Clad Steel Plate from Japan; Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review (Second Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order, 4482-4483 [E7-1571]
Download as PDF
4482
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices
Dated: January 24, 2007.
Joe Meade,
Chugach National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07–407 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economics and Statistics
Administration
Measuring Innovation in the 21st
Century Economy Advisory
Committee; Notice of Public Meeting
Economics and Statistics
Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(DOC) is announcing the first meeting of
the Measuring Innovation in the 21st
Century Economy Advisory Committee.
The meeting is open to the public.
Seating at the meeting will be on a firstcome, first-served basis. Interested
parties may register on the Advisory
Committee Web site: https://
www.innovationmetrics.gov.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Thursday, February 22, 2007, from
approximately 2 p.m. to 6 p.m. On-site
sign-in begins at noon. Pre-registration
is encouraged but not required.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
the Vista Ballroom at The Wyndham
Washington Hotel, 1400 M Street, NW.,
Washington DC. The Wyndham
telephone number is 202–429–1700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth E.R. Anderson, Deputy Under
Secretary for Economic Affairs, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230: facsimile: 202–482–0432 or
Jacque Mason, ESA Communications
and Advisory Committee Liaison, Room
4855, telephone: 202–482–5641, or
online: https://
www.innovationmetrics.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5
U.S.C. App. 2, and the General Services
Administration rule on Federal
Advisory Committee Management, 41
CFR part 101–6, the Secretary of
Commerce determined that the
establishment of the Measuring
Innovation in the 21st Century Economy
Advisory Committee (the ‘‘Committee’’)
was in the public interest in connection
with the performance of duties imposed
on the Department by law.
The Committee will advise the
Secretary on new or improved measures
of innovation in the economy that will
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 Jan 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
help explain how innovation occurs in
different sectors of the economy, how it
is diffused across the economy, and how
it impacts economic growth and
productivity.
The Committee consists of fifteen
members appointed by the Secretary of
Commerce and is composed of
individuals from business and
academia. The Committee will function
solely as an advisory body, in
compliance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act. The
Charter was filed under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act.
The meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Individuals
requiring special accommodations at
this meeting including sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should contact Jacque Mason at the
address listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT at least 5 business
days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
The meeting will be videotaped and
made public on the Committee Web site
within one month after the meeting
date.
Elizabeth ‘‘E.R.’’ Anderson,
Deputy Under Secretary for Economic Affairs.
[FR Doc. 07–427 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–BS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–838]
Clad Steel Plate from Japan; Final
Results of the Expedited Sunset
Review (Second Review) of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 2, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated the second sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on clad steel plate from Japan pursuant
to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). On the
basis of a notice of intent to participate
and a complete substantive response
filed on behalf of the domestic
interested parties, and no response from
respondent interested parties, the
Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B).
As a result of this sunset review, the
Department finds that revocation of the
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nichole Zink or Brandon Farlander, AD/
CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0049 and (202)
482–0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 2, 2006, the Department
of Commerce initiated a sunset review
of the antidumping duty order on clad
steel plate from Japan pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation
of Five-year (Sunset) Reviews, 71 FR
57921 (October 2, 2006) (Notice of
Initiation). The Department received a
notice of intent to participate from the
domestic parties, Mittal Steel USA
(Mittal Steel) and United Steel, Paper
and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing,
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service
Workers International Union, AFL–CIOCLC (USW), within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).
Mittal Steel claims interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act
as a domestic manufacturer of clad steel
plate. USW claims interested party
status under section 771(9)(D) of the Act
as a certified union or recognized union
group of workers which is
representative of an industry engaged in
the manufacture, production, or
wholesale in the United States of clad
steel products.
The Department received a complete
substantive response from Mittal Steel
within the 30-day deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We did not
receive a substantive response from
respondent interested parties in this
proceeding. As a result, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(iii)(C), the
Department determined that it was
appropriate to conduct an expedited
120-day sunset review of this
antidumping duty order.
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order is all clad1
steel plate of a width of 600 millimeters
1 Cladding is the association of layers of metals
of different colors or natures by molecular
interpenetration of the surfaces in contact. This
limited diffusion is characteristic of clad products
and differentiates them from products metalized in
other manners (e.g., by normal electroplating). The
various cladding processes include pouring molten
cladding metal onto the basic metal followed by
rolling; simple hot-rolling of the cladding metal to
ensure efficient welding to the basic metal; any
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices
(mm) or more and a composite thickness
of 4.5 mm or more. Clad steel plate is
a rectangular finished steel mill product
consisting of a layer of cladding material
(usually stainless steel or nickel) which
is metallurgically bonded to a base or
backing of ferrous metal (usually carbon
or low alloy steel) where the latter
predominates by weight.
Stainless clad steel plate is
manufactured to American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM)
specifications A263 (400 series stainless
types) and A264 (300 series stainless
types). Nickel and nickel–base alloy
clad steel plate is manufactured to
ASTM specification A265. These
specifications are illustrative but not
necessarily all–inclusive.
Clad steel plate within the scope of
this order is classifiable under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) 7210.90.10.00.
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Expedited Second Sunset Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Clad
Steel Plate from Japan’’ (Decision
Memo) from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, which is hereby
adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Decision Memo include
the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the order were revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in this review and
the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum, which is on
file in room B–099 of the main
Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and electronic versions
of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
other method of deposition of superimposing of the
cladding metal followed by any mechanical or
thermal process to ensure welding (e.g.,
electrocladding), in which the cladding metal
(nickel, chromium, etc.) is applied to the basic
metal by electroplating, molecular interpenetration
of the surfaces in contact then being obtained by
heat treatment at the appropriate temperature with
subsequent cold rolling. See Harmonized
Commodity Description and Coding System
Explanatory Notes, Chapter 72, General Note (IV)
(C) (2) (e).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 Jan 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
Final Results of Review
4483
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on entries of
The Department determines that
the subject merchandise for which the
revocation of the antidumping duty
importer–specific assessment rates are
order on clad steel plate from Japan
above de minimis.
would be likely to lead to continuation
We invite interested parties to
or recurrence of dumping at the rates
comment on these preliminary results.
listed below:
Parties who submit argument in these
proceedings are requested to submit
Margin
Producers/Exporters
with the argument 1) a statement of the
(percent)
issues; 2) a brief summary of the
The Japan Steel Company .........
118.53 argument; and 3) a table of authorities
All Others ....................................
118.53 cited.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 31, 2007.
Notification regarding Administrative
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Protective Order
Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD
This notice also serves as the only
Operations, Office 7, Import
reminder to parties subject to
Administration, International Trade
administrative protective order (APO) of Administration, U.S. Department of
their responsibility concerning the
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
return or destruction of proprietary
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230,
information disclosed under APO in
telephone (202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
0649, respectively.
Timely notification of the return or
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is Background
hereby requested. Failure to comply
On February 9, 1994, the Department
with the regulations and terms of an
published the antidumping duty order
APO is a violation which is subject to
on stainless steel flanges from India. See
sanction.
Amended Final Determination and
We are issuing and publishing the
Antidumping Duty Order; Certain
results and notice in accordance with
Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
India, 59 FR 5994 (February 9, 1994).
the Act.
On February 28, 2006, we received
requests for new shipper reviews from
Dated: January 25, 2007.
Kunj Forgings Pvt. Ltd. (Kunj), Micro
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. Forge (India) Ltd. (Micro), Pradeep
Metals Limited (Pradeep), and Rollwell
[FR Doc. E7–1571 Filed 1–30–06; 8:45 am]
Forge, Ltd. (Rollwell) for the period
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
February 1, 2005, through January 31,
2006. We initiated the reviews on April
6, 2006. See Stainless Steel Flanges from
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
India: Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper
International Trade Administration
Reviews 71 FR 17439 (April 6, 2006). On
[A–533–809]
September 29, 2006, we rescinded the
Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges reviews with respect to Micro, Pradeep,
From India; Preliminary Results of New and Rollwell. See Certain Forged
Stainless Steel Flanges from India:
Shipper Review
Notice of Partial Rescission of New
AGENCY: Import Administration,
Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 27468
International Trade Administration,
(September 29, 2006).
Department of Commerce.
On October 3, 2006, we extended the
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce time limit for the preliminary results of
(the Department) is conducting a new
this new shipper review to no later than
shipper review of the antidumping duty January 25, 2007. See Stainless Steel
order on certain forged stainless steel
Flanges From India: Notice of Extension
flanges (stainless steel flanges) from
of Time Limit for the Preliminary
India manufactured by Kunj Forgings
Results of Antidumping Duty New
(Kunj). The period of review (POR)
Shipper Review, 71 FR 58372 (October
covers February 1, 2005, through
3, 2006).
January 31, 2006. We preliminarily
Scope of the Order
determine that Kunj made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
The products covered by this order
value (NV) in the United States during
are certain forged stainless steel flanges,
the POR. If these preliminary results are both finished and not finished,
adopted in the final results of this new
generally manufactured to specification
shipper review, we will instruct U.S.
ASTM A–182, and made in alloys such
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4482-4483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1571]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-838]
Clad Steel Plate from Japan; Final Results of the Expedited
Sunset Review (Second Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 2, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated the second sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on clad steel plate from Japan pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On the basis of a notice of
intent to participate and a complete substantive response filed on
behalf of the domestic interested parties, and no response from
respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited
sunset review of the antidumping duty order pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B). As a result of
this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the order
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the
levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this
notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nichole Zink or Brandon Farlander, AD/
CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0049 and (202)
482-0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 2, 2006, the Department of Commerce initiated a sunset
review of the antidumping duty order on clad steel plate from Japan
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five-year
(Sunset) Reviews, 71 FR 57921 (October 2, 2006) (Notice of Initiation).
The Department received a notice of intent to participate from the
domestic parties, Mittal Steel USA (Mittal Steel) and United Steel,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial
and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC (USW), within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). Mittal Steel claims
interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a
domestic manufacturer of clad steel plate. USW claims interested party
status under section 771(9)(D) of the Act as a certified union or
recognized union group of workers which is representative of an
industry engaged in the manufacture, production, or wholesale in the
United States of clad steel products.
The Department received a complete substantive response from Mittal
Steel within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).
We did not receive a substantive response from respondent interested
parties in this proceeding. As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(iii)(C), the Department determined that it was
appropriate to conduct an expedited 120-day sunset review of this
antidumping duty order.
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order is all clad\1\ steel plate of a width of
600 millimeters
[[Page 4483]]
(mm) or more and a composite thickness of 4.5 mm or more. Clad steel
plate is a rectangular finished steel mill product consisting of a
layer of cladding material (usually stainless steel or nickel) which is
metallurgically bonded to a base or backing of ferrous metal (usually
carbon or low alloy steel) where the latter predominates by weight.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Cladding is the association of layers of metals of different
colors or natures by molecular interpenetration of the surfaces in
contact. This limited diffusion is characteristic of clad products
and differentiates them from products metalized in other manners
(e.g., by normal electroplating). The various cladding processes
include pouring molten cladding metal onto the basic metal followed
by rolling; simple hot-rolling of the cladding metal to ensure
efficient welding to the basic metal; any other method of deposition
of superimposing of the cladding metal followed by any mechanical or
thermal process to ensure welding (e.g., electrocladding), in which
the cladding metal (nickel, chromium, etc.) is applied to the basic
metal by electroplating, molecular interpenetration of the surfaces
in contact then being obtained by heat treatment at the appropriate
temperature with subsequent cold rolling. See Harmonized Commodity
Description and Coding System Explanatory Notes, Chapter 72, General
Note (IV) (C) (2) (e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stainless clad steel plate is manufactured to American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) specifications A263 (400 series stainless
types) and A264 (300 series stainless types). Nickel and nickel-base
alloy clad steel plate is manufactured to ASTM specification A265.
These specifications are illustrative but not necessarily all-
inclusive.
Clad steel plate within the scope of this order is classifiable
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
7210.90.10.00. Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope
of this order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Second
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Clad Steel Plate from
Japan'' (Decision Memo) from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memo include the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude
of the margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can
find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on
file in room B-099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper
copy and electronic versions of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
The Department determines that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on clad steel plate from Japan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the rates listed below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
Producers/Exporters (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Japan Steel Company..................................... 118.53
All Others.................................................. 118.53
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 25, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-1571 Filed 1-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S