In the Matter of Certain Peripheral Devices and Components Thereof and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation, 1242 [E7-122]

Download as PDF 1242 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 10, 2007 / Notices Manufacture, Inc., P.J. Flooring Distributor, R.A.H. Carpet Supplies, Inc., Salvage Building Material, Inc., Stalheim (USA), Inc., Universal Floor Covering, Inc., and Vegas Laminate Hardwood Floors LLC. The Commission has determined that the public interest factors enumerated in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f), and (g) do not preclude issuance of the aforementioned remedial orders, and that the bond during the Presidential period of review shall be set at 100 percent of the entered value for any covered laminated floor panels. The authority for the Commission’s determinations is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.45–210.51 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.45–210.51). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 5, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–190 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–580] In the Matter of Certain Peripheral Devices and Components Thereof and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the above-captioned investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The Commission has terminated the investigation based on settlement and licensing agreements. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., telephone 202–708– 2310, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Copies of all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:22 Jan 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on the matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on September 6, 2006, based on a complaint filed on August 1, 2006, by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington. 71 FR 52578. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain peripheral devices and components thereof and products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,460,094 and U.S. Patent No. 6,795,949. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complaint named a single respondent: Belkin Corporation of Compton, California. The complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. On November 30, 2006, the complainant and the only respondent filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of settlement and licensing agreements. The Commission Investigative Attorney filed a response in support of the motion on December 11, 2006. The ALJ issued the subject ID on December 19, 2006, granting the joint motion for termination. No party petitioned for review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the Commission found no basis for ordering a review on its own initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.21(a)(2), (b) and 210.42(h)(3) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 4, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–122 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–991 (Final) (Remand)] Silicon Metal From Russia; Notice and Scheduling of Remand Proceeding International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The United States International Trade Commission (Commission) gives notice of the courtordered remand of its final antidumping duty investigation No. 731–TA–991 (Final) (Remand). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June B. Brown, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, telephone (202) 205–3042, or Diane Mazur, Office of Investigations, telephone (202) 205–3184, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, U.S. International Trade Commission. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Reopening the Record In March 2003, the Commission made a final affirmative determination in the referenced investigation. The determination was appealed to the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), which affirmed the Commission upon remand, and was then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which vacated and remanded the Commission’s determination. Bratsk Aluminum Smelter v. United States, 444 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2006). On August 17, 2006, the CIT issued an order remanding the case to the Commission to comply with the Federal Circuit’s decision in Bratsk. By order of September 22, 2006, the remand proceeding was stayed upon the Commission’s motion. On December 22, 2006, the CIT issued an order lifting the stay and giving the Commission 90 days to issue its remand determination. In order to assist it in making its determination on remand, the Commission is reopening the record on remand in this investigation to include additional information on the role of non-subject imports of silicon metal in the U.S. market during the original period of investigation. The record in this proceeding will encompass the material from the record of the original E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM 10JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-580]


In the Matter of Certain Peripheral Devices and Components 
Thereof and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') 
terminating the above-captioned investigation under section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The Commission has terminated the 
investigation based on settlement and licensing agreements.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., telephone 202-
708-2310, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Copies of all 
nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on the matter can 
be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on September 6, 2006, based on a complaint filed on August 1, 2006, by 
Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington. 71 FR 52578. The 
complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain peripheral devices and components 
thereof and products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. 
Patent No. 6,460,094 and U.S. Patent No. 6,795,949. The complaint 
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as 
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complaint named a 
single respondent: Belkin Corporation of Compton, California. The 
complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists 
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    On November 30, 2006, the complainant and the only respondent filed 
a joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of 
settlement and licensing agreements. The Commission Investigative 
Attorney filed a response in support of the motion on December 11, 
2006.
    The ALJ issued the subject ID on December 19, 2006, granting the 
joint motion for termination. No party petitioned for review of the ID 
pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the Commission found no basis for 
ordering a review on its own initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44. The 
Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.21(a)(2), (b) and 210.42(h)(3) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 4, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E7-122 Filed 1-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.