United Healthcare Services, Inc., Contract Administration, Chico, California; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 7088 [E7-2471]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7088
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 14, 2007 / Notices
TA–W–60,611; BMCI Rodgers Molding
Corp., A Subsidiary of Bulk Molding
Compounds, El Paso, TX.
TA–W–60,728; Hoover Universal, Inc.,
d/b/a Johnson Controls, AG
Division, Oklahoma City, OK.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–60,664; Hoffmann-La Roche,
Inc., Biopharmaceutical
Manufacturing Department, Nutley,
NJ.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PRELIMS
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–60,631; Jay-Enn Corporation,
Troy, MI.
TA–W–60,780; Cer-Tek, Inc., El Paso,
TX.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
TA–W–60,571; Caribe General Electric,
Humacao, PR.
TA–W–60,714; Extreme Tool and
Engineering, Wakefield, MI.
TA–W–60,741; E.J. Victor, Inc., Case
Goods Division, Morganton, NC.
TA–W–60,754; Page Foam Cushioned
Products, Johnstown, PA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–60,486; Alma Products Co., A/C
Compressors, Alma, MI.
TA–W–60,490; Bollag International
Corp., Greenwood, SC.
TA–W–60,516; Milliken and Company,
Kingstree Mill Division, Kingstree,
SC.
TA–W–60,530; Tower Automotive, Inc.,
Upper Sandusky, OH.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:27 Feb 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
TA–W–60,577; Dixie Regency Foam,
Division of Hickory Springs Mfg.
Co., Hickory, NC.
TA–W–60,610; Belding Hausman, Inc.,
Southampton Textiles Division,
Emporia, VA.
TA–W–60,625; Huntington Foam
Pittsburgh Corp., A Subsidiary of
Huntington Foam Corp., Mt.
Pleasant, PA.
TA–W–60,626; Baseline Tool Company,
Inc., Wawaka, IN.
TA–W–60,656; Carpenter Company,
Consumer Products Division,
Hickory, NC.
TA–W–60,775; Oxbow Machine
Products, Livonia, MI.
TA–W–60,597; Mason County Forest
Products, Shelton, WA.
TA–W–60,647; Ito Cariani Foods,
Hayward, CA.
TA–W–60,685; ACE Style Intimate
Apparel, Inc., New York, NY.
The investigation revealed that the
predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria
(a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a
foreign country under a free trade
agreement or a beneficiary country
under a preferential trade agreement, or
there has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports).
None.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–60,505; Calstar Textiles, Inc.,
Vernon, CA.
TA–W–60,529; Hospira, Inc., Shared
Services Department, Rocky Mount,
NC.
TA–W–60,606; Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer Global
Research and Development Group,
Kalamazoo, MI.
TA–W–60,651; AOL LLC, Oklahoma City
Call Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
TA–W–60,768; IDT Corporation, IDT
Telecom, Newark, NJ.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
TA–W–60,495; Dumaine Investment
Company, dba Industrial Tool and
Engineering, Warrenville, SC.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of January 22
through February 2, 2007. Copies of
these determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
during normal business hours or will be
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
Dated: February 6, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–2474 Filed 2–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,415]
United Healthcare Services, Inc.,
Contract Administration, Chico,
California; Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
United Healthcare Services, Inc.,
Contract Administration, Chico,
California. The application did not
contain new information supporting a
conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–60,415; United Healthcare Services,
Inc., Contract Administration, Chico,
California (February 7, 2007).
Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of
February 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–2471 Filed 2–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NARA is giving public notice
that the agency proposes to request
extension of a currently approved
information collection, NATF Form 36,
Microfilm Publication Order Form, used
by customers/researchers for ordering
roll(s) or microfiche of a microfilm
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2471]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-60,415]
United Healthcare Services, Inc., Contract Administration, Chico,
California; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at United Healthcare Services, Inc.,
Contract Administration, Chico, California. The application did not
contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination
was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for
reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken
facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore,
dismissal of the application was issued.
TA-W-60,415; United Healthcare Services, Inc., Contract
Administration, Chico, California (February 7, 2007).
Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of February 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-2471 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
