Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No. 3 Thereto Adopting Generic Listing Standards for Exchange-Traded Funds Based on International or Global Indexes or Indexes Described in Exchange Rules Previously Approved by the Commission as Underlying Benchmarks for Derivative Securities, 7490-7496 [E7-2664]
Download as PDF
7490
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Notices
written notice of its intention to file the
proposed rule change at least five
business days prior to filing. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission
may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.
Under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) of the Act,11
the proposal does not become operative
for 30 days after the date of its filing, or
such shorter time as the Commission
may designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. The Exchange has requested
that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative date, so that the proposal may
take effect on January 30, 2007 for XEO
options and on February 6, 2007 for
NDX options. The Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change does not
raise any new regulatory issues. The
Commission agrees and, consistent with
the protection of investors and the
public interest, has determined to waive
the 30-day operative date, which
renders the proposal effective on
January 30, 2007 for XEO options and
on February 6, 2007 for NDX options.12
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2007–09 on the
subject line.
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2007–09. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying
at the principal office of the CBOE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2007–09 and should
be submitted on or before March 8,
2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–2612 Filed 2–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Paper Comments
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
11 Id. Rule 19b–4(f)(6) also requires the selfregulatory organization to give the Commission
notice of its intention to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of
the proposed rule change, at leave five business
days prior to the date of filing the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time designated by the
Commission. CBOE has satisfied the five-day
prefiling requirement.
12 For purposes only of accelerating the operative
date of this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55269; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2006–050]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change
as Modified by Amendment No. 3
Thereto Adopting Generic Listing
Standards for Exchange-Traded Funds
Based on International or Global
Indexes or Indexes Described in
Exchange Rules Previously Approved
by the Commission as Underlying
Benchmarks for Derivative Securities
February 9, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on November 28, 2006, The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by Nasdaq.
On November 28, 2006, Nasdaq filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposal. On
January 29, 2007, Nasdaq filed
Amendment No. 2 to the proposal. On
February 9, 2007, Nasdaq filed
Amendment No. 3 to the proposal. This
order provides notice of the proposal, as
amended, and approves the proposal on
an accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to revise its listing
standards to include generic listing
standards for series of portfolio
depository receipts (‘‘PDRs’’) and index
fund shares (‘‘IFSs’’) (PDRs and IFSs
together referred to as ‘‘exchange-traded
funds’’ or ‘‘ETFs’’) that are based on
international or global indexes or on
indexes described in exchange rules that
have been previously approved by the
Commission for the trading of ETFs or
other specified index-based securities.
The text of the proposed rule change is
available at Nasdaq, from the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and on Nasdaq’s Web site (https://
www.nasdaq.com).
1 15
13 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 17
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
15FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Notices
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
Nasdaq included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item III below. Nasdaq has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Nasdaq proposes to revise its listing
standards to include generic listing
standards for series of PDRs and IFSs
that are based on international or global
indexes or on indexes described in rules
previously approved by the Commission
for the trading of ETFs or other specified
index-based securities.
This proposal would enable Nasdaq to
list and trade ETFs pursuant to Rule
19b–4(e) under the Exchange Act.3 Rule
19b–4(e) provides that the listing and
trading of a new derivative securities
product by a self-regulatory organization
(‘‘SRO’’) shall not be deemed a proposed
rule change, pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1) of Rule 19b–4, if the Commission
has approved, pursuant to Section 19(b)
of the Exchange Act, the trading rules of
the SRO procedures and listing
standards for the product class that
would include the new derivatives
securities product, and the SRO has a
surveillance program for the product
class.4
Background
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Exchange-Traded Funds
Currently, Nasdaq Rule 4420(i) allows
for the listing and trading on Nasdaq of
PDRs. PDRs represent interests in a unit
investment trust registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 5
(‘‘1940 Act’’) that holds the securities
that comprise an index or portfolio.
Nasdaq Rule 4420(j) provides standards
for listing IFSs, which are securities
issued by an open-end management
investment company registered under
the 1940 Act and based on a portfolio
3 17
CFR 240.19b–4(e).
4 When relying on Rule 19b–4(e), the SRO must
submit Form 19b–4(e) to the Commission within
five business days after it begins trading the new
derivative securities products. See 17 CFR 240.19b–
4(e)(2)(ii).
5 15 U.S.C. 80a.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
of stocks that seeks to provide
investment results that correspond
generally to the price and yield
performance of a specified foreign or
domestic stock index. Pursuant to these
rules, PDRs and IFSs, eligible for listing
on Nasdaq, must be issued in a specified
aggregate minimum number in return
for a deposit of specified securities and/
or a cash amount, with a value equal to
the next determined net asset value
(‘‘NAV’’). When aggregated in the same
specified minimum number, PDRs or
IFSs must be redeemed by the issuer for
the securities and/or cash, with a value
equal to the next determined NAV. The
NAV is calculated once a day after the
close of the regular trading day.
To meet the investment objective of
providing investment returns that
correspond to the price and the
dividend and yield performance of the
underlying index, an ETF may use a
‘‘replication’’ strategy or a
‘‘representative sampling’’ strategy with
respect to the ETF portfolio.6 An ETF
using a replication strategy will invest
in each stock of the underlying index in
about the same proportion as that stock
is represented in the index itself. An
ETF using a representative sampling
strategy will generally invest in a
significant number but not all of the
component securities of the underlying
index, and will hold stocks that, in the
aggregate, are intended to approximate
the full index in terms of key
characteristics, such as price/earnings
ratio, earnings growth, and dividend
yield. In addition, an ETF portfolio may
be adjusted in accordance with changes
in the composition of the underlying
index or to maintain compliance with
requirements applicable to a regulated
investment company under the Internal
Revenue Code.
Generic Listing Standards for ExchangeTraded Funds
Nasdaq currently does not have
generic listing standards for ETFs that
are based on international or global
indexes or on previously approved
indexes, but systems operated by
Nasdaq and its affiliates currently trade
such ETFs on an over-the-counter basis
as facilities of NASD. Nasdaq proposes
that after Nasdaq begins to operate as an
exchange for trading securities not listed
on Nasdaq, it would continue trading
such ETFs pursuant to unlisted trading
6 In either case, an ETF, by its terms, may be
considered invested in the securities of the
underlying index to the extent the ETF invests in
sponsored American Depository Receipts (‘‘ADRs’’),
Global Depository Receipts (‘‘GDRs’’), or European
Depository Receipts (‘‘EDRs’’) that trade on
exchanges with last-sale reporting representing
securities in the underlying index.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7491
privileges (‘‘UTP’’) in much the same
manner as they are being traded
currently. Nasdaq also proposes to
makes its facilities available for listing
these ETFs.
The Commission recently approved
generic listing standards of the
American Stock Exchange pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(e) under the Exchange Act
for ETFs based on international or
global indexes, as well as on indexes
described in exchange rule changes that
have been previously approved by the
Commission under Section 19(b)(2) of
the Exchange Act for the trading of ETFs
or other index-based securities. Nasdaq
believes that approval of its comparable
generic listing standards and applying
Rule 19b–4(e) should fulfill the
intended objective of that rule by
allowing those ETFs that currently trade
on Nasdaq systems to continue trading
on Nasdaq as an exchange, without the
need for the public comment period and
Commission approval. The proposed
rules have the potential to reduce the
time frame for bringing ETFs to market,
thereby reducing the burdens on issuers
and other market participants. The
failure of a particular ETF to comply
with the proposed generic listing
standards under Rule 19b–4(e) would
not, however, preclude Nasdaq from
submitting a separate filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) requesting Commission
approval to list a particular ETF.
Requirements for Listing and Trading
ETFs Based on International and Global
Indexes or Previously Approved Indexes
ETFs that are listed pursuant to the
proposed generic listing standards or
that are traded UTP would be traded, in
all other respects, under Nasdaq’s
existing trading rules and procedures
that apply to ETFs and would be
covered under Nasdaq’s surveillance
program for ETFs. To list a PDR or an
IFS pursuant to the proposed generic
listing standards for international and
global indexes, the index underlying the
PDR or IFS must satisfy all the
conditions contained in the proposed
amendments to Rule 4420(i) (for PDRs)
or Rule 4420(j) (for IFSs). As with the
existing generic standards for ETFs
based on domestic indexes, these
generic listing standards are intended to
ensure that stocks with substantial
market capitalization and trading
volume account for a substantial portion
of the weight of an index or portfolio.
While the standards in this proposal are
based on the standards contained in the
current generic listing standards for
ETFs based on domestic indexes, they
have been adapted as appropriate to
apply to international and global
indexes.
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
7492
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Notices
As proposed, the definition section of
each of Rule 4420(i) and (j) would be
revised to include definitions of U.S.
Component Stock and Non-U.S.
Component Stock. These new
definitions would provide the basis for
the standards for indexes with either
domestic or international stocks, or a
combination of both. A ‘‘Non-U.S.
Component Stock’’ would mean an
equity security: (1) That is not registered
under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the
Exchange Act; 7 (2) that is issued by an
entity that is not organized, domiciled,
or incorporated in the United States;
and (3) that is issued by an entity that
is an operating company (including a
real estate investment trust (REIT) or
income trust, but excluding an
investment trust, unit trust, mutual
fund, or derivative). This definition is
designed to create a category of
component stocks that are issued by
companies that are not based in the
United States, are not subject to
oversight through Commission
registration, and would include
sponsored GDRs and EDRs. A ‘‘U.S.
Component Stock’’ would mean an
equity security that is registered under
Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange
Act or an ADR, the underlying equity
security of which is registered under
Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange
Act. An ADR with an underlying equity
security that is registered pursuant to
the Exchange Act is considered a U.S.
Component Stock because the issuer of
that security is subject to Commission
jurisdiction and must comply with
Commission rules.
Nasdaq proposes that, to list a PDR or
an IFS based on an international or
global index or portfolio pursuant to the
generic listing standards, such index or
portfolio must meet the following
criteria:
• Component stocks that in the
aggregate account for at least 90% of the
weight of the index or portfolio each
shall have a minimum market value of
at least $100 million;
• Component stocks representing at
least 90% of the weight of the index or
portfolio each shall have a minimum
worldwide monthly trading volume
during each of the last six months of at
least 250,000 shares;
• The most heavily weighted
component stock may not exceed 25%
of the weight of the index or portfolio
and the five most heavily weighted
component stocks may not exceed 60%
of the weight of the index or portfolio;
• The index or portfolio shall include
a minimum of 20 component stocks;
and
7
15 U.S.C. 78l(b) or (g).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Each U.S. Component Stock in the
index or portfolio shall be listed on a
national securities exchange and an
NMS stock as defined in Rule 600 of
Regulation NMS under the Exchange
Act, and each Non-U.S. Component
Stock in the index or portfolio shall be
listed on an exchange that has last-sale
reporting.
Nasdaq believes that these proposed
standards are reasonable for
international and global indexes, and,
when applied in conjunction with the
other listing requirements, would result
in the listing and trading on Nasdaq of
ETFs that are sufficiently broad-based in
scope and not readily susceptible to
manipulation. Nasdaq also believes that
the proposed standards would result in
ETFs that are adequately diversified in
weighting for any single security or
small group of securities to significantly
reduce concerns that trading in an ETF
based on an international or global
index could become a surrogate for the
trading of securities not registered in the
United States.
Nasdaq further notes that, while these
standards are similar to those for
indexes that include only U.S.
Component Stocks, they differ in certain
important respects and are generally
more restrictive, reflecting greater
concerns over portfolio diversification
with respect to ETFs investing in
components that are not individually
registered with the Commission. First,
in the proposed standards, component
stocks that in the aggregate account for
at least 90% of the weight of the index
or portfolio each shall have a minimum
market value of at least $100 million,
compared to a minimum market value
of at least $75 million for indexes with
only U.S. Component Stocks.8 Second,
in the proposed standards, the most
heavily weighted component stock
cannot exceed 25% of the weight of the
index or portfolio, in contrast to a 30%
standard for an index or portfolio
comprised of only U.S. Component
Stocks. Third, in the proposed
standards, the five most heavily
weighted component stocks shall not
exceed 60% of the weight of the index
or portfolio, compared to a 65%
standard for indexes comprised of only
U.S. Component Stocks. Fourth, the
minimum number of stocks in the
proposed standards is 20, in contrast to
a minimum of 13 in the standards for an
index or portfolio with only U.S.
Component Stocks. Finally, the
proposed standards require that each
Non-U.S. Component Stock included in
8 Market
value is calculated by multiplying the
total shares outstanding by the price per share of
the component stock.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the index or portfolio be listed and
traded on an exchange that has last-sale
reporting.
Nasdaq also proposes to modify Rules
4420(i) and (j) to require that the index
value for an ETF listed pursuant to the
proposed standards for international
and global indexes be widely
disseminated by one or more major
market data vendors at least every 60
seconds during the time when the ETF
shares trade on Nasdaq. If the index
value does not change during some or
all of the period when trading is
occurring on Nasdaq, the last official
calculated index value must remain
available throughout Nasdaq’s trading
hours. In contrast, the index value for an
ETF listed pursuant to the existing
standards for domestic indexes must be
disseminated at least every 15 seconds
during the trading day. This
modification reflects limitations, in
some instances, on the frequency of
intra-day trading information with
respect to Non-U.S. Component Stocks
and that, in many cases, trading hours
for overseas markets overlap only in
part, or not at all, with Nasdaq’s trading
hours.
In addition, Rules 4420(i) and (j)
would be modified to define the term
‘‘Intraday Indicative Value’’ (‘‘IIV’’) as
the estimate of the value of a share of
each ETF that is updated at least every
15 seconds during regular market hours
and during any pre-market trading
session for the ETF.9 Nasdaq also
proposes to clarify in these rules that
the IIV would be updated at least every
15 seconds during regular market hours
and during any pre-market trading
session for the ETF to reflect changes in
the exchange rate between the U.S.
dollar and the currency in which any
component stock is denominated. If the
IIV does not change during some or all
of the period when trading is occurring
on Nasdaq, then the last official
calculated IIV must remain available
throughout Nasdaq’s trading hours.
Nasdaq is proposing that it may
designate an ETF for trading during its
pre-market session and/or its postmarket session as long as the index
value and IIV dissemination
requirements of Nasdaq Rules
4420(i)(3)(B)(iii) and 4420(i)(3)(C) and
4420(j)(3)(B)(iii) and 4420(j)(3)(C) are
met. If there is no overlap with the
trading hours of the primary market
trading the underlying components of
an ETF, Nasdaq may designate the ETF
for pre-market trading as long as the last
9 Nasdaq’s regular market hours are 9:30 a.m. to
4 p.m. or 4:15 p.m. Eastern Time. Its pre-market
session begins at 7 a.m. Eastern Time, and its postmarket session ends at 8 p.m. Eastern Time.
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Notices
official calculated IIV remains available.
Although the IIV does not need to be
calculated during Nasdaq’s current postmarket session, the last official
calculated IIV must also remain
available during such post-market
trading session.
Nasdaq is also proposing to add
provisions regarding the creation and
redemption process for ETFs and
compliance with federal securities laws
for ETFs listed pursuant to the new
generic listing standards. These new
provisions would require that the
statutory prospectus or the application
for exemption from provisions of the
1940 Act for the ETF being listed
pursuant to these new standards must
state that the ETF must comply with the
federal securities laws in accepting
securities for deposits and satisfying
redemptions with redemption
securities, including that the securities
accepted for deposits and the securities
used to satisfy redemption requests are
sold in transactions that would be
exempt from registration under the
Securities Act of 1933.
Nasdaq also proposes to include, in
the generic standards for the listing of
PDRs and IFSs, indexes that have been
approved by the Commission in
connection with the listing of options,
PDRs, IFSs, index-linked exchangeable
notes, or index-linked securities.
Nasdaq believes that the application of
that standard to ETFs is appropriate
because the underlying index would
have been subject to detailed and
specific Commission review in the
context of the approval of listing of
those other derivatives. This new
generic standard would be limited to
stock indexes and would require that
each component stock be either: (1) A
U.S. Component Stock that is listed on
a national securities exchange and is an
NMS stock as defined in Rule 600 of
Regulation NMS; or (2) a Non-U.S.
Component Stock that is listed and
traded on an exchange that has last-sale
reporting.
Nasdaq represents that its
surveillance procedures are adequate to
properly monitor the trading of the
PDRs and IFSs that would be listed
pursuant to the proposed new listing
standards or traded on a UTP basis.
Specifically, Nasdaq would rely on its
existing surveillance procedures
governing PDRs and IFSs. Nasdaq has a
general policy prohibiting the
distribution of material, non-public
information by its employees. It should
also be noted that, as provided by
existing Nasdaq Rule 4420, Nasdaq
would commence delisting proceedings
for an ETF if the value of the underlying
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
index or portfolio is no longer
calculated or available.
Nasdaq also proposes to modify the
initial and continued listing standards
relating to disseminated information
relating to ETFs to formalize in the rules
existing best practices for providing
equal access to material information
about the value of ETFs. Prior to
approving an ETF for listing, Nasdaq
would obtain a representation from the
ETF issuer that the NAV per share
would be calculated daily and made
available to all market participants at
the same time. With regard to trading
halts, the proposed rules specifically set
out that if the IIV or the index value
applicable to an ETF that Nasdaq lists
is not being disseminated as required,
Nasdaq may halt trading during the day
in which the interruption to the
dissemination of the IIV or the index
value occurs. If the interruption to the
dissemination of the IIV or the index
value persists past the trading day in
which it occurred, Nasdaq would halt
trading no later than the beginning of
the trading day following the
interruption. The rule change would
also include language providing that
Nasdaq has discretion to halt trading in
a series of PDRs or IFSs based on a
consideration of the following factors:
(1) Trading in securities comprising the
underlying index applicable to that
series has been halted in the primary
market(s); (2) the extent to which
trading has ceased in securities
underlying the index; or (3) the
presence of other unusual conditions or
circumstances detrimental to the
maintenance of a fair and orderly
market.10
With respect to PDRs, IFSs, and other
‘‘Derivative Securities Products’’ 11 that
Nasdaq trades on a UTP basis, Nasdaq
is adopting a new trade halt provision
to reflect the scope of Nasdaq’s
deference to trading halts called by the
10 Nasdaq notes that the new language is
reflective of Nasdaq’s existing policies with regard
to trading halts of ETFs listed on Nasdaq, as
discussed in the predecessor NASD rule change to
establish listing standards for ETFs. In particular,
Nasdaq’s general policy has been to halt trading in
an ETF listed on Nasdaq when securities
accounting for 20% or more of the value of the
underlying index are halted or suspended. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45920 (May
13, 2002), 67 FR 35605 (May 20, 2002) (SR–NASD–
2002–45).
11 The term ‘‘Derivative Securities Product’’ is
defined to include a series of PDRs, IFSs, or Trust
Issued Receipts (as defined in Nasdaq Rule 4420),
a series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares (as
defined in Nasdaq Rule 4630), securities
representing interests in unit investment trusts,
investment companies, or commodity pools, or
securities representing interests in partnerships that
invest in any combination of futures contracts,
options on futures contracts, forward contracts,
commodities, and/or securities.
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7493
listing market when a ‘‘Required Value’’
relating to the product is not being
disseminated. The rule would define
Required Value as: (1) The value of any
index underlying a Derivative Securities
Product; and (2) the indicative
optimized portfolio value, intraday
indicative value, or other comparable
estimate of the value of a share of a
Derivative Securities Product updated
regularly during the trading day.
If a Derivative Securities Product
begins trading on Nasdaq in its PreMarket Session 12 and subsequently a
temporary interruption occurs in the
calculation or wide dissemination of an
applicable Required Value, Nasdaq may
continue to trade the Derivative
Securities Product for the remainder of
the Pre-Market Session. During Nasdaq’s
Regular Market Session,13 if a temporary
interruption occurs in the calculation or
wide dissemination of an applicable
Required Value with respect to a
Derivative Securities Product that
Nasdaq trades pursuant to UTP, Nasdaq,
upon notification by the listing market
of a halt due to such temporary
interruption, also shall immediately halt
trading in the Derivative Securities
Product on its market.
If an applicable Required Value
continues not to be calculated or widely
disseminated after the close of the
Regular Market Session, Nasdaq may
trade the Derivative Securities Product
in its Post-Market Session 14 only if the
listing market traded the Derivative
Securities Product until the close of its
regular trading session without a halt. If
an applicable Required Value continues
not to be calculated or widely
disseminated as of the beginning of the
Pre-Market Session on the next trading
day, Nasdaq shall not commence trading
of the Derivative Securities Product in
the pre-market session that day. If an
interruption in the calculation or wide
dissemination of a Required Value
continues, Nasdaq may resume trading
in the Derivative Securities Product
only if calculation and wide
dissemination of the applicable
Required Value resumes or trading in
the Derivative Securities Product
resumes in the listing market.
Nasdaq is also amending Rule 4420 to
stipulate that, as provided by
12 The rule defines the ‘‘Pre-Market Session’’ as
the trading session for that begins at 7 a.m. and
continues until 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.
13 The rule defines the ‘‘Regular Market Session’’
as the trading session that runs from 9:30 a.m. to
4 or 4:15 p.m. Eastern Time.
14 The rule defines the ‘‘Post-Market Session’’ as
the trading session for UTP trading that begins at
4 p.m. or 4:15 p.m., and that continues until 8 p.m.
Eastern Time.
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
7494
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Notices
Commission Rule 12f–5,15 Nasdaq may
extend unlisted trading privileges to any
security, such as PDRs or IFSs, for
which Nasdaq has in effect rules
providing for transactions in such class
or type of security. Provisions of Rule
4420 that govern trading hours and
surveillance procedures, and that relate
to information circulars and prospectus
delivery, also apply to securities traded
on a UTP basis (as do applicable trade
halt provisions of Rule 4120). Nasdaq
does not, however, apply quantitative
listing standards to securities traded on
a UTP basis. Accordingly, language in
Rule 4420(l) that could be read to
require unlisted securities to meet
Nasdaq’s quantitative listing standards
for Trust Issued Receipts in order to
trade on a UTP basis is being deleted.
Proposed rules 4420(i)(3)(B)(iv) and
(j)(3)(B)(iv) would be added to make
sure that an entity that advises index
providers or calculators and related
entities has in place procedures
designed to prevent the use and
dissemination of material non-public
information regarding the index
underlying the ETF. Finally, Nasdaq is
proposing several minor and clarifying
changes to Rules 4120 and 4420, such
as deletion of certain redundant
language, correction of typographical
errors, and clarification of the hours
during which ETFs are eligible to trade.
2. Statutory Basis
Nasdaq believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Exchange
Act,16 in general, and with Section
6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,17 in
particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Nasdaq does not believe that the
proposed rule change would result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
15 17
CFR 240.12f–5.
U.S.C. 78f.
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
Interested persons are invited to
exchange.18 In particular, the
submit written data, views, and
Commission finds that the proposal is
arguments concerning the foregoing,
consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the
including whether the proposed rule
Exchange Act 19 in that it is designed to
change is consistent with the Exchange
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
Act. Comments may be submitted by
acts and practices, to promote just and
any of the following methods:
equitable principles of trade, to foster
Electronic Comments
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
• Use the Commission’s Internet
transactions in securities, to remove
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
impediments to and perfect the
rules/sro.shtml); or
mechanism of a free and open market
• Send an e-mail to ruleand a national market system, and, in
comments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2006–050 on the general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
subject line.
Currently, Nasdaq does not have
Paper Comments
generic listing standards for ETFs based
• Send paper comments in triplicate
on international or global indexes or on
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
indexes described in exchange rules that
Securities and Exchange Commission,
have been previously approved by the
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
Commission, but systems operated by
20549–1090.
Nasdaq and its affiliates currently trade
All submissions should refer to File
such ETFs on an over-the-counter basis
Number SR–NASDAQ–2006–050. This
as facilities of NASD. After Nasdaq
file number should be included on the
begins to operate as an exchange for
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the non-Nasdaq-listed securities, Nasdaq
Commission process and review your
proposes to continue trading such ETFs
comments more efficiently, please use
pursuant to UTP in substantially the
only one method. The Commission will same manner as they trade currently
post all comments on the Commission’s and to trade additional ETFs as the
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
original listing market. Rule 19b–4(e)
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
provides that the listing and trading of
submission, all subsequent
a new derivative securities product by
amendments, all written statements
an SRO will not be deemed a proposed
with respect to the proposed rule
rule change pursuant to Rule 19b–
change that are filed with the
4(c)(1) if the Commission has approved,
Commission, and all written
pursuant to section 19(b) of the
communications relating to the
Exchange Act, the SRO’s trading rules,
proposed rule change between the
procedures, and listing standards for the
Commission and any person, other than product class that would include the
those that may be withheld from the
new derivative securities product, and
public in accordance with the
the SRO has a surveillance program for
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
the product class. Nasdaq’s proposed
available for inspection and copying in
rules for the listing and trading of ETFs
the Commission’s Public Reference
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(e) based on (1)
Room. Copies of such filing also will be Certain indexes with components that
available for inspection and copying at
include foreign securities or (2) indexes
the principal office of Nasdaq. All
or portfolios previously described in
comments received will be posted
exchange rules that have been approved
without change; the Commission does
by the Commission as underlying
not edit personal identifying
benchmarks for derivative securities,
information from submissions. You
fulfill these requirements. Use of Rule
should submit only information that
19b–4(e) by Nasdaq to list and trade
you wish to make available publicly. All such ETFs should promote competition,
submissions should refer to File
reduce burdens on issuers and other
Number SR–NASDAQ–2006–050 and
market participants, and make such
should be submitted on or before March ETFs available to investors more
8, 2007.
quickly.20
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
18 In approving this rule change, the Commission
Granting Accelerated Approval of the
notes that it has considered the proposed rule’s
Proposed Rule Change
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
III. Solicitation of Comments
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change, as
amended, is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
20 The Commission notes, however, that the
failure of a particular ETF to meet these generic
listing standards would not preclude Nasdaq from
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Notices
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
The Commission previously has
approved generic listing standards for
other exchanges, the American Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’) and the New
York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’),
that are substantially similar to those
proposed here by Nasdaq.21 This
proposal does not appear to raise any
novel regulatory issues. Therefore, the
Commission finds that Nasdaq’s
proposal is consistent with the
Exchange Act on the same basis that it
approved Amex’s and NYSE’s generic
listing standards for ETFs based on
international or global indexes or on
indexes or portfolios described in
exchange rules that have been
previously approved by the Commission
as underlying benchmarks for derivative
securities.
Proposed Nasdaq Rules
4420(i)(3)(A)(ii) and 4420(j)(3)(A)(ii)
establish standards for the composition
of an index or portfolio underlying an
ETF. These requirements are designed,
among other things, to require that
components of an index or portfolio
underlying the ETF are adequately
capitalized and sufficiently liquid, and
that no one security dominates the
index. The Commission believes that,
taken together, these standards are
reasonably designed to ensure that
securities with substantial market
capitalization and trading volume
account for a substantial portion of any
underlying index or portfolio, and with
the other applicable listing requirements
will permit the listing and trading of
ETFs that are sufficiently broad-based to
minimize potential manipulation. The
Commission further believes that the
proposed listing standards are
reasonably designed to preclude Nasdaq
from listing and trading ETFs that might
be used as surrogate for trading in
unregistered securities. The requirement
that each component security
underlying an ETF be an NMS stock (in
the case of a U.S. Component Stock) or
listed on an exchange and subject to
submitting a separate proposed rule change to list
and trade the ETF.
21 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54739
(November 9, 2006), 71 FR 66993 (November 17,
2006) (SR–Amex–2006–78) (approving generic
listing standards for ETFs based on international or
global indexes or indexes described in exchange
rules that have been previously approved by the
Commission as underlying benchmarks for
derivative securities); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 55018 (December 28, 2006), 72 FR 1040
(January 9, 2007) (SR–Amex–2006–109) (making
clarifying changes to the generic listing standards
set forth in SR–Amex–2006–78); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 55113 (January 17, 2007),
72 FR 3179 (January 24, 2007) (SR–NYSE–2006–
101) (approving generic listing standards for ETFs
based on international or global indexes or indexes
described in exchange rules that have been
previously approved by the Commission as
underlying benchmarks for derivative securities).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
last-sale reporting (in the case of a NonU.S. Component Stock) also should
contribute to the transparency of the
market for these ETFs.
The proposed generic listing
standards will permit Nasdaq to list and
trade an ETF if the Commission has
previously approved an SRO rule that
contemplates listing and trading a
derivative product based on the same
underlying index. Nasdaq would be able
to rely on that earlier approval order,
provided that: (1) The securities
comprising the underlying index consist
of U.S. Component Stocks or Non-U.S.
Component Stocks, as set forth in
proposed Nasdaq Rules 4420(i)(1)(C)
and (D) and 4420(j)(1)(C) and (D); and
(2) Nasdaq complies with the
commitments undertaken by the other
SRO set forth in the prior order,
including any surveillance-sharing
arrangements with a foreign market.
The Commission believes that
Nasdaq’s proposal is consistent with
section 11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of the Exchange
Act,22 which sets forth Congress’ finding
that it is in the public interest and
appropriate for the protection of
investors and the maintenance of fair
and orderly markets to assure the
availability to brokers, dealers, and
investors of information with respect to
quotations for and transactions in
securities. Nasdaq’s proposal requires
the value of the index or portfolio
underlying an ETF based on a global or
international index to be disseminated
at least once every 60 seconds during
Nasdaq trading hours.23 Nasdaq has
represented that, if an underlying index
or portfolio value is no longer calculated
or available, it would commence
delisting proceedings for the associated
ETF. Furthermore, these generic listing
standards provide that the issuer of an
ETF must represent that it will calculate
the NAV and make it available daily to
all market participants at the same
time.24
In addition, an IIV, which represents
an estimate of the value of a share of
each ETF, must be updated and
disseminated at least once every 15
seconds during regular market hours
and during any pre-market trading
session for the ETF. The IIV must reflect
changes in the exchange rate between
the U.S. dollar and the currency in
which any component stock is
U.S.C. 78k7–1(a)(1)(C)(iii).
proposed Nasdaq Rules 4420(i)(3)(B)(iii)(b)
and (c) and 4420(j)(3)(B)(iii)(b) and (c). If an index
or portfolio value does not change for some of the
time that the ETF trades on the Exchange, the last
official calculated value must remain available
throughout Exchange trading hours.
24 See proposed Nasdaq Rules 4420(i)(6)(A)(ii)
and 4420(j)(6)(A)(ii).
7495
denominated. When there is no overlap
with the trading hours of the primary
market or markets trading the
underlying components of an ETF,
Nasdaq may trade such ETF during any
pre-market trading session without an
IIV being updated, as long as the last
official calculated IIV remains available.
Although the IIV is not calculated
during any post-market trading session,
the last official calculated IIV must also
remain available during such postmarket session. The Commission
believes that the proposed rules
regarding the dissemination of the index
value and the IIV are reasonably
designed to promote transparency in the
pricing of ETFs and thus are consistent
with the Exchange Act.
Similarly, Nasdaq’s trading halt rules
are reasonably designed to prevent
trading in an ETF when transparency
cannot be assured. Proposed Nasdaq
Rule 4120(a)(9) provides that, when
Nasdaq is the listing market, Nasdaq
may halt trading when an interruption
occurs in the calculation or
dissemination of the IIV or index value
applicable to an ETF. If the interruption
continues, Nasdaq would halt trading
no later than the beginning of the next
trading day. In addition, proposed
Nasdaq Rule 4120(b) sets forth trading
halt procedures when Nasdaq trades the
ETF pursuant to UTP. This rule is
substantially similar to those recently
adopted by other exchanges and found
by the Commission to be consistent with
the Exchange Act.25
In approving this proposal, the
Commission relied on Nasdaq’s
representation that its surveillance
procedures are adequate to properly
monitor the trading of the PDRs and
IFSs listed pursuant to the proposed
new listing standards or traded on a
UTP basis. This approval is conditioned
on the continuing accuracy of that
representation.
Acceleration
The Commission finds good cause for
approving the proposed rule change, as
amended, prior to the 30th day after the
date of publication of the notice of filing
thereof in the Federal Register. The
Commission notes that Nasdaq’s
proposal is substantially similar to
Amex and NYSE proposals that have
been approved by the Commission.26
22 15
23 See
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34; NYSE Rule
1100(f)(2); Securities Exchange Act Release No.
54997 (December 21, 2006), 71 FR 78501 (December
29, 2006) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–77); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 55113 (January 17, 2007),
72 FR 3179 (January 24, 2007) (SR–NYSE–2006–
101).
26 See supra note 21.
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
7496
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 31 / Thursday, February 15, 2007 / Notices
The Commission does not believe that
Nasdaq’s proposal raises any novel
regulatory issues and, therefore, that
good cause exists for approving the
filing before the conclusion of a noticeand-comment period. Accelerated
approval of the proposal will expedite
the listing and trading of additional
ETFs by Nasdaq, subject to consistent
and reasonable standards. Furthermore,
accelerated approval of this proposal
will facilitate Nasdaq’s ability to
continue trading certain non-Nasdaqlisted ETFs as Nasdaq becomes an
exchange with respect to non-Nasdaqlisted securities, where there appears to
be no regulatory concerns about such
trading. Therefore, the Commission
finds good cause, consistent with
section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,27
to approve the proposed rule change, as
amended, on an accelerated basis.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,28
that the proposed rule change (SR–
NASDAQ–2006–050), as amended, be,
and it hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.29
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–2664 Filed 2–14–07; 8:45 am]
A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
02/01/2007, Private Non-Profit
organizations that provide essential
services of a governmental nature may
file disaster loan applications at the
address listed above or other locally
announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties:
Adair, Atoka, Bryan, Cherokee, Coal,
Cotton, Craig, Delaware, Haskell,
Hughes, Johnston, Latimer, Mayes,
Mcintosh, Muskogee, Okfuskee,
Okmulgee, Ottawa, Pittsburg,
Seminole, Sequoyah, Wagoner
The Interest Rates are:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Percent
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available
Elsewhere .................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .........................
5.250
4.000
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
02/01/2007, Private Non-Profit
organizations that provide essential
services of a governmental nature may
file disaster loan applications at the
address listed above or other locally
announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties:
Beaver, Cimarron, Texas
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available
Elsewhere .................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .........................
5.250
4.000
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 10803.
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 10804.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration # 10804]
Oklahoma Disaster # OK–00010
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–2659 Filed 2–14–07; 8:45 am]
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator, for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–2657 Filed 2–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of Oklahoma (FEMA–1678–
DR), dated 02/01/2007.
Incident: Severe Winter Storms.
Incident Period: 01/12/2007 through
01/26/2007.
Effective Date: 02/01/2007.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 04/02/2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
27 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
28 Id.
29 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Feb 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
[Public Notice 5697]
[Disaster Declaration # 10803]
AGENCY:
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: International Sports
Programming Initiative
SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of Oklahoma (FEMA–1677–
DR), dated 02/01/2007.
Incident: Severe Winter Storm.
Incident Period: 12/28/2006 through
12/30/2006.
Effective Date: 02/01/2007.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 04/02/2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/WHA–EAP–07–26.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Application Deadline:
April 6, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs
announces an open competition for the
International Sports Programming
Initiative. Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit
Oklahoma Disaster # OK–00009
U.S. Small Business
Administration
ACTION: Notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 31 (Thursday, February 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7490-7496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2664]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55269; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2006-050]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed
Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No. 3 Thereto Adopting Generic
Listing Standards for Exchange-Traded Funds Based on International or
Global Indexes or Indexes Described in Exchange Rules Previously
Approved by the Commission as Underlying Benchmarks for Derivative
Securities
February 9, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby
given that on November 28, 2006, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(``Nasdaq'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by Nasdaq. On
November 28, 2006, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposal. On
January 29, 2007, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposal. On
February 9, 2007, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 3 to the proposal. This
order provides notice of the proposal, as amended, and approves the
proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to revise its listing standards to include generic
listing standards for series of portfolio depository receipts
(``PDRs'') and index fund shares (``IFSs'') (PDRs and IFSs together
referred to as ``exchange-traded funds'' or ``ETFs'') that are based on
international or global indexes or on indexes described in exchange
rules that have been previously approved by the Commission for the
trading of ETFs or other specified index-based securities. The text of
the proposed rule change is available at Nasdaq, from the Commission's
Public Reference Room, and on Nasdaq's Web site (https://
www.nasdaq.com).
[[Page 7491]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Nasdaq proposes to revise its listing standards to include generic
listing standards for series of PDRs and IFSs that are based on
international or global indexes or on indexes described in rules
previously approved by the Commission for the trading of ETFs or other
specified index-based securities.
This proposal would enable Nasdaq to list and trade ETFs pursuant
to Rule 19b-4(e) under the Exchange Act.\3\ Rule 19b-4(e) provides that
the listing and trading of a new derivative securities product by a
self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') shall not be deemed a proposed
rule change, pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of Rule 19b-4, if the
Commission has approved, pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act,
the trading rules of the SRO procedures and listing standards for the
product class that would include the new derivatives securities
product, and the SRO has a surveillance program for the product
class.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(e).
\4\ When relying on Rule 19b-4(e), the SRO must submit Form 19b-
4(e) to the Commission within five business days after it begins
trading the new derivative securities products. See 17 CFR 240.19b-
4(e)(2)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
Exchange-Traded Funds
Currently, Nasdaq Rule 4420(i) allows for the listing and trading
on Nasdaq of PDRs. PDRs represent interests in a unit investment trust
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 \5\ (``1940 Act'')
that holds the securities that comprise an index or portfolio. Nasdaq
Rule 4420(j) provides standards for listing IFSs, which are securities
issued by an open-end management investment company registered under
the 1940 Act and based on a portfolio of stocks that seeks to provide
investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield
performance of a specified foreign or domestic stock index. Pursuant to
these rules, PDRs and IFSs, eligible for listing on Nasdaq, must be
issued in a specified aggregate minimum number in return for a deposit
of specified securities and/or a cash amount, with a value equal to the
next determined net asset value (``NAV''). When aggregated in the same
specified minimum number, PDRs or IFSs must be redeemed by the issuer
for the securities and/or cash, with a value equal to the next
determined NAV. The NAV is calculated once a day after the close of the
regular trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 80a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To meet the investment objective of providing investment returns
that correspond to the price and the dividend and yield performance of
the underlying index, an ETF may use a ``replication'' strategy or a
``representative sampling'' strategy with respect to the ETF
portfolio.\6\ An ETF using a replication strategy will invest in each
stock of the underlying index in about the same proportion as that
stock is represented in the index itself. An ETF using a representative
sampling strategy will generally invest in a significant number but not
all of the component securities of the underlying index, and will hold
stocks that, in the aggregate, are intended to approximate the full
index in terms of key characteristics, such as price/earnings ratio,
earnings growth, and dividend yield. In addition, an ETF portfolio may
be adjusted in accordance with changes in the composition of the
underlying index or to maintain compliance with requirements applicable
to a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In either case, an ETF, by its terms, may be considered
invested in the securities of the underlying index to the extent the
ETF invests in sponsored American Depository Receipts (``ADRs''),
Global Depository Receipts (``GDRs''), or European Depository
Receipts (``EDRs'') that trade on exchanges with last-sale reporting
representing securities in the underlying index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generic Listing Standards for Exchange-Traded Funds
Nasdaq currently does not have generic listing standards for ETFs
that are based on international or global indexes or on previously
approved indexes, but systems operated by Nasdaq and its affiliates
currently trade such ETFs on an over-the-counter basis as facilities of
NASD. Nasdaq proposes that after Nasdaq begins to operate as an
exchange for trading securities not listed on Nasdaq, it would continue
trading such ETFs pursuant to unlisted trading privileges (``UTP'') in
much the same manner as they are being traded currently. Nasdaq also
proposes to makes its facilities available for listing these ETFs.
The Commission recently approved generic listing standards of the
American Stock Exchange pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e) under the Exchange
Act for ETFs based on international or global indexes, as well as on
indexes described in exchange rule changes that have been previously
approved by the Commission under Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act
for the trading of ETFs or other index-based securities. Nasdaq
believes that approval of its comparable generic listing standards and
applying Rule 19b-4(e) should fulfill the intended objective of that
rule by allowing those ETFs that currently trade on Nasdaq systems to
continue trading on Nasdaq as an exchange, without the need for the
public comment period and Commission approval. The proposed rules have
the potential to reduce the time frame for bringing ETFs to market,
thereby reducing the burdens on issuers and other market participants.
The failure of a particular ETF to comply with the proposed generic
listing standards under Rule 19b-4(e) would not, however, preclude
Nasdaq from submitting a separate filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
requesting Commission approval to list a particular ETF.
Requirements for Listing and Trading ETFs Based on International and
Global Indexes or Previously Approved Indexes
ETFs that are listed pursuant to the proposed generic listing
standards or that are traded UTP would be traded, in all other
respects, under Nasdaq's existing trading rules and procedures that
apply to ETFs and would be covered under Nasdaq's surveillance program
for ETFs. To list a PDR or an IFS pursuant to the proposed generic
listing standards for international and global indexes, the index
underlying the PDR or IFS must satisfy all the conditions contained in
the proposed amendments to Rule 4420(i) (for PDRs) or Rule 4420(j) (for
IFSs). As with the existing generic standards for ETFs based on
domestic indexes, these generic listing standards are intended to
ensure that stocks with substantial market capitalization and trading
volume account for a substantial portion of the weight of an index or
portfolio. While the standards in this proposal are based on the
standards contained in the current generic listing standards for ETFs
based on domestic indexes, they have been adapted as appropriate to
apply to international and global indexes.
[[Page 7492]]
As proposed, the definition section of each of Rule 4420(i) and (j)
would be revised to include definitions of U.S. Component Stock and
Non-U.S. Component Stock. These new definitions would provide the basis
for the standards for indexes with either domestic or international
stocks, or a combination of both. A ``Non-U.S. Component Stock'' would
mean an equity security: (1) That is not registered under Section 12(b)
or 12(g) of the Exchange Act; \7\ (2) that is issued by an entity that
is not organized, domiciled, or incorporated in the United States; and
(3) that is issued by an entity that is an operating company (including
a real estate investment trust (REIT) or income trust, but excluding an
investment trust, unit trust, mutual fund, or derivative). This
definition is designed to create a category of component stocks that
are issued by companies that are not based in the United States, are
not subject to oversight through Commission registration, and would
include sponsored GDRs and EDRs. A ``U.S. Component Stock'' would mean
an equity security that is registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of
the Exchange Act or an ADR, the underlying equity security of which is
registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act. An ADR
with an underlying equity security that is registered pursuant to the
Exchange Act is considered a U.S. Component Stock because the issuer of
that security is subject to Commission jurisdiction and must comply
with Commission rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(b) or (g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasdaq proposes that, to list a PDR or an IFS based on an
international or global index or portfolio pursuant to the generic
listing standards, such index or portfolio must meet the following
criteria:
Component stocks that in the aggregate account for at
least 90% of the weight of the index or portfolio each shall have a
minimum market value of at least $100 million;
Component stocks representing at least 90% of the weight
of the index or portfolio each shall have a minimum worldwide monthly
trading volume during each of the last six months of at least 250,000
shares;
The most heavily weighted component stock may not exceed
25% of the weight of the index or portfolio and the five most heavily
weighted component stocks may not exceed 60% of the weight of the index
or portfolio;
The index or portfolio shall include a minimum of 20
component stocks; and
Each U.S. Component Stock in the index or portfolio shall
be listed on a national securities exchange and an NMS stock as defined
in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act, and each Non-U.S.
Component Stock in the index or portfolio shall be listed on an
exchange that has last-sale reporting.
Nasdaq believes that these proposed standards are reasonable for
international and global indexes, and, when applied in conjunction with
the other listing requirements, would result in the listing and trading
on Nasdaq of ETFs that are sufficiently broad-based in scope and not
readily susceptible to manipulation. Nasdaq also believes that the
proposed standards would result in ETFs that are adequately diversified
in weighting for any single security or small group of securities to
significantly reduce concerns that trading in an ETF based on an
international or global index could become a surrogate for the trading
of securities not registered in the United States.
Nasdaq further notes that, while these standards are similar to
those for indexes that include only U.S. Component Stocks, they differ
in certain important respects and are generally more restrictive,
reflecting greater concerns over portfolio diversification with respect
to ETFs investing in components that are not individually registered
with the Commission. First, in the proposed standards, component stocks
that in the aggregate account for at least 90% of the weight of the
index or portfolio each shall have a minimum market value of at least
$100 million, compared to a minimum market value of at least $75
million for indexes with only U.S. Component Stocks.\8\ Second, in the
proposed standards, the most heavily weighted component stock cannot
exceed 25% of the weight of the index or portfolio, in contrast to a
30% standard for an index or portfolio comprised of only U.S. Component
Stocks. Third, in the proposed standards, the five most heavily
weighted component stocks shall not exceed 60% of the weight of the
index or portfolio, compared to a 65% standard for indexes comprised of
only U.S. Component Stocks. Fourth, the minimum number of stocks in the
proposed standards is 20, in contrast to a minimum of 13 in the
standards for an index or portfolio with only U.S. Component Stocks.
Finally, the proposed standards require that each Non-U.S. Component
Stock included in the index or portfolio be listed and traded on an
exchange that has last-sale reporting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Market value is calculated by multiplying the total shares
outstanding by the price per share of the component stock.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasdaq also proposes to modify Rules 4420(i) and (j) to require
that the index value for an ETF listed pursuant to the proposed
standards for international and global indexes be widely disseminated
by one or more major market data vendors at least every 60 seconds
during the time when the ETF shares trade on Nasdaq. If the index value
does not change during some or all of the period when trading is
occurring on Nasdaq, the last official calculated index value must
remain available throughout Nasdaq's trading hours. In contrast, the
index value for an ETF listed pursuant to the existing standards for
domestic indexes must be disseminated at least every 15 seconds during
the trading day. This modification reflects limitations, in some
instances, on the frequency of intra-day trading information with
respect to Non-U.S. Component Stocks and that, in many cases, trading
hours for overseas markets overlap only in part, or not at all, with
Nasdaq's trading hours.
In addition, Rules 4420(i) and (j) would be modified to define the
term ``Intraday Indicative Value'' (``IIV'') as the estimate of the
value of a share of each ETF that is updated at least every 15 seconds
during regular market hours and during any pre-market trading session
for the ETF.\9\ Nasdaq also proposes to clarify in these rules that the
IIV would be updated at least every 15 seconds during regular market
hours and during any pre-market trading session for the ETF to reflect
changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the currency
in which any component stock is denominated. If the IIV does not change
during some or all of the period when trading is occurring on Nasdaq,
then the last official calculated IIV must remain available throughout
Nasdaq's trading hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Nasdaq's regular market hours are 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. or
4:15 p.m. Eastern Time. Its pre-market session begins at 7 a.m.
Eastern Time, and its post-market session ends at 8 p.m. Eastern
Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasdaq is proposing that it may designate an ETF for trading during
its pre-market session and/or its post-market session as long as the
index value and IIV dissemination requirements of Nasdaq Rules
4420(i)(3)(B)(iii) and 4420(i)(3)(C) and 4420(j)(3)(B)(iii) and
4420(j)(3)(C) are met. If there is no overlap with the trading hours of
the primary market trading the underlying components of an ETF, Nasdaq
may designate the ETF for pre-market trading as long as the last
[[Page 7493]]
official calculated IIV remains available. Although the IIV does not
need to be calculated during Nasdaq's current post-market session, the
last official calculated IIV must also remain available during such
post-market trading session.
Nasdaq is also proposing to add provisions regarding the creation
and redemption process for ETFs and compliance with federal securities
laws for ETFs listed pursuant to the new generic listing standards.
These new provisions would require that the statutory prospectus or the
application for exemption from provisions of the 1940 Act for the ETF
being listed pursuant to these new standards must state that the ETF
must comply with the federal securities laws in accepting securities
for deposits and satisfying redemptions with redemption securities,
including that the securities accepted for deposits and the securities
used to satisfy redemption requests are sold in transactions that would
be exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933.
Nasdaq also proposes to include, in the generic standards for the
listing of PDRs and IFSs, indexes that have been approved by the
Commission in connection with the listing of options, PDRs, IFSs,
index-linked exchangeable notes, or index-linked securities. Nasdaq
believes that the application of that standard to ETFs is appropriate
because the underlying index would have been subject to detailed and
specific Commission review in the context of the approval of listing of
those other derivatives. This new generic standard would be limited to
stock indexes and would require that each component stock be either:
(1) A U.S. Component Stock that is listed on a national securities
exchange and is an NMS stock as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS;
or (2) a Non-U.S. Component Stock that is listed and traded on an
exchange that has last-sale reporting.
Nasdaq represents that its surveillance procedures are adequate to
properly monitor the trading of the PDRs and IFSs that would be listed
pursuant to the proposed new listing standards or traded on a UTP
basis. Specifically, Nasdaq would rely on its existing surveillance
procedures governing PDRs and IFSs. Nasdaq has a general policy
prohibiting the distribution of material, non-public information by its
employees. It should also be noted that, as provided by existing Nasdaq
Rule 4420, Nasdaq would commence delisting proceedings for an ETF if
the value of the underlying index or portfolio is no longer calculated
or available.
Nasdaq also proposes to modify the initial and continued listing
standards relating to disseminated information relating to ETFs to
formalize in the rules existing best practices for providing equal
access to material information about the value of ETFs. Prior to
approving an ETF for listing, Nasdaq would obtain a representation from
the ETF issuer that the NAV per share would be calculated daily and
made available to all market participants at the same time. With regard
to trading halts, the proposed rules specifically set out that if the
IIV or the index value applicable to an ETF that Nasdaq lists is not
being disseminated as required, Nasdaq may halt trading during the day
in which the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the index
value occurs. If the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or
the index value persists past the trading day in which it occurred,
Nasdaq would halt trading no later than the beginning of the trading
day following the interruption. The rule change would also include
language providing that Nasdaq has discretion to halt trading in a
series of PDRs or IFSs based on a consideration of the following
factors: (1) Trading in securities comprising the underlying index
applicable to that series has been halted in the primary market(s); (2)
the extent to which trading has ceased in securities underlying the
index; or (3) the presence of other unusual conditions or circumstances
detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly market.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Nasdaq notes that the new language is reflective of
Nasdaq's existing policies with regard to trading halts of ETFs
listed on Nasdaq, as discussed in the predecessor NASD rule change
to establish listing standards for ETFs. In particular, Nasdaq's
general policy has been to halt trading in an ETF listed on Nasdaq
when securities accounting for 20% or more of the value of the
underlying index are halted or suspended. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 45920 (May 13, 2002), 67 FR 35605 (May 20, 2002)
(SR-NASD-2002-45).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to PDRs, IFSs, and other ``Derivative Securities
Products'' \11\ that Nasdaq trades on a UTP basis, Nasdaq is adopting a
new trade halt provision to reflect the scope of Nasdaq's deference to
trading halts called by the listing market when a ``Required Value''
relating to the product is not being disseminated. The rule would
define Required Value as: (1) The value of any index underlying a
Derivative Securities Product; and (2) the indicative optimized
portfolio value, intraday indicative value, or other comparable
estimate of the value of a share of a Derivative Securities Product
updated regularly during the trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The term ``Derivative Securities Product'' is defined to
include a series of PDRs, IFSs, or Trust Issued Receipts (as defined
in Nasdaq Rule 4420), a series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares (as
defined in Nasdaq Rule 4630), securities representing interests in
unit investment trusts, investment companies, or commodity pools, or
securities representing interests in partnerships that invest in any
combination of futures contracts, options on futures contracts,
forward contracts, commodities, and/or securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If a Derivative Securities Product begins trading on Nasdaq in its
Pre-Market Session \12\ and subsequently a temporary interruption
occurs in the calculation or wide dissemination of an applicable
Required Value, Nasdaq may continue to trade the Derivative Securities
Product for the remainder of the Pre-Market Session. During Nasdaq's
Regular Market Session,\13\ if a temporary interruption occurs in the
calculation or wide dissemination of an applicable Required Value with
respect to a Derivative Securities Product that Nasdaq trades pursuant
to UTP, Nasdaq, upon notification by the listing market of a halt due
to such temporary interruption, also shall immediately halt trading in
the Derivative Securities Product on its market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The rule defines the ``Pre-Market Session'' as the trading
session for that begins at 7 a.m. and continues until 9:30 a.m.
Eastern Time.
\13\ The rule defines the ``Regular Market Session'' as the
trading session that runs from 9:30 a.m. to 4 or 4:15 p.m. Eastern
Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If an applicable Required Value continues not to be calculated or
widely disseminated after the close of the Regular Market Session,
Nasdaq may trade the Derivative Securities Product in its Post-Market
Session \14\ only if the listing market traded the Derivative
Securities Product until the close of its regular trading session
without a halt. If an applicable Required Value continues not to be
calculated or widely disseminated as of the beginning of the Pre-Market
Session on the next trading day, Nasdaq shall not commence trading of
the Derivative Securities Product in the pre-market session that day.
If an interruption in the calculation or wide dissemination of a
Required Value continues, Nasdaq may resume trading in the Derivative
Securities Product only if calculation and wide dissemination of the
applicable Required Value resumes or trading in the Derivative
Securities Product resumes in the listing market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The rule defines the ``Post-Market Session'' as the trading
session for UTP trading that begins at 4 p.m. or 4:15 p.m., and that
continues until 8 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasdaq is also amending Rule 4420 to stipulate that, as provided by
[[Page 7494]]
Commission Rule 12f-5,\15\ Nasdaq may extend unlisted trading
privileges to any security, such as PDRs or IFSs, for which Nasdaq has
in effect rules providing for transactions in such class or type of
security. Provisions of Rule 4420 that govern trading hours and
surveillance procedures, and that relate to information circulars and
prospectus delivery, also apply to securities traded on a UTP basis (as
do applicable trade halt provisions of Rule 4120). Nasdaq does not,
however, apply quantitative listing standards to securities traded on a
UTP basis. Accordingly, language in Rule 4420(l) that could be read to
require unlisted securities to meet Nasdaq's quantitative listing
standards for Trust Issued Receipts in order to trade on a UTP basis is
being deleted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 240.12f-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rules 4420(i)(3)(B)(iv) and (j)(3)(B)(iv) would be added
to make sure that an entity that advises index providers or calculators
and related entities has in place procedures designed to prevent the
use and dissemination of material non-public information regarding the
index underlying the ETF. Finally, Nasdaq is proposing several minor
and clarifying changes to Rules 4120 and 4420, such as deletion of
certain redundant language, correction of typographical errors, and
clarification of the hours during which ETFs are eligible to trade.
2. Statutory Basis
Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Exchange Act,\16\ in general, and
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,\17\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to a free and open market and a national market system,
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change would result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2006-050 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2006-050. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of Nasdaq. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2006-050 and should be submitted on or before
March 8, 2007.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\18\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act \19\ in
that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, Nasdaq does not have generic listing standards for ETFs
based on international or global indexes or on indexes described in
exchange rules that have been previously approved by the Commission,
but systems operated by Nasdaq and its affiliates currently trade such
ETFs on an over-the-counter basis as facilities of NASD. After Nasdaq
begins to operate as an exchange for non-Nasdaq-listed securities,
Nasdaq proposes to continue trading such ETFs pursuant to UTP in
substantially the same manner as they trade currently and to trade
additional ETFs as the original listing market. Rule 19b-4(e) provides
that the listing and trading of a new derivative securities product by
an SRO will not be deemed a proposed rule change pursuant to Rule 19b-
4(c)(1) if the Commission has approved, pursuant to section 19(b) of
the Exchange Act, the SRO's trading rules, procedures, and listing
standards for the product class that would include the new derivative
securities product, and the SRO has a surveillance program for the
product class. Nasdaq's proposed rules for the listing and trading of
ETFs pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e) based on (1) Certain indexes with
components that include foreign securities or (2) indexes or portfolios
previously described in exchange rules that have been approved by the
Commission as underlying benchmarks for derivative securities, fulfill
these requirements. Use of Rule 19b-4(e) by Nasdaq to list and trade
such ETFs should promote competition, reduce burdens on issuers and
other market participants, and make such ETFs available to investors
more quickly.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Commission notes, however, that the failure of a
particular ETF to meet these generic listing standards would not
preclude Nasdaq from submitting a separate proposed rule change to
list and trade the ETF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 7495]]
The Commission previously has approved generic listing standards
for other exchanges, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'') and the
New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''), that are substantially similar
to those proposed here by Nasdaq.\21\ This proposal does not appear to
raise any novel regulatory issues. Therefore, the Commission finds that
Nasdaq's proposal is consistent with the Exchange Act on the same basis
that it approved Amex's and NYSE's generic listing standards for ETFs
based on international or global indexes or on indexes or portfolios
described in exchange rules that have been previously approved by the
Commission as underlying benchmarks for derivative securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54739 (November 9,
2006), 71 FR 66993 (November 17, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-78) (approving
generic listing standards for ETFs based on international or global
indexes or indexes described in exchange rules that have been
previously approved by the Commission as underlying benchmarks for
derivative securities); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55018
(December 28, 2006), 72 FR 1040 (January 9, 2007) (SR-Amex-2006-109)
(making clarifying changes to the generic listing standards set
forth in SR-Amex-2006-78); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55113
(January 17, 2007), 72 FR 3179 (January 24, 2007) (SR-NYSE-2006-101)
(approving generic listing standards for ETFs based on international
or global indexes or indexes described in exchange rules that have
been previously approved by the Commission as underlying benchmarks
for derivative securities).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Nasdaq Rules 4420(i)(3)(A)(ii) and 4420(j)(3)(A)(ii)
establish standards for the composition of an index or portfolio
underlying an ETF. These requirements are designed, among other things,
to require that components of an index or portfolio underlying the ETF
are adequately capitalized and sufficiently liquid, and that no one
security dominates the index. The Commission believes that, taken
together, these standards are reasonably designed to ensure that
securities with substantial market capitalization and trading volume
account for a substantial portion of any underlying index or portfolio,
and with the other applicable listing requirements will permit the
listing and trading of ETFs that are sufficiently broad-based to
minimize potential manipulation. The Commission further believes that
the proposed listing standards are reasonably designed to preclude
Nasdaq from listing and trading ETFs that might be used as surrogate
for trading in unregistered securities. The requirement that each
component security underlying an ETF be an NMS stock (in the case of a
U.S. Component Stock) or listed on an exchange and subject to last-sale
reporting (in the case of a Non-U.S. Component Stock) also should
contribute to the transparency of the market for these ETFs.
The proposed generic listing standards will permit Nasdaq to list
and trade an ETF if the Commission has previously approved an SRO rule
that contemplates listing and trading a derivative product based on the
same underlying index. Nasdaq would be able to rely on that earlier
approval order, provided that: (1) The securities comprising the
underlying index consist of U.S. Component Stocks or Non-U.S. Component
Stocks, as set forth in proposed Nasdaq Rules 4420(i)(1)(C) and (D) and
4420(j)(1)(C) and (D); and (2) Nasdaq complies with the commitments
undertaken by the other SRO set forth in the prior order, including any
surveillance-sharing arrangements with a foreign market.
The Commission believes that Nasdaq's proposal is consistent with
section 11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of the Exchange Act,\22\ which sets forth
Congress' finding that it is in the public interest and appropriate for
the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly
markets to assure the availability to brokers, dealers, and investors
of information with respect to quotations for and transactions in
securities. Nasdaq's proposal requires the value of the index or
portfolio underlying an ETF based on a global or international index to
be disseminated at least once every 60 seconds during Nasdaq trading
hours.\23\ Nasdaq has represented that, if an underlying index or
portfolio value is no longer calculated or available, it would commence
delisting proceedings for the associated ETF. Furthermore, these
generic listing standards provide that the issuer of an ETF must
represent that it will calculate the NAV and make it available daily to
all market participants at the same time.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78k7-1(a)(1)(C)(iii).
\23\ See proposed Nasdaq Rules 4420(i)(3)(B)(iii)(b) and (c) and
4420(j)(3)(B)(iii)(b) and (c). If an index or portfolio value does
not change for some of the time that the ETF trades on the Exchange,
the last official calculated value must remain available throughout
Exchange trading hours.
\24\ See proposed Nasdaq Rules 4420(i)(6)(A)(ii) and
4420(j)(6)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, an IIV, which represents an estimate of the value of a
share of each ETF, must be updated and disseminated at least once every
15 seconds during regular market hours and during any pre-market
trading session for the ETF. The IIV must reflect changes in the
exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the currency in which any
component stock is denominated. When there is no overlap with the
trading hours of the primary market or markets trading the underlying
components of an ETF, Nasdaq may trade such ETF during any pre-market
trading session without an IIV being updated, as long as the last
official calculated IIV remains available. Although the IIV is not
calculated during any post-market trading session, the last official
calculated IIV must also remain available during such post-market
session. The Commission believes that the proposed rules regarding the
dissemination of the index value and the IIV are reasonably designed to
promote transparency in the pricing of ETFs and thus are consistent
with the Exchange Act.
Similarly, Nasdaq's trading halt rules are reasonably designed to
prevent trading in an ETF when transparency cannot be assured. Proposed
Nasdaq Rule 4120(a)(9) provides that, when Nasdaq is the listing
market, Nasdaq may halt trading when an interruption occurs in the
calculation or dissemination of the IIV or index value applicable to an
ETF. If the interruption continues, Nasdaq would halt trading no later
than the beginning of the next trading day. In addition, proposed
Nasdaq Rule 4120(b) sets forth trading halt procedures when Nasdaq
trades the ETF pursuant to UTP. This rule is substantially similar to
those recently adopted by other exchanges and found by the Commission
to be consistent with the Exchange Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34; NYSE Rule 1100(f)(2);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54997 (December 21, 2006), 71 FR
78501 (December 29, 2006) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-77); Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 55113 (January 17, 2007), 72 FR 3179 (January 24,
2007) (SR-NYSE-2006-101).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In approving this proposal, the Commission relied on Nasdaq's
representation that its surveillance procedures are adequate to
properly monitor the trading of the PDRs and IFSs listed pursuant to
the proposed new listing standards or traded on a UTP basis. This
approval is conditioned on the continuing accuracy of that
representation.
Acceleration
The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule
change, as amended, prior to the 30th day after the date of publication
of the notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register. The Commission
notes that Nasdaq's proposal is substantially similar to Amex and NYSE
proposals that have been approved by the Commission.\26\
[[Page 7496]]
The Commission does not believe that Nasdaq's proposal raises any novel
regulatory issues and, therefore, that good cause exists for approving
the filing before the conclusion of a notice-and-comment period.
Accelerated approval of the proposal will expedite the listing and
trading of additional ETFs by Nasdaq, subject to consistent and
reasonable standards. Furthermore, accelerated approval of this
proposal will facilitate Nasdaq's ability to continue trading certain
non-Nasdaq-listed ETFs as Nasdaq becomes an exchange with respect to
non-Nasdaq-listed securities, where there appears to be no regulatory
concerns about such trading. Therefore, the Commission finds good
cause, consistent with section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\27\ to
approve the proposed rule change, as amended, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See supra note 21.
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act,\28\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2006-050),
as amended, be, and it hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Id.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-2664 Filed 2-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P