Preliminary Results of Full Sunset Review: Countervailing Duty Order on Honey from Argentina, 8970 [E7-3437]
Download as PDF
8970
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 28, 2007 / Notices
review if the subject merchandise is
sold in the United States through an
importer that is affiliated with such
exporter or producer. The request must
include the name(s) of the exporter or
producer for which the inquiry is
requested.
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective orders in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
These initiations and this notice are
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 USC
1675(a)), and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: February 22, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–3438 Filed 2–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
C–357–813
Preliminary Results of Full Sunset
Review: Countervailing Duty Order on
Honey from Argentina
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated a sunset review of
the countervailing duty (CVD) order on
honey from Argentina, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act). On the basis of a
notice of intent to participate and an
adequate substantive response filed on
behalf of the domestic interested parties
and adequate substantive responses
from respondent interested parties, the
Department determined to conduct a
full sunset review of this CVD order
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2). As a result of
our analysis, the Department
preliminarily finds that revocation of
the countervailing duty order would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy
at the level indicated in the
‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’ section
of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 28, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi
Blum or Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:43 Feb 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482–
1391, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2006, the Department
initiated the first sunset review of the
CVD order on honey from Argentina,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.
See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews, 71 FR 64242 (November 1,
2006). The Department received notices
of intent to participate from the
American Honey Producers Association
(AHPA) and the Sioux Honey
Association (SHA), the petitioners in the
original investigation (collectively,
‘‘domestic interested parties’’), within
the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). AHPA and SHA
claimed interested party status as trade
or business associations a majority of
whose members manufacture, produce
or wholesale a domestic like product for
the United States under section
771(9)(E) of the Act; SHA also claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as domestic
producers of processed and raw honey
in the United States engaged in the
manufacture, production, or wholesale
of honey in the United States. The
Department received substantive
responses from the domestic interested
parties and the following respondent
interested parties: the Government of
Argentina (GOA), Nexco, S.A (Nexco),
HoneyMax, S.A (HoneyMax), and the
´
Asociacion de Cooperativas Argentinas
(ACA).
On December 20, 2006, the
Department determined that the
participation of the respondent
interested parties was adequate, and
that it was appropriate to conduct a full
sunset review. See Memorandum to
Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary, Import Administration, Re:
Adequacy Determination: Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
on Honey from Argentina dated
December 20, 2006, and on file in the
Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B–
099 of the main Commerce Building.
Scope Of The Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is artificial honey containing more
than 50 percent natural honeys by
weight, preparations of natural honey
containing more than 50 percent natural
honeys by weight, and flavored honey.
The subject merchandise includes all
grades and colors of honey whether in
liquid, creamed, combs, cut comb, or
chunk form, and whether packaged for
retail or in bulk form. The merchandise
subject to this order is currently
classifiable under subheadings
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
0409.00.00, 1702.90, and 2106.90.99 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) purposes, the
Department’s written description of the
merchandise covered by this order is
dispositive.
Analysis Of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the Preliminary Issues and
Decision Memorandum from Stephen J.
Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with
this notice and which is hereby adopted
by this notice. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this review and the corresponding
recommendation in this public
memorandum which is on file in the
CRU. In addition, a complete version of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
can be accessed directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Preliminary Results Of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that revocation of the CVD
order would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of a countervailable
subsidy. The net countervailable
subsidy likely to prevail if the order
were revoked is 5.85 percent.
Interested parties may submit case
briefs and hearing requests no later than
50 days after the date of publication of
these preliminary results, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i) and 19 CFR
351.310(c). Rebuttal briefs, which must
be limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed not later than five
days from the filing of the case briefs,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(d).
If a hearing is requested, parties will be
notified of the date, time and location.
The Department will issue a notice of
final results of this sunset review, which
will include the results of its analysis of
issues raised in any such briefs, no later
than June 29, 2007.
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752,
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 20, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–3437 Filed 2–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3437]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
C-357-813
Preliminary Results of Full Sunset Review: Countervailing Duty
Order on Honey from Argentina
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated a sunset review of the countervailing duty (CVD)
order on honey from Argentina, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On the basis of a notice of intent
to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of
the domestic interested parties and adequate substantive responses from
respondent interested parties, the Department determined to conduct a
full sunset review of this CVD order pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2). As a result of our analysis, the
Department preliminarily finds that revocation of the countervailing
duty order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy at the level indicated in the ``Preliminary
Results of Review'' section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 28, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi Blum or Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0197 or (202) 482-1391, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2006, the Department initiated the first sunset
review of the CVD order on honey from Argentina, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 71
FR 64242 (November 1, 2006). The Department received notices of intent
to participate from the American Honey Producers Association (AHPA) and
the Sioux Honey Association (SHA), the petitioners in the original
investigation (collectively, ``domestic interested parties''), within
the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). AHPA and SHA claimed
interested party status as trade or business associations a majority of
whose members manufacture, produce or wholesale a domestic like product
for the United States under section 771(9)(E) of the Act; SHA also
claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as
domestic producers of processed and raw honey in the United States
engaged in the manufacture, production, or wholesale of honey in the
United States. The Department received substantive responses from the
domestic interested parties and the following respondent interested
parties: the Government of Argentina (GOA), Nexco, S.A (Nexco),
HoneyMax, S.A (HoneyMax), and the Asociaci[oacute]n de Cooperativas
Argentinas (ACA).
On December 20, 2006, the Department determined that the
participation of the respondent interested parties was adequate, and
that it was appropriate to conduct a full sunset review. See Memorandum
to Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import
Administration, Re: Adequacy Determination: Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order on Honey from Argentina dated December 20,
2006, and on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B-099 of the
main Commerce Building.
Scope Of The Order
The merchandise covered by this order is artificial honey
containing more than 50 percent natural honeys by weight, preparations
of natural honey containing more than 50 percent natural honeys by
weight, and flavored honey. The subject merchandise includes all grades
and colors of honey whether in liquid, creamed, combs, cut comb, or
chunk form, and whether packaged for retail or in bulk form. The
merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable under
subheadings 0409.00.00, 1702.90, and 2106.90.99 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) purposes, the Department's written description of the
merchandise covered by this order is dispositive.
Analysis Of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Preliminary
Issues and Decision Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with this notice and which is hereby adopted by this
notice. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in
this review and the corresponding recommendation in this public
memorandum which is on file in the CRU. In addition, a complete version
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Preliminary Results Of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that revocation of the CVD
order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy. The net countervailable subsidy likely to
prevail if the order were revoked is 5.85 percent.
Interested parties may submit case briefs and hearing requests no
later than 50 days after the date of publication of these preliminary
results, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i) and 19 CFR
351.310(c). Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in
the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days from the filing
of the case briefs, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(d). If a hearing
is requested, parties will be notified of the date, time and location.
The Department will issue a notice of final results of this sunset
review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised
in any such briefs, no later than June 29, 2007.
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results and notice
in accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 20, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-3437 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S