Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request, 1243-1244 [E7-164]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 10, 2007 / Notices
investigation and additional information
placed by Commission staff on the
record during this remand proceeding.
Participation in the Proceeding
Only those persons who were
interested parties in the original
administrative proceeding and are
parties to the ongoing litigation (i.e.,
persons listed on the Commission
Secretary’s service list and parties to
Bratsk Aluminum Smelter v. United
States, Consol. Ct. No. 03–00200) may
participate as interested parties in this
remand proceeding.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Nature of the Remand Proceeding
On February 16, 2007, the
Commission will make available to
parties who are participating in the
remand proceeding information that has
been gathered by the Commission as
part of this remand proceeding. These
parties may file comments on or before
February 27, 2007 on the legal issues
raised in Bratsk with respect to nonsubject imports and on the information
on the record that is relevant to how the
Commission addresses these issues in
its remand determination. No additional
new factual information may be
included in such comments. Such
comments shall not exceed 25 doublespaced pages.
All written submissions must conform
with the provisions of section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules; any
submissions that contain business
proprietary information (BPI) must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even
where electronic filing of a document is
permitted, certain documents must also
be filed in paper form, as specified in II
(C) of the Commission’s Handbook on
Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR
68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). Each
document filed by a party participating
in the remand investigation must be
served on all other parties who may
participate in the remand investigation
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service. Parties are also
advised to consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR
part 207), for provisions of general
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Jan 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
applicability concerning written
submissions to the Commission.
Limited Disclosure of Business
Proprietary Information (BPI) Under an
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
and BPI Service List
Information obtained during the
remand investigation will be released to
the referenced parties, as appropriate,
under the administrative protective
order (APO) in effect in the original
investigation. A separate service list will
be maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under
the APO in this remand investigation.
Authority: This action is taken under the
authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 4, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–187 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
1243
Federal Register on June 20, 2006 (71
FR 36359). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on October 12, 2006,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on January 5,
2007. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3895
(January, 2007), entitled Stainless Steel
Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain:
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679,
681, 682 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 5, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–191 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Office of the Secretary
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681,
and 682 (Second Review)]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India,
Japan, And Spain
Determinations
On the basis of the record1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on stainless steel bar from
Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.2
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on March 1, 2006 (71 FR 10552)
and determined on June 5, 2006 that it
would conduct full reviews (71 FR
34391, June 14, 2006). Notice of the
scheduling of the Commission’s reviews
and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner
Deanna Tanner Okun dissenting with respect to
Brazil and Spain.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
January 5, 2007.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection requests (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each
ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained from
RegInfo.gov at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or by contacting
Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is
not a toll-free number) / e-mail:
king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
202–395–7316 / Fax: 202–395–6974
(these are not a toll-free numbers),
within 30 days from the date of this
publication in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
1244
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 10, 2007 / Notices
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Title: Annual Report for Multiple
Employer Welfare Arrangements (Form
M–1).
OMB Number: 1210–0116.
Frequency: Annually.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: Private Sector:
Business or other for-profit and Not-forprofit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
515.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 515.
Average Response Time:
Approximately 9 minutes (average
across all filers).
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 78.
Estimated Total Annualized capital/
startup costs: $0.
Estimated Total Annual Costs
(operating/maintaining systems or
purchasing services): $45,520.
Description: The Department’s
regulation at 29 CFR 2520.101–2
requires annual reporting by ‘‘multiple
employer welfare arrangements,’’ as
defined in section 3(40) of Employee
Retirement Income Security Act
(ERISA), and certain other entities
claiming an exception from the ERISA
definition of ‘‘multiple employer
welfare arrangements,’’ for the purpose
of determining the extent to which such
entities comply with Part 7 of ERISA.
The Department provides a form (Form
M–1) for the required reporting and also
provides an electronic filing system
through which entities may complete
the required Form M–1 and file it
without cost.
Pursuant to section 101(g) of ERISA,
the Form M–1 information is used by
governmental oversight entities to
determine the extent of compliance with
the requirements of Part 7 of ERISA by
multiple employer welfare arrangements
and entities claiming exception under
section 3(40) of ERISA and to take
appropriate compliance assistance and
enforcement actions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Jan 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
Agency: Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Title: ERISA Investment Manager
Electronic Registration.
OMB Number: 1210–0125.
Frequency: Annually.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: Private Sector:
Business or other for-profit and Not-forprofit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
500.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 500.
Average Response Time: 2 hours for
new filers and 1 hour for existing
annual filers.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 550.
Estimated Total Annualized capital/
startup costs: $0.
Estimated Total Annual Costs
(operating/maintaining systems or
purchasing services): $17,500.
Description: The Department’s
regulation at 29 CFR 2510.3–38 provides
that, in order to meet the definition of
investment manager in the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act 3(38),
state-registered investment advisers
must register electronically through a
centralized electronic filing system
established by the Securities and
Extension Commission and state
investment authorities (‘‘Investment
Advisor Registration Depository’’/
IARD) rather than providing a paper
copy of their state registration to the
Secretary of Labor.
Although the primary users of the
information collected through the
Department’s regulation are plan
fiduciaries, who can review the IARD
registration statements for information
about investment advisers that are either
currently service providers to the plan
or potential service providers to the
plan, EBSA also uses the information for
enforcement and compliance purposes.
EBSA investigators are expected to
review IARD data whenever they
conduct an investigation that involves
investment advisers or investment
managers.
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–164 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,659]
Colgate Palmolive Company; Kansas
City, KS; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on December
22, 2006, in response to a worker
petition filed by the Missouri Workforce
Development Specialist on behalf of
workers at Colgate Palmolive Company,
Kansas City, Kansas.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
December, 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–146 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,045]
International Business Machines
Corporation; IBM/ITOS Rocklin;
Rocklin, CA; Dismissal of Application
for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
International Business Machines
Corporation, IBM/ITOS Rocklin,
Rocklin, California. The application did
not contain new information supporting
a conclusion that the determination was
erroneous, and also did not provide a
justification for reconsideration of the
determination that was based on either
mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal
of the application was issued.
TA–W–60,045; International Business
Machine Corporation, IBM/ITOS
Rocklin, Rocklin, California (December
27, 2006)
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
December 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–139 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1243-1244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-164]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request
January 5, 2007.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has submitted the following public
information collection requests (ICR) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of
each ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained
from RegInfo.gov at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain or by
contacting Darrin King on 202-693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number)
/ e-mail: king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 202-395-7316 / Fax: 202-395-6974
(these are not a toll-free numbers), within 30 days from the date of
this publication in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information,
[[Page 1244]]
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Agency: Employee Benefits Security Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without change of currently approved
collection.
Title: Annual Report for Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
(Form M-1).
OMB Number: 1210-0116.
Frequency: Annually.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: Private Sector: Business or other for-profit and
Not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 515.
Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 515.
Average Response Time: Approximately 9 minutes (average across all
filers).
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 78.
Estimated Total Annualized capital/startup costs: $0.
Estimated Total Annual Costs (operating/maintaining systems or
purchasing services): $45,520.
Description: The Department's regulation at 29 CFR 2520.101-2
requires annual reporting by ``multiple employer welfare
arrangements,'' as defined in section 3(40) of Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA), and certain other entities claiming an
exception from the ERISA definition of ``multiple employer welfare
arrangements,'' for the purpose of determining the extent to which such
entities comply with Part 7 of ERISA. The Department provides a form
(Form M-1) for the required reporting and also provides an electronic
filing system through which entities may complete the required Form M-1
and file it without cost.
Pursuant to section 101(g) of ERISA, the Form M-1 information is
used by governmental oversight entities to determine the extent of
compliance with the requirements of Part 7 of ERISA by multiple
employer welfare arrangements and entities claiming exception under
section 3(40) of ERISA and to take appropriate compliance assistance
and enforcement actions.
Agency: Employee Benefits Security Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without change of currently approved
collection.
Title: ERISA Investment Manager Electronic Registration.
OMB Number: 1210-0125.
Frequency: Annually.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: Private Sector: Business or other for-profit and
Not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 500.
Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 500.
Average Response Time: 2 hours for new filers and 1 hour for
existing annual filers.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 550.
Estimated Total Annualized capital/startup costs: $0.
Estimated Total Annual Costs (operating/maintaining systems or
purchasing services): $17,500.
Description: The Department's regulation at 29 CFR 2510.3-38
provides that, in order to meet the definition of investment manager in
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 3(38), state-registered
investment advisers must register electronically through a centralized
electronic filing system established by the Securities and Extension
Commission and state investment authorities (``Investment Advisor
Registration Depository''/ IARD) rather than providing a paper copy of
their state registration to the Secretary of Labor.
Although the primary users of the information collected through the
Department's regulation are plan fiduciaries, who can review the IARD
registration statements for information about investment advisers that
are either currently service providers to the plan or potential service
providers to the plan, EBSA also uses the information for enforcement
and compliance purposes. EBSA investigators are expected to review IARD
data whenever they conduct an investigation that involves investment
advisers or investment managers.
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-164 Filed 1-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P