Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, 4529 [E7-1560]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices
Notice of Availability of a Plan
of Operations and Environmental
Assessment and Floodplain Statement
of Findings for a 30-day Public Review
at Padre Island National Seashore.
ACTION:
Dated: January 18, 2007.
Colin W. Campbell,
Superintendent, Padre Island National
Seashore.
[FR Doc. 07–414 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–CD–M
Notice is hereby given in
accordance with Section 9.52(b) of Title
36 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 9, Subpart B, of a Plan of
Operations submitted by Kindee Oil and
Gas Texas, LLC, for the DM Murdock
Deep #1 Well in Padre Island National
Seashore, Kenedy County, Texas.
Additionally, the NPS has prepared an
Environmental Assessment and
Floodplain Statement of Findings for
this proposal.
SUMMARY:
The above documents are
available for public review and
comment through March 2, 2007.
DATES:
The Plan of Operations and
Environmental Assessment are available
for public review and comment in the
Office of the Superintendent, Colin
Campbell, Padre Island National
Seashore, 20301 Park Road 22, Corpus
Christi, Texas. The documents are also
available at the Planning, Environment
and Public Comment (PEPC) Web site at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/.
ADDRESSES:
Mr.
Darrell Echols, Chief, Division of
Science and Resources Management,
Padre Island National Seashore, P.O.
Box 181300, Corpus Christi, Texas
78480–1300, Telephone: 361–949–8173,
ext. 223, e-mail at
Darrell_Echols@nps.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This
notice was first published on July 28,
2006. The documents are still available
for public review and comment. If you
wish to comment on the Plan of
Operations, Environmental Assessment,
and draft Floodplain and Wetland
Statements of Findings, you may mail
comments to the name and address
below or post comments online at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/. This
environmental assessment will be on
public review for 30 days. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 Jan 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. AA1921–197 (Second
Review); 701–TA–319, 320, 325–327, 348
and 350 (Second Review); and 731–TA–573,
574, 576, 578, 582–587, 612, and 614–618
(Second Review)]
Certain Carbon Steel Products From
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,
Finland, France, Germany, Japan,
Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania,
Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United
Kingdom
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on cut-to-length carbon steel
plate from Belgium, Brazil, Finland,
Germany, Mexico, Poland, Romania,
Spain, Sweden, and the United
Kingdom, and the antidumping finding
on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from
Taiwan, as well as revocation of
countervailing duty orders on cut-tolength carbon steel plate from Belgium,
Brazil, Mexico, Spain, and Sweden,
would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
The Commission further determines
that revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on corrosion-resistant steel from
Germany and Korea and the
countervailing duty order on corrosionresistant steel from Korea would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time. Finally, the
Commission determines that revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on
corrosion-resistant steel from Australia,
Canada, France, and Japan, as well as
the countervailing duty order on
corrosion-resistant steel from France,
would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
1 The
record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4529
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.2
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on November 1, 2005 (70 FR
62324, October 31, 2005), and
determined on February 6, 2006, that it
would conduct full reviews (70 FR
8874, February 21, 2006). Notice of the
scheduling of the Commission’s reviews
and of public hearings to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register on March 30, 2006 (71
FR 16178). The hearings were held in
Washington, DC, on October 17 and 19,
2006, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on January 25,
2007. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3899
(January 2007), entitled Certain Carbon
Steel Products from Australia, Belgium,
Brazil, Canada, Finland, France,
Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland,
Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and
the United Kingdom: Investigation Nos.
AA1921–197 (Second Review); 701–TA–
319, 320, 325–327, 348, and 350
(Second Review); and 731–TA–573, 574,
576, 578, 582–587, 612, and 614–618
(Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 25, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–1560 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1190–0006]
Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights
Section; Agency Information
Collection Activities Under Review
60-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review:
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Disability in State and Local
Government Services (Self-Evaluation).
ACTION:
The Department of Justice, Civil
Rights Division, Disability Rights
Section, will be submitting the
following information collection request
2 Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane and Stephen
Koplan dissenting with respect to corrosionresistant steel from Australia, Canada, France, and
Japan.
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 4529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1560]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. AA1921-197 (Second Review); 701-TA-319, 320, 325-
327, 348 and 350 (Second Review); and 731-TA-573, 574, 576, 578, 582-
587, 612, and 614-618 (Second Review)]
Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil,
Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland,
Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom
Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Belgium, Brazil,
Finland, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the
United Kingdom, and the antidumping finding on cut-to-length carbon
steel plate from Taiwan, as well as revocation of countervailing duty
orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Belgium, Brazil,
Mexico, Spain, and Sweden, would not be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in Sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission further determines that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from Germany and
Korea and the countervailing duty order on corrosion-resistant steel
from Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Finally, the Commission determines that revocation of
the antidumping duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from
Australia, Canada, France, and Japan, as well as the countervailing
duty order on corrosion-resistant steel from France, would not be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane and Stephen Koplan
dissenting with respect to corrosion-resistant steel from Australia,
Canada, France, and Japan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted these reviews on November 1, 2005 (70 FR
62324, October 31, 2005), and determined on February 6, 2006, that it
would conduct full reviews (70 FR 8874, February 21, 2006). Notice of
the scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of public hearings to be
held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on
March 30, 2006 (71 FR 16178). The hearings were held in Washington, DC,
on October 17 and 19, 2006, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to
the Secretary of Commerce on January 25, 2007. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3899 (January 2007),
entitled Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil,
Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland,
Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom: Investigation
Nos. AA1921-197 (Second Review); 701-TA-319, 320, 325-327, 348, and 350
(Second Review); and 731-TA-573, 574, 576, 578, 582-587, 612, and 614-
618 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 25, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-1560 Filed 1-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P