Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Changes To Amend NYSE Rules 472 and 344, and NASD Rules 1050 and 2711 Relating to Research Analyst Conflicts of Interest, 2058-2078 [E7-548]
Download as PDF
2058
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
trading at 8:20 a.m. On November 6,
2006, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1.3 The proposed rule change, as
amended, was published for comment
in the Federal Register on November 28,
2006.4 The Commission received no
comments on the proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1.
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposed to amend
NYSE Rule 1300 (Gold Shares) and
NYSE Rule 51 (Hours for Business) to
allow Gold Shares to open for trading at
8:20 a.m.5 Gold Shares represent units
of fractional undivided interest in and
ownership of the streetTRACKS Gold
Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’). The Trust holds
gold bullion and the investment
objective of the Trust is to reflect the
performance of the price of gold bullion,
less the Trust’s expenses.
Except for the new opening time,
trading in Gold Shares will operate as it
does today. The current assigned
specialist will continue as the assigned
specialist and the stock will continue to
trade at its current post and panel. All
Exchange systems will be operative
beginning at 8:20 a.m. and throughout
the trading day including those systems
that provide audit trail information. The
Exchange surveillances that currently
operate during market hours will be in
place to coincide with the 8:20 a.m.
opening. Further, either a Floor
Governor or two Floor Officials will be
available upon the 8:20 a.m. opening.
All Exchange Rules will apply upon the
open at 8:20 a.m. and throughout the
trading day.
The Exchange represented that the
updated spot price of gold and the
Intraday Indicative Value (‘‘IIV’’) for
Gold Shares would be available at 8:20
a.m. on the Trust’s Web site
(www.streettracksgoldshares.com). The
IIV is calculated by the Trust’s Sponsor,
World Trust Gold Services, LLC. The
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.nyse.com) provides a link to the
Trust’s Web site. The spot price of gold
and the IIV on the Trust’s Web site are
subject to a 5 to 10 second delay.
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.6 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,7 which requires that
an exchange have rules designed, among
other things, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange stated that it proposes
to amend its Rules 1300 and 51 to allow
the opening of Gold Shares for trading
at 8:20 a.m. in order to remain
competitive and in light of the fact that
interest in commodity-based securities
has increased. An 8:20 a.m. opening
would coincide with the opening of
COMEX trading in gold futures and
gold options and thus permit trading in
Gold Shares to start at the same time as
other gold-based instruments. The
Commission believes that an 8:20 a.m.
opening would give customers the
opportunity to trade an equity product
based on the price of gold from the time
that gold futures and options on gold
futures begin trading on the COMEX
and would, therefore, provide the
Exchange customers with better
opportunities for exercising their
investment choices.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2006–
80), as modified by Amendment No. 1,
be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–535 Filed 1–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
3 See Form 19b–4 dated November 6, 2006
(‘‘Amendment No. 1’’). Amendment No. 1 replaced
the original filing in its entirety.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54801
(November 21, 2006), 71 FR 68870 (SR–NYSE–
2006–80).
5 Trading in Gold Shares has been offered on the
Exchange since 2004.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
6 In approving this rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55072; File Nos. SR–NYSE–
2006–78; SR–NASD–2006–113]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC and the
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Changes To Amend
NYSE Rules 472 and 344, and NASD
Rules 1050 and 2711 Relating to
Research Analyst Conflicts of Interest
January 9, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 27, 2006, the New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change. On December 20, 2006, NYSE
filed Amendment No. 1 to its proposed
rule change.3
On September 27, 2006, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Commission
the proposed rule change. On November
17, 2006, NASD filed Amendment No.
1 to its proposed rule change.4
The proposed rule changes are
described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have substantially been
prepared by the NYSE and NASD (the
‘‘SROs’’). The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule changes, as amended,
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statements of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Changes
The Exchange proposes to amend
certain provisions of NYSE Rules 472
and 344. These amendments eliminate
the exception for pre-publication factual
verification review of research reports
by non-research personnel; change the
quiet periods surrounding securities
offerings and the release of lock-up
agreements; allow member
organizations to develop policies and
procedures if they choose to prohibit
research analysts from holding
securities for companies they cover;
alter the format for certain disclosures
in research reports; and extend the antiretaliation prohibitions to all employees
of a member organization, not just
investment banking.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 NYSE Amendment No. 1 makes minor revisions
to the original filing.
4 NASD Amendment No. 1 makes minor revisions
to the original filing.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
NASD is proposing to amend NASD
Rules 1050 and 2711 to implement
certain recommendations contained in
the December 2005 Joint Report by
NASD and the NYSE on the Operation
and Effectiveness of the Research
Analyst Conflict of Interest Rules.5
NASD believes that the proposed rule
changes are intended to improve the
effectiveness of the research analyst
conflict of interest rules and registration
requirements by making certain changes
to the existing provisions regarding,
among other things: Disclosure of
conflicts; quiet periods; restrictions on
review of research reports by nonresearch personnel; and restrictions on
personal trading by research analysts.
Below is the text of the proposed rule
changes.6 Proposed new language is
italicized; proposed deletions are in
[brackets].
A. NYSE’s Proposed Rule Text
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Rule 472. Communications With the
Public Approval of Communications
and Research Reports
(a)(1) through (2) No Change.
Investment Banking, Research
Department and Subject Company
Relationships and Communications
(b)(1) Research analysts may not be
subject to the supervision, or control, of
any employee of the member
organization’s investment banking
department and personnel engaged in
investment banking activities may not
have any influence or control over the
compensatory evaluation of a research
analyst.
(2) Research reports may not be
subject to review or approval prior to
publication by Investment Banking
personnel or any other employee of the
member organization who is not directly
responsible for investment research
(‘‘non-research personnel’’) other than
Legal or Compliance personnel.
[(3) Non-research personnel may
review research reports prior to
publication only to verify the factual
accuracy of information in the research
report or to identify any potential
conflicts of interest that may exist,
provided that:
(i) Any written communication
concerning the content of research
reports between non-research personnel
and Research personnel must be made
either through Legal or Compliance
personnel or in a transmission copied to
Legal or Compliance personnel; and
5 https://www.nasd.com/web/groups/rules_regs/
documents/rules_regs/nasdw_015803.pdf
6 The rule text reflects the changes contained in
SR–NYSE–2006–77 and SR–NASD–2006–112,
which were filed for immediate effectiveness on
September 27, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
(ii) any oral communication
concerning the content of research
reports between non-research personnel
and Research personnel must be
documented and made either with Legal
or Compliance personnel acting as
intermediary or in a conversation
conducted in the presence of Legal or
Compliance personnel.]
(b)(4) through (6) renumbered as (b)(3)
through (5).
Written Procedures
(c) No change.
Retention of Communications
(d) No change.
Restrictions on Trading Securities by
Associated Persons
(e)(1) No research analyst or
household member may purchase or
receive an issuer’s securities prior to its
initial public offering (e.g., so-called
pre-IPO shares), if the issuer is
principally engaged in the same types of
business as companies (or in the same
industry classification) which the
research analyst usually covers in
research reports.
(2) No research analyst or household
member may trade in any subject
company’s securities or derivatives of
such securities that the research analyst
follows for a period of thirty (30)
calendar days prior to and five (5)
calendar days after the member
organization’s publication of research
reports concerning such security or a
change in rating or price target of a
subject company’s securities.
(3) No research analyst or household
member may effect trades in a manner
inconsistent with the research analyst’s
most current recommendations (i.e., sell
securities while maintaining a ‘‘buy’’ or
‘‘hold’’ recommendation, buy securities
while maintaining a ‘‘sell’’
recommendation, or effecting a ‘‘short
sale’’ in a security while maintaining a
‘‘buy’’ or ‘‘hold’’ recommendation on
such security).
(4) No change.
(5) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(e)(1) through (e)(3) do not apply when
the following conditions are satisfied:
(A) The research analyst is employed
by a member organization that has
adopted an internal policy that
prohibits research analysts from owning
any securities issued by the subject
company for which the research analyst
provides coverage and requires analysts
to completely divest themselves of their
existing holdings in such securities;
(B) The research analyst abides by a
reasonable plan of liquidation under
which all securities issued by subject
companies that the analyst follows are
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2059
to be sold within 120 days of the
effective date of the member
organization’s policy;
(C) The research analyst files such
liquidation plan with the member
organization’s legal or compliance
department within fifteen (15) days of
the effective date of the member
organization’s policy;
(D) The research analyst receives
written approval of the liquidation plan
from the member organization’s legal or
compliance department prior to the sale
of any securities under the plan; and
(E) The member organization must
maintain written records sufficient to
document compliance with each
liquidation plan approved by its legal or
compliance department for three years
following the date on which the
liquidation plan is approved.
(e)(5) through (6) renumbered as (e)(6)
through (7).
Restrictions on Member Organization’s
Issuance of Research Reports and
Participation in Public Appearances
(f)(1) A member organization may not
publish or otherwise distribute research
reports regarding an issuer and a
research analyst may not recommend or
offer an opinion on an issuer’s securities
in a public appearance, for which the
member organization acted as manager
[or], co-manager, underwriter or dealer
[of] for an initial public offering within
[forty (40)] twenty-five (25) calendar
days following the offering date.
[(2) A member organization may not
publish or otherwise distribute research
reports regarding an issuer and a
research analyst may not recommend or
offer an opinion on an issuer’s securities
in a public appearance, for which the
member organization acted as manager
or co-manager of a secondary offering
within ten (10) calendar days following
the offering date. This prohibition shall
not apply to public appearances or
research reports published or otherwise
distributed under Securities Act Rule
139 regarding issuers whose securities
are actively traded, as defined in
Securities Exchange Act Rule 101(c)(1)
of Regulation M.
(3) No member organization that has
agreed to participate or is participating
as an underwriter or dealer (other than
as manager or co-manager) of an issuer’s
initial public offering may publish or
otherwise distribute a research report
regarding that issuer and a research
analyst may not recommend or offer an
opinion on that issuer’s securities in a
public appearance for twenty-five (25)
calendar days following the offering
date.]
[(4)] (2) No member organization
which has acted as a manager or co-
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
2060
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
manager of a securities offering may
publish or otherwise distribute a
research report and a research analyst
may not recommend or offer an opinion
on an issuer’s securities in a public
appearance within [fifteen (15)] five (5)
days prior to or after the expiration,
waiver or termination of a lock-up
agreement or any other agreement that
the member organization has entered
into with a subject company and its
shareholders that restricts or prohibits
the sale of the subject company’s or its
shareholders’ securities after the
completion of a securities offering. This
prohibition shall not apply to public
appearances or research reports
published or otherwise distributed
under Securities Act Rule 139 regarding
issuers whose securities are actively
traded, as defined in Securities
Exchange Act Rule 101(c)(1) of
Regulation M.
[(5)] (3) A member organization may
permit exceptions to the prohibitions in
paragraphs (f)(1)[,] and (2)[, and (4)]
(consistent with other securities laws
and rules) for research reports that are
published or otherwise distributed or
recommendations or opinions on an
issuer’s securities made in a public
appearance due to significant news or
events, e.g. an announcement of
earnings, provided that such research
reports are pre-approved in writing by
the member organization’s Legal or
Compliance personnel.
[(6)] (4) If a member organization
intends to terminate its research
coverage of a subject company, notice of
this termination must be made. The
member organization must make
available a final research report on the
subject company using the means of
dissemination equivalent to those it
ordinarily uses to provide the customer
with its research reports on the subject
company. The report must be
comparable in scope and detail to prior
research reports and must include a
final recommendation or rating, unless
it is impracticable for the member
organization to produce a comparable
report (e.g., if the research analyst
covering the subject company or sector
has left the employ of the member
organization, or where the member
organization terminates coverage on the
industry or sector). In instances where
it is impracticable for the member
organization to provide a final
recommendation or rating, the member
organization must provide the rationale
for the decision to terminate coverage.
Prohibition of Offering Favorable
Research for Business
(g)(1) No change.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
(2) No member organization and no
employee of a member organization
[who is involved with the member
organization’s investment banking
activities] may, directly or indirectly,
retaliate against or threaten to retaliate
against any research analyst employed
by the member organization or its
affiliates as a result of an adverse,
negative, or otherwise unfavorable
research report written or public
appearance made by the research
analyst that may adversely affect the
member organization’s present or
prospective investment banking
relationship with the subject company
of a research report. This prohibition
shall not limit a member organization’s
authority to discipline or terminate a
research analyst, in accordance with the
member organization’s policies and
procedures, for any cause other than the
writing of such an unfavorable research
report or the making of such
unfavorable public appearance.
Restrictions on Compensation to
Research Analysts
(h) No change.
General Standards for All
Communications
(i) No change.
Specific Standards for Communications
(j) No change.
Disclosure
(k)(1) Disclosures Required in
Research Reports.
Disclosure of Member Organization’s,
and Research Analyst’s Ownership of
Securities, Receipt of Compensation,
and Subject Company Relationships
[The front page cover of a research
report either must include the
disclosures required under this Rule or
must refer the reader to the page(s) on
which each such disclosure is found.]
Any member organization that has a
conflict of interest or whose research
analyst has a conflict of interest
concerning the subject company of a
research report must disclose that
conflict of interest either (i) on its Web
site and prominently state the following
on the front page of the research report:
‘‘[Name of firm and/or the research
analyst preparing this report] has a
conflict of interest that may affect the
ability of the firm or the analyst to
provide objective analysis about the
company. For more information about
this conflict of interest, please see
[Reference to the firm’s Web site]’’ or (ii)
the front page cover of a research report
either must include the disclosures
required under this Rule or must refer
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the reader to the page(s) on which each
such disclosure is found. Disclosures,
and references to disclosures, must be
clear, comprehensive, and prominent.
For purposes of paragraph (k)(1),
‘‘conflict of interest’’ shall include any
of the following:
(i) A member organization must
disclose in research reports: a. If the
member organization or its affiliates:
1. Has managed or co-managed a
public offering of securities for the
subject company in the past twelve (12)
months;
2. Has received compensation for
investment banking services from the
subject company in the past twelve (12)
months; or
3. Expects to receive or intends to
seek compensation for investment
banking services from the subject
company in the next three (3) months.
b. If the member organization is
making a market in the subject
company’s securities at the time the
research report is issued;
c. If, as of the last day of the month
immediately preceding the date the
publication (or the end of the second
most recent month if the publication is
less than ten (10) calendar days after the
end of the most recent month), the
member organization or its affiliates
beneficially own 1% or more of any
class of common equity securities of the
subject company. The member
organization must make the required
beneficial ownership computation no
later than ten (10) calendar days after
the end of the prior month.
Computation of beneficial ownership of
securities must be based upon the same
standards used to compute ownership
for purposes of the reporting
requirements under Section 13(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
d. If, as of the last day of the month
immediately preceding the date of
publication of the research report (or the
end of the second most recent month if
the publication date is less than thirty
(30) calendar days after the end of the
most recent month):
1. The subject company currently is a
client of the member organization or
was a client of the member organization
during the twelve (12)-month period
preceding the date of distribution of the
research report (In such instances, the
member organization also must disclose
the types of services provided to the
subject company. For purposes of this
paragraph, the types of services
provided to the subject company may be
described as investment banking
services, non-investment bankingsecurities related services, and nonsecurities services.);
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
2. The member organization received
any compensation for products or
services other than for investment
banking services from the subject
company in the past twelve (12)
months.
e. If a research report contains a price
target, the valuation methods used, and
any price objectives must have a
reasonable basis and include a
discussion of risks;
f. If a research report contains a rating,
the meanings of all ratings used by the
organization in its ratings system (For
example, a member organization might
disclose that a ‘‘strong buy’’ rating
means that the rated security’s price is
expected to appreciate at least 10%
faster than other securities in its sector
over the next twelve (12)-month period.
Definitions of ratings terms also must be
consistent with their plain meaning.
Therefore, for example, a ‘‘hold’’ rating
should not mean or imply that an
investor should sell a security.);
g. If a research report contains a
rating, the percentage of all securities
that the member organization
recommends an investor ‘‘buy,’’ ‘‘hold,’’
or ‘‘sell.’’ Within each of the three (3)
categories, a member organization must
also disclose the percentage of subject
companies that are investment banking
services clients of the member
organization within the previous twelve
(12) months (see Rule 472.70 for further
information);
h. If a research report contains either
a rating or a price target, and the
member organization has assigned a
rating or price target to the subject
company for at least one (1) year, the
research report must include a chart that
depicts the price of the subject
company’s stock over time and indicates
points at which a member organization
assigned or changed a rating or price
target. This provision would apply only
to securities that have been assigned a
rating or price target for at least one (1)
year, and need not extend more than
three (3) years prior to the date of the
research report. The information in the
price chart must be current as of the end
of the most recent calendar quarter (or
the second most recent calendar quarter
if the publication date is less than
fifteen (15) calendar days after the most
recent calendar quarter).
(ii) A member organization must
include the following disclosures in
research reports:
a. If a research analyst received any
compensation:
1. From the subject company in the
past twelve (12) months;
2. That is based upon (among other
factors) the member organization’s
overall investment banking revenues.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
b. If, to the extent the research analyst
or an employee of the member
organization with the ability to
influence the substance of a research
report, knows:
1. The subject company currently is a
client of the member organization or
was a client of the member organization
during the twelve (12)-month period
preceding the date of distribution of the
research report. In such instances, such
member organization also must disclose
the types of services provided to the
subject company (For purposes of
paragraph (k)(1) of this Rule, the types
of services provided to the subject
company may be described as
investment banking services, noninvestment banking-securities related
services, and non-securities services.).
(For purpose of paragraph (k)(1) of this
Rule, an employee of a member
organization with the ability to
influence the substance of the research
report is an employee who, in the
ordinary course of that person’s duties,
has the authority to review the
particular research report and to change
that research report prior to
publication.);
2. That the member organization or
any affiliate thereof, received any
compensation for products or services
other than investment banking services
from the subject company in the past
twelve (12) months.
(iii) A research analyst and a member
organization must disclose in research
reports:
a. If, to the extent the research analyst
or member organization has reason to
know, an affiliate of the member
organization received any compensation
for products or services other than
investment banking services from the
subject company in the past twelve (12)
months;
1. This requirement will be deemed
satisfied if such compensation is
disclosed in research reports within
thirty (30) days after completion of the
most recent calendar quarter, provided
that the member organization has taken
steps reasonably designed to identify
such compensation during that calendar
quarter.
2. The member organization and the
research analyst will be presumed not to
have reason to know whether an affiliate
received compensation for other than
investment banking services from the
subject company in the past twelve (12)
months if the member organization
maintains and enforces policies and
procedures reasonably designed to
prevent all research analysts and
employees of the member organization
with the ability to influence the
substance of research reports from,
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2061
directly or indirectly, receiving
information from the affiliate
concerning such compensation.
3. Paragraph 472(k)(1)(iii)a. shall not
apply to any subject company as to
which the member organization
initiated coverage since the beginning of
the current calendar quarter.
b. If the research analyst or a
household member has a financial
interest in the securities of the subject
company, and the nature of the financial
interest, including, without limitation,
whether it consists of any option, right,
warrant, futures contract, long or short
position;
c. If the research analyst or a
household member is an officer,
director, or advisory board member of
the subject company;
d. Any other actual, material conflict
of interest of the research analyst, or
member organization, of which the
research analyst knows, or has reason to
know, at the time the research report is
published or otherwise distributed.
When a member organization
publishes or otherwise distributes a
research report covering six (6) or more
subject companies (a ‘‘compendium
report’’) for purposes of the disclosures
required in paragraph (k)(1) of this Rule,
the compendium report may direct the
reader in a clear and prominent manner
as to where the reader may obtain
applicable current disclosures.
Electronic compendium reports may
include a hyperlink to the required
disclosures. Paper-based compendium
reports must provide either a toll-free
number to call or a postal address to
write for the required disclosures and
may also include a web address of the
member organization where the
disclosures can be found.
(k)(2) Disclosures Required in Public
Appearances
Disclosure of Member Organization’s,
and Research Analyst’s Ownership of
Securities, Receipt of Compensation,
and Subject Company Relationships
(i) A research analyst must disclose
the following conflicts of interest in
public appearances:
a. If, as of the last day of the month
before the appearance (or the end of the
second most recent month if the
appearance is less than ten (10) calendar
days after the end of the most recent
month), the member organization or its
affiliates beneficially own 1% or more
of any class of common equity securities
of the subject company. The member
organization must make the required
beneficial ownership computation no
later than ten (10) calendar days after
the end of the prior month.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2062
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
Computation of beneficial ownership of
securities must be based upon the same
standards used to compute ownership
for purposes of the reporting
requirements under Section 13(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
b. If the research analyst or a
household member has a financial
interest in the securities of the subject
company, and the nature of the financial
interest, including, without limitation,
whether it consists of any option, right,
warrant, futures contract, long or short
position;
c. If, to the extent the research analyst
knows or has reason to know:
1. The subject company currently is a
client of the member organization or
was a client of the member organization
during the twelve (12)-month period
preceding the date of the public
appearance by the research analyst. In
such instances, the research analyst also
must disclose the types of services
provided to the subject company (For
purposes of this paragraph, the types of
services provided to the subject
company may be described as
investment banking services, noninvestment banking-securities related
services, and non-securities services.);
2. The member organization or any
affiliate thereof, received any
compensation from the subject company
in the past twelve (12) months.
d. Any other actual, material conflict
of interest of the research analyst, or
member organization, of which the
research analyst knows, or has reason to
know, at the time the public appearance
is made;
e. If the research analyst or a
household member is an officer,
director, or advisory board member of
the subject company;
f. If the research analyst received any
compensation from the subject company
in the past twelve (12) months.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
(k)(3) Exceptions to the Required
Disclosures
(i) A member organization or a
research analyst will not be required to
make a disclosure required by Rule
472(k)(l)(i)a.2. and 3., (k)(1)(i)d.1.,
(k)(1)(ii)b.1., and (k)(2)(i)c. to the extent
such disclosure would reveal material
non-public information regarding
specific potential future investment
banking services transactions of the
subject company.
(k)(4) Third-Party Research Reports
(i) Subject to paragraph (k)(4)(ii), if a
member organization distributes or
makes available research reports
produced by another member
organization, a non-member
organization affiliate of a member
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
organization, such as a foreign or
domestic broker-dealer or investment
adviser, or an independent third party,
the member organization must
accompany the research report with the
applicable disclosures, as they pertain
to the member organization, that are
required by paragraphs (k)(1)(i)c,
(k)(1)(i)a, (k)(1)(i)b and (k)(1)(iii)d of this
Rule.
a. A supervisory analyst qualified
under NYSE Rule 344 must approve,
pursuant to Rule 472(a)(2), by signature
or initial any third-party research
distributed by a member organization;
and
b. A supervisory analyst or qualified
person designated pursuant to Rule
342(b)(1) (e.g., a person who has taken
and passed the Series 9/10, or another
examination acceptable to the Exchange
which demonstrates competency
relevant to assigned responsibilities,
including the Series 24 if taken and
passed after July 1, 2001) must review
third-party research distributed by a
member organization to determine that
the disclosures required by Rule
472(k)(1)(i)c, (k)(1)(i)a, (k)(1)(i)b and
(k)(1)(iii)d are complete and accurate,
and that the content of the research
report is consistent with all applicable
standards regarding communications
with the public.
(ii) The requirements in paragraph
(k)(4)(i) shall not apply to research
reports prepared by an independent
third party that the member
organization makes available to its
customers either upon request or
through a member organizationmaintained Web site.
Other Communications Activities
(l) No change.
Small Firm Exception
(m) The provisions of Rule 472(b)(1)[,]
and (2) [and (3)] do not apply to
member organizations that over the
three previous years, on average per
year, have participated in ten (10) or
fewer investment banking services
transactions as manager or co-manager
and generated $5 million or less in gross
investment banking services revenues
from those transactions. For purposes of
this paragraph, the term ‘‘investment
banking services transactions’’ shall
include both debt and equity
underwritings but not municipal
securities underwritings. Member
organizations that qualify for this
exemption must maintain records for
three (3) years of any communications
that, but for this exemption, would be
subject to paragraphs (b)(1)[,] and (2)[,
and (3)] of this Rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
* * * Supplementary Material:
.10
Definitions
(1) No change.
(2) Research Report—‘‘Research
report’’ is generally defined as a written
or electronic communication which
includes an analysis of equity securities
of individual companies or industries
(other than an open-end registered
investment company that is not listed or
traded on an exchange or a public direct
participant program), and provides
information reasonably sufficient upon
which to base an investment decision.
This term does not include:
(a) The following communications,
provided that they do not include an
analysis, narrative discussion,
recommendation or rating of individual
securities or issuers:
(1) Reports discussing broad-based
indices, e.g. the Russell 2000 or S&P 500
index;
(2) Reports commenting on economic,
political or market conditions;
(3) Technical analysis concerning the
demand and supply for a sector, index
or industry based on trading volume
and price;
(4) Statistical summaries of multiple
companies’ financial data (including
listings of current ratings);
(5) Reports that recommend
increasing or decreasing holdings in
particular industries or sectors; or
(6) Notices of ratings or price target
changes, provided that the member
organization simultaneously directs the
readers of the notice as to where to
obtain the most recent research report
on the subject company that includes
the current applicable disclosures
required by this rule and that such
research report does not contain
materially misleading disclosures,
including disclosures that are outdated
or no longer applicable;
(b) The following communications,
even if they include information
reasonably sufficient upon which to
base an investment decision or a
recommendation or rating of individual
securities or companies:
(1) Any communication distributed to
fewer than 15 persons;
(2) Periodic reports, solicitations or
other communications prepared for
investment company shareholders or
discretionary investment account clients
that discuss individual securities in the
context of a fund’s or account’s past
performance or the basis for previously
made discretionary investment
decisions; or
(3) Internal communications that are
not given to customers; and
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
(c) Communications that constitute
statutory prospectuses that are filed as
part of the registration statement.
For purposes of approval by a
supervisory analyst pursuant to Rule
472(a)(2), the term research report
includes, but is not limited to, a report
which recommends equity securities,
derivatives of such securities, including
options, debt and other types of fixed
income securities, single stock futures
products, and other investment vehicles
subject to market risk.
.10 (3) through (5) No change.
.20 through .30 No change.
.40 For purposes of this Rule, the
term ‘‘research analyst’’ includes an
allied member, associated person or
employee of a member organization
primarily responsible for, and any
person who reports directly or
indirectly to such research analyst in
connection with, the preparation of the
substance of a research report whether
or not any such person has the job title
of ‘‘research analyst’’.
For purposes of this Rule, the term
‘‘household member’’ means any
individual whose principal residence is
the same as the research analyst’s
principal residence. This term does not
include an unrelated person who shares
the same residence as a research analyst,
provided that the research analyst and
unrelated person are financially
independent of one another. Paragraphs
(e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and
(v), (k)(1)(iii)b., c., and (k)(2)(i)b. and e.
apply to any account in which a
research analyst has a financial interest,
or over which the research analyst
exercises discretion or control[, other
than an investment company registered
under the Investment Company Act of
1940]. The trading restrictions
applicable to research analysts and
household members (i.e., paragraphs
(e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and
(v))[;] shall not include an investment
company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 over
which the research analyst or a
household member has discretion or
control, provided that the research
analyst or household member has no
financial interest in such investment
company, other than a performance or
management fee, and do not apply to a
‘‘blind trust’’ account that is controlled
by a person other than the research
analyst or research analyst’s household
member where neither the research
analyst nor household member knows of
the account’s investments or investment
transactions.
.50 through .140 No change.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Rule 344. Research Analysts and
Supervisory Analysts
Research analysts and supervisory
analysts must be registered with,
qualified by, and approved by the
Exchange.
* * * Supplementary Material:
.10 [For purposes of this Rule, the
term ‘‘research analyst’’ includes a
member, allied member, associated
person or employee who is primarily
responsible for the preparation of the
substance of a research report and/or
whose name appears on such report.
Such research analysts must pass a
qualification examination acceptable to
the Exchange.] For the purposes of this
Rule, ‘‘research analyst’’ shall mean an
associated person whose primary job
function is to provide investment
research and who is primarily
responsible for the preparation of the
substance of a research report or whose
name appears on the report.
.11 For purposes of this Rule, the
term ‘‘supervisory analyst’’ includes [a
member,] an allied member or employee
who is responsible for preparing or
approving research reports under Rule
472(a)(2). In order to show evidence of
acceptability to the Exchange as a
supervisory analyst, [a member,] an
allied member, or employee may do one
of the following:
(1) Present evidence of appropriate
experience and pass an Exchange
Supervisory Analyst Examination
(Series 16).
(2) Present evidence of appropriate
experience and successful completion of
a specified level of the Chartered
Financial Analysts Examination
prescribed by the Exchange and pass
only that portion of the Exchange
Supervisory Analyst Examination
(Series 16) dealing with Exchange rules
on research standards and related
matters.
The Exchange publishes a Study
Outline for the Research Analyst
Examination and the Supervisory
Analyst Examination (Series 16).
.12 No change.
B. NASD’s Proposed Rule Text
1050. Registration of Research Analysts
(a) No change.
(b) For the purposes of this Rule 1050,
‘‘research analyst’’ shall mean an
associated person whose primary job
function is to provide investment
research and who is primarily
responsible for the preparation of the
substance of a research report or whose
name appears on a research report.
(c) through (f) No change.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2063
2711. Research Analysts and Research
Reports
(a) Definitions
For purposes of this rule, the
following terms shall be defined as
provided.
(1) through (6) No Change.
(7) ‘‘Research analyst account’’ means
any account in which a research analyst
or member of the research analyst’s
household has a financial interest[,] or
over which such analyst has discretion
or control[, other than an investment
company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940]. The
term ‘‘research analyst account’’ shall
not include an investment company
registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 over which the
research analyst or a member of the
research analyst’s household has
discretion or control, provided that the
research analyst or household member
has no financial interest in such
investment company, other than a
performance or management fee. This
term also shall [does] not include a
‘‘blind trust’’ account that is controlled
by a person other than the research
analyst or member of the research
analyst’s household where neither the
research analyst nor a member of the
research analyst’s household knows of
the account’s investments or investment
transactions.
(8) No Change.
(9) ‘‘Research Report’’ means any
written (including electronic)
communication that includes an
analysis of equity securities of
individual companies or industries[,]
(other than an open-end registered
investment company that is not listed or
traded on an exchange or a public direct
participation program) and that
provides information reasonably
sufficient upon which to base an
investment decision. This term does not
include:
(A) through (C) No Change.
(10) No Change.
(b) Restrictions on Relationship With
Research Department
(1) No Change.
(2) [Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(3), n]No employee of the investment
banking department or any other
employee of the member who is not
directly responsible for investment
research (‘‘non-research personnel’’),
other than legal or compliance
personnel, may review or approve a
research report of the member before its
publication.
[(3) Non-research personnel may
review a research report before its
publication as necessary only to verify
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2064
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
the factual accuracy of information in
the research report or identify any
potential conflict of interest, provided
that:]
[(A) Any written communication
between non-research personnel and
research department personnel
concerning the content of a research
report must be made either through
authorized legal or compliance
personnel of the member or in a
transmission copied to such personnel;
and]
[(B) Any oral communication between
non-research personnel and research
department personnel concerning the
content of a research report must be
documented and made either through
authorized legal or compliance
personnel acting as intermediary or in a
conversation conducted in the presence
of such personnel.]
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
(c) Restrictions on Communications
With the Subject Company
(1) through (4) No Change.
(5) A research analyst is prohibited
from directly or indirectly:
(A) No Change.
(B) Engaging in any communication
with a current or prospective customer
or internal sales personnel in the
presence of investment banking
department personnel or company
management about an investment
banking services transaction.
(6) through (7) No Change.
(d) through (e) No Change.
(f) Restrictions on Publishing Research
Reports and Public Appearances;
Termination of Coverage
[(1) No member may publish or
otherwise distribute a research report
and no research analyst may make a
public appearance regarding a subject
company for which the member acted as
manager or co-manager of:]
[(A) An initial public offering, for 40
calendar days following the date of the
offering; or]
[(B) A secondary offering, for 10
calendar days following the date of the
offering; provided that:]
[(i) Paragraphs (f)(1)(A) and (f)(1)(B)
will not prevent a member from
publishing or otherwise distributing a
research report, or prevent a research
analyst from making a public
appearance, concerning the effects of
significant news or a significant event
on the subject company within such 40and 10-day periods, and provided
further that legal or compliance
personnel authorize publication of that
research report before it is issued or
authorize the public appearance before
it is made; and]
[(ii) paragraph (f)(1)(B) will not
prevent a member from publishing or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
otherwise distributing a research report
pursuant to SEC Rule 139 regarding a
subject company with ‘‘actively-traded
securities,’’ as defined in Regulation M,
17 CFR 242.101(c)(1), and will not
prevent a research analyst from making
a public appearance concerning such a
company.]
([2]1) No member that has agreed to
participate or is participating as an
underwriter or dealer [(other than as
manager or co-manager)] of an issuer’s
initial public offering may publish or
otherwise distribute a research report or
make a public appearance regarding that
issuer for 25 calendar days after the date
of the offering. This paragraph will not
prevent a member from publishing or
otherwise distributing a research report,
or prevent a research analyst from
making a public appearance,
concerning the effects of significant
news or a significant event on the
subject company within such 25-day
period, provided further that legal or
compliance personnel authorize
publication of that research report
before it is issued or authorize the
public appearance before it is made.
([3]2) For purpose[s] of paragraph
(f)(1)[and (f)(2)], the term ‘‘date of the
offering’’ refers to the later of the
effective date of the registration
statement or the first date on which the
security was bona fide offered to the
public.
[(4) No member that has acted as a
manager or co-manager of a securities
offering may publish or otherwise
distribute a research report or make a
public appearance concerning a subject
company 15 days prior to and after the
expiration, waiver or termination of a
lock-up agreement or any other
agreement that the member has entered
into with a subject company or its
shareholders that restricts or prohibits
the sale of securities held by the subject
company or its shareholders after the
completion of a securities offering. This
paragraph will not prevent a member
from publishing or otherwise
distributing a research report
concerning the effects of significant
news or a significant event on the
subject company within such period,
provided legal or compliance personnel
authorize publication of that research
report before it is issued. In addition,
this paragraph shall not apply to the
publication or distribution of a research
report pursuant to SEC Rule 139
regarding a subject company with
‘‘actively traded securities,’’ as defined
in Regulation M, 17 CFR 242.101(c)(1),
or to a public appearance concerning
such a subject company.]
(3) Any member that has acted as a
manager or co-manager of a securities
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
offering and publishes or otherwise
distributes a research report concerning
a subject company during a period 15
days prior to and after the expiration,
waiver or termination of a lock-up
agreement or any other agreement that
the member has entered into with a
subject company or its shareholders that
restricts or prohibits the sale of
securities held by the subject company
or its shareholders after the completion
of a securities offering shall provide
with the research report a certification,
in such form as prescribed by NASD,
stating that the member has a bona fide
reason for issuing the research report.
([5]4) If a member intends to
terminate its research coverage of a
subject company, notice of this
termination must be made. The member
must make available a final research
report on the subject company using the
means of dissemination equivalent to
those it ordinarily uses to provide the
customer with its research reports on
the subject company. The report must
be comparable in scope and detail to
prior research reports and must include
a final recommendation or rating, unless
it is impracticable for the member to
produce a comparable report (e.g., if the
research analyst covering the subject
company or sector has left the member
or if the member terminates coverage of
the industry or sector). If it is
impracticable to produce a final
recommendation or rating, the final
research report must disclose the
member’s rationale for the decision to
terminate coverage.
(g) Restrictions on Personal Trading by
Research Analysts
(1) through (4) No Change.
(5) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(g)(1) through (g)(3) do not apply to a
purchase or sale of the securities of[:]
[(A) Any registered diversified
investment company as defined under
Section (5)(b)(1) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940; or ]
[(B)] Any [other] investment fund over
which neither the research analyst nor
a member of the research analyst’s
household has any investment
discretion or control, provided that the
research analyst and household member
are not made aware of the fund’s
holdings or transactions other than
through periodic shareholder reports
and sales material based on such
reports[:] and
[(i)] The research analyst accounts
collectively own interests representing
no more than 1% of the assets of the
fund[;].
[(ii) The fund invests no more than
20% of its assets in securities of issuers
principally engaged in the same types of
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
business as companies that the research
analyst follows; and]
[(iii) If the investment fund distributes
securities in kind to the research analyst
or household member before the issuer’s
initial public offering, the research
analyst or household member must
either divest those securities
immediately or the research analyst
must refrain from participating in the
preparation of research reports
concerning that issuer.]
(6) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(g)(1) through (g)(3) do not apply when
the following conditions are satisfied:
(A) The research analyst is employed
by a member that has adopted an
internal policy that prohibits research
analysts from owning any securities
issued by subject companies for which
the research analyst provides coverage
and requires those analysts to
completely divest themselves of their
existing holdings in such securities;
(B) The research analyst abides by a
reasonable plan of liquidation under
which all securities issued by
companies that the analyst follows are
to be sold within 120 days of the
effective date of the member’s policy;
(C) The research analyst files such
liquidation plan with the member’s legal
or compliance department within 15
days of the effective date of the
member’s policy;
(D) The research analyst receives
written approval of the liquidation plan
from the member’s legal or compliance
department prior to the sale of any
securities under the plan; and
(E) The member must maintain
written records sufficient to document
compliance with each liquidation plan
approved by its legal or compliance
department for three years following the
date on which the liquidation plan is
approved.
([6]7) Legal or compliance personnel
of the member shall pre-approve all
transactions of persons who oversee
research analysts to the extent such
transactions involve equity securities of
subject companies covered by the
research analysts that they oversee. This
pre-approval requirement shall apply to
all persons, such as the director of
research, supervisory analyst, or
member of a committee, who have
direct influence or control with respect
to the preparation of the substance of
research reports or establishing or
changing a rating or price target of a
subject company’s equity securities.
(h) Disclosure Requirements
(1) [Ownership and
Material]Definition of ‘‘Conflict of
Interest’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
[A member must disclose in research
reports and a research analyst must
disclose in public appearances]For the
purposes of paragraph (h)(2), ‘‘conflict
of interest’’ shall include any of the
following:
(A) If the research analyst or a
member of the research analyst’s
household has a financial interest in the
securities of the subject company, and
the nature of the financial interest
(including, without limitation, whether
it consists of any option, right, warrant,
future, long or short position);
(B) If, as of the end of the month
immediately preceding the date of
publication of the research report or the
public appearance (or the end of the
second most recent month if the
publication date is less than 10 calendar
days after the end of the most recent
month), the member or its affiliates
beneficially own 1% or more of any
class of common equity securities of the
subject company. Computation of
beneficial ownership of securities must
be based upon the same standards used
to compute ownership for purposes of
the reporting requirements under
Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934;
[(C) Any other actual, material
conflict of interest of the research
analyst or member of which the research
analyst knows or has reason to know at
the time of publication of the research
report or at the time of the public
appearance.]
[(2) Receipt of Compensation]
[(A) A member must disclose in
research reports:]
([i]C) If the research analyst received
compensation:
[a.](i) Based upon (among other
factors) the member’s investment
banking revenues; or
[b.](ii) From the subject company in
the past 12 months.
([ii]D) If the member or any affiliate of
the member:
[a.](i) Managed or co-managed a
public offering of securities for the
subject company in the past 12 months;
[b.](ii) Received compensation for
investment banking services from the
subject company in the past 12 months;
or
[c.](iii) Expects to receive or intends
to seek compensation for investment
banking services from the subject
company in the next 3 months.
([iii]E) If ([1]i) as of the end of the
month immediately preceding the date
of publication of the research report (or
the end of the second most recent
month if the publication date is less
than 30 calendar days after the end of
the most recent month) or ([2]ii) to the
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2065
extent the research analyst or an
employee of the member with the ability
to influence the substance of the
research knows:
a. The member received any
compensation for products or services
other than investment banking services
from the subject company in the past 12
months; or
b. The subject company currently is,
or during the 12-month period
preceding the date of distribution of the
research report was, a client of the
member. In such cases, the member also
must disclose the types of services
provided to the subject company. For
purposes of this Rule 2711(h)(1), the
types of services provided to the subject
company shall be described as
investment banking services, noninvestment banking securities-related
services, and non-securities services.
([iv]F) If, to the extent the research
analyst or an employee of the member
with the ability to influence the
substance of the research report knows
an affiliate of the member received any
compensation for products or services
other than investment banking services
from the subject company in the past 12
months.
([v]G) If, to the extent the research
analyst or member has reason to know,
an affiliate of the member received any
compensation for products or services
other than investment banking services
from the subject company in the past 12
months.
[a.](i) [This]The requirement to
disclose this conflict of interest will be
deemed satisfied if such compensation
is disclosed in research reports or on a
member’s Web site within 30 days after
completion of the last calendar quarter,
provided that the member has taken
steps reasonably designed to identify
any such compensation during that
calendar quarter. [This]The disclosure
requirement shall not apply to any
subject company as to which the
member initiated coverage since the
beginning of the current calendar
quarter.
[b.](ii) The research analyst and the
member will be presumed not to have
reason to know whether an affiliate
received any compensation for products
or services other than investment
banking services from the subject
company in the past 12 months if the
member maintains and enforces policies
and procedures reasonably designed to
prevent the research analysts and
employees of the member with the
ability to influence the substance of
research reports from, directly or
indirectly, receiving information from
the affiliate concerning whether the
affiliate received such compensation.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2066
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
(H) If the research analyst or member
of a research analyst’s household serves
as an officer, director or advisory board
member of the subject company.
(I) If the member was making a
market in the subject company’s
securities at the time that the research
report was published; and
(J) Any other actual, material conflict
of interest of the research analyst or
member of which the research analyst
knows or has reason to know at the time
of publication of the research report or
at the time of the public appearance.
([vi]K) For the purposes of this Rule
2711(h)([2]1), an employee of the
member with the ability to influence the
substance of the research report is an
employee who, in the ordinary course of
that person’s duties, has the authority to
review the particular research report
and to change that research report prior
to publication.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
(2) Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
(A) Any member that has a conflict of
interest or whose research analyst has a
conflict of interest concerning the
subject company of a research report
must disclose that conflict of interest
either:
(i) On its Web site and prominently
state the following on the front page of
the research report:
‘‘[Name of firm and/or the research
analyst preparing this report] has a
conflict of interest that may affect the
ability of the firm or the analyst to
provide objective analysis about the
company. For more information about
this conflict of interest, please see
[Reference to the firm’s Web site]’’ or
(ii) In the research report in
accordance with paragraph (h)(8).
(B) A research analyst must disclose
in public appearances:
(i) The conflicts of interest described
in paragraphs (h)(1)(A), (B) and (J);
(ii) If, to the extent the research
analyst knows or has reason to know,
the member or any affiliate received any
compensation from the subject company
in the past 12 months;
(iii) If the research analyst received
any compensation from the subject
company in the past 12 months; or
([iii]iv) If, to the extent the research
analyst knows or has reason to know,
the subject company currently is, or
during the 12-month period preceding
the date of distribution of the research
report, was, a client of the member. In
such cases, the research analyst also
must disclose the types of services
provided to the subject company, if
known by the research analyst;[.]or
(v) If the research analyst or a member
of the research analyst’s household
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
serves as an officer, director or advisory
board member of the subject company.
(C) A member or research analyst will
not be required to make a disclosure
required by paragraphs (h)(1)(D)(ii) and
(iii)[(h)(2)(A)(ii)(b) and (c)],
(h)(1)(E)(b)[(2)(A)(iii)(b),] or (h)(2)(B)(ii)
and (iv[iii]) to the extent such disclosure
would reveal material non-public
information regarding specific potential
future investment banking transactions
of the subject company.
[(3) Position as Officer or Director]
[A member must disclose in research
reports and a research analyst must
disclose in public appearances if the
research analyst or a member of the
research analyst’s household serves as
an officer, director or advisory board
member of the subject company.]
([4]3) Meaning of Ratings
If a research report contains a rating,
the member must define in the research
report the meaning of each rating used
by the member in its rating system. The
definition of each rating must be
consistent with its plain meaning.
([5]4) Distribution of Ratings
(A) Through (B) No Change.
(C) The information that is disclosed
under paragraphs (h)([5]4)(A) and
(h)([5]4)(B) must be current as of the end
of the most recent calendar quarter (or
the second most recent calendar quarter
if the publication date is less than 15
calendar days after the most recent
calendar quarter) and must reflect the
distribution of the most recent ratings
issued by the member for all subject
companies, unless the most recent
rating was issued more than 12 months
ago.
(D) The requirements of paragraph
(h)([5]4) shall not apply to any research
report that does not contain a rating.
([6]5) Price Chart
If a research report contains either a
rating or a price target, and the member
has assigned a rating or price target to
the subject company’s securities for at
least one year, the research report must
include a line graph of the security’s
daily closing prices for the period that
the member has assigned any rating or
price target or for a three-year period,
whichever is shorter.
The line graph must:
(A) through (C) No Change.
([7]6) Price Targets
If a research report contains a price
target, the member must disclose in the
research report the valuation methods
used to determine the price target. Price
targets must have a reasonable basis and
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
must be accompanied by a disclosure
concerning the risks that may impede
achievement of the price target.
[(8) Market Making
A member must disclose in research
reports if it was making a market in the
subject company’s securities at the time
that the research report was published.]
([9]7) Disclosure Required by Other
Provisions
In addition to the disclosure required
by this rule, members and research
analysts must provide disclosure in
research reports and public appearances
that is required by applicable law or
regulation, including NASD Rule 2210
and the antifraud provisions of the
federal securities laws.
([10]8) Prominence of Disclosure
The disclosures required by this
paragraph (h), other than those made
pursuant to paragraph (h)(2)(A)(i), must
be presented on the front page of
research reports or the front page must
refer to the page on which disclosures
are found. Disclosures and references to
disclosures must be clear,
comprehensive and prominent.
([11]9) Disclosures in Research Reports
Covering Six or More Companies
When a member distributes a research
report covering six or more subject
companies (a ‘‘compendium report’’),
for purposes of the disclosures required
in paragraph (h), other than those
required by paragraph (h)(2), the
compendium report may direct the
reader in a clear manner as to where
they may obtain applicable current
disclosures. Electronic compendium
reports may include a hyperlink to the
required disclosures. Paper-based
compendium reports must provide
either a toll-free number to call or a
postal address to write for the required
disclosures and may also include a web
address of the member where the
disclosures can be found.
(1[2]0) Records of Public Appearances
Members must maintain records of
public appearances by research analysts
sufficient to demonstrate compliance by
those research analysts with the
applicable disclosure requirements
under paragraph (h) of this Rule. Such
records must be maintained for three
years from the date of the public
appearance.
(1[3]1) Third-Party Research Reports
(A) Subject to paragraph (h)(1[3]1)(B),
if a member distributes or makes
available any research report that is
produced by another member, a non-
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
member affiliate of the member or an
independent third party, the member
must accompany the research report
with the current applicable disclosures,
as they pertain to the member, that are
required by paragraphs (h)(1)(B),
[(h)(1)(C), (h)(2)(A)(ii) and (h)(8)]
(h)(1)(D), (h)(1)(I) and (h)(1)(J) of this
Rule.
(B) The requirements of paragraph
(h)(1[3]1)(A) shall not apply to research
reports prepared by an independent
third party that the member makes
available to its customers either upon
request or through a membermaintained Web site.
(C) No Change.
(i) Supervisory Procedures
Each member subject to this rule must
adopt and implement written
supervisory procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that the member and
its employees comply with the
provisions of this rule (including the
attestation requirements of Rule
2711(d)(2)), and a senior officer of such
a member must [attest] annually [to]file
with the NASD Member Regulation
Department by April 1 of each year an
attestation that it has adopted and
implemented those procedures.
(j) Prohibition of Retaliation Against
Research Analysts
No member and no [employee of a
member who is involved with the
member’s investment banking
activities]non-research personnel as
defined in paragraph (b)(2) may,
directly or indirectly, retaliate against or
threaten to retaliate against any research
analyst employed by the member or its
affiliates as a result of an adverse,
negative, or otherwise unfavorable
research report or public appearance
written or made by the research analyst
that may adversely affect the member’s
present or prospective investment
banking relationship with the subject
company of a research report. This
prohibition shall not limit a member’s
authority to discipline or terminate a
research analyst, in accordance with the
member’s policies and procedures, for
any cause other than the writing of such
an unfavorable research report or the
making of such an unfavorable public
appearance.
(k) No Change
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statements of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Changes
In their filings with the Commission,
the Exchange and NASD included
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule changes
and discussed any comments they
received on the proposed rule changes.
The text of these statements may be
examined at the places specified in Item
IV below. The Exchange and NASD
have prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statements of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Changes
1. NYSE’s Purpose
Background
Beginning in 2002, the Exchange and
the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. implemented a series of
rule changes (‘‘SRO Rules’’) to improve
objectivity and transparency in equity
research and provide investors with
more reliable and useful information to
make investment decisions. The NYSE
believes that the rules were intended to
restore public confidence in the validity
of research and the veracity of research
analysts, who are expected to function
as unbiased intermediaries between
issuers and the investors who buy and
sell their securities. According to the
NYSE, the trustworthiness of research
had eroded due to the pervasive
influences of investment banking and
other conflicts that had manifest
themselves during the market boom of
the late 1990s.
Generally, the SRO Rules require
clear, comprehensive and prominent
disclosure of conflicts of interest in
research reports and public appearances
by research analysts. The rules further
prohibit certain conduct—investment
banking personnel involvement in the
content of research and determination of
analyst compensation, for example—
when the conflicts are considered too
pronounced to be cured by disclosure.
The SROs enacted the research
analyst conflict rules in two primary
tranches and, more recently, adopted
additional amendments prohibiting
analysts from participating in road
shows. In addition, the SROs
supplemented their rulemaking with
two joint memoranda that provided
interpretive guidance to their members
on a number of issues.7 The NASD and
NYSE rules and interpretations are
virtually identical and are intended to
operate uniformly.
On May 10, 2002, the SEC approved
the first round of proposed SRO Rules
7 See NYSE Information Memos 02–26 and 04–10
and NASD Notices to Members 02–39 (July 2002)
and 04–18 (March 2004).
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2067
(‘‘Round 1 Amendments’’)—new NASD
Rule 2711 (‘‘Research Analysts and
Research Reports’’) and amendments to
NYSE Rules 351 (‘‘Reporting
Requirements’’) and 472
(‘‘Communications with the Public’’)—
which implemented basic reforms to
separate research from investment
banking and to provide more extensive
disclosure of conflicts of interest in
research reports and public
appearances.8
On July 29, 2003, the SEC approved
a second set of amendments to the SRO
Rules (‘‘Round 2 Amendments’’) 9 that
achieved two purposes. First, the Round
2 Amendments implemented SRO
initiatives to further promote analyst
objectivity and transparency of conflicts
in research reports. Second, the Round
2 Amendments implemented changes
mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (‘‘Sarbanes-Oxley’’).10 SarbanesOxley required adoption by July 30,
2003 of rules ‘‘reasonably designed to
address conflicts of interest that can
arise when securities analysts
recommend equity securities in research
reports and public appearances,’’ and
set forth certain specific rules to be
promulgated. Many of those rules had
already been adopted in the first round
of SRO rulemaking. The Round 2
Amendments therefore implemented
those specific Sarbanes-Oxley rules that
did not already exist and conformed the
language of the SRO Rules as necessary.
As part of the Round 2 Amendments,
the SEC approved rules requiring
registration and qualification
requirements for research analysts.
NYSE Rule 344 requires an associated
person who functions as a research
analyst on behalf of a member
organization to register as such and pass
a qualification examination. For the
purposes of this requirement, a
‘‘research analyst’’ is defined as an
associated person or employee who is
primarily responsible for the
preparation of the substance of a
research report and/or whose name
appears on such ‘‘research report,’’ as
that term is defined in NYSE Rule 472.
The SROs jointly developed and
implemented the Research Analyst
Qualification Examination (Series 86/
87). The examination consists of an
analysis part (Series 86) and a regulatory
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45908
(May 10, 2002), 67 FR 34968 (May 16, 2002) (order
approving SR–NASD–2002–021 and SR–NYSE–
2002–09).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48252
(July 29, 2003), 68 FR 45875 (Aug. 4, 2003) (order
approving SR–NASD–2002–154 and SR–NYSE–
2002–49).
10 See Section 15D(a) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78o–
6.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2068
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
part (Series 87). Prior to taking either
the Series 86 or 87, a candidate also
must have passed the General Securities
Registered Representative Examination
(Series 7), the Limited Registered
Representative Examination (Series 17),
or the Canada Module of Series 7 (Series
37 or 38).
The SRO Rules provide three
exemptions from the Series 86
examination. First, there is an
exemption for research analysts who
have passed Levels I and II of the
Chartered Financial Analyst (‘‘CFA’’)
examination and have either (1)
completed the CFA Level II within 2
years of application or registration, or
(2) functioned as a research analyst
continuously since having passed the
CFA Level II.11
A second exemption is available to
research analysts who have passed
Levels I and II of the Chartered Market
Technician Examination and produce
only ‘‘technical research reports,’’ as
that term is defined under the SRO
Rules.12
A third exemption—from both the
Series 86 and Series 87—is available to
persons who may be ‘‘associated
persons’’ of a member who are
employed by that member’s foreign
affiliate but who produce research on
behalf of the U.S. member. To be
eligible for the exemption, three primary
conditions must be met: (1) A foreign
analyst must comply with the
registration and qualification
requirements or other standards in an
SRO-approved foreign jurisdiction
whose regulatory scheme reflects a
recognition of principles that are
consonant with the SRO Rules and
qualification standards; (2) the U.S.
member must apply all of the other
SROs rules and other member firm
standards to the research produced by
the foreign affiliate and foreign research
analysts that qualify for, and rely upon,
the exemption; and (3) the U.S. member
must include a specific disclosure that
the research report has been prepared in
whole or part by foreign research
analysts who may be associated persons
of the member who are not registered/
qualified as a research analyst with the
NYSE or NASD, but instead have
satisfied the registration/qualification
requirements or other research-related
standards of a foreign jurisdiction that
has been recognized for these purposes
11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49464
(March 24, 2004), 69 FR 16628 (March 30, 2004)
(order approving SR–NASD–2004–020 and SR–
NYSE–2004–03).
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51240
(February 23, 2005), 70 FR 10451 (March 3, 2005)
(notice of immediate effectiveness of SR–NASD–
2005–022 and SR–NYSE–2005–12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
by the NYSE and NASD. Currently, the
following jurisdictions satisfy the
applicable SRO standards noted above:
China, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia,
Singapore, Thailand and the United
Kingdom.
On April 21, 2005, the Commission
approved an amendment to the SRO
Rules that prohibits research analysts
from participating in a road show
related to an investment banking
services transaction and from
communicating with current or
prospective customers in the presence
of investment banking department
personnel or company management
about such an investment banking
services transaction.13 Additionally, the
amendment prohibits investment
banking personnel from directing a
research analyst to engage in sales and
marketing efforts and other
communications with a current or
prospective customer about an
investment banking services transaction.
Joint SRO Report
As part of its May 2002 order
approving new NASD Rule 2711 and
amendments to NYSE Rule 472, the SEC
noted that it would require NASD and
the NYSE to assess the success of the
rules after they have been in place for
a suitable amount of time. In April 2005,
the SEC staff requested a joint
comprehensive report on the operation
and effectiveness of the rules, together
with any recommendations for changes
or additions to the rules. The SRO staffs
submitted that report to the SEC on
December 22, 2005.
The SRO staffs concluded in the
report that the SRO Rules have been
effective in helping to restore integrity
to research by minimizing the
influences of investment banking and
promoting transparency of other
potential conflicts of interest. However,
the SRO staffs further expressed their
belief that certain changes to the SRO
Rules would further improve their
effectiveness by striking an even better
balance between ensuring objective and
reliable research on the one hand and
permitting the flow of information to
investors and minimizing costs and
burdens to members on the other.
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51593
(April 21, 2005), 70 FR 22168 (April 28, 2005)
(order approving SR–NASD–2004–141 and SR–
NYSE–2005–24). As defined under NASD Rule
2711(a)(3) and NYSE Rule 472.20, ‘‘investment
banking services’’ includes, without limitation,
acting as an underwriter in an offering for the
issuer; acting as a financial adviser in a merger or
acquisition; providing venture capital, equity lines
of credit, PIPEs (private investment, public equity
transactions), or similar investments; serving as
placement agent for the issuer; or acting as a
member of a selling group in a securities
underwriting.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In formulating the recommendations
for rule changes in the report, the SROs
considered extensive data and
qualitative feedback regarding the range
of activities under the SRO Rules,
including examinations, sweeps,
enforcement activities, interpretive
issues and registration and qualification
of research analysts. The SROs also
surveyed academic studies and media
reports about the impact of the rules;
compared the SRO Rules to the
provisions of the so-called ‘‘Global
Settlement’’ among the SROs, the
Commission, the North American
Securities Administrators Association
and ten 14 of the largest investment
banks; reviewed industry comment
letters; and consulted with various
industry representatives. The proposed
rule changes would implement the
recommendations of the SROs in the
SRO report. A discussion of the
proposed rule changes is set out below.
Exception to Definition of ‘‘Research
Report’’
‘‘Research report’’ is defined in NYSE
Rule 472.10(2) as a ‘‘written or
electronic communication which
includes an analysis of equity securities
of individual companies or industries,
and provides information reasonably
sufficient upon which to base an
investment decision.’’ The proposed
rule change would expressly exclude
from the definition of ‘‘research report,’’
sales material regarding open-end
registered investment companies that
are not listed or traded on an exchange
and public direct participation programs
(‘‘DPPs’’). Since these investment
companies and DPPs are ‘‘equity
securities’’ as defined in Section
3(a)(11) 15 of the Exchange Act, related
sales material that contains an analysis
of those securities and information
sufficient upon which to base an
investment decision technically is
covered by the definition. For the
following reasons, the Exchange
believes sales material for both types of
products should be excluded from the
definition of ‘‘research report.’’
Sales material regarding investment
companies is already subject to a
separate regulatory regime, including
NASD Rule 2210 and Securities Act
Rule 482,16 and all advertisements and
sales literature regarding registered
investment companies must be filed
with the NASD Advertising Regulation
Department (the ‘‘Department’’) within
14 In August 2004, two additional firms settled
with regulators under the same terms as the April
2003 Global Settlement.
15 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(11).
16 17 CFR 230.482.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
ten (10) business days of first use.17
Moreover, the Exchange staff does not
believe that the conflicts underpinning
the SRO Rules are manifest to the same
extent with respect to research on openend investment companies that are not
listed or traded on an exchange.
Similarly, the NYSE believes that
sales material for public DPPs also do
not present the same conflicts of interest
or other regulatory concerns as research
on exchange-traded securities. Publicly
offered DPPs typically are limited
partnerships or limited liability
companies whose equity interests do
not trade on an exchange and do not
have an active secondary market. The
DPP sponsor generally produces its
sales material and sells interests in the
DPP during an initial public offering on
a best efforts basis. According to the
NYSE, this sales material typically
consists of ‘‘tombstone’’ advertisements
whose content is strictly limited under
Securities Act Rule 134,18 or
supplemental sales literature that must
be accompanied or preceded by a
prospectus for the DPP. Additionally,
unlike equity research, NASD Rule
2210(c)(2)(B) requires members to file
advertisements and sales literature
concerning public DPPs with the
Department within ten business days of
first use. Thus, NASD staff review such
sales material before or shortly after it
is distributed to the public.
Although exchange-traded funds
(‘‘ETFs’’) are open-end investment
companies, they trade on an exchange
and therefore those funds would not be
excepted from the definition of
‘‘research report.’’ The Exchange
requests comment on whether ETFs
should also be excluded from the
definition. In addition, the NYSE
believes that NASD Advertising
Regulation Department review of
registered investment company and
public DPP sales material reduces the
likelihood that it will contain content
that is not fair and balanced.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Exception to Registration and
Qualification Requirements for NonResearch Personnel That Produce
‘‘Research Reports’’
The SRO Rules, in accordance with
the mandates of Sarbanes-Oxley,19 are
constructed such that the author of a
17 An advertisement or sales literature concerning
a registered investment company that includes a
performance ranking or performance comparison of
the investment company with other investment
companies that is not generally published or are
created by the fund or its affiliates must be filed
with the Department at least 10 business days prior
to first use or publication. NASD Rule
2210(c)(4)(A).
18 17 CFR 230.134.
19 See Section 15D of the Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
communication that meets the
definition of a ‘‘research report’’ is a
‘‘research analyst,’’ irrespective of his or
her title or primary job. This prevents
firms from circumventing the rules by
redirecting through other channels, such
as registered representatives or traders,
potentially biased research that is not
subject to the SRO objectivity
safeguards.
The Exchange believes it is important
to maintain such communications as
research reports subject to the SRO
Rules and those principally responsible
for their preparation as research
analysts. However, the proposed rule
changes would create a limited
exemption from the NYSE Rule 344
registration requirements for nonresearch personnel that produce
research reports. Thus, for example, the
registration requirements would not
apply to a registered representative who
occasionally produces communications
that technically meet the definition of a
research report and are distributed to
fifteen (15) or more clients, or a trader
who similarly produced market
commentary that included an analysis
of an individual security—also
considered a research report under
NYSE rules.
The Exchange believes that the
registration and qualification
requirements were intended for those
individuals whose principal job
function is to produce research, while
the balance of the SRO Rules are
intended to foster objective analysis of
equity securities and transparency of
certain conflicts and to provide
beneficial information to investors.
Restrictions on Investment Banking
Department Relationship With Research
Department
Exchange Rule 472(b)(3) permits
investment banking and other nonresearch employees, other than legal
and compliance personnel, to review a
research report before publication only
to verify the factual accuracy of
information in the report or identify a
potential conflict of interest. This
provision also requires that an
authorized legal or compliance official
act as intermediary for all such
permissible communications.
The proposed rule changes eliminate
the pre-publication review of research
by investment banking and other nonresearch personnel, other than by legal
and compliance. The NYSE believes
that the factual review of a research
report by investment banking personnel
is unnecessary in light of the numerous
other sources available to verify factual
information, including the subject
company, and only raises concerns
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2069
about the objectivity of the report.
According to the NYSE, such review
may invite pressure on a research
analyst from investment banking
personnel that could be difficult to
monitor. Such factual reviews are not
permitted under the terms of the Global
Settlement and the Exchange staff is not
aware of any evidence that the factual
accuracy of research produced by firms
subject to the Global Settlement has
suffered. Moreover, the NYSE believes
that legal and compliance can
adequately perform a conflict review
without sharing draft research reports
with investment banking personnel and
other non-research personnel.
Restrictions on Publishing Research
Reports and Public Appearances
NYSE Rule 472(f) sets forth ‘‘quiet
periods’’ during which a member
organization is prohibited from
publishing or otherwise distributing a
research report and a research analyst is
prohibited from making a public
appearance. These quiet periods apply
in two circumstances: (1) After a public
offering of securities and (2) before and
after the expiration, waiver or
termination of a lock-up agreement
entered into by a member organization
with a subject company that restricts the
sale of securities by that company or its
shareholders.
With respect to the former, NYSE
Rule 472 establishes different quiet
periods depending on whether the
offering is an initial public offering
(‘‘IPO’’) or a secondary offering and
whether the member organization acted
as manager or co-manager or as an
underwriter or dealer. In the current
NYSE Rule 472, a member organization
that acted as a manager or co-manager
of an IPO may not publish or otherwise
distribute research for 40 calendar days
following the date of the offering; all
other member organizations that
participated as an underwriter or dealer
in the offering are subject to a 25-day
quiet period. For secondary offerings, a
ten-day quiet period applies only to the
manager and co-manager of the offering.
NYSE Rule 472(f)(5) contains an
exception that permits publication and
distribution of research or a public
appearance concerning the effects of
significant news or a significant event
on the subject company during the quiet
period. Prior guidance by the Exchange
has interpreted this exception to apply
only to news or events that have a
material impact on, or cause a material
change to, a company’s operation,
earnings or financial condition. There is
also an exception in NYSE Rule
472(f)(2) to the secondary offering quiet
period, which permits publication or
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2070
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
distribution of research pursuant to
Securities Act Rule 139 20 regarding a
subject company with ‘‘actively-traded
securities’’ as defined in Regulation M
of the Act.21
The Exchange proposes several
changes to the quiet periods
surrounding public offerings and the
releases of lock-up agreements:
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
(a) Quiet periods following public
offerings of securities
The proposed rule changes to NYSE
Rule 472(f) create a uniform IPO quiet
period for all underwriters and dealers
participating in the public offering. The
amended rule applies a 25-day quiet
period to managers, co-managers,
underwriters and dealers that
participate in an IPO. The NYSE
believes that the objectivity and
disclosure safeguards of NYSE Rule 472
and other research rule provisions have
obviated the need for a longer quiet
period for managers and co-managers
than other underwriters and dealers
participating in an IPO. The NYSE
believes that these changes will promote
an enhanced flow of valuable
information to investors and maintain
consistency with SEC regulations.
In addition, the proposed rule
changes eliminate quiet periods
following a secondary offering.
According to the NYSE, the success of
the SRO Rules in mitigating research
analyst conflicts of interest supports the
repeal of the quiet periods following
secondary offerings. The NYSE believes
this will expand the ability of member
organizations to release more
information regarding a subject
company’s prospects and financial
condition, without sacrificing the
reliability of the research.
(b) Quiet periods around releases of
lock-up agreements
The proposed rule changes reduce the
quiet period surrounding the expiration,
termination or waiver of a lock-up
agreement from the current 15-day
period to a five-day period. The
Exchange believes that some quiet
period must be maintained around the
release of lock-up agreements because
an analyst can conceivably write a
research report after an offering with an
honestly held positive opinion, but
advantageously time the publication of
the report for inappropriate reasons.
Also, the NYSE believes that absent a
quiet period around the expiration,
termination or waiver of a lock-up
agreement, member organizations may
selectively time the issuance of ‘‘booster
20 17
21 17
CFR 230.139.
CFR 242.101.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
shot’’ reports intended to raise the stock
price of a company just before lockedup shares become freely saleable into
the market by a company or its major
shareholders. NYSE believes a five-day
quiet period strikes a balance between
guarding investors against the selective
timing of the issuance of research and
allowing the prompt dissemination of
valuable information flow to the
marketplace.
While the Exchange may not have
jurisdiction over some of the
participants to such agreements (e.g.,
the company and its shareholders), it
does retain jurisdiction over its member
organizations that can issue research
and, as such, can limit the potential for
any untoward conduct by maintaining
this prohibition.
Lastly, the Exchange notes the recent
strength of the IPO market and that such
offerings generally contain lock-up
agreements. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that at this juncture it is
appropriate to maintain a form of
prohibition absent some compelling
empirical data/evidence to the contrary.
(c) Exceptions to quiet periods
As noted above, Exchange Rule
472(f)(5) contains an exception that
permits publication and distribution of
research or a public appearance
concerning the effects of significant
news or a significant event on the
subject company during the quiet
period, provided the reports are preapproved in writing by legal or
compliance personnel. The Exchange
has interpreted this exception to apply
only to news or events that have a
material impact on, or cause a material
change to, a company’s operations,
earnings or financial condition and that
generally would trigger the filing
requirements of SEC Form 8–K. The
Exchange has previously not interpreted
the exception to include earnings
announcements absent some other
significant news or significant event
because these announcements generally
are not causal events or news items that
materially affect a company’s
operations, earnings or financial
condition.
The Exchange believes that an
amendment to NYSE Rule 472 is
necessary to include earnings
announcements in this exception.
Accordingly, the proposed rule changes
provide that an announcement of
earnings is included in the exception to
the quiet periods for significant news or
events. The NYSE believes that this
amendment will promote the flow of
potentially important or noteworthy
information to the market and investors
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in a timely manner.22 According to the
NYSE, the announcement of a change to
earnings estimates or a release of
earnings that vary from street
expectations will, in many instances, be
accompanied by an announcement of
some type of causal events. Further, the
NYSE believes that earnings
announcements and guidance are
necessary pipelines of information for
research analysts to support the basis of
their investment recommendations.
Restrictions on Personal Trading by
Research Analysts
NYSE Rule 472(e) generally restricts
the trading of securities by research
analyst accounts.23 Specifically, the
Rule prohibits any research analyst
account from:
• Purchasing or receiving any
securities before the issuer’s initial
public offering if the issuer is
principally engaged in the same types of
business as companies that the research
analyst follows;
• Purchasing or selling any security
issued by a company that the research
analyst follows, or any option or
derivative of such a security, for a
period beginning thirty (30) days before
and ending five (5) days after the
publication of a research report
concerning the company or a change in
a rating or price target of the company’s
securities; and
• Purchasing or selling any security
or option or derivative of such a security
in a manner inconsistent with the
analyst’s most recent recommendation.
NYSE Rule 472(e)(4) includes
exceptions to these trading restrictions
for certain trades that:
• Are due to unanticipated significant
changes in an analyst’s personal
financial circumstances;
• Occur within the 30-day/five-day
trading blackout around the publication
of a report if the report is issued due to
a significant news event;
• Occur within 30 days after an
analyst initiates coverage of a company;
• Involve shares of diversified
registered investment companies; and
• Involve interests in an investment
fund over which neither the analyst nor
a household member has any
investment discretion or control, the
research analyst accounts collectively
own no more than 1% of the fund’s
assets, and the fund invests no more
22 See Securities Act Release No. 8400 and
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49424 (March
16, 2004), 69 FR 15594 (March 25, 2004).
23 According to the NYSE, although NYSE Rule
472 does not employ the term ‘‘research analyst
account,’’ the trading restrictions of NYSE Rule
472(e) and NASD Rule 2711(g) are coterminous. See
NYSE Rule 472.40.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
than 20% of its assets in securities of
issuers principally engaged in the same
types of business as companies that the
analyst follows.
NYSE Rule 472(e)(5) currently
requires legal or compliance personnel
to pre-approve all trades of persons who
oversee research analysts to the extent
such trades involve equity securities of
subject companies covered by the
analysts they oversee.
The proposed rule changes would
revise the exceptions to the personal
trading restrictions to create an
exemption for member organizations
that voluntarily choose to prohibit their
analysts from owning shares of the
companies they cover. The proposed
exemption allows such a firm to adopt
policies that permit research analysts to
divest their holdings in an orderly and
controlled manner with the oversight of
the firm’s legal and compliance
personnel.
With the proposed changes, NYSE
Rule 472 allows member organizations
that adopt ownership bans to implement
the same divestiture procedures,
regardless of when they adopted such a
policy, that were permitted when NYSE
Rule 472 first became effective, to allow
analysts to divest their holdings.
NASD has chosen to amend their Rule
2711(g)(5) by expanding the exceptions
to the personal trading restrictions for
investment funds to include
investments in any fund (including a
registered diversified investment
company), so long as neither the analyst
nor a member of his or her household
is aware of the fund’s holdings or
transactions other than through periodic
shareholder reports and sales material
based on such reports, and provided
that the research analyst account owns
no more than 1% of the assets of the
fund, eliminating the 20% asset
diversification threshold. NYSE
understands that the NASD reasons that
this change will simplify the ability of
analysts to invest in, for example,
mutual funds and hedge funds that do
not disclose their holdings other than
through periodic reports or sales
material based on such reports. Also,
according to the NYSE, NASD reasons
that absent discretion or control of an
account or the contemporaneous
knowledge of the account’s transactions,
a minimal investment by a research
analyst will not influence the analyst to
compromise research objectivity to
benefit the account.
The Exchange is not proposing to
make this change. The Exchange
believes that the 20% asset
diversification threshold must be
retained for an account to be eligible for
the exception. The Exchange believes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
that maintaining the 20% asset
diversification threshold has the
potential for limiting possible conflicts
of interest in the issuance research
reports by analysts with a vested
interest in a fund. The Exchange seeks
comment on whether to maintain this
separate requirement.
Disclosure Requirements
NYSE Rule 472(k) imposes a number
of disclosure requirements on member
organization research reports and
research analyst public appearances in
which the analyst makes a
recommendation or offers an opinion
concerning an equity security. NYSE
Rule 472(k) requires specific disclosures
of conflicts of interest, including
whether the member organization, the
research analyst or a member of the
analyst’s household has a financial
interest in the subject company’s
securities or the member organization or
its affiliates have received compensation
from the subject company. NYSE Rule
472(k) also requires a number of nonconflicts related disclosures in research
reports, including the meanings of
ratings used in the member
organization’s rating system if the
research report contains a rating, the
distribution of buy, hold, and sell
ratings assigned by the member
organization if a research report
contains a rating, and a price chart that
plots the assignment or changes of the
analyst’s ratings and price targets for the
subject company against the movement
of the subject company’s stock price
over time if the research report contains
a rating or a price target. According to
the NYSE, the required disclosures must
be presented on the front page of
research reports or the front page must
refer to the page on which the
disclosures are found. Electronic
research reports may utilize hyperlinks
to the disclosures. Disclosures and
references to disclosures must be clear,
comprehensive and prominent.
The Exchange is concerned that the
sheer volume of the disclosures required
presently may obscure the overall
message that the disclosures are
attempting to convey: That the member
organization or research analyst faces
conflicts of interest with respect to the
subject company. The NYSE believes
that this problem is compounded by the
fact that many member organizations
include additional disclosures required
by other jurisdictions, as well as
sometimes lengthy disclaimers for their
own purposes. To better realize the goal
of the disclosure requirements, the
Exchange believes that it would be more
effective and useful to investors to know
immediately whether the member
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2071
organization or research analyst
producing the research report is
conflicted, while providing the reader
the means to learn more about these
conflicts if he or she chooses to do so.
The NYSE believes that this disclosure
requirement would ensure that investors
obtain prominent disclosure that a
research-related conflict exists, and
would permit investors to find
additional information about the
conflict on the member organization’s
Web site.
To that end, the proposed rule
changes would amend NYSE Rule
472(k)(1) to permit members, in lieu of
publication in the research report itself,
to disclose their conflicts of interest by
including a prominent warning on the
cover of a research report that such
conflicts of interest exist, together with
information on how the reader may
obtain more detail about these conflicts
on the member’s Web site. This
alternative method of disclosure would
then require a member to include
detailed conflicts information on its
Web site. According to the NYSE,
member organizations could still opt to
make all of the disclosures in the report
itself; however, a Web-based disclosure
system can effectively alert investors
that the firm has a conflict of interest
that could affect the objectivity of a
research report. The NYSE believes that
it also provides a streamlined disclosure
alternative by placing disclosures in an
accessible and convenient location and
minimizes costs for many firms.
Specifically, the proposed rule
changes would require any member that
has a conflict of interest or whose
research analyst has a conflict of interest
to state prominently on the front page of
the research report the following:
‘‘[Name of firm and/or the research
analyst preparing this report] has a
conflict of interest that may affect the
ability of the firm or the analyst to
provide objective analysis about the
company. For more information about
this conflict of interest, please see
[Reference to the firm’s Web site].’’
According to the NYSE, conflicts of
interest, as defined by the proposed
rule, include any of the circumstances
that currently require disclosure under
NYSE Rule 472(k)(1), including if the
research analyst or household member
has a financial interest in the subject
company; if the member organization
owns 1% or more of any class of
common equity securities of the subject
company; receipt by the member
organization of investment banking and
other compensation from the subject
company or the expectation to seek
investment banking compensation; if
the member makes a market in the
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2072
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
subject company’s securities; if the
research analyst or household member
serves as an officer, director or advisory
board member of the subject company;
and any other actual, material conflict of
interest of the research analyst or
member organization of which the
research analyst knows or has reason to
know at the time of publication of the
research report.
The proposed amendment would still
require the Web-based disclosures
concern actual conflicts of interest,
rather than the possibility of such
conflicts. According to the NYSE, a
general ‘‘health warning’’ that conflicts
of interest ‘‘may or may not’’ exist are
neither useful nor effective.
The Exchange seeks comment on
whether a similar approach could be
used for disclosure of conflicts in public
appearances.
The proposed rule changes would not
permit Web site disclosure for certain
other disclosures, such as the meanings
of the member’s ratings and the price
chart showing the subject company’s
price movements against the analyst’s
assignments of ratings and price targets,
which still require disclosure in the
research report. The NYSE believes that
these disclosures provide useful
information that should be accessible to
investors in the report and do not lend
themselves easily to the terse material
conflict warning that would appear on
the cover of the report. Accordingly,
they must be readily available to
investors in the report itself.
Rule 472.40 to clarify that the trading
restrictions applicable to research
analysts and household members
excludes an investment company
registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 over which the
research analyst or household member
has discretion or control, provided that
the research analyst or household
member has no financial interest in
such investment company, other than a
performance or management fee.
Second, the proposed rule changes
would amend NYSE Rule 472(b) to
extend the prohibition on research
analysts from engaging in
communications about an investment
banking services transaction with a
current or prospective customer in the
presence of investment banking
department personnel or company
management to communications with
internal sales personnel. This
amendment is intended to further
mitigate potential conflicts of interest in
intra-office communications.
In addition, changes are proposed to
delete the term ‘‘member’’ as used in
NYSE Rule 344 to reflect the recent
reorganization of the Exchange.24
The Exchange will announce the
effective date of the proposed rule
change in an Information Memo to be
published no later than 60 days
following Commission approval.
2. NYSE’s Statutory Basis
Prohibition on Retaliation Against
Research Analysts
NYSE Rule 472(g)(2) prohibits any
member organization and any employee
of a member organization who is
involved with the member
organization’s investment banking
activities from directly or indirectly
retaliating against a research analyst as
a result of an unfavorable research
report or public appearance that may
adversely affect the member
organization’s current or prospective
investment banking relationship with a
subject company.
The Exchange believes that under no
circumstances is retaliation appropriate
against a research analyst who expresses
his or her genuine beliefs about a
subject company. As such, the proposed
rule changes extend the retaliation
prohibition to all employees, not just
those involved in investment banking
activities.
The statutory basis for the proposed
rule changes is Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 25 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of the Exchange are
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and national market system, and in
general to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that the proposed rule changes will
enhance the clarity and consistency of
the research analyst rules, thereby
facilitating the goals of reducing
conflicts of interest and fraudulent and
manipulative practices, and providing
investors with more objective, reliable
information upon which to base
investment decisions.
Other Changes
The proposed rule amendments
would also make certain other changes.
First, the proposal would amend NYSE
24 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53382
(February 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251 (March 6, 2006)
(order approving SR–NYSE–2005–77).
25 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. NASD’s Purpose
Background
Beginning in 2002, NASD and the
New York Stock Exchange implemented
a series of rule changes to improve
objectivity and transparency in equity
research and provide investors with
more reliable and useful information to
make investment decisions. The rules
were intended to restore public
confidence in the validity of research
and the veracity of research analysts,
who are expected to function as
unbiased intermediaries between issuers
and the investors who buy and sell their
securities. The trustworthiness of
research had eroded due to the
pervasive influences of investment
banking and other conflicts that had
manifest themselves during the market
boom of the late 1990s.
Generally, the SRO Rules require
clear, comprehensive and prominent
disclosure of conflicts of interest in
research reports and public appearances
by research analysts. The rules further
prohibit certain conduct—investment
banking personnel involvement in the
content of research and determination of
analyst compensation, for example—
when the conflicts are considered too
pronounced to be cured by disclosure.
The SROs enacted the research
analyst conflict rules in two primary
tranches and, more recently, adopted
additional amendments prohibiting
analysts from participating in road
shows. In addition, the SROs
supplemented their rulemaking with
two joint memoranda that provided
interpretive guidance to their members
on a number of issues.26 The NASD and
NYSE rules and interpretations are
virtually identical and are intended to
operate uniformly.
On May 10, 2002, the SEC approved
the first round of SRO Rules (‘‘Round 1
Amendments’’)—new NASD Rule
2711(’’Research Analysts and Research
Reports’’) and amendments to NYSE
Rules 351 (‘‘Reporting Requirements’’)
and 472 (‘‘Communications with the
Public’’)—which implemented basic
reforms to separate research from
investment banking and to provide more
extensive disclosure of conflicts of
interest in research reports and public
appearances.27 On July 29, 2003, the
SEC approved a second set of
amendments to the SRO Rules (‘‘Round
26 See NASD Notices to Members 02–39 (July
2002) and 04–18 (March 2004).
27 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45908
(May 10, 2002), 67 FR 34968 (May 16, 2002) (order
approving SR–NASD–2002–021 and SR–NYSE–
2002–09).
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
2 Amendments’’) 28 that achieved two
purposes. First, the Round 2
Amendments implemented SRO
initiatives to further promote analyst
objectivity and transparency of conflicts
in research reports. Second, the Round
2 Amendments implemented changes
mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley.29
Sarbanes-Oxley required adoption by
July 30, 2003 of rules ‘‘reasonably
designed to address conflicts of interest
that can arise when securities analysts
recommend equity securities in research
reports and public appearances,’’ and
set forth certain specific rules to be
promulgated. Many of those rules had
already been adopted in the first round
of SRO rulemaking. The Round 2
Amendments therefore implemented
those specific Sarbanes-Oxley rules that
did not already exist and conformed the
language of the SRO Rules as necessary.
As part of the Round 2 Amendments,
the SEC approved rules requiring
registration and qualification of research
analysts. NASD Rule 1050 requires an
associated person who functions as a
research analyst on behalf of a member
to register as such and pass a
qualification examination. For the
purposes of this requirement, a
‘‘research analyst’’ is defined as ‘‘an
associated person who is primarily
responsible for the preparation of the
substance of a research report or whose
name appears on a ‘research report,’ ’’ as
that term is defined in NASD Rule 2711.
The SROs jointly developed and
implemented the Research Analyst
Qualification Examination (Series 86/
87). The examination consists of an
analysis part (Series 86) and a regulatory
part (Series 87). Prior to taking either
the Series 86 or 87, a candidate also
must have passed the General Securities
Registered Representative Examination
(Series 7), the Limited Registered
Representative Examination (Series 17),
or the Canada Module of Series 7 (Series
37 or 38).
The SRO Rules provide three
exemptions from the Series 86
examination. First, there is an
exemption for research analysts who
have passed Levels I and II of the
Chartered Financial Analyst (‘‘CFA’’)
examination and have either (1)
completed the CFA Level II within 2
years of application or registration, or
(2) functioned as a research analyst
continuously since having passed the
CFA Level II.30 A second exemption is
28 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48252
(July 29, 2003), 68 FR 45875 (August 4, 2003) (order
approving SR–NASD–2002–154 and SR–NYSE–
2002–49).
29 See Section 15D of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78o-6.
30 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49464
(March 24, 2004), 69 FR 16628 (March 30, 2004)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
available to research analysts who have
passed Levels I and II of the Chartered
Market Technician Examination and
produce only ‘‘technical research
reports’’ as that term is defined under
the SRO Rules.31 A third exemption—
from both the Series 86 and Series 87—
is available to persons who may be
‘‘associated persons’’ of a member who
are employed by that member’s foreign
affiliate but who produce research on
behalf of the U.S. member. To be
eligible for the exemption, three primary
conditions must be met: (1) A foreign
analyst must comply with the
registration and qualification
requirements or other standards in an
SRO-approved foreign jurisdiction
whose regulatory scheme reflects a
recognition of principles that are
consonant with the SRO Rules and
qualification standards; (2) the U.S.
member must apply all of the other
SROs rules and other member firm
standards to the research produced by
the foreign affiliate and foreign research
analysts that qualify for, and rely upon,
the exemption; and (3) the U.S. member
must include a specific disclosure that
the research report has been prepared in
whole or part by foreign research
analysts who may be associated persons
of the member who are not registered/
qualified as a research analyst with the
NYSE or NASD, but instead have
satisfied the registration/qualification
requirements or other research-related
standards of a foreign jurisdiction that
have been recognized for these purposes
by the NYSE and NASD. Currently, the
following jurisdictions satisfy the
applicable SRO standards noted above:
China, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia,
Singapore, Thailand and the United
Kingdom.
On April 21, 2005, the Commission
approved an amendment to the SRO
Rules that prohibits research analysts
from participating in a road show
related to an investment banking
services transaction and from
communicating with current or
prospective customers in the presence
of investment banking department
personnel or company management
about such an investment banking
services transaction.32 Additionally, the
(order approving SR–NASD–2004–020 and SR–
NYSE–2004–03).
31 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51240
(February 23, 2005), 70 FR 10451 (March 3, 2005)
(notice of immediate effectiveness of SR–NASD–
2005–022 and SR–NYSE–2005–12).
32 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51593
(April 21, 2005), 70 FR 22168 (April 28, 2005)
(order approving SR–NASD–2004–141 and SR–
NYSE–2005–24). As defined under NASD Rule
2711(a)(3) and NYSE Rule 472.20, ‘‘investment
banking services’’ includes, without limitation,
acting as an underwriter or participating in a selling
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2073
amendment prohibits investment
banking personnel from directing a
research analyst to engage in sales and
marketing efforts and other
communications with a current or
prospective customer about an
investment banking services transaction.
Joint SRO Report
As part of its May 2002 order
approving new NASD Rule 2711, the
SEC noted that it would require NASD
and the NYSE to assess the success of
the rules after they have been in place
for a suitable amount of time. In April
2005, the SEC staff requested a joint
comprehensive report on the operation
and effectiveness of the rules, together
with any recommendations for changes
or additions to the rules. The SRO staffs
submitted that report to the SEC on
December 22, 2005.
The SRO staffs concluded in the
report that the SRO Rules have been
effective in helping to restore integrity
to research by minimizing the
influences of investment banking and
promoting transparency of other
potential conflicts of interest. However,
the SRO staffs further expressed their
belief that certain changes to the SRO
Rules would further improve their
effectiveness by striking an even better
balance between ensuring objective and
reliable research on the one hand and
permitting the flow of information to
investors and minimizing costs and
burdens to members on the other.
In formulating the recommendations
for rule changes in the report, the SROs
considered extensive data and
qualitative feedback regarding the range
of activities under the rule, including
examinations, sweeps, enforcement
activities, interpretive issues and
registration and qualification of research
analysts. The SROs also surveyed
academic studies and media reports
about the impact of the rules; compared
the SRO Rules to the provisions of the
‘‘Global Settlement’’ among the SROs,
the Commission, the North American
Securities Administrators Association
and ten 33 of the largest investment
banks; reviewed industry comment
letters; and consulted with various
industry representatives. If approved,
the proposed rule changes would
implement NASD staff’s
group in an offering for the issuer; acting as a
financial adviser in a merger or acquisition;
providing venture capital, equity lines of credit,
private investment, public equity transactions
(PIPEs), or similar investments; or serving as
placement agent for the issuer.
33 See SEC Litigation Release No. 18438, 2003
SEC LEXIS 2601 (October 31, 2003). In August
2004, two additional firms settled with regulators
under the same terms as the April 2003 Global
Settlement.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2074
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
recommendations in the SRO report. A
discussion of the proposed rule changes
is set out below.
Exception to Definition of ‘‘Research
Report’’
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
The proposed rule changes would
expressly exclude from the definition of
‘‘research report’’ sales material
regarding open-end registered
investment companies that are not listed
or traded on an exchange and public
direct participation programs (‘‘DPPs’’).
‘‘Research report’’ is defined in Rule
2711(a)(9) as a ‘‘written (including
electronic) communication that includes
an analysis of equity securities of
individual companies or industries, and
that provides information reasonably
sufficient upon which to base an
investment decision.’’ Since these
investment companies and DPPs are
‘‘equity securities’’ as defined in Section
3(a)(11) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, related sales material that
contains an analysis of those securities
and information sufficient upon which
to base an investment decision
technically is covered by the definition.
For the following reasons, NASD
believes sales material for both types of
products should be excluded from the
definition of ‘‘research report.’’
According to NASD, sales material
regarding investment companies is
already subject to a separate regulatory
regime, including NASD Rule 2210 and
SEC Rule 482, and all advertisements
and sales literature regarding registered
investment companies must be filed
with the NASD Advertising Regulation
Department within ten business days of
first use.34 Moreover, the NASD staff
does not believe that the conflicts
underpinning the SRO Rules are
manifest to the same extent with respect
to research on open-end investment
companies that are not listed or traded
on an exchange.
Similarly, NASD believes that sales
material for public DPPs also do not
present the same conflicts of interest or
other regulatory concerns as research on
exchange-traded securities. Publicly
offered DPPs typically are limited
partnerships or limited liability
companies whose equity interests do
not trade on an exchange and do not
have an active secondary market. The
DPP sponsor generally produces its
34 An advertisement or sales literature concerning
a registered investment company that includes a
performance ranking or performance comparison of
the investment company with other investment
companies that is not generally published or is
created by the fund or its affiliates must be filed
with the NASD Advertising Regulation Department
at least ten business days prior to first use or
publication. NASD Rule 2210(c)(4)(A).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
sales material and sells interests in the
DPP during an initial public offering on
a best efforts basis. This sales material
typically consists of ‘‘tombstone’’
advertisements whose content is strictly
limited under SEC Rule 134, or
supplemental sales literature that must
be accompanied or preceded by a
prospectus for the DPP. Additionally,
unlike equity research, NASD Rule
2210(c)(2)(B) requires members to file
advertisements and sales literature
concerning public DPPs with the
Department within ten business days of
first use. Thus, NASD staff reviews such
sales material before or shortly after it
is distributed to the public.
Although ETFs are open-end
investment companies, they trade on an
exchange and therefore those funds
would not be excepted from the
definition of ‘‘research report.’’ NASD
requests comment on whether ETFs
should also be excluded from the
definition. In addition, NASD believes
that NASD Advertising Regulation
Department review of registered
investment company and public DPP
sales material reduces the likelihood
that it will contain content that is not
fair and balanced.
Exception to Registration and
Qualification Requirements for NonResearch Personnel that Produce
‘‘Research Reports’’
The SRO Rules, in accordance with
the mandates of Sarbanes-Oxley, are
constructed such that the author of a
communication that meets the
definition of a ‘‘research report’’ is a
‘‘research analyst,’’ irrespective of his or
her title or primary job. NASD believes
that this prevents firms from
circumventing the rules by redirecting
through other channels, such as
registered representatives or traders,
potentially biased research that is not
subject to the SRO objectivity
safeguards.
NASD believes it is important to
maintain such communications as
‘‘research reports’’ subject to the rules
and those principally responsible for
their preparation as ‘‘research analysts.’’
However, the proposed rule changes
would create a limited exemption from
the NASD Rule 1050 registration
requirements for non-research personnel
that produce research reports. Thus, for
example, the registration requirements
would not apply to a registered
representative who occasionally
produces communications that
technically meet the definition of a
research report and are distributed to 15
or more clients, or a trader who
similarly produced market commentary
that included an analysis of an
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
individual security—also considered a
research report under NASD rules.
NASD believes that the registration and
qualification requirements were
intended for those individuals whose
principal job function is to produce
research, while the balance of the SRO
Rules are intended to foster objective
analysis of equity securities and
transparency of certain conflicts and to
provide beneficial information to
investors.
Restrictions on Investment Banking
Department Relationship With Research
Department
Currently, NASD Rule 2711(b)
permits investment banking and other
non-research employees, other than
legal and compliance personnel, to
review a research report before
publication only to verify the factual
accuracy of information in the report or
identify a potential conflict of interest.
The rule further requires that an
authorized legal or compliance official
act as intermediary for all such
permissible communications.
The proposed rule change would
eliminate paragraph (b)(3) of NASD Rule
2711 that permits pre-publication
review of research by investment
banking and other non-research
personnel, other than by legal and
compliance. NASD believes that review
of facts in a report by investment
banking and other non-research
personnel is unnecessary in light of the
numerous other sources available to
verify factual information, including the
subject company, and only raises
concerns about the objectivity of the
report. According to NASD, such review
may invite pressure on a research
analyst from such personnel that could
be difficult to monitor. Such factual
review is not permitted under the terms
of the Global Settlement, and NASD
staff is not aware of any evidence that
the factual accuracy of research
produced by Global Settlement firms
has suffered. Moreover, NASD believes
that legal and compliance can
adequately perform a conflict review
without sharing draft research reports
with investment banking or other nonresearch personnel.
Restrictions on Publishing Research
Reports and Public Appearances
NASD Rule 2711(f) sets forth ‘‘quiet
periods’’ during which a member is
prohibited from publishing or otherwise
distributing a research report and a
research analyst is prohibited from
making a public appearance. These
quiet periods apply in two
circumstances: (1) After a public
offering of securities and (2) before and
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
after the expiration, waiver or
termination of a lock-up agreement
entered into by a member with a subject
company that restricts the sale of
securities by that company or its
shareholders.
With respect to the former, NASD
Rule 2711(f) establishes different quiet
periods depending on whether the
offering is an IPO or secondary offering
and whether the member acted as
manager or co-manager. A member that
acted as a manager or co-manager of an
IPO may not publish or otherwise
distribute research for 40 calendar days
following the date of the offering; all
other members that participated as an
underwriter or dealer in the offering are
subject to a 25-day quiet period. A tenday quiet period applies only to the
manager and co-manager of a secondary
offering.
NASD Rule 2711(f) contains an
exception that permits publication and
distribution of research or a public
appearance concerning the effects of
‘‘significant news or a significant event
on the subject company’’ during the
quiet period. The SRO staffs have
interpreted this exception to apply only
to news or events that have a material
impact on, or cause a material change
to, a company’s operation, earnings or
financial condition. Another exception
to the secondary offering quiet period
permits publication or distribution of
research pursuant to SEC Rule 139
regarding a subject company with
‘‘actively-traded securities’’ as defined
in SEC Regulation M.
The proposed rule changes would
make several changes to the quiet period
requirements surrounding public
offerings and lock-up expirations. First,
the proposed rule changes would unify
the IPO quiet periods for all
underwriters and dealers participating
in the offering. As such, the proposed
rule change would amend the rules to
apply a 25-day quiet period to
managers, co-managers, underwriters
and dealers that participate in an IPO.
NASD believes that the lengthier quiet
period for managers and co-managers
was intended to allow other voices to
publicly analyze and value a subject
company before managers and comanagers—those members vested with
the greatest interest in seeing the stock
price of the subject company go up—
weighed in with their reports and public
appearances. According to NASD, at the
time this provision was enacted, it had
been commonplace for managers and
co-managers to initiate coverage with a
positive rating on a company they just
brought public, irrespective of whether
the stock price had already risen well
beyond the public offering price.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
However, NASD recently has
observed more circumstances in which
managers and co-managers have been
neutral or even negative with their
initial post-quiet period report based on
price appreciation or other factors.
Accordingly, NASD believes that the
objectivity safeguards of the SRO Rules
and the certification requirement of SEC
Regulation AC have obviated the need
for a longer quiet period for managers
and co-managers than other
underwriters and dealers participating
in an IPO. NASD also believes the
change would promote more
information flow to investors and
consistency in rule application.
For some of the same reasons, the
proposed rule changes would eliminate
the quiet periods following a secondary
offering. Coupled with the protections
of SEC Regulation AC and other SRO
Rule provisions, NASD believes that
repeal of this provision would advance
the SEC’s purpose in its Securities
Offering Reform rules 35 to increase the
flow of information to investors about
issuers, without sacrificing the
reliability of the research. Along those
lines, the existing SRO Rules already
provide exceptions for research reports
on issuers with ‘‘actively-traded
securities’’ as defined in SEC Regulation
M.
Second, the proposed rule changes
would eliminate the quiet periods
around the expiration, waiver or
termination of a lock-up agreement
provided, as discussed below, that
members provide an additional
certification, similar to Regulation AC,
to having a bona fide reason for issuing
research during such periods. According
to NASD, the quiet periods surrounding
lock-up releases are intended to prevent
abusive ‘‘booster shot’’ reports by
members to raise the stock price of a
company just before previously lockedup shares become freely saleable into
the market by a company or its major
shareholders.
While NASD remains concerned that
these periods pose heightened concerns
about biased research, the changes to
internal structure of investment banks
and the other safeguards imposed by the
current rules appear to have addressed
these concerns and obviate the need for
a quiet period that inhibits the flow of
information to the marketplace. NASD
has observed, for example, that negative
information about a subject company is
sometimes released by that company
during the quiet periods, but the quiet
periods prevent some members from
providing analysis of this negative
35 See Securities Act Release No. 8591 (July 19,
2005), 70 FR 44722 (August 3, 2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2075
information to investors in a timely
fashion. NASD believes that elimination
of the quiet periods around lock-ups
will permit such information to flow to
investors without sacrificing the overall
objectivity of the research.36
NASD Rule 2711(f) would continue to
require a reasonable basis for any
recommendation or price target and the
valuation method used to determine a
price target, while SEC Regulation AC
requires certification that any such
recommendation or price target is
genuinely held. Accordingly, NASD
believes that an effective alternative to
the quiet periods would be to require
that members provide an additional
certification, similar to Regulation AC,
to having a bona fide reason for issuing
research within 15 days before and after
a lock-up expiration and was not
otherwise issued for any reason
pertaining to conditioning the market
price of the security that was the subject
of the research report. NASD would set
forth the language of the certification in
a Notice to Members upon approval of
the proposed rule change.
In the Joint Report, NYSE
recommends an alternative proposal to
reduce the duration of the quiet periods
and expand the exception for research
concerning the effects of significant
news or a significant event on the
subject company to include earnings
related announcements. NASD believes
its proposal is a more viable means to
ensure timely information flow to
investors than such an alternative
approach. As the SROs have previously
noted in their March 2004 joint
interpretive memorandum, earnings
announcements do not generally fall
within the exception because ‘‘an
earnings announcement itself generally
is not a causal event or news item that
materially affects a company’s
operations, earnings or financial
condition.’’ NASD believes that a carveout for earnings related announcements
could lead to lock-up expirations timed
to coincide with such announcements—
many of which are scheduled
regularly—thereby essentially negating
the quiet period altogether. NASD
believes that this is problematic because
the significant news exception applies
not only to quiet periods around lockup expirations, but also to the quiet
periods after an IPO and the blackout
36 NASD believes that practical limitations inhibit
effective administration of the provision. Most
notably, NASD rules do not require lock-up
agreements, and NASD often has no jurisdiction
over parties to them, including the subject company
and its non-member shareholders. NASD therefore
cannot always be the arbiter of whether certain facts
constitute, for example, a waiver or termination of
a lock-up—a significant impediment to our ability
to enforce this provision.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2076
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
periods during which analysts are
prohibited from trading in securities
they cover.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Restrictions on Personal Trading by
Research Analysts
NASD Rule 2711(g) generally restricts
the trading of securities by ‘‘research
analyst accounts.’’ 37 Specifically, the
rule prohibits any research analyst
account from:
• Purchasing or receiving any
securities before the issuer’s initial
public offering if the issuer is
principally engaged in the same types of
business as companies that the research
analyst follows;
• Purchasing or selling any security
issued by a company that the research
analyst follows, or any option or
derivative of such a security, for a
period beginning 30 days before and
ending five days after the publication of
a research report concerning the
company or a change in a rating or price
target of the company’s securities; and
• Purchasing or selling any security
or option or derivative of such a security
in a manner inconsistent with the
analyst’s most recent recommendation.
NASD Rule 2711(g) includes certain
limited exceptions to these trading
restrictions.
The proposal would make two
principal changes to the personal
trading restrictions. First, the proposed
rule changes would revise the
exceptions to the personal trading
restrictions for investment funds in
paragraph (g)(5). Under the proposed
rule changes, the personal trading
restrictions would not apply to
investments in any fund (including a
registered diversified investment
company), so long as neither the analyst
nor a member of his or her household
is aware of the fund’s holdings or
transactions other than through periodic
shareholder reports and sales material
based on such reports, and provided
that the research analyst account owns
37 NASD Rule 2711(a)(7) defines the term
‘‘research analyst account’’ to include any account
in which a research analyst or member of the
analyst’s household has a financial interest, or over
which the analyst has discretion or control, other
than an investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940. The proposed
rule change would clarify that this definition is
intended to except from the definition those
registered investment companies that are managed
by a research analyst or member of the research
analyst’s household, provided that the research
analyst or household member has no financial
interest in such investment other than a
performance or management fee. See infra page 46.
The term does not include a ‘‘blind trust’’ account
that is controlled by a person other than the
research analyst or household member and neither
the analyst nor any household member knows of
the account’s investments or investment
transactions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
no more than 1% of the assets of the
fund.
NASD believes that this change would
simplify the ability of analysts to invest
in, for example, mutual funds and hedge
funds that do not disclose their holdings
other than through periodic reports or
sales material based on such reports.
According to NASD, absent discretion
or control of an account or the
contemporaneous knowledge of the
account’s transactions, a minimal
investment by a research analyst will
not influence the analyst to compromise
research objectivity to benefit the
account. NASD understands that NYSE
is proposing to retain the 20% asset
diversification threshold to be eligible
for the exception. NASD seeks comment
on whether to maintain that separate
requirement.
Second, the proposed rule changes
would create an exemption for firms
that voluntarily choose to prohibit their
analysts from owning shares of the
companies they cover. The exemption
would provide a means for analysts at
such firms to divest their holdings
without violating the blackout period
and trading against recommendation
prohibitions.
The exemption would allow such a
firm to adopt policies that permit
research analysts to divest their
holdings in an orderly and controlled
way with the oversight of the firm’s
legal and compliance personnel. The
SROs permitted firms to allow their
analysts to divest their holdings in the
same manner when the rule first became
effective by delaying for a certain time
period implementation of the personal
trading restrictions for firms that wished
to ban ownership. With the
recommended change, NASD Rule
2711(g) would allow firms that adopt
ownership bans to implement the same
divestiture procedures regardless of
when they adopted such a policy.
Disclosure Requirements
NASD Rule 2711(h) imposes a
number of disclosure requirements on
member research reports and research
analyst public appearances in which the
analyst makes a recommendation or
offers an opinion concerning an equity
security. NASD Rule 2711(h) requires
specific disclosures of conflicts of
interest, including where the member
firm, the research analyst or a member
of the analyst’s household has a
financial interest in the subject
company’s securities or the member or
its affiliates have received compensation
from the subject company. NASD Rule
2711(h) also requires a number of other
disclosures in research reports that are
not directly related to conflicts of
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interest with the subject company,
including the meanings of ratings used
in the member’s rating system, the
distribution of buy, hold, and sell
ratings assigned by the member, and a
price chart that plots the assignment or
changes of the analyst’s ratings and
price targets for the subject company
against the movement of the subject
company’s stock price over time. The
required disclosures must be presented
on the front page of research reports or
the front page must refer to the page on
which the disclosures are found.
Electronic research reports may utilize
hyperlinks to the disclosures.
Disclosures and references to
disclosures must be clear,
comprehensive and prominent.
According to NASD, these required
disclosures promote transparency and
provide important information to enable
investors to assess the value of the
research in making their investment
decision. However, NASD believes that
it would be equally effective and useful
for investors to know immediately
whether the member firm or research
analyst producing the research report is
conflicted, while providing the reader
the means to learn more about these
conflicts if he or she chooses to do so.
To that end, the proposed rule
changes would amend the rules to
permit members, in lieu of publication
in the research report itself, to disclose
their conflicts of interest by including a
prominent warning on the cover of a
research report that such conflicts of
interest exist, together with information
on how the reader may obtain more
detail about these conflicts on the
member’s Web site. This alternative
method of disclosure would then
require a member to include detailed
conflicts information on its Web site.
Members could still opt to make all of
the disclosures in the report itself;
however, NASD believes that a Webbased disclosure system would be at
least as effective and would minimize
costs for many firms.
Specifically, the proposed rule
changes would require any member that
has a conflict of interest or whose
research analyst has a conflict of interest
to state prominently on the front page of
the research report the following:
[Name of firm and/or the research analyst
preparing this report] has a conflict of
interest that may affect the ability of the firm
or the analyst to provide objective analysis
about the company. For more information
about this conflict of interest, please see
[Reference to the firm’s Web site].
The proposed rule changes would
define ‘‘conflict of interest’’ to include
any of the circumstances that currently
require disclosure under NASD Rule
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
2711(h), including if the research
analyst or member of the research
analyst’s household has a financial
interest in the subject company; if the
member owns 1% or more of any class
of common equity securities of the
subject company; receipt by the member
of investment banking and other
compensation from the subject company
or the intention to seek investment
banking compensation; if the member
makes a market in the subject
company’s securities; if the research
analyst or a member of the research
analyst’s household serves as an officer,
director or advisory board member of
the subject company; and any other
actual, material conflict of interest of the
research analyst or member of which the
research analyst knows or has reason to
know at the time of publication of the
research report.
The proposed amendment would still
require that Web-based disclosure
concern actual conflicts of interest,
rather than the possibility of such
conflicts. A general ‘‘health warning’’
that conflicts of interest ‘‘may or may
not’’ exist are neither useful nor
effective.
NASD specifically seeks comment on
whether a similar approach could be
used for disclosure of conflicts in public
appearances.
The proposed rule changes would not
permit Web site disclosure for certain
other disclosures, such as the meanings
of the member’s ratings and the price
chart showing the subject company’s
price movements against the analyst’s
assignments of ratings and price targets.
NASD believes that those disclosures do
not lend themselves easily to the terse
material conflict warning that would
appear on the cover of the report.
Accordingly, NASD believes that they
should be readily available to investors
in the report itself.
Prohibition on Retaliation Against
Research Analysts
NASD Rule 2711(j) currently prohibits
any member and any employee of a
member who is involved with the
member’s investment banking activities
from directly or indirectly retaliating
against a research analyst as a result of
an unfavorable research report or public
appearance that may adversely affect the
member’s current or prospective
investment banking relationship with a
subject company.
Under no circumstances is retaliation
appropriate against a research analyst
who expresses his or her truly held
beliefs about a subject company. As
such, the proposed rule changes would
amend this provision to extend the
retaliation prohibition to all employees,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
2077
not just those involved in investment
banking activities.
and does so in an efficient and effective
manner.
Other Changes
B. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statements on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule changes also
would make certain other changes. First,
the proposed rule change would amend
the definition of ‘‘research analyst
account’’ in NASD Rule 2711(a)(7) to
clarify that it excludes an investment
company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 over
which the research analyst or household
member has discretion or control,
provided that the research analyst or
household member has no financial
interest in such investment company,
other than a performance or
management fee.
Second, the proposed rule changes
would amend NASD Rule 2711(c)(5)(B)
to extend the prohibition on research
analysts from engaging in
communications about an investment
banking services transaction with a
current or prospective customer in the
presence of investment banking
department personnel or company
management to also apply to
communications with internal sales
personnel. NASD believes such change
would make the provision consistent
with respect to a research analyst’s
ability to educate investors and sales
personnel about an investment banking
services transaction.
Finally, the proposed rule changes
would clarify that the annual attestation
required by NASD Rule 2711(i) must be
filed with NASD’s Member Regulation
Department. NASD notes that the
Member Regulation Department has
developed a form, available on the
NASD Web site, that may be used to
make the attestation electronically.
NASD will announce the effective
date of the proposed rule changes in a
Notice to Members to be published no
later than 60 days following
Commission approval.
4. NASD’s Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule
changes are consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act,38 which requires, among other
things, that NASD rules be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. NASD believes that the
proposed rule changes are consistent
with the provisions of the Act because
it promotes both objective research and
increased information flow to investors
38 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The NYSE and NASD do not believe
that the proposed rule changes will
result in any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statements on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Changes Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Changes and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule changes, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule changes
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
changes are consistent with the Act and
whether there are any differences
between the NYSE and NASD proposals
that present compliance or interpretive
issues.
We solicit comment as to how the
proposals to relocate disclosures to a
member firm’s Web site would affect the
utility of this information to investors.
Please also provide comment on
whether relocating disclosures to a
member firm’s Web site would provide
a substantial cost benefit to firms.
Comments may be submitted by any
of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Numbers SR–NYSE–2006–78 and/or
SR–NASD–2006–113 on the subject
line.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
2078
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Numbers SR–NYSE–2006–78 and/or
SR–NASD–2006–113. The file numbers
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
changes that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule changes between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filings also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NYSE and
NASD. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Numbers SR–NYSE–2006–78 and/or
SR–NASD–2006–113 and should be
submitted on or before March 5, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.39
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–548 Filed 1–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55071; File No. SR–Phlx–
2006–84]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto
To Adopt an Appeal Fee
January 9, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
8, 2006, the Philadelphia Stock
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. On December 20, 2006, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 The Exchange
has designated this proposal as one
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by a selfregulatory organization pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 4 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt a
$250.00 appeal fee for Appeals to the
Board of Governors from decisions of
Standing Committees 6 (‘‘Appeal Fee’’).
An appeal from a decision of the
Business Conduct Committee, the
Hearing Officer, or a Hearing Panel,
pursuant to Exchange Rule 960.9 and
By-Law Article XI, Section 11–3, as well
as an appeal from a decision of the
Nominating, Elections and Governance
Committee, pursuant to By-Law Article
XI, Section 11–1, will not be subject to
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange modified
the scope of its proposal to exempt appeals of
decisions of the Nominating, Elections and
Governance Committee from the proposed fee.
Amendment No. 1 replaced the original filing in its
entirety.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
6 See Exchange By-Law Article X, Section 10–1
for the list of Standing Committees of the Exchange.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
2 17
39 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:58 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Appeal Fee.7 The Appeal Fee, which
will be paid by appellant at the time of
filing an appeal, will be refunded to the
appellant in the event the Board of
Governors overturns the decision of the
Standing Committee.
This fee became effective January 1,
2007. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room, the Exchange’s
Web site at https://www.phlx.com/
exchange/rulefilings/2006/SR–2006–
84.pdf, and at the Exchange.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange represents that the
purpose of the proposed rule change is
to reduce the number of frivolous
appeals by assessing a fee for all appeals
that are upheld. Currently, three
Governors hear appeals from decisions
of Standing Committees, with the
exception of an appeal from the
Nominating, Elections and Governance
Committee, which is heard by a majority
of Governors who are not then
candidates for office. The appeal may
require several hours of time from each
Governor. The Exchange believes that
the appeal process is subject to abuse by
members, participants, member
organizations and participant
organizations who incur no downside to
filing repeated appeals, whether valid or
otherwise. The Exchange believes that,
currently, the ease with which an
appeal can be filed and receive a
‘‘second look’’ at no cost creates a
potential for abuse. This fee will become
effective January 1, 2007.
An appeal from a decision of the
Business Conduct Committee, the
Hearing Officer or a Hearing Panel,
7 Telephone conversation between Leah Mesfin,
Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation,
Commission, and Angela Dunn, Director and
Counsel, Phlx, on December 21, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2058-2078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-548]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55072; File Nos. SR-NYSE-2006-78; SR-NASD-2006-113]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC and
the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Changes To Amend NYSE Rules 472 and 344, and NASD
Rules 1050 and 2711 Relating to Research Analyst Conflicts of Interest
January 9, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 27, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change. On December 20,
2006, NYSE filed Amendment No. 1 to its proposed rule change.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ NYSE Amendment No. 1 makes minor revisions to the original
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 27, 2006, the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Commission the proposed rule
change. On November 17, 2006, NASD filed Amendment No. 1 to its
proposed rule change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ NASD Amendment No. 1 makes minor revisions to the original
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule changes are described in Items I, II, and III
below, which Items have substantially been prepared by the NYSE and
NASD (the ``SROs''). The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule changes, as amended, from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statements of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Changes
The Exchange proposes to amend certain provisions of NYSE Rules 472
and 344. These amendments eliminate the exception for pre-publication
factual verification review of research reports by non-research
personnel; change the quiet periods surrounding securities offerings
and the release of lock-up agreements; allow member organizations to
develop policies and procedures if they choose to prohibit research
analysts from holding securities for companies they cover; alter the
format for certain disclosures in research reports; and extend the
anti-retaliation prohibitions to all employees of a member
organization, not just investment banking.
[[Page 2059]]
NASD is proposing to amend NASD Rules 1050 and 2711 to implement
certain recommendations contained in the December 2005 Joint Report by
NASD and the NYSE on the Operation and Effectiveness of the Research
Analyst Conflict of Interest Rules.\5\ NASD believes that the proposed
rule changes are intended to improve the effectiveness of the research
analyst conflict of interest rules and registration requirements by
making certain changes to the existing provisions regarding, among
other things: Disclosure of conflicts; quiet periods; restrictions on
review of research reports by non-research personnel; and restrictions
on personal trading by research analysts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ https://www.nasd.com/web/groups/rules_
regs/documents/rules_regs/nasdw_015803.pdf
_____________________________________-
Below is the text of the proposed rule changes.\6\ Proposed new
language is italicized; proposed deletions are in [brackets].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The rule text reflects the changes contained in SR-NYSE-
2006-77 and SR-NASD-2006-112, which were filed for immediate
effectiveness on September 27, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. NYSE's Proposed Rule Text
Rule 472. Communications With the Public Approval of Communications and
Research Reports
(a)(1) through (2) No Change.
Investment Banking, Research Department and Subject Company
Relationships and Communications
(b)(1) Research analysts may not be subject to the supervision, or
control, of any employee of the member organization's investment
banking department and personnel engaged in investment banking
activities may not have any influence or control over the compensatory
evaluation of a research analyst.
(2) Research reports may not be subject to review or approval prior
to publication by Investment Banking personnel or any other employee of
the member organization who is not directly responsible for investment
research (``non-research personnel'') other than Legal or Compliance
personnel.
[(3) Non-research personnel may review research reports prior to
publication only to verify the factual accuracy of information in the
research report or to identify any potential conflicts of interest that
may exist, provided that:
(i) Any written communication concerning the content of research
reports between non-research personnel and Research personnel must be
made either through Legal or Compliance personnel or in a transmission
copied to Legal or Compliance personnel; and
(ii) any oral communication concerning the content of research
reports between non-research personnel and Research personnel must be
documented and made either with Legal or Compliance personnel acting as
intermediary or in a conversation conducted in the presence of Legal or
Compliance personnel.]
(b)(4) through (6) renumbered as (b)(3) through (5).
Written Procedures
(c) No change.
Retention of Communications
(d) No change.
Restrictions on Trading Securities by Associated Persons
(e)(1) No research analyst or household member may purchase or
receive an issuer's securities prior to its initial public offering
(e.g., so-called pre-IPO shares), if the issuer is principally engaged
in the same types of business as companies (or in the same industry
classification) which the research analyst usually covers in research
reports.
(2) No research analyst or household member may trade in any
subject company's securities or derivatives of such securities that the
research analyst follows for a period of thirty (30) calendar days
prior to and five (5) calendar days after the member organization's
publication of research reports concerning such security or a change in
rating or price target of a subject company's securities.
(3) No research analyst or household member may effect trades in a
manner inconsistent with the research analyst's most current
recommendations (i.e., sell securities while maintaining a ``buy'' or
``hold'' recommendation, buy securities while maintaining a ``sell''
recommendation, or effecting a ``short sale'' in a security while
maintaining a ``buy'' or ``hold'' recommendation on such security).
(4) No change.
(5) The prohibitions in paragraphs (e)(1) through (e)(3) do not
apply when the following conditions are satisfied:
(A) The research analyst is employed by a member organization that
has adopted an internal policy that prohibits research analysts from
owning any securities issued by the subject company for which the
research analyst provides coverage and requires analysts to completely
divest themselves of their existing holdings in such securities;
(B) The research analyst abides by a reasonable plan of liquidation
under which all securities issued by subject companies that the analyst
follows are to be sold within 120 days of the effective date of the
member organization's policy;
(C) The research analyst files such liquidation plan with the
member organization's legal or compliance department within fifteen
(15) days of the effective date of the member organization's policy;
(D) The research analyst receives written approval of the
liquidation plan from the member organization's legal or compliance
department prior to the sale of any securities under the plan; and
(E) The member organization must maintain written records
sufficient to document compliance with each liquidation plan approved
by its legal or compliance department for three years following the
date on which the liquidation plan is approved.
(e)(5) through (6) renumbered as (e)(6) through (7).
Restrictions on Member Organization's Issuance of Research Reports and
Participation in Public Appearances
(f)(1) A member organization may not publish or otherwise
distribute research reports regarding an issuer and a research analyst
may not recommend or offer an opinion on an issuer's securities in a
public appearance, for which the member organization acted as manager
[or], co-manager, underwriter or dealer [of] for an initial public
offering within [forty (40)] twenty-five (25) calendar days following
the offering date.
[(2) A member organization may not publish or otherwise distribute
research reports regarding an issuer and a research analyst may not
recommend or offer an opinion on an issuer's securities in a public
appearance, for which the member organization acted as manager or co-
manager of a secondary offering within ten (10) calendar days following
the offering date. This prohibition shall not apply to public
appearances or research reports published or otherwise distributed
under Securities Act Rule 139 regarding issuers whose securities are
actively traded, as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 101(c)(1)
of Regulation M.
(3) No member organization that has agreed to participate or is
participating as an underwriter or dealer (other than as manager or co-
manager) of an issuer's initial public offering may publish or
otherwise distribute a research report regarding that issuer and a
research analyst may not recommend or offer an opinion on that issuer's
securities in a public appearance for twenty-five (25) calendar days
following the offering date.]
[(4)] (2) No member organization which has acted as a manager or
co-
[[Page 2060]]
manager of a securities offering may publish or otherwise distribute a
research report and a research analyst may not recommend or offer an
opinion on an issuer's securities in a public appearance within
[fifteen (15)] five (5) days prior to or after the expiration, waiver
or termination of a lock-up agreement or any other agreement that the
member organization has entered into with a subject company and its
shareholders that restricts or prohibits the sale of the subject
company's or its shareholders' securities after the completion of a
securities offering. This prohibition shall not apply to public
appearances or research reports published or otherwise distributed
under Securities Act Rule 139 regarding issuers whose securities are
actively traded, as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 101(c)(1)
of Regulation M.
[(5)] (3) A member organization may permit exceptions to the
prohibitions in paragraphs (f)(1)[,] and (2)[, and (4)] (consistent
with other securities laws and rules) for research reports that are
published or otherwise distributed or recommendations or opinions on an
issuer's securities made in a public appearance due to significant news
or events, e.g. an announcement of earnings, provided that such
research reports are pre-approved in writing by the member
organization's Legal or Compliance personnel.
[(6)] (4) If a member organization intends to terminate its
research coverage of a subject company, notice of this termination must
be made. The member organization must make available a final research
report on the subject company using the means of dissemination
equivalent to those it ordinarily uses to provide the customer with its
research reports on the subject company. The report must be comparable
in scope and detail to prior research reports and must include a final
recommendation or rating, unless it is impracticable for the member
organization to produce a comparable report (e.g., if the research
analyst covering the subject company or sector has left the employ of
the member organization, or where the member organization terminates
coverage on the industry or sector). In instances where it is
impracticable for the member organization to provide a final
recommendation or rating, the member organization must provide the
rationale for the decision to terminate coverage.
Prohibition of Offering Favorable Research for Business
(g)(1) No change.
(2) No member organization and no employee of a member organization
[who is involved with the member organization's investment banking
activities] may, directly or indirectly, retaliate against or threaten
to retaliate against any research analyst employed by the member
organization or its affiliates as a result of an adverse, negative, or
otherwise unfavorable research report written or public appearance made
by the research analyst that may adversely affect the member
organization's present or prospective investment banking relationship
with the subject company of a research report. This prohibition shall
not limit a member organization's authority to discipline or terminate
a research analyst, in accordance with the member organization's
policies and procedures, for any cause other than the writing of such
an unfavorable research report or the making of such unfavorable public
appearance.
Restrictions on Compensation to Research Analysts
(h) No change.
General Standards for All Communications
(i) No change.
Specific Standards for Communications
(j) No change.
Disclosure
(k)(1) Disclosures Required in Research Reports.
Disclosure of Member Organization's, and Research Analyst's Ownership
of Securities, Receipt of Compensation, and Subject Company
Relationships
[The front page cover of a research report either must include the
disclosures required under this Rule or must refer the reader to the
page(s) on which each such disclosure is found.] Any member
organization that has a conflict of interest or whose research analyst
has a conflict of interest concerning the subject company of a research
report must disclose that conflict of interest either (i) on its Web
site and prominently state the following on the front page of the
research report: ``[Name of firm and/or the research analyst preparing
this report] has a conflict of interest that may affect the ability of
the firm or the analyst to provide objective analysis about the
company. For more information about this conflict of interest, please
see [Reference to the firm's Web site]'' or (ii) the front page cover
of a research report either must include the disclosures required under
this Rule or must refer the reader to the page(s) on which each such
disclosure is found. Disclosures, and references to disclosures, must
be clear, comprehensive, and prominent. For purposes of paragraph
(k)(1), ``conflict of interest'' shall include any of the following:
(i) A member organization must disclose in research reports: a. If
the member organization or its affiliates:
1. Has managed or co-managed a public offering of securities for
the subject company in the past twelve (12) months;
2. Has received compensation for investment banking services from
the subject company in the past twelve (12) months; or
3. Expects to receive or intends to seek compensation for
investment banking services from the subject company in the next three
(3) months.
b. If the member organization is making a market in the subject
company's securities at the time the research report is issued;
c. If, as of the last day of the month immediately preceding the
date the publication (or the end of the second most recent month if the
publication is less than ten (10) calendar days after the end of the
most recent month), the member organization or its affiliates
beneficially own 1% or more of any class of common equity securities of
the subject company. The member organization must make the required
beneficial ownership computation no later than ten (10) calendar days
after the end of the prior month. Computation of beneficial ownership
of securities must be based upon the same standards used to compute
ownership for purposes of the reporting requirements under Section
13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
d. If, as of the last day of the month immediately preceding the
date of publication of the research report (or the end of the second
most recent month if the publication date is less than thirty (30)
calendar days after the end of the most recent month):
1. The subject company currently is a client of the member
organization or was a client of the member organization during the
twelve (12)-month period preceding the date of distribution of the
research report (In such instances, the member organization also must
disclose the types of services provided to the subject company. For
purposes of this paragraph, the types of services provided to the
subject company may be described as investment banking services, non-
investment banking-securities related services, and non-securities
services.);
[[Page 2061]]
2. The member organization received any compensation for products
or services other than for investment banking services from the subject
company in the past twelve (12) months.
e. If a research report contains a price target, the valuation
methods used, and any price objectives must have a reasonable basis and
include a discussion of risks;
f. If a research report contains a rating, the meanings of all
ratings used by the organization in its ratings system (For example, a
member organization might disclose that a ``strong buy'' rating means
that the rated security's price is expected to appreciate at least 10%
faster than other securities in its sector over the next twelve (12)-
month period. Definitions of ratings terms also must be consistent with
their plain meaning. Therefore, for example, a ``hold'' rating should
not mean or imply that an investor should sell a security.);
g. If a research report contains a rating, the percentage of all
securities that the member organization recommends an investor ``buy,''
``hold,'' or ``sell.'' Within each of the three (3) categories, a
member organization must also disclose the percentage of subject
companies that are investment banking services clients of the member
organization within the previous twelve (12) months (see Rule 472.70
for further information);
h. If a research report contains either a rating or a price target,
and the member organization has assigned a rating or price target to
the subject company for at least one (1) year, the research report must
include a chart that depicts the price of the subject company's stock
over time and indicates points at which a member organization assigned
or changed a rating or price target. This provision would apply only to
securities that have been assigned a rating or price target for at
least one (1) year, and need not extend more than three (3) years prior
to the date of the research report. The information in the price chart
must be current as of the end of the most recent calendar quarter (or
the second most recent calendar quarter if the publication date is less
than fifteen (15) calendar days after the most recent calendar
quarter).
(ii) A member organization must include the following disclosures
in research reports:
a. If a research analyst received any compensation:
1. From the subject company in the past twelve (12) months;
2. That is based upon (among other factors) the member
organization's overall investment banking revenues.
b. If, to the extent the research analyst or an employee of the
member organization with the ability to influence the substance of a
research report, knows:
1. The subject company currently is a client of the member
organization or was a client of the member organization during the
twelve (12)-month period preceding the date of distribution of the
research report. In such instances, such member organization also must
disclose the types of services provided to the subject company (For
purposes of paragraph (k)(1) of this Rule, the types of services
provided to the subject company may be described as investment banking
services, non-investment banking-securities related services, and non-
securities services.). (For purpose of paragraph (k)(1) of this Rule,
an employee of a member organization with the ability to influence the
substance of the research report is an employee who, in the ordinary
course of that person's duties, has the authority to review the
particular research report and to change that research report prior to
publication.);
2. That the member organization or any affiliate thereof, received
any compensation for products or services other than investment banking
services from the subject company in the past twelve (12) months.
(iii) A research analyst and a member organization must disclose in
research reports:
a. If, to the extent the research analyst or member organization
has reason to know, an affiliate of the member organization received
any compensation for products or services other than investment banking
services from the subject company in the past twelve (12) months;
1. This requirement will be deemed satisfied if such compensation
is disclosed in research reports within thirty (30) days after
completion of the most recent calendar quarter, provided that the
member organization has taken steps reasonably designed to identify
such compensation during that calendar quarter.
2. The member organization and the research analyst will be
presumed not to have reason to know whether an affiliate received
compensation for other than investment banking services from the
subject company in the past twelve (12) months if the member
organization maintains and enforces policies and procedures reasonably
designed to prevent all research analysts and employees of the member
organization with the ability to influence the substance of research
reports from, directly or indirectly, receiving information from the
affiliate concerning such compensation.
3. Paragraph 472(k)(1)(iii)a. shall not apply to any subject
company as to which the member organization initiated coverage since
the beginning of the current calendar quarter.
b. If the research analyst or a household member has a financial
interest in the securities of the subject company, and the nature of
the financial interest, including, without limitation, whether it
consists of any option, right, warrant, futures contract, long or short
position;
c. If the research analyst or a household member is an officer,
director, or advisory board member of the subject company;
d. Any other actual, material conflict of interest of the research
analyst, or member organization, of which the research analyst knows,
or has reason to know, at the time the research report is published or
otherwise distributed.
When a member organization publishes or otherwise distributes a
research report covering six (6) or more subject companies (a
``compendium report'') for purposes of the disclosures required in
paragraph (k)(1) of this Rule, the compendium report may direct the
reader in a clear and prominent manner as to where the reader may
obtain applicable current disclosures. Electronic compendium reports
may include a hyperlink to the required disclosures. Paper-based
compendium reports must provide either a toll-free number to call or a
postal address to write for the required disclosures and may also
include a web address of the member organization where the disclosures
can be found.
(k)(2) Disclosures Required in Public Appearances
Disclosure of Member Organization's, and Research Analyst's Ownership
of Securities, Receipt of Compensation, and Subject Company
Relationships
(i) A research analyst must disclose the following conflicts of
interest in public appearances:
a. If, as of the last day of the month before the appearance (or
the end of the second most recent month if the appearance is less than
ten (10) calendar days after the end of the most recent month), the
member organization or its affiliates beneficially own 1% or more of
any class of common equity securities of the subject company. The
member organization must make the required beneficial ownership
computation no later than ten (10) calendar days after the end of the
prior month.
[[Page 2062]]
Computation of beneficial ownership of securities must be based upon
the same standards used to compute ownership for purposes of the
reporting requirements under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934;
b. If the research analyst or a household member has a financial
interest in the securities of the subject company, and the nature of
the financial interest, including, without limitation, whether it
consists of any option, right, warrant, futures contract, long or short
position;
c. If, to the extent the research analyst knows or has reason to
know:
1. The subject company currently is a client of the member
organization or was a client of the member organization during the
twelve (12)-month period preceding the date of the public appearance by
the research analyst. In such instances, the research analyst also must
disclose the types of services provided to the subject company (For
purposes of this paragraph, the types of services provided to the
subject company may be described as investment banking services, non-
investment banking-securities related services, and non-securities
services.);
2. The member organization or any affiliate thereof, received any
compensation from the subject company in the past twelve (12) months.
d. Any other actual, material conflict of interest of the research
analyst, or member organization, of which the research analyst knows,
or has reason to know, at the time the public appearance is made;
e. If the research analyst or a household member is an officer,
director, or advisory board member of the subject company;
f. If the research analyst received any compensation from the
subject company in the past twelve (12) months.
(k)(3) Exceptions to the Required Disclosures
(i) A member organization or a research analyst will not be
required to make a disclosure required by Rule 472(k)(l)(i)a.2. and 3.,
(k)(1)(i)d.1., (k)(1)(ii)b.1., and (k)(2)(i)c. to the extent such
disclosure would reveal material non-public information regarding
specific potential future investment banking services transactions of
the subject company.
(k)(4) Third-Party Research Reports
(i) Subject to paragraph (k)(4)(ii), if a member organization
distributes or makes available research reports produced by another
member organization, a non-member organization affiliate of a member
organization, such as a foreign or domestic broker-dealer or investment
adviser, or an independent third party, the member organization must
accompany the research report with the applicable disclosures, as they
pertain to the member organization, that are required by paragraphs
(k)(1)(i)c, (k)(1)(i)a, (k)(1)(i)b and (k)(1)(iii)d of this Rule.
a. A supervisory analyst qualified under NYSE Rule 344 must
approve, pursuant to Rule 472(a)(2), by signature or initial any third-
party research distributed by a member organization; and
b. A supervisory analyst or qualified person designated pursuant to
Rule 342(b)(1) (e.g., a person who has taken and passed the Series 9/
10, or another examination acceptable to the Exchange which
demonstrates competency relevant to assigned responsibilities,
including the Series 24 if taken and passed after July 1, 2001) must
review third-party research distributed by a member organization to
determine that the disclosures required by Rule 472(k)(1)(i)c,
(k)(1)(i)a, (k)(1)(i)b and (k)(1)(iii)d are complete and accurate, and
that the content of the research report is consistent with all
applicable standards regarding communications with the public.
(ii) The requirements in paragraph (k)(4)(i) shall not apply to
research reports prepared by an independent third party that the member
organization makes available to its customers either upon request or
through a member organization-maintained Web site.
Other Communications Activities
(l) No change.
Small Firm Exception
(m) The provisions of Rule 472(b)(1)[,] and (2) [and (3)] do not
apply to member organizations that over the three previous years, on
average per year, have participated in ten (10) or fewer investment
banking services transactions as manager or co-manager and generated $5
million or less in gross investment banking services revenues from
those transactions. For purposes of this paragraph, the term
``investment banking services transactions'' shall include both debt
and equity underwritings but not municipal securities underwritings.
Member organizations that qualify for this exemption must maintain
records for three (3) years of any communications that, but for this
exemption, would be subject to paragraphs (b)(1)[,] and (2)[, and (3)]
of this Rule.
* * * Supplementary Material:
.10 Definitions
(1) No change.
(2) Research Report--``Research report'' is generally defined as a
written or electronic communication which includes an analysis of
equity securities of individual companies or industries (other than an
open-end registered investment company that is not listed or traded on
an exchange or a public direct participant program), and provides
information reasonably sufficient upon which to base an investment
decision. This term does not include:
(a) The following communications, provided that they do not include
an analysis, narrative discussion, recommendation or rating of
individual securities or issuers:
(1) Reports discussing broad-based indices, e.g. the Russell 2000
or S&P 500 index;
(2) Reports commenting on economic, political or market conditions;
(3) Technical analysis concerning the demand and supply for a
sector, index or industry based on trading volume and price;
(4) Statistical summaries of multiple companies' financial data
(including listings of current ratings);
(5) Reports that recommend increasing or decreasing holdings in
particular industries or sectors; or
(6) Notices of ratings or price target changes, provided that the
member organization simultaneously directs the readers of the notice as
to where to obtain the most recent research report on the subject
company that includes the current applicable disclosures required by
this rule and that such research report does not contain materially
misleading disclosures, including disclosures that are outdated or no
longer applicable;
(b) The following communications, even if they include information
reasonably sufficient upon which to base an investment decision or a
recommendation or rating of individual securities or companies:
(1) Any communication distributed to fewer than 15 persons;
(2) Periodic reports, solicitations or other communications
prepared for investment company shareholders or discretionary
investment account clients that discuss individual securities in the
context of a fund's or account's past performance or the basis for
previously made discretionary investment decisions; or
(3) Internal communications that are not given to customers; and
[[Page 2063]]
(c) Communications that constitute statutory prospectuses that are
filed as part of the registration statement.
For purposes of approval by a supervisory analyst pursuant to Rule
472(a)(2), the term research report includes, but is not limited to, a
report which recommends equity securities, derivatives of such
securities, including options, debt and other types of fixed income
securities, single stock futures products, and other investment
vehicles subject to market risk.
.10 (3) through (5) No change.
.20 through .30 No change.
.40 For purposes of this Rule, the term ``research analyst''
includes an allied member, associated person or employee of a member
organization primarily responsible for, and any person who reports
directly or indirectly to such research analyst in connection with, the
preparation of the substance of a research report whether or not any
such person has the job title of ``research analyst''.
For purposes of this Rule, the term ``household member'' means any
individual whose principal residence is the same as the research
analyst's principal residence. This term does not include an unrelated
person who shares the same residence as a research analyst, provided
that the research analyst and unrelated person are financially
independent of one another. Paragraphs (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(i), (ii),
(iii), (iv) and (v), (k)(1)(iii)b., c., and (k)(2)(i)b. and e. apply to
any account in which a research analyst has a financial interest, or
over which the research analyst exercises discretion or control[, other
than an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act
of 1940]. The trading restrictions applicable to research analysts and
household members (i.e., paragraphs (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(i), (ii),
(iii), (iv) and (v))[;] shall not include an investment company
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 over which the
research analyst or a household member has discretion or control,
provided that the research analyst or household member has no financial
interest in such investment company, other than a performance or
management fee, and do not apply to a ``blind trust'' account that is
controlled by a person other than the research analyst or research
analyst's household member where neither the research analyst nor
household member knows of the account's investments or investment
transactions.
.50 through .140 No change.
Rule 344. Research Analysts and Supervisory Analysts
Research analysts and supervisory analysts must be registered with,
qualified by, and approved by the Exchange.
* * * Supplementary Material:
.10 [For purposes of this Rule, the term ``research analyst''
includes a member, allied member, associated person or employee who is
primarily responsible for the preparation of the substance of a
research report and/or whose name appears on such report. Such research
analysts must pass a qualification examination acceptable to the
Exchange.] For the purposes of this Rule, ``research analyst'' shall
mean an associated person whose primary job function is to provide
investment research and who is primarily responsible for the
preparation of the substance of a research report or whose name appears
on the report.
.11 For purposes of this Rule, the term ``supervisory analyst''
includes [a member,] an allied member or employee who is responsible
for preparing or approving research reports under Rule 472(a)(2). In
order to show evidence of acceptability to the Exchange as a
supervisory analyst, [a member,] an allied member, or employee may do
one of the following:
(1) Present evidence of appropriate experience and pass an Exchange
Supervisory Analyst Examination (Series 16).
(2) Present evidence of appropriate experience and successful
completion of a specified level of the Chartered Financial Analysts
Examination prescribed by the Exchange and pass only that portion of
the Exchange Supervisory Analyst Examination (Series 16) dealing with
Exchange rules on research standards and related matters.
The Exchange publishes a Study Outline for the Research Analyst
Examination and the Supervisory Analyst Examination (Series 16).
.12 No change.
B. NASD's Proposed Rule Text
1050. Registration of Research Analysts
(a) No change.
(b) For the purposes of this Rule 1050, ``research analyst'' shall
mean an associated person whose primary job function is to provide
investment research and who is primarily responsible for the
preparation of the substance of a research report or whose name appears
on a research report.
(c) through (f) No change.
* * * * *
2711. Research Analysts and Research Reports
(a) Definitions
For purposes of this rule, the following terms shall be defined as
provided.
(1) through (6) No Change.
(7) ``Research analyst account'' means any account in which a
research analyst or member of the research analyst's household has a
financial interest[,] or over which such analyst has discretion or
control[, other than an investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940]. The term ``research analyst account''
shall not include an investment company registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 over which the research analyst or a member of the
research analyst's household has discretion or control, provided that
the research analyst or household member has no financial interest in
such investment company, other than a performance or management fee.
This term also shall [does] not include a ``blind trust'' account that
is controlled by a person other than the research analyst or member of
the research analyst's household where neither the research analyst nor
a member of the research analyst's household knows of the account's
investments or investment transactions.
(8) No Change.
(9) ``Research Report'' means any written (including electronic)
communication that includes an analysis of equity securities of
individual companies or industries[,] (other than an open-end
registered investment company that is not listed or traded on an
exchange or a public direct participation program) and that provides
information reasonably sufficient upon which to base an investment
decision. This term does not include:
(A) through (C) No Change.
(10) No Change.
(b) Restrictions on Relationship With Research Department
(1) No Change.
(2) [Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3), n]No employee of the
investment banking department or any other employee of the member who
is not directly responsible for investment research (``non-research
personnel''), other than legal or compliance personnel, may review or
approve a research report of the member before its publication.
[(3) Non-research personnel may review a research report before its
publication as necessary only to verify
[[Page 2064]]
the factual accuracy of information in the research report or identify
any potential conflict of interest, provided that:]
[(A) Any written communication between non-research personnel and
research department personnel concerning the content of a research
report must be made either through authorized legal or compliance
personnel of the member or in a transmission copied to such personnel;
and]
[(B) Any oral communication between non-research personnel and
research department personnel concerning the content of a research
report must be documented and made either through authorized legal or
compliance personnel acting as intermediary or in a conversation
conducted in the presence of such personnel.]
(c) Restrictions on Communications With the Subject Company
(1) through (4) No Change.
(5) A research analyst is prohibited from directly or indirectly:
(A) No Change.
(B) Engaging in any communication with a current or prospective
customer or internal sales personnel in the presence of investment
banking department personnel or company management about an investment
banking services transaction.
(6) through (7) No Change.
(d) through (e) No Change.
(f) Restrictions on Publishing Research Reports and Public Appearances;
Termination of Coverage
[(1) No member may publish or otherwise distribute a research
report and no research analyst may make a public appearance regarding a
subject company for which the member acted as manager or co-manager
of:]
[(A) An initial public offering, for 40 calendar days following the
date of the offering; or]
[(B) A secondary offering, for 10 calendar days following the date
of the offering; provided that:]
[(i) Paragraphs (f)(1)(A) and (f)(1)(B) will not prevent a member
from publishing or otherwise distributing a research report, or prevent
a research analyst from making a public appearance, concerning the
effects of significant news or a significant event on the subject
company within such 40- and 10-day periods, and provided further that
legal or compliance personnel authorize publication of that research
report before it is issued or authorize the public appearance before it
is made; and]
[(ii) paragraph (f)(1)(B) will not prevent a member from publishing
or otherwise distributing a research report pursuant to SEC Rule 139
regarding a subject company with ``actively-traded securities,'' as
defined in Regulation M, 17 CFR 242.101(c)(1), and will not prevent a
research analyst from making a public appearance concerning such a
company.]
([2]1) No member that has agreed to participate or is participating
as an underwriter or dealer [(other than as manager or co-manager)] of
an issuer's initial public offering may publish or otherwise distribute
a research report or make a public appearance regarding that issuer for
25 calendar days after the date of the offering. This paragraph will
not prevent a member from publishing or otherwise distributing a
research report, or prevent a research analyst from making a public
appearance, concerning the effects of significant news or a significant
event on the subject company within such 25-day period, provided
further that legal or compliance personnel authorize publication of
that research report before it is issued or authorize the public
appearance before it is made.
([3]2) For purpose[s] of paragraph (f)(1)[and (f)(2)], the term
``date of the offering'' refers to the later of the effective date of
the registration statement or the first date on which the security was
bona fide offered to the public.
[(4) No member that has acted as a manager or co-manager of a
securities offering may publish or otherwise distribute a research
report or make a public appearance concerning a subject company 15 days
prior to and after the expiration, waiver or termination of a lock-up
agreement or any other agreement that the member has entered into with
a subject company or its shareholders that restricts or prohibits the
sale of securities held by the subject company or its shareholders
after the completion of a securities offering. This paragraph will not
prevent a member from publishing or otherwise distributing a research
report concerning the effects of significant news or a significant
event on the subject company within such period, provided legal or
compliance personnel authorize publication of that research report
before it is issued. In addition, this paragraph shall not apply to the
publication or distribution of a research report pursuant to SEC Rule
139 regarding a subject company with ``actively traded securities,'' as
defined in Regulation M, 17 CFR 242.101(c)(1), or to a public
appearance concerning such a subject company.]
(3) Any member that has acted as a manager or co-manager of a
securities offering and publishes or otherwise distributes a research
report concerning a subject company during a period 15 days prior to
and after the expiration, waiver or termination of a lock-up agreement
or any other agreement that the member has entered into with a subject
company or its shareholders that restricts or prohibits the sale of
securities held by the subject company or its shareholders after the
completion of a securities offering shall provide with the research
report a certification, in such form as prescribed by NASD, stating
that the member has a bona fide reason for issuing the research report.
([5]4) If a member intends to terminate its research coverage of a
subject company, notice of this termination must be made. The member
must make available a final research report on the subject company
using the means of dissemination equivalent to those it ordinarily uses
to provide the customer with its research reports on the subject
company. The report must be comparable in scope and detail to prior
research reports and must include a final recommendation or rating,
unless it is impracticable for the member to produce a comparable
report (e.g., if the research analyst covering the subject company or
sector has left the member or if the member terminates coverage of the
industry or sector). If it is impracticable to produce a final
recommendation or rating, the final research report must disclose the
member's rationale for the decision to terminate coverage.
(g) Restrictions on Personal Trading by Research Analysts
(1) through (4) No Change.
(5) The prohibitions in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(3) do not
apply to a purchase or sale of the securities of[:]
[(A) Any registered diversified investment company as defined under
Section (5)(b)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940; or ]
[(B)] Any [other] investment fund over which neither the research
analyst nor a member of the research analyst's household has any
investment discretion or control, provided that the research analyst
and household member are not made aware of the fund's holdings or
transactions other than through periodic shareholder reports and sales
material based on such reports[:] and
[(i)] The research analyst accounts collectively own interests
representing no more than 1% of the assets of the fund[;].
[(ii) The fund invests no more than 20% of its assets in securities
of issuers principally engaged in the same types of
[[Page 2065]]
business as companies that the research analyst follows; and]
[(iii) If the investment fund distributes securities in kind to the
research analyst or household member before the issuer's initial public
offering, the research analyst or household member must either divest
those securities immediately or the research analyst must refrain from
participating in the preparation of research reports concerning that
issuer.]
(6) The prohibitions in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(3) do not
apply when the following conditions are satisfied:
(A) The research analyst is employed by a member that has adopted
an internal policy that prohibits research analysts from owning any
securities issued by subject companies for which the research analyst
provides coverage and requires those analysts to completely divest
themselves of their existing holdings in such securities;
(B) The research analyst abides by a reasonable plan of liquidation
under which all securities issued by companies that the analyst follows
are to be sold within 120 days of the effective date of the member's
policy;
(C) The research analyst files such liquidation plan with the
member's legal or compliance department within 15 days of the effective
date of the member's policy;
(D) The research analyst receives written approval of the
liquidation plan from the member's legal or compliance department prior
to the sale of any securities under the plan; and
(E) The member must maintain written records sufficient to document
compliance with each liquidation plan approved by its legal or
compliance department for three years following the date on which the
liquidation plan is approved.
([6]7) Legal or compliance personnel of the member shall pre-
approve all transactions of persons who oversee research analysts to
the extent such transactions involve equity securities of subject
companies covered by the research analysts that they oversee. This pre-
approval requirement shall apply to all persons, such as the director
of research, supervisory analyst, or member of a committee, who have
direct influence or control with respect to the preparation of the
substance of research reports or establishing or changing a rating or
price target of a subject company's equity securities.
(h) Disclosure Requirements
(1) [Ownership and Material]Definition of ``Conflict of Interest''
[A member must disclose in research reports and a research analyst
must disclose in public appearances]For the purposes of paragraph
(h)(2), ``conflict of interest'' shall include any of the following:
(A) If the research analyst or a member of the research analyst's
household has a financial interest in the securities of the subject
company, and the nature of the financial interest (including, without
limitation, whether it consists of any option, right, warrant, future,
long or short position);
(B) If, as of the end of the month immediately preceding the date
of publication of the research report or the public appearance (or the
end of the second most recent month if the publication date is less
than 10 calendar days after the end of the most recent month), the
member or its affiliates beneficially own 1% or more of any class of
common equity securities of the subject company. Computation of
beneficial ownership of securities must be based upon the same
standards used to compute ownership for purposes of the reporting
requirements under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934;
[(C) Any other actual, material conflict of interest of the
research analyst or member of which the research analyst knows or has
reason to know at the time of publication of the research report or at
the time of the public appearance.]
[(2) Receipt of Compensation]
[(A) A member must disclose in research reports:]
([i]C) If the research analyst received compensation:
[a.](i) Based upon (among other factors) the member's investment
banking revenues; or
[b.](ii) From the subject company in the past 12 months.
([ii]D) If the member or any affiliate of the member:
[a.](i) Managed or co-managed a public offering of securities for
the subject company in the past 12 months;
[b.](ii) Received compensation for investment banking services from
the subject company in the past 12 months; or
[c.](iii) Expects to receive or intends to seek compensation for
investment banking services from the subject company in the next 3
months.
([iii]E) If ([1]i) as of the end of the month immediately preceding
the date of publication of the research report (or the end of the
second most recent month if the publication date is less than 30
calendar days after the end of the most recent month) or ([2]ii) to the
extent the research analyst or an employee of the member with the
ability to influence the substance of the research knows:
a. The member received any compensation for products or services
other than investment banking services from the subject company in the
past 12 months; or
b. The subject company currently is, or during the 12-month period
preceding the date of distribution of the research report was, a client
of the member. In such cases, the member also must disclose the types
of services provided to the subject company. For purposes of this Rule
2711(h)(1), the types of services provided to the subject company shall
be described as investment banking services, non-investment banking
securities-related services, and non-securities services.
([iv]F) If, to the extent the research analyst or an employee of
the member with the ability to influence the substance of the research
report knows an affiliate of the member received any compensation for
products or services other than investment banking services from the
subject company in the past 12 months.
([v]G) If, to the extent the research analyst or member has reason
to know, an affiliate of the member received any compensation for
products or services other than investment banking services from the
subject company in the past 12 months.
[a.](i) [This]The requirement to disclose this conflict of interest
will be deemed satisfied if such compensation is disclosed in research
reports or on a member's Web site within 30 days after completion of
the last calendar quarter, provided that the member has taken steps
reasonably designed to identify any such compensation during that
calendar quarter. [This]The disclosure requirement shall not apply to
any subject company as to which the member initiated coverage since the
beginning of the current calendar quarter.
[b.](ii) The research analyst and the member will be presumed not
to have reason to know whether an affiliate received any compensation
for products or services other than investment banking services from
the subject company in the past 12 months if the member maintains and
enforces policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the
research analysts and employees of the member with the ability to
influence the substance of research reports from, directly or
indirectly, receiving information from the affiliate concerning whether
the affiliate received such compensation.
[[Page 2066]]
(H) If the research analyst or member of a research analyst's
household serves as an officer, director or advisory board member of
the subject company.
(I) If the member was making a market in the subject company's
securities at the time that the research report was published; and
(J) Any other actual, material conflict of interest of the research
analyst or member of which the research analyst knows or has reason to
know at the time of publication of the research report or at the time
of the public appearance.
([vi]K) For the purposes of this Rule 2711(h)([2]1), an employee of
the member with the ability to influence the substance of the research
report is an employee who, in the ordinary course of that person's
duties, has the authority to review the particular research report and
to change that research report prior to publication.
(2) Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
(A) Any member that has a conflict of interest or whose research
analyst has a conflict of interest concerning the subject company of a
research report must disclose that conflict of interest either:
(i) On its Web site and prominently state the following on the
front page of the research report:
``[Name of firm and/or the research analyst preparing this report]
has a conflict of interest that may affect the ability of the firm or
the analyst to provide objective analysis about the company. For more
information about this conflict of interest, please see [Reference to
the firm's Web site]'' or
(ii) In the research report in accordance with paragraph (h)(8).
(B) A research analyst must disclose in public appearances:
(i) The conflicts of interest described in paragraphs (h)(1)(A),
(B) and (J);
(ii) If, to the extent the research analyst knows or has reason to
know, the member or any affiliate received any compensation from the
subject company in the past 12 months;
(iii) If the research analyst received any compensation from the
subject company in the past 12 months; or
([iii]iv) If, to the extent the research analyst knows or has
reason to know, the subject company currently is, or during the 12-
month period preceding the date of distribution of the research report,
was, a client of the member. In such cases, the research analyst also
must disclose the types of services provided to the subject company, if
known by the research analyst;[.]or
(v) If the research analyst or a member of the research analyst's
household serves as an officer, director or advisory board member of
the subject company.
(C) A member or research analyst will not be required to make a
disclosure required by paragraphs (h)(1)(D)(ii) and
(iii)[(h)(2)(A)(ii)(b) and (c)], (h)(1)(E)(b)[(2)(A)(iii)(b),] or
(h)(2)(B)(ii) and (iv[iii]) to the extent such disclosure would reveal
material non-public information regarding specific potential future
investment banking transactions of the subject company.
[(3) Position as Officer or Director]
[A member must disclose in research reports and a research analyst
must disclose in public appearances if the research analyst or a member
of the research analyst's household serves as an officer, director or
advisory board member of the subject company.]
([4]3) Meaning of Ratings
If a research report contains a rating, the member must define in
the research report the meaning of each rating used by the member in
its rating system. The definition of each rating must be consistent
with its plain meaning.
([5]4) Distribution of Ratings
(A) Through (B) No Change.
(C) The information that is disclosed under paragraphs (h)([5]4)(A)
and (h)([5]4)(B) must be current as of the end of the most recent
calendar quarter (or the second most recent calendar quarter if the
publication date is less than 15 calendar days after the most recent
calendar quarter) and must reflect the distribution of the most recent
ratings issued by the member for all subject companies, unless the most
recent rating was issued more than 12 months ago.
(D) The requirements of paragraph (h)([5]4) shall not apply to any
research report that does not contain a rating.
([6]5) Price Chart
If a research report contains either a rating or a price target,
and the member has assigned a rating or price target to the subject
company's securities for at least one year, the research report must
include a line graph of the security's daily closing prices for the
period that the member has assigned any rating or price target or for a
three-year period, whichever is shorter.
The line graph must:
(A) through (C) No Change.
([7]6) Price Targets
If a research report contains a price target, the member must
disclose in the research report the valuation methods used to determine
the price target. Price targets must have a reasonable basis and must
be accompanied by a disclosure concerning the risks that may impede
achievement of the price target.
[(8) Market Making
A member must disclose in research reports if it was making a
market in the subject company's securities at the time that the
research report was published.]
([9]7) Disclosure Required by Other Provisions
In addition to the disclosure required by this rule, members and
research analysts must provide disclosure in research reports and
public appearances that is required by applicable law or regulation,
including NASD Rule 2210 and the antifraud provisions of the federal
securities laws.
([10]8) Prominence of Disclosure
The disclosures required by this paragraph (h), other than those
made pursuant to paragraph (h)(2)(A)(i), must be presented on the front
page of research reports or the front page must refer to the page on
which disclosures are found. Disclosures and references to disclosures
must be clear, comprehensive and prominent.
([11]9) Disclosures in Research Reports Covering Six or More Companies
When a member distributes a research report covering six or more
subject companies (a ``compendium report''), for purposes of the
disclosures required in paragraph (h), other than those required by
paragraph (h)(2), the compendium report may direct the reader in a
clear manner as to where they may obtain applicable current
disclosures. Electronic compendium reports may include a hyperlink to
the required disclosures. Paper-based compendium reports must provide
either a toll-free number to call or a postal address to write for the
required disclosures and may also include a web address of the member
where the disclosures can be found.
(1[2]0) Records of Public Appearances
Members must maintain records of public appearances by research
analysts sufficient to demonstrate compliance by those research
analysts with the applicable disclosure requirements under paragraph
(h) of this Rule. Such records must be maintained for three years from
the date of the public appearance.
(1[3]1) Third-Party Research Reports
(A) Subject to paragraph (h)(1[3]1)(B), if a member distributes or
makes available any research report that is produced by another member,
a non-
[[Page 2067]]
member affiliate of the member or an independent third party, the
member must accompany the research report with the current applicable
disclosures, as they pertain to the member, that are required by
paragraphs (h)(1)(B), [(h)(1)(C), (h)(2)(A)(ii) and (h)(8)] (h)(1)(D),
(h)(1)(I) and (h)(1)(J) of this Rule.
(B) The requirements of paragraph (h)(1[3]1)(A) shall not apply to
research reports prepared by an independent third party that the member
makes available to its customers either upon request or through a
member-maintained Web site.
(C) No Change.
(i) Supervisory Procedures
Each member subject to this rule must adopt and implement written
supervisory procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the member
and its employees comply with the provisions of this rule (including
the attestation requirements of Rule 2711(d)(2)), and a senior officer
of such a member must [attest] annually [to]file with the NASD Member
Regulation Department by April 1 of each year an attestation that it
has adopted and implemented those procedures.
(j) Prohibition of Retaliation Against Research Analysts
No member and no [employee of a member who is involved with the
member's investment banking activities]non-research personnel as
defined in paragraph (b)(2) may, directly or indirectly, retaliate
against or threaten to retaliate against any research analyst employed
by the member or its affiliates as a result of an adverse, negative, or
otherwise unfavorable research report or public appearance written or
made by the research analyst that may adversely affect the member's
present or prospective investment banking relationship with the subject
company of a research report. This prohibition shall not limit a
member's authority to discipline or terminate a research analyst, in
accordance with the member's policies and procedures, for any cause
other than the writing of such an unfavorable research report or the
making of such an unfavorable public appearance.
(k) No Change
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statements of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes
In their filings with the Commission, the Exchange and NASD
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule changes and discussed any comments they received on the
proposed rule changes. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange and NASD have
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statements of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes
1. NYSE's Purpose
Background
Beginning in 2002, the Exchange and the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. implemented a series of rule changes (``SRO
Rules'') to improve objectivity and transparency in equity research and
provide investors with more reliable and useful information to make
investment decisions. The NYSE believes that the rules were intended to
restore public confidence in the validity of research and the veracity
of research analysts, who are expected to function as unbiased
intermediaries between issuers and the investors who buy and sell their
securities. According to the NYSE, the trustworthiness of research had
eroded due to the pervasive influences of investment banking and other
conflicts that had manifest themselves during the market boom of the
late 1990s.
Generally, the SRO Rules require clear, comprehensive and prominent
disclosure of conflicts of interest in research reports and public
appearances by research analysts. The rules further prohibit certain
conduct--investment banking personnel involvement in the content of
research and determination of analyst compensation, for example--when
the conflicts are considered too pronounced to be cured by disclosure.
The SROs enacted the research analyst conflict rules in two primary
tranches and, more recently, adopted additional amendments prohibiting
analysts from participating in road shows. In addition, the SROs
supplemented their rulemaking with two joint memoranda that provided
interpretive guidance to their members on a number of issues.\7\ The
NASD and NYSE rules and interp