Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Rule 123D (Openings and Halts In Trading), 11072-11075 [E7-4327]
Download as PDF
11072
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
positions are significant indicators of
investor sentiment.11 As such, the
commenter stated that timelier reporting
of short interest data provides
additional relevant information and
more accurate indications of changes in
investor outlook.12
In response to these comments and in
recognition of technological and
systems changes that may be required to
implement the proposed rule change,
the Commission finds that the 180 day
implementation period proposed by the
SROs will provide members adequate
time to make any necessary changes.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule changes (SR–NASD–
2006–131; SR–NYSE–2006–111; SR–
Amex–2007–05) be, and it hereby
are,approved.
B. Related Issues
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55398; File No. SR–NYSE–
2007–25]
Discussion and Commission Findings
Short positions required to be
reported under the SROs’ rules are those
resulting from ‘‘short sales’’ as the term
is defined in Rule 200 of Regulation
SHO,13 with certain exceptions related
to Exchange Act Rule 10a–1.14
Commission staff has instructed the
SROs to review these exceptions to
short interest reporting to determine
whether further rulemaking is
appropriate.
A. Comments
C. Commission Findings
The Commission specifically asked
whether the proposed 180 day
implementation period should be
shortened. The Commission received
one comment letter.7 The commenter
supported the NYSE and NASD
proposals 8 because she favored
regulation of short sales generally.
However, the commenter believed that
the implementation period should be
shortened.
Prior to filing with the Commission,
NASD solicited comments on its
proposed rule change in NASD Notice
to Members 05–63 (September 2005)
and received two comments.9 Of the
two comment letters received, both were
in favor of the proposed rule change.
One commenter noted that minimal
programming and costs would be
required to implement this proposal, but
recommended six months for
implementation of the proposal.10 The
other commenter indicated that
increases or decreases in short interest
After a review of the rule proposals
and the comments, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule changes are
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to national
securities exchanges and national
securities associations, and in particular
Sections 6(b)(5) 15 and 15A(b)(6) 16 of
the Act, which require, among other
things, that NASD, NYSE, and Amex
rules must be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
The Commission believes that the
proposed rule changes will provide
additional and more timely information
related to short selling.17
structure and to reflect the adoption of
the Commission’s Regulation SHO.5
Æ Amex proposed to increase the
frequency of the short interest reporting
requirements from monthly to twice a
month, and to codify the short interest
reporting requirement authorized by
Amex Rule 30. The proposed
amendment would incorporate the short
interest reporting requirements into new
Amex Rule 30A.
The SROs proposed an
implementation date of 180 days (six
months) following Commission
approval of the filing in order to allow
firms sufficient time to make any
systems changes necessary to comply
with the new requirements.
The proposed rule changes were
published in the Federal Register on
February 1, 2007.6 The Commission
received one comment, which was
submitted in support of this proposal.
Prior to the proposal, NASD had
received two comments that also
supported the proposal. This order
approves the rule change.
5 17
CFR 242.200 through 242.203.
Exchange Act Release No. 55170
(January 26, 2007), 72 FR 4756 (February 1, 2007).
7 Letter from Carol McCrory, Visitiing Assistant
Professor of Legal Skils, Stetson University College
of Law (Jan. 30, 2007) (commenting on SR–NASD–
2006–131 and SR–NYSE–2006–111).
8 See id. The letter did not comment on the Amex
proposal.
9 Comments were received from the following:
Lisa Morel-Misener of Cognos Incorporated, dated
October 27, 2005 and Christopher Charles of Wulff
Hansen & Co., dated November 15, 2005.
10 See supra note 9, Wulff Hansen & Co. letter.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
6 Securities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
11 See
supra note 9, Cognos Incorporated letter.
12 Id.
13 17
CFR 242.200.
CFR 240.10a–1. NASD Rule 3360(b)(1)
excludes positions that meet the requirements of
subsections (e)(1), (6), (7), (8), and (10) of Rule 10a–
1 and NYSE Rule 421.10 currently excludes
positions resulting from sales specified in
subsections (1), (6), (7), (8), (9) and (10) of
paragraph (e) of Rule 10a–1. NYSE’s proposal
removes subsection (9). To conform with the NASD
and NYSE rules, Amex Rule 30A as proposed
excludes positions resulting from sales specified in
Rule 10a–1(e) (1), (6), (7), (8) or (10).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
17 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission notes that it has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
14 17
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–4293 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Rule 123D (Openings and Halts In
Trading)
March 5, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 2,
2007, the New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared substantially by the
Exchange. The Exchange has filed the
proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder,4 which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend
Exchange Rule 123D to add new section
(3) to enable the Exchange to halt
trading in a security whose price may be
about to fall below $1.00 per share,
without delisting the security, so that
the security may continue to trade on
other markets that deal in bids, offers,
orders, or indications of interest in subpenny prices, until the price of the
security has recovered sufficiently to
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
permit the Exchange to resume trading
in minimum increments of no less than
one penny or the issuer is delisted for
failing to correct the price condition
within the time provided under NYSE
rules. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at https://
www.nyse.com, NYSE and the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change. The text of
these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
Regulation NMS, adopted by the
Commission in April 2005,5 provides
that each trading center intending to
qualify for trade-through protection
under Regulation NMS Rule 611 (‘‘Rule
611’’) 6 is required to have a Regulation
NMS-compliant trading system fully
operational by March 5, 2007 (the
‘‘Trading Phase Date’’).7
Regulation NMS Rule 612 (‘‘Rule
612’’),8 permits markets to accept bids,
offers, orders, and indications of interest
in increments smaller than a $0.01 per
share, but not less than $0.0001 per
share, for stocks priced below $1.00 per
share and to quote and trade such stocks
in sub-pennies. Markets may choose not
to accept such bids, offers, orders or
indications of interest and the NYSE has
done so, maintaining a minimum
trading and quoting variation of $0.01
per share for all securities trading below
$100,000 per share.9
However, the Commission has said
that Rule 611’s proscription against
trade-throughs extends to quotes which
include a sub-penny component in
stocks priced below $1.00 per share,
provided they are better priced by a
minimum of $0.01 per share.10 Rule 612
5 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
6 17 CFR 242.611.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55160
(January 24, 2007), 72 FR 4202 (January 30, 2007).
8 17 CFR 242.612.
9 See NYSE Rule 62.
10 Order Exempting Certain Sub-Penny TradeThroughs From Rule 611 of Regulation NMS Under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
requires a market that routes an order to
another market in compliance with Rule
611 and receives a sub-penny execution
to accept the sub-penny execution,
report that execution to the customer,
and compare, clear and settle that trade.
The Exchange states that, currently,
there are no markets quoting or trading
NYSE-listed securities that are priced
under $1.00 per share in sub-penny
increments. The Exchange’s trading
system does not currently accommodate
sub-penny trading, nor can it recognize
a quote disseminated by another market
center if such quote has a sub-penny
component. The Exchange had
previously determined that it would not
be cost effective to make the changes
that would allow its trading system to
fully accommodate sub-penny trading.
In making this determination, the
Exchange weighed the resource
allocation choices that would be
necessary against the fact that only a
very small number of securities listed
on the Exchange have fallen below
$1.00 in the last three years.
The Exchange has been investigating
whether there are systemic or other
approaches that would allow it to deal
with sub-penny executions made on
markets to which we have routed an
order, while not necessitating all the
changes that would be required to fully
trade in sub-pennies. No acceptable
approach has yet been discovered.
The Exchange is proposing an
approach which will allow it to avoid
trading a security on NYSE when its
price falls below $1.00 per share, while
permitting it to remain listed on the
Exchange so that it could continue to be
traded by other markets on an unlisted
trading privileges (‘‘UTP’’) basis,
including NYSE Arca. This would
involve ‘‘halting’’ trading on NYSE, not
for a ‘‘regulatory’’ reason (as that would
require other markets to stop reporting
trades as well), but rather for an
‘‘operational’’ (i.e., non-regulatory)
reason. NYSE Rule 123D(2)
contemplates such a non-regulatory halt
for systems, equipment or
communication facility problems or for
other technical reasons and, in the
Exchange’s view, this is a related
situation, since it relates to the
Exchange’s systemic inability to
properly accommodate these sub-penny
prices. Existing Rule 123D(2)
contemplates halts which are relatively
brief in duration, whereas a halt for the
purposes described herein could
potentially endure for a number of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. See Securities
and Exchange Commission Release No. 54678
(October 31, 2006), 71 FR 65018 (November 6,
2006).
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11073
months.11 More significantly, Rule 123D
currently requires Floor Official
approval to implement a trading halt of
any kind, whether regulatory or
operational. However, the proposed halt
will have to occur automatically, so it
must be specified to occur without Floor
Official approval. For this reason the
Exchange is proposing to codify this
new non-regulatory halt in a new
subsection (3) or Rule 123D. The
Exchange is seeking to expand the use
of the operational halt in order to
prevent a problem that the Exchange
knows would occur if the price of the
stock fell below a $1.00 per share.12
Because the Exchange must halt
trading before a security in fact trades
below $1.00 per share, the new rule will
trigger the halt whenever a security
trading on the Exchange is reported on
the consolidated tape during normal
trading hours as having traded at a price
of $1.05 per share or less, or if a security
would open on the Exchange at a price
of $1.05 per share or less. In any such
event, trading in the security on the
Exchange shall be immediately halted.
Once halted for such reason, trading
shall not be resumed on the Exchange
until the security has traded on another
automated trading center as defined in
Rule 600(b)(4) under the Act 13 for at
least one entire trading day at a price or
prices that are at all times at or above
$1.10 per share. Any such resumption of
trading shall occur at the beginning of
a trading day, so that normal opening
procedures can apply. As noted above,
in contrast to other trading halts, a subpenny trading halt is automatic as it
does not require the approval of any
Floor Officials.14 However, if a
11 Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual sets out a minimum price criteria for capital
or common stock. Currently, that section provides
that a company will be considered to be below
compliance standards if the average closing price of
a security is less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30
trading-day period. Once notified, the company
must bring its share price and average share price
back above $1.00 within six months. Alternatively,
if a company determines that it will cure the price
condition by taking an action that will require
approval of its shareholders, it must obtain the
necessary shareholder approval by a date no later
than its next annual meeting, and must implement
the action promptly thereafter. The price condition
will be deemed cured if the price promptly exceeds
$1.00 per share, and the price remains above the
level for at least the following 30 trading days.
12 The Exchange will notify its members that the
description of ‘‘Equipment Changeover’’ will now
include a halt for this new non-regulatory halt.
13 See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(4).
14 Specifically, designated Exchange staff will
actively monitor the conditions of the securities and
immediately implement the trading halt when the
conditions of the securities require such halt
without any Floor Official approval. The Exchange
will investigate the possibility of creating a
systemic modification to automate this process.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
Continued
12MRN1
11074
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
determination is made by a Floor
Official that a trade that triggered a halt
because of a ‘‘Sub-penny trading’’
condition was made in error or
otherwise was an anomaly, trading of
the security on the Exchange will
resume immediately.
When a halt is called under NYSE
Rule 123D, a condition indication is
disseminated over the consolidated
tape. The condition under new Rule
123D(3) will be denominated as a ‘‘Subpenny trading’’ condition. However,
steps will be taken to undertake the
system development necessary to enable
the dissemination of such a condition
description but the changes will not be
completed by March 5, 2007, the date
when this change must be in place.
Accordingly, through September 7,
2007, or the date the systems are able to
disseminate such condition, if earlier,
should a Sub-penny trading halt be
required prior to the system being ready
to disseminate such condition
notification, the Exchange will in lieu
thereof disseminate the ‘‘Equipment
Changeover’’ condition (used when a
halt is called pursuant to NYSE Rule
123D(2)), and will clarify as soon as
practicable that the halt is due to a
‘‘Sub-penny trading’’ condition on the
NYSE’s Web site.15
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) 16 of the
Act, in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) 17 in
particular in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Telephone conversation on March 5, 2007 between
Deanna Logan, Director, NYSE and David Liu,
Senior Special Counsel, Division of Market
Regulation, Commission.
15 See also supra note 12.
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 18 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.19
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
NYSE has asked that the Commission
waive the 30-day operative delay and
five-day pre-filing requirement
contained in Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under
the Act.20 The Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because it expands the Exchange’s
current use of trading halts for
operational reasons to preemptively
prevent operational problems on the
Exchange and enable the Exchange to
comply with Rule 612. The proposal is
also consistent with the public interest
and the protection of investors because
it will permit Exchange-listed securities
whose price falls below $1.05 per share
to continue to quote and trade on an
UTP basis, including in sub-penny
increments, while recognizing the
current limitations of the Exchange’s
systemic capacities in that regard.
18 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
20 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). Rule 19b–4(f)(6) also
requires the self-regulatory organization to give the
Commission notice of its intent to file the proposed
rule change, along with a brief description and text
of the proposed rule change, at least five business
days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. NYSE gave the Commission written
notice of its intention to file the proposed rule
change on February 26, 2007, four business days
prior to filing. The Commission is granting the
Exchange’s request for a waiver of the five-day prefiling requirement.
19 17
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Accordingly, the Commission
designates the proposal to be effective
and operative upon filing with the
Commission.21
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2007–25 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2007–25. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NYSE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2007–25 and should
be submitted on or before April 2, 2007.
21 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay of this proposal, the Commission
has considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–4327 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
Percent
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere ........................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere ........................
For Economic Injury:
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without
Credit Available Elsewhere .....
5.250
[Disaster Declaration #10821 and #10822]
Alabama Disaster #AL–00007
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 10821B and for
economic injury is 108220.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008.)
AGENCY:
This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Alabama
(FEMA–1687–DR), dated 03/03/2007.
Incident: Severe Storms and
Tornadoes.
Incident Period: 03/01/2007.
Effective Date: 03/03/2007.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 05/02/2007.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 12/03/2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing And
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
03/03/2007, applications for disaster
loans may be filed at the address listed
above or other locally announced
locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and
Economic Injury Loans): Coffee.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury
Loans Only): Alabama: Covington,
Crenshaw, Dale, Geneva, and Pike.
The Interest Rates are:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere ........................
Homeowners
Without
Credit
Available Elsewhere ................
Businesses With Credit Available
Elsewhere ................................
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–4364 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere ........................
Homeowners
Without
Credit
Available Elsewhere ................
Businesses With Credit Available
Elsewhere ................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere ........................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere ........................
For Economic Injury
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without
Credit Available Elsewhere .....
5.750
2.875
8.000
5.250
4.000
4.000
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #10819 and #10820]
Georgia Disaster #GA–00008
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 10819B and for
economic injury is 108200.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008.)
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Georgia (FEMA–
1686–DR), dated 03/03/2007.
Incident: Severe Storms and
Tornadoes.
Incident Period: 03/01/2007 through
03/02/2007.
Effective Date: 03/03/2007.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 05/02/2007.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 12/03/2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing And
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
Percent President’s major disaster declaration on
03/03/2007, applications for disaster
loans may be filed at the address listed
above or other locally announced
5.750
locations.
The following areas have been
2.875
determined to be adversely affected by
8.000 the disaster:
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and
Economic Injury Loans): Sumter.
Jkt 211001
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury
Loans Only): Georgia: Crisp, Dooly,
Lee, Macon, Marion, Schley,
Terrell, and Webster.
4.000
4.000
11075
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–4363 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Maine District Advisory Council; Public
Meeting
The U.S. Small Business
Administration Maine District Advisory
Council, located in the geographical
area of Augusta, Maine will hold a
public meeting on Tuesday, March 27,
2007, starting at 10 a.m. The meeting
will be held at Husson College, Center
for Family Business, One College Circle,
Bangor, ME 04401.
The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss the following topics: (1) SBA
Small Business Week; (2) Lender update
(centralized processing, participating
and lender forms); (3) Updates by
SCORE; Maine Small Business
Development Center and Women’s
Business Center; (4) An overview of
SBA’s Alternate Work Site in Bangor,
Maine presented by Herb Thomas,
Senior Area Manager.
For further information, write or call
Mary McAleney, District Director, U.S.
Small Business Administration, Maine
District Office, 68 Sewall Street, Room
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11072-11075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4327]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55398; File No. SR-NYSE-2007-25]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Rule 123D (Openings and Halts In Trading)
March 5, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 2, 2007, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared substantially by the Exchange.
The Exchange has filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of
the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the
proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend Exchange Rule 123D to add new
section (3) to enable the Exchange to halt trading in a security whose
price may be about to fall below $1.00 per share, without delisting the
security, so that the security may continue to trade on other markets
that deal in bids, offers, orders, or indications of interest in sub-
penny prices, until the price of the security has recovered
sufficiently to
[[Page 11073]]
permit the Exchange to resume trading in minimum increments of no less
than one penny or the issuer is delisted for failing to correct the
price condition within the time provided under NYSE rules. The text of
the proposed rule change is available at https://www.nyse.com, NYSE and
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Regulation NMS, adopted by the Commission in April 2005,\5\
provides that each trading center intending to qualify for trade-
through protection under Regulation NMS Rule 611 (``Rule 611'') \6\ is
required to have a Regulation NMS-compliant trading system fully
operational by March 5, 2007 (the ``Trading Phase Date'').\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70
FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
\6\ 17 CFR 242.611.
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55160 (January 24,
2007), 72 FR 4202 (January 30, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation NMS Rule 612 (``Rule 612''),\8\ permits markets to
accept bids, offers, orders, and indications of interest in increments
smaller than a $0.01 per share, but not less than $0.0001 per share,
for stocks priced below $1.00 per share and to quote and trade such
stocks in sub-pennies. Markets may choose not to accept such bids,
offers, orders or indications of interest and the NYSE has done so,
maintaining a minimum trading and quoting variation of $0.01 per share
for all securities trading below $100,000 per share.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 17 CFR 242.612.
\9\ See NYSE Rule 62.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, the Commission has said that Rule 611's proscription
against trade-throughs extends to quotes which include a sub-penny
component in stocks priced below $1.00 per share, provided they are
better priced by a minimum of $0.01 per share.\10\ Rule 612 requires a
market that routes an order to another market in compliance with Rule
611 and receives a sub-penny execution to accept the sub-penny
execution, report that execution to the customer, and compare, clear
and settle that trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Order Exempting Certain Sub-Penny Trade-Throughs From Rule
611 of Regulation NMS Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. See
Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 54678 (October 31,
2006), 71 FR 65018 (November 6, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange states that, currently, there are no markets quoting
or trading NYSE-listed securities that are priced under $1.00 per share
in sub-penny increments. The Exchange's trading system does not
currently accommodate sub-penny trading, nor can it recognize a quote
disseminated by another market center if such quote has a sub-penny
component. The Exchange had previously determined that it would not be
cost effective to make the changes that would allow its trading system
to fully accommodate sub-penny trading. In making this determination,
the Exchange weighed the resource allocation choices that would be
necessary against the fact that only a very small number of securities
listed on the Exchange have fallen below $1.00 in the last three years.
The Exchange has been investigating whether there are systemic or
other approaches that would allow it to deal with sub-penny executions
made on markets to which we have routed an order, while not
necessitating all the changes that would be required to fully trade in
sub-pennies. No acceptable approach has yet been discovered.
The Exchange is proposing an approach which will allow it to avoid
trading a security on NYSE when its price falls below $1.00 per share,
while permitting it to remain listed on the Exchange so that it could
continue to be traded by other markets on an unlisted trading
privileges (``UTP'') basis, including NYSE Arca. This would involve
``halting'' trading on NYSE, not for a ``regulatory'' reason (as that
would require other markets to stop reporting trades as well), but
rather for an ``operational'' (i.e., non-regulatory) reason. NYSE Rule
123D(2) contemplates such a non-regulatory halt for systems, equipment
or communication facility problems or for other technical reasons and,
in the Exchange's view, this is a related situation, since it relates
to the Exchange's systemic inability to properly accommodate these sub-
penny prices. Existing Rule 123D(2) contemplates halts which are
relatively brief in duration, whereas a halt for the purposes described
herein could potentially endure for a number of months.\11\ More
significantly, Rule 123D currently requires Floor Official approval to
implement a trading halt of any kind, whether regulatory or
operational. However, the proposed halt will have to occur
automatically, so it must be specified to occur without Floor Official
approval. For this reason the Exchange is proposing to codify this new
non-regulatory halt in a new subsection (3) or Rule 123D. The Exchange
is seeking to expand the use of the operational halt in order to
prevent a problem that the Exchange knows would occur if the price of
the stock fell below a $1.00 per share.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual sets out
a minimum price criteria for capital or common stock. Currently,
that section provides that a company will be considered to be below
compliance standards if the average closing price of a security is
less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30 trading-day period. Once
notified, the company must bring its share price and average share
price back above $1.00 within six months. Alternatively, if a
company determines that it will cure the price condition by taking
an action that will require approval of its shareholders, it must
obtain the necessary shareholder approval by a date no later than
its next annual meeting, and must implement the action promptly
thereafter. The price condition will be deemed cured if the price
promptly exceeds $1.00 per share, and the price remains above the
level for at least the following 30 trading days.
\12\ The Exchange will notify its members that the description
of ``Equipment Changeover'' will now include a halt for this new
non-regulatory halt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the Exchange must halt trading before a security in fact
trades below $1.00 per share, the new rule will trigger the halt
whenever a security trading on the Exchange is reported on the
consolidated tape during normal trading hours as having traded at a
price of $1.05 per share or less, or if a security would open on the
Exchange at a price of $1.05 per share or less. In any such event,
trading in the security on the Exchange shall be immediately halted.
Once halted for such reason, trading shall not be resumed on the
Exchange until the security has traded on another automated trading
center as defined in Rule 600(b)(4) under the Act \13\ for at least one
entire trading day at a price or prices that are at all times at or
above $1.10 per share. Any such resumption of trading shall occur at
the beginning of a trading day, so that normal opening procedures can
apply. As noted above, in contrast to other trading halts, a sub-penny
trading halt is automatic as it does not require the approval of any
Floor Officials.\14\ However, if a
[[Page 11074]]
determination is made by a Floor Official that a trade that triggered a
halt because of a ``Sub-penny trading'' condition was made in error or
otherwise was an anomaly, trading of the security on the Exchange will
resume immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(4).
\14\ Specifically, designated Exchange staff will actively
monitor the conditions of the securities and immediately implement
the trading halt when the conditions of the securities require such
halt without any Floor Official approval. The Exchange will
investigate the possibility of creating a systemic modification to
automate this process. Telephone conversation on March 5, 2007
between Deanna Logan, Director, NYSE and David Liu, Senior Special
Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When a halt is called under NYSE Rule 123D, a condition indication
is disseminated over the consolidated tape. The condition under new
Rule 123D(3) will be denominated as a ``Sub-penny trading'' condition.
However, steps will be taken to undertake the system development
necessary to enable the dissemination of such a condition description
but the changes will not be completed by March 5, 2007, the date when
this change must be in place. Accordingly, through September 7, 2007,
or the date the systems are able to disseminate such condition, if
earlier, should a Sub-penny trading halt be required prior to the
system being ready to disseminate such condition notification, the
Exchange will in lieu thereof disseminate the ``Equipment Changeover''
condition (used when a halt is called pursuant to NYSE Rule 123D(2)),
and will clarify as soon as practicable that the halt is due to a
``Sub-penny trading'' condition on the NYSE's Web site.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See also supra note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \16\ of
the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
\17\ in particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act
\18\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
NYSE has asked that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay
and five-day pre-filing requirement contained in Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
under the Act.\20\ The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest because it expands the Exchange's current use of
trading halts for operational reasons to preemptively prevent
operational problems on the Exchange and enable the Exchange to comply
with Rule 612. The proposal is also consistent with the public interest
and the protection of investors because it will permit Exchange-listed
securities whose price falls below $1.05 per share to continue to quote
and trade on an UTP basis, including in sub-penny increments, while
recognizing the current limitations of the Exchange's systemic
capacities in that regard. Accordingly, the Commission designates the
proposal to be effective and operative upon filing with the
Commission.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). Rule 19b-4(f)(6) also requires
the self-regulatory organization to give the Commission notice of
its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. NYSE
gave the Commission written notice of its intention to file the
proposed rule change on February 26, 2007, four business days prior
to filing. The Commission is granting the Exchange's request for a
waiver of the five-day pre-filing requirement.
\21\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2007-25 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2007-25. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NYSE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2007-25 and should be submitted on or before April
2, 2007.
[[Page 11075]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4327 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P