Wilshire Variable Insurance Trust, et al, 8209-8215 [E7-3068]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
Rule 17f–6 (17 CFR 270.17f–6) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940
(15 U.S.C. 80a) permits registered
investment companies (‘‘funds’’) to
maintain assets (i.e., margin) with
futures commission merchants
(‘‘FCMs’’) in connection with
commodity transactions effected on
both domestic and foreign exchanges.
Before the rule was adopted, funds
generally were required to maintain
such assets in special accounts with a
custodian bank.1
The rule requires a written contract
that contains certain provisions
designed to ensure important safeguards
and other benefits relating to the
custody of fund assets by FCMs. To
protect fund assets, the contract must
require that FCMs comply with the
segregation or secured amount
requirements of the Commodity
Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’) and the rules
under that statute. The contract also
must contain a requirement that FCMs
obtain an acknowledgment from any
clearing organization that the fund’s
assets are held on behalf of the FCM’s
customers according to CEA provisions.
Finally, FCMs are required to furnish to
the Commission or its staff on request
information concerning the fund’s assets
in order to facilitate Commission
inspections.
The Commission estimates that
approximately 2,275 funds effect
commodities transactions and could
deposit margin with FCMs under Rule
17f-6 in connection with those
transactions. Commission staff estimates
that each fund uses and deposits margin
with two different FCMs in connection
with its commodity transactions.2
The Commission estimates that each
of the 2,275 funds spends an average of
1 hour annually complying with the
contract requirements of the rule (i.e.,
executing contracts that contain the
requisite provisions with additional
FCMs), for a total of 2,275 burden hours.
The estimate does not include the time
required by an FCM to comply with the
rule’s contract requirements because, to
the extent that complying with the
contract provisions could be considered
‘‘collections of information,’’ the burden
hours for compliance are already
included in other PRA submissions or
1 Custody of Investment Company Assets With
Futures Commission Merchants and Commodity
Clearing Organizations, Investment Company Act
Release No. 22389 (Dec. 11, 1996) (61 FR 66207
(Dec. 17, 1996)).
2 This estimate is based on information
conversations with representatives of the fund
industry.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
are de minimis.3 The estimate of average
burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative
survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms.
Compliance with the collection of
information requirements of the rule is
necessary to obtain the benefit of relying
on the rule. If an FCM furnishes records
pertaining to a fund’s assets at the
request of the Commission or its staff,
the records will be kept confidential to
the extent permitted by relevant
statutory or regulatory provisions. The
rule does not require these records be
retained for any specific period of time.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number.
Please direct general comments
regarding the above information to the
following persons: (i) Desk Officer for
the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503
or e-mail to:
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) R.
Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria,
VA 22312; or send an email to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
February 15, 2007.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–3098 Filed 2–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
3 The rule requires a contract with the FCM to
contain three provisions. Two of the provisions
require the FCM to comply with existing
requirements under the CEA and rules adopted
under that Act. Thus, to the extent these provisions
could be considered collections of information, the
hours required for compliance would be included
in the collection of information burden hours
submitted by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission for its rules. The third contract
provision requires that the FCM produce records or
other information requested by the Commission or
its staff. Commission staff has requested this type
of information from an FCM so infrequently in the
past that the annual burden hours are de minimis.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8209
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–27701; File No. 812–13272]
Wilshire Variable Insurance Trust, et
al.; Notice of Application
February 16, 2007.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
exemption pursuant to Section 6(c) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the ‘‘1940 Act’’) from the
provisions of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a)
and 15(b) of the Act and Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) thereunder.
AGENCY:
Wilshire Variable
Insurance Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’) and
Wilshire Associates Incorporated
(‘‘Wilshire’’ and together with the Trust,
‘‘Applicants’’).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
seek an order exempting them from the
provisions of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a)
and 15(b) of the 1940 Act, and Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) thereunder,
to the extent necessary to permit shares
of the Trust and shares of any other
investment company or portfolio that is
designed to fund insurance products
and for which Wilshire or any of its
affiliates may serve in the future as
investment adviser, manager, principal
underwriter, sponsor, or administrator
(‘‘Future Trusts’’) (the Trust, together
with Future Trusts, the ‘‘Trusts’’) to be
sold to and held by: (a) Separate
accounts funding variable annuity and
variable life insurance contracts
(collectively the ‘‘Variable Contracts’’)
issued by both affiliated and unaffiliated
life insurance companies; (b) trustees of
qualified group pension and group
retirement plans (‘‘Qualified Plans’’)
outside of the separate account context;
(c) separate accounts that are not
registered as investment companies
under the 1940 Act pursuant to
exemptions from registration under
Section 3(c) of the 1940 Act; (d)
Wilshire and any affiliate of Wilshire
that serves as an investment adviser,
manager, principal underwriter, sponsor
or administrator for the purpose of
providing seed capital (collectively,
‘‘Wilshire Entities’’); (e) any other
insurance company general accounts
permitted to hold shares of the Trusts
pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section
1.817–5 (‘‘General Accounts’’).
FILING DATE: The application was filed
on April 4, 2006 and amended on
November 1, 2006.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the application will
be issued unless the Commission orders
APPLICANTS:
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8210
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Secretary of the Commission and
serving Applicants with a copy of the
request, personally or by mail. Hearing
requests should be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on March 14,
2007, and should be accompanied by
proof of service on Applicants in the
form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Hearing requests
should State the nature of the
requester’s interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Secretary of the
Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
1090. Applicants, Lawrence E. Davanzo,
c/o Wilshire Associates Incorporated,
1299 Ocean Avenue, Suite 700, Santa
Monica, California 90401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sally Samuel, Senior Counsel, or Joyce
M. Pickholz, Branch Chief, Office of
Insurance Products, Division of
Investment Management, at (202) 551–
6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained for a fee from the SEC’s
Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549 (tel. (202)
551–8090).
Applicants’ Representations
1. The Trust is registered with the
Commission as an open-end
management investment company and
is organized as a Delaware statutory
trust. Wilshire, a California corporation,
is registered with the Commission as an
investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended, and serves as the investment
adviser to the Trust. The Trust currently
consists of, and offers shares of
beneficial interest (‘‘shares’’)
representing interests in, fourteen
separate investment portfolios (each, a
‘‘Portfolio,’’ and collectively, the
‘‘Portfolios’’). The Trust or any Future
Trusts may offer one or more additional
investment portfolios in the future (also
referred to as ‘‘Portfolios’’).
2. Shares of the Portfolios will be
offered to separate accounts of affiliated
and unaffiliated insurance companies
(each, a ‘‘Participating Insurance
Company’’) as investment vehicles to
fund Variable Contracts. These separate
accounts will be registered as
investment companies under the 1940
Act or will be exempt from such
registration (individually, a ‘‘Separate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Account’’ and collectively, the
‘‘Separate Accounts’’). Shares of the
Portfolios may also be offered to
Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities and
General Accounts.
3. The Participating Insurance
Companies at the time of their
investment in the Trusts either have
established or will establish their own
Separate Accounts and have designed or
will design their own Variable
Contracts. Each Participating Insurance
Company has or will have the legal
obligation of satisfying all applicable
requirements under both State and
Federal law. Each Participating
Insurance Company, on behalf of its
Separate Accounts, has entered or will
enter into an agreement with the Trusts
concerning such Participating Insurance
Company’s participation in the
Portfolios. The role of the Trusts under
this agreement, insofar as the Federal
securities laws are applicable, will
consist of, among other things, offering
shares of the Portfolios to the
participating Separate Accounts and
complying with any conditions that the
Commission may impose upon granting
the order requested herein.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. In connection with the funding of
scheduled premium variable life
insurance contracts issued through a
separate account registered as a unit
investment trust (‘‘UIT’’) under the 1940
Act, Rule 6e–2(b)(15) provides partial
exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act. Section
9(a)(2) of the 1940 Act makes it
unlawful for any company to serve as an
investment adviser or principal
underwriter of any UIT, if an affiliated
person of that company is subject to a
disqualification enumerated in Sections
9(a)(1) or (2) of the 1940 Act. Sections
13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act
have been deemed by the Commission
to require ‘‘pass-through’’ voting with
respect to an underlying investment
company’s shares. Rule 6e–2(b)(15)
provides that these exemptions apply
only where all of the assets of the UIT
are shares of management investment
companies ‘‘which offer their shares
exclusively to variable life insurance
separate accounts of the life insurer or
of any affiliated life insurance
company.’’ Therefore, the relief granted
by Rule 6e–2(b)(15) is not available with
respect to a scheduled premium life
insurance separate account that owns
shares of an underlying fund that also
offers its shares to a variable annuity
separate account or flexible premium
variable life insurance separate account
of the same company or any other
affiliated insurance company. The use
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of a common management investment
company as the underlying investment
vehicle for both variable annuity and
variable life insurance separate accounts
of the same life insurance company or
of any affiliated life insurance company
is referred to herein as ‘‘mixed
funding.’’
2. The relief granted by Rule 6e–
2(b)(15) also is not available with
respect to a scheduled premium variable
life insurance separate account that
owns shares of an underlying fund that
also offers its shares to separate
accounts funding Variable Contracts of
one or more unaffiliated life insurance
companies. The use of a common
management investment company as the
underlying investment vehicle for
variable annuity and/or variable life
insurance separate accounts of
unaffiliated life insurance companies is
referred to herein as ‘‘shared funding.’’
3. The relief under Rule 6e–2(b)(15) is
available only where shares are offered
exclusively to variable life insurance
separate accounts of a life insurer or any
affiliated life insurance company,
additional exemptive relief is necessary
if the shares of the Portfolios are also to
be sold to Qualified Plans or other
eligible holders of shares, as described
above. Applicants note that if shares of
the Portfolios are sold only to Qualified
Plans, exemptive relief under Rule 6e–
2 would not be necessary. The relief
provided for under this section does not
relate to Qualified Plans or to a
registered investment company’s ability
to sell its shares to Qualified Plans. The
use of a common management
investment company as the underlying
investment vehicle for variable annuity
and variable life separate accounts of
affiliated and unaffiliated insurance
companies, and for Qualified Plans, is
referred to herein as ‘‘extended mixed
and shared funding.’’
4. In connection with flexible
premium variable life insurance
contracts issued through a separate
account registered under the 1940 Act
as a UIT, Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15) provides
partial exemptions from Sections 9(a),
13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act.
The exemptions granted by Rule 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) are available only where all
the assets of the separate account
consist of the shares of one or more
registered management investment
companies that offer to sell their shares
‘‘exclusively to separate accounts of the
life insurer, or of any affiliated life
insurance companies, offering either
scheduled contracts or flexible
contracts, or both; or which also offer
their shares to variable annuity separate
accounts of the life insurer or of an
affiliated life insurance company or
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Notices
which offer their shares to any such life
insurance company in consideration
solely for advances made by the life
insurer in connection with the operation
of the separate account.’’ Therefore,
Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15) permits mixed
funding but does not permit shared
funding.
5. The relief under Rule 6e–3(T) is
available only where shares are offered
exclusively to variable life insurance
separate accounts of a life insurer or any
affiliated life insurance company, and
additional exemptive relief is necessary
if the shares of the Portfolios are also to
be sold to Qualified Plans or other
eligible holders of shares as described
above. Applicants note that if shares of
the Portfolios were sold only to
Qualified Plans, exemptive relief under
Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15) would not be
necessary. The relief provided for under
this section does not relate to Qualified
Plans or to a registered investment
company’s ability to sell its shares to
Qualified Plans.
6. Applicants maintain, as discussed
below, that there is no policy reason for
the sale of the Portfolios’ shares to
Qualified Plans, to Wilshire Entities, or
General Accounts to result in a
prohibition against, or otherwise limit, a
Participating Insurance Company from
relying on the relief provided by Rules
6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15).
However, because the relief under Rules
6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) is
available only when shares are offered
exclusively to separate accounts,
additional exemptive relief may be
necessary if the shares of the Portfolios
are also to be sold to Qualified Plans,
Wilshire Entities, or General Accounts.
Applicants therefore request relief in
order to have the Participating
Insurance Companies enjoy the benefits
of the relief granted in Rules 6e–2(b)(15)
and 6e–3(T)(b)(15). Applicants note that
if the Portfolios’ shares were to be sold
only to Qualified Plans, Wilshire
Entities, or General Accounts and/or
separate accounts funding variable
annuity contracts, exemptive relief
under Rule 6e–2 and Rule 6e–3(T)
would be unnecessary. The relief
provided for under Rules 6e–2(b)(15)
and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) does not relate to
Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities, or
General Accounts, or to a registered
investment company’s ability to sell its
shares to such purchasers.
7. Section 9(a)(3) of the 1940 Act
provides that it is unlawful for any
company to serve as investment adviser
or principal underwriter of any
registered open-end investment
company if an affiliated person of that
company is subject to a disqualification
enumerated in Sections 9(a)(1) or (2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(i) and (ii) and Rules
6e–3(T)(b)(15)(i) and (ii) under the 1940
Act provide exemptions from Section
9(a) under certain circumstances,
subject to the limitations discussed
above on mixed and shared funding.
These exemptions limit the application
of the eligibility restrictions to affiliated
individuals or companies that directly
participate in management of the
underlying management company.
8. The partial relief granted in Rules
6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) under the
1940 Act from the requirements of
Section 9 of the 1940 Act recognizes
that it is not necessary for the protection
of investors or the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the 1940 Act to apply the provisions of
Section 9(a) to individuals in a large
insurance company complex, most of
whom will have no involvement in
matters pertaining to investment
companies in that organization. The
Participating Insurance Companies and
Qualified Plans are not expected to play
any role in the management of the
Trusts. Those individuals who
participate in the management of the
Trusts will remain the same regardless
of which Separate Accounts or
Qualified Plans invest in the Trusts.
Applying the monitoring requirements
of Section 9(a) of the 1940 Act because
of investment by separate accounts of
other insurers or Qualified Plans would
be unjustified and would not serve any
regulatory purpose.
9. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the 1940 Act
provide exemptions from the passthrough voting requirement with respect
to several significant matters, assuming
the limitations on mixed and shared
funding are observed. Rules 6e–
2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(1) provide that the
insurance company may disregard the
voting instructions of its contract
owners with respect to the investments
of an underlying fund, or any contract
between such a fund and its investment
adviser, when required to do so by an
insurance regulatory authority (subject
to the provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(i)
and (b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e–2 and 6e–
3(T), respectively, under the 1940 Act).
Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii)(B) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(2) provide that the
insurance company may disregard the
voting instructions of its contract
owners if the contract owners initiate
any change in an underlying fund’s
investment policies, principal
underwriter, or any investment adviser
(provided that disregarding such voting
instructions is reasonable and subject to
the other provisions of paragraphs
(b)(5)(ii), (b)(7)(ii)(B), and (b)(7)(ii)(C),
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8211
respectively, of Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T)
under the 1940 Act).
10. Rule 6e–2 under the 1940 Act
recognizes that a variable life insurance
contract, as an insurance contract, has
important elements unique to insurance
contracts and is subject to extensive
State regulation of insurance. In
adopting Rule 6e–2(b)(15)(iii), the
Commission expressly recognized that
State insurance regulators have
authority, pursuant to State insurance
laws or regulations, to disapprove or
require changes in investment policies,
investment advisers, or principal
underwriters. The Commission also
expressly recognized that State
insurance regulators have authority to
require an insurer to draw from its
general account to cover costs imposed
upon the insurer by a change approved
by contract owners over the insurer’s
objection. The Commission, therefore,
deemed such exemptions necessary to
assure the life insurer’s solvency and
performance of its contractual
obligations by enabling an insurance
regulatory authority or the life insurer to
act when certain proposals reasonably
could be expected to increase the risks
undertaken by the life insurer. In this
respect, flexible premium variable life
insurance contracts are identical to
scheduled premium variable life
insurance contracts. Therefore, the
corresponding provisions of Rule 6e–
3(T) under the 1940 Act undoubtedly
were adopted in recognition of the same
factors.
11. The sale of Portfolio shares to
Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities, and
General Accounts will not have any
impact on the relief requested herein.
With respect to the Qualified Plans,
which are not registered as investment
companies under the 1940 Act, there is
no requirement to pass through voting
rights to Qualified Plan participants.
Indeed, to the contrary, applicable law
expressly reserves voting rights
associated with Qualified Plan assets to
certain specified persons. Under Section
403(a) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as
amended (‘‘ERISA’’), shares of a
portfolio of a fund sold to a Qualified
Plan must be held by the trustees of the
Qualified Plan. Section 403(a) also
provides that the trustee(s) must have
exclusive authority and discretion to
manage and control the Qualified Plan
with two exceptions: (i) When the
Qualified Plan expressly provides that
the trustee(s) are subject to the direction
of a named fiduciary who is not a
trustee, in which case the trustees are
subject to proper directions made in
accordance with the terms of the
Qualified Plan and not contrary to
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
8212
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Notices
ERISA, and (ii) when the authority to
manage, acquire, or dispose of assets of
the Qualified Plan is delegated to one or
more investment managers pursuant to
Section 402(c)(3) of ERISA. Unless one
of the above two exceptions stated in
Section 403(a) applies, Qualified Plan
trustees have the exclusive authority
and responsibility for voting proxies.
12. Where a named fiduciary to a
Qualified Plan appoints an investment
manager, the investment manager has
the responsibility to vote the shares held
unless the right to vote such shares is
reserved to the trustees or the named
fiduciary. The Qualified Plans may have
their trustee(s) or other fiduciaries
exercise voting rights attributable to
investment securities held by the
Qualified Plans in their discretion.
Some of the Qualified Plans, however,
may provide for the trustee(s), an
investment adviser (or advisers), or
another named fiduciary to exercise
voting rights in accordance with
instructions from participants.
Similarly, Wilshire Entities and General
Accounts are not subject to any passthrough voting requirements.
Accordingly, unlike the case with
insurance company separate accounts,
the issue of resolution of material
irreconcilable conflicts with respect to
voting is not present with Qualified
Plans, Wilshire Entities, or General
Accounts.
13. Where a Qualified Plan does not
provide participants with the right to
give voting instructions, the trustee or
named fiduciary has responsibility to
vote the shares held by the Qualified
Plan. In this circumstance, the trustee
has a fiduciary duty to vote the shares
in the best interest of the Qualified Plan
participants. Accordingly, even if
Wilshire or an affiliate of Wilshire were
to serve in the capacity of trustee or
named fiduciary with voting
responsibilities, Wilshire or its affiliate
would have a fiduciary duty to vote
those shares in the best interest of the
Qualified Plan participants.
14. In addition, even if a Qualified
Plan were to hold a controlling interest
in a Portfolio, Applicants do not believe
that such control would disadvantage
other investors in such Portfolio to any
greater extent than is the case when any
institutional shareholder holds a
majority of the voting securities of any
open-end management investment
company. In this regard, Applicants
submit that investment in a Portfolio by
a Qualified Plan will not create any of
the voting complications occasioned by
mixed funding or shared funding.
Unlike mixed funding or shared
funding, Qualified Plan investor voting
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
rights cannot be frustrated by veto rights
of insurers or State regulators.
15. Where a Qualified Plan provides
participants with the right to give voting
instructions, Applicants see no reason
to believe that participants in Qualified
Plans generally or those in a particular
Qualified Plan, either as a single group
or in combination with participants in
other Qualified Plans, would vote in a
manner that would disadvantage
Variable Contract holders. The purchase
of shares of Portfolios by Qualified
Plans that provide voting rights does not
present any complications not otherwise
occasioned by mixed or shared funding.
16. Shared funding by unaffiliated
insurance companies does not present
any issues that do not already exist
where a single insurance company is
licensed to do business in several or all
States. A particular State insurance
regulatory body could require action
that is inconsistent with the
requirements of other States in which
the insurance company offers its
policies. The fact that different insurers
may be domiciled in different States
does not create a significantly different
or enlarged problem.
17. Shared funding by unaffiliated
insurers, in this respect, is no different
than the use of the same investment
company as the funding vehicle for
affiliated insurers, which Rules 6e–
2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) under the
1940 Act permit. Affiliated insurers may
be domiciled in different States and be
subject to differing State law
requirements. Affiliation does not
reduce the potential, if any exists, for
differences in State regulatory
requirements. In any event, the
conditions set forth below are designed
to safeguard against, and provide
procedures for resolving, any adverse
effects that differences among State
regulatory requirements may produce. If
a particular State insurance regulator’s
decision conflicts with the majority of
other State regulators, then the affected
insurer will be required to withdraw its
Separate Account’s investment in the
affected Trust. This requirement will be
provided for in agreements that will be
entered into by Participating Insurance
Companies with respect to their
participation in the relevant Portfolio.
18. Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) under the 1940 Act give the
insurance company the right to
disregard the voting instructions of the
contract owners in certain
circumstances. Affiliation does not
eliminate the potential, if any exists, for
divergent judgments as to the
advisability or legality of a change in
investment policies, principal
underwriter, or investment adviser
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
initiated by contract owners. The
potential for disagreement is limited by
the requirements in Rules 6e–2 and 6e–
3(T) under the 1940 Act that the
insurance company’s disregard of voting
instructions be reasonable and based on
specific good-faith determinations.
19. A Participating Insurance
Company’s disregard of voting
instructions, nevertheless, could
conflict with the majority of contract
owners’ voting instructions. The
Participating Insurance Company’s
action possibly could be different than
the determination of all or some of the
other insurers (including affiliated
insurers) that the voting instructions of
contract owners should prevail, and
either could preclude a majority vote
approving the change or could represent
a minority view. If the Participating
Insurance Company’s judgment
represents a minority position or would
preclude a majority vote, then the
Participating Insurance Company’s may
be required, at the affected Trust’s
election, to withdraw its Separate
Account’s investment in such Portfolio.
No charge or penalty will be imposed as
a result of such withdrawal. This
requirement will be provided for in the
agreements entered into with respect to
participation by the Participating
Insurance Companies in each Portfolio.
20. Each Portfolio will be managed to
attempt to achieve the investment
objective or objectives of such Portfolio,
and not to favor or disfavor any
particular Participating Insurance
Company or type of insurance product.
There is no reason to believe that
different features of various types of
contracts, including the ‘‘minimum
death benefit’’ guarantee under certain
variable life insurance contracts, will
lead to different investment policies for
different types of Variable Contracts. To
the extent that the degree of risk may
differ as between variable annuity
contracts and variable life insurance
policies, the different insurance charges
imposed, in effect, adjust any such
differences and equalize the insurers’
exposure in either case.
21. Applicants do not believe that the
sale of the shares of the Portfolios to
Qualified Plans will increase the
potential for material irreconcilable
conflicts of interest between or among
different types of investors. In
particular, Applicants see very little
potential for such conflicts beyond
those which would otherwise exist
between variable annuity and variable
life insurance contract owners.
Moreover, in considering the
appropriateness of the requested relief,
Applicants have analyzed the following
issues to assure themselves that there
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Notices
were either no conflicts of interest or
that there existed the ability by the
affected parties to resolve the issues
without harm to the contract owners in
the Separate Accounts or to the
participants under the Qualified Plans.
22. Applicants considered whether
there are any issues raised under the
Internal Revnue Code of l986, as
amended, (the ‘‘Code’’), the regulations
issued by the Treasury Department (the
‘‘Regulations’’), or the revenue rulings
issued by the Internal Revenue Service
(the ‘‘Revenue Rulings’’), if Qualified
Plans, variable annuity separate
accounts, and variable life insurance
separate accounts all invest in the same
underlying fund. Section 817(h) of the
Code imposes certain diversification
standards on the underlying assets of
Variable Contracts held in an
underlying mutual fund. The Code
provides that a Variable Contract shall
not be treated as an annuity contract or
life insurance, as applicable, for any
period (and any subsequent period) for
which the investments are not, in
accordance with regulations prescribed
by the Treasury Department, adequately
diversified.
23. Regulations issued under Section
817(h) provide that, in order to meet the
statutory diversification requirements,
all of the beneficial interests in the
investment company must be held by
the segregated asset accounts of one or
more insurance companies. However,
the Regulations contain certain
exceptions to this requirement, one of
which allows shares in an underlying
mutual fund to be held by the trustees
of a qualified pension or retirement plan
without adversely affecting the ability of
such shares also to be held by separate
accounts of insurance companies in
connection with their Variable
Contracts. Thus, the Regulations
specifically permit ‘‘qualified pension
or retirement plans’’ and separate
accounts to invest in the same
underlying fund. For this reason,
Applicants have concluded that neither
the Code, nor Regulations, nor Revenue
Rulings thereunder, present any
inherent conflicts of interest if the
Qualified Plans and Separate Accounts
all invest in the same Portfolio.
24. Applicants note that while there
are differences in the manner in which
distributions from Variable Contracts
and Qualified Plans are taxed, these
differences will have no impact on the
Trusts. When distributions are to be
made, and a Separate Account or
Qualified Plan is unable to net purchase
payments to make the distributions, the
Separate Account and Qualified Plan
will redeem shares of the relevant
Portfolio at their respective net asset
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
value in conformity with Rule 22c–1
under the 1940 Act (without the
imposition of any sales charge) to
provide proceeds to meet distribution
needs. A Participating Insurance
Company then will make distributions
in accordance with the terms of its
Variable Contract, and a Qualified Plan
then will make distributions in
accordance with the terms of the
Qualified Plan.
25. In connection with any meeting of
shareholders, the soliciting Trust will
inform each shareholder, including each
Separate Account, Qualified Plan,
Wilshire Entities, and General Account,
of information necessary for the
meeting, including their respective
share of ownership in the relevant
Portfolio. Each Participating Insurance
Company then will solicit voting
instructions in accordance with Rules
6e–2 and 6e–3(T), as applicable, and its
agreement with the Trusts concerning
participation in the relevant Portfolio.
Shares of a Portfolio that are held by
Wilshire Entities and any General
Account will be voted in the same
proportion as all Variable Contract
owners having voting rights with
respect to that Portfolio. However,
Wilshire Entities and any General
Account will vote their shares in such
other manner as the Commission may
require. Shares held by Qualified Plans
will be voted in accordance with
applicable law. The voting rights
provided to Qualified Plans with respect
to shares of a Portfolio would be no
different from the voting rights that are
provided to Qualified Plans with respect
to shares of funds sold to the general
public. Furthermore, if a material
irreconcilable conflict arises because of
a Qualified Plan’s decision to disregard
Qualified Plan participant voting
instructions, if applicable, and that
decision represents a minority position
or would preclude a majority vote, the
Qualified Plan may be required, at the
election of the affected Trust, to
withdraw its investment in such
Portfolio, and no charge or penalty will
be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal.
26. Applicants reviewed whether a
‘‘senior security,’’ as such term is
defined under Section 18(g) of the 1940
Act, is created with respect to any
Variable Contract owner as opposed to
a participant under a Qualified Plan,
Wilshire Entities, or a General Account.
Applicants concluded that the ability of
the Trusts to sell shares of their
Portfolios directly to Qualified Plans,
Wilshire Entities, or a General Account
does not create a senior security.
‘‘Senior security’’ is defined under
Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act to include
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8213
‘‘any stock of a class having priority
over any other class as to distribution of
assets or payment of dividends.’’ As
noted above, regardless of the rights and
benefits of participants under Qualified
Plans, or contract owners under
Variable Contracts, the Qualified Plans,
Wilshire Entities, General Accounts and
the Separate Accounts only have rights
with respect to their respective shares of
the Portfolio. They only can redeem
such shares at net asset value. No
shareholder of a Portfolio has any
preference over any other shareholder
with respect to distribution of assets or
payment of dividends.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants and the Wilshire Entities
agree that the order granting the
requested relief shall be subject to the
following conditions which shall apply
to the Trust as well as any Future Trust
that relies on the order:
1. A majority of the Board of Trustees
(the ‘‘Board’’) of the Trust will consist
of persons who are not ‘‘interested
persons’’ of the Trust, as defined by
Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, and the
rules thereunder, and as modified by
any applicable orders of the
Commission, except that if this
condition is not met by reason of the
death, disqualification, or bona fide
resignation of any trustee or trustees,
then the operation of this condition will
be suspended: (a) For a period of 90
days if the vacancy or vacancies may be
filled by the Board; (b) for a period of
150 days if a vote of shareholders is
required to fill the vacancy or vacancies;
or (c) for such longer period as the
Commission may prescribe by order
upon application or by future rule.
2. The Board will monitor the Trust
for the existence of any material
irreconcilable conflict between the
interests of the contract owners of all
Separate Accounts and participants of
all Qualified Plans investing in such
Trust, and determine what action, if
any, should be taken in response to such
conflicts. A material irreconcilable
conflict may arise for a variety of
reasons, including: (a) An action by any
State insurance regulatory authority; (b)
a change in applicable Federal or State
insurance tax, or securities laws or
regulations, or a public ruling, private
letter ruling, no-action or interpretative
letter, or any similar action by
insurance, tax, or securities regulatory
authorities; (c) an administrative or
judicial decision in any relevant
proceeding; (d) the manner in which the
investments of such Trust are being
managed; (e) a difference in voting
instructions given by variable annuity
contract owners, variable life insurance
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
8214
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Notices
contract owners, and trustees of the
Qualified Plans; (f) a decision by a
Participating Insurance Company to
disregard the voting instructions of
contract owners; or (g) if applicable, a
decision by a Qualified Plan to
disregard the voting instructions of
Qualified Plan participants.
3. Participating Insurance Companies
(on their own behalf, as well as by
virtue of any investment of general
account assets in a Portfolio), Wilshire
Entities, and any Qualified Plan that
executes a participation agreement upon
becoming an owner of 10 percent or
more of the assets of any Portfolio
(collectively, ‘‘Participants’’) will report
any potential or existing conflicts to the
Board. Participants will be responsible
for assisting the Board in carrying out
the Board’s responsibilities under these
conditions by providing the Board with
all information reasonably necessary for
the Board to consider any issues raised.
This responsibility includes, but is not
limited to, an obligation by each
Participating Insurance Company to
inform the Board whenever contract
owner voting instructions are
disregarded, and, if pass-through voting
is applicable, an obligation by each
Qualified Plan to inform the Board
whenever it has determined to disregard
Qualified Plan participant voting
instructions. The responsibility to report
such information and conflicts, and to
assist the Board, will be a contractual
obligation of all Participating Insurance
Companies under their participation
agreements with the Trust, and these
responsibilities will be carried out with
a view only to the interests of the
contract owners. The responsibility to
report such information and conflicts,
and to assist the Board, also will be
contractual obligations of all Qualified
Plans with participation agreements,
and such agreements will provide that
these responsibilities will be carried out
with a view only to the interests of
Qualified Plan participants.
4. If it is determined by a majority of
the Board, or a majority of the
disinterested trustees of the Board, that
a material irreconcilable conflict exists,
then the relevant Participant will, at its
expense and to the extent reasonably
practicable (as determined by a majority
of the disinterested trustees), take
whatever steps are necessary to remedy
or eliminate the material irreconcilable
conflict, up to and including: (a)
Withdrawing the assets allocable to
some or all of the Separate Accounts
from the relevant Portfolio and
reinvesting such assets in a different
investment vehicle including another
Portfolio, or in the case of Participating
Insurance Company Participants
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
submitting the question as to whether
such segregation should be
implemented to a vote of all affected
contract owners and, as appropriate,
segregating the assets of any appropriate
group (i.e., annuity contract owners or
life insurance contract owners of one or
more Participating Insurance
Companies) that votes in favor of such
segregation, or offering to the affected
contract owners the option of making
such a change; (b) establishing a new
registered management investment
company or managed separate account;
and (c) withdrawing the assets allocable
to some or all of the Qualified Plans
from the affected Portfolio or
Participating Insurance Company and
reinvesting those assets in a different
investment medium. If a material
irreconcilable conflict arises because of
a decision by a Participating Insurance
Company to disregard contract owner
voting instructions, and that decision
represents a minority position or would
preclude a majority vote, then the
insurer may be required, at the election
of the Trust, to withdraw such insurer’s
Separate Account’s investment in the
Trust, and no charge or penalty will be
imposed as a result of such withdrawal.
If a material irreconcilable conflict
arises because of a Qualified Plan’s
decision to disregard Qualified Plan
participant voting instructions, if
applicable, and that decision represents
a minority position or would preclude
a majority vote, the Qualified Plan may
be required, at the election of the Trust,
to withdraw its investment in the Trust,
and no charge or penalty will be
imposed as a result of such withdrawal.
The responsibility to take remedial
action in the event of a Board
determination of a material
irreconcilable conflict and to bear the
cost of such remedial action will be a
contractual obligation of all Participants
under their agreements governing
participation in the Trust, and these
responsibilities will be carried out with
a view only to the interests of contract
owners and Qualified Plan participants.
For purposes of this Condition 4, a
majority of the disinterested members of
the Board will determine whether or not
any proposed action adequately
remedies any material irreconcilable
conflict, but, in no event will the Trust
or Wilshire, as relevant, be required to
establish a new funding vehicle for any
Variable Contract. No Participating
Insurance Company will be required by
this Condition 4 to establish a new
funding vehicle for any Variable
Contract if any offer to do so has been
declined by vote of a majority of the
contract owners materially and
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
adversely affected by the material
irreconcilable conflict. Further, no
Qualified Plan will be required by this
Condition 4 to establish a new funding
vehicle for the Qualified Plan if: (a) A
majority of the Qualified Plan
participants materially and adversely
affected by the irreconcilable material
conflict vote to decline such offer, or (b)
pursuant to documents governing the
Qualified Plan, the Qualified Plan
makes such decision without a
Qualified Plan participant vote.
5. The Board’s determination of the
existence of a material irreconcilable
conflict and its implications will be
made known in writing promptly to all
Participants.
6. As to Variable Contracts issued by
Separate Accounts registered under the
1940 Act, Participating Insurance
Companies will provide pass-through
voting privileges to all Variable Contract
owners as required by the 1940 Act as
interpreted by the Commission.
However, as to Variable Contracts
issued by unregistered Separate
Accounts, pass-through voting
privileges will be extended to contract
owners to the extent granted by the
issuing insurance company.
Accordingly, such Participants, where
applicable, will vote shares of the
applicable Portfolio held in their
Separate Accounts in a manner
consistent with voting instructions
timely received from Variable Contract
owners. Participating Insurance
Companies will be responsible for
assuring that each Separate Account
investing in a Portfolio calculates voting
privileges in a manner consistent with
other Participants.
The obligation to calculate voting
privileges as provided in this
Application will be a contractual
obligation of all Participating Insurance
Companies under their agreement with
the Trusts governing participation in a
Portfolio. Each Participating Insurance
Company will vote shares for which it
has not received timely voting
instructions, as well as shares it owns
through its General Account or
otherwise attributed to it, in the same
proportion as it votes those shares for
which it has received voting
instructions. Each Qualified Plan will
vote as required by applicable law and
governing Qualified Plan documents.
7. As long as the 1940 Act requires
pass-through voting privileges to be
provided to variable contract owners,
Wilshire Entities and any General
Account will vote their respective
shares of any Portfolio in the same
proportion of all variable contract
owners having voting rights with
respect to that Portfolio; provided;
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 36 / Friday, February 23, 2007 / Notices
however, that any Wilshire Entity or any
insurance company General Account
shall vote its shares in such other
manner as may be required by the
Commission or its staff.
8. The Trust will comply with all
provisions of the 1940 Act requiring
voting by shareholders, which for these
purposes, shall be the persons having a
voting interest in the shares of the
respective Portfolio, and, in particular,
the Trust will either provide for annual
meetings (except to the extent that the
Commission may interpret Section 16 of
the 1940 Act not to require such
meetings) or comply with Section 16(c)
of the 1940 Act (although the Trust is
not one of the funds of the type
described in the Section 16(c) of the
1940 Act), as well as with Section 16(a)
of the 1940 Act and, if and when
applicable, Section 16(b) of the 1940
Act. Further, the Trust will act in
accordance with the Commission’s
interpretation of the requirements of
Section 16(a) with respect to periodic
elections of trustees and with whatever
rules the Commission may promulgate
with respect thereto.
9. The Trust will notify all
Participants that Separate Account
prospectus disclosure or Qualified Plan
prospectuses or other Qualified Plan
disclosure documents regarding
potential risks of mixed and shared
funding may be appropriate. The Trust
will disclose in its prospectus that (a)
Shares of the Trust may be offered to
Separate Accounts of both variable
annuity and variable life insurance
contracts and, if applicable, to Qualified
Plans; (b) due to differences in tax
treatment and other considerations, the
interests of various contract owners
participating in the Trust and the
interests of Qualified Plans investing in
the Trust, if applicable, may conflict;
and (c) the Trust’s Board will monitor
events in order to identify the existence
of any material irreconcilable conflicts
and to determine what action, if any,
should be taken in response to any such
conflict.
10. If and to the extent that Rule 6e–
2 and Rule 6e–3(T) under the 1940 Act
are amended, or proposed Rule 6e–3
under the 1940 Act is adopted, to
provide exemptive relief from any
provision of the 1940 Act, or the rules
promulgated thereunder, with respect to
mixed or shared funding, on terms and
conditions materially different from any
exemptions granted in the order
requested in this Application, then the
Trust and/or Participating Insurance
Companies, as appropriate, shall take
such steps as may be necessary to
comply with Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T), or
Rule 6e–3, as such rules are applicable.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Feb 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
11. The Participants, at least annually,
will submit to the Board such reports,
materials, or data as a Board reasonably
may request so that the trustees of the
Board may fully carry out the
obligations imposed upon the Board by
the conditions contained in this
application. Such reports, materials, and
data will be submitted more frequently
if deemed appropriate by the Board. The
obligations of the Participants to
provide these reports, materials, and
data to the Board, when it so reasonably
requests, will be a contractual obligation
of all Participants under their
agreements governing participation in
the Portfolios.
12. All reports of potential or existing
conflicts received by the Board, and all
Board action with regard to determining
the existence of a conflict, notifying
Participants of a conflict, and
determining whether any proposed
action adequately remedies a conflict,
will be properly recorded in the minutes
of the Board or other appropriate
records, and such minutes or other
records shall be made available to the
Commission upon request.
13. The Trust will not accept a
purchase order from a Qualified Plan if
such purchase would make the
Qualified Plan shareholder an owner of
10 percent or more of the assets of such
Portfolio unless such Qualified Plan
executes an agreement with the Trust
governing participation in such
Portfolio that includes the conditions
set forth herein to the extent applicable.
A Qualified Plan or Qualified Plan
participant will execute an application
containing an acknowledgment of this
condition at the time of its initial
purchase of shares of any Portfolio.
14. A Portfolio will make its shares
available under a Variable Contract and/
or Qualified Plan at or about the same
time as it accepts any seed capital from
any Wilshire Entity or any General
Account of a Participating Insurance
Company.
Conclusions
Applicants submit, based on the
grounds summarized above, that the
exemptions requested are necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the 1940 Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–3068 Filed 2–22–07; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55308; File No. SR–CHX–
2006–38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change
To Extend the Late Trading Session
and To Permit Only the Execution of
Cross Orders During That Session
February 15, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
22, 2006, the Chicago Stock Exchange,
Inc. (the ‘‘CHX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the CHX. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules (i) To extend its late trading
session until 4 p.m. and (ii) to provide
that only cross orders may be executed
during that session. The text of this
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at https://
www.chx.com/rules/
proposed_rules.htm, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
CHX included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received regarding the
proposal. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The CHX has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
In the Exchange’s new trading model,
the Exchange conducts two trading
1 15
2 17
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Sfmt 4703
8215
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 36 (Friday, February 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8209-8215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3068]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. IC-27701; File No. 812-13272]
Wilshire Variable Insurance Trust, et al.; Notice of Application
February 16, 2007.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an exemption pursuant to Section 6(c)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ``1940 Act'')
from the provisions of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the Act
and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANTS: Wilshire Variable Insurance Trust (the ``Trust'') and
Wilshire Associates Incorporated (``Wilshire'' and together with the
Trust, ``Applicants'').
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants seek an order exempting them from
the provisions of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940
Act, and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder, to the extent
necessary to permit shares of the Trust and shares of any other
investment company or portfolio that is designed to fund insurance
products and for which Wilshire or any of its affiliates may serve in
the future as investment adviser, manager, principal underwriter,
sponsor, or administrator (``Future Trusts'') (the Trust, together with
Future Trusts, the ``Trusts'') to be sold to and held by: (a) Separate
accounts funding variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts
(collectively the ``Variable Contracts'') issued by both affiliated and
unaffiliated life insurance companies; (b) trustees of qualified group
pension and group retirement plans (``Qualified Plans'') outside of the
separate account context; (c) separate accounts that are not registered
as investment companies under the 1940 Act pursuant to exemptions from
registration under Section 3(c) of the 1940 Act; (d) Wilshire and any
affiliate of Wilshire that serves as an investment adviser, manager,
principal underwriter, sponsor or administrator for the purpose of
providing seed capital (collectively, ``Wilshire Entities''); (e) any
other insurance company general accounts permitted to hold shares of
the Trusts pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.817-5 (``General
Accounts'').
FILING DATE: The application was filed on April 4, 2006 and amended on
November 1, 2006.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders
[[Page 8210]]
a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the
Secretary of the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the
request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on March 14, 2007, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on Applicants in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests
should State the nature of the requester's interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by writing to the Secretary of the
Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-
1090. Applicants, Lawrence E. Davanzo, c/o Wilshire Associates
Incorporated, 1299 Ocean Avenue, Suite 700, Santa Monica, California
90401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Samuel, Senior Counsel, or
Joyce M. Pickholz, Branch Chief, Office of Insurance Products, Division
of Investment Management, at (202) 551-6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from
the SEC's Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549 (tel. (202) 551-8090).
Applicants' Representations
1. The Trust is registered with the Commission as an open-end
management investment company and is organized as a Delaware statutory
trust. Wilshire, a California corporation, is registered with the
Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940, as amended, and serves as the investment adviser to the Trust.
The Trust currently consists of, and offers shares of beneficial
interest (``shares'') representing interests in, fourteen separate
investment portfolios (each, a ``Portfolio,'' and collectively, the
``Portfolios''). The Trust or any Future Trusts may offer one or more
additional investment portfolios in the future (also referred to as
``Portfolios'').
2. Shares of the Portfolios will be offered to separate accounts of
affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies (each, a
``Participating Insurance Company'') as investment vehicles to fund
Variable Contracts. These separate accounts will be registered as
investment companies under the 1940 Act or will be exempt from such
registration (individually, a ``Separate Account'' and collectively,
the ``Separate Accounts''). Shares of the Portfolios may also be
offered to Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities and General Accounts.
3. The Participating Insurance Companies at the time of their
investment in the Trusts either have established or will establish
their own Separate Accounts and have designed or will design their own
Variable Contracts. Each Participating Insurance Company has or will
have the legal obligation of satisfying all applicable requirements
under both State and Federal law. Each Participating Insurance Company,
on behalf of its Separate Accounts, has entered or will enter into an
agreement with the Trusts concerning such Participating Insurance
Company's participation in the Portfolios. The role of the Trusts under
this agreement, insofar as the Federal securities laws are applicable,
will consist of, among other things, offering shares of the Portfolios
to the participating Separate Accounts and complying with any
conditions that the Commission may impose upon granting the order
requested herein.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. In connection with the funding of scheduled premium variable
life insurance contracts issued through a separate account registered
as a unit investment trust (``UIT'') under the 1940 Act, Rule 6e-
2(b)(15) provides partial exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a)
and 15(b) of the 1940 Act. Section 9(a)(2) of the 1940 Act makes it
unlawful for any company to serve as an investment adviser or principal
underwriter of any UIT, if an affiliated person of that company is
subject to a disqualification enumerated in Sections 9(a)(1) or (2) of
the 1940 Act. Sections 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act have been
deemed by the Commission to require ``pass-through'' voting with
respect to an underlying investment company's shares. Rule 6e-2(b)(15)
provides that these exemptions apply only where all of the assets of
the UIT are shares of management investment companies ``which offer
their shares exclusively to variable life insurance separate accounts
of the life insurer or of any affiliated life insurance company.''
Therefore, the relief granted by Rule 6e-2(b)(15) is not available with
respect to a scheduled premium life insurance separate account that
owns shares of an underlying fund that also offers its shares to a
variable annuity separate account or flexible premium variable life
insurance separate account of the same company or any other affiliated
insurance company. The use of a common management investment company as
the underlying investment vehicle for both variable annuity and
variable life insurance separate accounts of the same life insurance
company or of any affiliated life insurance company is referred to
herein as ``mixed funding.''
2. The relief granted by Rule 6e-2(b)(15) also is not available
with respect to a scheduled premium variable life insurance separate
account that owns shares of an underlying fund that also offers its
shares to separate accounts funding Variable Contracts of one or more
unaffiliated life insurance companies. The use of a common management
investment company as the underlying investment vehicle for variable
annuity and/or variable life insurance separate accounts of
unaffiliated life insurance companies is referred to herein as ``shared
funding.''
3. The relief under Rule 6e-2(b)(15) is available only where shares
are offered exclusively to variable life insurance separate accounts of
a life insurer or any affiliated life insurance company, additional
exemptive relief is necessary if the shares of the Portfolios are also
to be sold to Qualified Plans or other eligible holders of shares, as
described above. Applicants note that if shares of the Portfolios are
sold only to Qualified Plans, exemptive relief under Rule 6e-2 would
not be necessary. The relief provided for under this section does not
relate to Qualified Plans or to a registered investment company's
ability to sell its shares to Qualified Plans. The use of a common
management investment company as the underlying investment vehicle for
variable annuity and variable life separate accounts of affiliated and
unaffiliated insurance companies, and for Qualified Plans, is referred
to herein as ``extended mixed and shared funding.''
4. In connection with flexible premium variable life insurance
contracts issued through a separate account registered under the 1940
Act as a UIT, Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) provides partial exemptions from
Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act. The exemptions
granted by Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) are available only where all the assets
of the separate account consist of the shares of one or more registered
management investment companies that offer to sell their shares
``exclusively to separate accounts of the life insurer, or of any
affiliated life insurance companies, offering either scheduled
contracts or flexible contracts, or both; or which also offer their
shares to variable annuity separate accounts of the life insurer or of
an affiliated life insurance company or
[[Page 8211]]
which offer their shares to any such life insurance company in
consideration solely for advances made by the life insurer in
connection with the operation of the separate account.'' Therefore,
Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) permits mixed funding but does not permit shared
funding.
5. The relief under Rule 6e-3(T) is available only where shares are
offered exclusively to variable life insurance separate accounts of a
life insurer or any affiliated life insurance company, and additional
exemptive relief is necessary if the shares of the Portfolios are also
to be sold to Qualified Plans or other eligible holders of shares as
described above. Applicants note that if shares of the Portfolios were
sold only to Qualified Plans, exemptive relief under Rule 6e-
3(T)(b)(15) would not be necessary. The relief provided for under this
section does not relate to Qualified Plans or to a registered
investment company's ability to sell its shares to Qualified Plans.
6. Applicants maintain, as discussed below, that there is no policy
reason for the sale of the Portfolios' shares to Qualified Plans, to
Wilshire Entities, or General Accounts to result in a prohibition
against, or otherwise limit, a Participating Insurance Company from
relying on the relief provided by Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15).
However, because the relief under Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)
is available only when shares are offered exclusively to separate
accounts, additional exemptive relief may be necessary if the shares of
the Portfolios are also to be sold to Qualified Plans, Wilshire
Entities, or General Accounts. Applicants therefore request relief in
order to have the Participating Insurance Companies enjoy the benefits
of the relief granted in Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15).
Applicants note that if the Portfolios' shares were to be sold only to
Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities, or General Accounts and/or separate
accounts funding variable annuity contracts, exemptive relief under
Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) would be unnecessary. The relief provided
for under Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) does not relate to
Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities, or General Accounts, or to a
registered investment company's ability to sell its shares to such
purchasers.
7. Section 9(a)(3) of the 1940 Act provides that it is unlawful for
any company to serve as investment adviser or principal underwriter of
any registered open-end investment company if an affiliated person of
that company is subject to a disqualification enumerated in Sections
9(a)(1) or (2). Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(i) and (ii) and Rules 6e-
3(T)(b)(15)(i) and (ii) under the 1940 Act provide exemptions from
Section 9(a) under certain circumstances, subject to the limitations
discussed above on mixed and shared funding. These exemptions limit the
application of the eligibility restrictions to affiliated individuals
or companies that directly participate in management of the underlying
management company.
8. The partial relief granted in Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-
3(T)(b)(15) under the 1940 Act from the requirements of Section 9 of
the 1940 Act recognizes that it is not necessary for the protection of
investors or the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions
of the 1940 Act to apply the provisions of Section 9(a) to individuals
in a large insurance company complex, most of whom will have no
involvement in matters pertaining to investment companies in that
organization. The Participating Insurance Companies and Qualified Plans
are not expected to play any role in the management of the Trusts.
Those individuals who participate in the management of the Trusts will
remain the same regardless of which Separate Accounts or Qualified
Plans invest in the Trusts. Applying the monitoring requirements of
Section 9(a) of the 1940 Act because of investment by separate accounts
of other insurers or Qualified Plans would be unjustified and would not
serve any regulatory purpose.
9. Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the 1940
Act provide exemptions from the pass-through voting requirement with
respect to several significant matters, assuming the limitations on
mixed and shared funding are observed. Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and
6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(1) provide that the insurance company may
disregard the voting instructions of its contract owners with respect
to the investments of an underlying fund, or any contract between such
a fund and its investment adviser, when required to do so by an
insurance regulatory authority (subject to the provisions of paragraphs
(b)(5)(i) and (b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T), respectively,
under the 1940 Act). Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(B) and 6e-
3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(2) provide that the insurance company may disregard
the voting instructions of its contract owners if the contract owners
initiate any change in an underlying fund's investment policies,
principal underwriter, or any investment adviser (provided that
disregarding such voting instructions is reasonable and subject to the
other provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(ii), (b)(7)(ii)(B), and
(b)(7)(ii)(C), respectively, of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T) under the 1940
Act).
10. Rule 6e-2 under the 1940 Act recognizes that a variable life
insurance contract, as an insurance contract, has important elements
unique to insurance contracts and is subject to extensive State
regulation of insurance. In adopting Rule 6e-2(b)(15)(iii), the
Commission expressly recognized that State insurance regulators have
authority, pursuant to State insurance laws or regulations, to
disapprove or require changes in investment policies, investment
advisers, or principal underwriters. The Commission also expressly
recognized that State insurance regulators have authority to require an
insurer to draw from its general account to cover costs imposed upon
the insurer by a change approved by contract owners over the insurer's
objection. The Commission, therefore, deemed such exemptions necessary
to assure the life insurer's solvency and performance of its
contractual obligations by enabling an insurance regulatory authority
or the life insurer to act when certain proposals reasonably could be
expected to increase the risks undertaken by the life insurer. In this
respect, flexible premium variable life insurance contracts are
identical to scheduled premium variable life insurance contracts.
Therefore, the corresponding provisions of Rule 6e-3(T) under the 1940
Act undoubtedly were adopted in recognition of the same factors.
11. The sale of Portfolio shares to Qualified Plans, Wilshire
Entities, and General Accounts will not have any impact on the relief
requested herein. With respect to the Qualified Plans, which are not
registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act, there is no
requirement to pass through voting rights to Qualified Plan
participants. Indeed, to the contrary, applicable law expressly
reserves voting rights associated with Qualified Plan assets to certain
specified persons. Under Section 403(a) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (``ERISA''), shares of a
portfolio of a fund sold to a Qualified Plan must be held by the
trustees of the Qualified Plan. Section 403(a) also provides that the
trustee(s) must have exclusive authority and discretion to manage and
control the Qualified Plan with two exceptions: (i) When the Qualified
Plan expressly provides that the trustee(s) are subject to the
direction of a named fiduciary who is not a trustee, in which case the
trustees are subject to proper directions made in accordance with the
terms of the Qualified Plan and not contrary to
[[Page 8212]]
ERISA, and (ii) when the authority to manage, acquire, or dispose of
assets of the Qualified Plan is delegated to one or more investment
managers pursuant to Section 402(c)(3) of ERISA. Unless one of the
above two exceptions stated in Section 403(a) applies, Qualified Plan
trustees have the exclusive authority and responsibility for voting
proxies.
12. Where a named fiduciary to a Qualified Plan appoints an
investment manager, the investment manager has the responsibility to
vote the shares held unless the right to vote such shares is reserved
to the trustees or the named fiduciary. The Qualified Plans may have
their trustee(s) or other fiduciaries exercise voting rights
attributable to investment securities held by the Qualified Plans in
their discretion. Some of the Qualified Plans, however, may provide for
the trustee(s), an investment adviser (or advisers), or another named
fiduciary to exercise voting rights in accordance with instructions
from participants. Similarly, Wilshire Entities and General Accounts
are not subject to any pass-through voting requirements. Accordingly,
unlike the case with insurance company separate accounts, the issue of
resolution of material irreconcilable conflicts with respect to voting
is not present with Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities, or General
Accounts.
13. Where a Qualified Plan does not provide participants with the
right to give voting instructions, the trustee or named fiduciary has
responsibility to vote the shares held by the Qualified Plan. In this
circumstance, the trustee has a fiduciary duty to vote the shares in
the best interest of the Qualified Plan participants. Accordingly, even
if Wilshire or an affiliate of Wilshire were to serve in the capacity
of trustee or named fiduciary with voting responsibilities, Wilshire or
its affiliate would have a fiduciary duty to vote those shares in the
best interest of the Qualified Plan participants.
14. In addition, even if a Qualified Plan were to hold a
controlling interest in a Portfolio, Applicants do not believe that
such control would disadvantage other investors in such Portfolio to
any greater extent than is the case when any institutional shareholder
holds a majority of the voting securities of any open-end management
investment company. In this regard, Applicants submit that investment
in a Portfolio by a Qualified Plan will not create any of the voting
complications occasioned by mixed funding or shared funding. Unlike
mixed funding or shared funding, Qualified Plan investor voting rights
cannot be frustrated by veto rights of insurers or State regulators.
15. Where a Qualified Plan provides participants with the right to
give voting instructions, Applicants see no reason to believe that
participants in Qualified Plans generally or those in a particular
Qualified Plan, either as a single group or in combination with
participants in other Qualified Plans, would vote in a manner that
would disadvantage Variable Contract holders. The purchase of shares of
Portfolios by Qualified Plans that provide voting rights does not
present any complications not otherwise occasioned by mixed or shared
funding.
16. Shared funding by unaffiliated insurance companies does not
present any issues that do not already exist where a single insurance
company is licensed to do business in several or all States. A
particular State insurance regulatory body could require action that is
inconsistent with the requirements of other States in which the
insurance company offers its policies. The fact that different insurers
may be domiciled in different States does not create a significantly
different or enlarged problem.
17. Shared funding by unaffiliated insurers, in this respect, is no
different than the use of the same investment company as the funding
vehicle for affiliated insurers, which Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-
3(T)(b)(15) under the 1940 Act permit. Affiliated insurers may be
domiciled in different States and be subject to differing State law
requirements. Affiliation does not reduce the potential, if any exists,
for differences in State regulatory requirements. In any event, the
conditions set forth below are designed to safeguard against, and
provide procedures for resolving, any adverse effects that differences
among State regulatory requirements may produce. If a particular State
insurance regulator's decision conflicts with the majority of other
State regulators, then the affected insurer will be required to
withdraw its Separate Account's investment in the affected Trust. This
requirement will be provided for in agreements that will be entered
into by Participating Insurance Companies with respect to their
participation in the relevant Portfolio.
18. Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) under the 1940 Act give
the insurance company the right to disregard the voting instructions of
the contract owners in certain circumstances. Affiliation does not
eliminate the potential, if any exists, for divergent judgments as to
the advisability or legality of a change in investment policies,
principal underwriter, or investment adviser initiated by contract
owners. The potential for disagreement is limited by the requirements
in Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T) under the 1940 Act that the insurance
company's disregard of voting instructions be reasonable and based on
specific good-faith determinations.
19. A Participating Insurance Company's disregard of voting
instructions, nevertheless, could conflict with the majority of
contract owners' voting instructions. The Participating Insurance
Company's action possibly could be different than the determination of
all or some of the other insurers (including affiliated insurers) that
the voting instructions of contract owners should prevail, and either
could preclude a majority vote approving the change or could represent
a minority view. If the Participating Insurance Company's judgment
represents a minority position or would preclude a majority vote, then
the Participating Insurance Company's may be required, at the affected
Trust's election, to withdraw its Separate Account's investment in such
Portfolio. No charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. This requirement will be provided for in the agreements
entered into with respect to participation by the Participating
Insurance Companies in each Portfolio.
20. Each Portfolio will be managed to attempt to achieve the
investment objective or objectives of such Portfolio, and not to favor
or disfavor any particular Participating Insurance Company or type of
insurance product. There is no reason to believe that different
features of various types of contracts, including the ``minimum death
benefit'' guarantee under certain variable life insurance contracts,
will lead to different investment policies for different types of
Variable Contracts. To the extent that the degree of risk may differ as
between variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance
policies, the different insurance charges imposed, in effect, adjust
any such differences and equalize the insurers' exposure in either
case.
21. Applicants do not believe that the sale of the shares of the
Portfolios to Qualified Plans will increase the potential for material
irreconcilable conflicts of interest between or among different types
of investors. In particular, Applicants see very little potential for
such conflicts beyond those which would otherwise exist between
variable annuity and variable life insurance contract owners. Moreover,
in considering the appropriateness of the requested relief, Applicants
have analyzed the following issues to assure themselves that there
[[Page 8213]]
were either no conflicts of interest or that there existed the ability
by the affected parties to resolve the issues without harm to the
contract owners in the Separate Accounts or to the participants under
the Qualified Plans.
22. Applicants considered whether there are any issues raised under
the Internal Revnue Code of l986, as amended, (the ``Code''), the
regulations issued by the Treasury Department (the ``Regulations''), or
the revenue rulings issued by the Internal Revenue Service (the
``Revenue Rulings''), if Qualified Plans, variable annuity separate
accounts, and variable life insurance separate accounts all invest in
the same underlying fund. Section 817(h) of the Code imposes certain
diversification standards on the underlying assets of Variable
Contracts held in an underlying mutual fund. The Code provides that a
Variable Contract shall not be treated as an annuity contract or life
insurance, as applicable, for any period (and any subsequent period)
for which the investments are not, in accordance with regulations
prescribed by the Treasury Department, adequately diversified.
23. Regulations issued under Section 817(h) provide that, in order
to meet the statutory diversification requirements, all of the
beneficial interests in the investment company must be held by the
segregated asset accounts of one or more insurance companies. However,
the Regulations contain certain exceptions to this requirement, one of
which allows shares in an underlying mutual fund to be held by the
trustees of a qualified pension or retirement plan without adversely
affecting the ability of such shares also to be held by separate
accounts of insurance companies in connection with their Variable
Contracts. Thus, the Regulations specifically permit ``qualified
pension or retirement plans'' and separate accounts to invest in the
same underlying fund. For this reason, Applicants have concluded that
neither the Code, nor Regulations, nor Revenue Rulings thereunder,
present any inherent conflicts of interest if the Qualified Plans and
Separate Accounts all invest in the same Portfolio.
24. Applicants note that while there are differences in the manner
in which distributions from Variable Contracts and Qualified Plans are
taxed, these differences will have no impact on the Trusts. When
distributions are to be made, and a Separate Account or Qualified Plan
is unable to net purchase payments to make the distributions, the
Separate Account and Qualified Plan will redeem shares of the relevant
Portfolio at their respective net asset value in conformity with Rule
22c-1 under the 1940 Act (without the imposition of any sales charge)
to provide proceeds to meet distribution needs. A Participating
Insurance Company then will make distributions in accordance with the
terms of its Variable Contract, and a Qualified Plan then will make
distributions in accordance with the terms of the Qualified Plan.
25. In connection with any meeting of shareholders, the soliciting
Trust will inform each shareholder, including each Separate Account,
Qualified Plan, Wilshire Entities, and General Account, of information
necessary for the meeting, including their respective share of
ownership in the relevant Portfolio. Each Participating Insurance
Company then will solicit voting instructions in accordance with Rules
6e-2 and 6e-3(T), as applicable, and its agreement with the Trusts
concerning participation in the relevant Portfolio. Shares of a
Portfolio that are held by Wilshire Entities and any General Account
will be voted in the same proportion as all Variable Contract owners
having voting rights with respect to that Portfolio. However, Wilshire
Entities and any General Account will vote their shares in such other
manner as the Commission may require. Shares held by Qualified Plans
will be voted in accordance with applicable law. The voting rights
provided to Qualified Plans with respect to shares of a Portfolio would
be no different from the voting rights that are provided to Qualified
Plans with respect to shares of funds sold to the general public.
Furthermore, if a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a
Qualified Plan's decision to disregard Qualified Plan participant
voting instructions, if applicable, and that decision represents a
minority position or would preclude a majority vote, the Qualified Plan
may be required, at the election of the affected Trust, to withdraw its
investment in such Portfolio, and no charge or penalty will be imposed
as a result of such withdrawal.
26. Applicants reviewed whether a ``senior security,'' as such term
is defined under Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act, is created with respect
to any Variable Contract owner as opposed to a participant under a
Qualified Plan, Wilshire Entities, or a General Account. Applicants
concluded that the ability of the Trusts to sell shares of their
Portfolios directly to Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities, or a General
Account does not create a senior security. ``Senior security'' is
defined under Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act to include ``any stock of a
class having priority over any other class as to distribution of assets
or payment of dividends.'' As noted above, regardless of the rights and
benefits of participants under Qualified Plans, or contract owners
under Variable Contracts, the Qualified Plans, Wilshire Entities,
General Accounts and the Separate Accounts only have rights with
respect to their respective shares of the Portfolio. They only can
redeem such shares at net asset value. No shareholder of a Portfolio
has any preference over any other shareholder with respect to
distribution of assets or payment of dividends.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants and the Wilshire Entities agree that the order granting
the requested relief shall be subject to the following conditions which
shall apply to the Trust as well as any Future Trust that relies on the
order:
1. A majority of the Board of Trustees (the ``Board'') of the Trust
will consist of persons who are not ``interested persons'' of the
Trust, as defined by Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, and the rules
thereunder, and as modified by any applicable orders of the Commission,
except that if this condition is not met by reason of the death,
disqualification, or bona fide resignation of any trustee or trustees,
then the operation of this condition will be suspended: (a) For a
period of 90 days if the vacancy or vacancies may be filled by the
Board; (b) for a period of 150 days if a vote of shareholders is
required to fill the vacancy or vacancies; or (c) for such longer
period as the Commission may prescribe by order upon application or by
future rule.
2. The Board will monitor the Trust for the existence of any
material irreconcilable conflict between the interests of the contract
owners of all Separate Accounts and participants of all Qualified Plans
investing in such Trust, and determine what action, if any, should be
taken in response to such conflicts. A material irreconcilable conflict
may arise for a variety of reasons, including: (a) An action by any
State insurance regulatory authority; (b) a change in applicable
Federal or State insurance tax, or securities laws or regulations, or a
public ruling, private letter ruling, no-action or interpretative
letter, or any similar action by insurance, tax, or securities
regulatory authorities; (c) an administrative or judicial decision in
any relevant proceeding; (d) the manner in which the investments of
such Trust are being managed; (e) a difference in voting instructions
given by variable annuity contract owners, variable life insurance
[[Page 8214]]
contract owners, and trustees of the Qualified Plans; (f) a decision by
a Participating Insurance Company to disregard the voting instructions
of contract owners; or (g) if applicable, a decision by a Qualified
Plan to disregard the voting instructions of Qualified Plan
participants.
3. Participating Insurance Companies (on their own behalf, as well
as by virtue of any investment of general account assets in a
Portfolio), Wilshire Entities, and any Qualified Plan that executes a
participation agreement upon becoming an owner of 10 percent or more of
the assets of any Portfolio (collectively, ``Participants'') will
report any potential or existing conflicts to the Board. Participants
will be responsible for assisting the Board in carrying out the Board's
responsibilities under these conditions by providing the Board with all
information reasonably necessary for the Board to consider any issues
raised. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to, an
obligation by each Participating Insurance Company to inform the Board
whenever contract owner voting instructions are disregarded, and, if
pass-through voting is applicable, an obligation by each Qualified Plan
to inform the Board whenever it has determined to disregard Qualified
Plan participant voting instructions. The responsibility to report such
information and conflicts, and to assist the Board, will be a
contractual obligation of all Participating Insurance Companies under
their participation agreements with the Trust, and these
responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the interests
of the contract owners. The responsibility to report such information
and conflicts, and to assist the Board, also will be contractual
obligations of all Qualified Plans with participation agreements, and
such agreements will provide that these responsibilities will be
carried out with a view only to the interests of Qualified Plan
participants.
4. If it is determined by a majority of the Board, or a majority of
the disinterested trustees of the Board, that a material irreconcilable
conflict exists, then the relevant Participant will, at its expense and
to the extent reasonably practicable (as determined by a majority of
the disinterested trustees), take whatever steps are necessary to
remedy or eliminate the material irreconcilable conflict, up to and
including: (a) Withdrawing the assets allocable to some or all of the
Separate Accounts from the relevant Portfolio and reinvesting such
assets in a different investment vehicle including another Portfolio,
or in the case of Participating Insurance Company Participants
submitting the question as to whether such segregation should be
implemented to a vote of all affected contract owners and, as
appropriate, segregating the assets of any appropriate group (i.e.,
annuity contract owners or life insurance contract owners of one or
more Participating Insurance Companies) that votes in favor of such
segregation, or offering to the affected contract owners the option of
making such a change; (b) establishing a new registered management
investment company or managed separate account; and (c) withdrawing the
assets allocable to some or all of the Qualified Plans from the
affected Portfolio or Participating Insurance Company and reinvesting
those assets in a different investment medium. If a material
irreconcilable conflict arises because of a decision by a Participating
Insurance Company to disregard contract owner voting instructions, and
that decision represents a minority position or would preclude a
majority vote, then the insurer may be required, at the election of the
Trust, to withdraw such insurer's Separate Account's investment in the
Trust, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a result of such
withdrawal. If a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a
Qualified Plan's decision to disregard Qualified Plan participant
voting instructions, if applicable, and that decision represents a
minority position or would preclude a majority vote, the Qualified Plan
may be required, at the election of the Trust, to withdraw its
investment in the Trust, and no charge or penalty will be imposed as a
result of such withdrawal. The responsibility to take remedial action
in the event of a Board determination of a material irreconcilable
conflict and to bear the cost of such remedial action will be a
contractual obligation of all Participants under their agreements
governing participation in the Trust, and these responsibilities will
be carried out with a view only to the interests of contract owners and
Qualified Plan participants.
For purposes of this Condition 4, a majority of the disinterested
members of the Board will determine whether or not any proposed action
adequately remedies any material irreconcilable conflict, but, in no
event will the Trust or Wilshire, as relevant, be required to establish
a new funding vehicle for any Variable Contract. No Participating
Insurance Company will be required by this Condition 4 to establish a
new funding vehicle for any Variable Contract if any offer to do so has
been declined by vote of a majority of the contract owners materially
and adversely affected by the material irreconcilable conflict.
Further, no Qualified Plan will be required by this Condition 4 to
establish a new funding vehicle for the Qualified Plan if: (a) A
majority of the Qualified Plan participants materially and adversely
affected by the irreconcilable material conflict vote to decline such
offer, or (b) pursuant to documents governing the Qualified Plan, the
Qualified Plan makes such decision without a Qualified Plan participant
vote.
5. The Board's determination of the existence of a material
irreconcilable conflict and its implications will be made known in
writing promptly to all Participants.
6. As to Variable Contracts issued by Separate Accounts registered
under the 1940 Act, Participating Insurance Companies will provide
pass-through voting privileges to all Variable Contract owners as
required by the 1940 Act as interpreted by the Commission. However, as
to Variable Contracts issued by unregistered Separate Accounts, pass-
through voting privileges will be extended to contract owners to the
extent granted by the issuing insurance company. Accordingly, such
Participants, where applicable, will vote shares of the applicable
Portfolio held in their Separate Accounts in a manner consistent with
voting instructions timely received from Variable Contract owners.
Participating Insurance Companies will be responsible for assuring that
each Separate Account investing in a Portfolio calculates voting
privileges in a manner consistent with other Participants.
The obligation to calculate voting privileges as provided in this
Application will be a contractual obligation of all Participating
Insurance Companies under their agreement with the Trusts governing
participation in a Portfolio. Each Participating Insurance Company will
vote shares for which it has not received timely voting instructions,
as well as shares it owns through its General Account or otherwise
attributed to it, in the same proportion as it votes those shares for
which it has received voting instructions. Each Qualified Plan will
vote as required by applicable law and governing Qualified Plan
documents.
7. As long as the 1940 Act requires pass-through voting privileges
to be provided to variable contract owners, Wilshire Entities and any
General Account will vote their respective shares of any Portfolio in
the same proportion of all variable contract owners having voting
rights with respect to that Portfolio; provided;
[[Page 8215]]
however, that any Wilshire Entity or any insurance company General
Account shall vote its shares in such other manner as may be required
by the Commission or its staff.
8. The Trust will comply with all provisions of the 1940 Act
requiring voting by shareholders, which for these purposes, shall be
the persons having a voting interest in the shares of the respective
Portfolio, and, in particular, the Trust will either provide for annual
meetings (except to the extent that the Commission may interpret
Section 16 of the 1940 Act not to require such meetings) or comply with
Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act (although the Trust is not one of the
funds of the type described in the Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act), as
well as with Section 16(a) of the 1940 Act and, if and when applicable,
Section 16(b) of the 1940 Act. Further, the Trust will act in
accordance with the Commission's interpretation of the requirements of
Section 16(a) with respect to periodic elections of trustees and with
whatever rules the Commission may promulgate with respect thereto.
9. The Trust will notify all Participants that Separate Account
prospectus disclosure or Qualified Plan prospectuses or other Qualified
Plan disclosure documents regarding potential risks of mixed and shared
funding may be appropriate. The Trust will disclose in its prospectus
that (a) Shares of the Trust may be offered to Separate Accounts of
both variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts and, if
applicable, to Qualified Plans; (b) due to differences in tax treatment
and other considerations, the interests of various contract owners
participating in the Trust and the interests of Qualified Plans
investing in the Trust, if applicable, may conflict; and (c) the
Trust's Board will monitor events in order to identify the existence of
any material irreconcilable conflicts and to determine what action, if
any, should be taken in response to any such conflict.
10. If and to the extent that Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) under the
1940 Act are amended, or proposed Rule 6e-3 under the 1940 Act is
adopted, to provide exemptive relief from any provision of the 1940
Act, or the rules promulgated thereunder, with respect to mixed or
shared funding, on terms and conditions materially different from any
exemptions granted in the order requested in this Application, then the
Trust and/or Participating Insurance Companies, as appropriate, shall
take such steps as may be necessary to comply with Rules 6e-2 and 6e-
3(T), or Rule 6e-3, as such rules are applicable.
11. The Participants, at least annually, will submit to the Board
such reports, materials, or data as a Board reasonably may request so
that the trustees of the Board may fully carry out the obligations
imposed upon the Board by the conditions contained in this application.
Such reports, materials, and data will be submitted more frequently if
deemed appropriate by the Board. The obligations of the Participants to
provide these reports, materials, and data to the Board, when it so
reasonably requests, will be a contractual obligation of all
Participants under their agreements governing participation in the
Portfolios.
12. All reports of potential or existing conflicts received by the
Board, and all Board action with regard to determining the existence of
a conflict, notifying Participants of a conflict, and determining
whether any proposed action adequately remedies a conflict, will be
properly recorded in the minutes of the Board or other appropriate
records, and such minutes or other records shall be made available to
the Commission upon request.
13. The Trust will not accept a purchase order from a Qualified
Plan if such purchase would make the Qualified Plan shareholder an
owner of 10 percent or more of the assets of such Portfolio unless such
Qualified Plan executes an agreement with the Trust governing
participation in such Portfolio that includes the conditions set forth
herein to the extent applicable. A Qualified Plan or Qualified Plan
participant will execute an application containing an acknowledgment of
this condition at the time of its initial purchase of shares of any
Portfolio.
14. A Portfolio will make its shares available under a Variable
Contract and/or Qualified Plan at or about the same time as it accepts
any seed capital from any Wilshire Entity or any General Account of a
Participating Insurance Company.
Conclusions
Applicants submit, based on the grounds summarized above, that the
exemptions requested are necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3068 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P