Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2004 Volkswagen Passat Sedan and Wagon Model Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation, 9999-10001 [E7-3817]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 6, 2007 / Notices
preemption of the WMTCs is an
‘‘unintended consequence’’ of Section
4306. The Agency found no evidence to
support that position. In fact, one could
just as easily conclude that the WMTCs
are exactly the type of display Section
4306 was enacted to prohibit.
Furthermore, there is no indication in
the legislative history of SAFETEA–LU
that Congress intended to ‘‘grandfather’’
existing display requirements, other
than those specifically listed in 49
U.S.C. 14506(b). In consideration of the
above, the State of Oregon may no
longer require interstate motor carriers
to display weight-mile tax credentials
on CMVs.
Issued on: February 26, 2007.
John H. Hill,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–3806 Filed 3–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2005–21323]
Withdrawal of Regulatory Guidance
Concerning the Use of Surge Brakes
on Commercial Motor Vehicles
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; withdrawal of regulatory
guidance.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FMCSA withdraws all prior
regulatory guidance, previously in the
Federal Register, as well as memoranda
and letters issued by the Agency,
indicating that surge brakes do not meet
certain provisions of the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs).
Elsewhere in today’s issue of the
Federal Register, FMCSA amends the
FMCSRs to allow the use of automatic
hydraulic inertia brake systems (surge
brakes) on trailers when the ratios of
gross vehicle weight ratings for the
towing-vehicle and trailer are within
certain limits.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Luke Loy, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, Office of Policy and
Program Development, Vehicle and
Roadside Operations Division,
Washington, DC 20590, phone (202)
366–0676, fax (202) 366–8842, e-mail
luke.loy@dot.gov.
On
November 17, 1993, the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) 1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 The Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of
1999 [Public Law 106–159, 113 Stat. 1748
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Mar 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
published ‘‘Regulatory Guidance for the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations,’’ at 58 FR 60734. The
publication included interpretations of
49 CFR 393.48, a rule that requires
brakes to be operable at all times, and
49 CFR 393.49, the requirement that the
braking system on CMVs be designed
such that one brake application valve
controls all the brakes on the vehicle.
The Agency interpreted the regulations
to prohibit the use of surge brakes on
Commercial Motor Vehicles (CMVs)
operated in interstate commerce. The
regulatory guidance was republished on
April 4, 1997, at 62 FR 16370.
The FMCSA subsequently issued an
Enforcement Policy memorandum on
September 14, 2004, directing Federal
enforcement staff, and requesting State
and local enforcement officials,
temporarily to allow surge brakes on
CMVs operated in interstate commerce,
under certain conditions, pending
completion of a notice-and-comment
rulemaking proceeding through which a
determination would be made whether
surge brakes should be allowed on a
permanent basis. A copy of that
Enforcement Policy memorandum is in
the docket cited at the beginning of this
notice.
A final rule issued by FMCSA,
published elsewhere in today’s issue of
the Federal Register, amends the
FMCSRs to allow the use of surge
brakes. The final rule defines the term
‘‘surge brake’’, identifies the
requirements for a surge brake system,
and allows the use of automatic
hydraulic inertia brake systems (surge
brakes) on trailers when the ratios of
gross vehicle weight ratings for the
towing-vehicle and trailer are within
certain limits. Therefore, in
consideration of the final rule on surge
brakes, the Agency withdraws all prior
interpretations and regulatory guidance,
issued previously in the Federal
Register, as well as FMCSA memoranda
and letters, stating that surge brakes do
not meet the requirements of 49 CFR
393.48 and 393.49.
Issued on: February 26, 2007.
John H. Hill,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–3813 Filed 3–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
(December 9, 1999)] established the FMCSA in the
Department of Transportation. On January 4, 2000,
the Office of the Secretary published a final rule
delegating to the FMCSA Administrator the motor
carrier safety functions required by MCSIA, which
included certain motor carrier safety functions
previously delegated to the FHWA (65 FR 200).
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9999
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2006–26555]
The New Car Assessment Program;
Suggested Approaches for
Enhancements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Correction of Public Hearing
Time.
AGENCY:
Correction
In notice document Volume 72
Number 16 beginning on page 3473 on
the issue date of January 25, 2007, make
the following correction to the meeting
time posted:
1. On page 3473, under Public
Hearing, the beginning time is corrected
to read as 8:30 a.m.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30111, 30168;
delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and
501.8.
Issued on: February 27, 2007.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E7–3814 Filed 3–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2007–27376]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 2004
Volkswagen Passat Sedan and Wagon
Model Passenger Cars Are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for
decision that nonconforming 2004
Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon
model passenger cars are eligible for
importation.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that 2004
Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon
model passenger cars that were not
originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable Federal motor vehicle
safety standards (FMVSS) are eligible
for importation into the United States
because (1) they are substantially
similar to vehicles that were originally
manufactured for importation into and
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
10000
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 6, 2007 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
sale in the United States and that were
certified by their manufacturer as
complying with the safety standards,
and (2) they are capable of being readily
altered to conform to the standards.
DATE: The closing date for comments on
the petition is April 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket number and notice number,
and be submitted to: Docket
Management, Room PL–401, 400
Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC
20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m.]. Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC, of Baltimore,
Maryland (‘‘J.K.’’) (Registered Importer
90–006) has petitioned NHTSA to
decide whether nonconforming 2004
Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon
model passenger cars are eligible for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Mar 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
importation into the United States. The
vehicles which J.K. believes are
substantially similar are 2004
Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon
model passenger cars that were
manufactured for importation into, and
sale in, the United States and certified
by their manufacturer as conforming to
all applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it carefully
compared non-U.S. certified 2004
Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon
model passenger cars to their U.S.certified counterparts, and found the
vehicles to be substantially similar with
respect to compliance with most
FMVSS.
J.K. submitted information with its
petition intended to demonstrate that
non-U.S. certified 2004 Volkswagen
Passat sedan and wagon model
passenger cars, as originally
manufactured, conform to many FMVSS
in the same manner as their U.S.
certified counterparts, or are capable of
being readily altered to conform to those
standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that
non-U.S. certified 2004 Volkswagen
Passat sedan and wagon model
passenger cars are identical to their U.S.
certified counterparts with respect to
compliance with Standard Nos. 102
Transmission Shift Lever Sequence,
Starter Interlock, and Transmission
Braking Effect, 103 Windshield
Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104
Windshield Wiping and Washing
Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109 New
Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch
System, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids,
124 Accelerator Control Systems, 135
Passenger Car Brake Systems, 201
Occupant Protection in Interior Impact,
202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering
Control Rearward Displacement, 205
Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and
Door Retention Components, 207
Seating Systems, 209 Seat Belt
Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly
Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting,
214 Side Impact Protection, 216 Roof
Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone
Intrusion, and 302 Flammability of
Interior Materials.
In addition, the petitioner claims that
the vehicles comply with the Bumper
Standard found in 49 CFR Part 581.
The petitioner also contends that the
vehicles are capable of being readily
altered to meet the following standards,
in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and
Displays: Installation of a U.S.-model
instrument cluster.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment: (a)
Installation of U.S.-model headlamp
assemblies which incorporate front side-
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
mounted marker lamps; and (b)
installation of U.S.-model taillamp
assemblies which incorporate rear sidemounted marker lamps.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and
Rims: Installation of a tire information
placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors:
Installation of a U.S.-model passenger
side rearview mirror, or inscription of
the required warning statement on the
face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection:
Installation of U.S.-version software to
meet the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated
Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Installation of U.S.-version
software to meet the requirements of
this standard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash
Protection: (a) Inspection of all vehicles
and replacement of any non U.S.-model
seat belts, air bag control units, air bags,
and sensors with U.S.-model
components on vehicles that are not
already so equipped; and (b) installation
of U.S.-version software to ensure that
the seat belt warning system meets the
requirements of this standard.
The petitioner states that the crash
protection system used in these vehicles
consists of dual front airbags and knee
bolsters, and combination lap and
shoulder belts at the front and rear
outboard seating positions. These
manual systems are automatic, selftensioning, and are released by means of
a single red push-button.
Standard No. 225 Child Restraint
Anchorage Systems: Inspection of all
vehicles and installation of U.S.-model
components on vehicles that are not
already so equipped.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System
Integrity: Inspection of all vehicles and
replacement of non-U.S.-model fuel
system components with U.S.-model
components on vehicles not already so
equipped.
Standard No. 401 Interior Trunk
Release: Inspection of all vehicles and
installation of U.S.-model components
on vehicles that are not already so
equipped.
The petitioner additionally states that
a vehicle identification plate must be
affixed to the vehicles near the left
windshield post to meet the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on the petition
described above. Comments should refer
to the docket number and be submitted
to: Docket Management, Room PL–401,
400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC
20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m.]. It is requested but not required
that 10 copies be submitted.
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 6, 2007 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
All comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above address both before
and after that date. To the extent
possible, comments filed after the
closing date will also be considered.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Mar 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
10001
Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Issued on: February 27, 2007.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E7–3817 Filed 3–5–07; 8:45 am]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and
(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority
at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9999-10001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3817]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2007-27376]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
2004 Volkswagen Passat Sedan and Wagon Model Passenger Cars Are
Eligible for Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming
2004 Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon model passenger cars are
eligible for importation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
2004 Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon model passenger cars that were
not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor
vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) are eligible for importation into the
United States because (1) they are substantially similar to vehicles
that were originally manufactured for importation into and
[[Page 10000]]
sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer
as complying with the safety standards, and (2) they are capable of
being readily altered to conform to the standards.
DATE: The closing date for comments on the petition is April 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice
number, and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400
Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m.]. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC, of Baltimore, Maryland (``J.K.'')
(Registered Importer 90-006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether
nonconforming 2004 Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon model passenger
cars are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles
which J.K. believes are substantially similar are 2004 Volkswagen
Passat sedan and wagon model passenger cars that were manufactured for
importation into, and sale in, the United States and certified by their
manufacturer as conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it carefully compared non-U.S. certified
2004 Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon model passenger cars to their
U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially
similar with respect to compliance with most FMVSS.
J.K. submitted information with its petition intended to
demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2004 Volkswagen Passat sedan and
wagon model passenger cars, as originally manufactured, conform to many
FMVSS in the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or are
capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2004
Volkswagen Passat sedan and wagon model passenger cars are identical to
their U.S. certified counterparts with respect to compliance with
Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock,
and Transmission Braking Effect, 103 Windshield Defrosting and
Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 106 Brake
Hoses, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch System, 116 Motor
Vehicle Brake Fluids, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 135 Passenger
Car Brake Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head
Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing
Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating
Systems, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages,
212 Windshield Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection, 216 Roof Crush
Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, and 302 Flammability of
Interior Materials.
In addition, the petitioner claims that the vehicles comply with
the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR Part 581.
The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being
readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner
indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: Installation of a U.S.-
model instrument cluster.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: (a) Installation of U.S.-model headlamp assemblies which
incorporate front side-mounted marker lamps; and (b) installation of
U.S.-model taillamp assemblies which incorporate rear side-mounted
marker lamps.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of a tire
information placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Installation of a U.S.-model
passenger side rearview mirror, or inscription of the required warning
statement on the face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of U.S.-version
software to meet the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Installation of U.S.-version software to meet the requirements
of this standard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: (a) Inspection of all
vehicles and replacement of any non U.S.-model seat belts, air bag
control units, air bags, and sensors with U.S.-model components on
vehicles that are not already so equipped; and (b) installation of
U.S.-version software to ensure that the seat belt warning system meets
the requirements of this standard.
The petitioner states that the crash protection system used in
these vehicles consists of dual front airbags and knee bolsters, and
combination lap and shoulder belts at the front and rear outboard
seating positions. These manual systems are automatic, self-tensioning,
and are released by means of a single red push-button.
Standard No. 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems: Inspection of
all vehicles and installation of U.S.-model components on vehicles that
are not already so equipped.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Inspection of all vehicles
and replacement of non-U.S.-model fuel system components with U.S.-
model components on vehicles not already so equipped.
Standard No. 401 Interior Trunk Release: Inspection of all vehicles
and installation of U.S.-model components on vehicles that are not
already so equipped.
The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification
plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post to
meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition
described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be
submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.]. It is
requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
[[Page 10001]]
All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above address both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: February 27, 2007.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E7-3817 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
