Avondale Mills, Inc., Townsend Plant, Graniteville, SC; Notice of Termination of Investigation, 4533-4534 [E7-1474]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices
furthers the law enforcement sharing
initiatives that are the basis of the RDEX
system. The RDEX system is part of the
Department’s Law Enforcement
Information Sharing Program (LEISP).
The RDEX system includes this
information to facilitate regional sharing
initiatives which serves to further the
LEISP’s principal purpose of ensuring
that criminal law enforcement
information is available for users at all
levels of government so that they can
more effectively investigate, disrupt,
and deter criminal activity, including
terrorism, and protect the national
security.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)
and (11), the public is given a 30-day
period in which to comment; and the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), which has oversight
responsibility under the Privacy Act,
requires a 40-day period in which to
conclude its review of the system.
Therefore, please submit any comments
by March 12, 2007. The public, OMB,
and Congress are invited to submit any
comments to Mary E. Cahill,
Management Analyst, Management and
Planning Staff, Justice Management
Division, United States Department of
Justice, Washington, DC, 20530–0001
(Room 1400, National Place Building),
Facsimile Number 202–307–1853.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r),
the Department is providing a report of
this modification to OMB and
appropriate Members of Congress.
Dated: January 25, 2007.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DOJ–012
SYSTEM NAME:
Department of Justice Regional Data
Exchange System (RDEX).
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
Individuals covered by this system
include individuals who are referred to
in potential or actual cases or matters of
concern to the Federal Bureau of Prisons
(BOP), the United States Marshals
Service (USMS), the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
(ATF), the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI), as well as
individuals referred to in law
enforcement information contributed by
certain state and local law enforcement
agencies that participate in the RDEX
system under memoranda of
understanding with the Department of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 Jan 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
Justice. Because the system contains
audit logs regarding queries, individuals
who use the system to conduct such
queries are also covered.
*
*
*
*
*
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
The system consists of unclassified
criminal law enforcement records
collected and produced by the BOP, the
USMS, the ATF, the DEA, the FBI, and
certain state and local law enforcement
agencies, including: investigative
reports and witness interviews from
both open and closed cases; criminal
event data (e.g., characteristics of
criminal activities and incidents that
identify links or patterns); criminal
history information (e.g., history of
arrests, nature and disposition of
criminal charges, sentencing,
confinement, and release); and
identifying information about criminal
offenders (e.g., name, address, date of
birth, birthplace, physical description).
The system also consists of audit logs
that contain information regarding
queries made of the system.
*
*
*
*
*
PURPOSE OF THE SYSTEM:
This system is maintained for the
purpose of ensuring that Department of
Justice criminal law enforcement
information is available for users at all
levels of government so that they can
more effectively investigate, disrupt,
and deter criminal activity, including
terrorism, and protect the national
security. RDEX furthers this purpose by
consolidating certain law enforcement
information from other Department of
Justice systems, as well as certain state
and local law enforcement information,
in order that it may more readily be
available for sharing with other law
enforcement entities.
*
*
*
*
*
Records in this system are maintained
and disposed of in accordance with all
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
SYSTEM MANAGERS AND ADDRESSES:
[Replace first paragraph with the
following:]
For the RDEX system generally and
for state and local information: Director,
Federal Bureau of Investigation, 935
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20535.
[Other system managers remain the
same.]
*
*
*
*
*
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Records in RDEX come directly from
the criminal law enforcement files and
records systems of the participating
Department of Justice components
(ATF, BOP, DEA, FBI, and USMS), as
well as certain state and local law
enforcement agencies participating in
the RDEX system under memoranda of
understanding with the Department of
Justice.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–1567 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FB–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,747]
Aerotek Staffing Agency, Kentwood,
MI; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on January 11, 2007 in
response to a worker petition filed by
the State Agency on behalf of workers
at Aerotek Staffing Agency, Kentwood,
Michigan, working on-site at D–M–E
Company, a subsidiary of Milacron, Inc.,
Charlevoix, Michigan.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active amended
certification (TA–W–60,301), which
expires on November 8, 2008.
Consequently, further investigation in
this case would serve no purpose, and
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
January, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–1470 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
PO 00000
4533
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,719]
Avondale Mills, Inc., Townsend Plant,
Graniteville, SC; Notice of Termination
of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on January 9, 2007, in response
to a petition filed by a State agency
representative on behalf of workers of
Avondale Mills, Inc., Townsend Plant,
Graniteville, South Carolina.
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
4534
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
further investigation in this case would
serve no purpose, and the investigation
has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day
of January, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–1474 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,409]
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Davis International, Okolona, MS;
Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application of January 2, 2007, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA).
The workers of Davis International,
Okolona, Mississippi were certified
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and denied to apply
for ATAA on December 5, 2006. The
denial notice will be soon published in
the Federal Register.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The group eligibility criteria for the
ATAA program that the Department
must consider under Section 246 of the
Trade Act are:
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 Jan 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
The initial ATAA investigation
revealed that no workers at the subject
firm were 50 years of age or older during
the relevant time period and thus
criterion (1) has not been met.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner stated that he was part of the
petitioning worker group and that he
was also over the age of 50 during the
relevant time period.
A company official was contacted to
confirm the age of all the employees of
the subject firm during the relevant time
period. The company official did
acknowledge the fact that the worker
who submitted the request for
reconsideration is over the age of 50 and
that she made a mistake omitting him
from the petitioning worker group
during the initial investigation. The
official further stated that this worker
was the only employee over the age of
50 or older at the subject firm during the
relevant time period.
When assessing eligibility for ATAA,
the Department makes its
determinations based on the
requirements as outlined in Section 222
of the Trade Act. In particular, the
Department considers the relevant
employment data for the facility where
the petitioning worker group was
employed in order to establish whether
criterion 1 has been met. For this
purpose, the term ‘‘significant number’’
means five percent of the adversely
affected workforce or 50 workers,
whichever is less, or at least three
workers in a firm with less than 50
adversely affected workers.
As the total number of workers 50
years of age or older was one employee
during the relevant period, criterion (1)
of the eligibility requirements for ATAA
has not been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC this 17th day of
January, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–1469 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,640]
National Apparel, LLC, San Francisco,
CA; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on December
19, 2006 in response to a petition filed
on behalf of workers of National
Apparel, LLC, San Francisco, California.
The petition regarding the
investigation has been deemed invalid.
The petition, filed by three workers, did
not contain the signatures of the
petitioners. Consequently, the
investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
January 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–1473 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than February 12, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4533-4534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1474]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-60,719]
Avondale Mills, Inc., Townsend Plant, Graniteville, SC; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation
was initiated on January 9, 2007, in response to a petition filed by a
State agency representative on behalf of workers of Avondale Mills,
Inc., Townsend Plant, Graniteville, South Carolina.
[[Page 4534]]
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of January, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-1474 Filed 1-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
