Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Nissan, 188-189 [06-9958]

Download as PDF rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES 188 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 1 / Wednesday, January 3, 2007 / Notices rates than NHTSA has used in the past, NHTSA agrees that both calculations show a substantial reduction in the theft rate since the installation of the device as standard equipment. For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full DaimlerChrysler’s petition for exemption for the Dodge Magnum vehicle line from the partsmarking requirements of 49 CFR Part 541, beginning with the 2008 model year vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR Part 541, Appendix A–1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the disposition of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard. If DaimlerChrysler decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must formally notify the agency, and, thereafter, the line must be fully marked as required by 49 CFR Parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts). NHTSA notes that if DaimlerChrysler wishes in the future to modify the device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the line’s exemption is based. Further, 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to permit the use of an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in that exemption.’’ The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part 543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself. The agency did not intend Part 543 to require the submission of a modification petition for every change to the components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer contemplates making any changes the effects of which might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before preparing and submitting a petition to modify. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:02 Dec 29, 2006 Jkt 211001 Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Issued on: December 27, 2006. Stephen R. Kratzke, Associate Administration for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 06–9957 Filed 12–29–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Nissan National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Nissan North America, Inc.’s (Nissan) petition for exemption of the Versa vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from the Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541). Nissan requested confidential treatment for the information and attachments it submitted in support of its petition. In a letter dated November 2, 2006, the agency granted the petitioner’s request for confidential treatment of most aspects of its petition. DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with the 2008 model year. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of International Vehicle, Fuel Economy and Consumer Standards, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck’s phone number is (202) 366– 0846. Her fax number is (202) 493–2290. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated September 29, 2006, Nissan requested exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard (49 CFR Part 541) for the MY 2008 Nissan Versa vehicle line. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment for the entire vehicle line. Under 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant exemptions for PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 one line of its vehicle lines per model year. In its petition, Nissan provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft device fro the new vehicle line. Nissan will install its passive, transponder-based immobilizer device as standard equipment on its Versa vehicle line beginning with MY 2008. Key components of the antitheft device are in engine electronic control module (ECM), a passive immobilizer and a transponder key. The immobilizer system prevents normal operation of the vehicle without the use of the key. Nissan also stated that the system will not incorporated an audible or visible alarm. Nissan’s submission is considered a complete petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements contained in 543.5 and the specific content requirements of 543.6. Nissan also provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed device, conducting tests based on its own specified standards. In a letter dated November 2, 2006, NHTSA granted Nissan confidential treatment for the test information. Nissan provided a list of the tests it conducted. Nissan based its belief that the device is reliable and durable on the fact that the device complied with the specific requirements for each test. Nissan compared the device proposed for its vehicle line with other devices which NHTSA has determined to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as would compliance with the parts-marking requirements. Nissan stated that its antitheft device will be no less effective than those devices in the lines for which NHTSA has already granted full exemption from the parts-marking requirements. Nissan stated that NHTSA’s theft data have shown a decline in theft rates for vehicle lines that have been equipped with antitheft devices similar to that which Nissan proposes to install on the new line. Nissan stated that based on the agency’s theft rate data, the Buick Riviera and the Oldsmobile Toronado/ Aurora vehicles equipped with the PASS-Key and PASS-Key II systems experienced a significant reduction in theft rates from 1987 to 1996. Nissan concluded that the data indicates that the immobilizer was effective in contributing to the theft rate reduction for these lines. Nissan stated that based on NHTSA’s theft data for 1987 through 1996, the average theft rate for the Buick Rivieraand the Oldsmobile Toronado/ Aurora vehicles without the immobilizer was 4.8970 and 5.0760, E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM 03JAN1 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 1 / Wednesday, January 3, 2007 / Notices respectively and 1.4288 and 2.0955 after installation of the immobilizer device. Further review of the agency’s theft data published through the 2004 MY revealed that, while there is some variation, the theft rates for both lines continued to stay below the median theft rate of 3.5826. The agency agrees that the device is substantially similar to devices in other vehicles for which the agency has already granted exemptions. For clarification purposes, the agency notes that it does not collect theft data. NHTSA publishes theft rates based on data provided by the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. NHTSA uses NCIC data to calculate theft rates and publishes these rates annually in theFederal Register. The agency also notes that the device will provide four of the five types of performances listed in § 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a petition for an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part 541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541. The agency finds that Nissan has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the antitheft device will reduce and deter theft. This conclusion is based on the information Nissan provided about its device. For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full Nissan’s petition for exemption for the Versa vehicle line from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR Part 541, beginning with the 2008 model year vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR Part 541, Appendix A–1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the disposition of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:02 Dec 29, 2006 Jkt 211001 If Nissan decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must formally notify the agency, and, thereafter, the line must be fully marked as required by 49 CFR Parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts). NHTSA notes that if Nissan wishes in the future to modify the device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a petition to modify the exemption. Parts 543.7(d) states that a Part 543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under this part and equipped with the anti-theft device on which the line’s exemption is based. Further 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to permit the use of an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in that exemption.’’ The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part 543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself. The agency did not intend Part 543 to require the submission of a modification petition for every change to the components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer contemplates making any changes the effects of which might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before preparing and submitting a petition to modify. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Issued on: December 27, 2006. Stephen R. Kratzke, Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 06–9958 Filed 12–29–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–M DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) Inviting Applications for the FY 2007 and FY 2008 Funding Rounds of the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program Announcement Type: Initial announcement of funding opportunity. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CDFA) Number: 21.021. DATES: Applications for the FY 2007 funding round must be received by 5 p.m. ET on March 15, 2007 and applications for the FY 2008 funding round must be received by 5 p.m. ET on March 13, 2008. Applications must meet all eligibility and other requirements PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 189 and deadlines, as applicable, set forth in this NOFA. Applications received after 5 p.m. ET on the applicable deadline will be rejected and returned to the sender. Executive Summary: This NOFA is issued in connection with the FY 2007 and FY 2008 funding rounds of the BEA Program. Through the BEA Program, the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (the Fund) encourages Insured Depository Institutions to increase their levels of loans, investments, services, and technical assistance within Distressed Communities, and financial assistance to Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) through grants, stock purchases, loans, deposits, and other forms of financial and technical assistance, during a specified period. I. Funding Opportunity Description A. Baseline Period and Assessment Period Dates A BEA Program award is based on an Applicant’s increases in Qualified Activities from the Baseline Period to the Assessment Period. For the FY 2007 funding round, the Baseline Period is calendar year 2005 (January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005), and the Assessment Period is calendar year 2006 (January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006). For the FY 2008 funding round, the Baseline Period is calendar year 2006 (January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006), and the Assessment Period is calendar year 2007 (January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007). B. Program Regulations The regulations governing the BEA Program can be found at 12 CFR part 1806 (the Interim Rule) and provide guidance on evaluation criteria and other requirements of the BEA Program. The Fund encourages Applicants to review the Interim Rule. Detailed application content requirements are found in the application related to this NOFA. Each capitalized term in this NOFA is more fully defined either in the Interim Rule or the application. C. Qualified Activities Qualified Activities are defined in the Interim Rule to include CDFI Related Activities, Distressed Community Financing Activities, and Service Activities (12 CFR 1806.103(mm)). CDFI Related Activities include Equity Investments, Equity-Like Loans, and CDFI Support Activities (12 CFR 1806.103(p)). Distressed Community Financing Activities include Affordable Housing Loans, Affordable Housing Development Loans and related Project E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM 03JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 1 (Wednesday, January 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 188-189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention 
Standard; Nissan

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Nissan North America, Inc.'s 
(Nissan) petition for exemption of the Versa vehicle line in accordance 
with 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from the Theft Prevention Standard. 
This petition is granted because the agency has determined that the 
antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard equipment is 
likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft 
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft 
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541). Nissan requested confidential 
treatment for the information and attachments it submitted in support 
of its petition. In a letter dated November 2, 2006, the agency granted 
the petitioner's request for confidential treatment of most aspects of 
its petition.

DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with 
the 2008 model year.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of 
International Vehicle, Fuel Economy and Consumer Standards, NHTSA, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck's phone number is 
(202) 366-0846. Her fax number is (202) 493-2290.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated September 29, 2006, 
Nissan requested exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the 
theft prevention standard (49 CFR Part 541) for the MY 2008 Nissan 
Versa vehicle line. The petition requested an exemption from parts-
marking pursuant to 49 CFR 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention 
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard 
equipment for the entire vehicle line.
    Under 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant 
exemptions for one line of its vehicle lines per model year. In its 
petition, Nissan provided a detailed description and diagram of the 
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft 
device fro the new vehicle line. Nissan will install its passive, 
transponder-based immobilizer device as standard equipment on its Versa 
vehicle line beginning with MY 2008. Key components of the antitheft 
device are in engine electronic control module (ECM), a passive 
immobilizer and a transponder key. The immobilizer system prevents 
normal operation of the vehicle without the use of the key. Nissan also 
stated that the system will not incorporated an audible or visible 
alarm. Nissan's submission is considered a complete petition as 
required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements 
contained in 543.5 and the specific content requirements of 543.6.
    Nissan also provided information on the reliability and durability 
of its proposed device, conducting tests based on its own specified 
standards. In a letter dated November 2, 2006, NHTSA granted Nissan 
confidential treatment for the test information. Nissan provided a list 
of the tests it conducted. Nissan based its belief that the device is 
reliable and durable on the fact that the device complied with the 
specific requirements for each test.
    Nissan compared the device proposed for its vehicle line with other 
devices which NHTSA has determined to be as effective in reducing and 
deterring motor vehicle theft as would compliance with the parts-
marking requirements. Nissan stated that its antitheft device will be 
no less effective than those devices in the lines for which NHTSA has 
already granted full exemption from the parts-marking requirements.
    Nissan stated that NHTSA's theft data have shown a decline in theft 
rates for vehicle lines that have been equipped with antitheft devices 
similar to that which Nissan proposes to install on the new line. 
Nissan stated that based on the agency's theft rate data, the Buick 
Riviera and the Oldsmobile Toronado/Aurora vehicles equipped with the 
PASS-Key and PASS-Key II systems experienced a significant reduction in 
theft rates from 1987 to 1996. Nissan concluded that the data indicates 
that the immobilizer was effective in contributing to the theft rate 
reduction for these lines. Nissan stated that based on NHTSA's theft 
data for 1987 through 1996, the average theft rate for the Buick 
Rivieraand the Oldsmobile Toronado/Aurora vehicles without the 
immobilizer was 4.8970 and 5.0760,

[[Page 189]]

respectively and 1.4288 and 2.0955 after installation of the 
immobilizer device. Further review of the agency's theft data published 
through the 2004 MY revealed that, while there is some variation, the 
theft rates for both lines continued to stay below the median theft 
rate of 3.5826. The agency agrees that the device is substantially 
similar to devices in other vehicles for which the agency has already 
granted exemptions.
    For clarification purposes, the agency notes that it does not 
collect theft data. NHTSA publishes theft rates based on data provided 
by the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) of the Federal Bureau 
of Investigation. NHTSA uses NCIC data to calculate theft rates and 
publishes these rates annually in theFederal Register.
    The agency also notes that the device will provide four of the five 
types of performances listed in Sec.  543.6(a)(3): Promoting 
activation; preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by 
unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by 
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and durability of 
the device.
    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants 
a petition for an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part 
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon 
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely 
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as 
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541. The agency 
finds that Nissan has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the 
antitheft device will reduce and deter theft. This conclusion is based 
on the information Nissan provided about its device.
    For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full 
Nissan's petition for exemption for the Versa vehicle line from the 
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR Part 541, beginning with the 2008 
model year vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR Part 541, Appendix A-
1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention 
Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains 
publication requirements incident to the disposition of all Part 543 
petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future product 
nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is granted 
and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order 
to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from 
the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
    If Nissan decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must 
formally notify the agency, and, thereafter, the line must be fully 
marked as required by 49 CFR Parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major 
component parts and replacement parts).
    NHTSA notes that if Nissan wishes in the future to modify the 
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit 
a petition to modify the exemption. Parts 543.7(d) states that a Part 
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted 
under this part and equipped with the anti-theft device on which the 
line's exemption is based. Further 543.9(c)(2) provides for the 
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of 
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in 
that exemption.''
    The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part 
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself. 
The agency did not intend Part 543 to require the submission of a 
modification petition for every change to the components or design of 
an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de 
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer 
contemplates making any changes the effects of which might be 
characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before 
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 
1.50.

    Issued on: December 27, 2006.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 06-9958 Filed 12-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.