Notice of Waivers Granted under Section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as Amended, 10990-10996 [07-1149]
Download as PDF
10990
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington,
DC 20202–4700. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E7–4426 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Waivers Granted under
Section 9401 of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act, as Amended
Summary: In this notice, we
announce the waivers that the U.S.
Department of Education (Department)
has granted, from the date of enactment
of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
through December 31, 2006, under the
waiver authority in section 9401 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965 (ESEA). The Department
considered waiver requests in several
different categories: (1) Waivers related
to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita; (2)
growth model pilots; (3) waivers
allowing local educational agencies
(LEAs) to provide supplemental
educational services (SES) rather than
public school choice to eligible students
attending schools that receive funding
under Part A of Title I of the ESEA (Title
I schools) and are in the first year of
school improvement; (4) waivers
allowing LEAs in need of improvement
to be eligible to apply to their State
educational agency (SEA) to become
SES providers; (5) general programmatic
waivers; (6) extensions of the period in
which funds are available for obligation;
and (7) waivers allowing recipients of
funds under the Indian Education
program to charge additional
administrative costs to the program.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Waiver Data
I. Waivers Related to Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita
Through December 31, 2006, the
Department granted the following
hurricane-related waivers to States
under the general waiver authority in
section 9401 of the ESEA:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
1. Waiver Applicant: Alabama
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and 1111(h)(1)(C) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: May 18, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Alabama to create a separate subgroup
for students displaced by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita for adequate yearly
progress (AYP) decisions based on
assessment data for the 2005–2006
school year.
2. Waiver Applicant: Arkansas
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and 1111(h)(1)(C) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: May 19, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Arkansas to create a separate subgroup
for students displaced by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita for AYP decisions
based on assessment data for the 2005–
2006 school year.
3. Waiver Applicant: Georgia
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and 1111(h)(1)(C) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: April 19, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Georgia to create a separate subgroup for
students displaced by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita for AYP decisions
based on assessment data for the 2005–
2006 school year.
4. Waiver Applicant: Georgia
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1)(E) and 1116(b)(5)(B) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: May 5, 2006.
• Description of waiver: For the 2006–
2007 school year, because of the large
number of students displaced by
Hurricane Katrina, permits the Dekalb
County School District to provide SES,
rather than public school choice, to
eligible students attending Title I
schools in the first year of school
improvement.
5. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section
2416(a)(1) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: September 21,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Waived, with
respect to FY 2004 and FY 2005 Title II,
Part D, ESEA (Educational Technology)
funds, the requirement that districts
spend at least 25 percent of those funds
on professional development.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of the
General Education Provisions Act
(GEPA).
• Date waiver granted: September 21,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Extended by
one year the period of availability for all
ESEA funds that otherwise would have
expired on September 30, 2005.
7. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section 1127 of
the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: September 21,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Louisiana to waive for its districts, more
than once every three years, the 15
percent carryover limitation for FY 2003
Title I, Part A, ESEA funds.
8. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1)(E)(i) and 1116(b)(5)(B) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: January 13,
2006.
• Description of waiver: For the 2005–
2006 school year, permitted the LEAs of
three parishes—Orleans, Calcasieu, and
Jefferson—to provide SES, rather than
public school choice, to eligible
students attending Title I schools in
their first year of school improvement.
9. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: July 27, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Extended by
one year the period of availability for all
ESEA funds that otherwise would have
expired on September 30, 2006.
10. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section 1127 of
the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: July 27, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Extended to
FY 2004 and FY 2005 Title I, Part A,
ESEA funds a previously granted waiver
allowing Louisiana to waive for its
districts, more than once every three
years, the 15 percent Title I, Part A,
ESEA carryover limitation.
11. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and 1111(h)(1)(C) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: August 2,
2006.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Louisiana to create a separate subgroup
for students displaced by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita for AYP decisions
based on assessment data for the 2005–
2006 school year.
12. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1), (5), (7), and (8) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: August 2,
2006.
• Description of waiver: Provided
greater flexibility in making
accountability determinations for
districts and schools that were closed
for 18 or more instructional days and
were located in an area declared a
disaster area due to Hurricanes Katrina
or Rita.
13. Waiver Applicant: Mississippi
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 12,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Extended by
one year the period of availability for all
ESEA funds that otherwise would have
expired on September 30, 2005.
14. Waiver Applicant: Mississippi
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section
2416(a)(1) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: December 14,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Waived, with
respect to FY 2004 and FY 2005 Title II,
Part D, ESEA (Educational Technology)
funds, the requirement that districts
must spend at least 25 percent of those
funds on professional development.
15. Waiver Applicant: Mississippi
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and 1111(h)(1)(C) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: June 28, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Mississippi to create a separate
subgroup for students displaced by
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita for AYP
decisions based on assessment data for
the 2005–2006 school year.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
16. Waiver Applicant: Tennessee
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and 1111(h)(1)(C) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: May 19, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Tennessee to create a separate subgroup
for students displaced by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita for AYP decisions
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
based on assessment data for the 2005–
2006 school year.
17. Waiver Applicant: Texas Education
Agency
• Provisions waived: Sections
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and 1111(h)(1)(C) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: May 23, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Texas to create a separate subgroup for
students displaced by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita for AYP decisions
based on assessment data for the 2005–
2006 school year.
18. Waiver Applicant: Texas Education
Agency
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1), (5), (7), and (8) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: May 23, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Provided
greater flexibility in making
accountability determinations for
districts and campuses that were closed
for 7 or more instructional days and
were located in an area declared a
disaster area due to Hurricane Rita.
II. Other Section 9401 Waivers
In addition to the waivers related to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the
Department has granted the following
waivers to States and districts, through
December 31, 2006, under the general
waiver authority in section 9401 of the
ESEA:
A. Growth Model Pilots
1. Waiver Applicant: North Carolina
Department of Public Instruction
• Provision waived: Section
1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: May 17, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Provided
North Carolina the flexibility to
implement a growth-based
accountability model as part of
determining AYP beginning in the
2005–2006 school year, conditioned on
the State’s having received approval of
its assessment system by July 1, 2006.
2. Waiver Applicant: Tennessee
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section
1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: May 17, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Provided
Tennessee the flexibility to implement a
growth-based accountability model as
part of determining AYP beginning in
the 2005–2006 school year.
3. Waiver Applicant: Arkansas
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section
1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: November 9,
2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10991
• Description of waiver: Provided
Arkansas the flexibility to implement a
growth-based accountability model as
part of determining AYP beginning in
the 2006–2007 school year, conditioned
on the State’s receiving approval of its
standards and assessment system by the
end of the 2006–2007 school year.
4. Waiver Applicant: Delaware
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section
1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: November 9,
2006.
• Description of waiver: Provided
Delaware the flexibility to implement a
growth-based accountability model as
part of determining AYP beginning in
the 2006–2007 school year.
5. Waiver Applicant: Florida
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section
1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: November 9,
2006.
• Description of waiver: Provided
Florida the flexibility to implement a
growth-based accountability model as
part of determining AYP beginning in
the 2006–2007 school year, conditioned
on the State’s receiving approval of its
standards and assessment system by the
end of the 2006–2007 school year.
B. Allowing Local Educational Agencies
(LEAs) to Provide SES Rather Than
Public School Choice to Eligible
Students in Title I Schools in the First
Year of School Improvement
1. Waiver Applicant: Virginia
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1)(E) and 1116(b)(5)(B) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: August 25,
2005.
• Description of waiver: For the 2005–
2006 school year, permitted four school
districts—Alexandria City Schools,
Henry County Public Schools, Newport
News City Schools, and Stafford County
Public Schools—to offer SES, rather
than public school choice, to eligible
students in Title I schools in the first
year of school improvement.
2. Waiver Applicant: Alaska Department
of Education and Early Development
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1)(E) and 1116(b)(5)(B) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: August 14,
2006.
• Description of waiver: For the 2006–
2007 school year, permits the
Anchorage School District to offer SES,
rather than public school choice, to
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
10992
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
eligible students in Title I schools in the
first year of school improvement.
3. Waiver Applicant: Delaware
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1)(E) and 1116(b)(5)(B) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: August 14,
2006.
• Description of waiver: For the 2006–
2007 school year, permits the New
Castle Vocational and Technical School
District to offer SES, rather than public
school choice, to eligible students in
Title I schools in the first year of school
improvement.
4. Waiver Applicant: Indiana
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1)(E) and 1116(b)(5)(B) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
• Description of waiver: For the 2006–
2007 school year, permits three school
districts—Metropolitan School District
of Decatur Township, Monroe County
Community School Corporation, and
Muncie Community Schools—to offer
SES, rather than public school choice, to
eligible students in Title I schools in the
first year of school improvement.
5. Waiver Applicant: North Carolina
Department of Public Instruction
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1)(E) and 1116(b)(5)(B) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
• Description of waiver: For the 2006–
2007 school year, permits seven school
districts—Burke County, Cumberland
County, Durham County, Guilford
County, Northampton County, Pitt
County, and Robeson County—to offer
SES, rather than public school choice, to
eligible students in Title I schools in the
first year of school improvement.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
6. Waiver Applicant: Virginia
Department of Education
• Provisions waived: Sections
1116(b)(1)(E) and 1116(b)(5)(B) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
• Description of waiver: For the 2006–
2007 school year, permits four school
districts—Alexandria City Schools,
Henry County Public Schools, Newport
News City Schools, and Stafford County
Public Schools—to offer SES, rather
than public school choice, to eligible
students in Title I schools in the first
year of school improvement.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
C. Allowing LEAs in Need of
Improvement To Be Eligible to Apply to
their SEA to Become SES Providers
1. Waiver Applicant: Boston Public
Schools
• Provision waived: 34 CFR
200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
• Date waiver granted: November 3,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Boston Public Schools to be eligible to
apply to its SEA to become a provider
of SES to eligible students during the
2005–2006 school year even though the
district was identified for improvement.
6. Waiver Applicant: Hillsborough
County Public Schools
• Provision waived: 34 CFR
200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
• Date waiver granted: August 14,
2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Hillsborough County Public Schools to
be eligible to apply to its SEA to become
a provider of SES to eligible students
during the 2006–2007 school year even
though the district has been identified
for improvement.
D. General Programmatic Waivers
2. Waiver Applicant: Chicago Public
Schools
1. Waiver Applicant: San Diego City
Schools, CA
• Provision waived: 34 CFR
200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
• Date waiver granted: November 3,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Chicago Public Schools to be eligible to
apply to its SEA to become a provider
of SES to eligible students during the
2005–2006 school year even though the
district was identified for improvement.
• Provision waived: 34 CFR
200.63(b)(1)(i) (2002).
• Date waiver granted: August 21,
2002.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
San Diego to exclude from
comparability determinations for school
year 2002–2003 supplemental State and
local funds that the district spent on a
particular program (Blueprint for
Student Success) implemented in
schools that had less than 50 percent
students from low-income families.
3. Waiver Applicant: Anchorage School
District
• Provision waived: 34 CFR
200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
• Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted the
Anchorage School District to be eligible
to apply to its SEA to become a provider
of SES to eligible students during the
2006–2007 school year even though the
district has been identified for
improvement.
4. Waiver Applicant: Boston Public
Schools
• Provision waived: 34 CFR
200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
• Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Boston Public Schools to be eligible to
apply to its SEA to become a provider
of SES to eligible students during the
2006–2007 school year even though the
district has been identified for
improvement.
5. Waiver Applicant: Chicago Public
Schools
• Provision waived: 34 CFR
200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
• Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Chicago Public Schools to be eligible to
apply to its SEA to become a provider
of SES to eligible students during the
2006–2007 school year even though the
district has been identified for
improvement.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Waiver Applicant: San Diego City
Schools, CA
• Provision waived: 34 CFR
200.79(b)(1) (2003).
• Date waiver granted: October 29,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
San Diego to exclude from
comparability determinations through
school year 2005–2006 supplemental
State and local funds that the district
spent on a particular program (Blueprint
for Student Success) implemented in
schools that had less than 40 percent
students from low-income families.
3. Waiver Applicant: Belleville
Township High School District 201, IL
• Provisions waived: Sections
1113(a)(2) and 1113(c)(2)(A) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: June 3, 2003.
• Description of waiver: Permitted the
district to provide, through summer
2006, Title I, Part A, ESEA funding to
its second high school, which has a
poverty rate below the district-wide
poverty rate, and to allocate an amount
per poor child to both its high schools
that is less than 125 percent of the
amount of funds under Title I, Part A of
the ESEA that the district received for
the year.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
4. Waiver Applicant: DuPage High
School District 88, IL
• Provisions waived: Sections
1113(a)(2) and 1113(c)(2)(A) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: August 27,
2004.
• Description of waiver: Permits the
district to provide, through summer
2008, Title I, Part A, ESEA funding to
its second high school, which has a
poverty rate below the district-wide
poverty rate, and to allocate an amount
per poor child to both its high schools
that is less than 125 percent of the
amount of funds under Title I, Part A of
the ESEA that the district received for
the year.
5. Waiver Applicant: Belleville
Township High School District 201, IL
• Provisions waived: Sections
1113(a)(2) and 1113(c)(2)(A) of the
ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: April 26, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Extended
Belleville’s previously granted waiver,
allowing the district to provide Title I,
Part A, ESEA funding to its second high
school, which has a poverty rate below
the district-wide poverty rate, and to
allocate an amount per poor child to
both its high schools that is less than
125 percent of the amount of funds
under Title I, Part A of the ESEA that
the district received for the year.
2005–2006 school year certain Federal
funds reserved for State administration
even though a majority of the SEA’s
resources were not derived from nonFederal sources.
9. Waiver Applicant: New York State
Education Department
• Provision waived: Section 9201(a)
of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: June 7, 2006.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
New York to consolidate certain FY
2006 Federal funds (and remaining
carryover funds) reserved for State
administration even though a majority
of the SEA’s resources are not derived
from non-Federal sources.
10. Waiver Applicant: Clay County
Schools, WV
• Provisions waived: Section
1113(c)(1) of the ESEA and 34 CFR
200.78(c).
• Date waiver granted: July 28, 2004.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through the end of school year 2007–
2008 a previously granted waiver that
allows the district to allocate more Title
I, Part A, ESEA funds per poor child to
several elementary schools than to
middle schools with a higher percentage
of children from low-income families.
E. Extensions of the Obligation Period
7. Waiver Applicant: New Hampshire
School Administrative Unit No. 29, NH
• Provision waived: Section
1113(a)(1) of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: June 10, 2004.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through the end of school year 2006–
2007 a previously granted waiver that
enables three schools that do not meet
the Title I, Part A, ESEA eligibility
requirements to continue to receive
funds under the program.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
6. Waiver Applicant: Minnesota
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Section 1127 of
the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: July 1, 2004.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
Minnesota to waive for its districts,
more than once every three years, the 15
percent carryover limitation for FY 2003
and FY 2004 Title I, Part A, ESEA funds.
1. Waiver Applicant: Alaska Department
of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 29,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through December 31, 2004 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
2. Waiver Applicant: Colorado
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: November 25,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through December 31, 2004 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
8. Waiver Applicant: New York State
Education Department
• Provision waived: Section 9201(a)
of the ESEA.
• Date waiver granted: October 27,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Permitted
New York to consolidate through the
3. Waiver Applicant: District of
Columbia Public Schools
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: November 24,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through December 31, 2003 the period
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10993
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
4. Waiver Applicant: District of
Columbia Public Schools
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: January 14,
2004.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through February 29, 2004 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
December 31, 2003.
5. Waiver Applicant: Florida
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 29,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through September 30, 2004 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
6. Waiver Applicant: Illinois State Board
of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: January 14,
2004.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through June 30, 2004 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
7. Waiver Applicant: Maryland
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 25,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through December 15, 2003 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
8. Waiver Applicant: Massachusetts
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: November 24,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through June 30, 2004 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
10994
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
9. Waiver Applicant: Michigan
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 25,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through September 30, 2004 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
10. Waiver Applicant: Nebraska
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: January 14,
2004.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through June 30, 2004 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
11. Waiver Applicant: Nevada
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: January 14,
2004.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through June 30, 2004 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
12. Waiver Applicant: New Jersey
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 29,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through September 30, 2004 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
13. Waiver Applicant: New Jersey
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: June 17, 2005.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through September 30, 2006 the period
of availability for Title II, Part D, ESEA
(Educational Technology) funds that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2005.
14. Waiver Applicant: New Mexico
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 24,
2003.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Description of waiver: Extended
through June 30, 2004 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
15. Waiver Applicant: New York State
Education Department
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: March 31,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through September 30, 2005 the period
of availability for Title II, Part D, ESEA
(Educational Technology) funds that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2004.
16. Waiver Applicant: North Dakota
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 29,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through December 31, 2003 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
17. Waiver Applicant: Ohio Department
of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: November 24,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through August 20, 2004 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
18. Waiver Applicant: Ohio Department
of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: March 31,
2005.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through June 1, 2006 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
August 20, 2004.
19. Waiver Applicant: Pennsylvania
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 29,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended by
six months the period of availability for
funds awarded under section 6111 of
the ESEA (Grants for State Assessments
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Related Activities) that otherwise
would have expired on September 30,
2003.
20. Waiver Applicant: Rhode Island
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: July 29, 2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through September 30, 2004 the period
of availability for Title I, ESEA
Accountability funds that otherwise
would have expired on September 30,
2003.
21. Waiver Applicant: South Carolina
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 29,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through September 30, 2004 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
22. Waiver Applicant: Tennessee
Department of Education
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: September 29,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through December 30, 2003 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
23. Waiver Applicant: Washington
Office of Public Instruction
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: November 24,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through December 31, 2003 the period
of availability for funds awarded under
the School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2003.
24. Waiver Applicant: Washington
Office of Public Instruction
• Provision waived: Tydings
Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA.
• Date waiver granted: December 30,
2003.
• Description of waiver: Extended
through February 29, 2004 the period of
availability for funds awarded under the
School Renovation program that
otherwise would have expired on
December 31, 2003.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
F. Waivers of Administrative Cost
Limitation That Applies to Indian
Education Funds
As part of their application for funds
under the Indian Education Formula
Grant program, LEAs were allowed to
request, if needed, waivers of the five
percent administrative cost limitation in
section 7115(d) of the ESEA. The
following LEAs received approval of
budgets that permitted them to expend
more than five percent of their funds on
administrative costs for the fiscal year
grant awards noted:
• Dillingham City School District,
AK—FY 2004 and FY 2005.
• Iditarod Area School District, AK—
FY 2005.
• Juneau Borough School District,
AK—FY 2005.
• Pike County School District, AL—
FY 2004.
• Alhambra School District 68, AZ—
FY 2003.
• Cedar Unified School District, AZ—
FY 2003.
• Kayenta Unified School District,
AZ—FY 2003.
• San Carlos Unified School District,
AZ—FY 2003.
• Snowflake Unified School District,
AZ—FY 2003.
• Whiteriver Unified School District,
AZ—FY 2004.
• Clovis Unified School District,
CA—FY 2004.
• El Dorado County Office of
Education, CA—FY 2005.
• Eureka City Unified School District,
CA—FY 2004 and FY 2005.
• Fortuna Union High School District,
CA—FY 2004 and FY 2005.
• Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified
School District, CA—FY 2005.
• Marysville Joint Unified School
District, CA—FY 2003 and FY 2005.
• Oakland Unified School District,
CA—FY 2004.
• Palermo Union Elementary School
District, CA—FY 2003 and FY 2005.
• San Diego Unified School District,
CA—FY 2005.
• San Francisco Unified School
District, CA—FY 2003.
• San Lorenzo Unified School
District, CA—FY 2004 and FY 2005.
• Shasta Union High School District,
CA—FY 2003 and FY 2004.
• Ventura Unified School District,
CA—FY 2004.
• Arkansas City Unified School
District 470, KS—FY 2005.
• Coffeyville Unified School District
445, KS—FY 2005.
• Lawrence Unified School District
497, KS—FY 2003 and FY 2005.
• Baraga Area Schools, MI—FY 2003.
• Carman-Ainsworth Community
Schools, MI—FY 2003, FY 2004, and FY
2005.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Gladstone Area Schools, MI—FY
2004 and FY 2005.
• Grand Rapids Public Schools, MI—
FY 2004.
• L’Anse Area Schools, MI—FY 2004.
• Bloomington Public Schools, MN—
FY 2002.
• Cass Lake-Bena Schools ISD 115,
MN—FY 2003.
• East Grand Forks Schools, MN—FY
2003 and FY 2005.
• Grand Rapids Schools ISD 318,
MN—FY 2004.
• Minneapolis Special School District
1, MN—FY 2004.
• Richmond County Schools, NC—FY
2004.
• Grand Forks Public Schools, ND—
FY 2005.
• Farmington Municipal Schools,
NM—FY 2005.
• Washoe County School District,
NV—FY 2003 and FY 2004.
• Anadarko Public Schools, OK—FY
2004 and FY 2005.
• Bartlesville Public Schools ISD 30,
OK—FY 2003, FY 2004, and FY 2005.
• Bixby Public Schools, OK—FY 2003
and FY 2005.
• Broken Arrow Public Schools, OK—
FY 2003 and FY 2005.
• Choctaw-Nicoma Park Schools,
OK—FY 2002.
• Coalgate Public Schools, OK—FY
2004.
• Colbert Public Schools, OK—FY
2003, FY 2004, and FY 2005.
• Colcord Public Schools, OK—FY
2003, FY 2004, and FY 2005.
• Collinsville Public Schools, OK—
FY 2004.
• Dickson Independent School
District, OK—FY 2003.
• El Reno Public Schools, OK—FY
2005.
• Fort Gibson Schools, OK—FY 2003.
• Haskell Public Schools, OK—FY
2004 and FY 2005.
• Jay Public Schools, OK—FY 2003
and FY 2004.
• Little Axe Public Schools, OK—FY
2004.
• Meeker Public Schools, OK—FY
2004.
• Morris Public Schools, OK—FY
2004.
• Mounds Public Schools, OK—FY
2002.
• Muskogee Public Schools, OK—FY
2003 and FY 2004.
• Norman Public Schools, OK—FY
2004.
• Oklahoma City Public Schools,
OK—FY 2003 and FY 2005.
• Oolagah-Talala Public Schools,
OK—FY 2005.
• Pocola Public Schools, OK—FY
2002.
• Ponca City Public Schools, OK—FY
2003, FY 2004, and FY 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10995
• Poteau Public Schools, OK—FY
2005.
• Sand Springs Public Schools, OK—
FY 2004 and FY 2005.
• Sapulpa Public Schools, OK—FY
2002 and FY 2003.
• Sequoyah Public Schools, OK—FY
2005.
• Shawnee Public Schools, OK—FY
2005.
• Sperry Public Schools, OK—FY
2005.
• Sterling Public Schools, OK—FY
2004.
• Sulphur Public Schools, OK—FY
2004.
• Tishomingo Public Schools, OK—
FY 2003 and FY 2004.
• Tulsa Public Schools, OK—FY
2003.
• Eugene Public Schools, OR—FY
2004.
• Lincoln County School District,
OR—FY 2005.
• Umatilla Confederated Tribes, OR—
FY 2003.
• Mitchell School District 17–2, SD—
FY 2002.
• Mobridge School District 62–3,
SD—FY 2002.
• Rapid City Area School District 51–
4, SD—FY 2002.
• Shannon County School District
65–1, SD—FY 2002.
• Sioux Falls School District 49–5,
SD—FY 2004.
• Fort Worth Independent School
District, TX—FY 2004.
• Edmonds School District 15, WA—
FY 2003.
• Highline School District 401, WA—
FY 2002, FY 2004, and FY 2005.
• North Thurston School District 3,
WA—FY 2003, FY 2004, and FY 2005.
• Okanogan School District 105,
WA—FY 2002.
• Puget Sound Educational Service
District 121, WA—FY 2003 and FY
2004.
• Quinault Lake School District 97,
WA—FY 2002.
• Spokane Public Schools (School
District 81), WA—FY 2004.
• Milwaukee Public Schools, WI—FY
2004 and FY 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanette Lim, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 3W314, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 401–9090 or by e-mail:
jeanette.lim@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339. Individuals with
disabilities may obtain this document in
an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
10996
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
on request to the program contact
person listed in this section.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Dated: March 7, 2007.
Raymond Simon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–1149 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services; Overview
Information; Rehabilitation Short-Term
Training Program—National
Rehabilitation Leadership Institute;
Notice Inviting Applications for New
Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.246D.
Dates: Applications Available: March
12, 2007.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: April 11, 2007.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: June 11, 2007.
Eligible Applicants: States and public
and nonprofit agencies and
organizations, including Indian tribes
and institutions of higher education.
Estimated Available Funds: $250,000.
Maximum Award: We will reject any
application that proposes a budget
exceeding $250,000 for a single budget
period of 12 months. The Assistant
Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services may change the
maximum amount through a notice
published in the Federal Register.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$225,000–$250,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 1.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Short-Term
Training program supports special
seminars, institutes, workshops, and
other short-term courses in technical
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 Mar 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
matters relating to the vocational,
medical, social, and psychological
rehabilitation programs, independent
living services programs, and client
assistance programs.
Priority: This priority is from the
notice of final priority for this program,
published in the Federal Register on
November 7, 2001 (66 FR 56422). This
priority is designed to improve the
leadership among top-level managers
and administrators of the State
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
Program. This priority supports a
National Rehabilitation Leadership
Institute that will address the leadership
needs in all VR agencies funded under
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), and programs funded
under section 121 of the Act.
Absolute Priority: For FY 2007, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
National Rehabilitation Leadership
Institute
We will fund one project to establish
a National Rehabilitation Leadership
Institute that will focus on developing
the leadership skills of top-level
managers and administrators in State
VR agencies. The project must have
plans for addressing the leadership
needs in all VR agencies funded under
the Act and programs funded under
section 121 of the Act.
The project must employ a
curriculum that focuses on the
development of leadership skills and on
the application of those skills to current
challenges and issues in the VR
program. The project must be capable of
structuring leadership curricula around
current VR issues of national
significance, such as using VR
evaluation standards and performance
indicators to assess and improve agency
performance, coordinating effectively
with generic employment and training
programs, and increasing client choice.
The advisory committee (described later
in this notice) and the Assistant
Secretary will determine actual issues.
The project must employ a
curriculum that includes several levels
of training to meet the needs of
audiences ranging from new State
administrators and directors to seasoned
administrators and directors. The
project’s curriculum must include
sequential courses that allow for
repeated practice of newly learned skills
over time, with performance feedback.
The project must provide training in a
peer setting.
The project must coordinate its
training activities with activities
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
conducted under the State Vocational
Rehabilitation Unit In-Service Training
program, the Rehabilitation Continuing
Education Program, and the National
Technical Assistance Centers funded by
the Rehabilitation Services
Administration (RSA). These programs
are also charged with improving the
leadership skills of State agency
personnel. Therefore, collaboration and
coordination are necessary.
The project must establish an
advisory committee that includes RSA
central and regional office
representatives, representatives of State
VR agency administrators and trainers,
rehabilitation counselors, VR clients,
Regional Continuing Education Centers,
other educators and trainers of VR
personnel, tribes and tribal agencies,
and others as determined to be
appropriate by the grantee and RSA.
This committee must provide
substantial input on and direction to the
training curriculum, including the
specific VR issues to be incorporated.
The project must include an
evaluation component based upon clear,
specific performance and outcome
measures. The results must be reported
in its annual progress report.
The project must be designed to
ensure that State agencies will
contribute to the costs of the
participant’s training.
Note: Examples of current challenges and
issues in the VR program include the new
approach to monitoring, and how State
agency leaders should plan to use the system
and the information it yields for program
improvement.
Note: There are no longer RSA regional
offices. References to regional offices in the
program priority should be interpreted to
apply to the RSA central office.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C.
709(a)(2) and 772.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
84, 85, and 86. (b) The regulations in 34
CFR parts 385 and 390. (c) The notice
of final priority for this program
published in the Federal Register on
November 7, 2001 (66 FR 56422).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to institutions of higher education
only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
agreement.
Estimated Available Funds: $250,000.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10990-10996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Waivers Granted under Section 9401 of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act, as Amended
Summary: In this notice, we announce the waivers that the U.S.
Department of Education (Department) has granted, from the date of
enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 through December 31,
2006, under the waiver authority in section 9401 of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). The Department considered
waiver requests in several different categories: (1) Waivers related to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita; (2) growth model pilots; (3) waivers
allowing local educational agencies (LEAs) to provide supplemental
educational services (SES) rather than public school choice to eligible
students attending schools that receive funding under Part A of Title I
of the ESEA (Title I schools) and are in the first year of school
improvement; (4) waivers allowing LEAs in need of improvement to be
eligible to apply to their State educational agency (SEA) to become SES
providers; (5) general programmatic waivers; (6) extensions of the
period in which funds are available for obligation; and (7) waivers
allowing recipients of funds under the Indian Education program to
charge additional administrative costs to the program.
Waiver Data
I. Waivers Related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
Through December 31, 2006, the Department granted the following
hurricane-related waivers to States under the general waiver authority
in section 9401 of the ESEA:
1. Waiver Applicant: Alabama Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and
1111(h)(1)(C) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: May 18, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Alabama to create a
separate subgroup for students displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
for adequate yearly progress (AYP) decisions based on assessment data
for the 2005-2006 school year.
2. Waiver Applicant: Arkansas Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and
1111(h)(1)(C) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: May 19, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Arkansas to create a
separate subgroup for students displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
for AYP decisions based on assessment data for the 2005-2006 school
year.
3. Waiver Applicant: Georgia Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and
1111(h)(1)(C) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: April 19, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Georgia to create a
separate subgroup for students displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
for AYP decisions based on assessment data for the 2005-2006 school
year.
4. Waiver Applicant: Georgia Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1)(E) and
1116(b)(5)(B) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: May 5, 2006.
Description of waiver: For the 2006-2007 school year,
because of the large number of students displaced by Hurricane Katrina,
permits the Dekalb County School District to provide SES, rather than
public school choice, to eligible students attending Title I schools in
the first year of school improvement.
5. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 2416(a)(1) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: September 21, 2005.
Description of waiver: Waived, with respect to FY 2004 and
FY 2005 Title II, Part D, ESEA (Educational Technology) funds, the
requirement that districts spend at least 25 percent of those funds on
professional development.
6. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of the
General Education Provisions Act (GEPA).
Date waiver granted: September 21, 2005.
Description of waiver: Extended by one year the period of
availability for all ESEA funds that otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2005.
7. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 1127 of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: September 21, 2005.
Description of waiver: Permitted Louisiana to waive for
its districts, more than once every three years, the 15 percent
carryover limitation for FY 2003 Title I, Part A, ESEA funds.
8. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1)(E)(i) and
1116(b)(5)(B) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: January 13, 2006.
Description of waiver: For the 2005-2006 school year,
permitted the LEAs of three parishes--Orleans, Calcasieu, and
Jefferson--to provide SES, rather than public school choice, to
eligible students attending Title I schools in their first year of
school improvement.
9. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: July 27, 2006.
Description of waiver: Extended by one year the period of
availability for all ESEA funds that otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2006.
10. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 1127 of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: July 27, 2006.
Description of waiver: Extended to FY 2004 and FY 2005
Title I, Part A, ESEA funds a previously granted waiver allowing
Louisiana to waive for its districts, more than once every three years,
the 15 percent Title I, Part A, ESEA carryover limitation.
11. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and
1111(h)(1)(C) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: August 2, 2006.
[[Page 10991]]
Description of waiver: Permitted Louisiana to create a
separate subgroup for students displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
for AYP decisions based on assessment data for the 2005-2006 school
year.
12. Waiver Applicant: Louisiana Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1), (5), (7), and (8)
of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: August 2, 2006.
Description of waiver: Provided greater flexibility in
making accountability determinations for districts and schools that
were closed for 18 or more instructional days and were located in an
area declared a disaster area due to Hurricanes Katrina or Rita.
13. Waiver Applicant: Mississippi Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 12, 2005.
Description of waiver: Extended by one year the period of
availability for all ESEA funds that otherwise would have expired on
September 30, 2005.
14. Waiver Applicant: Mississippi Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 2416(a)(1) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: December 14, 2005.
Description of waiver: Waived, with respect to FY 2004 and
FY 2005 Title II, Part D, ESEA (Educational Technology) funds, the
requirement that districts must spend at least 25 percent of those
funds on professional development.
15. Waiver Applicant: Mississippi Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and
1111(h)(1)(C) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: June 28, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Mississippi to create a
separate subgroup for students displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
for AYP decisions based on assessment data for the 2005-2006 school
year.
16. Waiver Applicant: Tennessee Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and
1111(h)(1)(C) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: May 19, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Tennessee to create a
separate subgroup for students displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
for AYP decisions based on assessment data for the 2005-2006 school
year.
17. Waiver Applicant: Texas Education Agency
Provisions waived: Sections 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) and
1111(h)(1)(C) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: May 23, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Texas to create a
separate subgroup for students displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
for AYP decisions based on assessment data for the 2005-2006 school
year.
18. Waiver Applicant: Texas Education Agency
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1), (5), (7), and (8)
of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: May 23, 2006.
Description of waiver: Provided greater flexibility in
making accountability determinations for districts and campuses that
were closed for 7 or more instructional days and were located in an
area declared a disaster area due to Hurricane Rita.
II. Other Section 9401 Waivers
In addition to the waivers related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita,
the Department has granted the following waivers to States and
districts, through December 31, 2006, under the general waiver
authority in section 9401 of the ESEA:
A. Growth Model Pilots
1. Waiver Applicant: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Provision waived: Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: May 17, 2006.
Description of waiver: Provided North Carolina the
flexibility to implement a growth-based accountability model as part of
determining AYP beginning in the 2005-2006 school year, conditioned on
the State's having received approval of its assessment system by July
1, 2006.
2. Waiver Applicant: Tennessee Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: May 17, 2006.
Description of waiver: Provided Tennessee the flexibility
to implement a growth-based accountability model as part of determining
AYP beginning in the 2005-2006 school year.
3. Waiver Applicant: Arkansas Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: November 9, 2006.
Description of waiver: Provided Arkansas the flexibility
to implement a growth-based accountability model as part of determining
AYP beginning in the 2006-2007 school year, conditioned on the State's
receiving approval of its standards and assessment system by the end of
the 2006-2007 school year.
4. Waiver Applicant: Delaware Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: November 9, 2006.
Description of waiver: Provided Delaware the flexibility
to implement a growth-based accountability model as part of determining
AYP beginning in the 2006-2007 school year.
5. Waiver Applicant: Florida Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 1111(b)(2) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: November 9, 2006.
Description of waiver: Provided Florida the flexibility to
implement a growth-based accountability model as part of determining
AYP beginning in the 2006-2007 school year, conditioned on the State's
receiving approval of its standards and assessment system by the end of
the 2006-2007 school year.
B. Allowing Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) to Provide SES Rather
Than Public School Choice to Eligible Students in Title I Schools in
the First Year of School Improvement
1. Waiver Applicant: Virginia Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1)(E) and
1116(b)(5)(B) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: August 25, 2005.
Description of waiver: For the 2005-2006 school year,
permitted four school districts--Alexandria City Schools, Henry County
Public Schools, Newport News City Schools, and Stafford County Public
Schools--to offer SES, rather than public school choice, to eligible
students in Title I schools in the first year of school improvement.
2. Waiver Applicant: Alaska Department of Education and Early
Development
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1)(E) and
1116(b)(5)(B) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: August 14, 2006.
Description of waiver: For the 2006-2007 school year,
permits the Anchorage School District to offer SES, rather than public
school choice, to
[[Page 10992]]
eligible students in Title I schools in the first year of school
improvement.
3. Waiver Applicant: Delaware Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1)(E) and
1116(b)(5)(B) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: August 14, 2006.
Description of waiver: For the 2006-2007 school year,
permits the New Castle Vocational and Technical School District to
offer SES, rather than public school choice, to eligible students in
Title I schools in the first year of school improvement.
4. Waiver Applicant: Indiana Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1)(E) and
1116(b)(5)(B) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
Description of waiver: For the 2006-2007 school year,
permits three school districts--Metropolitan School District of Decatur
Township, Monroe County Community School Corporation, and Muncie
Community Schools--to offer SES, rather than public school choice, to
eligible students in Title I schools in the first year of school
improvement.
5. Waiver Applicant: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1)(E) and
1116(b)(5)(B) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
Description of waiver: For the 2006-2007 school year,
permits seven school districts--Burke County, Cumberland County, Durham
County, Guilford County, Northampton County, Pitt County, and Robeson
County--to offer SES, rather than public school choice, to eligible
students in Title I schools in the first year of school improvement.
6. Waiver Applicant: Virginia Department of Education
Provisions waived: Sections 1116(b)(1)(E) and
1116(b)(5)(B) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
Description of waiver: For the 2006-2007 school year,
permits four school districts--Alexandria City Schools, Henry County
Public Schools, Newport News City Schools, and Stafford County Public
Schools--to offer SES, rather than public school choice, to eligible
students in Title I schools in the first year of school improvement.
C. Allowing LEAs in Need of Improvement To Be Eligible to Apply to
their SEA to Become SES Providers
1. Waiver Applicant: Boston Public Schools
Provision waived: 34 CFR 200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
Date waiver granted: November 3, 2005.
Description of waiver: Permitted Boston Public Schools to
be eligible to apply to its SEA to become a provider of SES to eligible
students during the 2005-2006 school year even though the district was
identified for improvement.
2. Waiver Applicant: Chicago Public Schools
Provision waived: 34 CFR 200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
Date waiver granted: November 3, 2005.
Description of waiver: Permitted Chicago Public Schools to
be eligible to apply to its SEA to become a provider of SES to eligible
students during the 2005-2006 school year even though the district was
identified for improvement.
3. Waiver Applicant: Anchorage School District
Provision waived: 34 CFR 200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted the Anchorage School
District to be eligible to apply to its SEA to become a provider of SES
to eligible students during the 2006-2007 school year even though the
district has been identified for improvement.
4. Waiver Applicant: Boston Public Schools
Provision waived: 34 CFR 200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Boston Public Schools to
be eligible to apply to its SEA to become a provider of SES to eligible
students during the 2006-2007 school year even though the district has
been identified for improvement.
5. Waiver Applicant: Chicago Public Schools
Provision waived: 34 CFR 200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
Date waiver granted: July 25, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Chicago Public Schools to
be eligible to apply to its SEA to become a provider of SES to eligible
students during the 2006-2007 school year even though the district has
been identified for improvement.
6. Waiver Applicant: Hillsborough County Public Schools
Provision waived: 34 CFR 200.47(b)(1)(iv)(B).
Date waiver granted: August 14, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted Hillsborough County
Public Schools to be eligible to apply to its SEA to become a provider
of SES to eligible students during the 2006-2007 school year even
though the district has been identified for improvement.
D. General Programmatic Waivers
1. Waiver Applicant: San Diego City Schools, CA
Provision waived: 34 CFR 200.63(b)(1)(i) (2002).
Date waiver granted: August 21, 2002.
Description of waiver: Permitted San Diego to exclude from
comparability determinations for school year 2002-2003 supplemental
State and local funds that the district spent on a particular program
(Blueprint for Student Success) implemented in schools that had less
than 50 percent students from low-income families.
2. Waiver Applicant: San Diego City Schools, CA
Provision waived: 34 CFR 200.79(b)(1) (2003).
Date waiver granted: October 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Permitted San Diego to exclude from
comparability determinations through school year 2005-2006 supplemental
State and local funds that the district spent on a particular program
(Blueprint for Student Success) implemented in schools that had less
than 40 percent students from low-income families.
3. Waiver Applicant: Belleville Township High School District 201, IL
Provisions waived: Sections 1113(a)(2) and 1113(c)(2)(A)
of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: June 3, 2003.
Description of waiver: Permitted the district to provide,
through summer 2006, Title I, Part A, ESEA funding to its second high
school, which has a poverty rate below the district-wide poverty rate,
and to allocate an amount per poor child to both its high schools that
is less than 125 percent of the amount of funds under Title I, Part A
of the ESEA that the district received for the year.
[[Page 10993]]
4. Waiver Applicant: DuPage High School District 88, IL
Provisions waived: Sections 1113(a)(2) and 1113(c)(2)(A)
of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: August 27, 2004.
Description of waiver: Permits the district to provide,
through summer 2008, Title I, Part A, ESEA funding to its second high
school, which has a poverty rate below the district-wide poverty rate,
and to allocate an amount per poor child to both its high schools that
is less than 125 percent of the amount of funds under Title I, Part A
of the ESEA that the district received for the year.
5. Waiver Applicant: Belleville Township High School District 201, IL
Provisions waived: Sections 1113(a)(2) and 1113(c)(2)(A)
of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: April 26, 2006.
Description of waiver: Extended Belleville's previously
granted waiver, allowing the district to provide Title I, Part A, ESEA
funding to its second high school, which has a poverty rate below the
district-wide poverty rate, and to allocate an amount per poor child to
both its high schools that is less than 125 percent of the amount of
funds under Title I, Part A of the ESEA that the district received for
the year.
6. Waiver Applicant: Minnesota Department of Education
Provision waived: Section 1127 of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: July 1, 2004.
Description of waiver: Permitted Minnesota to waive for
its districts, more than once every three years, the 15 percent
carryover limitation for FY 2003 and FY 2004 Title I, Part A, ESEA
funds.
7. Waiver Applicant: New Hampshire School Administrative Unit No. 29,
NH
Provision waived: Section 1113(a)(1) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: June 10, 2004.
Description of waiver: Extended through the end of school
year 2006-2007 a previously granted waiver that enables three schools
that do not meet the Title I, Part A, ESEA eligibility requirements to
continue to receive funds under the program.
8. Waiver Applicant: New York State Education Department
Provision waived: Section 9201(a) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: October 27, 2003.
Description of waiver: Permitted New York to consolidate
through the 2005-2006 school year certain Federal funds reserved for
State administration even though a majority of the SEA's resources were
not derived from non-Federal sources.
9. Waiver Applicant: New York State Education Department
Provision waived: Section 9201(a) of the ESEA.
Date waiver granted: June 7, 2006.
Description of waiver: Permitted New York to consolidate
certain FY 2006 Federal funds (and remaining carryover funds) reserved
for State administration even though a majority of the SEA's resources
are not derived from non-Federal sources.
10. Waiver Applicant: Clay County Schools, WV
Provisions waived: Section 1113(c)(1) of the ESEA and 34
CFR 200.78(c).
Date waiver granted: July 28, 2004.
Description of waiver: Extended through the end of school
year 2007-2008 a previously granted waiver that allows the district to
allocate more Title I, Part A, ESEA funds per poor child to several
elementary schools than to middle schools with a higher percentage of
children from low-income families.
E. Extensions of the Obligation Period
1. Waiver Applicant: Alaska Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through December 31, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
2. Waiver Applicant: Colorado Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: November 25, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through December 31, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
3. Waiver Applicant: District of Columbia Public Schools
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: November 24, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through December 31, 2003
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
4. Waiver Applicant: District of Columbia Public Schools
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: January 14, 2004.
Description of waiver: Extended through February 29, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on December 31,
2003.
5. Waiver Applicant: Florida Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through September 30, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
6. Waiver Applicant: Illinois State Board of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: January 14, 2004.
Description of waiver: Extended through June 30, 2004 the
period of availability for funds awarded under the School Renovation
program that otherwise would have expired on September 30, 2003.
7. Waiver Applicant: Maryland Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 25, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through December 15, 2003
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
8. Waiver Applicant: Massachusetts Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: November 24, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through June 30, 2004 the
period of availability for funds awarded under the School Renovation
program that otherwise would have expired on September 30, 2003.
[[Page 10994]]
9. Waiver Applicant: Michigan Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 25, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through September 30, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
10. Waiver Applicant: Nebraska Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: January 14, 2004.
Description of waiver: Extended through June 30, 2004 the
period of availability for funds awarded under the School Renovation
program that otherwise would have expired on September 30, 2003.
11. Waiver Applicant: Nevada Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: January 14, 2004.
Description of waiver: Extended through June 30, 2004 the
period of availability for funds awarded under the School Renovation
program that otherwise would have expired on September 30, 2003.
12. Waiver Applicant: New Jersey Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through September 30, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
13. Waiver Applicant: New Jersey Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: June 17, 2005.
Description of waiver: Extended through September 30, 2006
the period of availability for Title II, Part D, ESEA (Educational
Technology) funds that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2005.
14. Waiver Applicant: New Mexico Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 24, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through June 30, 2004 the
period of availability for funds awarded under the School Renovation
program that otherwise would have expired on September 30, 2003.
15. Waiver Applicant: New York State Education Department
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: March 31, 2005.
Description of waiver: Extended through September 30, 2005
the period of availability for Title II, Part D, ESEA (Educational
Technology) funds that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2004.
16. Waiver Applicant: North Dakota Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through December 31, 2003
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
17. Waiver Applicant: Ohio Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: November 24, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through August 20, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
18. Waiver Applicant: Ohio Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: March 31, 2005.
Description of waiver: Extended through June 1, 2006 the
period of availability for funds awarded under the School Renovation
program that otherwise would have expired on August 20, 2004.
19. Waiver Applicant: Pennsylvania Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended by six months the period
of availability for funds awarded under section 6111 of the ESEA
(Grants for State Assessments and Related Activities) that otherwise
would have expired on September 30, 2003.
20. Waiver Applicant: Rhode Island Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: July 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through September 30, 2004
the period of availability for Title I, ESEA Accountability funds that
otherwise would have expired on September 30, 2003.
21. Waiver Applicant: South Carolina Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through September 30, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
22. Waiver Applicant: Tennessee Department of Education
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: September 29, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through December 30, 2003
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
23. Waiver Applicant: Washington Office of Public Instruction
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: November 24, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through December 31, 2003
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on September 30,
2003.
24. Waiver Applicant: Washington Office of Public Instruction
Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of
GEPA.
Date waiver granted: December 30, 2003.
Description of waiver: Extended through February 29, 2004
the period of availability for funds awarded under the School
Renovation program that otherwise would have expired on December 31,
2003.
[[Page 10995]]
F. Waivers of Administrative Cost Limitation That Applies to Indian
Education Funds
As part of their application for funds under the Indian Education
Formula Grant program, LEAs were allowed to request, if needed, waivers
of the five percent administrative cost limitation in section 7115(d)
of the ESEA. The following LEAs received approval of budgets that
permitted them to expend more than five percent of their funds on
administrative costs for the fiscal year grant awards noted:
Dillingham City School District, AK--FY 2004 and FY 2005.
Iditarod Area School District, AK--FY 2005.
Juneau Borough School District, AK--FY 2005.
Pike County School District, AL--FY 2004.
Alhambra School District 68, AZ--FY 2003.
Cedar Unified School District, AZ--FY 2003.
Kayenta Unified School District, AZ--FY 2003.
San Carlos Unified School District, AZ--FY 2003.
Snowflake Unified School District, AZ--FY 2003.
Whiteriver Unified School District, AZ--FY 2004.
Clovis Unified School District, CA--FY 2004.
El Dorado County Office of Education, CA--FY 2005.
Eureka City Unified School District, CA--FY 2004 and FY
2005.
Fortuna Union High School District, CA--FY 2004 and FY
2005.
Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District, CA--FY
2005.
Marysville Joint Unified School District, CA--FY 2003 and
FY 2005.
Oakland Unified School District, CA--FY 2004.
Palermo Union Elementary School District, CA--FY 2003 and
FY 2005.
San Diego Unified School District, CA--FY 2005.
San Francisco Unified School District, CA--FY 2003.
San Lorenzo Unified School District, CA--FY 2004 and FY
2005.
Shasta Union High School District, CA--FY 2003 and FY
2004.
Ventura Unified School District, CA--FY 2004.
Arkansas City Unified School District 470, KS--FY 2005.
Coffeyville Unified School District 445, KS--FY 2005.
Lawrence Unified School District 497, KS--FY 2003 and FY
2005.
Baraga Area Schools, MI--FY 2003.
Carman-Ainsworth Community Schools, MI--FY 2003, FY 2004,
and FY 2005.
Gladstone Area Schools, MI--FY 2004 and FY 2005.
Grand Rapids Public Schools, MI--FY 2004.
L'Anse Area Schools, MI--FY 2004.
Bloomington Public Schools, MN--FY 2002.
Cass Lake-Bena Schools ISD 115, MN--FY 2003.
East Grand Forks Schools, MN--FY 2003 and FY 2005.
Grand Rapids Schools ISD 318, MN--FY 2004.
Minneapolis Special School District 1, MN--FY 2004.
Richmond County Schools, NC--FY 2004.
Grand Forks Public Schools, ND--FY 2005.
Farmington Municipal Schools, NM--FY 2005.
Washoe County School District, NV--FY 2003 and FY 2004.
Anadarko Public Schools, OK--FY 2004 and FY 2005.
Bartlesville Public Schools ISD 30, OK--FY 2003, FY 2004,
and FY 2005.
Bixby Public Schools, OK--FY 2003 and FY 2005.