In the Matter of Certain Coupler Devices For Power Supply Facilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 2554-2556 [E7-670]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
2554
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices
session for a confidential presentation
by Thai Respondents. Each session will
be followed by an in camera rebuttal
presentation by petitioner and questions
from the Commission relating to the
BPI. During the in camera session the
room will be cleared of all persons
except those who have been granted
access to BPI under a Commission
administrative protective order (APO)
and are included on the Commission’s
APO service list in this investigation.
See 19 CFR 201.35(b). The time for the
parties’ presentations and rebuttals in
the in camera session will be taken from
their respective overall allotments for
the hearing. All persons planning to
attend the in camera portions of the
hearing should be prepared to present
proper identification.
Authority: The General Counsel has
certified, pursuant to Commission Rule
201.39 (19 CFR 201.39) that, in his opinion,
a portion of the Commission’s hearing in
Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand, Inv.
Nos. 731–TA–706 (Second Review), may be
closed to the public to prevent the disclosure
of BPI.
Issued: January 16, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–718 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 731–TA–739 (Second Review)]
Clad Steel Plate From Japan
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping
duty order on clad steel plate from
Japan.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on clad steel plate from
Japan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
January 5, 2007.
18:10 Jan 18, 2007
Jkt 211001
Eric
Land (202–205–3349), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On January 5, 2007, the
Commission determined that the
domestic group response to its notice of
institution (71 FR 57996, October 2,
2006) of the subject five-year review was
adequate and that the respondent
interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not
find any other circumstances that would
warrant conducting a full review.1
Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct an
expedited review pursuant to section
751(c)(3) of the Act.2
Staff report. A staff report containing
information concerning the subject
matter of the review will be placed in
the nonpublic record on February 1,
2007, and made available to persons on
the Administrative Protective Order
service list for this review. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions. As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,3 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1A
record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s web site.
2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner
Deanna Tanner Okun concluded that the domestic
group response for this review was adequate and
the respondent group response was inadequate, but
that circumstances warranted a full review.
3 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by the domestic interested party Mittal
Steel USA, Inc., to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments are due on or before
February 6, 2007, and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
review nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to the review by
February 6, 2007. However, should the
Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its review, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II (C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173
(November 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
Issued: January 12, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–669 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–590]
In the Matter of Certain Coupler
Devices For Power Supply Facilities,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices
Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
ACTION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 13, 2006, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Topower
Computer Industrial, Co., Ltd. of
Taiwan. A letter supplementing the
Complaint was filed on January 9, 2007.
The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain coupler devices for power
supply facilities, components thereof,
and products containing same by reason
of infringement of U.S. Patent No.
6,935,902. The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent general exclusion order and
permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint and
supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone 202–205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2574.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2006).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:10 Jan 18, 2007
Jkt 211001
International Trade Commission, on
January 10, 2007, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain coupler devices
for power supply facilities, components
thereof, and products containing same
by reason of infringement of one or
more of claims 1–14 of U.S. Patent No.
6,935,902, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is—
Topower Computer Industrial Co., Ltd.,
7F, No. 7, Lane 235, Pao Chiao Road,
Xindian City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Xion/Axpertec Inc., 201 Lemon Creek
Drive No. B, Walnut, CA 91789.
Thermaltake Technology, Inc., USA, 525
Parriott Place, City of Industry, CA
91745.
Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd.,
Taiwan, 8F., No. 27, Lane 155, Sec. 3,
Peishen Rd., Saen Keng, Hsiang,
Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Aspire/Apevia Int’l Corp., 21490 Ferrero
Pkwy., City of Industry, CA 91789.
MGE Company, USA, 18235 Valley
Boulevard, City of Industry, CA
91744.
Raidcom Technology Inc., Corporation,
15339 E. Don Julian Rd., City of
Industry, CA 91745.
Codegen Technology Co., Ltd., 581
Yorbita Road, City of Industry, CA
91748.
Leadman Electronic Co., Ltd., 891 S.
Azusa Ave. B–6, City of Industry, CA
91748.
Hipro Electronics Co., Ltd., 19937
Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, CA
91789.
Cooler Master Inc., USA, 1951 S. Parco
Ave. Unit A, Ontario, CA 91761.
Cooler Master Co., Ltd., Taiwan, 9F, No.
782, Chung-Cheng Rd., Chung-Ho
City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Broadway Com Corp., 18715 E. Harrison
Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91789.
JPAC Computer, Inc., 14422 Valley
Blvd., City of Industry, CA 91746.
Silent Power Electronics, GmbH,
¨
Muhlenstr. 123, 41352
Korschenbroich, Germany.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2555
Linkworld Electronics Corporation, 670
Endeavor Circle, Brea, CA 92821.
Acbel Polytech Inc., 251 Dominion Dr.,
Suite 103, Morrisville, NC 27560.
HEC Group, Compucase Enterprise,
USA, 16720 Chestnut Street, Unit C,
City of Industry, CA 91748.
HEC Group, Compucase Enterprise,
Taiwan, No. 225, Lane 54, An-Ho Rd,
Sec. 2, Tainan, Taiwan.
Atrix Inc., 9680 Flair Drive, El Monte,
CA 91731.
ASYS, 19941 Harrison Avenue, City of
Industry, CA 91789.
Logisys Computer Inc., 1962 West Holt
Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768.
Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., B6
7601 Penn Avenue, South Richfield,
MN 55423.
Sunbeam Company, 15339 Don Julian
Rd., City of Industry, CA 91745.
Sirtec International Co., Ltd., 2430 N.
Glassell St., #F, Orange, CA 92865.
Enhance Electronics, 13100 Alondra
Boulevard, Unit 106, Cerritos, CA
90701.
Super Flower Computer Inc., 7 Fl. No.
649–1, Chung-Cheng Rd., Hsinchuang
City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Taiwan Youngyear Electronics Co., Ltd.,
113, Lin Sen Rd., Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Sun Pro Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 46,
Luwei Village, Sanzing Industrial
Area, Quingxi Town, Dongguan City,
Guangdon Province, China.
Unitek Electronics Co., Ltd.,
HuiMingSheng Industrial Zone,
FuYong Town, BaoAn, Shen Zhen,
China.
Shenzhen Chi Yuan Industrial Co., Ltd.,
Hang-Jia Industrial Park Xue-Xiang
Village, Bu-Ji Town Shenzhen
Guangdong 518129, China.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Room 401–R, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Robert L. Barton, Jr. is
designated as the presiding
administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
2556
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of a limited exclusion order or
cease and desist order or both directed
against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 11, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–670 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–404–408 and
731–TA–898–908 (Review)]
Hot-Rolled Steel Products From
Argentina, China, India, Indonesia,
Kazakhstan, Netherlands, Romania,
South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and
Ukraine
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year
reviews concerning the countervailing
duty orders on hot-rolled steel products
from Argentina, India, Indonesia, South
Africa, and Thailand and the
antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled
steel products from Argentina, China,
India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan,
Netherlands, Romania, South Africa,
Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of full reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5))
(the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the countervailing duty
orders on hot-rolled steel products from
Argentina, India, Indonesia, South
Africa, and Thailand and the
antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled
steel products from Argentina, China,
India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan,
Netherlands, Romania, South Africa,
Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:10 Jan 18, 2007
Jkt 211001
Commission has determined to exercise
its authority to extend the review period
by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B). For further information
concerning the conduct of these reviews
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
January 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On November 6, 2006,
the Commission determined that
responses to its notice of institution of
the subject five-year reviews were such
that full reviews pursuant to section
751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed (71
FR 67366, November 21, 2006). A record
of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements are available from the Office
of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list. Persons, including
industrial users of the subject
merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in these reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the
Commission’s rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that
filed a notice of appearance following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the reviews need not
file an additional notice of appearance.
The Secretary will maintain a public
service list containing the names and
addresses of all persons, or their
representatives, who are parties to the
reviews.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list. Pursuant to section
207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the
Secretary will make BPI gathered in
these reviews available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the
reviews, provided that the application is
made by 45 days after publication of
this notice. Authorized applicants must
represent interested parties, as defined
by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
the reviews. A party granted access to
BPI following publication of the
Commission’s notice of institution of
the reviews need not reapply for such
access. A separate service list will be
maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under
the APO.
Staff report. The prehearing staff
report in the reviews will be placed in
the nonpublic record on August 29,
2007, and a public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section
207.64 of the Commission’s rules.
Hearing. The Commission will hold a
two-day hearing in connection with the
reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on
September 19 and 20, 2007, at the U.S.
International Trade Commission
Building. Requests to appear at the
hearing should be filed in writing with
the Secretary to the Commission on or
before September 5, 2007, so that the
Commission may determine the level of
interest in the two days of hearings. A
nonparty who has testimony that may
aid the Commission’s deliberations may
request permission to present a short
statement at the hearing. All parties and
nonparties desiring to appear at the
hearing and make oral presentations
should attend a prehearing conference
to be held at 9:30 a.m. on September 14,
2007, at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Oral testimony
and written materials to be submitted at
the public hearing are governed by
sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24,
and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules.
Parties must submit any request to
present a portion of their hearing
testimony in camera no later than 7
business days prior to the date of the
hearing.
Written submissions. Each party to the
reviews may submit a prehearing brief
to the Commission. Prehearing briefs
must conform with the provisions of
section 207.65 of the Commission’s
rules; the deadline for filing is
September 10, 2007. Parties may also
file written testimony in connection
with their presentation at the hearing, as
provided in section 207.24 of the
Commission’s rules, and posthearing
briefs, which must conform with the
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2554-2556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-670]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-590]
In the Matter of Certain Coupler Devices For Power Supply
Facilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
[[Page 2555]]
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on December 13, 2006, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Topower Computer Industrial, Co., Ltd. of Taiwan. A letter
supplementing the Complaint was filed on January 9, 2007. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain coupler
devices for power supply facilities, components thereof, and products
containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,935,902.
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent general
exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202) 205-2574.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on January 10, 2007, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain coupler
devices for power supply facilities, components thereof, and products
containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-14
of U.S. Patent No. 6,935,902, and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is--
Topower Computer Industrial Co., Ltd., 7F, No. 7, Lane 235, Pao Chiao
Road, Xindian City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Xion/Axpertec Inc., 201 Lemon Creek Drive No. B, Walnut, CA 91789.
Thermaltake Technology, Inc., USA, 525 Parriott Place, City of
Industry, CA 91745.
Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd., Taiwan, 8F., No. 27, Lane 155, Sec.
3, Peishen Rd., Saen Keng, Hsiang, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Aspire/Apevia Int'l Corp., 21490 Ferrero Pkwy., City of Industry, CA
91789.
MGE Company, USA, 18235 Valley Boulevard, City of Industry, CA 91744.
Raidcom Technology Inc., Corporation, 15339 E. Don Julian Rd., City of
Industry, CA 91745.
Codegen Technology Co., Ltd., 581 Yorbita Road, City of Industry, CA
91748.
Leadman Electronic Co., Ltd., 891 S. Azusa Ave. B-6, City of Industry,
CA 91748.
Hipro Electronics Co., Ltd., 19937 Harrison Avenue, City of Industry,
CA 91789.
Cooler Master Inc., USA, 1951 S. Parco Ave. Unit A, Ontario, CA 91761.
Cooler Master Co., Ltd., Taiwan, 9F, No. 782, Chung-Cheng Rd., Chung-Ho
City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Broadway Com Corp., 18715 E. Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, CA
91789.
JPAC Computer, Inc., 14422 Valley Blvd., City of Industry, CA 91746.
Silent Power Electronics, GmbH, M[uuml]hlenstr. 123, 41352
Korschenbroich, Germany.
Linkworld Electronics Corporation, 670 Endeavor Circle, Brea, CA 92821.
Acbel Polytech Inc., 251 Dominion Dr., Suite 103, Morrisville, NC
27560.
HEC Group, Compucase Enterprise, USA, 16720 Chestnut Street, Unit C,
City of Industry, CA 91748.
HEC Group, Compucase Enterprise, Taiwan, No. 225, Lane 54, An-Ho Rd,
Sec. 2, Tainan, Taiwan.
Atrix Inc., 9680 Flair Drive, El Monte, CA 91731.
ASYS, 19941 Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91789.
Logisys Computer Inc., 1962 West Holt Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768.
Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., B6 7601 Penn Avenue, South
Richfield, MN 55423.
Sunbeam Company, 15339 Don Julian Rd., City of Industry, CA 91745.
Sirtec International Co., Ltd., 2430 N. Glassell St., F,
Orange, CA 92865.
Enhance Electronics, 13100 Alondra Boulevard, Unit 106, Cerritos, CA
90701.
Super Flower Computer Inc., 7 Fl. No. 649-1, Chung-Cheng Rd.,
Hsinchuang City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Taiwan Youngyear Electronics Co., Ltd., 113, Lin Sen Rd., Taoyuan,
Taiwan.
Sun Pro Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 46, Luwei Village, Sanzing
Industrial Area, Quingxi Town, Dongguan City, Guangdon Province, China.
Unitek Electronics Co., Ltd., HuiMingSheng Industrial Zone, FuYong
Town, BaoAn, Shen Zhen, China.
Shenzhen Chi Yuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Hang-Jia Industrial Park Xue-
Xiang Village, Bu-Ji Town Shenzhen Guangdong 518129, China.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Room 401-R, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L.
Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
[[Page 2556]]
investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion
order or cease and desist order or both directed against the
respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 11, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-670 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
