Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests, 2871-2872 [E7-917]
Download as PDF
2871
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 23, 2007 / Notices
Item
Issue
Issue
Issue
Issue
Issue
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Form No.
(design patent, no publication fee, small entity) ..............
(plant patent, no publication fee) .....................................
(plant patent, no publication fee, small entity) .................
(plant patent, with publication fee) ...................................
(plant patent, with publication fee, small entity) ...............
Totals ..........................................................................................
Customers may incur postage costs
when submitting the information in this
collection to the USPTO by mail. The
USPTO estimates that the average firstclass postage cost for a mailed
submission will be 52 cents and that up
to 186,326 submissions will be mailed
to the USPTO per year. The total
estimated postage cost for this collection
is $96,890 per year.
When submitting the electronic
version of the Issue Fee Transmittal, the
applicant is strongly urged to retain a
copy of the acknowledgment receipt as
evidence that the form was received by
the USPTO on the date noted. The
USPTO estimates that it will take 5
seconds (0.001 hours) to print and retain
a copy of the acknowledgment receipt
and that 38,600 submissions per year
will submit the issue fee electronically,
for a total of approximately 39 hours per
year for printing this receipt. Using the
paraprofessional rate of $90 per hour,
the USPTO estimates that the
recordkeeping cost associated with this
requirement will be $3,510 per year.
The total non-hour respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
filing fees, postage costs, and
recordkeeping costs is $273,113,430 per
year.
mstockstill on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:33 Jan 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
PTOL–85B
PTOL–85B
PTOL–85B
PTOL–85B
PTOL–85B
Estimated
annual
responses
8,500
120
80
480
320
400.00
1,100.00
550.00
1,400.00
850.00
3,400,000.00
132,000.00
44,000.00
672,000.00
272,000.00
................................
224,926
........................
273,013,030.00
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Establishment and Operation of an
Intelligence, Surveillance,
Reconnaissance, and Strike Capability,
Andersen Air Force Base, Guam
ACTION:
Department of the Air Force.
Record of Decision (ROD).
SUMMARY: On January 12, 2007, the
United States Air Force signed the ROD
for the Establishment and Operation of
an Intelligence, Surveillance,
Reconnaissance, and Strike Capability,
Andersen Air Force Base, Guam. The
decision was based on matters
discussed in the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), inputs from the
public and regulatory agencies, and
other relevant factors. The Final EIS was
made available on November 24, 2006
in the Federal Register (Volume 71,
Number 226, Page 67864) with a wait
period ending December 26, 2006. The
Air Force was the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) lead
agency with the Department of the Navy
acting as a Cooperating Agency under
NEPA. The ROD documents only the
decision of the Air Force with respect to
the proposed Air Force actions analyzed
in the Final EIS.
Jonathan
Wald, 36 Civil Engineer Squadron, 671–
366–2549.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
Bao-Anh Trinh,
DAF, Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–893 Filed 1–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–05–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Estimated
annual
filing costs
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
Dated: January 16, 2007.
Susan K. Brown,
Records Officer, USPTO Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Architecture,
Engineering and Technical Services, Data
Architecture and Services Division.
[FR Doc. E7–908 Filed 1–22–07; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Fee
amount
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
Department of Education.
The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management, invites
comments on the proposed information
collection requests as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
March 26, 2007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
2872
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 23, 2007 / Notices
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Dated: January 17, 2007.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
mstockstill on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: New.
Title: Conversion Magnet Schools
Evaluation.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Not-for-profit
institutions.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 71.
Burden Hours: 1,131.
Abstract: The Conversion Magnet
Schools Evaluation studies the impact
of federally funded elementary magnet
schools on the academic achievement of
students who attend them, and on
minority group isolation in the schools.
The first phase of the study investigates
the feasibility of conducting rigorous
research using experimental or quasiexperimental designs to explore the
impact of the magnet programs on
students who attend them as their
neighborhood schools and on students
from other neighborhoods who compete
in lotteries for admission. Collection
and analysis of student data will
proceed if rigorous studies are found to
be feasible. The evaluation will inform
policymakers and researchers on the
effectiveness of magnet schools as an
educational approach and a type of
school choice.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 3262. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington,
DC 20202–4700. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to:
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:33 Jan 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E7–917 Filed 1–22–07; 8:45 am]
Office of Vocational and Adult
Education
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Department of Education.
The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites
comments on the submission for OMB
review as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before February
22, 2007.
DATES:
Written comments should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Rachel Potter, Desk Officer,
Department of Education, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10222, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395–6974.
ADDRESSES:
Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Dated: January 17, 2007.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
Sfmt 4703
Type of Review: Reinstatement.
Title: Native American Career and
Technical Education Program.
Frequency: Semi-Annually; Annually.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 80.
Burden Hours: 9,600.
Abstract: The Native American Career
and Technical Education Program
(NACTEP) is authorized under Section
116 of the Carl D. Perkins Career and
Technical Education Improvement Act
of 2006. The purpose of the Native
American Career and Technical
Education Program is to provide grants
to improve career and technical
education programs that are consistent
with the purposes of the Act and that
benefit American Indians and Alaska
Natives.
This information collection is being
submitted under the Streamlined
Clearance Process for Discretionary
Grant Information Collections (1890–
0001). Therefore, the 30-day public
comment period notice will be the only
public comment notice published for
this information collection.
Requests for copies of the information
collection submission for OMB review
may be accessed from https://
edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the
‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and
by clicking on link number 3255. When
you access the information collection,
click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to
view. Written requests for information
should be addressed to U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., Potomac Center, 9th Floor,
Washington, DC 20202–4700. Requests
may also be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E7–918 Filed 1–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2871-2872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-917]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the proposed
information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
March 26, 2007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an
early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB
may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the
extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat
the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal
law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform
its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory
Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that
notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to
submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information
collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of
review requested, e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5)
Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.
The Department of Education is especially interested in public
comment addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this
information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the
estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the
[[Page 2872]]
Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden
of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of
information technology.
Dated: January 17, 2007.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services,
Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: New.
Title: Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden:
Responses: 71.
Burden Hours: 1,131.
Abstract: The Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation studies the
impact of federally funded elementary magnet schools on the academic
achievement of students who attend them, and on minority group
isolation in the schools. The first phase of the study investigates the
feasibility of conducting rigorous research using experimental or
quasi-experimental designs to explore the impact of the magnet programs
on students who attend them as their neighborhood schools and on
students from other neighborhoods who compete in lotteries for
admission. Collection and analysis of student data will proceed if
rigorous studies are found to be feasible. The evaluation will inform
policymakers and researchers on the effectiveness of magnet schools as
an educational approach and a type of school choice.
Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request
may be accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ``Browse
Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 3262. When
you access the information collection, click on ``Download
Attachments'' to view. Written requests for information should be
addressed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20202-4700. Requests may also
be electronically mailed to: ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202-245-
6623. Please specify the complete title of the information collection
when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity
requirements should be electronically mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov.
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
[FR Doc. E7-917 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P