Magnet Schools Assistance Program, 10729-10731 [E7-4272]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Notices
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as specified by
the Secretary in 34 CFR 75.118,
including information that documents
the extent of success in addressing the
performance measures described in the
following paragraph. For specific
requirements on grantee reporting,
please go to the ED Performance Report
Form 524B at https://www.ed.gov/fund/
grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: We have
established three performance measures
for the MSAP:
(a) The percentage of magnet schools
whose student applicant pool reflects a
racial and ethnic composition that, in
relation to the total enrollment of the
school, reduces, eliminates or prevents
minority group isolation. The Secretary
has set an overall performance target
that calls for the percentage of magnet
schools whose student applicant pool
would have a beneficial effect on the
reduction, prevention or elimination of
minority group isolation in participating
project schools to increase annually
from a baseline established with magnet
school applicant data from the first year
of the project.
(b) The percentage of magnet schools
whose students from major racial and
ethnic groups meet or exceed their
State’s adequate yearly progress
standard, in accordance with their
State’s plan required by section 1111 of
the ESEA. The Secretary has set an
overall performance target that calls for
the percentage of magnet schools whose
students meet or exceed the adequate
yearly progress standard to increase
annually from a baseline established by
participating schools’ performance in
the school year prior to the beginning of
the project.
(c) The percentage of magnet schools
that receive assistance and that are still
operating magnet school programs three
years after Federal funding ends and the
percentage of magnet schools that
received assistance that meet State
standards at least three years after
Federal funding ends. The Secretary has
set an overall performance target that
calls for the percentage of magnet
schools that are in operation and meet
or exceed State standards three years
after Federal funding ends to increase
annually from a baseline established
three years after Federal funding ceases.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven L. Brockhouse, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., room 4W229, Washington, DC
20202–5970. Telephone: (202) 260–2476
or by e-mail: steve.brockhouse@ed.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:24 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person
listed in this section.
VIII. Other Information
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: March 6, 2007.
Morgan S. Brown,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. E7–4271 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Magnet Schools Assistance Program
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priority.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Assistant Deputy
Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement announces a priority
under the Magnet Schools Assistance
Program (MSAP). The Assistant Deputy
Secretary may use this priority for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2007
and later years. We intend this priority
to encourage eligible applicants to focus
on expanding their capacity to provide
public school choice by using magnet
schools to provide public school choice
options to parents whose children
attend schools that have been identified
for school improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring under Title I of
the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(ESEA).
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10729
Effective Date: This priority is
effective April 9, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven L. Brockhouse, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., room 4W229, Washington, DC
20202–5970. Telephone: (202) 260–2476
or via Internet:
steve.brockhouse@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
MSAP provides grants to eligible local
educational agencies (LEAs) and
consortia of LEAs to support magnet
schools that are part of an approved
desegregation plan. For the purpose of
the MSAP, a magnet school is a public
elementary school, public secondary
school, public elementary education
center, or public secondary education
center that offers a special curriculum
capable of attracting substantial
numbers of students of different racial
backgrounds.
Through the implementation of
magnet schools, MSAP resources
support objectives and activities that
enable all elementary and secondary
students to achieve to high standards,
hold schools and LEAs accountable for
ensuring they do so, and help schools
and LEAs develop and design
innovative educational methods and
practices that support desegregation
efforts to eliminate, reduce, or prevent
minority group isolation and increase
choices in public elementary and
secondary schools.
Consistent with the statutory purpose
of the MSAP, magnet schools are
designed to eliminate, reduce, or
prevent minority group isolation in
schools with substantial numbers or
percentages of minority group students,
bring students of different backgrounds
together, assist LEAs in achieving
systemic reforms, provide all students
the opportunity to meet challenging
State content standards and challenging
State performance standards, and
increase choices in public elementary
and secondary schools.
The priority, Expanding Capacity to
Provide Choice, provides eligible LEAs
with an opportunity to continue to use
magnet schools, consistent with their
desegregation plan objectives for the
elimination, reduction, or prevention of
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
10730
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Notices
minority group isolation, to expand
their capacity to provide public school
choice to parents whose children attend
schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring.
The priority provides eligible
applicants the flexibility to use either or
both of two approaches to expanding
their capacity to provide public school
choice.
First, an eligible applicant could
convert one or more schools identified
for improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring under Title I to magnet
schools in order to improve the quality
of teaching and instruction in these
schools. Using this approach,
conversion of a school to a magnet
school would benefit students already
attending the school by offering a
magnet curriculum that would include
subject matter or teaching methodology
that is generally not available at other
schools in the LEA and would be more
challenging and innovative than the
curricular program that the school had
previously provided. The
implementation of the magnet
curriculum, along with resources such
as equipment, supplies and staff
development to support the
implementation of the magnet
curriculum, would also help the school
reduce, eliminate, or prevent minority
group isolation at the magnet school
and/or at the sending schools by
attracting other students, including
higher-achieving students of different
backgrounds, based on their interest in
a curricular program that would not be
available to them in the schools that
they would otherwise attend.
Second, an eligible applicant could
use higher-performing schools as
magnet schools and, by doing so,
significantly increase the opportunity
for students attending schools identified
for school improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring to participate in
public school choice by attending a
higher-performing school. Using this
approach, an eligible applicant would
need to ensure that the magnet school
would have sufficient space available to
accommodate students who would
likely be interested in transferring from
schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring. Additionally, the LEA
would need to show how the enrollment
of the magnet and/or sending schools
(i.e., the schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring from which students
would transfer) would change in a
manner that resulted in the elimination,
reduction, or prevention of minority
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:24 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
group isolation in those sending
schools.
Under either approach, an applicant
would be required to show how it
would effectively inform parents whose
children attend schools identified for
school improvement, corrective action,
or restructuring about the new choices
made available to them in the magnet
schools to be funded under the project.
We published a notice of proposed
priority for this program in the Federal
Register on April 12, 2006 (71 FR
18728).
There are no differences between the
notice of proposed priority and this
notice of final priority.
Public Comment
In the notice of proposed priority, we
invited comments on the proposed
priority. We did not receive any
comments.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
When inviting applications we designate the
priority as absolute, competitive preference,
or invitational. The effect of each type of
priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority we consider only applications that
meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a
competitive preference priority we give
competitive preference to an application by
either (1) awarding additional points,
depending on how well or the extent to
which the application meets the competitive
preference priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i));
or (2) selecting an application that meets the
competitive preference priority over an
application of comparable merit that does not
meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational
priority we are particularly interested in
applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the invitational
priority a competitive or absolute preference
over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority
Expanding Capacity To Provide Choice
This priority supports projects that
will—
(1) Help parents whose children
attend low-performing schools (that is,
schools that have been identified for
school improvement, corrective action,
or restructuring under Title I of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended) by—
(a) Selecting schools identified for
school improvement, corrective action,
or restructuring under Title I as magnet
schools to be funded under this project
and improving the quality of teaching
and instruction in these schools; or
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(b) Maximizing the opportunity for
students in low-performing schools to
attend higher-performing magnet
schools funded under the project and
thereby reduce minority group isolation
in the low-performing sending schools;
and
(2) Effectively inform parents whose
children attend low-performing schools
about choices that are available to them
in the magnet schools to be funded
under the project.
Note: For the purpose of selecting
applications under this priority, school
improvement has the meaning given in 34
CFR 200.32(a)(1), corrective action has the
meaning given in 34 CFR 200.33(a), and
restructuring has the meaning given in 34
CFR 200.34(a).
Executive Order 12866
This notice of final priority has been
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866. Under the terms of the
order, we have assessed the potential
costs and benefits of this regulatory
action.
The potential costs associated with
the notice of final priority are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined as
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this notice of final
priority, we have determined that the
benefits of the final priority justify the
costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
Summary of potential costs and
benefits: The potential cost associated
with this final priority is minimal while
the benefits are significant.
The benefit of the final priority is that
it will help applicants prepare highquality proposals that expand their
capacity to provide public school choice
to parents whose children attend
schools that have not made adequate
yearly progress.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 46 / Friday, March 9, 2007 / Notices
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 280.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
You may also view this document in
text or PDF at the following site: https://
www.ed.gov/programs/magnet/
applicant.html.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 84.165A Magnet Schools Assistance
Program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7231–7231j.
Dated: March 6, 2007.
Morgan S. Brown,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. E7–4272 Filed 3–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools;
Overview Information; School-Based
Student Drug-Testing Programs;
Notice Inviting Applications for New
Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.184D.
DATES:
Applications Available: March 9,
2007.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: May 8, 2007.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: July 9, 2007.
Eligible Applicants: Local educational
agencies (LEAs) and public and private
entities.
Estimated Available Funds:
$1,600,000. Contingent upon the
availability of funds, the Secretary may
make additional awards later in FY 2007
and in subsequent years from the list of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:24 Mar 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$100,000-$200,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$150,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 11.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of the Program: The SchoolBased Student Drug-Testing program
awards grants to LEAs and public and
private entities to develop and
implement, or expand, school-based
drug-testing programs for students.
Priority: This priority is from the
notice of final eligibility and application
requirements, priorities, and selection
criteria for this program, published in
the Federal Register on July 7, 2005 (70
FR 39254).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2007 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards based on the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Mandatory Random and Voluntary
Student Drug-Testing Programs. Under
this priority, we will provide Federal
financial assistance to eligible
applicants to develop and implement, or
expand, school-based mandatory
random or voluntary drug-testing
programs for students in one or more
grades 6 through 12. Any drug-testing
program conducted with funds awarded
under this priority must be limited to
one or more of the following:
(1) Students who participate in the
school’s athletic program;
(2) Students who are engaged in
competitive, extracurricular, schoolsponsored activities; and
(3) A voluntary drug-testing program
for students who, along with their
parent or guardian, have provided
written consent to participate in a
random drug-testing program.
Applicants that propose voluntary drug
testing for students who, along with
their parent or guardian, provide written
consent, must not prohibit students who
do not consent from participating in
school or extracurricular activities.
Application Requirements: The
following requirements apply to all
applications submitted under this
program. Requirements (1) and (3)
through (5) are from the notice of final
eligibility and application requirements,
priorities, and selection criteria for this
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10731
program, published in the Federal
Register on July 7, 2005 (70 FR 39254).
Requirement (2) is from the notice of
final eligibility requirement for the
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools
discretionary grant programs published
in the Federal Register on December 4,
2006 (71 FR 70369).
(1) Applicants may not submit more
than one application for an award under
this program.
(2) Eligibility under this grant
competition is limited to applicants that
do not currently have an active grant
under the Department of Education’s
School-Based Student Drug-Testing
Program (CFDA 84.184D). For the
purpose of this requirement, a grant is
considered active until the end of the
grant’s project or funding period,
including any extensions of those
periods that extend the grantee’s
authority to obligate funds.
(3) Non-LEA applicants must submit
a letter of agreement to participate from
an LEA. The letter must be signed by the
applicant and an authorized
representative of the LEA. Letters of
support are not acceptable as evidence
of the required agreement.
(4) Funds may not be used for the
following purposes:
(a) Student drug tests administered
under suspicion of drug use;
(b) Incentives for students to
participate in programs;
(c) Drug treatment; or
(d) Drug prevention curricula or other
prevention programs.
(5) Applicants must:
(a) Identify a target population and
demonstrate a significant need for drug
testing within the target population;
(b) Explain how the proposed drugtesting program will be part of an
existing, comprehensive drug
prevention program in the schools to be
served;
(c) Provide a comprehensive plan for
referring students who are identified as
drug users through the testing program
to a student assistance program,
counseling, or drug treatment if
necessary;
(d) Provide a plan to ensure the
confidentiality of drug-testing results,
including a provision that prohibits the
party conducting drug tests from
disclosing to school officials any
information about a student’s use of
legal medications;
(e) Limit the cost of site-based
evaluations to no more than 10 percent
of total funds requested; and
(f) Provide written assurances of the
following:
(i) That results of student drug tests
will not be disclosed to law enforcement
officials;
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10729-10731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4272]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Magnet Schools Assistance Program
AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
announces a priority under the Magnet Schools Assistance Program
(MSAP). The Assistant Deputy Secretary may use this priority for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2007 and later years. We intend this
priority to encourage eligible applicants to focus on expanding their
capacity to provide public school choice by using magnet schools to
provide public school choice options to parents whose children attend
schools that have been identified for school improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA).
DATES: Effective Date: This priority is effective April 9, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven L. Brockhouse, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 4W229, Washington, DC
20202-5970. Telephone: (202) 260-2476 or via Internet:
steve.brockhouse@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MSAP provides grants to eligible local
educational agencies (LEAs) and consortia of LEAs to support magnet
schools that are part of an approved desegregation plan. For the
purpose of the MSAP, a magnet school is a public elementary school,
public secondary school, public elementary education center, or public
secondary education center that offers a special curriculum capable of
attracting substantial numbers of students of different racial
backgrounds.
Through the implementation of magnet schools, MSAP resources
support objectives and activities that enable all elementary and
secondary students to achieve to high standards, hold schools and LEAs
accountable for ensuring they do so, and help schools and LEAs develop
and design innovative educational methods and practices that support
desegregation efforts to eliminate, reduce, or prevent minority group
isolation and increase choices in public elementary and secondary
schools.
Consistent with the statutory purpose of the MSAP, magnet schools
are designed to eliminate, reduce, or prevent minority group isolation
in schools with substantial numbers or percentages of minority group
students, bring students of different backgrounds together, assist LEAs
in achieving systemic reforms, provide all students the opportunity to
meet challenging State content standards and challenging State
performance standards, and increase choices in public elementary and
secondary schools.
The priority, Expanding Capacity to Provide Choice, provides
eligible LEAs with an opportunity to continue to use magnet schools,
consistent with their desegregation plan objectives for the
elimination, reduction, or prevention of
[[Page 10730]]
minority group isolation, to expand their capacity to provide public
school choice to parents whose children attend schools identified for
school improvement, corrective action, or restructuring.
The priority provides eligible applicants the flexibility to use
either or both of two approaches to expanding their capacity to provide
public school choice.
First, an eligible applicant could convert one or more schools
identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring under
Title I to magnet schools in order to improve the quality of teaching
and instruction in these schools. Using this approach, conversion of a
school to a magnet school would benefit students already attending the
school by offering a magnet curriculum that would include subject
matter or teaching methodology that is generally not available at other
schools in the LEA and would be more challenging and innovative than
the curricular program that the school had previously provided. The
implementation of the magnet curriculum, along with resources such as
equipment, supplies and staff development to support the implementation
of the magnet curriculum, would also help the school reduce, eliminate,
or prevent minority group isolation at the magnet school and/or at the
sending schools by attracting other students, including higher-
achieving students of different backgrounds, based on their interest in
a curricular program that would not be available to them in the schools
that they would otherwise attend.
Second, an eligible applicant could use higher-performing schools
as magnet schools and, by doing so, significantly increase the
opportunity for students attending schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or restructuring to participate in
public school choice by attending a higher-performing school. Using
this approach, an eligible applicant would need to ensure that the
magnet school would have sufficient space available to accommodate
students who would likely be interested in transferring from schools
identified for school improvement, corrective action, or restructuring.
Additionally, the LEA would need to show how the enrollment of the
magnet and/or sending schools (i.e., the schools identified for school
improvement, corrective action, or restructuring from which students
would transfer) would change in a manner that resulted in the
elimination, reduction, or prevention of minority group isolation in
those sending schools.
Under either approach, an applicant would be required to show how
it would effectively inform parents whose children attend schools
identified for school improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
about the new choices made available to them in the magnet schools to
be funded under the project.
We published a notice of proposed priority for this program in the
Federal Register on April 12, 2006 (71 FR 18728).
There are no differences between the notice of proposed priority
and this notice of final priority.
Public Comment
In the notice of proposed priority, we invited comments on the
proposed priority. We did not receive any comments.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register. When inviting applications we
designate the priority as absolute, competitive preference, or
invitational. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority we give competitive preference to an application by either
(1) awarding additional points, depending on how well or the extent
to which the application meets the competitive preference priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting an application that meets
the competitive preference priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over
other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority
Expanding Capacity To Provide Choice
This priority supports projects that will--
(1) Help parents whose children attend low-performing schools (that
is, schools that have been identified for school improvement,
corrective action, or restructuring under Title I of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended) by--
(a) Selecting schools identified for school improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring under Title I as magnet schools to be funded
under this project and improving the quality of teaching and
instruction in these schools; or
(b) Maximizing the opportunity for students in low-performing
schools to attend higher-performing magnet schools funded under the
project and thereby reduce minority group isolation in the low-
performing sending schools; and
(2) Effectively inform parents whose children attend low-performing
schools about choices that are available to them in the magnet schools
to be funded under the project.
Note: For the purpose of selecting applications under this
priority, school improvement has the meaning given in 34 CFR
200.32(a)(1), corrective action has the meaning given in 34 CFR
200.33(a), and restructuring has the meaning given in 34 CFR
200.34(a).
Executive Order 12866
This notice of final priority has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have assessed
the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the notice of final priority
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this notice of final priority, we have determined
that the benefits of the final priority justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
Summary of potential costs and benefits: The potential cost
associated with this final priority is minimal while the benefits are
significant.
The benefit of the final priority is that it will help applicants
prepare high-quality proposals that expand their capacity to provide
public school choice to parents whose children attend schools that have
not made adequate yearly progress.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
[[Page 10731]]
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 280.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
You may also view this document in text or PDF at the following
site: https://www.ed.gov/programs/magnet/applicant.html.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.165A Magnet
Schools Assistance Program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7231-7231j.
Dated: March 6, 2007.
Morgan S. Brown,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. E7-4272 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P