Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 1342-1344 [E7-162]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
1342
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Notices
to be held at 9:30 a.m. on March 6, 2007,
at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Oral testimony
and written materials to be submitted at
the public hearing are governed by
§§ 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of
the Commission’s rules. Parties must
submit any request to present a portion
of their hearing testimony in camera no
later than 7 business days prior to the
date of the hearing.
Written submissions. Each party who
is an interested party shall submit a
prehearing brief to the Commission.
Prehearing briefs must conform with the
provisions of section 207.23 of the
Commission’s rules; the deadline for
filing is March 6, 2007. Parties may also
file written testimony in connection
with their presentation at the hearing, as
provided in § 207.24 of the
Commission’s rules, and posthearing
briefs, which must conform with the
provisions of § 207.25 of the
Commission’s rules. The deadline for
filing posthearing briefs is March 20,
2007; witness testimony must be filed
no later than three days before the
hearing. In addition, any person who
has not entered an appearance as a party
to the investigation may submit a
written statement of information
pertinent to the subject of the
investigation, including statements of
support or opposition to the petition, on
or before March 20, 2007. On April 5,
2007, the Commission will make
available to parties all information on
which they have not had an opportunity
to comment. Parties may submit final
comments on this information on or
before April 9, 2007, but such final
comments must not contain new factual
information and must otherwise comply
with § 207.30 of the Commission’s rules.
All written submissions must conform
with the provisions of § 201.8 of the
Commission’s rules; any submissions
that contain BPI must also conform with
the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and
207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The
Commission’s rules do not authorize
filing of submissions with the Secretary
by facsimile or electronic means, except
to the extent permitted by § 201.8 of the
Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR
68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where
electronic filing of a document is
permitted, certain documents must also
be filed in paper form, as specified in II
(C) of the Commission’s Handbook on
Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR
68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each
document filed by a party to the
investigation must be served on all other
parties to the investigation (as identified
by either the public or BPI service list),
and a certificate of service must be
timely filed. The Secretary will not
accept a document for filing without a
certificate of service.
Authority: This investigation is being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to § 207.21 of the Commission’s
rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 8, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–259 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of a Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act and
the Clean Water Act
Notice is hereby given that on
December 20, 2006 a proposed Consent
Decree ‘‘Consent Decree’’ in United
States v. EnTire Recycling, Inc., Civil
Action No. 8:06–CV–766 was lodged
with the United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska.
In this action the United States sought
recovery of costs incurred by the
National Pollution Funds Center and the
Environmental Protection Agency in
responding to the release, discharge and
threat of release of oil and hazardous
substances at a tire recycling facility
owned and operated by Defendants
EnTire Recycling, Inc., Brock Grain
Company, Inc. and James D. Gerking in
Nebraska City, Nebraska. Under the
Consent Decree, the Defendants will
reimburse the United States
$201,000.00.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. EnTire Recycling, Inc. D.J. Ref.
90–5–1–1–08431. The Consent Decree
may be examined at the Office of the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
United States Attorney, District of
Nebraska, 1620 Dodge Street, Suite
1400, Omaha, Nebraska 68102 and at
U.S. EPA Region VII, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66025.
During the public comment period, the
Consent Decree may also be examined
on the following Department of Justice
Web site, to https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $5.00 (25 cents per
page reproduction cost) payable to the
U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax,
forward a check in that amount to the
Consent Decree Library at the stated
address.
Robert E. Maher, Jr.,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 07–49 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed reinstatement
of the ‘‘National Longitudinal Survey of
Youth 1979.’’ A copy of the proposed
information collection request (ICR) can
be obtained by contacting the individual
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
1343
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Notices
listed in the Addresses section of this
notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
Addresses section below on or before
March 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Amy A.
Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer, Division
of Management Systems, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Room 4080, 2
Massachusetts Avenue, NE.,
Washington, DC 20212, 202–691–7628.
(This is not a toll free number.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy A. Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer,
202–691–7628. (See Addresses section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
I. Background
The National Longitudinal Survey of
Youth 1979 (NLSY79) is a nationally
representative survey of people who
were born in the years 1957 to 1964 and
lived in the U.S. when the survey began
in 1979. NLSY79 participants were
interviewed annually from 1979 to 1994
and have been interviewed every two
years since 1994. The focus of the
survey is labor market experiences, but
the survey also covers topics that affect
or are affected by labor market activity.
These topics include education,
training, marital and family
relationships, fertility, childcare, health,
substance use, and others.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
contracts with the National Opinion
Research Center (NORC) of the
University of Chicago to conduct the
NLSY79. Prior to each round of the
NLSY79, a pretest has been conducted
with a separate, smaller sample to help
ensure the proper functioning of
questionnaires, procedures, and systems
and to rectify any problems before the
main fielding of the NLSY79. Over time,
the size of the pretest sample has
declined significantly, and the
characteristics of pretest participants
now differ so sharply from the
characteristics of most NLSY79
participants that the pretest no longer is
a useful tool to detect and remedy
problems with the survey. For this
reason, the BLS and its contractors have
decided to replenish the pretest sample.
One of the goals of the Department of
Labor (DOL) is to produce and
disseminate timely, accurate, and
relevant information about the U.S.
labor force. The BLS contributes to this
goal by gathering information about the
labor force and labor market and
disseminating it to policymakers and
the public so that participants in those
markets can make more informed, and
thus more efficient, choices. Research
based on the NLSY79 contributes to the
formation of national policy in the areas
of education, training, employment
programs, and school-to-work
transitions. In addition to the reports
that the BLS produces based on data
from the NLSY79, members of the
academic community publish articles
and reports based on NLSY79 data for
the DOL and other funding agencies.
The survey design provides data
gathered from the same respondents
over time to form the only data set that
contains this type of intergenerational
information for these important
population groups. Without the
collection of these data, an accurate
longitudinal data set could not be
provided to researchers and
policymakers, thus adversely affecting
the DOL’s ability to perform its policyand report-making activities.
II. Current Action
The BLS seeks approval to conduct
interviews to replenish the pretest
sample of the NLSY79. The process of
replenishing the sample requires new
sample members to be interviewed
during the summer of 2007. The
information obtained from this
interview will be used for an input file
during the NLSY79 Round 23 pretest
that is planned for October 2007.
Because the NLSY79 is longitudinal, the
questions that respondents are asked in
one round sometimes depend on the
responses they provided in previous
rounds. The summer 2007 interview is
necessary to obtain information that will
enable all questions to function properly
in the October 2007 pretest. At an
appropriate later date, the BLS will
request approval to conduct the regular
pretest and main fielding for Round 23
of the NLSY79.
The expanded pretest sample will add
100 cooperative respondents born in the
years 1957 to 1964. The sample will be
selected from a targeted telephone list of
approximately 1,000 numbers that is
maintained in the NORC telephone
center system. To make the dialing
effort more efficient, NORC will screen
Total
respondents
Form
NLSY79 Pretest Sample Replenishment Screener ................................
NLSY79 Pretest Sample Replenishment Interview ................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
1,000
100
Sfmt 4703
its list for phone numbers that are no
longer working or that are associated
with businesses. The new sample
members will be dispersed across rural,
suburban, and urban tracts within 40
miles of Chicago. The sample will be
targeted across these different types of
tracts based on the area codes selected
for the replenishment effort.
By design, the replenished pretest
sample will be one of convenience
rather than one used to produce
nationally representative estimates. The
sample characteristics will be
constrained only by the birth year, but
the BLS and its contractors will seek a
diverse mix of men and women across
racial and ethnic groups. Employed
individuals also will be targeted so that
the pretest can effectively examine the
most critical NLSY79 questionnaire
paths, which relate to employment.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility.
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Type of Review: Reinstatement, with
change, of a previously approved
collection for which approval has
expired.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: National Longitudinal Survey of
Youth 1979.
OMB Number: 1220–0109.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency
Once ..........
Once ..........
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
Total
responses
1,000
100
11JAN1
Average
time per
response
3 minutes ...
15 minutes
Estimated
total burden
50 hours.
25 hours.
1344
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Notices
Total
respondents
Form
Totals ...............................................................................................
1,100
Frequency
....................
Total
responses
1,100
Average
time per
response
....................
Estimated
total burden
75 hours.
Note: In some cases, the respondents for the replenishment interview will be the same people who responded to the screener. These respondents could be different people, however. For example, one spouse who was not born in the years 1957 to 1964 and therefore is ineligible
for the pretest sample may respond to the screener questions, while the other spouse who is eligible for the pretest sample responds to the replenishment interview.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they also
will become a matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of
January 2007.
Cathy Kazanowski,
Chief, Division of Management Systems,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. E7–162 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
For Further Information Contact: J.
William Leonard, Director Information
Security Oversight Office, National
Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408,
telephone number (202) 357–5250.
Dated: January 9, 2007.
J. William Leonard,
Director, Information Security Oversight
Office.
[FR Doc. E7–254 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
[Docket No. 52–008–ESP; ASLBP No. 04–
822–02–ESP]
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Information Security Oversight Office;
Public Interest Declassification Board
(PIDB); Notice of Meeting
Pursuant to Section 1102 of the
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 which extended
and modified the Public Interest
Declassification Board (PIDB) as
established by the Public Interest
Declassification Act of 2000 (Pub. L.
106–567, title VII, December 27, 2000,
114 Stat. 2856), announcement is made
for the following committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Public Interest
Declassification Board (PIDB).
Date of Meeting: Friday, January 19,
2007.
Time of Meeting: 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
Place of Meeting: National Archives
and Records Administration, 700
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Archivist’s
Reception Room, Room 105,
Washington, DC 20408.
Purpose: To discuss declassification
program issues.
This meeting will be open to the
public. However, due to space
limitations and access procedures, the
name and telephone number of
individuals planning to attend must be
submitted to the Information Security
Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than
Monday, January 15, 2007. ISOO will
provide additional instructions for
gaining access to the location of the
meeting.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In
the Matter of Dominion Nuclear North
Anna, LLC (Early Site Permit for North
Anna ESP Site); Order (Notice of
Opportunity To Make Oral or Written
Limited Appearance Statements)
January 5, 2007.
Before Administrative Judges: Alex S. Karlin,
Chairman, Dr. Thomas S. Elleman, Dr.
Richard F. Cole.
This proceeding concerns the
September 25, 2003 application of
Dominion Nuclear North Anna LLC for
an early site permit (ESP) for the
possible construction of two nuclear
power reactors on the site of two
existing nuclear reactors in Mineral,
Virginia.
This Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board hereby gives notice that, pursuant
to 10 CFR 2.315(a), the Board will
entertain oral limited appearance
statements from members of the public
regarding the North Anna ESP
application. The limited appearance
statement session will be held on
February 8, 2007 from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m.
EST at the Louisa County High School
auditorium, 757 Davis Highway,
Mineral, Virginia 23117.
I. Background and Scope of Proceeding
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(Commission) has defined an ESP as
‘‘Commission approval * * * for a site
or sites for one or more nuclear power
facilities.’’ 10 CFR 52.3(b). If an ESP
application is approved, then, if the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
holder applies for a later construction
permit, ‘‘the Commission shall treat as
resolved those matters resolved in the
proceeding on the application for
issuance or renewal of the early site
permit.’’ 10 CFR 52.39(a)(2). The North
Anna ESP application also includes a
site redress plan, which, if approved,
would allow the ESP holder to prepare
the site for construction of the plant, as
long as the activities will not result in
any significant adverse environmental
impact which cannot be redressed, and
the applicant commits to redress the site
if a construction permit is not issued. 10
CFR 52.25. See North Anna ESP
Application, Revision 9, 4–1–1
(September 2006). The applicant may
not undertake any other construction
activities on the site, however, without
having applied for and received a
construction or combined operating
license from the NRC. 10 CFR 52.3. On
December 2, 2003, the Commission
published a notice of hearing with
regard to Dominion’s North Anna ESP
application, notifying the public of the
mandatory hearing on certain
uncontested safety and environmental
issues, and of the right to petition for
leave to intervene to contest the
application. 68 FR 67489 (Dec. 2, 2003).
On January 2, 2004, Blue Ridge
Environmental Defense League, Nuclear
Information and Resource Service, and
Public Citizen filed a petition to
intervene. The predecessor Board
admitted two of the Intervenors’
contentions. See Dominion Nuclear
North Anna LLC (North Anna ESP),
LBP–04–18, 60 NRC 253, 274 (2004).
On January 13, 2006, Dominion
submitted a supplement to its
application, proposing to change the
cooling system for proposed Unit 3 and
to increase the power level of each
proposed unit (Units 3 and 4) from 4300
MWt to 4500 MWt. As a consequence,
the application process was delayed by
a year. The Staff issued a supplemental
Final Safety Evaluation Report (FSER)
on November 15, 2006, and a
supplemental Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) on December
14, 2006, addressing the changed
application.
Both of the admitted contentions were
resolved, one by a settlement and the
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 7 (Thursday, January 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1342-1344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-162]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments concerning the
proposed reinstatement of the ``National Longitudinal Survey of Youth
1979.'' A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can
be obtained by contacting the individual
[[Page 1343]]
listed in the Addresses section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
Addresses section below on or before March 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Amy A. Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer,
Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 4080,
2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Washington, DC 20212, 202-691-7628. (This
is not a toll free number.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy A. Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer,
202-691-7628. (See Addresses section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) is a
nationally representative survey of people who were born in the years
1957 to 1964 and lived in the U.S. when the survey began in 1979.
NLSY79 participants were interviewed annually from 1979 to 1994 and
have been interviewed every two years since 1994. The focus of the
survey is labor market experiences, but the survey also covers topics
that affect or are affected by labor market activity. These topics
include education, training, marital and family relationships,
fertility, childcare, health, substance use, and others.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) contracts with the National
Opinion Research Center (NORC) of the University of Chicago to conduct
the NLSY79. Prior to each round of the NLSY79, a pretest has been
conducted with a separate, smaller sample to help ensure the proper
functioning of questionnaires, procedures, and systems and to rectify
any problems before the main fielding of the NLSY79. Over time, the
size of the pretest sample has declined significantly, and the
characteristics of pretest participants now differ so sharply from the
characteristics of most NLSY79 participants that the pretest no longer
is a useful tool to detect and remedy problems with the survey. For
this reason, the BLS and its contractors have decided to replenish the
pretest sample.
One of the goals of the Department of Labor (DOL) is to produce and
disseminate timely, accurate, and relevant information about the U.S.
labor force. The BLS contributes to this goal by gathering information
about the labor force and labor market and disseminating it to
policymakers and the public so that participants in those markets can
make more informed, and thus more efficient, choices. Research based on
the NLSY79 contributes to the formation of national policy in the areas
of education, training, employment programs, and school-to-work
transitions. In addition to the reports that the BLS produces based on
data from the NLSY79, members of the academic community publish
articles and reports based on NLSY79 data for the DOL and other funding
agencies. The survey design provides data gathered from the same
respondents over time to form the only data set that contains this type
of intergenerational information for these important population groups.
Without the collection of these data, an accurate longitudinal data set
could not be provided to researchers and policymakers, thus adversely
affecting the DOL's ability to perform its policy- and report-making
activities.
II. Current Action
The BLS seeks approval to conduct interviews to replenish the
pretest sample of the NLSY79. The process of replenishing the sample
requires new sample members to be interviewed during the summer of
2007. The information obtained from this interview will be used for an
input file during the NLSY79 Round 23 pretest that is planned for
October 2007. Because the NLSY79 is longitudinal, the questions that
respondents are asked in one round sometimes depend on the responses
they provided in previous rounds. The summer 2007 interview is
necessary to obtain information that will enable all questions to
function properly in the October 2007 pretest. At an appropriate later
date, the BLS will request approval to conduct the regular pretest and
main fielding for Round 23 of the NLSY79.
The expanded pretest sample will add 100 cooperative respondents
born in the years 1957 to 1964. The sample will be selected from a
targeted telephone list of approximately 1,000 numbers that is
maintained in the NORC telephone center system. To make the dialing
effort more efficient, NORC will screen its list for phone numbers that
are no longer working or that are associated with businesses. The new
sample members will be dispersed across rural, suburban, and urban
tracts within 40 miles of Chicago. The sample will be targeted across
these different types of tracts based on the area codes selected for
the replenishment effort.
By design, the replenished pretest sample will be one of
convenience rather than one used to produce nationally representative
estimates. The sample characteristics will be constrained only by the
birth year, but the BLS and its contractors will seek a diverse mix of
men and women across racial and ethnic groups. Employed individuals
also will be targeted so that the pretest can effectively examine the
most critical NLSY79 questionnaire paths, which relate to employment.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is particularly interested in
comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used.
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected.
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
Type of Review: Reinstatement, with change, of a previously
approved collection for which approval has expired.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979.
OMB Number: 1220-0109.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Total Average time per Estimated total
Form respondents Frequency responses response burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NLSY79 Pretest Sample 1,000 Once............. 1,000 3 minutes........ 50 hours.
Replenishment Screener.
NLSY79 Pretest Sample 100 Once............. 100 15 minutes....... 25 hours.
Replenishment Interview.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 1344]]
Totals.................... 1,100 ................. 1,100 ................. 75 hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In some cases, the respondents for the replenishment interview will be the same people who responded to
the screener. These respondents could be different people, however. For example, one spouse who was not born
in the years 1957 to 1964 and therefore is ineligible for the pretest sample may respond to the screener
questions, while the other spouse who is eligible for the pretest sample responds to the replenishment
interview.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget
approval of the information collection request; they also will become a
matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of January 2007.
Cathy Kazanowski,
Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. E7-162 Filed 1-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
