In the Matter of Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 9354-9355 [E7-3585]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
9354
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
SUMMARY: The title of the investigation
as published in the Federal Register on
February 9, 2007 (72 FR 7455) suggests
that the Commission will provide
advice limited to the probable economic
effect of modification of certain rules of
origin in the Dominican RepublicCentral America-United States Free
Trade Agreement for certain apparel
goods of Costa Rica and the Dominican
Republic only. However, the text of the
notice indicates that the Commission
will provide such advice with respect to
the probable economic effect of
modification of the rules of origin on
such apparel goods of all the parties to
the agreement. The Commission’s intent
to is provide the broader advice.
Accordingly, the title of the
investigation is amended to delete ‘‘of
Costa Rica and the Dominican
Republic.’’ To allow additional time for
any interested parties who may have
been confused by the title, the
Commission has extended the deadline
for filing written submissions in this
investigation from March 2, 2007 to
March 16, 2007.
All other information in the notice
published on February 9, 2007,
including with respect to Commission
contacts, background information, and
requirements for submitting written
statements (except for the deadline)
remains the same.
Issued: February 23, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–3539 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–595]
In the Matter of Certain Dynamic
Random Access Memory Devices and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
January 29, 2007, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Renesas
Technology Corp., of Tokyo, Japan. A
supplemental letter was filed on
February 16, 2007. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 in the importation into the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain dynamic
random access memory devices and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.
7,115,344 and 7,116,128. The
complaint, as supplemented, further
alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent exclusion order and
permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint and
supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone 202–205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2560.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2006).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
February 22, 2007, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain dynamic random
access memory devices and products
containing same by reason of
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
infringement of one or more of claims 1
and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,115,344 and
claims 1 and 5 of U.S. Patent No.
7,116,128, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is—
Renesas Technology Corp., Marunouchi
Building, 4–1, Marunouchi 2-chome,
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100–6334.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
Main Building, 250, Taepyeongno 2ga, Jung-ga, Seoul 100–742, Korea.
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105
Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park,
New Jersey.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Room 401–R, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is
designated as the presiding
administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of a limited exclusion order or
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices
cease and desist order or both directed
against the respondent.
Issued: February 23, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–3585 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–585]
In the Matter of Certain Engines,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To
Review ALJ Order No. 6 Granting
Complainant’s Motion To Amend the
Complaint and Notice of Investigation
by Adding a Respondent
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) (Order No. 6) granting
complainant’s motion to amend the
complaint and the notice of
investigation to add respondent Wuxi
Kama Power Co. Ltd. to the
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–3152. Copies of the ID and all other
nonconfidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 19, 2006, the Commission
instituted an investigation under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.
1337, based on a complaint filed by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Feb 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
of Torrance, California, alleging a
violation of section 337 in the
importation, sale for importation, and
sale within the United States after
importation of certain engines,
components thereof, and products
containing the same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,706,769 and 6,250,273. 71
FR 61799 (Oct. 19, 2006). The
complainant named Wuxi Kipor Power
Co., Ltd. of Jiangsu, China as a
respondent.
On January 24, 2007, the ALJ issued
Order No. 6 granting complainant’s
motion to amend the complaint and the
notice of investigation to add Wuxi
Kama Power Co. Ltd. as a respondent to
the investigation. No party petitioned
for review of Order No. 6, and the
Commission has determined not to
review it.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42(h)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 23, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–3587 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–556]
In the Matter of Certain HighBrightness Light Emitting Diodes and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Commission Decision To Review-inPart a Final Initial Determination
Finding a Violation of Section 337 and
To Grant a Motion To Strike
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to reviewin-part a final initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative
law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) finding a violation of
section 337 by the respondent’s
products in the above-captioned
investigation. The Commission has also
granted respondent’s motion to strike
complainant’s arguments that are based
on evidence that was excluded by the
ALJ.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9355
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on December 8, 2005, based on a
complaint filed by Lumileds Lighting
U.S., LLC (‘‘Lumileds’’) of San Jose,
California. 70 FR 73026. The complaint,
as amended and supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain high-brightness
light emitting diodes (‘‘LEDs’’) and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,008,718 (‘‘the ‘718 patent’’);
claims 1–3, 8–9, 16, 18, and 23–28 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,376,580 (‘‘the ‘580
patent’’); and claims 12–16 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,502,316 (‘‘the ‘316 patent’’).
The complaint further alleges the
existence of a domestic industry. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named Epistar Corporation (‘‘Epistar’’)
of Hsinchu, Taiwan, and United Epitaxy
Company (‘‘UEC’’) of Hsinchu, Taiwan
as respondents.
On April 28, 2006, Lumileds moved
to amend the complaint to: (1) Remove
UEC as a named respondent, (2) change
the complainant’s full name from
Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC to Philips
Lumileds Lighting Company LLC
(‘‘Philips’’), and (3) identify additional
Epistar LEDs alleged to infringe one or
more patents-in-suit. Neither
respondent opposed the motion.
On May 15, 2006, the Commission
issued a notice determining not to
review an ID (Order No. 14) granting the
complainant’s motion for partial
summary determination to dismiss
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9354-9355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3585]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-595]
In the Matter of Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices and
Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 29, 2007, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Renesas Technology Corp., of Tokyo, Japan. A supplemental letter was
filed on February 16, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain dynamic random access memory devices and
products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.
7,115,344 and 7,116,128. The complaint, as supplemented, further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion
order and permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19
CFR 210.10 (2006).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on February 22, 2007, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain dynamic
random access memory devices and products containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1 and 8 of U.S. Patent No.
7,115,344 and claims 1 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 7,116,128, and whether
an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is--
Renesas Technology Corp., Marunouchi Building, 4-1, Marunouchi 2-chome,
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6334.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Main Building, 250, Taepyeongno
2-ga, Jung-ga, Seoul 100-742, Korea.
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105 Challenger Road, Ridgefield
Park, New Jersey.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Room 401-R, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion
order or
[[Page 9355]]
cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: February 23, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-3585 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
