Large Newspaper Printing Presses and Components Thereof, Whether Assembled or Unassembled, from Japan: Discontinuation of Reconsideration of Sunset Review, 9730-9731 [E7-3788]
Download as PDF
9730
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Notices
section 751(c) of the Act. See Furfuryl
Alcohol from Thailand; Preliminary
Results of the Second Sunset Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order, 71 FR
62583 (October 26, 2006) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’).
The Department conducted a
verification of the data provided by
Indorama Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd.
(‘‘Indorama’’) on December 19 and 20,
2006. The verification report was issued
on January 3, 2007.
We provided interested parties an
opportunity to comment on our
preliminary results. The Department
received a case brief from Penn
Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (‘‘Penn’’) on
January 16, 2007, and a rebuttal brief
from Indorama on January 22, 2007. A
hearing was not held because none was
requested.
erjones on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is furfuryl alcohol
(C4H3OCH2OH). Furfuryl alcohol is a
primary alcohol, and is colorless or pale
yellow in appearance. It is used in the
manufacture of resins and as a wetting
agent and solvent for coating resins,
nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, and
other soluble dyes. The product subject
to this order is classifiable under
subheading 2932.13.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of this
proceeding is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review
are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Second
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Furfuryl Alcohol from
Thailand; Final Results,’’ to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated February 27,
2007 (‘‘Decision Memo’’), which is
hereby adopted by this notice. The
issues discussed in the Decision Memo
include the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margin likely to
prevail if the antidumping duty order
were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this sunset review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
room B–099 of the main Department
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper
copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memo are identical in content.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Mar 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
Final Results of Review and Revocation
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
The Department determines that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand
is not likely to lead to a continuation or
recurrence of dumping. Consequently,
the Department is revoking the
antidumping duty order on furfuryl
alcohol from Thailand, pursuant to
section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.222(i)(1)(ii). Consistent with 19 CFR
351.222(i)(2)(i) and section
751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of the Act, this
revocation will be effective May 4, 2006,
the fifth anniversary of the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the notice of continuation. See Notice of
Continuation of Antidumping Duty
Orders: Furfuryl Alcohol from the
People’s Republic of China and
Thailand, 66 FR 22519 (May 4, 2001).
We will notify the U.S. International
Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) of our final
results. We do not intend, however, to
report a rate to the ITC as a
determination by the Department that
revocation of the order would not lead
to a continuation or recurrence of
dumping will result in revocation of the
order.1 Moreover, the ITC has already
ruled in this proceeding.
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to
liquidate without regard to dumping
duties entries of the subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption on or after
May 4, 2006, (the effective date), and to
discontinue collection of cash deposits
of antidumping duties.
This sunset review and notice are in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752,
and 777(i)(1) of the Act. This notice
serves as a final reminder to parties
subject to administrative protective
order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of
proprietary material disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
International Trade Administration
Dated: February 27, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–3792 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
1Contrary to the ITC’s statement that the order on
furfuryl alcohol from Thailand remains in place, the
Department’s sunset determination in this
proceeding will, in fact, result in the order being
revoked. See ITC News Release 06-093 (September
1, 2006) concerning Inv. Nos. 731-TA-703 and 705
(Second Review).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[A–588–837]
Large Newspaper Printing Presses and
Components Thereof, Whether
Assembled or Unassembled, from
Japan: Discontinuation of
Reconsideration of Sunset Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 24, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Goldberger, Kate Johnson, or
Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD Operations,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: 202–482–4136, 202–482–
4929, or 202–482–4007, respectively.
AGENCY:
Discontinuation of Reconsideration of
Sunset Review
On April 13, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
the notice of initiation notice of the
reconsideration of the sunset review of
the antidumping duty order on large
newspaper printing presses and
components thereof, whether assembled
or unassembled (LNPP), from Japan. See
Large Newspaper Printing Presses and
Components Thereof, Whether
Assembled or Unassembled, From
Japan: Reconsideration of Sunset
Review, 71 FR 19164 (April 13, 2006).
This review was initiated to reconsider
the sunset review of the antidumping
duty order on LNPP from Japan, which
resulted in the revocation of that
antidumping duty order. See, Large
Newspaper Printing Presses and
Components Thereof, Whether
Assembled or Unassembled, from Japan
(A–588–837) and Germany (A–428–821):
Notice of Final Results of Five-year
Sunset Reviews and Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Orders, 67 FR 8522
(February 25, 2002). The Department
published its preliminary results in the
reconsideration of sunset review on
November 6, 2006. See Large
Newspaper Printing Presses and
Components Thereof, Whether
Assembled or Unassembled, from Japan:
Preliminary Results of Reconsideration
of Sunset Review, 71 FR 64927
(November 6, 2006).
On January 24, 2007, the Court of
International Trade (CIT) issued its
decision in Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho,
Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court No.
06–00078, Slip. Op. 07–12 (January 24,
2007), and ordered the Department to
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Notices
9731
Dated: February 27, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–3797 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am]
Dated: February 26, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–3788 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am]
administrative review.1 No other parties
requested a review. On February 2,
2007, the Department published the
Initiation Notice covering Mueller, and
issued an antidumping duty
questionnaire to Mueller for the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on malleable
cast iron pipe fittings from the PRC with
respect to Mueller for the period
December 1, 2005, through November
30, 2006.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Rescission of Review
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from
the People’s Republic of China: Notice
of Extension of Time Limit for the Final
Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
‘‘discontinue any action in regard to a
reconsideration’’ of the sunset review.
Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United
States. See FULL CITE Slip Op. 07–12.
In accordance with that is decision, the
Department is discontinuing action with
respect toits reconsideration of the
sunset review.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–881]
Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from
the People’s Republic of China: Notice
of Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
March 5, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Moats, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration, Room
1870, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erjones on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
Background
On December 1, 2006, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on malleable
cast iron pipe fittings from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation: Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 71 FR 69543
(December 1, 2006). On December 15,
2006, Beijing Sai Lin Ke Hardware Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘SLK’’) requested that the
Department conduct a review of its sales
and entries of subject merchandise into
the United States. On January 3, 2007,
´
Mueller Comercial de Mexico, D. de R.L.
de C.V. (‘‘Mueller’’) requested that the
Department conduct an administrative
review of its sales and entries of subject
merchandise into the United States. On
January 4, 2007, SLK withdrew its
request for review. On January 31, 2007,
Mueller withdrew its request for an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Mar 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
The Department’s regulations at 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1) provide that the
Department will rescind an
administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request for review within 90 days of the
date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws its request at a later date if
the Department determines that it is
reasonable to extend the time limit for
withdrawing the request. Mueller timely
withdrew its request before the 90-day
deadline. Therefore, we are rescinding
this review of the antidumping duty
order on malleable cast iron pipe fittings
from the PRC covering the period
December 1, 2005, through November
30, 2006. The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection 15 days
after of publication of this rescission.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
1 Although Mueller submitted its withdrawal of
its request for review before the Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests for
Revocation in Part, 72 FR 5005 (February 2, 2007)
(‘‘Initiation Notice’’), published in the Federal
Register, Mueller’s withdrawal was submitted after
the Initiation Notice had been transmitted to the
Federal Register for publication.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–886]
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 5, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita or Matthew Quigley,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482–
4551, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On September 28, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published in the Federal
Register a notice of initiation of the
antidumping duty administrative review
of Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags
(‘‘PRCBs’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period January
26, 2004, through July 31, 2005. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 56631 (September 28, 2005).
On September 13, 2006, the Department
published the preliminary results. See
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR
54021 (September 13, 2006)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). On January 10,
2007, the Department extended the time
period for completion of the final results
of this review. See Polyethylene Retail
Carrier Bags from the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Extension of Time
Limit for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 72 FR 1216 (January 10, 2007).
On February 15, 2007, the Department
extended the time period for completion
of the final results of this review a
second time. See Polyethylene Retail
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 42 (Monday, March 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9730-9731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3788]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-837]
Large Newspaper Printing Presses and Components Thereof, Whether
Assembled or Unassembled, from Japan: Discontinuation of
Reconsideration of Sunset Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 24, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger, Kate Johnson, or
Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202-482-4136, 202-482-4929, or 202-482-4007, respectively.
Discontinuation of Reconsideration of Sunset Review
On April 13, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the notice of initiation notice of the reconsideration of the
sunset review of the antidumping duty order on large newspaper printing
presses and components thereof, whether assembled or unassembled
(LNPP), from Japan. See Large Newspaper Printing Presses and Components
Thereof, Whether Assembled or Unassembled, From Japan: Reconsideration
of Sunset Review, 71 FR 19164 (April 13, 2006). This review was
initiated to reconsider the sunset review of the antidumping duty order
on LNPP from Japan, which resulted in the revocation of that
antidumping duty order. See, Large Newspaper Printing Presses and
Components Thereof, Whether Assembled or Unassembled, from Japan (A-
588-837) and Germany (A-428-821): Notice of Final Results of Five-year
Sunset Reviews and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Orders, 67 FR 8522
(February 25, 2002). The Department published its preliminary results
in the reconsideration of sunset review on November 6, 2006. See Large
Newspaper Printing Presses and Components Thereof, Whether Assembled or
Unassembled, from Japan: Preliminary Results of Reconsideration of
Sunset Review, 71 FR 64927 (November 6, 2006).
On January 24, 2007, the Court of International Trade (CIT) issued
its decision in Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States, Consol.
Court No. 06-00078, Slip. Op. 07-12 (January 24, 2007), and ordered the
Department to
[[Page 9731]]
``discontinue any action in regard to a reconsideration'' of the sunset
review. Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States. See FULL CITE
Slip Op. 07-12. In accordance with that is decision, the Department is
discontinuing action with respect toits reconsideration of the sunset
review.
Dated: February 26, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-3788 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S