A.
d. Executive Summary (700 words or
less). The Executive Summary should,
at a minimum, include a summary of
the proposed research project that
addresses the following information:
(1) Specific purpose of the
manuscript/dissertation;
(2) Methodology being used; and
(3) How the student meets the
eligibility criteria for the program from
which she/he is requesting funding.
In addition, include the following
information:
(1) Student’s address, telephone
number, facsimile number, and e-mail
address at the university; and
(2) The faculty advisor’s name, title,
department, address, telephone number,
facsimile number, and e-mail address.
This person will serve as the Principal
Investigator for this grant.
e. Narrative statement addressing the
Rating Factors. HUD will use the
narrative response to the ‘‘Rating
Factors’’ to evaluate, rate, and rank
applications. The narrative statement is
the main source of information.
Therefore, it is very important that the
student becomes fully familiar with the
rating factors for the program from
which he/she is requesting funding. The
narrative should be numbered in
accordance with each factor and
subfactor. Please do not repeat material
in response to the four factors; instead,
focus on how well the proposal
responds to each of the factors. Make
sure to address each factor and subfactor
and provide sufficient information
about every element. The application
narrative, bibliographies, and any
supporting references must not exceed
15 pages in length (excluding forms,
assurances, budget narrative, Table of
Contents, and Executive Summary) and
must be submitted on 81⁄2 by 11-inch
paper, double-spaced on one side of the
paper, with one inch margins (from the
top, bottom, left, and right side of the
document) and printed in standard
Times New Roman 12-point font. Each
page must be numbered and the name
of the student and university must be on
each page. The double-spacing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
requirement applies to the narrative
section of the application (excluding
references, and bibliographies ). Note
that although submitting pages in excess
of the page limit will not disqualify the
application, HUD will not consider the
information on any excess page. This
exclusion may result in a lower score or
failure to meet a threshold requirement.
All applicants submitting electronic
applications must attach their narrative
response to Rating Factors 1–4 as one
attachment. Please do not attach your
response to each factor separately.
Please follow the instructions on file
extension and file names in the General
Section.
f. University Support Letter. This
letter must provide a statement from the
appropriate official at the university that
describes in detail the type of support
the University will be providing. Please
remember that this support may not
replace support or assistance that the
institution would otherwise provide the
student. Doctoral students are not
required to submit this letter with their
application but it must be on file at the
time of application submission.
Students chosen to proceed to the next
step in the selection process will be
required to submit the support letter
from the institution seven calendar days
after initial contact from the OUP. OUP
will provide specific instructions on
how the letter must be submitted at that
time. If OUP does not receive the
support letter within the allotted
timeframe, the application will not be
funded and the funding will be made
available to the next eligible applicant.
g. Budget. The budget submission
must include the following:
(1) HUD–424–CB, ‘‘Grant Application
Detailed Budget.’’ This budget form
shows the total budget by year and by
line item for the program activities to be
carried out with the proposed HUD
grant. Each year of the program should
be presented separately. Make sure that
the amount shown on the SF–424, the
HUD–424–CB and on all other required
program forms is consistent and the
budget totals are correct. Remember to
check addition in totaling the categories
on the Form HUD–424–CB so that all
items are included in the total. The
budget form must be fully completed. If
there is any inconsistency between any
required forms, the HUD–424–CB will
be used. If this correction puts an
application over the grant maximum,
the doctoral student will not be able to
correct the amount requested and the
application will be disqualified. If an
application is selected for award, the
applicant may be required to provide
greater specificity to the budget during
grant agreement negotiations.
PO 00000
Frm 00330
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(2) Budget Narrative. A narrative must
be submitted that explains how the
doctoral student arrived at the cost
estimates. The proposed cost estimates
should be reasonable for the work to be
performed and consistent with rates
established for the level of expertise
required to perform the work proposed.
h. Appendix. Doctoral students
receiving a waiver of the electronic
submission requirements and
submitting a paper copy of the
application must place all required
forms in this section. The appendix
section of an application must not
exceed five (5) pages in length
(excluding forms, budget narrative and
assurances). Each page must include the
applicant’s name and be numbered. An
applicant SHOULD NOT submit support
letters, resumes, or other back-up
materials. If this information is
included, it will not be considered
during the review process. The
additional items will also slow the
transmission of your application.
C. Submission Dates and Times
A complete application package must
be received and validated electronically
by the Grants.gov portal no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on or before
the application deadline date. In an
effort to address any issues with
transmission of your application,
applicants are strongly encouraged to
submit their applications at least 48 to
72 hours prior to the application
deadline. This will allow an applicant
enough time to make the necessary
adjustments to meet the deadline in the
event Grants.gov rejects the application.
Please see the General Section for
further instructions. Electronic faxes
using the Facsimile Transmittal Cover
Sheet (Form HUD–96011) contained in
the electronic application must be
received no later than 11:59:59 p.m.
eastern time on the application deadline
date.
D. Intergovernmental Review
These programs are excluded from an
Intergovernmental Review.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Funding may only be provided to
doctoral students who meet the
standards for eligible applicants
outlined in Section III. A. under the
program for which they are requesting
funding.
2. Grant funds awarded for programs
under this NOFA may not be used to
pay for tuition, computer hardware, or
meals.
3. Early Doctoral Student Research
Grant (EDSRG) Program. Three
thousand dollars of the grant funds will
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
be held until the doctoral student’s
research manuscript has been
completed and accepted for
presentation at a conference or
publication in a refereed journal by the
end of the grant period, or a committee
of three faculty members (including the
faculty sponsor, as the principal
investigator of the grant) has determined
and certified to HUD that the
manuscript is of high quality and
worthy of submission to conferences or
journals, and two copies of the research
product are submitted to HUD in its
final version.
4. Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant (DDRG) Program. Six thousand
dollars of the grant funds will be held
until the doctoral student’s dissertation
has been completed, approved by the
committee, and two final copies are
submitted to HUD in its final version.
5. Institutions that have had
previously awarded grants under these
programs terminated for nonperformance and have outstanding
funds owed to HUD resulting from the
termination, will be excluded from
competition until the outstanding funds
are repaid. (Applicants must comply
with the Delinquent Federal Debt
Requirement as defined in the General
Section).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
F. Other Submission Requirements
1. Application Submission and
Receipt Procedure. Please read the
General Section carefully and
completely for the electronic
submission and receipt procedures for
all applications because failure to
comply may disqualify a doctoral
student’s application.
2. Waiver of Electronic Submission
Requirements. Applicants should
submit their waiver requests in writing
using e-mail or fax. Waiver requests
must be submitted no later than 15 days
prior to the application deadline date
and should be submitted to: Susan
Brunson, Office of University
Partnerships, Email:
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov, FAX: (202)
708–0309.
Paper applications will not be
accepted from applicants that have not
been granted a waiver. If an applicant is
granted a waiver, the Office of
University Partnerships will provide
instructions for submission. All
applicants submitting applications in
paper format must have received a
waiver to the electronic application
submission requirement and the
application must be received by HUD on
or before the application deadline date.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Rating Factor 1. Capacity to do the
Research (25 Points). In reviewing this
factor, HUD will determine the extent to
which the doctoral student clearly
addresses the following:
a. Describe the skills and expertise
you possess to conduct research.
Research skills and expertise will be
judged in terms of how recent they are.
Research skills and expertise developed
within the last two (2) years will be
considered recent.
b. Describe the knowledge and
experience you posses to undertake the
proposed research hypotheses.
Knowledge and experience will be
judged in terms of how relevant it is to
the research proposed (e.g., course
work, teaching, research projects, and
presentations). Knowledge and
experience developed within the last
five (5) years in the area of the proposed
research will be considered relevant.
c. Provide a detailed list that outlines
the preliminary steps that were taken
(e.g., literature review, research
hypotheses, questions to be answered)
to identify the proposed manuscript/
dissertation topic/hypotheses.
2. Rating Factor 2. Need for the
Research (15 Points). This factor
addresses the extent to which there is a
need for funding the proposed research.
HUD encourages doctoral students to
undertake research that will assist the
Department in implementing its policy
priorities and which help the
Department achieve its goals and
objectives in FY 2007. In reviewing this
factor, HUD will determine the extent to
which the doctoral student clearly
addresses the following:
a. Describe the need for funding your
proposed research manuscript/
dissertation.
b. Express the impact your proposed
research manuscript/dissertation may
have in producing information that will
be generally accepted in the relevant
research community.
c. Explain the direct relationship
between your proposed manuscript/
dissertation and at least one of HUD’s
annual goals and objectives (i.e., the
research that will be produced could
have an effect on HUD’s strategic goals
and programs and policies to achieve
these goals). For a full list and
explanation of the annual goal and
objectives, please refer to the General
Section.
3. Rating Factor 3. Soundness of
Approach (50 Points). This factor
addresses the quality and effectiveness
of the proposed research and
methodology and the actions regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00331
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11763
HUD’s policy priorities. This factor will
be evaluated based on the extent to
which the proposed work plan will
demonstrate the following:
a. (25 Points) Quality of Research.
(1) Describe in detail the proposed
research design and methodology that
will be used to complete the proposed
manuscript/dissertation. (2). Describe
how the research design and
methodology proposed will produce
data and information that will
successfully answer the research
hypothesis.
b. (20 Points) Specific Activities. The
work plan must identify all the major
tasks involved in completing the
proposed research;
(1) Indicate the sequence in which
these tasks will be performed;
(2) The sequence and duration of this
effort should be presented in quarterly
(3 month) intervals for the entire life of
the grant (use of a milestone chart to
present this information is
recommended); and
(3) Identify any key individuals
assisting in the proposed activities.
Efforts on the part of the doctoral
student who proposes extremely
complex and time-consuming data
collection efforts (e.g., major
longitudinal studies or a very large
number of site visits within the grant
period) will be determined less feasible
for completion within the allotted grant
performance period. For example, if the
proposed methodology is based on
information that may not be publicly
available until after the end of the grant
period (e.g., Census information), or a
data collection plan that will take longer
than the allotted grant performance
period, zero points will be awarded for
this factor.
c. (2 Points) HUD Policy Priorities. As
described in the General Section, to earn
points under this subfactor, HUD
requires applicants to undertake specific
activities that will assist the Department
in implementing its policy priorities
and that help the Department achieve its
goals and objectives in FY2008, when
the majority of grant recipients will be
reporting programmatic results and
achievement. In addressing this
subfactor, HUD will evaluate the extent
to which a program will further and
support HUD priorities. The quality of
the responses provided to one or more
of HUD’s priorities will determine the
score an applicant can receive.
Applicants must describe how each
policy priority is addressed. Applicants
that just list a priority will receive no
points.
The total number of points an
applicant can receive under this
subfactor is two (2). Each policy priority
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11764
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
addressed has a point value of one (1)
point, with the exception of the policy
priority related to removal of regulatory
barriers to affordable housing, which
has a value of up to two (2) points. To
receive these two (2) points, an
applicant must: (1) Complete either Part
A or Part B (not both), (2) include
appropriate documentation, (3) identify
a point of contact, (4) indicate how this
priority will be addressed and (5)
submit the completed questionnaire,
(HUD–27300) ‘‘HUD’s Initiative on
Removal of Regulatory Barriers ‘‘ found
in the General Section along with
required documentation. It is up to the
applicant to determine which of the
policy priorities they elect to address to
receive the available two (2) points.
d. (3 Points) Dissemination Strategies.
In reviewing this subfactor, HUD will
assess the doctoral student’s ability to
disseminate results of the research.
Describe your plan to disseminate the
research.
4. Rating Factor 4. Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (10 Points) This
factor reflects HUD’s goal to embrace
high standards of management and
accountability. It measures the student’s
commitment to assess their performance
to complete their proposed research
within the grant performance period.
Students are required to develop an
effective, quantifiable, outcome oriented
evaluation plan for measuring
performance and determining the
outputs to achieve their proposed
outcome(s). The Logic Model is a
summary of the narrative statements
presented in Factors 1–3. Therefore, the
information submitted on the logic
model should be consistent with the
information contained in the narrative
statements.
‘‘Outcomes’’ are ultimate goals. A
student must clearly identify the
outcomes to be measured and achieved.
Examples of outcomes are the
completion of the research manuscript/
dissertation, the cultivation of research
skills to the student, the plan to
disseminate the research, and the
benefits of the research study to HUD’s
policy priorities and annual goals and
objectives.
In addition, a student must establish
interim benchmarks and outputs that
lead to the ultimate achievement of the
outcomes. ‘‘Outputs’’ are the direct
benchmarks and indicators that will
allow a student to measure their
performance. Performance indicators
should be objectively quantifiable and
measure actual achievements. At a
minimum, an applicant must address
the following activities in the evaluation
plan:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
(1) Identify benchmarks that will be
used to track the progress of your study;
(2) Indicate the sequence in which
tasks will be performed; and
(3) Identify potential obstacles in
meeting the objectives, and discuss how
the obstacles will be handled;
This information must be included
under this section on a HUD–96010,
Program Logic Model form. HUD has
developed a new approach to
completing this form. Please carefully
read the General Section for
instructions, training is available. (Form
HUD–96010 will be excluded from the
page count.) If an applicant utilizes
‘‘other’’ from the Logic Model
categories, then the applicant should
describe briefly this ‘‘other’’ category
within the Rating Factor 4 narrative. If
a narrative is provided, those pages will
be included in the page count.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Application Selection Process. Two
types of reviews will be conducted:
a. A threshold review to determine an
applicant’s basic eligibility; and
b. A technical review for all
applications that pass the threshold
review to rate and rank the application
based on the ‘‘Rating Factors’’ listed in
Section V.A above. Only those
applications that pass the threshold
review will receive a technical review
and be rated and ranked.
2. Rating Panels. To review and rate
applications, HUD may establish panels
which may include experts or
consultants not currently employed by
HUD. These individuals may be
included to obtain certain expertise.
3. Ranking. In order to be funded, an
application must receive a minimum
score of 75 points out of a possible 100
for Factors 1 through 4. The RC/EZ/EC–
II communities two bonus points
described in the General Section do not
apply to this NOFA. HUD will fund
applications under each program in
rank order, until all available program
funds are awarded. If two or more
applications have the same number of
points, the application with the higher
points for Factor 3, shall be selected. If
there is still a tie, the application with
the higher points for Factor 2, shall be
selected. HUD reserves the right to
reduce the amount of funding requested
in order to fund as many highly ranked
applications as possible. Additionally, if
funds remain after funding the highest
ranked applications, HUD may fund
part of the next highest-ranking
application. If an applicant turns down
the award offer, HUD will make the
same determination for the next highestranking application.
PO 00000
Frm 00332
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4. Correction to Deficient
Applications. See the General Section.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Announcements of awards are
anticipated on or before September 30,
2008.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
After all selections have been made,
HUD will notify all winning applicants
in writing. HUD may require winning
applicants to participate in additional
negotiations before receiving an official
award.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Refer to the General Section.
1. Debriefing. The General Section
provides the procedures for requesting a
debriefing. All requests for debriefings
must be made in writing and submitted
within 30 days of receipt of comments
to Susan Brunson, Office of University
Partnerships, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 8106, Washington,
DC 20410–6000. Applicants may also
write to Ms. Brunson via e-mail at
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov.
2. Environmental Requirements. The
provision of assistance under these
programs is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and not subject to
compliance actions for related
environmental authorities under 24 CFR
50.19(b)(1) and (b)(9).
3. Administrative. Grants awarded
under this NOFA will be governed by
the provisions of 24 CFR part 84 (Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and Other
Non-Profit Organizations), A–21 (Cost
Principles for Educational Institutions)
and A–133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations). Applicants can access
the OMB circulars at the White House
Web site at: www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
circulars/.
C. Reporting Requirements
All doctoral students that receive
grant funds under this program NOFA
are required to submit a report, halfway
through the grant period, on the
progress to date that has been made
toward completion of the research
product and the likelihood that it will
be completed on time.
At the end of the grant performance
period doctoral students must submit
two copies of the approved manuscript/
dissertation to HUD in its final version.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Titles of the manuscript/dissertation
must not be changed from the title
awarded unless prior approval has been
received from HUD.
VII. Agency Contacts
Doctoral students may contact Susan
Brunson, Office of University
Partnerships at (202) 708–3061,
extension 3852 or Sherone Ivey at (202)
708–3061, extension 4200. Persons with
speech or hearing impairments may call
the Federal Information Relay Service
TTY at 800–877–8339. Except for the
‘‘800’’ number, these telephone numbers
are not toll-free. Students may also
reach Ms. Brunson via e-mail at
Susan_S._Brunson@hud.gov and/or
Sherone Ivey at
Sherone_E._Ivey@hud.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Paperwork Reduction Act
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
The information collection
requirements contained in this
document have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2528–
0216 (for the Early Doctoral Student
Research Grant Program) and 2528–0213
(for the Doctoral Dissertation Research
Grant Program). In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 44 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
for collecting, reviewing, and reporting
the data for the application, semi-annual
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
reports, and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
Appendix A—Application Checklist
EDSRG and DDRG
This checklist identifies application
submission requirements. Doctoral students
are requested to use this checklist when
preparing an application to ensure
submission of all required elements. Students
submitting an electronic application do not
have to submit the checklist. Students that
receive a waiver of the electronic application
submission requirement must include a copy
of the checklist in their application.
Check off to ensure these items have been
included in the application:
lllSF–424 ‘‘Application for Federal
Assistance
lllTable of Contents
lll_Application Checklist (if applicable)
lllExecutive Summary (700 words or
less)
Indicate the page number where each of
the Rating Factors are located:
lllNarrative Statement Addressing the
Rating Factors. The application narrative
must not exceed 15 pages in length
(excluding required forms, assurances,
table of contents, executive summary,
budget narrative, commitment letters,
memorandum of understanding, and
agreements) double-spaced on one side
of the paper, with one-inch margins
(from top, bottom, left and right) printed
in standard Times New Roman 12 point
font). Applicants that submit
applications via Grants.gov should
review the General Section for
information about file names and
extensions. File names should not
contain spaces or special characters.
lllFactor I
lllFactor II
PO 00000
Frm 00333
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11765
lllFactor III
lllFactor IV
Check off to ensure these items have been
included in the application: Appendix. The
appendix section of an application must not
exceed five (5) pages in length (excluding
forms, budget narrative, and assurances).
lllBudget
lllGrant Application Detailed Budget,
(HUD–CB) (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov
lllBudget Narrative (No form provided
and must be submitted for the total grant
period)
Appendix B—All Required Forms
The following forms are required for
submission. All required forms are contained
in the electronic application package.
lllApplication for Federal Assistance
(SF–424)
lllSurvey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity
for Applicants (SF–424 Supplement)
(‘‘Faith Based EEO Survey (SF–424
SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov)
lllGrant Application Detailed Budget
(HUD–424–CB) (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov)
lllDisclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF–
LLL); if applicable
lllQuestionnaire for HUD’s Removal of
Regulatory Barriers (HUD–27300) (‘‘HUD
Communities Initiative Form’’ on
Grants.gov), if applicable
lllApplicant/Recipient Disclosure/
Update Report (HUD–2880) (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov)
lllClient Comments and Suggestions
(HUD–2994), if applicable
lllYou Are Our Client! Grant Applicant
Survey (HUD–2994–A)
lllProgram Outcome Logic Model (HUD–
96010)
lllHUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal
(‘‘Facsimile Transmittal Form’’ on
Grants.gov)
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00334
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
EN13MR07.029
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11766
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
Housing Counseling Training
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner.
B. Funding Opportunity Title:
Housing Counseling Training.
C. Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR–
5100–N–23; OMB approval number is
2502–0261.
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: Housing
Counseling Training Program 14.316.
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is May 17, 2007. Applications
submitted through https://
www.grants.gov must be received and
validated by grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date. See Section
IV of the General Section, regarding
application submission procedures and
timely filing requirements.
Full Text of Announcement
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Program Purpose. Funds are available
to provide, under cooperative
agreements with HUD, training
activities designed to improve and
standardize the quality of counseling
provided by housing counselors
employed by HUD-approved housing
counseling agencies.
Authority. HUD’s Housing Counseling
Program, and the training of this NOFA
are authorized by Section 106 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701x), with guidance
provided in HUD Handbook 7610.1,
REV–4, CHG–1, dated October 27, 1997.
II. Award Information
A. Available Funds: This NOFA
announces the availability of
approximately $3.0 million.
B. Anticipated Awards: HUD’s goal is
to fund an organization to deliver the
full spectrum of activities eligible for
funding under this NOFA. Should this
not be possible, HUD reserves the right
to make multiple awards under this
NOFA.
C. Award Instrument: HUD expects to
use a cooperative agreement, but
reserves the right to use the award
instrument it determines to be most
appropriate. All awards will be made on
a cost reimbursement basis in
accordance with, and subject to, the
requirements in OMB Circular A–87,
Cost Principles for State, Local, and
Indian Tribal Governments; or OMB
Circular A–122, Cost Principles for Non-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Profit Organizations, as applicable to
your organization. These awards are
also subject to the administrative
requirements established in OMB
Circular A–102, implemented at 24 CFR
part 85 (Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Cooperative Agreements
to State, Local, and Federally
Recognized Indian Tribal Governments);
OMB Circular A–110, implemented at
24 CFR part 84 (Grants and Agreements
with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals and Other Non-Profit
Organizations); and OMB Circular A–
133 (Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations), implemented at 24 CFR
parts 84 and 85. If you receive an award,
you must comply with and are required
to ensure that any subrecipients also
comply with the above requirements.
OMB circulars can be found at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/
index.html.
Awards made as cooperative
agreements will entail significant HUD
involvement including but not limited
to the following items:
• Review and approval of proposed
courses, including course materials;
• Review and approval of evaluation
instruments and methodology for
determining value of courses and
impacts; and
• Review and Approval of training
locations. HUD reserves the right to
review and approve training locations as
well as the type of training and courses
offered.
• Targeting based on special needs
1. Award Adjustments. HUD reserves
the right to adjust funding levels for
each applicant. Once applicants are
selected for award, HUD will determine
the total amount to be awarded to any
grantee, based upon the scope and
geographic coverage of services to be
provided and funds available.
2. Award Period. Cooperative
agreements will be for a period of up to
twelve (12) months.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
1. Eligible Applicants. Applicants
must be public or private nonprofit
organizations with at least two years of
experience providing all types of
housing counseling training services
nation wide listed under Section III.C.2
of this NOFA. The only exception to
this requirement is public or nonprofit
organizations with at least 2 years
experience providing Home Equity
Conversion Mortgage (HECM)
counseling training nationwide.
A consortium of organizations may
apply for funding under this NOFA, but
PO 00000
Frm 00335
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11767
one organization must be designated as
the primary applicant. Furthermore,
applicants may utilize in-house staff,
sub-grant recipients or consultants, and
networks of local organizations with
requisite experience and capacity.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing or matching is not
required.
C. Other
1. Geographic Coverage: Applicants
must propose to provide the housing
counseling trainings nationwide.
2. Eligible Activities. Applicants must
propose to develop and implement a
comprehensive and ongoing training
program for housing counselors. The
training program must contain both
basic and advanced courses. The
majority of the training services must be
conducted as place-based activities.
Some training services may be provided
through satellite broadcast, or through
computer training software.
An applicant must be capable of
providing training on all the training
topics listed below. The only exception
to this requirement is an applicant
proposing to provide HECM counseling
training exclusively.
a. General Housing Counseling. Teach
counselors the principles and
applications of housing counseling from
the industry’s and the counselor’s point
of view. Review the skills and tools
needed to be an effective housing
counselor. Provide overviews of the
industry from a national perspective as
well as, information about pre- and
post-purchase counseling for
homeowners, delinquency, and default
counseling.
b. Credit Counseling for Prospective
Homeowners. Train counselors in
conducting results-oriented individual
counseling sessions for prospective
homebuyers, including triaging
customers, developing corrective action
plans and timelines for success, and
facilitating progress as customers
overcome obstacles and move toward
mortgage-readiness. Train counselors
regarding state-of-the-art software
designed specifically for credit
rebuilding, debt reduction, automated
budgeting, and downpayment savings
accumulation. Use sample customer
cases to identify obstacles and simulate
counseling sessions.
c. Matching Clients with Loan
Products. Train counselors in industry
practices, analysis of financials, risk
elements, and general concepts affecting
conventional and government-insured
mortgage loan decisions. Provide
counselors with effective procedures
and techniques that will translate into
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
11768
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
appropriate loans and satisfied housing
counseling clients. Review case studies
to illustrate the functional areas of the
underwriting process, from the
application to the loan sale.
d. Homebuyer Education Programs.
Teach counselors how to deliver a
comprehensive homebuyer education
program to turn prospective
homebuyers into satisfied homeowners.
Teach counselors to use the best
materials and methods to train
homebuyers how to shop for a home, get
a mortgage loan, improve their budget
and credit profiles, and maintain their
home and finances after purchase.
e. Section 8 Homeownership. Train
counselors in how to effectively
approach and partner with Public
Housing Authorities (PHAs) in the
implementation of a Section 8
Homeownership Program. Review the
unique characteristics of the program
and the voucher holders as they relate
to the counseling component. Share
effective and proven implementation
strategies.
f. Helping Homeowners Avoid
Delinquency and Predatory Lending.
Teach counselors to conduct
educational seminars and advise clients
regarding how to avoid predatory
lenders and common lending pitfalls.
Give counselors the knowledge and
tools to help unwary borrowers avoid
inflated appraisals, unreasonably high
interest rates, unaffordable repayment
terms, and other conditions that can
result in a loss of equity, increased debt,
default, and foreclosure. Train
counselors to help clients manage debt,
avoid predatory lenders, and avoid
mortgage default. Teach counselors how
to read the warning signs of debt
problems and how to recognize
predatory lenders, as well as identify
available resources to help keep
homeowners out of financial trouble.
Review state and federal regulations,
including the Real Estate Settlement
Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2601
et seq.) (RESPA) and the Truth in
Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
g. Foreclosure Prevention. Train
counselors on the protocol for
counseling homeowners in financial
distress. Address all aspects of default
and delinquency, including reasons for
default, ways to maximize income and
reduce expenses, calculating
delinquencies, understanding the
players in the mortgage marketplace,
loss-mitigation options for FHA-insured
and other loans, information about
foreclosure laws and timelines, tips on
effectively intervening with lenders and
servicers, managing multiple mortgages
or liens, and the pros and cons of
refinancing.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
h. Home Equity Conversion Mortgages
(HECM). Train counselors about reverse
mortgages for elderly homeowners.
Teach them to understand products and
programs, analyze plans and compare
their costs and benefits, and identify
alternatives. Also, review relevant
counseling skills and ethics.
i. Home Maintenance and Financial
Management for New Homeowners.
Train counselors in how to advise
individuals and conduct workshops
aimed at ensuring the long-term success
of new homebuyers, including home
maintenance and repair, financial
management, insurance, and record
keeping.
j. Counseling Individuals and
Families Who are Homeless or at Risk
of Becoming Homeless. Train
counselors about the various social
services available to which they should
be referring homeless and potentially
homeless families and individuals.
Provide information on federal, state,
and local homeless programs and how
clients can access these programs. Share
strategies on how to partner with local
public service providers to ensure that
clients receive attention and assistance
quickly and efficiently. Review the
unique characteristics of the homeless
population to help counselors
understand the types of financial,
physical, and social problems facing the
families and individuals who seek their
assistance.
k. Disaster Victims Counseling. Train
counselors about the unique
circumstances faced by disaster victims
including: counseling homeowners in
financial distress, mortgage related
counseling, default and delinquency,
loss-mitigation options for FHA-insured
and other loans, information about
foreclosure laws and timelines,
alternative housing, FEMA services and
emergency housing (HUD homes).
l. HUD’s Housing Counseling Program
Requirements. Train counselors about
the basic requirements of HUD’s
Housing Counseling Program, including
the delivery of homeownership
counseling and education for local,
national, regional and state housing
counseling agencies, how to fill out
form HUD–9902, Housing Counseling
System (HCS), biennial reviews, and
record keeping.
m. Rental Housing: Securing and
maintaining residence in rental housing,
tenant/landlord responsibilities, state/
county laws, budgeting.
n. Federal Housing Administration:
Train housing counselors about FHAinsured financing, including, minimum
requirements of FHA loans, loan limits,
advantages of financing through FHA,
HUD foreclosed properties, FHA
PO 00000
Frm 00336
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
appraisal requirements, 203k, 203b,
203h, and Home Equity Mortgage
(HECM).
3. Threshold Requirements.
Applicants and proposed grantees must
meet the following Threshold
Requirements:
a. Compliance with Fair Housing and
Civil Rights Laws. See the General
Section.
b. Debarment and Suspension. See
General Section.
c. Delinquent Federal Debt. See
General Section.
d. False Statements. See General
Section.
e. Additional requirements: Agencies
selected as grantees or sub-grantees
must also comply with the following
requirements:
(1) Salary Limitation for Consultants.
See General Section.
(2) Accessibility. All grant recipients
and subrecipients must use training
facilities and services reasonably
accessible to persons with a wide range
of disabilities or provide other means of
accommodation for disabled persons. In
addition, counseling training must train
counselors in the accessibility
requirements applicable to eligible
counseling activities and accessibility
requirements under the Fair Housing
Act, including requirements for
reasonable modification. All training
materials must be compliant with
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
(Section 508). See the Accessible
Technology Requirements in the
General Section.
(3) Reports. All grant recipients will
be required to report to HUD on a
quarterly basis, unless otherwise
specified in the cooperative agreement.
(4) Code of Conduct. Entities that are
subject to 24 CFR parts 84 and 85
(including most nonprofit organizations
and state, local, and tribal governments
or government agencies or
instrumentalities that receive federal
awards of financial assistance) are
required to develop and maintain a
written code of conduct (See Sections
84.42 and 85.36(b)(3)). The code of
conduct must prohibit real and apparent
conflicts of interest that may arise
among employees, officers, or agents;
prohibit the solicitation and acceptance
of gifts or gratuities by your officers,
employees and agents for their personal
benefit in excess of minimal value; and
outline administrative and disciplinary
actions available to remedy violations of
such standards. Self-recusal will not
eliminate a potential or apparent
conflict of interest. Prior to entering into
an agreement with HUD, the applicant
will be required to submit a copy of its
code of conduct and describe the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
methods it will use to ensure that all
officers, employees, and agents of the
organization are aware of the code of
conduct.
(5) Financial Management Systems.
Applicants selected for funding must
provide documentation demonstrating
that the applicant’s financial
management systems satisfy the
requirements in the applicable
regulations at 24 CFR 84.21(b) and
85.20. Consistent with the requirements
of the Single Audit Act Amendments of
1996 (31 U.S.C. 7501–07), if the
applicant expended $500,000 or more in
federal awards in its most recent fiscal
year, such documentation must include
a certification from or most recent audit
by the applicant’s independent public
accountant that the applicant maintains
internal controls over federal awards,
complies with applicable laws,
regulations, and contract or grant
provisions, and prepares appropriate
financial statements. The applicant will
have at least 30 calendar days to
respond to this requirement. If an
applicant does not respond within the
prescribed time or responds with
insufficient documentation, then HUD
may determine that the applicant has
not met this requirement and may
withdraw the grant offer.
If an applicant selected for funding
expended less than $500,000 in federal
funds in the last fiscal year and
therefore does not fall under the
requirements of the Single Audit Act,
HUD will conduct a review of the
applicant’s financial management
system to ensure that the accounting
system meets federal requirements.
HUD reserves the right not to fund an
applicant that has an accounting system
that does not meet federal requirements
or require an applicant to attain the
services of an organization acceptable to
HUD that can manage the financial
records of the applicant.
(6) Indirect Cost Rate. Applicants
must also submit documentation
establishing the organization’s indirect
cost rate. Such documentation may
consist of a certification from the most
recent audit or indirect cost rate
agreement by the cognizant federal
agency or an independent public
accountant. If the organization does not
have an established indirect cost rate,
the organization will be required to
develop and submit an indirect cost
proposal to HUD or the cognizant
federal agency as applicable, for
determination of an indirect cost rate
that will govern an award. Applicants
that do not have a previously
established indirect cost rate with a
federal agency shall submit an initial
indirect cost rate proposal immediately
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
after the applicant is advised that it will
be offered a grant. If an applicant does
not have an established indirect cost
rate, and there is no other cognizant
federal agency, or HUD is the cognizant
federal agency, HUD will set the rate
based upon the submission of an
acceptable indirect cost rate proposal. If
a proposal is not submitted within three
months of award, HUD may suspend
work or terminate for noncompliance
with requirements. OMB Circular A–122
sets forth the requirements to determine
allowable direct and indirect costs and
the preparation of indirect cost
proposals. The circular can be found at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb.
(7) Name Check Review. See the
General Section.
(8) Participation in HUD-Sponsored
Program Evaluation. See the General
Section.
(9) Ensuring the Participation of
Small Businesses, Small Disadvantaged
Businesses, and Women-Owned
Businesses. See the General Section.
(10) Executive Order 13166,
Improving Access to Persons With
Limited English Proficiency (LEP). See
the General Section.
(11) Executive Order 13279, Equal
Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based
and Community Organizations. HUD is
committed to full implementation of
Executive Order 13279 in the operation
of its programs. See the General Section.
(12) The Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.), the
Age Discrimination Act of 1974 (42
U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), and Title IX of the
Education Amendments Act of 1972 (20
U.S.C. 1681 et seq.).
(13) Affirmatively Furthering Fair
Housing. See the General Section.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. Addresses to Request Application
Package
All applications submitted in
response to this NOFA must be
submitted electronically. The
information required to submit an
application is contained in the General
Section. Applications can be
downloaded from the following web
site: www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. If you have
difficulty accessing the information you
may call the Grants.gov helpline tollfree at (800) 518–GRANTS (4726) from
Monday to Friday from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m.
eastern time, or send an e-mail to
3Support@grants.gov.
If you do not have Internet access and
need to obtain a hard copy of this NOFA
or the General Section, you can contact
HUD’s NOFA Information Center toll-
PO 00000
Frm 00337
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11769
free at (800) HUD–8929. Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may
access any of these numbers via (TTY)
by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
1. Application Checklist. Use the
checklist below to organize the
application. Unless indicated below, all
applicants must submit the following:
a. Forms. The standard forms,
certifications, and assurances are listed
below. (The forms referred to as the
‘‘standard forms’’). All of the standard
forms required for this NOFA are
available on the Grant.gov Web site.
(Please note that forms may vary slightly
in appearance on the Grants.gov Web
site.)
(1) SF–424, Application for Federal
Assistance
(2) SF–424 Supplement, Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants (optional) (‘‘Faith Based EEO
Survey (SF–424 SUPP)’’ on Grants.gov)
(3) SF–LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities (if applicable)
(4) HUD–96010, Program Outcome
Logic Model
(5) HUD–2880, Applicant Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov)
(6) SF–424 CB, Grant Application
Detailed Budget (‘‘HUD Detailed Budget
Form’’ on Grants.gov)
(7) HUD–2880, Applicant Recipient
Disclosure Update Report (‘‘HUD
Applicant Recipient Disclosure Report’’
on Grants.gov)
(8) HUD–2994, You Are Our Client
Grant Applicant Survey (optional)
(9) HUD–96011, Third Party
Documentation Facsimile Transmittal.
(For use with electronic applications as
the cover page to provide third party
documentation.) (‘‘Facsimile
Transmittal Form’’ on Grants.gov)
b. Nonprofit Status. Each applicant is
required to submit, for itself and for any
organization with which it is partnering
for the purpose of this NOFA, a legible
copy of the document that supports the
applicant’s claim to be a nonprofit
organization (for example, a 501(c) letter
issued by the IRS). The documentation
must contain the official name, address,
and telephone number of the legal
authority that granted the nonprofit
status. These documents must be
scanned, attached to the attachment
form, which is part of the Grants.gov
package, and submitted electronically to
Grants.gov, or faxed using the fax cover
sheet in the Grants.gov application
package. Please read the General Section
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11770
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
for information about submitting
documents as attachments or using the
facsimile solution, and acceptable file
formats.
c. Narrative Statements. Provide
narrative statements addressing the
Rating Factors in section V below.
Responses to the rating factors should
provide HUD with detailed quantitative
and qualitative information and relevant
examples regarding the housing
counseling training and other work of
the organization that is related to the
proposed activities. These narrative
statements will be the basis for
evaluating the application. Applicants
should clearly label each narrative with
the Factor Title and number related to
the response. When creating file names,
please follow the directions in the
General Section.
d. Prohibition Against Lobbying
Activities. See the General Section.
C. Submission Dates and Time: Your
completed application must be received
and validated by Grants.gov no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the
application deadline date. Please note
that validation may take up to 72 hours.
Applicants should carefully read the
section titled ‘‘APPLICATION and
SUBMISSION INFORMATION’’ in the
General Section.
D. Intergovernmental Review
This NOFA is excluded from the
requirement of an Intergovernmental
Review.
F. Other Submission Requirements
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
Electronic delivery via Grants.gov is
HUD’s required method for application
submission. Applicants interested in
applying for funding under this NOFA
must submit their applications
electronically or request a waiver from
the electronic submission requirement.
Applicants must submit their waiver
requests in writing using e-mail. Waiver
requests must be submitted no later than
15 days prior to the application
deadline date and should be submitted
to Miriam_Torres@hud.gov. If granted a
waiver, the notification will provide
instructions on where to submit the
application and how many copies are
required. Paper copy applications must
be received by the deadline date. HUD
will not accept a paper application
without a waiver being granted. See the
General Section for detailed submission
and timely receipt instructions.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
Applications will be evaluated
competitively according to the Factors
for Award described below, and ranked
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:39 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
against all other applicants. All
applications will be scored and ranked
in HUD Headquarters.
1. Factors For Award Used To Rate and
Rank Applications
a. The factors for award, and
maximum points for each factor, are
outlined below. These factors will be
used to evaluate applications. The
maximum score is 100 for all applicants.
b. HUD may rely on other
information, such as performance
reports, financial status information,
monitoring reports, audit reports and
other information available to HUD in
making score determinations under any
Rating Factor.
2. Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the
Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Staff (40 points)
HUD uses responses to this rating
factor to evaluate the readiness and
ability of an applicant to begin the
proposed work program immediately, as
well as the potential for an applicant to
cost-effectively and successfully
implement the proposed activities
indicated under Rating Factor 3.
a. Relevant Staff (15 points). In rating
this section, HUD will consider the
degree to which the applicant and, if
applicable, partnering organizations,
have sufficient personnel with the
relevant knowledge and experience to
implement the proposed activities in a
timely and effective fashion.
Specifically, scoring will be based on
the number of years of relevant and
recent housing counseling training,
housing counseling material production,
and other related experience of program
managers and staff.
Submit the names and titles of
employees, including subcontractors
and consultants, who would perform
the activities proposed in Rating Factor
3. Clerical staff should not be listed.
Describe each employee’s,
subcontractor’s, or consultant’s relevant
professional background and
experience. Experience is relevant if it
corresponds directly to projects of a
similar scale and purpose. Provide the
number of years of experience for each
position listed, and indicate when each
position was held. Individual
descriptions should be limited to one
page. List recent and relevant training
received.
b. Experience (20 points). Applicants
should carefully document recent
experience, and the experience of
organizations with which it is
partnering, in providing the eligible
activities listed in Section III of this
NOFA that it is proposing to offer
through this NOFA. Indicate the types
PO 00000
Frm 00338
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
and complexity of the services provided
and the outcomes for counselors as a
result of the training and other services.
Describe the level of effort and time
required to provide the services and to
meet the needs of the counselors.
Indicate the number of counselors
that have participated in your training
program or otherwise benefited from the
relevant services you provided.
c. Performance/Grant Requirements (5
points). In scoring this section, HUD
will evaluate how well the applicant has
satisfied the requirements, including
reporting, on HUD grants received. If an
applicant has not received a HUD grant,
the applicant should base its response
on activities and requirements under
other sources of funding, such as other
federal, state, local, or other awards.
An applicant should characterize
performance with regard to the
timeliness and completeness with
which the applicant satisfied reporting
requirements (such as Form HUD 9902)
and quarterly and final reports.
Also, indicate whether or not an
applicant fully expended grant awards
during the specified award periods. If
not fully expended, provide an
explanation as to the reason why the
funds were not fully expended on time
and the steps taken to ensure that future
funding will be expended in a timely
manner.
3. Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the
Problem (5 points)
This factor addresses the extent to
which there is a need to fund proposed
activities described in response to
Rating Factor 3.
Describe and document the national
need, such as the number of housing
counselors and areas of housing
counseling training the application
intends to address with the services
proposed in Rating Factor 3. Responses
will be evaluated based on how well
they demonstrate a grasp of the
elements of the problems this NOFA is
intended to address. Include applicable
statistics and analyses, if available,
contained in data sources that are sound
and reliable. Sources for all data
provided must be clearly cited.
4. Rating Factor 3: Soundness of
Approach/Scope of Housing Counseling
Services (35 points)
This factor addresses the quality and
effectiveness of the proposed work plan.
In rating this factor, HUD will evaluate
the extent to which the applicant
presents a detailed and sound approach
for providing the proposed services.
HUD will also evaluate the extent to
which the applicant demonstrates the
cost-effectiveness of its activities, and
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
convincingly explains how the
proposed activities will yield long-term
results.
a. Work Plan (20 points).
Applicants should provide a work
plan that lists the major objectives and
activities it intends to undertake, and
how it plans to provide those services.
Include administrative and project
tasks.
The Work Plan must include all the
housing counseling training topics
listed in section III. The only exception
to this requirement is organizations
proposing to provide Home Equity
Conversion Mortgage (HECM)
counseling exclusively. Indicate if any
of the listed trainings will be provided
by organizations with which an
applicant has partnered. The proposed
program must be national in scope. All
proposals to provide training must
include a description of the
methodology for measuring the success
of the training program. The proposals
must also include a scholarship
element, detailing the full or partial
costs to be covered, including travel,
hotel, and tuition expenses. Applicants
must also indicate the total number of
tuition, travel, and lodging scholarships
they estimate can be offered, and
describe plans for determining how the
various types of scholarship assistance
will be equitably distributed.
b. Proposed Budget (15 points).
For the work plan proposed above,
indicate the Grant amount in line 18a of
form SF–424. Describe and explain a
proposed budget, utilizing the HUD–
424–CB. If applicable, the budget should
highlight portions being proposed as
sub-grants to partnering organizations.
Make a case for why the proposed
budget is cost effective in achieving
proposed results. Responses will be
evaluated based on the quality,
thoroughness, and reasonableness of the
cost estimates provided.
5. Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources
(10 Points)
Although HUD funding through this
NOFA may fully fund an organization’s
proposed program, applicants are
encouraged to secure the use of other
resources to supplement the HUD grant.
In scoring this factor, applicants will
be evaluated based on their ability to
obtain additional resources for their
proposed training and other related
eligible activities, including direct
financial assistance and in-kind
contributions, which may include
services, equipment, office space, labor,
etc. Resources may be provided by
governmental entities, public or private
nonprofit organizations, for-profit
private organizations, or other entities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
committed to providing the applicant
assistance.
Additionally, resources provided by
the applicant, recorded as ‘‘applicant
match’’ and ‘‘program income’’ on form
SF–424, will count as leveraged
resources.
Points for this factor will be awarded
based on the ratio of requested HUD
funds to total budget for the proposed
activities.
Percentage
01–15
16–23
24–29
30–35
36–41
42–47
48–53
54–59
60–65
66–99
Points
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
6. Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (10 Points)
Outcomes are benefits accruing to
recipients of the service to be offered
(e.g., increase in the number of
counselors demonstrating proficiency
after training. Outputs are units of
service or activity (e.g., instructional
units developed, number of counselors
trained, number tested). Outputs and
outcomes must be objectively
quantifiable. The purpose of this factor
is for the applicant to identify program
outputs and outcomes that will allow an
applicant and HUD to measure actual
achievements against anticipated
achievements. For this NOFA, HUD will
give particular weight to an applicant’s
ability to demonstrate change in
counselors’ knowledge and skills as a
result of the training offered. Applicants
should therefore emphasize a rigorous
and objective testing protocol as part of
their performance evaluation strategy.
Submission Requirements for Factor
5. Applicants must submit an effective,
quantifiable, and outcome-oriented
evaluation plan. The plan must be in
narrative form and must also be
presented utilizing HUD’s (Logic Model,
form 96010) for measuring performance
and determining that output and
outcome goals have been met. An
applicant must submit a program
evaluation plan that demonstrates how
it will measure its own program
performance. The evaluation plan
should identify what an applicant is
going to measure, how an applicant is
going to measure it, and the steps in
place to make adjustments to its work
plan if performance targets are not met
within established timeframes.
Specifically, the plan must identify:
PO 00000
Frm 00339
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
11771
—Outputs. Outputs are the direct
products of an applicant’s activities
that lead to the ultimate achievement
of outcomes. Examples of outputs are
the number of training sessions to be
provided and the number of
counselors to be trained. Identify
interim and full grant term projected
outputs and timeframes for
accomplishing these goals. The plan
must show how an applicant will
measure actual accomplishments
against anticipated achievements.
—Work Plan Adjustments. Describe
steps in place to make adjustments to
the work plan if outputs are not met
within established timeframes or if a
grantee begins to fall short of
established outputs or timeframes.
—Outcomes. Outcomes are benefits
accruing to the counselors as a result
of participation in an applicant’s
program. Outcomes are performance
indicators an applicant expects to
achieve or goals an applicant hopes to
meet over the term of its proposed
grant. An example of an outcome is
the percentage of counselors who,
following training, can demonstrate
competence in the areas of training.
Another example of an outcome is an
instructional module, which when
administered to counselors, produces
a measurable increase in counselors’
knowledge or skills. An applicant
should identify how it will determine
that a counselor has demonstrated
competence following training, and
provide projected outcomes of the
number of counselors trained and the
number of counselors demonstrating
competence following training for the
full grant term, as well as timeframes
for accomplishing these goals. The
plan must show how an applicant
will measure actual accomplishments
against anticipated achievements.
—Information Collection. An applicant
should describe its strategy for
collecting outcome information.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. General. HUD will review each
application to determine whether it
meets the threshold and the eligibility
requirements found in Section III of this
NOFA. Only applicants that meet all of
the eligibility and threshold
requirements will be rated and ranked.
2. Rating Panels. To review and rate
applications, HUD may establish panels
which may include persons not
currently employed by HUD. HUD may
include these non-HUD employees to
obtain certain expertise and outside
points of view, including views from
other federal agencies.
3. Corrections To Deficient
Applications. See the General Section.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
11772
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 / Notices
4. Rating and Ranking.
a. Applications that earn a score of 75
points or more will be considered
eligible for funding.
b. HUD intends to award the entire
amount available under this NOFA to
the highest scoring application.
However, HUD reserves the right to
make multiple awards.
c. If an applicant turns down an
award offer, HUD may make an offer to
the next highest-ranking application.
d. In the event HUD commits an error
that, when corrected, would result in
selection of an otherwise eligible
applicant during the funding round of
this NOFA, HUD may select that
applicant when sufficient funds become
available.
5. Award Size. All grantees will
receive the lower of either the award
amount determined by HUD or the
amount actually requested by the
applicant.
6. Award Adjustments. HUD reserves
the right to adjust funding levels for
each applicant as indicated in Section II
C. of this NOFA. HUD reserves the right
to fund less than the full amount
requested in an application.
7. Ineligible Activities. HUD will not
fund any portion of an application that:
is not eligible for funding under this
program’s statutory or regulatory
requirements; does not meet the
requirements of this NOFA; or may be
duplicative of other funded programs or
activities from prior year awards or
other selected applicants. Only the
eligible portions of an application
(including non-duplicative portions)
may be funded. Funds from this
program may not be used for real
property acquisition, disposition,
leasing, rehabilitation, alteration,
demolition, or new construction.
VI. Award Administration Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
A. Award Notices
After all eligible applications have
been rated and ranked and selections
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Mar 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
have been made, HUD will notify
applicants regarding the disposition of
their application.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Environmental Requirements.
Activities funded through this program
are categorically excluded under 24 CFR
50.19(b)(9) from the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and are not
subject to review under the related laws
and authorities.
2. Procurement of Recovered
Materials. Please see the General
Section for this requirement.
C. Reporting: Grant recipients will be
required to submit quarterly progress
reports, comparing actual
accomplishments with the goals and
objectives established for the period,
explaining why established goals were
not met, and highlighting any problems,
delays, or adverse conditions that
materially impaired the ability to meet
the objectives of the awards. Each
recipient is also required to submit a
completed Logic Model showing
accomplishments against proposed
outputs and outcomes as part of their
quarterly reporting requirement to HUD.
Recipients shall use quantifiable data to
measure performance against goals and
objectives outlined in their Logic Model.
For FY2007, HUD is considering a new
concept for the Logic Model. The new
concept is a Return on Investment (ROI)
statement. HUD will be publishing a
separate notice on the ROI concept.
D. Debriefing. HUD will provide a
debriefing to a requesting applicant
related to its application. See the
General Section for more information.
VII. Agency Contact
For further information about this
NOFA or application requirements,
applicants should contact Miriam
Torres, HUD Headquarters, Single
Family Housing, Program Support
PO 00000
Frm 00340
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Division, at (202) 708–0317 x2618 (this
is not a toll-free number). Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may
access any of these numbers via (TTY)
by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339. For technical help with the
electronic submission procedure,
applicants may e-mail
support@grants.gov or call (800) 518–
4726 (800) 518-GRANTS). The
Grants.gov Customer Support Center is
open from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Eastern
Time.
VIII. Other Information
Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection requirements
contained in this document have been
approved by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2502–0261. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Public reporting burden for the
collection of information is estimated to
average 68 hours per annum per
respondent for the application and grant
administration. This includes the time
collecting, reviewing, and reporting the
data for the application, semi-annual
reports, and final report. The
information will be used for grantee
selection and monitoring the
administration of funds. Response to
this request for information is required
in order to receive the benefits to be
derived.
[FR Doc. 07–974 Filed 3–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–01–P
E:\FR\FM\13MRN2.SGM
13MRN2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11434-11772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-974]
[[Page 11433]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Housing and Urban Development
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal Year 2007 SuperNOFA for HUD's Discretionary Programs; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 13, 2007 /
Notices
[[Page 11434]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5100-N-01A]
Fiscal Year 2007 SuperNOFA for HUD's Discretionary Programs
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Notice of HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Notice of Funding
Availability (NOFA) for HUD's Discretionary Programs (SuperNOFA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On January 18, 2007, HUD published its Notice of FY2007 Notice
of Funding Availability Policy Requirements and General Section to the
SuperNOFA (General Section). HUD published the General Section of the
FY2007 SuperNOFA in advance of the individual NOFAs to give prospective
applicants sufficient time to begin preparing their applications, and
to register early with Grants.gov in order to facilitate their
application submission process. Today's publication contains the 38
funding opportunities or program NOFAs that constitute HUD's FY2007
SuperNOFA. In addition, today's publication provides a revised listing
of programs contained in the FY2007 SuperNOFA and corrects two items
contained in the General Section published on January 18, 2007.
DATES: Application deadline and other key dates that apply to all HUD
federal financial assistance made available through HUD's FY2007
SuperNOFA are contained in each individual program NOFA and in Appendix
A of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The individual program NOFA identifies
the applicable agency contact(s) for each program. Questions regarding
today's Introduction to the SuperNOFA should be directed to the NOFA
Information Center between the hours 10 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. eastern time
at (800) HUD-8929. Hearing-impaired persons may access this telephone
via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at
(800) 877-8339. Questions regarding specific program requirements
should be directed to the agency contact(s) identified in each program
NOFA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HUD published the General Section of the
FY2007 SuperNOFA on January 18, 2007 (72 FR 2396). HUD published the
General Section in advance of the individual program NOFAs to give
prospective applicants sufficient time to begin preparing their
applications, and to register early with Grants.gov in order to
facilitate their application submission process. Today's publication
contains the 38 individual funding opportunities, or program NOFAs,
that constitute HUD's FY2007 SuperNOFA. Through the FY2007 SuperNOFA,
HUD is making available approximately $2 billion in federal financial
assistance. In addition, today's publication provides a revised listing
of programs contained in the FY2007 SuperNOFA and corrects one item
contained in the General Section published on January 18, 2007.
Each program NOFA provides the statutory and regulatory
requirements, threshold requirements, and rating factors applicable to
funding made available through the individual NOFA. Applicants must
also review, however, the January 18, 2007, General Section for
important application information and requirements, including
submission requirements that provide explicit instructions on file
formats acceptable to HUD.
Appendix A to the January 18, 2007, General Section identified the
funding opportunities anticipated to be included in the FY2007
SuperNOFA. HUD is revising and republishing Appendix A (Revised
Appendix A) as part of today's FY2007 SuperNOFA publication. Revised
Appendix A provides an up-to-date funding chart that lists the funding
opportunities included in today's FY2007 SuperNOFA publication, along
with the application deadline.
In reviewing Revised Appendix A, applicants should note that the
Youthbuild NOFA, Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI)
NOFA, and the Public Housing Neighborhood Networks (PH-NN) NOFA are not
part of today's FY2007 SuperNOFA publication. The Youthbuild program
was transferred to the U.S. Department of Labor on September 22, 2006,
in accordance with Public Law 109-281, and will not be included in the
FY2007 SuperNOFA. Persons interested in funding opportunities under the
Youthbuild program should contact the U.S. Department of Labor. The
BEDI and PH-NN were not funded in FY2007. HUD is also providing NOFAs
for three programs that were not contained in its FY2006 SuperNOFA,
specifically the Housing Counseling Training Program, Early Doctoral
Student Research Grant Program, and the Doctoral Dissertation Research
Program NOFAs.
HUD is also using today's publication to correct two items
contained in the General Section published on January 18, 2007.
Initially, HUD noted in section V.A.1. (third column beginning on page
2408 and continuing to page 2409), that: ``For each program NOFA, the
points awarded for the rating factors total 100. Depending on the
program for which you are seeking funding, the funding opportunity may
provide up to four bonus points, as provided below:''
In fact, since the FY2007 SuperNOFA offers bonus points only for
applicants that certify that their activities or projects are located
in, intended to serve the residents of, or are consistent with the
strategic plan for an empowerment zone (EZ), utilization plan for an
urban or rural renewal community designated by HUD (RC), or strategic
plan for an enterprise community designated in round II by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (EZ-II), collectively referred to as ``RC/EZ/
EC-IIs,'' only two bonus points are available. As a result, section
V.A.1. (third column beginning on page 2408 and continuing to page
2409), should read: ``For each program NOFA, the points awarded for the
rating factors total 100. Depending on the program for which you are
seeking funding, the funding opportunity may provide up to two bonus
points, as provided below:''
HUD is also correcting instructions regarding the completion of the
Logic Model form (HUD-96010). In the third sentence of section
VI.C.5.b. (middle column, page 2414), HUD stated that applicants should
include all activities and outcomes expected per year of the period of
performance. To be consistent with and correctly complete the Logic
Model forms, applicants are advised that they must include all
activities and outcomes expected per year of the period of performance.
As a result, the third sentence of section VI.C.5.b. is corrected to
read, ``[T]o provide for greater consistency in reporting, applicants
must include all activities and outcomes expected per year of the
period of performance as defined in the program logic model for the
program NOFA that they apply for.''
HUD published the General Section of the FY2007 SuperNOFA early to
provide its applicant community with the opportunity to become familiar
with cross-cutting requirements, and to remind prospective applicants
to register or renew their registration in order to successfully submit
an application via Grants.gov.
Applicants are required to complete a five-step registration
process in order to submit their applications electronically and
previously registered applicants must annually update their information
in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) for the registration to
remain viable. HUD has developed the following brochures and guidance,
found at https://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm, to
assist applicants with the registration, CCR update, and application
processes:
STEP BY STEP: Your Guide to Registering for Grant
Opportunities.
[[Page 11435]]
Finding and Applying for Grant Opportunities.
Desktop User Guide for Submitting Grant Applications.
For FY2007, the Continuum of Care remains a paper application
process. HUD continues to encourage Continuum of Care agencies to
become familiar with Grants.gov requirements to facilitate the future
transition to Grants.gov. If you have questions concerning the
registration process or renewal, or have a question about a NOFA
requirement, contact HUD staff listed in the program NOFAs. HUD staff
cannot help you write your application, but can clarify requirements
contained in this Notice and HUD's registration materials.
Finally, applicants are invited and encouraged to participate in
HUD's satellite training and webcast sessions designed to provide a
detailed explanation of the general section and program section
requirements for each of the SuperNOFA programs. The interactive
broadcasts provide an opportunity to ask questions of HUD staff. These
broadcasts are archived and accessible from HUD's Grants page at http:/
/www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. HUD also encourages
applicants to subscribe to the Grants.gov free notification service. By
doing so, applicants will receive e-mail notification as soon as items
are posted to Grants.gov and will have access to a significant amount
of useful information, including responses to frequently asked
questions that arise during the funding application period. The address
to subscribe to the Grants.gov free notification service is https://
www.grants.gov/search/email.do. Modifications to the General Section,
any of the program NOFAs, or the application are posted to
www.Grants.gov as soon as they are available (except for the Continuum
of Care NOFA). Modifications to the Continuum of Care NOFA, or the
Continuum of Care application are posted to HUD's grants page at http:/
/www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.
As stated in the General Section, HUD hopes that the steps that it
has taken to provide information early in the FY2007 funding process
will be of benefit to you, our applicants.
Dated: February 26, 2007.
Roy A. Bernardi,
Deputy Secretary.
[[Page 11436]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13MR07.000
[[Page 11437]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13MR07.001
[[Page 11438]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13MR07.002
[[Page 11439]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13MR07.003
[[Page 11440]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13MR07.004
[[Page 11441]]
BILLING CODE 4210-01-C
Community Development Technical Assistance
Overview Information
A. Federal Agency Name: Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Office of Community Planning and Development.
B. Funding Opportunity Title: Community Development Technical
Assistance (CD-TA).
C. Announcement Type: Initial Announcement.
D. Funding Opportunity Number: FR-5100-N-08; OMB Approval Numbers:
2506-0166 for HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), HOME
Investment Partnerships Program for Community Housing Development
Organizations (CHDO (HOME)), and McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance
(Homeless), 2506-0133 for Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS
(HOPWA).
E. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Numbers: 14.239,
HOME and CHDO (HOME); 14.235, Homeless; 14.241, HOPWA.
F. Dates: The application deadline date is May 25, 2007.
G. Additional Overview Information: Applicants interested in
providing technical assistance to entities participating in HUD's
community development programs should carefully review the General
Section and the information listed in this CD-TA NOFA. Funds are
available to provide technical assistance for four separate program
areas: HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless, and HOPWA. Applicants may apply for
one, two, three, or all four CD-TA program areas. The application
submission information is contained in this CD-TA NOFA at Section IV.B.
Approximately $25.4 million is available. No cost sharing is required.
Grants will be administered under cooperative agreements with
significant HUD involvement (see Section II.C of this NOFA).
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. CD-TA Purpose. The purpose of the CD-TA program is to provide
assistance to achieve the highest level of performance and results for
four separate community development program areas: (1) HOME; (2) CHDO
(HOME); (3) Homeless and; (4) HOPWA. Information about the four
community development programs and their missions, goals, and
activities can be found on the HUD Web site at www.hud.gov.
B. Description of National TA and Local TA. There are two types of
technical assistance (TA) funding available in this NOFA: National TA
and Local TA.
National TA activities are those that address, at a nationwide
level, one or more of the CD-TA program activities and/or priorities
identified in Section III.C. of this NOFA. National TA activities may
include the development of written products, development of on-line
materials, development of training courses, delivery of training
courses previously approved by HUD, organization and delivery of
workshops and conferences, and delivery of direct TA as part of a
national program. Applicants for National TA must also be willing to
work in any HUD field office area, although work in the field office
areas is likely to be a negligible portion of National TA activities.
National TA activities are administered by a Government Technical
Representative (GTR) and Government Technical Monitor (GTM) at HUD
Headquarters.
Local TA activities also must address the CD-TA program activities
and/or priorities identified in this NOFA; however the Local TA is
targeted to the specific needs of the HUD community development program
recipients in the field office area in which the TA is proposed. Local
TA activities are limited to the development of need assessments,
direct TA to HUD community development program recipients, organization
and delivery of workshops and conferences, and customization and
delivery of previously HUD-approved trainings. Local TA will be
administered by a GTR and GTM in the respective HUD field office.
C. Authority. HOME TA is authorized by the HOME Investment
Partnerships Act (42 U.S.C. 12781-12783); 24 CFR part 92. CHDO (HOME)
TA is authorized by the HOME Investment Partnerships Act (42 U.S.C.
12773); 24 CFR part 92. For the McKinney-Vento Act Homeless Assistance
Programs TA, the Supportive Housing Program is authorized under 42
U.S.C. 11381 et seq.; 24 CFR 583.140; Emergency Shelter Grants, Section
8 Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program, and Shelter
Plus Care TA are authorized by the Revised Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-5, approved February 15, 2007). HOPWA TA
is also authorized under the continuing resolution.
II. Award Information
A. Available Funds. Approximately $25.4 million is available for
the CD-TA program. Additional funds may become available as a result of
recapturing unused funds. This chart shows how the funds are divided
among National TA and Local TA activities:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program National TA Local TA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOME.................................... $4,000,000 $6,000,000
CHDO (HOME)............................. 2,000,000 6,000,000
Homeless................................ 3,500,000 3,000,000
HOPWA................................... 900,000 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Local TA funds are divided among HUD's field office
jurisdictions for the HOME, CHDO (HOME), and Homeless programs. No
Local TA funds are available for HOPWA. In the case of the national
CHDO (HOME) program, if less than the total amount of available funds
is awarded, the balance may be used to make awards under the national
HOME TA program, subject to congressional reprogramming approval, if
applicable. The chart below shows the amounts available in dollars for
Local TA by CD-TA program:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local TA Area HOME CHDO (HOME) Homeless
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama......................................................... $75,000 $50,000 $55,000
Alaska.......................................................... 45,000 50,000 30,000
Arkansas........................................................ 50,000 75,000 55,000
California--Northern and Arizona, Nevada........................ 400,000 425,000 300,000
California--Southern............................................ 425,000 450,000 275,000
Caribbean....................................................... 125,000 100,000 40,000
Colorado and Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming. 175,000 195,000 60,000
Connecticut..................................................... 70,000 80,000 40,000
District of Columbia area....................................... 70,000 80,000 50,000
Florida--Southern............................................... 75,000 60,000 25,000
[[Page 11442]]
Florida--Northern............................................... 125,000 76,000 85,000
Georgia......................................................... 125,000 100,000 55,000
Hawaii.......................................................... 65,000 65,000 45,000
Illinois........................................................ 180,000 175,000 160,000
Indiana......................................................... 130,000 75,000 25,000
Kansas and Missouri--Western.................................... 100,000 75,000 50,000
Missouri--Eastern............................................... 40,000 55,000 40,000
Kentucky........................................................ 250,000 150,000 55,000
Louisiana....................................................... 100,000 100,000 54,000
Maryland, except District of Columbia area...................... 60,000 50,000 30,000
Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont...... 310,000 300,000 200,000
Michigan........................................................ 175,000 225,000 150,000
Minnesota....................................................... 100,000 140,000 60,000
Mississippi..................................................... 150,000 250,000 50,000
Nebraska and Iowa............................................... 90,000 55,000 40,000
New Jersey...................................................... 150,000 75,000 40,000
New Mexico...................................................... 200,000 275,000 60,000
New York--Downstate............................................. 200,000 425,000 210,000
New York--Upstate............................................... 125,000 75,000 40,000
North Carolina.................................................. 300,000 300,000 55,000
Ohio............................................................ 150,000 190,000 70,000
Oklahoma........................................................ 55,000 40,000 15,000
Oregon and Idaho................................................ 85,000 75,000 30,000
Pennsylvania--Eastern and Delaware.............................. 225,000 125,000 50,000
Pennsylvania--Western and West Virginia......................... 150,000 100,000 49,000
South Carolina.................................................. 65,000 34,000 40,000
Tennessee....................................................... 150,000 175,000 40,000
Texas--Northern................................................. 150,000 175,000 85,000
Texas--Southern................................................. 85,000 40,000 0
Virginia, except District of Columbia area...................... 100,000 100,000 40,000
Washington...................................................... 100,000 65,000 40,000
Wisconsin....................................................... 100,000 150,000 70,000
Houston......................................................... 100,000 125,000 37,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Performance Period. Awards will be for a period of up to 36
months. HUD, however, reserves the right to withdraw funds from a
specific TA provider if HUD determines that the urgency of need for the
assistance is greater in other field office jurisdictions or the need
for assistance is not commensurate with the award.
C. Terms of Award. HUD will enter into a cooperative agreement with
selected applicants for the performance period. Because CD-TA awards
are made as cooperative agreements, implementation entails significant
HUD involvement. Significant HUD involvement is required in all aspects
of TA planning, delivery, and follow-up.
In addition to the requirements listed in the General Section,
selected applicants are subject to the following requirements:
1. Demand-Response System. All CD-TA awardees must operate within
the structure of the demand-response system. Under the demand-response
system, TA providers are required to:
a. When requested by a GTR, market the availability of their
services to existing and potential recipients within the jurisdictions
in which the assistance will be delivered;
b. Respond to requests for assistance from the GTR;
c. When requested by a GTR, conduct a needs assessment to identify
the type and nature of the assistance needed by the recipient of the
assistance;
d. Obtain the local HUD field office's approval before responding
to direct requests for technical assistance from HOME Participating
Jurisdictions (PJs), Community Housing Development Organizations
(CHDOs), and McKinney-Vento Act Homeless Assistance and HOPWA grantees;
and
e. For CHDO (HOME) TA providers, secure a letter from a PJ stating
that a CHDO, or prospective CHDO to be assisted by the provider, is a
recipient or intended recipient of HOME funds and indicating, at its
option, subject areas of assistance that are most important to the PJ.
2. Training. When conducting training sessions as part of its CD-TA
activities, CD-TA providers are required to:
a. Design the course materials as ``step-in'' packages so that HUD
or other CD-TA providers may independently conduct the course on their
own;
b. Make the course materials available to the GTR in sufficient
time for review (minimum of three weeks) and receive concurrence from
the GTR on the content and quality prior to delivery;
c. Provide all course materials in an electronic format that will
permit wide distribution among TA providers, field offices, and HUD
grantees;
d. Arrange for joint delivery of the training with HUD
participation when requested by the GTR;
e. Deliver HUD-approved training courses that have been designed
and developed by others on a ``step-in'' basis when requested; and
f. Send trainers to approved ``train-the-trainers'' sessions. The
costs associated with attending these required sessions are eligible
under the cooperative agreement.
3. Field Office Involvement under National TA awards. When National
TA providers are undertaking activities in field office jurisdictions,
the National TA providers must work cooperatively with HUD field
offices. Providers must notify the applicable HUD field office of the
planned activities; consider the views or recommendations of that
office, if any; follow those recommendations, to the degree
practicable; and report to the applicable field office on the
accomplishments of the assistance.
D. Certification of HOME and CHDO TA Providers Required-Beginning
FY2008.
Many technical assistance providers have taken the HOME Certified
Specialist--Regulations training and
[[Page 11443]]
have passed the certification exam. Please note that beginning with the
FY2008 NOFA, HUD intends to award higher points, under Rating Factor 1,
to applicants delivering HOME or CHDO technical assistance that have
staff who have taken and passed the HOME Certified Specialist--
Regulations training and exam.
At least ten HOME Certified Specialist--Regulations training
deliveries are scheduled for 2007 and a number of slots are set aside
for TA providers at each of these deliveries. Registration information
for these deliveries can be found on the web at: https://
www.icfhosting.com/hcd/cpd/hcdcpd.nsf/webpages/Welcome.html.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants. The eligible applicants for each of the
four CD-TA programs are listed in the chart below. In accordance with
the President's faith-based initiative, HUD welcomes the participation
of eligible faith-based and other community organizations in the CD-TA
programs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Eligible applicants
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOME................................. A for-profit or nonprofit
professional and technical
services company or firm that
has demonstrated knowledge of
the HOME program and the
capacity to provide technical
assistance services;
A HOME Participating Jurisdiction
(PJ);
A public purpose organization,
established pursuant to state or
local legislation, responsible
to the chief elected officer of
a PJ;
An agency or authority
established by two or more PJs
to carry out activities
consistent with the purposes of
the HOME program; or
A national or regional nonprofit
organization that has membership
comprised predominantly of
entities or officials of
entities of PJs or PJs' agencies
or established organizations.
CHDO (HOME) A public or private nonprofit
intermediary organization that
customarily provides services,
in more than one community,
related to the provision of
decent housing that is
affordable to low-income and
moderate-income persons or
related to the revitalization of
deteriorating neighborhoods; has
demonstrated experience in
providing a range of assistance
(such as financing, technical
assistance, construction and
property management assistance)
to CHDOs or similar
organizations that engage in
community revitalization; and
has demonstrated the ability to
provide technical assistance and
training for community-based
developers of affordable
housing.
Note: Any organization funded to
assist CHDOs under CD-TA may not
undertake CHDO set-aside
activities itself within its
service area while under
cooperative agreement with HUD.
Homeless............................. A state;
A unit of general local
government;
A public housing authority; or
A public or private nonprofit or
for profit organization,
including educational
institutions and area-wide
planning organizations.
HOPWA................................ A for-profit or nonprofit
organization;
A state; or
A unit of general local
government.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants must also meet the threshold requirements of the General
Section, including the Civil Rights threshold in Section III (C).
A consortium of organizations may apply for one or more CD-TA
programs, but one organization must be designated as the applicant.
Applicants may propose assistance using in house staff, sub
contractors, sub recipients, and local organizations with the requisite
experience and capabilities. Where appropriate, applicants should make
use of TA providers located in the field office jurisdiction receiving
services.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching. None.
C. Other
1. Eligible Activities and Priorities. Funds may be used to provide
TA to grantees, prospective applicants, and project sponsors of the
HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless, and HOPWA programs. For each of the TA
programs, activities may include but are not limited to written
information such as papers, manuals, guides, and brochures; assistance
to individual communities; needs assessments; and training. TA should
include information needed by the grantee to meet all Fair Housing and
section 504 requirements. The priority TA areas for each of the four
program areas are:
a. HOME TA. HUD has identified four HOME program technical
assistance priorities. These priorities that result in measurable
performance outputs and outcomes are:
(1) Improve the ability of PJs to design and implement housing
programs that reflect sound underwriting, management, and fiscal
controls; demonstrate measurable outcomes in the use of public funds;
and provide accurate and timely reporting of HOME program
accomplishments.
(2) Encourage public-private partnerships that yield an increase in
the amount of private dollars leveraged for HOME-assisted projects and
result in an increase in the commitment and production of HOME-assisted
units.
(3) Assist PJs in developing strategies that ameliorate the
affordability gap between rapidly increasing housing costs and the less
rapid growth in incomes among low-income households, especially among
underserved populations (e.g., residents of the Colonias, homeless
persons, persons with disabilities, and residents of an empowerment
zone (EZ) designated by HUD or the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), an urban or rural renewal community designated by
HUD (RC), or an enterprise community designated in round II by USDA
(EC-II).
(4) Assist PJs in developing strategies that increase and help
sustain homeownership opportunities for low-income households--
particularly low-income, minority households--and directly result in
the commitment and completion of HOME-assisted units.
Some examples of measurable performance outputs and outcomes are
given in Rating Factor 5.
b. CHDO (HOME) TA.
(1) HUD has identified three CHDO-specific technical assistance
priorities. These priorities that result in measurable performance
outputs and outcomes are:
(a) Assist new CHDOs and potential CHDOs in developing the
organizational capacity to own, develop, and sponsor HOME-assisted
projects. A new CHDO is defined as a nonprofit organization that within
three years of the publication of this NOFA was
[[Page 11444]]
determined by a PJ to qualify as a CHDO. A potential CHDO is defined as
a nonprofit organization that is expected by the PJ to qualify as a
CHDO and is expected to enter into a written agreement with that PJ to
own, develop, or sponsor HOME-assisted housing within 24 months of the
PJ determining the organization qualifies as a CHDO.
(b) Improve the HOME program production and performance of existing
CHDOs in the areas of:
(i) Program design and management, including underwriting, project
financing, property management, and compliance; and
(ii) Organizational management and capacity, including fiscal
controls, board development, contract administration, and compliance
systems.
(c) Provide organizational support, technical assistance, and
training to community groups for the establishment of community land
trusts, as defined in section 233(f) of the Cranston-Gonzales National
Affordable Housing Act.
(2) Additional CHDO (HOME) eligible activities are:
(a) Under the ``Pass-Through'' provision, CD-TA providers may
propose to fund various operating expenses for eligible CHDOs that own,
develop, or sponsor HOME-assisted housing. Such operating expenses may
include reasonable and necessary costs for the operation of the CHDO
including salaries, wages, and other employee compensation and
benefits; employee education, training and travel; rent; utilities;
communication costs; taxes; insurance; equipment, materials, and
supplies.
(b) CD-TA providers must establish written criteria for selection
of CHDOs receiving pass-through funds. PJs must designate the
organizations as CHDOs; and, generally, the organizations should not
have been in existence more than three years.
CD-TA providers must enter into an agreement with the CHDO that the
agreement and pass-through funding may be terminated at the discretion
of HUD if no written legally binding agreement to provide assistance
for a specific housing project (for acquisition, rehabilitation, new
construction, or tenant-based rental assistance) has been made by the
PJ with the CHDO within 24 months of initially receiving pass-through
funding. The pass-through amount, when combined with other capacity
building and operating support available through the HOME program,
cannot exceed the greater of 50 percent of the CHDO's operating budget
for the year in which it receives funds, or $50,000 annually.
c. Homeless TA. Homeless TA funds are available to provide
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, HUD-funded grantees, project
sponsors, and potential recipients with skills and knowledge needed to
develop and operate projects and activities. The assistance may
include, but is not limited to, developing and disseminating written
information such as papers, monographs, manuals, curriculums, guides,
and brochures; and person-to-person exchanges, conferences, training
and use of technology. TA activities are focused on these priorities
that result in measurable performance outputs and outcomes:
(1) Assist CoCs with Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)
implementation. National technical assistance will relate to data
collection, data quality, data analysis, provider participation,
reporting, performance measurement, data warehousing, and HMIS Data and
Technical Standards.
(2) Maintain and enhance the HMIS Web site portal as the vehicle
for collection and dissemination of HMIS information.
(3) Support collaboration between metropolitan, regional and
statewide HMISs. Assistance may include providing state and/or regional
HMIS technical assistance coordinators and/or technology to promote
effectuating long-distance meeting, conferencing and networking.
(4) Support collaboration between metropolitan, regional, and
statewide HMISs for use in disaster preparedness and recovery efforts,
utilizing the experience of communities that experienced Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita.
(5) Improve participation in the Annual Homeless Assessment Report
(AHAR) by CoCs and providers in their geographic areas through outreach
and capacity building. Develop materials and training for: Reporting
bed coverage; extrapolation and data analysis methodologies and
documents; data integration; data quality assessments; utilization of
AHAR data at the program and/or CoC level; and the collection and
analysis of CoC data for Congressionally-directed HMIS-related reports
to Congress.
d. HOPWA TA. HOPWA funds are available for technical assistance,
training, and oversight activities which can be used to provide
grantees, project sponsors, and potential recipients with the skills
and knowledge to effectively develop, operate, and support HOPWA-
eligible project activities that result in measurable performance
outputs and outcomes. TA activities are focused on these priorities:
(1) Improve the capacity of HOPWA grantees and project sponsors to
execute long-term comprehensive housing strategies by developing
housing plans that integrate permanent housing and supportive services,
thereby promoting HOPWA's national performance goals of increasing
housing stability, reducing risks of homelessness, and improving access
to care for HOPWA beneficiaries.
(2) Develop national models that effectively integrate AIDS housing
strategies into consolidated planning and Continuum of Care planning
processes.
(3) Develop curriculums and related training tools to assist
grantees and project sponsors in coordinating HOPWA permanent housing
assistance with mainstream medical and supportive service resources,
including Ryan White CARE Act, state, local, and private resources.
(4) Conduct training activities to improve the capacity of grantees
and project sponsors to increase the availability of affordable housing
opportunities for eligible persons in high incidence HIV/AIDS
communities with substantial unmet housing needs (e.g., emerging
populations, in major disaster areas and underserved rural areas.)
(5) Develop training materials to promote use of Homeless
Management Information Systems in the provision of HOPWA-assisted
housing and coordination of supportive services for eligible homeless
persons.
(6) Develop technical assistance plans in collaboration with HUD
field office oversight for local HOPWA-assisted housing programs. It is
estimated that up to 40 percent of HOPWA TA funds will be made
available for this purpose.
2. DUNS Requirement. Refer to the General Section for information
regarding the DUNS requirement. Applicants must obtain a DUNS number to
receive an award from HUD.
3. Other Eligibility Requirements. All applicants requesting
funding from programs under this NOFA must be in compliance with the
applicable threshold requirements found in the General Section.
Applicants that do not meet these requirements will be ineligible for
funding.
4. False Statements. An applicant's false statement in an
application is grounds for denial or termination of an award and
grounds for possible punishment as provided in 18 U.S.C. 1001.
5. Environmental review. Most activities under the CD-TA program
are categorically excluded and not subject
[[Page 11445]]
to environmental review under 24 CFR 50.19(b)(9) or (13), but in the
case of CHDO (HOME) TA eligible activities, a proposal for payment of
rent as part of CHDO operational costs will be subject to environmental
review by HUD under 24 CFR part 50. If an applicant proposes to assist
CHDO operating expenses that include rent, the application constitutes
an assurance that the applicant and CHDO will assist HUD to comply with
24 CFR part 50; will supply HUD with all available and relevant
information to perform an environmental review for the proposed
property to be rented; will carry out mitigating measures required by
HUD or select an alternate property; and will not lease or rent,
construct, rehabilitate, convert or repair the property, or commit or
expend HUD or non-HUD funds for these activities on the property to be
rented, until HUD has completed an environmental review to the extent
required by 24 CFR part 50. The results of the environmental review may
require that the proposed property be rejected.
IV. Application and Submission Information
A. Addresses to Request Application Package. Applications must be
received and validated by Grants.gov no later than 11:59:59 p.m.
Eastern time on the application deadline date. HUD must receive paper
copy applications from applicants that received a waiver no later than
11:59:59 p.m. on the application deadline date. See the General Section
for application submission and timely receipt procedures and for
instructions on how to request a waiver. Paper applications will not be
accepted unless the applicant has received a waiver of the electronic
submission requirement.
B. Content and Form of Application Submission. Applicants must
submit a separate application for each National TA and Local TA area
program for which they are applying. For example, an applicant for
National TA for HOME and for Local TA in three field office
jurisdictions would submit four separate and distinct applications.
A completed application consists of an application submitted by an
authorized official of the organization and contains all relevant
sections of the application, as shown in the checklist below in Section
IV.B.4.
1. Number of Copies. This information will be included in approval
letters to applicants submitting a waiver request.
2. Page Limitation. Narratives addressing Factors 1-5 are limited
to no more than 25 typed pages. That is, reviewers will not review more
than 25 pages for all five factors combined, except that the page limit
does not include the Form HUD-96010, Logic Model.
3. Prohibition on Materials Not Required. Materials other than what
is requested in this NOFA are prohibited. Reviewers will not consider
r[eacute]sum[eacute]s, charts, letters, or any other documents attached
to the application.
4. Checklist for Application Submission. Applicants submitting
electronic copies should follow the procedures in Sections IV.B. and F.
of the General Section. The following checklist is provided as a guide
to help ensure that you submit all the required elements. For
applicants receiving a waiver of the electronic submission, the paper
submission must be in the order provided below. All applicants should
enter the applicant name, DUNS number, and page numbers on the
narrative pages of the application. All forms are available when you
download the application and instructions from https://
apply.grants.gov/forms_apps_idx.html.
--SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance (see General Section)
--An Application Cover Page indicating in bold (a) the type of TA
proposed in the application whether HOME National, CHDO National, CHDO
Local, Homeless National, Homeless Local, or HOPWA National (b) the
amount of funds requested; and (c) for Local TA, the jurisdiction
proposed in the application.
--A one-page Summary describing (a) each major component of the
proposed TA approach; (b) the proposed cost of each major component;
and (c) whether the component is integrally related to another
component in order to be successful.
--Narrative addressing Factors 1-5
--HUD-96010, Logic Model
--HUD-424-CB, Grant Application Detailed Budget Form (see General
Section)
--HUD-424-CBW, Detailed Budget Worksheet for Non-Construction Projects
(see General Section)
--If applying for CHDO (HOME) TA, statement as to whether the
organization proposes to pass through funds to new CHDOs.
--If applying for the CHDO (HOME) TA, a certification as to whether the
organization qualifies as a primarily single-state provider under
section 233(e) of the Cranston-Gonzales Affordable Housing Act.
--SF-LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (see General Section)
--HUD-2880, Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/Update Report (see General
Section)
--SF-424, Supplement, Survey on Equal Opportunity for Applicants
--HUD-96011, Facsimile Transmittal (required for electronic submissions
of third party documents)
C. Submission Dates and Times. Your completed application must be
received and validated electronically by Grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 p.m. eastern time on the deadline date.
D. Intergovernmental Review. Intergovernmental review is not
applicable to CD-TA applications.
E. Funding Restrictions. An organization may not provide assistance
to itself. An organization may not provide assistance to another
organization with which it contracts or sub-awards funds to carry out
activities under the TA award.
Funding from HOME and from CHDO (HOME) TA to any single eligible
organization (excluding funds for organizational support and housing
education ``passed through'' to CHDOs), whether as an applicant or sub-
recipient is limited to not more than 20 percent of the operating
budget of the recipient organization for any one-year period of each
cooperative agreement. In addition, funding under either HOME or CHDO
(HOME) TA to any single organization is limited to 20 percent of the
$18,000,000 made available for HOME and CHDO (HOME) TA in FY2007.
Not less than 40 percent of the approximately $8,000,000 for CHDO
(HOME) shall be made available for eligible TA providers that have
worked primarily in one state. HUD will consider an applicant as a
primarily single state TA provider if it can document that more than 50
percent of its past activities in working with CHDOs or similar
nonprofit and other organizations (on the production of affordable
housing, revitalization of deteriorating neighborhoods, and/or the
delivery of technical assistance to these groups) was confined to the
geographic limits of a single state.
No fee or profit may be paid to any recipient or sub-recipient of
an award under this CD-TA NOFA.
F. Other Submission Requirements. The General Section describes
application submission procedures and how applicants may obtain proof
of timely submission.
Waiver of Electronic Submission Requirements. Applicants interested
in applying for funding under this NOFA must submit their applications
electronically or request a waiver from the Community Development
Technical Assistance program. Applicants should
[[Page 11446]]
submit their waiver requests in writing by e-mail. Waiver requests must
be submitted no later than 15 days prior to the application deadline
date and should be submitted to Mark--A.--Horwath@hud.gov. Instructions
regarding the number of copies to submit and the address where they
must be submitted will be contained in any approval of the waiver
request. Paper submissions must be received at the appropriate HUD
office(s) no later than the deadline date.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria. The maximum number of points to be awarded for a CD-TA
application is 100. The minimum score for an application to be
considered for funding is 75 with a minimum of 20 points on Factor 1.
The CD-TA program is not subject to bonus points, as described in the
General Section.
Points are assigned on five factors. When addressing Factors 2-5,
applicants should discuss the specific TA activities that will be
carried out during the term of the cooperative agreement. Applicants
should provide relevant examples to support the proposal, where
appropriate. Applicants should also be specific when describing the
communities, populations, and organizations that they propose to serve
and the specific outcomes expected as a result of the TA.
Factor 1 relates to the capacity of the applicant and its relevant
organizational experience. Rating of the ``applicant'' or the
``applicant's organization and staff'' includes in-house staff and any
sub-contractors and sub-recipients which are firmly committed to the
project. In responding to Factor 1, applicants should specify the
experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities of the applicant's
organization and staff, and any persons and organizations firmly
committed to the project.
Rating Factor 1: Capacity of the Applicant and Relevant Organizational
Experience (30 points) (Minimum for Funding Eligibility--20 points)
a. (10 points) Recent and successful experience of the applicant's
organization in providing TA in eligible activities and to eligible
entities for the HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless, or HOPWA. CD-TA programs,
as applicable.
In rating this factor, HUD will consider the extent to which the
application demonstrates successful experience within the last four
years of providing TA related to the applicable CD-TA program.
b. (10 points) Depth of experience in managing multiple TA tasks,
to multiple entities, and in more than one geographic area.
In rating this factor, HUD will consider the extent to which the
application demonstrates ability to manage TA assignments effectively.
c. (10 points) Knowledgeable key personnel skilled in providing TA
in one or more of the eligible activities for HOME, CHDO (HOME),
Homeless, and/or HOPWA programs, as applicable; a sufficient number of
staff or ability to procure qualified experts or professionals with the
knowledge, skills, and abilities to deliver the proposed level of TA in
the proposed service area in a timely and effective fashion; and an
ability to provide CD-TA in a geographic area larger than a single city
or county.
In rating this factor, HUD will consider the extent to which the
application demonstrates the organization has an adequate number of key
staff or ability to procure individuals with the knowledge of effective
TA approaches and knowledge of HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless, or HOPWA,
as applicable.
Rating Factor 2: Need/Extent of the Problem (10 points)
a. For National TA applications: Sound and extensive understanding
of need for TA in relation to the priorities listed in Section III C of
this NOFA as demonstrated by objective information and/or data, such as
information from HOME Snapshots, current census data, the American
Housing Survey, or other relevant data sources.
b. For Local TA applications: Sound and extensive understanding of
high priority needs for TA in the jurisdiction as demonstrated by
objective information and/or data, such as information from HOME
Snapshots, current census data, the American Housing Survey, or other
relevant data sources.
In rating this factor, HUD will evaluate the extent to which the
application demonstrates an understanding of the specific needs for TA
and supports the description of need with reliable, program-specific,
quantitative information. Applicants for HOME should, at a minimum,
draw on HOME Snapshot information to demonstrate PJs' needs, in an area
or nationwide, for additional training and capacity building. See
https://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/affordablehousing/programs/home/
snapshot/index.cfm.
Rating Factor 3: Soundness of Approach (40 points)
a. (25 points) (1) For National TA applications: A sound approach
for addressing the need for eligible TA activities in relation to the
priorities listed in Section III C of this NOFA that will result in
positive outcomes.
(2) For Local TA applications: A sound approach for addressing high
priority needs for TA in the jurisdiction that will result in positive
outcomes.
In rating this factor, HUD will evaluate the extent to which the
application presents and supports a detailed, feasible, practical
approach for addressing TA needs (Local TA applications) or CD-TA
program priorities (National TA applications), including techniques,
timeframes, goals, and intended beneficiaries, and the likelihood that
these activities will be cost-effective and will result in positive
outcomes.
b. (10 points) A feasible work plan for designing, organizing,
managing, and carrying out the proposed TA activities under the demand-
response system.
In rating this factor, HUD will evaluate the applicant's
understanding of the demand-response system and the extent to which the
application demonstrates the efficiency of the design, organization,
and management of the proposed activities.
c. (5 points) An effective assistance program to specific
disadvantaged communities, populations, and/or organizations which
previously have been underserved and have the potential to participate
in the CD-TA program (such as the Colonias, an empowerment zone (EZ)
designated by HUD or the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA), an urban or rural renewal community designated by HUD (RC), an
enterprise community designated in round II by USDA (EC-II), or
homeless persons and persons with disabilities).
In rating this factor, HUD will evaluate the extent to which the
applicant has identified and has documented, using reliable data,
specific communities, populations, or organizations that have been
disadvantaged or previously underserved communities, populations, or
organizations and has developed an effective strategy for engaging
their participation in the HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless, or HOPWA
program, as applicable.
Rating Factor 4: Leveraging Resources (10 points)
An efficient practical method to transfer manuals, guides,
assessment
[[Page 11447]]
forms, other work products, models, and lessons learned in its CD-TA
activities to other CD-TA grantees and/or HOME, CHDO (HOME), Homeless,
or HOPWA program beneficiaries.
In rating this factor, HUD will evaluate the extent to which the
application demonstrates a cost-effective means of sharing resources
developed under the CD-TA activities with a wide audience, including
sharing information with other TA providers in the CD-TA program.
Rating Factor 5: Achieving Results and Program Evaluation (10
points)
a. (5 points) An effective, quantifiable evaluation plan for
measuring performance using the Logic Model with specific outcome
measures and benchmarks, including--for HOME applicants--performance
improvements as measured by the HOME Snapshot indicators.
In rating this factor, HUD will evaluate the extent to which the
application has an evaluation plan that includes outcomes and is
specific, measurable, and appropriate in relation to the activities
proposed.
b. (5 points) Successful past performance in administering HUD CD-
TA programs or, for applicants new to HUD's CD-TA Programs, successful
past performance in providing TA in other community development
programs. Applicants should include, as applicable, increases in CPD or
community development program accomplishments as a result of TA (e.g.,
number of homeless people or persons with HIV/AIDS receiving housing
and services, efficiency or effectiveness of administration of CPD or
community development programs, number of affordable housing units,
HOME Snapshot indicators, timeliness of use of CPD or community
development program funds).
In rating this factor, HUD will evaluate the extent to which the
application demonstrates successful past performance that was timely
and resulted in positive outcomes in the delivery of community
development TA. HUD will also consider past performance of current CD-
TA providers, including financial and other information in HUD's files.
B. Review and Selection Process
1. Review Types. Two types of reviews will be conducted. First, HUD
will review each application to determine whether it meets threshold
eligibility requirements.
Second, HUD will review and assign scores to applications using the
Factors for Award noted in Section V.A.
2. Ranked Order.
a. Once rating scores are assigned, rated applications submitted
for each National TA program and for each Local TA program will be
listed in ranked order. Applications within the fundable range (score
of 75+ points with 20+ points for Factor 1) may then be funded in
ranked order under the CD-TA program and service area for which they
applied.
b. For purposes of coordinating activities on a national basis, HUD
reserves the right to select a single national provider to carry out
activities, as follows:
(1) one for HOPWA technical assistance activities, including
national products and local support;
(2) one for HMIS technical assistance activities;
(3) one for HOME and one for CHDO technical assistance activities.
3. Threshold Eligibility Requirements. All applicants requesting
CD-TA must be in compliance with the applicable threshold requirements
found in the General Section and the eligibility requirements listed in
Section III of this NOFA in order to be reviewed, scored, and ranked.
Applications that do not meet these requirements and applications that
were received after the deadline (see Section IV.C of the General
Section) will be considered ineligible for funding.
4. Award Adjustment. In addition to the funding adjustment
authority provided for in the General Section, HUD reserves the right
to adjust funding amounts for each CD-TA selectee. The amounts listed
in the charts in Section II.A are provided to assist applicants to
develop Local TA or National TA budgets and do not represent the exact
amounts to be awarded. Once TA applicants are selected for award, HUD
will determine the total amount to be awarded to any selected applicant
based upon the size and needs of each of the selected applicant's
service areas, the funds available for that area and CD-TA program, the
number of other CD-TA applicants selected in that area or CD-TA
program, and the scope of the TA to be provided.
Additionally, HUD may reduce the amount of funds allocated for
field office jurisdictions to fund National CD-TA providers and other
CD-TA providers for activities that cannot be fully budgeted for or
estimated by HUD Headquarters or field offices at the time this NOFA
was published. HUD may also require selected applicants, as a condition
of funding, to provide coverage on a geographically broader basis than
proposed in order to supplement or strengthen the CD-TA network in
terms of the size of the area covered and types and scope of TA
proposed.
If funds remain after all selections have been made, the remaining
funds may be distributed among field offices for Local TA and/or used
for National TA, or made available for other CD-TA program
competitions.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices. HUD will send written notifications to both
successful and unsuccessful applicants. A notification sent to a
successful applicant is not an authorization to begin performance.
After selection, HUD requires that all selected applicants
participate in negotiations to determine the specific terms of the
cooperative agreement, including the budget. Costs may be denied or
modified if HUD determines that they are not allowable, allocable, and/
or reasonable. In cases where HUD cannot successfully conclude
negotiations with a selected applicant or a selected applicant fails to
provide HUD with requested information, an award will not be made to
that applicant. In this instance, HUD may offer an award, and proceed
with negotiations with the next highest-ranking applicant.
After selection for funding but prior to executing the cooperative
agreement, the selected applicant must develop in consultation with the
GTR, a Technical Assistance Delivery Plan (TADP) for each National TA
award. The TADP must be approved by the GTR and delineate the tasks for
each CD-TA program the applicant will undertake during the performance
period. For Local TA awards and generally for National TA awards, prior
to undertaking individual tasks, the selected applicant must develop in
consultation with the GTR a Work Plan for specific activities. The TADP
and the Work Plans must specify the location of the proposed CD-TA
activities, the amount of CD-TA funding and proposed activities by
location, the improved program performance or other results expected
from the CD-TA activities, and the methodology to be used for measuring
the success of the CD-TA. A detailed time schedule for delivery of the
activities, budget summary, budget-by-task, and staffing plan must be
included in the TADP and Work Plans.
After selection, but prior to award, applicants selected for
funding will be required to provide HUD with their written Code of
Conduct if they have not previously done so and it is recorded on the
HUD Web site at https://
[[Page 11448]]
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/codeofconduct/sconduct.cfm.
B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements. After selection
for funding but prior to award, applicants must submit financial and
administrative information to comply with applicable requirements.
These requirements are found in 24 CFR part 84 for all organizations
except states and local governments whose requirements are found in 24
CFR Part 85. Cost principles requirements are found at OMB Circular A-
122 for nonprofit organizations, OMB Circular A-21 for institutions of
higher education, OMB Circular A-87 for states and local governments,
and at 48 CFR 31.2 for commercial organizations. Applicants must submit
a certification from an Independent Public Accountant or the cognizant
government auditor, stating that the applicant's financial management
system meets prescribed standards for fund control and accountability.
See the General Section for requirements for Procurement of
Recovered Materials.
The requirements to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing do not
apply.
C. Reporting. CD-TA awardees will be required to report to the GTR
on, at a minimum, a quarterly basis unless otherwise specified in the
cooperative agreement. As part of the required report to HUD, grant
recipients must include a completed Logic Model (HUD 96010), which
identifies output and outcome achievements. For FY 2007, HUD is
considering a new concept for the Logic Model. The new concept is a
Return on Investment (ROI) statement. HUD will be publishing a separate
notice