Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, 78222-78223 [E6-22183]

Download as PDF 78222 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information to a federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, acquire, install and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to train personnel and to be able to respond to a collection of information, to search data sources, to complete and review the collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The comments, names and addresses of commenters will be available for public view during regular business hours. If you wish us to withhold this information, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will honor your request to the extent allowable by law. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. Dated: December 22, 2006. Michael D. Olsen, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. [FR Doc. E6–22265 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [MT–079–07–1010–PH] The next two regular meetings of the Western Montana RAC will be held February 21, 2007 at the Butte Field Office, 106 N. Parkmont, Butte, Montana and May 16, 2007 at the Missoula Field Office, 3255 Fort Missoula Road, Missoula, Montana beginning at 9 a.m. The public comment period for both meetings will begin at 11:30 a.m. and the meetings are expected to adjourn at approximately 3 p.m. Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: For the Western Montana RAC, contact Marilyn Krause, Resource Advisory Council Coordinator, at the Butte Field Office, 106 North Parkmont, Butte, Montana 59701, telephone 406–533– 7617. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 15member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in western Montana. At the February 21 meeting, topics we plan to discuss include: a presentation and discussion on recreation fees for the Forest Service and BLM, an update on the Butte Resource Management Plan, and a presentation on the Energy Corridor EIS for federal lands in the West. Topics for the May 16 meeting will be determined at the February meeting. All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided below. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Western VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:03 Dec 27, 2006 Jkt 211001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION DATES: Dated: December 21, 2006. Richard M. Hotaling, Field Manager. [FR Doc. E6–22286 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am] Notice of Public Meeting, Western Montana Resource Advisory Council Meeting sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Montana Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated below. PO 00000 [Investigation Nos. AA1921–197 (Second Review); 701–TA–319, 320, 325–327, 348 and 350 (Second Review); and 731–TA–573, 574, 576, 578, 582–587, 612, and 614–618 (Second Review)] Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Belgium, Brazil, Finland, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, and the antidumping finding on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Taiwan, as well as revocation of countervailing duty orders on cut-tolength carbon steel plate from Belgium, Brazil, Mexico, Spain, and Sweden, would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission further determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from Germany and Korea and the countervailing duty order on corrosionresistant steel from Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Finally, the Commission determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from Australia, Canada, France, and Japan, as well as the countervailing duty order on corrosion-resistant steel from France, would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.2 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane and Stephen Koplan dissenting with respect to corrosionresistant steel from Australia, Canada, France, and Japan. Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices Background Background The Commission instituted these reviews on November 1, 2005 (70 FR 62324, October 31, 2005), and determined on February 6, 2006, that it would conduct full reviews (70 FR 8874, February 21, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of public hearings to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on March 30, 2006 (71 F.R. 16178). The hearings were held in Washington, DC, on October 17 and 19, 2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission is scheduled to transmit its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on January 17, 2007. The views of the Commission will be contained in USITC Publication 3899 (January 2007), entitled Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom: Investigation Nos. AA1921– 197 (Second Review); 701–TA–319, 320, 325–327, 348, and 350 (Second Review); and 731–TA–573, 574, 576, 578, 582– 587, 612, and 614–618 (Second Review). The Commission instituted this review on August 1, 2006 (71 FR 43518) and determined on November 6, 2006 that it would conduct an expedited review (71 FR 67161, November 20, 2006). The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on December 20, 2006. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3897 (December 2006), entitled Foundry Coke From China: Investigation No. 731–TA– 891 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: December 20, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–22183 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–891 (Review)] Foundry Coke From China sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on foundry coke from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)). VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:03 Dec 27, 2006 Jkt 211001 By order of the Commission. Issued: December 20, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–22181 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on December 6, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (‘‘ASME’’ has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, since August 25, 2005, ASME has published several standards and initiated several new standards activities within the general nature and scope of ASME’s standards development activities, as specified in its original notification. More details regarding these changes can be found at https://www.asme.org. On September 15, 2004, AMSE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the FEDERAL REGISTER pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 13, 2004 (69 FR 60895). The last notification was filed with the Department on August 28, 2006. A notice was published in the FEDERAL REGISTER pursuant to Section 6(b0 of the PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 78223 Act on September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53133). Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 06–9911 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Applications Work Order Collaboration (AWOC) Notice is hereby given that, on December 7, 2006, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Applications Work Order Collaboration (‘‘AWOC’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology North America, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC, Troy, MI; Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, MI; Mark IV, IVHS, Inc., Flemington, NJ; NAVTEQ North America, LLC, Chicago, IL; and Raytheon Co., Fullerton, CA. The general area of AWOC’s planned activity is the development of specified applications to be integrated into the vehicle infrastructure integration system, a national infrastructure to enable data collection and exchange in real time between vehicles and vehicles and the roadway. Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 06–9910 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11—M E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78222-78223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22183]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. AA1921-197 (Second Review); 701-TA-319, 320, 325-
327, 348 and 350 (Second Review); and 731-TA-573, 574, 576, 578, 582-
587, 612, and 614-618 (Second Review)]


Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil, 
Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, 
Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Belgium, Brazil, 
Finland, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the 
United Kingdom, and the antidumping finding on cut-to-length carbon 
steel plate from Taiwan, as well as revocation of countervailing duty 
orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from Belgium, Brazil, 
Mexico, Spain, and Sweden, would not be likely to lead to continuation 
or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec.  207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission further determines that revocation of the 
antidumping duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from Germany and 
Korea and the countervailing duty order on corrosion-resistant steel 
from Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time. Finally, the Commission determines that revocation of 
the antidumping duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from 
Australia, Canada, France, and Japan, as well as the countervailing 
duty order on corrosion-resistant steel from France, would not be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane and Stephen Koplan 
dissenting with respect to corrosion-resistant steel from Australia, 
Canada, France, and Japan.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 78223]]

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on November 1, 2005 (70 FR 
62324, October 31, 2005), and determined on February 6, 2006, that it 
would conduct full reviews (70 FR 8874, February 21, 2006). Notice of 
the scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of public hearings to be 
held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice 
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
March 30, 2006 (71 F.R. 16178). The hearings were held in Washington, 
DC, on October 17 and 19, 2006, and all persons who requested the 
opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission is scheduled to transmit its determinations in these 
reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on January 17, 2007. The views of 
the Commission will be contained in USITC Publication 3899 (January 
2007), entitled Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, 
Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, 
Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom: Investigation 
Nos. AA1921-197 (Second Review); 701-TA-319, 320, 325-327, 348, and 350 
(Second Review); and 731-TA-573, 574, 576, 578, 582-587, 612, and 614-
618 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: December 20, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-22183 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.