In the Matter of Certain Agricultural Vehicles and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision To Review in Part the Administrative Law Judge's Initial Determination on Remand; Schedule for Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review, 8399-8400 [E7-3139]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices
School MPS) 556 Parkway, Gatlinburg,
07000185
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Sullivan County
[Investigation No. 337–TA–487 (Remand)]
Washington, George, School, 205 E. Sevier
Ave., Kingsport, 07000184
VERMONT
Lamoille County
Morrisville Historic District, Portland, Lower
Main, Upper Main, Railroad and Foundry
Sts., Morristown, 07000196
VIRGINIA
Marshall Historic District, Inc. parts of
Anderson R., Emerald Ln., Frost St., Main
St., Rosstown Rd. Wild Aster Ct. and
Winchester Rd., Marshall, 07000191
Paris Historic District Area Inc. Federal St.
and parts of Republican St. and Gap Run
Rd., Paris, 07000192
Hampton Independent City
Chamberlin Hotel, #2 Fenwick Rd., Fort
Monroe, Hampton (Independent City),
07000190
Isle Of Wight County
Tynes, Robert, House, 13060 Courthouse
Hwy., Smithfield, 07000194
Nelson County
Schuyler Historic District, Crossroads of
Schuyler Rd., Salem Rd. and Rockfish
River Rd., Schuyler, 07000195
Suffolk Independent City
Mount Sinai Baptist Church, 6100 Holy Neck
Rd., Suffolk (Independent City), 07000193
WISCONSIN
Manitowoc County
ROUSE SIMMONS (Shipwreck), (Great Lakes
Shipwreck Sites of Wisconsin MPS) 6 mi.
off Point Veach, Lake Michigan, 07000197
A request for REMOVAL has been made for
the following resource:
TENNESSEE
Meigs County
Meigs County High School Gymnasium,
(Meigs County, Tennessee MRA), Brown
St., Decatur, 82004005
[FR Doc. E7–3261 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Fauquier County
VerDate Aug<31>2005
In the Matter of Certain Agricultural
Vehicles and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Decision To
Review in Part the Administrative Law
Judge’s Initial Determination on
Remand; Schedule for Written
Submissions on the Issues Under
Review
16:03 Feb 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review
in part the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial
determination on remand in the abovecaptioned investigation, including part
of Order No. 55.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan Engler, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3112. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on February 13, 2003, based on a
complaint filed by Deere & Company
(‘‘Deere’’) of Moline, Illinois. 68 FR 7388
(February 13, 2003). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in
the importation into the United States,
sale for importation, and sale within the
United States after importation of
certain agricultural vehicles and
components thereof by reason of
infringement and dilution of U.S.
Registered Trademarks Nos. 1,254,339;
1,502,576; 1,503,576, and 91,860.
Twenty-four respondents were named
in the Commission’s notice of
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8399
investigation. Most of the respondents
were terminated from the investigation
on the basis of consent orders, or found
in default. Of the remaining
respondents, Erntetechnik Franz Becker;
Sunova Implement Company; Bourdeau
Bros., Inc. and OK Enterprises
(collectively, ‘‘the Bourdeau
respondents’’); Fitzpatrick Farms;
Stanley Farms; J&T Farms; and Co-Ag
LLC (collectively, ‘‘the Fitzpatrick
Farms respondents’’); and Agrideal
participated in the investigation. On
January 13, 2004, the ALJ issued his
final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) finding
a violation of section 337. He also
recommended the issuance of remedial
orders. The Bourdeau respondents and
Fitzpatrick Farms respondents
petitioned for review of the ID.
On March 30, 2004, the Commission
determined not to review the ID. The
Commission then issued its final
determination, together with a general
exclusion order, two limited exclusion
orders, and cease and desist orders, on
May 14, 2004.
The Bourdeau respondents appealed
the Commission’s final determination to
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (the ‘‘Federal Circuit’’).
On March 30, 2006, the Federal Circuit
vacated and remanded the
Commission’s final determination as it
related to Deere European-version selfpropelled forage harvesters. Bourdeau
Bros. v. International Trade
Commission, 444 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir.
2006).
On June 20, 2006, the Commission
issued notice that it had rescinded the
general exclusion order and certain
cease and desist orders, and had
remanded the investigation to the
presiding ALJ for proceedings consistent
with the Federal Circuit’s decision in
Bourdeau. The ALJ issued his final ID
on remand (‘‘Remand ID’’) on December
20, 2006. He found that Deere did not
authorize the sale of Deere Europeanversion self-propelled forage harvesters
in the United States and that all or
substantially all of the Deere selfpropelled forage harvesters sold in the
United States were North American
versions. The Bourdeau respondents
have petitioned for review of the
remand ID, including Order No. 55 and
Order No. 59. Deere and the
Commission investigative attorney
oppose the petition.
The Commission has determined to
review in part Order No. 55 and the
Remand ID. The Commission requests
briefing by the parties (1) On the
standard for authorization that was
applied in Order No. 55 and how that
standard was applied in light of the
burden of proof; (2) on the issue of
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
8400
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices
Deere’s alleged financing of certain
EVSPFHs; (3) with respect to the ALJ’s
application of the ‘‘all or substantially
all’’ standard, including a statement of
the type and number of sales relied on
and the basis for reliance on those sales,
especially the basis for including used
sales of North American-version
harvesters in the assessment of whether
that standard has been met by Deere;
and (4) on whether all or substantially
all of Deere’s sales of SPFHs were of
North American versions of these
machines. The Commission has
determined not to review Order No. 59.
Schedule for Written Submissions:
Written submissions on the issues under
review are limited to the parties and
must be filed by March 6, 2007. Reply
submissions must be filed by March 13,
2007.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42(h)).
Issued: February 20, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–3139 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–585]
In the Matter of Certain Engines,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To
Review ALJ Order No. 7 Granting
Complainant’s Motion To Add a Claim
to the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) (Order No. 7) granting
complainant’s motion to add a claim to
the complaint and notice of
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–3152. Copies of the ID and all other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:03 Feb 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
nonconfidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
On
October 19, 2006, the Commission
instituted an investigation under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.
1337, based on a complaint filed by
American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
of Torrance, California, alleging a
violation of section 337 in the
importation, sale for importation, and
sale within the United States after
importation of certain engines,
components thereof, and products
containing the same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,706,769 (‘‘the ’769
patent’’) and 6,250,273. 71 FR 61799
(Oct. 19, 2006). The complainant named
Wuxi Kipor Power Co., Ltd. of Jiangsu,
China as a respondent.
On January 30, 2007, the ALJ issued
Order No. 7 granting complainant’s
motion to add dependent claim 6 of the
’769 patent to the complaint and the
notice of investigation. No party
petitioned for review of Order No. 7,
and the Commission has determined not
to review it.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42(h)).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued: February 20, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–3249 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1122–0007]
Office on Violence Against Women;
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Extension of a Currently
Approved Collection; Comments
Requested
30-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Semi-Annual
Progress Report for the Grantees from
the Legal Assistance for Victims Grant
Program.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice, Office on
Violence Against Women (OVW) has
submitted the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register Volume 71, Number 243, page
75984 on December 19, 2006, allowing
for a 60-day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for an additional 30 days for public
comment until March 28, 2007. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to The Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503.
Additionally, comments may be
submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)
395–5806.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8399-8400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3139]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-487 (Remand)]
In the Matter of Certain Agricultural Vehicles and Components
Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision To Review in Part the
Administrative Law Judge's Initial Determination on Remand; Schedule
for Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review in part the presiding
administrative law judge's (``ALJ'') final initial determination on
remand in the above-captioned investigation, including part of Order
No. 55.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Engler, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3112. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on February 13, 2003, based on a complaint filed by Deere & Company
(``Deere'') of Moline, Illinois. 68 FR 7388 (February 13, 2003). The
complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States, sale for
importation, and sale within the United States after importation of
certain agricultural vehicles and components thereof by reason of
infringement and dilution of U.S. Registered Trademarks Nos. 1,254,339;
1,502,576; 1,503,576, and 91,860.
Twenty-four respondents were named in the Commission's notice of
investigation. Most of the respondents were terminated from the
investigation on the basis of consent orders, or found in default. Of
the remaining respondents, Erntetechnik Franz Becker; Sunova Implement
Company; Bourdeau Bros., Inc. and OK Enterprises (collectively, ``the
Bourdeau respondents''); Fitzpatrick Farms; Stanley Farms; J&T Farms;
and Co-Ag LLC (collectively, ``the Fitzpatrick Farms respondents'');
and Agrideal participated in the investigation. On January 13, 2004,
the ALJ issued his final initial determination (``ID'') finding a
violation of section 337. He also recommended the issuance of remedial
orders. The Bourdeau respondents and Fitzpatrick Farms respondents
petitioned for review of the ID.
On March 30, 2004, the Commission determined not to review the ID.
The Commission then issued its final determination, together with a
general exclusion order, two limited exclusion orders, and cease and
desist orders, on May 14, 2004.
The Bourdeau respondents appealed the Commission's final
determination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the
``Federal Circuit''). On March 30, 2006, the Federal Circuit vacated
and remanded the Commission's final determination as it related to
Deere European-version self-propelled forage harvesters. Bourdeau Bros.
v. International Trade Commission, 444 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
On June 20, 2006, the Commission issued notice that it had
rescinded the general exclusion order and certain cease and desist
orders, and had remanded the investigation to the presiding ALJ for
proceedings consistent with the Federal Circuit's decision in Bourdeau.
The ALJ issued his final ID on remand (``Remand ID'') on December 20,
2006. He found that Deere did not authorize the sale of Deere European-
version self-propelled forage harvesters in the United States and that
all or substantially all of the Deere self-propelled forage harvesters
sold in the United States were North American versions. The Bourdeau
respondents have petitioned for review of the remand ID, including
Order No. 55 and Order No. 59. Deere and the Commission investigative
attorney oppose the petition.
The Commission has determined to review in part Order No. 55 and
the Remand ID. The Commission requests briefing by the parties (1) On
the standard for authorization that was applied in Order No. 55 and how
that standard was applied in light of the burden of proof; (2) on the
issue of
[[Page 8400]]
Deere's alleged financing of certain EVSPFHs; (3) with respect to the
ALJ's application of the ``all or substantially all'' standard,
including a statement of the type and number of sales relied on and the
basis for reliance on those sales, especially the basis for including
used sales of North American-version harvesters in the assessment of
whether that standard has been met by Deere; and (4) on whether all or
substantially all of Deere's sales of SPFHs were of North American
versions of these machines. The Commission has determined not to review
Order No. 59.
Schedule for Written Submissions: Written submissions on the issues
under review are limited to the parties and must be filed by March 6,
2007. Reply submissions must be filed by March 13, 2007.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)).
Issued: February 20, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-3139 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P