In the Matter of Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct a Portion of the Hearing In Camera, 2553-2554 [E7-718]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices
concerns in addition to national
concerns.
The survey cannot be used to make
recommendations about management
actions because (1) the management
problem has not yet been defined
(except in the case of Valley Forge
NHP), and (2) no questions were asked
about potential actions. No other
unsolicited comments were received for
this one-time information collection as
a result of the Federal Register notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Identifying Capacity for Local
Community Participation in Wildlife
Management Planning: White-tailed
Deer in Northeastern NPS Units.
OMB Number: To be requested.
Expiration Date: To be requested.
Type of Request: New collection.
Description of need: NPS and DOI
policies have begun to emphasize on
civic engagement and public
participation in park management (NPS
Director’s Order 75A), as well as
communication and collaboration with
local communities (NPS Director’s
Order 52A). Discussions with NPS
natural resource managers indicate a
need for tools to better understand local
community residents and ways to
engage them in management and
planning, especially in situations where
communities may be impacted by NPS
Management decisions. This study will
provide insight on local stakeholder
opinions and experiences related to the
role of parks in deer and other wildlife
management, their understanding of
deer issues and ways to address them in
parks, and the influence of public input
in wildlife management in parks. This
information will assist park staff in
improving communication with the
public in the event that these parks
consider managing impacts related to
deer in the future. Insights from this
study also should enhance NPS ability
to respond to other natural resource
management issues that involve local
communities.
The goal of this study is to identify
criteria for public involvement strategies
that successfully engage the public in
management planning, particularly with
respect to deer management. Collection
of these data will assist NPS managers
in fulfilling recent policy directives for
public participation by indicating how
to adapt participatory processes to best
meet the specific management and
stakeholder contexts. Should these data
not be collected, future participatory
processes will be undertaken without
the benefit of research showing the
relevance to public-participation
processes to audiences. This could
result in receiving public input that is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:10 Jan 18, 2007
Jkt 211001
not representative of the public at large
or designing participatory processes that
are more likely to incite controversy
than identify constructive solutions.
Specific requirements regarding the
information that must be submitted by
offerors in response to a prospectus
issued by NPS are contained in sections
403(4), (5), (7), and (8) of the Act.
Comments are invited on: (1) The
practical utility of the information being
gathered; (2) the accuracy of the burden
hour estimate; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (40
ways to minimize the burden to
respondents, including the use of
automated information collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Description of respondents: Residents
of communities near: The Potomac
Gorge area of Chesapeake and Ohio
Canal National Historical Park; Fire
Island National Seashore; Morristown
National Historical Park; Prince William
Forest Park; and Valley Forge National
Historical Park.
Automated data collection: This
information will be collected via mailback questionnaire. Telephone
interviews will be conducted with a
small number of non-respondents to the
mail survey. No automated data
collection will take place.
Estimated average number of
respondents: 2500 (2000 respondents for
mail survey; 500 respondents for
telephone interviews).
Estimated average number of
responses: 2500 (2000 responses for
mail survey; 500 responses for
telephone interviews).
Estimated average burden hours per
response: 1⁄3 hour for mail survey
respondents, 1⁄12 for follow-up
telephone interview respondents.
Frequency of Response: 1 time per
respondent.
Estimated annual reporting burden:
709 hours.
Total Non-hour Cost Burden: 0.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2553
Dated: January 10, 2007.
Leonard Stowe,
NPS Information Collection Clearance
Officer.
[FR Doc. 07–205 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–M
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–706 (Second
Review)]
In the Matter of Canned Pineapple Fruit
from Thailand; Notice of Commission
Determination To Conduct a Portion of
the Hearing In Camera
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Closure of a portion of a
Commission hearing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Upon the timely, joint request
of respondents, the Commission has
determined to conduct a portion of its
hearing in the above-captioned
investigation scheduled for January 18,
2007, in camera. See Commission rules
207.24(d), 201.13(m) and 201.36(b)(4)
(19 CFR 207.24(d), 201.13(m) and
201.36(b)(4)). The remainder of the
hearing will be open to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gracemary R. Roth-Roffy, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–
3106. Hearing-impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
may be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission believes that Thai
Pineapple Canning Industry Corp.;
Malee Sampran Public Co., Ltd.; The
Siam Agro Industry Pineapples and
Others Public Co., Ltd.; Pranburi Hotei
Co., Ltd.; Siam Fruit Canning (1988) Co.,
Ltd.; and Great Oriental Food Products
and Other Fruits, Co. Ltd. (‘‘Thai
Respondents’’) have justified the need
for a closed session. Thai Respondents
seek a closed session to allow for a
discussion of business proprietary
information (‘‘BPI’’) regarding the sole
domestic producer’s financial and
production operations as well as data
relating to subject imports from
Thailand. In making this decision, the
Commission nevertheless reaffirms its
belief that whenever possible its
business should be conducted in public.
The hearing will include the usual
public presentations by petitioner and
by respondents, with questions from the
Commission. In addition, the hearing
will include a 10-minute in camera
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
2554
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices
session for a confidential presentation
by Thai Respondents. Each session will
be followed by an in camera rebuttal
presentation by petitioner and questions
from the Commission relating to the
BPI. During the in camera session the
room will be cleared of all persons
except those who have been granted
access to BPI under a Commission
administrative protective order (APO)
and are included on the Commission’s
APO service list in this investigation.
See 19 CFR 201.35(b). The time for the
parties’ presentations and rebuttals in
the in camera session will be taken from
their respective overall allotments for
the hearing. All persons planning to
attend the in camera portions of the
hearing should be prepared to present
proper identification.
Authority: The General Counsel has
certified, pursuant to Commission Rule
201.39 (19 CFR 201.39) that, in his opinion,
a portion of the Commission’s hearing in
Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand, Inv.
Nos. 731–TA–706 (Second Review), may be
closed to the public to prevent the disclosure
of BPI.
Issued: January 16, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–718 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 731–TA–739 (Second Review)]
Clad Steel Plate From Japan
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping
duty order on clad steel plate from
Japan.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on clad steel plate from
Japan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
January 5, 2007.
18:10 Jan 18, 2007
Jkt 211001
Eric
Land (202–205–3349), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On January 5, 2007, the
Commission determined that the
domestic group response to its notice of
institution (71 FR 57996, October 2,
2006) of the subject five-year review was
adequate and that the respondent
interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not
find any other circumstances that would
warrant conducting a full review.1
Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct an
expedited review pursuant to section
751(c)(3) of the Act.2
Staff report. A staff report containing
information concerning the subject
matter of the review will be placed in
the nonpublic record on February 1,
2007, and made available to persons on
the Administrative Protective Order
service list for this review. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions. As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,3 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1A
record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s web site.
2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner
Deanna Tanner Okun concluded that the domestic
group response for this review was adequate and
the respondent group response was inadequate, but
that circumstances warranted a full review.
3 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by the domestic interested party Mittal
Steel USA, Inc., to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments are due on or before
February 6, 2007, and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
review nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to the review by
February 6, 2007. However, should the
Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its review, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II (C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173
(November 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
Issued: January 12, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–669 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–590]
In the Matter of Certain Coupler
Devices For Power Supply Facilities,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2553-2554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-718]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-706 (Second Review)]
In the Matter of Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand; Notice of
Commission Determination To Conduct a Portion of the Hearing In Camera
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Closure of a portion of a Commission hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Upon the timely, joint request of respondents, the Commission
has determined to conduct a portion of its hearing in the above-
captioned investigation scheduled for January 18, 2007, in camera. See
Commission rules 207.24(d), 201.13(m) and 201.36(b)(4) (19 CFR
207.24(d), 201.13(m) and 201.36(b)(4)). The remainder of the hearing
will be open to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gracemary R. Roth-Roffy, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
202-205-3106. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information
on this matter may be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on 202-205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission believes that Thai Pineapple
Canning Industry Corp.; Malee Sampran Public Co., Ltd.; The Siam Agro
Industry Pineapples and Others Public Co., Ltd.; Pranburi Hotei Co.,
Ltd.; Siam Fruit Canning (1988) Co., Ltd.; and Great Oriental Food
Products and Other Fruits, Co. Ltd. (``Thai Respondents'') have
justified the need for a closed session. Thai Respondents seek a closed
session to allow for a discussion of business proprietary information
(``BPI'') regarding the sole domestic producer's financial and
production operations as well as data relating to subject imports from
Thailand. In making this decision, the Commission nevertheless
reaffirms its belief that whenever possible its business should be
conducted in public.
The hearing will include the usual public presentations by
petitioner and by respondents, with questions from the Commission. In
addition, the hearing will include a 10-minute in camera
[[Page 2554]]
session for a confidential presentation by Thai Respondents. Each
session will be followed by an in camera rebuttal presentation by
petitioner and questions from the Commission relating to the BPI.
During the in camera session the room will be cleared of all persons
except those who have been granted access to BPI under a Commission
administrative protective order (APO) and are included on the
Commission's APO service list in this investigation. See 19 CFR
201.35(b). The time for the parties' presentations and rebuttals in the
in camera session will be taken from their respective overall
allotments for the hearing. All persons planning to attend the in
camera portions of the hearing should be prepared to present proper
identification.
Authority: The General Counsel has certified, pursuant to
Commission Rule 201.39 (19 CFR 201.39) that, in his opinion, a
portion of the Commission's hearing in Canned Pineapple Fruit from
Thailand, Inv. Nos. 731-TA-706 (Second Review), may be closed to the
public to prevent the disclosure of BPI.
Issued: January 16, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-718 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
