Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Revise Stock Futures Adjustment Methodology, 9825-9826 [E7-3747]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Notices
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–NYSEArca–2007–19 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55349; File No. SR–OCC–
2006–08]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To
Revise Stock Futures Adjustment
Methodology
February 26, 2007.
I. Introduction
On May 19, 2006, The Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed
All submissions should refer to File No. rule change SR–OCC–2006–08 pursuant
SR–NYSEArca–2007–19. This file
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
number should be included on the
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 Notice
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the of the proposal was published in the
Commission process and review your
Federal Register on December 14,
comments more efficiently, please use
2006.2 The Commission received no
only one method. The Commission will comment letters. For the reasons
post all comments on the Commission’s discussed below, the Commission is
approving the proposed rule change.
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
II. Description
submission, all subsequent
OCC is seeking to amend Article XII
amendments, all written statements
(Futures and Futures Options), Section
with respect to the proposed rule
3 (Adjustments to Futures and Futures
change that are filed with the
Options) of OCC’s By-Laws to conform
Commission, and all written
to the changes adopted in rule change
communications relating to the
SR–OCC–2006–01, which amended
proposed rule change between the
Article VI (Clearance of Exchange
Commission and any person, other than Transactions), Section 11A
those that may be withheld from the
(Adjustments for Stock Option
public in accordance with the
Contracts).3
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
On January 12, 2006, OCC filed with
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission proposed rule change
the Commission’s Public Reference
SR–OCC–2006–01. Pursuant to SR–
Room. Copies of such filing will also be OCC–2006–01, OCC proposed, among
other things, to amend its adjustment
available for inspection and copying at
rules in Article VI, Section 11A for stock
the principal office of NYSE Arca. All
option contracts with respect to stock
comments received will be posted
dividends, stock distributions, and stock
without change; the Commission does
splits. Subject to the Commission
not edit personal identifying
approving proposed rule change SR–
information from submissions. You
OCC–2006–01, OCC proposed to amend
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All Article XII, Section 3 to ensure stock
futures contracts can be adjusted in a
submissions should refer to File No.
manner consistent with adjustments
SR–NYSEArca-2007–19 and should be
made to stock option contracts on the
submitted on or before March 26, 2007.
same underlying security.
For the Commission, by the Division of
As described in rule change SR–OCC–
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
2006–01, OCC amended certain of its
authority.15
adjustment rules with respect to stock
option contracts to eliminate the need to
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–3745 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am]
erjones on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Mar 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Exchange Act Release No. 54898
(December 8, 2006), 71 FR 75287.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 55258
(February 8, 2007), 72 FR 7701 [File No. SR–OCC–
2006–01] (order approving proposed rule change to
revise stock options adjustment methodology) and
53400 (March 2, 2006), 71 FR 12226 [File No. SR–
OCC–2006–01] (notice of filing of proposed rule
change to revise stock options adjustment
methodology).
2 Securities
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9825
round strike prices and/or units of
trading in the event of certain stock
dividends, stock distributions, and stock
splits.4 The adjustment rules for stock
futures as currently provided in Article
XII, Section 3 parallel the adjustment
rules for stock options provided in
Article VI, Section 11A. Uniformity of
the two provisions would ensure that
stock futures contracts can be adjusted
in a manner consistent with adjustments
made to stock option contracts on the
same underlying security. The changes
to Article XII, Section 3 that are the
subject of this proposed rule change are
made solely to track the changes made
to Article VI, Section 11A and are
intended to ensure that adjustments to
stock options and to stock futures made
for stock dividends, stock distributions,
and stock splits will remain consistent
with respect to an underlying security.
As noted above, the central purpose of
the rule change in SR–OCC–2006–01
was to eliminate inequities which
resulted from certain rounding practices
previously required by OCC’s By-Laws
because stock option strike prices are
quoted in and are therefore rounded to
the nearest one-eighth. Stock futures do
not have the same inequities because
they are quoted in decimals.
Nevertheless, in order to ensure
adjustments for stock options and for
stock futures remain consistent, OCC
proposes to revise the adjustment rules
with respect to stock futures to match
the revised adjustment rules with
respect to stock options for stock
dividends, stock distributions, and stock
splits.
OCC will implement the proposed
rule change described herein
concurrently with the implementation
of the changes approved in SR–OCC–
2006–01.
III. Discussion
Section 19(b) of the Act directs the
Commission to approve a proposed rule
change of a self-regulatory organization
if it finds that such proposed rule
change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act requires that the rules of a
clearing agency be designed, in general,
to protect investors and the public
interest.5 The Commission believes that
OCC’s rule change is consistent with
this Section because it is intended
solely to keep the adjustment rules for
stock futures with respect to stock
4 The notice and order for SR–OCC–2006–01
describes OCC’s proposed changes to and the
rationale for the rule change to its adjustment rules
for stock options.
5 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
9826
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Notices
dividends, stock distributions, and stock
splits consistent with the adjustment
rules for stock options with respect to
stock dividends, stock distributions, and
stock splits and thus should protect
investors and the public interest.
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and in
particular Section 17A of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder. In
approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s
impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
OCC–2006–08) be and hereby is
approved.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–3747 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55362; File No. SR–OCC–
2007–01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Credit Default Options
February 27, 2007.
erjones on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
February 13, 2007, The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change described in Items I, II, and III
below, which items have been prepared
primarily by OCC. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested parties.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would
permit OCC to clear and settle credit
default options (‘‘CDOs’’), which are
options related to the creditworthiness
of an issuer or guarantor of one or more
specified debt securities. Credit default
6 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Mar 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
options are proposed to be traded by the
Chicago Board Options Exchange
(‘‘CBOE’’).2
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
OCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. OCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.3
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
The purpose of this rule change is to
permit OCC to clear and settle CDOs,
which are options related to the
creditworthiness of an issuer or
guarantor (‘‘reference entity’’) of one or
more specified debt securities
(‘‘reference obligation(s)’’). CDOs are
binary options that pay a fixed amount
to the holder of the option upon the
occurrence of a ‘‘credit event’’ affecting
the reference obligations.4
Characteristics of CDOs are described
below, followed by an explanation of
the specific rule changes being proposed
to clear them.
Description of Credit Default Options
CDOs are structured as binary options
that are automatically exercised and the
exercise settlement amount payable if a
‘‘credit event’’ occurs at any time prior
to the last day of trading. A ‘‘credit
event’’ is generally defined as any
failure to pay on any of the reference
obligations or any other occurrence that
would constitute an ‘‘event of default’’
or ‘‘restructuring’’ under the terms of
any of the reference obligations and that
the listing exchange has determined
would be a credit event for purposes of
the CDO. Under CBOE’s current
proposal, the payout or ‘‘settlement
amount’’ for a single exercised option
would be $100,000.
OCC does not currently clear any
binary options although OCC has filed
2 File No. SR–CBOE–2006–84, Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 55251 (February 7, 2007),
72 FR 7091 (February 14, 2007) (notice of filing of
proposed rule change).
3 The Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by OCC.
4 ‘‘Binary’’ options (also sometimes referred to as
‘‘digital’’ options) are ‘‘all-or-nothing’’ options that
pay a fixed amount if automatically exercised and
otherwise pay nothing.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a rule change 5 seeking to clear binary
options on securities and securities
indexes that have been proposed for
trading by CBOE and the American
Stock Exchange (‘‘Amex’’).6 The binary
options rule filings of OCC, Amex, and
CBOE are still pending approval by the
Commission, and OCC expects to amend
its binary options rule filing in the near
future in order to conform it to the
changes made in this filing and to make
any additional changes necessary to
accommodate the Amex and CBOE
products. Under the binary options rule
filings, binary options are proposed to
be traded on the price of single
securities or on the price of indexes of
securities where the option is exercised
if the closing value of the underlying
interest meets the specified criterion for
automatic exercise, which could be
defined as ‘‘at or above’’ a certain value,
‘‘below’’ a certain value, or in other
ways. In other words, the underlying
interest is a continuous measure that
could have a wide range of positive
values. CDOs, on the other hand, are
options for which the payout is
determined by the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a discrete credit event
affecting underlying securities. The
rules proposed in the current rule filing
for CDOs are intended to be sufficiently
generic to be the basis for clearing CDOs
as well as other binary options although
certain provisions specific to other
binary options proposals will be filed
separately.
By-Law and Rule Amendments
Applicable to CDOs
In order to accommodate trading in
CDOs and to provide a framework of
rules that can accommodate other
binary option products as well, OCC
proposes to add a new By-Law Article
and a new Chapter to its Rules to
incorporate several new defined terms
and procedures for clearing and settling
binary options generally and CDOs
specifically.
1. Terminology—Article I, Section 1 and
Article XIV, Section 1 of the By-Laws
‘‘Binary Option’’ is defined in Article
XIV, Section 1 of the By-Laws, and that
definition is cross-referenced in Article
I of the By-Laws. The definition of
‘‘expiration time’’ in Article I is
modified to be a default provision,
permitting the expiration time to be
defined differently for different classes
of options. The definition of ‘‘option
contract’’ in Article I of the By-Laws is
amended to include a binary option and
5 File
No. SR–OCC–2004–21.
Nos. SR–Amex–2004–27 and SR–CBOE–
2006–105.
6 File
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 42 (Monday, March 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9825-9826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3747]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55349; File No. SR-OCC-2006-08]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Revise Stock Futures Adjustment
Methodology
February 26, 2007.
I. Introduction
On May 19, 2006, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') proposed
rule change SR-OCC-2006-08 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\1\ Notice of the proposal
was published in the Federal Register on December 14, 2006.\2\ The
Commission received no comment letters. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54898 (December 8,
2006), 71 FR 75287.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description
OCC is seeking to amend Article XII (Futures and Futures Options),
Section 3 (Adjustments to Futures and Futures Options) of OCC's By-Laws
to conform to the changes adopted in rule change SR-OCC-2006-01, which
amended Article VI (Clearance of Exchange Transactions), Section 11A
(Adjustments for Stock Option Contracts).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 55258 (February 8,
2007), 72 FR 7701 [File No. SR-OCC-2006-01] (order approving
proposed rule change to revise stock options adjustment methodology)
and 53400 (March 2, 2006), 71 FR 12226 [File No. SR-OCC-2006-01]
(notice of filing of proposed rule change to revise stock options
adjustment methodology).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 12, 2006, OCC filed with the Commission proposed rule
change SR-OCC-2006-01. Pursuant to SR-OCC-2006-01, OCC proposed, among
other things, to amend its adjustment rules in Article VI, Section 11A
for stock option contracts with respect to stock dividends, stock
distributions, and stock splits. Subject to the Commission approving
proposed rule change SR-OCC-2006-01, OCC proposed to amend Article XII,
Section 3 to ensure stock futures contracts can be adjusted in a manner
consistent with adjustments made to stock option contracts on the same
underlying security.
As described in rule change SR-OCC-2006-01, OCC amended certain of
its adjustment rules with respect to stock option contracts to
eliminate the need to round strike prices and/or units of trading in
the event of certain stock dividends, stock distributions, and stock
splits.\4\ The adjustment rules for stock futures as currently provided
in Article XII, Section 3 parallel the adjustment rules for stock
options provided in Article VI, Section 11A. Uniformity of the two
provisions would ensure that stock futures contracts can be adjusted in
a manner consistent with adjustments made to stock option contracts on
the same underlying security. The changes to Article XII, Section 3
that are the subject of this proposed rule change are made solely to
track the changes made to Article VI, Section 11A and are intended to
ensure that adjustments to stock options and to stock futures made for
stock dividends, stock distributions, and stock splits will remain
consistent with respect to an underlying security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The notice and order for SR-OCC-2006-01 describes OCC's
proposed changes to and the rationale for the rule change to its
adjustment rules for stock options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, the central purpose of the rule change in SR-OCC-
2006-01 was to eliminate inequities which resulted from certain
rounding practices previously required by OCC's By-Laws because stock
option strike prices are quoted in and are therefore rounded to the
nearest one-eighth. Stock futures do not have the same inequities
because they are quoted in decimals. Nevertheless, in order to ensure
adjustments for stock options and for stock futures remain consistent,
OCC proposes to revise the adjustment rules with respect to stock
futures to match the revised adjustment rules with respect to stock
options for stock dividends, stock distributions, and stock splits.
OCC will implement the proposed rule change described herein
concurrently with the implementation of the changes approved in SR-OCC-
2006-01.
III. Discussion
Section 19(b) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the rules
of a clearing agency be designed, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.\5\ The Commission believes that OCC's rule change
is consistent with this Section because it is intended solely to keep
the adjustment rules for stock futures with respect to stock
[[Page 9826]]
dividends, stock distributions, and stock splits consistent with the
adjustment rules for stock options with respect to stock dividends,
stock distributions, and stock splits and thus should protect investors
and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
in particular Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder. In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and capital
formation.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-2006-08) be and hereby
is approved.
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3747 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P