In the Matter of Certain Coupler Devices For Power Supply Facilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 2554-2556 [E7-670]

Download as PDF 2554 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices session for a confidential presentation by Thai Respondents. Each session will be followed by an in camera rebuttal presentation by petitioner and questions from the Commission relating to the BPI. During the in camera session the room will be cleared of all persons except those who have been granted access to BPI under a Commission administrative protective order (APO) and are included on the Commission’s APO service list in this investigation. See 19 CFR 201.35(b). The time for the parties’ presentations and rebuttals in the in camera session will be taken from their respective overall allotments for the hearing. All persons planning to attend the in camera portions of the hearing should be prepared to present proper identification. Authority: The General Counsel has certified, pursuant to Commission Rule 201.39 (19 CFR 201.39) that, in his opinion, a portion of the Commission’s hearing in Canned Pineapple Fruit from Thailand, Inv. Nos. 731–TA–706 (Second Review), may be closed to the public to prevent the disclosure of BPI. Issued: January 16, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–718 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 731–TA–739 (Second Review)] Clad Steel Plate From Japan United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping duty order on clad steel plate from Japan. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on clad steel plate from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: VerDate Aug<31>2005 January 5, 2007. 18:10 Jan 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 Eric Land (202–205–3349), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background. On January 5, 2007, the Commission determined that the domestic group response to its notice of institution (71 FR 57996, October 2, 2006) of the subject five-year review was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2 Staff report. A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on February 1, 2007, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions. As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the review and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,3 and any party other than an interested party to the review may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the review. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s web site. 2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun concluded that the domestic group response for this review was adequate and the respondent group response was inadequate, but that circumstances warranted a full review. 3 The Commission has found the responses submitted by the domestic interested party Mittal Steel USA, Inc., to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Comments are due on or before February 6, 2007, and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review by February 6, 2007. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: January 12, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–669 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–590] In the Matter of Certain Coupler Devices For Power Supply Facilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM 19JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. ACTION: sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 13, 2006, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Topower Computer Industrial, Co., Ltd. of Taiwan. A letter supplementing the Complaint was filed on January 9, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain coupler devices for power supply facilities, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,935,902. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent general exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential information contained therein, are available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2574. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:10 Jan 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 International Trade Commission, on January 10, 2007, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain coupler devices for power supply facilities, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,935,902, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is— Topower Computer Industrial Co., Ltd., 7F, No. 7, Lane 235, Pao Chiao Road, Xindian City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Xion/Axpertec Inc., 201 Lemon Creek Drive No. B, Walnut, CA 91789. Thermaltake Technology, Inc., USA, 525 Parriott Place, City of Industry, CA 91745. Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd., Taiwan, 8F., No. 27, Lane 155, Sec. 3, Peishen Rd., Saen Keng, Hsiang, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan. Aspire/Apevia Int’l Corp., 21490 Ferrero Pkwy., City of Industry, CA 91789. MGE Company, USA, 18235 Valley Boulevard, City of Industry, CA 91744. Raidcom Technology Inc., Corporation, 15339 E. Don Julian Rd., City of Industry, CA 91745. Codegen Technology Co., Ltd., 581 Yorbita Road, City of Industry, CA 91748. Leadman Electronic Co., Ltd., 891 S. Azusa Ave. B–6, City of Industry, CA 91748. Hipro Electronics Co., Ltd., 19937 Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91789. Cooler Master Inc., USA, 1951 S. Parco Ave. Unit A, Ontario, CA 91761. Cooler Master Co., Ltd., Taiwan, 9F, No. 782, Chung-Cheng Rd., Chung-Ho City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan. Broadway Com Corp., 18715 E. Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91789. JPAC Computer, Inc., 14422 Valley Blvd., City of Industry, CA 91746. Silent Power Electronics, GmbH, ¨ Muhlenstr. 123, 41352 Korschenbroich, Germany. PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2555 Linkworld Electronics Corporation, 670 Endeavor Circle, Brea, CA 92821. Acbel Polytech Inc., 251 Dominion Dr., Suite 103, Morrisville, NC 27560. HEC Group, Compucase Enterprise, USA, 16720 Chestnut Street, Unit C, City of Industry, CA 91748. HEC Group, Compucase Enterprise, Taiwan, No. 225, Lane 54, An-Ho Rd, Sec. 2, Tainan, Taiwan. Atrix Inc., 9680 Flair Drive, El Monte, CA 91731. ASYS, 19941 Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91789. Logisys Computer Inc., 1962 West Holt Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768. Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., B6 7601 Penn Avenue, South Richfield, MN 55423. Sunbeam Company, 15339 Don Julian Rd., City of Industry, CA 91745. Sirtec International Co., Ltd., 2430 N. Glassell St., #F, Orange, CA 92865. Enhance Electronics, 13100 Alondra Boulevard, Unit 106, Cerritos, CA 90701. Super Flower Computer Inc., 7 Fl. No. 649–1, Chung-Cheng Rd., Hsinchuang City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan. Taiwan Youngyear Electronics Co., Ltd., 113, Lin Sen Rd., Taoyuan, Taiwan. Sun Pro Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 46, Luwei Village, Sanzing Industrial Area, Quingxi Town, Dongguan City, Guangdon Province, China. Unitek Electronics Co., Ltd., HuiMingSheng Industrial Zone, FuYong Town, BaoAn, Shen Zhen, China. Shenzhen Chi Yuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Hang-Jia Industrial Park Xue-Xiang Village, Bu-Ji Town Shenzhen Guangdong 518129, China. (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401–R, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L. Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM 19JAN1 2556 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 11, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–670 Filed 1–18–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–404–408 and 731–TA–898–908 (Review)] Hot-Rolled Steel Products From Argentina, China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from Argentina, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand and the antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from Argentina, China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from Argentina, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand and the antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from Argentina, China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:10 Jan 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: January 11, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background. On November 6, 2006, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed (71 FR 67366, November 21, 2006). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Participation in the reviews and public service list. Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list. Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report. The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 29, 2007, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing. The Commission will hold a two-day hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on September 19 and 20, 2007, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before September 5, 2007, so that the Commission may determine the level of interest in the two days of hearings. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on September 14, 2007, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions. Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is September 10, 2007. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM 19JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2554-2556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-590]


In the Matter of Certain Coupler Devices For Power Supply 
Facilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

[[Page 2555]]


ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on December 13, 2006, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Topower Computer Industrial, Co., Ltd. of Taiwan. A letter 
supplementing the Complaint was filed on January 9, 2007. The 
complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain coupler 
devices for power supply facilities, components thereof, and products 
containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,935,902. 
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States 
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent general 
exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential 
information contained therein, are available for inspection during 
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 
(202) 205-2574.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006).

    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on January 10, 2007, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain coupler 
devices for power supply facilities, components thereof, and products 
containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-14 
of U.S. Patent No. 6,935,902, and whether an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:

    (a) The complainant is--
Topower Computer Industrial Co., Ltd., 7F, No. 7, Lane 235, Pao Chiao 
Road, Xindian City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Xion/Axpertec Inc., 201 Lemon Creek Drive No. B, Walnut, CA 91789.
Thermaltake Technology, Inc., USA, 525 Parriott Place, City of 
Industry, CA 91745.
Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd., Taiwan, 8F., No. 27, Lane 155, Sec. 
3, Peishen Rd., Saen Keng, Hsiang, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Aspire/Apevia Int'l Corp., 21490 Ferrero Pkwy., City of Industry, CA 
91789.
MGE Company, USA, 18235 Valley Boulevard, City of Industry, CA 91744.
Raidcom Technology Inc., Corporation, 15339 E. Don Julian Rd., City of 
Industry, CA 91745.
Codegen Technology Co., Ltd., 581 Yorbita Road, City of Industry, CA 
91748.
Leadman Electronic Co., Ltd., 891 S. Azusa Ave. B-6, City of Industry, 
CA 91748.
Hipro Electronics Co., Ltd., 19937 Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, 
CA 91789.
Cooler Master Inc., USA, 1951 S. Parco Ave. Unit A, Ontario, CA 91761.
Cooler Master Co., Ltd., Taiwan, 9F, No. 782, Chung-Cheng Rd., Chung-Ho 
City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Broadway Com Corp., 18715 E. Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, CA 
91789.
JPAC Computer, Inc., 14422 Valley Blvd., City of Industry, CA 91746.
Silent Power Electronics, GmbH, M[uuml]hlenstr. 123, 41352 
Korschenbroich, Germany.
Linkworld Electronics Corporation, 670 Endeavor Circle, Brea, CA 92821.
Acbel Polytech Inc., 251 Dominion Dr., Suite 103, Morrisville, NC 
27560.
HEC Group, Compucase Enterprise, USA, 16720 Chestnut Street, Unit C, 
City of Industry, CA 91748.
HEC Group, Compucase Enterprise, Taiwan, No. 225, Lane 54, An-Ho Rd, 
Sec. 2, Tainan, Taiwan.
Atrix Inc., 9680 Flair Drive, El Monte, CA 91731.
ASYS, 19941 Harrison Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91789.
Logisys Computer Inc., 1962 West Holt Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768.
Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., B6 7601 Penn Avenue, South 
Richfield, MN 55423.
Sunbeam Company, 15339 Don Julian Rd., City of Industry, CA 91745.
Sirtec International Co., Ltd., 2430 N. Glassell St., F, 
Orange, CA 92865.
Enhance Electronics, 13100 Alondra Boulevard, Unit 106, Cerritos, CA 
90701.
Super Flower Computer Inc., 7 Fl. No. 649-1, Chung-Cheng Rd., 
Hsinchuang City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan.
Taiwan Youngyear Electronics Co., Ltd., 113, Lin Sen Rd., Taoyuan, 
Taiwan.
Sun Pro Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 46, Luwei Village, Sanzing 
Industrial Area, Quingxi Town, Dongguan City, Guangdon Province, China.
Unitek Electronics Co., Ltd., HuiMingSheng Industrial Zone, FuYong 
Town, BaoAn, Shen Zhen, China.
Shenzhen Chi Yuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Hang-Jia Industrial Park Xue-
Xiang Village, Bu-Ji Town Shenzhen Guangdong 518129, China.

    (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this 
investigation, is Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Room 401-R, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L. 
Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of

[[Page 2556]]

investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion 
order or cease and desist order or both directed against the 
respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 11, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E7-670 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P