Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, And Spain, 1243 [E7-191]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 10, 2007 / Notices investigation and additional information placed by Commission staff on the record during this remand proceeding. Participation in the Proceeding Only those persons who were interested parties in the original administrative proceeding and are parties to the ongoing litigation (i.e., persons listed on the Commission Secretary’s service list and parties to Bratsk Aluminum Smelter v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 03–00200) may participate as interested parties in this remand proceeding. mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES Nature of the Remand Proceeding On February 16, 2007, the Commission will make available to parties who are participating in the remand proceeding information that has been gathered by the Commission as part of this remand proceeding. These parties may file comments on or before February 27, 2007 on the legal issues raised in Bratsk with respect to nonsubject imports and on the information on the record that is relevant to how the Commission addresses these issues in its remand determination. No additional new factual information may be included in such comments. Such comments shall not exceed 25 doublespaced pages. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain business proprietary information (BPI) must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). Each document filed by a party participating in the remand investigation must be served on all other parties who may participate in the remand investigation (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Parties are also advised to consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207), for provisions of general VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:22 Jan 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 applicability concerning written submissions to the Commission. Limited Disclosure of Business Proprietary Information (BPI) Under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) and BPI Service List Information obtained during the remand investigation will be released to the referenced parties, as appropriate, under the administrative protective order (APO) in effect in the original investigation. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO in this remand investigation. Authority: This action is taken under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 4, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–187 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am] 1243 Federal Register on June 20, 2006 (71 FR 36359). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on October 12, 2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on January 5, 2007. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3895 (January, 2007), entitled Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681, 682 (Second Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 5, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–191 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Office of the Secretary INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681, and 682 (Second Review)] Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, And Spain Determinations On the basis of the record1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.2 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on March 1, 2006 (71 FR 10552) and determined on June 5, 2006 that it would conduct full reviews (71 FR 34391, June 14, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun dissenting with respect to Brazil and Spain. PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request January 5, 2007. The Department of Labor (DOL) has submitted the following public information collection requests (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained from RegInfo.gov at https://www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain or by contacting Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free number) / e-mail: king.darrin@dol.gov. Comments should be sent to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 202–395–7316 / Fax: 202–395–6974 (these are not a toll-free numbers), within 30 days from the date of this publication in the Federal Register. The OMB is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM 10JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-191]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-678, 679, 681, and 682 (Second Review)]


Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, Japan, And Spain

Determinations

    On the basis of the record\1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain 
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material 
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner Deanna Tanner 
Okun dissenting with respect to Brazil and Spain.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on March 1, 2006 (71 FR 
10552) and determined on June 5, 2006 that it would conduct full 
reviews (71 FR 34391, June 14, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on June 20, 2006 (71 
FR 36359). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on October 12, 2006, 
and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear 
in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on January 5, 2007. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3895 (January, 2007), 
entitled Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain: 
Investigation Nos. 731-TA-678, 679, 681, 682 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 5, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E7-191 Filed 1-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.