Nissan North America, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 7709 [E7-2810]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 32 / Friday, February 16, 2007 / Notices
site at https://dms.dot.gov. Click on
‘‘Help’’ to obtain instructions for filing
the document electronically. Comments
may be faxed to 1–202–493–2251, or
may be submitted to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
Comment closing date: March 19,
2007.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8)
Issued on: February 9, 2007.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E7–2809 Filed 2–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2007–27073; Notice 1]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Nissan North America, Inc., Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan)
has determined that the rims on certain
vehicles that it produced in 2000
through 2005 do not comply with
S5.2(a) and S5.2(c) of 49 CFR 571.120,
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 120, ‘‘Tire selection and
rims for motor vehicles other than
passenger cars.’’ Nissan has filed an
appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 573, ‘‘Defect and Noncompliance
Reports.’’
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h), Nissan has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Nissan’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
Affected are a total of approximately
5,000 optional dealer accessory wheels
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:03 Feb 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
that have been sold and have been
installed on approximately 1,250-model
year 2000 through 2005 Nissan Xterra
multipurpose passenger vehicles and
Frontier pickup trucks. S5.2 of FMVSS
No. 120, rim marking, requires that each
rim be marked with certain information
on the weather side, including:
S5.2(a) A designation which indicates
the source of the rim’s published
nominal dimensions, and S5.2(c) the
symbol DOT.
The rims installed on the affected
vehicles do not contain the markings
required by S5.2(a) or S5.2(c). Nissan
has corrected the problem that caused
these errors so that they will not be
repeated in future production.
Nissan believes that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety and that no
corrective action is warranted. Nissan
states that the affected rims are 16″x7″
aluminum alloy, which are commonly
available and utilized in the United
States. They are a correct specification
for mounting 16″ original equipment
tires specified for Xterra and Frontier
models, and are capable of carrying the
gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of
the vehicle. Nissan first became aware
of the noncompliance of these vehicles
during a regulatory compliance review
during March 2006.
Nissan states that no accidents or
injuries have occurred, and no customer
complaints have been received related
to the lack of the markings or any
problem that may have resulted from
the lack of the markings. Nissan further
states that the missing markings do not
affect the performance of the wheels or
the tire and wheel assemblies.
The rims are marked in compliance
with S5.2(b), rim size designation;
S5.2(d), manufacturer identification;
and S5.2(e) month, day and year or
month and year of manufacture. The
rims are also marked with a 4030S
RSD20–10/20 part number.
The tire size is marked on the tire
sidewalls, and the owner’s manual and
tire inflation pressure placard contain
the appropriate tire size to be installed
on the original equipment rims.
Therefore, Nissan does not believe there
is a possibility of a tire and rim
mismatch as a result of the missing rim
markings. All other requirements under
FMVSS No. 120 are met.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments on this petition. Comments
must refer to the docket and notice
number cited at the beginning of this
notice and be submitted by any of the
following methods. Mail: Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Nassif Building,
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7709
Room PL–401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, 20590–0001. Hand
Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC. It
is requested, but not required, that two
copies of the comments be provided.
The Docket Section is open on
weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays. Comments may be
submitted electronically by logging onto
the Docket Management System Web
site at https://dms.dot.gov. Click on
‘‘Help’’ to obtain instructions for filing
the document electronically. Comments
may be faxed to 1–202–493–2251, or
may be submitted to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
Comment closing date: March 19,
2007.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120;
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8.
Issued on: February 9, 2007.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E7–2810 Filed 2–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34991]
Koch Industries, Inc.—Continuance in
Control Exemption—Moscow Camden
and San Augustine Railroad LLC
Koch Industries, Inc. (Koch
Industries), a noncarrier, has filed a
verified notice of exemption to
indirectly continue in control of
Moscow Camden and San Augustine
Railroad LLC (MCSA), upon MCSA’s
becoming a Class III rail carrier.1
The transaction is scheduled to be
consummated after the effectiveness of
the exemption, and no earlier than
March 2, 2007.
1 Simultaneously with this filing, Koch Industries
filed a motion for a protective order. The motion
is being addressed in a separate Board decision.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 32 (Friday, February 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2810]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2007-27073; Notice 1]
Nissan North America, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) has determined that the rims on
certain vehicles that it produced in 2000 through 2005 do not comply
with S5.2(a) and S5.2(c) of 49 CFR 571.120, Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 120, ``Tire selection and rims for motor
vehicles other than passenger cars.'' Nissan has filed an appropriate
report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, ``Defect and Noncompliance
Reports.''
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h), Nissan has petitioned
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Nissan's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
Affected are a total of approximately 5,000 optional dealer
accessory wheels that have been sold and have been installed on
approximately 1,250-model year 2000 through 2005 Nissan Xterra
multipurpose passenger vehicles and Frontier pickup trucks. S5.2 of
FMVSS No. 120, rim marking, requires that each rim be marked with
certain information on the weather side, including:
S5.2(a) A designation which indicates the source of the rim's
published nominal dimensions, and S5.2(c) the symbol DOT.
The rims installed on the affected vehicles do not contain the
markings required by S5.2(a) or S5.2(c). Nissan has corrected the
problem that caused these errors so that they will not be repeated in
future production.
Nissan believes that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety and that no corrective action is warranted. Nissan
states that the affected rims are 16''x7'' aluminum alloy, which are
commonly available and utilized in the United States. They are a
correct specification for mounting 16'' original equipment tires
specified for Xterra and Frontier models, and are capable of carrying
the gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of the vehicle. Nissan first
became aware of the noncompliance of these vehicles during a regulatory
compliance review during March 2006.
Nissan states that no accidents or injuries have occurred, and no
customer complaints have been received related to the lack of the
markings or any problem that may have resulted from the lack of the
markings. Nissan further states that the missing markings do not affect
the performance of the wheels or the tire and wheel assemblies.
The rims are marked in compliance with S5.2(b), rim size
designation; S5.2(d), manufacturer identification; and S5.2(e) month,
day and year or month and year of manufacture. The rims are also marked
with a 4030S RSD20-10/20 part number.
The tire size is marked on the tire sidewalls, and the owner's
manual and tire inflation pressure placard contain the appropriate tire
size to be installed on the original equipment rims. Therefore, Nissan
does not believe there is a possibility of a tire and rim mismatch as a
result of the missing rim markings. All other requirements under FMVSS
No. 120 are met.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be submitted by
any of the following methods. Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Nassif Building, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC, 20590-0001. Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC. It is requested, but not required, that two copies of
the comments be provided. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from
10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays. Comments may be submitted
electronically by logging onto the Docket Management System Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov. Click on ``Help'' to obtain instructions for filing
the document electronically. Comments may be faxed to 1-202-493-2251,
or may be submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
Comment closing date: March 19, 2007.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at
CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: February 9, 2007.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E7-2810 Filed 2-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P